Chori Chori Chupke Chupke: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Thefallguy2025
No edit summary
 
imported>Citation bot
Added date. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | #UCB_toolbar
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 29: Line 29:
| gross          = {{INRConvert|37.5|c|year=2001}} <ref name="CCCCBOI">{{Cite web |title=Chori Chori Chupke Chupke |url=https://boxofficeindia.com/movie.php?movieid=662 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200902061003/https://boxofficeindia.com/movie.php?movieid=662 |archive-date=2 September 2020 |access-date=11 October 2020 |website=[[Box Office India]]}}</ref>
| gross          = {{INRConvert|37.5|c|year=2001}} <ref name="CCCCBOI">{{Cite web |title=Chori Chori Chupke Chupke |url=https://boxofficeindia.com/movie.php?movieid=662 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200902061003/https://boxofficeindia.com/movie.php?movieid=662 |archive-date=2 September 2020 |access-date=11 October 2020 |website=[[Box Office India]]}}</ref>
}}
}}
'''''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke''''' ({{Translation|''Secretly and Stealthily''}}) is a 2001 Indian [[Hindi]]-language [[Romance film|romantic drama]] film directed by [[Abbas–Mustan]], with a screenplay by Javed Siddiqui and story by [[Neeraj Vora]]. Produced by Nazim Rizvi, the film stars [[Salman Khan]], [[Rani Mukerji]], and [[Preity Zinta]], with music composed by [[Anu Malik]] and lyrics by [[Sameer Anjaan|Sameer]]. The narrative follows a wealthy married couple who, unable to conceive a child, hire a [[sex worker]] to serve as a [[Surrogacy|surrogate]] mother, leading to emotional and social complications.
'''''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke''''' ({{Translation|''Secretly and Stealthily''}}) is a 2001 Indian [[Hindi]]-language [[romantic drama film]] directed by [[Abbas–Mustan]], with screenplay and story from [[Javed Siddiqui]] and [[Neeraj Vora]] respectively. Starring [[Salman Khan]], [[Rani Mukerji]] and [[Preity Zinta]] in lead roles, the film's music is composed by [[Anu Malik]] and lyrics are penned by [[Sameer (lyricist)|Sameer]]. Telling the story of a married couple hiring a young prostitute as a [[Surrogacy|surrogate mother]], the film generated controversy during its release for dealing with the [[taboo]] issue of [[Surrogacy in India|surrogate childbirth in India]].


The film was inspired by the Tamil film [[Avan Aval Adhu|''Avan Aval Adhu'']] (1980), and explores themes of surrogacy, societal [[taboo]], and unconventional family structures. [[Principal photography]] took place in [[Switzerland]] and various locations in India. The film’s subject matter generated widespread attention, as it was one of the earliest mainstream Hindi films to address surrogacy—a subject rarely depicted in Indian cinema at the time.
Initially set to release on 22 December 2000, ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke''<nowiki/>'s release was delayed for several months when producer Nazim Rizvi and financier [[Bharat Shah]] were arrested and the [[Central Bureau of Investigation]] seized the film's prints on the suspicion that the production had been funded by [[Chhota Shakeel]] of the [[Organised crime in India|Mumbai underworld]]. The film was released in March 2001 to a wide audience and emerged as a commercial success, becoming the [[List of Hindi films of 2001|sixth highest-grossing film of 2001 in India]].


Initially scheduled for release on 22 December 2000, ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' was delayed following the arrest of its producer Nazim Rizvi and financier [[Bharat Shah]]. The [[Central Bureau of Investigation]] alleged connections between the film’s financing and [[Organised crime in India#Mumbai underworld|Mumbai underworld]] figure [[Chhota Shakeel]], leading to the temporary seizure of the film's prints. It was eventually released in March 2001.
Critical praise was majorly directed towards Zinta's performance as a prostitute-turned-surrogate mother, earning her a [[Filmfare Award for Best Supporting Actress|Best Supporting Actress]] nomination at the [[47th Filmfare Awards]], the only nomination for the film. The film has often been associated with surrogacy in Indian popular culture. This film was remade as a television drama series named ''[[Dil Se Dil Tak]]'' in which [[Sidharth Shukla]] portrayed as Raj, [[Rashami Desai]] as Priya and [[Jasmin Bhasin]] as Madhubala.  
 
The film received mixed-to-positive reviews from critics. While the direction and storyline attracted some criticism, Zinta’s performance as a prostitute-turned-surrogate mother received widespread acclaim and earned her a nomination for [[Filmfare Award for Best Supporting Actress|Best Supporting Actress]] at the [[47th Filmfare Awards]]—the film’s sole nomination. ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' emerged as a commercial success, ranking as the [[List of Hindi films of 2001#Highest-grossing films|sixth highest-grossing Hindi film of the year]]. Over time, it has been regarded as a landmark film in Bollywood’s cinematic portrayal of surrogacy, and later inspired the Indian television series [[Dil Se Dil Tak|''Dil Se Dil Tak'']] (2017).


== Plot ==
== Plot ==
Raj Malhotra and Priya, members of affluent Indian families, meet at a wedding and fall in love. After marrying, Priya becomes pregnant but suffers a [[miscarriage]], resulting in permanent [[infertility]]. On the advice of Dr. Balraj Chopra, the couple decides to have a child through [[surrogacy]] while concealing Priya's condition from Raj’s conservative family. Due to their social status and concern over media scrutiny, they forgo [[artificial insemination]] and opt for natural conception.
Raj and Priya, who come from well-to-do Indian families, meet at a wedding and fall in love. Soon after they marry, Priya becomes pregnant. Early in the pregnancy, Priya miscarries and becomes permanently infertile. On Dr. Balraj Chopra's advice, they decide to look for a [[surrogate mother]] to bear Raj's child and hide Priya's infertility from his conservative family. Since the process of [[artificial insemination]] could be revealed in the Indian media due to the family's renown and position in society, the couple agree that pregnancy should be achieved by means of sexual relations between Raj and the surrogate mother. Raj meets Madhubala "Madhu", a prostitute, who agrees to carry Raj's baby in exchange for money. After some much-needed behavioral grooming and a makeover, Madhu meets Priya—who is unaware of Madhu's background—and the three depart for [[Switzerland]] in order to carry out their plan secretly.


Raj contacts Madhubala "Madhu", a [[Prostitution|prostitute]], who agrees to act as a surrogate mother in exchange for money. Following a transformation in her appearance and manners, Madhu is introduced to Priya—who is unaware of Madhu's background—and the three travel to Switzerland to maintain secrecy. Madhu becomes pregnant with Raj’s child, and Raj informs his family that Priya is expecting.
Soon Madhu is pregnant with Raj's child, and he happily tells his family that Priya is expecting. Meanwhile, Raj's business partner Ajay Sharma begins to sexually harass Madhu and she decides to leave Switzerland, mistakenly believing that Raj told his friend that she is a prostitute. Eventually, Priya finds out about Madhu's past, but still believes that Madhu should carry their child and begs her to stay. When Madhu is at home by herself, Raj's friend assaults her but Raj arrives in time to save her. Overwhelmed by Raj's kindness, Madhu falls in love with him.


Complications arise when Raj's associate, Ajay Sharma, harasses Madhu, prompting her to leave [[Switzerland]], believing Raj had revealed her past. Priya later learns the truth about Madhu’s background but convinces her to return and complete the pregnancy. After Raj protects Madhu from Ajay’s assault, she begins to develop feelings for him.
Raj's family suddenly arrives in Switzerland. While Priya reaches for [[Simulated pregnancy|pregnancy-simulating]] pillows, the family meets the heavily pregnant Madhu who is introduced to them as a friend staying with them while her husband is travelling for business. Raj's grandfather Kailashnath and father Ranjit arrange a Godbharaai, a religious [[baby shower]] ceremony. They ask Raj, Priya, and Madhu to return with them to India, where the ritual must be held as formally required by tradition.


Unexpectedly, Raj's family arrives in Switzerland. Madhu is introduced as a friend whose husband is away on business, while Priya pretends to be pregnant using pillows. The family insists on holding a ''godbharai'' ([[baby shower]]) in India. To uphold the illusion, Madhu poses as Priya during the ceremony. Struggling with the emotional attachment to the unborn child, Madhu contemplates keeping the baby.
The ceremony is very important so Priya sends Madhu as herself. An emotional Madhu becomes conflicted about giving up her child. Finding Madhu's room empty and the money dumped on the bed, a frantic Priya pursues her to the train station and slaps Madhu when she confesses that she loves Raj. By the time Raj arrives, Madhu has gone into [[Preterm birth|premature labour]]. The doctor announces that either Madhu or the child can be saved, and Priya asks him to save Madhu. However, both mother and baby survive. Frustrated, Madhu gives the baby to Priya, who quickly settles into a hospital bed with "her" baby. Dr. Balraj Chopra lies to Raj's family that while Priya gave birth, Madhu's child was [[stillborn]].


When Madhu goes into [[Preterm birth|premature labor]], Priya instructs the doctor to save Madhu if forced to choose between her and the child. Both survive, but Madhu ultimately decides to give the baby to Priya. Dr. Chopra tells Raj's family that Priya gave birth, while Madhu’s child was stillborn. Before leaving, Madhu assures Raj that she will abandon prostitution. As he drops her at the airport, he acknowledges her sacrifice with a parting gesture, and she departs contentedly.
When Madhu is ready to leave, she promises Raj that she will not go back to prostitution. When he takes her to the airport, he realizes that she loves him and kisses her forehead. Madhu leaves happily.


== Cast ==
== Cast ==
The cast is listed below:<ref name="Cast&Crew01">{{Cite web |title=Chori Chori Chupke Chupke Cast & Crew |url=https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/movie/chori-chori-chupke-chupke/cast/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201015022431/https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/movie/chori-chori-chupke-chupke/cast/ |archive-date=15 October 2020 |access-date=12 October 2020 |website=Bollywood Hungama}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Chori Chori Chupke Chupke Cast |url=https://www.boxofficeindia.com/cast_crew.php?movieid=662 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201015022516/https://www.boxofficeindia.com/cast_crew.php?movieid=662 |archive-date=15 October 2020 |access-date=12 October 2020 |website=Box Office India}}</ref>
The cast is listed below:<ref name="Cast&Crew01">{{Cite web |title=Chori Chori Chupke Chupke Cast & Crew |url=https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/movie/chori-chori-chupke-chupke/cast/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201015022431/https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/movie/chori-chori-chupke-chupke/cast/ |archive-date=15 October 2020 |access-date=12 October 2020 |website=Bollywood Hungama |date=9 March 2001 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Chori Chori Chupke Chupke Cast |url=https://www.boxofficeindia.com/cast_crew.php?movieid=662 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201015022516/https://www.boxofficeindia.com/cast_crew.php?movieid=662 |archive-date=15 October 2020 |access-date=12 October 2020 |website=Box Office India}}</ref>
{{div col begin}}
{{div col begin}}
* [[Salman Khan]] as Raj Malhotra
* [[Salman Khan]] as Raj Malhotra
Line 66: Line 64:


==Production==
==Production==
Director duo [[Abbas–Mustan]] had almost completed ''[[Ajnabee (2001 film)|Ajnabee]]'' by October 1999 when they declared ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' as their next project.<ref name="Tribune99">{{Cite news |last=Mittal |first=Madhur |date=3 October 1999 |title=Abbas–Mastan's masti |work=[[The Tribune (Chandigarh)|The Tribune]] |url=https://www.tribuneindia.com/1999/99oct03/sunday/bolywood.htm |access-date=15 October 2020}}</ref> The three leads, Salman Khan, Rani Mukerji, and Preity Zinta, previously starred together in the romantic comedy ''[[Har Dil Jo Pyar Karega]]'' (2000).<ref name="Tribune99" /> Producer Nazim Rizvi clarified that the casting of the three actors happened before they signed for the latter film.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Renuka |first=Methil |date=27 November 2000 |title=Action replay |language=en |work=[[India Today]] |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/eyecatchers/story/20001127-salman-khan-rani-mukherjee-and-preity-zinta-to-play-winsome-threesome-again-778489-2000-11-27 |url-status=live |access-date=12 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201015022624/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/eyecatchers/story/20001127-salman-khan-rani-mukherjee-and-preity-zinta-to-play-winsome-threesome-again-778489-2000-11-27 |archive-date=15 October 2020}}</ref> Khan, Mukerji and Zinta were paid {{INRConvert|1.5|c}}, {{INRConvert|0.24|c}}, and {{INRConvert|0.25|c}} for their roles, respectively (all sums unadjusted for inflation).<ref name="pay">{{Cite web |date=December 2000 |title=Under suspicion |url=http://www.indiafm.com/scoop/dec/0112cccc/index.shtml |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010124095900/http://www.indiafm.com/scoop/dec/0112cccc/index.shtml |archive-date=24 January 2001 |access-date=13 October 2020 |website=Bollywood Hungama}}</ref> Zinta was initially reluctant to play her role, as she was unsure she was suited to play a prostitute, but she eventually accepted it at the directors' persuasion. To prepare for it, she visited several bars and nightclubs in Mumbai's [[Red-light district|red-light areas]] to study the lingo and mannerisms of sex-workers.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ashraf |first=Syed Firdaus |date=9 January 2003 |title=Bharat Shah case: Preity Zinta sticks to her stand |url=https://www.rediff.com/news/report/shah/20030109.htm |access-date=15 October 2020 |work=Rediff.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=29 April 2005 |title=Why Preity refused to play a prostitute... |url=http://www.sify.com/movies/why-preity-refused-to-play-a-prostitute-news-bollywood-kkfv5gbagdf.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130919212414/http://www.sify.com/movies/why-preity-refused-to-play-a-prostitute-news-bollywood-kkfv5gbagdf.html |archive-date=19 September 2013 |access-date=11 October 2020 |website=[[Sify]] |agency=IndiaFM News Bureau}}</ref>


=== Development ===
''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' was made on a budget of {{INRConvert|13|c|year=2001}}.<ref name="budget" /> Principal photography started in early 2000 and lasted two months.<ref name="Cast&Crew01" /><ref name="pay" /> Location filming, performed by Thomas A. Xavier, took place in both [[Mahabaleshwar]] and Switzerland.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Puri |first1=Amrish |title=[[The Act of Life]] |last2=Sabharwal |first2=Jyoti |date=24 May 2006 |publisher=Stellar Publishers |isbn=978-81-902247-4-1 |page=335 |language=en |author-link=Amrish Puri}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Mahmood |first=Abdulla |date=16 May 2008 |title=Bollywood hot spots over the years |work=[[Gulf News]] |url=https://gulfnews.com/travel/bollywood-hot-spots-over-the-years-1.21285 |url-status=live |access-date=15 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201015025710/https://gulfnews.com/travel/bollywood-hot-spots-over-the-years-1.21285 |archive-date=15 October 2020}}</ref> The film was edited by Hussain A. Burmawala, and Surendra Sodhi composed the background score.<ref name="Cast&Crew01" /><ref>{{Cite book |last=Param |first=Arunachalam |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UNvyDwAAQBAJ |title=BollySwar: 2001–2010 |publisher=Mavrix Infotech Private Limited |year=2019 |isbn=978-81-938482-0-3 |page=20}}</ref>
Director duo [[Abbas–Mustan]] announced ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' as their next project in October 1999, while nearing completion of their thriller ''[[Ajnabee (2001 film)|Ajnabee]]'' (2001).<ref name="Tribune99">{{Cite news |last=Mittal |first=Madhur |date=3 October 1999 |title=Abbas–Mastan's masti |url=https://www.tribuneindia.com/1999/99oct03/sunday/bolywood.htm |access-date=15 October 2020 |work=[[The Tribune (Chandigarh)|The Tribune]]}}</ref> The film reunited [[Salman Khan]], [[Rani Mukerji]], and [[Preity Zinta]], who had previously appeared together in [[Har Dil Jo Pyar Karega|''Har Dil Jo Pyar Karega'']] (2000).<ref name="Tribune99" /> Producer Nazim Rizvi later clarified that the casting of the three leads had been finalized prior to their commitment to that film.<ref name=":0">{{Cite news |last=Renuka |first=Methil |date=27 November 2000 |title=Action replay |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/eyecatchers/story/20001127-salman-khan-rani-mukherjee-and-preity-zinta-to-play-winsome-threesome-again-778489-2000-11-27 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201015022624/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/eyecatchers/story/20001127-salman-khan-rani-mukherjee-and-preity-zinta-to-play-winsome-threesome-again-778489-2000-11-27 |archive-date=15 October 2020 |access-date=12 October 2020 |work=[[India Today]] |language=en}}</ref>


=== Casting ===
Initially, [[Shah Rukh Khan]] was offered the lead role as Raj Malhotra, who had previously worked in the directors' two films ''[[Baazigar]]'', and ''[[Baadshah (1999 film)|Baadshah]]''. However, he declined due to lack of dates, and then Salman Khan was approached and has accepted the offer.
[[Salman Khan]], [[Rani Mukerji]], and [[Preity Zinta]] were cast in lead roles, with Khan portraying Raj, Mukerji as Priya, and Zinta as Madhubala. The three actors were paid ₹1.5 crore, ₹24 lakh, and ₹25 lakh respectively (unadjusted for inflation).<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ashraf |first=Syed Firdaus |date=9 January 2003 |title=Bharat Shah case: Preity Zinta sticks to her stand |url=https://www.rediff.com/news/report/shah/20030109.htm |access-date=15 October 2020 |work=Rediff.com}}</ref> Zinta initially hesitated to accept the role of a [[Prostitution|prostitute]], expressing doubts about her suitability for the character. However, after persuasion from the directors, she agreed to take on the part.<ref name=":0" /><ref name="pay">{{Cite web |date=December 2000 |title=Under suspicion |url=http://www.indiafm.com/scoop/dec/0112cccc/index.shtml |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010124095900/http://www.indiafm.com/scoop/dec/0112cccc/index.shtml |archive-date=24 January 2001 |access-date=13 October 2020 |website=Bollywood Hungama}}</ref> To prepare for the role, Zinta conducted research by visiting bars and nightclubs in Mumbai’s [[Red-light district|red-light areas]] to observe the speech and mannerisms of sex workers.<ref>{{Cite web |date=29 April 2005 |title=Why Preity refused to play a prostitute... |url=http://www.sify.com/movies/why-preity-refused-to-play-a-prostitute-news-bollywood-kkfv5gbagdf.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130919212414/http://www.sify.com/movies/why-preity-refused-to-play-a-prostitute-news-bollywood-kkfv5gbagdf.html |archive-date=19 September 2013 |access-date=11 October 2020 |website=[[Sify]] |agency=IndiaFM News Bureau}}</ref>
 
[[Shah Rukh Khan]] was initially approached to play the role of Raj Malhotra, following his earlier collaborations with Abbas–Mustan in ''[[Baazigar]]'' (1993) and ''[[Baadshah (1999 film)|Baadshah]]'' (1999). However, he declined due to scheduling conflicts, and the role eventually went to Salman Khan.<ref name="pay" />
 
=== Filming ===
''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' was produced on a budget of ₹13 crore (equivalent to ₹52 crore or US$6.1 million in 2023).<ref name="budget" /> Principal photography began in early 2000 and was completed over two months<ref name="Cast&Crew01" /><ref name="pay" />. Cinematography was handled by Thomas A. Xavier, with location shooting conducted in [[Mahabaleshwar]] and [[Switzerland]].<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Puri |first1=Amrish |author-link=Amrish Puri |title=[[The Act of Life]] |last2=Sabharwal |first2=Jyoti |date=24 May 2006 |publisher=Stellar Publishers |isbn=978-81-902247-4-1 |page=335 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Mahmood |first=Abdulla |date=16 May 2008 |title=Bollywood hot spots over the years |url=https://gulfnews.com/travel/bollywood-hot-spots-over-the-years-1.21285 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201015025710/https://gulfnews.com/travel/bollywood-hot-spots-over-the-years-1.21285 |archive-date=15 October 2020 |access-date=15 October 2020 |work=[[Gulf News]]}}</ref> The film was edited by Hussain A. Burmawala, while the background score was composed by Surendra Sodhi.<ref name="Cast&Crew01" /><ref>{{Cite book |last=Param |first=Arunachalam |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UNvyDwAAQBAJ |title=BollySwar: 2001–2010 |publisher=Mavrix Infotech Private Limited |year=2019 |isbn=978-81-938482-0-3 |page=20}}</ref>


==Themes and influence==
==Themes and influence==
''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' attracted attention for its exploration of [[surrogacy]] and [[prostitution]]—two subjects rarely addressed in mainstream [[Hindi cinema]] at the time of its release. The film's depiction of surrogacy, achieved through [[sexual intercourse]] rather than [[artificial insemination]], sparked discussions about the portrayal of women and reproductive choices in Indian popular culture.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Shikha |first=Sharma |date=2020 |title=Raising awareness on surrogacy through films |url=https://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:mcomm&volume=14&issue=2&article=006 |journal=Mass Communicator: International Journal of Communication Studies |volume=14 |issue=2 |issn=0973-9688}}</ref><ref name="Shamim">{{Cite news |last=Shamim |first=M. |date=11 March 2001 |title=Chori Chori Chupke Chupke — and how! |url=http://hindu.com/2001/03/11/stories/14112185.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121111003656/http://hindu.com/2001/03/11/stories/14112185.htm |archive-date=11 November 2012 |access-date=11 October 2020 |work=[[The Hindu]]}}</ref> Scholar Aditya Bharadwaj argued that the film draws an implicit analogy between surrogacy and prostitution, reinforcing prevailing taboos surrounding both practices.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Bharadwaj |first=Aditya |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aG4yCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA179 |title=Conceptions: Infertility and Procreative Technologies in India |date=2016 |publisher=Berghahn Books |isbn=978-1-78533-231-9 |pages=179 |language=en}}</ref>
The film generated some controversy before and during its release for being one of the only [[Hindi]]-language films dealing with the [[taboo]] issue of [[Surrogacy in India|surrogate childbirth in India]], in addition to [[prostitution in India]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Shikha |first=Sharma |date=2020 |title=Raising awareness on surrogacy through films |url=https://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:mcomm&volume=14&issue=2&article=006 |journal=Mass Communicator: International Journal of Communication Studies |volume=14 |issue=2 |issn=0973-9688}}</ref><ref name="Shamim">{{Cite news |last=Shamim |first=M. |date=11 March 2001 |title=Chori Chori Chupke Chupke — and how! |url=http://hindu.com/2001/03/11/stories/14112185.htm |access-date=11 October 2020 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121111003656/http://hindu.com/2001/03/11/stories/14112185.htm |work=[[The Hindu]] |archive-date=11 November 2012}}</ref> Surrogacy in the film is not achieved through artificial insemination but sexual intercourse, and author Aditya Bharadwaj argued that the film draws an analogy between surrogacy and prostitution.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Bharadwaj |first=Aditya |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aG4yCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA179 |title=Conceptions: Infertility and Procreative Technologies in India |date=2016 |publisher=Berghahn Books |isbn=978-1-78533-231-9 |pages=179 |language=en}}</ref> Anindita Majumdar, author of the book ''Surrogacy'' (2018), wrote, "In popular Indian culture, surrogacy has come to be associated with the 2001 Hindi language film ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke''".<ref name="Majumdar18">{{Cite book |last=Majumdar |first=Anindita |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kPqNDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT22 |title=Surrogacy |date=2018 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-909654-1 |pages=19–23 |language=en}}</ref> According to author Daniel Grey, that Madhubala was a prostitute before becoming a surrogate "reinforces a stereotyped and erroneous popular association between the two roles that has contributed to considerable prejudice on the Subcontinent against women who act as surrogates".<ref>{{Cite book |last=Grey |first=Daniel |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=L7szDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA249 |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Infertility in History: Approaches, Contexts and Perspectives |date=2017 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-1-137-52080-7 |editor-last=Davis |editor-first=Gayle |pages=249 |language=en |editor-last2=Loughran |editor-first2=Tracey}}</ref>
 
In her 2018 book ''Surrogacy'', author Anindita Majumdar noted that the film played a significant role in shaping public perception of surrogacy in India, writing, "In popular Indian culture, surrogacy has come to be associated with the 2001 Hindi language film ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke''."<ref name="Majumdar18">{{Cite book |last=Majumdar |first=Anindita |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kPqNDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT22 |title=Surrogacy |date=2018 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-909654-1 |pages=19–23 |language=en}}</ref> Historian Daniel Grey similarly observed that the film's portrayal of Madhubala—a sex worker who becomes a surrogate—helped solidify a “stereotyped and erroneous” association between prostitution and surrogacy, contributing to societal prejudice against surrogate mothers in the Indian context.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Grey |first=Daniel |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=L7szDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA249 |title=The Palgrave Handbook of Infertility in History: Approaches, Contexts and Perspectives |date=2017 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-1-137-52080-7 |editor-last=Davis |editor-first=Gayle |pages=249 |language=en |editor-last2=Loughran |editor-first2=Tracey}}</ref>
 
Some critics and scholars drew comparisons between ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' and earlier works. According to [[The Hindu|''The Hindu'']], the film borrowed select scenes from ''[[Pretty Woman]]'' (1990) and shared thematic similarities with ''[[Doosri Dulhan]]'' (1983).<ref name="remake">{{Cite news |last=Rustam |first=Chhupa |date=25 March 2001 |title=Double trouble all the way |url=http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/2001/03/25/stories/14252183.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020313014617/http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/2001/03/25/stories/14252183.htm |archive-date=13 March 2002 |access-date=11 October 2020 |work=[[The Hindu]]}}</ref> Academic Lucia Krämer acknowledged visual parallels to ''Pretty Woman'', but argued that they were limited to a single subplot and that the overall narrative diverged significantly.<ref name="Kramer">{{Cite book |last=Krämer |first=Lucia |title=The Oxford Handbook of Adaptation Studies |date=2017 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-933100-0 |editor-last=Leitch |editor-first=Thomas |editor-link=Thomas Leitch |page=258 |language=en |chapter=Adaptation in Bollywood |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3FkjDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA258}}</ref> In her 2017 book ''Transnational Commercial Surrogacy and the (Un)Making of Kin in India'', Majumdar analyzed both ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' and ''Doosri Dulhan'', noting that surrogate characters in both films begin as "fallen women" uninterested in motherhood, only to develop maternal instincts over the course of their pregnancies.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Majumdar |first=Anindita |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NlNUDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT29 |title=Transnational Commercial Surrogacy and the (Un)Making of Kin in India |date=2017 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-909142-3 |pages=14–15 |language=en}}</ref>


Zinta’s character of Madhubala was described by [[Anupama Chopra]] and Krämer as a "[[hooker with a heart of gold]]"—a recurring trope in popular cinema.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Chopra |first=Anupama |author-link=Anupama Chopra |date=2 April 2001 |title=The courtesan club |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/society-the-arts/films/story/20010402-preity-zinta-joins-group-of-heroines-who-played-role-of-courtesan-girl-775422-2001-04-02 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201015023447/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/society-the-arts/films/story/20010402-preity-zinta-joins-group-of-heroines-who-played-role-of-courtesan-girl-775422-2001-04-02 |archive-date=15 October 2020 |access-date=12 October 2020 |work=India Today |language=en}}</ref><ref name="Kramer" /> Sociologist Steve Derné argued that the film portrays Madhubala as a hypersexual and materialistic woman who is ultimately "redeemed" through transformation into a consumer and maternal figure. He credited the film with blending the archetypal roles of “heroine” and “vamp” in Hindi cinema, positioning Zinta as a “legitimate heroine.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Derne |first=Steve D. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ybaGAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA107 |title=Globalization on the Ground: New Media and the Transformation of Culture, Class, and Gender in India |date=2008 |publisher=SAGE Publications India |isbn=978-81-321-0038-6 |pages=107–108 |language=en}}</ref> Scholar S. Banaji observed a shift in the film’s moral framing of the prostitute character, reflecting a broader evolution in Hindi film narratives.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Banaji |first=S. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=saXtCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA9 |title=Reading 'Bollywood': The Young Audience and Hindi Films |date=2006 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-0-230-50120-1 |pages=9 |language=en}}</ref>
According to ''[[The Hindu]]'', some of film's scenes were said to have been borrowed from ''[[Pretty Woman]]'' (1990) and the storyline inspired by ''[[Doosri Dulhan]]'' (1983).<ref name="remake">{{Cite news |last=Rustam |first=Chhupa |date=25 March 2001 |title=Double trouble all the way |url=http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/2001/03/25/stories/14252183.htm |access-date=11 October 2020 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020313014617/http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/2001/03/25/stories/14252183.htm |work=[[The Hindu]] |archive-date=13 March 2002}}</ref> According to Krämer, the similarities between ''Pretty Woman'' and ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' are limited to replicated scenes in "merely one plot strand among many", in an otherwise different story.<ref name="Kramer" /> In another book by Majumdar, ''Transnational Commercial Surrogacy and the (Un)Making of Kin in India'' (2017), she discusses the similarity between ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' and ''Doosri Dulhan''. Majumdar describes the surrogate mothers as "fallen women" who are first portrayed as aberrant women with no interest in motherhood, who gradually develop a sense of maternal instinct during the process of pregnancy.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Majumdar |first=Anindita |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NlNUDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT29 |title=Transnational Commercial Surrogacy and the (Un)Making of Kin in India |date=2017 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-909142-3 |pages=14–15 |language=en}}</ref>


Film critic [[Bhawana Somaaya]], while critical of the film's commercial elements, praised its portrayal of Priya (Rani Mukerji), noting that she was uniquely positioned as the decision-maker in the surrogacy arrangement—an uncommon depiction for female characters in mainstream Hindi films of the period.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Somaaya |first=Bhawana |author-link=Bhawana Somaaya |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=s_FkAAAAMAAJ |title=Cinema: Images & Issues |date=2004 |publisher=Rupa & Company |isbn=9788129103703 |page=34 |language=en}}</ref>
[[Anupama Chopra]] of ''[[India Today]]'' described Zinta's character of Madhubala as [[hooker with a heart of gold]], as did academic Lucia Krämer.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Chopra |first=Anupama |author-link=Anupama Chopra |date=2 April 2001 |title=The courtesan club |language=en |work=India Today |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/society-the-arts/films/story/20010402-preity-zinta-joins-group-of-heroines-who-played-role-of-courtesan-girl-775422-2001-04-02 |access-date=12 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201015023447/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/society-the-arts/films/story/20010402-preity-zinta-joins-group-of-heroines-who-played-role-of-courtesan-girl-775422-2001-04-02 |archive-date=15 October 2020}}</ref><ref name="Kramer">{{Cite book |last=Krämer |first=Lucia |title=The Oxford Handbook of Adaptation Studies |date=2017 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-933100-0 |editor-last=Leitch |editor-first=Thomas |editor-link=Thomas Leitch |page=258 |language=en |chapter=Adaptation in Bollywood |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3FkjDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA258}}</ref> Sociologist Steve Derné wrote in his book ''Globalization on the Ground: New Media and the Transformation of Culture, Class, and Gender in India'' that through the character of Madhubala, ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' becomes one of the films which portray "excessively sexual, greedy women who are redeemed by being remade as consumers". Derné further credited the film with melding the stereotypical "heroine" and "vamp" roles of Hindi heroines in contrast to how they were portrayed in previous decades, describing Zinta as a "legitimate heroine" in the film.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Derne |first=Steve D. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ybaGAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA107 |title=Globalization on the Ground: New Media and the Transformation of Culture, Class, and Gender in India |date=2008 |publisher=SAGE Publications India |isbn=978-81-321-0038-6 |pages=107–108 |language=en}}</ref> S. Banaji spoke of a "transformation in the 'moral' consciousness of the prostitute".<ref>{{Cite book |last=Banaji |first=S. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=saXtCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA9 |title=Reading 'Bollywood': The Young Audience and Hindi Films |date=2006 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-0-230-50120-1 |pages=9 |language=en}}</ref> [[Bhawana Somaaya]], while critical of the film's "regular packaging of commercial clichés", commended it for the unique portrayal of the wife, played by Mukerji, who is the sole decision-maker in the family throughout the entire process of surrogacy.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Somaaya |first=Bhawana |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=s_FkAAAAMAAJ |title=Cinema: Images & Issues |date=2004 |publisher=Rupa & Company |page=34 |isbn=9788129103703 |language=en |author-link=Bhawana Somaaya}}</ref>


==Soundtrack==
==Soundtrack==
Line 104: Line 92:
| producer  = Anu Malik
| producer  = Anu Malik
}}
}}
The soundtrack for ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' was composed by [[Anu Malik]], with lyrics written by [[Sameer (lyricist)|Sameer]].<ref name="Cast&Crew01" /> The album was released in 2000 by [[Universal Music India]].<ref name="iTunes">{{Cite web |title=Chori Chori Chupke Chupke (Soundtrack from the Motion Picture) |url=https://music.apple.com/gb/album/chori-chori-chupke-chupke-soundtrack-from-motion-picture/1442870128 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201015023609/https://music.apple.com/gb/album/chori-chori-chupke-chupke-soundtrack-from-motion-picture/1442870128 |archive-date=15 October 2020 |access-date=13 October 2020 |website=[[iTunes]]}}</ref>
The soundtrack for ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' was composed by [[Anu Malik]] and the lyrics were written by [[Sameer (lyricist)|Sameer]].<ref name="Cast&Crew01" /> It was released in 2000 by [[Universal Music India]].<ref name="iTunes">{{Cite web |title=Chori Chori Chupke Chupke (Soundtrack from the Motion Picture) |url=https://music.apple.com/gb/album/chori-chori-chupke-chupke-soundtrack-from-motion-picture/1442870128 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201015023609/https://music.apple.com/gb/album/chori-chori-chupke-chupke-soundtrack-from-motion-picture/1442870128 |archive-date=15 October 2020 |access-date=13 October 2020 |website=[[iTunes]]}}</ref> According to the Indian trade website [[Box Office India]], with around two million units sold, the soundtrack became the sixth highest-selling music album of the year.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Music Hits 2000–2009 (Figures in Units) |url=http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=286&catName=MjAwMC0yMDA5 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080215081557/http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=286&catName=MjAwMC0yMDA5&PHPSESSID=108b9056cd4ca14236f9c6119d34dcce |archive-date=15 February 2008 |access-date=20 December 2016 |website=Box Office India}}</ref>


According to the trade website [[Box Office India|''Box Office India'']], the soundtrack sold approximately two million units, making it the sixth highest-selling Hindi film music album of the year.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Music Hits 2000–2009 (Figures in Units) |url=http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=286&catName=MjAwMC0yMDA5 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080215081557/http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=286&catName=MjAwMC0yMDA5&PHPSESSID=108b9056cd4ca14236f9c6119d34dcce |archive-date=15 February 2008 |access-date=20 December 2016 |website=Box Office India}}</ref>{{Track listing
{{Track listing
| headline    = ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' (Soundtrack from the Motion Picture)<ref name="iTunes" />
| headline    = ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' (Soundtrack from the Motion Picture)<ref name="iTunes" />
| extra_column = Singer(s)
| extra_column = Singer(s)
Line 143: Line 131:
==Release==
==Release==
[[File:Salman Khan, Rani Mukerji and Preity Zinta.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|[[Salman Khan]], [[Rani Mukerji]] and [[Preity Zinta]] (l-r) at the audio release of ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' in 2000]]
[[File:Salman Khan, Rani Mukerji and Preity Zinta.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|[[Salman Khan]], [[Rani Mukerji]] and [[Preity Zinta]] (l-r) at the audio release of ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' in 2000]]
''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' was initially scheduled for theatrical release on 22 December 2000.<ref name="rediff">{{Cite web |last=Rediff Entertainment Bureau |date=13 December 2000 |title=Showbuzz! Chori Chori Chupke Chupke producer arrested |url=https://www.rediff.com/movies/2000/dec/13riz.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080226024239/https://www.rediff.com/movies/2000/dec/13riz.htm |archive-date=26 February 2008 |access-date=11 October 2020 |work=Rediff.com}}</ref> However, the release was delayed following the arrest of producer Nazim Rizvi in December 2000 and financier [[Bharat Shah]] in January 2001. Both were charged with obtaining funding from [[Organised crime in India#Mumbai underworld|Mumbai underworld]] figure [[Chhota Shakeel]] and allegedly coercing prominent actors, including [[Salman Khan]], to participate in the film, with the intent of sharing profits with Shakeel.<ref name="rediff" /><ref name="Bharat">{{Cite news |last=Harding |first=Luke |date=14 March 2001 |title=Dirty money cleans up for Bollywood blockbuster |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/mar/14/filmnews.film |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140510162843/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/mar/14/filmnews.film |archive-date=10 May 2014 |access-date=11 October 2020 |work=[[The Guardian]] |language=en}}</ref><ref name="guilty">{{Cite journal |last=Rajadhyaksha |first=Ashish |date=2014 |title=The Guilty Secret: The Latter Career of the Bollywood's Illegitimacy |url=https://ari.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/wps14_230.pdf |journal=Asia Research Institute |series=230 |language=en |location=Bangalore, India}}</ref> Rizvi had reportedly been under police surveillance for several months, and the [[Central Bureau of Investigation]] (CBI) seized the film's prints, which were subsequently held by a court receiver.<ref name="today">{{Cite news |date=31 December 2001 |title=Diamond daddy |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/20011231-diamond-merchant-bharat-shah-held-for-aiding-underworld-don-chhota-shakeel-776546-2001-12-31 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201012170450/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/20011231-diamond-merchant-bharat-shah-held-for-aiding-underworld-don-chhota-shakeel-776546-2001-12-31 |archive-date=12 October 2020 |access-date=11 October 2020 |work=India Today |language=en}}</ref>
The film's initial release date of 22 December 2000<ref name=rediff>{{Cite web |last=Rediff Entertainment Bureau |date=13 December 2000 |title=Showbuzz! Chori Chori Chupke Chupke producer arrested |url=https://www.rediff.com/movies/2000/dec/13riz.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080226024239/https://www.rediff.com/movies/2000/dec/13riz.htm |archive-date=26 February 2008 |access-date=11 October 2020 |work=Rediff.com}}</ref> was delayed when producer Nazim Rizvi was arrested in December and film financier [[Bharat Shah]] was arrested in January; both were charged with receiving funding from [[Chhota Shakeel]] of the [[Organised crime in India|Mumbai underworld]] and pressuring leading Bollywood actors—specifically, Khan—to appear in the film and for the profits to be shared with Shakeel.<ref name=rediff/><ref name="Bharat">{{Cite news |last=Harding |first=Luke |date=14 March 2001 |title=Dirty money cleans up for Bollywood blockbuster |language=en |work=[[The Guardian]] |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/mar/14/filmnews.film |url-status=live |access-date=11 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140510162843/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/mar/14/filmnews.film |archive-date=10 May 2014}}</ref><ref name=guilty>{{Cite journal |last=Rajadhyaksha |first=Ashish |date=2014 |title=The Guilty Secret: The Latter Career of the Bollywood's Illegitimacy |url=https://ari.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/wps14_230.pdf |journal=Asia Research Institute |series=230 |language=en |location=Bangalore, India}}</ref><ref name=today>{{Cite news |date=31 December 2001 |title=Diamond daddy |language=en |work=India Today |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/20011231-diamond-merchant-bharat-shah-held-for-aiding-underworld-don-chhota-shakeel-776546-2001-12-31 |url-status=live |access-date=11 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201012170450/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/20011231-diamond-merchant-bharat-shah-held-for-aiding-underworld-don-chhota-shakeel-776546-2001-12-31 |archive-date=12 October 2020}}</ref> Rizvi had reportedly been under telephone surveillance by the [[Mumbai Police]] for a number of months.<ref name="Bharat"/> The [[Central Bureau of Investigation]] seized the film's [[Release print|prints]] and delivered them to the court receiver.<ref name="Bharat"/> The [[Negative (photography)|negatives]] were released on 12 February 2001 on a judicial order.<ref>{{Cite web |date=12 February 2001 |title=Judge allows release of 'Chori Chori Chupke Chupke' |url=https://www.rediff.com/news/2001/feb/12shah.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041228051024/https://www.rediff.com/news/2001/feb/12shah.htm |archive-date=28 December 2004 |access-date=12 October 2020 |work=Rediff.com}}</ref> In its ruling, the court ordered all profits from the film to go to the [[Maharashtra]] state government.<ref name="Bharat"/> Rivzi and Shah were still incarcerated when ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' opened to the public on 9 March 2001.<ref name="Bharat"/> The film was released with an opening credit thanking the Special Court, [[Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act|MCOCA]], the [[Criminal Investigation Department (India)#Crime Branch CID|Crime Branch]], the Mumbai Police, and the court receiver, "without whose untiring efforts and good office this picture would never have been made".<ref name=guilty/>
 
On 12 February 2001, the film’s [[Negative (photography)|negatives]] were released by judicial order, with all profits mandated to be deposited with the Maharashtra state government.<ref>{{Cite web |date=12 February 2001 |title=Judge allows release of 'Chori Chori Chupke Chupke' |url=https://www.rediff.com/news/2001/feb/12shah.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041228051024/https://www.rediff.com/news/2001/feb/12shah.htm |archive-date=28 December 2004 |access-date=12 October 2020 |work=Rediff.com}}</ref><ref name="Bharat" /> Rizvi and Shah remained in custody at the time of the film’s release on 9 March 2001.<ref name="Bharat" /> The opening credits included a note of gratitude to the Special Court ([[Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act|MCOCA]]), [[Criminal Investigation Department (India)#Crime Branch CID|Crime Branch]], Mumbai Police, and the court receiver “without whose untiring efforts and good office this picture would never have been made.<ref name="guilty" />


The film's release was met with protests related to its alleged underworld financing.<ref>{{Cite news |date=9 March 2001 |title="Chori Chori" opens amid protests |url=https://www.tribuneindia.com/2001/20010310/main6.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071215233951/https://www.tribuneindia.com/2001/20010310/main6.htm |archive-date=15 December 2007 |access-date=11 October 2020 |work=The Tribune}}</ref> Nevertheless, widespread publicity and controversy generated high anticipation, with 325 prints sold in advance of release.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Bhattacharyya |first=Debashis |date=6 March 2001 |title=Chupke Crores For Chori Chori |url=https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/chupke-crores-for-chori-chori/cid/934281 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201015023850/https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/chupke-crores-for-chori-chori/cid/934281 |archive-date=15 October 2020 |access-date=12 October 2020 |work=The Telegraph}}</ref> Two days before the theatrical opening, Abbas–Mustan held a special screening for senior officials of the Mumbai Police to demonstrate that the film contained no objectionable content.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Nahta |first=Komal |author-link=Komal Nahta |date=8 March 2001 |title=Special screening of CCCC for top cops |url=https://www.rediff.com/entertai/2001/mar/08cccc.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201012214955/https://www.rediff.com/entertai/2001/mar/08cccc.htm |archive-date=12 October 2020 |access-date=12 October 2020 |work=Rediff.com}}</ref>
The film's release took place amid protests due to its alleged funding by the underworld.<ref>{{Cite news |date=9 March 2001 |title="Chori Chori" opens amid protests |work=The Tribune |url=https://www.tribuneindia.com/2001/20010310/main6.htm |url-status=live |access-date=11 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071215233951/https://www.tribuneindia.com/2001/20010310/main6.htm |archive-date=15 December 2007}}</ref> Due to the controversy surrounding its delayed release—and the recurrent publicity around it—the film was expected to be a big success, with 325 prints sold before release.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Bhattacharyya |first=Debashis |date=6 March 2001 |title=Chupke Crores For Chori Chori |work=The Telegraph |url=https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/chupke-crores-for-chori-chori/cid/934281 |url-status=live |access-date=12 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201015023850/https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/chupke-crores-for-chori-chori/cid/934281 |archive-date=15 October 2020}}</ref> The director duo held a special screening of the film two days prior to its release for the senior brass of the Mumbai Police, to fulfill a promise made earlier in order to prove that no objectionable content appeared in the film, as could have been projected.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Nahta |first=Komal |author-link=Komal Nahta |date=8 March 2001 |title=Special screening of CCCC for top cops |url=https://www.rediff.com/entertai/2001/mar/08cccc.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201012214955/https://www.rediff.com/entertai/2001/mar/08cccc.htm |archive-date=12 October 2020 |access-date=12 October 2020 |work=Rediff.com}}</ref>


Certified "[[Central Board of Film Certification#Certificates and guidelines|U]]" (universal) by the [[Central Board of Film Certification]],<ref>{{Cite web |last=IndiaFM News Bureau |date=20 December 2000 |title=Chori Chori Chupke Chupke given U certificate by the Censor |url=https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/bollywood/chori-chori-chupke-chupke-given-u-certificate-by-the-censor/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201015025041/https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/bollywood/chori-chori-chupke-chupke-given-u-certificate-by-the-censor/ |archive-date=15 October 2020 |access-date=11 October 2020 |website=Bollywood Hungama |language=en}}</ref> ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' opened to a wide theatrical rollout across India.
Certified [[Central Board of Film Certification#Certificates and guidelines|U]] (suitable for all age groups) by the [[Central Board of Film Certification]],<ref>{{Cite web |last=IndiaFM News Bureau |date=20 December 2000 |title=Chori Chori Chupke Chupke given U certificate by the Censor |url=https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/bollywood/chori-chori-chupke-chupke-given-u-certificate-by-the-censor/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201015025041/https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/bollywood/chori-chori-chupke-chupke-given-u-certificate-by-the-censor/ |archive-date=15 October 2020 |access-date=11 October 2020 |website=Bollywood Hungama |language=en}}</ref> ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' opened to a wide audience and emerged a commercial success and one of the highest-grossing [[List of Bollywood films of 2001|films of 2001]].<ref name="BOI">{{Cite web |title=Top Hits 2001 |url=http://www.boxofficeindia.com/hit-down.php?txtYearlyData=2000-2009&year=2001 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161115193406/http://www.boxofficeindia.com/hit-down.php?txtYearlyData=2000-2009&year=2001 |archive-date=15 November 2016 |access-date=15 October 2020 |website=Box Office India}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Box Office Collection India 2001 |url=https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/box-office-collections/filterbycountry/IND/2001/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200529030338/https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/box-office-collections/filterbycountry/IND/2001/ |archive-date=29 May 2020 |access-date=11 October 2020 |website=Bollywood Hungama |language=en}}</ref> Still, despite a strong opening, the film gradually lost public interest; it eventually grossed {{INRConvert|31|c}} against its {{INRConvert|13|c}} budget, with additional $1.4&nbsp;million earned overseas, leaving its worldwide gross in 2001 at {{INRConvert|37.51|c|year=2001}}.<ref name="CCCCBOI" /> ''[[Box Office India]]'' concluded the film's final commercial performance with the verdict "semi hit".<ref name="BOI" />


== Reception ==
== Reception ==
=== Box office ===
Despite the controversies, ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' emerged as one of the highest-grossing Hindi [[List of Bollywood films of 2001|films of 2001]].<ref name="BOI">{{Cite web |title=Top Hits 2001 |url=http://www.boxofficeindia.com/hit-down.php?txtYearlyData=2000-2009&year=2001 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161115193406/http://www.boxofficeindia.com/hit-down.php?txtYearlyData=2000-2009&year=2001 |archive-date=15 November 2016 |access-date=15 October 2020 |website=Box Office India}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Box Office Collection India 2001 |url=https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/box-office-collections/filterbycountry/IND/2001/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200529030338/https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/box-office-collections/filterbycountry/IND/2001/ |archive-date=29 May 2020 |access-date=11 October 2020 |website=Bollywood Hungama |language=en}}</ref> While it opened to strong box office numbers, interest declined in subsequent weeks. Domestically, the film grossed approximately ₹31 crore (US$3.7 million) against a production budget of ₹13 crore (US$1.5 million). Overseas, it earned an additional US$1.4 million, bringing the worldwide gross to ₹37.51 crore (equivalent to ₹149 crore or US$18 million in 2023).<ref name="CCCCBOI" />
[[Box Office India|''Box Office India'']] ultimately classified the film’s commercial performance as a “semi hit.”<ref name="BOI" />
=== Critical reception ===
[[File:Preity Zinta 2001.jpg|thumb|upright|right|alt=Photo of Zinta at the audio release of ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' in 2001|Critics particularly praised Zinta's performance as Madhubala]]
[[File:Preity Zinta 2001.jpg|thumb|upright|right|alt=Photo of Zinta at the audio release of ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' in 2001|Critics particularly praised Zinta's performance as Madhubala]]
''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' received mixed-to-positive reviews from critics. The film was noted for its attempt to tackle surrogacy—an unconventional subject in Hindi cinema at the time—but faced criticism for its melodramatic treatment and narrative execution. However, widespread praise was directed toward [[Preity Zinta]]'s performance in what was considered a bold and atypical role.
Critics praised the uniqueness of the film for dealing with the rarely-touched subject of surrogacy, but disliked the execution. Preity Zinta's performance, in what was seen as an unconventional role, was especially noted by a number of critics, with high praise for her portrayal of the gradual change her character goes through over the course of the story.<ref name="Different">{{Cite news |last=Bhattacharya |first=Roshmila |author-link=Roshmila Bhattacharya |date=3 August 2001 |title=Preity Zinta Different Strokes |work=Screen |url=http://www.screenindia.com/20010803/fcover1.html |url-status=dead |access-date=14 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20011031180954/http://www.screenindia.com/20010803/fcover1.html |archive-date=31 October 2001}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Kothari |first=Jitendra |year=2001 |title=Preity Zinta: Taking Charge |work=India Today |agency=TNT Movies |url=http://tntmovies.thenewspapertoday.com/starofthemonth/propreity.shtml |url-status=dead |access-date=14 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010626153748/http://tntmovies.thenewspapertoday.com/starofthemonth/propreity.shtml |archive-date=26 June 2001}}</ref> Film critic [[Sukanya Verma]], who was left with "mixed emotions" after seeing the film, noted Zinta's role as "the meatiest part of all", finding her transformation throughout the film "amazingly believable".<ref name="Sukanya">{{Cite web |last=Verma |first=Sukanya |author-link=Sukanya Verma |date=9 March 2001 |title=Preity Trite |url=http://www.rediff.com/movies/2001/mar/09cccc.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181105012127/http://www.rediff.com/movies/2001/mar/09cccc.htm |archive-date=5 November 2018 |access-date=25 January 2008 |work=Rediff.com}}</ref> Padmaraj Nair of ''[[Screen India|Screen]]'' called Zinta the film's "real scene-stealer" for having delivered "a stunning performance".<ref name="Padmaraj">{{Cite news |last=Nair |first=Padmaraj |date=23 March 2001 |title=Desi version of Surrogate Mother |work=Screen |url=http://www.screenindia.com/20010323/review.htm |access-date=19 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030103111004/http://www.screenindia.com/20010323/review.htm |archive-date=3 January 2003}}</ref> Vinayak Chakravorty of ''[[Hindustan Times]]'' hailed Zinta's "admirable zest" as the "trumpcard of the film".<ref name="Vinayak">{{Cite news |last=Chakravorty, Vinayak |date=9 March 2001 |title=Chori Chori Chupke Chupke |work=Hindustan Times |url=http://www.go4i.com/cinema/reviews/bollywood/reviewscccc.shtml |url-status=dead |access-date=19 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010820232724/http://www.go4i.com/cinema/reviews/bollywood/reviewscccc.shtml |archive-date=20 August 2001}}</ref> [[Dinesh Raheja]] of ''India Today'' credited Zinta with giving the film "its electric charge".<ref name="Raheja">{{Cite news |last=Raheja |first=Dinesh |author-link=Dinesh Raheja |date=2001 |title=Chori Chori Chupke Chupke — A Preity Show |work=India Today |url=http://tntmovies.thenewspapertoday.com/reviews/reviewcccc.shtml |access-date=10 May 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010409225755/http://tntmovies.thenewspapertoday.com/reviews/reviewcccc.shtml |archive-date=9 April 2001}}</ref> Likewise, [[Nikhat Kazmi]] of ''[[The Times of India]]'' noted Zinta for keeping "the adrenalin gushing" and wrote of "riveting moments" where she "shows flashes of a fine performance".<ref name="TOI">{{cite news |last1=Kazmi |first1=Nikhat |author1-link=Nikhat Kazmi |title=Chori Chori Chupke Chupke |url=http://www.indiatimes.com:80/movies/reviews/choriccc1.html |access-date=7 February 2022 |work=[[The Times of India]] |publisher=The Times Group |date=9 March 2001 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20011109105211/http://www.indiatimes.com:80/movies/reviews/choriccc1.html |archive-date=9 November 2001}}</ref> [[Ziya Us Salam]] of ''The Hindu'', though similarly fond of Zinta for putting "life into her character of Madhubala", found the actress less convincing in "mouthing the inanities used by the women of the street".<ref>{{Cite news |last=Us Salam |first=Ziya |date=16 March 2001 |title=Film review: Chori Chori Chupke Chupke |work=[[The Hindu]] |url=http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/2001/03/16/stories/09160223.htm |access-date=21 July 2020 |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080420213348/http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/2001/03/16/stories/09160223.htm |archive-date=20 April 2008}}</ref> M. Shamim, writing for the same publication, believed Zinta had "put her body and soul into the streetwalker's flaming-red dress".<ref name="Shamim" />
 
Zinta’s portrayal of Madhubala, a sex worker turned surrogate mother, was highlighted by several reviewers as the film's standout element.<ref name="Different">{{Cite news |last=Bhattacharya |first=Roshmila |author-link=Roshmila Bhattacharya |date=3 August 2001 |title=Preity Zinta Different Strokes |url=http://www.screenindia.com/20010803/fcover1.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20011031180954/http://www.screenindia.com/20010803/fcover1.html |archive-date=31 October 2001 |access-date=14 October 2020 |work=Screen}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Kothari |first=Jitendra |year=2001 |title=Preity Zinta: Taking Charge |url=http://tntmovies.thenewspapertoday.com/starofthemonth/propreity.shtml |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010626153748/http://tntmovies.thenewspapertoday.com/starofthemonth/propreity.shtml |archive-date=26 June 2001 |access-date=14 October 2020 |work=India Today |agency=TNT Movies}}</ref> [[Sukanya Verma]] of ''[[Rediff.com]]'' called her role "the meatiest part of all" and described her character arc as "amazingly believable," though she expressed mixed feelings about the film overall.<ref name="Sukanya">{{Cite web |last=Verma |first=Sukanya |author-link=Sukanya Verma |date=9 March 2001 |title=Preity Trite |url=http://www.rediff.com/movies/2001/mar/09cccc.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181105012127/http://www.rediff.com/movies/2001/mar/09cccc.htm |archive-date=5 November 2018 |access-date=25 January 2008 |work=Rediff.com}}</ref> ''[[Screen (magazine)|Screen]]'' critic Padmaraj Nair referred to Zinta as the "real scene-stealer" and commended her for delivering "a stunning performance".<ref name="Padmaraj">{{Cite news |last=Nair |first=Padmaraj |date=23 March 2001 |title=Desi version of Surrogate Mother |url=http://www.screenindia.com/20010323/review.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030103111004/http://www.screenindia.com/20010323/review.htm |archive-date=3 January 2003 |access-date=19 April 2020 |work=Screen}}</ref> Vinayak Chakravorty of [[Hindustan Times|''Hindustan Times'']] praised Zinta’s "admirable zest", calling her the film's "trumpcard",<ref name="Vinayak">{{Cite news |last=Chakravorty, Vinayak |date=9 March 2001 |title=Chori Chori Chupke Chupke |url=http://www.go4i.com/cinema/reviews/bollywood/reviewscccc.shtml |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010820232724/http://www.go4i.com/cinema/reviews/bollywood/reviewscccc.shtml |archive-date=20 August 2001 |access-date=19 April 2020 |work=Hindustan Times}}</ref> while [[Dinesh Raheja]] of ''India Today'' credited her with giving the film "its electric charge".<ref name="Raheja">{{Cite news |last=Raheja |first=Dinesh |author-link=Dinesh Raheja |date=2001 |title=Chori Chori Chupke Chupke — A Preity Show |url=http://tntmovies.thenewspapertoday.com/reviews/reviewcccc.shtml |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010409225755/http://tntmovies.thenewspapertoday.com/reviews/reviewcccc.shtml |archive-date=9 April 2001 |access-date=10 May 2020 |work=India Today}}</ref> [[Nikhat Kazmi]] of ''[[The Times of India]]'' noted that Zinta "keeps the adrenalin gushing" and delivers "riveting moments" that "show flashes of a fine performance".<ref name="TOI">{{cite news |last1=Kazmi |first1=Nikhat |author1-link=Nikhat Kazmi |date=9 March 2001 |title=Chori Chori Chupke Chupke |url=http://www.indiatimes.com:80/movies/reviews/choriccc1.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20011109105211/http://www.indiatimes.com:80/movies/reviews/choriccc1.html |archive-date=9 November 2001 |access-date=7 February 2022 |work=[[The Times of India]] |publisher=The Times Group}}</ref>


Some critics, however, expressed reservations about certain aspects of Zinta's portrayal. [[Ziya Us Salam]] of [[The Hindu|''The Hindu'']] appreciated her ability to "put life into her character", though he found her less convincing when delivering street vernacular.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Us Salam |first=Ziya |date=16 March 2001 |title=Film review: Chori Chori Chupke Chupke |url=http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/2001/03/16/stories/09160223.htm |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080420213348/http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/2001/03/16/stories/09160223.htm |archive-date=20 April 2008 |access-date=21 July 2020 |work=[[The Hindu]]}}</ref> M. Shamim, also writing for ''The Hindu'', observed that Zinta "put her body and soul into the streetwalker's flaming-red dress".<ref name="Shamim" />
The duo of Salman Khan and Rani Mukerji faced some criticism from Sukanya Verma, who lamented their underdeveloped roles. She considered Mukerji to be "handicapped with a role that doesn't give her much scope besides weeping and sobbing" and stated that Khan's performance lacked substance.<ref name="Sukanya" /> Raheja described Khan as "overtly subdued" as opposed to his recent comic roles, but wrote of Mukerji, "The emotions that drive Rani Mukherji's character are not given either a layered detailing or an adequate exposition so she comes across as pale as the pastel-coloured dresses she favours".<ref name="Raheja" /> Chakravorty similarly noted Khan for playing against type.<ref name="Vinayak" /> Kazmi similarly disliked their characters in contrast to Zinta's: "From a street-walker to sensitive young girl and then a jealous lover - stray vignettes of flesh and blood form from Preity which come as a respite in a terrain dominated by an ever-say-cheese and forever understanding Rani and an unruffled, mumbling Salman who plays the perfect gentleman with the zeal of a zombie."<ref name="TOI"/> Padmaraj Nair, however, praised the actors in addition to Zinta, noting Khan for his "understated" performance, and arguing that Mukerji is "at her best".<ref name="Padmaraj" />


In contrast, [[Salman Khan]] and [[Rani Mukerji]] received more mixed responses. Verma criticized their characters as underdeveloped, stating that Mukerji was "handicapped with a role that doesn't give her much scope besides weeping" and that Khan’s performance lacked depth.<ref name="Sukanya" /> Raheja felt that Khan was "overtly subdued" and that Mukerji’s role lacked sufficient emotional layering.<ref name="Vinayak" /> Kazmi described their characters as lacking complexity, writing that Zinta’s portrayal offered a refreshing break in a film "dominated by an ever-say-cheese and forever understanding Rani and an unruffled, mumbling Salman."<ref name="TOI" /> However, Nair was more favorable, describing Khan as "understated" and asserting that Mukerji was "at her best".<ref name="Padmaraj" />
''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' was reviewed positively by a number of critics. [[Taran Adarsh]] from the entertainment portal [[Bollywood Hungama]] was positive of the film, concluding it "lives up to the towering expectations thanks to the solid drama".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Adarsh |first=Taran |author-link=Taran Adarsh |date=8 March 2001 |title=Chori Chori Chupke Chupke Movie Review |url=https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/movie/chori-chori-chupke-chupke/critic-review/chori-chori-chupke-chupke-movie-review/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201015024709/https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/movie/chori-chori-chupke-chupke/critic-review/chori-chori-chupke-chupke-movie-review/ |archive-date=15 October 2020 |access-date=11 October 2020 |website=Bollywood Hungama |language=en}}</ref> Several reviewers appreciated the film for its portrayal of the big family and its overall positive atmosphere, including Kazmi, who found it to be a "modern ode to the ancient Indian family" and admired its "overwhelming feel-goodness".<ref name="Bharat" /><ref name="TOI"/> Likewise, Us Salam noted the film's "loads of good music, beautiful locales, sweet smiles and lovely feel", and Shamim shared similar sentiments, appreciating the directors for not allowing "any moral issue to cloud the narrative" and filling "the screen with mesmerising charm and beauty of the lifestyle of a well-knit family".<ref name="Shamim" />


[[Taran Adarsh]] of [[Bollywood Hungama|''Bollywood Hungama'']] offered a positive review, praising the film’s drama and concluding that it "lives up to the towering expectations".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Adarsh |first=Taran |author-link=Taran Adarsh |date=8 March 2001 |title=Chori Chori Chupke Chupke Movie Review |url=https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/movie/chori-chori-chupke-chupke/critic-review/chori-chori-chupke-chupke-movie-review/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201015024709/https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/movie/chori-chori-chupke-chupke/critic-review/chori-chori-chupke-chupke-movie-review/ |archive-date=15 October 2020 |access-date=11 October 2020 |website=Bollywood Hungama |language=en}}</ref> Several reviewers appreciated the film’s portrayal of family values and traditional settings. Kazmi referred to it as a "modern ode to the ancient Indian family" and highlighted its "overwhelming feel-goodness".<ref name="Bharat" /> Us Salam and Shamim both remarked on the film’s emotional tone, scenic visuals, and its portrayal of a "well-knit family", with Shamim commending the filmmakers for avoiding overt moral messaging.<ref name="TOI" /><ref name="Shamim" />
Less positive views were expressed in relation to the film's stereotypical approach and poor execution of the story. Verma found the presentation of the story to be "absurd".<ref name="Sukanya" /> Nair was ambivalent towards the film in this regard: "On the one hand, the film stands by family values and desi culture while, on the other, it goes in for cheap gimmicks like hiring a cabaret dancer as a solution for bearing a child just to lure the front benchers and the masses". Still, he ultimately noted an "engrossing" second half and commended the directors for having "done their best to bring a fair amount of conviction while putting it across on the screen".<ref name="Padmaraj" />


Less favorable critiques focused on the film’s reliance on stereotypes and lack of subtlety. Verma called the story's presentation "absurd",<ref name="Shamim" /> while Chakravorty criticized its thematic overlap with ''Doosri Dulhan'' (1983), describing it as "a veritable rerun of the stereotypes".<ref name="Sukanya" /> Nair noted tonal inconsistency, stating that the film alternated between promoting "desi culture" and resorting to "cheap gimmicks" but acknowledged the directors' success in delivering an "engrossing" second half.<ref name="Padmaraj" /> Raheja echoed similar concerns, describing the film as lacking nuance, though he praised its pacing.<ref name="Raheja" /> Suman Tarafdar of ''[[Filmfare]]'' offered a more negative perspective, labeling the film "saccharine" and calling it "a film for anyone gullible enough to believe in fairy lands", with Zinta providing "the only slightly noteworthy performance".<ref>{{Cite news |last=Tarafdar |first=Suman |date=2001 |title=Chori Chori Chupke Chupke |url=http://www.indiatimes.com/movies/reviews/choriccc.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20011023070945/http://www.indiatimes.com/movies/reviews/choriccc.html |archive-date=23 October 2001 |access-date=14 October 2020 |work=[[Filmfare]] |publisher=The Times Group |language=en |agency=Indiatimes Movies}}</ref>
Vinayak Chakravorty, who gave the film a three-star rating, noted its resemblance to ''Doosri Dulhan'' and criticised it for occasionally coming across as "a veritable rerun of the stereotypes". Raheja was critical of the film's lack of subtlety but believed the directors are "masters of pace and don't allow your attention to wander".<ref name="Raheja" /> Suman Tarafdar of ''[[Filmfare]]'' was particularly critical of the film, calling it "saccarine" and "a film for anyone gullible enough to believe in fairy lands", and noting that Zinta gave "the only slightly noteworthy performance".<ref>{{Cite news |last=Tarafdar |first=Suman |date=2001 |title=Chori Chori Chupke Chupke |language=en |work=[[Filmfare]] |publisher=The Times Group |agency=Indiatimes Movies |url=http://www.indiatimes.com/movies/reviews/choriccc.html |access-date=14 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20011023070945/http://www.indiatimes.com/movies/reviews/choriccc.html |archive-date=23 October 2001}}</ref>


==Accolades==
==Accolades==
At the [[47th Filmfare Awards]], [[Preity Zinta]] received a nomination for [[Filmfare Award for Best Supporting Actress|Best Supporting Actress]], the film’s only nomination.[2] [[Salman Khan]] won Most Sensational Actor at the [[Bollywood Movie Awards]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Winners of Bollywood Movie Awards |url=http://www.bollywoodawards.com/winba9.php |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131102124901/http://www.bollywoodawards.com/winba9.php |archive-date=2 November 2013 |access-date=12 October 2020 |publisher=[[Bollywood Movie Awards]]}}</ref>
Khan was named the [[Bollywood Movie Award&nbsp;– Most Sensational Actor|Most Sensational Actor]] at the [[Bollywood Movie Awards]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Winners of Bollywood Movie Awards |url=http://www.bollywoodawards.com/winba9.php |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131102124901/http://www.bollywoodawards.com/winba9.php |archive-date=2 November 2013 |access-date=12 October 2020 |publisher=[[Bollywood Movie Awards]]}}</ref> At the [[47th Filmfare Awards]], Zinta was nominated in the [[Filmfare Award for Best Supporting Actress|Best Supporting Actress]] category, the only nomination for the film.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Preity Zinta: Awards & nominations |url=http://www.indiafm.com/celebrities/awards/10155/index.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080526234522/http://www.indiafm.com/celebrities/awards/10155/index.html |archive-date=26 May 2008 |access-date=12 October 2020 |website=Bollywood Hungama}}</ref>


==Legacy==
==Legacy==
''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' has often been associated with the popularisation of surrogacy in Indian cinema and remains one of the earliest mainstream Hindi films to address the topic.<ref name="Majumdar18" /> Since its release, the film has been screened at various international events. In 2002, it was featured as one of 30 films in a three-month-long Bollywood retrospective organised by the [[Federal Council (Switzerland)|Swiss Government]] in [[Zürich]].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Times News Network |date=23 May 2002 |title=Bollywood bug bites Switzerland |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/hyderabad-times/Bollywood-bug-bites-Switzerland/articleshow/10713564.cms |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201015025309/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/hyderabad-times/Bollywood-bug-bites-Switzerland/articleshow/10713564.cms |archive-date=15 October 2020 |access-date=14 October 2020 |work=The Times of India |publisher=The Times Group |language=en}}</ref> It was later showcased at the 2005 [[ISAFF|Independent South Asian Film Festival]] in Seattle and the 2012 Fiji Film Festival.<ref>{{Cite web |title=ISAFF 2005&nbsp;– Festival Launch Party |url=https://tasveer.org/isaff-2005-festival-launch-party |access-date=16 October 2020 |website=Tasveer.org |publisher=[[ISAFF|Independent South Asian Film Festival]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Stolz |first=Ellen |date=5 October 2012 |title=FNU Film Festival On |url=https://fijisun.com.fj/2012/10/05/fnu-film-festival-on/ |access-date=16 October 2020 |work=[[Fiji Sun]]}}</ref>
''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' has often been associated with surrogacy in Indian popular culture.<ref name="Majumdar18" /> It has been screened at a number of events since its release. In 2002, it was one of 30 films screened at a three-month-long Bollywood event organised by the [[Federal Council (Switzerland)|Swiss Government]] in [[Zürich]].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Times News Network |date=23 May 2002 |title=Bollywood bug bites Switzerland |language=en |work=The Times of India |publisher=The Times Group |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/hyderabad-times/Bollywood-bug-bites-Switzerland/articleshow/10713564.cms |access-date=14 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201015025309/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/hyderabad-times/Bollywood-bug-bites-Switzerland/articleshow/10713564.cms |archive-date=15 October 2020}}</ref> It was later screened at the 2005 [[ISAFF|Independent South Asian Film Festival]] and the 2012 Fiji Film Festival.<ref>{{Cite web |title=ISAFF 2005&nbsp;– Festival Launch Party |url=https://tasveer.org/isaff-2005-festival-launch-party |access-date=16 October 2020 |website=Tasveer.org |publisher=[[ISAFF|Independent South Asian Film Festival]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Stolz |first=Ellen |date=5 October 2012 |title=FNU Film Festival On |work=[[Fiji Sun]] |url=https://fijisun.com.fj/2012/10/05/fnu-film-festival-on/ |access-date=16 October 2020}}</ref>


[[Preity Zinta]]’s performance as Madhubala has been widely regarded as a significant moment in her career. In an August 2001 column for ''[[Screen (magazine)|Screen]]'', [[Roshmila Bhattacharya]] credited the film’s appeal among traditional audiences to Zinta’s portrayal of a complex and unconventional role.<ref name="Different" /> Writing for ''[[Sify]]'' in 2003, [[Subhash K. Jha]] described her performance as "her best yet", noting her commitment to the role despite initial discomfort with its bold elements.<ref>{{Cite web |last=K. Jha |first=Subhash |author-link=Subhash K. Jha |date=30 October 2003 |title=Playing the streetwalker |url=http://sify.com/movies/bollywood/fullstory.php?id=13295633 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040307010103/http://sify.com/movies/bollywood/fullstory.php?id=13295633 |archive-date=7 March 2004 |access-date=11 October 2020 |website=[[Sify]] |language=en}}</ref> A [[Stardust (magazine)|''Stardust'']] profile published the same year praised Zinta’s performance, highlighting her ability to balance emotional depth with her characteristic vivacity in the film’s early scenes.<ref>{{Cite news |date=August 2003 |title=Not just Pretty! |url=http://www.stardustindia.com/display_garam.asp?issue=August2003&id=3 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060907155409/http://www.stardustindia.com/display_garam.asp?issue=August2003&id=3 |archive-date=7 September 2006 |access-date=4 December 2020 |work=[[Stardust (magazine)|Stardust]]}}</ref>
Zinta's role has been noted as one of her notable works. In a column about Zinta, published in an August 2001 issue of ''Screen'' magazine, [[Roshmila Bhattacharya]] asserted, "If ''Chori Chori Chupke Chupke'' found a following in conventional circles, it's thanks to Preity’s handling of yet another 'brave' role".<ref name="Different" /> In a 2003 column for [[Sify]] about the portrayal of sex-workers in Hindi films, Subhash K. Jha wrote of Zinta that in spite of being "uncomfortable about using all the foul language ... Once she entered the zone of the rented womb Preity had a ball. This remains her best performance yet".<ref>{{Cite web |last=K. Jha |first=Subhash |date=30 October 2003 |title=Playing the streetwalker |url=http://sify.com/movies/bollywood/fullstory.php?id=13295633 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040307010103/http://sify.com/movies/bollywood/fullstory.php?id=13295633 |archive-date=7 March 2004 |access-date=11 October 2020 |website=[[Sify]] |url-status=dead |language=en}}</ref> Published in the same year, a column analysing Zinta's career by ''[[Stardust (magazine)|Stardust]]'' found her to be "manifested [her]self most prominently ... in [the film]", adding, "Here was Preity essaying a character with tremendous scope for performance, but the scenes in which she excelled was when she did her bubbly act in the initial stages of the film".<ref>{{Cite news |date=August 2003 |title=Not just Pretty! |work=[[Stardust (magazine)|Stardust]] |url=http://www.stardustindia.com/display_garam.asp?issue=August2003&id=3 |url-status=dead |access-date=4 December 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060907155409/http://www.stardustindia.com/display_garam.asp?issue=August2003&id=3 |archive-date=7 September 2006}}</ref>


==References==
==References==

Latest revision as of 05:31, 13 December 2025

Template:Short description Template:Good article Template:Use dmy dates Template:Use Indian English Template:Infobox film/short descriptionScript error: No such module "Infobox".Template:Template otherScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character "[". Chori Chori Chupke Chupke (Template:Translation) is a 2001 Indian Hindi-language romantic drama film directed by Abbas–Mustan, with screenplay and story from Javed Siddiqui and Neeraj Vora respectively. Starring Salman Khan, Rani Mukerji and Preity Zinta in lead roles, the film's music is composed by Anu Malik and lyrics are penned by Sameer. Telling the story of a married couple hiring a young prostitute as a surrogate mother, the film generated controversy during its release for dealing with the taboo issue of surrogate childbirth in India.

Initially set to release on 22 December 2000, Chori Chori Chupke Chupke's release was delayed for several months when producer Nazim Rizvi and financier Bharat Shah were arrested and the Central Bureau of Investigation seized the film's prints on the suspicion that the production had been funded by Chhota Shakeel of the Mumbai underworld. The film was released in March 2001 to a wide audience and emerged as a commercial success, becoming the sixth highest-grossing film of 2001 in India.

Critical praise was majorly directed towards Zinta's performance as a prostitute-turned-surrogate mother, earning her a Best Supporting Actress nomination at the 47th Filmfare Awards, the only nomination for the film. The film has often been associated with surrogacy in Indian popular culture. This film was remade as a television drama series named Dil Se Dil Tak in which Sidharth Shukla portrayed as Raj, Rashami Desai as Priya and Jasmin Bhasin as Madhubala.

Plot

Raj and Priya, who come from well-to-do Indian families, meet at a wedding and fall in love. Soon after they marry, Priya becomes pregnant. Early in the pregnancy, Priya miscarries and becomes permanently infertile. On Dr. Balraj Chopra's advice, they decide to look for a surrogate mother to bear Raj's child and hide Priya's infertility from his conservative family. Since the process of artificial insemination could be revealed in the Indian media due to the family's renown and position in society, the couple agree that pregnancy should be achieved by means of sexual relations between Raj and the surrogate mother. Raj meets Madhubala "Madhu", a prostitute, who agrees to carry Raj's baby in exchange for money. After some much-needed behavioral grooming and a makeover, Madhu meets Priya—who is unaware of Madhu's background—and the three depart for Switzerland in order to carry out their plan secretly.

Soon Madhu is pregnant with Raj's child, and he happily tells his family that Priya is expecting. Meanwhile, Raj's business partner Ajay Sharma begins to sexually harass Madhu and she decides to leave Switzerland, mistakenly believing that Raj told his friend that she is a prostitute. Eventually, Priya finds out about Madhu's past, but still believes that Madhu should carry their child and begs her to stay. When Madhu is at home by herself, Raj's friend assaults her but Raj arrives in time to save her. Overwhelmed by Raj's kindness, Madhu falls in love with him.

Raj's family suddenly arrives in Switzerland. While Priya reaches for pregnancy-simulating pillows, the family meets the heavily pregnant Madhu who is introduced to them as a friend staying with them while her husband is travelling for business. Raj's grandfather Kailashnath and father Ranjit arrange a Godbharaai, a religious baby shower ceremony. They ask Raj, Priya, and Madhu to return with them to India, where the ritual must be held as formally required by tradition.

The ceremony is very important so Priya sends Madhu as herself. An emotional Madhu becomes conflicted about giving up her child. Finding Madhu's room empty and the money dumped on the bed, a frantic Priya pursues her to the train station and slaps Madhu when she confesses that she loves Raj. By the time Raj arrives, Madhu has gone into premature labour. The doctor announces that either Madhu or the child can be saved, and Priya asks him to save Madhu. However, both mother and baby survive. Frustrated, Madhu gives the baby to Priya, who quickly settles into a hospital bed with "her" baby. Dr. Balraj Chopra lies to Raj's family that while Priya gave birth, Madhu's child was stillborn.

When Madhu is ready to leave, she promises Raj that she will not go back to prostitution. When he takes her to the airport, he realizes that she loves him and kisses her forehead. Madhu leaves happily.

Cast

The cast is listed below:[1][2] Template:Div col begin

Production

Director duo Abbas–Mustan had almost completed Ajnabee by October 1999 when they declared Chori Chori Chupke Chupke as their next project.[3] The three leads, Salman Khan, Rani Mukerji, and Preity Zinta, previously starred together in the romantic comedy Har Dil Jo Pyar Karega (2000).[3] Producer Nazim Rizvi clarified that the casting of the three actors happened before they signed for the latter film.[4] Khan, Mukerji and Zinta were paid Template:Indian rupee1.5 crore ({{INRConvert/Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character "[".|1.5|7||USD|year={{{year}}}}}), Template:Indian rupee0.24 crore ({{INRConvert/Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character "[".|0.24|7||USD|year={{{year}}}}}), and Template:Indian rupee0.25 crore ({{INRConvert/Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character "[".|0.25|7||USD|year={{{year}}}}}) for their roles, respectively (all sums unadjusted for inflation).[5] Zinta was initially reluctant to play her role, as she was unsure she was suited to play a prostitute, but she eventually accepted it at the directors' persuasion. To prepare for it, she visited several bars and nightclubs in Mumbai's red-light areas to study the lingo and mannerisms of sex-workers.[6][7]

Chori Chori Chupke Chupke was made on a budget of Template:Indian rupee13 crore ({{INRConvert/Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character "[".|13|7||USD|year=2001}}).[8] Principal photography started in early 2000 and lasted two months.[1][5] Location filming, performed by Thomas A. Xavier, took place in both Mahabaleshwar and Switzerland.[9][10] The film was edited by Hussain A. Burmawala, and Surendra Sodhi composed the background score.[1][11]

Initially, Shah Rukh Khan was offered the lead role as Raj Malhotra, who had previously worked in the directors' two films Baazigar, and Baadshah. However, he declined due to lack of dates, and then Salman Khan was approached and has accepted the offer.

Themes and influence

The film generated some controversy before and during its release for being one of the only Hindi-language films dealing with the taboo issue of surrogate childbirth in India, in addition to prostitution in India.[12][13] Surrogacy in the film is not achieved through artificial insemination but sexual intercourse, and author Aditya Bharadwaj argued that the film draws an analogy between surrogacy and prostitution.[14] Anindita Majumdar, author of the book Surrogacy (2018), wrote, "In popular Indian culture, surrogacy has come to be associated with the 2001 Hindi language film Chori Chori Chupke Chupke".[15] According to author Daniel Grey, that Madhubala was a prostitute before becoming a surrogate "reinforces a stereotyped and erroneous popular association between the two roles that has contributed to considerable prejudice on the Subcontinent against women who act as surrogates".[16]

According to The Hindu, some of film's scenes were said to have been borrowed from Pretty Woman (1990) and the storyline inspired by Doosri Dulhan (1983).[17] According to Krämer, the similarities between Pretty Woman and Chori Chori Chupke Chupke are limited to replicated scenes in "merely one plot strand among many", in an otherwise different story.[18] In another book by Majumdar, Transnational Commercial Surrogacy and the (Un)Making of Kin in India (2017), she discusses the similarity between Chori Chori Chupke Chupke and Doosri Dulhan. Majumdar describes the surrogate mothers as "fallen women" who are first portrayed as aberrant women with no interest in motherhood, who gradually develop a sense of maternal instinct during the process of pregnancy.[19]

Anupama Chopra of India Today described Zinta's character of Madhubala as hooker with a heart of gold, as did academic Lucia Krämer.[20][18] Sociologist Steve Derné wrote in his book Globalization on the Ground: New Media and the Transformation of Culture, Class, and Gender in India that through the character of Madhubala, Chori Chori Chupke Chupke becomes one of the films which portray "excessively sexual, greedy women who are redeemed by being remade as consumers". Derné further credited the film with melding the stereotypical "heroine" and "vamp" roles of Hindi heroines in contrast to how they were portrayed in previous decades, describing Zinta as a "legitimate heroine" in the film.[21] S. Banaji spoke of a "transformation in the 'moral' consciousness of the prostitute".[22] Bhawana Somaaya, while critical of the film's "regular packaging of commercial clichés", commended it for the unique portrayal of the wife, played by Mukerji, who is the sole decision-maker in the family throughout the entire process of surrogacy.[23]

Soundtrack

Script error: No such module "Unsubst-infobox".Script error: No such module "Check for conflicting parameters". The soundtrack for Chori Chori Chupke Chupke was composed by Anu Malik and the lyrics were written by Sameer.[1] It was released in 2000 by Universal Music India.[24] According to the Indian trade website Box Office India, with around two million units sold, the soundtrack became the sixth highest-selling music album of the year.[25]

Script error: No such module "Track listing".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Release

File:Salman Khan, Rani Mukerji and Preity Zinta.jpg
Salman Khan, Rani Mukerji and Preity Zinta (l-r) at the audio release of Chori Chori Chupke Chupke in 2000

The film's initial release date of 22 December 2000[26] was delayed when producer Nazim Rizvi was arrested in December and film financier Bharat Shah was arrested in January; both were charged with receiving funding from Chhota Shakeel of the Mumbai underworld and pressuring leading Bollywood actors—specifically, Khan—to appear in the film and for the profits to be shared with Shakeel.[26][27][28][29] Rizvi had reportedly been under telephone surveillance by the Mumbai Police for a number of months.[27] The Central Bureau of Investigation seized the film's prints and delivered them to the court receiver.[27] The negatives were released on 12 February 2001 on a judicial order.[30] In its ruling, the court ordered all profits from the film to go to the Maharashtra state government.[27] Rivzi and Shah were still incarcerated when Chori Chori Chupke Chupke opened to the public on 9 March 2001.[27] The film was released with an opening credit thanking the Special Court, MCOCA, the Crime Branch, the Mumbai Police, and the court receiver, "without whose untiring efforts and good office this picture would never have been made".[28]

The film's release took place amid protests due to its alleged funding by the underworld.[31] Due to the controversy surrounding its delayed release—and the recurrent publicity around it—the film was expected to be a big success, with 325 prints sold before release.[32] The director duo held a special screening of the film two days prior to its release for the senior brass of the Mumbai Police, to fulfill a promise made earlier in order to prove that no objectionable content appeared in the film, as could have been projected.[33]

Certified U (suitable for all age groups) by the Central Board of Film Certification,[34] Chori Chori Chupke Chupke opened to a wide audience and emerged a commercial success and one of the highest-grossing films of 2001.[35][36] Still, despite a strong opening, the film gradually lost public interest; it eventually grossed Template:Indian rupee31 crore ({{INRConvert/Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character "[".|31|7||USD|year={{{year}}}}}) against its Template:Indian rupee13 crore ({{INRConvert/Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character "[".|13|7||USD|year={{{year}}}}}) budget, with additional $1.4 million earned overseas, leaving its worldwide gross in 2001 at Template:Indian rupee37.51 crore ({{INRConvert/Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character "[".|37.51|7||USD|year=2001}}).[37] Box Office India concluded the film's final commercial performance with the verdict "semi hit".[35]

Reception

Photo of Zinta at the audio release of Chori Chori Chupke Chupke in 2001
Critics particularly praised Zinta's performance as Madhubala

Critics praised the uniqueness of the film for dealing with the rarely-touched subject of surrogacy, but disliked the execution. Preity Zinta's performance, in what was seen as an unconventional role, was especially noted by a number of critics, with high praise for her portrayal of the gradual change her character goes through over the course of the story.[38][39] Film critic Sukanya Verma, who was left with "mixed emotions" after seeing the film, noted Zinta's role as "the meatiest part of all", finding her transformation throughout the film "amazingly believable".[40] Padmaraj Nair of Screen called Zinta the film's "real scene-stealer" for having delivered "a stunning performance".[41] Vinayak Chakravorty of Hindustan Times hailed Zinta's "admirable zest" as the "trumpcard of the film".[42] Dinesh Raheja of India Today credited Zinta with giving the film "its electric charge".[43] Likewise, Nikhat Kazmi of The Times of India noted Zinta for keeping "the adrenalin gushing" and wrote of "riveting moments" where she "shows flashes of a fine performance".[44] Ziya Us Salam of The Hindu, though similarly fond of Zinta for putting "life into her character of Madhubala", found the actress less convincing in "mouthing the inanities used by the women of the street".[45] M. Shamim, writing for the same publication, believed Zinta had "put her body and soul into the streetwalker's flaming-red dress".[13]

The duo of Salman Khan and Rani Mukerji faced some criticism from Sukanya Verma, who lamented their underdeveloped roles. She considered Mukerji to be "handicapped with a role that doesn't give her much scope besides weeping and sobbing" and stated that Khan's performance lacked substance.[40] Raheja described Khan as "overtly subdued" as opposed to his recent comic roles, but wrote of Mukerji, "The emotions that drive Rani Mukherji's character are not given either a layered detailing or an adequate exposition so she comes across as pale as the pastel-coloured dresses she favours".[43] Chakravorty similarly noted Khan for playing against type.[42] Kazmi similarly disliked their characters in contrast to Zinta's: "From a street-walker to sensitive young girl and then a jealous lover - stray vignettes of flesh and blood form from Preity which come as a respite in a terrain dominated by an ever-say-cheese and forever understanding Rani and an unruffled, mumbling Salman who plays the perfect gentleman with the zeal of a zombie."[44] Padmaraj Nair, however, praised the actors in addition to Zinta, noting Khan for his "understated" performance, and arguing that Mukerji is "at her best".[41]

Chori Chori Chupke Chupke was reviewed positively by a number of critics. Taran Adarsh from the entertainment portal Bollywood Hungama was positive of the film, concluding it "lives up to the towering expectations thanks to the solid drama".[46] Several reviewers appreciated the film for its portrayal of the big family and its overall positive atmosphere, including Kazmi, who found it to be a "modern ode to the ancient Indian family" and admired its "overwhelming feel-goodness".[27][44] Likewise, Us Salam noted the film's "loads of good music, beautiful locales, sweet smiles and lovely feel", and Shamim shared similar sentiments, appreciating the directors for not allowing "any moral issue to cloud the narrative" and filling "the screen with mesmerising charm and beauty of the lifestyle of a well-knit family".[13]

Less positive views were expressed in relation to the film's stereotypical approach and poor execution of the story. Verma found the presentation of the story to be "absurd".[40] Nair was ambivalent towards the film in this regard: "On the one hand, the film stands by family values and desi culture while, on the other, it goes in for cheap gimmicks like hiring a cabaret dancer as a solution for bearing a child just to lure the front benchers and the masses". Still, he ultimately noted an "engrossing" second half and commended the directors for having "done their best to bring a fair amount of conviction while putting it across on the screen".[41]

Vinayak Chakravorty, who gave the film a three-star rating, noted its resemblance to Doosri Dulhan and criticised it for occasionally coming across as "a veritable rerun of the stereotypes". Raheja was critical of the film's lack of subtlety but believed the directors are "masters of pace and don't allow your attention to wander".[43] Suman Tarafdar of Filmfare was particularly critical of the film, calling it "saccarine" and "a film for anyone gullible enough to believe in fairy lands", and noting that Zinta gave "the only slightly noteworthy performance".[47]

Accolades

Khan was named the Most Sensational Actor at the Bollywood Movie Awards.[48] At the 47th Filmfare Awards, Zinta was nominated in the Best Supporting Actress category, the only nomination for the film.[49]

Legacy

Chori Chori Chupke Chupke has often been associated with surrogacy in Indian popular culture.[15] It has been screened at a number of events since its release. In 2002, it was one of 30 films screened at a three-month-long Bollywood event organised by the Swiss Government in Zürich.[50] It was later screened at the 2005 Independent South Asian Film Festival and the 2012 Fiji Film Festival.[51][52]

Zinta's role has been noted as one of her notable works. In a column about Zinta, published in an August 2001 issue of Screen magazine, Roshmila Bhattacharya asserted, "If Chori Chori Chupke Chupke found a following in conventional circles, it's thanks to Preity’s handling of yet another 'brave' role".[38] In a 2003 column for Sify about the portrayal of sex-workers in Hindi films, Subhash K. Jha wrote of Zinta that in spite of being "uncomfortable about using all the foul language ... Once she entered the zone of the rented womb Preity had a ball. This remains her best performance yet".[53] Published in the same year, a column analysing Zinta's career by Stardust found her to be "manifested [her]self most prominently ... in [the film]", adding, "Here was Preity essaying a character with tremendous scope for performance, but the scenes in which she excelled was when she did her bubbly act in the initial stages of the film".[54]

References

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

  1. a b c d Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. Cite error: Script error: No such module "Namespace detect".Script error: No such module "Namespace detect".
  9. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  12. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  13. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  14. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  15. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  16. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  17. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  18. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  19. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  20. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  21. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  22. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  23. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  24. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  25. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  26. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  27. a b c d e f Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  28. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  29. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  30. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  31. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  32. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  33. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  34. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  35. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  36. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  37. Cite error: Script error: No such module "Namespace detect".Script error: No such module "Namespace detect".
  38. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  39. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  40. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  41. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  42. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  43. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  44. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  45. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  46. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  47. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  48. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  49. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  50. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  51. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  52. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  53. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  54. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Further reading

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

External links

Script error: No such module "Portal".

Script error: No such module "Navbox".