Overwhelmingly Large Telescope: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Pristino
no mention of its potential location in the article
 
imported>GreenC bot
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:


==History==
==History==
OWL was first proposed in 1998, and at that time was estimated to be technologically feasible by 2010–2015.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Gilmozzi|first1= R.|display-authors=etal|others=European Southern Observatory|editor-first1= Larry M.|editor-last1= Stepp|date=1998|title=The future of filled aperature telescopes: Is a 100m feasible?|language=en|url=http://www.eso.org/sci/facilities/eelt/owl/Files/publications/1998_Kona_The_Future_of_Filled_Aperture_Telescopes.pdf|access-date=25 Oct 2018|journal=Advanced Technology Optical/IR Telescopes|series= Advanced Technology Optical/IR Telescopes VI|volume=VI|issue=3352|page= 778|publisher=SPIE|doi= 10.1117/12.319284|bibcode= 1998SPIE.3352..778G|s2cid= 12512243}}</ref>
OWL was first proposed in 1998, and at that time was estimated to be technologically feasible by 2010–2015.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Gilmozzi|first1= R.|display-authors=etal |title= Advanced Technology Optical/IR Telescopes VI|chapter= Future of filled aperture telescopes: Is a 100-m feasible?|editor-first1= Larry M.|editor-last1= Stepp|date=1998 |language=en|chapter-url=http://www.eso.org/sci/facilities/eelt/owl/Files/publications/1998_Kona_The_Future_of_Filled_Aperture_Telescopes.pdf|access-date=25 Oct 2018 |series=Proceedings of the SPIE |volume= 3352|pages= 778–791|doi= 10.1117/12.319284|bibcode= 1998SPIE.3352..778G|s2cid= 12512243}}</ref>


While the original 100&nbsp;m design would not exceed the angular resolving power of [[astronomical interferometer|interferometric telescopes]], it would have exceptional light-gathering and imaging capacity.<ref>{{cite web |date=13 April 2006 |title=OWL – a future milestone for Astronomy? |url=https://www.eso.org/sci/facilities/eelt/owl/index_3.html |access-date=26 December 2021 |website=www.eso.org}}</ref> The OWL could be expected to regularly see astronomical objects with an [[apparent magnitude]] of 38, or 1,500 times fainter than the faintest object that has been detected by the [[Hubble Space Telescope]].
While the original 100&nbsp;m design would not exceed the angular resolving power of [[astronomical interferometer|interferometric telescopes]], it would have exceptional light-gathering and imaging capacity.<ref>{{cite web |date=13 April 2006 |title=OWL – a future milestone for Astronomy? |url=https://www.eso.org/sci/facilities/eelt/owl/index_3.html |access-date=26 December 2021 |website=www.eso.org}}</ref> The OWL could be expected to regularly see astronomical objects with an [[apparent magnitude]] of 38, or 1,500 times fainter than the faintest object that has been detected by the [[Hubble Space Telescope]].
Line 12: Line 12:
All proposed designs for the OWL are variations on a [[segmented mirror]], since there is no technology available to build and transport a monolithic 60- or 100-meter mirror. The operation of a segmented mirror is somewhat more complicated than that of a monolithic one, requiring careful alignment of the segments (a technique called [[cophasing]]). Experience gained in existing segmented mirrors (for example, the [[Keck telescope]]) suggests that the mirror proposed for the OWL is feasible. However, the projected cost (of around €1.5 billion<!-- The €1.5 billion ($1.65 billion) figure listed seems kind of questionable. The ESO website admits the figure given is a preliminary estimate based on engineering/analytical models, and is not final. Given that both the 30 Meter Telescope and the European Extremely Large Telescope are in the ballpark of $1-$2 billion, it seems unlikely a structure or telescope 3x bigger in diameter (9x bigger in area, and 27x bigger in volume) would be so close in cost.
All proposed designs for the OWL are variations on a [[segmented mirror]], since there is no technology available to build and transport a monolithic 60- or 100-meter mirror. The operation of a segmented mirror is somewhat more complicated than that of a monolithic one, requiring careful alignment of the segments (a technique called [[cophasing]]). Experience gained in existing segmented mirrors (for example, the [[Keck telescope]]) suggests that the mirror proposed for the OWL is feasible. However, the projected cost (of around €1.5 billion<!-- The €1.5 billion ($1.65 billion) figure listed seems kind of questionable. The ESO website admits the figure given is a preliminary estimate based on engineering/analytical models, and is not final. Given that both the 30 Meter Telescope and the European Extremely Large Telescope are in the ballpark of $1-$2 billion, it seems unlikely a structure or telescope 3x bigger in diameter (9x bigger in area, and 27x bigger in volume) would be so close in cost.


I could be wrong, however if we could find updated estimates, I think the estimated cost of the OWLT will be much higher than their preliminary estimate from years ago. (Is this how I'm supposed to use invisible comments? I hope so, please delete if not.) -->) was considered too high, so the ESO is now building the smaller [[Extremely Large Telescope]] around 39 m in diameter.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.eso.org/sci/facilities/eelt/owl/FAQs.html|title=OWL 100-m telescope|website=www.eso.org|access-date=2019-10-08}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=THE EXTREMELY LARGE TELESCOPE: The World's Biggest Eye In The Sky |url=https://elt.eso.org/ |website=elt.eso.org |date=2021 |access-date=26 December 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/5252228.stm | work=BBC News | title=Record mirror for Euro telescope | date=2006-08-07 | access-date=2010-03-27}}</ref> Also, there appears to be some inconsistency as to the actual construction costs of the OWL, with some estimating its cost an order of magnitude higher (ELT currently at €1.3 billion,<ref>{{Cite web|last=|title=Funding boost for ESO's Extremely Large Telescope|url=https://www.eso.org/public/announcements/ann20034/|access-date=2020-12-05|website=www.eso.org|language=en}}</ref> equivalent to around $1.3 billion, scaled using {{Math|''D''<sup>2.77</sup>}} proportionality assuming a 100 meter diameter yields $21 billion).<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www2.lowell.edu/users/gerard/publications/van_belle_meinel2_2004.pdf|title=The Scaling Relationship Between Telescope Cost and Aperture Size for Very Large Telescopes|last=van Belle|first=Gerard T.|website=Lowell Observatory}}</ref>
I could be wrong, however if we could find updated estimates, I think the estimated cost of the OWLT will be much higher than their preliminary estimate from years ago. (Is this how I'm supposed to use invisible comments? I hope so, please delete if not.) -->) was considered too high, so the ESO is now building the smaller [[Extremely Large Telescope]] 39,5 m in diameter.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.eso.org/sci/facilities/eelt/owl/FAQs.html|title=OWL 100-m telescope|website=www.eso.org|access-date=2019-10-08}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=THE EXTREMELY LARGE TELESCOPE: The World's Biggest Eye In The Sky |url=https://elt.eso.org/ |website=elt.eso.org |date=2021 |access-date=26 December 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=https://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/5252228.stm | work=BBC News | title=Record mirror for Euro telescope | date=2006-08-07 | access-date=2010-03-27}}</ref> Also, there appears to be some inconsistency as to the actual construction costs of the OWL, with some estimating its cost an order of magnitude higher (ELT currently at €1.3 billion,<ref>{{Cite web|last=|title=Funding boost for ESO's Extremely Large Telescope|url=https://www.eso.org/public/announcements/ann20034/|access-date=2020-12-05|website=www.eso.org|language=en}}</ref> equivalent to around $1.3 billion, scaled using {{Math|''D''<sup>2.77</sup>}} proportionality assuming a 100 meter diameter yields $21 billion).<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www2.lowell.edu/users/gerard/publications/van_belle_meinel2_2004.pdf|title=The Scaling Relationship Between Telescope Cost and Aperture Size for Very Large Telescopes|last=van Belle|first=Gerard T.|website=Lowell Observatory}}</ref>


It has been estimated that a telescope with a diameter of 80 meters would be able to [[spectroscopy|spectroscopical]]ly analyse Earth-size planets around the forty nearest sun-like stars.<ref>{{cite news |first=Roberto |last=Gilmozzi |title=Giant Telescopes of the Future |url=http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=giant-telescopes-of-the-f |work=[[Scientific American]] |date=May 2006 }}</ref> As such, this telescope could help in the exploration of [[exoplanet]]s and [[extraterrestrial life]] (because the spectrum from the planets could reveal the presence of [[biochemistry|molecules indicative of life]]).
It has been estimated that a telescope with a diameter of 80 meters would be able to [[spectroscopy|spectroscopical]]ly analyse Earth-size planets around the forty nearest sun-like stars.<ref>{{cite news |first=Roberto |last=Gilmozzi |title=Giant Telescopes of the Future |url=http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=giant-telescopes-of-the-f |work=[[Scientific American]] |date=May 2006 }}</ref> As such, this telescope could help in the exploration of [[exoplanet]]s and [[extraterrestrial life]] (because the spectrum from the planets could reveal [[biosignature|the presence of molecules indicative of life]]).


==See also==
==See also==
Line 30: Line 30:
== External links ==
== External links ==
*{{Commons category inline}}
*{{Commons category inline}}
*[http://www.eso.org/sci/facilities/eelt/owl/ The ESO 100-m optical telescope concept]
*[https://www.eso.org/sci/facilities/eelt/owl/ The ESO 100-m optical telescope concept]
*[http://www.eso.org/sci/facilities/eelt/owl/Phase_A_Review.html OWL BLUE BOOK] – Phase A design report
*[https://www.eso.org/sci/facilities/eelt/owl/Phase_A_Review.html OWL BLUE BOOK] – Phase A design report
*[http://www.eso.org/projects/e-elt/ ESO – ELT]
*[http://www.gemini.edu/science/maxat/future/future.html The Future of Filled Aperture Telescopes: Is a 100 m feasible?]


{{European Southern Observatory}}
{{European Southern Observatory}}

Latest revision as of 11:50, 15 September 2025

Template:Short description Template:Use dmy dates Script error: No such module "Infobox".Template:Template otherScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Template:Main other Template:Comparison optical telescope primary mirrors.svg The Overwhelmingly Large Telescope (OWL) was a conceptual design by the European Southern Observatory (ESO) organisation for an extremely large telescope, which was intended to have a single aperture of 100 metres in diameter. Because of the complexity and cost of building a telescope of this unprecedented size, ESO has decided to focus on the 39-metre diameter Extremely Large Telescope instead.

History

OWL was first proposed in 1998, and at that time was estimated to be technologically feasible by 2010–2015.[1]

While the original 100 m design would not exceed the angular resolving power of interferometric telescopes, it would have exceptional light-gathering and imaging capacity.[2] The OWL could be expected to regularly see astronomical objects with an apparent magnitude of 38, or 1,500 times fainter than the faintest object that has been detected by the Hubble Space Telescope.

All proposed designs for the OWL are variations on a segmented mirror, since there is no technology available to build and transport a monolithic 60- or 100-meter mirror. The operation of a segmented mirror is somewhat more complicated than that of a monolithic one, requiring careful alignment of the segments (a technique called cophasing). Experience gained in existing segmented mirrors (for example, the Keck telescope) suggests that the mirror proposed for the OWL is feasible. However, the projected cost (of around €1.5 billion) was considered too high, so the ESO is now building the smaller Extremely Large Telescope 39,5 m in diameter.[3][4][5] Also, there appears to be some inconsistency as to the actual construction costs of the OWL, with some estimating its cost an order of magnitude higher (ELT currently at €1.3 billion,[6] equivalent to around $1.3 billion, scaled using Template:Math proportionality assuming a 100 meter diameter yields $21 billion).[7]

It has been estimated that a telescope with a diameter of 80 meters would be able to spectroscopically analyse Earth-size planets around the forty nearest sun-like stars.[8] As such, this telescope could help in the exploration of exoplanets and extraterrestrial life (because the spectrum from the planets could reveal the presence of molecules indicative of life).

See also

References

Template:Reflist

External links

Template:European Southern Observatory Template:Portal bar

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".