Mob rule: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Trakking
imported>AwerDiWeGo
Replaced "democracy" with "polity", which at least is true for Aristotle. I didn't add a citation (e.g. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2025/entries/aristotle-politics/ ) because they only support that my change may be better than the previous version but don't support the rest of the sentence (which I didn't touch except to replace the citation to Plato with a "who?" tag). I linked "polity" to Politeia: see the section there about translations of "politeia". Needs more cleanup.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
{{Democracy}}
{{Democracy}}
{{Forms of government}}
{{Forms of government}}
[[File:T2C, Fred Barnard, The Carmagnole (III,5).jpeg|thumb|right|''[[A Tale of Two Cities]]'', the mob in Paris dancing [[La Carmagnole]], by Fred Barnard.]]
[[File:T2C, Fred Barnard, The Carmagnole (III,5).jpeg|thumb|right|''[[A Tale of Two Cities]]'', the mob in Paris dancing [[La Carmagnole]], by Fred Barnard]]


'''Mob rule''' or '''ochlocracy''' or '''mobocracy''' is a [[pejorative]] term describing an oppressive [[majoritarianism|majoritarian]] form of [[government]] controlled by the common people through the [[intimidation]] of authorities. Ochlocracy is distinguished from [[democracy]] or similarly legitimate and representative governments by the absence or impairment of a procedurally civil process reflective of the entire polity.<ref name="auto">{{cite journal|url=https://www.academia.edu/26803846|title=Ochlocracy in the Practices of Civil Society: A Threat for Democracy?|first=Jasmin|last=Hasanović|journal=Studia Juridica et Politica Jaurinensis|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180515004503/http://www.academia.edu/26803846/Ochlocracy_in_the_Practices_of_Civil_Society_A_Threat_for_Democracy|archive-date=2018-05-15}}</ref>
'''Mob rule''' or '''ochlocracy''' or '''mobocracy''' is a [[pejorative]] term describing an oppressive [[majoritarianism|majoritarian]] form of [[government]] controlled by the common people through the [[intimidation]] of authorities.{{Dubious|date=December 2025|reason=Against authorities or against the rule of law in the context of what today we call liberal democracy, that is, against laws that prevent the use of majority rule in a way that is unfair with minorities etcetera?}} Ochlocracy is distinguished from [[democracy]] or similarly legitimate and representative governments by the absence or impairment of a procedurally civil process reflective of the entire polity.<ref name="auto">{{cite journal|url=https://www.academia.edu/26803846|title=Ochlocracy in the Practices of Civil Society: A Threat for Democracy?|first=Jasmin|last=Hasanović|journal=Studia Juridica et Politica Jaurinensis|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180515004503/http://www.academia.edu/26803846/Ochlocracy_in_the_Practices_of_Civil_Society_A_Threat_for_Democracy|archive-date=2018-05-15}}</ref>{{Dubious|date=December 2025|reason=This is the only source cited in the lead section and it is explicitly contrary to liberal democracy and contrary to a neutral point of view}}{{Better source needed|date=December 2025}}


{{anchor|Name|Etymology}}
{{anchor|Name|Etymology}}


== Names ==
== Names ==
Ochlocracy comes from [[Latin]] {{lang|la|ochlocratia}}, from [[Ancient Greek|Greek]] {{lang|grc|ὀχλοκρατία}} (''okhlokratía''), from {{lang|grc|ὄχλος}} (''ókhlos'', "mass", "mob", or "common people") and {{lang|grc|κράτος}} (''krátos'', "rule").<ref>{{cite web|title=ochlocracy|url=https://www.thefreedictionary.com/ochlocracy|work=The Free Dictionary|access-date=2021-12-31}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=ochlocracy {{!}} Etymology, origin and meaning of ochlocracy by etymonline|url=https://www.etymonline.com/word/ochlocracy|access-date=2021-12-31|website=www.etymonline.com|language=en}}</ref> An ochlocrat is one who is an advocate or partisan of ochlocracy. The adjective may be either ochlocratic or ochlocratical.
Ochlocracy comes from [[Latin]] {{lang|la|ochlocratia}}, from [[Ancient Greek|Greek]] {{lang|grc|ὀχλοκρατία}} (''okhlokratía''), from {{lang|grc|ὄχλος}} (''ókhlos'', "mass", "mob", or "common people") and {{lang|grc|κράτος}} (''krátos'', "rule").<ref>{{cite web|title=ochlocracy|url=https://www.thefreedictionary.com/ochlocracy|work=The Free Dictionary|access-date=2021-12-31}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=ochlocracy {{!}} Etymology, origin and meaning of ochlocracy by etymonline|url=https://www.etymonline.com/word/ochlocracy|access-date=2021-12-31|website=www.etymonline.com}}</ref> An ochlocrat is one who is an advocate or partisan of ochlocracy. The adjective may be either ochlocratic or ochlocratical.


Ochlocracy is synonymous in meaning and usage to mob rule or '''[[wikt:mobocracy|mobocracy]]''', which [[neologism|was coined]] in the 18th century from the sense of "mob" meaning the common rabble that arose from the Latin phrase {{lang|la|mobile vulgus}} ("the fickle [[crowd]]") in the 1680s during disputes over the [[United Kingdom]]'s [[Glorious Revolution]].
Ochlocracy is synonymous in meaning and usage to mob rule or [[wikt:mobocracy|mobocracy]], which [[neologism|was coined]] in the 18th century from the sense of "mob" meaning the common rabble that arose from the Latin phrase {{lang|la|mobile vulgus}} ("the fickle [[crowd]]") in the 1680s during disputes over the [[United Kingdom]]'s [[Glorious Revolution]].


== Origin ==
== Origin ==
Line 27: Line 27:
</ref> He uses it to name the "pathological" version of popular rule, in opposition to the good version, which he refers to as democracy. There are numerous mentions of the word "ochlos" in the [[Talmud]], in which "ochlos" refers to anything from "mob", "populace", to "armed guard", as well as in the writings of [[Rashi]], a Jewish commentator on the Bible. The word was first recorded in English in 1584, derived from the [[French language|French]] ''ochlocratie'' (1568), which stems from the original Greek ''okhlokratia'', from ''okhlos'' ("mob") and ''kratos'' ("rule", "power", "strength").
</ref> He uses it to name the "pathological" version of popular rule, in opposition to the good version, which he refers to as democracy. There are numerous mentions of the word "ochlos" in the [[Talmud]], in which "ochlos" refers to anything from "mob", "populace", to "armed guard", as well as in the writings of [[Rashi]], a Jewish commentator on the Bible. The word was first recorded in English in 1584, derived from the [[French language|French]] ''ochlocratie'' (1568), which stems from the original Greek ''okhlokratia'', from ''okhlos'' ("mob") and ''kratos'' ("rule", "power", "strength").


Ancient Greek political thinkers<ref>[[Plato]] ''Statesman'', 302c</ref> regarded ochlocracy as one of the three "bad" forms of government ([[tyranny]], [[oligarchy]], and ochlocracy) as opposed to the three "good" forms of government: [[monarchy]], [[aristocracy]], and [[democracy]]. They distinguished "good" and "bad" according to whether the government form would act in the interest of the whole community ("good") or in the exclusive interests of a group or individual at the expense of justice ("bad").{{Citation needed|date=September 2023}}
Ancient Greek political thinkers{{who?|date=December 2025}} regarded ochlocracy as one of the three "bad" forms of government ([[tyranny]], [[oligarchy]], and ochlocracy) as opposed to the three "good" forms of government: [[monarchy]], [[aristocracy]], and "[[Politeia|polity]]". They distinguished "good" and "bad" according to whether the government form would act in the interest of the whole community ("good") or in the exclusive interests of a group or individual at the expense of justice ("bad").{{Citation needed|date=September 2023}}


Polybius' predecessor, [[Aristotle]], distinguished between different forms of democracy, stating that those disregarding the [[rule of law]] devolved into ochlocracy.<ref>[[Aristotle]] ''Politics'', Bk IV, Part IV</ref> Aristotle's teacher, [[Plato]], considered democracy itself to be a degraded form of government and the term is absent from his work.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |last=Blössner |first=Norbert |chapter=The City-Soul Analogy |editor-last=Ferrari |editor-first=G. R. F. |others=Translated from the German by G. R. F. Ferrari |title=The Cambridge Companion to Plato's Republic |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2007 }}</ref>
Polybius' predecessor, [[Aristotle]], distinguished between different forms of democracy, stating that those disregarding the [[rule of law]] devolved into ochlocracy.<ref>[[Aristotle]] ''Politics'', Bk IV, Part IV</ref> Aristotle's teacher, [[Plato]], considered democracy itself to be a degraded form of government and the term is absent from his work.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |last=Blössner |first=Norbert |chapter=The City-Soul Analogy |editor-last=Ferrari |editor-first=G. R. F. |others=Translated from the German by G. R. F. Ferrari |title=The Cambridge Companion to Plato's Republic |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2007 }}</ref>


The threat of "mob rule" to a democracy is restrained by ensuring that the rule of law protects [[Minority group|minorities]] or individuals against short-term [[demagoguery]] or [[moral panic]].<ref>[[Jesús Padilla Gálvez]], Democracy in Times of Ochlocracy, Synthesis philosophica, Vol. 32 No.1, 2017, pp. 167–178.{{cite journal |url=http://hrcak.srce.hr/190389 |title=Demokracija u vremenu ohlokracije |journal=Synthesis Philosophica |date=23 August 2017 |volume=32 |issue=1 |pages=167–178 |doi=10.21464/sp32112 |access-date=2017-12-18 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171224042438/http://hrcak.srce.hr/190389 |archive-date=2017-12-24|last1=Padilla Gálvez |first1=Jesús |doi-access=free }}</ref> However, considering how laws in a democracy are established or repealed by the majority, the protection of minorities by rule of law is questionable. Some authors, like the Bosnian political theoretician Jasmin Hasanović, connect the emergence of ochlocracy in democratic societies with the [[Criticism of democracy|decadence of democracy]] in [[Neoliberalism|neo-liberal]] [[Western world|Western societies]], in which "the democratic role of the people has been reduced mainly to the electoral process".<ref name="auto"/>
The threat of "mob rule" to a democracy is restrained by ensuring that the rule of law protects [[Minority group|minorities]] or individuals against short-term [[demagoguery]] or [[moral panic]].<ref>[[Jesús Padilla Gálvez]], Democracy in Times of Ochlocracy, Synthesis philosophica, Vol. 32 No.1, 2017, pp. 167–178.{{cite journal |title=Demokracija u vremenu ohlokracije |journal=Synthesis Philosophica |date=23 August 2017 |volume=32 |issue=1 |pages=167–178 |doi=10.21464/sp32112 |last1=Padilla Gálvez |first1=Jesús |doi-access=free }}</ref> However, considering how laws in a democracy are established or repealed by the majority, the protection of minorities by rule of law is questionable. Some authors, like the Bosnian political theoretician Jasmin Hasanović, connect the emergence of ochlocracy in democratic societies with the [[Criticism of democracy|decadence of democracy]] in [[Neoliberalism|neo-liberal]] [[Western world|Western societies]], in which "the democratic role of the people has been reduced mainly to the electoral process".<ref name="auto"/>


==History==
==History==
[[File:T2C, Fred Barnard, The Mob attacking Foulon de Doué, 22 July 1789 (II,22).jpeg|thumb|right|The mob attacking [[Joseph Foullon de Doué]]]]
[[File:T2C, Fred Barnard, The Mob attacking Foulon de Doué, 22 July 1789 (II,22).jpeg|thumb|right|The mob attacking [[Joseph Foullon de Doué]]]]
[[File:Red Summer 1919 Omaha Nebraska lynching.jpg|thumb|African-American [[lynched]] by white mob in Omaha, Nebraska, September 28, 1919, during the "[[Red Summer]]"]]
[[File:Red Summer 1919 Omaha Nebraska lynching.jpg|thumb|African-American [[lynched]] by white mob in Omaha, Nebraska, September 28, 1919, during the "[[Red Summer]]"]]
During the late 17th and the early 18th centuries, English life was very disorderly. Although the [[James Scott, 1st Duke of Monmouth|Duke of Monmouth]]'s rising of 1685 was the last rebellion, there was scarcely a year in which [[London]] or the provincial towns did not see aggrieved people breaking out into riots. In [[Anne, Queen of Great Britain|Queen Anne]]'s reign (1702–14) the word "mob", first heard of not long before, came into general use. With no police force, there was little public order.<ref name="Clark">{{cite book |last=Clark |first=Sir George |date=1956 |title=The Later Stuarts, 1660–1714 |location=The Oxford History of England |publisher=Oxford University Press |pages=258–259 |isbn=0-19-821702-1}}</ref> Several decades later, the anti-Catholic [[Gordon Riots]] swept through London and claimed hundreds of lives; at the time, a proclamation painted on the wall of Newgate prison announced that the inmates had been freed by the authority of "His Majesty, King Mob".
During the late 17th and the early 18th centuries, English life was very disorderly. Although the [[James Scott, 1st Duke of Monmouth|Duke of Monmouth]]'s rising of 1685 was the last rebellion, there was scarcely a year in which [[London]] or the provincial towns did not see aggrieved people breaking out into riots. According to the historian [[George Clark (historian)|George Clark]], "In [[Anne, Queen of Great Britain|Queen Anne]]'s reign [1702–1714] the word 'mob', first heard of not long before, came into general use."<ref name="Clark">{{cite book |last=Clark |first=Sir George |author-link=George Clark (historian) |date=1972 |orig-date=1934 |title=The Later Stuarts, 1660–1714 |series=[[Oxford History of England|The Oxford History of England]] |publisher=Oxford University Press |pages=258–259 |isbn=0-19-821702-1 |url=https://archive.org/details/laterstuarts16600002clar/page/258/mode/1up}}</ref> With no police force, there was little public order. Several decades later, the anti-Catholic [[Gordon Riots]] swept through London and claimed hundreds of lives; at the time, a proclamation painted on the wall of Newgate prison announced that the inmates had been freed by the authority of "His Majesty, King Mob".


The [[Salem Witch Trials]] in [[Province of Massachusetts|colonial Massachusetts]] during the 1690s, in which the unified belief of the townspeople overpowered the logic of the law, also has been cited by one essayist as an example of mob rule.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://amath.colorado.edu/carnegie/lit/lynch/mobrule.htm|title=Mob Rule and Violence in American Culture|website=colorado.edu|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100221030848/http://amath.colorado.edu/carnegie/lit/lynch/mobrule.htm|archive-date=2010-02-21|access-date=2010-01-20}}</ref>
The [[Salem Witch Trials]] in [[Province of Massachusetts|colonial Massachusetts]] during the 1690s, in which the unified belief of the townspeople overpowered the logic of the law, also has been cited by one essayist as an example of mob rule.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://amath.colorado.edu/carnegie/lit/lynch/mobrule.htm|title=Mob Rule and Violence in American Culture|website=colorado.edu|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100221030848/http://amath.colorado.edu/carnegie/lit/lynch/mobrule.htm|archive-date=2010-02-21|access-date=2010-01-20}}</ref>


In 1837, [[Abraham Lincoln]] wrote about [[lynching]] and "the increasing disregard for law which pervades the country – the growing disposition to substitute the wild and furious passions in lieu of the sober judgment of courts, and the worse than savage mobs for the executive ministers of justice."<ref>"[http://www.classicreader.com/book/3237/12/ Opposition to Mob-Rule] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090109025333/http://www.classicreader.com/book/3237/12/ |date=2009-01-09 }}", ''The Writings of Abraham Lincoln, Volume 1''.</ref>
In 1837, [[Abraham Lincoln]] wrote about [[lynching]] and "the increasing disregard for law which pervades the country – the growing disposition to substitute the wild and furious passions in lieu of the sober judgment of courts, and the worse than savage mobs for the executive ministers of justice."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Lincoln |first=Abraham |author-link=Abraham Lincoln |date=27 January 1837 |url=http://www.classicreader.com/book/3237/12/ |title=Opposition to Mob-Rule |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090109025333/http://www.classicreader.com/book/3237/12/ |archive-date=2009-01-09 |work=The Writings of Abraham Lincoln, Volume 1}}</ref>


Mob violence played a prominent role in the early history of the [[Latter Day Saint movement]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Arrington |first1=Leonard J. |last2=Bitton |first2=Davis |author-link1=Leonard J. Arrington |author-link2=Davis Bitton |name-list-style=amp|title=The Mormon Experience: A History of the Latter-Day Saints |date=1992 |publisher=University of Illinois Press |isbn=9780252062360 |page=45 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oMQgrBcI998C&q=mob&pg=PA45 |access-date=23 June 2018 |language=en}}</ref> Examples include the [[1838 Mormon War|expulsions from Missouri]], the [[Haun's Mill massacre]], the [[death of Joseph Smith]], the [[History of Nauvoo, Illinois#The "Mormon War in Illinois" and the Mormon Exodus|expulsion from Nauvoo]], the murder of [[Joseph Standing]], the [[Cane Creek Massacre]], <ref>{{cite web |title=Cane Creek Massacre |url=https://sites.google.com/site/tnmormonhistory/events/1884/cane-creek-massacre |website=TNMormonHistory |access-date=23 June 2018 |archive-date=14 February 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220214103609/https://sites.google.com/site/tnmormonhistory/events/1884/cane-creek-massacre |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Wingfield |first1=Marshall |title=Tennessee's Mormon Massacre |journal=[[Tennessee Historical Quarterly]] |date=1958 |volume=17 |issue=1 |pages=19–36 |jstor=42621358 }}</ref> and the [[Mountain Meadows Massacre]]. In [[Danite#Brigham Young|an 1857 speech]], [[Brigham Young]] gave an address demanding military action against "mobocrats."
Mob violence played a prominent role in the early history of the [[Latter Day Saint movement]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Arrington |first1=Leonard J. |last2=Bitton |first2=Davis |author-link1=Leonard J. Arrington |author-link2=Davis Bitton |name-list-style=amp|title=The Mormon Experience: A History of the Latter-Day Saints |date=1992 |publisher=University of Illinois Press |isbn=9780252062360 |page=45 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oMQgrBcI998C&q=mob&pg=PA45 |access-date=23 June 2018}}</ref> Examples include the [[1838 Mormon War|expulsions from Missouri]], the [[Haun's Mill massacre]], the [[death of Joseph Smith]], the [[History of Nauvoo, Illinois#The "Mormon War in Illinois" and the Mormon Exodus|expulsion from Nauvoo]], the [[Mountain Meadows Massacre]], the murder of [[Joseph Standing]], and the [[Cane Creek Massacre]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Cane Creek Massacre |url=https://sites.google.com/site/tnmormonhistory/events/1884/cane-creek-massacre |website=TNMormonHistory |access-date=23 June 2018 |archive-date=14 February 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220214103609/https://sites.google.com/site/tnmormonhistory/events/1884/cane-creek-massacre |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Wingfield |first1=Marshall |title=Tennessee's Mormon Massacre |journal=[[Tennessee Historical Quarterly]] |date=1958 |volume=17 |issue=1 |pages=19–36 |jstor=42621358 }}</ref> In [[Danite#Brigham Young|an 1857 speech]], [[Brigham Young]] gave an address demanding military action against "mobocrats".


==See also==
==See also==
Line 50: Line 50:
* ''[[Argumentum ad populum]]''
* ''[[Argumentum ad populum]]''
* [[Bandwagon effect]]
* [[Bandwagon effect]]
* [[California]]
* [[Cancel culture]]
* [[Cancel culture]]
* [[Collective consciousness]]
* [[Collective consciousness]]
Line 77: Line 78:
* [[Social group]]
* [[Social group]]
* [[Spiral of silence]]
* [[Spiral of silence]]
* [[Texas]]
* [[Tyranny of the majority]]
* [[Tyranny of the majority]]
* [[Vigilantism]]
* [[Vigilantism]]
Line 105: Line 107:
[[Category:Political systems]]
[[Category:Political systems]]
[[Category:Crowd psychology]]
[[Category:Crowd psychology]]
[[Category:Warlordism]]
[[Category:Societal collapse]]
[[Category:Social crises]]
[[Category:Government crises]]

Latest revision as of 20:54, 15 December 2025

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "other uses". Template:Democracy Template:Forms of government

File:T2C, Fred Barnard, The Carmagnole (III,5).jpeg
A Tale of Two Cities, the mob in Paris dancing La Carmagnole, by Fred Barnard

Mob rule or ochlocracy or mobocracy is a pejorative term describing an oppressive majoritarian form of government controlled by the common people through the intimidation of authorities.Script error: No such module "Unsubst". Ochlocracy is distinguished from democracy or similarly legitimate and representative governments by the absence or impairment of a procedurally civil process reflective of the entire polity.[1]Script error: No such module "Unsubst".Template:Better source needed

Script error: No such module "anchor".

Names

Ochlocracy comes from Latin Script error: No such module "Lang"., from Greek Script error: No such module "Lang". (okhlokratía), from Script error: No such module "Lang". (ókhlos, "mass", "mob", or "common people") and Script error: No such module "Lang". (krátos, "rule").[2][3] An ochlocrat is one who is an advocate or partisan of ochlocracy. The adjective may be either ochlocratic or ochlocratical.

Ochlocracy is synonymous in meaning and usage to mob rule or mobocracy, which was coined in the 18th century from the sense of "mob" meaning the common rabble that arose from the Latin phrase Script error: No such module "Lang". ("the fickle crowd") in the 1680s during disputes over the United Kingdom's Glorious Revolution.

Origin

Polybius appears to have coined the term ochlocracy in his 2nd century BC work Histories (6.4.6).[4] He uses it to name the "pathological" version of popular rule, in opposition to the good version, which he refers to as democracy. There are numerous mentions of the word "ochlos" in the Talmud, in which "ochlos" refers to anything from "mob", "populace", to "armed guard", as well as in the writings of Rashi, a Jewish commentator on the Bible. The word was first recorded in English in 1584, derived from the French ochlocratie (1568), which stems from the original Greek okhlokratia, from okhlos ("mob") and kratos ("rule", "power", "strength").

Ancient Greek political thinkersScript error: No such module "Unsubst". regarded ochlocracy as one of the three "bad" forms of government (tyranny, oligarchy, and ochlocracy) as opposed to the three "good" forms of government: monarchy, aristocracy, and "polity". They distinguished "good" and "bad" according to whether the government form would act in the interest of the whole community ("good") or in the exclusive interests of a group or individual at the expense of justice ("bad").Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

Polybius' predecessor, Aristotle, distinguished between different forms of democracy, stating that those disregarding the rule of law devolved into ochlocracy.[5] Aristotle's teacher, Plato, considered democracy itself to be a degraded form of government and the term is absent from his work.[6]

The threat of "mob rule" to a democracy is restrained by ensuring that the rule of law protects minorities or individuals against short-term demagoguery or moral panic.[7] However, considering how laws in a democracy are established or repealed by the majority, the protection of minorities by rule of law is questionable. Some authors, like the Bosnian political theoretician Jasmin Hasanović, connect the emergence of ochlocracy in democratic societies with the decadence of democracy in neo-liberal Western societies, in which "the democratic role of the people has been reduced mainly to the electoral process".[1]

History

File:T2C, Fred Barnard, The Mob attacking Foulon de Doué, 22 July 1789 (II,22).jpeg
The mob attacking Joseph Foullon de Doué
File:Red Summer 1919 Omaha Nebraska lynching.jpg
African-American lynched by white mob in Omaha, Nebraska, September 28, 1919, during the "Red Summer"

During the late 17th and the early 18th centuries, English life was very disorderly. Although the Duke of Monmouth's rising of 1685 was the last rebellion, there was scarcely a year in which London or the provincial towns did not see aggrieved people breaking out into riots. According to the historian George Clark, "In Queen Anne's reign [1702–1714] the word 'mob', first heard of not long before, came into general use."[8] With no police force, there was little public order. Several decades later, the anti-Catholic Gordon Riots swept through London and claimed hundreds of lives; at the time, a proclamation painted on the wall of Newgate prison announced that the inmates had been freed by the authority of "His Majesty, King Mob".

The Salem Witch Trials in colonial Massachusetts during the 1690s, in which the unified belief of the townspeople overpowered the logic of the law, also has been cited by one essayist as an example of mob rule.[9]

In 1837, Abraham Lincoln wrote about lynching and "the increasing disregard for law which pervades the country – the growing disposition to substitute the wild and furious passions in lieu of the sober judgment of courts, and the worse than savage mobs for the executive ministers of justice."[10]

Mob violence played a prominent role in the early history of the Latter Day Saint movement.[11] Examples include the expulsions from Missouri, the Haun's Mill massacre, the death of Joseph Smith, the expulsion from Nauvoo, the Mountain Meadows Massacre, the murder of Joseph Standing, and the Cane Creek Massacre.[12][13] In an 1857 speech, Brigham Young gave an address demanding military action against "mobocrats".

See also

<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>

References

Notes

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

  1. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. Aristotle Politics, Bk IV, Part IV
  6. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. Jesús Padilla Gálvez, Democracy in Times of Ochlocracy, Synthesis philosophica, Vol. 32 No.1, 2017, pp. 167–178.Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  9. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  12. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Bibliography

External links

Template:Political philosophy Script error: No such module "Navbox". Template:Authority control Template:Use dmy dates