Riemann zeta function: Difference between revisions
imported>David Eppstein remove unwanted no-break spaces |
imported>Baby345&73njs838 No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Analytic function in mathematics}} | {{Short description|Analytic function in mathematics}} | ||
[[File:Cplot zeta.svg|right|thumb|250px|The Riemann zeta function {{math|''ζ''(''z'')}} plotted with [[domain coloring]] | [[File:Cplot zeta.svg|right|thumb|250px|The Riemann zeta function {{math|''ζ''(''z'')}} plotted with [[domain coloring]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://nbviewer.ipython.org/github/empet/Math/blob/master/DomainColoring.ipynb |title=Jupyter Notebook Viewer|website=Nbviewer.ipython.org|access-date=2017-01-04}}</ref>]] | ||
[[File:Riemann-Zeta-Detail.png|right|thumb|200px|The pole at | [[File:Riemann-Zeta-Detail.png|right|thumb|200px|The pole at {{math|1=''z'' = 1}} and two zeros on the critical line]] | ||
The '''Riemann zeta function''' or '''Euler–Riemann zeta function''', denoted by the [[Greek alphabet|Greek letter]] {{math|''ζ''}} ([[zeta]]), is a [[function (mathematics)|mathematical function]] of a [[complex variable]] defined as <math display="block"> \zeta(s) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n^s} = \frac{1}{1^s} + \frac{1}{2^s} + \frac{1}{3^s} + \cdots</math> for {{ | The '''Riemann zeta function''' or '''Euler–Riemann zeta function''', denoted by the [[Greek alphabet|Greek letter]] {{math|''ζ''}} ([[zeta]]), is a [[function (mathematics)|mathematical function]] of a [[complex variable]] defined as <math display="block"> \zeta(s) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n^s} = \frac{1}{1^s} + \frac{1}{2^s} + \frac{1}{3^s} + \cdots</math> for {{math|Re(''s'') > 1}}, and its [[analytic continuation]] elsewhere.<ref name=":0" /> | ||
The Riemann zeta function plays a pivotal role in [[analytic number theory]] and has applications in [[physics]], [[probability theory]], and applied [[statistics]]. | The Riemann zeta function plays a pivotal role in [[analytic number theory]] and has applications in [[physics]], [[probability theory]], and applied [[statistics]]. | ||
[[Leonhard Euler]] first introduced and studied the function over the [[real numbers|reals]] in the first half of the eighteenth century. [[Bernhard Riemann]]'s 1859 article "[[On the Number of Primes Less Than a Given Magnitude]]" extended the Euler definition to a [[complex number|complex]] variable, proved its [[meromorphic]] continuation and [[functional equation]], and established a relation between its [[Root of a function|zeros]] and [[prime number theorem|the distribution of prime numbers]]. This paper also contained the [[Riemann hypothesis]], a [[conjecture]] about the distribution of complex zeros of the Riemann zeta function that many mathematicians consider the most important unsolved problem in [[pure mathematics]].<ref>{{cite web | last=Bombieri | first=Enrico | url=http://www.claymath.org/sites/default/files/official_problem_description.pdf | title=The Riemann Hypothesis – official problem description | publisher=[[Clay Mathematics Institute]] | access-date=2014-08-08 | archive-date=22 December 2015 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151222090027/http://www.claymath.org/sites/default/files/official_problem_description.pdf | [[Leonhard Euler]] first introduced and studied the function over the [[real numbers|reals]] in the first half of the eighteenth century. [[Bernhard Riemann]]'s 1859 article "[[On the Number of Primes Less Than a Given Magnitude]]" extended the Euler definition to a [[complex number|complex]] variable, proved its [[meromorphic]] continuation and [[functional equation]], and established a relation between its [[Root of a function|zeros]] and [[prime number theorem|the distribution of prime numbers]]. This paper also contained the [[Riemann hypothesis]], a [[conjecture]] about the distribution of complex zeros of the Riemann zeta function that many mathematicians consider the most important unsolved problem in [[pure mathematics]].<ref>{{cite web | last=Bombieri | first=Enrico | url=http://www.claymath.org/sites/default/files/official_problem_description.pdf | title=The Riemann Hypothesis – official problem description | publisher=[[Clay Mathematics Institute]] | access-date=2014-08-08 | archive-date=22 December 2015 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151222090027/http://www.claymath.org/sites/default/files/official_problem_description.pdf }}</ref> | ||
The values of the Riemann zeta function at even positive integers were computed by Euler. The first of them, {{math|''ζ''(2)}}, provides a solution to the [[Basel problem]]. In 1979 [[Roger Apéry]] proved the irrationality of | The values of the Riemann zeta function at even positive integers were computed by Euler. The first of them, {{math|''ζ''(2)}}, provides a solution to the [[Basel problem]]. In 1979 [[Roger Apéry]] proved the irrationality of [[Apéry's constant|{{math|''ζ''(3)}}]]. The values at negative integer points, also found by Euler, are [[rational number]]s and play an important role in the theory of [[modular form]]s. Many generalizations of the Riemann zeta function, such as [[Dirichlet series]], [[Dirichlet L-function|Dirichlet {{math|''L''}}-functions]] and [[L-function|{{math|''L''}}-functions]], are known. | ||
==Definition== | == Definition == | ||
[[File:Ueber die Anzahl der Primzahlen unter einer gegebenen Grösse.pdf|thumb|upright|Bernhard Riemann's article ''On the number of primes below a given magnitude'']] | [[File:Ueber die Anzahl der Primzahlen unter einer gegebenen Grösse.pdf|thumb|upright|Bernhard Riemann's article ''On the number of primes below a given magnitude'']] | ||
The Riemann zeta function {{math|''ζ''(''s'')}} is a function of a complex variable {{math|''s'' | The Riemann zeta function {{math|''ζ''(''s'')}} is a function of a complex variable {{math|1=''s'' = ''σ'' + ''it''}}, where {{math|''σ''}} and {{math|''t''}} are real numbers. (The notation {{math|''s''}}, {{math|''σ''}}, and {{math|''t''}} is used traditionally in the study of the zeta function, following Riemann.) When {{math|1=Re(''s'') = ''σ'' > 1}}, the function can be written as a converging summation or as an integral: | ||
<!-- This seemingly roundabout way of writing the integral makes it clear that the zeta function is a quotient of two Mellin transforms; i.e. that we integrate 1/(e^x − 1) against the invariant measure of R^* and the multiplicative character character x^s . --> | <!-- This seemingly roundabout way of writing the integral makes it clear that the zeta function is a quotient of two Mellin transforms; i.e. that we integrate 1/(e^x − 1) against the invariant measure of R^* and the multiplicative character character x^s . --> | ||
:<math>\zeta(s) =\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{1}{n^s} = \frac{1}{\Gamma(s)} \int_0^\infty \frac{x ^ {s-1}}{e ^ x - 1} \, \mathrm{d}x\,,</math> | : <math>\zeta(s) =\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{1}{n^s} = \frac{1}{\Gamma(s)} \int_0^\infty \frac{x ^ {s-1}}{e ^ x - 1} \, \mathrm{d}x\,,</math> | ||
where | where | ||
:<math>\Gamma(s) = \int_0^\infty x^{s-1}\,e^{-x} \, \mathrm{d}x </math> | : <math>\Gamma(s) = \int_0^\infty x^{s-1}\,e^{-x} \, \mathrm{d}x </math> | ||
is the [[gamma function]]. The Riemann zeta function is defined for other complex values via [[analytic continuation]] of the function defined for {{math|''σ'' > 1}}. | is the [[gamma function]]. The Riemann zeta function is defined for other complex values via [[analytic continuation]] of the function defined for {{math|''σ'' > 1}}. | ||
[[Leonhard Euler]] considered the above series in 1740 for positive integer values of {{ | [[Leonhard Euler]] considered the above series in 1740 for positive integer values of {{math|''s''}}, and later [[Chebyshev]] extended the definition to {{math|Re(''s'') > 1}}.<ref name='devlin'>{{cite book |last=Devlin |first=Keith |author-link=Keith Devlin |title=The Millennium Problems: The seven greatest unsolved mathematical puzzles of our time |publisher=Barnes & Noble |year=2002 |location=New York |pages=43–47 |isbn=978-0-7607-8659-8}}</ref> | ||
The above series is a prototypical [[Dirichlet series]] that [[absolute convergence|converges absolutely]] to an [[analytic function]] for {{ | The above series is a prototypical [[Dirichlet series]] that [[absolute convergence|converges absolutely]] to an [[analytic function]] for {{math|''s''}} such that {{math|''σ'' > 1}} and [[divergent series|diverges]] for all other values of {{math|''s''}}. Riemann showed that the function defined by the series on the half-plane of convergence can be continued analytically to all complex values {{math|''s'' ≠ 1}}. For {{math|1=''s'' = 1}}, the series is the [[harmonic series (mathematics)|harmonic series]] which diverges to {{math|+∞}}, and | ||
<math display="block"> \lim_{s \to 1} (s - 1)\zeta(s) = 1.</math> | <math display="block"> \lim_{s \to 1} (s - 1)\zeta(s) = 1.</math> | ||
Thus the Riemann zeta function is a [[meromorphic function]] on the whole complex plane, which is [[holomorphic function|holomorphic]] everywhere except for a [[simple pole]] at {{math|''s'' | Thus the Riemann zeta function is a [[meromorphic function]] on the whole complex plane, which is [[holomorphic function|holomorphic]] everywhere except for a [[simple pole]] at {{math|1=''s'' = 1}} with [[Residue (complex analysis)|residue]] {{math|1}}. | ||
==Euler's product formula== | == Euler's product formula == | ||
In 1737, the connection between the zeta function and [[prime number]]s was discovered by Euler, who [[Proof of the Euler product formula for the Riemann zeta function|proved the identity]] | In 1737, the connection between the zeta function and [[prime number]]s was discovered by Euler, who [[Proof of the Euler product formula for the Riemann zeta function|proved the identity]] | ||
: <math>\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{1}{n^s} = \prod_{p \text{ prime}} \frac{1}{1-p^{-s}},</math> | |||
where, by definition, the left hand side is {{math|''ζ''(''s'')}} and the [[infinite product]] on the right hand side extends over all prime numbers {{math|''p''}} (such expressions are called [[Euler product]]s): | |||
: <math>\prod_{p \text{ prime}} \frac{1}{1-p^{-s}} = \frac{1}{1-2^{-s}}\cdot\frac{1}{1-3^{-s}}\cdot\frac{1}{1-5^{-s}}\cdot\frac{1}{1-7^{-s}}\cdot\frac{1}{1-11^{-s}} \cdots \frac{1}{1-p^{-s}} \cdots</math> | |||
Both sides of the Euler product formula converge for {{math|Re(''s'') > 1}}. The [[Proof of the Euler product formula for the Riemann zeta function|proof of Euler's identity]] uses only the formula for the [[geometric series]] and the [[fundamental theorem of arithmetic]]. Since the [[harmonic series (mathematics)|harmonic series]], obtained when {{math|1=''s'' = 1}}, diverges, Euler's formula (which becomes {{math|Π<sub>''p''</sub> {{sfrac|''p''|''p'' − 1}}}}) implies that there are [[Euclid's theorem|infinitely many primes]].<ref>{{cite book|first=Charles Edward |last=Sandifer |title=How Euler Did It |publisher=Mathematical Association of America |date=2007 |page=193 |isbn=978-0-88385-563-8}}</ref> Since the logarithm of {{math|''p''/(''p'' − 1)}} is approximately {{math|1/''p''}}, the formula can also be used to prove the stronger result that the sum of the reciprocals of the primes is infinite. On the other hand, combining that with the [[sieve of Eratosthenes]] shows that the density of the set of primes within the set of positive integers is zero. | |||
Both sides of the Euler product formula converge for {{math|Re(''s'') > 1}}. The [[Proof of the Euler product formula for the Riemann zeta function|proof of Euler's identity]] uses only the formula for the [[geometric series]] and the [[fundamental theorem of arithmetic]]. Since the [[harmonic series (mathematics)|harmonic series]], obtained when {{math|''s'' | |||
The Euler product formula can be used to calculate the [[asymptotic density|asymptotic probability]] that {{math|''s''}} randomly selected integers within a bound are set-wise [[coprime]]. Intuitively, the probability that any single number is divisible by a prime (or any integer) {{math|''p''}} is {{math|1/''p''}}. Hence the probability that {{math|''s''}} numbers are all divisible by this prime is {{math|1/''p''{{isup|''s''}}}}, and the probability that at least one of them is ''not'' is {{math|1 − 1/''p''{{isup|''s''}}}}. Now, for distinct primes, these divisibility events are mutually independent because the candidate divisors are coprime (a number is divisible by coprime divisors {{math|''n''}} and {{math|''m''}} [[if and only if]] it is divisible by {{math|''nm''}}, an event which occurs with probability {{math|1/(''nm'')}}). Thus the asymptotic probability that {{math|''s''}} numbers are coprime is given by a product over all primes,<ref>{{cite book | |||
| last = Mollin | first = Richard A. | |||
| isbn = 978-1-4200-8328-6 | |||
| mr = 2560324 | |||
| page = 220 | |||
| publisher = CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL | |||
| series = Discrete Mathematics and its Applications (Boca Raton) | |||
| title = Advanced Number Theory with Applications | |||
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=6I1setlljDYC&pg=PA220 | |||
| year = 2010}}</ref> | |||
: <math>\prod_{p \text{ prime}} \left(1-\frac{1}{p^s}\right) = \left( \prod_{p \text{ prime}} \frac{1}{1-p^{-s}} \right)^{-1} = \frac{1}{\zeta(s)}. </math> | : <math>\prod_{p \text{ prime}} \left(1-\frac{1}{p^s}\right) = \left( \prod_{p \text{ prime}} \frac{1}{1-p^{-s}} \right)^{-1} = \frac{1}{\zeta(s)}. </math> | ||
| Line 46: | Line 51: | ||
This zeta function satisfies the [[functional equation]] | This zeta function satisfies the [[functional equation]] | ||
<math display="block"> \zeta(s) = 2^s \pi^{s-1}\ \sin\left( \frac{\pi s}{2} \right)\ \Gamma(1-s)\ \zeta(1-s)\ ,</math> | <math display="block"> \zeta(s) = 2^s \pi^{s-1}\ \sin\left( \frac{\pi s}{2} \right)\ \Gamma(1-s)\ \zeta(1-s)\ ,</math> | ||
where {{math|Γ(''s'')}} is the [[gamma function]]. This is an equality of meromorphic functions valid on the whole [[complex plane]]. The equation relates values of the Riemann zeta function at the points {{ | where {{math|Γ(''s'')}} is the [[gamma function]]. This is an equality of meromorphic functions valid on the whole [[complex plane]]. The equation relates values of the Riemann zeta function at the points {{math|''s''}} and {{math|1 − ''s''}}, in particular relating even positive integers with odd negative integers. Owing to the zeros of the sine function, the functional equation implies that {{math|''ζ''(''s'')}} has a simple zero at each even negative integer {{math|1=''s'' = −2''n''}}, known as the '''[[Triviality (mathematics)|trivial]] zeros''' of {{math|''ζ''(''s'')}}. When {{math|''s''}} is an even positive integer, the product {{nobr|{{math|sin({{sfrac| ''π s'' | 2 }}) Γ(1 − ''s'')}}}} on the right is non-zero because {{math|Γ(1 − ''s'')}} has a simple [[pole (complex analysis)|pole]], which cancels the simple zero of the sine factor. When {{math|''s''}} is {{math|0}}, the zero of the sine factor is cancelled by the simple pole of {{math|''ζ''(1)}}. | ||
{{ | {{collapse top|title=Proof of Riemann's functional equation}} | ||
A proof of the functional equation proceeds as follows: | A proof of the functional equation proceeds as follows: | ||
We observe that if | We observe that if {{math|''s'' > 0}}, then | ||
<math display="block"> \int_0^\infty x^{ \frac{1}{2} s - 1 } e^{-n^2\pi x}\ \ | <math display="block"> \int_0^\infty x^{ \frac{1}{2} s - 1 } e^{-n^2\pi x}\ \mathrm dx\ =\ \frac{\ \Gamma\!\left( \frac{s}{2} \right)\ }{\ n^s\ \pi^{\frac{s}{2}}\ } ~.</math> | ||
As a result, if | As a result, if {{math|''s'' > 1}} then | ||
<math display="block"> \frac{\ \Gamma\!\left(\frac{s}{2}\right)\ \zeta(s)\ }{\ \pi^{ \frac{s}{2} }\ }\ =\ \sum_{n=1}^\infty\ \int_0^\infty\ x^{{s\over 2}-1}\ e^{-n^2 \pi x}\ \ | <math display="block"> \frac{\ \Gamma\!\left(\frac{s}{2}\right)\ \zeta(s)\ }{\ \pi^{ \frac{s}{2} }\ }\ =\ \sum_{n=1}^\infty\ \int_0^\infty\ x^{{s\over 2}-1}\ e^{-n^2 \pi x}\ \mathrm dx\ =\ \int_0^\infty x^{{s\over 2}-1} \sum_{n=1}^\infty e^{-n^2 \pi x}\ \mathrm dx\ ,</math> | ||
with the inversion of the limiting processes justified by absolute convergence (hence the stricter requirement on <math>s</math>). | with the inversion of the limiting processes justified by absolute convergence (hence the stricter requirement on <math>s</math>). | ||
For convenience, let | For convenience, let | ||
<math display="block"> \psi(x)\ := \ \sum_{n=1}^\infty\ e^{-n^2 \pi x} </math> | <math display="block"> \psi(x)\ := \ \sum_{n=1}^\infty\ e^{-n^2 \pi x} ,</math> | ||
which is a special case of the [[theta function]]. | which is a special case of the [[theta function]]. | ||
Because <math>e^{-n^2 \pi x}</math> and <math>\frac1\sqrt{x} e^{\frac{-n^2 \pi}{x}}</math> are [[Fourier transform#Definition|Fourier transform pairs]],<ref name='Damm-Johnsen'>{{cite book |last=Damm-Johnsenn |first=Håvard |title=Theta functions and their applications |year=2019 | | Because <math>e^{-n^2 \pi x}</math> and <math>\frac1\sqrt{x} e^{\frac{-n^2 \pi}{x}}</math> are [[Fourier transform#Definition|Fourier transform pairs]],<ref name='Damm-Johnsen'>{{cite book |last=Damm-Johnsenn |first=Håvard |title=Theta functions and their applications |year=2019 |page=5|url=https://users.ox.ac.uk/~quee4127/theta.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250321130227/https://users.ox.ac.uk/~quee4127/theta.pdf|archive-date=2025-03-21}}</ref> then, by the [[Poisson summation formula]], we have | ||
<math display="block"> \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty\ e^{ - n^2 \pi\ x }\ =\ \frac{ 1 }{\ \sqrt{x\ }\ }\ \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty\ e^{ -\frac{\ n^2 \pi\ }{ x } }\ ,</math> | <math display="block"> \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty\ e^{ - n^2 \pi\ x }\ =\ \frac{ 1 }{\ \sqrt{x\ }\ }\ \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty\ e^{ -\frac{\ n^2 \pi\ }{ x } }\ ,</math> | ||
so that | so that | ||
<math display="block">\ 2\ \psi(x) + 1\ =\ \frac{ 1 }{\ \sqrt{x\ }\ } \left(\ 2\ \psi\!\left( \frac{ 1 }{ x } \right) + 1\ \right) ~.</math> | <math display="block">\ 2\ \psi(x) + 1\ =\ \frac{ 1 }{\ \sqrt{x\ }\ } \left(\ 2\ \psi\!\left( \frac{ 1 }{ x } \right) + 1\ \right) ~.</math> | ||
Hence | Hence | ||
<math display="block"> \pi^{ -\frac{s}{2} }\ \Gamma\!\left( \frac{s}{2} \right)\ \zeta(s)\ =\ \int_0^1\ x^{ \frac{s}{2} - 1 }\ \psi(x)\ \ | <math display="block"> \pi^{ -\frac{s}{2} }\ \Gamma\!\left( \frac{s}{2} \right)\ \zeta(s)\ =\ \int_0^1\ x^{ \frac{s}{2} - 1 }\ \psi(x)\ \mathrm dx + \int_1^\infty x^{ \frac{s}{2} - 1 } \psi(x)\ \mathrm dx ~.</math> | ||
The right side is equivalent to | The right side is equivalent to | ||
<math display="block"> \int_0^1 x^{ \frac{s}{2} - 1 } \left( \frac{ 1 }{\ \sqrt{x\ }\ }\ \psi\!\left( \frac{1}{x} \right) + \frac{ 1 }{\ 2 \sqrt{x\ }\ } - \frac{ 1 }{ 2 }\ \right) \ \ | <math display="block"> \int_0^1 x^{ \frac{s}{2} - 1 } \left( \frac{ 1 }{\ \sqrt{x\ }\ }\ \psi\!\left( \frac{1}{x} \right) + \frac{ 1 }{\ 2 \sqrt{x\ }\ } - \frac{ 1 }{ 2 }\ \right) \ \mathrm dx + \int_1^\infty x^{{s\over 2}-1} \psi(x)\ \mathrm dx </math> | ||
or | or | ||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
\frac{ 1 }{\ s - 1\ } - \frac{ 1 }{\ s\ } + \int_0^1\ x^{ \frac{s}{2} - \frac{3}{2}}\ \psi\!\left( \frac{ 1 }{\ x\ } \right)\ \ | \frac{ 1 }{\ s - 1\ } - \frac{ 1 }{\ s\ } + \int_0^1\ x^{ \frac{s}{2} - \frac{3}{2}}\ \psi\!\left( \frac{ 1 }{\ x\ } \right)\ \mathrm dx + \int_1^\infty\ x^{ \frac{s}{2} - 1 }\ \psi(x)\ \mathrm dx | ||
~.</math> | ~.</math> | ||
So | So | ||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
\pi^{ -\frac{ s }{ 2 } }\ \Gamma\!\left( \frac{\ s\ }{ 2 } \right)\ \zeta(s)\ =\ \frac{ 1 }{\ s ( s - 1 )\ } + \int_1^\infty\ \left( x^{ -\frac{ s }{ 2 } - \frac{ 1 }{ 2 } } + x^{ \frac{ s }{ 2 } - 1 } \right)\ \psi(x)\ \ | \pi^{ -\frac{ s }{ 2 } }\ \Gamma\!\left( \frac{\ s\ }{ 2 } \right)\ \zeta(s)\ =\ \frac{ 1 }{\ s ( s - 1 )\ } + \int_1^\infty\ \left( x^{ -\frac{ s }{ 2 } - \frac{ 1 }{ 2 } } + x^{ \frac{ s }{ 2 } - 1 } \right)\ \psi(x)\ \mathrm dx | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
which is convergent for all {{math|''s''}}, because {{math|''ψ''(''x'') → 0}} more quickly than any power of {{math|''x''}} for {{math| ''x'' > 1}}, so the integral converges. As the RHS remains the same if {{math|''s''}} is replaced by {{math|1 − ''s''}}, | |||
which is convergent for all {{ | |||
<math display="block"> \frac{\ \Gamma\!\left(\ \frac{s}{2}\ \right)\ \zeta\!\left(\ s\ \right)\ }{\ \pi^{ \frac{s}{2}\ }\ }\ =\ \frac{\ \Gamma\!\left(\ \frac{1}{2} - \frac{s}{2}\ \right)\ \zeta\!\left(\ 1 - s\ \right)\ }{\ \pi^{ \frac{1}{2} - \frac{s}{2} }\ } </math> | <math display="block"> \frac{\ \Gamma\!\left(\ \frac{s}{2}\ \right)\ \zeta\!\left(\ s\ \right)\ }{\ \pi^{ \frac{s}{2}\ }\ }\ =\ \frac{\ \Gamma\!\left(\ \frac{1}{2} - \frac{s}{2}\ \right)\ \zeta\!\left(\ 1 - s\ \right)\ }{\ \pi^{ \frac{1}{2} - \frac{s}{2} }\ } </math> | ||
which is the functional equation attributed to [[Bernhard Riemann]].<ref>{{cite book |first=E.C. |last=Titchmarsh |year=1986 |title=The Theory of the Riemann Zeta Function |edition=2nd |publisher=Oxford Science Publications |place=[[Oxford]], UK |isbn=0-19-853369-1 |pages=21–22 }}</ref> | which is the functional equation attributed to [[Bernhard Riemann]].<ref>{{cite book |first=E.C. |last=Titchmarsh |year=1986 |title=The Theory of the Riemann Zeta Function |edition=2nd |publisher=Oxford Science Publications |place=[[Oxford]], UK |isbn=0-19-853369-1 |pages=21–22 }}</ref> | ||
The functional equation above can be obtained using both the [[reflection formula]] and the [[Multiplication theorem#Gamma function–Legendre formula|duplication formula]]. | The functional equation above can be obtained using both the [[reflection formula]] and the [[Multiplication theorem#Gamma function–Legendre formula|duplication formula]]. | ||
First collect terms of | First collect terms of {{math|''π''}}: | ||
<math display="block">\Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}\right)\zeta\left(s\right) = \Gamma\left(\frac{1}{2} - \frac{s}{2}\right)\zeta\left(1 - s\right)\pi^{s-\frac{1}{2}}</math> | <math display="block">\Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}\right)\zeta\left(s\right) = \Gamma\left(\frac{1}{2} - \frac{s}{2}\right)\zeta\left(1 - s\right)\pi^{s-\frac{1}{2}}</math> | ||
Then multiply both sides by | Then multiply both sides by {{math|Γ(1 − ''s''/2)}} and use the reflection formula: | ||
<math display="block">\Gamma\left(1-\frac s2\right)\Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}\right)\zeta\left(s\right) = \Gamma\left(1-\frac s2\right)\Gamma\left(\frac{1}{2} - \frac{s}{2}\right)\zeta\left(1 - s\right)\pi^{s-\frac{1}{2}}</math> | <math display="block">\Gamma\left(1-\frac s2\right)\Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}\right)\zeta\left(s\right) = \Gamma\left(1-\frac s2\right)\Gamma\left(\frac{1}{2} - \frac{s}{2}\right)\zeta\left(1 - s\right)\pi^{s-\frac{1}{2}}</math> | ||
<math display="block">\zeta\left(s\right) = \sin\left(\frac{\pi s}2\right)\Gamma\left(1-\frac s2\right)\Gamma\left(\frac{1}{2} - \frac{s}{2}\right)\zeta\left(1 - s\right)\pi^{s-\frac{3}{2}}</math> | <math display="block">\zeta\left(s\right) = \sin\left(\frac{\pi s}2\right)\Gamma\left(1-\frac s2\right)\Gamma\left(\frac{1}{2} - \frac{s}{2}\right)\zeta\left(1 - s\right)\pi^{s-\frac{3}{2}}</math> | ||
Use the duplication formula with | Use the duplication formula with {{math|1=''z'' = (1 − ''s'')/2}} | ||
<math display="block">\zeta\left(s\right) = \sin\left(\frac{\pi s}2\right)2^{1-1+s}\sqrt{\pi}\Gamma\left(1-s\right)\zeta\left(1 - s\right)\pi^{s-\frac{3}{2}}</math> | <math display="block">\zeta\left(s\right) = \sin\left(\frac{\pi s}2\right)2^{1-1+s}\sqrt{\pi}\Gamma\left(1-s\right)\zeta\left(1 - s\right)\pi^{s-\frac{3}{2}}</math> | ||
so that | so that | ||
<math display="block">\zeta\left(s\right) = \sin\left(\frac{\pi s}2\right)2^s\Gamma\left(1-s\right)\zeta\left(1 - s\right)\pi^{s-1}</math> | <math display="block">\zeta\left(s\right) = \sin\left(\frac{\pi s}2\right)2^s\Gamma\left(1-s\right)\zeta\left(1 - s\right)\pi^{s-1}</math> | ||
{{ | {{collapse bottom}} | ||
The functional equation was established by Riemann in his 1859 paper "[[On the Number of Primes Less Than a Given Magnitude]]" and used to construct the analytic continuation in the first place. | The functional equation was established by Riemann in his 1859 paper "[[On the Number of Primes Less Than a Given Magnitude]]" and used to construct the analytic continuation in the first place. | ||
==Riemann's | == Riemann's xi function == | ||
{{main|Riemann | {{main|Riemann xi function}} | ||
Riemann also found a [[Symmetry|symmetric]] version of the functional equation by setting | Riemann also found a [[Symmetry|symmetric]] version of the functional equation by setting | ||
<math display="block">\xi(s) =\frac{s(s-1)}{2} \times \pi^{-\frac{s}{2}}\Gamma\left( \frac{s}{2} \right)\zeta(s) = (s-1)\pi^{-\frac{s}{2}}\Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}+1\right)\zeta(s) | <math display="block">\xi(s) =\frac{s(s-1)}{2} \times \pi^{-\frac{s}{2}}\Gamma\left( \frac{s}{2} \right)\zeta(s) = (s-1)\pi^{-\frac{s}{2}}\Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}+1\right)\zeta(s)</math> | ||
that satisfies: | |||
<math display="block"> \xi(s) = \xi(1 - s) ~.</math> | <math display="block"> \xi(s) = \xi(1 - s) ~.</math> | ||
Returning to the functional equation's derivation in the previous section, we have | Returning to the functional equation's derivation in the previous section, we have | ||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
\xi(s) =\frac12 + \frac{s(s-1)}{2} \int_1^\infty \left(x^{-\frac{s}{2}-\frac{1}{2}} + x^{\frac{s}{2}-1}\right)\psi(x) dx | \xi(s) =\frac12 + \frac{s(s-1)}{2} \int_1^\infty \left(x^{-\frac{s}{2}-\frac{1}{2}} + x^{\frac{s}{2}-1}\right)\psi(x) dx | ||
| Line 136: | Line 130: | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
Using integration by parts again with a factorization of < | Using integration by parts again with a factorization of {{math|''x''<sup>3/2</sup>}}, | ||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
\xi(s) =\frac12 + \psi(1) - 2\left[x^{\frac32}\psi'(x)\left(x^{\frac{s-1}{2}} + x^{-\frac{s}{2}}\right)\right]_1^\infty + 2\int_1^\infty \left(x^{\frac{s-1}{2}} + x^{-\frac{s}{2}}\right)\frac{d}{dx}\left[x^{\frac32}\psi'(x)\right] dx | \xi(s) =\frac12 + \psi(1) - 2\left[x^{\frac32}\psi'(x)\left(x^{\frac{s-1}{2}} + x^{-\frac{s}{2}}\right)\right]_1^\infty + 2\int_1^\infty \left(x^{\frac{s-1}{2}} + x^{-\frac{s}{2}}\right)\frac{d}{dx}\left[x^{\frac32}\psi'(x)\right] dx | ||
| Line 145: | Line 139: | ||
As <math>\frac12 +\psi(1) + 4\psi'(1)=0</math>, | As <math>\frac12 +\psi(1) + 4\psi'(1)=0</math>, | ||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
\xi(s) = 2\int_1^\infty \frac{d}{dx}\left[x^{\frac32}\psi'(x)\right]\left(x^{\frac{s-1}{2}} + x^{-\frac{s}{2}}\right) dx | \xi(s) = 2\int_1^\infty \frac{d}{dx}\left[x^{\frac32}\psi'(x)\right]\left(x^{\frac{s-1}{2}} + x^{-\frac{s}{2}}\right) dx | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
Remove a factor of < | Remove a factor of {{math|''x''<sup>−1/4</sup>}} to make the exponents in the remainder opposites. | ||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
\xi(s) = 2\int_1^\infty \frac{d}{dx}\left[x^{\frac32}\psi'(x)\right]x^{-\frac14}\left(x^{\frac{s- | \xi(s) = 2\int_1^\infty \frac{d}{dx}\left[x^{\frac32}\psi'(x)\right]x^{-\frac14}\left(x^{\frac{s-1/2}{2}} + x^{\frac{1/2-s}{2}}\right) dx | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
Using the [[hyperbolic functions]], namely | Using the [[hyperbolic functions]], namely {{math|1=cos(''x'') = cosh(''ix'')}}, and letting {{math|1=''s'' = 1/2 + ''it''}} gives | ||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
\xi(s) = 4\int_1^\infty \frac{d}{dx}\left[x^{\frac32}\psi'(x)\right]x^{-\frac14}\cos(\frac{t}2\log x) dx | \xi(s) = 4\int_1^\infty \frac{d}{dx}\left[x^{\frac32}\psi'(x)\right]x^{-\frac14}\cos(\frac{t}2\log x) dx | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
and by separating the integral and using the [[power series]] for {{math|cos}}, | |||
and by separating the integral and using the [[power series]] for | |||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
\xi(s) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty a_{2n}t^{2n} | \xi(s) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty a_{2n}t^{2n} | ||
| Line 167: | Line 158: | ||
which led Riemann to his famous hypothesis. | which led Riemann to his famous hypothesis. | ||
==Zeros, the critical line, and the Riemann hypothesis== | == Zeros, the critical line, and the Riemann hypothesis == | ||
{{main|Riemann hypothesis}} | {{main|Riemann hypothesis}} | ||
[[File:Zero-free region for the Riemann zeta-function.svg|right|thumb|300px|The Riemann zeta function has no zeros to the right of {{math|''σ'' {{=}} 1}} or (apart from the trivial zeros) to the left of {{math|1=''σ'' = 0}} (nor can the zeros lie too close to those lines). Furthermore, the non-trivial zeros are symmetric about the real axis and the line {{math|1=''σ'' = 1/2}} and, according to the [[Riemann hypothesis]], they all lie on the line {{math|1=''σ'' = 1/2}}.]] | |||
[[File:Zero-free region for the Riemann zeta-function.svg|right|thumb|300px|The Riemann zeta function has no zeros to the right of {{math|''σ'' {{=}} 1}} or (apart from the trivial zeros) to the left of {{math|''σ'' | [[Image:Zeta polar.svg|right|thumb|300px|This image shows a plot of the Riemann zeta function along the critical line for real values of {{math|''t''}} running from 0 to 34. The first five zeros in the critical strip are clearly visible as the place where the spirals pass through the origin.]] | ||
[[Image:Zeta polar.svg|right|thumb|300px|This image shows a plot of the Riemann zeta function along the critical line for real values of {{ | [[File:RiemannCriticalLine.svg|thumb|300px|The real part (red) and imaginary part (blue) of the Riemann zeta function along the critical line {{math|1=Re(''s'') = 1/2}}. The first non-trivial zeros can be seen at {{math|1=Im(''s'') =}} {{math|±14.135}}, {{math|±21.022}} and {{math|±25.011}}.]] | ||
[[File:RiemannCriticalLine.svg|thumb|300px|The real part (red) and imaginary part (blue) of the Riemann zeta function along the critical line Re(''s'') = 1/2. The first non-trivial zeros can be seen at Im(''s'') = ±14.135, | The functional equation shows that the Riemann zeta function has zeros at {{math|−2, −4, ...}}. These are called the '''trivial zeros'''. They are trivial in the sense that their existence is relatively easy to prove, for example, from {{math|sin(''πs''/2)}} being {{math|0}} in the functional equation. The non-trivial zeros have captured far more attention because their distribution not only is far less understood but, more importantly, their study yields important results concerning prime numbers and related objects in number theory. It is known that any non-trivial zero lies in the open strip {{math|{{mset|''s'' ∈ <math>\C</math> {{!}} 0 < Re(''s'') < 1}}}}, which is called the '''critical strip'''. The set {{math|{{mset|''s'' ∈ <math>\C</math> {{!}} Re(''s'') {{=}} 1/2}}}} is called the '''critical line'''. The [[Riemann hypothesis]], considered one of the greatest unsolved problems in mathematics, asserts that all non-trivial zeros are on the critical line. In 1989, Conrey proved that more than 40% of the non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function are on the critical line.<ref>{{cite journal | first = J. B. | last = Conrey | author-link = Brian Conrey | title = More than two fifths of the zeros of the Riemann zeta function are on the critical line | journal= J. Reine Angew. Math. | volume= 1989 | year = 1989 | issue = 399 | pages = 1–26 |url = http://www.digizeitschriften.de/resolveppn/GDZPPN002206781 | mr = 1004130 | doi = 10.1515/crll.1989.399.1 | s2cid = 115910600}}</ref> This has since been improved to 41.7%.<ref>{{cite journal | url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40687-019-0199-8 | doi=10.1007/s40687-019-0199-8 | title=More than five-twelfths of the zeros of <math>\zeta </math> are on the critical line | date=2020 | last1=Pratt | first1=Kyle | last2=Robles | first2=Nicolas | last3=Zaharescu | first3=Alexandru | last4=Zeindler | first4=Dirk | journal=Research in the Mathematical Sciences | volume=7 | arxiv=1802.10521 }}</ref> | ||
The functional equation shows that the Riemann zeta function has zeros at {{ | |||
For the Riemann zeta function on the critical line, see [[Z function|{{ | For the Riemann zeta function on the critical line, see [[Z function|{{math|''Z''}}-function]]. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| Line 183: | Line 172: | ||
! Zero | ! Zero | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1/2 ± 14.134725... ''i'' | | {{math|1/2 ± 14.134725... ''i''}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1/2 ± 21.022040... ''i'' | | {{math|1/2 ± 21.022040... ''i''}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1/2 ± 25.010858... ''i'' | | {{math|1/2 ± 25.010858... ''i''}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1/2 ± 30.424876... ''i'' | | {{math|1/2 ± 30.424876... ''i''}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1/2 ± 32.935062... ''i'' | | {{math|1/2 ± 32.935062... ''i''}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1/2 ± 37.586178... ''i'' | | {{math|1/2 ± 37.586178... ''i''}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1/2 ± 40.918719... ''i'' | | {{math|1/2 ± 40.918719... ''i''}} | ||
|} | |} | ||
===Number of zeros in the critical strip=== | === Number of zeros in the critical strip === | ||
Let | Let {{math|''N''(''T'')}} be the number of zeros of {{math|''ζ''(''s'')}} in the critical strip {{math|0 < Re(''s'') < 1}}, whose imaginary parts are in the interval {{math|0 < Im(''s'') < ''T''}}. | ||
[[Timothy Trudgian]] proved that, if | [[Timothy Trudgian]] proved that, if {{math|''T'' > ''e''}}, then<ref>{{cite journal | first=Timothy S. | last=Trudgian | title = An improved upper bound for the argument of the Riemann zeta function on the critical line II | journal = J. Number Theory | date = 2014 | volume = 134 | pages = 280–292 | doi = 10.1016/j.jnt.2013.07.017 | arxiv = 1208.5846}}</ref> | ||
:<math> \left|N(T) - \frac{T}{2\pi} \log{\frac{T}{2\pi e}}\right| \leq 0.112 \log T + 0.278 \log\log T + 3.385 + \frac{0.2}{T}</math>. | : <math> \left|N(T) - \frac{T}{2\pi} \log{\frac{T}{2\pi e}}\right| \leq 0.112 \log T + 0.278 \log\log T + 3.385 + \frac{0.2}{T}</math>. | ||
=== | === Hardy–Littlewood conjectures === | ||
In 1914, [[G. H. Hardy]] proved that {{math|''ζ'' ({{sfrac|1|2}} + ''it'')}} has infinitely many real zeros.<ref>{{cite journal|first1 = G.H. |last1 = Hardy |title = Sur les zeros de la fonction ζ(s) |journal = Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences | volume = 158 |publisher = [[French Academy of Sciences]]|year = 1914 |pages = 1012–1014}}</ref><ref>{{ | In 1914, [[G. H. Hardy]] proved that {{math|''ζ''({{sfrac|1|2}} + ''it'')}} has infinitely many real zeros.<ref>{{cite journal|first1 = G.H. |last1 = Hardy |title = Sur les zeros de la fonction ζ(s) |journal = Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences | volume = 158 |publisher = [[French Academy of Sciences]]|year = 1914 |pages = 1012–1014}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Hardy |first1=G. H. |last2=Fekete |first2=M. |last3=Littlewood |first3=J. E. |date=1921-09-01 |title=The Zeros of Riemann's Zeta-Function on the Critical Line |journal=Journal of the London Mathematical Society |pages=15–19 |url=https://zenodo.org/record/1447415 |volume=s1-1 |doi=10.1112/jlms/s1-1.1.15 }}</ref> | ||
Hardy and [[John Edensor Littlewood|J. E. Littlewood]] formulated two conjectures on the density and distance between the zeros of {{math|''ζ'' ( | Hardy and [[John Edensor Littlewood|J. E. Littlewood]] formulated two conjectures on the density and distance between the zeros of {{math|''ζ''(1/2 + ''it'')}} on intervals of large positive real numbers. In the following, {{math|''N''(''T'')}} is the total number of real zeros and {{math|''N''<sub>0</sub>(''T'')}} the total number of zeros of odd order of the function {{math|''ζ''(1/2 + ''it'')}} lying in the interval {{math|(0, ''T'']}}. | ||
{{numbered list | {{numbered list | ||
|For any {{math|''ε'' > 0}}, there exists a {{math|''T''<sub>0</sub>(''ε'') > 0}} such that when | |For any {{math|''ε'' > 0}}, there exists a {{math|''T''<sub>0</sub>(''ε'') > 0}} such that when | ||
:<math>T \geq T_0(\varepsilon) \quad\text{ and }\quad H=T^{\frac14+\varepsilon},</math> | : <math>T \geq T_0(\varepsilon) \quad\text{ and }\quad H=T^{\frac14+\varepsilon},</math> | ||
the interval {{math|(''T'', ''T'' + ''H'']}} contains a zero of odd order. | the interval {{math|(''T'', ''T'' + ''H'']}} contains a zero of odd order. | ||
|For any {{math|''ε'' > 0}}, there exists a {{math|''T''<sub>0</sub>(''ε'') > 0}} and {{math|''c<sub>ε</sub> | |For any {{math|''ε'' > 0}}, there exists a {{math|''T''<sub>0</sub>(''ε'') > 0}} and {{math|''c''<sub>''ε''</sub> > 0}} such that the inequality | ||
:<math>N_0(T+H)-N_0(T) \geq c_\varepsilon H</math> | : <math>N_0(T+H)-N_0(T) \geq c_\varepsilon H</math> | ||
holds when | holds when | ||
:<math>T \geq T_0(\varepsilon) \quad\text{ and }\quad H=T^{\frac12+\varepsilon}.</math> | : <math>T \geq T_0(\varepsilon) \quad\text{ and }\quad H=T^{\frac12+\varepsilon}.</math> | ||
}} | }} | ||
These two conjectures opened up new directions in the investigation of the Riemann zeta function. | These two conjectures opened up new directions in the investigation of the Riemann zeta function. | ||
=== Zero-free region === | === Zero-free region === | ||
The location of the Riemann zeta function's zeros is of great importance in number theory. The [[prime number theorem]] is equivalent to the fact that there are no zeros of the zeta function on the {{math|Re(''s'') | The location of the Riemann zeta function's zeros is of great importance in number theory. The [[prime number theorem]] is equivalent to the fact that there are no zeros of the zeta function on the line {{math|1=Re(''s'') = 1}}.<ref name="Diamond1982">{{cite journal |first=Harold G. |last=Diamond |title=Elementary methods in the study of the distribution of prime numbers |journal=Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society |volume=7 |issue=3 |year=1982 |pages=553–589 |mr=670132 |doi=10.1090/S0273-0979-1982-15057-1 |doi-access=free }}</ref> It is also known that zeros do not exist in certain regions slightly to the left of the line {{math|1=Re(''s'') = 1}}, known as zero-free regions. For instance, Korobov<ref>{{cite journal | first1 = Nikolai Mikhailovich| last1 = Korobov | title = Estimates of trigonometric sums and their applications | journal = Usp. Mat. Nauk | volume = 13 | number = 4 | year = 1958 | pages=185–192 }}</ref> and Vinogradov<ref>{{cite journal | first1 = I.M.| last1 = Vinogradov | title = Eine neue Abschätzung der Funktion {{nowrap|''ζ''(1 + ''it'')}} | journal = Russian. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat | volume = 22 | year = 1958 | pages =161–164 }}</ref> independently showed via the [[Vinogradov's mean-value theorem]] that for sufficiently large {{math|{{abs|''t''}}}}, {{math|''ζ''(''σ'' + ''it'') ≠ 0}} for | ||
:<math>\sigma \geq 1 - \frac{c}{(\log|t|)^{2/3 + \varepsilon}}</math> | : <math>\sigma \geq 1 - \frac{c}{(\log|t|)^{2/3 + \varepsilon}}</math> | ||
for any | for any {{math|''ε'' > 0}} and a number {{math|''c'' > 0}} depending on {{math|''ε''}}. Asymptotically, this is the largest known zero-free region for the zeta function. | ||
Explicit zero-free regions are also known. Platt and Trudgian<ref>{{cite journal | first1 = David| last1 = Platt | first2= Timothy S. | last2= Trudgian | title = The Riemann hypothesis is true up to < | Explicit zero-free regions are also known. Platt and Trudgian<ref>{{cite journal | first1 = David| last1 = Platt | first2= Timothy S. | last2= Trudgian | title = The Riemann hypothesis is true up to 3⋅10<sup>12</sup> | journal = Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society| volume = 53 | number = 3 | year = 2021 | pages =792–797 | doi = 10.1112/blms.12460 | arxiv = 2004.09765}}</ref> | ||
verified computationally that | verified computationally that {{math|''ζ''(''σ'' + ''it'') ≠ 0}} if {{math|''σ'' ≠ 1/2}} and {{math|{{abs|''t''}} ≤ 3⋅10<sup>12</sup>}}. Mossinghoff, Trudgian and Yang proved<ref>{{cite journal | first1 = Michael J. | last1 = Mossinghoff | first2 = Timothy S. | last2 = Trudgian |first3 = Andrew | last3 = Yang | title = Explicit zero-free regions for the Riemann zeta-function | journal = Res. Number Theory | volume = 10 | year = 2024 | article-number = 11 | arxiv = 2212.06867 | doi = 10.1007/s40993-023-00498-y }}</ref> that zeta has no zeros in the region | ||
:<math>\sigma\ge 1 - \frac{1}{5.558691\log|t|}</math> | : <math>\sigma\ge 1 - \frac{1}{5.558691\log|t|}</math> | ||
for {{math|{{abs|''t''}} ≥ 2}}, which is the largest known zero-free region in the critical strip for < | for {{math|{{abs|''t''}} ≥ 2}}, which is the largest known zero-free region in the critical strip for {{math|3⋅10<sup>12</sup> < {{abs|''t''}} < exp(64.1) ≈ 7⋅10<sup>27</sup>}} (for previous results see<ref>{{cite journal | first1 = Michael J. | last1 = Mossinghoff | first2 = Timothy S. | last2 = Trudgian | title = Nonnegative trigonometric polynomials and a zero-free region for the Riemann zeta-function | journal = J. Number Theory | volume = 157 | year = 2015 | pages = 329–349 | arxiv = 1410.3926 | doi = 10.1016/J.JNT.2015.05.010| s2cid = 117968965 }}</ref>). | ||
Yang<ref>{{cite journal | first1 = Andrew| last1 = Yang | title =Explicit bounds on <math>\zeta(s)</math> in the critical strip and a zero-free region | journal = J. Math. Anal. Appl.| volume = 534 | number = 2 | year = 2024 | | Yang<ref>{{cite journal | first1 = Andrew| last1 = Yang | title =Explicit bounds on <math>\zeta(s)</math> in the critical strip and a zero-free region | journal = J. Math. Anal. Appl.| volume = 534 | number = 2 | year = 2024 | article-number =128124 | doi=10.1016/j.jmaa.2024.128124 | arxiv = 2301.03165 }}</ref> showed that {{math|''ζ''(''σ'' + ''it'') ≠ 0}} if | ||
:<math>\sigma \geq 1 - \frac{\log\log|t|}{21.233\log|t|}</math> | : <math>\sigma \geq 1 - \frac{\log\log|t|}{21.233\log|t|}</math> and <math>|t| \geq 3</math> | ||
which is the largest known zero-free region for | which is the largest known zero-free region for {{math|exp(170.2) < {{abs|''t''}} < exp(4.8⋅10<sup>5</sup>)}}. | ||
Bellotti proved<ref>{{cite journal | first1 = Chiara| last1 = Bellotti | title =Explicit bounds for the Riemann zeta function and a new zero-free region | journal = J. Math. Anal. Appl.| volume = 536 | number = 2 | year = 2024 | | Bellotti proved<ref>{{cite journal | first1 = Chiara| last1 = Bellotti | title =Explicit bounds for the Riemann zeta function and a new zero-free region | journal = J. Math. Anal. Appl.| volume = 536 | number = 2 | year = 2024 | article-number =128249 | doi = 10.1016/j.jmaa.2024.128249 | arxiv = 2306.10680}}</ref> (building on the work of Ford<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Ford | first1 = K. | year = 2002 | title = Vinogradov's integral and bounds for the Riemann zeta function | journal = Proc. London Math. Soc. | volume = 85 | issue = 3| pages = 565–633 | doi = 10.1112/S0024611502013655 | arxiv = 1910.08209 | s2cid = 121144007 }}</ref>) the zero-free region | ||
:<math>\sigma \ge 1 - \frac{1}{53.989(\log|t|)^{2/3}(\log\log|t|)^{1/3}}</math> and <math>|t| \ge 3</math>. | : <math>\sigma \ge 1 - \frac{1}{53.989(\log|t|)^{2/3}(\log\log|t|)^{1/3}}</math> and <math>|t| \ge 3</math>. | ||
This is the largest known zero-free region for fixed | This is the largest known zero-free region for fixed {{math|{{abs|''t''}} ≥ exp(4.8⋅10<sup>5</sup>)}}. Bellotti also showed that for sufficiently large {{math|{{abs|''t''}}}}, the following better result is known: {{math|''ζ''(''σ'' + ''it'') ≠ 0}} for | ||
:<math>\sigma \geq 1 - \frac{1}{48.0718(\log|t|)^{2/3}(\log\log|t|)^{1/3}}.</math> | : <math>\sigma \geq 1 - \frac{1}{48.0718(\log|t|)^{2/3}(\log\log|t|)^{1/3}}.</math> | ||
The strongest result of this kind one can hope for is the truth of the Riemann hypothesis, which would have many profound [[Riemann hypothesis#Consequences|consequences]] in the theory of numbers. | The strongest result of this kind one can hope for is the truth of the Riemann hypothesis, which would have many profound [[Riemann hypothesis#Consequences|consequences]] in the theory of numbers. | ||
=== Other results === | === Other results === | ||
It is known that there are infinitely many zeros on the critical line. [[John Edensor Littlewood|Littlewood]] showed that if the sequence ({{math|''γ<sub>n</sub>''}}) contains the imaginary parts of all zeros in the [[upper half-plane]] in ascending order, then | It is known that there are infinitely many zeros on the critical line. [[John Edensor Littlewood|Littlewood]] showed that if the sequence ({{math|''γ<sub>n</sub>''}}) contains the imaginary parts of all zeros in the [[upper half-plane]] in ascending order, then | ||
: <math>\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left(\gamma_{n+1}-\gamma_n\right)=0.</math> | |||
The [[critical line theorem]] asserts that a positive proportion of the nontrivial zeros lies on the critical line. (The Riemann hypothesis would imply that this proportion is {{math|1}}.) | |||
The | In the critical strip, the zero with smallest non-negative imaginary part is {{math|1/2 + 14.13472514... ''i''}} ({{OEIS2C|A058303}}). The fact that, for all complex {{math|''s'' ≠ 1}}, | ||
: <math>\zeta(s)=\overline{\zeta(\overline{s})}</math> | |||
implies that the zeros of the Riemann zeta function are symmetric about the real axis. Combining this symmetry with the functional equation, furthermore, one sees that the non-trivial zeros are symmetric about the critical line {{math|1=Re(''s'') = 1/2}}. | |||
It is also known that no zeros lie on the line with real part {{math|1}}. | |||
A large class of modified zeta functions exists that share the same non-trivial zeros as the Riemann zeta function, where modification means replacing the prime numbers in the Euler product by real numbers, which was shown in a [[Grosswald–Schnitzer theorem|result by Grosswald and Schnitzer]]. | |||
==Specific values== | == Specific values == | ||
{{main|Particular values of the Riemann zeta function}} | {{main|Particular values of the Riemann zeta function}} | ||
For any positive even integer {{math|2''n''}}, | For any positive even integer {{math|2''n''}}, | ||
<math display="block"> \zeta(2n) = \frac{|{B_{2n}}|(2\pi)^{2n}}{2(2n)!},</math> | <math display="block"> \zeta(2n) = \frac{|{B_{2n}}|(2\pi)^{2n}}{2(2n)!},</math> | ||
where {{math|''B''<sub>2''n''</sub>}} is the {{math|2''n''}} | where {{math|''B''<sub>2''n''</sub>}} is the {{math|(2''n'')}}th [[Bernoulli number]]. | ||
For odd positive integers, no such simple expression is known, although these values are thought to be related to the algebraic {{ | For odd positive integers, no such simple expression is known, although these values are thought to be related to the algebraic {{math|''K''}}-theory of the integers; see [[Special values of L-functions|Special values of {{math|''L''}}-functions]]. | ||
For nonpositive integers, one has | For nonpositive integers, one has | ||
<math display="block">\zeta(-n)= -\frac{B_{n+1}}{n+1}</math> | <math display="block">\zeta(-n)= -\frac{B_{n+1}}{n+1}</math> | ||
for {{math|''n'' ≥ 0}} (using the convention that {{math|''B''<sub>1</sub> {{=}} | for {{math|''n'' ≥ 0}} (using the convention that {{math|''B''<sub>1</sub> {{=}} 1/2}}). | ||
In particular, {{ | In particular, {{math|''ζ''}} vanishes at the negative even integers because {{math|''B''<sub>''m''</sub> {{=}} 0}} for all odd {{math|''m''}} other than {{math|1}}. These are the so-called "trivial zeros" of the zeta function. | ||
Via [[analytic continuation]], one can show that | Via [[analytic continuation]], one can show that | ||
<math display="block">\zeta(-1) = -\tfrac{1}{12}</math> | <math display="block">\zeta(-1) = -\tfrac{1}{12}</math> | ||
This gives a pretext for assigning a finite value to the divergent series [[1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ⋯]], which has been used in certain contexts ([[Ramanujan summation]]) such as [[string theory]].<ref name='polchinski'>{{cite book |last=Polchinski |first=Joseph |author-link=Joseph Polchinski |series=String Theory |volume=I |title=An Introduction to the Bosonic String |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1998 |page=22 |isbn=978-0-521-63303-1}}</ref> Analogously, the particular value | This gives a pretext for assigning a finite value to the divergent series {{math|[[1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ⋯]]}}, which has been used in certain contexts ([[Ramanujan summation]]) such as [[string theory]].<ref name='polchinski'>{{cite book |last=Polchinski |first=Joseph |author-link=Joseph Polchinski |series=String Theory |volume=I |title=An Introduction to the Bosonic String |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1998 |page=22 |isbn=978-0-521-63303-1}}</ref> Analogously, the particular value | ||
<math display="block">\zeta(0) = -\tfrac{1}{2}</math> | <math display="block">\zeta(0) = -\tfrac{1}{2}</math> | ||
can be viewed as assigning a finite result to the divergent series [[1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + ⋯]]. | can be viewed as assigning a finite result to the divergent series {{math|[[1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + ⋯]]}}. | ||
The value | The value | ||
| Line 275: | Line 265: | ||
diverges, its [[Cauchy principal value]] | diverges, its [[Cauchy principal value]] | ||
<math display="block"> \lim_{\varepsilon \to 0} \frac{\zeta(1+\varepsilon)+\zeta(1-\varepsilon)}{2}</math> | <math display="block"> \lim_{\varepsilon \to 0} \frac{\zeta(1+\varepsilon)+\zeta(1-\varepsilon)}{2}</math> | ||
exists and is equal to the [[Euler–Mascheroni constant]] {{math|''γ'' | exists and is equal to the [[Euler–Mascheroni constant]] {{math|1=''γ'' = 0.5772...}}.<ref name=Sondow1998>{{cite journal |last1=Sondow |first1=Jonathan |date=1998 |title=An antisymmetric formula for Euler's constant |journal=Mathematics Magazine |volume=71 |issue=3 |pages=219–220 |doi=10.1080/0025570X.1998.11996638 |access-date=2006-05-29 |url=http://home.earthlink.net/~jsondow/id8.html |archive-date=2011-06-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110604123534/http://home.earthlink.net/~jsondow/id8.html}}</ref> | ||
The demonstration of the particular value | The demonstration of the particular value | ||
<math display="block">\zeta(2) = 1 + \frac{1}{2^2} + \frac{1}{3^2} + \cdots = \frac{\pi^2}{6}</math> | <math display="block">\zeta(2) = 1 + \frac{1}{2^2} + \frac{1}{3^2} + \cdots = \frac{\pi^2}{6}</math> | ||
is known as the [[Basel problem]]. The reciprocal of this sum answers the question: | is known as the [[Basel problem]]. The reciprocal of this sum answers the question: 'What is the probability that two numbers selected from a uniform distribution from {{math|1}} to {{math|''n''}}] are [[coprime]] as {{math|''n'' → ∞}}?'<ref>{{cite book|author-link=C. Stanley Ogilvy|first1=C. S. |last1=Ogilvy |first2=J. T. |last2=Anderson |title=Excursions in Number Theory |pages=29–35 |publisher=Dover Publications |date=1988 |isbn=0-486-25778-9}}</ref> | ||
The value | The value | ||
<math display="block">\zeta(3) = 1 + \frac{1}{2^3} + \frac{1}{3^3} + \cdots = 1.202056903159594285399...</math> | <math display="block">\zeta(3) = 1 + \frac{1}{2^3} + \frac{1}{3^3} + \cdots = 1.202056903159594285399...</math> | ||
is [[Apéry's constant]]. | is [[Apéry's constant]]. | ||
Taking the limit | Taking the limit {{math|''s'' → +∞}} through the real numbers, one obtains {{math|1=''ζ''(+∞) = 1}}. But at [[complex infinity]] on the [[Riemann sphere]] the zeta function has an [[essential singularity]].<ref name=":0">{{cite journal |last1=Steuding |first1=Jörn |last2=Suriajaya |first2=Ade Irma |date=2020-11-01 |title=Value-Distribution of the Riemann Zeta-Function Along Its Julia Lines |journal=Computational Methods and Function Theory |language=en |volume=20 |issue=3 |pages=389–401 |doi=10.1007/s40315-020-00316-x|s2cid=216323223 |issn=2195-3724|quote=Theorem 2 implies that ''ζ'' has an essential singularity at infinity |doi-access=free |hdl=2324/4483207 |hdl-access=free |arxiv=2007.14661 }}</ref> | ||
==Various properties== | == Various properties == | ||
For sums involving the zeta function at integer and [[half-integer]] values, see [[rational zeta series]]. | For sums involving the zeta function at integer and [[half-integer]] values, see [[rational zeta series]]. | ||
===Reciprocal=== | === Reciprocal === | ||
The reciprocal of the zeta function may be expressed as a [[Dirichlet series]] over the [[Möbius function]] {{math|''μ''(''n'')}}: | The reciprocal of the zeta function may be expressed as a [[Dirichlet series]] over the [[Möbius function]] {{math|''μ''(''n'')}}: | ||
:<math>\frac{1}{\zeta(s)} = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{\mu(n)}{n^s}</math> | : <math>\frac{1}{\zeta(s)} = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{\mu(n)}{n^s}</math> | ||
for every complex number {{ | for every complex number {{math|''s''}} with real part greater than {{math|1}}. There are a number of similar relations involving various well-known [[multiplicative function]]s; these are given in the article on the [[Dirichlet series]]. | ||
<!--The paragraph below needs to be explained better; we need a section on RH equivalents. --> | <!--The paragraph below needs to be explained better; we need a section on RH equivalents. --> | ||
The Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to the claim that this expression is valid when the real part of {{ | The Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to the claim that this expression is valid when the real part of {{math|''s''}} is greater than {{math|1/2}}. | ||
===Universality=== | === Universality === | ||
The critical strip of the Riemann zeta function has the remarkable property of '''universality'''. This [[zeta function universality]] states that there exists some location on the critical strip that approximates any [[holomorphic function]] arbitrarily well. Since holomorphic functions are very general, this property is quite remarkable. The first proof of universality was provided by Sergei Mikhailovitch Voronin in 1975.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Voronin|first=S. M.|date=1975|title=Theorem on the Universality of the Riemann Zeta Function|journal=Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Matem.|volume=39|pages=475–486}} Reprinted in ''Math. USSR Izv.'' (1975) '''9''': 443–445.</ref> More recent work has included [[Zeta function universality#Effective universality|effective]] versions of Voronin's theorem<ref>{{ cite journal |author1=Ramūnas Garunkštis |author2=Antanas Laurinčikas |author3=Kohji Matsumoto | The critical strip of the Riemann zeta function has the remarkable property of '''universality'''. This [[zeta function universality]] states that there exists some location on the critical strip that approximates any [[holomorphic function]] arbitrarily well. Since holomorphic functions are very general, this property is quite remarkable. The first proof of universality was provided by [[Sergei Mikhailovitch Voronin]] in 1975.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Voronin |first=S. M. |date=1975 |title=Theorem on the Universality of the Riemann Zeta Function |journal=Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Matem. |volume=39 |pages=475–486 }} Reprinted in ''Math. USSR Izv.'' (1975) '''9''': 443–445.</ref> More recent work has included [[Zeta function universality#Effective universality|effective]] versions of Voronin's theorem<ref>{{cite journal |author1=Ramūnas Garunkštis |author2=Antanas Laurinčikas |author3=Kohji Matsumoto |author4=Jörn Steuding |author5=Rasa Steuding |title=Effective uniform approximation by the Riemann zeta-function |journal=Publicacions Matemàtiques |date=2010 |volume=54 |issue=1 |pages=209–219 |doi=10.5565/PUBLMAT_54110_12 |jstor=43736941 |url=http://ddd.uab.cat/record/52304 }}</ref> and [[Zeta function universality#Universality of other zeta functions|extending]] it to [[Dirichlet L-function|Dirichlet {{math|''L''}}-function]]s.<ref>{{ cite journal |author=Bhaskar Bagchi |title=A Joint Universality Theorem for Dirichlet L-Functions |journal=Mathematische Zeitschrift |issn=0025-5874 |volume=181 |issue=3 |date=1982 |pages=319–334 |doi=10.1007/bf01161980 |s2cid=120930513 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Steuding |first=Jörn |date=2007 |title=Value-Distribution of L-Functions |volume=1877 |location=Berlin |publisher=Springer |page=19 |isbn=978-3-540-26526-9 |series=Lecture Notes in Mathematics |doi=10.1007/978-3-540-44822-8 |arxiv=1711.06671 }}</ref> | ||
|volume=1877 |location=Berlin |publisher=Springer |page=19 |isbn=978-3-540-26526-9 |series=Lecture Notes in Mathematics | |||
=== Estimates of the maximum of the modulus of the zeta function === | |||
Let the functions {{math|''F''(''T''; ''H'')}} and {{math|''G''(''s''<sub>0</sub>; Δ)}} be defined by the equalities | |||
: <math> F(T;H) = \max_{|t-T|\le H}\left|\zeta\left(\tfrac{1}{2}+it\right)\right|,\qquad G(s_{0};\Delta) = \max_{|s-s_{0}|\le\Delta}|\zeta(s)|. </math> | : <math> F(T;H) = \max_{|t-T|\le H}\left|\zeta\left(\tfrac{1}{2}+it\right)\right|,\qquad G(s_{0};\Delta) = \max_{|s-s_{0}|\le\Delta}|\zeta(s)|. </math> | ||
Here {{ | Here {{math|''T''}} is a sufficiently large positive number, {{math|0 < ''H'' ≪ log log ''T''}}, {{math|1=''s''<sub>0</sub> = ''σ''<sub>0</sub> + ''iT''}}, {{math|1/2 ≤ ''σ''<sub>0</sub> ≤ 1}}, {{math|0 < Δ < 1/3}}. Estimating the values {{math|''F''}} and {{math|''G''}} from below shows, how large (in modulus) values {{math|''ζ''(''s'')}} can take on short intervals of the critical line or in small neighborhoods of points lying in the critical strip {{math|0 ≤ Re(''s'') ≤ 1}}. | ||
The case {{math|''H'' ≫ log log ''T''}} was studied by [[Kanakanahalli Ramachandra]]; the case {{math|Δ > ''c''}}, where {{math|''c''}} is a sufficiently large constant, is trivial. | The case {{math|''H'' ≫ log log ''T''}} was studied by [[Kanakanahalli Ramachandra]]; the case {{math|Δ > ''c''}}, where {{math|''c''}} is a sufficiently large constant, is trivial. | ||
[[Anatolii Alexeevitch Karatsuba|Anatolii Karatsuba]] proved,<ref>{{cite journal| first=A. A.| last=Karatsuba| title= Lower bounds for the maximum modulus of | [[Anatolii Alexeevitch Karatsuba|Anatolii Karatsuba]] proved,<ref>{{cite journal| first=A. A.| last=Karatsuba| title=Lower bounds for the maximum modulus of ''ζ''(''s'') in small domains of the critical strip | pages=796–798| journal= Mat. Zametki| volume=70|issue=5| year=2001}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal| first=A. A.| last=Karatsuba| title= Lower bounds for the maximum modulus of the Riemann zeta function on short segments of the critical line| pages=99–104| journal= Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Mat.| volume=68|issue=8| year=2004| doi=10.1070/IM2004v068n06ABEH000513| bibcode=2004IzMat..68.1157K| s2cid=250796539}}</ref> in particular, that if the values {{math|''H''}} and {{math|Δ}} exceed certain sufficiently small constants, then the estimates | ||
: <math> F(T;H) \ge T^{- c_1},\qquad G(s_0; \Delta) \ge T^{-c_2}, </math> | : <math> F(T;H) \ge T^{- c_1},\qquad G(s_0; \Delta) \ge T^{-c_2}, </math> | ||
hold, where {{math|''c''<sub>1</sub>}} and {{math|''c''<sub>2</sub>}} are certain absolute constants. | hold, where {{math|''c''<sub>1</sub>}} and {{math|''c''<sub>2</sub>}} are certain absolute constants. | ||
=== | === Argument of the Riemann zeta function === | ||
The function | The function | ||
:<math>S(t) = \frac{1}{\pi}\arg{\zeta\left(\tfrac12+it\right)}</math> | : <math>S(t) = \frac{1}{\pi}\arg{\zeta\left(\tfrac12+it\right)}</math> | ||
is called the [[complex argument|argument]] of the Riemann zeta function. Here {{math|arg ''ζ''( | is called the [[complex argument|argument]] of the Riemann zeta function. Here {{math|arg ''ζ''(1/2 + ''it'')}} is the increment of an arbitrary continuous branch of {{math|arg ''ζ''(''s'')}} along the broken line joining the points {{math|2}}, {{math|2 + ''it''}} and {{math|1/2 + ''it''}}. | ||
There are some theorems on properties of the function {{math|''S''(''t'')}}. Among those results<ref>{{cite journal |first=A. A. |last=Karatsuba |title=Density theorem and the behavior of the argument of the Riemann zeta function |pages=448–449 |journal=Mat. Zametki |issue=60 |year=1996}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |first=A. A. |last=Karatsuba |title=On the function | There are some theorems on properties of the function {{math|''S''(''t'')}}. Among those results<ref>{{cite journal |first=A. A. |last=Karatsuba |title=Density theorem and the behavior of the argument of the Riemann zeta function |pages=448–449 |journal=Mat. Zametki |issue=60 |year=1996}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |first=A. A. |last=Karatsuba |title=On the function ''S''(''t'') | pages=27–56| journal= Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Mat. |volume=60 |issue=5 |year=1996}}</ref> are the [[Mean value theorems for definite integrals|mean value theorems]] for {{math|''S''(''t'')}} and its first integral | ||
:<math>S_1(t) = \int_0^t S(u) \, \mathrm{d}u</math> | : <math>S_1(t) = \int_0^t S(u) \, \mathrm{d}u</math> | ||
on intervals of the real line, and also the theorem claiming that every interval {{math|(''T'', ''T'' + ''H'']}} for | on intervals of the real line, and also the theorem claiming that every interval {{math|(''T'', ''T'' + ''H'']}} for | ||
:<math>H \ge T^{\frac{27}{82}+\varepsilon}</math> | : <math>H \ge T^{\frac{27}{82}+\varepsilon}</math> | ||
contains at least | contains at least | ||
: <math> H\sqrt[3]{\ln T}e^{-c\sqrt{\ln\ln T}} </math> | : <math> H\sqrt[3]{\ln T}e^{-c\sqrt{\ln\ln T}} </math> | ||
points where the function {{math|''S''(''t'')}} changes sign. Earlier similar results were obtained by [[Atle Selberg]] for the case | points where the function {{math|''S''(''t'')}} changes sign. Earlier similar results were obtained by [[Atle Selberg]] for the case | ||
:<math>H\ge T^{\frac12+\varepsilon}.</math> | : <math>H\ge T^{\frac12+\varepsilon}.</math> | ||
==Representations== | == Representations == | ||
===Dirichlet series=== | === Dirichlet series === | ||
An extension of the area of convergence can be obtained by rearranging the original series.<ref name="Knopp">{{cite book|first=Konrad|last=Knopp|title=Theory of Functions, Part Two|url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.212186|date=1947|pages=[https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.212186/page/n57/mode/2up 51–55]|publisher=New York, Dover publications}}</ref> The series | An extension of the area of convergence can be obtained by rearranging the original series.<ref name="Knopp">{{cite book |first=Konrad |last=Knopp |title=Theory of Functions, Part Two |url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.212186 |date=1947 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.212186/page/n57/mode/2up 51–55] |publisher=New York, Dover publications }}</ref> The series | ||
:<math>\zeta(s)=\frac{1}{s-1}\sum_{n=1}^\infty \left(\frac{n}{(n+1)^s}-\frac{n-s}{n^s}\right)</math> | : <math>\zeta(s)=\frac{1}{s-1}\sum_{n=1}^\infty \left(\frac{n}{(n+1)^s}-\frac{n-s}{n^s}\right)</math> | ||
converges for {{math|Re(''s'') > 0}}, while | converges for {{math|Re(''s'') > 0}}, while | ||
:<math>\zeta(s) =\frac{1}{s-1}\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{n(n+1)}{2}\left(\frac{2n+3+s}{(n+1)^{s+2}}-\frac{2n-1-s}{n^{s+2}}\right)</math> | : <math>\zeta(s) =\frac{1}{s-1}\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{n(n+1)}{2}\left(\frac{2n+3+s}{(n+1)^{s+2}}-\frac{2n-1-s}{n^{s+2}}\right)</math> | ||
converge even for {{math|Re(''s'') > −1}}. In this way, the area of convergence can be extended to {{math|Re(''s'') > −''k''}} for any negative integer {{math|−''k''}}. | converge even for {{math|Re(''s'') > −1}}. In this way, the area of convergence can be extended to {{math|Re(''s'') > −''k''}} for any negative integer {{math|−''k''}}. | ||
The recurrence connection is clearly visible from the expression valid for {{math|Re(''s'') > −2}} enabling further expansion by integration by parts. | The recurrence connection is clearly visible from the expression valid for {{math|Re(''s'') > −2}} enabling further expansion by integration by parts. | ||
: <math>\begin{aligned} | |||
:<math>\begin{aligned} | |||
\zeta(s)= & 1+\frac{1}{s-1}-\frac{s}{2 !}[\zeta(s+1)-1] \\ | \zeta(s)= & 1+\frac{1}{s-1}-\frac{s}{2 !}[\zeta(s+1)-1] \\ | ||
- & \frac{s(s+1)}{3 !}[\zeta(s+2)-1] \\ | - & \frac{s(s+1)}{3 !}[\zeta(s+2)-1] \\ | ||
& -\frac{s(s+1)(s+2)}{3 !} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \int_0^1 \frac{t^3 d t}{(n+t)^{s+3}} | & -\frac{s(s+1)(s+2)}{3 !} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \int_0^1 \frac{t^3 d t}{(n+t)^{s+3}}. | ||
\end{aligned}</math> | \end{aligned}</math> | ||
This recurrence leads to this other series development that uses the [[Pochhammer symbol|rising factorial]] and is valid for the entire complex plane <ref name="Knopp" /> | |||
: <math>\zeta(s) = \frac{s}{s-1} - \sum_{n=1}^\infty \bigl(\zeta(s+n)-1\bigr)\frac{s(s+1)\cdots(s+n-1)}{(n+1)!}.</math> | |||
This can be used recursively to extend the Dirichlet series definition to all complex numbers. | |||
The Riemann zeta function also appears in a form similar to the Mellin transform in an integral over the [[Gauss–Kuzmin–Wirsing operator]] acting on {{math|''x''<sup>''s''−1</sup>}}; that context gives rise to a series expansion in terms of the [[falling factorial]].<ref>{{cite web |title=A series representation for the Riemann Zeta derived from the Gauss-Kuzmin-Wirsing Operator |url=http://linas.org/math/poch-zeta.pdf |access-date=2017-01-04 |website=Linas.org}}</ref> | |||
=== Mellin-type integrals === | |||
The [[Mellin transform]] of a function {{math|''f''(''x'')}} is defined as<ref>{{cite journal |last=Riemann |first=Bernhard |title=[[On the number of primes less than a given magnitude]] |year=1859 |journal=Monatsberichte der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin }} translated and reprinted in {{cite book |last=Edwards |first=H. M. |author-link=Harold Edwards (mathematician) |year=1974 |title=Riemann's Zeta Function |publisher=Academic Press |location=New York |isbn=0-12-232750-0 |zbl=0315.10035 }}</ref> | |||
: <math> \int_0^\infty f(x)x^s\, \frac{\mathrm{d}x}{x} </math> | |||
in the region where the integral is defined. There are various expressions for the zeta function as Mellin transform-like integrals. If the real part of {{math|''s''}} is greater than one, we have | |||
: <math>\Gamma(s)\zeta(s) =\int_0^\infty\frac{x^{s-1}}{e^x-1} \,\mathrm{d}x \quad</math> and <math>\quad\Gamma(s)\zeta(s) =\frac1{2s}\int_0^\infty\frac{x^{s}}{\cosh(x)-1} \,\mathrm{d}x ,</math> | |||
where {{math|Γ}} denotes the [[gamma function]]. By modifying the [[Contour integration|contour]], Riemann showed that | where {{math|Γ}} denotes the [[gamma function]]. By modifying the [[Contour integration|contour]], Riemann showed that | ||
: <math>2\sin(\pi s)\Gamma(s)\zeta(s) =i\oint_H \frac{(-x)^{s-1}}{e^x-1}\,\mathrm{d}x </math> | |||
:<math>2\sin(\pi s)\Gamma(s)\zeta(s) =i\oint_H \frac{(-x)^{s-1}}{e^x-1}\,\mathrm{d}x </math> | for all {{math|''s''}}<ref>Trivial exceptions of values of {{math|''s''}} that cause removable singularities are not taken into account throughout this article.</ref> (where {{math|''H''}} denotes the [[Hankel contour]]). | ||
for all {{ | |||
We can also find expressions which relate to prime numbers and the [[prime number theorem]]. If {{math|''π''(''x'')}} is the [[prime-counting function]], then | We can also find expressions which relate to prime numbers and the [[prime number theorem]]. If {{math|''π''(''x'')}} is the [[prime-counting function]], then | ||
: <math>\ln \zeta(s) = s \int_0^\infty \frac{\pi(x)}{x(x^s-1)}\,\mathrm{d}x,</math> | |||
:<math>\ln \zeta(s) = s \int_0^\infty \frac{\pi(x)}{x(x^s-1)}\,\mathrm{d}x,</math> | |||
for values with {{math|Re(''s'') > 1}}. | for values with {{math|Re(''s'') > 1}}. | ||
A similar Mellin transform involves the Riemann function {{math|''J''(''x'')}}, which counts prime powers {{math|''p''<sup>''n''</sup>}} with a weight of {{math | A similar Mellin transform involves the Riemann function {{math|''J''(''x'')}}, which counts prime powers {{math|''p''<sup>''n''</sup>}} with a weight of {{math|1/''n''}}, so that | ||
: <math>J(x) = \sum \frac{\pi\left(x^\frac{1}{n}\right)}{n}.</math> | : <math>J(x) = \sum \frac{\pi\left(x^\frac{1}{n}\right)}{n}.</math> | ||
Now | Now | ||
: <math>\ln \zeta(s) = s\int_0^\infty J(x)x^{-s-1}\,\mathrm{d}x. </math> | |||
:<math>\ln \zeta(s) = s\int_0^\infty J(x)x^{-s-1}\,\mathrm{d}x. </math> | |||
These expressions can be used to prove the prime number theorem by means of the inverse Mellin transform. Riemann's [[prime-counting function]] is easier to work with, and {{math|''π''(''x'')}} can be recovered from it by [[Möbius inversion formula|Möbius inversion]]. | These expressions can be used to prove the prime number theorem by means of the inverse Mellin transform. Riemann's [[prime-counting function]] is easier to work with, and {{math|''π''(''x'')}} can be recovered from it by [[Möbius inversion formula|Möbius inversion]]. | ||
===Theta functions=== | === Theta functions === | ||
The Riemann zeta function can be given by a Mellin transform<ref>{{ | The Riemann zeta function can be given by a Mellin transform<ref>{{cite book |first=Jürgen |last=Neukirch |title=Algebraic number theory |publisher=Springer |date=1999 |page=422 |isbn=3-540-65399-6}}</ref> | ||
: <math>2\pi^{-\frac{s}{2}}\Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}\right)\zeta(s) = \int_0^\infty \bigl(\theta(it)-1\bigr)t^{\frac{s}{2}-1}\,\mathrm{d}t,</math> | |||
:<math>2\pi^{-\frac{s}{2}}\Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}\right)\zeta(s) = \int_0^\infty \bigl(\theta(it)-1\bigr)t^{\frac{s}{2}-1}\,\mathrm{d}t,</math> | |||
in terms of [[Theta function|Jacobi's theta function]] | in terms of [[Theta function|Jacobi's theta function]] | ||
: <math>\theta(\tau)= \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty e^{\pi i n^2\tau}.</math> | |||
However, this integral only converges if the real part of {{math|''s''}} is greater than {{math|1}}, but it can be regularized. This gives the following expression for the zeta function, which is well defined for all {{math|''s''}} except {{math|0}} and {{math|1}}: | |||
: <math> \pi^{-\frac{s}{2}}\Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}\right)\zeta(s) = \frac{1}{s-1}-\frac{1}{s} +\frac{1}{2} \int_0^1 \left(\theta(it)-t^{-\frac12}\right)t^{\frac{s}{2}-1}\,\mathrm{d}t + \frac{1}{2}\int_1^\infty \bigl(\theta(it)-1\bigr)t^{\frac{s}{2}-1}\,\mathrm{d}t.</math> | |||
However, this integral only converges if the real part of {{ | |||
:<math> \pi^{-\frac{s}{2}}\Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}\right)\zeta(s) = \frac{1}{s-1}-\frac{1}{s} +\frac{1}{2} \int_0^1 \left(\theta(it)-t^{-\frac12}\right)t^{\frac{s}{2}-1}\,\mathrm{d}t + \frac{1}{2}\int_1^\infty \bigl(\theta(it)-1\bigr)t^{\frac{s}{2}-1}\,\mathrm{d}t.</math | |||
:<math>\zeta(s)=\frac{1}{s-1}+\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{\gamma_n}{n!}(1-s)^n.</math> | === Laurent series === | ||
The Riemann zeta function is [[meromorphic]] with a single [[pole (complex analysis)|pole]] of order one at {{math|''s'' {{=}} 1}}. It can therefore be expanded as a [[Laurent series]] about {{math|1=''s'' = 1}}; the series development is then<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Hashimoto | first1 = Yasufumi | last2 = Iijima | first2 = Yasuyuki | last3 = Kurokawa | first3 = Nobushige | last4 = Wakayama | first4 = Masato | doi = 10.36045/bbms/1102689119 | issue = 4 | journal = [[Simon Stevin (journal)|Bulletin of the Belgian Mathematical Society, Simon Stevin]] | mr = 2115723 | pages = 493–516 | title = Euler's constants for the Selberg and the Dedekind zeta functions | url = https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bbms/1102689119 | volume = 11 | year = 2004| doi-access = free | url-access = subscription }}</ref> | |||
: <math>\zeta(s)=\frac{1}{s-1}+\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{\gamma_n}{n!}(1-s)^n.</math> | |||
The constants {{math|''γ''<sub>''n''</sub>}} here are called the [[Stieltjes constants]] and can be defined by the [[limit of a sequence|limit]] | The constants {{math|''γ''<sub>''n''</sub>}} here are called the [[Stieltjes constants]] and can be defined by the [[limit of a sequence|limit]] | ||
: <math> \gamma_n = \lim_{m \rightarrow \infty}{\left(\left(\sum_{k = 1}^m \frac{(\ln k)^n}{k}\right) - \frac{(\ln m)^{n+1}}{n+1}\right)}.</math> | : <math> \gamma_n = \lim_{m \rightarrow \infty}{\left(\left(\sum_{k = 1}^m \frac{(\ln k)^n}{k}\right) - \frac{(\ln m)^{n+1}}{n+1}\right)}.</math> | ||
| Line 407: | Line 378: | ||
=== Integral === | === Integral === | ||
For all {{math|''s'' ∈ | For all {{math|''s'' ∈ <math>\C</math>}}, {{math|''s'' ≠ 1}}, the integral relation (cf. [[Abel–Plana formula]]) | ||
:<math> | : <math>\zeta(s) = \frac{ 1 }{s - 1} + \frac{1}{2} + 2 \int_0^{\infty} \frac{\sin(s\arctan t) }{ \left(1 + t^2 \right)^{s/2} \left(e^{2\pi t} - 1\right)\ }\ \operatorname{d}t </math> | ||
holds true, which may be used for a numerical evaluation of the zeta function. | holds true, which may be used for a numerical evaluation of the zeta function. | ||
=== Hadamard product === | |||
===Hadamard product=== | |||
On the basis of [[Weierstrass factorization theorem|Weierstrass's factorization theorem]], [[Hadamard]] gave the [[infinite product]] expansion | On the basis of [[Weierstrass factorization theorem|Weierstrass's factorization theorem]], [[Hadamard]] gave the [[infinite product]] expansion | ||
: <math>\zeta(s) = \frac{e^{\left(\log(2\pi)-1-\frac{\gamma}{2}\right)s}}{2(s-1)\Gamma\left(1+\frac{s}{2}\right)} \prod_\rho \left(1 - \frac{s}{\rho} \right) e^\frac{s}{\rho},</math> | |||
where the product is over the non-trivial zeros {{math|''ρ''}} of {{math|''ζ''}} and the letter {{math|''γ''}} again denotes the [[Euler–Mascheroni constant]]. A simpler [[infinite product]] expansion is | |||
: <math>\zeta(s) = \pi^\frac{s}{2} \frac{\prod_\rho \left(1 - \frac{s}{\rho} \right)}{2(s-1)\Gamma\left(1+\frac{s}{2}\right)}.</math> | |||
This form clearly displays the simple pole at {{math|1=''s'' = 1}}, the trivial zeros at {{math|−2, −4, }}... due to the gamma function term in the denominator, and the non-trivial zeros at {{math|1=''s'' = ''ρ''}}. (To ensure convergence in the latter formula, the product should be taken over "matching pairs" of zeros, i.e. the factors for a pair of zeros of the form {{math|''ρ''}} and {{math|1 − ''ρ''}} should be combined.) | |||
This form clearly displays the simple pole at {{math|''s'' | |||
:<math>\zeta(s)=\frac{1}{1-2^{1-s}} \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac {1}{2^{n+1}} \sum_{k=0}^n \binom{n}{k} \frac{(-1)^k}{(k+1)^{s}}.</math> | === Globally convergent series === | ||
A globally convergent series for the zeta function, valid for all complex numbers {{math|''s''}} except {{math|1=''s'' = 1 + {{sfrac|2π''i''|ln 2}}''n''}} for some integer {{math|''n''}}, was conjectured by [[Konrad Knopp]] in 1926 <ref name="blag2018" /> and proven by [[Helmut Hasse]] in 1930<ref name = Hasse1930 /> (cf. [[Euler summation]]): | |||
: <math>\zeta(s)=\frac{1}{1-2^{1-s}} \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac {1}{2^{n+1}} \sum_{k=0}^n \binom{n}{k} \frac{(-1)^k}{(k+1)^{s}}.</math> | |||
The series appeared in an appendix to Hasse's paper, and was published for the second time by Jonathan Sondow in 1994.<ref>{{cite journal|first = Jonathan|last = Sondow|title = Analytic continuation of Riemann's zeta function and values at negative integers via Euler's transformation of series|journal = [[Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society]]|year = 1994|volume = 120|issue = 2|pages = 421–424|url = https://www.ams.org/journals/proc/1994-120-02/S0002-9939-1994-1172954-7/S0002-9939-1994-1172954-7.pdf|doi = 10.1090/S0002-9939-1994-1172954-7|doi-access = free}}</ref> | The series appeared in an appendix to Hasse's paper, and was published for the second time by Jonathan Sondow in 1994.<ref>{{cite journal |first = Jonathan |last = Sondow |title = Analytic continuation of Riemann's zeta function and values at negative integers via Euler's transformation of series |journal = [[Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society]] |year = 1994 |volume = 120 |issue = 2 |pages = 421–424 |url = https://www.ams.org/journals/proc/1994-120-02/S0002-9939-1994-1172954-7/S0002-9939-1994-1172954-7.pdf |doi = 10.1090/S0002-9939-1994-1172954-7 |doi-access = free }}</ref> | ||
Hasse also proved the globally converging series | Hasse also proved the globally converging series | ||
:<math>\zeta(s)=\frac 1{s-1}\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac 1{n+1}\sum_{k=0}^n\binom {n}{k}\frac{(-1)^k}{(k+1)^{s-1}}</math> | : <math>\zeta(s)=\frac 1{s-1}\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac 1{n+1}\sum_{k=0}^n\binom {n}{k}\frac{(-1)^k}{(k+1)^{s-1}}</math> | ||
in the same publication.<ref name = Hasse1930 /> Research by Iaroslav Blagouchine<ref>{{cite journal | in the same publication.<ref name = Hasse1930 /> Research by Iaroslav Blagouchine<ref> | ||
{{cite journal | |||
| last = Blagouchine | first = Iaroslav V. | | last = Blagouchine | first = Iaroslav V. | ||
| arxiv = 1501.00740 | | arxiv = 1501.00740 | ||
| Line 448: | Line 407: | ||
| title = Expansions of generalized Euler's constants into the series of polynomials in {{pi}}<sup>−2</sup> and into the formal enveloping series with rational coefficients only | | title = Expansions of generalized Euler's constants into the series of polynomials in {{pi}}<sup>−2</sup> and into the formal enveloping series with rational coefficients only | ||
| volume = 158 | | volume = 158 | ||
| year = 2016}}</ref><ref name="blag2018">{{cite journal | | year = 2016}}</ref><ref name="blag2018"> | ||
{{cite journal | |||
| last = Blagouchine | first = Iaroslav V. | | last = Blagouchine | first = Iaroslav V. | ||
| arxiv = 1606.02044 | | arxiv = 1606.02044 | ||
| Line 458: | Line 418: | ||
| year = 2018| doi = 10.5281/zenodo.10581385 | | year = 2018| doi = 10.5281/zenodo.10581385 | ||
| bibcode = 2016arXiv160602044B}}</ref> | | bibcode = 2016arXiv160602044B}}</ref> | ||
has found that a similar, equivalent series was published by [[Joseph Ser]] in 1926.<ref>{{cite journal|first = Joseph|last = Ser|author-link = Joseph Ser|title = Sur une expression de la fonction ζ(s) de Riemann|trans-title = Upon an expression for Riemann's ζ function|year = 1926|journal = [[Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l'Académie des Sciences]]|volume = 182|pages = 1075–1077|language = fr}}</ref> | has found that a similar, equivalent series was published by [[Joseph Ser]] in 1926.<ref>{{cite journal|first = Joseph|last = Ser|author-link = Joseph Ser|title = Sur une expression de la fonction ''ζ''(''s'') de Riemann|trans-title = Upon an expression for Riemann's ''ζ'' function|year = 1926|journal = [[Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l'Académie des Sciences]]|volume = 182|pages = 1075–1077|language = fr}}</ref> | ||
:<math>\zeta (s)=\frac{1}{s-1}\sum_{k=0}^\infty \biggl(\prod_{i=1}^{k} (i-\frac{s}{2})\biggl) \frac{A_{k}}{k!}= | In 1997 K. Maślanka gave another globally convergent (except {{math|1=''s'' = 1}}) series for the Riemann zeta function: | ||
: <math>\zeta (s)=\frac{1}{s-1}\sum_{k=0}^\infty \biggl(\prod_{i=1}^{k} (i-\frac{s}{2})\biggl) \frac{A_{k}}{k!}= | |||
\frac{1}{s-1} \sum_{k=0}^\infty \biggl(1-\frac{s}{2}\biggl)_{k} | \frac{1}{s-1} \sum_{k=0}^\infty \biggl(1-\frac{s}{2}\biggl)_{k} | ||
\frac{A_{k}}{k!}</math> | \frac{A_{k}}{k!}</math> | ||
where real coefficients <math>A_k</math> are given by: | where real coefficients <math>A_k</math> are given by: | ||
: <math>A_k=\sum_{j=0}^{k}(-1)^{j}\binom{k}{j}(2j+1)\zeta | |||
:<math>A_k=\sum_{j=0}^{k}(-1)^{j}\binom{k}{j}(2j+1)\zeta | |||
(2j+2)=\sum_{j=0}^{k}\binom{k}{j}\frac{B_{2j+2}\pi ^{2j+2}}{\left(2\right) _{j}\left( \frac{1}{2}\right) _{j}} </math> | (2j+2)=\sum_{j=0}^{k}\binom{k}{j}\frac{B_{2j+2}\pi ^{2j+2}}{\left(2\right) _{j}\left( \frac{1}{2}\right) _{j}} </math> | ||
Here < | Here {{math|''B''<sub>''n''</sub>}} are the Bernoulli numbers and {{math|(''x'')<sub>''k''</sub>}} denotes the Pochhammer symbol.<ref>{{cite journal | ||
|first = Krzysztof | |first = Krzysztof |last = Maślanka | ||
|title = The Beauty of Nothingness | |title = The Beauty of Nothingness | ||
|year = 1997 | |year = 1997 | ||
|journal = Acta Cosmologica | |journal = Acta Cosmologica | ||
|volume = XXIII-I | |volume = XXIII-I | ||
|pages = 13–17}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | |pages = 13–17}}</ref><ref> | ||
|first = Luis | {{cite journal | ||
|first = Luis |last = Báez-Duarte | |||
|title = On Maslanka's Representation for the Riemann Zeta Function | |title = On Maslanka's Representation for the Riemann Zeta Function | ||
|year = 2010 | |year = 2010 | ||
| Line 486: | Line 442: | ||
|volume = 2010 | |volume = 2010 | ||
|pages = 1–9 | |pages = 1–9 | ||
|doi = 10.1155/2010/714147 | |doi = 10.1155/2010/714147 | ||
|doi-access = free | |doi-access = free | ||
|arxiv = math/0307214 | |arxiv = math/0307214 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
Note that this representation of the zeta function is essentially an interpolation with nodes, where the nodes are points | Note that this representation of the zeta function is essentially an interpolation with nodes, where the nodes are points {{math|1=''s'' = 2, 4, 6, ...}}, i.e. exactly those where the zeta values are precisely known, as Euler showed. An elegant and very short proof of this representation of the zeta function, based on [[Carlson's theorem]], was presented by Philippe Flajolet in 2006.<ref>{{cite journal | ||
|first1 = Philippe | |first1 = Philippe |last1 = Flajolet | ||
|first2 = Linas |last2 = Vepstas | |||
|first2 = Linas | |||
|title = On Differences of Zeta Values | |title = On Differences of Zeta Values | ||
|year = 2008 | |year = 2008 | ||
| Line 503: | Line 457: | ||
|pages = 58–73 | |pages = 58–73 | ||
|doi = 10.1016/j.cam.2007.07.040 | |doi = 10.1016/j.cam.2007.07.040 | ||
|arxiv = math/0611332|bibcode = 2008JCoAM.220...58F | |arxiv = math/0611332 |bibcode = 2008JCoAM.220...58F | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
The asymptotic behavior of the coefficients <math>A_{k}</math> is rather curious: for growing <math>k</math> values, we observe regular oscillations with a nearly exponentially decreasing amplitude and slowly decreasing frequency (roughly as <math>k^{-2/3}</math>). Using the saddle point method, we can show that | The asymptotic behavior of the coefficients <math>A_{k}</math> is rather curious: for growing <math>k</math> values, we observe regular oscillations with a nearly exponentially decreasing amplitude and slowly decreasing frequency (roughly as <math>k^{-2/3}</math>). Using the saddle point method, we can show that | ||
: <math>A_{k}\sim \frac{4\pi ^{3/2}}{\sqrt{3\kappa }}\exp \biggl( -\frac{3\kappa }{2}+\frac{\pi ^{2}}{4\kappa }\biggl) \cos \biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3}-\frac{3\sqrt{3} | |||
:<math>A_{k}\sim \frac{4\pi ^{3/2}}{\sqrt{3\kappa }}\exp \biggl( -\frac{3\kappa }{2}+\frac{\pi ^{2}}{4\kappa }\biggl) \cos \biggl( \frac{4\pi }{3}-\frac{3\sqrt{3} | |||
\kappa }{2}+\frac{\sqrt{3}\pi ^{2}}{4\kappa }\biggl)</math> | \kappa }{2}+\frac{\sqrt{3}\pi ^{2}}{4\kappa }\biggl)</math> | ||
where <math>\kappa</math> stands for: | where <math>\kappa</math> stands for: | ||
: <math>\kappa :=\sqrt[3]{\pi ^{2}k} </math> | |||
:<math>\kappa :=\sqrt[3]{\pi ^{2}k} </math> | |||
(see <ref>{{cite journal | (see <ref>{{cite journal | ||
|first1 = Krzysztof | |first1 = Krzysztof |last1 = Maślanka | ||
|first2 = Andrzej |last2 = Koleżyński | |||
|first2 = Andrzej | |||
|title = The High Precision Numerical Calculation of Stieltjes Constants. Simple and Fast Algorithm | |title = The High Precision Numerical Calculation of Stieltjes Constants. Simple and Fast Algorithm | ||
|journal = Computational Methods in Science and Technology | |journal = Computational Methods in Science and Technology | ||
| Line 526: | Line 474: | ||
|issue = 2 | |issue = 2 | ||
|pages = 47–59 | |pages = 47–59 | ||
|doi = 10.12921/cmst.2022.0000014 | |doi = 10.12921/cmst.2022.0000014 | ||
|arxiv = 2210.04609 | |arxiv = 2210.04609 | ||
|s2cid = 252780397 | |s2cid = 252780397 | ||
| Line 532: | Line 480: | ||
On the basis of this representation, in 2003 Luis Báez-Duarte provided a new criterion for the Riemann hypothesis.<ref>{{cite journal | On the basis of this representation, in 2003 Luis Báez-Duarte provided a new criterion for the Riemann hypothesis.<ref>{{cite journal | ||
|first = Luis | |first = Luis |last = Báez-Duarte | ||
|title = A New Necessary and Sufficient Condition for the Riemann Hypothesis | |title = A New Necessary and Sufficient Condition for the Riemann Hypothesis | ||
|journal = Number Theory | |journal = Number Theory | ||
|arxiv = math/0307215 | |arxiv = math/0307215 | ||
|year = 2003 | |year = 2003 | ||
|bibcode = 2003math......7215B | |bibcode = 2003math......7215B | ||
}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | }}</ref><ref> | ||
|first = Krzysztof | {{cite journal | ||
|first = Krzysztof |last = Maślanka | |||
|title = Báez-Duarte's Criterion for the Riemann Hypothesis and Rice's Integrals | |title = Báez-Duarte's Criterion for the Riemann Hypothesis and Rice's Integrals | ||
|journal = Number Theory | |journal = Number Theory | ||
|arxiv = math/0603713v2 | |arxiv = math/0603713v2 | ||
|year = 2006 | |year = 2006 | ||
|bibcode = 2006math......3713M | |bibcode = 2006math......3713M | ||
}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | }}</ref><ref> | ||
|first = Marek | {{cite journal | ||
|first = Marek |last = Wolf | |||
|title = Some remarks on the Báez-Duarte criterion for the Riemann Hypothesis | |title = Some remarks on the Báez-Duarte criterion for the Riemann Hypothesis | ||
|journal = Computational Methods in Science and Technology | |journal = Computational Methods in Science and Technology | ||
| Line 556: | Line 503: | ||
|issue = 2 | |issue = 2 | ||
|pages = 39–47 | |pages = 39–47 | ||
|doi = 10.12921/cmst.2014.20.02.39-47 | |doi = 10.12921/cmst.2014.20.02.39-47 |doi-access = free | ||
}}</ref> Namely, if we define the coefficients {{math|''c''<sub>''k''</sub>}} as | |||
}}</ref> Namely, if we define the coefficients < | : <math>c_{k}:=\sum_{j=0}^{k}(-1)^{j}\binom{k}{j}\frac{1}{\zeta (2j+2)}</math> | ||
:<math>c_{k}:=\sum_{j=0}^{k}(-1)^{j}\binom{k}{j}\frac{1}{\zeta (2j+2)}</math> | |||
then the Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to | then the Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to | ||
: <math>c_{k}=\mathcal{O}\left( k^{-3/4+\varepsilon }\right) \qquad (\forall\varepsilon >0) </math> | |||
=== Rapidly convergent series === | |||
[[Peter Borwein]] developed an algorithm that applies [[Chebyshev polynomial]]s to the [[Dirichlet eta function]] to produce a [[Dirichlet eta function#Borwein's method|very rapidly convergent series suitable for high precision numerical calculations]].<ref>{{cite book|first = Peter|last = Borwein|author-link = Peter Borwein|chapter-url = http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/personal/pborwein/PAPERS/P155.pdf|chapter = An Efficient Algorithm for the Riemann Zeta Function|series = Conference Proceedings, Canadian Mathematical Society|year = 2000|title = Constructive, Experimental, and Nonlinear Analysis|volume = 27|pages = 29–34|isbn = 978-0-8218-2167-1|editor-first = Michel A.|editor-last = Théra|publisher = [[American Mathematical Society]], on behalf of the [[Canadian Mathematical Society]]|location = Providence, RI|access-date = 25 November 2017|archive-date = 26 July 2011|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110726090927/http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/personal/pborwein/PAPERS/P155.pdf}}</ref> | |||
===Rapidly convergent series=== | |||
[[Peter Borwein]] developed an algorithm that applies [[Chebyshev polynomial]]s to the [[Dirichlet eta function]] to produce a [[Dirichlet eta function#Borwein's method|very rapidly convergent series suitable for high precision numerical calculations]].<ref>{{cite book|first = Peter|last = Borwein|author-link = Peter Borwein|chapter-url = http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/personal/pborwein/PAPERS/P155.pdf|chapter = An Efficient Algorithm for the Riemann Zeta Function|series = Conference Proceedings, Canadian Mathematical Society|year = 2000|title = Constructive, Experimental, and Nonlinear Analysis|volume = 27|pages = 29–34|isbn = 978-0-8218-2167-1|editor-first = Michel A.|editor-last = Théra|publisher = [[American Mathematical Society]], on behalf of the [[Canadian Mathematical Society]]|location = Providence, RI|access-date = 25 November 2017|archive-date = 26 July 2011|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110726090927/http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/personal/pborwein/PAPERS/P155.pdf | |||
===Series representation at positive integers via the primorial=== | === Series representation at positive integers via the primorial === | ||
: <math> \zeta(k)=\frac{2^k}{2^k-1}+\sum_{r=2}^\infty\frac{(p_{r-1}\#)^k}{J_k(p_r\#)}\qquad k=2,3,\ldots.</math> | : <math> \zeta(k)=\frac{2^k}{2^k-1}+\sum_{r=2}^\infty\frac{(p_{r-1}\#)^k}{J_k(p_r\#)}\qquad k=2,3,\ldots.</math> | ||
Here {{math|''p<sub>n</sub>''#}} is the [[primorial]] sequence and {{math|''J<sub>k</sub>''}} is [[Jordan's totient function]].<ref>{{cite journal | Here {{math|''p<sub>n</sub>''#}} is the [[primorial]] sequence and {{math|''J<sub>k</sub>''}} is [[Jordan's totient function]].<ref>{{cite journal | ||
|first=István | |first=István |last=Mező | ||
|last=Mező | |||
|title=The primorial and the Riemann zeta function | |title=The primorial and the Riemann zeta function | ||
|journal= The American Mathematical Monthly | |journal=The American Mathematical Monthly | ||
|year=2013 | |year=2013 | ||
|volume=120 | |volume=120 | ||
| Line 582: | Line 524: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
===Series representation by the incomplete poly-Bernoulli numbers=== | === Series representation by the incomplete poly-Bernoulli numbers === | ||
The function {{ | The function {{math|''ζ''}} can be represented, for {{math|Re(''s'') > 1}}, by the infinite series | ||
:<math>\zeta(s)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty B_{n,\ge2}^{(s)}\frac{(W_k(-1))^n}{n!},</math> | : <math>\zeta(s)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty B_{n,\ge2}^{(s)}\frac{(W_k(-1))^n}{n!},</math> | ||
where {{math|''k'' ∈ {−1, 0 | where {{math|''k'' ∈ {{mset|−1, 0}}}}, {{math|''W<sub>k</sub>''}} is the {{mvar|k}}th branch of the [[Lambert W function|Lambert {{mvar|W}}-function]], and {{math|''B''{{su|b=''n'',≥2|p=(''μ'')|lh=1}}}} is an incomplete poly-Bernoulli number.<ref>{{cite journal | ||
|first1=Takao | |first1=Takao |last1=Komatsu | ||
|last1=Komatsu | |first2=István |last2=Mező | ||
|first2=István | |title=Incomplete poly-Bernoulli numbers associated with incomplete Stirling numbers | ||
|last2=Mező | |journal=Publicationes Mathematicae Debrecen | ||
|title=Incomplete poly-Bernoulli numbers associated with incomplete Stirling numbers | |year=2016 | ||
|journal=Publicationes Mathematicae Debrecen | |volume=88 |issue=3–4 | ||
|year=2016 | |pages=357–368 | ||
|volume=88 | |doi=10.5486/pmd.2016.7361 |arxiv=1510.05799 |s2cid=55741906 | ||
|issue=3–4 | |||
|pages=357–368 | |||
|doi=10.5486/pmd.2016.7361 | |||
|arxiv=1510.05799 | |||
|s2cid=55741906 | |||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
=== | === Mellin transform of the Engel map === | ||
The function | The function {{math|1=''g''(''x'') = ''x''(1 + {{floor|''x''<sup>−1</sup>}}) − 1}} is iterated to find the coefficients appearing in [[Engel expansion]]s.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://oeis.org/A220335 |title=A220335 – OEIS |website=oeis.org |access-date=2019-04-17 }}</ref> | ||
The [[Mellin transform]] of the map <math>g(x)</math> is related to the Riemann zeta function by the formula | The [[Mellin transform]] of the map <math>g(x)</math> is related to the Riemann zeta function by the formula | ||
:<math> \begin{align} | : <math> \begin{align} | ||
\int_0^1 g (x) x^{s - 1} \, dx & = \sum_{n = 1}^\infty | \int_0^1 g (x) x^{s - 1} \, dx & = \sum_{n = 1}^\infty | ||
\int_{\frac{1}{n + 1}}^{\frac{1}{n}} (x (n + 1) - 1) x^{s - 1} \, d x\\[6pt] | \int_{\frac{1}{n + 1}}^{\frac{1}{n}} (x (n + 1) - 1) x^{s - 1} \, d x\\[6pt] | ||
| Line 612: | Line 549: | ||
\end{align}</math> | \end{align}</math> | ||
=== | === Stochastic representations === | ||
The [[Brownian motion and Riemann zeta function]] are connected through the [[moment-generating function]]s of [[stochastic process]]es derived from the [[Brownian motion]].<ref>{{cite journal | |||
{{cite journal| | | last1 = Biane | first1 = Philippe | ||
| last2 = Pitman | first2 = Jim | |||
| last3 = Yor | first3 = Marc | |||
| title = Probability laws related to the Jacobi theta and Riemann zeta functions, and Brownian excursions | |||
| journal = Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society |series=New Series | |||
| volume = 38 | issue = 4 | |||
| pages = 435–465 | |||
| year = 2001 | |||
| doi = 10.1090/S0273-0979-01-00912-0 | doi-access = free | |||
| url = https://www.ams.org/journals/bull/2001-38-04/S0273-0979-01-00912-0/ | |||
| publisher = American Mathematical Society | |||
| access-date = 2025-07-27 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
== Numerical algorithms == | == Numerical algorithms == | ||
A classical algorithm, in use prior to about 1930, proceeds by applying the [[ | A classical algorithm, in use prior to about 1930, proceeds by applying the [[Euler–Maclaurin formula]] to obtain, for positive integers {{math|''n''}} and {{math|''m''}}, | ||
: <math>\zeta(s) = \sum_{j=1}^{n-1}j^{-s} + \tfrac12 n^{-s} + \frac{n^{1-s}}{s-1} + \sum_{k=1}^m T_{k,n}(s) + E_{m,n}(s)</math> | |||
:<math>\zeta(s) = \sum_{j=1}^{n-1}j^{-s} + \tfrac12 n^{-s} + \frac{n^{1-s}}{s-1} + \sum_{k=1}^m T_{k,n}(s) + E_{m,n}(s)</math> | |||
where, letting <math>B_{2k}</math> denote the indicated [[Bernoulli number]], | where, letting <math>B_{2k}</math> denote the indicated [[Bernoulli number]], | ||
: <math>T_{k,n}(s) = \frac{B_{2k}}{(2k)!} n^{1-s-2k}\prod_{j=0}^{2k-2}(s+j)</math> | |||
:<math>T_{k,n}(s) = \frac{B_{2k}}{(2k)!} n^{1-s-2k}\prod_{j=0}^{2k-2}(s+j)</math> | |||
and the error satisfies | and the error satisfies | ||
: <math>|E_{m,n}(s)| < \left|\frac{s+2m+1}{\sigma + 2m + 1}T_{m+1,n}(s)\right|,</math> | |||
:<math>|E_{m,n}(s)| < \left|\frac{s+2m+1}{\sigma + 2m + 1}T_{m+1,n}(s)\right|,</math> | with {{math|1=''σ'' = Re(''s'')}}.<ref>{{cite journal |mr=0961614 | ||
|last1=Odlyzko |first1= A. M. |author1-link=Odlyzko |last2= Schönhage |first2= A. |author2-link=Schönhage | |||
with '' | |||
|title=Fast algorithms for multiple evaluations of the Riemann zeta function | |title=Fast algorithms for multiple evaluations of the Riemann zeta function | ||
|journal=Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.|volume= 309 |year=1988|issue= 2|pages= 797–809 | |journal=Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. |volume=309 |year=1988 |issue=2 |pages=797–809 | ||
|doi=10.2307/ | |doi=10.2307/2000939 |doi-access=free |jstor=2000939 }} | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
A modern numerical algorithm is the [[Odlyzko–Schönhage algorithm]]. | A modern numerical algorithm is the [[Odlyzko–Schönhage algorithm]]. | ||
==Applications== | == Applications == | ||
The zeta function occurs in applied [[statistics]] including [[Zipf's law]], [[Zipf–Mandelbrot law]], and [[Lotka's law]]. | The zeta function occurs in applied [[statistics]] including [[Zipf's law]], [[Zipf–Mandelbrot law]], and [[Lotka's law]]. | ||
[[Zeta function regularization]] is used as one possible means of [[regularization (physics)|regularization]] of [[divergent series]] and [[divergent integral]]s in [[quantum field theory]]. In one notable example, the Riemann zeta function shows up explicitly in one method of calculating the [[Casimir effect]]. The zeta function is also useful for the analysis of [[dynamical systems]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://empslocal.ex.ac.uk/people/staff/mrwatkin/zeta/spinchains.htm |title=Work on spin-chains by A. Knauf, et. al |website=Empslocal.ex.ac.uk |access-date=2017-01-04}}</ref> | [[Zeta function regularization]] is used as one possible means of [[regularization (physics)|regularization]] of [[divergent series]] and [[divergent integral]]s in [[quantum field theory]]. In one notable example, the Riemann zeta function shows up explicitly in one method of calculating the [[Casimir effect]]. The zeta function is also useful for the analysis of [[dynamical systems]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://empslocal.ex.ac.uk/people/staff/mrwatkin/zeta/spinchains.htm |title=Work on spin-chains by A. Knauf, et. al |website=Empslocal.ex.ac.uk |access-date=2017-01-04 }}</ref> | ||
===Musical tuning=== | === Musical tuning === | ||
In the theory of [[musical tuning]]s, the zeta function can be used to find [[Equal temperament|equal divisions of the octave]] (EDOs) that closely approximate the intervals of the [[Harmonic series (music)|harmonic series]]. For increasing values of <math>t \in \mathbb{R}</math>, the value of | In the theory of [[musical tuning]]s, the zeta function can be used to find [[Equal temperament|equal divisions of the octave]] (EDOs) that closely approximate the intervals of the [[Harmonic series (music)|harmonic series]]. For increasing values of <math>t \in \mathbb{R}</math>, the value of | ||
: <math>\left\vert \zeta \left( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{2\pi{i}}{\ln{(2)}}t \right) \right\vert</math> | |||
peaks near integers that correspond to such EDOs.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://oeis.org/A117536 |title=Nearest integer to locations of increasingly large peaks of abs(zeta(0.5 + i×2×Pi/log(2)×t)) for increasing real t |author=Gene Ward Smith |website=The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences |access-date=2022-03-04}}</ref> Examples include popular choices such as 12, 19, and 53.<ref>{{cite book |title=Tuning, Timbre, Spectrum, Scale |author=William A. Sethares |date=2005 |edition=2nd |publisher=Springer-Verlag London |page=74 |quote=... there are many different ways to evaluate the goodness, reasonableness, fitness, or quality of a scale ... Under some measures, 12-tet is the winner, under others 19-tet appears best, 53-tet often appears among the victors ...}}</ref> | |||
=== Infinite series === | |||
===Infinite series=== | |||
The zeta function evaluated at equidistant positive integers appears in infinite series representations of a number of constants.<ref>Most of the formulas in this section are from § 4 of J. M. Borwein et al. (2000)</ref> | The zeta function evaluated at equidistant positive integers appears in infinite series representations of a number of constants.<ref>Most of the formulas in this section are from § 4 of J. M. Borwein et al. (2000)</ref> | ||
*<math>\sum_{n=2}^\infty\bigl(\zeta(n)-1\bigr) = 1</math> | * <math>\sum_{n=2}^\infty\bigl(\zeta(n)-1\bigr) = 1</math> | ||
In fact the even and odd terms give the two sums | In fact the even and odd terms give the two sums | ||
*<math>\sum_{n=1}^\infty\bigl(\zeta(2n)-1\bigr)=\frac{3}{4}</math> | * <math>\sum_{n=1}^\infty\bigl(\zeta(2n)-1\bigr)=\frac{3}{4}</math> | ||
and | and | ||
* <math>\sum_{n=1}^\infty\bigl(\zeta(2n+1)-1\bigr)=\frac{1}{4}</math> | |||
*<math>\sum_{n=1}^\infty\bigl(\zeta(2n+1)-1\bigr)=\frac{1}{4}</math> | |||
Parametrized versions of the above sums are given by | Parametrized versions of the above sums are given by | ||
* <math>\sum_{n=1}^\infty(\zeta(2n)-1)\,t^{2n} = \frac{t^2}{t^2-1} + \frac{1}{2} \left(1- \pi t\cot(t\pi)\right)</math> | |||
*<math>\sum_{n=1}^\infty(\zeta(2n)-1)\,t^{2n} = \frac{t^2}{t^2-1} + \frac{1}{2} \left(1- \pi t\cot(t\pi)\right)</math> | |||
and | and | ||
* <math>\sum_{n=1}^\infty(\zeta(2n+1)-1)\,t^{2n} = \frac{t^2}{t^2-1} -\frac{1}{2}\left(\psi^0(t)+\psi^0(-t) \right) - \gamma</math> | |||
*<math>\sum_{n=1}^\infty(\zeta(2n+1)-1)\,t^{2n} = \frac{t^2}{t^2-1} -\frac{1}{2}\left(\psi^0(t)+\psi^0(-t) \right) - \gamma</math> | with {{math|{{abs|''t''}} < 2}} and where <math>\psi</math> and <math>\gamma</math> are the [[polygamma function]] and [[Euler's constant]], respectively, as well as | ||
* <math>\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{\zeta(2n)-1}{n}\,t^{2n} = \log\left(\dfrac{1-t^2}{\operatorname{sinc}(\pi\,t)}\right)</math> | |||
with | |||
*<math>\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{\zeta(2n)-1}{n}\,t^{2n} = \log\left(\dfrac{1-t^2}{\operatorname{sinc}(\pi\,t)}\right)</math> | |||
all of which are continuous at <math>t=1</math>. Other sums include | all of which are continuous at <math>t=1</math>. Other sums include | ||
* <math>\sum_{n=2}^\infty\frac{\zeta(n)-1}{n} = 1-\gamma</math> | |||
*<math>\sum_{n=2}^\infty\frac{\zeta(n)-1}{n} = 1-\gamma</math> | * <math>\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{\zeta(2n)-1}{n} = \ln 2</math> | ||
*<math>\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{\zeta(2n)-1}{n} = \ln 2</math> | * <math>\sum_{n=2}^\infty\frac{\zeta(n)-1}{n} \left(\left(\tfrac{3}{2}\right)^{n-1}-1\right) = \frac{1}{3} \ln \pi</math> | ||
*<math>\sum_{n=2}^\infty\frac{\zeta(n)-1}{n} \left(\left(\tfrac{3}{2}\right)^{n-1}-1\right) = \frac{1}{3} \ln \pi</math> | * <math>\sum_{n=1}^\infty\bigl(\zeta(4n)-1\bigr) = \frac78-\frac{\pi}{4}\left(\frac{e^{2\pi}+1}{e^{2\pi}-1}\right)</math> | ||
*<math>\sum_{n=1}^\infty\bigl(\zeta(4n)-1\bigr) = \frac78-\frac{\pi}{4}\left(\frac{e^{2\pi}+1}{e^{2\pi}-1}\right) | * <math>\sum_{n=2}^\infty\frac{\zeta(n)-1}{n}\Im \bigl((1+i)^n-1-i^n\bigr) = \frac{\pi}{4}</math> | ||
*<math>\sum_{n=2}^\infty\frac{\zeta(n)-1}{n}\Im \bigl((1+i)^n-1-i^n\bigr) = \frac{\pi}{4}</math> | |||
where <math>\Im</math> denotes the [[imaginary part]] of a complex number. | where <math>\Im</math> denotes the [[imaginary part]] of a complex number. | ||
Another interesting series that relates to the [[natural logarithm]] of the [[lemniscate constant]] is the following | Another interesting series that relates to the [[natural logarithm]] of the [[lemniscate constant]] is the following | ||
* <math>\sum_{n=2}^\infty\left[\frac{2(-1)^n\zeta(n)}{4^n n}-\frac{(-1)^n\zeta(n)}{2^n n} \right]= \ln \left( \frac{\varpi}{2\sqrt2} \right) | |||
*<math>\sum_{n=2}^\infty\left[\frac{2(-1)^n\zeta(n)}{4^n n}-\frac{(-1)^n\zeta(n)}{2^n n} \right]= \ln \left( \frac{\varpi}{2\sqrt2} \right) | |||
</math> | </math> | ||
There are yet more formulas in the article [[Harmonic number#Relation to the Riemann zeta function|Harmonic number.]] | There are yet more formulas in the article [[Harmonic number#Relation to the Riemann zeta function|Harmonic number.]] | ||
==Generalizations==<!-- This section is linked from [[Power law]] --> | == Generalizations == | ||
<!-- This section is linked from [[Power law]] --> | |||
There are a number of related [[zeta function]]s that can be considered to be generalizations of the Riemann zeta function. These include the [[Hurwitz zeta function]] | There are a number of related [[zeta function]]s that can be considered to be generalizations of the Riemann zeta function. These include the [[Hurwitz zeta function]] | ||
: <math>\zeta(s,q) = \sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{(k+q)^s}</math> | |||
:<math>\zeta(s,q) = \sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{(k+q)^s}</math> | (the convergent series representation was given by [[Helmut Hasse]] in 1930,<ref name = Hasse1930>{{cite journal |first=Helmut |last=Hasse |author-link=Helmut Hasse |title=Ein Summierungsverfahren für die Riemannsche ''ζ''-Reihe |trans-title=A summation method for the Riemann ''ζ'' series |year=1930 |journal=[[Mathematische Zeitschrift]] |volume=32 |issue=1 |pages=458–464 |doi=10.1007/BF01194645 |s2cid=120392534 |language=de}}</ref> cf. [[Hurwitz zeta function]]), which coincides with the Riemann zeta function when {{math|''q'' {{=}} 1}} (the lower limit of summation in the Hurwitz zeta function is {{math|0}}, not {{math|1}}), the [[Dirichlet L-function|Dirichlet {{math|''L''}}-functions]] and the [[Dedekind zeta function]]. For other related functions see the articles [[zeta function]] and [[L-function|{{math|''L''}}-function]]. | ||
(the convergent series representation was given by [[Helmut Hasse]] in 1930,<ref name = Hasse1930>{{ | |||
The [[polylogarithm]] is given by | The [[polylogarithm]] is given by | ||
: <math>\operatorname{Li}_s(z) = \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{z^k}{k^s}</math> | |||
:<math>\operatorname{Li}_s(z) = \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{z^k}{k^s}</math> | which coincides with the Riemann zeta function when {{math|1=''z'' = 1}}. | ||
which coincides with the Riemann zeta function when {{math|''z'' | |||
The [[Clausen function]] {{math|Cl<sub>''s''</sub>(''θ'')}} can be chosen as the real or imaginary part of {{math|Li<sub>''s''</sub>(''e''{{isup|''iθ''}})}}. | The [[Clausen function]] {{math|Cl<sub>''s''</sub>(''θ'')}} can be chosen as the real or imaginary part of {{math|Li<sub>''s''</sub>(''e''{{isup|''iθ''}})}}. | ||
The [[Lerch transcendent]] is given by | The [[Lerch transcendent]] is given by | ||
:<math>\Phi(z, s, q) = \sum_{k=0}^\infty\frac { z^k} {(k+q)^s}</math> | : <math>\Phi(z, s, q) = \sum_{k=0}^\infty\frac {z^k} {(k+q)^s}</math> | ||
which coincides with the Riemann zeta function when {{math|''z'' | which coincides with the Riemann zeta function when {{math|1=''z'' = 1}} and {{math|1=''q'' = 1}} (the lower limit of summation in the Lerch transcendent is {{math|0}}, not {{math|1}}). | ||
The [[multiple zeta functions]] are defined by | The [[multiple zeta functions]] are defined by | ||
: <math>\zeta(s_1,s_2,\ldots,s_n) = \sum_{k_1>k_2>\cdots>k_n>0} {k_1}^{-s_1}{k_2}^{-s_2}\cdots {k_n}^{-s_n}.</math> | |||
One can analytically continue these functions to the {{math|''n''}}-dimensional complex space. The special values taken by these functions at positive integer arguments are called [[multiple zeta values]] by number theorists and have been connected to many different branches in mathematics and physics. | |||
== See also == | |||
* [[1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ···]] | |||
* [[Arithmetic zeta function]] | |||
* [[Dirichlet eta function]] | |||
* [[Generalized Riemann hypothesis]] | |||
* [[Lehmer pair]] | |||
* [[Particular values of the Riemann zeta function]] | |||
* [[Prime zeta function]] | |||
* [[Renormalization]] | |||
* [[Riemann–Siegel theta function]] | |||
* [[ZetaGrid]] | |||
== References == | |||
==References== | |||
{{reflist|25em}} | {{reflist|25em}} | ||
==Sources== | == Sources == | ||
{{refbegin|colwidth=25em|small=yes}} | {{refbegin|colwidth=25em|small=yes}} | ||
* {{dlmf | * {{dlmf | ||
| Line 749: | Line 672: | ||
| doi=10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00336-8 | doi-access=free | | doi=10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00336-8 | doi-access=free | ||
| bibcode = 2000JCoAM.121..247B | | bibcode = 2000JCoAM.121..247B | ||
}} | |||
* {{cite journal | * {{cite journal | ||
| first1=Djurdje |last1= Cvijović | | first1=Djurdje |last1= Cvijović | ||
| Line 781: | Line 704: | ||
| last1 = Hadamard | first1 = Jacques | author-link = Jacques Hadamard | | last1 = Hadamard | first1 = Jacques | author-link = Jacques Hadamard | ||
| year = 1896 | | year = 1896 | ||
| title = Sur la distribution des zéros de la fonction | | title = Sur la distribution des zéros de la fonction ''ζ''(''s'') et ses conséquences arithmétiques |language=fr | ||
| trans-title = Regarding the distribution of the zeros of the function | | trans-title = Regarding the distribution of the zeros of the function ''ζ''(''s'') and the arithmetical consequences | ||
| journal = Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France | | journal = Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France | ||
| volume = 14 | pages = 199–220 | | volume = 14 | pages = 199–220 | ||
| Line 797: | Line 720: | ||
|first = Helmut |last = Hasse |author-link = Helmut Hasse | |first = Helmut |last = Hasse |author-link = Helmut Hasse | ||
|year=1930 | |year=1930 | ||
|title=Ein Summierungsverfahren für die Riemannsche | |title=Ein Summierungsverfahren für die Riemannsche ''ζ''-Reihe |language=de | ||
|trans-title=A summation method for the Riemann | |trans-title=A summation method for the Riemann ''ζ'' series | ||
|journal=Math. Z. | |journal=Math. Z. | ||
|volume=32 |pages=458–464 | |volume=32 |pages=458–464 | ||
| Line 816: | Line 739: | ||
| title=Spectral Theory of the Riemann Zeta-Function | | title=Spectral Theory of the Riemann Zeta-Function | ||
| publisher= Cambridge University Press | | publisher= Cambridge University Press | ||
| isbn= | | isbn=0-521-44520-5 | ||
}} | }} | ||
* {{cite book | * {{cite book | ||
| Line 843: | Line 766: | ||
| publisher=Springer-Verlag | | publisher=Springer-Verlag | ||
| isbn=0-387-98308-2 | | isbn=0-387-98308-2 | ||
|at=Ch. 6}} | |at=Ch. 6 | ||
}} | |||
* {{cite journal | * {{cite journal | ||
|first1=Guo |last1=Raoh | |first1=Guo |last1=Raoh | ||
| Line 862: | Line 786: | ||
}} Also available in {{cite book | }} Also available in {{cite book | ||
|first=Bernhard |last=Riemann |author-link=Bernhard Riemann | |first=Bernhard |last=Riemann |author-link=Bernhard Riemann | ||
|orig- | |orig-date=1892 |year=1953 | ||
|title=Gesammelte Werke |language=de | |title=Gesammelte Werke |language=de | ||
|trans-title=Collected Works | |trans-title=Collected Works | ||
| Line 906: | Line 830: | ||
{{refend}} | {{refend}} | ||
==External links== | == External links == | ||
*{{Commons category-inline}} | *{{Commons category-inline}} | ||
* {{springer|title=Zeta-function|id=p/z099260|mode=cs1}} | * {{springer|title=Zeta-function|id=p/z099260|mode=cs1}} | ||
| Line 915: | Line 839: | ||
* [http://functions.wolfram.com/ZetaFunctionsandPolylogarithms/Zeta/ Formulas and identities for the Riemann Zeta function] functions.wolfram.com | * [http://functions.wolfram.com/ZetaFunctionsandPolylogarithms/Zeta/ Formulas and identities for the Riemann Zeta function] functions.wolfram.com | ||
* [http://www.math.sfu.ca/~cbm/aands/page_807.htm Riemann Zeta Function and Other Sums of Reciprocal Powers], section 23.2 of [[Abramowitz and Stegun]] | * [http://www.math.sfu.ca/~cbm/aands/page_807.htm Riemann Zeta Function and Other Sums of Reciprocal Powers], section 23.2 of [[Abramowitz and Stegun]] | ||
* {{cite web|last=Frenkel|first=Edward|author-link=Edward Frenkel|title=Million Dollar Math Problem|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6c6uIyieoo |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211211/d6c6uIyieoo| archive-date=2021-12-11 |url-status=live|publisher=[[Brady Haran]]|access-date=11 March 2014|format=video}}{{cbignore}} | * {{cite web|last=Frenkel|first=Edward|author-link=Edward Frenkel|title=Million Dollar Math Problem|date=11 March 2014 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6c6uIyieoo |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211211/d6c6uIyieoo| archive-date=2021-12-11 |url-status=live|publisher=[[Brady Haran]]|access-date=11 March 2014|format=video}}{{cbignore}} | ||
* [https://combinatorialsums.risc.jku.at/papers/rfeq.pdf Mellin transform and the functional equation of the Riemann Zeta function]—Computational examples of Mellin transform methods involving the Riemann Zeta Function | * [https://combinatorialsums.risc.jku.at/papers/rfeq.pdf Mellin transform and the functional equation of the Riemann Zeta function]—Computational examples of Mellin transform methods involving the Riemann Zeta Function | ||
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sD0NjbwqlYw Visualizing the Riemann zeta function and analytic continuation] a video from [[3Blue1Brown]] | * [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sD0NjbwqlYw Visualizing the Riemann zeta function and analytic continuation] a video from [[3Blue1Brown]] | ||
Latest revision as of 23:45, 8 December 2025
The Riemann zeta function or Euler–Riemann zeta function, denoted by the Greek letter ζScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". (zeta), is a mathematical function of a complex variable defined as for Re(s) > 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., and its analytic continuation elsewhere.[2]
The Riemann zeta function plays a pivotal role in analytic number theory and has applications in physics, probability theory, and applied statistics.
Leonhard Euler first introduced and studied the function over the reals in the first half of the eighteenth century. Bernhard Riemann's 1859 article "On the Number of Primes Less Than a Given Magnitude" extended the Euler definition to a complex variable, proved its meromorphic continuation and functional equation, and established a relation between its zeros and the distribution of prime numbers. This paper also contained the Riemann hypothesis, a conjecture about the distribution of complex zeros of the Riemann zeta function that many mathematicians consider the most important unsolved problem in pure mathematics.[3]
The values of the Riemann zeta function at even positive integers were computed by Euler. The first of them, ζ(2)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., provides a solution to the Basel problem. In 1979 Roger Apéry proved the irrationality of ζ(3)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. The values at negative integer points, also found by Euler, are rational numbers and play an important role in the theory of modular forms. Many generalizations of the Riemann zeta function, such as Dirichlet series, Dirichlet LScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".-functions and LScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".-functions, are known.
Definition
The Riemann zeta function ζ(s)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is a function of a complex variable s = σ + itScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., where σScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". and tScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". are real numbers. (The notation sScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., σScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., and tScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is used traditionally in the study of the zeta function, following Riemann.) When Re(s) = σ > 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., the function can be written as a converging summation or as an integral:
where
is the gamma function. The Riemann zeta function is defined for other complex values via analytic continuation of the function defined for σ > 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"..
Leonhard Euler considered the above series in 1740 for positive integer values of sScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., and later Chebyshev extended the definition to Re(s) > 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"..[4]
The above series is a prototypical Dirichlet series that converges absolutely to an analytic function for sScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". such that σ > 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". and diverges for all other values of sScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. Riemann showed that the function defined by the series on the half-plane of convergence can be continued analytically to all complex values s ≠ 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. For s = 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., the series is the harmonic series which diverges to +∞Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., and Thus the Riemann zeta function is a meromorphic function on the whole complex plane, which is holomorphic everywhere except for a simple pole at s = 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". with residue 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"..
Euler's product formula
In 1737, the connection between the zeta function and prime numbers was discovered by Euler, who proved the identity
where, by definition, the left hand side is ζ(s)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". and the infinite product on the right hand side extends over all prime numbers pScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". (such expressions are called Euler products):
Both sides of the Euler product formula converge for Re(s) > 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. The proof of Euler's identity uses only the formula for the geometric series and the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. Since the harmonic series, obtained when s = 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., diverges, Euler's formula (which becomes Πp Template:SfracScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".) implies that there are infinitely many primes.[5] Since the logarithm of p/(p − 1)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is approximately 1/pScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., the formula can also be used to prove the stronger result that the sum of the reciprocals of the primes is infinite. On the other hand, combining that with the sieve of Eratosthenes shows that the density of the set of primes within the set of positive integers is zero.
The Euler product formula can be used to calculate the asymptotic probability that sScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". randomly selected integers within a bound are set-wise coprime. Intuitively, the probability that any single number is divisible by a prime (or any integer) pScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is 1/pScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. Hence the probability that sScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". numbers are all divisible by this prime is 1/pTemplate:IsupScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., and the probability that at least one of them is not is 1 − 1/pTemplate:IsupScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. Now, for distinct primes, these divisibility events are mutually independent because the candidate divisors are coprime (a number is divisible by coprime divisors nScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". and mScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". if and only if it is divisible by nmScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., an event which occurs with probability 1/(nm)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".). Thus the asymptotic probability that sScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". numbers are coprime is given by a product over all primes,[6]
Riemann's functional equation
This zeta function satisfies the functional equation where Γ(s)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is the gamma function. This is an equality of meromorphic functions valid on the whole complex plane. The equation relates values of the Riemann zeta function at the points sScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". and 1 − sScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., in particular relating even positive integers with odd negative integers. Owing to the zeros of the sine function, the functional equation implies that ζ(s)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". has a simple zero at each even negative integer s = −2nScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., known as the trivial zeros of ζ(s)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. When sScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is an even positive integer, the product sin(Template:Sfrac) Γ(1 − s)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". on the right is non-zero because Γ(1 − s)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". has a simple pole, which cancels the simple zero of the sine factor. When sScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is 0Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., the zero of the sine factor is cancelled by the simple pole of ζ(1)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"..
Proof of Riemann's functional equation
|
|---|
|
A proof of the functional equation proceeds as follows: We observe that if s > 0Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., then As a result, if s > 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". then with the inversion of the limiting processes justified by absolute convergence (hence the stricter requirement on ). For convenience, let which is a special case of the theta function. Because and are Fourier transform pairs,[7] then, by the Poisson summation formula, we have so that Hence The right side is equivalent to or So which is convergent for all sScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., because ψ(x) → 0Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". more quickly than any power of xScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". for x > 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., so the integral converges. As the RHS remains the same if sScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is replaced by 1 − sScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., which is the functional equation attributed to Bernhard Riemann.[8] The functional equation above can be obtained using both the reflection formula and the duplication formula. First collect terms of πScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Then multiply both sides by Γ(1 − s/2)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". and use the reflection formula:
Use the duplication formula with z = (1 − s)/2Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". so that |
The functional equation was established by Riemann in his 1859 paper "On the Number of Primes Less Than a Given Magnitude" and used to construct the analytic continuation in the first place.
Riemann's xi function
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
Riemann also found a symmetric version of the functional equation by setting that satisfies:
Returning to the functional equation's derivation in the previous section, we have
Using integration by parts,
Using integration by parts again with a factorization of x3/2Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".,
As ,
Remove a factor of x−1/4Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". to make the exponents in the remainder opposites.
Using the hyperbolic functions, namely cos(x) = cosh(ix)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., and letting s = 1/2 + itScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". gives and by separating the integral and using the power series for cosScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., which led Riemann to his famous hypothesis.
Zeros, the critical line, and the Riemann hypothesis
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
The functional equation shows that the Riemann zeta function has zeros at −2, −4, ...Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. These are called the trivial zeros. They are trivial in the sense that their existence is relatively easy to prove, for example, from sin(πs/2)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". being 0Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". in the functional equation. The non-trivial zeros have captured far more attention because their distribution not only is far less understood but, more importantly, their study yields important results concerning prime numbers and related objects in number theory. It is known that any non-trivial zero lies in the open strip Template:MsetScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., which is called the critical strip. The set Template:MsetScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is called the critical line. The Riemann hypothesis, considered one of the greatest unsolved problems in mathematics, asserts that all non-trivial zeros are on the critical line. In 1989, Conrey proved that more than 40% of the non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function are on the critical line.[9] This has since been improved to 41.7%.[10]
For the Riemann zeta function on the critical line, see ZScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".-function.
| Zero |
|---|
| 1/2 ± 14.134725... iScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". |
| 1/2 ± 21.022040... iScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". |
| 1/2 ± 25.010858... iScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". |
| 1/2 ± 30.424876... iScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". |
| 1/2 ± 32.935062... iScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". |
| 1/2 ± 37.586178... iScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". |
| 1/2 ± 40.918719... iScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". |
Number of zeros in the critical strip
Let N(T)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". be the number of zeros of ζ(s)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". in the critical strip 0 < Re(s) < 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., whose imaginary parts are in the interval 0 < Im(s) < TScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. Timothy Trudgian proved that, if T > eScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., then[13]
- .
Hardy–Littlewood conjectures
In 1914, G. H. Hardy proved that ζ(Template:Sfrac + it)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". has infinitely many real zeros.[14][15]
Hardy and J. E. Littlewood formulated two conjectures on the density and distance between the zeros of ζ(1/2 + it)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". on intervals of large positive real numbers. In the following, N(T)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is the total number of real zeros and N0(T)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". the total number of zeros of odd order of the function ζ(1/2 + it)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". lying in the interval (0, T]Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. Template:Numbered list These two conjectures opened up new directions in the investigation of the Riemann zeta function.
Zero-free region
The location of the Riemann zeta function's zeros is of great importance in number theory. The prime number theorem is equivalent to the fact that there are no zeros of the zeta function on the line Re(s) = 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"..[16] It is also known that zeros do not exist in certain regions slightly to the left of the line Re(s) = 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., known as zero-free regions. For instance, Korobov[17] and Vinogradov[18] independently showed via the Vinogradov's mean-value theorem that for sufficiently large Template:AbsScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., ζ(σ + it) ≠ 0Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". for
for any ε > 0Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". and a number c > 0Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". depending on εScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. Asymptotically, this is the largest known zero-free region for the zeta function.
Explicit zero-free regions are also known. Platt and Trudgian[19] verified computationally that ζ(σ + it) ≠ 0Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". if σ ≠ 1/2Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". and Template:Abs ≤ 3⋅1012Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. Mossinghoff, Trudgian and Yang proved[20] that zeta has no zeros in the region
for Template:Abs ≥ 2Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., which is the largest known zero-free region in the critical strip for 3⋅1012 < Template:Abs < exp(64.1) ≈ 7⋅1027Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". (for previous results see[21]). Yang[22] showed that ζ(σ + it) ≠ 0Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". if
- and
which is the largest known zero-free region for exp(170.2) < Template:Abs < exp(4.8⋅105)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. Bellotti proved[23] (building on the work of Ford[24]) the zero-free region
- and .
This is the largest known zero-free region for fixed Template:Abs ≥ exp(4.8⋅105)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. Bellotti also showed that for sufficiently large Template:AbsScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., the following better result is known: ζ(σ + it) ≠ 0Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". for
The strongest result of this kind one can hope for is the truth of the Riemann hypothesis, which would have many profound consequences in the theory of numbers.
Other results
It is known that there are infinitely many zeros on the critical line. Littlewood showed that if the sequence (γnScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".) contains the imaginary parts of all zeros in the upper half-plane in ascending order, then
The critical line theorem asserts that a positive proportion of the nontrivial zeros lies on the critical line. (The Riemann hypothesis would imply that this proportion is 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"..)
In the critical strip, the zero with smallest non-negative imaginary part is 1/2 + 14.13472514... iScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". (OEIS: A058303). The fact that, for all complex s ≠ 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".,
implies that the zeros of the Riemann zeta function are symmetric about the real axis. Combining this symmetry with the functional equation, furthermore, one sees that the non-trivial zeros are symmetric about the critical line Re(s) = 1/2Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"..
It is also known that no zeros lie on the line with real part 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"..
A large class of modified zeta functions exists that share the same non-trivial zeros as the Riemann zeta function, where modification means replacing the prime numbers in the Euler product by real numbers, which was shown in a result by Grosswald and Schnitzer.
Specific values
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". For any positive even integer 2nScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., where B2nScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is the (2n)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".th Bernoulli number. For odd positive integers, no such simple expression is known, although these values are thought to be related to the algebraic KScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".-theory of the integers; see Special values of LScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".-functions.
For nonpositive integers, one has for n ≥ 0Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". (using the convention that B1 = 1/2Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".). In particular, ζScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". vanishes at the negative even integers because Bm = 0Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". for all odd mScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". other than 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. These are the so-called "trivial zeros" of the zeta function.
Via analytic continuation, one can show that This gives a pretext for assigning a finite value to the divergent series 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ⋯Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., which has been used in certain contexts (Ramanujan summation) such as string theory.[25] Analogously, the particular value can be viewed as assigning a finite result to the divergent series 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + ⋯Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"..
The value is employed in calculating kinetic boundary layer problems of linear kinetic equations.[26][27]
Although diverges, its Cauchy principal value exists and is equal to the Euler–Mascheroni constant γ = 0.5772...Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"..[28]
The demonstration of the particular value is known as the Basel problem. The reciprocal of this sum answers the question: 'What is the probability that two numbers selected from a uniform distribution from 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". to nScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".] are coprime as n → ∞Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".?'[29] The value is Apéry's constant.
Taking the limit s → +∞Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". through the real numbers, one obtains ζ(+∞) = 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. But at complex infinity on the Riemann sphere the zeta function has an essential singularity.[2]
Various properties
For sums involving the zeta function at integer and half-integer values, see rational zeta series.
Reciprocal
The reciprocal of the zeta function may be expressed as a Dirichlet series over the Möbius function μ(n)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".:
for every complex number sScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". with real part greater than 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. There are a number of similar relations involving various well-known multiplicative functions; these are given in the article on the Dirichlet series.
The Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to the claim that this expression is valid when the real part of sScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is greater than 1/2Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"..
Universality
The critical strip of the Riemann zeta function has the remarkable property of universality. This zeta function universality states that there exists some location on the critical strip that approximates any holomorphic function arbitrarily well. Since holomorphic functions are very general, this property is quite remarkable. The first proof of universality was provided by Sergei Mikhailovitch Voronin in 1975.[30] More recent work has included effective versions of Voronin's theorem[31] and extending it to Dirichlet LScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".-functions.[32][33]
Estimates of the maximum of the modulus of the zeta function
Let the functions F(T; H)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". and G(s0; Δ)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". be defined by the equalities
Here TScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is a sufficiently large positive number, 0 < H ≪ log log TScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., s0 = σ0 + iTScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., 1/2 ≤ σ0 ≤ 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., 0 < Δ < 1/3Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. Estimating the values FScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". and GScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". from below shows, how large (in modulus) values ζ(s)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". can take on short intervals of the critical line or in small neighborhoods of points lying in the critical strip 0 ≤ Re(s) ≤ 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"..
The case H ≫ log log TScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". was studied by Kanakanahalli Ramachandra; the case Δ > cScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., where cScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is a sufficiently large constant, is trivial.
Anatolii Karatsuba proved,[34][35] in particular, that if the values HScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". and ΔScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". exceed certain sufficiently small constants, then the estimates
hold, where c1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". and c2Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". are certain absolute constants.
Argument of the Riemann zeta function
The function
is called the argument of the Riemann zeta function. Here arg ζ(1/2 + it)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is the increment of an arbitrary continuous branch of arg ζ(s)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". along the broken line joining the points 2Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., 2 + itScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". and 1/2 + itScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"..
There are some theorems on properties of the function S(t)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. Among those results[36][37] are the mean value theorems for S(t)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". and its first integral
on intervals of the real line, and also the theorem claiming that every interval (T, T + H]Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". for
contains at least
points where the function S(t)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". changes sign. Earlier similar results were obtained by Atle Selberg for the case
Representations
Dirichlet series
An extension of the area of convergence can be obtained by rearranging the original series.[38] The series
converges for Re(s) > 0Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., while
converge even for Re(s) > −1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. In this way, the area of convergence can be extended to Re(s) > −kScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". for any negative integer −kScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"..
The recurrence connection is clearly visible from the expression valid for Re(s) > −2Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". enabling further expansion by integration by parts.
This recurrence leads to this other series development that uses the rising factorial and is valid for the entire complex plane [38]
This can be used recursively to extend the Dirichlet series definition to all complex numbers.
The Riemann zeta function also appears in a form similar to the Mellin transform in an integral over the Gauss–Kuzmin–Wirsing operator acting on xs−1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".; that context gives rise to a series expansion in terms of the falling factorial.[39]
Mellin-type integrals
The Mellin transform of a function f(x)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is defined as[40]
in the region where the integral is defined. There are various expressions for the zeta function as Mellin transform-like integrals. If the real part of sScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is greater than one, we have
- and
where ΓScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". denotes the gamma function. By modifying the contour, Riemann showed that
for all sScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".[41] (where HScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". denotes the Hankel contour).
We can also find expressions which relate to prime numbers and the prime number theorem. If π(x)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is the prime-counting function, then
for values with Re(s) > 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"..
A similar Mellin transform involves the Riemann function J(x)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., which counts prime powers pnScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". with a weight of 1/nScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., so that
Now
These expressions can be used to prove the prime number theorem by means of the inverse Mellin transform. Riemann's prime-counting function is easier to work with, and π(x)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". can be recovered from it by Möbius inversion.
Theta functions
The Riemann zeta function can be given by a Mellin transform[42]
in terms of Jacobi's theta function
However, this integral only converges if the real part of sScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is greater than 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., but it can be regularized. This gives the following expression for the zeta function, which is well defined for all sScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". except 0Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". and 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".:
Laurent series
The Riemann zeta function is meromorphic with a single pole of order one at s = 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. It can therefore be expanded as a Laurent series about s = 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".; the series development is then[43]
The constants γnScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". here are called the Stieltjes constants and can be defined by the limit
The constant term γ0Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is the Euler–Mascheroni constant.
Integral
For all s ∈ Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., s ≠ 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., the integral relation (cf. Abel–Plana formula)
holds true, which may be used for a numerical evaluation of the zeta function.
Hadamard product
On the basis of Weierstrass's factorization theorem, Hadamard gave the infinite product expansion
where the product is over the non-trivial zeros ρScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". of ζScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". and the letter γScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". again denotes the Euler–Mascheroni constant. A simpler infinite product expansion is
This form clearly displays the simple pole at s = 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., the trivial zeros at −2, −4, Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".... due to the gamma function term in the denominator, and the non-trivial zeros at s = ρScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. (To ensure convergence in the latter formula, the product should be taken over "matching pairs" of zeros, i.e. the factors for a pair of zeros of the form ρScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". and 1 − ρScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". should be combined.)
Globally convergent series
A globally convergent series for the zeta function, valid for all complex numbers sScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". except s = 1 + Template:SfracnScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". for some integer nScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., was conjectured by Konrad Knopp in 1926 [44] and proven by Helmut Hasse in 1930[45] (cf. Euler summation):
The series appeared in an appendix to Hasse's paper, and was published for the second time by Jonathan Sondow in 1994.[46]
Hasse also proved the globally converging series
in the same publication.[45] Research by Iaroslav Blagouchine[47][44] has found that a similar, equivalent series was published by Joseph Ser in 1926.[48]
In 1997 K. Maślanka gave another globally convergent (except s = 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".) series for the Riemann zeta function:
where real coefficients are given by:
Here BnScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". are the Bernoulli numbers and (x)kScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". denotes the Pochhammer symbol.[49][50]
Note that this representation of the zeta function is essentially an interpolation with nodes, where the nodes are points s = 2, 4, 6, ...Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., i.e. exactly those where the zeta values are precisely known, as Euler showed. An elegant and very short proof of this representation of the zeta function, based on Carlson's theorem, was presented by Philippe Flajolet in 2006.[51]
The asymptotic behavior of the coefficients is rather curious: for growing values, we observe regular oscillations with a nearly exponentially decreasing amplitude and slowly decreasing frequency (roughly as ). Using the saddle point method, we can show that
where stands for:
(see [52] for details).
On the basis of this representation, in 2003 Luis Báez-Duarte provided a new criterion for the Riemann hypothesis.[53][54][55] Namely, if we define the coefficients ckScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". as
then the Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to
Rapidly convergent series
Peter Borwein developed an algorithm that applies Chebyshev polynomials to the Dirichlet eta function to produce a very rapidly convergent series suitable for high precision numerical calculations.[56]
Series representation at positive integers via the primorial
Here pn#Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is the primorial sequence and JkScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is Jordan's totient function.[57]
Series representation by the incomplete poly-Bernoulli numbers
The function ζScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". can be represented, for Re(s) > 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., by the infinite series
where k ∈ Template:MsetScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., WkScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is the Template:Mvarth branch of the [[Lambert W function|Lambert Template:Mvar-function]], and BScript error: No such module "Su".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is an incomplete poly-Bernoulli number.[58]
Mellin transform of the Engel map
The function g(x) = x(1 + ⌊x−1⌋) − 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is iterated to find the coefficients appearing in Engel expansions.[59]
The Mellin transform of the map is related to the Riemann zeta function by the formula
Stochastic representations
The Brownian motion and Riemann zeta function are connected through the moment-generating functions of stochastic processes derived from the Brownian motion.[60]
Numerical algorithms
A classical algorithm, in use prior to about 1930, proceeds by applying the Euler–Maclaurin formula to obtain, for positive integers nScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". and mScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".,
where, letting denote the indicated Bernoulli number,
and the error satisfies
with σ = Re(s)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"..[61]
A modern numerical algorithm is the Odlyzko–Schönhage algorithm.
Applications
The zeta function occurs in applied statistics including Zipf's law, Zipf–Mandelbrot law, and Lotka's law.
Zeta function regularization is used as one possible means of regularization of divergent series and divergent integrals in quantum field theory. In one notable example, the Riemann zeta function shows up explicitly in one method of calculating the Casimir effect. The zeta function is also useful for the analysis of dynamical systems.[62]
Musical tuning
In the theory of musical tunings, the zeta function can be used to find equal divisions of the octave (EDOs) that closely approximate the intervals of the harmonic series. For increasing values of , the value of
peaks near integers that correspond to such EDOs.[63] Examples include popular choices such as 12, 19, and 53.[64]
Infinite series
The zeta function evaluated at equidistant positive integers appears in infinite series representations of a number of constants.[65]
In fact the even and odd terms give the two sums
and
Parametrized versions of the above sums are given by
and
with Template:Abs < 2Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". and where and are the polygamma function and Euler's constant, respectively, as well as
all of which are continuous at . Other sums include
where denotes the imaginary part of a complex number.
Another interesting series that relates to the natural logarithm of the lemniscate constant is the following
There are yet more formulas in the article Harmonic number.
Generalizations
There are a number of related zeta functions that can be considered to be generalizations of the Riemann zeta function. These include the Hurwitz zeta function
(the convergent series representation was given by Helmut Hasse in 1930,[45] cf. Hurwitz zeta function), which coincides with the Riemann zeta function when q = 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". (the lower limit of summation in the Hurwitz zeta function is 0Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., not 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".), the Dirichlet LScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".-functions and the Dedekind zeta function. For other related functions see the articles zeta function and LScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".-function.
The polylogarithm is given by
which coincides with the Riemann zeta function when z = 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. The Clausen function Cls(θ)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". can be chosen as the real or imaginary part of Lis(eTemplate:Isup)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"..
The Lerch transcendent is given by
which coincides with the Riemann zeta function when z = 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". and q = 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". (the lower limit of summation in the Lerch transcendent is 0Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., not 1Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".).
The multiple zeta functions are defined by
One can analytically continue these functions to the nScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".-dimensional complex space. The special values taken by these functions at positive integer arguments are called multiple zeta values by number theorists and have been connected to many different branches in mathematics and physics.
See also
- 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ···
- Arithmetic zeta function
- Dirichlet eta function
- Generalized Riemann hypothesis
- Lehmer pair
- Particular values of the Riemann zeta function
- Prime zeta function
- Renormalization
- Riemann–Siegel theta function
- ZetaGrid
References
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Further digits and references for this constant are available at OEIS: A059750.
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1". Reprinted in Math. USSR Izv. (1975) 9: 443–445.
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1". translated and reprinted in Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Trivial exceptions of values of sScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". that cause removable singularities are not taken into account throughout this article.
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Most of the formulas in this section are from § 4 of J. M. Borwein et al. (2000)
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Sources
<templatestyles src="Refbegin/styles.css" />
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". Has an English translation of Riemann's paper.
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1". (Globally convergent series expression.)
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1". Also available in Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
External links
- Template:Sister-inline
- Template:Springer
- Riemann Zeta Function, in Wolfram Mathworld — an explanation with a more mathematical approach
- Tables of selected zeros Template:Webarchive
- Prime Numbers Get Hitched A general, non-technical description of the significance of the zeta function in relation to prime numbers.
- X-Ray of the Zeta Function Visually oriented investigation of where zeta is real or purely imaginary.
- Formulas and identities for the Riemann Zeta function functions.wolfram.com
- Riemann Zeta Function and Other Sums of Reciprocal Powers, section 23.2 of Abramowitz and Stegun
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Template:Cbignore
- Mellin transform and the functional equation of the Riemann Zeta function—Computational examples of Mellin transform methods involving the Riemann Zeta Function
- Visualizing the Riemann zeta function and analytic continuation a video from 3Blue1Brown
Template:Use dmy dates Template:L-functions-footer Template:Series (mathematics) Template:Bernhard Riemann Template:Authority control