Temperate perch: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>OAbot
m Open access bot: doi updated in citation with #oabot.
 
imported>Monkbot
 
Line 19: Line 19:


== Evolution ==
== Evolution ==
Potential percichthyid fossil remains are known from the [[Danian|Early Paleocene]] of the [[El Molino Formation]] of Bolivia; these remains have been described as resembling those of the fossil ''[[Percichthys hondoensis]]'' from the [[Eocene]] of [[Argentina]]. One articulated specimen is known from the Paleocene portion of the formation, but other remains are known from the [[Maastrichtian]] beds of the formation, indicating that percichthyids could have potential [[Cretaceous]] origins. However, the condition of this material is unclear. Another fossil percichthyid, ''[[Percichthys lonquimayiensis]]'' from [[Chile]], was initially dated to the Paleocene, but further studies have found it to be from the [[Miocene]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Friedman |first=Matt |last2=V. Andrews |first2=James |last3=Saad |first3=Hadeel |last4=El-Sayed |first4=Sanaa |date=2023-06-16 |title=The Cretaceous–Paleogene transition in spiny-rayed fishes: surveying “Patterson’s Gap” in the acanthomorph skeletal record André Dumont medalist lecture 2018 |url=https://popups.uliege.be/1374-8505/index.php?id=7048 |journal=Geologica Belgica |language=en |doi=10.20341/gb.2023.002 |issn=1374-8505|doi-access=free }}</ref>
Potential percichthyid fossil remains are known from the [[Danian|Early Paleocene]] of the [[El Molino Formation]] of Bolivia; these remains have been described as resembling those of the fossil ''[[Percichthys hondoensis]]'' from the [[Eocene]] of [[Argentina]]. One articulated specimen is known from the Paleocene portion of the formation, but other remains are known from the [[Maastrichtian]] beds of the formation, indicating that percichthyids could have potential [[Cretaceous]] origins. However, the condition of this material is unclear. Another fossil percichthyid, ''[[Percichthys lonquimayiensis]]'' from [[Chile]], was initially dated to the Paleocene, but further studies have found it to be from the [[Miocene]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Friedman |first=Matt |last2=V. Andrews |first2=James |last3=Saad |first3=Hadeel |last4=El-Sayed |first4=Sanaa |date=2023-06-16 |title=The Cretaceous–Paleogene transition in spiny-rayed fishes: surveying "Patterson's Gap" in the acanthomorph skeletal record André Dumont medalist lecture 2018 |url=https://popups.uliege.be/1374-8505/index.php?id=7048 |journal=Geologica Belgica |language=en |doi=10.20341/gb.2023.002 |issn=1374-8505|doi-access=free }}</ref>


Potential percichthyid scales have been recovered from the [[Miocene]]-aged fossil deposits of [[Foulden Maar]] in New Zealand. If these are of percichthyids, this suggests they had a wider distribution during the [[Neogene]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=McDowall |first=R. M. |last2=and Lee |first2=D. E. |date=2005-06-01 |title=Probable perciform fish scales from a Miocene freshwater lake deposit, Central Otago, New Zealand |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03014223.2005.9517788 |journal=Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand |volume=35 |issue=3 |pages=339–344 |doi=10.1080/03014223.2005.9517788 |issn=0303-6758}}</ref> They also appear to have ranged as far north as the [[Neotropical realm|Neotropics]] during the Oligocene/Miocene, with the fossil genus ''[[Santosius]]'' known from Brazil.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last=Arratia |first=Gloria |last2=Quezada-Romegialli |first2=Claudio |date=2019-04-25 |title=The South American and Australian percichthyids and perciliids. What is new about them? |url=https://www.scielo.br/j/ni/a/4NnD4LzmJhR66NRC6ZT79mC/?lang=en |journal=Neotropical Ichthyology |language=en |volume=17 |pages=e180102 |doi=10.1590/1982-0224-20180102 |issn=1679-6225|doi-access=free }}</ref>
Potential percichthyid scales have been recovered from the [[Miocene]]-aged fossil deposits of [[Foulden Maar]] in New Zealand. If these are of percichthyids, this suggests they had a wider distribution during the [[Neogene]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=McDowall |first=R. M. |last2=and Lee |first2=D. E. |date=2005-06-01 |title=Probable perciform fish scales from a Miocene freshwater lake deposit, Central Otago, New Zealand |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03014223.2005.9517788 |journal=Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand |volume=35 |issue=3 |pages=339–344 |doi=10.1080/03014223.2005.9517788 |issn=0303-6758}}</ref> They also appear to have ranged as far north as the [[Neotropical realm|Neotropics]] during the Oligocene/Miocene, with the fossil genus ''[[Santosius]]'' known from Brazil.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last=Arratia |first=Gloria |last2=Quezada-Romegialli |first2=Claudio |date=2019-04-25 |title=The South American and Australian percichthyids and perciliids. What is new about them? |url=https://www.scielo.br/j/ni/a/4NnD4LzmJhR66NRC6ZT79mC/?lang=en |journal=Neotropical Ichthyology |language=en |volume=17 |article-number=e180102 |doi=10.1590/1982-0224-20180102 |issn=1679-6225|doi-access=free }}</ref>


Modern percichthyids have a significant [[disjunct distribution]], being found in Australia and southern South America. All extant members of the group only inhabit freshwater habitats, and it is thus unlikely they ever evolved marine habits. For this reason, it is likely that the modern distribution of percichthyids derives from dispersal over the [[Antarctic land bridge]] between South America and Australia, which existed up to the end of the Eocene. This suggests that percichthyids likely inhabited Antarctica as well.<ref name=":0" />
Modern percichthyids have a significant [[disjunct distribution]], being found in Australia and southern South America. All extant members of the group only inhabit freshwater habitats, and it is thus unlikely they ever evolved marine habits. For this reason, it is likely that the modern distribution of percichthyids derives from dispersal over the [[Antarctic land bridge]] between South America and Australia, which existed up to the end of the Eocene. This suggests that percichthyids likely inhabited Antarctica as well.<ref name=":0" />
Line 30: Line 30:
Almost 40 [[species]] of percichthyids are now recognised, grouped in 11–12 [[genus|genera]]. Most but not all are exclusively freshwater fishes.  They are mainly found in [[Australia]], but species are also found in southern South America (''Percichthys'').
Almost 40 [[species]] of percichthyids are now recognised, grouped in 11–12 [[genus|genera]]. Most but not all are exclusively freshwater fishes.  They are mainly found in [[Australia]], but species are also found in southern South America (''Percichthys'').


More recently the Chinese perches have been classified in the separate family [[Sinipercidae]] while the genus ''[[Percilia]]'' has been found not to be closely related to either that family or the Percichthyidae and has been placed in its own [[monotypy|monotypic]] family [[Perciliidae]].<ref name = Nelson5>{{cite book  |title=Fishes of the World |edition=5th |author1=J. S. Nelson |author2=T. C. Grande |author3=M. V. H. Wilson |year=2016 |pages=442 |publisher=Wiley |ISBN= 978-1-118-34233-6 |url=https://sites.google.com/site/fotw5th/ }}</ref> The two [[catadromous]] species in ''[[Percalates]]'' are found in Australia and were previously placed in ''Macquaria'', but phylogenetic analyses have found them to be the most [[Basal (phylogenetics)|basal]] members of the whole order.<ref name="Lavoue">{{cite journal |author1=Sébastien Lavoué |author2=Kouji Nakayama |author3=Dean R. Jerry |author4=Yusuke Yamanoue |author5=Naoki Yagishita |author6=Nobuaki Suzuki |author7=Mutsumi Nishida |author8=Masaki Miya |display-authors=3 |year=2014 |title=Mitogenomic phylogeny of the Percichthyidae and Centrarchiformes (Percomorphaceae): comparison with recent nuclear gene-based studies and simultaneous analysis |journal=Gene |volume=549 |issue=1 |pages=46–57 |doi=10.1016/j.gene.2014.07.033}} Abstract</ref>
More recently the Chinese perches have been classified in the separate family [[Sinipercidae]] while the genus ''[[Percilia]]'' has been found not to be closely related to either that family or the Percichthyidae and has been placed in its own [[monotypy|monotypic]] family [[Perciliidae]].<ref name = Nelson5>{{cite book  |title=Fishes of the World |edition=5th |author1=J. S. Nelson |author2=T. C. Grande |author3=M. V. H. Wilson |year=2016 |page=442 |publisher=Wiley |ISBN= 978-1-118-34233-6 |url=https://sites.google.com/site/fotw5th/ }}</ref> The two [[catadromous]] species in ''[[Percalates]]'' are found in Australia and were previously placed in ''Macquaria'', but phylogenetic analyses have found them to be the most [[Basal (phylogenetics)|basal]] members of the whole order.<ref name="Lavoue">{{cite journal |author1=Sébastien Lavoué |author2=Kouji Nakayama |author3=Dean R. Jerry |author4=Yusuke Yamanoue |author5=Naoki Yagishita |author6=Nobuaki Suzuki |author7=Mutsumi Nishida |author8=Masaki Miya |display-authors=3 |year=2014 |title=Mitogenomic phylogeny of the Percichthyidae and Centrarchiformes (Percomorphaceae): comparison with recent nuclear gene-based studies and simultaneous analysis |journal=Gene |volume=549 |issue=1 |pages=46–57 |doi=10.1016/j.gene.2014.07.033}} Abstract</ref>


The following 8 genera are classified within the family Percichthyidae:<ref name = Nelson5/><ref name = Fishbase/>
The following 8 genera are classified within the family Percichthyidae:<ref name = Nelson5/><ref name = Fishbase/>

Latest revision as of 04:25, 2 October 2025

Template:Short description Template:Automatic taxobox

File:Murray cod02 melb aquarium.jpg
Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii peelii)

Percichthyidae, the temperate perches, are a family of freshwater ray-finned fish found in Australia and southern South America. Formerly placed in the order Perciformes, they are now placed in the order Centrarchiformes.

The name Percichthyidae derives from the Latin perca for perch and Ancient Greek ἰχθύς, ichthys for fish.

Evolution

Potential percichthyid fossil remains are known from the Early Paleocene of the El Molino Formation of Bolivia; these remains have been described as resembling those of the fossil Percichthys hondoensis from the Eocene of Argentina. One articulated specimen is known from the Paleocene portion of the formation, but other remains are known from the Maastrichtian beds of the formation, indicating that percichthyids could have potential Cretaceous origins. However, the condition of this material is unclear. Another fossil percichthyid, Percichthys lonquimayiensis from Chile, was initially dated to the Paleocene, but further studies have found it to be from the Miocene.[1]

Potential percichthyid scales have been recovered from the Miocene-aged fossil deposits of Foulden Maar in New Zealand. If these are of percichthyids, this suggests they had a wider distribution during the Neogene.[2] They also appear to have ranged as far north as the Neotropics during the Oligocene/Miocene, with the fossil genus Santosius known from Brazil.[3]

Modern percichthyids have a significant disjunct distribution, being found in Australia and southern South America. All extant members of the group only inhabit freshwater habitats, and it is thus unlikely they ever evolved marine habits. For this reason, it is likely that the modern distribution of percichthyids derives from dispersal over the Antarctic land bridge between South America and Australia, which existed up to the end of the Eocene. This suggests that percichthyids likely inhabited Antarctica as well.[3]

Classification

The temperate perches are closely related to the freshwater sunfish of North America, with both belonging to the suborder Centrarchoidei. They were previously also thought to be allied with the temperate basses of the family Moronidae and the seabasses in the family Serranidae, but are now thought to not be closely related.[4]

Almost 40 species of percichthyids are now recognised, grouped in 11–12 genera. Most but not all are exclusively freshwater fishes. They are mainly found in Australia, but species are also found in southern South America (Percichthys).

More recently the Chinese perches have been classified in the separate family Sinipercidae while the genus Percilia has been found not to be closely related to either that family or the Percichthyidae and has been placed in its own monotypic family Perciliidae.[5] The two catadromous species in Percalates are found in Australia and were previously placed in Macquaria, but phylogenetic analyses have found them to be the most basal members of the whole order.[6]

The following 8 genera are classified within the family Percichthyidae:[5][7]

In addition, two extinct genera are known exclusively from fossil remains:[3]

Species

Australia has the greatest number of percichthyid species, where they are represented by the Australian freshwater cods (Maccullochella spp.), which are Murray cod, Mary River cod, eastern freshwater cod, and trout cod, by the Australian freshwater blackfishes (Gadopsis spp.), which are river blackfish and two-spined blackfish, and by the Australian freshwater perches which are golden perch, Macquarie perch (Macquaria spp.), and Australian bass, and estuary perch (Percalates spp.).

Several other Australian freshwater species also sit within the family Percichthyidae, while research using mitochondrial DNA suggests the species of the family Nannopercidae are in reality percichthyids, as well. Australia is unique in having a freshwater fish fauna dominated by percichthyids and allied families/species. This in contrast to Europe and Asia, whose fish faunas are dominated by members of the Cyprinidae carp family. (Australia does not have a single naturally occurring cyprinid species; unfortunately, the illegal introduction of carp has now established the family's presence in Australia.)

A single genus occurs outside Australia, Percichthys in southern South America.

A number of species are or have been important food species; some of these (e.g. the Murray cod, Maccullochella peelii peelii) have become threatened through overfishing and river regulation, while others are now farmed to some extent. Some smaller species (e.g. Balston's pygmy perch, Nannatherina balstoni) are popular in aquaria.

The extremely rare Bloomfield River cod, Guyu wujalwujalensis, is only found in a short stretch of the Bloomfield River in north Queensland.

Timeline

<timeline> ImageSize = width:1000px height:auto barincrement:15px PlotArea = left:10px bottom:50px top:10px right:10px

Period = from:-65.5 till:10 TimeAxis = orientation:horizontal ScaleMajor = unit:year increment:5 start:-65.5 ScaleMinor = unit:year increment:1 start:-65.5 TimeAxis = orientation:hor AlignBars = justify

Colors =

#legends
 id:CAR	  value:claret
 id:ANK 	 value:rgb(0.4,0.3,0.196)
 id:HER	  value:teal
 id:HAD	  value:green
 id:OMN	  value:blue
 id:black        value:black
 id:white        value:white
 id:cenozoic     value:rgb(0.54,0.54,0.258)
 id:paleogene     value:rgb(0.99,0.6,0.32) 
 id:paleocene     value:rgb(0.99,0.65,0.37) 
 id:eocene     value:rgb(0.99,0.71,0.42) 
 id:oligocene     value:rgb(0.99,0.75,0.48) 
 id:neogene     value:rgb(0.999999,0.9,0.1) 
 id:miocene     value:rgb(0.999999,0.999999,0) 
 id:pliocene     value:rgb(0.97,0.98,0.68)  
 id:quaternary   value:rgb(0.98,0.98,0.5)
 id:pleistocene   value:rgb(0.999999,0.95,0.68)
 id:holocene   value:rgb(0.999,0.95,0.88)

BarData=

bar:eratop
bar:space
bar:periodtop
bar:space
bar:NAM1
bar:NAM2
bar:NAM3
bar:space
bar:period
bar:space
bar:era

PlotData=

align:center textcolor:black fontsize:M mark:(line,black) width:25 
shift:(7,-4)
bar:periodtop
from: -65.5   till:  -55.8    color:paleocene  text:Paleocene
from: -55.8   till:  -33.9    color:eocene  text:Eocene 
from: -33.9   till:  -23.03    color:oligocene  text:Oligocene            
from: -23.03    till: -5.332    color:miocene    text:Miocene
from: -5.332    till: -2.588    color:pliocene    text:Plio.
from: -2.588    till: -0.0117   color:pleistocene    text:Pleist.
from: -0.0117    till: 0    color:holocene    text:H.
bar:eratop
from: -65.5   till:  -23.03    color:paleogene  text:Paleogene         
from: -23.03    till: -2.588    color:neogene    text:Neogene
from: -2.588    till: 0   color:quaternary    text:Q.

PlotData=

align:left fontsize:M mark:(line,white) width:5 anchor:till align:left
color:paleocene bar:NAM1  from:	-58.7	till:	-55.8	text:	Palaeopercichthys
color:eocene bar:NAM2  from:	-55.8	till:	0	text:	Percalates
color:miocene bar:NAM3  from:	-23.03	till:	0	text:	Maccullochella

PlotData=

align:center textcolor:black fontsize:M mark:(line,black) width:25
bar:period
from: -65.5   till:  -55.8    color:paleocene  text:Paleocene
from: -55.8   till:  -33.9    color:eocene  text:Eocene 
from: -33.9   till:  -23.03    color:oligocene  text:Oligocene            
from: -23.03    till: -5.332    color:miocene    text:Miocene
from: -5.332    till: -2.588    color:pliocene    text:Plio.
from: -2.588    till: -0.0117   color:pleistocene    text:Pleist.
from: -0.0117    till: 0    color:holocene    text:H.
bar:era
from: -65.5   till:  -23.03    color:paleogene  text:Paleogene         
from: -23.03    till: -2.588    color:neogene    text:Neogene
from: -2.588    till: 0   color:quaternary    text:Q.

</timeline>

See also

References

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

  1. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  3. a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1". Abstract
  7. Cite error: Script error: No such module "Namespace detect".Script error: No such module "Namespace detect".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

  • Script error: No such module "template wrapper".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".

External links

Template:Sister project

Template:Taxonbar Template:Authority control