Hormesis: Difference between revisions
imported>SchlurcherBot m Bot: http → https |
imported>Zefr m lead caption - no certainty |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Characteristic of biological processes}} | {{Short description|Characteristic of biological processes}} | ||
[[File:Hormesis — Two Sides of the Same Coin.webp| | [[File:Hormesis — Two Sides of the Same Coin.webp|thumb|Hormesis is a biological phenomenon wherein an organism that is exposed to a known harmful stressor has an adaptive response that may be beneficial to the organism]] | ||
'''Hormesis''' is a two-phased [[dose-response relationship]] | '''Hormesis''' is a two-phased [[dose-response relationship]] whereby low-dose exposures have a beneficial effect and high-dose amounts are either inhibitory to function or toxic.<ref name="calab2014">{{cite journal |author=Calabrese EJ |date=2014 |title=Hormesis: a fundamental concept in biology |journal=Microbial Cell |volume=1 |issue=5 |pages=145–9 |doi=10.15698/mic2014.05.145 |pmc=5354598 |pmid=28357236}}</ref> Within the ''hormetic zone'', the biological response to low-dose amounts of some [[stressor]]s is generally favorable. An example is the breathing of [[oxygen]], which is needed in certain concentrations for [[Respiration (physiology)|respiration]] in aerobic animals. Exposure to elevated levels of oxygen can have beneficial effects, but it becomes toxic in high concentrations.<ref name="hoch">{{cite journal |vauthors=Hochberg CH, Semler MW, Brower RG |title=Oxygen toxicity in critically ill adults |journal=American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine |volume=204 |issue=6 |pages=632–641 |date=September 2021 |pmid=34086536 |pmc=8521700 |doi=10.1164/rccm.202102-0417CI}}</ref> | ||
In [[toxicology]], hormesis is a dose-response phenomenon to [[xenobiotic]]s or other stressors. | In [[toxicology]], hormesis is a dose-response phenomenon to [[xenobiotic]]s or other stressors. In [[physiology]] and nutrition, hormesis has regions extending from low-dose deficiencies to homeostasis, and potential toxicity at high levels.<ref name="mattson">{{Cite journal |last1=Mattson |first1=M. P |year=2007 |title=Hormesis defined |journal=Ageing Research Reviews |volume=7 |issue=1 |pages=1–7 |doi=10.1016/j.arr.2007.08.007 |pmc=2248601 |pmid=18162444}}</ref> Physiological concentrations of an agent above or below homeostasis may adversely affect an organism, where the hormetic zone is a region of homeostasis of balanced nutrition.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Hayes|first=D. P.|date=2007|title=Nutritional hormesis|journal=European Journal of Clinical Nutrition|language=en|volume=61|issue=2 |pages=147–159|doi=10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602507|pmid=16885926|issn=1476-5640|doi-access=free}}</ref> In [[pharmacology]], the hormetic zone is similar to the [[therapeutic window]].{{medcn|date=December 2025}} | ||
In [[physiology]] and nutrition, hormesis has regions extending from low-dose deficiencies to homeostasis, and potential toxicity at high levels.<ref name="mattson">{{Cite journal |last1=Mattson |first1=M. P |year=2007 |title=Hormesis defined |journal=Ageing Research Reviews |volume=7 |issue=1 |pages=1–7 |doi=10.1016/j.arr.2007.08.007 |pmc=2248601 |pmid=18162444}}</ref> Physiological concentrations of an agent above or below homeostasis may adversely affect an organism, where the hormetic zone is a region of homeostasis of balanced nutrition.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Hayes|first=D. P.|date=2007|title=Nutritional hormesis|journal=European Journal of Clinical Nutrition|language=en|volume=61|issue=2|pages=147–159|doi=10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602507|pmid=16885926|issn=1476-5640|doi-access=free}}</ref> In [[pharmacology]], the hormetic zone is similar to the [[therapeutic window]]. | |||
In the context of toxicology, the hormesis model of dose response is vigorously debated.<ref name="Kaiser" /> The biochemical mechanisms by which hormesis works (particularly in applied cases pertaining to behavior and toxins) remain under early laboratory research and are not well understood.<ref name="mattson" /> | In the context of toxicology, the hormesis model of dose response is vigorously debated.<ref name="Kaiser" /> The biochemical mechanisms by which hormesis works (particularly in applied cases pertaining to behavior and toxins) remain under early laboratory research and are not well understood.<ref name="mattson" /> | ||
| Line 16: | Line 15: | ||
German [[pharmacologist]] [[Hugo Schulz]] first described such a phenomenon in 1888 following his own observations that the growth of yeast could be stimulated by small doses of poisons. This was coupled with the work of German physician [[Rudolph Arndt]], who studied animals given low doses of drugs, eventually giving rise to the [[Arndt–Schulz rule]].<ref name="Kaiser">{{cite journal |doi=10.1126/science.302.5644.376 |title=Sipping from a Poisoned Chalice |year=2003 |last1=Kaiser |first1=Jocelyn |journal=Science |volume=302 |issue=5644 |pages=376–9 |pmid=14563981|s2cid=58523840 }}</ref> Arndt's advocacy of [[homeopathy]] contributed to the rule's diminished credibility in the 1920s and 1930s.<ref name="Kaiser" /> The term "hormesis" was coined and used for the first time in a scientific paper by [[Chester M. Southam]] and J. Ehrlich in 1943 in the journal ''Phytopathology'', volume 33, pp. 517–541. | German [[pharmacologist]] [[Hugo Schulz]] first described such a phenomenon in 1888 following his own observations that the growth of yeast could be stimulated by small doses of poisons. This was coupled with the work of German physician [[Rudolph Arndt]], who studied animals given low doses of drugs, eventually giving rise to the [[Arndt–Schulz rule]].<ref name="Kaiser">{{cite journal |doi=10.1126/science.302.5644.376 |title=Sipping from a Poisoned Chalice |year=2003 |last1=Kaiser |first1=Jocelyn |journal=Science |volume=302 |issue=5644 |pages=376–9 |pmid=14563981|s2cid=58523840 }}</ref> Arndt's advocacy of [[homeopathy]] contributed to the rule's diminished credibility in the 1920s and 1930s.<ref name="Kaiser" /> The term "hormesis" was coined and used for the first time in a scientific paper by [[Chester M. Southam]] and J. Ehrlich in 1943 in the journal ''Phytopathology'', volume 33, pp. 517–541. | ||
In 2004, [[Edward Calabrese]] evaluated the concept of hormesis.<ref | In 2004, [[Edward Calabrese]] evaluated the concept of hormesis.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/sj.embor.7400222 |title=Hormesis: A revolution in toxicology, risk assessment and medicine |year=2004 |last1=Calabrese |first1=Edward J. |journal=EMBO Reports |volume=5 |pages=S37–40 |pmid=15459733 |pmc=1299203 |issue=Suppl 1}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Bethell | first = Tom | title = The Politically Incorrect Guide to Science | publisher = Regnery Publishing | location = USA | pages = [https://archive.org/details/politicallyincor00beth_0/page/58 58]–61 | url = https://archive.org/details/politicallyincor00beth_0 |url-access=registration | isbn = 978-0-89526-031-4 |year=2005}}</ref> Over 600 substances show a U-shaped [[dose–response relationship]]; Calabrese and Baldwin wrote: "One percent (195 out of 20,285) of the published articles contained 668 dose-response relationships that met the entry criteria [of a U-shaped response indicative of hormesis]"<ref>{{cite journal|vauthors=Calabrese EJ, Baldwin LA|year=2001|title=The frequency of U-shaped dose responses in the toxicological literature|journal=Toxicological Sciences|volume=62|issue=2|pages=330–8|doi=10.1093/toxsci/62.2.330|pmid=11452146|doi-access=free}}</ref> | ||
==Examples== | ==Examples== | ||
=== Carbon monoxide === | === Carbon monoxide === | ||
[[Carbon monoxide]] is produced in small quantities across [[Phylogenetics|phylogenetic]] kingdoms, where it has essential roles as a [[neurotransmitter]] (subcategorized as a [[gasotransmitter]]). The majority of endogenous carbon monoxide is produced by [[heme oxygenase]]; the loss of heme oxygenase and subsequent loss of carbon monoxide signaling has catastrophic implications for an organism.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Hopper|first1=Christopher P.|last2=De La Cruz|first2=Ladie Kimberly|last3=Lyles|first3=Kristin V.|last4=Wareham|first4=Lauren K.|last5=Gilbert|first5=Jack A.|last6=Eichenbaum|first6=Zehava|last7=Magierowski|first7=Marcin|last8=Poole|first8=Robert K.|last9=Wollborn|first9=Jakob|last10=Wang|first10=Binghe|date=2020-12-23|title=Role of Carbon Monoxide in Host–Gut Microbiome Communication | [[Carbon monoxide]] is produced in small quantities across [[Phylogenetics|phylogenetic]] kingdoms, where it has essential roles as a [[neurotransmitter]] (subcategorized as a [[gasotransmitter]]). The majority of endogenous carbon monoxide is produced by [[heme oxygenase]]; the loss of heme oxygenase and subsequent loss of carbon monoxide signaling has catastrophic implications for an organism.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Hopper|first1=Christopher P.|last2=De La Cruz|first2=Ladie Kimberly|last3=Lyles|first3=Kristin V.|last4=Wareham|first4=Lauren K.|last5=Gilbert|first5=Jack A.|last6=Eichenbaum|first6=Zehava|last7=Magierowski|first7=Marcin|last8=Poole|first8=Robert K.|last9=Wollborn|first9=Jakob|last10=Wang|first10=Binghe|date=2020-12-23|title=Role of Carbon Monoxide in Host–Gut Microbiome Communication|journal=Chemical Reviews|volume=120|issue=24|pages=13273–13311|doi=10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00586|pmid=33089988|s2cid=224824871|issn=0009-2665 |url=https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/264519 }}</ref> In addition to physiological roles, small amounts of carbon monoxide can be inhaled or administered in the form of [[carbon monoxide-releasing molecules]] as a therapeutic agent.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Motterlini|first1=Roberto|last2=Otterbein|first2=Leo E.|date=2010|title=The therapeutic potential of carbon monoxide|url=https://www.nature.com/articles/nrd3228|journal=Nature Reviews Drug Discovery|language=en|volume=9|issue=9|pages=728–743|doi=10.1038/nrd3228|pmid=20811383|bibcode=2010NRvDD...9..728M |s2cid=205477130|issn=1474-1784|url-access=subscription}}</ref> | ||
Regarding the hormetic curve graph: | Regarding the hormetic curve graph: | ||
| Line 39: | Line 38: | ||
====Physical exercise==== | ====Physical exercise==== | ||
Physical exercise intensity may exhibit a hormetic curve. Individuals with low levels of physical activity are at risk for some diseases; however, individuals engaged in moderate, regular exercise may experience less disease risk.<ref | Physical exercise intensity may exhibit a hormetic curve. Individuals with low levels of physical activity are at risk for some diseases; however, individuals engaged in moderate, regular exercise may experience less disease risk.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/j.arr.2007.04.004 |title=Exercise, oxidative stress and hormesis |year=2008 |last1=Radak |first1=Zsolt |last2=Chung |first2=Hae Y. |last3=Koltai |first3=Erika |last4=Taylor |first4=Albert W. |last5=Goto |first5=Sataro |journal=Ageing Research Reviews |volume=7 |pages=34–42 |pmid=17869589 |issue=1|s2cid=20964603 }}</ref> | ||
====Mitohormesis{{anchor|Mitohormesis}}==== | ====Mitohormesis{{anchor|Mitohormesis}}==== | ||
{{see also|Antioxidant#Health research}} | {{see also|Antioxidant#Health research}} | ||
The possible effect of small amounts of oxidative stress is under laboratory research.<ref | The possible effect of small amounts of oxidative stress is under laboratory research.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Bárcena |first1=Clea |last2=Mayoral |first2=Pablo |last3=Quirós |first3=Pedro M. |editor1-last=López-Otín |editor1-first=Carlos |editor2-last=Galluzzi |editor2-first=Lorenzo |title=International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology: Mitochondria and Longevity |date=1 January 2018 |publisher=Elsevier |isbn=978-0-12-815736-7 |pages=35–77 |chapter-url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1937644818300522 |access-date=11 October 2021 |language=en |chapter-format=Book series |chapter=Chapter Two - Mitohormesis, an Antiaging Paradigm}}</ref> [[Mitochondria]] are sometimes described as "cellular power plants" because they generate most of the cell's supply of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), a source of chemical energy. [[Reactive oxygen species]] (ROS) have been discarded as unwanted byproducts of [[oxidative phosphorylation]] in mitochondria by the proponents of the free-radical theory of aging promoted by [[Denham Harman]]. The [[free-radical theory]] states that compounds inactivating ROS would lead to a reduction of oxidative stress and thereby produce an increase in lifespan, although this theory holds only in [[basic research]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Sanz |first1=Alberto |last2=Stefanatos |first2=Rhoda K.A. |title=The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging: A Critical View|journal=Current Aging Science |pages=10–21 |doi=10.2174/1874609810801010010 |date=1 March 2008|volume=1 |issue=1 |pmid=20021368 }}</ref> However, in over 19 [[clinical trial]]s, "nutritional and genetic interventions to boost antioxidants have generally failed to increase life span."<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Brewer |first1=Gregory J. |title=Epigenetic oxidative redox shift (EORS) theory of aging unifies the free radical and insulin signaling theories |journal=Experimental Gerontology |date=March 2010 |volume=45 |issue=3 |pages=173–179 |doi=10.1016/j.exger.2009.11.007 |pmid=19945522 |pmc=2826600 |language=en}}</ref> | ||
Whether this concept applies to humans remains to be shown, although a 2007 [[Epidemiology|epidemiological]] study supports the possibility of mitohormesis, indicating that supplementation with [[beta-carotene]], [[vitamin A]] or [[vitamin E]] may increase disease [[prevalence]] in humans.<ref | Whether this concept applies to humans remains to be shown, although a 2007 [[Epidemiology|epidemiological]] study supports the possibility of mitohormesis, indicating that supplementation with [[beta-carotene]], [[vitamin A]] or [[vitamin E]] may increase disease [[prevalence]] in humans.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bjelakovic |first1=Goran |last2=Nikolova |first2=Dimitrinka |last3=Gluud |first3=Lise Lotte |last4=Simonetti |first4=Rosa G. |last5=Gluud |first5=Christian |title=Mortality in Randomized Trials of Antioxidant Supplements for Primary and Secondary Prevention: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |journal=JAMA |date=28 February 2007 |volume=297 |issue=8 |pages=842–857 |doi=10.1001/jama.297.8.842 |pmid=17327526 }}</ref> | ||
===Alcohol=== | ===Alcohol=== | ||
{{Main|Alcohol consumption and health|Alcohol and cancer|Alcohol and cardiovascular disease}} | {{Main|Alcohol consumption and health|Alcohol and cancer|Alcohol and cardiovascular disease}} | ||
[[Ethanol|Alcohol]] is believed to be hormetic in preventing heart disease and stroke,<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1289/ehp.8606 |title=The Importance of Hormesis to Public Health |year=2006 |last1=Calabrese |first1=Edward J. |last2=Cook |first2=Ralph |journal=Environmental Health Perspectives |pmid=17107845 |jstor=4091789 |volume=114 |issue=11 |pages=1631–5 |pmc=1665397|bibcode=2006EnvHP.114.1631C }}</ref> although the benefits of light drinking may have been exaggerated.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1080/16066350500497983 |date=2006 |title=Moderate alcohol use and reduced mortality risk: Systematic error in prospective studies |last1=Fillmore |first1=Kaye Middleton |last2=Kerr |first2=William C. |last3=Stockwell |first3=Tim |last4=Chikritzhs |first4=Tanya |last5=Bostrom |first5=Alan |journal=Addiction Research & Theory |volume=14 |issue=2 |pages=101–32|s2cid=72709357 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.01.005 |title=Moderate Alcohol Use and Reduced Mortality Risk: Systematic Error in Prospective Studies and New Hypotheses |year=2007 |last1=Fillmore |first1=Kaye Middleton |last2=Stockwell |first2=Tim |last3=Chikritzhs |first3=Tanya |last4=Bostrom |first4=Alan |last5=Kerr |first5=William |journal=Annals of Epidemiology |volume=17 |issue=5 |pages=S16–23 |pmid=17478320}}</ref> The [[Gut microbiota|gut microbiome]] of a typical healthy individual naturally ferments small amounts of ethanol, and in rare cases dysbiosis leads to [[auto-brewery syndrome]], therefore whether benefits of alcohol are derived from the behavior of consuming alcoholic drinks or as a homeostasis factor in normal physiology via metabolites from commensal microbiota remains unclear.<ref>{{ | [[Ethanol|Alcohol]] is believed to be hormetic in preventing heart disease and stroke,<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1289/ehp.8606 |title=The Importance of Hormesis to Public Health |year=2006 |last1=Calabrese |first1=Edward J. |last2=Cook |first2=Ralph |journal=Environmental Health Perspectives |pmid=17107845 |jstor=4091789 |volume=114 |issue=11 |pages=1631–5 |pmc=1665397|bibcode=2006EnvHP.114.1631C }}</ref> although the benefits of light drinking may have been exaggerated.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1080/16066350500497983 |date=2006 |title=Moderate alcohol use and reduced mortality risk: Systematic error in prospective studies |last1=Fillmore |first1=Kaye Middleton |last2=Kerr |first2=William C. |last3=Stockwell |first3=Tim |last4=Chikritzhs |first4=Tanya |last5=Bostrom |first5=Alan |journal=Addiction Research & Theory |volume=14 |issue=2 |pages=101–32|s2cid=72709357 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.01.005 |title=Moderate Alcohol Use and Reduced Mortality Risk: Systematic Error in Prospective Studies and New Hypotheses |year=2007 |last1=Fillmore |first1=Kaye Middleton |last2=Stockwell |first2=Tim |last3=Chikritzhs |first3=Tanya |last4=Bostrom |first4=Alan |last5=Kerr |first5=William |journal=Annals of Epidemiology |volume=17 |issue=5 |pages=S16–23 |pmid=17478320}}</ref> The [[Gut microbiota|gut microbiome]] of a typical healthy individual naturally ferments small amounts of ethanol, and in rare cases dysbiosis leads to [[auto-brewery syndrome]], therefore whether benefits of alcohol are derived from the behavior of consuming alcoholic drinks or as a homeostasis factor in normal physiology via metabolites from commensal microbiota remains unclear.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Painter |first1=Kelly |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513346/ |title=Auto-brewery Syndrome |last2=Cordell |first2=Barbara J. |last3=Sticco |first3=Kristin L. |date=2021 |work=StatPearls |publisher=StatPearls Publishing |location=Treasure Island (FL) |pmid=30020718 |access-date=2021-05-04}}</ref> | ||
===Methylmercury=== | ===Methylmercury=== | ||
In 2010, a paper in the journal ''Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry'' showed that low doses of [[methylmercury]], a potent neurotoxic pollutant, improved the hatching rate of [[mallard]] eggs.<ref name= | In 2010, a paper in the journal ''Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry'' showed that low doses of [[methylmercury]], a potent neurotoxic pollutant, improved the hatching rate of [[mallard]] eggs.<ref name="Heinz-2010">{{cite journal |doi=10.1002/etc.64 |date=2010 |title=Enhanced reproduction in mallards fed a low level of methylmercury: An apparent case of hormesis |last1=Heinz |first1=Gary H. |last2=Hoffman |first2=David J. |last3=Klimstra |first3=Jon D. |last4=Stebbins |first4=Katherine R. |journal=Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry |volume=29 |issue=3 |pages=650–3 |pmid=20821490|bibcode=2010EnvTC..29..650H |s2cid=34149560 |url=https://zenodo.org/record/1229166 }}</ref> The author of the study, Gary Heinz, who led the study for the [[U.S. Geological Survey]] at the [[Patuxent Wildlife Research Center]] in [[Beltsville]], stated that other explanations are possible. For instance, the flock he studied might have harbored some low, subclinical infection and that mercury, well known to be antimicrobial, might have killed the infection that otherwise hurt reproduction in the untreated birds.<ref name="Heinz-2010"/> | ||
===Radiation=== | ===Radiation=== | ||
====Ionizing radiation{{anchor|Ionizing Radiation}}==== | ====Ionizing radiation{{anchor|Ionizing Radiation}}==== | ||
{{see also|Radiation hormesis}} | {{see also|Radiation hormesis}} | ||
Hormesis has been observed in a number of cases in humans and animals exposed to chronic low doses of ionizing radiation. A-bomb survivors who received high doses exhibited shortened lifespan and increased cancer mortality, but those who received low doses had lower cancer mortality than the Japanese average.<ref>Sutou | Hormesis has been observed in a number of cases in humans and animals exposed to chronic low doses of ionizing radiation. A-bomb survivors who received high doses exhibited shortened lifespan and increased cancer mortality, but those who received low doses had lower cancer mortality than the Japanese average.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Sutou |first=Shizuyo |date=2018 |title=Low-dose radiation from A-bombs elongated lifespan and reduced cancer mortality relative to un-irradiated individuals |journal=Genes and Environment |volume=40 |issue=1 |article-number=26 |doi=10.1186/s41021-018-0114-3 |issn=1880-7062 |pmc=6299535 |pmid=30598710 |doi-access=free|bibcode=2018GeneE..40...26S }}{{Creative Commons text attribution notice|cc=by4|from this source=yes}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Sutou |first1=Shizuyo |title=Black rain in Hiroshima: a critique to the Life Span Study of A-bomb survivors, basis of the linear no-threshold model |journal=Genes and Environment |date=1 January 2020 |volume=42 |issue=1 |article-number=1 |doi=10.1186/s41021-019-0141-8 |doi-access=free |pmid=31908690 |pmc=6937943 |bibcode=2020GeneE..42....1S |language=en |issn=1880-7062}}</ref> | ||
In Taiwan, recycled [[Radiation contamination|radiocontaminated]] steel was inadvertently used in the construction of over 100 apartment buildings, causing the long-term exposure of 10,000 people. The average dose rate was 50 mSv/year and a subset of the population (1,000 people) received a total dose over 4,000 mSv over ten years. In the widely used [[linear no-threshold model]] used by regulatory bodies, the expected cancer deaths in this population would have been 302 with 70 caused by the extra ionizing radiation, with the remainder caused by natural background radiation. The observed cancer rate, though, was quite low at 7 cancer deaths when 232 would be predicted by the LNT model had they not been exposed to the radiation from the building materials. Ionizing radiation hormesis appears to be at work.<ref>{{Cite book|date=2010 |last=Sanders |first=Charles |editor-first1=Charles L. |editor-last1=Sanders |title=Radiation Hormesis and the Linear-No-Threshold Assumption |url=https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-03720-7|publisher=Springer|location=Berlin|doi=10.1007/978-3-642-03720-7 |isbn=978-3-642-42566-0|bibcode=2010rhln.book.....S }}</ref> | In Taiwan, recycled [[Radiation contamination|radiocontaminated]] steel was inadvertently used in the construction of over 100 apartment buildings, causing the long-term exposure of 10,000 people. The average dose rate was 50 mSv/year and a subset of the population (1,000 people) received a total dose over 4,000 mSv over ten years. In the widely used [[linear no-threshold model]] used by regulatory bodies, the expected cancer deaths in this population would have been 302 with 70 caused by the extra ionizing radiation, with the remainder caused by natural background radiation. The observed cancer rate, though, was quite low at 7 cancer deaths when 232 would be predicted by the LNT model had they not been exposed to the radiation from the building materials. Ionizing radiation hormesis appears to be at work.<ref>{{Cite book|date=2010 |last=Sanders |first=Charles |editor-first1=Charles L. |editor-last1=Sanders |title=Radiation Hormesis and the Linear-No-Threshold Assumption |url=https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-03720-7|publisher=Springer|location=Berlin|doi=10.1007/978-3-642-03720-7 |isbn=978-3-642-42566-0|bibcode=2010rhln.book.....S }}</ref> | ||
| Line 66: | Line 63: | ||
No experiment can be performed in perfect isolation. Thick lead shielding around a chemical dose experiment to rule out the effects of ionizing radiation is built and rigorously controlled for in the laboratory, and certainly not the field. Likewise the same applies for ionizing radiation studies. Ionizing radiation is released when an unstable particle releases radiation, creating two new substances and energy in the form of an [[electromagnetic wave]]. The resulting materials are then free to interact with any environmental elements, and the energy released can also be used as a catalyst in further ionizing radiation interactions.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs371/en/|title=Ionizing radiation, health effects and protective measures|website=World Health Organization|language=en-GB|access-date=2017-02-16}}</ref> | No experiment can be performed in perfect isolation. Thick lead shielding around a chemical dose experiment to rule out the effects of ionizing radiation is built and rigorously controlled for in the laboratory, and certainly not the field. Likewise the same applies for ionizing radiation studies. Ionizing radiation is released when an unstable particle releases radiation, creating two new substances and energy in the form of an [[electromagnetic wave]]. The resulting materials are then free to interact with any environmental elements, and the energy released can also be used as a catalyst in further ionizing radiation interactions.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs371/en/|title=Ionizing radiation, health effects and protective measures|website=World Health Organization|language=en-GB|access-date=2017-02-16}}</ref> | ||
The resulting confusion in the low-dose exposure field (radiation and chemical) arise from lack of consideration of this concept as described by Mothersill and Seymory.<ref | The resulting confusion in the low-dose exposure field (radiation and chemical) arise from lack of consideration of this concept as described by Mothersill and Seymory.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Mothersill C, Seymour C |title=Implications for environmental health of multiple stressors |journal=Journal of Radiological Protection |volume=29 |issue=2A |pages=A21–8 |year=2009 |pmid=19454807 |doi=10.1088/0952-4746/29/2A/S02 |bibcode = 2009JRP....29...21M |s2cid=32270666 }}</ref> | ||
===Nucleotide excision repair=== | ===Nucleotide excision repair=== | ||
Veterans of the [[Gulf War]] (1991) who suffered from the persistent symptoms of [[Gulf War Syndrome|Gulf War Illness]] (GWI) were likely exposed to stresses from toxic chemicals and/or radiation.<ref name = Latimer2020>Latimer | Veterans of the [[Gulf War]] (1991) who suffered from the persistent symptoms of [[Gulf War Syndrome|Gulf War Illness]] (GWI) were likely exposed to stresses from toxic chemicals and/or radiation.<ref name="Latimer2020">{{Cite journal |last1=Latimer |first1=Jean J |last2=Alhamed |first2=Abdullah |last3=Sveiven |first3=Stefanie |last4=Almutairy |first4=Ali |last5=Klimas |first5=Nancy G |last6=Abreu |first6=Maria |last7=Sullivan |first7=Kimberly |last8=Grant |first8=Stephen G |date=2019-07-23 |title=Preliminary Evidence for a Hormetic Effect on DNA Nucleotide Excision Repair in Veterans with Gulf War Illness |url=https://academic.oup.com/milmed/article-pdf/185/1-2/e47/33486393/usz177.pdf |journal=Military Medicine |publisher=Oxford University Press (OUP) |volume=185 |issue=1–2 |pages=e47–e52 |doi=10.1093/milmed/usz177 |issn=0026-4075 |pmc=7353836 |pmid=31334811 |doi-access=free}}</ref> The DNA damaging ([[genotoxicity|genotoxic]]) effects of such exposures can be, at least partially, overcome by the DNA [[nucleotide excision repair]] (NER) pathway. [[Lymphocyte]]s from GWI veterans exhibited a significantly elevated level of NER repair.<ref name = Latimer2020/> It was suggested that this increased NER capability in exposed veterans was likely a hormetic response, that is, an induced protective response resulting from battlefield exposure.<ref name = Latimer2020/> | ||
== Applications == | == Applications == | ||
===Effects in aging=== | ===Effects in aging=== | ||
One of the areas where the concept of hormesis has been explored | One of the areas where the concept of hormesis has been explored for its applicability is aging.<ref>{{cite book|title=Mild Stress and Healthy Aging: Applying hormesis in aging research and interventions|year=2008|publisher=Springer |isbn=978-1-4020-6868-3|editor1-last=Le Bourg|editor1-first=Eric|editor2-last=Rattan|editor2-first=Suresh|editor2-link=Suresh Rattan}}{{page needed|date=February 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Rattan|first1=S. I.|year=2008|title=Principles and practice of hormetic treatment of aging and age-related diseases|journal=Human & Experimental Toxicology|volume=27|issue=2|pages=151–4|doi=10.1177/0960327107083409|pmid=18480141|bibcode=2008HETox..27..151R |s2cid=504736}}</ref> Since the basic survival capacity of any biological system depends on its [[homeostatic]] ability, [[biogerontologist]]s proposed that exposing cells and organisms to mild stress should result in the adaptive or hormetic response with various biological benefits.{{better source|date=December 2025|reason=the sources are 17 years out of date and unconvincing per [[WP:BMI]]}} | ||
==Controversy== | ==Controversy== | ||
| Line 90: | Line 87: | ||
A United States–based [[National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements]] stated in 2001 that evidence for radiation hormesis is insufficient and radiation protection authorities should continue to apply the LNT model for purposes of risk estimation.<ref name="ISBN 978-0-929600-69-7" /> | A United States–based [[National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements]] stated in 2001 that evidence for radiation hormesis is insufficient and radiation protection authorities should continue to apply the LNT model for purposes of risk estimation.<ref name="ISBN 978-0-929600-69-7" /> | ||
A 2005 report commissioned by the French National Academy concluded that evidence for hormesis occurring at low doses is sufficient and LNT should be reconsidered as the methodology used to estimate risks from low-level sources of radiation, such as [[deep geological repository|deep geological repositories]] for [[nuclear waste]].<ref | A 2005 report commissioned by the French National Academy concluded that evidence for hormesis occurring at low doses is sufficient and LNT should be reconsidered as the methodology used to estimate risks from low-level sources of radiation, such as [[deep geological repository|deep geological repositories]] for [[nuclear waste]].<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.06.013 |title=Dose–effect relationship and estimation of the carcinogenic effects of low doses of ionizing radiation: The joint report of the Académie des Sciences (Paris) and of the Académie Nationale de Médecine |year=2005 |last1=Tubiana |first1=Maurice |journal=International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics |volume=63 |issue=2 |pages=317–9 |pmid=16168825|doi-access=free }}</ref> | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
{{See also|Radiation hormesis}} | {{See also|Radiation hormesis}} | ||
| Line 97: | Line 94: | ||
They conclude that the [[linear no threshold model]] that is effective at high doses, and which predicts that the chance of causing cancer is always linearly proportional to the amount of radiation an individual receives, should be used at low doses too. The report squarely rejects almost all research showing radiation induced hormesis as being flawed in some way (e.g. the cancer a study focuses on does not exist in humans, a clear threshold could not be established in humans, the assumptions are seriously flawed, the hormetic effect is too short to be useful). | They conclude that the [[linear no threshold model]] that is effective at high doses, and which predicts that the chance of causing cancer is always linearly proportional to the amount of radiation an individual receives, should be used at low doses too. The report squarely rejects almost all research showing radiation induced hormesis as being flawed in some way (e.g. the cancer a study focuses on does not exist in humans, a clear threshold could not be established in humans, the assumptions are seriously flawed, the hormetic effect is too short to be useful). | ||
Radiation hormesis is not generally accepted by The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), its U.S. counterpart, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), the National Research Council Committees on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (the BEIR Committees), or the U.S. regulatory agencies.<ref> | Radiation hormesis is not generally accepted by The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), its U.S. counterpart, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), the National Research Council Committees on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (the BEIR Committees), or the U.S. regulatory agencies.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Information on hormesis |url=http://hps.org/publicinformation/ate/q299.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060614082713/http://hps.org/publicinformation/ate/q299.html |archive-date=2006-06-14 |access-date=26 Feb 2006 |website=Health Physics Society}}</ref>{{dubious|note: that ref is dead, and this: http://hps.org/documents/risk_ps010-1.pdf indicates that HPS does not accept <abbr title="linear no-threshold">LNT</abbr> for estimation of risk for low doses; the document says that ) | ||
Reasons include: | Reasons include: | ||
| Line 108: | Line 105: | ||
===Policy consequences=== | ===Policy consequences=== | ||
Hormesis remains largely unknown to the public, requiring a policy change for a possible toxin to consider exposure risk of small doses.<ref> | Hormesis remains largely unknown to the public, requiring a policy change for a possible toxin to consider exposure risk of small doses.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Poumadére |first=Marc |date=2003 |title=Hormesis: public health policy, organizational safety and risk communication |journal=Human & Experimental Toxicology |volume=22 |issue=1 |pages=39–41 |doi=10.1191/0960327103ht318oa |issn=0960-3271 |doi-access=free|pmid=12643303 |bibcode=2003HETox..22...39P }}</ref> | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Latest revision as of 22:53, 16 December 2025
Hormesis is a two-phased dose-response relationship whereby low-dose exposures have a beneficial effect and high-dose amounts are either inhibitory to function or toxic.[1] Within the hormetic zone, the biological response to low-dose amounts of some stressors is generally favorable. An example is the breathing of oxygen, which is needed in certain concentrations for respiration in aerobic animals. Exposure to elevated levels of oxygen can have beneficial effects, but it becomes toxic in high concentrations.[2]
In toxicology, hormesis is a dose-response phenomenon to xenobiotics or other stressors. In physiology and nutrition, hormesis has regions extending from low-dose deficiencies to homeostasis, and potential toxicity at high levels.[3] Physiological concentrations of an agent above or below homeostasis may adversely affect an organism, where the hormetic zone is a region of homeostasis of balanced nutrition.[4] In pharmacology, the hormetic zone is similar to the therapeutic window.Template:Medcn
In the context of toxicology, the hormesis model of dose response is vigorously debated.[5] The biochemical mechanisms by which hormesis works (particularly in applied cases pertaining to behavior and toxins) remain under early laboratory research and are not well understood.[3]
Etymology
The term "hormesis" derives from Greek hórmēsis for "rapid motion, eagerness", itself from ancient Greek Script error: No such module "lang". to excite.[1] The same Greek root provides the word hormone. The term "hormetics" is used for the study of hormesis.[3] The word hormesis was first reported in English in 1943.[1]
History
A form of hormesis famous in antiquity was Mithridatism, the practice whereby Mithridates VI of Pontus supposedly made himself immune to a variety of toxins by regular exposure to small doses. Mithridate and theriac, polypharmaceutical electuaries claiming descent from his formula and initially including flesh from poisonous animals, were consumed for centuries by emperors, kings, and queens as protection against poison and ill health. In the Renaissance, the Swiss doctor Paracelsus said, "All things are poison, and nothing is without poison; the dosage alone makes it so a thing is not a poison."
German pharmacologist Hugo Schulz first described such a phenomenon in 1888 following his own observations that the growth of yeast could be stimulated by small doses of poisons. This was coupled with the work of German physician Rudolph Arndt, who studied animals given low doses of drugs, eventually giving rise to the Arndt–Schulz rule.[5] Arndt's advocacy of homeopathy contributed to the rule's diminished credibility in the 1920s and 1930s.[5] The term "hormesis" was coined and used for the first time in a scientific paper by Chester M. Southam and J. Ehrlich in 1943 in the journal Phytopathology, volume 33, pp. 517–541.
In 2004, Edward Calabrese evaluated the concept of hormesis.[6][7] Over 600 substances show a U-shaped dose–response relationship; Calabrese and Baldwin wrote: "One percent (195 out of 20,285) of the published articles contained 668 dose-response relationships that met the entry criteria [of a U-shaped response indicative of hormesis]"[8]
Examples
Carbon monoxide
Carbon monoxide is produced in small quantities across phylogenetic kingdoms, where it has essential roles as a neurotransmitter (subcategorized as a gasotransmitter). The majority of endogenous carbon monoxide is produced by heme oxygenase; the loss of heme oxygenase and subsequent loss of carbon monoxide signaling has catastrophic implications for an organism.[9] In addition to physiological roles, small amounts of carbon monoxide can be inhaled or administered in the form of carbon monoxide-releasing molecules as a therapeutic agent.[10]
Regarding the hormetic curve graph:
- Deficiency zone: an absence of carbon monoxide signaling has toxic implications
- Hormetic zone / region of homeostasis: small amount of carbon monoxide has a positive effect:
- essential as a neurotransmitter
- beneficial as a pharmaceutical
- Toxicity zone: excessive exposure results in carbon monoxide poisoning[11]
Oxygen
Many organisms maintain a hormesis relationship with oxygen, which follows a hormetic curve similar to carbon monoxide:
- Deficiency zone: hypoxia / asphyxia
- Hormetic zone / region of homeostasis
- Toxicity zone: oxidative stress[2]
Physical exercise
Physical exercise intensity may exhibit a hormetic curve. Individuals with low levels of physical activity are at risk for some diseases; however, individuals engaged in moderate, regular exercise may experience less disease risk.[12]
MitohormesisScript error: No such module "anchor".
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". The possible effect of small amounts of oxidative stress is under laboratory research.[13] Mitochondria are sometimes described as "cellular power plants" because they generate most of the cell's supply of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), a source of chemical energy. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been discarded as unwanted byproducts of oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria by the proponents of the free-radical theory of aging promoted by Denham Harman. The free-radical theory states that compounds inactivating ROS would lead to a reduction of oxidative stress and thereby produce an increase in lifespan, although this theory holds only in basic research.[14] However, in over 19 clinical trials, "nutritional and genetic interventions to boost antioxidants have generally failed to increase life span."[15]
Whether this concept applies to humans remains to be shown, although a 2007 epidemiological study supports the possibility of mitohormesis, indicating that supplementation with beta-carotene, vitamin A or vitamin E may increase disease prevalence in humans.[16]
Alcohol
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Alcohol is believed to be hormetic in preventing heart disease and stroke,[17] although the benefits of light drinking may have been exaggerated.[18][19] The gut microbiome of a typical healthy individual naturally ferments small amounts of ethanol, and in rare cases dysbiosis leads to auto-brewery syndrome, therefore whether benefits of alcohol are derived from the behavior of consuming alcoholic drinks or as a homeostasis factor in normal physiology via metabolites from commensal microbiota remains unclear.[20]
Methylmercury
In 2010, a paper in the journal Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry showed that low doses of methylmercury, a potent neurotoxic pollutant, improved the hatching rate of mallard eggs.[21] The author of the study, Gary Heinz, who led the study for the U.S. Geological Survey at the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center in Beltsville, stated that other explanations are possible. For instance, the flock he studied might have harbored some low, subclinical infection and that mercury, well known to be antimicrobial, might have killed the infection that otherwise hurt reproduction in the untreated birds.[21]
Radiation
Ionizing radiationScript error: No such module "anchor".
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Hormesis has been observed in a number of cases in humans and animals exposed to chronic low doses of ionizing radiation. A-bomb survivors who received high doses exhibited shortened lifespan and increased cancer mortality, but those who received low doses had lower cancer mortality than the Japanese average.[22][23]
In Taiwan, recycled radiocontaminated steel was inadvertently used in the construction of over 100 apartment buildings, causing the long-term exposure of 10,000 people. The average dose rate was 50 mSv/year and a subset of the population (1,000 people) received a total dose over 4,000 mSv over ten years. In the widely used linear no-threshold model used by regulatory bodies, the expected cancer deaths in this population would have been 302 with 70 caused by the extra ionizing radiation, with the remainder caused by natural background radiation. The observed cancer rate, though, was quite low at 7 cancer deaths when 232 would be predicted by the LNT model had they not been exposed to the radiation from the building materials. Ionizing radiation hormesis appears to be at work.[24]
Chemical and ionizing radiation combinedScript error: No such module "anchor".
No experiment can be performed in perfect isolation. Thick lead shielding around a chemical dose experiment to rule out the effects of ionizing radiation is built and rigorously controlled for in the laboratory, and certainly not the field. Likewise the same applies for ionizing radiation studies. Ionizing radiation is released when an unstable particle releases radiation, creating two new substances and energy in the form of an electromagnetic wave. The resulting materials are then free to interact with any environmental elements, and the energy released can also be used as a catalyst in further ionizing radiation interactions.[25]
The resulting confusion in the low-dose exposure field (radiation and chemical) arise from lack of consideration of this concept as described by Mothersill and Seymory.[26]
Nucleotide excision repair
Veterans of the Gulf War (1991) who suffered from the persistent symptoms of Gulf War Illness (GWI) were likely exposed to stresses from toxic chemicals and/or radiation.[27] The DNA damaging (genotoxic) effects of such exposures can be, at least partially, overcome by the DNA nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway. Lymphocytes from GWI veterans exhibited a significantly elevated level of NER repair.[27] It was suggested that this increased NER capability in exposed veterans was likely a hormetic response, that is, an induced protective response resulting from battlefield exposure.[27]
Applications
Effects in aging
One of the areas where the concept of hormesis has been explored for its applicability is aging.[28][29] Since the basic survival capacity of any biological system depends on its homeostatic ability, biogerontologists proposed that exposing cells and organisms to mild stress should result in the adaptive or hormetic response with various biological benefits.Template:Better source
Controversy
Hormesis suggests dangerous substances have benefits. Concerns exist that the concept has been leveraged by lobbyists to weaken environmental regulations of some well-known toxic substances in the US.[30]
Radiation controversy
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". The hypothesis of hormesis has generated the most controversy when applied to ionizing radiation. This hypothesis is called radiation hormesis. For policy-making purposes, the commonly accepted model of dose response in radiobiology is the linear no-threshold model (LNT), which assumes a strictly linear dependence between the risk of radiation-induced adverse health effects and radiation dose, implying that there is no safe dose of radiation for humans.
Nonetheless, many countries including the Czech Republic, Germany, Austria, Poland, and the United States have radon therapy centers whose whole primary operating principle is the assumption of radiation hormesis, or beneficial impact of small doses of radiation on human health. Countries such as Germany and Austria at the same time have imposed very strict antinuclear regulations, which have been described as radiophobic inconsistency.
The United States National Research Council (part of the National Academy of Sciences),[31] the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (a body commissioned by the United States Congress)[32] and the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Ionizing Radiation all agree that radiation hormesis is not clearly shown, nor clearly the rule for radiation doses.
A United States–based National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements stated in 2001 that evidence for radiation hormesis is insufficient and radiation protection authorities should continue to apply the LNT model for purposes of risk estimation.[32]
A 2005 report commissioned by the French National Academy concluded that evidence for hormesis occurring at low doses is sufficient and LNT should be reconsidered as the methodology used to estimate risks from low-level sources of radiation, such as deep geological repositories for nuclear waste.[33]
Policy consequences
Hormesis remains largely unknown to the public, requiring a policy change for a possible toxin to consider exposure risk of small doses.[34]
See also
- Calorie restriction
- Michael Ristow
- Petkau effect
- Radiation hormesis
- Stochastic resonance
- Mithridatism
- Xenohormesis
- Antifragility
- Post-traumatic growth
- Eustress
References
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
- ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".Template:Creative Commons text attribution notice
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".