Pinaceae: Difference between revisions
imported>OAbot m Open access bot: url-access updated in citation with #oabot. |
imported>GreenC bot Move 1 url. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:URLREQ#usda.gov |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
==Description== | ==Description== | ||
Members of the family Pinaceae are [[tree]]s (rarely [[shrub]]s) growing from {{convert|2|to|100|m|ft|sigfig=1|abbr=off}} tall, mostly [[evergreen]] (except the [[deciduous]] ''[[Larix]]'' and ''[[Pseudolarix]]''), [[resin]]ous, [[monoecious]], with subopposite or whorled branches, and spirally arranged, linear (needle-like) leaves.<ref name="Farjon"/> The embryos of Pinaceae have three to 24 [[cotyledon]]s. | Members of the family Pinaceae are [[tree]]s (rarely [[shrub]]s) growing from {{convert|2|to|100|m|ft|sigfig=1|abbr=off}} tall, mostly [[evergreen]] (except the [[deciduous]] ''[[Larix]]'' and ''[[Pseudolarix]]''), [[resin]]ous, [[monoecious]], with subopposite or whorled branches, and spirally arranged, linear (needle-like) leaves.<ref name="Farjon"/> The embryos of Pinaceae have three to 24 [[cotyledon]]s. | ||
| Line 40: | Line 39: | ||
Boreal conifers have many adaptions for winter. The narrow conical shape of northern conifers, and their downward-drooping limbs help them shed snow, and many of them seasonally alter their biochemistry to make them more resistant to freezing, called "hardening". | Boreal conifers have many adaptions for winter. The narrow conical shape of northern conifers, and their downward-drooping limbs help them shed snow, and many of them seasonally alter their biochemistry to make them more resistant to freezing, called "hardening". | ||
<gallery class=center mode=nolines widths=200 heights=260> | |||
File:Floral Morphology and Anatomy of Picea sp. (Spruce).jpg|Floral Morphology and Anatomy of ''Picea'' sp. (Spruce) | |||
File:Vagamon Pine Forest.jpg|Cultivated pine forest in [[Western Ghats]], India | |||
</gallery> | |||
==Classification== | ==Classification== | ||
[[File:Ab plant 673.jpg|thumb|An immature second-year cone of [[European black pine]] (''Pinus nigra'') with the light brown umbo visible on the green cone scales]] | [[File:Ab plant 673.jpg|thumb|An immature second-year cone of [[European black pine]] (''Pinus nigra'') with the light brown umbo visible on the green cone scales]] | ||
[[File:Norway Spruce cone.jpg|thumb|An immature cone of [[Norway spruce]] (''Picea abies'') with no umbo]] | [[File:Norway Spruce cone.jpg|thumb|upright|An immature cone of [[Norway spruce]] (''Picea abies'') with no umbo]] | ||
Classification of the subfamilies and genera of Pinaceae has been subject to debate in the past. Pinaceae ecology, morphology, and history have all been used as the basis for methods of analyses of the family. An 1891 publication divided the family into two subfamilies, using the number and position of resin canals in the primary vascular region of the young taproot as the primary consideration. In a 1910 publication, the family was divided into two tribes based on the occurrence and type of long–short shoot dimorphism. | Classification of the subfamilies and genera of Pinaceae has been subject to debate in the past. Pinaceae ecology, morphology, and history have all been used as the basis for methods of analyses of the family. An 1891 publication divided the family into two subfamilies, using the number and position of resin canals in the primary vascular region of the young taproot as the primary consideration. In a 1910 publication, the family was divided into two tribes based on the occurrence and type of long–short shoot dimorphism. | ||
A more recent classification divided the subfamilies and genera based on the consideration of features of ovulate cone anatomy among extant and fossil members of the family. Below is an example of how the morphology has been used to classify Pinaceae. | A more recent classification divided the subfamilies and genera based on the consideration of features of ovulate cone anatomy among extant and fossil members of the family. Below is an example of how the morphology has been used to classify Pinaceae. | ||
The 11 genera are grouped into four subfamilies, based on the microscopical anatomy and the morphology of the cones, pollen, wood, seeds, and leaves:<ref>{{cite journal |author=Robert A. Price, Jeanine Olsen-Stojkovich & Jerold M. Lowenstein |year=1987 |title=Relationships among the genera of Pinaceae: an immunological comparison |journal=[[Systematic Botany]] |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=91–97 |jstor=2419217 |doi=10.2307/2419217}}</ref> | The 11 genera are grouped into four subfamilies, based on the microscopical anatomy and the morphology of the cones, pollen, wood, seeds, and leaves:<ref>{{cite journal |author=Robert A. Price, Jeanine Olsen-Stojkovich & Jerold M. Lowenstein |year=1987 |title=Relationships among the genera of Pinaceae: an immunological comparison |journal=[[Systematic Botany]] |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=91–97 |jstor=2419217 |doi=10.2307/2419217|bibcode=1987SysBo..12...91P }}</ref> | ||
* Subfamily [[Pinoideae]] (''[[Pinus]]''): cones are biennial, rarely triennial, with each year's scale-growth distinct, forming an umbo on each scale, the cone scale base is broad, concealing the seeds fully from [[abaxial]] (below the [[phloem]] vessels) view, the seed is without resin vesicles, the seed wing holds the seed in a pair of claws, leaves have primary stomatal bands adaxial (above the xylem) or equally on both surfaces. | * Subfamily [[Pinoideae]] (''[[Pinus]]''): cones are biennial, rarely triennial, with each year's scale-growth distinct, forming an umbo on each scale, the cone scale base is broad, concealing the seeds fully from [[abaxial]] (below the [[phloem]] vessels) view, the seed is without resin vesicles, the seed wing holds the seed in a pair of claws, leaves have primary stomatal bands adaxial (above the xylem) or equally on both surfaces. | ||
| Line 56: | Line 61: | ||
=== Phylogeny === | === Phylogeny === | ||
A revised 2018 phylogeny places ''Cathaya'' as sister to the pines rather than in the Laricoidae subfamily with ''Larix'' and ''Pseudotsuga''. | A revised 2018 phylogeny places ''Cathaya'' as sister to the pines rather than in the Laricoidae subfamily with ''Larix'' and ''Pseudotsuga''. | ||
| Line 154: | Line 160: | ||
=== Evolutionary history === | === Evolutionary history === | ||
Pinaceae | |||
The Pinaceae diverged from other conifer groups during the late [[Carboniferous]] ~313 million years ago.<ref name="Leslie 2018 1531–1544">{{Cite journal |last1=Leslie |first1=Andrew B. |last2=Beaulieu |first2=Jeremy |last3=Holman |first3=Garth |last4=Campbell |first4=Christopher S. |last5=Mei |first5=Wenbin |last6=Raubeson |first6=Linda R. |last7=Mathews |first7=Sarah |date=2018 |title=An overview of extant conifer evolution from the perspective of the fossil record |url=https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ajb2.1143 |journal=American Journal of Botany |language=en |volume=105 |issue=9 |pages=1531–1544 |doi=10.1002/ajb2.1143 |pmid=30157290 |s2cid=52120430 |issn=1537-2197}}</ref> Various possible [[stem-group]] relatives have been reported from as early as the Late [[Permian]] ([[Lopingian]]) The extinct conifer cone genus ''[[Schizolepidopsis]]'' likely represent stem-group members of the Pinaceae, the first good records of which are in the Middle-Late [[Triassic]], with abundant records during the [[Jurassic]] across Eurasia.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Domogatskaya |first1=Ksenia V. |last2=Herman |first2=Alexei B. |date=May 2019 |title=New species of the genus Schizolepidopsis (conifers) from the Albian of the Russian high Arctic and geological history of the genus |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0195667118304257 |journal=Cretaceous Research |language=en |volume=97 |pages=73–93 |doi=10.1016/j.cretres.2019.01.012|bibcode=2019CrRes..97...73D |s2cid=134849082 |url-access=subscription }}</ref><ref name=":11">{{Cite journal |last1=Matsunaga |first1=Kelly K. S. |last2=Herendeen |first2=Patrick S. |last3=Herrera |first3=Fabiany |last4=Ichinnorov |first4=Niiden |last5=Crane |first5=Peter R. |last6=Shi |first6=Gongle |date=2021-05-10 |title=Ovulate Cones of Schizolepidopsis ediae sp. nov. Provide Insights into the Evolution of Pinaceae |journal=International Journal of Plant Sciences |volume=182 |issue=6 |pages=490–507 |doi=10.1086/714281 |issn=1058-5893 |doi-access=free|bibcode=2021IJPlS.182..490M }}</ref> The oldest [[crown group]] (descendant of the last common ancestor of all living species) member of Pinaceae is the cone ''[[Eathiestrobus]]'', known from the Upper Jurassic (lower [[Kimmeridgian]], 157.3-154.7 million years ago) of Scotland,<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Rothwell |first1=Gar W. |last2=Mapes |first2=Gene |last3=Stockey |first3=Ruth A. |last4=Hilton |first4=Jason |date=April 2012 |title=The seed cone Eathiestrobus gen. nov.: Fossil evidence for a Jurassic origin of Pinaceae |journal=American Journal of Botany |language=en |volume=99 |issue=4 |pages=708–720 |doi=10.3732/ajb.1100595 |pmid=22491001|bibcode=2012AmJB...99..708R }}</ref> which likely belongs to the pinoid grouping of the family.<ref name=":12">{{Cite journal |last1=Smith |first1=Selena Y. |last2=Stockey |first2=Ruth A. |last3=Rothwell |first3=Gar W. |last4=Little |first4=Stefan A. |date=2017-01-02 |title=A new species of Pityostrobus (Pinaceae) from the Cretaceous of California: moving towards understanding the Cretaceous radiation of Pinaceae |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14772019.2016.1143885 |journal=Journal of Systematic Palaeontology |language=en |volume=15 |issue=1 |pages=69–81 |doi=10.1080/14772019.2016.1143885 |bibcode=2017JSPal..15...69S |s2cid=88292891 |issn=1477-2019|url-access=subscription }}</ref><ref name=":11" /> Pinaceae rapidly radiated during the [[Early Cretaceous]].<ref name="Leslie 2018 1531–1544" /> Members of the modern genera ''Pinus'' (pines), ''Picea'' (spruce) and ''Cedrus'' (cedar) first appear during the Early Cretaceous.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Blokhina |first1=N. I. |last2=Afonin |first2=M. |date=2007 |title=Fossil wood Cedrus penzhinaensis sp. nov. (Pinaceae) from the Lower Cretaceous of north-western Kamchatka (Russia) |journal=Acta Paleobotanica |language=en |volume=47 |pages=379–389 |s2cid=54653621 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author1=Ashley A. Klymiuk |author2=Ruth A. Stockey |name-list-style=amp |year=2012 |title=A Lower Cretaceous (Valanginian) seed cone provides the earliest fossil record for Picea (Pinaceae) |journal=[[American Journal of Botany]] |volume=99 |issue=6 |pages=1069–1082 |doi=10.3732/ajb.1100568 |pmid=22623610 |doi-access=free|bibcode=2012AmJB...99.1069K }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author1=Patricia E. Ryberg |author2=Gar W. Rothwell |author3=Ruth A. Stockey |author4=Jason Hilton |author5=Gene Mapes |author6=James B. Riding |year=2012 |title=Reconsidering Relationships among Stem and Crown Group Pinaceae: Oldest Record of the Genus ''Pinus'' from the Early Cretaceous of Yorkshire, United Kingdom |journal=International Journal of Plant Sciences |volume=173 |issue=8 |pages=917–932 |doi=10.1086/667228 |bibcode=2012IJPlS.173..917R |s2cid=85402168}}</ref> The extinct Cretaceous genera ''[[Pseudoaraucaria]]'' and ''[[Obirastrobus]]'' appear to be members of Abietoideae, while ''[[Pityostrobus]]'' appears to be non-monophyletic, containing many disparately related members of Pinaceae.<ref name=":12" /> While Pinaceae, and indeed all of its subfamilies, substantially predate the break up of the super-continent [[Pangaea|Pangea]], its distribution was limited to northern [[Laurasia]]. During the Cenozoic, Pinaceae had higher rates of species turnover than Southern Hemisphere conifers, thought to be driven by range shifts in response to glacial cycles.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Leslie |first1=Andrew B. |last2=Beaulieu |first2=Jeremy M. |last3=Rai |first3=Hardeep S. |last4=Crane |first4=Peter R. |last5=Donoghue |first5=Michael J. |last6=Mathews |first6=Sarah |date=2012-10-02 |title=Hemisphere-scale differences in conifer evolutionary dynamics |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |language=en |volume=109 |issue=40 |pages=16217–16221 |doi=10.1073/pnas.1213621109 |doi-access=free |issn=0027-8424 |pmc=3479534 |pmid=22988083|bibcode=2012PNAS..10916217L }}</ref> | |||
== Defense mechanisms == | == Defense mechanisms == | ||
''Pinaceae'' defenses are prevalent in the bark of the trees. This part of the tree contributes a complex defensive boundary against external antagonists.<ref name=":0">Franceschi, V. R., P. Krokene, T. Krekling, and E. Christiansen. 2000. Phloem parenchyma cells are involved in local and distance defense response to fungal inoculation or bark-beetle attack in Norway spruce (''Pinaceae''). American Journal of Botany 87:314-326.</ref> [[Constitutive defense|Constitutive]] and [[Inducible plant defenses against herbivory|induced defenses]] are both found in the bark.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":6">{{Cite journal|last1=Hudgins|first1=J. W.|last2=Christiansen|first2=E.|last3=Franceschi|first3=V. R.|date=2004-03-01|title=Induction of anatomically based defense responses in stems of diverse conifers by methyl jasmonate: a phylogenetic perspective|journal=Tree Physiology|language=en|volume=24|issue=3|pages=251–264|doi=10.1093/treephys/24.3.251|pmid=14704135|issn=0829-318X|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":9">{{Cite journal|last1=Krokene|first1=P.|last2=Nagy|first2=N. E.|last3=Solheim|first3=H.|date=2008-01-01|title=Methyl jasmonate and oxalic acid treatment of Norway spruce: anatomically based defense responses and increased resistance against fungal infection|journal=Tree Physiology | External stresses on plants have the ability to change the structure and composition of [[Forest ecology|forest ecosystems]]. Common external stress that ''Pinaceae'' experience are [[herbivore]] and [[pathogen]] attack which often leads to tree death.<ref name=":7">{{Cite journal|last1=Cherubini|first1=Paolo |last2=Fontana|first2=Giovanni |last3=Rigling|first3=Daniel|last4=Dobbertin|first4=Matthias|last5=Brang|first5=Peter|last6=Innes|first6=John L. |date=2002 |title=Tree-Life History Prior to Death: Two Fungal Root Pathogens Affect Tree-Ring Growth Differently |jstor=3072253 |journal=Journal of Ecology|volume=90|issue=5 |pages=839–850 |doi=10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00715.x |doi-access=free |bibcode=2002JEcol..90..839C }}</ref> In order to combat these stresses, trees need to adapt or evolve defenses against these stresses. ''Pinaceae'' have evolved myriad mechanical and chemical defenses, or a combination of the two, in order to protect themselves against antagonists.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|title=Terpenoid biosynthesis and specialized vascular cells of conifer defense. - Semantic Scholar|year=2010|doi=10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00910.x |pmid=20074143 |s2cid=26043965|last1=Zulak|first1=K. G.|last2=Bohlmann|first2=J.|journal=Journal of Integrative Plant Biology|volume=52|issue=1|pages=86–97|doi-access=free}}</ref> ''Pinaceae'' have the ability to up-regulate a combination of constitutive mechanical and [[Chemical defense|chemical strategies]] to further their defenses.<ref name=":8">{{Cite journal|last1=Franceschi|first1=Vincent R.|last2=Krokene|first2=Paal|last3=Christiansen |first3=Erik|last4=Krekling |first4=Trygve|date=2005-08-01|title=Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests|journal=New Phytologist |volume=167 |issue=2|pages=353–376 |doi=10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01436.x|pmid=15998390 |doi-access=free|bibcode=2005NewPh.167..353F }}</ref> | ||
''Pinaceae'' defenses are prevalent in the bark of the trees. This part of the tree contributes a complex defensive boundary against external antagonists.<ref name=":0">Franceschi, V. R., P. Krokene, T. Krekling, and E. Christiansen. 2000. Phloem parenchyma cells are involved in local and distance defense response to fungal inoculation or bark-beetle attack in Norway spruce (''Pinaceae''). American Journal of Botany 87:314-326.</ref> [[Constitutive defense|Constitutive]] and [[Inducible plant defenses against herbivory|induced defenses]] are both found in the bark.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":6">{{Cite journal |last1=Hudgins|first1=J. W.|last2=Christiansen|first2=E.|last3=Franceschi|first3=V. R.|date=2004-03-01|title=Induction of anatomically based defense responses in stems of diverse conifers by methyl jasmonate: a phylogenetic perspective |journal=Tree Physiology|language=en|volume=24|issue=3|pages=251–264 |doi=10.1093/treephys/24.3.251 |pmid=14704135|issn=0829-318X|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":9">{{Cite journal |last1=Krokene|first1=P.|last2=Nagy|first2=N. E.|last3=Solheim|first3=H.|date=2008-01-01|title=Methyl jasmonate and oxalic acid treatment of Norway spruce: anatomically based defense responses and increased resistance against fungal infection|journal=Tree Physiology |volume=28|issue=1|pages=29–35|doi=10.1093/treephys/28.1.29|pmid=17938111|issn=0829-318X|doi-access=free}}</ref> | |||
=== Constitutive defenses === | === Constitutive defenses === | ||
[[Constitutive defense]]s are typically the first line of defenses used against antagonists and can include sclerified cells, lignified periderm cells, and secondary compounds such as [[Phenols|phenolics]] and resins.<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last=Sampedro|first=L.|date=2014-09-01|title=Physiological trade-offs in the complexity of pine tree defensive chemistry|journal=Tree Physiology | |||
[[Constitutive defense]]s are typically the first line of defenses used against antagonists and can include sclerified cells, lignified periderm cells, and secondary compounds such as [[Phenols|phenolics]] and resins.<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last=Sampedro|first=L.|date=2014-09-01|title=Physiological trade-offs in the complexity of pine tree defensive chemistry|journal=Tree Physiology |volume=34|issue=9|pages=915–918|doi=10.1093/treephys/tpu082|pmid=25261122|issn=0829-318X|doi-access=free|hdl=10261/105595|hdl-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":0" /><ref name=":6" /> Constitutive defenses are always expressed and offer immediate protection from invaders but could also be defeated by antagonists that have evolved adaptations to these defense mechanisms.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":0" /> One of the common secondary compounds used by ''Pinaceae'' are phenolics or polyphenols. These secondary compounds are preserved in [[vacuole]]s of polyphenolic [[Parenchyma|parenchyma cells]] (PP) in the [[Phloem|secondary phloem]].<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal|last1=Nagy|first1=N. E.|last2=Krokene|first2=P.|last3=Solheim|first3=H. |date=2006-02-01 |title=Anatomical-based defense responses of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) stems to two fungal pathogens |journal=Tree Physiology |volume=26|issue=2 |pages=159–167|doi=10.1093/treephys/26.2.159|pmid=16356912|issn=0829-318X|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":9" /> | |||
=== Induced defenses === | === Induced defenses === | ||
[[Inducible plant defenses against herbivory|Induced defense]] responses need to be activated by certain cues, such as herbivore damage or other biotic signals.<ref name=":2" /> | [[Inducible plant defenses against herbivory|Induced defense]] responses need to be activated by certain cues, such as herbivore damage or other biotic signals.<ref name=":2" /> | ||
A common induced defense mechanism used by ''Pinaceae'' is resins.<ref name=":4">{{Cite journal|last1=Nagy|first1=Nina E.|last2=Franceschi|first2=Vincent R.|last3=Solheim|first3=Halvor|last4=Krekling|first4=Trygve|last5=Christiansen|first5=Erik|date=2000-03-01|title=Wound-induced traumatic resin duct development in stems of Norway spruce (Pinaceae): anatomy and cytochemical traits|journal=American Journal of Botany|language=en|volume=87|issue=3|pages=302–313|doi=10.2307/2656626 | A common induced defense mechanism used by ''Pinaceae'' is resins.<ref name=":4">{{Cite journal|last1=Nagy|first1=Nina E.|last2=Franceschi |first2=Vincent R.|last3=Solheim|first3=Halvor |last4=Krekling|first4=Trygve |last5=Christiansen |first5=Erik |date=2000-03-01|title=Wound-induced traumatic resin duct development in stems of Norway spruce (Pinaceae): anatomy and cytochemical traits |journal=American Journal of Botany|language=en|volume=87|issue=3 |pages=302–313 |doi=10.2307/2656626 |jstor=2656626|pmid=10718991}}</ref> Resins are also one of the primary defenses used against attack.<ref name=":1" /> Resins are short term defenses that are composed of a complex combination of volatile [[Monoterpene|mono]]- (C<sub>10</sub>) and [[sesquiterpene]]s (C<sub>15</sub>) and nonvolatile [[diterpene]] resin acids (C<sub>20</sub>).<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":4" /> They are produced and stored in specialized secretory areas known as resin ducts, resin blisters, or resin cavities.<ref name=":4" /> Resins have the ability to wash away, trap, fend off antagonists, and are also involved in wound sealing.<ref name=":3" /> They are an effective defense mechanism because they have toxic and inhibitory effects on invaders, such as insects or pathogens.<ref name=":5">{{Cite journal|last1=Lewinsohn|first1=Efraim|last2=Gijzen|first2=Mark|last3=Croteau|first3=Rodney|date=1991-05-01|title=Defense Mechanisms of Conifers: Differences in Constitutive and Wound-Induced Monoterpene Biosynthesis Among Species|journal=Plant Physiology|language=en|volume=96|issue=1|pages=44–49|doi=10.1104/pp.96.1.44|issn=0032-0889|pmid=16668184|pmc=1080711}}</ref> Resins could have developed as an evolutionary defense against [[bark beetle]] attacks.<ref name=":4" /> One well researched resin present in ''Pinaceae'' is [[oleoresin]]. Oleoresin had been found to be a valuable part of the [[Pinophyta|conifer]] defense mechanism against [[Biotic stress|biotic attacks]].<ref name=":5" /> They are found in [[Plant secretory tissue|secretory tissues]] in tree stems, roots, and leaves.<ref name=":5" /> Oleoresin is also needed in order to classify conifers.<ref name=":5" /> | ||
=== Active research: methyl jasmonate === | === Active research: methyl jasmonate === | ||
<gallery> | The topic of defense mechanisms within family ''Pinaceae'' is a very active area of study with numerous studies being conducted. Many of these studies use [[methyl jasmonate]] (MJ) as an antagonist.<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":9" /><ref name=":10">{{Cite journal|last1=Fäldt|first1=Jenny|last2=Martin|first2=Diane |last3=Miller|first3=Barbara |last4=Rawat|first4=Suman|last5=Bohlmann|first5=Jörg|date=2003-01-01|title=Traumatic resin defense in Norway spruce (Picea abies): Methyl jasmonate-induced terpene synthase gene expression, and cDNA cloning and functional characterization of (+)-3-carene synthase |journal=Plant Molecular Biology |volume=51|issue=1|pages=119–133 |doi=10.1023/A:1020714403780 |pmid=12602896 |s2cid=21153303}}</ref> Methyl jasmonate is known to be able to induce defense responses in the stems of multiple ''Pinaceae'' species.<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":10" /> It has been found that MJ stimulated the activation of PP cells and formation of xylem traumatic resin ducts (TD). These are structures that are involved in the release of phenolics and resins, both forms of defense mechanism.<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":9" /> | ||
<gallery class=center mode=nolines widths=200 heights=200> | |||
File:Pinceae_Bishop_pine_prickle_cone_pine_pinus_muricata.jpg | Close up of bishop pine cones | File:Pinceae_Bishop_pine_prickle_cone_pine_pinus_muricata.jpg | Close up of bishop pine cones | ||
File:Pinaceae_Knobcone_Pine_Pinus_attenuata.jpg | Knobcone pine cone | File:Pinaceae_Knobcone_Pine_Pinus_attenuata.jpg | Knobcone pine cone | ||
| Line 178: | Line 189: | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
{{Reflist}} | {{Reflist}} | ||
| Line 190: | Line 202: | ||
* {{Jepson eFlora|32|Pinaceae|link=1|type=key|mode=cs2}}, covers Californian species and much of western North America | * {{Jepson eFlora|32|Pinaceae|link=1|type=key|mode=cs2}}, covers Californian species and much of western North America | ||
* [http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=1&taxon_id=10691 Pinaceae in Flora of North America] | * [http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=1&taxon_id=10691 Pinaceae in Flora of North America] | ||
* [ | * [http://plants.usda.gov/plant-profile?symbol=PINUS Pinus in USDA Plants Database] | ||
{{Acrogymnospermae classification}} | {{Acrogymnospermae classification}} | ||
Latest revision as of 06:33, 29 June 2025
Template:Short description Template:Automatic taxobox
The Pinaceae (Template:IPAc-en), or pine family, are conifer trees or shrubs, including many of the well-known conifers of commercial importance such as cedars, firs, hemlocks, piñons, larches, pines and spruces. The family is included in the order Pinales, formerly known as Coniferales. Pinaceae have distinctive cones with woody scales bearing typically two ovules, and are supported as monophyletic by both morphological trait and genetic analysis.[1] They are the largest extant conifer family in species diversity, with between 220 and 250 species (depending on taxonomic opinion) in 11 genera,[2] and the second-largest (after Cupressaceae) in geographical range, found in most of the Northern Hemisphere, with the majority of the species in temperate climates, but ranging from subarctic to tropical. The family often forms the dominant component of boreal, coastal, and montane forests. One species, Pinus merkusii, grows just south of the equator in Southeast Asia.[3] Major centres of diversity are found in the mountains of southwest China, Mexico, central Japan, and California.
Description
Members of the family Pinaceae are trees (rarely shrubs) growing from Template:Convert tall, mostly evergreen (except the deciduous Larix and Pseudolarix), resinous, monoecious, with subopposite or whorled branches, and spirally arranged, linear (needle-like) leaves.[2] The embryos of Pinaceae have three to 24 cotyledons.
The female cones are large and usually woody, Template:Convert long, with numerous spirally arranged scales, and two winged seeds on each scale. The male cones are small, Template:Convert long, and fall soon after pollination; pollen dispersal is by wind. Seed dispersal is mostly by wind, but some species have large seeds with reduced wings, and are dispersed by birds. Analysis of Pinaceae cones reveals how selective pressure has shaped the evolution of variable cone size and function throughout the family. Variation in cone size in the family has likely resulted from the variation of seed dispersal mechanisms available in their environments over time. All Pinaceae with seeds weighing less than 90 milligrams are seemingly adapted for wind dispersal. Pines having seeds larger than 100 mg are more likely to have benefited from adaptations that promote animal dispersal, particularly by birds.[4] Pinaceae that persist in areas where tree squirrels are abundant do not seem to have evolved adaptations for bird dispersal.
Boreal conifers have many adaptions for winter. The narrow conical shape of northern conifers, and their downward-drooping limbs help them shed snow, and many of them seasonally alter their biochemistry to make them more resistant to freezing, called "hardening".
-
Floral Morphology and Anatomy of Picea sp. (Spruce)
-
Cultivated pine forest in Western Ghats, India
Classification
Classification of the subfamilies and genera of Pinaceae has been subject to debate in the past. Pinaceae ecology, morphology, and history have all been used as the basis for methods of analyses of the family. An 1891 publication divided the family into two subfamilies, using the number and position of resin canals in the primary vascular region of the young taproot as the primary consideration. In a 1910 publication, the family was divided into two tribes based on the occurrence and type of long–short shoot dimorphism.
A more recent classification divided the subfamilies and genera based on the consideration of features of ovulate cone anatomy among extant and fossil members of the family. Below is an example of how the morphology has been used to classify Pinaceae. The 11 genera are grouped into four subfamilies, based on the microscopical anatomy and the morphology of the cones, pollen, wood, seeds, and leaves:[5]
- Subfamily Pinoideae (Pinus): cones are biennial, rarely triennial, with each year's scale-growth distinct, forming an umbo on each scale, the cone scale base is broad, concealing the seeds fully from abaxial (below the phloem vessels) view, the seed is without resin vesicles, the seed wing holds the seed in a pair of claws, leaves have primary stomatal bands adaxial (above the xylem) or equally on both surfaces.
- Subfamily Piceoideae (Picea): cones are annual, without a distinct umbo, the cone scale base is broad, concealing the seeds fully from abaxial view, seed is without resin vesicles, blackish, the seed wing holds the seed loosely in a cup, leaves have primary stomatal bands adaxial (above the xylem) or equally on both surfaces.
- Subfamily Laricoideae (Larix, Pseudotsuga, and Cathaya): cones are annual, without a distinct umbo, the cone scale base is broad, concealing the seeds fully from abaxial view, the seed is without resin vesicles, whitish, the seed wing holds the seed tightly in a cup, leaves have primary stomatal bands abaxial only.
- Subfamily Abietoideae (Abies, Cedrus, Pseudolarix, Keteleeria, Nothotsuga, and Tsuga): cones are annual, without a distinct umbo, the cone scale base is narrow, with the seeds partly visible in abaxial view, the seed has resin vesicles, the seed wing holds the seed tightly in a cup, leaves have primary stomatal bands abaxial only.
Phylogeny
A revised 2018 phylogeny places Cathaya as sister to the pines rather than in the Laricoidae subfamily with Larix and Pseudotsuga.
| Ran et al. 2018[6] & Leslie et al. 2018[7][8] | Stull et al. 2021[9][10] |
|---|---|
Multiple molecular studies indicate that in contrast to previous classifications placing it outside the conifers, Gnetophyta may in fact be the sister group to the Pinaceae, with both lineages having diverged during the early-mid Carboniferous. This is known as the "gnepine" hypothesis.[11][12]
Evolutionary history
The Pinaceae diverged from other conifer groups during the late Carboniferous ~313 million years ago.[13] Various possible stem-group relatives have been reported from as early as the Late Permian (Lopingian) The extinct conifer cone genus Schizolepidopsis likely represent stem-group members of the Pinaceae, the first good records of which are in the Middle-Late Triassic, with abundant records during the Jurassic across Eurasia.[14][15] The oldest crown group (descendant of the last common ancestor of all living species) member of Pinaceae is the cone Eathiestrobus, known from the Upper Jurassic (lower Kimmeridgian, 157.3-154.7 million years ago) of Scotland,[16] which likely belongs to the pinoid grouping of the family.[17][15] Pinaceae rapidly radiated during the Early Cretaceous.[13] Members of the modern genera Pinus (pines), Picea (spruce) and Cedrus (cedar) first appear during the Early Cretaceous.[18][19][20] The extinct Cretaceous genera Pseudoaraucaria and Obirastrobus appear to be members of Abietoideae, while Pityostrobus appears to be non-monophyletic, containing many disparately related members of Pinaceae.[17] While Pinaceae, and indeed all of its subfamilies, substantially predate the break up of the super-continent Pangea, its distribution was limited to northern Laurasia. During the Cenozoic, Pinaceae had higher rates of species turnover than Southern Hemisphere conifers, thought to be driven by range shifts in response to glacial cycles.[21]
Defense mechanisms
External stresses on plants have the ability to change the structure and composition of forest ecosystems. Common external stress that Pinaceae experience are herbivore and pathogen attack which often leads to tree death.[22] In order to combat these stresses, trees need to adapt or evolve defenses against these stresses. Pinaceae have evolved myriad mechanical and chemical defenses, or a combination of the two, in order to protect themselves against antagonists.[23] Pinaceae have the ability to up-regulate a combination of constitutive mechanical and chemical strategies to further their defenses.[24]
Pinaceae defenses are prevalent in the bark of the trees. This part of the tree contributes a complex defensive boundary against external antagonists.[25] Constitutive and induced defenses are both found in the bark.[25][26][27]
Constitutive defenses
Constitutive defenses are typically the first line of defenses used against antagonists and can include sclerified cells, lignified periderm cells, and secondary compounds such as phenolics and resins.[28][25][26] Constitutive defenses are always expressed and offer immediate protection from invaders but could also be defeated by antagonists that have evolved adaptations to these defense mechanisms.[28][25] One of the common secondary compounds used by Pinaceae are phenolics or polyphenols. These secondary compounds are preserved in vacuoles of polyphenolic parenchyma cells (PP) in the secondary phloem.[29][27]
Induced defenses
Induced defense responses need to be activated by certain cues, such as herbivore damage or other biotic signals.[28]
A common induced defense mechanism used by Pinaceae is resins.[30] Resins are also one of the primary defenses used against attack.[23] Resins are short term defenses that are composed of a complex combination of volatile mono- (C10) and sesquiterpenes (C15) and nonvolatile diterpene resin acids (C20).[23][30] They are produced and stored in specialized secretory areas known as resin ducts, resin blisters, or resin cavities.[30] Resins have the ability to wash away, trap, fend off antagonists, and are also involved in wound sealing.[29] They are an effective defense mechanism because they have toxic and inhibitory effects on invaders, such as insects or pathogens.[31] Resins could have developed as an evolutionary defense against bark beetle attacks.[30] One well researched resin present in Pinaceae is oleoresin. Oleoresin had been found to be a valuable part of the conifer defense mechanism against biotic attacks.[31] They are found in secretory tissues in tree stems, roots, and leaves.[31] Oleoresin is also needed in order to classify conifers.[31]
Active research: methyl jasmonate
The topic of defense mechanisms within family Pinaceae is a very active area of study with numerous studies being conducted. Many of these studies use methyl jasmonate (MJ) as an antagonist.[26][27][32] Methyl jasmonate is known to be able to induce defense responses in the stems of multiple Pinaceae species.[26][32] It has been found that MJ stimulated the activation of PP cells and formation of xylem traumatic resin ducts (TD). These are structures that are involved in the release of phenolics and resins, both forms of defense mechanism.[26][27]
-
Close up of bishop pine cones
-
Knobcone pine cone
References
External links
Template:Sister project Template:Sister project
- Arboretum de Villardebelle French Arboretum of conifers around the world
- Gymnosperm Database – Pinaceae
- Pinaceae on the web page of the Tree-of-Life project
- 40 Pine Trees From Around the World by The Spruce
- Template:Jepson eFlora, covers Californian species and much of western North America
- Pinaceae in Flora of North America
- Pinus in USDA Plants Database
Template:Acrogymnospermae classification Template:Taxonbar Template:Authority control
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Template:Gymnosperm Database
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c d Franceschi, V. R., P. Krokene, T. Krekling, and E. Christiansen. 2000. Phloem parenchyma cells are involved in local and distance defense response to fungal inoculation or bark-beetle attack in Norway spruce (Pinaceae). American Journal of Botany 87:314-326.
- ↑ a b c d e Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c d Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c d Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c d Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".