Fail-deadly: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Voidxor Replace {{More citations needed}} with a more targeted {{Citation needed}}. →See also: Annotate some links as is now preferred per MOS:SEEALSO. |
imported>Danhash |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* {{Annotated link|Special Weapons Emergency Separation System}} | * {{Annotated link|Special Weapons Emergency Separation System}} | ||
* [[Two Generals' Problem]] | * [[Two Generals' Problem]] | ||
* [[Dead Hand]] | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Latest revision as of 13:19, 4 June 2025
Fail-deadly is a concept in nuclear military strategy that encourages deterrence by guaranteeing an immediate, automatic, and overwhelming response to an attack, even if there is no one left to trigger such retaliation.Script error: No such module "Unsubst". The term fail-deadly was coined as a contrast to fail-safe.
Fail-deadly can refer to specific technology components, or the controls system as a whole. The United Kingdom's fail-deadly policies delegate strike authority to submarine commanders in the event of a loss of command (using letters of last resort), ensuring that even when uncoordinated, nuclear retaliation can be carried out.[1]
See also
- AN/DRC-8 Emergency Rocket Communications System
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Dr. Strangelove
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Mutual assured destruction (MAD)
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Two Generals' Problem
- Dead Hand
References
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".