Anti-gravity: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Explicit
imported>OAbot
m Open access bot: arxiv, url-access=subscription updated in citation with #oabot.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Idea of creating a place or object that is free from the force of gravity}}
{{Short description|Physical and science fiction concept}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2015}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2015}}
{{for|the Artificial intelligence-assisted software developer tool|Google Antigravity}}
[[File:BOXXX-3W.jpg|thumb|Artistic depiction of a fictional anti-gravity vehicle]]
[[File:BOXXX-3W.jpg|thumb|Artistic depiction of a fictional anti-gravity vehicle]]


'''Anti-gravity''' (also known as '''non-gravitational field''') is the phenomenon of creating a place or object that is free from the force of [[gravity]]. It does not refer to either the lack of weight under gravity experienced in [[free fall]] or [[orbit]], or to balancing the force of gravity with some other force, such as [[electromagnetism]] or [[aerodynamic lift]]. Anti-gravity is a recurring concept in science fiction.
'''Anti-gravity''' is the concept of a force that would exactly oppose the force of [[gravity]]. Under the known laws of physics, anti-gravity is impossible except possibly between matter and [[antimatter]]. Experimental measurement rule out repulsion between [[antihydrogen]] and the mass of the Earth.<ref name=Anderson-2023/>


"Anti-gravity" is often used to refer to devices that look as if they reverse gravity even though they operate through other means, such as [[Ionocraft|lifters]], which fly in the air by moving air with [[electromagnetic field]]s.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.08/pwr_antigravity.html|access-date=23 July 2010|first=Clive|last=Thompson|work=[[Wired Magazine|Wired]]|date=August 2003|title=The Antigravity Underground| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20100818230902/http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.08/pwr_antigravity.html| archive-date= 18 August 2010 | url-status= live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://paranormal.about.com/library/weekly/aa081902a.htm|title=On the Verge of Antigravity|publisher=[[About.com]]|access-date=23 July 2010|archive-date=23 February 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170223030341/http://paranormal.about.com/library/weekly/aa081902a.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref>
Anti-gravity does not refer to either the lack of weight under gravity experienced in [[free fall]] or [[orbit]], or to balancing the force of gravity with some other force, such as [[electromagnetism]], [[aerodynamic lift]], or ion-propelled "[[ion-propelled aircraft|lifters]]", which fly in the air by moving air with [[electromagnetic field]]s.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.08/pwr_antigravity.html|access-date=23 July 2010|first=Clive|last=Thompson|work=[[Wired Magazine|Wired]]|date=August 2003|title=The Antigravity Underground| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20100818230902/http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.08/pwr_antigravity.html| archive-date= 18 August 2010 | url-status= live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://paranormal.about.com/library/weekly/aa081902a.htm|title=On the Verge of Antigravity|publisher=[[About.com]]|access-date=23 July 2010|archive-date=23 February 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170223030341/http://paranormal.about.com/library/weekly/aa081902a.htm}}</ref>


==Historical attempts at understanding gravity==
Anti-gravity is a recurring concept in science fiction.
{{Main|History of gravitational theory}}
The possibility of creating anti-gravity depends upon a complete understanding and description of gravity and its interactions with other physical theories, such as [[general relativity]] and [[quantum mechanics]]; however, no quantum theory of gravity has yet been found.


During the summer of 1666, [[Isaac Newton]] observed an apple falling from the tree in his garden, thus realizing the [[Newton's law of universal gravitation|principle of universal gravitation]].<ref name="york">Department of Physics [https://www.york.ac.uk/physics/about/newtonsappletree/ A Brief History of Isaac Newton's Apple Tree], [[University of York]], Retrieved 2019-07-20</ref> [[Albert Einstein]] in 1915 considered the physical interaction between matter and space, where gravity occurs as a consequence of matter causing a geometric deformation of spacetime which is otherwise flat.<ref>{{cite arXiv | eprint=1603.00871 | last1=Papachristou | first1=Costas J. | title=Electromagnetic waves, gravitational waves and the prophets who predicted them | date=2016 | class=physics.pop-ph }}</ref><ref>[[Albert Einstein]] Grundgedanken der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie und Anwendung dieser Theorie in der Astronomie (Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Sitzungsberichte, 1915 (teil 1), 31),  Zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie (Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Sitzungsberichte, 1915 (teil 2), 778–786, 799–80) Retrieved 2019-06-16</ref><ref>[[Charles W. Misner]], [[Kip S. Thorne]], [[John Archibald Wheeler]] ''Gravitation'', [https://books.google.com/books?id=SyQzDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA1231 p. 1231], Princeton University Press, 24 October 2017 {{ISBN|0691177791}}, {{ISBN|9780691177793}}, Retrieved 2019-06-16</ref> Einstein, both independently and with [[Walther Mayer]], attempted to unify his [[general theory of relativity|theory of gravity]] with [[electromagnetism]] using the work of [[Theodor Kaluza]]<ref>{{cite journal |last=Kaluza |first=Theodor |date=1921 |title=Zum Unitätsproblem in der Physik |journal=Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin. (Math. Phys.) |pages=966–972 |bibcode=1921SPAW.......966K }} https://archive.org/details/sitzungsberichte1921preussi</ref> and [[James Clerk Maxwell]] to link gravity and [[quantum field theory]].<ref>[https://Christianize/lotfinder/Lot/einstein-albert-1879-1955-autograph-manuscript-comprising-calculations-1471725-details.aspx Einstein, Albert (1879-1955). Autograph manuscript, comprising calculations and arguments from the Einheitliche theorie von Gravitation un Elektrizitt] [[Christie's]] Retrieved 2019-06-16</ref>
== Theoretical probability  ==
{{See also|History of gravitational theory}}


Theoretical quantum physicists have postulated the existence of a quantum gravity particle, the [[graviton]]. Various theoretical explanations of [[quantum gravity]] have been created, including [[History of string theory|superstring theory]], [[loop quantum gravity]], [[An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything|E8 theory]] and [[Asymptotic safety in quantum gravity|asymptotic safety theory]] amongst many others.
Under the laws of [[general relativity]], anti-gravity is impossible except under contrived circumstances.<ref>Peskin, M and Schroeder, D.; ''An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory'' (Westview Press, 1995) {{ISBN|0-201-50397-2}}</ref><ref>{{cite book | author = Wald, Robert M.| author-link = Robert M. Wald| title = ''General Relativity'' | location = Chicago | publisher = University of Chicago Press | date = 1984 | isbn = 978-0-226-87033-5 | title-link = General Relativity (book)}}</ref><ref>[[Joseph Polchinski|Polchinski, Joseph]] (1998). ''String Theory'', Cambridge University Press. A modern textbook</ref> Under that theory, and particle physics, gravity is mass-energy, a quantity believed to always be positive. It is always attractive and never repulsive.<ref name=Nieto-1991/>


==Probable solutions==
During the close of the twentieth century [[NASA]] provided funding for the [[Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program]] (BPP) from 1996 through 2002. This program studied a number of "far out" designs for space propulsion that were not receiving funding through normal university or commercial channels. Anti-gravity-like concepts were listed under "approaches categorized as non-viable" since the study found no evidence of anti-gravity-like forces.<ref name="millis2005">{{cite journal|last1=Millis|first1=Mark G.|title= Assessing Potential Propulsion Breakthroughs|journal= Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences|volume=1065|pages=441–461|date=Dec 1, 2005|url=https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20060000022.pdf|access-date=8 February 2018|bibcode=2005NYASA1065..441M|doi=10.1196/annals.1370.023|pmid=16510425|hdl=2060/20060000022|s2cid=41358855|hdl-access=free}}</ref> So many inappropriate proposals were submitted that NASA developed a screening guide for reviewers.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Millis |first=Marc G. |last2=Thomas |first2=Nicholas E. |date=December 1, 2006 |title=Responding to Mechanical Antigravity |url=https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20070004897 |language=en}}</ref>
In [[Newton's law of universal gravitation]], gravity was an external force transmitted by unknown means. In the 20th century, Newton's model was replaced by [[general relativity]] where gravity is not a force but the result of the geometry of spacetime. Under general relativity, anti-gravity is impossible except under contrived circumstances.<ref>Peskin, M and Schroeder, D.; ''An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory'' (Westview Press, 1995) {{ISBN|0-201-50397-2}}</ref><ref>{{cite book | author = Wald, Robert M.| author-link = Robert M. Wald| title = ''General Relativity'' | location = Chicago | publisher = University of Chicago Press | date = 1984 | isbn = 978-0-226-87033-5 | title-link = General Relativity (book)}}</ref><ref>[[Joseph Polchinski|Polchinski, Joseph]] (1998). ''String Theory'', Cambridge University Press. A modern textbook</ref>


===Gravity shields===
== History ==
[[File:New boston babson monument.JPG|thumb|right|A monument at [[Babson College]] dedicated to [[Roger Babson]] for research into anti-gravity and partial gravity insulators]]
Attempts to understand why gravity is solely an attractive force goes back at least as far as [[James Clerk Maxwell]] in the late nineteenth century. He noted that existence of unlike charges in electromagnetism was the root of its fundamental difference from gravity. With the discovery of [[general relativity]] and the emergence of particle physics in the twentieth century this difference seemed even more fundamental. The "charge" in the theory of gravity is mass-energy, a quantity believed to always be positive. Thus gravity seemed to always be attractive and never repulsive. Two significant possible exceptions emerged, one in quantum physics and one at cosmological scales.<ref name=Nieto-1991>{{Cite journal |last=Nieto |first=Michael Martin |last2=Goldman |first2=T. |date=July 1, 1991 |title=The arguments against "antigravity" and the gravitational acceleration of antimatter |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037015739190138C |journal=Physics Reports |volume=205 |issue=5 |pages=221–281 |doi=10.1016/0370-1573(91)90138-C |issn=0370-1573}}</ref>
{{Main|Gravitational shielding}}


In 1948 businessman [[Roger Babson]] (founder of [[Babson College]]) formed the [[Gravity Research Foundation]] to study ways to reduce the effects of gravity.<ref>{{cite magazine | last1 = Mooallem | first1 = J. | date = October 2007 | title = A curious attraction | magazine = Harper's Magazine | volume = 315 | issue = 1889 | pages = 84–91 }}</ref> Their efforts were initially somewhat "[[crank (person)|crank]]ish", but they held occasional conferences that drew such people as [[Clarence Birdseye]], known for his frozen-food products, and helicopter pioneer [[Igor Sikorsky]].{{Citation needed|date=January 2022}} Over time the Foundation turned its attention away from trying to control gravity, to simply better understanding it. The Foundation nearly disappeared after Babson's death in 1967. However, it continues to run an essay award, offering prizes of up to $4,000. As of 2017, it is still administered out of [[Wellesley, Massachusetts]], by George Rideout Jr., son of the foundation's original director.<ref>[http://www.gravityresearchfoundation.org/winners_name.html#s List of winners] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121228174605/http://www.gravityresearchfoundation.org/winners_name.html |date=28 December 2012 }}</ref> Winners include California astrophysicist [[George F. Smoot]] (1993), who later won the 2006 [[Nobel Prize in Physics]], and [[Gerard 't Hooft]] (2015) who previously won the 1999 Nobel Prize in Physics.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1999/summary/|title = The Nobel Prize in Physics 1999}}</ref>
=== Antimatter gravitation ===
In 1928 [[Paul Dirac]] produced the first [[relativistic quantum mechanics]] theory. The theory accurately predicted properties of the electron but it also has a second solution. In 1931 [[Robert Oppenheimer]] showed that Dirac's original interpretation of the second solution was incorrect and Dirac responded with a new proposal: the second solution was a positively charged "anti-electron". Dirac also said that every other particle should have an opposite charged counterpart. With the discovery of the [[positron]] in 1932 and the [[antiproton]] in 1955, this theoretical concept of [[antimatter]] was grounded in empirical evidence.<ref>{{cite book
|last=Close |first=F. E.
|date=2009
|title=Antimatter
|page=114
|publisher=Oxford University Press
|isbn=978-0-19-955016-6
}}</ref>{{rp|47}}


===General relativity research in the 1950s===
Dirac's theory did not include gravitation and there remains no consistent theory that combines both quantum mechanics and general relativity.  A hypothetical negative mass charge in Newton's equations or general relativity is theoretically consistent even though no observations support this concept.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Bondi |first=H. |date=July 1, 1957 |title=Negative Mass in General Relativity |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.29.423 |journal=Reviews of Modern Physics |language=en |volume=29 |issue=3 |pages=423–428 |doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.29.423 |issn=0034-6861|url-access=subscription }}</ref> Since antimatter is extremely rare, the possibility remained that repulsion between matter and antimatter would lead to antigravity.<ref name=Nieto-1991/>{{rp|224}}  
{{Main|United States gravity control propulsion research}}


General relativity was introduced in the 1910s, but development of the theory was greatly slowed by a lack of suitable mathematical tools.{{clarify|reason=The mathematics of general relativity was little known at the time, but it is dubious that new tools would have to be developed to further explore the theory, once it had been formulated. A more important factor is likely that the empirical evidence for GR over Newtonian gravity for several decades consisted of only three astronomical phenomena — why worry about fine details, when you can just barely measure any effect at all?|date=July 2018}} It appeared that anti-gravity was outlawed under general relativity.
By 1956 the scientific impossibility of antigravity was a subject of theoretical analysis.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Peaslee |first=D. C. |date=December 28, 1956 |title=Nonexistence of Gravity Shields |url=https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.124.3235.1292.a |journal=Science |volume=124 |issue=3235 |pages=1292–1292 |doi=10.1126/science.124.3235.1292.a|url-access=subscription }}</ref> Three more comprehensive arguments were published soon thereafter.<ref name=Nieto-1991/><ref name=Villata-2011>{{Cite journal |last=Villata |first=M. |date=April 2011 |title=CPT symmetry and antimatter gravity in general relativity |url=https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1209/0295-5075/94/20001 |journal=EPL (Europhysics Letters) |volume=94 |issue=2 |article-number=20001 |doi=10.1209/0295-5075/94/20001 |issn=0295-5075|arxiv=1103.4937 }}</ref> In 1958, [[Philip Morrison]] showed that repulsion by mass would imply failure of conservation of energy in Earth's gravitational field.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Morrison |first=P. |date=September 1, 1958 |title=Approximate Nature of Physical Symmetries |url=https://pubs.aip.org/ajp/article/26/6/358/1036931/Approximate-Nature-of-Physical-Symmetries |journal=American Journal of Physics |language=en |volume=26 |issue=6 |pages=358–368 |doi=10.1119/1.1996159 |issn=0002-9505|url-access=subscription }}</ref>
In 1959, [[Leonard I. Schiff]] showed that in [[quantum field theory]] the virtual anti-electron contribution to the vacuum polarization would break the equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass contrary to the results of the [[Eötvös experiment]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Schiff |first=L. I. |date=January 1959 |title=Gravitational properties of antimatter* |url=https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.45.1.69 |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |volume=45 |issue=1 |pages=69–80 |doi=10.1073/pnas.45.1.69 |pmc=222515 |pmid=16590358}}</ref> Then in 1961, [[Myron L. Good]] noted that the longest lived [[K meson]] is a [[superposition]] of a particle and its antiparticle; if these two particles responded differently to gravity the long-lived K meson would decay.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Good |first=Myron L. |date=January 1961 |title=K 2 0 and the Equivalence Principle |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.121.311 |journal=Physical Review |language=en |volume=121 |issue=1 |pages=311–313 |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.121.311 |issn=0031-899X|url-access=subscription }}</ref> Despite these arguments, new theories motivated by issues in cosmology and uncertainties in particle physics, have been proposed in which the gravitational interaction of matter and antimatter could be repulsive.<ref name=Nieto-1991/><ref name=Villata-2011/>


It is claimed the [[US Air Force]] also ran a study effort throughout the 1950s and into the 1960s.<ref>Goldberg, J. M. (1992). US air force support of general relativity: 1956–1972. In, J. Eisenstaedt & A. J. Kox (Ed.), ''Studies in the History of General Relativity, Volume 3'' Boston, Massachusetts: Center for Einstein Studies. {{ISBN|0-8176-3479-7}}</ref> Former Lieutenant Colonel [[Ansel Talbert]] wrote two series of newspaper articles claiming that most of the major aviation firms had started gravity control propulsion research in the 1950s. However, there is no outside confirmation of these stories, and since they take place in the midst of the [[policy by press release]] era, it is not clear how much weight these stories should be given.
=== Experiments ===
Attempts to measure the gravitational force on antimatter particles is extremely challenging. For matter particles, the equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass, known as the [[weak equivalence principle]], has been demonstrated to a precision of 10<sup>-15</sup>.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Touboul |first=Pierre |last2=Métris |first2=Gilles |last3=Rodrigues |first3=Manuel |last4=Bergé |first4=Joel |last5=Robert |first5=Alain |last6=Baghi |first6=Quentin |last7=André |first7=Yves |last8=Bedouet |first8=Judicaël |last9=Boulanger |first9=Damien |last10=Bremer |first10=Stefanie |last11=Carle |first11=Patrice |last12=Chhun |first12=Ratana |last13=Christophe |first13=Bruno |last14=Cipolla |first14=Valerio |last15=Damour |first15=Thibault |date=September 14, 2022 |title=M I C R O S C O P E Mission: Final Results of the Test of the Equivalence Principle |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.121102 |journal=Physical Review Letters |language=en |volume=129 |issue=12 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.121102 |issn=0031-9007|arxiv=2209.15487 }}</ref> However the technique  used differential electrostatic accelerometers on a pair of test masses composed of titanium and of platinum, all in an orbiting satellite. Producing antimatter hydrogen atoms requires a source of antiprotons like a [[particle accelerator]] combined with a source of [[positrons]], making a satellite, two-mass experiment impractical. In 2023, the amount of antihydrogen escaping from the top and bottom of a vertical vacuum chamber at [[CERN]] was compared, ruling out repulsive gravity between antihydrogen and Earth's mass.<ref name=Anderson-2023>{{Cite journal |last=Anderson |first=E. K. |last2=Baker |first2=C. J. |last3=Bertsche |first3=W. |last4=Bhatt |first4=N. M. |last5=Bonomi |first5=G. |last6=Capra |first6=A. |last7=Carli |first7=I. |last8=Cesar |first8=C. L. |last9=Charlton |first9=M. |last10=Christensen |first10=A. |last11=Collister |first11=R. |last12=Cridland Mathad |first12=A. |last13=Duque Quiceno |first13=D. |last14=Eriksson |first14=S. |last15=Evans |first15=A. |date=September 2023 |title=Observation of the effect of gravity on the motion of antimatter |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06527-1 |journal=Nature |language=en |volume=621 |issue=7980 |pages=716–722 |doi=10.1038/s41586-023-06527-1 |issn=1476-4687 |pmc=10533407 |pmid=37758891}}</ref>


It is known that there were serious efforts underway at the [[Glenn L. Martin Company]], who formed the Research Institute for Advanced Study.<ref>Mallan, L. (1958). ''Space satellites'' (How to book 364). Greenwich, CT: Fawcett Publications, pp. 9–10, 137, 139. LCCN 58-001060</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Clarke | first1 = A. C. | date = 1957 | title = The conquest of gravity | journal = Holiday | volume = 22 | issue = 6| page = 62 }}</ref> Major newspapers announced the contract that had been made between theoretical physicist [[Burkhard Heim]] and the Glenn L. Martin Company. Another effort in the private sector to master understanding of gravitation was the creation of the Institute for Field Physics, [[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]] in 1956, by Gravity Research Foundation trustee [[Agnew H. Bahnson]].
==Studies, empirical claims and commercial efforts==
 
There have been a number of studies, attempts to build anti-gravity devices, and a small number of reports of anti-gravity-like effects in popular and scientific literature. None of the examples that follow are accepted as reproducible examples of anti-gravity.
Military support for anti-gravity projects was terminated by the [[Mansfield Amendment]] of 1973, which restricted [[United States Department of Defense|Department of Defense]] spending to only the areas of scientific research with explicit military applications. The Mansfield Amendment was passed specifically to end long-running projects that had no results.
 
Under general relativity, gravity is the result of following spatial geometry (change in the normal shape of space) caused by local mass-energy. This theory holds that it is the altered shape of space, deformed by massive objects, that causes gravity, which is actually a property of deformed space rather than being a true force. Although the equations cannot normally produce a "negative geometry", it is possible to do so by using "[[negative mass]]". The same equations do not, of themselves, rule out the existence of negative mass.
 
Both general relativity and Newtonian gravity appear to predict that negative mass would produce a repulsive gravitational field. In particular, Sir [[Hermann Bondi]] proposed in 1957 that negative gravitational mass, combined with negative inertial mass, would comply with the [[strong equivalence principle]] of general relativity theory and the Newtonian laws of conservation of linear momentum and energy. Bondi's proof yielded singularity-free solutions for the relativity equations.<ref name="Bondi">{{cite journal | last1 = Bondi | first1 = H. | date = 1957 | title = Negative mass in general relativity | journal = Reviews of Modern Physics | volume = 29 | issue = 3| pages = 423–428 | doi=10.1103/revmodphys.29.423|bibcode = 1957RvMP...29..423B }}</ref> In July 1988, [[Robert L. Forward]] presented a paper at the AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE 24th Joint Propulsion Conference that proposed a Bondi negative gravitational mass propulsion system.<ref name= "Forward">{{cite journal | last1 = Forward | first1 = R. L. | year = 1990 | title =  Negative matter propulsion | journal = Journal of Propulsion and Power | volume = 6 | issue = 1| pages = 28–37 | doi=10.2514/3.23219}}; see also commentary {{cite journal | last1 = Landis | first1 = G.A. | year = 1991 | title = Comments on Negative Mass Propulsion | journal = Journal of Propulsion and Power | volume = 7 | issue = 2| page = 304 | doi=10.2514/3.23327}}</ref>
 
Bondi pointed out that a negative mass will fall toward (and not away from) "normal" matter, since although the gravitational force is repulsive, the negative mass (according to Newton's law, F=ma) responds by accelerating in the opposite of the direction of the force. Normal mass, on the other hand, will fall away from the negative matter. He noted that two identical masses, one positive and one negative, placed near each other will therefore self-accelerate in the direction of the line between them, with the negative mass chasing after the positive mass.<ref name="Bondi" /> Notice that because the negative mass acquires negative [[kinetic energy]], the total energy of the accelerating masses remains at zero. Forward pointed out that the self-acceleration effect is due to the negative inertial mass, and could be seen induced without the gravitational forces between the particles.<ref name="Forward" />
 
The [[Standard Model]] of particle physics, which describes all currently known forms of matter, does not include negative mass. Although cosmological [[dark matter]] may consist of particles outside the Standard Model whose nature is unknown, their mass is ostensibly known – since they were postulated from their gravitational effects on surrounding objects, which implies their mass is positive. The proposed cosmological [[dark energy]], on the other hand, is more complicated, since according to general relativity the effects of both its energy density and its negative pressure contribute to its gravitational effect.
 
===Unique force===
Under general relativity any form of energy couples with spacetime to create the geometries that cause gravity. A longstanding question was whether or not these same equations applied to [[antimatter]]. The issue was considered solved in 1960 with the development of [[CPT symmetry]], which demonstrated that antimatter follows the same laws of physics as "normal" matter, and therefore has positive energy content and also causes (and reacts to) gravity like normal matter (see [[gravitational interaction of antimatter]]).
 
For much of the last quarter of the 20th century, the physics community was involved in attempts to produce a [[unified field theory]], a single physical theory that explains the four fundamental forces: gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces. Scientists have made progress in [[grand unification theory|unifying the three quantum forces]], but gravity has remained "the problem" in every attempt. This has not stopped any number of such attempts from being made, however.
 
Generally these attempts tried to "quantize gravity" by positing a particle, the [[graviton]], that carried gravity in the same way that [[photon]]s (light) carry electromagnetism. Simple attempts along this direction all failed, however, leading to more complex examples that attempted to account for these problems. Two of these, [[supersymmetry]] and the relativity related [[supergravity]], both required the existence of an extremely weak "fifth force" carried by a [[graviphoton]], which coupled together several "loose ends" in quantum field theory, in an organized manner. As a side effect, both theories also all but required that antimatter be affected by this fifth force in a way similar to anti-gravity, dictating repulsion away from mass. Several experiments were carried out in the 1990s to measure this effect, but none yielded positive results.<ref name=SciAm79>''Supergravity and the Unification of the Laws of Physics,'' by [[Daniel Z. Freedman]] and Peter van Nieuwenhuizen, Scientific American, February 1978</ref>
 
In 2013 [[CERN]] looked for an antigravity effect in an experiment designed to study the energy levels within antihydrogen. The antigravity measurement was just an "interesting sideshow" and was inconclusive.<ref>[https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-22355187 Jason Palmer, Antigravity gets first test at Cern's Alpha experiment, bbc.co.uk, 30 April 2013 ]</ref>
 
===Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program===
During the close of the twentieth century [[NASA]] provided funding for the [[Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program]] (BPP) from 1996 through 2002. This program studied a number of "far out" designs for space propulsion that were not receiving funding through normal university or commercial channels. Anti-gravity-like concepts were investigated under the name "diametric drive". The work of the BPP program continues in the independent, non-NASA affiliated [[Tau Zero Foundation]].<ref>[http://www.tauzero.aero/ Tau Zero Foundation]</ref>
 
==Empirical claims and commercial efforts==
There have been a number of attempts to build anti-gravity devices, and a small number of reports of anti-gravity-like effects in the scientific literature. None of the examples that follow are accepted as reproducible examples of anti-gravity.
 
===Gyroscopic devices===
[[File:H W Wallace force field figure 4.png|thumb|upright=1.5|A "kinemassic field" generator from {{US patent|3626605}}: Method and apparatus for generating a secondary gravitational force field]]
[[Gyroscope]]s produce a force when twisted that operates "out of plane" and can appear to lift themselves against gravity. Although this force is well understood to be illusory, even under Newtonian models, it has nevertheless generated numerous claims of anti-gravity devices and any number of patented devices. None of these devices has ever been demonstrated to work under controlled conditions, and they have often become the subject of [[conspiracy theories]] as a result.
 
Another "rotating device" example is shown in a series of patents granted to Henry Wallace between 1968 and 1974. His devices consist of rapidly spinning disks of [[brass]], a material made up largely of elements with a total half-integer nuclear spin. He claimed that by rapidly rotating a disk of such material, the [[nuclear spin]] became aligned, and as a result created a "gravitomagnetic" field in a fashion similar to the magnetic field created by the [[Barnett effect]].<ref>{{US patent|3626606}}</ref><ref>{{US patent|3626605}}</ref><ref>{{US patent|3823570}}</ref> No independent testing or public demonstration of these devices is known.
 
In 1989, it was reported that a weight decreases along the axis of a right spinning gyroscope.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Hayasaka, H.|author2=Takeuchi, S.|name-list-style=amp|date=1989|journal=[[Physical Review Letters]]|title=Anomalous weight reduction on a gyroscope's right rotations around the vertical axis on the Earth|volume=63|issue=25|pages=2701–2704|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.2701|pmid=10040968|bibcode=1989PhRvL..63.2701H}}</ref> A test of this claim a year later yielded null results.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Nitschke, J. M.|author2=Wilmath, P. A.|name-list-style=amp|title=Null result for the weight change of a spinning gyroscope|date=1990|journal=[[Physical Review Letters]]|volume=64| issue=18|pages=2115–2116|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2115|pmid=10041587|bibcode = 1990PhRvL..64.2115N |url=https://zenodo.org/record/1233872}}</ref> A recommendation was made to conduct further tests at a 1999 AIP conference.<ref>{{cite conference |last=Iwanaga |first=N. |book-title=AIP Conference Proceedings |date=1999 |volume=458 |pages=1015–1059 |doi=10.1063/1.57497 |title=Reviews of some field propulsion methods from the general relativistic standpoint}}</ref>


===Thomas Townsend Brown's gravitator===
===Thomas Townsend Brown's gravitator===
{{Further|Biefeld-Brown effect|Electrogravitics|United States gravity control propulsion research#Brown's gravitator}}
{{Further|Biefeld-Brown effect|Electrogravitics}}
In 1921, while still in [[high school]], [[Thomas Townsend Brown]] found that a high-voltage [[Coolidge tube]] seemed to change mass depending on its orientation on a balance scale. Through the 1920s Brown developed this into devices that combined high voltages with materials with high [[dielectric]] constants (essentially large [[capacitors]]); he called such a device a "gravitator". Brown made the claim to observers and in the media that his experiments were showing anti-gravity effects. Brown would continue his work and produced a series of high-voltage devices in the following years in attempts to sell his ideas to aircraft companies and the military. He coined the names [[Biefeld–Brown effect]] and [[electrogravitics]] in conjunction with his devices. Brown tested his asymmetrical capacitor devices in a vacuum, supposedly showing it was not a more down-to-earth [[electrohydrodynamic]] effect generated by high voltage ion flow in air.
In 1921, while still in [[high school]], [[Thomas Townsend Brown]] found that a high-voltage [[Coolidge tube]] seemed to change mass depending on its orientation on a balance scale. Through the 1920s Brown developed this into devices that combined high voltages with materials with high [[dielectric]] constants (essentially large [[capacitors]]); he called such a device a "gravitator". Brown made the claim to observers and in the media that his experiments were showing anti-gravity effects. Brown would continue his work and produced a series of high-voltage devices in the following years in attempts to sell his ideas to aircraft companies and the military. He coined the names [[Biefeld–Brown effect]] and [[electrogravitics]] in conjunction with his devices. Brown tested his asymmetrical capacitor devices in a vacuum, supposedly showing it was not a more down-to-earth [[electrohydrodynamic]] effect generated by high voltage ion flow in air.


Line 79: Line 54:
}}</ref> There is also research and videos on the internet purported to show lifter-style capacitor devices working in a vacuum, therefore not receiving propulsion from ion drift or [[ion wind]] being generated in air.<ref name="Wired"/><ref>Thomas Valone, Electrogravitics II: Validating Reports on a New Propulsion Methodology,  Integrity Research Institute, page 52-58</ref>
}}</ref> There is also research and videos on the internet purported to show lifter-style capacitor devices working in a vacuum, therefore not receiving propulsion from ion drift or [[ion wind]] being generated in air.<ref name="Wired"/><ref>Thomas Valone, Electrogravitics II: Validating Reports on a New Propulsion Methodology,  Integrity Research Institute, page 52-58</ref>


Follow-up studies on Brown's work and other claims have been conducted by R. L. Talley in a 1990 US Air Force study, NASA scientist Jonathan Campbell in a 2003 experiment,<ref name="Wired"/>  and Martin Tajmar in a 2004 paper.<ref>{{Cite journal | last1 = Tajmar | first1 = M. | title = Biefeld-Brown Effect: Misinterpretation of Corona Wind Phenomena | journal = AIAA Journal | volume = 42 | issue = 2 | pages = 315–318 | date = 2004 | doi = 10.2514/1.9095|bibcode = 2004AIAAJ..42..315T }}</ref> They have found that no thrust could be observed in a vacuum and that Brown's and other [[Ionocraft|ion lifter]] devices produce thrust along their axis regardless of the direction of gravity consistent with electrohydrodynamic effects.
Follow-up studies on Brown's work and other claims have been conducted by R. L. Talley in a 1990 US Air Force study, NASA scientist Jonathan Campbell in a 2003 experiment,<ref name="Wired"/>  and Martin Tajmar in a 2004 paper.<ref>{{Cite journal | last1 = Tajmar | first1 = M. | title = Biefeld-Brown Effect: Misinterpretation of Corona Wind Phenomena | journal = AIAA Journal | volume = 42 | issue = 2 | pages = 315–318 | date = 2004 | doi = 10.2514/1.9095|bibcode = 2004AIAAJ..42..315T }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Tajmar |first1=M. |last2=Kößling |first2=M. |last3=Neunzig |first3=O. |date=August 21, 2024 |title=In-depth experimental search for a coupling between gravity and electromagnetism with steady fields |journal=Scientific Reports |language=en |volume=14 |issue=1 |article-number=19427 |doi=10.1038/s41598-024-70286-w |issn=2045-2322 |pmc=11339412 |pmid=39169102 |arxiv=2402.15640 |bibcode=2024NatSR..1419427T }}</ref>
Talley attempted to measure the effect in high vacuum chamber with up to 19kV voltage differences but reported that no force was generated above the detection limit of 2 x 10<sup>-9</sup> N.<ref>{{Cite report |url=https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/html/tr/ADA237853/ |title=Twenty first century propulsion concept |last=Talley |first=Robert L. |date=7 Jul 1990 |publisher=Defense Technical Information Center |issue=ADA237853 |volume=F06-9-1, PL/EDWARDS-TR-91-3009 |access-date=October 17, 2025}}</ref>
Tajmar and colleagues made a comprehensive search but found no effects in vacuum with steady electric fields.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Tajmar |first1=M. |last2=Kößling |first2=M. |last3=Neunzig |first3=O. |date=August 21, 2024 |title=In-depth experimental search for a coupling between gravity and electromagnetism with steady fields |journal=Scientific Reports |language=en |volume=14 |issue=1 |page=19427 |doi=10.1038/s41598-024-70286-w |issn=2045-2322 |pmc=11339412 |pmid=39169102 |arxiv=2402.15640 |bibcode=2024NatSR..1419427T }}</ref>
The conclusion from these experiments was that the effect observed by Brown was "ion wind"; no experiments found evidence that thrust could be observed in a vacuum.<ref>{{Cite conference |last=Millis |first=M.G. |date=2004 |title=Prospects for breakthrough propulsion from physics |conference=Proceedings. 2004 NASA/DoD Conference on Evolvable Hardware, 2004., Seattle, WA, USA, 2004 |publisher=IEEE |pages=325–333 |doi=10.1109/EH.2004.1310847 |isbn=978-0-7695-2145-9}}</ref>
 
===Gravity Research Foundation===
{{Main|Gravity Research Foundation}}
[[File:New boston babson monument.JPG|thumb|left|A monument at [[Babson College]] dedicated to [[Roger Babson]] for research into anti-gravity and partial gravity insulators]]
 
In 1948 businessman [[Roger Babson]] (founder of [[Babson College]]) formed the [[Gravity Research Foundation]] to study ways to reduce the effects of gravity.<ref>{{cite magazine | last1 = Mooallem | first1 = J. | date = October 2007 | title = A curious attraction | magazine = Harper's Magazine | volume = 315 | issue = 1889 | pages = 84–91 }}</ref> Their efforts were initially somewhat "[[wiktionary:crank|crankish]]", but they held occasional conferences that drew such people as [[Clarence Birdseye]], known for his frozen-food products, and helicopter pioneer [[Igor Sikorsky]].{{Citation needed|date=January 2022}} Over time the Foundation turned its attention away from trying to control gravity, to simply better understanding it. The Foundation nearly disappeared after Babson's death in 1967. However, it continues to run an essay award, offering prizes of up to $4,000. As of 2017, it is still administered out of [[Wellesley, Massachusetts]], by George Rideout Jr., son of the foundation's original director.<ref>[http://www.gravityresearchfoundation.org/winners_name.html#s List of winners] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121228174605/http://www.gravityresearchfoundation.org/winners_name.html |date=28 December 2012 }}</ref> Winners include California astrophysicist [[George F. Smoot]] (1993), who later won the 2006 [[Nobel Prize in Physics]], and [[Gerard 't Hooft]] (2015) who previously won the 1999 Nobel Prize in Physics.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1999/summary/|title = The Nobel Prize in Physics 1999}}</ref>
 
===Gyroscopic devices===
 
[[Gyroscope]]s produce a force when twisted that operates "out of plane" and can appear to lift themselves against gravity. Although this force is well understood to be illusory, even under Newtonian models, it has nevertheless generated numerous claims of anti-gravity devices and any number of patented devices. None of these devices has ever been demonstrated to work under controlled conditions, and they have often become the subject of [[conspiracy theories]] as a result.
 
[[File:H W Wallace force field figure 4.png|thumb|upright=1.5|Henry Wallace's 1968 "kinemassic field" generator which he claimed would created a "gravitomagnetic" field]]
 
Another "rotating device" example is shown in a series of patents granted to Henry Wallace between 1968 and 1974. His devices consist of rapidly spinning disks of [[brass]], a material made up largely of elements with a total half-integer nuclear spin. He claimed that by rapidly rotating a disk of such material, the [[nuclear spin]] became aligned, and as a result created a "gravitomagnetic" field in a fashion similar to the magnetic field created by the [[Barnett effect]].<ref>{{US patent|3626606}}</ref><ref>{{US patent|3626605}}</ref><ref>{{US patent|3823570}}</ref> No independent testing or public demonstration of these devices is known.{{primary source inline|date=October 2025}}
 
In 1989, it was reported that a weight decreases along the axis of a right spinning [[gyroscope]].<ref>{{cite journal|author=Hayasaka, H.|author2=Takeuchi, S.|name-list-style=amp|date=1989|journal=[[Physical Review Letters]]|title=Anomalous weight reduction on a gyroscope's right rotations around the vertical axis on the Earth|volume=63|issue=25|pages=2701–2704|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.2701|pmid=10040968|bibcode=1989PhRvL..63.2701H}}</ref> A test of this claim a year later yielded null results.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Nitschke, J. M.|author2=Wilmath, P. A.|name-list-style=amp|title=Null result for the weight change of a spinning gyroscope|date=1990|journal=[[Physical Review Letters]]|volume=64| issue=18|pages=2115–2116|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2115|pmid=10041587|bibcode = 1990PhRvL..64.2115N |url=https://zenodo.org/record/1233872}}</ref> A recommendation was made to conduct further tests at a 1999 AIP conference.<ref>{{cite conference |last=Iwanaga |first=N. |book-title=AIP Conference Proceedings |date=1999 |volume=458 |pages=1015–1059 |doi=10.1063/1.57497 |title=Reviews of some field propulsion methods from the general relativistic standpoint}}</ref>


===Gravitoelectric coupling===
===Gravitoelectric coupling===
In 1992, the Russian researcher [[Eugene Podkletnov]] claimed to have discovered, whilst experimenting with [[superconductor]]s, that a fast rotating superconductor reduces the gravitational effect.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Podkletnov|first1=E|last2=Nieminen|first2=R |title=A possibility of gravitational force shielding by bulk YBa<sub>2</sub>Cu<sub>3</sub>O<sub>7−x</sub> superconductor|journal=[[Physica C]] |volume=203|issue=3–4|date=10 December 1992|pages=441–444|bibcode = 1992PhyC..203..441P |doi = 10.1016/0921-4534(92)90055-H }}</ref> Many studies have attempted to reproduce Podkletnov's experiment, always to negative results.<ref>{{cite journal| display-authors=4| author=N. Li| author2=D. Noever| author3=T. Robertson| author4=R. Koczor| author5=W. Brantley| name-list-style=amp|title=Static Test for a Gravitational Force Coupled to Type II YBCO Superconductors|journal=[[Physica C]]|volume=281|issue=2–3|date=August 1997|pages=260–267|bibcode = 1997PhyC..281..260L |doi = 10.1016/S0921-4534(97)01462-7 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book | doi=10.2514/6.2001-3363 | chapter=Gravity modification by high-temperature superconductors | title=37th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit | date=2001 | last1=Woods | first1=C. | last2=Helme | first2=J. | last3=Cooke | first3=S. | last4=Caldwell | first4=C. }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | doi=10.1016/S0921-4534(02)02284-0 | title=Gravity modification experiment using a rotating superconducting disk and radio frequency fields | date=2003 | last1=Hathaway | first1=G. | last2=Cleveland | first2=B. | last3=Bao | first3=Y. | journal=Physica C: Superconductivity | volume=385 | issue=4 | pages=488–500 | bibcode=2003PhyC..385..488H }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | doi=10.1016/S0921-4534(02)02305-5 | title=Gravitomagnetic field of a rotating superconductor and of a rotating superfluid | date=2003 | last1=Tajmar | first1=M. | last2=De Matos | first2=C.J. | journal=Physica C: Superconductivity | volume=385 | issue=4 | pages=551–554 | arxiv=gr-qc/0203033 | bibcode=2003PhyC..385..551T }}</ref>
In 1992, the Russian researcher [[Eugene Podkletnov]] claimed to have discovered, while experimenting with [[superconductor]]s, that a fast rotating superconductor reduces the gravitational effect.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Podkletnov|first1=E|last2=Nieminen|first2=R |title=A possibility of gravitational force shielding by bulk YBa<sub>2</sub>Cu<sub>3</sub>O<sub>7−x</sub> superconductor|journal=[[Physica C]] |volume=203|issue=3–4|date=10 December 1992|pages=441–444|bibcode = 1992PhyC..203..441P |doi = 10.1016/0921-4534(92)90055-H }}</ref> Many studies have attempted to reproduce Podkletnov's experiment, always to negative results.<ref>{{cite journal| display-authors=4| author=N. Li| author2=D. Noever| author3=T. Robertson| author4=R. Koczor| author5=W. Brantley| name-list-style=amp|title=Static Test for a Gravitational Force Coupled to Type II YBCO Superconductors|journal=[[Physica C]]|volume=281|issue=2–3|date=August 1997|pages=260–267|bibcode = 1997PhyC..281..260L |doi = 10.1016/S0921-4534(97)01462-7 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book | doi=10.2514/6.2001-3363 | chapter=Gravity modification by high-temperature superconductors | title=37th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit | date=2001 | last1=Woods | first1=C. | last2=Helme | first2=J. | last3=Cooke | first3=S. | last4=Caldwell | first4=C. }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | doi=10.1016/S0921-4534(02)02284-0 | title=Gravity modification experiment using a rotating superconducting disk and radio frequency fields | date=2003 | last1=Hathaway | first1=G. | last2=Cleveland | first2=B. | last3=Bao | first3=Y. | journal=Physica C: Superconductivity | volume=385 | issue=4 | pages=488–500 | bibcode=2003PhyC..385..488H }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | doi=10.1016/S0921-4534(02)02305-5 | title=Gravitomagnetic field of a rotating superconductor and of a rotating superfluid | date=2003 | last1=Tajmar | first1=M. | last2=De Matos | first2=C.J. | journal=Physica C: Superconductivity | volume=385 | issue=4 | pages=551–554 | arxiv=gr-qc/0203033 | bibcode=2003PhyC..385..551T }}</ref>


Douglas Torr, of the [[University of Alabama in Huntsville]] proposed how a time-dependent magnetic field could cause the spins of the lattice ions in a superconductor to generate detectable [[Gravitoelecromagnetism|gravitomagnetic and gravitoelectric]] fields in a series of papers published between 1991 and 1993.<ref>{{cite journal |journal=Physical Review |date=1 September 1992 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevB.46.5489 |pmid=10004334 |title=Gravitational effects on the magnetic attenuation of superconductors |last1=Li |first1=Ning |last2=Torr |first2=DG |volume=B46 |issue=9 |pages=5489–5495 |bibcode = 1992PhRvB..46.5489L }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |journal=Physical Review |date=15 January 1991 |title=Effects of a gravitomagnetic field on pure superconductors |last1=Li |first1=Ning |last2=Torr |first2=DG |volume=D43 |issue=2 |pages=457–459 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.43.457 |pmid=10013404 |bibcode=1991PhRvD..43..457L }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Li |first1=Ning |last2=Torr |first2=DG |journal=Foundations of Physics Letters |title=Gravitoelectric-electric coupling via superconductivity |volume=6 |issue=4 |pages=371–383 |date=August 1993 |bibcode=1993FoPhL...6..371T |doi=10.1007/BF00665654 |s2cid=122075917 }}</ref> In 1999, a Miss Li appeared in ''[[Popular Mechanics]]'', claiming to have constructed a working [[prototype]] to generate what she described as "AC Gravity." No further evidence of this prototype has been offered.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-65730414.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121105040310/http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-65730414.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=5 November 2012 |title=Taming Gravity |journal=Popular Mechanics |date=1 October 2000 |first=Jim |last=Wilson |access-date=5 January 2014 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.light-science.com/gen2.html |title=Gravity Conquered? |last=Cain |first=Jeanette |publisher=light-science.com |access-date=5 January 2014 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130706031149/http://www.light-science.com/gen2.html |archive-date=6 July 2013 }}</ref>
Douglas Torr, of the [[University of Alabama in Huntsville]] proposed how a time-dependent magnetic field could cause the spins of the lattice ions in a superconductor to generate detectable [[Gravitoelectromagnetism|gravitomagnetic and gravitoelectric]] fields in a series of papers published between 1991 and 1993.<ref>{{cite journal |journal=Physical Review |date=1 September 1992 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevB.46.5489 |pmid=10004334 |title=Gravitational effects on the magnetic attenuation of superconductors |last1=Li |first1=Ning |last2=Torr |first2=DG |volume=B46 |issue=9 |pages=5489–5495 |bibcode = 1992PhRvB..46.5489L }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |journal=Physical Review |date=15 January 1991 |title=Effects of a gravitomagnetic field on pure superconductors |last1=Li |first1=Ning |last2=Torr |first2=DG |volume=D43 |issue=2 |pages=457–459 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.43.457 |pmid=10013404 |bibcode=1991PhRvD..43..457L }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Li |first1=Ning |last2=Torr |first2=DG |journal=Foundations of Physics Letters |title=Gravitoelectric-electric coupling via superconductivity |volume=6 |issue=4 |pages=371–383 |date=August 1993 |bibcode=1993FoPhL...6..371T |doi=10.1007/BF00665654 |s2cid=122075917 }}</ref> In 1999, a Miss Li appeared in ''[[Popular Mechanics]]'', claiming to have constructed a working [[prototype]] to generate what she described as "AC Gravity." No further evidence of this prototype has been offered.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-65730414.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121105040310/http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-65730414.html |archive-date=5 November 2012 |title=Taming Gravity |journal=Popular Mechanics |date=1 October 2000 |first=Jim |last=Wilson |access-date=5 January 2014 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.light-science.com/gen2.html |title=Gravity Conquered? |last=Cain |first=Jeanette |publisher=light-science.com |access-date=5 January 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130706031149/http://www.light-science.com/gen2.html |archive-date=6 July 2013 }}</ref>


Douglas Torr and [[Timir Datta]] were involved in the development of a "gravity generator" at the [[University of South Carolina]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Patent and Copyright Committee List of Disclosures Reviewed Between July 1996 and June 1997 - USC ID|number=96140 |url=http://www.sc.edu/faculty/senate/97/annual/patentlist.html|access-date=2 May 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140502013440/http://www.sc.edu/faculty/senate/97/annual/patentlist.html |archive-date=2 May 2014 }}</ref> According to a leaked document from the Office of Technology Transfer at the University of South Carolina and confirmed to [[Wired (magazine)|''Wired'']] reporter Charles Platt in 1998, the device would create a "force beam" in any desired direction and the university planned to patent and license this device. No further information about this university research project or the "Gravity Generator" device was ever made public.<ref name="Platt1998">{{cite news |last=Platt |first=Charles |date=March 1, 1998 |title=Breaking the Law of Gravity |newspaper=Wired |url=https://www.wired.com/1998/03/antigravity/ |access-date=May 10, 2025 }}</ref>
Douglas Torr and Timir Datta were involved in the development of a "gravity generator" at the [[University of South Carolina]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Patent and Copyright Committee List of Disclosures Reviewed Between July 1996 and June 1997 - USC ID|number=96140 |url=http://www.sc.edu/faculty/senate/97/annual/patentlist.html|access-date=2 May 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140502013440/http://www.sc.edu/faculty/senate/97/annual/patentlist.html |archive-date=2 May 2014 }}</ref> According to a leaked document from the Office of Technology Transfer at the University of South Carolina and confirmed to [[Wired (magazine)|''Wired'']] reporter Charles Platt in 1998, the device would create a "force beam" in any desired direction and the university planned to patent and license this device. No further information about this university research project or the "Gravity Generator" device was ever made public.<ref name="Platt1998">{{cite news |last=Platt |first=Charles |date=March 1, 1998 |title=Breaking the Law of Gravity |newspaper=Wired |url=https://www.wired.com/1998/03/antigravity/ |access-date=May 10, 2025 }}</ref>


== Göde Award ==
== Göde Award ==
The Institute for Gravity Research of the Göde Scientific Foundation has tried to reproduce many of the different experiments which claim any "anti-gravity" effects. All attempts by this group to observe an anti-gravity effect by reproducing past experiments have been unsuccessful thus far. The foundation has offered a reward of one million euros for a reproducible anti-gravity experiment.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.goede-stiftung.org/uk/institute-for-gravity-research/goede-award.html |title=The Göde award - One Million Euro to overcome gravity |publisher=Institute of Gravity Research|access-date=2 January 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150428051435/http://www.goede-stiftung.org/uk/institute-for-gravity-research/goede-award.html |archive-date=28 April 2015 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
The Institute for Gravity Research of the Göde Scientific Foundation has tried to reproduce many of the different experiments which claim any "anti-gravity" effects. All attempts by this group to observe an anti-gravity effect by reproducing past experiments have been unsuccessful thus far. The foundation has offered a reward of one million euros for a reproducible anti-gravity experiment.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.goede-stiftung.org/uk/institute-for-gravity-research/goede-award.html |title=The Göde award - One Million Euro to overcome gravity |publisher=Institute of Gravity Research|access-date=2 January 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150428051435/http://www.goede-stiftung.org/uk/institute-for-gravity-research/goede-award.html |archive-date=28 April 2015 }}</ref>


== In fiction ==
== In fiction ==
The existence of anti-gravity is a common theme in [[science fiction]].<ref name="SFEAntigravity">{{cite encyclopedia |year=2020 |title=Antigravity |encyclopedia=[[The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction]] |url=https://sf-encyclopedia.com/entry/antigravity |access-date=2024-12-20 |edition=4th |author1-last=Sudbery |author1-first=Tony |author2-last=Langford |author2-first=David |author2-link=David Langford |author3-last=Nicholls |author3-first=Peter |author3-link=Peter Nicholls (writer) |editor1-last=Clute |editor1-first=John |editor1-link=John Clute |editor2-last=Langford |editor2-first=David |editor2-link=David Langford |editor3-last=Sleight |editor3-first=Graham |editor3-link=Graham Sleight }}</ref> ''[[The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction]]'' lists [[Francis Godwin]]'s posthumously-published 1638 novel ''[[The Man in the Moone]]'', where a "semi-magical" stone has the power to make gravity stronger or weaker, as the earliest variation of the theme.<ref name="SFEAntigravity" /> The first story to use anti-gravity for the purpose of space travel, as well as the first to treat the subject from a scientific rather than supernatural angle, was [[George Tucker (American politician)|George Tucker]]'s 1827 novel ''[[A Voyage to the Moon (Tucker novel)|A Voyage to the Moon]]''.<ref name="SFEAntigravity" /><ref>{{cite book |last=Bailey |first=James Osler |author-link=J. O. Bailey |title=Pilgrims Through Space and Time: Trends and Patterns in Scientific and Utopian Fiction |date=1972 |publisher=Greenwood Press |isbn=978-0-8371-6323-9 |pages=45 |language=en |chapter=Chapter Three: Down Alph the Sacred River: Scientific Fiction, 1817–1870—C. The Wonderful Journey—3. To Other Planets |orig-date=1947 |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/pilgrimsthroughs00nanc/page/44/mode/2up }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Roberts |first=Adam |author-link=Adam Roberts (British writer) |title=The History of Science Fiction |date=2016 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |isbn=978-1-137-56957-8 |edition=2nd |series=Palgrave Histories of Literature |pages=156 |chapter=SF 1850–1900: Mobility and Mobilisation |doi=10.1057/978-1-137-56957-8_7 |oclc=956382503 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gq7LDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA156}} </ref>
The existence of anti-gravity is a common theme in [[science fiction]].<ref name="SFEAntigravity">{{cite encyclopedia |year=2020 |title=Antigravity |encyclopedia=[[The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction]] |url=https://sf-encyclopedia.com/entry/antigravity |access-date=2024-12-20 |edition=4th |author1-last=Sudbery |author1-first=Tony |author2-last=Langford |author2-first=David |author2-link=David Langford |author3-last=Nicholls |author3-first=Peter |author3-link=Peter Nicholls (writer) |editor1-last=Clute |editor1-first=John |editor1-link=John Clute |editor2-last=Langford |editor2-first=David |editor2-link=David Langford |editor3-last=Sleight |editor3-first=Graham |editor3-link=Graham Sleight }}</ref> ''[[The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction]]'' lists [[Francis Godwin]]'s posthumously-published 1638 novel ''[[The Man in the Moone]]'', where a "semi-magical" stone has the power to make gravity stronger or weaker, as the earliest variation of the theme.<ref name="SFEAntigravity" /> The first story to use anti-gravity for the purpose of space travel, as well as the first to treat the subject from a scientific rather than supernatural angle, was [[George Tucker (American politician)|George Tucker]]'s 1827 novel ''[[A Voyage to the Moon (Tucker novel)|A Voyage to the Moon]]''.<ref name="SFEAntigravity" /><ref>{{cite book |last=Bailey |first=James Osler |author-link=J. O. Bailey |title=Pilgrims Through Space and Time: Trends and Patterns in Scientific and Utopian Fiction |date=1972 |publisher=Greenwood Press |isbn=978-0-8371-6323-9 |page=45 |language=en |chapter=Chapter Three: Down Alph the Sacred River: Scientific Fiction, 1817–1870—C. The Wonderful Journey—3. To Other Planets |orig-date=1947 |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/pilgrimsthroughs00nanc/page/44/mode/2up }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Roberts |first=Adam |author-link=Adam Roberts (British writer) |title=The History of Science Fiction |date=2016 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |isbn=978-1-137-56957-8 |edition=2nd |series=Palgrave Histories of Literature |page=156 |chapter=SF 1850–1900: Mobility and Mobilisation |doi=10.1057/978-1-137-56957-8_7 |oclc=956382503 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gq7LDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA156}} </ref>


=== Apergy ===
=== Apergy ===
Line 100: Line 94:
{{div col|colwidth=18em}}
{{div col|colwidth=18em}}
* [[Area 51]]
* [[Area 51]]
* [[Aerodynamic levitation]]
* [[Artificial gravity]]
* [[Artificial gravity]]
* [[Burkhard Heim]]
* [[Burkhard Heim]]
* [[Casimir effect]]
* [[Casimir effect]]
* [[Clinostat]]
* [[Clinostat]]
* [[Electrostatic levitation]]
* [[Exotic matter]]
* [[Exotic matter]]
* [[Gravitational interaction of antimatter]]
* [[Gravitational interaction of antimatter]]
Line 112: Line 104:
* [[Ion-propelled aircraft]]
* [[Ion-propelled aircraft]]
* [[Heim theory]]
* [[Heim theory]]
* [[Magnetic levitation]]
* [[Levitation (physics)]]
** [[Aerodynamic levitation]]
** [[Electrostatic levitation]]
** [[Magnetic levitation]]
** [[Optical levitation]]
* [[Nazi UFOs]]
* [[Nazi UFOs]]
* [[Optical levitation]]
* [[Reactionless drive]]
* [[Reactionless drive]]
* [[Tractor beam]]
* [[Tractor beam]]
Line 121: Line 116:
== References ==
== References ==
{{reflist|30em}}
{{reflist|30em}}
== Bibliography ==
Criteria:
* [https://www.google.com/search?q=Newtons+discovery+of+the+apple+law&rlz=1C1GGRV_enGB858GB858&oq=Newtons+discovery+of+the+apple+law&aqs=chrome..69i57.8545j0j1&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 "Newtons discovery of the apple law"]
* [https://www.google.com/search?q=Newtons+principle+of+gravitation&rlz=1C1GGRV_enGB858GB858&oq=Newtons+principle+of+gravitation&aqs=chrome..69i57.10463j0j1&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 "Newtons principle of gravitation"] > [https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1GGRV_enGB858GB858&ei=JWszXa2WFcyU8gK_3pQ4&q=Newtons+principle+of+gravitation+apple+falls&oq=Newtons+principle+of+gravitation+apple+falls&gs_l=psy-ab.3...3593.5878..6069...0.0..0.119.897.11j1......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i22i30j33i22i29i30j33i160j33i21.yJ8BrLKZQMk&ved=0ahUKEwjtvKqtncTjAhVMilwKHT8vBQcQ4dUDCAo&uact=5 "Newtons principle of gravitation apple falls"] (google > google books)


== Further reading ==
== Further reading ==
Line 132: Line 122:


== External links ==
== External links ==
{{Sister project links|Anti-gravity}}
{{Wiktionary}}
* [https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20070004897 Responding to Mechanical Antigravity], a NASA paper debunking a wide variety of gyroscopic (and related) devices
* {{ cite magazine |url= http://www.salon.com/2002/08/05/zero_gravity/ |title= The Hunt for Zero Point by Nick Cook |series= Review |quote= An editor for the esteemed Jane's {{sic|Defense|hide=yes}} Weekly says the U.S. government has been working on Nazi anti-gravity technology in secret for 50 years |first= Kurt |last= Kleiner |magazine= Salon |date= 5 August 2002  |url-status= live |archive-date= 15 January 2011 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110115142418/http://dir.salon.com/story/books/review/2002/08/05/zero_gravity/index.html |ref=none}} Review of a book about a conspiracy theory around anti-gravity.
*[http://www.gravitation.org/institute_of_gravity_research/institute_of_gravity_research.html Göde Scientific Foundation] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100531053008/http://www.gravitation.org/institute_of_gravity_research/institute_of_gravity_research.html |date=31 May 2010 }}
* [https://sites.google.com/view/kured/research KURED Research]


{{Science fiction}}
{{Science fiction}}
{{Spacecraft propulsion}}
{{Spacecraft propulsion}}
{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Anti-Gravity}}
[[Category:Anti-gravity| ]]
[[Category:Anti-gravity| ]]
[[Category:Fringe physics]]
[[Category:General relativity]]
[[Category:General relativity]]
[[Category:Historiography of science]]
[[Category:History of physics]]
[[Category:History of physics]]
[[Category:History of science and technology in the United States]]
[[Category:History of science and technology in the United States]]
[[Category:Historiography of science]]
[[Category:Science fiction themes]]
[[Category:Science fiction themes]]
[[Category:Fringe physics]]
[[Category:Pseudoscience]]

Latest revision as of 05:47, 8 December 2025

Template:Short description Template:Use dmy dates Script error: No such module "For".

File:BOXXX-3W.jpg
Artistic depiction of a fictional anti-gravity vehicle

Anti-gravity is the concept of a force that would exactly oppose the force of gravity. Under the known laws of physics, anti-gravity is impossible except possibly between matter and antimatter. Experimental measurement rule out repulsion between antihydrogen and the mass of the Earth.[1]

Anti-gravity does not refer to either the lack of weight under gravity experienced in free fall or orbit, or to balancing the force of gravity with some other force, such as electromagnetism, aerodynamic lift, or ion-propelled "lifters", which fly in the air by moving air with electromagnetic fields.[2][3]

Anti-gravity is a recurring concept in science fiction.

Theoretical probability

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Under the laws of general relativity, anti-gravity is impossible except under contrived circumstances.[4][5][6] Under that theory, and particle physics, gravity is mass-energy, a quantity believed to always be positive. It is always attractive and never repulsive.[7]

During the close of the twentieth century NASA provided funding for the Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program (BPP) from 1996 through 2002. This program studied a number of "far out" designs for space propulsion that were not receiving funding through normal university or commercial channels. Anti-gravity-like concepts were listed under "approaches categorized as non-viable" since the study found no evidence of anti-gravity-like forces.[8] So many inappropriate proposals were submitted that NASA developed a screening guide for reviewers.[9]

History

Attempts to understand why gravity is solely an attractive force goes back at least as far as James Clerk Maxwell in the late nineteenth century. He noted that existence of unlike charges in electromagnetism was the root of its fundamental difference from gravity. With the discovery of general relativity and the emergence of particle physics in the twentieth century this difference seemed even more fundamental. The "charge" in the theory of gravity is mass-energy, a quantity believed to always be positive. Thus gravity seemed to always be attractive and never repulsive. Two significant possible exceptions emerged, one in quantum physics and one at cosmological scales.[7]

Antimatter gravitation

In 1928 Paul Dirac produced the first relativistic quantum mechanics theory. The theory accurately predicted properties of the electron but it also has a second solution. In 1931 Robert Oppenheimer showed that Dirac's original interpretation of the second solution was incorrect and Dirac responded with a new proposal: the second solution was a positively charged "anti-electron". Dirac also said that every other particle should have an opposite charged counterpart. With the discovery of the positron in 1932 and the antiproton in 1955, this theoretical concept of antimatter was grounded in empirical evidence.[10]Template:Rp

Dirac's theory did not include gravitation and there remains no consistent theory that combines both quantum mechanics and general relativity. A hypothetical negative mass charge in Newton's equations or general relativity is theoretically consistent even though no observations support this concept.[11] Since antimatter is extremely rare, the possibility remained that repulsion between matter and antimatter would lead to antigravity.[7]Template:Rp

By 1956 the scientific impossibility of antigravity was a subject of theoretical analysis.[12] Three more comprehensive arguments were published soon thereafter.[7][13] In 1958, Philip Morrison showed that repulsion by mass would imply failure of conservation of energy in Earth's gravitational field.[14] In 1959, Leonard I. Schiff showed that in quantum field theory the virtual anti-electron contribution to the vacuum polarization would break the equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass contrary to the results of the Eötvös experiment.[15] Then in 1961, Myron L. Good noted that the longest lived K meson is a superposition of a particle and its antiparticle; if these two particles responded differently to gravity the long-lived K meson would decay.[16] Despite these arguments, new theories motivated by issues in cosmology and uncertainties in particle physics, have been proposed in which the gravitational interaction of matter and antimatter could be repulsive.[7][13]

Experiments

Attempts to measure the gravitational force on antimatter particles is extremely challenging. For matter particles, the equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass, known as the weak equivalence principle, has been demonstrated to a precision of 10-15.[17] However the technique used differential electrostatic accelerometers on a pair of test masses composed of titanium and of platinum, all in an orbiting satellite. Producing antimatter hydrogen atoms requires a source of antiprotons like a particle accelerator combined with a source of positrons, making a satellite, two-mass experiment impractical. In 2023, the amount of antihydrogen escaping from the top and bottom of a vertical vacuum chamber at CERN was compared, ruling out repulsive gravity between antihydrogen and Earth's mass.[1]

Studies, empirical claims and commercial efforts

There have been a number of studies, attempts to build anti-gravity devices, and a small number of reports of anti-gravity-like effects in popular and scientific literature. None of the examples that follow are accepted as reproducible examples of anti-gravity.

Thomas Townsend Brown's gravitator

Script error: No such module "labelled list hatnote". In 1921, while still in high school, Thomas Townsend Brown found that a high-voltage Coolidge tube seemed to change mass depending on its orientation on a balance scale. Through the 1920s Brown developed this into devices that combined high voltages with materials with high dielectric constants (essentially large capacitors); he called such a device a "gravitator". Brown made the claim to observers and in the media that his experiments were showing anti-gravity effects. Brown would continue his work and produced a series of high-voltage devices in the following years in attempts to sell his ideas to aircraft companies and the military. He coined the names Biefeld–Brown effect and electrogravitics in conjunction with his devices. Brown tested his asymmetrical capacitor devices in a vacuum, supposedly showing it was not a more down-to-earth electrohydrodynamic effect generated by high voltage ion flow in air.

Electrogravitics is a popular topic in ufology, anti-gravity, free energy, with government conspiracy theorists and related websites, in books and publications with claims that the technology became highly classified in the early 1960s and that it is used to power UFOs and the B-2 bomber.[18] There is also research and videos on the internet purported to show lifter-style capacitor devices working in a vacuum, therefore not receiving propulsion from ion drift or ion wind being generated in air.[18][19]

Follow-up studies on Brown's work and other claims have been conducted by R. L. Talley in a 1990 US Air Force study, NASA scientist Jonathan Campbell in a 2003 experiment,[18] and Martin Tajmar in a 2004 paper.[20][21] Talley attempted to measure the effect in high vacuum chamber with up to 19kV voltage differences but reported that no force was generated above the detection limit of 2 x 10-9 N.[22] Tajmar and colleagues made a comprehensive search but found no effects in vacuum with steady electric fields.[23] The conclusion from these experiments was that the effect observed by Brown was "ion wind"; no experiments found evidence that thrust could be observed in a vacuum.[24]

Gravity Research Foundation

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

File:New boston babson monument.JPG
A monument at Babson College dedicated to Roger Babson for research into anti-gravity and partial gravity insulators

In 1948 businessman Roger Babson (founder of Babson College) formed the Gravity Research Foundation to study ways to reduce the effects of gravity.[25] Their efforts were initially somewhat "crankish", but they held occasional conferences that drew such people as Clarence Birdseye, known for his frozen-food products, and helicopter pioneer Igor Sikorsky.Script error: No such module "Unsubst". Over time the Foundation turned its attention away from trying to control gravity, to simply better understanding it. The Foundation nearly disappeared after Babson's death in 1967. However, it continues to run an essay award, offering prizes of up to $4,000. As of 2017, it is still administered out of Wellesley, Massachusetts, by George Rideout Jr., son of the foundation's original director.[26] Winners include California astrophysicist George F. Smoot (1993), who later won the 2006 Nobel Prize in Physics, and Gerard 't Hooft (2015) who previously won the 1999 Nobel Prize in Physics.[27]

Gyroscopic devices

Gyroscopes produce a force when twisted that operates "out of plane" and can appear to lift themselves against gravity. Although this force is well understood to be illusory, even under Newtonian models, it has nevertheless generated numerous claims of anti-gravity devices and any number of patented devices. None of these devices has ever been demonstrated to work under controlled conditions, and they have often become the subject of conspiracy theories as a result.

File:H W Wallace force field figure 4.png
Henry Wallace's 1968 "kinemassic field" generator which he claimed would created a "gravitomagnetic" field

Another "rotating device" example is shown in a series of patents granted to Henry Wallace between 1968 and 1974. His devices consist of rapidly spinning disks of brass, a material made up largely of elements with a total half-integer nuclear spin. He claimed that by rapidly rotating a disk of such material, the nuclear spin became aligned, and as a result created a "gravitomagnetic" field in a fashion similar to the magnetic field created by the Barnett effect.[28][29][30] No independent testing or public demonstration of these devices is known.Template:Primary source inline

In 1989, it was reported that a weight decreases along the axis of a right spinning gyroscope.[31] A test of this claim a year later yielded null results.[32] A recommendation was made to conduct further tests at a 1999 AIP conference.[33]

Gravitoelectric coupling

In 1992, the Russian researcher Eugene Podkletnov claimed to have discovered, while experimenting with superconductors, that a fast rotating superconductor reduces the gravitational effect.[34] Many studies have attempted to reproduce Podkletnov's experiment, always to negative results.[35][36][37][38]

Douglas Torr, of the University of Alabama in Huntsville proposed how a time-dependent magnetic field could cause the spins of the lattice ions in a superconductor to generate detectable gravitomagnetic and gravitoelectric fields in a series of papers published between 1991 and 1993.[39][40][41] In 1999, a Miss Li appeared in Popular Mechanics, claiming to have constructed a working prototype to generate what she described as "AC Gravity." No further evidence of this prototype has been offered.[42][43]

Douglas Torr and Timir Datta were involved in the development of a "gravity generator" at the University of South Carolina.[44] According to a leaked document from the Office of Technology Transfer at the University of South Carolina and confirmed to Wired reporter Charles Platt in 1998, the device would create a "force beam" in any desired direction and the university planned to patent and license this device. No further information about this university research project or the "Gravity Generator" device was ever made public.[45]

Göde Award

The Institute for Gravity Research of the Göde Scientific Foundation has tried to reproduce many of the different experiments which claim any "anti-gravity" effects. All attempts by this group to observe an anti-gravity effect by reproducing past experiments have been unsuccessful thus far. The foundation has offered a reward of one million euros for a reproducible anti-gravity experiment.[46]

In fiction

The existence of anti-gravity is a common theme in science fiction.[47] The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction lists Francis Godwin's posthumously-published 1638 novel The Man in the Moone, where a "semi-magical" stone has the power to make gravity stronger or weaker, as the earliest variation of the theme.[47] The first story to use anti-gravity for the purpose of space travel, as well as the first to treat the subject from a scientific rather than supernatural angle, was George Tucker's 1827 novel A Voyage to the Moon.[47][48][49]

Apergy

Apergy is a term for a fictitious form of anti-gravitational energy first used by Percy Greg in his 1880 sword and planet novel Across the Zodiac.[50] The term was later adopted by other fiction authors such as John Jacob Astor IV in his 1894 science fiction novel A Journey in Other Worlds, and it also appeared outside of explicit fiction writing.[47][50]

See also

<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>

References

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

  1. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. Peskin, M and Schroeder, D.; An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Westview Press, 1995) Template:ISBN
  5. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. Polchinski, Joseph (1998). String Theory, Cambridge University Press. A modern textbook
  7. a b c d e Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  9. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  12. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  13. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  14. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  16. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  17. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  18. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  19. Thomas Valone, Electrogravitics II: Validating Reports on a New Propulsion Methodology, Integrity Research Institute, page 52-58
  20. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  21. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  22. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  23. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  24. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  25. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  26. List of winners Template:Webarchive
  27. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  28. U.S. patent 3626606
  29. U.S. patent 3626605
  30. U.S. patent 3823570
  31. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  32. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  33. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  34. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  35. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  36. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  37. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  38. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  39. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  40. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  41. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  42. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  43. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  44. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  45. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  46. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  47. a b c d Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  48. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  49. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  50. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Further reading

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Cady, W. M. (15 September 1952). "Thomas Townsend Brown: Electro-Gravity Device" (File 24–185). Pasadena, CA: Office of Naval Research. Public access to the report was authorized on 1 October 1952.

External links

Template:Sister project

  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1". Review of a book about a conspiracy theory around anti-gravity.

Script error: No such module "Navbox".

Template:Spacecraft propulsion

Template:Authority control