Conformal geometry: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Feynman 0511
 
imported>Quondum
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Study of angle-preserving transformations of a geometric space}}
{{Short description|Study of angle-preserving transformations of a geometric space}}
In [[mathematics]], '''conformal geometry''' is the study of the set of angle-preserving ([[conformal map|conformal]]) transformations on a space.
In [[mathematics]], '''conformal geometry''' is the study of the set of angle-preserving ([[conformal map|conformal]]) transformations on a space.


In a real two dimensional space, conformal geometry is precisely the geometry of [[Riemann surfaces]]. In space higher than two dimensions, conformal geometry may refer either to the study of [[conformal mapping|conformal transformations]] of what are called "flat spaces" (such as [[Euclidean space]]s or [[n-sphere|spheres]]), or to the study of '''conformal manifolds''' which are [[Riemannian manifold|Riemannian]] or [[pseudo-Riemannian manifold]]s with a class of [[metric tensor|metrics]] that are defined up to scale. Study of the flat structures is sometimes termed '''Möbius geometry''', and is a type of [[Klein geometry]].
In a real two dimensional space, conformal geometry is precisely the geometry of [[Riemann surfaces]]. In space higher than two dimensions, conformal geometry may refer either to the study of [[conformal mapping|conformal transformations]] of what are called "flat spaces" (such as [[Euclidean space]]s or [[n-sphere|spheres]]), or to the study of '''conformal manifolds''' that are [[Riemannian manifold|Riemannian]] or [[pseudo-Riemannian manifold]]s with a class of [[metric tensor|metrics]] that are defined up to scale. Study of the flat structures is sometimes termed '''Möbius geometry''', and is a type of [[Klein geometry]].


==Conformal manifolds==
== Conformal manifolds ==
A '''conformal manifold''' is a [[Riemannian manifold]] (or [[pseudo-Riemannian manifold]]) equipped with an [[equivalence class]] of [[metric tensor]]s, in which two metrics ''g'' and ''h'' are equivalent if and only if
A '''conformal manifold''' is a [[Riemannian manifold]] (or [[pseudo-Riemannian manifold]]) equipped with an [[equivalence class]] of [[metric tensor]]s, in which two metrics ''g'' and ''h'' are equivalent if and only if
 
: <math>h = \lambda^2 g ,</math>
:<math>h = \lambda^2 g ,</math>
 
where ''λ'' is a real-valued [[smooth function]] defined on the manifold and is called the '''conformal factor'''. An equivalence class of such metrics is known as a '''conformal metric''' or '''conformal class'''.  Thus, a conformal metric may be regarded as a metric that is only defined "up to scale".  Often conformal metrics are treated by selecting a metric in the conformal class, and applying only "conformally invariant" constructions to the chosen metric.
where ''λ'' is a real-valued [[smooth function]] defined on the manifold and is called the '''conformal factor'''. An equivalence class of such metrics is known as a '''conformal metric''' or '''conformal class'''.  Thus, a conformal metric may be regarded as a metric that is only defined "up to scale".  Often conformal metrics are treated by selecting a metric in the conformal class, and applying only "conformally invariant" constructions to the chosen metric.


A conformal metric is '''[[Conformally flat manifold|conformally flat]]''' if there is a metric representing it that is flat, in the usual sense that the [[Riemann curvature tensor]] vanishes.  It may only be possible to find a metric in the conformal class that is flat in an open neighborhood of each point.  When it is necessary to distinguish these cases, the latter is called ''locally conformally flat'', although often in the literature no distinction is maintained. The [[n-sphere|''n''-sphere]] is a locally conformally flat manifold that is not globally conformally flat in this sense, whereas a Euclidean space, a torus, or any conformal manifold that is covered by an open subset of Euclidean space is (globally) conformally flat in this sense.  A locally conformally flat manifold is locally conformal to a [[Möbius geometry]], meaning that there exists an angle preserving [[local diffeomorphism]] from the manifold into a Möbius geometry. In two dimensions, every conformal metric is locally conformally flat. In dimension {{nowrap|''n'' > 3}} a conformal metric is locally conformally flat if and only if its [[Weyl tensor]] vanishes; in dimension {{nowrap|1=''n'' = 3}}, if and only if the [[Cotton tensor]] vanishes.
A conformal metric is '''[[Conformally flat manifold|conformally flat]]''' if there is a metric representing it that is flat, in the usual sense that the [[Riemann curvature tensor]] vanishes.  It may only be possible to find a metric in the conformal class that is flat in an open neighborhood of each point.  When it is necessary to distinguish these cases, the latter is called ''locally conformally flat'', although often in the literature no distinction is maintained. The [[n-sphere|''n''-sphere]] is a locally conformally flat manifold that is not globally conformally flat in this sense, whereas a Euclidean space, a torus, or any conformal manifold that is covered by an open subset of Euclidean space is (globally) conformally flat in this sense.  A locally conformally flat manifold is locally conformal to a [[Möbius geometry]], meaning that there exists an angle-preserving [[local diffeomorphism]] from the manifold into a Möbius geometry. In two dimensions, every conformal metric is locally conformally flat. In dimension {{nowrap|''n'' > 3}} a conformal metric is locally conformally flat if and only if its [[Weyl tensor]] vanishes; in dimension {{nowrap|1=''n'' = 3}}, if and only if the [[Cotton tensor]] vanishes.


Conformal geometry has a number of features which distinguish it from (pseudo-)Riemannian geometry.  The first is that although in (pseudo-)Riemannian geometry one has a well-defined metric at each point, in conformal geometry one only has a class of metrics.  Thus the length of a [[tangent vector]] cannot be defined, but the angle between two vectors still can.  Another feature is that there is no [[Levi-Civita connection]] because if ''g'' and ''λ''<sup>2</sup>''g'' are two representatives of the conformal structure, then the [[Christoffel symbol]]s of ''g'' and ''λ''<sup>2</sup>''g'' would not agree.  Those associated with ''λ''<sup>2</sup>''g'' would involve derivatives of the function λ whereas those associated with ''g'' would not.
Conformal geometry has a number of features that distinguish it from (pseudo-)Riemannian geometry.  The first is that although in (pseudo-)Riemannian geometry one has a well-defined metric at each point, in conformal geometry one only has a class of metrics.  Thus the length of a [[tangent vector]] cannot be defined, but the angle between two vectors still can.  Another feature is that there is no [[Levi-Civita connection]] because if ''g'' and ''λ''<sup>2</sup>''g'' are two representatives of the conformal structure, then the [[Christoffel symbol]]s of ''g'' and ''λ''<sup>2</sup>''g'' would not agree.  Those associated with ''λ''<sup>2</sup>''g'' would involve derivatives of the function ''λ'' whereas those associated with ''g'' would not.


Despite these differences, conformal geometry is still tractable.  The Levi-Civita connection and [[curvature form|curvature tensor]], although only being defined once a particular representative of the conformal structure has been singled out, do satisfy certain transformation laws involving the ''λ'' and its derivatives when a different representative is chosen.  In particular, (in dimension higher than 3) the [[Weyl tensor]] turns out not to depend on ''λ'', and so it is a '''conformal invariant'''.  Moreover, even though there is no Levi-Civita connection on a conformal manifold, one can instead work with a [[conformal connection]], which can be handled either as a type of [[Cartan connection]] modelled on the associated Möbius geometry, or as a [[Weyl connection]].  This allows one to define '''conformal curvature''' and other invariants of the conformal structure.
Despite these differences, conformal geometry is still tractable.  The Levi-Civita connection and [[curvature form|curvature tensor]], although only being defined once a particular representative of the conformal structure has been singled out, do satisfy certain transformation laws involving the ''λ'' and its derivatives when a different representative is chosen.  In particular, (in dimension higher than 3) the [[Weyl tensor]] turns out not to depend on ''λ'', and so it is a '''conformal invariant'''.  Moreover, even though there is no Levi-Civita connection on a conformal manifold, one can instead work with a [[conformal connection]], which can be handled either as a type of [[Cartan connection]] modelled on the associated Möbius geometry, or as a [[Weyl connection]].  This allows one to define '''conformal curvature''' and other invariants of the conformal structure.


==Möbius geometry==
== Möbius geometry ==


Möbius geometry is the study of "[[Euclidean space]] with a point added at infinity", or a "[[Minkowski space|Minkowski (or pseudo-Euclidean) space]] with a [[null cone]] added at infinity". That is, the setting is a [[compactification (mathematics)|compactification]] of a familiar space; the [[geometry]] is concerned with the implications of preserving angles.
Möbius geometry is the study of "[[Euclidean space]] with a point added at infinity", or a "[[pseudo-Euclidean space]] with a [[null cone]] added at infinity". That is, the setting is a [[compactification (mathematics)|compactification]] of a familiar space; the [[geometry]] is concerned with the implications of preserving angles.


At an abstract level, the Euclidean and pseudo-Euclidean spaces can be handled in much the same way, except in the case of dimension two.  The compactified two-dimensional [[Minkowski plane]] exhibits extensive conformal [[symmetry]].  Formally, its group of conformal transformations is infinite-dimensional.  By contrast, the group of conformal transformations of the compactified Euclidean plane is only 6-dimensional.
At an abstract level, the Euclidean and pseudo-Euclidean spaces can be handled in much the same way, except in the case of dimension two.  The compactified two-dimensional [[Minkowski plane]] exhibits extensive conformal [[symmetry]].  Formally, its group of conformal transformations is infinite-dimensional.  By contrast, the group of conformal transformations of the compactified Euclidean plane is only 6-dimensional.


===Two dimensions===
=== Two dimensions ===


====Minkowski plane====
==== Minkowski plane ====
The [[conformal group]] for the Minkowski quadratic form {{nowrap|1=''q''(''x'', ''y'') = 2''xy''}} in the plane is the [[abelian group|abelian]] [[Lie group]]
The [[conformal group]] for the Minkowski quadratic form {{nowrap|1=''q''(''x'', ''y'') = 2''xy''}} in the plane is the [[abelian group|abelian]] [[Lie group]]
 
: <math> \operatorname{CSO}(1,1) = \left\{ \left. \begin{pmatrix}
:<math> \operatorname{CSO}(1,1) = \left\{ \left. \begin{pmatrix}
e^a&0\\
e^a&0\\
0&e^b
0&e^b
\end{pmatrix} \right| a , b \in \mathbb{R} \right\} ,</math>
\end{pmatrix} \right| a , b \in \mathbb{R} \right\} ,</math>
with [[Lie algebra]] {{nowrap|'''cso'''(1, 1)}} consisting of all real diagonal {{nowrap|2 × 2}} matrices.
with [[Lie algebra]] {{nowrap|'''cso'''(1, 1)}} consisting of all real diagonal {{nowrap|2 × 2}} matrices.


Line 39: Line 35:


A 1-parameter group of conformal transformations gives rise to a vector field ''X'' with the property that the [[Lie derivative]] of ''g'' along ''X'' is proportional to ''g''.  Symbolically,
A 1-parameter group of conformal transformations gives rise to a vector field ''X'' with the property that the [[Lie derivative]] of ''g'' along ''X'' is proportional to ''g''.  Symbolically,
:{{math|1='''L'''<sub>''X''</sub> ''g'' = ''λg''}} &nbsp; for some ''λ''.
: {{math|1='''L'''<sub>''X''</sub> ''g'' = ''λg''}} &nbsp; for some ''λ''.


In particular, using the above description of the Lie algebra {{nowrap|'''cso'''(1, 1)}}, this implies that
In particular, using the above description of the Lie algebra {{nowrap|'''cso'''(1, 1)}}, this implies that
# '''L'''<sub>''X''</sub>&nbsp; {{nowrap|1=''dx'' = ''a''(''x'') ''dx''}}
# '''L'''<sub>''X''</sub>&nbsp; {{nowrap|1=''dx'' = ''a''(''x'') ''dx''}}
# '''L'''<sub>''X''</sub>&nbsp; {{nowrap|1=''dy'' = ''b''(''y'') ''dy''}}  
# '''L'''<sub>''X''</sub>&nbsp; {{nowrap|1=''dy'' = ''b''(''y'') ''dy''}}  
for some real-valued functions ''a'' and ''b'' depending, respectively, on ''x'' and ''y''.
for some real-valued functions ''a'' and ''b'' depending, respectively, on ''x'' and ''y''.


Conversely, given any such pair of real-valued functions, there exists a vector field ''X'' satisfying 1. and 2.  Hence the [[Lie algebra]] of infinitesimal symmetries of the conformal structure, the [[Witt algebra]], is [[Conformal field theory#Two dimensions|infinite-dimensional]].
Conversely, given any such pair of real-valued functions, there exists a vector field ''X'' satisfying 1. and 2.  Hence the [[Lie algebra]] of infinitesimal symmetries of the conformal structure, the [[Witt algebra]], is [[Conformal field theory#Two dimensions|infinite-dimensional]].


The conformal compactification of the Minkowski plane is a Cartesian product of two circles {{nowrap|''S''<sup>1</sup> × ''S''<sup>1</sup>}}.  On the [[universal cover]], there is no obstruction to integrating the infinitesimal symmetries, and so the group of conformal transformations is the infinite-dimensional Lie group
The conformal compactification of the Minkowski plane is a Cartesian product of two circles {{nowrap|''S''<sup>1</sup> × ''S''<sup>1</sup>}}.  On the [[universal cover]], there is no obstruction to integrating the infinitesimal symmetries, and so the group of conformal transformations is the infinite-dimensional Lie group
:<math>(\mathbb{Z}\rtimes\mathrm{Diff}(S^1))\times(\mathbb{Z}\rtimes\mathrm{Diff}(S^1)) ,</math>
:<math>(\mathbb{Z}\rtimes\mathrm{Diff}(S^1))\times(\mathbb{Z}\rtimes\mathrm{Diff}(S^1)) ,</math>
where Diff(''S''<sup>1</sup>) is the [[diffeomorphism group]] of the circle.<ref>[[Paul Ginsparg]] (1989), ''Applied Conformal Field Theory''. {{arxiv|hep-th/9108028}}. Published in ''Ecole d'Eté de Physique Théorique: Champs, cordes et phénomènes critiques/Fields, strings and critical phenomena'' (Les Houches), ed. by E. Brézin and J. Zinn-Justin, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.</ref>
where Diff(''S''<sup>1</sup>) is the [[diffeomorphism group]] of the circle.<ref>[[Paul Ginsparg]] (1989), ''Applied Conformal Field Theory''. {{arxiv|hep-th/9108028}}. Published in ''Ecole d'Eté de Physique Théorique: Champs, cordes et phénomènes critiques/Fields, strings and critical phenomena'' (Les Houches), ed. by E. Brézin and J. Zinn-Justin, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.</ref>


The conformal group {{nowrap|CSO(1, 1)}} and its Lie algebra are of current interest in [[two-dimensional conformal field theory]].
The conformal group {{nowrap|CSO(1, 1)}} and its Lie algebra are of current interest in [[two-dimensional conformal field theory]].


{{see also |Virasoro algebra}}
{{see also|Virasoro algebra}}


====Euclidean space====
==== Euclidean space ====
[[Image:Conformal grid before Möbius transformation.svg|thumb|right|A coordinate grid prior to a Möbius transformation]]
[[Image:Conformal grid before Möbius transformation.svg|thumb|right|A coordinate grid prior to a Möbius transformation]]
[[Image:Conformal grid after Möbius transformation.svg|thumb|right|The same grid after a Möbius transformation]]
[[Image:Conformal grid after Möbius transformation.svg|thumb|right|The same grid after a Möbius transformation]]
The group of conformal symmetries of the quadratic form
The group of conformal symmetries of the quadratic form
 
: <math>q(z,\bar{z}) = z\bar{z} </math>
:<math>q(z,\bar{z}) = z\bar{z} </math>
 
is the group {{nowrap|1=GL<sub>1</sub>('''C''') = '''C'''<sup>×</sup>}}, the [[multiplicative group]] of the complex numbers.  Its Lie algebra is {{nowrap|1='''gl'''<sub>1</sub>('''C''') = '''C'''}}.
is the group {{nowrap|1=GL<sub>1</sub>('''C''') = '''C'''<sup>×</sup>}}, the [[multiplicative group]] of the complex numbers.  Its Lie algebra is {{nowrap|1='''gl'''<sub>1</sub>('''C''') = '''C'''}}.


Consider the (Euclidean) [[complex plane]] equipped with the metric
Consider the (Euclidean) [[complex plane]] equipped with the metric
 
: <math>g = dz \, d\bar{z}.</math>
:<math>g = dz \, d\bar{z}.</math>


The infinitesimal conformal symmetries satisfy
The infinitesimal conformal symmetries satisfy
#<math>\mathbf{L}_X \, dz = f(z) \, dz</math>
# <math>\mathbf{L}_X \, dz = f(z) \, dz</math>
#<math>\mathbf{L}_X \, d\bar{z} = f(\bar{z}) \, d\bar{z} ,</math>
# <math>\mathbf{L}_X \, d\bar{z} = f(\bar{z}) \, d\bar{z} ,</math>
where ''f'' satisfies the [[Cauchy–Riemann equation]], and so is [[Holomorphic function|holomorphic]] over its domain.  (See [[Witt algebra]].)
where ''f'' satisfies the [[Cauchy–Riemann equation]], and so is [[Holomorphic function|holomorphic]] over its domain.  (See ''[[Witt algebra]]''.)


The conformal isometries of a domain therefore consist of holomorphic self-maps.  In particular, on the conformal compactification &ndash; the [[Riemann sphere]] &ndash; the conformal transformations are given by the [[Möbius transformation]]s
The conformal isometries of a domain therefore consist of holomorphic self-maps.  In particular, on the conformal compactification &ndash; the [[Riemann sphere]] &ndash; the conformal transformations are given by the [[Möbius transformation]]s
 
: <math>z \mapsto \frac{az+b}{cz+d}</math>
:<math>z \mapsto \frac{az+b}{cz+d}</math>
 
where {{nowrap|''ad'' &minus; ''bc''}} is nonzero.
where {{nowrap|''ad'' &minus; ''bc''}} is nonzero.


===Higher dimensions===
=== Higher dimensions ===
In two dimensions, the group of conformal automorphisms of a space can be quite large (as in the case of Lorentzian signature) or variable (as with the case of Euclidean signature).  The comparative lack of rigidity of the two-dimensional case with that of higher dimensions owes to the analytical fact that the asymptotic developments of the infinitesimal automorphisms of the structure are relatively unconstrained.  In Lorentzian signature, the freedom is in a pair of real valued functions.  In Euclidean, the freedom is in a single holomorphic function.
In two dimensions, the group of conformal automorphisms of a space can be quite large (as in the case of Lorentzian quadratic form) or variable (as with the case of definite (Euclidean) quadratic form).  The comparative lack of rigidity of the two-dimensional case compared to that of higher dimensions derives from the analytical fact that the asymptotic developments of the infinitesimal automorphisms of the structure are relatively unconstrained.  With a Lorentzian quadratic form, the freedom is in a pair of real-valued functions.  With a definite quadratic form, the freedom is in a single holomorphic function.


In the case of higher dimensions, the asymptotic developments of infinitesimal symmetries are at most quadratic polynomials.<ref>Kobayashi (1972).</ref>  In particular, they form a finite-dimensional [[Lie algebra]].  The pointwise infinitesimal conformal symmetries of a manifold can be integrated precisely when the manifold is a certain model ''conformally flat'' space ([[up to]] taking universal covers and discrete group quotients).<ref>Due to a general theorem of Sternberg (1962).</ref>
In the case of higher dimensions, the asymptotic developments of infinitesimal symmetries are at most quadratic polynomials.<ref>Kobayashi (1972).</ref>  In particular, they form a finite-dimensional [[Lie algebra]].  The pointwise infinitesimal conformal symmetries of a manifold can be integrated precisely when the manifold is a certain model ''conformally flat'' space ([[up to]] taking universal covers and discrete group quotients).<ref>Due to a general theorem of Sternberg (1962).</ref>
Line 87: Line 78:
The general theory of conformal geometry is similar, although with some differences, in the cases of Euclidean and pseudo-Euclidean signature.<ref>Slovak (1993).</ref>  In either case, there are a number of ways of introducing the model space of conformally flat geometry.  Unless otherwise clear from the context, this article treats the case of Euclidean conformal geometry with the understanding that it also applies, ''[[mutatis mutandis]]'', to the pseudo-Euclidean situation.
The general theory of conformal geometry is similar, although with some differences, in the cases of Euclidean and pseudo-Euclidean signature.<ref>Slovak (1993).</ref>  In either case, there are a number of ways of introducing the model space of conformally flat geometry.  Unless otherwise clear from the context, this article treats the case of Euclidean conformal geometry with the understanding that it also applies, ''[[mutatis mutandis]]'', to the pseudo-Euclidean situation.


====The inversive model====
==== Inversive model ====
The inversive model of conformal geometry consists of the group of local transformations on the [[Euclidean space]] '''E'''<sup>''n''</sup> generated by inversion in spheres.  By [[Liouville's theorem (conformal mappings)|Liouville's theorem]], any angle-preserving local (conformal) transformation is of this form.<ref>{{springer|id=L/l059680|title=Liouville theorems|author=S.A. Stepanov}}.  {{cite book|chapter=''Extension au case des trois dimensions de la question du tracé géographique, Note VI'' (by J. Liouville)|pages=609–615|author=G. Monge|title=Application de l'Analyse à la géometrie|url=https://archive.org/details/applicationdela00monggoog|publisher=Bachelier, Paris|year=1850}}.</ref>  From this perspective, the transformation properties of flat conformal space are those of [[inversive geometry]].
The inversive model of conformal geometry consists of the group of local transformations on the [[Euclidean space]] '''E'''<sup>''n''</sup> generated by inversion in spheres.  By [[Liouville's theorem (conformal mappings)|Liouville's theorem]], any angle-preserving local (conformal) transformation is of this form.<ref>{{springer|id=L/l059680|title=Liouville theorems|author=S.A. Stepanov}}.  {{cite book|chapter=''Extension au case des trois dimensions de la question du tracé géographique, Note VI'' (by J. Liouville)|pages=609–615|author=G. Monge|title=Application de l'Analyse à la géometrie|url=https://archive.org/details/applicationdela00monggoog|publisher=Bachelier, Paris|year=1850}}.</ref>  From this perspective, the transformation properties of flat conformal space are those of [[inversive geometry]].


====The projective model====
==== Projective model ====
The projective model identifies the conformal sphere with a certain [[quadric]] in a [[projective space]].  Let ''q'' denote the Lorentzian [[quadratic form]] on '''R'''<sup>''n''+2</sup> defined by
The projective model identifies the conformal sphere with a certain [[quadric]] in a [[projective space]].  Let ''q'' denote the Lorentzian [[quadratic form]] on '''R'''<sup>''n''+2</sup> defined by
 
: <math>q(x_0,x_1,\ldots,x_{n+1}) = -2x_0x_{n+1}+x_1^2+x_2^2+\cdots+x_n^2.</math>
:<math>q(x_0,x_1,\ldots,x_{n+1}) = -2x_0x_{n+1}+x_1^2+x_2^2+\cdots+x_n^2.</math>


In the projective space '''P'''('''R'''<sup>''n''+2</sup>), let ''S'' be the locus of {{nowrap|1=''q'' = 0}}.  Then ''S'' is the projective (or Möbius) model of conformal geometry.  A conformal transformation on ''S'' is a [[projective linear group|projective linear transformation]] of '''P'''('''R'''<sup>''n''+2</sup>) that leaves the quadric invariant.
In the projective space '''P'''('''R'''<sup>''n''+2</sup>), let ''S'' be the locus of {{nowrap|1=''q'' = 0}}.  Then ''S'' is the projective (or Möbius) model of conformal geometry.  A conformal transformation on ''S'' is a [[projective linear group|projective linear transformation]] of '''P'''('''R'''<sup>''n''+2</sup>) that leaves the quadric invariant.


In a related construction, the quadric ''S'' is thought of as the [[celestial sphere]] at infinity of the [[null cone]] in the Minkowski space {{nowrap|'''R'''<sup>''n''+1,1</sup>}}, which is equipped with the quadratic form ''q'' as above.  The null cone is defined by
In a related construction, the quadric ''S'' is thought of as the [[celestial sphere]] at infinity of the [[null cone]] in the pseudo-Euclidean space {{nowrap|'''R'''<sup>''n''+1,1</sup>}}, which is equipped with the quadratic form ''q'' as above.  The null cone is defined by
 
: <math> N = \left\{ ( x_0 , \ldots , x_{n+1} ) \mid -2 x_0 x_{n+1} + x_1^2 + \cdots + x_n^2 = 0 \right\} .</math>
:<math> N = \left\{ ( x_0 , \ldots , x_{n+1} ) \mid -2 x_0 x_{n+1} + x_1^2 + \cdots + x_n^2 = 0 \right\} .</math>


This is the affine cone over the projective quadric ''S''.  Let ''N''<sup>+</sup> be the future part of the null cone (with the origin deleted).  Then the tautological projection {{nowrap|'''R'''<sup>''n''+1,1</sup> \ {0} → '''P'''('''R'''<sup>''n''+2</sup>)}} restricts to a projection {{nowrap|''N''<sup>+</sup> → ''S''}}.  This gives ''N''<sup>+</sup> the structure of a [[line bundle]] over ''S''.  Conformal transformations on ''S'' are induced by the [[Lorentz transformation|orthochronous Lorentz transformation]]s of {{nowrap|'''R'''<sup>''n''+1,1</sup>}}, since these are homogeneous linear transformations preserving the future null cone.
This is the affine cone over the projective quadric ''S''.  Let ''N''<sup>+</sup> be the future part of the null cone (with the origin deleted).  Then the tautological projection {{nowrap|'''R'''<sup>''n''+1,1</sup> \ {0} → '''P'''('''R'''<sup>''n''+2</sup>)}} restricts to a projection {{nowrap|''N''<sup>+</sup> → ''S''}}.  This gives ''N''<sup>+</sup> the structure of a [[line bundle]] over ''S''.  Conformal transformations on ''S'' are induced by the [[Lorentz transformation|orthochronous Lorentz transformation]]s of {{nowrap|'''R'''<sup>''n''+1,1</sup>}}, since these are homogeneous linear transformations preserving the future null cone.


====The Euclidean sphere====
==== Euclidean sphere ====
Intuitively, the conformally flat geometry of a sphere is less rigid than the [[Riemannian geometry]] of a sphere.  Conformal symmetries of a sphere are generated by the inversion in all of its [[hypersphere]]s.  On the other hand, Riemannian [[isometry|isometries]] of a sphere are generated by inversions in ''[[geodesic]]'' hyperspheres (see the [[Cartan–Dieudonné theorem]].) The Euclidean sphere can be mapped to the conformal sphere in a canonical manner, but not vice versa.
Intuitively, the conformally flat geometry of a sphere is less rigid than the [[Riemannian geometry]] of a sphere.  Conformal symmetries of a sphere are generated by the inversion in all of its [[hypersphere]]s.  On the other hand, Riemannian [[isometry|isometries]] of a sphere are generated by inversions in ''[[geodesic]]'' hyperspheres (see ''[[Cartan–Dieudonné theorem]]'').  The Euclidean sphere can be mapped to the conformal sphere in a canonical manner, but not vice versa.


The Euclidean unit sphere is the locus in '''R'''<sup>''n''+1</sup>
The Euclidean unit sphere is the locus in '''R'''<sup>''n''+1</sup>
: <math>z^2+x_1^2+x_2^2+\cdots+x_n^2=1.</math>


:<math>z^2+x_1^2+x_2^2+\cdots+x_n^2=1.</math>
This can be mapped to the pseudo-Euclidean space {{nowrap|'''R'''<sup>''n''+1,1</sup>}} by letting
 
: <math>x_0 = \frac{z+1}{\sqrt{2}},\, x_1=x_1,\, \ldots,\, x_n=x_n,\, x_{n+1}=\frac{z-1}{\sqrt{2}}.</math>
This can be mapped to the Minkowski space {{nowrap|'''R'''<sup>''n''+1,1</sup>}} by letting
 
:<math>x_0 = \frac{z+1}{\sqrt{2}},\, x_1=x_1,\, \ldots,\, x_n=x_n,\, x_{n+1}=\frac{z-1}{\sqrt{2}}.</math>


It is readily seen that the image of the sphere under this transformation is null in the Minkowski space, and so it lies on the cone ''N''<sup>+</sup>.  Consequently, it determines a cross-section of the line bundle {{nowrap|''N''<sup>+</sup> → ''S''}}.
It is readily seen that the image of the sphere under this transformation is null in the pseudo-Euclidean space, and so it lies on the cone ''N''<sup>+</sup>.  Consequently, it determines a cross-section of the line bundle {{nowrap|''N''<sup>+</sup> → ''S''}}.


Nevertheless, there was an arbitrary choice.  If ''κ''(''x'') is any positive function of {{nowrap|1=''x'' = (''z'', ''x''<sub>0</sub>, ..., ''x''<sub>''n''</sub>)}}, then the assignment
Nevertheless, there was an arbitrary choice.  If ''κ''(''x'') is any positive function of {{nowrap|1=''x'' = (''z'', ''x''<sub>0</sub>, ..., ''x''<sub>''n''</sub>)}}, then the assignment
 
: <math>x_0 = \frac{z+1}{\kappa(x)\sqrt{2}}, \, x_1=x_1,\, \ldots,\, x_n=x_n,\, x_{n+1}=\frac{(z-1)\kappa(x)}{\sqrt{2}}</math>
:<math>x_0 = \frac{z+1}{\kappa(x)\sqrt{2}}, \, x_1=x_1,\, \ldots,\, x_n=x_n,\, x_{n+1}=\frac{(z-1)\kappa(x)}{\sqrt{2}}</math>
 
also gives a mapping into ''N''<sup>+</sup>.  The function ''κ'' is an arbitrary choice of ''conformal scale''.
also gives a mapping into ''N''<sup>+</sup>.  The function ''κ'' is an arbitrary choice of ''conformal scale''.


====Representative metrics====
==== Representative metrics ====
A representative [[Riemannian metric]] on the sphere is a metric which is proportional to the standard sphere metric.  This gives a realization of the sphere as a [[conformal geometry#Conformal manifolds|conformal manifold]].  The standard sphere metric is the restriction of the Euclidean metric on '''R'''<sup>''n''+1</sup>
A representative [[Riemannian metric]] on the sphere is a metric that is proportional to the standard sphere metric.  This gives a realization of the sphere as a [[conformal geometry#Conformal manifolds|conformal manifold]].  The standard sphere metric is the restriction of the Euclidean metric on '''R'''<sup>''n''+1</sup>
 
: <math>g=dz^2+dx_1^2+dx_2^2+\cdots+dx_n^2</math>
:<math>g=dz^2+dx_1^2+dx_2^2+\cdots+dx_n^2</math>
 
to the sphere
to the sphere
 
: <math>z^2+x_1^2+x_2^2+\cdots+x_n^2=1.</math>
:<math>z^2+x_1^2+x_2^2+\cdots+x_n^2=1.</math>


A conformal representative of ''g'' is a metric of the form ''λ''<sup>2</sup>''g'', where ''λ'' is a positive function on the sphere.  The conformal class of ''g'', denoted [''g''], is the collection of all such representatives:
A conformal representative of ''g'' is a metric of the form ''λ''<sup>2</sup>''g'', where ''λ'' is a positive function on the sphere.  The conformal class of ''g'', denoted [''g''], is the collection of all such representatives:
 
: <math> [ g ] = \left\{ \lambda ^2 g \mid \lambda > 0 \right\} .</math>
:<math> [ g ] = \left\{ \lambda ^2 g \mid \lambda > 0 \right\} .</math>


An embedding of the Euclidean sphere into ''N''<sup>+</sup>, as in the previous section, determines a conformal scale on ''S''.  Conversely, any conformal scale on ''S'' is given by such an embedding.  Thus the line bundle {{nowrap|''N''<sup>+</sup> → ''S''}} is identified with the bundle of conformal scales on ''S'': to give a section of this bundle is tantamount to specifying a metric in the conformal class [''g''].
An embedding of the Euclidean sphere into ''N''<sup>+</sup>, as in the previous section, determines a conformal scale on ''S''.  Conversely, any conformal scale on ''S'' is given by such an embedding.  Thus the line bundle {{nowrap|''N''<sup>+</sup> → ''S''}} is identified with the bundle of conformal scales on ''S'': to give a section of this bundle is tantamount to specifying a metric in the conformal class [''g''].


====Ambient metric model====
==== Ambient metric model ====
{{see also|Ambient construction}}
{{see also|Ambient construction}}
Another way to realize the representative metrics is through a special [[coordinate system]] on {{nowrap|'''R'''<sup>''n''+1, 1</sup>}}.  Suppose that the Euclidean ''n''-sphere ''S'' carries a [[stereographic projection|stereographic coordinate system]].  This consists of the following map of {{nowrap|'''R'''<sup>''n''</sup> → ''S'' ⊂ '''R'''<sup>''n''+1</sup>}}:
Another way to realize the representative metrics is through a special [[coordinate system]] on {{nowrap|'''R'''<sup>''n''+1,1</sup>}}.  Suppose that the Euclidean ''n''-sphere ''S'' carries a [[stereographic projection|stereographic coordinate system]].  This consists of the following map of {{nowrap|'''R'''<sup>''n''</sup> → ''S'' ⊂ '''R'''<sup>''n''+1</sup>}}:
 
: <math> \mathbf{y} \in \mathbf{R} ^n \mapsto \left( \frac{ 2 \mathbf{y} }{ \left| \mathbf{y} \right| ^2 + 1 }, \frac{ \left| \mathbf{y} \right| ^2 - 1 }{ \left| \mathbf{y} \right| ^2 + 1 } \right) \in S \sub \mathbf{R} ^{n+1} .</math>
:<math> \mathbf{y} \in \mathbf{R} ^n \mapsto \left( \frac{ 2 \mathbf{y} }{ \left| \mathbf{y} \right| ^2 + 1 }, \frac{ \left| \mathbf{y} \right| ^2 - 1 }{ \left| \mathbf{y} \right| ^2 + 1 } \right) \in S \sub \mathbf{R} ^{n+1} .</math>
 
In terms of these stereographic coordinates, it is possible to give a coordinate system on the null cone ''N''<sup>+</sup> in Minkowski space.  Using the embedding given above, the representative metric section of the null cone is


:<math> x_0 = \sqrt{2} \frac{ \left| \mathbf{y} \right| ^2 }{ 1 + \left| \mathbf{y} \right| ^2 } , x_i = \frac{ y_i }{ \left| \mathbf{y} \right| ^2 + 1 } , x _{n+1} = \sqrt{2} \frac{1}{ \left| \mathbf{y} \right| ^2 + 1 } .</math>
In terms of these stereographic coordinates, it is possible to give a coordinate system on the null cone ''N''<sup>+</sup> in pseudo-Euclidean space.  Using the embedding given above, the representative metric section of the null cone is
: <math> x_0 = \sqrt{2} \frac{ \left| \mathbf{y} \right| ^2 }{ 1 + \left| \mathbf{y} \right| ^2 } , x_i = \frac{ y_i }{ \left| \mathbf{y} \right| ^2 + 1 } , x _{n+1} = \sqrt{2} \frac{1}{ \left| \mathbf{y} \right| ^2 + 1 } .</math>


Introduce a new variable ''t'' corresponding to dilations up ''N''<sup>+</sup>, so that the null cone is coordinatized by
Introduce a new variable ''t'' corresponding to dilations up ''N''<sup>+</sup>, so that the null cone is coordinatized by
 
: <math>x_0 = t \sqrt{2} \frac{ \left| \mathbf{y} \right| ^2}{ 1 + \left| \mathbf{y} \right| ^2 }, x_i = t \frac{y_i}{ \left| \mathbf{y} \right| ^2 + 1}, x_{n+1} = t \sqrt{2} \frac{1}{ \left| \mathbf{y} \right| ^2 + 1 } .</math>
:<math>x_0 = t \sqrt{2} \frac{ \left| \mathbf{y} \right| ^2}{ 1 + \left| \mathbf{y} \right| ^2 }, x_i = t \frac{y_i}{ \left| \mathbf{y} \right| ^2 + 1}, x_{n+1} = t \sqrt{2} \frac{1}{ \left| \mathbf{y} \right| ^2 + 1 } .</math>


Finally, let ''ρ'' be the following defining function of ''N''<sup>+</sup>:
Finally, let ''ρ'' be the following defining function of ''N''<sup>+</sup>:
: <math> \rho = \frac{ - 2 x _0 x _{n+1} + x _1^2 + x _2^2 + \cdots + x _n^2 }{ t ^2 } .</math>


:<math> \rho = \frac{ - 2 x _0 x _{n+1} + x _1^2 + x _2^2 + \cdots + x _n^2 }{ t ^2 } .</math>
In the ''t'', ''ρ'', ''y'' coordinates on {{nowrap|'''R'''<sup>''n''+1,1</sup>}}, the [[Lorentzian metric]] takes the form:
 
: <math> t ^2 g _{ij} ( y ) \, dy ^i \, dy ^j + 2 \rho \, dt ^2 + 2 t \, dt \, d \rho , </math>
In the ''t'', ''ρ'', ''y'' coordinates on {{nowrap|'''R'''<sup>''n''+1,1</sup>}}, the Minkowski metric takes the form:
 
:<math> t ^2 g _{ij} ( y ) \, dy ^i \, dy ^j + 2 \rho \, dt ^2 + 2 t \, dt \, d \rho , </math>
 
where ''g''<sub>''ij''</sub> is the metric on the sphere.
where ''g''<sub>''ij''</sub> is the metric on the sphere.


In these terms, a section of the bundle ''N''<sup>+</sup> consists of a specification of the value of the variable {{nowrap|1=''t'' = ''t''(''y''<sup>''i''</sup>)}} as a function of the ''y''<sup>''i''</sup> along the null cone {{nowrap|1=''ρ'' = 0}}.  This yields the following representative of the conformal metric on ''S'':
In these terms, a section of the bundle ''N''<sup>+</sup> consists of a specification of the value of the variable {{nowrap|1=''t'' = ''t''(''y''<sup>''i''</sup>)}} as a function of the ''y''<sup>''i''</sup> along the null cone {{nowrap|1=''ρ'' = 0}}.  This yields the following representative of the conformal metric on ''S'':
: <math> t ( y ) ^2 g _{ij} \, d y ^i \, d y ^j .</math>


:<math> t ( y ) ^2 g _{ij} \, d y ^i \, d y ^j .</math>
==== Kleinian model ====
 
Consider first the case of the flat conformal geometry in Euclidean signature.  The ''n''-dimensional model is the [[celestial sphere]] of the {{nowrap|(''n'' + 2)}}-dimensional Lorentzian space '''R'''<sup>''n''+1,1</sup>.  Here the model is a [[Klein geometry]]: a [[homogeneous space]] ''G''/''H'' where {{nowrap|1=''G'' = SO(''n'' + 1, 1)}} acting on the {{nowrap|(''n'' + 2)}}-dimensional Lorentzian space '''R'''<sup>''n''+1,1</sup> and ''H'' is the [[isotropy group]] of a fixed null ray in the [[light cone]].  Thus the conformally flat models are the spaces of [[inversive geometry]].  For pseudo-Euclidean of [[metric signature]] {{nowrap|(''p'', ''q'')}}, the model flat geometry is defined analogously as the homogeneous space {{nowrap|O(''p'' + 1, ''q'' + 1) / ''H''}}, where ''H'' is again taken as the stabilizer of a null line.  Note that both the Euclidean and pseudo-Euclidean model spaces are [[Compact space|compact]].
====The Kleinian model====
Consider first the case of the flat conformal geometry in Euclidean signature.  The ''n''-dimensional model is the [[celestial sphere]] of the {{nowrap|(''n'' + 2)}}-dimensional Lorentzian space '''R'''<sup>''n''+1,1</sup>.  Here the model is a [[Klein geometry]]: a [[homogeneous space]] ''G''/''H'' where {{nowrap|1=''G'' = SO(''n'' + 1, 1)}} acting on the {{nowrap|(''n'' + 2)}}-dimensional Lorentzian space '''R'''<sup>''n''+1,1</sup> and ''H'' is the [[isotropy group]] of a fixed null ray in the [[light cone]].  Thus the conformally flat models are the spaces of [[inversive geometry]].  For pseudo-Euclidean of [[metric signature]] {{nowrap|(''p'', ''q'')}}, the model flat geometry is defined analogously as the homogeneous space {{nowrap|O(''p'' + 1, ''q'' + 1)/''H''}}, where ''H'' is again taken as the stabilizer of a null line.  Note that both the Euclidean and pseudo-Euclidean model spaces are [[Compact space|compact]].


====The conformal Lie algebras====
==== Conformal Lie algebras ====
To describe the groups and algebras involved in the flat model space, fix the following form on {{nowrap|'''R'''<sup>''p''+1,''q''+1</sup>}}:
To describe the groups and algebras involved in the flat model space, fix the following form on {{nowrap|'''R'''<sup>''p''+1,''q''+1</sup>}}:
 
: <math>
:<math>
Q=\begin{pmatrix}
Q=\begin{pmatrix}
0&0&-1\\
0&0&-1\\
Line 179: Line 152:
</math>
</math>
where ''J'' is a quadratic form of signature {{nowrap|(''p'', ''q'')}}.  Then {{nowrap|1=''G'' = O(''p'' + 1, ''q'' + 1)}} consists of {{nowrap|(''n'' + 2) × (''n'' + 2)}} matrices stabilizing {{nowrap|1=''Q'' : <sup>t</sup>''MQM'' = ''Q''}} (the superscript ''t'' means transpose).  The Lie algebra admits a [[Cartan decomposition]]
where ''J'' is a quadratic form of signature {{nowrap|(''p'', ''q'')}}.  Then {{nowrap|1=''G'' = O(''p'' + 1, ''q'' + 1)}} consists of {{nowrap|(''n'' + 2) × (''n'' + 2)}} matrices stabilizing {{nowrap|1=''Q'' : <sup>t</sup>''MQM'' = ''Q''}} (the superscript ''t'' means transpose).  The Lie algebra admits a [[Cartan decomposition]]
 
: <math>\mathbf{g}=\mathbf{g}_{-1}\oplus\mathbf{g}_0\oplus\mathbf{g}_1</math>
:<math>\mathbf{g}=\mathbf{g}_{-1}\oplus\mathbf{g}_0\oplus\mathbf{g}_1</math>
 
where
where
 
: <math>
:<math>
\mathbf{g}_{-1} = \left\{\left.
\mathbf{g}_{-1} = \left\{\left.
\begin{pmatrix}
\begin{pmatrix}
0&^tp&0\\
0&^\text{t}p&0\\
0&0&J^{-1}p\\
0&0&J^{-1}p\\
0&0&0
0&0&0
Line 194: Line 164:
\begin{pmatrix}
\begin{pmatrix}
0&0&0\\
0&0&0\\
^tq&0&0\\
^\text{t}q&0&0\\
0&qJ^{-1}&0
0&qJ^{-1}&0
\end{pmatrix}\right| q\in(\mathbb{R}^n)^*\right\}
\end{pmatrix}\right| q\in(\mathbb{R}^n)^*\right\}
</math>
</math>
 
: <math>
:<math>
\mathbf{g}_0 = \left\{\left.
\mathbf{g}_0 = \left\{\left.
\begin{pmatrix}
\begin{pmatrix}
Line 210: Line 179:


The stabilizer of the null ray pointing up the last coordinate vector is given by the [[Borel subalgebra]]
The stabilizer of the null ray pointing up the last coordinate vector is given by the [[Borel subalgebra]]
: '''h''' = '''g'''<sub>0</sub> ⊕ '''g'''<sub>1</sub>.


:'''h''' = '''g'''<sub>0</sub> ⊕ '''g'''<sub>1</sub>.
== See also ==
 
* [[Conformal geometric algebra]]
==See also==
* [[Conformal gravity]]
*[[Conformal geometric algebra]]
* [[Conformal Killing equation]]
*[[Conformal gravity]]
* [[Erlangen program]]
*[[Conformal Killing equation]]
* [[Möbius plane]]
*[[Erlangen program]]
*[[Möbius plane]]


==Notes==
== Notes ==
{{Reflist}}
{{reflist}}


==References==
== References ==
*{{cite book | author=Kobayashi, Shoshichi| title = Transformation Groups in Differential Geometry | publisher=Springer | year=1970|edition=First |isbn = 3-540-05848-6}}
* {{cite book | author=Kobayashi, Shoshichi | title = Transformation Groups in Differential Geometry | publisher=Springer | year=1970 |edition=First |isbn = 3-540-05848-6 }}
*{{cite book|last=Slovák|first=Jan|title=Invariant Operators on Conformal Manifolds|url=http://www.math.muni.cz/~slovak/ftp/papers/vienna.ps|year=1993|publisher=Research Lecture Notes, University of Vienna (Dissertation)}}
* {{cite book |last=Slovák |first=Jan |title=Invariant Operators on Conformal Manifolds |url=http://www.math.muni.cz/~slovak/ftp/papers/vienna.ps |year=1993 |publisher=Research Lecture Notes, University of Vienna (Dissertation) }}
*{{cite book| author=Sternberg, Shlomo |title=Lectures on differential geometry |location=New York |publisher=Chelsea |year=1983 |isbn=0-8284-0316-3}}
* {{cite book | author=Sternberg, Shlomo |title=Lectures on differential geometry |location=New York |publisher=Chelsea |year=1983 |isbn=0-8284-0316-3 }}


==External links==
== External links ==
{{Commons category|Conformal geometry}}
{{Commons category|Conformal geometry}}
*{{springer|id=C/c024770|title=Conformal geometry|author=G.V. Bushmanova}}
* {{springer|id=C/c024770|title=Conformal geometry|author=G.V. Bushmanova}}
*http://www.euclideanspace.com/maths/geometry/space/nonEuclid/conformal/index.htm
* http://www.euclideanspace.com/maths/geometry/space/nonEuclid/conformal/index.htm


{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}

Latest revision as of 14:42, 13 August 2025

Template:Short description In mathematics, conformal geometry is the study of the set of angle-preserving (conformal) transformations on a space.

In a real two dimensional space, conformal geometry is precisely the geometry of Riemann surfaces. In space higher than two dimensions, conformal geometry may refer either to the study of conformal transformations of what are called "flat spaces" (such as Euclidean spaces or spheres), or to the study of conformal manifolds that are Riemannian or pseudo-Riemannian manifolds with a class of metrics that are defined up to scale. Study of the flat structures is sometimes termed Möbius geometry, and is a type of Klein geometry.

Conformal manifolds

A conformal manifold is a Riemannian manifold (or pseudo-Riemannian manifold) equipped with an equivalence class of metric tensors, in which two metrics g and h are equivalent if and only if

h=λ2g,

where λ is a real-valued smooth function defined on the manifold and is called the conformal factor. An equivalence class of such metrics is known as a conformal metric or conformal class. Thus, a conformal metric may be regarded as a metric that is only defined "up to scale". Often conformal metrics are treated by selecting a metric in the conformal class, and applying only "conformally invariant" constructions to the chosen metric.

A conformal metric is conformally flat if there is a metric representing it that is flat, in the usual sense that the Riemann curvature tensor vanishes. It may only be possible to find a metric in the conformal class that is flat in an open neighborhood of each point. When it is necessary to distinguish these cases, the latter is called locally conformally flat, although often in the literature no distinction is maintained. The n-sphere is a locally conformally flat manifold that is not globally conformally flat in this sense, whereas a Euclidean space, a torus, or any conformal manifold that is covered by an open subset of Euclidean space is (globally) conformally flat in this sense. A locally conformally flat manifold is locally conformal to a Möbius geometry, meaning that there exists an angle-preserving local diffeomorphism from the manifold into a Möbius geometry. In two dimensions, every conformal metric is locally conformally flat. In dimension n > 3 a conformal metric is locally conformally flat if and only if its Weyl tensor vanishes; in dimension n = 3, if and only if the Cotton tensor vanishes.

Conformal geometry has a number of features that distinguish it from (pseudo-)Riemannian geometry. The first is that although in (pseudo-)Riemannian geometry one has a well-defined metric at each point, in conformal geometry one only has a class of metrics. Thus the length of a tangent vector cannot be defined, but the angle between two vectors still can. Another feature is that there is no Levi-Civita connection because if g and λ2g are two representatives of the conformal structure, then the Christoffel symbols of g and λ2g would not agree. Those associated with λ2g would involve derivatives of the function λ whereas those associated with g would not.

Despite these differences, conformal geometry is still tractable. The Levi-Civita connection and curvature tensor, although only being defined once a particular representative of the conformal structure has been singled out, do satisfy certain transformation laws involving the λ and its derivatives when a different representative is chosen. In particular, (in dimension higher than 3) the Weyl tensor turns out not to depend on λ, and so it is a conformal invariant. Moreover, even though there is no Levi-Civita connection on a conformal manifold, one can instead work with a conformal connection, which can be handled either as a type of Cartan connection modelled on the associated Möbius geometry, or as a Weyl connection. This allows one to define conformal curvature and other invariants of the conformal structure.

Möbius geometry

Möbius geometry is the study of "Euclidean space with a point added at infinity", or a "pseudo-Euclidean space with a null cone added at infinity". That is, the setting is a compactification of a familiar space; the geometry is concerned with the implications of preserving angles.

At an abstract level, the Euclidean and pseudo-Euclidean spaces can be handled in much the same way, except in the case of dimension two. The compactified two-dimensional Minkowski plane exhibits extensive conformal symmetry. Formally, its group of conformal transformations is infinite-dimensional. By contrast, the group of conformal transformations of the compactified Euclidean plane is only 6-dimensional.

Two dimensions

Minkowski plane

The conformal group for the Minkowski quadratic form q(x, y) = 2xy in the plane is the abelian Lie group

CSO(1,1)={(ea00eb)|a,b},

with Lie algebra cso(1, 1) consisting of all real diagonal 2 × 2 matrices.

Consider now the Minkowski plane, 2 equipped with the metric

g=2dxdy.

A 1-parameter group of conformal transformations gives rise to a vector field X with the property that the Lie derivative of g along X is proportional to g. Symbolically,

LX g = λgScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".   for some λ.

In particular, using the above description of the Lie algebra cso(1, 1), this implies that

  1. LX  dx = a(x) dx
  2. LX  dy = b(y) dy

for some real-valued functions a and b depending, respectively, on x and y.

Conversely, given any such pair of real-valued functions, there exists a vector field X satisfying 1. and 2. Hence the Lie algebra of infinitesimal symmetries of the conformal structure, the Witt algebra, is infinite-dimensional.

The conformal compactification of the Minkowski plane is a Cartesian product of two circles S1 × S1. On the universal cover, there is no obstruction to integrating the infinitesimal symmetries, and so the group of conformal transformations is the infinite-dimensional Lie group

(Diff(S1))×(Diff(S1)),

where Diff(S1) is the diffeomorphism group of the circle.[1]

The conformal group CSO(1, 1) and its Lie algebra are of current interest in two-dimensional conformal field theory.

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Euclidean space

File:Conformal grid before Möbius transformation.svg
A coordinate grid prior to a Möbius transformation
File:Conformal grid after Möbius transformation.svg
The same grid after a Möbius transformation

The group of conformal symmetries of the quadratic form

q(z,z¯)=zz¯

is the group GL1(C) = C×, the multiplicative group of the complex numbers. Its Lie algebra is gl1(C) = C.

Consider the (Euclidean) complex plane equipped with the metric

g=dzdz¯.

The infinitesimal conformal symmetries satisfy

  1. 𝐋Xdz=f(z)dz
  2. 𝐋Xdz¯=f(z¯)dz¯,

where f satisfies the Cauchy–Riemann equation, and so is holomorphic over its domain. (See Witt algebra.)

The conformal isometries of a domain therefore consist of holomorphic self-maps. In particular, on the conformal compactification – the Riemann sphere – the conformal transformations are given by the Möbius transformations

zaz+bcz+d

where adbc is nonzero.

Higher dimensions

In two dimensions, the group of conformal automorphisms of a space can be quite large (as in the case of Lorentzian quadratic form) or variable (as with the case of definite (Euclidean) quadratic form). The comparative lack of rigidity of the two-dimensional case compared to that of higher dimensions derives from the analytical fact that the asymptotic developments of the infinitesimal automorphisms of the structure are relatively unconstrained. With a Lorentzian quadratic form, the freedom is in a pair of real-valued functions. With a definite quadratic form, the freedom is in a single holomorphic function.

In the case of higher dimensions, the asymptotic developments of infinitesimal symmetries are at most quadratic polynomials.[2] In particular, they form a finite-dimensional Lie algebra. The pointwise infinitesimal conformal symmetries of a manifold can be integrated precisely when the manifold is a certain model conformally flat space (up to taking universal covers and discrete group quotients).[3]

The general theory of conformal geometry is similar, although with some differences, in the cases of Euclidean and pseudo-Euclidean signature.[4] In either case, there are a number of ways of introducing the model space of conformally flat geometry. Unless otherwise clear from the context, this article treats the case of Euclidean conformal geometry with the understanding that it also applies, mutatis mutandis, to the pseudo-Euclidean situation.

Inversive model

The inversive model of conformal geometry consists of the group of local transformations on the Euclidean space En generated by inversion in spheres. By Liouville's theorem, any angle-preserving local (conformal) transformation is of this form.[5] From this perspective, the transformation properties of flat conformal space are those of inversive geometry.

Projective model

The projective model identifies the conformal sphere with a certain quadric in a projective space. Let q denote the Lorentzian quadratic form on Rn+2 defined by

q(x0,x1,,xn+1)=2x0xn+1+x12+x22++xn2.

In the projective space P(Rn+2), let S be the locus of q = 0. Then S is the projective (or Möbius) model of conformal geometry. A conformal transformation on S is a projective linear transformation of P(Rn+2) that leaves the quadric invariant.

In a related construction, the quadric S is thought of as the celestial sphere at infinity of the null cone in the pseudo-Euclidean space Rn+1,1, which is equipped with the quadratic form q as above. The null cone is defined by

N={(x0,,xn+1)2x0xn+1+x12++xn2=0}.

This is the affine cone over the projective quadric S. Let N+ be the future part of the null cone (with the origin deleted). Then the tautological projection Rn+1,1 \ {0} → P(Rn+2) restricts to a projection N+S. This gives N+ the structure of a line bundle over S. Conformal transformations on S are induced by the orthochronous Lorentz transformations of Rn+1,1, since these are homogeneous linear transformations preserving the future null cone.

Euclidean sphere

Intuitively, the conformally flat geometry of a sphere is less rigid than the Riemannian geometry of a sphere. Conformal symmetries of a sphere are generated by the inversion in all of its hyperspheres. On the other hand, Riemannian isometries of a sphere are generated by inversions in geodesic hyperspheres (see Cartan–Dieudonné theorem). The Euclidean sphere can be mapped to the conformal sphere in a canonical manner, but not vice versa.

The Euclidean unit sphere is the locus in Rn+1

z2+x12+x22++xn2=1.

This can be mapped to the pseudo-Euclidean space Rn+1,1 by letting

x0=z+12,x1=x1,,xn=xn,xn+1=z12.

It is readily seen that the image of the sphere under this transformation is null in the pseudo-Euclidean space, and so it lies on the cone N+. Consequently, it determines a cross-section of the line bundle N+S.

Nevertheless, there was an arbitrary choice. If κ(x) is any positive function of x = (z, x0, ..., xn), then the assignment

x0=z+1κ(x)2,x1=x1,,xn=xn,xn+1=(z1)κ(x)2

also gives a mapping into N+. The function κ is an arbitrary choice of conformal scale.

Representative metrics

A representative Riemannian metric on the sphere is a metric that is proportional to the standard sphere metric. This gives a realization of the sphere as a conformal manifold. The standard sphere metric is the restriction of the Euclidean metric on Rn+1

g=dz2+dx12+dx22++dxn2

to the sphere

z2+x12+x22++xn2=1.

A conformal representative of g is a metric of the form λ2g, where λ is a positive function on the sphere. The conformal class of g, denoted [g], is the collection of all such representatives:

[g]={λ2gλ>0}.

An embedding of the Euclidean sphere into N+, as in the previous section, determines a conformal scale on S. Conversely, any conformal scale on S is given by such an embedding. Thus the line bundle N+S is identified with the bundle of conformal scales on S: to give a section of this bundle is tantamount to specifying a metric in the conformal class [g].

Ambient metric model

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Another way to realize the representative metrics is through a special coordinate system on Rn+1,1. Suppose that the Euclidean n-sphere S carries a stereographic coordinate system. This consists of the following map of RnSRn+1:

𝐲𝐑n(2𝐲|𝐲|2+1,|𝐲|21|𝐲|2+1)S𝐑n+1.

In terms of these stereographic coordinates, it is possible to give a coordinate system on the null cone N+ in pseudo-Euclidean space. Using the embedding given above, the representative metric section of the null cone is

x0=2|𝐲|21+|𝐲|2,xi=yi|𝐲|2+1,xn+1=21|𝐲|2+1.

Introduce a new variable t corresponding to dilations up N+, so that the null cone is coordinatized by

x0=t2|𝐲|21+|𝐲|2,xi=tyi|𝐲|2+1,xn+1=t21|𝐲|2+1.

Finally, let ρ be the following defining function of N+:

ρ=2x0xn+1+x12+x22++xn2t2.

In the t, ρ, y coordinates on Rn+1,1, the Lorentzian metric takes the form:

t2gij(y)dyidyj+2ρdt2+2tdtdρ,

where gij is the metric on the sphere.

In these terms, a section of the bundle N+ consists of a specification of the value of the variable t = t(yi) as a function of the yi along the null cone ρ = 0. This yields the following representative of the conformal metric on S:

t(y)2gijdyidyj.

Kleinian model

Consider first the case of the flat conformal geometry in Euclidean signature. The n-dimensional model is the celestial sphere of the (n + 2)-dimensional Lorentzian space Rn+1,1. Here the model is a Klein geometry: a homogeneous space G/H where G = SO(n + 1, 1) acting on the (n + 2)-dimensional Lorentzian space Rn+1,1 and H is the isotropy group of a fixed null ray in the light cone. Thus the conformally flat models are the spaces of inversive geometry. For pseudo-Euclidean of metric signature (p, q), the model flat geometry is defined analogously as the homogeneous space O(p + 1, q + 1) / H, where H is again taken as the stabilizer of a null line. Note that both the Euclidean and pseudo-Euclidean model spaces are compact.

Conformal Lie algebras

To describe the groups and algebras involved in the flat model space, fix the following form on Rp+1,q+1:

Q=(0010J0100)

where J is a quadratic form of signature (p, q). Then G = O(p + 1, q + 1) consists of (n + 2) × (n + 2) matrices stabilizing Q : tMQM = Q (the superscript t means transpose). The Lie algebra admits a Cartan decomposition

𝐠=𝐠1𝐠0𝐠1

where

𝐠1={(0tp000J1p000)|pn},𝐠1={(000tq000qJ10)|q(n)*}
𝐠0={(a000A000a)|A𝔰𝔬(p,q),a}.

Alternatively, this decomposition agrees with a natural Lie algebra structure defined on Rncso(p, q) ⊕ (Rn).

The stabilizer of the null ray pointing up the last coordinate vector is given by the Borel subalgebra

h = g0g1.

See also

Notes

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

  1. Paul Ginsparg (1989), Applied Conformal Field Theory. arXiv:hep-th/9108028File:Lock-green.svg . Published in Ecole d'Eté de Physique Théorique: Champs, cordes et phénomènes critiques/Fields, strings and critical phenomena (Les Houches), ed. by E. Brézin and J. Zinn-Justin, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
  2. Kobayashi (1972).
  3. Due to a general theorem of Sternberg (1962).
  4. Slovak (1993).
  5. Template:Springer. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

References

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

External links

Template:Sister project

Template:Authority control