Clareification: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>LukeSurl
Editors: reduce list to just notable persons.
 
imported>GreenC bot
Rescued 1 archive link; Move 1 url. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:URLREQ#guardian.co.uk
 
Line 17: Line 17:
In 2007, in a guest-edited edition devoted to religious satire, entitled ''Crucification'', the magazine re-printed one of the [[Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy|Danish Muhammad cartoons]] which provoked an international incident when they were originally published 15 months earlier.
In 2007, in a guest-edited edition devoted to religious satire, entitled ''Crucification'', the magazine re-printed one of the [[Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy|Danish Muhammad cartoons]] which provoked an international incident when they were originally published 15 months earlier.


The guest editor was taken into hiding due to the threat of violent reprisals.<ref>[http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/news/story/0,,2011340,00.html]</ref> The college's former senior tutor, Patricia Fara, issued a statement saying, "The college finds the publication and the views expressed abhorrent." The college called a Court of Discipline to judge the student and suspended the newsletter's funding. The ''[[Cambridge Evening News]]'' described the issue as "racist",<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20070329020457/http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/city/2007/02/09/ef79ee97-fec1-4f00-babf-dbd17447b40b.lpf]</ref> in an article in which an "insider" suggested that the magazine might constitute "racial incitement". Two students were subsequently interviewed under caution by police in connection with the issue.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20070320144446/http://www.indexonline.org/en/news/articles/2007/1/clare-college-students-questioned.shtml]</ref>
The guest editor was taken into hiding due to the threat of violent reprisals.<ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/education/2007/feb/12/students.highereducation]</ref> The college's former senior tutor, Patricia Fara, issued a statement saying, "The college finds the publication and the views expressed abhorrent." The college called a Court of Discipline to judge the student and suspended the newsletter's funding. The ''[[Cambridge Evening News]]'' described the issue as "racist",<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20070329020457/http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/city/2007/02/09/ef79ee97-fec1-4f00-babf-dbd17447b40b.lpf]</ref> in an article in which an "insider" suggested that the magazine might constitute "racial incitement". Two students were subsequently interviewed under caution by police in connection with the issue.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20070320144446/http://www.indexonline.org/en/news/articles/2007/1/clare-college-students-questioned.shtml]</ref>


Following the incident, the Union of Clare Students Executive independently published two further issues, predominantly devoted to satirising the coverage of the controversy. A new editor was elected the following academic year.
Following the incident, the Union of Clare Students Executive independently published two further issues, predominantly devoted to satirising the coverage of the controversy. A new editor was elected the following academic year.
Line 32: Line 32:
The offending pages on [https://web.archive.org/web/20070502131424/http://pubphilosopher.blogs.com/pub_philosopher/2007/03/that_clare_coll.html  Pub Philosopher] blog.
The offending pages on [https://web.archive.org/web/20070502131424/http://pubphilosopher.blogs.com/pub_philosopher/2007/03/that_clare_coll.html  Pub Philosopher] blog.


Critical analysis of the controversy in [https://web.archive.org/web/20070827010428/http://www.theberry.org.uk/religion/index.html The Berry], [http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/2943/ Spiked Online], [http://www.newstatesman.com/200702190065 New Statesman], [http://observer.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,2031234,00.html The Observer] and [http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/sue_blackmore/2007/03/offended_muslims_should_be_ash.html Guardian Unlimited].
Critical analysis of the controversy in [https://web.archive.org/web/20070827010428/http://www.theberry.org.uk/religion/index.html The Berry], [http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/2943/ Spiked Online], [http://www.newstatesman.com/200702190065 New Statesman], [https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2007/mar/11/comment.religion The Observer] and [https://web.archive.org/web/20070307093326/http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/sue_blackmore/2007/03/offended_muslims_should_be_ash.html Guardian Unlimited].


Home page [http://www.clareification.co.uk]{{dead link|date=August 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}
Home page [http://www.clareification.co.uk]{{dead link|date=August 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}

Latest revision as of 02:21, 30 October 2025

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

Template:Use dmy dates Script error: No such module "Infobox".Template:Template otherScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". Clareification is the student newsletter of Clare College, a college of the University of Cambridge. It is produced termlyScript error: No such module "Unsubst". by editor(s) elected each year by the student body.

In 2005, it won the 'Best College Paper' award in The Cambridge Student.

Controversy

In 2007, in a guest-edited edition devoted to religious satire, entitled Crucification, the magazine re-printed one of the Danish Muhammad cartoons which provoked an international incident when they were originally published 15 months earlier.

The guest editor was taken into hiding due to the threat of violent reprisals.[1] The college's former senior tutor, Patricia Fara, issued a statement saying, "The college finds the publication and the views expressed abhorrent." The college called a Court of Discipline to judge the student and suspended the newsletter's funding. The Cambridge Evening News described the issue as "racist",[2] in an article in which an "insider" suggested that the magazine might constitute "racial incitement". Two students were subsequently interviewed under caution by police in connection with the issue.[3]

Following the incident, the Union of Clare Students Executive independently published two further issues, predominantly devoted to satirising the coverage of the controversy. A new editor was elected the following academic year.

Editors

Past editors of Clareification include the comedian Matt Kirshen and the philosopher Jonathan Birch.

References

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

External links

A summary of the controversial issue and the ensuing controversy on Harrys PlaceScript error: No such module "Unsubst". blog.

The offending pages on Pub Philosopher blog.

Critical analysis of the controversy in The Berry, Spiked Online, New Statesman, The Observer and Guardian Unlimited.

Home page [4]Script error: No such module "Unsubst".