OpenOffice.org: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Wbm1058
m redirect bypass from StarDivision to Star Division using popups
imported>Bot1058
Task 9 – Bypass piped link: Mac OS XMac OS X
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Discontinued office suite software}}
{{short description|Office suite software}}
{{redirect|OOo|other uses|OOO (disambiguation)}}
{{redirect|OOo|other uses|OOO (disambiguation)}}
{{about|the discontinued office suite|active descendants|#Forks and derivative software}}
{{about|the discontinued office suite|active descendants|#Forks and derivative software}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2014}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2025}}
{{infobox software
{{infobox software
| name = OpenOffice.org
| name = OpenOffice.org
Line 12: Line 12:
| author = [[Star Division]] (1985–1999)
| author = [[Star Division]] (1985–1999)
| developer = [[Sun Microsystems]] (1999–2009)<br />[[Oracle Corporation]] (2010–2011)
| developer = [[Sun Microsystems]] (1999–2009)<br />[[Oracle Corporation]] (2010–2011)
| released = {{Start date and age|df=yes|2002|5|1}}<ref name="release1.0">{{cite web|url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/05/01/openoffice_suite_goes/|title=OpenOffice suite goes 1.0|date=1 May 2002|first=John|last=Lettice|work=The Register|publisher=Situation Publishing|access-date=16 October 2013|archive-date=9 April 2004|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040409222335/https://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/05/01/openoffice_suite_goes/|url-status=live}}</ref>
| released = {{Start date and age|df=yes|2002|5|1}}<ref name="release1.0">{{Cite web |last=Lettice |first=John |date=1 May 2002 |title=OpenOffice suite goes 1.0 |url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/05/01/openoffice_suite_goes/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040409222335/https://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/05/01/openoffice_suite_goes/ |archive-date=9 April 2004 |access-date=16 October 2013 |website=The Register |publisher=Situation Publishing}}</ref>
| programming language = [[C++]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Hacking&oldid=192524|title=Hacking|date=27 January 2011|access-date=20 August 2013|work=OpenOffice.org Wiki|publisher=Oracle Corporation|archive-date=9 November 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171109191507/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Hacking&oldid=192524|url-status=live}}</ref> and [[Java (programming language)|Java]]
| programming language = [[C++]]<ref>{{Cite web |date=27 January 2011 |title=Hacking |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Hacking&oldid=192524 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171109191507/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Hacking&oldid=192524 |archive-date=9 November 2017 |access-date=20 August 2013 |website=OpenOffice.org Wiki |publisher=Oracle Corporation}}</ref> and [[Java (programming language)|Java]]
| operating system = [[Linux]], [[OS X]], [[Microsoft Windows]], [[Solaris (operating system)|Solaris]]<ref name="ooo34b1"/><ref name="ooo34b1changes">{{cite web|url=http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/3.4beta.html|title=3.4 Beta – Developer Snapshot – Release Notes|publisher=Oracle Corporation|access-date=22 September 2013|archive-date=27 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130927045244/http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/3.4beta.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
| operating system = [[Linux]], [[Mac OS X]], [[Microsoft Windows]], [[Solaris (operating system)|Solaris]]<ref name="ooo34b1" /><ref name="ooo34b1changes">{{Cite web |title=3.4 Beta – Developer Snapshot – Release Notes |url=http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/3.4beta.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130927045244/http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/3.4beta.html |archive-date=27 September 2013 |access-date=22 September 2013 |publisher=Oracle Corporation}}</ref>
| platform = [[IA-32]], [[x86-64]], [[PowerPC]], [[SPARC]]<ref name="ooo34b1"/>
| platform = [[IA-32]], [[x86-64]], [[PowerPC]], [[SPARC]]<ref name="ooo34b1" />
| language count = 121
| language count = 121
| language footnote = <ref name=langcount>{{cite web | url= http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Languages&oldid=195965 | title= Language localization status | work= OpenOffice Language Localization Project | publisher= Oracle Corporation | date= 12 April 2011 | access-date= 20 June 2013 | archive-date= 22 November 2018 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20181122133557/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Languages&oldid=195965 | url-status= live }}</ref><!-- 121 is count of languages listed on that page -->
| language footnote = <ref name="langcount">{{Cite web |date=12 April 2011 |title=Language localization status |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Languages&oldid=195965 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181122133557/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Languages&oldid=195965 |archive-date=22 November 2018 |access-date=20 June 2013 |website=OpenOffice Language Localization Project |publisher=Oracle Corporation}}</ref><!-- 121 is count of languages listed on that page -->
| ver layout = simple
| ver layout = simple
| discontinued =  
| discontinued =  
Line 23: Line 23:
| latest release date = {{wikidata|qualifier|preferred|references|Q511977|P348|P548=Q2804309|P577}}
| latest release date = {{wikidata|qualifier|preferred|references|Q511977|P348|P548=Q2804309|P577}}
| genre = [[Office productivity suite]]
| genre = [[Office productivity suite]]
| license = [[dual-licensing|Dual-licensed]] under the [[Sun Industry Standards Source License|SISSL]] and [[GNU Lesser General Public License|GNU LGPL]] (OpenOffice.org 2 Beta 2 and earlier)<ref name="ooolicensechange">{{cite web |url=http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/license-change.html |title=License Simplification FAQ |publisher=Sun Microsystems |access-date=27 February 2010 |archive-date=29 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180929013430/http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/license-change.html |url-status=live }}</ref><br />[[GNU Lesser General Public License|GNU LGPL version 3]] (OpenOffice.org 2 and later)<ref name="License">{{cite web |url=http://www.openoffice.org/license.html |title=Licenses |publisher=Apache Software Foundation |access-date=21 January 2012 |archive-date=25 February 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120225144320/http://www.openoffice.org/license.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
| license = [[dual-licensing|Dual-licensed]] under the [[Sun Industry Standards Source License|SISSL]] and [[GNU Lesser General Public License|GNU LGPL]] (OpenOffice.org 2 Beta 2 and earlier)<ref name="ooolicensechange">{{Cite web |title=License Simplification FAQ |url=http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/license-change.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180929013430/http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/license-change.html |archive-date=29 September 2018 |access-date=27 February 2010 |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref><br />[[GNU Lesser General Public License|GNU LGPL version 3]] (OpenOffice.org 2 and later)<ref name="License">{{Cite web |title=Licenses |url=http://www.openoffice.org/license.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120225144320/http://www.openoffice.org/license.html |archive-date=25 February 2012 |access-date=21 January 2012 |publisher=Apache Software Foundation}}</ref>
| website = {{URL|https://www.openoffice.org/|openoffice.org}}
| website = {{URL|https://www.openoffice.org/|openoffice.org}}
| standard = [[OpenDocument]]
| standard = [[OpenDocument]]
Line 30: Line 30:
}}
}}


'''OpenOffice.org''' is a discontinued [[open-source]] office [[productivity software]] suite.  It originated from the proprietary [[StarOffice]], developed by [[Star Division]], which was acquired by [[Sun Microsystems]] in 1999. Sun open-sourced the software in July 2000 as a free alternative to [[Microsoft Office]],<ref name="ooo-announcement">{{cite web |date=19 July 2000 |title=SUN MICROSYSTEMS OPEN SOURCES STAROFFICE TECHNOLOGY |url=http://www.openoffice.org/press/sun_release.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111114053747/http://www.openoffice.org/press/sun_release.html |archive-date=14 November 2011 |access-date=19 January 2012 |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref><ref name="ooo1announce" /> and released OpenOffice.org version 1.0 on 1 May 2002.<ref name="release1.0" />
'''OpenOffice.org''' is an [[open-source]] office [[productivity software]] suite.  It originated from the proprietary [[StarOffice]], developed by [[Star Division]], which was acquired by [[Sun Microsystems]] in 1999. Sun open-sourced the software in July 2000 as a free alternative to [[Microsoft Office]],<ref name="ooo-announcement">{{Cite web |date=19 July 2000 |title=SUN MICROSYSTEMS OPEN SOURCES STAROFFICE TECHNOLOGY |url=http://www.openoffice.org/press/sun_release.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111114053747/http://www.openoffice.org/press/sun_release.html |archive-date=14 November 2011 |access-date=19 January 2012 |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref><ref name="ooo1announce" /> and released OpenOffice.org version 1.0 on 1 May 2002.<ref name="release1.0" />


Following Sun’s acquisition by [[Oracle Corporation]], development of OpenOffice.org slowed and eventually ended.<ref name="oooclosurepr"/> In 2011, Oracle donated the project to the [[Apache Software Foundation]],<ref>{{citation|url=http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/statements-on-openofficeorg-contribution-to-apache-nasdaq-orcl-1521400.htm|title=Statements on OpenOffice.org Contribution to Apache|date=1 June 2011|access-date=6 October 2014|archive-date=29 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130929120004/http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/statements-on-openofficeorg-contribution-to-apache-nasdaq-orcl-1521400.htm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{citation|url=http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/oracle-gives-openoffice-to-apache/9035|title=Oracle gives OpenOffice to Apache|author=Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols|date=1 June 2011|publisher=ZDnet|access-date=7 October 2014|archive-date=3 June 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110603145326/http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/oracle-gives-openoffice-to-apache/9035|url-status=dead}}</ref> which continues it as [[Apache OpenOffice]],<ref name=":0">{{citation|url=http://www.openoffice.org/legacy/thankyou.html|title=Thank you for using OpenOffice.org – now Apache OpenOffice|access-date=6 October 2014|archive-date=10 October 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141010091034/http://www.openoffice.org/legacy/thankyou.html|url-status=live}}</ref> although that project has been largely dormant since 2015. A more actively developed [[Fork (software development)|fork]], [[LibreOffice]], was created in 2010 by members of the OpenOffice.org community.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Byfield |first=Bruce |date=25 October 2014 |title=LibreOffice and OpenOffice: comparing the community health |url=http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/Blogs/Off-the-Beat-Bruce-Byfield-s-Blog/LibreOffice-and-OpenOffice-comparing-the-community-health |access-date=2016-08-05 |website=Linux Magazine |archive-date=19 November 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171119164614/http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/Blogs/Off-the-Beat-Bruce-Byfield-s-Blog/LibreOffice-and-OpenOffice-comparing-the-community-health |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Newman |first=Jared |date=23 April 2015 |title=OpenOffice development is looking grim as developers flock to LibreOffice |url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2913764/openoffice-development-is-looking-grim-as-developers-flock-to-libreoffice.html |access-date=2016-08-05 |website=PC World |archive-date=20 August 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160820234123/http://www.pcworld.com/article/2913764/openoffice-development-is-looking-grim-as-developers-flock-to-libreoffice.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Byfield |first=Bruce |date=27 October 2014 |title=LibreOffice vs. OpenOffice: Why LibreOffice Wins – Datamation |url=http://www.datamation.com/open-source/libreoffice-vs.-openoffice-why-libreoffice-wins-1.html |access-date=2016-08-05 |website=Datamation |archive-date=17 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170917030849/http://www.datamation.com/open-source/libreoffice-vs.-openoffice-why-libreoffice-wins-1.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
Following Sun’s acquisition by [[Oracle Corporation]], development of OpenOffice.org slowed and eventually ended.<ref name="oooclosurepr" /> In 2011, Oracle donated the project to the [[Apache Software Foundation]],<ref>{{Citation |title=Statements on OpenOffice.org Contribution to Apache |date=1 June 2011 |url=http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/statements-on-openofficeorg-contribution-to-apache-nasdaq-orcl-1521400.htm |access-date=6 October 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130929120004/http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/statements-on-openofficeorg-contribution-to-apache-nasdaq-orcl-1521400.htm |archive-date=29 September 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |last=Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols |title=Oracle gives OpenOffice to Apache |date=1 June 2011 |url=http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/oracle-gives-openoffice-to-apache/9035 |access-date=7 October 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110603145326/http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/oracle-gives-openoffice-to-apache/9035 |archive-date=3 June 2011 |url-status=dead |publisher=ZDnet}}</ref> which continues it as [[Apache OpenOffice]],<ref name=":0">{{Citation |title=Thank you for using OpenOffice.org – now Apache OpenOffice |url=http://www.openoffice.org/legacy/thankyou.html |access-date=6 October 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141010091034/http://www.openoffice.org/legacy/thankyou.html |archive-date=10 October 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref> although that project has been largely dormant since 2015. A more actively developed [[Fork (software development)|fork]], [[LibreOffice]], was created in 2010 by members of the OpenOffice.org community.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Byfield |first=Bruce |date=25 October 2014 |title=LibreOffice and OpenOffice: comparing the community health |url=http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/Blogs/Off-the-Beat-Bruce-Byfield-s-Blog/LibreOffice-and-OpenOffice-comparing-the-community-health |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171119164614/http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/Blogs/Off-the-Beat-Bruce-Byfield-s-Blog/LibreOffice-and-OpenOffice-comparing-the-community-health |archive-date=19 November 2017 |access-date=5 August 2016 |website=Linux Magazine}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Newman |first=Jared |date=23 April 2015 |title=OpenOffice development is looking grim as developers flock to LibreOffice |url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2913764/openoffice-development-is-looking-grim-as-developers-flock-to-libreoffice.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160820234123/http://www.pcworld.com/article/2913764/openoffice-development-is-looking-grim-as-developers-flock-to-libreoffice.html |archive-date=20 August 2016 |access-date=5 August 2016 |website=PC World}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Byfield |first=Bruce |date=27 October 2014 |title=LibreOffice vs. OpenOffice: Why LibreOffice Wins – Datamation |url=http://www.datamation.com/open-source/libreoffice-vs.-openoffice-why-libreoffice-wins-1.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170917030849/http://www.datamation.com/open-source/libreoffice-vs.-openoffice-why-libreoffice-wins-1.html |archive-date=17 September 2017 |access-date=5 August 2016 |website=Datamation}}</ref>


OpenOffice included applications for [[Word processor|word processing]] (Writer), [[spreadsheet]]s (Calc), [[Presentation program|presentations]] (Impress), [[Vector graphics editor|vector graphics]] (Draw), [[Relational database management system|database management]] (Base), and [[Formula editor|formula editing]] (Math).<ref name="why1">{{cite web|title=Why OpenOffice.org|url=http://why.openoffice.org/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120104082941/http://www.openoffice.org/why/|archive-date=4 January 2012|publisher=Sun Microsystems, Apache Software Foundation|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref> Its default [[file format]] was the [[OpenDocument]] Format (ODF), which it [[OpenDocument standardization|originated]]. It could also read a wide variety of other file formats, with particular attention to those from Microsoft Office. OpenOffice.org was primarily developed for [[Linux]], [[Microsoft Windows]] and [[Solaris (operating system)|Solaris]], and later for [[OS X]], with [[porting|ports]] to other [[operating system]]s. It was distributed under the [[GNU Lesser General Public License]] version 3 (LGPL); early versions were also available under the [[Sun Industry Standards Source License]] (SISSL).
OpenOffice included applications for [[Word processor|word processing]] (Writer), [[spreadsheet]]s (Calc), [[Presentation program|presentations]] (Impress), [[Vector graphics editor|vector graphics]] (Draw), [[Relational database management system|database management]] (Base), and [[Formula editor|formula editing]] (Math).<ref name="why1">{{Cite web |title=Why OpenOffice.org |url=http://why.openoffice.org/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120104082941/http://www.openoffice.org/why/ |archive-date=4 January 2012 |publisher=Sun Microsystems, Apache Software Foundation }}</ref> Its default [[file format]] was the [[OpenDocument]] Format (ODF), which it [[OpenDocument standardization|originated]]. It could also read a wide variety of other file formats, with particular attention to those from Microsoft Office. OpenOffice.org was primarily developed for [[Linux]], [[Microsoft Windows]] and [[Solaris (operating system)|Solaris]], and later for [[Mac OS X]], with [[porting|ports]] to other [[operating system]]s. It was distributed under the [[GNU Lesser General Public License]] version 3 (LGPL); early versions were also available under the [[Sun Industry Standards Source License]] (SISSL).


== History ==
== History ==
{{see also|StarOffice#History|label 1=History of StarOffice}}
{{see also|StarOffice#History|label 1=History of StarOffice}}
OpenOffice.org originated from [[StarOffice]], a [[proprietary software|proprietary]] office productivity software suite developed by German company [[Star Division]] beginning in 1985. In August 1999, Star Division was acquired by [[Sun Microsystems]]<ref name="briefhistory">{{cite web |date=13 October 2010 |title=A Brief History Of OpenOffice.org |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=A_Brief_History_Of_OpenOffice.org&oldid=186681 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200328102035/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=A_Brief_History_Of_OpenOffice.org&oldid=186681 |archive-date=28 March 2020 |access-date=21 September 2013 |work=OpenOffice.org Wiki |publisher=Oracle Corporation}}</ref><ref name="zdnet34">{{Cite news |last=Rooney |first=Paula |title=Apache OpenOffice 3.4 makes official debut; LibreOffice makes its case |publisher=[[ZDnet]] |date=8 May 2012 |url=http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/apache-openoffice-34-makes-official-debut-libreoffice-makes-its-case/10915 |access-date=9 May 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120508233526/http://www.zdnet.com//blog/open-source/apache-openoffice-34-makes-official-debut-libreoffice-makes-its-case/10915 |archive-date=8 May 2012 |df=dmy-all }}</ref> for {{US$|59.5 million}} (equivalent to US${{Inflation|index=US|value=59.5|start_year=1999|r=1}}{{Nbsp}}million in {{Inflation/year|index=US}}), reportedly because the acquisition was less expensive than licensing [[Microsoft Office]] for Sun's 42,000 employees.<ref>{{cite web|title=Star-Division-Gründer Marco Börries verlässt Sun Microsystems|url=http://business.chip.de/news/Star-Division-Gruender-Marco-Boerries-verlaesst-Sun-Microsystems_41399961.html|work=Chip Online DE|date=18 January 2001|access-date=21 June 2013|language=de|trans-title=Star Division founder Marco Börries leaves Sun Microsystems|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130922204916/http://business.chip.de/news/Star-Division-Gruender-Marco-Boerries-verlaesst-Sun-Microsystems_41399961.html|archive-date=22 September 2013|df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.h-online.com/open/features/OpenOffice-at-the-crossroads-1023702.html?page=2|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131208042359/http://www.h-online.com/open/features/OpenOffice-at-the-crossroads-1023702.html?page=2|archive-date=8 December 2013|work=The H Open|publisher=Heinz Heise|title=OpenOffice at the crossroads: Every bug is a feature|page=2|first=Richard|last=Hillesley|date=21 June 2010|access-date=20 June 2013|quote=Simon Phipps, now an ex-Sun employee, later claimed that 'The number one reason why Sun bought Star Division in 1999 was because, at the time, Sun had something approaching forty-two thousand employees. Pretty much every one of them had to have both a Unix workstation and a Windows laptop. And it was cheaper to go buy a company that could make a Solaris and Linux desktop productivity suite than it was to buy forty-two thousand licenses from Microsoft.'|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref>
OpenOffice.org originated from [[StarOffice]], a [[proprietary software|proprietary]] office productivity software suite developed by German company [[Star Division]] beginning in 1985. In August 1999, Star Division was acquired by [[Sun Microsystems]]<ref name="briefhistory">{{Cite web |date=13 October 2010 |title=A Brief History Of OpenOffice.org |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=A_Brief_History_Of_OpenOffice.org&oldid=186681 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200328102035/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=A_Brief_History_Of_OpenOffice.org&oldid=186681 |archive-date=28 March 2020 |access-date=21 September 2013 |website=OpenOffice.org Wiki |publisher=Oracle Corporation}}</ref><ref name="zdnet34">{{Cite news |last=Rooney |first=Paula |date=8 May 2012 |title=Apache OpenOffice 3.4 makes official debut; LibreOffice makes its case |url=http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/apache-openoffice-34-makes-official-debut-libreoffice-makes-its-case/10915 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120508233526/http://www.zdnet.com//blog/open-source/apache-openoffice-34-makes-official-debut-libreoffice-makes-its-case/10915 |archive-date=8 May 2012 |access-date=9 May 2012 |publisher=[[ZDnet]] }}</ref> for {{US$|59.5 million}} (equivalent to US${{Inflation|index=US|value=59.5|start_year=1999|r=1}}{{Nbsp}}million in {{Inflation/year|index=US}}), reportedly because the acquisition was less expensive than licensing [[Microsoft Office]] for Sun's 42,000 employees.<ref>{{Cite web |date=18 January 2001 |title=Star-Division-Gründer Marco Börries verlässt Sun Microsystems |trans-title=Star Division founder Marco Börries leaves Sun Microsystems |url=http://business.chip.de/news/Star-Division-Gruender-Marco-Boerries-verlaesst-Sun-Microsystems_41399961.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130922204916/http://business.chip.de/news/Star-Division-Gruender-Marco-Boerries-verlaesst-Sun-Microsystems_41399961.html |archive-date=22 September 2013 |access-date=21 June 2013 |website=Chip Online DE |language=de }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Hillesley |first=Richard |date=21 June 2010 |title=OpenOffice at the crossroads: Every bug is a feature |url=http://www.h-online.com/open/features/OpenOffice-at-the-crossroads-1023702.html?page=2 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131208042359/http://www.h-online.com/open/features/OpenOffice-at-the-crossroads-1023702.html?page=2 |archive-date=8 December 2013 |access-date=20 June 2013 |website=The H Open |publisher=Heinz Heise |page=2 |quote=Simon Phipps, now an ex-Sun employee, later claimed that 'The number one reason why Sun bought Star Division in 1999 was because, at the time, Sun had something approaching forty-two thousand employees. Pretty much every one of them had to have both a Unix workstation and a Windows laptop. And it was cheaper to go buy a company that could make a Solaris and Linux desktop productivity suite than it was to buy forty-two thousand licenses from Microsoft.'}}</ref>


On 19 July 2000, at the [[O'Reilly Open Source Convention]], Sun announced that it would release the StarOffice source code to encourage the development of a free and open-source office suite.<ref name="ooo-announcement" /><ref name="ooo1announce" /><ref name="thonline2011">{{cite web |last=Hillesley |first=Richard |date=6 July 2011 |title=OpenOffice – splits and pirouettes |url=http://www.h-online.com/open/features/OpenOffice-splits-and-pirouettes-1270296.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131208000704/http://www.h-online.com/open/features/OpenOffice-splits-and-pirouettes-1270296.html |archive-date=8 December 2013 |access-date=9 May 2012 |work=The H Online |publisher=Heinz Heise |df=dmy-all}}</ref> The project, officially named OpenOffice.org,<ref name="Sun Systemnews">{{cite web |title=Sun Will Release StarOffice Source Code |url=http://sun.systemnews.com/articles/29/1/news/2477 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041031190014/http://sun.systemnews.com/articles/29/1/news/2477 |archive-date=31 October 2004 |access-date=14 January 2012 |work=Sun.systemnews.com |publisher=System News |volume=29 |issue=1}}</ref> with the ".org" added to avoid trademark conflicts, officially released its source code on 13 October 2000. The first public preview, Milestone Build 638c, followed in October 2001 and quickly surpassed one million downloads.<ref>{{cite web |last=Foley |first=Mary Jo |date=13 October 2000 |title=Sun puts StarOffice into open source |url=http://www4.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2640108,00.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20001211201100/http://www4.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2640108,00.html |archive-date=11 December 2000 |access-date=15 October 2013 |work=ZDNet News |publisher=ZDNet |df=dmy-all}}</ref> OpenOffice.org 1.0 was officially released on 1 May 2002.<ref name="release1.0" />
On 19 July 2000, at the [[O'Reilly Open Source Convention]], Sun announced that it would release the StarOffice source code to encourage the development of a free and open-source office suite.<ref name="ooo-announcement" /><ref name="ooo1announce" /><ref name="thonline2011">{{Cite web |last=Hillesley |first=Richard |date=6 July 2011 |title=OpenOffice – splits and pirouettes |url=http://www.h-online.com/open/features/OpenOffice-splits-and-pirouettes-1270296.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131208000704/http://www.h-online.com/open/features/OpenOffice-splits-and-pirouettes-1270296.html |archive-date=8 December 2013 |access-date=9 May 2012 |website=The H Online |publisher=Heinz Heise }}</ref> The project, officially named OpenOffice.org,<ref name="Sun Systemnews">{{Cite web |title=Sun Will Release StarOffice Source Code |url=http://sun.systemnews.com/articles/29/1/news/2477 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041031190014/http://sun.systemnews.com/articles/29/1/news/2477 |archive-date=31 October 2004 |access-date=14 January 2012 |website=Sun.systemnews.com |publisher=System News |volume=29 |issue=1}}</ref> with the ".org" added to avoid trademark conflicts, officially released its source code on 13 October 2000. The first public preview, Milestone Build 638c, followed in October 2001 and quickly surpassed one million downloads.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Foley |first=Mary Jo |date=13 October 2000 |title=Sun puts StarOffice into open source |url=http://www4.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2640108,00.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20001211201100/http://www4.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2640108,00.html |archive-date=11 December 2000 |access-date=15 October 2013 |website=ZDNet News |publisher=ZDNet }}</ref> OpenOffice.org 1.0 was officially released on 1 May 2002.<ref name="release1.0" />


OpenOffice.org became the default office suite on many [[Linux distribution|Linux distributions]] and quickly emerged as a significant competitor to Microsoft Office, reportedly achieving 14% penetration in the large enterprise market by 2004.<ref name="Register">{{cite web |last=Orlowski |first=Andrew |date=24 November 2003 |title=MS scorns Israeli OpenOffice defection |url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/11/24/ms_scorns_israeli_openoffice_defection/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121003224049/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/11/24/ms_scorns_israeli_openoffice_defection/ |archive-date=3 October 2012 |access-date=5 January 2013 |work=The Register |publisher=Situation Publishing}}</ref><ref name="Slashdot">{{cite web |date=25 March 2004 |title=Why You Should Choose MS Office Over OO.org |url=http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04%2F03%2F25%2F1950234 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230117075825/https://slashdot.org/story/04/03/25/1950234/why-you-should-choose-ms-office-over-ooorg |archive-date=17 January 2023 |access-date=5 January 2013 |publisher=Slashdot}}</ref><ref name="Techtarget">{{cite web |last=Loftus |first=Jack |date=4 October 2004 |title=Desktop apps ripe turf for open source |url=http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid39_gci1011227,00.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051214195107/http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid39_gci1011227,00.html |archive-date=14 December 2005 |access-date=5 January 2013 |publisher=Searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com}}</ref> Sun designed the suite’s [[OpenOffice.org XML]] file format, compressed in a [[ZIP (file format)|ZIP archive]], for easier data interchange and machine processing, intending it to replace proprietary binary formats.<ref>{{cite web |date=December 2000 |title=StarOffice XML File Format: Working Draft: Technical Reference Manual: Draft 9 |url=http://xml.coverpages.org/openoffice-xml_specification_draft200012.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131110170006/http://xml.coverpages.org/openoffice-xml_specification_draft200012.pdf |archive-date=10 November 2013 |access-date=17 October 2013 |publisher=Sun Microsystems |page=19 |quote=Our goal is twofold: to have a complete specification encompassing all StarOffice components, and to provide an open standard for office documents.}}</ref> In 2002, Sun submitted the format to the [[Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards]] leading to the creation of the [[OpenDocument]] file format standard in 2005,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/12572/OpenDocument-v1.0-os.pdf|title=Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) v1.0: OASIS Standard, 1 May 2005|publisher=Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards|date=1 May 2005|access-date=17 October 2013|archive-date=17 October 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131017190635/https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/12572/OpenDocument-v1.0-os.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> which was ratified as [[ISO/IEC 26300]] in 2006.<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=43485&scopelist=PROGRAMME|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20070208224733/http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=43485&scopelist=PROGRAMME|archive-date= 8 February 2007|title= Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) v1.0|date= 30 November 2006|access-date= 17 October 2013|publisher= International Organization for Standardization|url-status= dead|df= dmy-all}}</ref> OpenDocument became OpenOffice's default format beginning with version 2.0 and other organisations would [[OpenDocument adoption|adopt the OpenDocument]] format.
OpenOffice.org became the default office suite on many [[Linux distribution|Linux distributions]] and quickly emerged as a significant competitor to Microsoft Office, reportedly achieving 14% penetration in the large enterprise market by 2004.<ref name="Register">{{Cite web |last=Orlowski |first=Andrew |date=24 November 2003 |title=MS scorns Israeli OpenOffice defection |url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/11/24/ms_scorns_israeli_openoffice_defection/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121003224049/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/11/24/ms_scorns_israeli_openoffice_defection/ |archive-date=3 October 2012 |access-date=5 January 2013 |website=The Register |publisher=Situation Publishing}}</ref><ref name="Slashdot">{{Cite web |date=25 March 2004 |title=Why You Should Choose MS Office Over OO.org |url=http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04%2F03%2F25%2F1950234 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230117075825/https://slashdot.org/story/04/03/25/1950234/why-you-should-choose-ms-office-over-ooorg |archive-date=17 January 2023 |access-date=5 January 2013 |publisher=Slashdot}}</ref><ref name="Techtarget">{{Cite web |last=Loftus |first=Jack |date=4 October 2004 |title=Desktop apps ripe turf for open source |url=http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid39_gci1011227,00.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051214195107/http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid39_gci1011227,00.html |archive-date=14 December 2005 |access-date=5 January 2013 |publisher=Searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com}}</ref> Sun designed the suite’s [[OpenOffice.org XML]] file format, compressed in a [[ZIP (file format)|ZIP archive]], for easier data interchange and machine processing, intending it to replace proprietary binary formats.<ref>{{Cite web |date=December 2000 |title=StarOffice XML File Format: Working Draft: Technical Reference Manual: Draft 9 |url=http://xml.coverpages.org/openoffice-xml_specification_draft200012.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131110170006/http://xml.coverpages.org/openoffice-xml_specification_draft200012.pdf |archive-date=10 November 2013 |access-date=17 October 2013 |publisher=Sun Microsystems |page=19 |quote=Our goal is twofold: to have a complete specification encompassing all StarOffice components, and to provide an open standard for office documents.}}</ref> In 2002, Sun submitted the format to the [[Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards]] leading to the creation of the [[OpenDocument]] file format standard in 2005,<ref>{{Cite web |date=1 May 2005 |title=Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) v1.0: OASIS Standard, 1 May 2005 |url=https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/12572/OpenDocument-v1.0-os.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131017190635/https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/12572/OpenDocument-v1.0-os.pdf |archive-date=17 October 2013 |access-date=17 October 2013 |publisher=Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards}}</ref> which was ratified as [[ISO/IEC 26300]] in 2006.<ref>{{Cite web |date=30 November 2006 |title=Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) v1.0 |url=http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=43485&scopelist=PROGRAMME |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070208224733/http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=43485&scopelist=PROGRAMME |archive-date=8 February 2007 |access-date=17 October 2013 |publisher=International Organization for Standardization }}</ref> OpenDocument became OpenOffice's default format beginning with version 2.0 and other organizations would [[OpenDocument adoption|adopt the OpenDocument]] format.


Development of OpenOffice was led primarily by Sun, which continued to use the codebase for its proprietary StarOffice suite. Contributors were required to sign a Contributor Agreement granting joint ownership of their code to Sun<ref name="SCA">{{cite web |url=http://www.openoffice.org/licenses/sca.pdf |title=Licenses – SCA |publisher=Sun Microsystems |access-date=5 January 2013 |archive-date=1 December 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121201124940/http://www.openoffice.org/licenses/sca.pdf |url-status=live}}</ref> (and later Oracle),<ref name="OCA">{{cite web |url=http://www.openoffice.org/licenses/oca.pdf |title=Oracle Contributor Agreement |publisher=Oracle Corporation |access-date=13 September 2011 |archive-date=11 May 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110511233018/http://www.openoffice.org/licenses/oca.pdf |url-status=live}}</ref> a requirement that generated controversy for years.<ref name="Berlind">{{cite news |last=Berlind |first=David |date=26 April 2005 |title=Is Sun right to insist on copyright transfer? |url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/is-sun-right-to-insist-on-copyright-transfer/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130502230522/http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/is-sun-right-to-insist-on-copyright-transfer/1311 |archive-date=2 May 2013 |access-date=3 January 2013 |work=Between The Lines |publisher=ZDNet}}</ref><ref name="phipps-tippingpoint">{{cite web |last=Phipps |first=Simon |date=3 October 2007 |title=OpenOffice.org Tipping Point? |url=https://blogs.oracle.com/webmink/entry/sca_r_office |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130308081654/https://blogs.oracle.com/webmink/entry/sca_r_office |archive-date=8 March 2013 |access-date=3 January 2013 |work=SunMink |df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref name="lwn20110520">{{cite news|url=https://lwn.net/Articles/443989/|title=OpenOffice.org and contributor agreements|work=LWN.net|first=Simon|last=Phipps|author-link=Simon Phipps (programmer)|date=20 May 2011|access-date=16 June 2013|archive-date=30 April 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140430141822/http://lwn.net/Articles/443989/|url-status=live}}</ref> A separate [[Public Documentation License]] (PDL) was used for non-code contributions such as documentation.<ref name="PDL">{{cite web |url=http://www.openoffice.org/licenses/pdl.pdf |title=Public Documentation License |publisher=Sun Microsystems |access-date=13 September 2011 |archive-date=2 September 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110902232448/http://www.openoffice.org/licenses/pdl.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="FAQ">{{cite web|url=http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/faq-licensing.html#pdla|title=FAQs: Licensing|date=22 July 2009|publisher=Sun Microsystems|access-date=4 July 2013|archive-date=28 May 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130528031615/http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/faq-licensing.html#pdla|url-status=live}}</ref>
Development of OpenOffice.org was led by Sun, which continued to use the codebase as the upstream source for StarOffice, which it continued to sell commercially. Sun also licensed the codebase to third parties, including [[IBM]], which used it as the foundation for [[IBM Lotus Symphony]] (originally [[IBM Workplace]]). This dual role led to criticism that Sun prioritized commercial interests over community collaboration. For example, building OpenOffice.org on many Linux distributions proved difficult, prompting the creation of projects like [[ooo-build]] to improve compatibility and incorporate unaccepted community patches. Sun was also criticized for being slow to accept outside contributions and controversially required contributors to sign a Contributor Agreement granting joint ownership of submitted code, enabling the company to continue selling proprietary versions of the software.<ref name="Berlind">{{Cite news |last=Berlind |first=David |date=26 April 2005 |title=Is Sun right to insist on copyright transfer? |url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/is-sun-right-to-insist-on-copyright-transfer/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130502230522/http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/is-sun-right-to-insist-on-copyright-transfer/1311 |archive-date=2 May 2013 |access-date=3 January 2013 |work=Between The Lines |publisher=ZDNet}}</ref><ref name="phipps-tippingpoint">{{Cite web |last=Phipps |first=Simon |date=3 October 2007 |title=OpenOffice.org Tipping Point? |url=https://blogs.oracle.com/webmink/entry/sca_r_office |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130308081654/https://blogs.oracle.com/webmink/entry/sca_r_office |archive-date=8 March 2013 |access-date=3 January 2013 |website=SunMink}}</ref><ref name="lwn20110520">{{Cite news |last=Phipps |first=Simon |author-link=Simon Phipps (programmer) |date=20 May 2011 |title=OpenOffice.org and contributor agreements |url=https://lwn.net/Articles/443989/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140430141822/http://lwn.net/Articles/443989/ |archive-date=30 April 2014 |access-date=16 June 2013 |work=LWN.net}}</ref>


Following [[Acquisition of Sun Microsystems by Oracle Corporation|Sun’s acquisition]] by [[Oracle Corporation]] in January 2010, development continued under the a new brand, Oracle Open Office.<ref name="oracleopenoffice" /> However, Oracle significantly reduced the number of developers assigned to the project,<ref>{{cite web |last=Dölle |first=Mirko |date=4 November 2010 |title=Die Woche: Bad Company Oracle? |trans-title=The Week: Bad Company Oracle? |url=http://www.heise.de/open/artikel/Die-Woche-Bad-Company-Oracle-1130884.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131024094250/http://www.heise.de/open/artikel/Die-Woche-Bad-Company-Oracle-1130884.html |archive-date=24 October 2013 |access-date=19 October 2013 |work=Heise Open Source |publisher=Heinz Heise |language=de |quote=Nach der Übernahme von Sun hatte Oracle offenbar etliche Entwickler vom OpenOffice-Projekt abgezogen, was zu empfindlichen Verzögerungen bei der Weiterentwicklung geführt hat. [After the acquisition of Sun, Oracle apparently took several developers off the OpenOffice project, which led to severe delays in development.]}}</ref> and its commitment to the project was widely questioned.<ref>{{cite web |last=Noyes |first=Katherine |date=23 August 2010 |title=Don't Count on Oracle to Keep OpenOffice.org Alive |url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/203910/dont_count_on_oracle_to_keep_openoffice_org_alive.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141018100603/http://www.pcworld.com/article/203910/dont_count_on_oracle_to_keep_openoffice_org_alive.html |archive-date=18 October 2014 |access-date=12 October 2014 |work=PC World Linux Line |publisher=IDG}}</ref> In September 2010, the majority<ref name="reg20110314">{{cite news |last=Gilbertson |first=Scott |date=14 March 2011 |title=openSUSE 11.4 rocks despite missing GNOME: Fork, yeah: LibreOffice replaces OpenOffice |url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/14/opensuse_11_point_4_review/page2.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130607093427/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/14/opensuse_11_point_4_review/page2.html |archive-date=7 June 2013 |access-date=30 December 2012 |newspaper=The Register |publisher=Situation Publishing |quote=LibreOffice came about last year when the majority of OpenOffice developers, concerned about the future of the project under new owner Oracle, broke away.}}</ref><ref name="ARS02Nov10">{{Cite news |last=Paul |first=Ryan |date=2 November 2010 |title=Fork off: mass exodus from OOo as contributors join LibreOffice |url=https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2010/11/fork-off-mass-exodus-from-ooo-as-contributors-join-libreoffice/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121202232505/http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2010/11/fork-off-mass-exodus-from-ooo-as-contributors-join-libreoffice/ |archive-date=2 December 2012 |access-date=26 December 2012 |work=[[Ars Technica]]}}</ref> of community OpenOffice contributors left the project,<ref>{{cite web |date=31 October 2010 |title=&#91;native-lang&#93; Every end is a new beginning |url=http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@native-lang.openoffice.org/msg04865.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130114195437/http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@native-lang.openoffice.org/msg04865.html |archive-date=14 January 2013 |access-date=5 January 2013 |publisher=Mail-archive.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=28 September 2010 |title=OpenOffice wird zu LibreOffice: Die OpenOffice-Community löst sich von Oracle |trans-title=OpenOffice to LibreOffice: The OpenOffice community dissolves Oracle |url=http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/OpenOffice-wird-zu-LibreOffice-Die-OpenOffice-Community-loest-sich-von-Oracle-1097356.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130712194501/http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/OpenOffice-wird-zu-LibreOffice-Die-OpenOffice-Community-loest-sich-von-Oracle-1097356.html |archive-date=12 July 2013 |access-date=21 June 2013 |work=Heise Online |publisher=Heinz Heise |language=de}}</ref> and formed [[The Document Foundation]] (TDF), citing concerns over Oracle’s management of the project and its broader approach to open-source software.<ref>{{cite news |last=Wallen |first=Jack |date=7 September 2010 |title=Could Oracle fracture open source community? |url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/could-oracle-fracture-open-source-community/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140502012759/http://www.zdnet.com/could-oracle-fracture-open-source-community-2062202707/ |archive-date=2 May 2014 |access-date=8 October 2013 |work=ZDNet}}</ref><ref name="ARS28Sep10">{{cite news |last=Paul |first=Ryan |date=28 September 2010 |title=Document Foundation forks OpenOffice.org, liberates it from Oracle |url=https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2010/09/document-foundation-forks-openofficeorg-to-liberate-it-from-oracle/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120822102322/https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2010/09/document-foundation-forks-openofficeorg-to-liberate-it-from-oracle/ |archive-date=22 August 2012 |access-date=26 December 2012 |work=Ars Technica}}</ref> TDF launched a fork called [[LibreOffice]] in January 2011,<ref>{{cite web |author=Florian Effenberger |date=25 January 2011 |title=The Document Foundation launches LibreOffice 3.3 |url=http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2011/01/25/the-document-foundation-launches-libreoffice-3-3/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110303000124/http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2011/01/25/the-document-foundation-launches-libreoffice-3-3/ |archive-date=3 March 2011 |access-date=16 November 2011 |work=The Document Foundation Blog |publisher=The Document Foundation}}</ref> which was quickly adopted by most Linux distributions.<ref name="debian-lo">{{cite web|url=http://wiki.debian.org/LibreOffice?action=recall&rev=6|title=LibreOffice has replaced OpenOffice in Debian|work=Debian wiki|publisher=Debian|date=26 February 2012|access-date=20 June 2013|archive-date=21 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921151847/https://wiki.debian.org/LibreOffice?action=recall&rev=6|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="ubuntu-lo">{{cite news |last=Vaughan-Nichols |first=Steven J. |title=Ubuntu opts for LibreOffice over Oracle's OpenOffice |work=ZDNet |date=23 January 2012 |url=http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/ubuntu-opts-for-libreoffice-over-oracles-openoffice/8122 |access-date=19 January 2012 |archive-date=6 January 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120106191208/http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/ubuntu-opts-for-libreoffice-over-oracles-openoffice/8122 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name="suse-lo">{{cite news|last=Gilbertson|first=Scott|title=openSUSE 11.4 rocks despite missing GNOME|work=The Register|publisher=Situation Publishing|date=14 March 2011|url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/14/opensuse_11_point_4_review/|access-date=19 January 2012|archive-date=19 January 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120119234953/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/14/opensuse_11_point_4_review/|url-status=live}}</ref>
Following [[Acquisition of Sun Microsystems by Oracle Corporation|Sun’s acquisition]] by [[Oracle Corporation]] in January 2010, development continued under the a new brand, Oracle Open Office.<ref name="oracleopenoffice">{{Cite press release |title=Oracle Announces Oracle Cloud Office and Oracle Open Office 3.3: Industry's First Complete, Open Standards-Based Office Productivity Suites for Desktop, Web and Mobile Users |date=15 December 2010 |publisher=Oracle Corporation |url=http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/195766 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101217212955/http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/195766 |archive-date=17 December 2010}}</ref> However, Oracle significantly reduced the number of developers assigned to the project,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Dölle |first=Mirko |date=4 November 2010 |title=Die Woche: Bad Company Oracle? |trans-title=The Week: Bad Company Oracle? |url=http://www.heise.de/open/artikel/Die-Woche-Bad-Company-Oracle-1130884.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131024094250/http://www.heise.de/open/artikel/Die-Woche-Bad-Company-Oracle-1130884.html |archive-date=24 October 2013 |access-date=19 October 2013 |website=Heise Open Source |publisher=Heinz Heise |language=de |quote=Nach der Übernahme von Sun hatte Oracle offenbar etliche Entwickler vom OpenOffice-Projekt abgezogen, was zu empfindlichen Verzögerungen bei der Weiterentwicklung geführt hat. [After the acquisition of Sun, Oracle apparently took several developers off the OpenOffice project, which led to severe delays in development.]}}</ref> and its commitment to the project was widely questioned.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Noyes |first=Katherine |date=23 August 2010 |title=Don't Count on Oracle to Keep OpenOffice.org Alive |url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/203910/dont_count_on_oracle_to_keep_openoffice_org_alive.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141018100603/http://www.pcworld.com/article/203910/dont_count_on_oracle_to_keep_openoffice_org_alive.html |archive-date=18 October 2014 |access-date=12 October 2014 |website=PC World Linux Line |publisher=IDG}}</ref> In September 2010, the majority<ref name="reg20110314">{{Cite news |last=Gilbertson |first=Scott |date=14 March 2011 |title=openSUSE 11.4 rocks despite missing GNOME: Fork, yeah: LibreOffice replaces OpenOffice |url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/14/opensuse_11_point_4_review/page2.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130607093427/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/14/opensuse_11_point_4_review/page2.html |archive-date=7 June 2013 |access-date=30 December 2012 |work=The Register |publisher=Situation Publishing |quote=LibreOffice came about last year when the majority of OpenOffice developers, concerned about the future of the project under new owner Oracle, broke away.}}</ref><ref name="ARS02Nov10">{{Cite news |last=Paul |first=Ryan |date=2 November 2010 |title=Fork off: mass exodus from OOo as contributors join LibreOffice |url=https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2010/11/fork-off-mass-exodus-from-ooo-as-contributors-join-libreoffice/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121202232505/http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2010/11/fork-off-mass-exodus-from-ooo-as-contributors-join-libreoffice/ |archive-date=2 December 2012 |access-date=26 December 2012 |work=[[Ars Technica]]}}</ref> of community OpenOffice contributors left the project,<ref>{{Cite web |date=31 October 2010 |title=&#91;native-lang&#93; Every end is a new beginning |url=http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@native-lang.openoffice.org/msg04865.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130114195437/http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@native-lang.openoffice.org/msg04865.html |archive-date=14 January 2013 |access-date=5 January 2013 |publisher=Mail-archive.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=28 September 2010 |title=OpenOffice wird zu LibreOffice: Die OpenOffice-Community löst sich von Oracle |trans-title=OpenOffice to LibreOffice: The OpenOffice community dissolves Oracle |url=http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/OpenOffice-wird-zu-LibreOffice-Die-OpenOffice-Community-loest-sich-von-Oracle-1097356.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130712194501/http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/OpenOffice-wird-zu-LibreOffice-Die-OpenOffice-Community-loest-sich-von-Oracle-1097356.html |archive-date=12 July 2013 |access-date=21 June 2013 |website=Heise Online |publisher=Heinz Heise |language=de}}</ref> and formed [[The Document Foundation]] (TDF), citing concerns over Oracle’s management of the project and its broader approach to open-source software.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Wallen |first=Jack |date=7 September 2010 |title=Could Oracle fracture open source community? |url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/could-oracle-fracture-open-source-community/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140502012759/http://www.zdnet.com/could-oracle-fracture-open-source-community-2062202707/ |archive-date=2 May 2014 |access-date=8 October 2013 |work=ZDNet}}</ref><ref name="ARS28Sep10">{{Cite news |last=Paul |first=Ryan |date=28 September 2010 |title=Document Foundation forks OpenOffice.org, liberates it from Oracle |url=https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2010/09/document-foundation-forks-openofficeorg-to-liberate-it-from-oracle/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120822102322/https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2010/09/document-foundation-forks-openofficeorg-to-liberate-it-from-oracle/ |archive-date=22 August 2012 |access-date=26 December 2012 |work=Ars Technica}}</ref> TDF launched a fork called [[LibreOffice]] in January 2011,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Florian Effenberger |date=25 January 2011 |title=The Document Foundation launches LibreOffice 3.3 |url=http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2011/01/25/the-document-foundation-launches-libreoffice-3-3/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110303000124/http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2011/01/25/the-document-foundation-launches-libreoffice-3-3/ |archive-date=3 March 2011 |access-date=16 November 2011 |website=The Document Foundation Blog |publisher=The Document Foundation}}</ref> which was quickly adopted by most Linux distributions.<ref name="debian-lo">{{Cite web |date=26 February 2012 |title=LibreOffice has replaced OpenOffice in Debian |url=http://wiki.debian.org/LibreOffice?action=recall&rev=6 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921151847/https://wiki.debian.org/LibreOffice?action=recall&rev=6 |archive-date=21 September 2013 |access-date=20 June 2013 |website=Debian wiki |publisher=Debian}}</ref><ref name="ubuntu-lo">{{Cite news |last=Vaughan-Nichols |first=Steven J. |date=23 January 2012 |title=Ubuntu opts for LibreOffice over Oracle's OpenOffice |url=http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/ubuntu-opts-for-libreoffice-over-oracles-openoffice/8122 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120106191208/http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/ubuntu-opts-for-libreoffice-over-oracles-openoffice/8122 |archive-date=6 January 2012 |access-date=19 January 2012 |work=ZDNet}}</ref><ref name="suse-lo">{{Cite news |last=Gilbertson |first=Scott |date=14 March 2011 |title=openSUSE 11.4 rocks despite missing GNOME |url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/14/opensuse_11_point_4_review/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120119234953/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/14/opensuse_11_point_4_review/ |archive-date=19 January 2012 |access-date=19 January 2012 |work=The Register |publisher=Situation Publishing}}</ref>


In April 2011, Oracle ceased development of OpenOffice and laid off the remaining team.<ref name="oooclosurepr">{{cite web|url=https://www.oracle.com/lb/corporate/pressrelease/2-7334.html|title=Oracle Announces Its Intention to Move OpenOffice.org to a Community-based Project|author=Oracle Corporation|date=15 April 2011|work=press release|access-date=5 June 2013|archive-date=9 December 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191209110154/https://www.oracle.com/lb/corporate/pressrelease/2-7334.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="lwn20110520" /><ref name="nww20130904">{{cite web |last=Gold |first=Jon |date=9 April 2013 |title=Open-Xchange takes aim at no less than Microsoft Office, Google Docs |url=https://www.networkworld.com/news/2013/040913-open-xchange-268535.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130502063445/https://www.networkworld.com/news/2013/040913-open-xchange-268535.html |archive-date=2 May 2013 |access-date=23 June 2013 |work=Network World}}</ref> While Oracle did not publicly state its reasons, speculation ranged from the project's declining community support to commercial considerations.<ref name="lwn20110520" /><ref name="ARS18Apr11">{{Cite news |last=Paul |first=Ryan |date=18 April 2011 |title=Oracle gives up on OpenOffice after community forks the project |url=https://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2011/04/oracle-gives-up-on-ooo-after-community-forks-the-project.ars |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110421024120/http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2011/04/oracle-gives-up-on-ooo-after-community-forks-the-project.ars |archive-date=21 April 2011 |access-date=19 April 2011 |work=Ars Technica}}</ref> In June 2011, Oracle donated the OpenOffice.org trademarks and codebase to the [[Apache Software Foundation]].<ref name="MW01June">{{Cite news |author=Oracle Corporation |date=June 2011 |title=Statements on OpenOffice.org Contribution to Apache |url=http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/statements-on-openofficeorg-contribution-to-apache-nasdaq-orcl-1521400.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110606030535/http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/statements-on-openofficeorg-contribution-to-apache-nasdaq-orcl-1521400.htm |archive-date=6 June 2011 |access-date=15 June 2011 |publisher=MarketWire |df=dmy-all}}; [https://blogs.oracle.com/trond/entry/statements_on_openoffice_org_contribution Oracle blog version] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130308081752/https://blogs.oracle.com/trond/entry/statements_on_openoffice_org_contribution|date=8 March 2013}}</ref> The code was relicensed under the [[Apache License]] at the request of [[IBM]], which existing contractual interests in the code and preferred a permissive license.<ref name="thonline2011" /><ref>{{cite news |last=Vaughan-Nichols |first=Steven J. |date=31 May 2011 |title=What the heck is happening with OpenOffice? (UPDATE) |url=http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/what-the-heck-is-happening-with-openoffice-update/9025 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121002224747/http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/what-the-heck-is-happening-with-openoffice-update/9025 |archive-date=2 October 2012 |access-date=27 December 2012 |work=ZDNet Linux and Open Source |publisher=ZDNet}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www-304.ibm.com/connections/blogs/bcde08b8-816c-42a8-aa37-5f1ce02470a9/entry/symphony_is_alive_and_well_and_living_at_apache_explaining_ibm_s_document_strategy1?lang=en_us|title=Symphony is alive and well and living at Apache: Explaining IBM's document strategy|first=Douglas|last=Heintzman|publisher=IBM|work=IBM Software Blog|date=12 March 2012|access-date=16 June 2013|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130927083420/https://www-304.ibm.com/connections/blogs/bcde08b8-816c-42a8-aa37-5f1ce02470a9/entry/symphony_is_alive_and_well_and_living_at_apache_explaining_ibm_s_document_strategy1?lang=en_us|archive-date=27 September 2013|df=dmy-all}}</ref> This donation became the foundation for the ongoing [[Apache OpenOffice]] project.<ref name="ApacheOOo">{{cite web |url=http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openofficeorg.html |title=OpenOffice.org Incubation Status |access-date=18 June 2011 |publisher=Apache Software Foundation |date=June 2011 |archive-date=28 March 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180328062952/http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openofficeorg.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
In April 2011, Oracle ceased development of OpenOffice and laid off the remaining team.<ref name="oooclosurepr">{{Cite web |last=Oracle Corporation |date=15 April 2011 |title=Oracle Announces Its Intention to Move OpenOffice.org to a Community-based Project |url=https://www.oracle.com/lb/corporate/pressrelease/2-7334.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191209110154/https://www.oracle.com/lb/corporate/pressrelease/2-7334.html |archive-date=9 December 2019 |access-date=5 June 2013 |website=press release}}</ref><ref name="lwn20110520" /><ref name="nww20130904">{{Cite web |last=Gold |first=Jon |date=9 April 2013 |title=Open-Xchange takes aim at no less than Microsoft Office, Google Docs |url=https://www.networkworld.com/news/2013/040913-open-xchange-268535.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130502063445/https://www.networkworld.com/news/2013/040913-open-xchange-268535.html |archive-date=2 May 2013 |access-date=23 June 2013 |website=Network World}}</ref> While Oracle did not publicly state its reasons, speculation ranged from the project's declining community support to commercial considerations.<ref name="lwn20110520" /><ref name="ARS18Apr11">{{Cite news |last=Paul |first=Ryan |date=18 April 2011 |title=Oracle gives up on OpenOffice after community forks the project |url=https://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2011/04/oracle-gives-up-on-ooo-after-community-forks-the-project.ars |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110421024120/http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2011/04/oracle-gives-up-on-ooo-after-community-forks-the-project.ars |archive-date=21 April 2011 |access-date=19 April 2011 |work=Ars Technica}}</ref> In June 2011, Oracle donated the OpenOffice.org trademarks and codebase to the [[Apache Software Foundation]].<ref name="MW01June">{{Cite news |last=Oracle Corporation |date=June 2011 |title=Statements on OpenOffice.org Contribution to Apache |url=http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/statements-on-openofficeorg-contribution-to-apache-nasdaq-orcl-1521400.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110606030535/http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/statements-on-openofficeorg-contribution-to-apache-nasdaq-orcl-1521400.htm |archive-date=6 June 2011 |access-date=15 June 2011 |publisher=MarketWire }}; [https://blogs.oracle.com/trond/entry/statements_on_openoffice_org_contribution Oracle blog version] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130308081752/https://blogs.oracle.com/trond/entry/statements_on_openoffice_org_contribution|date=8 March 2013}}</ref> The code was relicensed under the [[Apache License]] at the request of [[IBM]], which existing contractual interests in the code and preferred a permissive license.<ref name="thonline2011" /><ref>{{Cite news |last=Vaughan-Nichols |first=Steven J. |date=31 May 2011 |title=What the heck is happening with OpenOffice? (UPDATE) |url=http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/what-the-heck-is-happening-with-openoffice-update/9025 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121002224747/http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/what-the-heck-is-happening-with-openoffice-update/9025 |archive-date=2 October 2012 |access-date=27 December 2012 |work=ZDNet Linux and Open Source |publisher=ZDNet}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Heintzman |first=Douglas |date=12 March 2012 |title=Symphony is alive and well and living at Apache: Explaining IBM's document strategy |url=https://www-304.ibm.com/connections/blogs/bcde08b8-816c-42a8-aa37-5f1ce02470a9/entry/symphony_is_alive_and_well_and_living_at_apache_explaining_ibm_s_document_strategy1?lang=en_us |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130927083420/https://www-304.ibm.com/connections/blogs/bcde08b8-816c-42a8-aa37-5f1ce02470a9/entry/symphony_is_alive_and_well_and_living_at_apache_explaining_ibm_s_document_strategy1?lang=en_us |archive-date=27 September 2013 |access-date=16 June 2013 |website=IBM Software Blog |publisher=IBM }}</ref> This donation became the foundation for the ongoing [[Apache OpenOffice]] project.<ref name="ApacheOOo">{{Cite web |date=June 2011 |title=OpenOffice.org Incubation Status |url=http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openofficeorg.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180328062952/http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openofficeorg.html |archive-date=28 March 2018 |access-date=18 June 2011 |publisher=Apache Software Foundation}}</ref>


=== Governance ===
=== Governance ===
During Sun's sponsorship, the OpenOffice.org project was governed by the ''Community Council'', comprising OpenOffice.org community members. The Community Council suggested project goals and coordinated with producers of derivatives on long-term development planning issues.<ref name="charter">{{cite web|url=http://council.openoffice.org/councilcharter12.html|title=Community Council Charter: version 1.2|work=OpenOffice.org|publisher=Sun Microsystems|date=25 March 2009|access-date=9 February 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110424032526/http://council.openoffice.org/councilcharter12.html|archive-date=24 April 2011|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://council.openoffice.org/|title=OpenOffice.org Community Council|date=15 November 2010|publisher=Oracle Corporation|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111213124745/http://council.openoffice.org/|archive-date=13 December 2011|access-date=16 October 2013|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/guidelines.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100913013250/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/guidelines.html|archive-date=13 September 2010|title=Guidelines for Participating in OpenOffice.org|publisher=Oracle Corporation|access-date=16 October 2013|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref>
During Sun's sponsorship, the OpenOffice.org project was governed by the ''Community Council'', comprising OpenOffice.org community members. The Community Council suggested project goals and coordinated with producers of derivatives on long-term development planning issues.<ref name="charter">{{Cite web |date=25 March 2009 |title=Community Council Charter: version 1.2 |url=http://council.openoffice.org/councilcharter12.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110424032526/http://council.openoffice.org/councilcharter12.html |archive-date=24 April 2011 |access-date=9 February 2010 |website=OpenOffice.org |publisher=Sun Microsystems }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=15 November 2010 |title=OpenOffice.org Community Council |url=http://council.openoffice.org/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111213124745/http://council.openoffice.org/ |archive-date=13 December 2011 |access-date=16 October 2013 |publisher=Oracle Corporation }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Guidelines for Participating in OpenOffice.org |url=http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/guidelines.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100913013250/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/guidelines.html |archive-date=13 September 2010 |access-date=16 October 2013 |publisher=Oracle Corporation }}</ref>


Both Sun and Oracle are claimed to have made decisions without consulting the Council or in contravention to the council's recommendations,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.dailytech.com/Open+Source+Rebels+Defeat+Oracle+Free+OpenOffice/article21401.htm |title=Open Source Rebels Defeat Oracle, Free OpenOffice |first=Jason |last=Mick |work=DailyTech |quote=With the death of OpenOffice, LibreOffice lives on, inheriting its legacy. |date=18 April 2011 |access-date=1 January 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121231054935/http://www.dailytech.com/Open+Source+Rebels+Defeat+Oracle+Free+OpenOffice/article21401.htm |archive-date=31 December 2012 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name=webwereld20100930>{{cite web|url=http://webwereld.nl/development/45256-openoffice-coup-al-jaren-in-de-maak|title=OpenOffice-coup al jaren in de maak|language=nl|trans-title=OpenOffice coup years in the making|first=Sander|last=van der Meijs|work=WebWereld|date=30 September 2010|access-date=6 July 2013|archive-date=21 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921055240/http://webwereld.nl/development/45256-openoffice-coup-al-jaren-in-de-maak|url-status=live}}</ref> leading to the majority of outside developers leaving for LibreOffice.<ref name="ARS28Sep10"/> Oracle demanded in October 2010 that all Council members involved with the Document Foundation step down,<ref name=ars20101018>{{cite web |last=Paul |first=Ryan |title=Oracle wants LibreOffice members to leave OOo council |date=18 October 2010 |url=https://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/10/oracle-wants-libreoffice-members-to-leave-ooo-council.ars |work=Ars Technica |access-date=17 February 2011 |archive-date=25 June 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120625041345/http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2010/10/oracle-wants-libreoffice-members-to-leave-ooo-council/ |url-status=live }}</ref> leaving the Community Council composed only of Oracle employees.<ref name=zdnet20101019>{{cite news |last=Blankenhorn |first=Dana |url=http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/oracle-purging-openoffice-org-community-council/7575 |title=Oracle purging OpenOffice.org community council |work=ZDNet |date=19 October 2010 |access-date=5 January 2013 |archive-date=17 March 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130317180130/http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/oracle-purging-openoffice-org-community-council/7575 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
Both Sun and Oracle are claimed to have made decisions without consulting the Council or in contravention to the council's recommendations,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Mick |first=Jason |date=18 April 2011 |title=Open Source Rebels Defeat Oracle, Free OpenOffice |url=http://www.dailytech.com/Open+Source+Rebels+Defeat+Oracle+Free+OpenOffice/article21401.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121231054935/http://www.dailytech.com/Open+Source+Rebels+Defeat+Oracle+Free+OpenOffice/article21401.htm |archive-date=31 December 2012 |access-date=1 January 2013 |website=DailyTech |quote=With the death of OpenOffice, LibreOffice lives on, inheriting its legacy.}}</ref><ref name="webwereld20100930">{{Cite web |last=van der Meijs |first=Sander |date=30 September 2010 |title=OpenOffice-coup al jaren in de maak |trans-title=OpenOffice coup years in the making |url=http://webwereld.nl/development/45256-openoffice-coup-al-jaren-in-de-maak |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921055240/http://webwereld.nl/development/45256-openoffice-coup-al-jaren-in-de-maak |archive-date=21 September 2013 |access-date=6 July 2013 |website=WebWereld |language=nl}}</ref> leading to the majority of outside developers leaving for LibreOffice.<ref name="ARS28Sep10" /> Oracle demanded in October 2010 that all Council members involved with the Document Foundation step down,<ref name="ars20101018">{{Cite web |last=Paul |first=Ryan |date=18 October 2010 |title=Oracle wants LibreOffice members to leave OOo council |url=https://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/10/oracle-wants-libreoffice-members-to-leave-ooo-council.ars |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120625041345/http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2010/10/oracle-wants-libreoffice-members-to-leave-ooo-council/ |archive-date=25 June 2012 |access-date=17 February 2011 |website=Ars Technica}}</ref> leaving the Community Council composed only of Oracle employees.<ref name="zdnet20101019">{{Cite news |last=Blankenhorn |first=Dana |date=19 October 2010 |title=Oracle purging OpenOffice.org community council |url=http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/oracle-purging-openoffice-org-community-council/7575 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130317180130/http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/oracle-purging-openoffice-org-community-council/7575 |archive-date=17 March 2013 |access-date=5 January 2013 |work=ZDNet}}</ref>


=== Naming ===
=== Naming ===
The project and software were informally referred to as ''OpenOffice'' since the Sun release, but since this term is a [[trademark]] held by Open Office Automatisering in [[Benelux]] since 1999,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.zdnet.com/home-and-office/networking/orange-launches-open-office/|title=Orange launches 'Open Office'|first=David|last=Meyer|work=ZDNet Networking|publisher=ZDNet|date=4 September 2007|access-date=22 June 2013|archive-date=18 October 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121018133813/http://www.zdnet.com/orange-launches-open-office-3039289058/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://openoffice.nl/merkenregistratie|title=over het merk "Open Office"|language=nl|trans-title=about the brand "Open Office"|publisher=Openoffice.nl|access-date=27 June 2013|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130823152257/http://www.openoffice.nl/merkenregistratie|archive-date=23 August 2013|df=dmy-all}}</ref> ''OpenOffice.org'' was its formal name.<ref name="openoffice1">{{cite web
Although the project was commonly called ''OpenOffice'', the official name was ''OpenOffice.org'' because "OpenOffice" was already a registered [[trademark]] in the [[Benelux]] region, owned by the company Open Office Automatisering since 1999.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Meyer |first=David |date=4 September 2007 |title=Orange launches 'Open Office' |url=https://www.zdnet.com/home-and-office/networking/orange-launches-open-office/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121018133813/http://www.zdnet.com/orange-launches-open-office-3039289058/ |archive-date=18 October 2012 |access-date=22 June 2013 |website=ZDNet Networking |publisher=ZDNet}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=over het merk "Open Office" |trans-title=about the brand "Open Office" |url=http://openoffice.nl/merkenregistratie |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130823152257/http://www.openoffice.nl/merkenregistratie |archive-date=23 August 2013 |access-date=27 June 2013 |publisher=Openoffice.nl |language=nl }}</ref><ref name="openoffice1">{{Cite web |date=16 June 2010 |title=Why should we say "OpenOffice.org" instead of simply "OpenOffice" |url=http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/faq-other.html#4 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100616005802/http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/faq-other.html#4 |archive-date=16 June 2010 |access-date=27 June 2013 |website=OpenOffice.org Frequently Asked Questions  |quote=The trademark for "OpenOffice" belongs to someone else. Therefore we must use "OpenOffice.org" when referring to this open source project and its software.}}</ref> A similar trademark conflict in Brazil led to the suite being distributed there as ''BrOffice.org'' starting in 2004. The name was also adopted by a supporting nonprofit organization founded in 2006.<ref>{{Cite web |date=7 July 2006 |title=Sobre o BrOffice.org |url=http://www.broffice.org/sobre |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101120111119/http://broffice.org/sobre |archive-date=20 November 2010 |access-date=16 October 2013 |language=pt}}</ref> The BrOffice.org nonprofit transitioned to supporting LibreOffice in December 2010.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Effenberger |first=Florian |date=6 December 2010 |title=LibreOffice Development Extends To Brazil |url=http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2010/12/06/libreoffice-development-extends-to-brazil/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120317124020/http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2010/12/06/libreoffice-development-extends-to-brazil/ |archive-date=17 March 2012 |access-date=24 January 2011 |publisher=The Document Foundation}}</ref>
|url         = http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/faq-other.html#4
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100616005802/http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/faq-other.html#4
|archive-date = 16 June 2010
|title      = Why should we say "OpenOffice.org" instead of simply "OpenOffice"
|work        = OpenOffice.org Frequently Asked Questions
|date        = 16 June 2010
|access-date  = 27 June 2013
  |quote       = ''Why should we say "OpenOffice.org" instead of simply "OpenOffice"?'' The trademark for "OpenOffice" belongs to someone else. Therefore we must use "OpenOffice.org" when referring to this open source project and its software.
|url-status    = dead
|df          = dmy-all
}}</ref>
 
Due to a similar trademark issue (a [[Rio de Janeiro]] company that owned that trademark in Brazil), the [[Brazilian Portuguese]] version of the suite was distributed under the name BrOffice.org from 2004, with BrOffice.Org being the name of the associated local nonprofit from 2006.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.broffice.org/sobre|title=Sobre o BrOffice.org|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101120111119/http://broffice.org/sobre|archive-date=20 November 2010|date=7 July 2006|language=pt|access-date=16 October 2013|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref> (BrOffice.org moved to LibreOffice in December 2010.<ref>{{cite web|title=LibreOffice Development Extends To Brazil|url=http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2010/12/06/libreoffice-development-extends-to-brazil/|publisher=The Document Foundation|date=6 December 2010|first=Florian|last=Effenberger|access-date=24 January 2011|archive-date=17 March 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120317124020/http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2010/12/06/libreoffice-development-extends-to-brazil/|url-status=live}}</ref>)


== Features ==
== Features ==
OpenOffice.org 1.0 was launched under the following [[mission statement]]:<ref name=ooo1announce>{{cite web |title=OpenOffice.org community announces OpenOffice.org 1.0: free office productivity software |url=http://www.openoffice.org/about_us/ooo_release.html |date=30 April 2002 |access-date=16 March 2007 |publisher=Sun Microsystems |archive-date=21 April 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070421173321/http://www.openoffice.org/about_us/ooo_release.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
OpenOffice.org 1.0 was launched under the following [[mission statement]]:<ref name="ooo1announce">{{Cite web |date=30 April 2002 |title=OpenOffice.org community announces OpenOffice.org 1.0: free office productivity software |url=http://www.openoffice.org/about_us/ooo_release.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070421173321/http://www.openoffice.org/about_us/ooo_release.html |archive-date=21 April 2007 |access-date=16 March 2007 |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref>
{{blockquote|text=The mission of OpenOffice.org is to create, as a community, the leading international office suite that will run on all major platforms and provide access to all functionality and data through open-component based APIs and an XML-based file format.}}
{{blockquote|text=The mission of OpenOffice.org is to create, as a community, the leading international office suite that will run on all major platforms and provide access to all functionality and data through open-component based APIs and an XML-based file format.}}


Line 90: Line 77:
| [[File:OOoImpress3logo.png|alt=OOo 3 Impress icon|48px]]
| [[File:OOoImpress3logo.png|alt=OOo 3 Impress icon|48px]]
| '''Impress'''
| '''Impress'''
| A [[presentation program]] analogous to [[Microsoft PowerPoint]] or [[Apple Keynote]]. Impress could export presentations to [[Adobe Flash]] (SWF) files, allowing them to be played on any computer with a Flash player installed. Presentation templates were available on the OpenOffice.org website.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://documentation.openoffice.org/Samples_Templates/User/template/presentations/index.html |title=Presentation templates at OpenOffice.org |publisher=documentation.openoffice.org |access-date=22 April 2009 |archive-date=28 April 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090428003904/http://documentation.openoffice.org/Samples_Templates/User/template/presentations/index.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://documentation.openoffice.org/Samples_Templates/User/template_2_x/impress/index.html |title=Impress Templates&nbsp;— User/Template |publisher=documentation.openoffice.org |access-date=22 April 2009 |archive-date=10 May 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090510051859/http://documentation.openoffice.org/Samples_Templates/User/template_2_x/impress/index.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
| A [[presentation program]] analogous to [[Microsoft PowerPoint]] or [[Apple Keynote]]. Impress could export presentations to [[Adobe Flash]] (SWF) files, allowing them to be played on any computer with a Flash player installed. Presentation templates were available on the OpenOffice.org website.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Presentation templates at OpenOffice.org |url=http://documentation.openoffice.org/Samples_Templates/User/template/presentations/index.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090428003904/http://documentation.openoffice.org/Samples_Templates/User/template/presentations/index.html |archive-date=28 April 2009 |access-date=22 April 2009 |publisher=documentation.openoffice.org}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Impress Templates&nbsp;— User/Template |url=http://documentation.openoffice.org/Samples_Templates/User/template_2_x/impress/index.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090510051859/http://documentation.openoffice.org/Samples_Templates/User/template_2_x/impress/index.html |archive-date=10 May 2009 |access-date=22 April 2009 |publisher=documentation.openoffice.org}}</ref>
|-
|-
| [[File:OOoDraw3logo.png|alt=OOo 3 Draw icon|48px]]
| [[File:OOoDraw3logo.png|alt=OOo 3 Draw icon|48px]]
Line 105: Line 92:
|}
|}


The suite contained no [[personal information manager]], [[email client]] or [[calendar application]] analogous to [[Microsoft Outlook]], despite one having been present in StarOffice 5.2. Such functionality was frequently requested.<ref name=lightning3.0/> The OpenOffice.org Groupware project, intended to replace Outlook and [[Microsoft Exchange Server]], spun off in 2003 as OpenGroupware.org,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.cnet.com/Exchange-targeted-by-open-source-group/2100-1012_3-1024994.html|title=Exchange targeted by open-source group|first=Matt|last=Hines|work=CNET News|publisher=CNet|date=11 July 2003|access-date=17 June 2013|archive-date=1 October 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001122742/http://news.cnet.com/Exchange-targeted-by-open-source-group/2100-1012_3-1024994.html|url-status=live}}</ref> which is now [[SOGo]]. The project considered bundling [[Mozilla Thunderbird]] and [[Mozilla Lightning]] for OpenOffice.org 3.0.<ref name=lightning3.0>{{cite web|first=Louis|last=Suárez-Potts|url=http://www.openoffice.org/editorial/mozilla_lightning_and_OOo.html|title=Interview: Mozilla Lightning and OpenOffice.org|publisher=Openoffice.org|access-date=5 January 2013|archive-date=30 December 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121230022618/http://www.openoffice.org/editorial/mozilla_lightning_and_OOo.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
The suite contained no [[personal information manager]], [[email client]] or [[calendar application]] analogous to [[Microsoft Outlook]], despite one having been present in StarOffice 5.2. Such functionality was frequently requested.<ref name=lightning3.0/> The OpenOffice.org Groupware project, intended to replace Outlook and [[Microsoft Exchange Server]], spun off in 2003 as OpenGroupware.org,<ref>{{Cite news |last=Hines |first=Matt |date=11 July 2003 |title=Exchange targeted by open-source group |url=http://news.cnet.com/Exchange-targeted-by-open-source-group/2100-1012_3-1024994.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001122742/http://news.cnet.com/Exchange-targeted-by-open-source-group/2100-1012_3-1024994.html |archive-date=1 October 2013 |access-date=17 June 2013 |work=CNET News |publisher=CNet}}</ref> which is now [[SOGo]]. The project considered bundling [[Mozilla Thunderbird]] and [[Mozilla Lightning]] for OpenOffice.org 3.0.<ref name="lightning3.0">{{Cite web |last=Suárez-Potts |first=Louis |title=Interview: Mozilla Lightning and OpenOffice.org |url=http://www.openoffice.org/editorial/mozilla_lightning_and_OOo.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121230022618/http://www.openoffice.org/editorial/mozilla_lightning_and_OOo.html |archive-date=30 December 2012 |access-date=5 January 2013 |publisher=Openoffice.org}}</ref>


=== Supported operating systems ===
=== Supported operating systems ===
The last version, 3.4 Beta 1, was available for [[IA-32]] versions of [[Windows 2000]] Service Pack 2 or later, [[Linux]] (IA-32 and x64), [[Solaris (operating system)|Solaris]] and [[OS X]] 10.4 or later, and the [[SPARC]] version of Solaris.<ref name="ooo34b1">{{cite web|url=http://download.openoffice.org/all_beta.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110429112756/http://download.openoffice.org/all_beta.html|title=OpenOffice.org – Download Beta Release|publisher=Oracle Corporation|archive-date=29 April 2011|access-date=16 October 2013|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref name="sysreqs">{{cite web|url=http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs.html|title=System Requirements for OpenOffice.org|publisher=Oracle Corporation|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110514140306/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs.html|archive-date=14 May 2011|access-date=15 October 2013|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref>
The last version, 3.4 Beta 1, was available for [[IA-32]] versions of [[Windows 2000]] Service Pack 2 or later, [[Linux]] (IA-32 and x64), [[Solaris (operating system)|Solaris]] and [[MacOS|Mac OS X]] 10.4 or later, and the [[SPARC]] version of Solaris.<ref name="ooo34b1">{{Cite web |title=OpenOffice.org – Download Beta Release |url=http://download.openoffice.org/all_beta.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110429112756/http://download.openoffice.org/all_beta.html |archive-date=29 April 2011 |access-date=16 October 2013 |publisher=Oracle Corporation }}</ref><ref name="sysreqs">{{Cite web |title=System Requirements for OpenOffice.org |url=http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110514140306/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs.html |archive-date=14 May 2011 |access-date=15 October 2013 |publisher=Oracle Corporation }}</ref>


The latest versions of OpenOffice.org on other operating systems were:<ref>{{cite web|title=Porting: The OpenOffice.org Porting Project: home|url=http://porting.openoffice.org/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120109000427/http://www.openoffice.org/porting/|archive-date=9 January 2012|publisher=[[Apache Software Foundation]]|access-date=16 October 2013|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20210506072821/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_10.html System Requirements for OpenOffice.org 1.0.x]</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20210126195630/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_11.html System Requirements for OpenOffice.org 1.1.x]</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20210815094437/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_20.html System Requirements for OpenOffice.org 2]</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20210818080457/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_30.html System Requirements for OpenOffice.org 3.0 – 3.3]</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20121104055215/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_aoo34.html System Requirements for Apache OpenOffice 3.4]</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_aoo40.html |title=System Requirements for Apache OpenOffice 4.0 |access-date=29 October 2021 |archive-date=29 October 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211029220103/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_aoo40.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_aoo41.html |title=System Requirements for Apache OpenOffice 4.1.x |access-date=29 October 2021 |archive-date=16 December 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171216060244/https://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_aoo41.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
The latest versions of OpenOffice.org on other operating systems were:<ref>{{Cite web |title=Porting: The OpenOffice.org Porting Project: home |url=http://porting.openoffice.org/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120109000427/http://www.openoffice.org/porting/ |archive-date=9 January 2012 |access-date=16 October 2013 |publisher=[[Apache Software Foundation]] }}</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20210506072821/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_10.html System Requirements for OpenOffice.org 1.0.x]</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20210126195630/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_11.html System Requirements for OpenOffice.org 1.1.x]</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20210815094437/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_20.html System Requirements for OpenOffice.org 2]</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20210818080457/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_30.html System Requirements for OpenOffice.org 3.0 – 3.3]</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20121104055215/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_aoo34.html System Requirements for Apache OpenOffice 3.4]</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=System Requirements for Apache OpenOffice 4.0 |url=http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_aoo40.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211029220103/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_aoo40.html |archive-date=29 October 2021 |access-date=29 October 2021}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=System Requirements for Apache OpenOffice 4.1.x |url=http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_aoo41.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171216060244/https://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_aoo41.html |archive-date=16 December 2017 |access-date=29 October 2021}}</ref>
* [[IRIX]] ([[MIPS architecture|MIPS IV]]): v1.0.3<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.openoffice.org/porting/irix/ |title=IRIX OpenOffice.org Porting Site |publisher=Openoffice.org |date=17 May 2003 |access-date=5 January 2013 |archive-date=28 January 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130128065340/http://www.openoffice.org/porting/irix/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
* [[IRIX]] ([[MIPS architecture|MIPS IV]]): v1.0.3<ref>{{Cite web |date=17 May 2003 |title=IRIX OpenOffice.org Porting Site |url=http://www.openoffice.org/porting/irix/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130128065340/http://www.openoffice.org/porting/irix/ |archive-date=28 January 2013 |access-date=5 January 2013 |publisher=Openoffice.org}}</ref>
* [[Linux 2.2]]: v2.x
* [[Linux 2.2]]: v2.x
* [[Linux 2.4]]: v3.3.x
* [[Linux 2.4]]: v3.3.x
Line 119: Line 106:
* [[Windows 95]]: v1.1.5
* [[Windows 95]]: v1.1.5
* [[Windows NT 4.0 SP6]]: v1.1.x
* [[Windows NT 4.0 SP6]]: v1.1.x
* [[Windows 98]] and [[Windows ME]]: v2.4.3<ref name="sysreqs20">{{cite web|url=http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_20.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110529092059/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_20.html|archive-date=29 May 2011|title=System Requirements for OpenOffice.org 2|publisher=Oracle Corporation|access-date=15 October 2013|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref>
* [[Windows 98]] and [[Windows ME]]: v2.4.3<ref name="sysreqs20">{{Cite web |title=System Requirements for OpenOffice.org 2 |url=http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_20.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110529092059/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_20.html |archive-date=29 May 2011 |access-date=15 October 2013 |publisher=Oracle Corporation }}</ref>
* [[Windows 2000]] Service Pack 2 or later: v3.3.x
* [[Windows 2000]] Service Pack 2 or later: v3.3.x
* [[Solaris 7]]: 1.0.x
* [[Solaris 7]]: 1.0.x
Line 126: Line 113:


=== Fonts ===
=== Fonts ===
OpenOffice.org included [[OpenSymbol]], [[DejaVu fonts|DejaVu]],<ref name="modules-fonts">{{cite web|url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=External%2FModules&oldid=91799#Fonts|title=External/Modules|work=OpenOffice.org Wiki|publisher=Sun Microsystems|date=4 September 2008|access-date=20 June 2013|archive-date=4 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904074256/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=External%2FModules&oldid=91799#Fonts|url-status=live}}</ref> the [[Liberation fonts]] (from 2.4) and the [[Gentium]] fonts (from 3.2).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89682 |title=OpenOffice.org&nbsp;— Issue 89682 — Include the Gentium open fonts |publisher=OpenOffice.org |access-date=3 February 2010 |archive-date=17 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230117075829/https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=89682 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77705 |title=OpenOffice.org&nbsp;— Issue 77705 – Liberation font and OOo |publisher=OpenOffice.org |access-date=5 February 2010 |archive-date=11 May 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110511113949/http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77705 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104723 |title=OpenOffice.org&nbsp;— Issue 104723 – Update Liberation fonts to v1.05.1.20090721 |publisher=OpenOffice.org |access-date=5 February 2010 |archive-date=11 May 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110511113839/http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104723 |url-status=live }}</ref> Versions up to 2.3 included the [[Bitstream Vera]] fonts.<ref name="modules-fonts" /><ref name="ooo240" /> OpenOffice.org also used the default fonts of the running operating system.
OpenOffice.org included [[OpenSymbol]], [[DejaVu fonts|DejaVu]],<ref name="modules-fonts">{{Cite web |date=4 September 2008 |title=External/Modules |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=External%2FModules&oldid=91799#Fonts |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904074256/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=External%2FModules&oldid=91799#Fonts |archive-date=4 September 2015 |access-date=20 June 2013 |website=OpenOffice.org Wiki |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref> the [[Liberation fonts]] (from 2.4) and the [[Gentium]] fonts (from 3.2).<ref>{{Cite web |title=OpenOffice.org&nbsp;— Issue 89682 — Include the Gentium open fonts |url=http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89682 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230117075829/https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=89682 |archive-date=17 January 2023 |access-date=3 February 2010 |publisher=OpenOffice.org}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=OpenOffice.org&nbsp;— Issue 77705 – Liberation font and OOo |url=http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77705 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110511113949/http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77705 |archive-date=11 May 2011 |access-date=5 February 2010 |publisher=OpenOffice.org}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=OpenOffice.org&nbsp;— Issue 104723 – Update Liberation fonts to v1.05.1.20090721 |url=http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104723 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110511113839/http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104723 |archive-date=11 May 2011 |access-date=5 February 2010 |publisher=OpenOffice.org}}</ref> Versions up to 2.3 included the [[Bitstream Vera]] fonts.<ref name="modules-fonts" /><ref name="ooo240">{{Cite web |title=New Features in OpenOffice.org 2.4 |url=http://development.openoffice.org/releases/2.4.0.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121230132246/http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/2.4.0.html |archive-date=30 December 2012 |access-date=22 May 2011 |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref> OpenOffice.org also used the default fonts of the running operating system.


''Fontwork'' is a feature that allows users to create stylized text with special effects differing from ordinary text with the added features of gradient colour fills, shaping, letter height, and character spacing. It is similar to [[WordArt]] used by Microsoft Word.  When OpenOffice.org saved documents in Microsoft Office file format, all Fontwork was converted into WordArt.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Documentation%2FOOoAuthors_User_Manual%2FImpress_Guide%2FUsing_Fontwork&oldid=78557|date=23 May 2008|title=Using Fontwork|work=OpenOffice.org Wiki|publisher=Sun Microsystems|access-date=22 September 2013|archive-date=4 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904074256/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Documentation%2FOOoAuthors_User_Manual%2FImpress_Guide%2FUsing_Fontwork&oldid=78557|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/OOoAuthors_User_Manual/Getting_Started/Using_Fontwork|title=Using Fontwork|date=9 November 2007|access-date=22 September 2013|work=OpenOffice.org Wiki|publisher=Sun Microsystems|archive-date=16 March 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120316194556/http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/OOoAuthors_User_Manual/Getting_Started/Using_Fontwork|url-status=live}}</ref>
''Fontwork'' is a feature that allows users to create stylized text with special effects differing from ordinary text with the added features of gradient colour fills, shaping, letter height, and character spacing. It is similar to [[WordArt]] used by Microsoft Word.  When OpenOffice.org saved documents in Microsoft Office file format, all Fontwork was converted into WordArt.<ref>{{Cite web |date=23 May 2008 |title=Using Fontwork |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Documentation%2FOOoAuthors_User_Manual%2FImpress_Guide%2FUsing_Fontwork&oldid=78557 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904074256/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Documentation%2FOOoAuthors_User_Manual%2FImpress_Guide%2FUsing_Fontwork&oldid=78557 |archive-date=4 September 2015 |access-date=22 September 2013 |website=OpenOffice.org Wiki |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=9 November 2007 |title=Using Fontwork |url=http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/OOoAuthors_User_Manual/Getting_Started/Using_Fontwork |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120316194556/http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/OOoAuthors_User_Manual/Getting_Started/Using_Fontwork |archive-date=16 March 2012 |access-date=22 September 2013 |website=OpenOffice.org Wiki |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref>


=== Extensions ===
=== Extensions ===
From version 2.0.4, OpenOffice.org supported third-party extensions.<ref>{{cite mailing list |last=Bergmann |first=Stephan |title=.oxt, .uno.pkg, .zip |mailing-list=dev@extensions.openoffice.org |date=7 July 2006 |url=http://markmail.org/thread/mqs2zu2razceqnr3 |access-date=22 September 2013 |archive-date=26 September 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130926192901/http://markmail.org/thread/mqs2zu2razceqnr3 |url-status=live }}</ref> As of April 2011, the OpenOffice Extension Repository listed more than 650 extensions.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/project|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110424015927/http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/project|title=OpenOffice.org Extensions|publisher=Oracle Corporation|archive-date=24 April 2011|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref> Another list was maintained by the [[Free Software Foundation]].<ref>{{cite magazine|title=Open Office und FSF streiten um Extensions|language=de|trans-title=OpenOffice and FSF argue about extensions|magazine=[[Linux Magazine|Linux Magazin]]|url=http://www.linux-magazin.de/NEWS/Open-Office-und-FSF-streiten-um-Extensions|access-date=16 May 2012|date=10 May 2010|first=Ulrich|last=Bantle|archive-date=20 July 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120720234707/http://www.linux-magazin.de/NEWS/Open-Office-und-FSF-streiten-um-Extensions|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:OpenOfficeExtensions/List|title=Group:OpenOfficeExtensions/List|publisher=LibrePlanet|access-date=23 June 2013|archive-date=19 June 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130619105248/http://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:OpenOfficeExtensions/List|url-status=live}}</ref>
From version 2.0.4, OpenOffice.org supported third-party extensions.<ref>{{Cite mailing list |last=Bergmann |first=Stephan |title=.oxt, .uno.pkg, .zip |mailing-list=dev@extensions.openoffice.org |date=7 July 2006 |url=http://markmail.org/thread/mqs2zu2razceqnr3 |access-date=22 September 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130926192901/http://markmail.org/thread/mqs2zu2razceqnr3 |archive-date=26 September 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref> As of April 2011, the OpenOffice Extension Repository listed more than 650 extensions.<ref>{{Cite web |title=OpenOffice.org Extensions |url=http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/project |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110424015927/http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/project |archive-date=24 April 2011 |publisher=Oracle Corporation }}</ref> Another list was maintained by the [[Free Software Foundation]].<ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Bantle |first=Ulrich |date=10 May 2010 |title=Open Office und FSF streiten um Extensions |trans-title=OpenOffice and FSF argue about extensions |url=http://www.linux-magazin.de/NEWS/Open-Office-und-FSF-streiten-um-Extensions |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120720234707/http://www.linux-magazin.de/NEWS/Open-Office-und-FSF-streiten-um-Extensions |archive-date=20 July 2012 |access-date=16 May 2012 |magazine=[[Linux Magazine|Linux Magazin]] |language=de}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Group:OpenOfficeExtensions/List |url=http://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:OpenOfficeExtensions/List |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130619105248/http://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:OpenOfficeExtensions/List |archive-date=19 June 2013 |access-date=23 June 2013 |publisher=LibrePlanet}}</ref>


=== OpenOffice Basic ===
=== OpenOffice Basic ===
{{Main|OpenOffice Basic}}
{{Main|OpenOffice Basic}}


OpenOffice.org included OpenOffice Basic, a [[programming language]] similar to Microsoft [[Visual Basic for Applications]] (VBA). OpenOffice Basic was available in Writer, Calc and Base.<ref>{{cite web |last=Bain |first=Mark Alexander |work=NewsForge |title=An introduction to OpenOffice.org Basic |url=http://software.newsforge.com/software/05/09/20/1840248.shtml |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060323022629/http://software.newsforge.com/software/05/09/20/1840248.shtml |archive-date=23 March 2006 |access-date=3 March 2007 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all }}</ref> OpenOffice.org also had some Microsoft VBA macro support.
OpenOffice.org included OpenOffice Basic, a [[programming language]] similar to Microsoft [[Visual Basic for Applications]] (VBA). OpenOffice Basic was available in Writer, Calc and Base.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Bain |first=Mark Alexander |title=An introduction to OpenOffice.org Basic |url=http://software.newsforge.com/software/05/09/20/1840248.shtml |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060323022629/http://software.newsforge.com/software/05/09/20/1840248.shtml |archive-date=23 March 2006 |access-date=3 March 2007 |website=NewsForge }}</ref> OpenOffice.org also had some Microsoft VBA macro support.


=== Connectivity ===
=== Connectivity ===
OpenOffice.org could interact with databases (local or remote) using ODBC ([[Open Database Connectivity]]), JDBC ([[Java Database Connectivity]]) or SDBC (StarOffice Database Connectivity).<ref>{{Cite conference
OpenOffice.org could interact with databases (local or remote) using ODBC ([[Open Database Connectivity]]), JDBC ([[Java Database Connectivity]]) or SDBC (StarOffice Database Connectivity).<ref>{{Cite conference |last=Dimalen |first=Editha D. |last2=Dimalen |first2=Davis Muhajereen D. |year=2007 |title=An OpenOffice Spelling and Grammar Checker Add-in Using an Open Source External Engine as Resource Manager and Parser |url=http://www.dlsu.edu.ph/research/centers/adric/nlp/downloads/4NNLPRS/pdf/paper16.pdf |conference=4th National Natural Language Processing Research Symposium: Philippine Languages and Computation |page=70 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110501094549/http://www.dlsu.edu.ph/research/centers/adric/nlp/downloads/4NNLPRS/pdf/paper16.pdf |archive-date=1 May 2011 |access-date=16 October 2013 |quote=SDBC (StarOffice Database Connectivity) and ODBC (Open Database Connectivity) was used to bridge the postgreSQL engine with the OpenOffice document. |conference-url=http://www.dlsu.edu.ph/research/centers/adric/nlp/events.asp |place=Manila |url-status=dead }}</ref>
|first1        = Editha D.
|last1          = Dimalen
|first2       = Davis Muhajereen D.
|last2        = Dimalen
|title         = An OpenOffice Spelling and Grammar Checker Add-in Using an Open Source External Engine as Resource Manager and Parser
|url           = http://www.dlsu.edu.ph/research/centers/adric/nlp/downloads/4NNLPRS/pdf/paper16.pdf
|archive-url   = https://web.archive.org/web/20110501094549/http://www.dlsu.edu.ph/research/centers/adric/nlp/downloads/4NNLPRS/pdf/paper16.pdf
|archive-date   = 1 May 2011
|conference    = 4th National Natural Language Processing Research Symposium: Philippine Languages and Computation
|year          = 2007
|page          = 70
|place        = Manila
|conference-url = http://www.dlsu.edu.ph/research/centers/adric/nlp/events.asp
|access-date   = 16 October 2013
|quote         = SDBC (StarOffice Database Connectivity) and ODBC (Open Database Connectivity) was used to bridge the postgreSQL engine with the OpenOffice document.
|url-status       = dead
|df            = dmy-all
}}
</ref>


== File formats ==
== File formats ==
From Version 2.0 onward, OpenOffice.org used ISO/IEC 26300:2006<ref>{{cite web
From Version 2.0 onward, OpenOffice.org used ISO/IEC 26300:2006<ref>{{Cite web |date=8 May 2006 |title=ISO and IEC approve OpenDocument OASIS standard for data interoperability of office applications |url=http://www.iso.org/iso/home/news_index/news_archive/news.htm?refid=Ref1004 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131102041911/http://www.iso.org/iso/home/news_index/news_archive/news.htm?refid=Ref1004 |archive-date=2 November 2013 |access-date=23 April 2013 |website=ISO Press Releases |publisher=[[International Organization for Standardization|ISO]]}}</ref> [[OpenDocument]] as its native format. Versions 2.0–2.3.0 default to the ODF 1.0 file format; versions 2.3.1–2.4.3 default to ODF 1.1; versions 3.0 onward default to ODF 1.2.
|url=http://www.iso.org/iso/home/news_index/news_archive/news.htm?refid=Ref1004
|title=ISO and IEC approve OpenDocument OASIS standard for data interoperability of office applications
|date=8 May 2006
|access-date=23 April 2013
|work=ISO Press Releases
|publisher=[[International Organization for Standardization|ISO]]
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131102041911/http://www.iso.org/iso/home/news_index/news_archive/news.htm?refid=Ref1004
|archive-date=2 November 2013
|url-status=dead
}}</ref> [[OpenDocument]] as its native format. Versions 2.0–2.3.0 default to the ODF 1.0 file format; versions 2.3.1–2.4.3 default to ODF 1.1; versions 3.0 onward default to ODF 1.2.


OpenOffice.org 1 used [[OpenOffice.org XML]] as its native format. This was contributed to [[OASIS (organization)|OASIS]] and OpenDocument was developed from it.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.openoffice.org/xml/general.html |title=OpenOffice.org XML File Format |access-date=22 September 2013 |publisher=Sun Microsystems |archive-date=20 September 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130920212503/http://www.openoffice.org/xml/general.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
OpenOffice.org 1 used [[OpenOffice.org XML]] as its native format. This was contributed to [[OASIS (organization)|OASIS]] and OpenDocument was developed from it.<ref>{{Cite web |title=OpenOffice.org XML File Format |url=http://www.openoffice.org/xml/general.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130920212503/http://www.openoffice.org/xml/general.html |archive-date=20 September 2013 |access-date=22 September 2013 |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref>


OpenOffice.org also claimed support for the following formats:<ref name="fileformats">{{cite web|url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Documentation%2FOOo3_User_Guides%2FGetting_Started%2FFile_formats&oldid=175577|title=File formats OOo can open|date=17 July 2010|access-date=20 June 2013|work=OpenOffice.org Wiki|publisher=Oracle Corporation|archive-date=29 June 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130629134404/http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Documentation%2FOOo3_User_Guides%2FGetting_Started%2FFile_formats&oldid=175577|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="started2x">{{cite web|url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Documentation%2FOOoAuthors_User_Manual%2FGetting_Started%2FFile_formats&oldid=74444|title=Getting Started Guide for OpenOffice.org 2.x&nbsp;— File formats|date=23 April 2008|access-date=20 June 2013|work=OpenOffice.org Wiki|publisher=Sun Microsystems|archive-date=4 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904074256/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Documentation%2FOOoAuthors_User_Manual%2FGetting_Started%2FFile_formats&oldid=74444|url-status=live}}</ref>
OpenOffice.org also claimed support for the following formats:<ref name="fileformats">{{Cite web |date=17 July 2010 |title=File formats OOo can open |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Documentation%2FOOo3_User_Guides%2FGetting_Started%2FFile_formats&oldid=175577 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130629134404/http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Documentation%2FOOo3_User_Guides%2FGetting_Started%2FFile_formats&oldid=175577 |archive-date=29 June 2013 |access-date=20 June 2013 |website=OpenOffice.org Wiki |publisher=Oracle Corporation}}</ref><ref name="started2x">{{Cite web |date=23 April 2008 |title=Getting Started Guide for OpenOffice.org 2.x&nbsp;— File formats |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Documentation%2FOOoAuthors_User_Manual%2FGetting_Started%2FFile_formats&oldid=74444 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904074256/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Documentation%2FOOoAuthors_User_Manual%2FGetting_Started%2FFile_formats&oldid=74444 |archive-date=4 September 2015 |access-date=20 June 2013 |website=OpenOffice.org Wiki |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref>


{| class="sortable collapsible collapsed wikitable"
{| class="sortable collapsible collapsed wikitable"
Line 285: Line 243:
|{{yes}}
|{{yes}}
|{{yes}}
|{{yes}}
|"you are likely to experience loss of formatting and images"<ref name="started2x"/>
|"you are likely to experience loss of formatting and images"<ref name="started2x" />
|-
|-
|Plain text
|Plain text
Line 297: Line 255:
|{{yes}}
|{{yes}}
|{{yes}}
|{{yes}}
|Export from 1.1;<ref name="ooo11" /> [[PDF/A]]-1a (ISO 19005-1) export from 2.4;<ref name="ooo240" /><ref>{{cite web|url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=API%2FTutorials%2FPDF_export&oldid=169158|title=API/Tutorials/PDF export|date=24 May 2010|work=OpenOffice.org Wiki|publisher=Oracle Corporation|access-date=22 May 2011|archive-date=4 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904074256/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=API%2FTutorials%2FPDF_export&oldid=169158|url-status=live}}</ref> some readable in Impress
|Export from 1.1;<ref name="ooo11">{{Cite web |title=1.1 Features |url=http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/1.1/index.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121230012359/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/1.1/index.html |archive-date=30 December 2012 |access-date=26 July 2010 |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref> [[PDF/A]]-1a (ISO 19005-1) export from 2.4;<ref name="ooo240" /><ref>{{Cite web |date=24 May 2010 |title=API/Tutorials/PDF export |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=API%2FTutorials%2FPDF_export&oldid=169158 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904074256/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=API%2FTutorials%2FPDF_export&oldid=169158 |archive-date=4 September 2015 |access-date=22 May 2011 |website=OpenOffice.org Wiki |publisher=Oracle Corporation}}</ref> some readable in Impress
|-
|-
|Comma-separated values
|Comma-separated values
Line 561: Line 519:
|{{yes}}
|{{yes}}
|
|
|read since 3.0;<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/3.0/ |title=3.0 New Features |publisher=Openoffice.org |access-date=5 January 2013 |archive-date=25 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210125024230/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/3.0/ |url-status=live }}</ref> writing only in derivatives descended via [[go-oo]]
|read since 3.0;<ref>{{Cite web |title=3.0 New Features |url=http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/3.0/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210125024230/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/3.0/ |archive-date=25 January 2021 |access-date=5 January 2013 |publisher=Openoffice.org}}</ref> writing only in derivatives descended via [[go-oo]]
|}
|}


Line 570: Line 528:


=== Native desktop integration ===
=== Native desktop integration ===
OpenOffice.org 1.0 was criticized for not having the [[look and feel]] of applications developed natively for the platforms on which it runs. Starting with version 2.0, OpenOffice.org used native [[widget toolkit]], icons, and font-rendering libraries on [[GNOME]], [[KDE]] and Windows.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://projects.gnome.org/ooo/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090415144829/http://projects.gnome.org/ooo/|archive-date=15 April 2009|title=Gnome/OpenOffice.org(G/OO.o)|publisher=Gnome.org|access-date=22 April 2009|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://kde.openoffice.org/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100713115136/http://kde.openoffice.org/|archive-date=13 July 2010|title=OpenOffice.org KDE Integration Project|publisher=OpenOffice.org|access-date=16 October 2013|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://blogs.kde.org/node/3983 |title=Elite Kubuntu Developers Successful OpenOffice KDE 4 Integration |publisher=blogs.kde.org |access-date=23 September 2013 |archive-date=7 August 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110807073936/http://blogs.kde.org/node/3983 |url-status=live }}</ref>
OpenOffice.org 1.0 was criticized for not having the [[look and feel]] of applications developed natively for the platforms on which it runs. Starting with version 2.0, OpenOffice.org used native [[widget toolkit]], icons, and font-rendering libraries on [[GNOME]], [[KDE]] and Windows.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Gnome/OpenOffice.org(G/OO.o) |url=http://projects.gnome.org/ooo/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090415144829/http://projects.gnome.org/ooo/ |archive-date=15 April 2009 |access-date=22 April 2009 |publisher=Gnome.org }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=OpenOffice.org KDE Integration Project |url=http://kde.openoffice.org/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100713115136/http://kde.openoffice.org/ |archive-date=13 July 2010 |access-date=16 October 2013 |publisher=OpenOffice.org }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Elite Kubuntu Developers Successful OpenOffice KDE 4 Integration |url=http://blogs.kde.org/node/3983 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110807073936/http://blogs.kde.org/node/3983 |archive-date=7 August 2011 |access-date=23 September 2013 |publisher=blogs.kde.org}}</ref>


The issue had been particularly pronounced on Mac OS X. Early versions of OpenOffice.org required the installation of [[X11.app]] or [[XDarwin]] (though the [[NeoOffice]] port supplied a native interface). Versions since 3.0 ran natively using Apple's [[Aqua (GUI)|Aqua GUI]].<ref>{{cite web|title=OpenOffice.org Mac OS X Delivery Schedule|url=http://www.openoffice.org/porting/mac/timeline.html|publisher=Sun Microsystems|access-date=23 September 2013|archive-date=30 June 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130630173444/http://www.openoffice.org/porting/mac/timeline.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
The issue had been particularly pronounced on Mac OS X. Early versions of OpenOffice.org required the installation of [[X11.app]] or [[XDarwin]] (though the [[NeoOffice]] port supplied a native interface). Versions since 3.0 ran natively using Apple's [[Aqua (GUI)|Aqua GUI]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=OpenOffice.org Mac OS X Delivery Schedule |url=http://www.openoffice.org/porting/mac/timeline.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130630173444/http://www.openoffice.org/porting/mac/timeline.html |archive-date=30 June 2013 |access-date=23 September 2013 |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref>


=== Use of Java ===
=== Use of Java ===
Although originally written in C++, OpenOffice.org became increasingly reliant on the Java Runtime Environment, even including a bundled [[Java virtual machine|JVM]].<ref name=bundled-java>{{cite web|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120105133104/http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/java.html|archive-date=5 January 2012|url=http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/java.html|title=Java & OpenOffice.org|publisher=Apache Software Foundation|access-date=30 December 2012|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref> OpenOffice.org was criticized by the Free Software Foundation for its increasing dependency on Java, which was not [[free software]].<ref name="Byfield">{{cite news |last=Byfield |first=Bruce |author-link=Bruce Byfield |title=Free Software Foundation and OpenOffice.org team up to escape Java trap |publisher=[[Linux Foundation]] |work=[[linux.com]] |date=16 May 2005 |url=http://www.linux.com/feature/44959 |access-date=9 September 2007 |archive-date=27 January 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080127130021/http://www.linux.com/feature/44959 |url-status=live }}</ref>
Although originally written in C++, OpenOffice.org became increasingly reliant on the Java Runtime Environment, even including a bundled [[Java virtual machine|JVM]].<ref name="bundled-java">{{Cite web |title=Java & OpenOffice.org |url=http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/java.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120105133104/http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/java.html |archive-date=5 January 2012 |access-date=30 December 2012 |publisher=Apache Software Foundation }}</ref> OpenOffice.org was criticized by the Free Software Foundation for its increasing dependency on Java, which was not [[free software]].<ref name="Byfield">{{Cite news |last=Byfield |first=Bruce |author-link=Bruce Byfield |date=16 May 2005 |title=Free Software Foundation and OpenOffice.org team up to escape Java trap |url=http://www.linux.com/feature/44959 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080127130021/http://www.linux.com/feature/44959 |archive-date=27 January 2008 |access-date=9 September 2007 |work=[[linux.com]] |publisher=[[Linux Foundation]]}}</ref>


The issue came to the fore in May 2005, when [[Richard Stallman]] appeared to call for a fork of the application in a posting on the Free Software Foundation website.<ref name="Byfield"/> OpenOffice.org adopted a development guideline that future versions of OpenOffice.org would run on free implementations of Java and fixed the issues which previously prevented OpenOffice.org 2.0 from using free-software Java implementations.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mail-archive.com/jdk@tools.openoffice.org/msg00005.html|title=Reoccuring discussions arounds OOos Java usage ''(sic)''|first=Kay|last=Ramme|work=tools-jdk mailing list|publisher=OpenOffice.org|date=11 May 2005|access-date=22 September 2013|archive-date=28 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130928061527/http://www.mail-archive.com/jdk@tools.openoffice.org/msg00005.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
The issue came to the fore in May 2005, when [[Richard Stallman]] appeared to call for a fork of the application in a posting on the Free Software Foundation website.<ref name="Byfield" /> OpenOffice.org adopted a development guideline that future versions of OpenOffice.org would run on free implementations of Java and fixed the issues which previously prevented OpenOffice.org 2.0 from using free-software Java implementations.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ramme |first=Kay |date=11 May 2005 |title=Reoccuring discussions arounds OOos Java usage ''(sic)'' |url=http://www.mail-archive.com/jdk@tools.openoffice.org/msg00005.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130928061527/http://www.mail-archive.com/jdk@tools.openoffice.org/msg00005.html |archive-date=28 September 2013 |access-date=22 September 2013 |website=tools-jdk mailing list |publisher=OpenOffice.org}}</ref>


On 13 November 2006, Sun committed to releasing Java under the [[GNU General Public License]]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.sun.com/2006-1113/feature/story.jsp |title=Sun Opens Java |access-date=25 November 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061116045838/http://www.sun.com/2006-1113/feature/story.jsp |publisher=Sun Microsystems |archive-date=16 November 2006 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all }}</ref> and had released a free software Java, [[OpenJDK]], by May 2007.
On 13 November 2006, Sun committed to releasing Java under the [[GNU General Public License]]<ref>{{Cite web |title=Sun Opens Java |url=http://www.sun.com/2006-1113/feature/story.jsp |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061116045838/http://www.sun.com/2006-1113/feature/story.jsp |archive-date=16 November 2006 |access-date=25 November 2006 |publisher=Sun Microsystems }}</ref> and had released a free software Java, [[OpenJDK]], by May 2007.


=== Security ===
=== Security ===
In 2006, Lt. Col. Eric Filiol of the  Laboratoire de Virologie et de Cryptologie de l'ESAT demonstrated security weaknesses, in particular within macros.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060718-7288.html|title=OpenOffice.org less secure than Microsoft Office?|work=Ars Technica|first=Eric|last=Bangeman|date=18 July 2006|access-date=1 August 2006|archive-date=21 July 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060721120651/http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060718-7288.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://openoffice.2283327.n4.nabble.com/quot-Le-ministere-de-la-Defense-met-OpenOffice-a-l-index-quot-td2918635.html|title='Le ministère de la Défense met OpenOffice à l'index'|first=Louis|last=Suárez-Potts|date=21 July 2006|access-date=23 September 2013|archive-date=1 July 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140701190215/http://openoffice.2283327.n4.nabble.com/quot-Le-ministere-de-la-Defense-met-OpenOffice-a-l-index-quot-td2918635.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.zdnet.fr/actualites/le-ministere-de-la-defense-met-openoffice-a-l-index-39362096.htm|title=Le ministère de la Défense met OpenOffice à l'index|language=fr|first=Thomas|last=Rousseau|work=ZDnet.fr|date=11 July 2006|access-date=14 October 2015|archive-date=16 October 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151016114524/http://www.zdnet.fr/actualites/le-ministere-de-la-defense-met-openoffice-a-l-index-39362096.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2006, [[Kaspersky Lab]] demonstrated a [[proof of concept]] virus, "Stardust", for OpenOffice.org.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.cnet.com/2100-7349_3-6078475.html|first=Joris|last=Evans|title=Stardust virus lands on OpenOffice|publisher=CNet|date=31 May 2006|access-date=23 September 2013|archive-date=21 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921060944/http://news.cnet.com/2100-7349_3-6078475.html|url-status=live}}</ref> This showed OpenOffice.org viruses are possible, but there is no known virus "in the wild".
In 2006, Lt. Col. Eric Filiol of the  Laboratoire de Virologie et de Cryptologie de l'ESAT demonstrated security weaknesses, in particular within macros.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Bangeman |first=Eric |date=18 July 2006 |title=OpenOffice.org less secure than Microsoft Office? |url=https://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060718-7288.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060721120651/http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060718-7288.html |archive-date=21 July 2006 |access-date=1 August 2006 |website=Ars Technica}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Suárez-Potts |first=Louis |date=21 July 2006 |title='Le ministère de la Défense met OpenOffice à l'index' |url=http://openoffice.2283327.n4.nabble.com/quot-Le-ministere-de-la-Defense-met-OpenOffice-a-l-index-quot-td2918635.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140701190215/http://openoffice.2283327.n4.nabble.com/quot-Le-ministere-de-la-Defense-met-OpenOffice-a-l-index-quot-td2918635.html |archive-date=1 July 2014 |access-date=23 September 2013}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Rousseau |first=Thomas |date=11 July 2006 |title=Le ministère de la Défense met OpenOffice à l'index |url=http://www.zdnet.fr/actualites/le-ministere-de-la-defense-met-openoffice-a-l-index-39362096.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151016114524/http://www.zdnet.fr/actualites/le-ministere-de-la-defense-met-openoffice-a-l-index-39362096.htm |archive-date=16 October 2015 |access-date=14 October 2015 |website=ZDnet.fr |language=fr}}</ref> In 2006, [[Kaspersky Lab]] demonstrated a [[proof of concept]] virus, "Stardust", for OpenOffice.org.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Evans |first=Joris |date=31 May 2006 |title=Stardust virus lands on OpenOffice |url=http://news.cnet.com/2100-7349_3-6078475.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921060944/http://news.cnet.com/2100-7349_3-6078475.html |archive-date=21 September 2013 |access-date=23 September 2013 |publisher=CNet}}</ref> This showed OpenOffice.org viruses are possible, but there is no known virus "in the wild".
 
As of October 2011, [[Secunia]] reported no known unpatched security flaws for the software.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Vulnerability Report: OpenOffice.org 3.x |url=http://secunia.com/advisories/product/20130/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111218221239/http://secunia.com/advisories/product/20130/ |archive-date=18 December 2011 |access-date=20 October 2011 |publisher=[[Secunia]]}}</ref> A vulnerability in the inherited OpenOffice.org codebase was found and fixed in LibreOffice in October 2011<ref>{{Cite web |last=Edge |first=Jake |date=5 October 2011 |title=An odd vulnerability report for LibreOffice |url=https://lwn.net/Articles/461673/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130928135641/http://lwn.net/Articles/461673/ |archive-date=28 September 2013 |access-date=15 October 2013 |website=LWN.net}}</ref> and Apache OpenOffice in May 2012.<ref name="aoo340">{{Cite web |title=AOO 3.4.0 Release Notes |url=http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/3.4.0.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130924085701/http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/3.4.0.html |archive-date=24 September 2013 |access-date=30 September 2013 |website=Apache OpenOffice |publisher=Apache Software Foundation}}</ref>
 
== Version history ==
 
=== OpenOffice.org 1 ===
The source code for OpenOffice.org was released on 13 October 2000.<ref name="Sun Systemnews" /> The first public preview, known as milestone build 638c, was made available in October 2001.<ref name="briefhistory" /> The first stable release, OpenOffice.org 1.0, was launched on 1 May 2002, under both the LGPL and SISSL licenses<ref name="thonline2011" /> for Windows, Linux, and Solaris platforms.<ref name="release1.0" /><ref>{{Cite web |date=May 2002 |title=Release Notes for the OpenOffice.org 1.0.0 Release |url=http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/1.0.0/release_notes_1.0.0.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020504114841/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/1.0.0/release_notes_1.0.0.html |archive-date=4 May 2002 |access-date=16 October 2013 |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=5 June 2002 |title=News: The Press on OpenOffice.org and Open Source |url=http://www.openoffice.org/news.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020607182735/http://www.openoffice.org/news.html |archive-date=7 June 2002 |access-date=16 October 2013 |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref> A Mac OS X version, using an [[X Window System|X11]] interface, was released on 23 June 2003.<ref>{{Cite web |date=29 June 2003 |title=Mac OS X OpenOffice.org Port |url=http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/index.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030801095825/http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/index.html |archive-date=1 August 2003 |access-date=8 August 2010 |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=7 July 2003 |title=OpenOffice.org 1.0 for Mac OS X (X11) |url=http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/ooo-osx_downloads.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030801095614/http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/ooo-osx_downloads.html |archive-date=1 August 2003 |access-date=8 August 2010 |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref> OpenOffice.org 1.0.3.1, released in April 2003, was the last version to officially support Windows 95.<ref name="briefhistory" />
 
The subsequent major release, OpenOffice.org 1.1, launched on 2 September 2003, introduced several new features, including one-click export to PDF, export to Flash (.SWF), [[Macro (computer science)|macro]] recording, and a basic extension mechanism for third-party add-ons.<ref name="ooo11" /><ref name="productrelease">{{Cite web |date=11 April 2011 |title=Product Release |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Product_Release&oldid=195944 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904074256/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Product_Release&oldid=195944 |archive-date=4 September 2015 |access-date=23 September 2013 |website=OpenOffice.org Wiki |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref>
 
Version 1.1.1, released on 29 March 2004, was notable for being included in the [[OpenCD]] project, a curated collection of open-source software for Windows users.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Loli |first=Eugenia |date=29 March 2004 |title=OpenOffice.org 1.1.1 Released |url=http://www.osnews.com/story/6515 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131017032755/http://www.osnews.com/story/6515 |archive-date=17 October 2013 |access-date=16 October 2013 |website=OSNews}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=TheOpenCD Home |url=http://theopencd.sunsite.dk/programs-v1.4/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040610181058/http://theopencd.sunsite.dk/programs-v1.4/ |archive-date=10 June 2004 |access-date=2 February 2013 |publisher=[[TheOpenCD]]}}</ref>


As of October 2011, [[Secunia]] reported no known unpatched security flaws for the software.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://secunia.com/advisories/product/20130/ |title= Vulnerability Report: OpenOffice.org 3.x |publisher= [[Secunia]] |access-date= 20 October 2011 |archive-date= 18 December 2011 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20111218221239/http://secunia.com/advisories/product/20130/ |url-status= live }}</ref> A vulnerability in the inherited OpenOffice.org codebase was found and fixed in LibreOffice in October 2011<ref>{{cite web|url=https://lwn.net/Articles/461673/|title=An odd vulnerability report for LibreOffice|first=Jake|last=Edge|work=LWN.net|date=5 October 2011|access-date=15 October 2013|archive-date=28 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130928135641/http://lwn.net/Articles/461673/|url-status=live}}</ref> and Apache OpenOffice in May 2012.<ref name="aoo340"/>
On 2 September 2005, Sun announced it would retire the SISSL to help reduce [[license proliferation]],<ref>{{Cite web |last=Phipps |first=Simon |title=Addressing Proliferation: Deeds not just Words |url=https://blogs.oracle.com/webmink/entry/addressing_proliferation_deeds_not_just |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130308081837/https://blogs.oracle.com/webmink/entry/addressing_proliferation_deeds_not_just |archive-date=8 March 2013 |access-date=26 December 2012 |website=Simon Phipps, SunMink |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref> though some analysts speculated the move was also intended to prevent IBM from reusing the code without contributing back.<ref name="thonline2011" /> The 1.1.4 update, released on 22 December 2004, was the last version distributed under the dual SISSL and LGPL licenses.<ref name="productrelease" /> The change also applied to beta versions of OpenOffice.org 2, already under development.<ref name="ooolicensechange" />


=== Version history ===
The final release in the OpenOffice.org 1 series, version 1.1.5, arrived on 9 September 2005. It introduced the ability to edit documents in the [[OpenDocument]] format (ODF) and was the last version to officially support Windows NT 4.0.<ref name="productrelease" />
{| class="wikitable floatright" style="width: 30em; margin-left:1em;"
|+ OpenOffice.org release history
|-
! Version
! style=white-space:nowrap | Release date
! Description
|-
|Build 638c
|2001–10<ref name="briefhistory"/>
|The first public milestone release.
|-
|1.0
|2002-05-01<ref name="release1.0"/>
|First official release.
|-
|1.0.3.1
|2003–04<ref name="briefhistory"/>
|Last version officially supporting Windows&nbsp;95.
|-
|1.1
|2003-09-02<ref name=productrelease/>
|Export to PDF, export to Flash, macro recording, extension mechanism.<ref name="ooo11"/>
|-
|1.1.1
|2004-03-29<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.osnews.com/story/6515|title=OpenOffice.org 1.1.1 Released|first=Eugenia|last=Loli|work=OSNews|date=29 March 2004|access-date=16 October 2013|archive-date=17 October 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131017032755/http://www.osnews.com/story/6515|url-status=live}}</ref>
|Bundled with [[TheOpenCD]].<ref>{{cite web|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040610181058/http://theopencd.sunsite.dk/programs-v1.4/|archive-date=10 June 2004|publisher=[[TheOpenCD]]|title=TheOpenCD Home|access-date=2 February 2013|url-status=dead|url=http://theopencd.sunsite.dk/programs-v1.4/|df=dmy-all}}</ref>
|-
|1.1.4
|2004-12-22<ref name=productrelease>{{cite web|url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Product_Release&oldid=195944|title=Product Release|work=OpenOffice.org Wiki|publisher=Sun Microsystems|date=11 April 2011|access-date=23 September 2013|archive-date=4 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904074256/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Product_Release&oldid=195944|url-status=live}}</ref>
|Last version released under SISSL.
|-
|1.1.5
|2005-09-09<ref name=productrelease/>
|Last release for 1.x product line. Can edit OpenDocument files.<br/>Last version to officially support Windows NT 4.0.
|-
|2.0
|2005-10-20<ref name="ooo20pr"/>
|Milestone, with major enhancements and default saving in the OpenDocument format.
|-
|2.1.0
|2006-12-12<ref name=productrelease/>
|Minor enhancements, bug fixes.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/2.1.0.html|title=OpenOffice.org2.1 – Release Notes|publisher=Sun Microsystems|access-date=26 September 2013|archive-date=28 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130928130854/http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/2.1.0.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
|-
|2.2.0
|2007-03-29<ref name=productrelease/>
|Minor enhancements, bug fixes,<ref name="ooo220">{{cite web|url=http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/2.2.0.html|title=OpenOffice.org 2.2 (build OOF680_m14) – Release Notes|publisher=Sun Microsystems|access-date=26 September 2013|archive-date=28 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130928131007/http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/2.2.0.html|url-status=live}}</ref> security fixes.<ref>{{cite news |last=Espiner |first=Tom |title=New OpenOffice version includes security upgrades |publisher=CNet |date=4 April 2007 | url = http://news.cnet.com/New+OpenOffice+version+includes+security+upgrade/2100-7344_3-6173145.html| access-date =16 October 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121022081324/http://news.cnet.com/New-OpenOffice-version-includes-security-upgrade/2100-7344_3-6173145.html|archive-date=22 October 2012}}</ref>
|-
|2.3.0
|2007-09-17<ref name=productrelease/>
|Updated charting component, minor enhancements,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://development.openoffice.org/releases/2.3.0.html |title=OpenOffice.org 2.3.0 (build OOG680_m5) – Release Notes |publisher=Sun Microsystems |access-date=22 May 2011 |archive-date=27 July 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110727151234/http://development.openoffice.org/releases/2.3.0.html |url-status=live }}</ref> improved extension manager.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/09/20/openoffice_org_unveils_new_version_trumpeting_extensions/ |work=The Register |publisher=Situation Publishing |access-date=26 April 2012 |title=OpenOffice builds extensions for v2.3 |date=20 September 2007 |first=Cade |last=Metz |archive-date=4 October 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121004044010/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/09/20/openoffice_org_unveils_new_version_trumpeting_extensions/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
|2.4.0
|2008-03-27<ref name=productrelease/>
|Bug fixes and new features,<ref name="ooo240">{{cite web |url=http://development.openoffice.org/releases/2.4.0.html |title=New Features in OpenOffice.org 2.4 |publisher=Sun Microsystems |access-date=22 May 2011 |archive-date=30 December 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121230132246/http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/2.4.0.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Feature_Freeze_Testing_2.4&oldid=108873|title=Feature Freeze Testing 2.4|work=OpenOffice.org Wiki|publisher=Sun Microsystems|date=23 January 2009|access-date=22 May 2011|archive-date=25 August 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120825214319/http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Feature_Freeze_Testing_2.4&oldid=108873|url-status=live}}</ref> enhancements from RedOffice.<ref name=redflag240>{{cite web|url=http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/openoffice_org_2_4_features|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071024114047/http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/openoffice_org_2_4_features|archive-date=24 October 2007|title=OpenOffice.org 2.4 features implemented in cooperation with the RedFlag 2000 framework team|work=GullFOSS|publisher=Sun Microsystems|date=22 October 2007|first=Carsten|last=Driesner|access-date=16 October 2013|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref>
|-
|2.4.3
|2009-09-04<ref name=productrelease/>
|Last version for Windows 98 and Windows ME<ref name="sysreqs20"/>
|-
|3.0.0
|2008-10-13<ref name=productrelease/>
|Milestone: ODF 1.2, OOXML import, improved VBA, native OS X interface, Start Center.<ref name=ooo30/>
|-
|3.1.0
|2009-05-07<ref name=productrelease/>
|Overlining and transparent dragging.
|-
|3.2
|2010-02-11<ref>{{cite web|url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=OOoRelease32&oldid=157099|title=OpenOffice 3.2 developer page|date=11 February 2010|access-date=11 February 2010|work=OpenOffice.org Wiki|publisher=Oracle Corporation|archive-date=30 December 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121230071237/http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=OOoRelease32&oldid=157099|url-status=live}}</ref>
|New features,<ref name="OOo32plannedFeatures">{{cite web |title=Features planned for OOo 3.2 (November 2009) |work=OpenOffice.org wiki |publisher=Sun Microsystems |date=1 August 2009 |url=http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Features&oldid=153651#Features_planned_for_OOo_3.2_.28January_2010.29 |access-date=23 August 2009 |archive-date=17 January 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100117020356/http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Features&oldid=153651#Features_planned_for_OOo_3.2_.28January_2010.29 |url-status=live }}</ref> and performance enhancements.<ref>{{cite web |title=Performance |work=OpenOffice.org wiki |publisher=Sun Microsystems |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Performance&oldid=135877 |date=24 July 2009 |access-date=23 August 2009 |archive-date=4 September 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904074256/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Performance&oldid=135877 |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
|3.2.1
|2010-06-04<ref name=productrelease/>
|Updated Oracle Start Center and OpenDocument format icons, bug fixes. First Oracle stable release.<ref name="releasenotes321">{{cite web|url=http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/3.2.1.html#note|title=3.2.1 (build OOO320m18) – Release Notes: Important Notes: OOo Brand Refresh|publisher=Oracle Corporation|access-date=19 October 2013|archive-date=20 October 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131020133105/http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/3.2.1.html#note|url-status=live}}</ref>
|-
|3.3
|2011-01-26<ref name=productrelease/>
|New spreadsheet functions and parameters. Last Oracle stable release, and the last stable release to support Windows 2000 and Mac OS X on PowerPC.
|-
|3.4 Beta 1
|2011-04-12<ref name="ooo34b1"/>
|Last Oracle code release, and the last release to support Windows 2000 and Mac OS X on PowerPC.
|}


==== OpenOffice.org 1 ====
=== OpenOffice.org 2 ===
[[File:OpenOffice.org 1.1 official main logo 2col trans.png|left|thumb|OpenOffice.org 1.1 logo]]
Development of version 2.0 began in early 2003, guided by the "Q Product Concept", which aimed to improve Microsoft Office compatibility, performance, [[Scripting language|scripting]] support, GNOME integration, database usability, digital signatures, and overall user experience.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Hoeger |first=Lutz |date=August 2003 |title=StarOffice / OpenOffice.org "Q" Product Concept |url=http://www.openoffice.org/tools/releases/q-concept.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130927200324/http://www.openoffice.org/tools/releases/q-concept.html |archive-date=27 September 2013 |access-date=23 September 2013 |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref> It also marked the transition to ODF as the default file format. The first beta was released on 4 March 2005.<ref>{{Cite web |date=4 March 2005 |title=Openoffice.org Announces Version 2.0 Public Beta |url=http://www.openoffice.org/about_us/2.0beta_press_release.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131020133258/http://www.openoffice.org/about_us/2.0beta_press_release.html |archive-date=20 October 2013 |access-date=19 October 2013 |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref>
The preview, Milestone 638c, was released October 2001.<ref name="briefhistory"/> OpenOffice.org 1.0 was released under both the LGPL and the SISSL<ref name="thonline2011" /> for Windows, Linux and Solaris<ref>{{cite web |title=Release Notes for the OpenOffice.org 1.0.0 Release |publisher=Sun Microsystems |url=http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/1.0.0/release_notes_1.0.0.html |date=May 2002 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020504114841/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/1.0.0/release_notes_1.0.0.html |archive-date=4 May 2002 |access-date=16 October 2013 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all }}</ref> on 1 May 2002.<ref name="release1.0"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.openoffice.org/news.html|title=News: The Press on OpenOffice.org and Open Source|publisher=Sun Microsystems|date=5 June 2002|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020607182735/http://www.openoffice.org/news.html|archive-date=7 June 2002|access-date=16 October 2013|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref> The version for Mac OS X (with [[X Window System|X11]] interface) was released on 23 June 2003.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/index.html |title=Mac OS X OpenOffice.org Port |date=29 June 2003 |access-date=8 August 2010 |publisher=Sun Microsystems |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030801095825/http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/index.html |archive-date=1 August 2003 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=OpenOffice.org 1.0 for Mac OS X (X11) |date=7 July 2003 |url=http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/ooo-osx_downloads.html |publisher=Sun Microsystems |access-date=8 August 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030801095614/http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/ooo-osx_downloads.html |archive-date=1 August 2003 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all }}</ref>


OpenOffice.org 1.1 introduced One-click Export to PDF, Export presentations to Flash (.SWF) and [[Macro (computer science)|macro]] recording. It also allowed third-party addons.<ref name="ooo11">{{cite web |url=http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/1.1/index.html |title=1.1 Features |publisher=Sun Microsystems |access-date=26 July 2010 |archive-date=30 December 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121230012359/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/1.1/index.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
The final version 2.0 was released on 20 October 2005,<ref name="ooo20pr">{{Cite press release |title=OpenOffice.org 2.0 Is Here (OpenOffice.org 2.0 Announcement) |date=20 October 2005 |publisher=Sun Microsystems |url=http://www.openoffice.org/press/2.0/press_release.html |access-date=16 October 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180413002841/http://www.openoffice.org/press/2.0/press_release.html |archive-date=13 April 2018}}</ref> followed by version 2.0.1 eight weeks later, which included bug fixes and new features. With version 2.0.3, the project switched from an 18-month release cycle to quarterly updates.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Sanders |first=Tom |title=OpenOffice aims to boost lagging performance |url=http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2153630/openoffice-zooms-lagging |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060408003518/http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2153630/openoffice-zooms-lagging |archive-date=8 April 2006 |access-date=20 April 2006 |publisher=vnunet.com}}</ref>


OpenOffice.org was used in 2005 by ''[[The Guardian]]'' to illustrate what it saw as the limitations of open-source software.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2005/dec/08/opensource.software |title=If this suite's a success, why is it so buggy? |last=Brown |first=Andrew |newspaper=The Guardian |date=8 December 2005 |access-date=2 October 2012 |archive-date=21 September 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921105259/http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2005/dec/08/opensource.software |url-status=live }}</ref>
Version 2.1, released on 12 December 2006, included minor enhancements and bug fixes.<ref name="productrelease" /><ref>{{Cite web |title=OpenOffice.org2.1 – Release Notes |url=http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/2.1.0.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130928130854/http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/2.1.0.html |archive-date=28 September 2013 |access-date=26 September 2013 |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref> This was followed by version 2.2 on 29 March 2007, which added further refinements, security updates, and small usability improvements.<ref name="productrelease" /><ref name="ooo220">{{Cite web |title=OpenOffice.org 2.2 (build OOF680_m14) – Release Notes |url=http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/2.2.0.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130928131007/http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/2.2.0.html |archive-date=28 September 2013 |access-date=26 September 2013 |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Espiner |first=Tom |date=4 April 2007 |title=New OpenOffice version includes security upgrades |url=http://news.cnet.com/New+OpenOffice+version+includes+security+upgrade/2100-7344_3-6173145.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121022081324/http://news.cnet.com/New-OpenOffice-version-includes-security-upgrade/2100-7344_3-6173145.html |archive-date=22 October 2012 |access-date=16 October 2013 |publisher=CNet}}</ref> Version 2.3, released on 17 September 2007, introduced a redesigned charting component, enhanced the extension manager, and made several additional minor upgrades.<ref name="productrelease" /><ref>{{Cite web |title=OpenOffice.org 2.3.0 (build OOG680_m5) – Release Notes |url=http://development.openoffice.org/releases/2.3.0.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110727151234/http://development.openoffice.org/releases/2.3.0.html |archive-date=27 July 2011 |access-date=22 May 2011 |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Metz |first=Cade |date=20 September 2007 |title=OpenOffice builds extensions for v2.3 |url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/09/20/openoffice_org_unveils_new_version_trumpeting_extensions/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121004044010/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/09/20/openoffice_org_unveils_new_version_trumpeting_extensions/ |archive-date=4 October 2012 |access-date=26 April 2012 |website=The Register |publisher=Situation Publishing}}</ref>


==== OpenOffice.org 2 ====
On 27 March 2008, version 2.4 was released with new features and bug fixes, incorporating enhancements from RedOffice, a Chinese derivative of OpenOffice.org.<ref name="ooo240" /><ref name="productrelease" /><ref>{{Cite web |date=23 January 2009 |title=Feature Freeze Testing 2.4 |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Feature_Freeze_Testing_2.4&oldid=108873 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120825214319/http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Feature_Freeze_Testing_2.4&oldid=108873 |archive-date=25 August 2012 |access-date=22 May 2011 |website=OpenOffice.org Wiki |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref><ref name="redflag240">{{Cite web |last=Driesner |first=Carsten |date=22 October 2007 |title=OpenOffice.org 2.4 features implemented in cooperation with the RedFlag 2000 framework team |url=http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/openoffice_org_2_4_features |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071024114047/http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/openoffice_org_2_4_features |archive-date=24 October 2007 |access-date=16 October 2013 |website=GullFOSS |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref> The final maintenance release in the OpenOffice.org 2 series, version 2.4.3, arrived on 4 September 2009 and was the last version to officially support Windows 98 and Windows ME.<ref name="sysreqs20" /><ref name="productrelease" />
Work on version 2.0 began in early 2003 with the following goals (the "Q Product Concept"): better interoperability with Microsoft Office; improved speed and lower memory usage; greater [[Scripting language|scripting]] capabilities; better integration, particularly with GNOME; a more usable database; digital signatures; and improved [[usability]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.openoffice.org/tools/releases/q-concept.html|title=StarOffice / OpenOffice.org "Q" Product Concept|first=Lutz|last=Hoeger|publisher=Sun Microsystems|date=August 2003|access-date=23 September 2013|archive-date=27 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130927200324/http://www.openoffice.org/tools/releases/q-concept.html|url-status=live}}</ref> It would also be the first version to default to OpenDocument. Sun released the first [[beta version]] on 4 March 2005.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.openoffice.org/about_us/2.0beta_press_release.html|title=Openoffice.org Announces Version 2.0 Public Beta|date=4 March 2005|publisher=Sun Microsystems|access-date=19 October 2013|archive-date=20 October 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131020133258/http://www.openoffice.org/about_us/2.0beta_press_release.html|url-status=live}}</ref>


On 2 September 2005, Sun announced that it was retiring SISSL to reduce [[license proliferation]],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://blogs.oracle.com/webmink/entry/addressing_proliferation_deeds_not_just|first=Simon|last=Phipps|work=Simon Phipps, SunMink|publisher=Sun Microsystems|title=Addressing Proliferation: Deeds not just Words|access-date=26 December 2012|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130308081837/https://blogs.oracle.com/webmink/entry/addressing_proliferation_deeds_not_just|archive-date=8 March 2013|df=dmy-all}}</ref> though some press analysts felt it was so that IBM could not reuse OpenOffice.org code without contributing back.<ref name="thonline2011"/> Versions after 2.0 beta 2 would use only the LGPL.<ref name="ooolicensechange"/>
Version 2 received significant media attention.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Vaughan-Nichols |first=Steven |date=20 October 2005 |title=Why OpenOffice.org 2.0 Is Your Best Choice |url=http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/Why-OpenOfficeorg-20-Is-Your-Best-Choice |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130102121639/http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/Why-OpenOfficeorg-20-Is-Your-Best-Choice |archive-date=2 January 2013 |access-date=16 November 2008 |work=Linux & Open Source |publisher=[[eWeek]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Brooks |first=Jason |date=21 October 2005 |title=OpenOffice.org 2.0 Has Edge over Its StarOffice 8 Cousin |url=http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/OpenOfficeorg-20-Has-Edge-over-Its-StarOffice-8-Cousin |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120913082852/http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/OpenOfficeorg-20-Has-Edge-over-Its-StarOffice-8-Cousin |archive-date=13 September 2012 |access-date=8 November 2008 |work=Linux & Open Source |publisher=eWeek}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Bona |first=Michael |date=February 2006 |title=OFFICE ARRIVAL. Here at last: OpenOffice 2.0 |url=http://w3.linux-magazine.com/issue/63/OpenOffice.org_2.0_Review.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071011090041/http://w3.linux-magazine.com/issue/63/OpenOffice.org_2.0_Review.pdf |archive-date=11 October 2007 |access-date=27 April 2009 |work=Reviews |publisher=Linux Magazine |pages=44–46, 48}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=1 December 2004 |title=OpenOffice.org |url=https://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1851001,00.asp |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090416022555/http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1851001,00.asp |archive-date=16 April 2009 |access-date=22 April 2009 |publisher=Pcmag.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=London |first=Simon |date=21 April 2005 |title=Open source moves into Microsoft's Office block |url=https://www.ft.com/content/1c5e53b8-b205-11d9-8c61-00000e2511c8 |access-date=16 November 2008 |publisher=[[Financial Times]] (Registration required)}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Joseph |first=Cliff |date=22 July 2005 |title=Openoffice.org 2 |url=http://www.vnunet.com/personal-computer-world/software/2140229/openoffice-org |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051214234333/http://www.vnunet.com/personal-computer-world/software/2140229/openoffice-org |archive-date=14 December 2005 |access-date=22 April 2009 |publisher=Personal Computer World}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Maleshefski |first=Tiffany |date=13 June 2007 |title=OpenOffice Sports All-Around Improvements |url=http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Windows/OpenOffice-Sports-AllAround-Improvements/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130102124300/http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Windows/OpenOffice-Sports-AllAround-Improvements/ |archive-date=2 January 2013 |access-date=22 April 2009 |publisher=eWeek}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Maleshefski |first=Tiffany |date=28 November 2007 |title=OpenOffice.org 2.3 Impresses |url=http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/OpenOfficeorg-23-Impresses/ |access-date=22 April 2009 |publisher=eWeek}}{{Dead link|date=January 2023|bot=InternetArchiveBot|fix-attempted=yes}}</ref> ''[[PC Pro]]'' gave it a perfect 6-star rating, noting that it now rivaled Microsoft Office in features.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Rawlinson |first=Nik |date=18 November 2005 |title=OpenOffice 2 review |url=http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/80012/openoffice-2.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090130081735/http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/80012/openoffice-2.html |archive-date=30 January 2009 |access-date=22 April 2009 |publisher=PC Pro}}</ref> ''[[Federal Computer Week]]'' listed it among the "5 stars of open-source products," citing the importance of the ODF standard.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Joch |first=Alan |date=26 September 2005 |title=5 stars of open-source products: If you're not using these tools, you may be missing out |url=http://www.fcw.com/Articles/2005/09/26/5-stars-of-opensource-products.aspx |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131017080350/http://fcw.com/Articles/2005/09/26/5-stars-of-opensource-products.aspx |archive-date=17 October 2013 |access-date=23 September 2013 |website=Federal Computer Week |publisher=1105 Public Sector Media Group}}</ref> ''[[Computerworld]]'' reported that migrating to OpenOffice.org 2.0 cost some large government agencies just a tenth of the price of upgrading to [[Microsoft Office 2007]].<ref>{{Cite news |date=4 October 2005 |title=Migrating to OpenOffice.org 90 per cent cheaper than to Microsoft Office 12 |url=http://www.computerworld.com.my/PrinterFriendly.aspx?articleid=2742&issueid=94&pubid=1 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071110134943/http://computerworld.com.my/ShowPage.aspx?pagetype=2&articleid=2742&pubid=3&issueid=66 |archive-date=10 November 2007 |access-date=16 October 2013 |work=Daily Update |publisher=[[Computerworld]] Singapore}} Computerworld Volume 11, Issue 23.</ref>


On 20 October 2005, OpenOffice.org 2.0 was released.<ref name="ooo20pr">{{cite press release
=== OpenOffice.org 3 ===
| url=http://www.openoffice.org/press/2.0/press_release.html
[[File:Sun Start Center.png|thumb|220px|The Start Center for OpenOffice.org 3]]Version 3.0 was released on 13 October 2008, introducing several major changes, including the ability to import (though not export) documents in Microsoft's [[Office Open XML]] format, compatibility with ODF 1.2, improved handling of Microsoft's [[Visual Basic for Applications]] macros, and a native Mac OS X interface. It also introduced the "Start Center" and adopted the LGPL version 3 license.<ref name="ooo30">{{Cite web |title=OpenOffice.org 3.0 Features |url=http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/3.0 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921232224/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/3.0/ |archive-date=21 September 2013 |access-date=23 September 2013 |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Suarez-Potts |first=Louis |date=7 March 2008 |title=OpenOffice.org moving to LGPLv3 |url=https://lwn.net/Articles/272202/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160915215140/https://lwn.net/Articles/272202/ |archive-date=15 September 2016 |access-date=16 August 2016 |work=Linux Weekly News}}</ref>
| title=OpenOffice.org 2.0 Is Here (OpenOffice.org 2.0 Announcement)
| publisher=Sun Microsystems
| date=20 October 2005
| access-date=16 October 2013
| archive-date=13 April 2018
| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180413002841/http://www.openoffice.org/press/2.0/press_release.html
| url-status=live
}}</ref> 2.0.1 was released eight weeks later, fixing minor bugs and introducing new features. As of the 2.0.3 release, OpenOffice.org changed its release cycle from 18 months to releasing updates every three months.<ref>{{cite web
|url         = http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2153630/openoffice-zooms-lagging
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20060408003518/http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2153630/openoffice-zooms-lagging
|archive-date = 8 April 2006
|first      = Tom
|last        = Sanders
|publisher  = vnunet.com
|title      = OpenOffice aims to boost lagging performance
|access-date = 20 April 2006
|url-status    = dead
|df          = dmy-all
}}</ref>


The OpenOffice.org 2 series attracted considerable press attention.<ref>{{cite news |last=Vaughan-Nichols |first=Steven |title=Why OpenOffice.org 2.0 Is Your Best Choice |work=Linux & Open Source |publisher=[[eWeek]] |date=20 October 2005 |url=http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/Why-OpenOfficeorg-20-Is-Your-Best-Choice |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130102121639/http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/Why-OpenOfficeorg-20-Is-Your-Best-Choice |url-status=dead |archive-date=2 January 2013 |access-date=16 November 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Brooks |first=Jason |title=OpenOffice.org 2.0 Has Edge over Its StarOffice 8 Cousin |work=Linux & Open Source |publisher=eWeek |date=21 October 2005 |url=http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/OpenOfficeorg-20-Has-Edge-over-Its-StarOffice-8-Cousin |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120913082852/http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/OpenOfficeorg-20-Has-Edge-over-Its-StarOffice-8-Cousin |url-status=dead |archive-date=13 September 2012 |access-date=8 November 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Bona |first=Michael |title=OFFICE ARRIVAL. Here at last: OpenOffice 2.0 |work=Reviews |publisher=Linux Magazine |date=February 2006 |url=http://w3.linux-magazine.com/issue/63/OpenOffice.org_2.0_Review.pdf |pages=44–46, 48 |access-date=27 April 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071011090041/http://w3.linux-magazine.com/issue/63/OpenOffice.org_2.0_Review.pdf |archive-date=11 October 2007 |df=dmy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1851001,00.asp|title=OpenOffice.org|publisher=Pcmag.com|date=1 December 2004|access-date=22 April 2009|archive-date=16 April 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090416022555/http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1851001,00.asp|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=London |first=Simon |title=Open source moves into Microsoft's Office block |publisher=[[Financial Times]] (Registration required) |date=21 April 2005 |url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1c5e53b8-b205-11d9-8c61-00000e2511c8.html?nclick_check=1 |access-date=16 November 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.vnunet.com/personal-computer-world/software/2140229/openoffice-org|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051214234333/http://www.vnunet.com/personal-computer-world/software/2140229/openoffice-org|archive-date=14 December 2005|title=Openoffice.org 2|publisher=Personal Computer World|date=22 July 2005|first=Cliff|last=Joseph|access-date=22 April 2009|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Windows/OpenOffice-Sports-AllAround-Improvements/ |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130102124300/http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Windows/OpenOffice-Sports-AllAround-Improvements/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=2 January 2013 |title=OpenOffice Sports All-Around Improvements |publisher=eWeek |first=Tiffany |last=Maleshefski |date=13 June 2007 |access-date=22 April 2009 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/OpenOfficeorg-23-Impresses/ |title=OpenOffice.org 2.3 Impresses |publisher=eWeek |access-date=22 April 2009 |first=Tiffany |last=Maleshefski |date=28 November 2007 }}{{Dead link|date=January 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> A ''[[PC Pro]]'' review awarded it 6 stars out of 6 and stated: "Our pick of the low-cost office suites has had a much-needed overhaul, and now battles Microsoft in terms of features, not just price."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/80012/openoffice-2.html|first=Nik|last=Rawlinson|date=18 November 2005|title=OpenOffice 2 review|publisher=PC Pro|access-date=22 April 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090130081735/http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/80012/openoffice-2.html|archive-date=30 January 2009|url-status=dead}}</ref> ''[[Federal Computer Week]]'' listed OpenOffice.org as one of the "5 stars of open-source products",<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.fcw.com/Articles/2005/09/26/5-stars-of-opensource-products.aspx |title=5 stars of open-source products: If you're not using these tools, you may be missing out |last=Joch |first=Alan |work=Federal Computer Week |publisher=1105 Public Sector Media Group |date=26 September 2005 |access-date=23 September 2013 |archive-date=17 October 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131017080350/http://fcw.com/Articles/2005/09/26/5-stars-of-opensource-products.aspx |url-status=live }}</ref> noting in particular the importance of OpenDocument. ''[[Computerworld]]'' reported that for large government departments, migration to OpenOffice.org 2.0 cost one tenth of the price of upgrading to [[Microsoft Office 2007]].<ref>{{cite news |title=Migrating to OpenOffice.org 90 per cent cheaper than to Microsoft Office 12 |work=Daily Update |publisher=[[Computerworld]] Singapore |date=4 October 2005 |url=http://www.computerworld.com.my/PrinterFriendly.aspx?articleid=2742&issueid=94&pubid=1 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071110134943/http://computerworld.com.my/ShowPage.aspx?pagetype=2&articleid=2742&pubid=3&issueid=66 |archive-date=10 November 2007 |access-date=16 October 2013 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all }} Computerworld Volume 11, Issue 23.</ref>
The 3.1 update, released on 7 May 2009, added support for overlining text and transparent dragging of objects.<ref name="productrelease" />


==== OpenOffice.org 3 ====
Version 3.2, released on 11 February 2010, improved support for PostScript-based [[OpenType]] fonts, added integrity checks for ODF files with repair options, and reduced "cold start" times by 46% compared to version 3.0. This release also introduced new features and performance enhancements.<ref>{{Cite web |date=11 February 2010 |title=OpenOffice 3.2 developer page |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=OOoRelease32&oldid=157099 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121230071237/http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=OOoRelease32&oldid=157099 |archive-date=30 December 2012 |access-date=11 February 2010 |website=OpenOffice.org Wiki |publisher=Oracle Corporation}}</ref><ref name="OOo32plannedFeatures">{{Cite web |date=1 August 2009 |title=Features planned for OOo 3.2 (November 2009) |url=http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Features&oldid=153651#Features_planned_for_OOo_3.2_.28January_2010.29 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100117020356/http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Features&oldid=153651#Features_planned_for_OOo_3.2_.28January_2010.29 |archive-date=17 January 2010 |access-date=23 August 2009 |website=OpenOffice.org wiki |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=24 July 2009 |title=Performance |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Performance&oldid=135877 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904074256/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Performance&oldid=135877 |archive-date=4 September 2015 |access-date=23 August 2009 |website=OpenOffice.org wiki |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=OpenOffice.org 3.2 New Features |url=http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/3.2/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100222023142/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/3.2/ |archive-date=22 February 2010 |access-date=26 July 2010 |publisher=Oracle Corporation}}</ref>
[[File:Sun Start Center.png|thumb|220px|left|The Sun Start Center for versions between 3.0 and 3.2.0]]
On 13 October 2008, version 3.0 was released, featuring the ability to import (though not export) [[Office Open XML]] documents, support for ODF 1.2, improved [[Visual Basic for Applications|VBA]] [[Macro (computer science)|macros]], and a native interface port for OS X. It also introduced the new Start Center<ref name=ooo30>{{cite web|url=http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/3.0|title=OpenOffice.org 3.0 Features|publisher=Sun Microsystems|access-date=23 September 2013|archive-date=21 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921232224/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/3.0/|url-status=live}}</ref> and upgraded to LGPL version 3 as its license.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Suarez-Potts|first1=Louis|title=OpenOffice.org moving to LGPLv3|url=https://lwn.net/Articles/272202/|access-date=16 August 2016|work=Linux Weekly News|date=7 March 2008|archive-date=15 September 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160915215140/https://lwn.net/Articles/272202/|url-status=live}}</ref>


Version 3.2 included support for PostScript-based [[OpenType]] fonts. It warned users when ODF 1.2 Extended features had been used. An improvement to the document integrity check determined if an ODF document conformed to the ODF specification and offered a repair if necessary. Calc and Writer both reduced "cold start" time by 46% compared to version 3.0.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/3.2/|title=OpenOffice.org 3.2 New Features|publisher=Oracle Corporation|access-date=26 July 2010|archive-date=22 February 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100222023142/http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/3.2/|url-status=live}}</ref> 3.2.1 was the first Oracle release.<ref name="releasenotes321"/>
Version 3.2.1 followed on 4 June 2010,[1] featuring bug fixes, refreshed OpenDocument icons, and an updated "Oracle Start Center." It was the first stable release under Oracle's ownership.<ref name="productrelease" /><ref name="releasenotes321">{{Cite web |title=3.2.1 (build OOO320m18) – Release Notes: Important Notes: OOo Brand Refresh |url=http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/3.2.1.html#note |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131020133105/http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/3.2.1.html#note |archive-date=20 October 2013 |access-date=19 October 2013 |publisher=Oracle Corporation}}</ref>


Version 3.3, the last Oracle version, was released in January 2011.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.golem.de/1101/81004.html |language=de |publisher=Golem.de |access-date=7 May 2012 |title=Openoffice.org 3.3 als kostenloser Download |trans-title=Openoffice.org 3.3 as a free download |date=26 January 2011 |first=Ingo |last=Pakalski |archive-date=26 January 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120126132334/http://www.golem.de/1101/81004.html |url-status=live }}</ref> New features include an updated print form, a FindBar and interface improvements for Impress.<ref name="wiki.services.openoffice.org">{{cite web |title=Features planned for OOo 3.3 Third quarter 2010 |work=OpenOffice.org Wiki |publisher=Oracle Corporation |date=21 June 2010 |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Features&oldid=172840#Features_planned_for_OOo_3.3_.28Third_quarter_2010.29 |access-date=26 July 2010 |archive-date=4 September 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904074256/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Features&oldid=172840#Features_planned_for_OOo_3.3_.28Third_quarter_2010.29 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Roadmap 2009 |publisher=Sun Microsystems |date=23 October 2009 |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Renaissance:The_Roadmap&oldid=144031 |access-date=3 November 2009 |archive-date=24 November 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151124210931/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Renaissance:The_Roadmap&oldid=144031 |url-status=live }}</ref> The commercial version, Oracle Open Office 3.3 (StarOffice renamed), based on the beta, was released on 15 December 2010, as was the single release of Oracle Cloud Office (a proprietary product from an unrelated codebase).<ref name=oracleopenoffice>{{cite press release |title=Oracle Announces Oracle Cloud Office and Oracle Open Office 3.3: Industry's First Complete, Open Standards-Based Office Productivity Suites for Desktop, Web and Mobile Users |publisher=Oracle Corporation |date=15 December 2010 |url=http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/195766 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101217212955/http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/195766 |archive-date=17 December 2010 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/22/cloud_office_javafx_ready/ |title=Oracle preps Google and Microsoft Office challenger |first=Gavin |last=Clarke |work=The Register |publisher=Situation Publishing |date=22 September 2010 |access-date=9 October 2013 |archive-date=16 October 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131016131152/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/22/cloud_office_javafx_ready/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
The final Oracle-sponsored version, 3.3, was released on 26 January 2011.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Pakalski |first=Ingo |date=26 January 2011 |title=Openoffice.org 3.3 als kostenloser Download |trans-title=Openoffice.org 3.3 as a free download |url=http://www.golem.de/1101/81004.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120126132334/http://www.golem.de/1101/81004.html |archive-date=26 January 2012 |access-date=7 May 2012 |publisher=Golem.de |language=de}}</ref> It added new spreadsheet functions and parameters, a revised print form, a FindBar, and usability improvements in Impress.<ref name="wiki.services.openoffice.org">{{Cite web |date=21 June 2010 |title=Features planned for OOo 3.3 Third quarter 2010 |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Features&oldid=172840#Features_planned_for_OOo_3.3_.28Third_quarter_2010.29 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904074256/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Features&oldid=172840#Features_planned_for_OOo_3.3_.28Third_quarter_2010.29 |archive-date=4 September 2015 |access-date=26 July 2010 |website=OpenOffice.org Wiki |publisher=Oracle Corporation}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite web |date=23 October 2009 |title=Roadmap 2009 |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Renaissance:The_Roadmap&oldid=144031 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151124210931/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Renaissance:The_Roadmap&oldid=144031 |archive-date=24 November 2015 |access-date=3 November 2009 |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref> Version 3.3 was also the last stable release to support Windows 2000 and Mac OS X on PowerPC systems.<ref name="productrelease" />


==== OpenOffice.org 3.4 Beta 1 ====
Version 3.3, the last Oracle version, was released in January 2011. New features include an updated print form, a FindBar and interface improvements for Impress.<ref name="wiki.services.openoffice.org" /><ref name=":1" /> In parallel, Oracle released a commercial variant Oracle Open Office 3.3 (formerly named StarOffice) on 15 December 2010, along with a proprietary cloud-based suite called Oracle Cloud Office, built on a separate codebase.<ref name="oracleopenoffice" /><ref>{{Cite news |last=Clarke |first=Gavin |date=22 September 2010 |title=Oracle preps Google and Microsoft Office challenger |url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/22/cloud_office_javafx_ready/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131016131152/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/22/cloud_office_javafx_ready/ |archive-date=16 October 2013 |access-date=9 October 2013 |work=The Register |publisher=Situation Publishing}}</ref>
A beta version of OpenOffice.org 3.4 was released on 12 April 2011, including new SVG import, improved ODF 1.2 support, and spreadsheet functionality.<ref name="ooo34b1"/><ref name="ooo34b1changes"/><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.openoffice.org/news/index.html#OOo340beta |title=News |publisher=Oracle Corporation |year=2011 |access-date=14 January 2012 |archive-date=29 April 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110429190252/http://www.openoffice.org/news/index.html#OOo340beta |url-status=live }}</ref>


Before the final version of OpenOffice.org 3.4 could be released, Oracle cancelled its sponsorship of development<ref name="oooclosurepr"/> and fired the remaining Star Division development team.<ref name="lwn20110520"/><ref name="nww20130904"/>
A beta of OpenOffice.org 3.4 was released on 12 April 2011, featuring SVG import, improved support for ODF 1.2, and enhanced spreadsheet functionality.<ref name="ooo34b1" /><ref name="ooo34b1changes" /><ref>{{Cite web |year=2011 |title=News |url=http://www.openoffice.org/news/index.html#OOo340beta |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110429190252/http://www.openoffice.org/news/index.html#OOo340beta |archive-date=29 April 2011 |access-date=14 January 2012 |publisher=Oracle Corporation}}</ref> However, before a final release could be issued, Oracle withdrew its support for the project,<ref name="oooclosurepr" /> disbanding the remaining development team.<ref name="lwn20110520" /><ref name="nww20130904" />


== Market share ==
== Market share ==
Problems arise in estimating the [[market share]] of OpenOffice.org because it could be freely distributed via download sites (including mirror sites), peer-to-peer networks, CDs, Linux distributions and so forth. The project tried to capture key adoption data in a market-share analysis,<ref name=marketshareanalysis>{{cite web |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Market_Share_Analysis&oldid=170058 |title=OpenOffice.org Market Share Analysis |publisher=Oracle Corporation |date=1 June 2010 |access-date=20 June 2013 |archive-date=4 September 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904074256/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Market_Share_Analysis&oldid=170058 |url-status=live }}</ref> listing known distribution totals, known deployments and conversions and analyst statements and surveys.
Problems arise in estimating the [[market share]] of OpenOffice.org because it could be freely distributed via download sites (including mirror sites), peer-to-peer networks, CDs, Linux distributions and so forth. The project tried to capture key adoption data in a market-share analysis,<ref name="marketshareanalysis">{{Cite web |date=1 June 2010 |title=OpenOffice.org Market Share Analysis |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Market_Share_Analysis&oldid=170058 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904074256/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Market_Share_Analysis&oldid=170058 |archive-date=4 September 2015 |access-date=20 June 2013 |publisher=Oracle Corporation}}</ref> listing known distribution totals, known deployments and conversions and analyst statements and surveys.


According to [[Valve Corporation|Valve]], as of July 2010, 14.63% of [[Steam (service)|Steam]] users had OpenOffice.org installed on their machines.<ref>{{cite web|title=Steam Hardware & Software Survey|url=http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/?platform=combined|publisher=[[Valve Corporation|Valve]]|access-date=3 December 2012|date=November 2012|archive-date=13 June 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100613214530/http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/?platform=combined|url-status=live}}</ref>
According to [[Valve Corporation|Valve]], as of July 2010, 14.63% of [[Steam (service)|Steam]] users had OpenOffice.org installed on their machines.<ref>{{Cite web |date=November 2012 |title=Steam Hardware & Software Survey |url=http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/?platform=combined |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100613214530/http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/?platform=combined |archive-date=13 June 2010 |access-date=3 December 2012 |publisher=[[Valve Corporation|Valve]]}}</ref>


A market-share analysis conducted by a [[web analytics]] service in 2010, based on over 200,000 Internet users, showed a wide range of adoption in different countries:<ref>{{cite news |author=Thomas H |title=International OpenOffice market shares |publisher=Webmasterpro.de |date=5 February 2010 |url=http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html |access-date=27 May 2012 |archive-date=11 February 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100211120822/http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html |url-status=live }}</ref> 0.2% in China, 9% in the US and the UK and over 20% in Poland, the Czech Republic, and Germany.
A market-share analysis conducted by a [[web analytics]] service in 2010, based on over 200,000 Internet users, showed a wide range of adoption in different countries:<ref>{{Cite news |last=Thomas H |date=5 February 2010 |title=International OpenOffice market shares |url=http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100211120822/http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html |archive-date=11 February 2010 |access-date=27 May 2012 |publisher=Webmasterpro.de}}</ref> 0.2% in China, 9% in the US and the UK and over 20% in Poland, the Czech Republic, and Germany.


Although Microsoft Office retained 95% of the general market — as measured by revenue — as of August 2007,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1795|title=Rivals Set Their Sights on Microsoft Office: Can They Topple the Giant?|work=Knowledge@Wharton|publisher=[[Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania]]|date=22 August 2007|access-date=23 September 2013|archive-date=30 August 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070830001652/http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1795|url-status=live}}</ref> OpenOffice.org and StarOffice had secured 15–20% of the business market as of 2004<ref>{{cite web |last=Loftus |first=Jack |title=Desktop apps ripe turf for open source |format=First two paragraphs available, the rest requires login |work=SearchEnterpriseLinux.com |publisher=TechTarget |date=4 October 2004 |url=http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid39_gci1011227,00.html |access-date=27 May 2012 |archive-date=14 December 2005 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051214195107/http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid39_gci1011227,00.html |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Wrolstad |first=Jay |title=OpenOffice.org 2.0 Release Delayed |publisher=Top Tech News |date=13 October 2005 |url=http://www.toptechnews.com/news/OpenOffice-org-2-0-Release-Delayed/story.xhtml?story_id=03100339SMZN |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090104215102/http://www.toptechnews.com/news/OpenOffice-org-2-0-Release-Delayed/story.xhtml?story_id=03100339SMZN |archive-date=4 January 2009 |access-date=27 May 2012 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all }}</ref> and a 2010 University of Colorado at Boulder study reported that OpenOffice.org had reached a point where it had an "irreversible" installed user base and that it would continue to grow.<ref>{{cite book|ssrn=1656616|first1=Tony|last1=Casson|first2=Patrick|last2=Ryan|chapter=Open Standards, Open Source Adoption in the Public Sector, and Their Relationship to Microsoft's Market Dominance|title=STANDARDS EDGE: UNIFIER OR DIVIDER?|editor-first=Sherrie|editor-last=Bolin|page=87|publisher=Sheridan Books|year=2006}}</ref>
Although Microsoft Office retained 95% of the general market — as measured by revenue — as of August 2007,<ref>{{Cite web |date=22 August 2007 |title=Rivals Set Their Sights on Microsoft Office: Can They Topple the Giant? |url=http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1795 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070830001652/http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1795 |archive-date=30 August 2007 |access-date=23 September 2013 |website=Knowledge@Wharton |publisher=[[Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania]]}}</ref> OpenOffice.org and StarOffice had secured 15–20% of the business market as of 2004<ref>{{Cite web |last=Loftus |first=Jack |date=4 October 2004 |title=Desktop apps ripe turf for open source |url=http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid39_gci1011227,00.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051214195107/http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid39_gci1011227,00.html |archive-date=14 December 2005 |access-date=27 May 2012 |website=SearchEnterpriseLinux.com |publisher=TechTarget |format=First two paragraphs available, the rest requires login}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Wrolstad |first=Jay |date=13 October 2005 |title=OpenOffice.org 2.0 Release Delayed |url=http://www.toptechnews.com/news/OpenOffice-org-2-0-Release-Delayed/story.xhtml?story_id=03100339SMZN |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090104215102/http://www.toptechnews.com/news/OpenOffice-org-2-0-Release-Delayed/story.xhtml?story_id=03100339SMZN |archive-date=4 January 2009 |access-date=27 May 2012 |publisher=Top Tech News }}</ref> and a 2010 University of Colorado at Boulder study reported that OpenOffice.org had reached a point where it had an "irreversible" installed user base and that it would continue to grow.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Casson |first=Tony |title=STANDARDS EDGE: UNIFIER OR DIVIDER? |last2=Ryan |first2=Patrick |publisher=Sheridan Books |year=2006 |editor-last=Bolin |editor-first=Sherrie |page=87 |chapter=Open Standards, Open Source Adoption in the Public Sector, and Their Relationship to Microsoft's Market Dominance |ssrn=1656616}}</ref>


The project claimed more than 98 million downloads as of September 2007<ref>{{cite web|url=http://stats.openoffice.org/spreadsheet/OOo-2007-09-01.ods|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081205141746/http://stats.openoffice.org/spreadsheet/OOo-2007-09-01.ods|archive-date=5 December 2008|title=OOo-2007-09-01.ods|publisher=Sun Microsystems|access-date=16 October 2013|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref> and 300 million total to the release of version 3.2 in February 2010.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/02/prweb3584404.htm|title=OpenOffice.org 3.2 is First Out of the Blocks in the 2010 Office Software Race (press release)|publisher=Oracle Corporation|date=11 February 2010|access-date=7 October 2013|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120426155704/http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/02/prweb3584404.htm|archive-date=26 April 2012|df=dmy-all}}</ref> The project claimed over one hundred million downloads for the OpenOffice.org 3 series within a year of release.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.prweb.com/releases/ooo/centomilioni/prweb3108474.htm|title=OpenOffice.org clocks up one hundred million downloads|access-date=28 November 2009|publisher=Sun Microsystems|date=29 October 2009|archive-date=1 December 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091201233525/http://www.prweb.com/releases/ooo/centomilioni/prweb3108474.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref>
The project claimed more than 98 million downloads as of September 2007<ref>{{Cite web |title=OOo-2007-09-01.ods |url=http://stats.openoffice.org/spreadsheet/OOo-2007-09-01.ods |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081205141746/http://stats.openoffice.org/spreadsheet/OOo-2007-09-01.ods |archive-date=5 December 2008 |access-date=16 October 2013 |publisher=Sun Microsystems }}</ref> and 300 million total to the release of version 3.2 in February 2010.<ref>{{Cite web |date=11 February 2010 |title=OpenOffice.org 3.2 is First Out of the Blocks in the 2010 Office Software Race (press release) |url=http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/02/prweb3584404.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120426155704/http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/02/prweb3584404.htm |archive-date=26 April 2012 |access-date=7 October 2013 |publisher=Oracle Corporation }}</ref> The project claimed over one hundred million downloads for the OpenOffice.org 3 series within a year of release.<ref>{{Cite web |date=29 October 2009 |title=OpenOffice.org clocks up one hundred million downloads |url=http://www.prweb.com/releases/ooo/centomilioni/prweb3108474.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091201233525/http://www.prweb.com/releases/ooo/centomilioni/prweb3108474.htm |archive-date=1 December 2009 |access-date=28 November 2009 |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref>


=== Notable users ===
=== Notable users ===
{{see also|OpenDocument adoption}}
{{see also|OpenDocument adoption}}


Large-scale users of OpenOffice.org included [[Ministry of Defence (Singapore)|Singapore's Ministry of Defence]],<ref name="mindef">{{cite news|url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/singapore-government-deploys-openoffice-org-on-5000-pcs/|title=Singapore government deploys OpenOffice.org on 5,000 PCs|first=Ingrid|last=Marson|work=ZDNet|date=2 November 2004|access-date=23 September 2013|archive-date=21 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921055505/http://www.zdnet.com/singapore-government-deploys-openoffice-org-on-5000-pcs-3039171012/|url-status=live}}</ref> and [[Banco do Brasil]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Banco do Brasil, a successful case on the OpenOffice.org migration |url=http://opendocument.xml.org/node/153 |author=kraucermazuco |date=8 February 2007 |publisher=Opendocument.xml.org |access-date=26 July 2010 |archive-date=6 July 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100706155532/http://opendocument.xml.org/node/153 |url-status=live }}</ref> {{As of | 2006}} OpenOffice.org was the official office suite for the [[French Gendarmerie]].<ref name=marketshareanalysis/>
Large-scale users of OpenOffice.org included [[Ministry of Defence (Singapore)|Singapore's Ministry of Defence]],<ref name="mindef">{{Cite news |last=Marson |first=Ingrid |date=2 November 2004 |title=Singapore government deploys OpenOffice.org on 5,000 PCs |url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/singapore-government-deploys-openoffice-org-on-5000-pcs/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921055505/http://www.zdnet.com/singapore-government-deploys-openoffice-org-on-5000-pcs-3039171012/ |archive-date=21 September 2013 |access-date=23 September 2013 |work=ZDNet}}</ref> and [[Banco do Brasil]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=kraucermazuco |date=8 February 2007 |title=Banco do Brasil, a successful case on the OpenOffice.org migration |url=http://opendocument.xml.org/node/153 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100706155532/http://opendocument.xml.org/node/153 |archive-date=6 July 2010 |access-date=26 July 2010 |publisher=Opendocument.xml.org}}</ref> {{As of | 2006}} OpenOffice.org was the official office suite for the [[French Gendarmerie]].<ref name=marketshareanalysis/>


In [[India]], several government organizations such as [[Employees' State Insurance]], [[IIT Bombay]], [[National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development]], the [[Supreme Court of India]], [[ICICI Bank]],<ref>{{cite web|title=What's Behind the Move to OpenOffice.org, Can OpenOffice Replace MS-Office?|publisher=TheUnical Technologies|url=http://blog.theunical.com/general/whats-behind-the-move-to-openoffice-org-can-openoffice-replace-ms-office/|work=TheUnical Technologies Blog|date=15 January 2010|access-date=9 March 2011|archive-date=18 January 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100118025408/http://blog.theunical.com/general/whats-behind-the-move-to-openoffice-org-can-openoffice-replace-ms-office/|url-status=dead}}</ref> and the [[Allahabad High Court]],<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.allahabadhighcourt.in/faq.htm |title=FAQ: Why are Linux, Firefox, Thunderbird and OpenOffice.org softwares selected for use by the High Court? |publisher=High Court of Judicature at Allahabad |date=20 November 2004 |access-date=22 April 2009 |archive-date=22 April 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090422085018/http://www.allahabadhighcourt.in/faq.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> which use Linux, completely relied on OpenOffice.org for their administration.
In [[India]], several government organizations such as [[Employees' State Insurance]], [[IIT Bombay]], [[National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development]], the [[Supreme Court of India]], [[ICICI Bank]],<ref>{{Cite web |date=15 January 2010 |title=What's Behind the Move to OpenOffice.org, Can OpenOffice Replace MS-Office? |url=http://blog.theunical.com/general/whats-behind-the-move-to-openoffice-org-can-openoffice-replace-ms-office/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100118025408/http://blog.theunical.com/general/whats-behind-the-move-to-openoffice-org-can-openoffice-replace-ms-office/ |archive-date=18 January 2010 |access-date=9 March 2011 |website=TheUnical Technologies Blog |publisher=TheUnical Technologies}}</ref> and the [[Allahabad High Court]],<ref>{{Cite web |date=20 November 2004 |title=FAQ: Why are Linux, Firefox, Thunderbird and OpenOffice.org softwares selected for use by the High Court? |url=http://www.allahabadhighcourt.in/faq.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090422085018/http://www.allahabadhighcourt.in/faq.htm |archive-date=22 April 2009 |access-date=22 April 2009 |publisher=High Court of Judicature at Allahabad}}</ref> which use Linux, completely relied on OpenOffice.org for their administration.


In [[Japan]], conversions from Microsoft Office to OpenOffice.org included many municipal offices: [[Sumoto, Hyōgo]], in 2004,<ref>{{cite web
In [[Japan]], conversions from Microsoft Office to OpenOffice.org included many municipal offices: [[Sumoto, Hyōgo]], in 2004,<ref>{{Cite web |date=19 January 2004 |title=IT特区の洲本市、OpenOfficeを全庁内PCに導入 |url=http://www.itmedia.co.jp/news/articles/0401/19/news041.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130923102642/http://www.itmedia.co.jp/news/articles/0401/19/news041.html |archive-date=23 September 2013 |access-date=23 September 2013 |publisher=ITmedia |language=ja}}</ref> [[Ninomiya, Tochigi]] in 2006,<ref>{{Cite web |date=10 May 2006 |title=「全事務職員がLinuxデスクトップを使用している町役場」は実在する |trans-title="All Town Hall administrative staff using the Linux desktop" is real |url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/OPINION/20060428/236610/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001225344/http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/OPINION/20060428/236610/ |archive-date=1 October 2013 |access-date=23 September 2013 |website=ITpro |publisher=[[Nikkei Business Publications]] |language=ja}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2 June 2006 |title=オープンソースも「使えば慣れる」、みんなが Linux、OpenOffice.org を使う町役場 |url=http://japan.internet.com/public/news/20060602/5.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091214235028/http://japan.internet.com/public/news/20060602/5.html |archive-date=14 December 2009 |access-date=23 September 2013 |publisher=japan.internet.com |language=ja}}</ref> [[Aizuwakamatsu, Fukushima]], in 2008<ref>{{Cite web |date=29 May 2008 |title=会津若松市がOpenOffice.orgを全庁導入へ「順次MS {{sic|hide=y|reason=error in source|Off|ce}} から切り替え,5年間で約1500万円削減」 |trans-title=Aizuwakamatsu City switches all agencies to OpenOffice.org: "switching from MS Office sequentially, saving about 15 million yen in five years" |url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20080529/304780/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001225346/http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20080529/304780/ |archive-date=1 October 2013 |access-date=23 September 2013 |website=ITpro |publisher=Nikkei Business Publications |language=ja}}</ref> (and to LibreOffice as of 2012<ref>{{Cite web |date=20 February 2012 |title=会津若松市がOpenOffice.orgからLibreOfficeに移行 |trans-title=Aizuwakamatsu transitions to LibreOffice from OpenOffice.org |url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20120220/382107/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001225338/http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20120220/382107/ |archive-date=1 October 2013 |access-date=23 September 2013 |website=ITpro |publisher=Nikkei Business Publications |language=ja}}</ref>), [[Shikokuchūō, Ehime]], in 2009,<ref>{{Cite web |date=31 March 2009 |title=四国中央市がOpenOffice.orgを全庁PC1100台に導入,5年で3300万円コスト削減 |trans-title=Shikokuchūō puts OpenOffice.org onto 1100 PCs, 33 million yen cost savings in five years |url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20090331/327513/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001225341/http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20090331/327513/ |archive-date=1 October 2013 |access-date=23 September 2013 |website=ITpro |publisher=Nikkei Business Publications |language=ja}}</ref> [[Minoh, Osaka]], in 2009<ref>{{Cite web |date=14 October 2009 |title=~脱MS!無償「 Linux 」シンクライアントにより中古パソコン500台を再生利用へ~ |trans-title=De-MS! 500 used computers to be reclaimed free of charge by the "Linux" thin client |url=http://www2.city.minoh.osaka.jp/JYOUHOU/HOUDOU/20091014linux_supporter.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100304212459/http://www2.city.minoh.osaka.jp/JYOUHOU/HOUDOU/20091014linux_supporter.html |archive-date=4 March 2010 |access-date=23 September 2013 |publisher=City of Minoh |language=ja}}</ref> [[Toyokawa, Aichi]],<ref>{{Cite web |date=21 February 2010 |title=豊川市がOpenOffice.orgを全面導入、コスト削減狙う |trans-title=Toyokawa is fully introduced to OpenOffice.org, aiming at cost reduction |url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20100222/344886/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001225349/http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20100222/344886/ |archive-date=1 October 2013 |access-date=23 September 2013 |website=ITpro |publisher=Nikkei Business Publications |language=ja}}</ref> [[Fukagawa, Hokkaido]],<ref>{{Cite web |date=2 August 2010 |title=北海道深川市、OpenOffice.org全庁導入を決定 |trans-title=Hokkaido Fukagawa City decides to introduce OpenOffice.org to all PCs |url=http://cloud.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/release/20100802_385080.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130928003158/http://cloud.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/release/20100802_385080.html |archive-date=28 September 2013 |access-date=23 September 2013 |website=press release |publisher=City of [[Fukagawa, Hokkaido]] |language=ja}}</ref> and [[Katano, Osaka]],<ref>{{Cite web |date=16 August 2010 |title=大阪府交野市がOpenOffice.orgとODF採用、中古PCのLinuxによる再生も |trans-title=Katano, Osaka City adopts ODF and OpenOffice.org, also trialling Linux pre-owned PCs |url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20100815/351172/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100923011824/http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20100815/351172/ |archive-date=23 September 2010 |access-date=23 September 2010 |website=ITpro |publisher=Nikkei Business Publications |language=ja}}</ref> in 2010 and [[Ryūgasaki, Ibaraki]], in 2011.<ref>{{Cite web |date=11 June 2012 |title=龍ケ崎市、全庁標準オフィス・ソフトとしてOpenOffice.orgを利用 |trans-title=Ryugasaki uses OpenOffice.org as standard office software for all PCs |url=http://japan.cnet.com/release/30021374/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001123543/http://japan.cnet.com/release/30021374/ |archive-date=1 October 2013 |access-date=23 September 2013 |publisher=CNet Japan |language=ja}}</ref> Corporate conversions included Assist in 2007<ref>{{Cite web |date=15 March 2007 |title=アシストが社内通常業務をMicrosoft OfficeからOpenOffice.orgへ全面移行 |trans-title=Assist's full conversion to OpenOffice.org from Microsoft Office for the normal course of business |url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20070315/265301/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001231333/http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20070315/265301/ |archive-date=1 October 2013 |access-date=24 September 2013 |website=ITpro |publisher=Nikkei Business Publications |language=ja}}</ref> (and to LibreOffice on [[Ubuntu Linux|Ubuntu]] in 2011<ref>{{Cite web |date=20 July 2011 |title=アシストが社内のPC約800台をWindowsからUbuntu Linuxに移行へ |trans-title=Assist to migrate about 800 in-house PCs to Ubuntu Linux from Windows |url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20110720/362604/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001231359/http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20110720/362604/ |archive-date=1 October 2013 |access-date=24 September 2013 |website=ITpro |publisher=Nikkei Business Publications |language=ja}}</ref>), [[Sumitomo Electric Industries]] in 2008<ref>{{Cite web |date=23 May 2008 |title=「コスト削減が狙いではない」、住友電工OpenOffice導入の真相 |trans-title="Cost reduction is not the aim": the facts on Sumitomo Electric's OpenOffice introduction |url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20080523/303912/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001231434/http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20080523/303912/ |archive-date=1 October 2013 |access-date=24 September 2013 |website=ITpro |publisher=Nikkei Business Publications |language=ja}}</ref> (and to LibreOffice in 2012<ref>{{Cite web |date=28 March 2012 |title=オープンソース・ソフトウェアの社内推奨オフィスソフトをOpenOffice.orgからLibreOfficeに移行 |trans-title=The transition from OpenOffice.org to LibreOffice — company-recommended open source office software |url=http://www.sei.co.jp/news/press/12/prs030_s.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130927135231/http://www.sei.co.jp/news/press/12/prs030_s.html |archive-date=27 September 2013 |access-date=24 September 2013 |website=press release |publisher=[[Sumitomo Electric Industries]] |language=ja}}</ref>), Toho Co., Ltd. in 2009<ref name="assistcojpsupport">{{Cite web |date=27 January 2009 |title=トーホー,OpenOffice.orgの導入を決定,アシストの支援サービスを採用 |trans-title=Toho decides to adopt OpenOffice.org, uses the support services of Assist |url=http://gihyo.jp/ad/pr/2009/NRR200943213 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130510093437/http://gihyo.jp/ad/pr/2009/NRR200943213 |archive-date=10 May 2013 |access-date=24 September 2013 |publisher=Gihyo.jp |language=ja}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=27 January 2009 |title=トーホーがオープンオフィス採用、PC約1500台に一斉導入 |trans-title=Toho adopts OpenOffice, simultaneously introduced to about 1500 PCs |url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20090127/323592/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001231438/http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20090127/323592/ |archive-date=1 October 2013 |access-date=24 September 2013 |website=ITpro |publisher=Nikkei Business Publications |language=ja}}</ref> and Shinsei Financial Co., Ltd. in 2010.<ref name="shinsei">{{Cite web |date=26 March 2012 |title=新生フィナンシャルがOpenOffice.orgを全社標準に、対象は1000台以上 |trans-title=Company-wide standard OpenOffice.org on more than 1000 PCs at Shinsei Financial |url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20120326/388017/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001231330/http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20120326/388017/ |archive-date=1 October 2013 |access-date=24 September 2013 |website=ITpro |publisher=Nikkei Business Publications |language=ja}}</ref> Assist also provided support services for OpenOffice.org.<ref name=assistcojpsupport/><ref name=shinsei/>
|url=http://www.itmedia.co.jp/news/articles/0401/19/news041.html
|title=IT特区の洲本市、OpenOfficeを全庁内PCに導入
|language=ja
|publisher=ITmedia
|date=19 January 2004
|access-date=23 September 2013
|archive-date=23 September 2013
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130923102642/http://www.itmedia.co.jp/news/articles/0401/19/news041.html
|url-status=live
}}</ref> [[Ninomiya, Tochigi]] in 2006,<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/OPINION/20060428/236610/
|title=「全事務職員がLinuxデスクトップを使用している町役場」は実在する
|trans-title="All Town Hall administrative staff using the Linux desktop" is real
|language=ja
|work=ITpro
|publisher=[[Nikkei Business Publications]]
|date=10 May 2006
|access-date=23 September 2013
|archive-date=1 October 2013
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001225344/http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/OPINION/20060428/236610/
|url-status=live
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url=http://japan.internet.com/public/news/20060602/5.html
|title=オープンソースも「使えば慣れる」、みんなが Linux、OpenOffice.org を使う町役場
|language=ja
|publisher=japan.internet.com
|date=2 June 2006
|access-date=23 September 2013
|archive-date=14 December 2009
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091214235028/http://japan.internet.com/public/news/20060602/5.html
|url-status=live
}}</ref> [[Aizuwakamatsu, Fukushima]], in 2008<ref>{{cite web|url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20080529/304780/|title=会津若松市がOpenOffice.orgを全庁導入へ「順次MS {{sic|hide=y|reason=error in source|Off|ce}} から切り替え,5年間で約1500万円削減」|date=29 May 2008|publisher=Nikkei Business Publications|language=ja|trans-title=Aizuwakamatsu City switches all agencies to OpenOffice.org: "switching from MS Office sequentially, saving about 15 million yen in five years"|work=ITpro|access-date=23 September 2013|archive-date=1 October 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001225346/http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20080529/304780/|url-status=live}}</ref> (and to LibreOffice as of 2012<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20120220/382107/
|title=会津若松市がOpenOffice.orgからLibreOfficeに移行
|trans-title=Aizuwakamatsu transitions to LibreOffice from OpenOffice.org
|language=ja
|work=ITpro
|publisher=Nikkei Business Publications
|date=20 February 2012
|access-date=23 September 2013
|archive-date=1 October 2013
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001225338/http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20120220/382107/
|url-status=live
}}</ref>), [[Shikokuchūō, Ehime]], in 2009,<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20090331/327513/
|title=四国中央市がOpenOffice.orgを全庁PC1100台に導入,5年で3300万円コスト削減
|trans-title=Shikokuchūō puts OpenOffice.org onto 1100 PCs, 33 million yen cost savings in five years
|language=ja
|work=ITpro
|publisher=Nikkei Business Publications
|date=31 March 2009
|access-date=23 September 2013
|archive-date=1 October 2013
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001225341/http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20090331/327513/
|url-status=live
}}</ref> [[Minoh, Osaka]], in 2009<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www2.city.minoh.osaka.jp/JYOUHOU/HOUDOU/20091014linux_supporter.html
|title=~脱MS!無償「 Linux 」シンクライアントにより中古パソコン500台を再生利用へ~
|trans-title=De-MS! 500 used computers to be reclaimed free of charge by the "Linux" thin client
|language=ja
|publisher=City of Minoh
|date=14 October 2009
|access-date=23 September 2013
|archive-date=4 March 2010
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100304212459/http://www2.city.minoh.osaka.jp/JYOUHOU/HOUDOU/20091014linux_supporter.html
|url-status=live
}}</ref> [[Toyokawa, Aichi]],<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20100222/344886/
|title=豊川市がOpenOffice.orgを全面導入、コスト削減狙う
|trans-title=Toyokawa is fully introduced to OpenOffice.org, aiming at cost reduction
|language=ja
|work=ITpro
|publisher=Nikkei Business Publications
|date=21 February 2010
|access-date=23 September 2013
|archive-date=1 October 2013
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001225349/http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20100222/344886/
|url-status=live
}}</ref> [[Fukagawa, Hokkaido]],<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://cloud.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/release/20100802_385080.html
|title=北海道深川市、OpenOffice.org全庁導入を決定
|trans-title=Hokkaido Fukagawa City decides to introduce OpenOffice.org to all PCs
|language=ja
|work=press release
|publisher=City of [[Fukagawa, Hokkaido]]
|date=2 August 2010
|access-date=23 September 2013
|archive-date=28 September 2013
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130928003158/http://cloud.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/release/20100802_385080.html
|url-status=live
}}</ref> and [[Katano, Osaka]],<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20100815/351172/
|title=大阪府交野市がOpenOffice.orgとODF採用、中古PCのLinuxによる再生も
|trans-title=Katano, Osaka City adopts ODF and OpenOffice.org, also trialling Linux pre-owned PCs
|language=ja
|work=ITpro
|publisher=Nikkei Business Publications
|date=16 August 2010
|access-date=23 September 2010
|archive-date=23 September 2010
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100923011824/http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20100815/351172/
|url-status=live
}}</ref> in 2010 and [[Ryūgasaki, Ibaraki]], in 2011.<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://japan.cnet.com/release/30021374/
|title=龍ケ崎市、全庁標準オフィス・ソフトとしてOpenOffice.orgを利用
|trans-title=Ryugasaki uses OpenOffice.org as standard office software for all PCs
|language=ja
|publisher=CNet Japan
|date=11 June 2012
|access-date=23 September 2013
|archive-date=1 October 2013
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001123543/http://japan.cnet.com/release/30021374/
|url-status=live
}}</ref> Corporate conversions included Assist in 2007<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20070315/265301/
|title=アシストが社内通常業務をMicrosoft OfficeからOpenOffice.orgへ全面移行
|trans-title=Assist's full conversion to OpenOffice.org from Microsoft Office for the normal course of business
|language=ja
|work=ITpro
|publisher=Nikkei Business Publications
|date=15 March 2007
|access-date=24 September 2013
|archive-date=1 October 2013
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001231333/http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20070315/265301/
|url-status=live
}}</ref> (and to LibreOffice on [[Ubuntu Linux|Ubuntu]] in 2011<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20110720/362604/
|title=アシストが社内のPC約800台をWindowsからUbuntu Linuxに移行へ
|trans-title=Assist to migrate about 800 in-house PCs to Ubuntu Linux from Windows
|language=ja
|work=ITpro
|publisher=Nikkei Business Publications
|date=20 July 2011
|access-date=24 September 2013
|archive-date=1 October 2013
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001231359/http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20110720/362604/
|url-status=live
}}</ref>), [[Sumitomo Electric Industries]] in 2008<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20080523/303912/
|title=「コスト削減が狙いではない」、住友電工OpenOffice導入の真相
|trans-title="Cost reduction is not the aim": the facts on Sumitomo Electric's OpenOffice introduction
|language=ja
|work=ITpro
|publisher=Nikkei Business Publications
|date=23 May 2008
|access-date=24 September 2013
|archive-date=1 October 2013
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001231434/http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20080523/303912/
|url-status=live
}}</ref> (and to LibreOffice in 2012<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.sei.co.jp/news/press/12/prs030_s.html
|title=オープンソース・ソフトウェアの社内推奨オフィスソフトをOpenOffice.orgからLibreOfficeに移行
|trans-title=The transition from OpenOffice.org to LibreOffice — company-recommended open source office software
|language=ja
|work=press release
|publisher=[[Sumitomo Electric Industries]]
|date=28 March 2012
|access-date=24 September 2013
|archive-date=27 September 2013
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130927135231/http://www.sei.co.jp/news/press/12/prs030_s.html
|url-status=live
}}</ref>), Toho Co., Ltd. in 2009<ref name=assistcojpsupport>{{cite web
|url=http://gihyo.jp/ad/pr/2009/NRR200943213
|title=トーホー,OpenOffice.orgの導入を決定,アシストの支援サービスを採用
|trans-title=Toho decides to adopt OpenOffice.org, uses the support services of Assist
|language=ja
|publisher=Gihyo.jp
|date=27 January 2009
|access-date=24 September 2013
|archive-date=10 May 2013
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130510093437/http://gihyo.jp/ad/pr/2009/NRR200943213
|url-status=dead
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20090127/323592/
|title=トーホーがオープンオフィス採用、PC約1500台に一斉導入
|trans-title=Toho adopts OpenOffice, simultaneously introduced to about 1500 PCs
|language=ja
|work=ITpro
|publisher=Nikkei Business Publications
|date=27 January 2009
|access-date=24 September 2013
|archive-date=1 October 2013
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001231438/http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20090127/323592/
|url-status=live
}}</ref> and Shinsei Financial Co., Ltd. in 2010.<ref name=shinsei>{{cite web
|url=http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20120326/388017/
|title=新生フィナンシャルがOpenOffice.orgを全社標準に、対象は1000台以上
|trans-title=Company-wide standard OpenOffice.org on more than 1000 PCs at Shinsei Financial
|language=ja
|work=ITpro
|publisher=Nikkei Business Publications
|date=26 March 2012
|access-date=24 September 2013
|archive-date=1 October 2013
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001231330/http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20120326/388017/
|url-status=live
}}</ref> Assist also provided support services for OpenOffice.org.<ref name=assistcojpsupport/><ref name=shinsei/>


=== Retail ===
=== Retail ===
In July 2007, [[Everex]], a division of [[First International Computer]] and the 9th-largest PC supplier in the U.S., began shipping systems preloaded with OpenOffice.org 2.2 into [[Wal-Mart]], [[Kmart (United States)|K-mart]] and [[Sam's Club]] outlets in North America.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.electronista.com/articles/07/07/18/everex.gc3502/ |title=Everex intros $298 green PC with OpenOffice |publisher=Electronista |date=18 July 2007 |access-date=5 January 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070820072711/http://www.electronista.com/articles/07/07/18/everex.gc3502/#comments |archive-date=20 August 2007 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
In July 2007, [[Everex]], a division of [[First International Computer]] and the 9th-largest PC supplier in the U.S., began shipping systems preloaded with OpenOffice.org 2.2 into [[Wal-Mart]], [[Kmart (United States)|K-mart]] and [[Sam's Club]] outlets in North America.<ref>{{Cite web |date=18 July 2007 |title=Everex intros $298 green PC with OpenOffice |url=http://www.electronista.com/articles/07/07/18/everex.gc3502/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070820072711/http://www.electronista.com/articles/07/07/18/everex.gc3502/#comments |archive-date=20 August 2007 |access-date=5 January 2013 |publisher=Electronista}}</ref>


== Forks and derivative software ==
== Forks and derivative software ==
A number of open source and proprietary products derive at least some code from OpenOffice.org, including AndrOpen Office,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pianetatech.it/p2p-download/download/openoffice-sbarca-su-android.html|title=OpenOffice sbarca su Android|language=it|trans-title=OpenOffice lands on Android|author=Mirko|work=P2P Download|publisher=PianetaTech|date=20 September 2013|access-date=5 October 2013|archive-date=11 March 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140311174947/http://www.pianetatech.it/p2p-download/download/openoffice-sbarca-su-android.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> [[Apache OpenOffice]], ChinaOffice, Co-Create Office, EuroOffice 2005,<ref name="EuroOffice">{{cite web|title=A multilingual OpenOffice with some commercial extensions|access-date=13 March 2016|publisher=MultiRáció Ltd.|url=http://www.multiracio.com/index.php?lang=en&style=eurooffice&page=eo|archive-date=16 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160316192032/http://www.multiracio.com/index.php?lang=en&style=eurooffice&page=eo|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Go-oo]], KaiOffice, [[IBM Lotus Symphony]], [[IBM Workplace]], [[Kilinux#Jambo OpenOffice|Jambo OpenOffice]] (the first office suite in [[Swahili language|Swahili]]),<ref name="BBC">{{cite web|access-date=23 September 2013|publisher=BBC|title=L'Afrique dit "Jambo" aux logiciels libres|trans-title=Africa says "Jambo" to free software|language=fr|date=15 December 2004|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/french/highlights/story/2004/12/041215_openofficejambo.shtml|archive-date=23 February 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140223225059/http://www.bbc.co.uk/french/highlights/story/2004/12/041215_openofficejambo.shtml|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.openoffice.org/editorial/interview_alberto_escudero.html|access-date=1 January 2012|title=Interview: Alberto Escudero, klnX: The Open Swahili Localization Project|date=25 October 2004|first1=Louis|last1=Suárez-Potts|first2=Alberto|last2=Escudero|publisher=OpenOffice.org|archive-date=13 September 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110913012927/http://www.openoffice.org/editorial/interview_alberto_escudero.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="ZDNET">{{cite news|title=OpenOffice.org goes Swahili|first=Ingrid|last=Marson|work=ZDNet|date=6 December 2004|access-date=30 December 2011|url=http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/application-development/2004/12/06/openofficeorg-goes-swahili-39179058/|archive-date=23 February 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120223182336/http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/application-development/2004/12/06/openofficeorg-goes-swahili-39179058/|url-status=live}}</ref> [[LibreOffice]], MagyarOffice, MultiMedia Office, MYOffice 2007, [[NeoOffice]], NextOffice, OfficeOne, OfficeTLE, OOo4Kids,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ooo4kids.org/|title=Welcome to OOo4Kids project|publisher=EducOOo|access-date=1 October 2013|archive-date=29 March 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100329113654/http://www.ooo4kids.org/|url-status=live}}</ref> OpenOfficePL, OpenOffice.org Portable,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://portableapps.com/apps/office/openoffice_portable|title=OpenOffice.org Portable|publisher=PortableApps.com|date=25 February 2010|access-date=1 October 2013|archive-date=4 March 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070304224646/http://portableapps.com/apps/office/openoffice_portable|url-status=live}}</ref> OpenOfficeT7, OpenOffice.ux.pl, OxOffice,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ithelp.ithome.com.tw/question/10054256|title=Openoffice.org與OxOffice|trans-title=Openoffice.org and OxOffice|work=iT邦|date=15 October 2010|access-date=14 October 2015|archive-date=16 October 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151016114525/http://ithelp.ithome.com.tw/question/10054256|url-status=dead}}</ref> OxygenOffice Professional,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.download.com/8301-2007_4-9822335-12.html|title=Oxygen breathes more life into OpenOffice|access-date=20 November 2007|last=Rosenblatt|first=Seth|date=24 November 2007|work=[[Download.com]]|publisher=[[CNET]]|archive-date=27 November 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071127161039/http://www.download.com/8301-2007_4-9822335-12.html|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/12990/go-oo-erster-fork-von-openofficeorg.html|title=Go-oo: Erster Fork von OpenOffice.org|language=de|trans-title=Go-oo: First fork of OpenOffice.org|first=Hans-Joachim|last=Baader|work=Pro-Linux.de|date=30 July 2008|access-date=21 June 2013|quote=Nach Angaben der Entwickler beruht die bereits bekannte erweiterte Distribution Oxygen Office Professional auf Go-oo und nicht, wie man beim Lesen auf der Webseite von Oxygen Office vermuten würde, direkt auf OpenOffice.org. [According to the developer, the well-known expanded distribution Oxygen Office Professional was based on Go-oo and not, as one might expect from reading the Oxygen Office website, on OpenOffice.org.]|archive-date=29 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130929153427/http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/12990/go-oo-erster-fork-von-openofficeorg.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Pladao Office,<ref>{{cite conference
{{Panorama
| url = http://www.openoffice.org/marketing/conference/presentations-pdf/fri1330/PladaoOffice2003.pdf
| image = StarOffice major derivatives.svg
| title = Pladao Office
| height = 255px
| first = Nusorn
| caption = A timeline of major derivatives of StarOffice (purple) and OpenOffice.org (blue)
| last = Photpipat
| dir =
| date = 21 March 2003
}}A number of open source and proprietary products derive at least some code from OpenOffice.org. Major derivatives include:
| conference = OpenOffice.org Conference 2003
| conference-url = //www.openoffice.org/marketing/ooocon2003/index.html
| publisher = Sun Microsystems
| location = Hamburg
| access-date = 16 October 2013
| archive-date = 4 October 2013
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20131004213506/http://www.openoffice.org/marketing/conference/presentations-pdf/fri1330/PladaoOffice2003.pdf
| url-status = dead
}}</ref> PlusOffice Mac,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.macworld.com/article/1137502/plusoffice.html|title=PlusOffice to build on OpenOffice.org|first=Peter|last=Cohen|date=12 December 2008|access-date=1 October 2013|publisher=MacWorld|archive-date=5 October 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131005003737/http://www.macworld.com/article/1137502/plusoffice.html|url-status=live}}</ref> RedOffice,<ref name=phipps-tippingpoint/><ref name=redflag240/><ref>{{Cite press release|publisher=Sun Microsystems|url=http://www.sun.com/aboutsun/pr/2007-05/sunflash.20070523.2.xml|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080216183643/http://www.sun.com/aboutsun/pr/2007-05/sunflash.20070523.2.xml|title=Sun and Redflag Chinese 2000 to Collaborate on OpenOffice.org Projects|date=23 May 2007|archive-date=16 February 2008|access-date=16 October 2013|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref> RomanianOffice, [[StarOffice]]/Oracle Open Office, SunShine Office, ThizOffice, UP Office, White Label Office,<ref>{{Cite press release|url=http://world.einnews.com/pr_news/61139143/open-source-software-defends-itself-against-looming-shut-down|publisher=Team OpenOffice e.V.|title=Open-Source Software Defends Itself Against Looming Shut-Down|location=[[Hamburg]], Germany|date=11 October 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111108212808/http://world.einnews.com/pr_news/61139143/open-source-software-defends-itself-against-looming-shut-down|archive-date=8 November 2011|access-date=16 October 2013|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://www.pcworld.com/article/241758/facing_closure_openofficeorg_makes_a_plea_for_survival.html|access-date=16 May 2012|title=Facing Closure, OpenOffice.org Makes a Plea for Survival|date=13 October 2011|first=Katherine|last=Noyes|magazine=PCWorld}}{{Dead link|date=January 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_statement|publisher=Apache Software Foundation|access-date=13 May 2012|date=14 October 2011|title=The Apache Software Foundation Statement on Apache OpenOffice.org|archive-date=12 May 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120512193159/http://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_statement|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|access-date=13 May 2012|work=The H Open|publisher=Heinz Heise|url=http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/ASF-says-OpenOffice-org-is-in-good-health-1362079.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131208113518/http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/ASF-says-OpenOffice-org-is-in-good-health-1362079.html|archive-date=8 December 2013|title=ASF says OpenOffice.org is in good health|date=17 October 2011|first=Chris|last=von Eitzen|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref> WPS Office Storm (the 2004 edition of [[Kingsoft Office]]) and 602Office.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=DerivedWorks&oldid=171353 |work=OpenOffice.org Wiki |title=DerivedWorks |publisher=Oracle Corporation |date=8 June 2010 |access-date=26 July 2010 |archive-date=4 September 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904074256/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=DerivedWorks&oldid=171353 |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
The OpenOffice.org website also listed a large variety of complementary products, including [[groupware]] systems.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=OpenOffice.org_Solutions&oldid=196039 |title=Openoffice.org Solutions |work=OpenOffice.org Wiki |publisher=Oracle Corporation |date=17 April 2011 |access-date=20 June 2013 |archive-date=4 September 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904074256/https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=OpenOffice.org_Solutions&oldid=196039 |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
{{Panorama|image=StarOffice major derivatives.svg|height=255px|caption=A timeline of major derivatives of StarOffice and OpenOffice.org
{{legend|#C83296|[[StarOffice]]}}
{{legend|#003BAA|OpenOffice.org}}
{{legend|#F3581F|[[Go-oo]]}}
{{legend|#FFAF32|[[IBM Workplace]]/[[IBM Lotus Symphony]]}}
{{legend|#BF7FFF|[[NeoOffice]]}}
{{legend|#18A303|[[LibreOffice]]}}
{{legend|#0E85CD|[[Apache OpenOffice]]}}
|dir=rtl}}
 
Major derivatives include:


=== Active ===
=== Active ===
Line 977: Line 619:
{{main|Apache OpenOffice}}
{{main|Apache OpenOffice}}


In June 2011, Oracle contributed the OpenOffice.org code and trademarks to the Apache Software Foundation. The developer pool for the Apache project was proposed to be seeded by IBM employees, Linux distribution companies and public sector agencies.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/raw/%3C4DE65D8F.8060002@oracle.com%3E/2|title=Proposal|first=Luke|last=Kowalski|work=attachment|access-date=23 September 2013|archive-date=2 July 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160702010257/http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/raw/%3C4DE65D8F.8060002@oracle.com%3E/2|url-status=dead}}; attachment to {{cite web|url=https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/%3C4DE65D8F.8060002@oracle.com%3E|title=OpenOffice.org Apache Incubator Proposal|first=Luke|last=Kowalski|work=incubator-general mailing list|publisher=Apache Software Foundation|date=1 June 2011|access-date=23 September 2013|archive-date=1 September 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180901115423/https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/%3C4DE65D8F.8060002@oracle.com%3E|url-status=live}}</ref> IBM employees did the majority of the development,<ref name=infoworld20130826>{{cite magazine|url=http://www.infoworld.com/print/225555|title=In defense of Apache|magazine=InfoWorld|first=Andrew|last=Oliver|date=26 August 2013|access-date=28 August 2013|archive-date=27 August 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130827150444/http://www.infoworld.com/print/225555|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="hillesley20120404">{{cite news|url=http://www.linuxuser.co.uk/news/apache-openoffice-who-knows-where-the-time-goes|title=Apache OpenOffice: who knows where the time goes?|last=Hillesley|first=Richard|date=4 April 2012|publisher=LinuxUser|access-date=11 June 2013|archive-date=4 April 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160404082126/http://www.linuxuser.co.uk/news/apache-openoffice-who-knows-where-the-time-goes|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="sjvn20121028">{{cite news|url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/does-openoffice-have-a-future/|title=Does OpenOffice have a future?|last=Vaughan-Nichols|first=Steven J.|work=ZDNet Linux and Open Source|publisher=ZDNet|date=28 October 2012|access-date=27 December 2012|archive-date=4 December 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141204142233/http://www.zdnet.com/does-openoffice-have-a-future-7000006480/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="brillblog"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/simon-says/2012/05/open-source-suites-highly-active/index.htm|title=Open Source Suites Highly Active|first=Simon|last=Phipps|work=Simon Says|publisher=Computerworld UK|date=9 May 2012|access-date=2 July 2013|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921054858/http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/simon-says/2012/05/open-source-suites-highly-active/index.htm|archive-date=21 September 2013|df=dmy-all}}</ref> including hiring ex-Star Division developers.<ref name="sjvn20121028"/> The Apache project removed or replaced as much code as possible from OpenOffice.org 3.4 beta 1, including fonts, under licenses unacceptable to Apache<ref name=asflegal>{{cite web |url=https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html |title=ASF Legal Previously Asked Questions |publisher=Apache Software Foundation |access-date=5 January 2013 |archive-date=6 February 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180206232339/http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html |url-status=live }}</ref> and released 3.4.0 in May 2012.<ref name="aoo340">{{cite web|url=http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/3.4.0.html|title=AOO 3.4.0 Release Notes|work=Apache OpenOffice|publisher=Apache Software Foundation|access-date=30 September 2013|archive-date=24 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130924085701/http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/3.4.0.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
In June 2011, Oracle donated the OpenOffice.org codebase and trademarks to [[The Apache Software Foundation]]. The resulting project, Apache OpenOffice project was expected to be developed by contributors from IBM, Linux distributors, and public sector agencies.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kowalski |first=Luke |title=Proposal |url=http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/raw/%3C4DE65D8F.8060002@oracle.com%3E/2 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160702010257/http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/raw/%3C4DE65D8F.8060002@oracle.com%3E/2 |archive-date=2 July 2016 |access-date=23 September 2013 |website=attachment}}; attachment to {{cite web|url=https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/%3C4DE65D8F.8060002@oracle.com%3E|title=OpenOffice.org Apache Incubator Proposal|first=Luke|last=Kowalski|work=incubator-general mailing list|publisher=Apache Software Foundation|date=1 June 2011|access-date=23 September 2013|archive-date=1 September 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180901115423/https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/%3C4DE65D8F.8060002@oracle.com%3E|url-status=live}}</ref> In practice, most of the development was carried out by IBM,<ref name="infoworld20130826">{{Cite magazine |last=Oliver |first=Andrew |date=26 August 2013 |title=In defense of Apache |url=http://www.infoworld.com/print/225555 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130827150444/http://www.infoworld.com/print/225555 |archive-date=27 August 2013 |access-date=28 August 2013 |magazine=InfoWorld}}</ref><ref name="hillesley20120404">{{Cite news |last=Hillesley |first=Richard |date=4 April 2012 |title=Apache OpenOffice: who knows where the time goes? |url=http://www.linuxuser.co.uk/news/apache-openoffice-who-knows-where-the-time-goes |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160404082126/http://www.linuxuser.co.uk/news/apache-openoffice-who-knows-where-the-time-goes |archive-date=4 April 2016 |access-date=11 June 2013 |publisher=LinuxUser}}</ref><ref name="sjvn20121028">{{Cite news |last=Vaughan-Nichols |first=Steven J. |date=28 October 2012 |title=Does OpenOffice have a future? |url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/does-openoffice-have-a-future/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141204142233/http://www.zdnet.com/does-openoffice-have-a-future-7000006480/ |archive-date=4 December 2014 |access-date=27 December 2012 |work=ZDNet Linux and Open Source |publisher=ZDNet}}</ref><ref name="brillblog" /><ref>{{Cite web |last=Phipps |first=Simon |date=9 May 2012 |title=Open Source Suites Highly Active |url=http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/simon-says/2012/05/open-source-suites-highly-active/index.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921054858/http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/simon-says/2012/05/open-source-suites-highly-active/index.htm |archive-date=21 September 2013 |access-date=2 July 2013 |website=Simon Says |publisher=Computerworld UK}}</ref> which had hired several former project developers from Oracle.<ref name="sjvn20121028" />
 
To comply with Apache's licensing policies, the project removed or replaced components from OpenOffice.org 3.4 beta 1 whose licenses were incompatible with the [[Apache License]].<ref name="asflegal">{{Cite web |title=ASF Legal Previously Asked Questions |url=https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180206232339/http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html |archive-date=6 February 2018 |access-date=5 January 2013 |publisher=Apache Software Foundation}}</ref> The first Apache release, OpenOffice 3.4.0, was published in May 2012.<ref name="aoo340" />


The codebase for IBM's Lotus Symphony was donated to the Apache Software Foundation in 2012 and merged for Apache OpenOffice 4.0,<ref name="symphony_allegro_moderato"/> and Symphony was deprecated in favour of Apache OpenOffice.<ref name="brillblog">{{cite web |first=Ed |last=Brill |url=http://edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/more-on-the-lotus-symphony-and-desktop-productivity-roadmap |title=More on the Lotus Symphony and desktop productivity roadmap |publisher=Ed Brill |date=5 February 2012 |access-date=18 October 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120606140010/http://edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/more-on-the-lotus-symphony-and-desktop-productivity-roadmap |archive-date=6 June 2012 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
Later that year, IBM donated the codebase of Lotus Symphony, its customized version of OpenOffice.org, which was merged into Apache OpenOffice 4.0.<ref name="symphony_allegro_moderato" /> Symphony was then discontinued.<ref name="brillblog">{{Cite web |last=Brill |first=Ed |date=5 February 2012 |title=More on the Lotus Symphony and desktop productivity roadmap |url=http://edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/more-on-the-lotus-symphony-and-desktop-productivity-roadmap |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120606140010/http://edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/more-on-the-lotus-symphony-and-desktop-productivity-roadmap |archive-date=6 June 2012 |access-date=18 October 2012 |publisher=Ed Brill}}</ref> After IBM's withdrawal, the project has struggled to maintain a sustainable contributor base.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Byfield |first=Bruce |date=30 September 2014 |title=LibreOffice, OpenOffice, and rumors of unification |url=http://www.linuxpromagazine.com/Online/Blogs/Off-the-Beat-Bruce-Byfield-s-Blog/LibreOffice-OpenOffice-and-rumors-of-unification |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141008203914/http://www.linuxpromagazine.com/Online/Blogs/Off-the-Beat-Bruce-Byfield-s-Blog/LibreOffice-OpenOffice-and-rumors-of-unification |archive-date=8 October 2014 |access-date=7 October 2014 |website=Linux Pro Magazine |publisher=Linux New Media}}</ref><ref name="ASF Board minutes January 2015">{{Cite web |date=21 January 2015 |title=The Apache Software Foundation Board of Directors Meeting Minutes January 21, 2015 |url=http://apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2015/board_minutes_2015_01_21.txt |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150620113743/http://apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2015/board_minutes_2015_01_21.txt |archive-date=20 June 2015 |access-date=3 May 2015 |publisher=Apache Software Foundation}}</ref> Since 2015, Apache OpenOffice has faced ongoing difficulties delivering timely security patches.<ref name="regfeb2019">{{Cite web |last=Claburn |first=Thomas |date=4 February 2019 |title=LibreOffice patches malicious code-execution bug, Apache OpenOffice – wait for it, wait for it – doesn't |url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/02/04/apache_openoffice_no_patch/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190228192327/https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/02/04/apache_openoffice_no_patch/ |archive-date=28 February 2019 |access-date=28 February 2019 |website=The Register}}</ref> The most recent major feature release was version 4.1 in 2014, with the latest maintenance release, 4.1.15, issued on 22 December 2023.<ref name="4115-release-notes">{{Cite web |date=22 December 2023 |title=Announcing Apache OpenOffice 4.1.15 |url=https://openoffice.apache.org/blog/announcing-apache-openoffice-4-1-15.html |access-date=16 February 2024}}</ref>


While the project considers itself the unbroken continuation of OpenOffice.org,<ref>{{cite web|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130825090723/http://www.openoffice.org/about/|url=http://www.openoffice.org/about/|archive-date=25 August 2013|access-date=3 October 2013|title=About Apache OpenOffice|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref> others regard it as a fork,<ref name="thonline2011"/><ref name=infoworld20130826/><ref name="hillesley20120404"/><ref name=cloudave>{{cite web|url=http://www.cloudave.com/13293/oracle-donates-openoffice-org-to-apache-a-quick-analysis/|title=Oracle Donates OpenOffice.org To Apache: A Quick Analysis|first=Krishnan|last=Subramanian|date=1 June 2011|access-date=1 October 2013|work=CloudAve|publisher=Cloud Avenue LLC|archive-date=10 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170810205917/https://www.cloudave.com/13293/oracle-donates-openoffice-org-to-apache-a-quick-analysis/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/06/11/apache_openoffice_ship_when_ready/|title=Apache devs: 'We'll ship no OpenOffice before its time'|first=Neil|last=McAllister|work=The Register|publisher=Situation Publishing|date=11 June 2013|access-date=2 October 2013|archive-date=24 October 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171024125840/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/06/11/apache_openoffice_ship_when_ready/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://opensource.com/life/13/1/software-wars|title=Software Wars: A film about FOSS, collaboration, and software freedom|first=Jason|last=Hibbets|work=opensource.com|publisher=Red Hat|date=15 January 2013|access-date=2 October 2013|archive-date=10 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170810205937/https://opensource.com/life/13/1/software-wars|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2048446/apache-openoffice-4-0-review-new-features-easier-to-use-still-free.html|title=Apache OpenOffice 4.0 review: New features, easier to use, still free|first=Ian|last=Harac|work=Download This|publisher=PCWorld|date=23 September 2013|access-date=13 October 2013|archive-date=15 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170815151734/http://www.pcworld.com/article/2048446/apache-openoffice-4-0-review-new-features-easier-to-use-still-free.html|url-status=live}}</ref> or at the least a separate project.<ref name="gamalielsson2013">{{Cite journal | last1 = Gamalielsson | first1 = J. | last2 = Lundell | first2 = B. R. | title = Sustainability of Open Source software communities beyond a fork: How and why has the LibreOffice project evolved? | doi = 10.1016/j.jss.2013.11.1077 | journal = Journal of Systems and Software | volume = 89 | pages = 128–145 | year = 2013 | doi-access = free }}</ref>
In September 2016, discussions began about possibly retiring the project entirely,<ref>{{Cite news |date=2 September 2016 |title=Contemplating the possible retirement of Apache OpenOffice |url=https://lwn.net/Articles/699047/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160903175541/https://lwn.net/Articles/699047/ |archive-date=3 September 2016 |access-date=3 January 2017 |work=[[LWN.net]]}}</ref> though no final decision was made. As of July 2025, Apache OpenOffice remains available for download, but the Apache Software Foundation acknowledges that the software contains multiple unresolved security vulnerabilities.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |date=20 November 2024 |title=The Apache Software Foundation Board of Directors Meeting Minutes |url=https://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2024/board_minutes_2024_11_20.txt |website=www.apache.org}}</ref>


In October 2014, [[Bruce Byfield]], writing for [[Linux Magazine]], said the project had "all but stalled [possibly] due to IBM's withdrawal from the project."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.linuxpromagazine.com/Online/Blogs/Off-the-Beat-Bruce-Byfield-s-Blog/LibreOffice-OpenOffice-and-rumors-of-unification|first=Bruce|last=Byfield|date=30 September 2014|title=LibreOffice, OpenOffice, and rumors of unification|work=Linux Pro Magazine|publisher=Linux New Media|access-date=7 October 2014|archive-date=8 October 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141008203914/http://www.linuxpromagazine.com/Online/Blogs/Off-the-Beat-Bruce-Byfield-s-Blog/LibreOffice-OpenOffice-and-rumors-of-unification|url-status=live}}</ref> {{As of|2015}}, the project has no release manager,<ref>[https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@openoffice.apache.org/msg20922.html Retirement announcement] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220328195545/https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@openoffice.apache.org/msg20922.html |date=28 March 2022 }}, October 2014; [http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.ooo.devel/49631 note of position still being unfilled] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170204195222/http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.ooo.devel/49631 |date=4 February 2017 }}, March 2015</ref> and itself reports a lack of volunteer involvement and code contributions.<ref name="ASF Board minutes January 2015">{{cite web|url=http://apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2015/board_minutes_2015_01_21.txt|title=The Apache Software Foundation Board of Directors Meeting Minutes January 21, 2015|publisher=Apache Software Foundation|date=21 January 2015|access-date=3 May 2015|archive-date=20 June 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150620113743/http://apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2015/board_minutes_2015_01_21.txt|url-status=live}}</ref> After ongoing problems with unfixed [[computer security|security]] [[Vulnerability (computing)|vulnerabilities]] from 2015 onward,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://lwn.net/Articles/695562/|title=Apache OpenOffice and CVE-2016-1513|date=27 July 2016|first=Jake|last=Edge|work=[[LWN.net]]|access-date=4 August 2016|archive-date=1 September 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160901144206/http://lwn.net/Articles/695562/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="asfboard201701">{{cite web|url=http://apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2017/board_minutes_2017_01_18.txt|title=Board of Directors Meeting Minutes|date=18 January 2017|publisher=Apache Foundation|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170418162204/https://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2017/board_minutes_2017_01_18.txt|archive-date=18 April 2017|url-status=dead|access-date=18 April 2017|quote=There will be at least one security fix in the under-development release 4.1.4.}}</ref><ref name="regfeb2019">{{cite web|url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/02/04/apache_openoffice_no_patch/|title=LibreOffice patches malicious code-execution bug, Apache OpenOffice – wait for it, wait for it – doesn't|last=Claburn|first=Thomas|date=4 February 2019|work=The Register|access-date=28 February 2019|archive-date=28 February 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190228192327/https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/02/04/apache_openoffice_no_patch/|url-status=live}}</ref> in September 2016 the project started discussions on possibly retiring AOO.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://lwn.net/Articles/699047/|title=Contemplating the possible retirement of Apache OpenOffice|work=[[LWN.net]]|date=2 September 2016|access-date=3 January 2017|archive-date=3 September 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160903175541/https://lwn.net/Articles/699047/|url-status=live}}</ref>
Although the Apache project considers itself the direct continuation of OpenOffice.org,<ref>{{Cite web |title=About Apache OpenOffice |url=http://www.openoffice.org/about/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130825090723/http://www.openoffice.org/about/ |archive-date=25 August 2013 |access-date=3 October 2013 }}</ref> others have described it as a fork or at least a separate project,<ref name="gamalielsson2013">{{Cite journal |last=Gamalielsson |first=J. |last2=Lundell |first2=B. R. |year=2013 |title=Sustainability of Open Source software communities beyond a fork: How and why has the LibreOffice project evolved? |journal=Journal of Systems and Software |volume=89 |pages=128–145 |doi=10.1016/j.jss.2013.11.1077 |doi-access=free}}</ref> due to its different governance model, licensing, and development direction.<ref name="thonline2011" /><ref name="infoworld20130826" /><ref name="hillesley20120404" /><ref name="cloudave">{{Cite web |last=Subramanian |first=Krishnan |date=1 June 2011 |title=Oracle Donates OpenOffice.org To Apache: A Quick Analysis |url=http://www.cloudave.com/13293/oracle-donates-openoffice-org-to-apache-a-quick-analysis/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170810205917/https://www.cloudave.com/13293/oracle-donates-openoffice-org-to-apache-a-quick-analysis/ |archive-date=10 August 2017 |access-date=1 October 2013 |website=CloudAve |publisher=Cloud Avenue LLC}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=McAllister |first=Neil |date=11 June 2013 |title=Apache devs: 'We'll ship no OpenOffice before its time' |url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/06/11/apache_openoffice_ship_when_ready/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171024125840/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/06/11/apache_openoffice_ship_when_ready/ |archive-date=24 October 2017 |access-date=2 October 2013 |website=The Register |publisher=Situation Publishing}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Hibbets |first=Jason |date=15 January 2013 |title=Software Wars: A film about FOSS, collaboration, and software freedom |url=http://opensource.com/life/13/1/software-wars |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170810205937/https://opensource.com/life/13/1/software-wars |archive-date=10 August 2017 |access-date=2 October 2013 |website=opensource.com |publisher=Red Hat}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Harac |first=Ian |date=23 September 2013 |title=Apache OpenOffice 4.0 review: New features, easier to use, still free |url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/2048446/apache-openoffice-4-0-review-new-features-easier-to-use-still-free.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170815151734/http://www.pcworld.com/article/2048446/apache-openoffice-4-0-review-new-features-easier-to-use-still-free.html |archive-date=15 August 2017 |access-date=13 October 2013 |website=Download This |publisher=PCWorld}}</ref>  


==== LibreOffice ====
==== LibreOffice ====
{{main|LibreOffice}}
{{main|LibreOffice}}
Sun had stated in the original OpenOffice.org announcement in 2000 that the project would be run by a neutral foundation,<ref name="ooo-announcement"/> and put forward a more detailed proposal in 2001.<ref name="ooofoundation">{{cite web|url=http://www.openoffice.org/white_papers/OOo_project/openofficefoundation.html|title=The OpenOffice.org Foundation|publisher=Sun Microsystems|date=4 November 2001|access-date=9 October 2013|archive-date=21 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921102841/http://www.openoffice.org/white_papers/OOo_project/openofficefoundation.html|url-status=live}}</ref> There were many calls to put this into effect over the ensuing years.<ref name="lwngooo">{{cite news |last=Edge |first=Jake |date=15 October 2008 |title=OpenOffice.org releases 3.0, faces new challenges |url=https://lwn.net/Articles/303009/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130421005310/http://lwn.net/Articles/303009/ |archive-date=21 April 2013 |access-date=3 January 2013 |work=LWN.net}}</ref><ref name="ooo2008stats"/><ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10129764-16.html|title=Why is OpenOffice "profoundly sick"?|first=Matt|last=Asay|work=The Open Road|publisher=CNet|date=30 December 2008|access-date=17 June 2013|archive-date=21 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921054113/http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10129764-16.html|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Dave|last=Neary|url=http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2008/04/29/openofficeorg-a-candidate-for-a-501c6/|title=OpenOffice.org – a candidate for a 501(c)6?|work=Safe as Milk|publisher=Blogs.gnome.org|date=29 April 2008|access-date=5 January 2013|archive-date=1 May 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080501123533/http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2008/04/29/openofficeorg-a-candidate-for-a-501c6/|url-status=live}}</ref> On 28 September 2010, in frustration at years of perceived neglect of the codebase and community by Sun and then Oracle,<ref name=webwereld20100930/> members of the OpenOffice.org community announced a non-profit called The Document Foundation and a fork of OpenOffice.org named LibreOffice. Go-oo improvements were merged, and that project was retired in favour of LibreOffice.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://lwn.net/Articles/407339/ |title=Michael Meeks talks about LibreOffice and the Document Foundation |date=28 September 2010 |first=Jake |last=Edge |publisher=Linux Weekly News |access-date=21 July 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180928121520/https://lwn.net/Articles/407339/ |archive-date=28 September 2018 |url-status=dead }}</ref> The goal was to produce a vendor-independent office suite with ODF support and without any copyright assignment requirements.<ref name="tdfcontact" />
Sun had stated in the original OpenOffice.org announcement in 2000 that the project would be run by a neutral foundation,<ref name="ooo-announcement" /> and put forward a more detailed proposal in 2001.<ref name="ooofoundation">{{Cite web |date=4 November 2001 |title=The OpenOffice.org Foundation |url=http://www.openoffice.org/white_papers/OOo_project/openofficefoundation.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921102841/http://www.openoffice.org/white_papers/OOo_project/openofficefoundation.html |archive-date=21 September 2013 |access-date=9 October 2013 |publisher=Sun Microsystems}}</ref> There were many calls to put this into effect over the ensuing years.<ref name="lwngooo">{{Cite news |last=Edge |first=Jake |date=15 October 2008 |title=OpenOffice.org releases 3.0, faces new challenges |url=https://lwn.net/Articles/303009/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130421005310/http://lwn.net/Articles/303009/ |archive-date=21 April 2013 |access-date=3 January 2013 |work=LWN.net}}</ref><ref name="ooo2008stats" /><ref>{{Cite news |last=Asay |first=Matt |date=30 December 2008 |title=Why is OpenOffice "profoundly sick"? |url=http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10129764-16.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921054113/http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10129764-16.html |archive-date=21 September 2013 |access-date=17 June 2013 |work=The Open Road |publisher=CNet}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Neary |first=Dave |date=29 April 2008 |title=OpenOffice.org – a candidate for a 501(c)6? |url=http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2008/04/29/openofficeorg-a-candidate-for-a-501c6/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080501123533/http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2008/04/29/openofficeorg-a-candidate-for-a-501c6/ |archive-date=1 May 2008 |access-date=5 January 2013 |website=Safe as Milk |publisher=Blogs.gnome.org}}</ref> On 28 September 2010, in frustration at years of perceived neglect of the codebase and community by Sun and then Oracle,<ref name=webwereld20100930/> members of the OpenOffice.org community announced a non-profit called The Document Foundation and a fork of OpenOffice.org named LibreOffice. Go-oo improvements were merged, and that project was retired in favour of LibreOffice.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Edge |first=Jake |date=28 September 2010 |title=Michael Meeks talks about LibreOffice and the Document Foundation |url=https://lwn.net/Articles/407339/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180928121520/https://lwn.net/Articles/407339/ |archive-date=28 September 2018 |access-date=21 July 2016 |publisher=Linux Weekly News}}</ref> The goal was to produce a vendor-independent office suite with ODF support and without any copyright assignment requirements.<ref name="tdfcontact" />


Oracle was invited to become a member of the Document Foundation and was asked to donate the OpenOffice.org brand.<ref name="tdfcontact">{{cite web|url=http://www.documentfoundation.org/contact/tdf_release.html|title=OpenOffice.org Community announces The Document Foundation|access-date=31 December 2012|date=28 September 2010|publisher=The Document Foundation|archive-date=30 September 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100930085933/http://www.documentfoundation.org/contact/tdf_release.html|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=OpenOffice.org developers move to break ties with Oracle|publisher=Computerworld|url=http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9188338/OpenOffice.org_developers_move_to_break_ties_with_Oracle|first=Jeremy|last=Kirk|date=28 September 2010|access-date=28 September 2010|archive-date=17 January 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230117075827/https://www.computerworld.com/article/2516107/update--openoffice-org-developers-move-to-break-ties-with-oracle.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Oracle instead demanded that all members of the OpenOffice.org Community Council involved with the Document Foundation step down,<ref name=ars20101018/> leaving the Council composed only of Oracle employees.<ref name=zdnet20101019/>
Oracle was invited to become a member of the Document Foundation and was asked to donate the OpenOffice.org brand.<ref name="tdfcontact">{{Cite web |date=28 September 2010 |title=OpenOffice.org Community announces The Document Foundation |url=http://www.documentfoundation.org/contact/tdf_release.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100930085933/http://www.documentfoundation.org/contact/tdf_release.html |archive-date=30 September 2010 |access-date=31 December 2012 |publisher=The Document Foundation }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Kirk |first=Jeremy |date=28 September 2010 |title=OpenOffice.org developers move to break ties with Oracle |url=http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9188338/OpenOffice.org_developers_move_to_break_ties_with_Oracle |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230117075827/https://www.computerworld.com/article/2516107/update--openoffice-org-developers-move-to-break-ties-with-oracle.html |archive-date=17 January 2023 |access-date=28 September 2010 |publisher=Computerworld}}</ref> Oracle instead demanded that all members of the OpenOffice.org Community Council involved with the Document Foundation step down,<ref name=ars20101018/> leaving the Council composed only of Oracle employees.<ref name=zdnet20101019/>


Most Linux distributions promptly replaced OpenOffice.org with LibreOffice;<ref name="nww20120525">{{cite news |last=Gold |first=Jon |date=25 May 2012 |title=Most OpenOffice users run Windows |url=https://www.networkworld.com/news/2012/052512-openoffice-windows-259633.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130618030001/https://www.networkworld.com/news/2012/052512-openoffice-windows-259633.html |archive-date=18 June 2013 |access-date=27 December 2012 |work=Network World}}</ref><ref name="debian-lo"/><ref name="ubuntu-lo"/><ref name="suse-lo"/> [[Oracle Linux]] 6 also features LibreOffice rather than OpenOffice.org or Apache OpenOffice.<ref name="techrepublic-oracle-lo">{{cite web|url=http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/european-technology/open-source-development-the-history-of-openoffice-shows-why-licensing-matters/1079|title=Open-source development: The history of OpenOffice shows why licensing matters|first=Richard|last=Hillesley|work=TechRepublic|date=2 October 2012|access-date=22 June 2013|archive-date=16 May 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130516014231/http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/european-technology/open-source-development-the-history-of-openoffice-shows-why-licensing-matters/1079|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="derstandard-oracle-lo">{{cite web|url=http://derstandard.at/1342947279200/Ironie-Oracle-liefert-nun-LibreOffice-aus|title=Ironie: Oracle liefert nun LibreOffice aus|language=de|trans-title=Irony: Oracle now provides LibreOffice|work=derStandard.at|date=22 July 2012|access-date=22 June 2013|archive-date=21 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921055001/http://derstandard.at/1342947279200/Ironie-Oracle-liefert-nun-LibreOffice-aus|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="oracle-lo">{{cite web|url=https://oss.oracle.com/ol6/docs/RELEASE-NOTES-U3-en.html|title=Oracle Linux 6.3 Release Notes|publisher=Oracle Corporation|date=June 2012|access-date=19 June 2013|archive-date=18 January 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130118031550/https://oss.oracle.com/ol6/docs/RELEASE-NOTES-U3-en.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The project rapidly accumulated developers, development effort<ref>{{cite web |url=http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2011/09/28/the-document-foundation-celebrates-its-first-anniversary/ |title=The Document Foundation celebrates its first anniversary |first=Italo |last=Vignoli |work=The Document Foundation Blog |publisher=[[The Document Foundation]] |date=28 September 2011 |access-date=5 January 2013 |archive-date=1 October 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111001154739/http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2011/09/28/the-document-foundation-celebrates-its-first-anniversary/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.novell.com/prblogs/?p=3095 |title=Viva la LibreOffice! |access-date=28 September 2010 |first=Kerry |last=Adorno |date=28 September 2010 |work=Novell News |publisher=[[Novell]] |quote=Novell, Google, Red Hat, Canonical, and others are pleased to work with The Document Foundation to help make LibreOffice the best office productivity suite on the market. |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110415090729/http://www.novell.com/prblogs/?p=3095 |archive-date=15 April 2011 |df=dmy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.heise.de/open/meldung/Canonical-unterstuetzt-LibreOffice-1194699.html|title=Canonical unterstützt LibreOffice|language=de|trans-title=Canonical supports LibreOffice|work=Heise Open Source|publisher=Heinz Heise|date=22 February 2011|access-date=21 June 2013|quote=Das Unternehmen hinter Ubuntu bezahlt mit Björn Michaelsen einen Entwickler, der vollzeit an der freien Bürosuite arbeiten soll. [The company behind Ubuntu pays a developer, Björn Michaelsen, to work full-time on the free office suite.]|archive-date=15 June 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130615152949/http://www.heise.de/open/meldung/Canonical-unterstuetzt-LibreOffice-1194699.html|url-status=live}}</ref> and added features,<ref name="ostatic20120426">{{cite news|url=http://ostatic.com/blog/apache-openoffice-lagging-behind-libreoffice-in-features|title=Apache OpenOffice Lagging Behind LibreOffice in Features|work=Ostatic|first=Susan|last=Linton|date=26 April 2012|access-date=5 January 2013|archive-date=27 May 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130527104344/http://ostatic.com/blog/apache-openoffice-lagging-behind-libreoffice-in-features|url-status=live}}</ref> the majority of outside OpenOffice.org developers having moved to LibreOffice.<ref name=reg20110314/><ref name="ARS02Nov10"/><ref name="ARS28Sep10"/> In March 2015, an [[LWN.net]] development comparison of LibreOffice with Apache OpenOffice concluded that "LibreOffice has won the battle for developer participation".<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://lwn.net/Articles/637735/ |title=Development activity in LibreOffice and OpenOffice |access-date=20 June 2015 |author=Jonathan Corbet |date=15 March 2015 |work=LWN.net |archive-date=30 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180930063841/https://lwn.net/Articles/637735/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
Most Linux distributions promptly replaced OpenOffice.org with LibreOffice;<ref name="nww20120525">{{Cite news |last=Gold |first=Jon |date=25 May 2012 |title=Most OpenOffice users run Windows |url=https://www.networkworld.com/news/2012/052512-openoffice-windows-259633.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130618030001/https://www.networkworld.com/news/2012/052512-openoffice-windows-259633.html |archive-date=18 June 2013 |access-date=27 December 2012 |work=Network World}}</ref><ref name="debian-lo" /><ref name="ubuntu-lo" /><ref name="suse-lo" /> [[Oracle Linux]] 6 also features LibreOffice rather than OpenOffice.org or Apache OpenOffice.<ref name="techrepublic-oracle-lo">{{Cite web |last=Hillesley |first=Richard |date=2 October 2012 |title=Open-source development: The history of OpenOffice shows why licensing matters |url=http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/european-technology/open-source-development-the-history-of-openoffice-shows-why-licensing-matters/1079 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130516014231/http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/european-technology/open-source-development-the-history-of-openoffice-shows-why-licensing-matters/1079 |archive-date=16 May 2013 |access-date=22 June 2013 |website=TechRepublic}}</ref><ref name="derstandard-oracle-lo">{{Cite web |date=22 July 2012 |title=Ironie: Oracle liefert nun LibreOffice aus |trans-title=Irony: Oracle now provides LibreOffice |url=http://derstandard.at/1342947279200/Ironie-Oracle-liefert-nun-LibreOffice-aus |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921055001/http://derstandard.at/1342947279200/Ironie-Oracle-liefert-nun-LibreOffice-aus |archive-date=21 September 2013 |access-date=22 June 2013 |website=derStandard.at |language=de}}</ref><ref name="oracle-lo">{{Cite web |date=June 2012 |title=Oracle Linux 6.3 Release Notes |url=https://oss.oracle.com/ol6/docs/RELEASE-NOTES-U3-en.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130118031550/https://oss.oracle.com/ol6/docs/RELEASE-NOTES-U3-en.html |archive-date=18 January 2013 |access-date=19 June 2013 |publisher=Oracle Corporation}}</ref> The project rapidly accumulated developers, development effort<ref>{{Cite web |last=Vignoli |first=Italo |date=28 September 2011 |title=The Document Foundation celebrates its first anniversary |url=http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2011/09/28/the-document-foundation-celebrates-its-first-anniversary/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111001154739/http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2011/09/28/the-document-foundation-celebrates-its-first-anniversary/ |archive-date=1 October 2011 |access-date=5 January 2013 |website=The Document Foundation Blog |publisher=[[The Document Foundation]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Adorno |first=Kerry |date=28 September 2010 |title=Viva la LibreOffice! |url=http://www.novell.com/prblogs/?p=3095 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110415090729/http://www.novell.com/prblogs/?p=3095 |archive-date=15 April 2011 |access-date=28 September 2010 |website=Novell News |publisher=[[Novell]] |quote=Novell, Google, Red Hat, Canonical, and others are pleased to work with The Document Foundation to help make LibreOffice the best office productivity suite on the market.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=22 February 2011 |title=Canonical unterstützt LibreOffice |trans-title=Canonical supports LibreOffice |url=http://www.heise.de/open/meldung/Canonical-unterstuetzt-LibreOffice-1194699.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130615152949/http://www.heise.de/open/meldung/Canonical-unterstuetzt-LibreOffice-1194699.html |archive-date=15 June 2013 |access-date=21 June 2013 |website=Heise Open Source |publisher=Heinz Heise |language=de |quote=Das Unternehmen hinter Ubuntu bezahlt mit Björn Michaelsen einen Entwickler, der vollzeit an der freien Bürosuite arbeiten soll. [The company behind Ubuntu pays a developer, Björn Michaelsen, to work full-time on the free office suite.]}}</ref> and added features,<ref name="ostatic20120426">{{Cite news |last=Linton |first=Susan |date=26 April 2012 |title=Apache OpenOffice Lagging Behind LibreOffice in Features |url=http://ostatic.com/blog/apache-openoffice-lagging-behind-libreoffice-in-features |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130527104344/http://ostatic.com/blog/apache-openoffice-lagging-behind-libreoffice-in-features |archive-date=27 May 2013 |access-date=5 January 2013 |work=Ostatic}}</ref> the majority of outside OpenOffice.org developers having moved to LibreOffice.<ref name=reg20110314/><ref name="ARS02Nov10" /><ref name="ARS28Sep10" /> In March 2015, an [[LWN.net]] development comparison of LibreOffice with Apache OpenOffice concluded that "LibreOffice has won the battle for developer participation".<ref>{{Cite news |last=Jonathan Corbet |date=15 March 2015 |title=Development activity in LibreOffice and OpenOffice |url=https://lwn.net/Articles/637735/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180930063841/https://lwn.net/Articles/637735/ |archive-date=30 September 2018 |access-date=20 June 2015 |work=LWN.net}}</ref>


[[Collabora Online]] is a version of LibreOffice with a web interface and real-time collaborative editing. It is developed by [[Collabora|Collabora Productivity]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Collabora Online in Nextcloud |url=https://nextcloud.com/collaboraonline/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170204234805/https://nextcloud.com/collaboraonline/ |archive-date=4 February 2017 |access-date=2021-01-20 |website=NextCloud |quote=Collabora Online is a powerful LibreOffice-based online office suite with collaborative editing, which supports all major document, spreadsheet and presentation file formats and works in all modern browsers}}</ref> Collabora Online also has local client applications for Android, Chromebooks, iOS, iPadOS, Linux, Mac and Windows.
[[Collabora Online]] is a version of LibreOffice with a web interface and real-time collaborative editing. It is developed by [[Collabora|Collabora Productivity]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Collabora Online in Nextcloud |url=https://nextcloud.com/collaboraonline/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170204234805/https://nextcloud.com/collaboraonline/ |archive-date=4 February 2017 |access-date=20 January 2021 |website=NextCloud |quote=Collabora Online is a powerful LibreOffice-based online office suite with collaborative editing, which supports all major document, spreadsheet and presentation file formats and works in all modern browsers}}</ref> Collabora Online also has local client applications for Android, Chromebooks, iOS, iPadOS, Linux, Mac and Windows.


=== Discontinued ===
=== Discontinued ===
Line 999: Line 643:
==== NeoOffice ====
==== NeoOffice ====
{{main|NeoOffice}}
{{main|NeoOffice}}
[[NeoOffice]], an independent commercial port for [[Macintosh]] that tracked the main line of development, offered a native OS X [[Aqua (user interface)|Aqua]] user interface before OpenOffice.org did.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://neowiki.neooffice.org/index.php/NeoOffice |title=Information about NeoOffice |publisher=[[NeoOffice]] |date=13 June 2007 |access-date=22 April 2009 |archive-date=6 May 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090506161723/http://neowiki.neooffice.org/index.php/NeoOffice |url-status=live }}</ref> Later versions are derived from Go-oo, rather than directly from OpenOffice.org.<ref name="go-oo-download"/> All versions from NeoOffice 3.1.1 to NeoOffice 2015 were based on OpenOffice.org 3.1.1, though latter versions included stability fixes from LibreOffice and Apache OpenOffice.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://trinity.neooffice.org/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=64520#64520|title=Mac App Store complaints|date=7 November 2013|author=Pluby|publisher=trinity.neooffice.org|access-date=25 December 2013|archive-date=27 December 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131227032323/http://trinity.neooffice.org/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=64520#64520|url-status=live}}</ref> NeoOffice 2017 and later versions are fully based on LibreOffice.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://trinity.neooffice.org/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=65212#65212|title=NeoOffice 2017 Beta Professional Edition released|date=2 May 2017|author=Pluby|publisher=trinity.neooffice.org|access-date=10 May 2017|archive-date=8 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170808033049/https://trinity.neooffice.org/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=65212#65212|url-status=live}}</ref>
[[NeoOffice]], an independent commercial port for [[Macintosh]] that tracked the main line of development, offered a native Mac OS X [[Aqua (user interface)|Aqua]] user interface before OpenOffice.org did.<ref>{{Cite web |date=13 June 2007 |title=Information about NeoOffice |url=http://neowiki.neooffice.org/index.php/NeoOffice |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090506161723/http://neowiki.neooffice.org/index.php/NeoOffice |archive-date=6 May 2009 |access-date=22 April 2009 |publisher=[[NeoOffice]]}}</ref> Later versions are derived from Go-oo, rather than directly from OpenOffice.org.<ref name="go-oo-download" /> All versions from NeoOffice 3.1.1 to NeoOffice 2015 were based on OpenOffice.org 3.1.1, though latter versions included stability fixes from LibreOffice and Apache OpenOffice.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Pluby |date=7 November 2013 |title=Mac App Store complaints |url=http://trinity.neooffice.org/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=64520#64520 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131227032323/http://trinity.neooffice.org/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=64520#64520 |archive-date=27 December 2013 |access-date=25 December 2013 |publisher=trinity.neooffice.org}}</ref> NeoOffice 2017 and later versions are fully based on LibreOffice.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Pluby |date=2 May 2017 |title=NeoOffice 2017 Beta Professional Edition released |url=https://trinity.neooffice.org/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=65212#65212 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170808033049/https://trinity.neooffice.org/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=65212#65212 |archive-date=8 August 2017 |access-date=10 May 2017 |publisher=trinity.neooffice.org}}</ref>


==== Go-oo ====
==== Go-oo ====
{{main|Go-oo}}
{{main|Go-oo}}


The ooo-build [[Patch (computing)|patch]] set was started at [[Ximian]] in 2002, because Sun was slow to accept outside work on OpenOffice.org, even from corporate partners, and to make the build process easier on Linux. It tracked the main line of development and was not intended to constitute a fork.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://ooo.ximian.com/ooo-build.html |title=About ooo-build |publisher=[[Ximian]] |date=18 October 2003 |access-date=5 January 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060410080023/http://ooo.ximian.com/ooo-build.html |archive-date=10 April 2006 |df=dmy-all }}</ref> Most Linux distributions used,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://tuxdeluxe.org/node/184|title=Meek not geek - Interview with Michael Meeks of OpenOffice.org|work=Tux Deluxe|first=Daniel|last=James|date=7 May 2007|access-date=1 October 2013|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130929232956/http://www.tuxdeluxe.org/node/184|archive-date=29 September 2013|df=dmy-all}}</ref> and worked together on,<ref>{{cite conference |last=Meeks |first=Michael |editor-last=Lockhart |editor-first=John W. |date=21–24 July 2004 |title=The World of OpenOffice |conference=Linux Symposium 2004 |conference-url=http://www.linuxsymposium.org/archives/OLS/Reprints-2004/ |book-title=Proceedings of the Linux Symposium |location=Ottawa, Ontario |volume=2 |pages=361–366 |url=http://www.linuxsymposium.org/archives/OLS/Reprints-2004/Reprint-Meeks-OLS2004.pdf |access-date=1 October 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140502012130/http://www.linuxsymposium.org/archives/OLS/Reprints-2004/Reprint-Meeks-OLS2004.pdf |archive-date=2 May 2014}}</ref> ooo-build.
The ooo-build [[Patch (computing)|patch]] set was started at [[Ximian]] in 2002, because Sun was slow to accept outside work on OpenOffice.org, even from corporate partners, and to make the build process easier on Linux. It tracked the main line of development and was not intended to constitute a fork.<ref>{{Cite web |date=18 October 2003 |title=About ooo-build |url=http://ooo.ximian.com/ooo-build.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060410080023/http://ooo.ximian.com/ooo-build.html |archive-date=10 April 2006 |access-date=5 January 2013 |publisher=[[Ximian]] }}</ref> Most Linux distributions used,<ref>{{Cite web |last=James |first=Daniel |date=7 May 2007 |title=Meek not geek - Interview with Michael Meeks of OpenOffice.org |url=http://tuxdeluxe.org/node/184 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130929232956/http://www.tuxdeluxe.org/node/184 |archive-date=29 September 2013 |access-date=1 October 2013 |website=Tux Deluxe }}</ref> and worked together on,<ref>{{Cite conference |last=Meeks |first=Michael |date=21–24 July 2004 |editor-last=Lockhart |editor-first=John W. |title=The World of OpenOffice |url=http://www.linuxsymposium.org/archives/OLS/Reprints-2004/Reprint-Meeks-OLS2004.pdf |conference=Linux Symposium 2004 |location=Ottawa, Ontario |volume=2 |pages=361–366 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140502012130/http://www.linuxsymposium.org/archives/OLS/Reprints-2004/Reprint-Meeks-OLS2004.pdf |archive-date=2 May 2014 |access-date=1 October 2013 |conference-url=http://www.linuxsymposium.org/archives/OLS/Reprints-2004/ |book-title=Proceedings of the Linux Symposium |url-status=dead}}</ref> ooo-build.


Sun's contributions to OpenOffice.org had been declining for a number of years<ref name="ooo2008stats">{{cite web |url=http://people.gnome.org/~michael/blog/ooo-commit-stats-2008.html |first=Michael |last=Meeks |work=Stuff Michael Meeks is doing |title=Measuring the true success of OpenOffice.org |publisher=People.gnome.org |date=10 October 2008 |access-date=5 January 2013 |archive-date=2 December 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121202050329/http://people.gnome.org/~michael/blog/ooo-commit-stats-2008.html |url-status=live }}</ref> and some developers were unwilling to assign copyright in their work to Sun,<ref name="calcsolver">{{cite web |last=Yoshida |first=Kohei |date=2 October 2007 |title=History of Calc Solver |url=http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130118060456/http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/ |archive-date=18 January 2013 |access-date=3 January 2013 |work=Roundtrip to Shanghai via Tokyo}}</ref> particularly given the deal between Sun and IBM to license the code outside the LGPL.<ref name=lwn20110520/> On 2 October 2007, [[Novell]] announced that ooo-build would be available as a software package called Go-oo, not merely a patch set.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.gnome.org/~michael/blog/2007-10-02.html |title=2007-10-02: Tuesday |work=Stuff Michael Meeks is doing |publisher=People.gnome.org |date=2 October 2007 |access-date=22 April 2009 |archive-date=6 May 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090506095725/http://www.gnome.org/~michael/blog/2007-10-02.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> (The go-oo.org [[domain name]] had been in use by ooo-build as early as 2005.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://lwn.net/Articles/121441/|title=ooo-build 1.3.8 Announced|first=Michael|last=Meeks|work=LWN.net|date=28 January 2005|access-date=1 October 2013|archive-date=4 October 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131004231252/http://lwn.net/Articles/121441/|url-status=live}}</ref>) Sun reacted negatively, with [[Simon Phipps (programmer)|Simon Phipps]] of Sun terming it "a hostile and competitive fork".<ref name="lwngooo"/> Many [[free software]] advocates worried that Go-oo was a Novell effort to incorporate [[Microsoft]] technologies, such as Office Open XML, that might be vulnerable to [[software patent|patent]] claims.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/osrc/article.php/12068_3794611_1|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090323073107/http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/osrc/article.php/12068_3794611_1|archive-date=23 March 2009|date=7 January 2009|first=Bruce|last=Byfield|title=OpenOffice.org vs. Go-OO: Cutting through the Gordian Knot|work=Datamation|access-date=15 August 2015|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref> However, the office suite branded "OpenOffice.org" in most Linux distributions, having previously been ooo-build, soon in fact became Go-oo.<ref name="go-oo-download">{{cite web |url=http://www.go-oo.org/download/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100803034339/http://www.go-oo.org/download/ |archive-date=3 August 2010 |title=Download Go-OO!: Other derivatives |publisher=Go-oo.org |access-date=16 October 2013 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/151829/comments/5|title=Bug #151829 in openoffice.org (Ubuntu): "Include go-oo in Ubuntu"|work=Launchpad.net|publisher=[[Canonical Ltd.]]|access-date=28 January 2009|archive-date=1 May 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110501012532/https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/151829/comments/5|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="linux.com">{{cite web |url=http://www.linux.com/feature/154364 |title=Go-OO: The best office suite you never knew you used |first=Federico |last=Kereki |publisher=Linux.com |date=4 December 2008 |access-date=26 July 2010 |archive-date=10 February 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090210192845/http://www.linux.com/feature/154364 |url-status=live }}</ref>
Sun's contributions to OpenOffice.org had been declining for a number of years<ref name="ooo2008stats">{{Cite web |last=Meeks |first=Michael |date=10 October 2008 |title=Measuring the true success of OpenOffice.org |url=http://people.gnome.org/~michael/blog/ooo-commit-stats-2008.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121202050329/http://people.gnome.org/~michael/blog/ooo-commit-stats-2008.html |archive-date=2 December 2012 |access-date=5 January 2013 |website=Stuff Michael Meeks is doing |publisher=People.gnome.org}}</ref> and some developers were unwilling to assign copyright in their work to Sun,<ref name="calcsolver">{{Cite web |last=Yoshida |first=Kohei |date=2 October 2007 |title=History of Calc Solver |url=http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130118060456/http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/ |archive-date=18 January 2013 |access-date=3 January 2013 |website=Roundtrip to Shanghai via Tokyo}}</ref> particularly given the deal between Sun and IBM to license the code outside the LGPL.<ref name=lwn20110520/> On 2 October 2007, [[Novell]] announced that ooo-build would be available as a software package called Go-oo, not merely a patch set.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2 October 2007 |title=2007-10-02: Tuesday |url=http://www.gnome.org/~michael/blog/2007-10-02.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090506095725/http://www.gnome.org/~michael/blog/2007-10-02.html |archive-date=6 May 2009 |access-date=22 April 2009 |website=Stuff Michael Meeks is doing |publisher=People.gnome.org}}</ref> (The go-oo.org [[domain name]] had been in use by ooo-build as early as 2005.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Meeks |first=Michael |date=28 January 2005 |title=ooo-build 1.3.8 Announced |url=https://lwn.net/Articles/121441/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131004231252/http://lwn.net/Articles/121441/ |archive-date=4 October 2013 |access-date=1 October 2013 |website=LWN.net}}</ref>) Sun reacted negatively, with [[Simon Phipps (programmer)|Simon Phipps]] of Sun terming it "a hostile and competitive fork".<ref name="lwngooo" /> Many [[free software]] advocates worried that Go-oo was a Novell effort to incorporate [[Microsoft]] technologies, such as Office Open XML, that might be vulnerable to [[software patent|patent]] claims.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Byfield |first=Bruce |date=7 January 2009 |title=OpenOffice.org vs. Go-OO: Cutting through the Gordian Knot |url=http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/osrc/article.php/12068_3794611_1 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090323073107/http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/osrc/article.php/12068_3794611_1 |archive-date=23 March 2009 |access-date=15 August 2015 |website=Datamation }}</ref> However, the office suite branded "OpenOffice.org" in most Linux distributions, having previously been ooo-build, soon in fact became Go-oo.<ref name="go-oo-download">{{Cite web |title=Download Go-OO!: Other derivatives |url=http://www.go-oo.org/download/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100803034339/http://www.go-oo.org/download/ |archive-date=3 August 2010 |access-date=16 October 2013 |publisher=Go-oo.org }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Bug #151829 in openoffice.org (Ubuntu): "Include go-oo in Ubuntu" |url=https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/151829/comments/5 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110501012532/https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/151829/comments/5 |archive-date=1 May 2011 |access-date=28 January 2009 |website=Launchpad.net |publisher=[[Canonical Ltd.]]}}</ref><ref name="linux.com">{{Cite web |last=Kereki |first=Federico |date=4 December 2008 |title=Go-OO: The best office suite you never knew you used |url=http://www.linux.com/feature/154364 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090210192845/http://www.linux.com/feature/154364 |archive-date=10 February 2009 |access-date=26 July 2010 |publisher=Linux.com}}</ref>


Go-oo also encouraged outside contributions, with rules similar to those later adopted for LibreOffice.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.h-online.com/open/features/Calling-a-cat-a-dog-746843.html|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20131208000702/http://www.h-online.com/open/features/Calling-a-cat-a-dog-746843.html|archive-date = 8 December 2013|title = Healthcheck: OpenOffice: Calling a cat a dog|page = 4|first = Richard|last = Hillesley|work = The H Open|date = 29 January 2009|access-date = 26 June 2013|url-status = dead|df = dmy-all}}</ref> When LibreOffice forked, Go-oo was deprecated in favour of that project.
Go-oo also encouraged outside contributions, with rules similar to those later adopted for LibreOffice.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Hillesley |first=Richard |date=29 January 2009 |title=Healthcheck: OpenOffice: Calling a cat a dog |url=http://www.h-online.com/open/features/Calling-a-cat-a-dog-746843.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131208000702/http://www.h-online.com/open/features/Calling-a-cat-a-dog-746843.html |archive-date=8 December 2013 |access-date=26 June 2013 |website=The H Open |page=4 }}</ref> When LibreOffice forked, Go-oo was deprecated in favour of that project.


OpenOffice Novell edition was a supported version of Go-oo.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.oooninja.com/2008/01/openxml-translator-odf-converter-11.html|access-date=21 November 2012|title=odf-converter 1.1 released|first=Andrew|last=Ziem|date=31 January 2008|publisher=OpenOffice.org Ninja|archive-date=27 November 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121127233415/http://www.oooninja.com/2008/01/openxml-translator-odf-converter-11.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
OpenOffice Novell edition was a supported version of Go-oo.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ziem |first=Andrew |date=31 January 2008 |title=odf-converter 1.1 released |url=http://www.oooninja.com/2008/01/openxml-translator-odf-converter-11.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121127233415/http://www.oooninja.com/2008/01/openxml-translator-odf-converter-11.html |archive-date=27 November 2012 |access-date=21 November 2012 |publisher=OpenOffice.org Ninja}}</ref>


==== IBM Lotus Symphony ====
==== IBM Lotus Symphony ====
{{main|IBM Lotus Symphony}}
{{main|IBM Lotus Symphony}}
The Workplace Managed Client in [[IBM Workplace]] 2.6 (23 January 2006<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/19142.wss|title=IBM Announces New Version of Workplace Products With Enhanced Support for Open Standards and Improved SOA Functionality|publisher=IBM|date=23 January 2006|access-date=22 September 2013|archive-date=27 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130927083017/http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/19142.wss|url-status=dead }}</ref>) incorporated code from OpenOffice.org 1.1.4,<ref name="thonline2011"/> the last version under the SISSL. This code was broken out into a separate application as Lotus Symphony (30 May 2008<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www-03.ibm.com/software/lotus/symphony/buzz.nsf/web_DisPlayPlugin?open&unid=ED2B95285B0545B3862574A40074E7C6|title=Announcing ----- IBM Lotus Symphony Version 1.0 is NOW AVAILABLE|work=Lotus Symphony Buzz|author=((Buzzmaster1))|publisher=IBM|date=30 May 2008|access-date=22 September 2013|archive-date=27 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130927083100/http://www-03.ibm.com/software/lotus/symphony/buzz.nsf/web_DisPlayPlugin?open&unid=ED2B95285B0545B3862574A40074E7C6|url-status=dead}}</ref>), with a new interface based on [[Eclipse (software)|Eclipse]]. Symphony 3.0 (21 October 2010<ref>{{cite web|url=http://edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/lotus-symphony-3.0-now-available|title=Lotus Symphony 3.0 now available|first=Ed|last=Brill|date=21 October 2010|access-date=22 September 2013|archive-date=28 October 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101028215203/http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/lotus-symphony-3.0-now-available|url-status=dead }}</ref>) was [[rebasing|rebased]] on OpenOffice.org 3.0, with the code licensed privately from Sun. IBM's changes were donated to the Apache Software Foundation in 2012, Symphony was deprecated in favour of Apache OpenOffice<ref name="brillblog" /> and its code was merged into Apache OpenOffice 4.0.<ref name="symphony_allegro_moderato">{{cite web|first=Rob|last=Weir|url=https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/merging_lotus_symphony_allegro_moderato|title=Merging Lotus Symphony: Allegro moderato|publisher=Apache Software Foundation|date=21 January 2013|access-date=23 July 2013|archive-date=25 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211125064416/https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/merging_lotus_symphony_allegro_moderato|url-status=live}}</ref>
The Workplace Managed Client in [[IBM Workplace]] 2.6 (23 January 2006<ref>{{Cite web |date=23 January 2006 |title=IBM Announces New Version of Workplace Products With Enhanced Support for Open Standards and Improved SOA Functionality |url=http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/19142.wss |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130927083017/http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/19142.wss |archive-date=27 September 2013 |access-date=22 September 2013 |publisher=IBM}}</ref>) incorporated code from OpenOffice.org 1.1.4,<ref name="thonline2011" /> the last version under the SISSL. This code was broken out into a separate application as Lotus Symphony (30 May 2008<ref>{{Cite web |last=((Buzzmaster1)) |date=30 May 2008 |title=Announcing ----- IBM Lotus Symphony Version 1.0 is NOW AVAILABLE |url=http://www-03.ibm.com/software/lotus/symphony/buzz.nsf/web_DisPlayPlugin?open&unid=ED2B95285B0545B3862574A40074E7C6 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130927083100/http://www-03.ibm.com/software/lotus/symphony/buzz.nsf/web_DisPlayPlugin?open&unid=ED2B95285B0545B3862574A40074E7C6 |archive-date=27 September 2013 |access-date=22 September 2013 |website=Lotus Symphony Buzz |publisher=IBM}}</ref>), with a new interface based on [[Eclipse (software)|Eclipse]]. Symphony 3.0 (21 October 2010<ref>{{Cite web |last=Brill |first=Ed |date=21 October 2010 |title=Lotus Symphony 3.0 now available |url=http://edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/lotus-symphony-3.0-now-available |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101028215203/http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/lotus-symphony-3.0-now-available |archive-date=28 October 2010 |access-date=22 September 2013}}</ref>) was [[rebasing|rebased]] on OpenOffice.org 3.0, with the code licensed privately from Sun. IBM's changes were donated to the Apache Software Foundation in 2012, Symphony was deprecated in favour of Apache OpenOffice<ref name="brillblog" /> and its code was merged into Apache OpenOffice 4.0.<ref name="symphony_allegro_moderato">{{Cite web |last=Weir |first=Rob |date=21 January 2013 |title=Merging Lotus Symphony: Allegro moderato |url=https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/merging_lotus_symphony_allegro_moderato |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211125064416/https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/merging_lotus_symphony_allegro_moderato |archive-date=25 November 2021 |access-date=23 July 2013 |publisher=Apache Software Foundation}}</ref>


==== StarOffice ====
==== StarOffice ====
{{main|StarOffice}}
{{main|StarOffice}}
Sun used OpenOffice.org as a base for its commercial proprietary StarOffice application software, which was OpenOffice.org with some added proprietary components. [[Sun acquisition by Oracle|Oracle bought Sun]] in January 2010 and quickly renamed StarOffice to Oracle Open Office.<ref name=oracleoojan2010>{{cite web|url=http://www.newformat.se/documents/oracle/oracle-open-office-features-overview-060550.pdf|title=Oracle Open Office: Features Overview: An Oracle White Paper|date=January 2010|publisher=Oracle Corporation|access-date=20 September 2013|archive-date=21 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921053420/http://www.newformat.se/documents/oracle/oracle-open-office-features-overview-060550.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> Oracle discontinued development in April 2011.<ref name="oooclosurepr"/>
Sun used OpenOffice.org as a base for its commercial proprietary StarOffice application software, which was OpenOffice.org with some added proprietary components. [[Sun acquisition by Oracle|Oracle bought Sun]] in January 2010 and quickly renamed StarOffice to Oracle Open Office.<ref name="oracleoojan2010">{{Cite web |date=January 2010 |title=Oracle Open Office: Features Overview: An Oracle White Paper |url=http://www.newformat.se/documents/oracle/oracle-open-office-features-overview-060550.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130921053420/http://www.newformat.se/documents/oracle/oracle-open-office-features-overview-060550.pdf |archive-date=21 September 2013 |access-date=20 September 2013 |publisher=Oracle Corporation}}</ref> Oracle discontinued development in April 2011.<ref name="oooclosurepr" />


{{Portal bar|Free and open-source software|Computer programming}}
{{Portal bar|Free and open-source software|Computer programming}}

Latest revision as of 10:43, 23 October 2025

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "redirect hatnote". Script error: No such module "about". Template:Use dmy dates Script error: No such module "Infobox".Template:Template otherScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Template:Main other

OpenOffice.org is an open-source office productivity software suite. It originated from the proprietary StarOffice, developed by Star Division, which was acquired by Sun Microsystems in 1999. Sun open-sourced the software in July 2000 as a free alternative to Microsoft Office,[1][2] and released OpenOffice.org version 1.0 on 1 May 2002.[3]

Following Sun’s acquisition by Oracle Corporation, development of OpenOffice.org slowed and eventually ended.[4] In 2011, Oracle donated the project to the Apache Software Foundation,[5][6] which continues it as Apache OpenOffice,[7] although that project has been largely dormant since 2015. A more actively developed fork, LibreOffice, was created in 2010 by members of the OpenOffice.org community.[8][9][10]

OpenOffice included applications for word processing (Writer), spreadsheets (Calc), presentations (Impress), vector graphics (Draw), database management (Base), and formula editing (Math).[11] Its default file format was the OpenDocument Format (ODF), which it originated. It could also read a wide variety of other file formats, with particular attention to those from Microsoft Office. OpenOffice.org was primarily developed for Linux, Microsoft Windows and Solaris, and later for Mac OS X, with ports to other operating systems. It was distributed under the GNU Lesser General Public License version 3 (LGPL); early versions were also available under the Sun Industry Standards Source License (SISSL).

History

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". OpenOffice.org originated from StarOffice, a proprietary office productivity software suite developed by German company Star Division beginning in 1985. In August 1999, Star Division was acquired by Sun Microsystems[12][13] for Template:US$ (equivalent to US$Template:InflationTemplate:Nbspmillion in Template:Inflation/year), reportedly because the acquisition was less expensive than licensing Microsoft Office for Sun's 42,000 employees.[14][15]

On 19 July 2000, at the O'Reilly Open Source Convention, Sun announced that it would release the StarOffice source code to encourage the development of a free and open-source office suite.[1][2][16] The project, officially named OpenOffice.org,[17] with the ".org" added to avoid trademark conflicts, officially released its source code on 13 October 2000. The first public preview, Milestone Build 638c, followed in October 2001 and quickly surpassed one million downloads.[18] OpenOffice.org 1.0 was officially released on 1 May 2002.[3]

OpenOffice.org became the default office suite on many Linux distributions and quickly emerged as a significant competitor to Microsoft Office, reportedly achieving 14% penetration in the large enterprise market by 2004.[19][20][21] Sun designed the suite’s OpenOffice.org XML file format, compressed in a ZIP archive, for easier data interchange and machine processing, intending it to replace proprietary binary formats.[22] In 2002, Sun submitted the format to the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards leading to the creation of the OpenDocument file format standard in 2005,[23] which was ratified as ISO/IEC 26300 in 2006.[24] OpenDocument became OpenOffice's default format beginning with version 2.0 and other organizations would adopt the OpenDocument format.

Development of OpenOffice.org was led by Sun, which continued to use the codebase as the upstream source for StarOffice, which it continued to sell commercially. Sun also licensed the codebase to third parties, including IBM, which used it as the foundation for IBM Lotus Symphony (originally IBM Workplace). This dual role led to criticism that Sun prioritized commercial interests over community collaboration. For example, building OpenOffice.org on many Linux distributions proved difficult, prompting the creation of projects like ooo-build to improve compatibility and incorporate unaccepted community patches. Sun was also criticized for being slow to accept outside contributions and controversially required contributors to sign a Contributor Agreement granting joint ownership of submitted code, enabling the company to continue selling proprietary versions of the software.[25][26][27]

Following Sun’s acquisition by Oracle Corporation in January 2010, development continued under the a new brand, Oracle Open Office.[28] However, Oracle significantly reduced the number of developers assigned to the project,[29] and its commitment to the project was widely questioned.[30] In September 2010, the majority[31][32] of community OpenOffice contributors left the project,[33][34] and formed The Document Foundation (TDF), citing concerns over Oracle’s management of the project and its broader approach to open-source software.[35][36] TDF launched a fork called LibreOffice in January 2011,[37] which was quickly adopted by most Linux distributions.[38][39][40]

In April 2011, Oracle ceased development of OpenOffice and laid off the remaining team.[4][27][41] While Oracle did not publicly state its reasons, speculation ranged from the project's declining community support to commercial considerations.[27][42] In June 2011, Oracle donated the OpenOffice.org trademarks and codebase to the Apache Software Foundation.[43] The code was relicensed under the Apache License at the request of IBM, which existing contractual interests in the code and preferred a permissive license.[16][44][45] This donation became the foundation for the ongoing Apache OpenOffice project.[46]

Governance

During Sun's sponsorship, the OpenOffice.org project was governed by the Community Council, comprising OpenOffice.org community members. The Community Council suggested project goals and coordinated with producers of derivatives on long-term development planning issues.[47][48][49]

Both Sun and Oracle are claimed to have made decisions without consulting the Council or in contravention to the council's recommendations,[50][51] leading to the majority of outside developers leaving for LibreOffice.[36] Oracle demanded in October 2010 that all Council members involved with the Document Foundation step down,[52] leaving the Community Council composed only of Oracle employees.[53]

Naming

Although the project was commonly called OpenOffice, the official name was OpenOffice.org because "OpenOffice" was already a registered trademark in the Benelux region, owned by the company Open Office Automatisering since 1999.[54][55][56] A similar trademark conflict in Brazil led to the suite being distributed there as BrOffice.org starting in 2004. The name was also adopted by a supporting nonprofit organization founded in 2006.[57] The BrOffice.org nonprofit transitioned to supporting LibreOffice in December 2010.[58]

Features

OpenOffice.org 1.0 was launched under the following mission statement:[2]

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

The mission of OpenOffice.org is to create, as a community, the leading international office suite that will run on all major platforms and provide access to all functionality and data through open-component based APIs and an XML-based file format.

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Components

Icon Title Description
OOo 3 Writer icon Writer A word processor analogous to Microsoft Word or WordPerfect.
OOo 3 Calc icon Calc A spreadsheet analogous to Microsoft Excel or Lotus 1-2-3.
OOo 3 Impress icon Impress A presentation program analogous to Microsoft PowerPoint or Apple Keynote. Impress could export presentations to Adobe Flash (SWF) files, allowing them to be played on any computer with a Flash player installed. Presentation templates were available on the OpenOffice.org website.[59][60]
OOo 3 Draw icon Draw A vector graphics editor comparable in features to the drawing functions in Microsoft Office.
OOo 3 Math icon Math A tool for creating and editing mathematical formulas, analogous to Microsoft Equation Editor. Formulas could be embedded inside other OpenOffice.org documents, such as those created by Writer.
OOo 3 Base icon Base A database management program analogous to Microsoft Access. Base could function as a front-end to a number of different database systems, including Access databases (JET), ODBC data sources, MySQL and PostgreSQL. Base became part of the suite starting with version 2.0. HSQL was the included database engine. From version 2.3, Base offered report generation via Pentaho.

The suite contained no personal information manager, email client or calendar application analogous to Microsoft Outlook, despite one having been present in StarOffice 5.2. Such functionality was frequently requested.[61] The OpenOffice.org Groupware project, intended to replace Outlook and Microsoft Exchange Server, spun off in 2003 as OpenGroupware.org,[62] which is now SOGo. The project considered bundling Mozilla Thunderbird and Mozilla Lightning for OpenOffice.org 3.0.[61]

Supported operating systems

The last version, 3.4 Beta 1, was available for IA-32 versions of Windows 2000 Service Pack 2 or later, Linux (IA-32 and x64), Solaris and Mac OS X 10.4 or later, and the SPARC version of Solaris.[63][64]

The latest versions of OpenOffice.org on other operating systems were:[65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72]

Fonts

OpenOffice.org included OpenSymbol, DejaVu,[75] the Liberation fonts (from 2.4) and the Gentium fonts (from 3.2).[76][77][78] Versions up to 2.3 included the Bitstream Vera fonts.[75][79] OpenOffice.org also used the default fonts of the running operating system.

Fontwork is a feature that allows users to create stylized text with special effects differing from ordinary text with the added features of gradient colour fills, shaping, letter height, and character spacing. It is similar to WordArt used by Microsoft Word. When OpenOffice.org saved documents in Microsoft Office file format, all Fontwork was converted into WordArt.[80][81]

Extensions

From version 2.0.4, OpenOffice.org supported third-party extensions.[82] As of April 2011, the OpenOffice Extension Repository listed more than 650 extensions.[83] Another list was maintained by the Free Software Foundation.[84][85]

OpenOffice Basic

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

OpenOffice.org included OpenOffice Basic, a programming language similar to Microsoft Visual Basic for Applications (VBA). OpenOffice Basic was available in Writer, Calc and Base.[86] OpenOffice.org also had some Microsoft VBA macro support.

Connectivity

OpenOffice.org could interact with databases (local or remote) using ODBC (Open Database Connectivity), JDBC (Java Database Connectivity) or SDBC (StarOffice Database Connectivity).[87]

File formats

From Version 2.0 onward, OpenOffice.org used ISO/IEC 26300:2006[88] OpenDocument as its native format. Versions 2.0–2.3.0 default to the ODF 1.0 file format; versions 2.3.1–2.4.3 default to ODF 1.1; versions 3.0 onward default to ODF 1.2.

OpenOffice.org 1 used OpenOffice.org XML as its native format. This was contributed to OASIS and OpenDocument was developed from it.[89]

OpenOffice.org also claimed support for the following formats:[90][91]

Development

OpenOffice.org converted all external formats to and from an internal XML representation.

The OpenOffice.org API was based on a component technology known as Universal Network Objects (UNO). It consisted of a wide range of interfaces defined in a CORBA-like interface description language.

Native desktop integration

OpenOffice.org 1.0 was criticized for not having the look and feel of applications developed natively for the platforms on which it runs. Starting with version 2.0, OpenOffice.org used native widget toolkit, icons, and font-rendering libraries on GNOME, KDE and Windows.[95][96][97]

The issue had been particularly pronounced on Mac OS X. Early versions of OpenOffice.org required the installation of X11.app or XDarwin (though the NeoOffice port supplied a native interface). Versions since 3.0 ran natively using Apple's Aqua GUI.[98]

Use of Java

Although originally written in C++, OpenOffice.org became increasingly reliant on the Java Runtime Environment, even including a bundled JVM.[99] OpenOffice.org was criticized by the Free Software Foundation for its increasing dependency on Java, which was not free software.[100]

The issue came to the fore in May 2005, when Richard Stallman appeared to call for a fork of the application in a posting on the Free Software Foundation website.[100] OpenOffice.org adopted a development guideline that future versions of OpenOffice.org would run on free implementations of Java and fixed the issues which previously prevented OpenOffice.org 2.0 from using free-software Java implementations.[101]

On 13 November 2006, Sun committed to releasing Java under the GNU General Public License[102] and had released a free software Java, OpenJDK, by May 2007.

Security

In 2006, Lt. Col. Eric Filiol of the Laboratoire de Virologie et de Cryptologie de l'ESAT demonstrated security weaknesses, in particular within macros.[103][104][105] In 2006, Kaspersky Lab demonstrated a proof of concept virus, "Stardust", for OpenOffice.org.[106] This showed OpenOffice.org viruses are possible, but there is no known virus "in the wild".

As of October 2011, Secunia reported no known unpatched security flaws for the software.[107] A vulnerability in the inherited OpenOffice.org codebase was found and fixed in LibreOffice in October 2011[108] and Apache OpenOffice in May 2012.[109]

Version history

OpenOffice.org 1

The source code for OpenOffice.org was released on 13 October 2000.[17] The first public preview, known as milestone build 638c, was made available in October 2001.[12] The first stable release, OpenOffice.org 1.0, was launched on 1 May 2002, under both the LGPL and SISSL licenses[16] for Windows, Linux, and Solaris platforms.[3][110][111] A Mac OS X version, using an X11 interface, was released on 23 June 2003.[112][113] OpenOffice.org 1.0.3.1, released in April 2003, was the last version to officially support Windows 95.[12]

The subsequent major release, OpenOffice.org 1.1, launched on 2 September 2003, introduced several new features, including one-click export to PDF, export to Flash (.SWF), macro recording, and a basic extension mechanism for third-party add-ons.[92][114]

Version 1.1.1, released on 29 March 2004, was notable for being included in the OpenCD project, a curated collection of open-source software for Windows users.[115][116]

On 2 September 2005, Sun announced it would retire the SISSL to help reduce license proliferation,[117] though some analysts speculated the move was also intended to prevent IBM from reusing the code without contributing back.[16] The 1.1.4 update, released on 22 December 2004, was the last version distributed under the dual SISSL and LGPL licenses.[114] The change also applied to beta versions of OpenOffice.org 2, already under development.[118]

The final release in the OpenOffice.org 1 series, version 1.1.5, arrived on 9 September 2005. It introduced the ability to edit documents in the OpenDocument format (ODF) and was the last version to officially support Windows NT 4.0.[114]

OpenOffice.org 2

Development of version 2.0 began in early 2003, guided by the "Q Product Concept", which aimed to improve Microsoft Office compatibility, performance, scripting support, GNOME integration, database usability, digital signatures, and overall user experience.[119] It also marked the transition to ODF as the default file format. The first beta was released on 4 March 2005.[120]

The final version 2.0 was released on 20 October 2005,[121] followed by version 2.0.1 eight weeks later, which included bug fixes and new features. With version 2.0.3, the project switched from an 18-month release cycle to quarterly updates.[122]

Version 2.1, released on 12 December 2006, included minor enhancements and bug fixes.[114][123] This was followed by version 2.2 on 29 March 2007, which added further refinements, security updates, and small usability improvements.[114][124][125] Version 2.3, released on 17 September 2007, introduced a redesigned charting component, enhanced the extension manager, and made several additional minor upgrades.[114][126][127]

On 27 March 2008, version 2.4 was released with new features and bug fixes, incorporating enhancements from RedOffice, a Chinese derivative of OpenOffice.org.[79][114][128][129] The final maintenance release in the OpenOffice.org 2 series, version 2.4.3, arrived on 4 September 2009 and was the last version to officially support Windows 98 and Windows ME.[74][114]

Version 2 received significant media attention.[130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137] PC Pro gave it a perfect 6-star rating, noting that it now rivaled Microsoft Office in features.[138] Federal Computer Week listed it among the "5 stars of open-source products," citing the importance of the ODF standard.[139] Computerworld reported that migrating to OpenOffice.org 2.0 cost some large government agencies just a tenth of the price of upgrading to Microsoft Office 2007.[140]

OpenOffice.org 3

File:Sun Start Center.png
The Start Center for OpenOffice.org 3

Version 3.0 was released on 13 October 2008, introducing several major changes, including the ability to import (though not export) documents in Microsoft's Office Open XML format, compatibility with ODF 1.2, improved handling of Microsoft's Visual Basic for Applications macros, and a native Mac OS X interface. It also introduced the "Start Center" and adopted the LGPL version 3 license.[141][142]

The 3.1 update, released on 7 May 2009, added support for overlining text and transparent dragging of objects.[114]

Version 3.2, released on 11 February 2010, improved support for PostScript-based OpenType fonts, added integrity checks for ODF files with repair options, and reduced "cold start" times by 46% compared to version 3.0. This release also introduced new features and performance enhancements.[143][144][145][146]

Version 3.2.1 followed on 4 June 2010,[1] featuring bug fixes, refreshed OpenDocument icons, and an updated "Oracle Start Center." It was the first stable release under Oracle's ownership.[114][147]

The final Oracle-sponsored version, 3.3, was released on 26 January 2011.[148] It added new spreadsheet functions and parameters, a revised print form, a FindBar, and usability improvements in Impress.[149][150] Version 3.3 was also the last stable release to support Windows 2000 and Mac OS X on PowerPC systems.[114]

Version 3.3, the last Oracle version, was released in January 2011. New features include an updated print form, a FindBar and interface improvements for Impress.[149][150] In parallel, Oracle released a commercial variant Oracle Open Office 3.3 (formerly named StarOffice) on 15 December 2010, along with a proprietary cloud-based suite called Oracle Cloud Office, built on a separate codebase.[28][151]

A beta of OpenOffice.org 3.4 was released on 12 April 2011, featuring SVG import, improved support for ODF 1.2, and enhanced spreadsheet functionality.[63][152][153] However, before a final release could be issued, Oracle withdrew its support for the project,[4] disbanding the remaining development team.[27][41]

Market share

Problems arise in estimating the market share of OpenOffice.org because it could be freely distributed via download sites (including mirror sites), peer-to-peer networks, CDs, Linux distributions and so forth. The project tried to capture key adoption data in a market-share analysis,[154] listing known distribution totals, known deployments and conversions and analyst statements and surveys.

According to Valve, as of July 2010, 14.63% of Steam users had OpenOffice.org installed on their machines.[155]

A market-share analysis conducted by a web analytics service in 2010, based on over 200,000 Internet users, showed a wide range of adoption in different countries:[156] 0.2% in China, 9% in the US and the UK and over 20% in Poland, the Czech Republic, and Germany.

Although Microsoft Office retained 95% of the general market — as measured by revenue — as of August 2007,[157] OpenOffice.org and StarOffice had secured 15–20% of the business market as of 2004[158][159] and a 2010 University of Colorado at Boulder study reported that OpenOffice.org had reached a point where it had an "irreversible" installed user base and that it would continue to grow.[160]

The project claimed more than 98 million downloads as of September 2007[161] and 300 million total to the release of version 3.2 in February 2010.[162] The project claimed over one hundred million downloads for the OpenOffice.org 3 series within a year of release.[163]

Notable users

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Large-scale users of OpenOffice.org included Singapore's Ministry of Defence,[164] and Banco do Brasil.[165] Template:As of OpenOffice.org was the official office suite for the French Gendarmerie.[154]

In India, several government organizations such as Employees' State Insurance, IIT Bombay, National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, the Supreme Court of India, ICICI Bank,[166] and the Allahabad High Court,[167] which use Linux, completely relied on OpenOffice.org for their administration.

In Japan, conversions from Microsoft Office to OpenOffice.org included many municipal offices: Sumoto, Hyōgo, in 2004,[168] Ninomiya, Tochigi in 2006,[169][170] Aizuwakamatsu, Fukushima, in 2008[171] (and to LibreOffice as of 2012[172]), Shikokuchūō, Ehime, in 2009,[173] Minoh, Osaka, in 2009[174] Toyokawa, Aichi,[175] Fukagawa, Hokkaido,[176] and Katano, Osaka,[177] in 2010 and Ryūgasaki, Ibaraki, in 2011.[178] Corporate conversions included Assist in 2007[179] (and to LibreOffice on Ubuntu in 2011[180]), Sumitomo Electric Industries in 2008[181] (and to LibreOffice in 2012[182]), Toho Co., Ltd. in 2009[183][184] and Shinsei Financial Co., Ltd. in 2010.[185] Assist also provided support services for OpenOffice.org.[183][185]

Retail

In July 2007, Everex, a division of First International Computer and the 9th-largest PC supplier in the U.S., began shipping systems preloaded with OpenOffice.org 2.2 into Wal-Mart, K-mart and Sam's Club outlets in North America.[186]

Forks and derivative software

Template:PanoramaA number of open source and proprietary products derive at least some code from OpenOffice.org. Major derivatives include:

Active

Apache OpenOffice

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

In June 2011, Oracle donated the OpenOffice.org codebase and trademarks to The Apache Software Foundation. The resulting project, Apache OpenOffice project was expected to be developed by contributors from IBM, Linux distributors, and public sector agencies.[187] In practice, most of the development was carried out by IBM,[188][189][190][191][192] which had hired several former project developers from Oracle.[190]

To comply with Apache's licensing policies, the project removed or replaced components from OpenOffice.org 3.4 beta 1 whose licenses were incompatible with the Apache License.[193] The first Apache release, OpenOffice 3.4.0, was published in May 2012.[109]

Later that year, IBM donated the codebase of Lotus Symphony, its customized version of OpenOffice.org, which was merged into Apache OpenOffice 4.0.[194] Symphony was then discontinued.[191] After IBM's withdrawal, the project has struggled to maintain a sustainable contributor base.[195][196] Since 2015, Apache OpenOffice has faced ongoing difficulties delivering timely security patches.[197] The most recent major feature release was version 4.1 in 2014, with the latest maintenance release, 4.1.15, issued on 22 December 2023.[198]

In September 2016, discussions began about possibly retiring the project entirely,[199] though no final decision was made. As of July 2025, Apache OpenOffice remains available for download, but the Apache Software Foundation acknowledges that the software contains multiple unresolved security vulnerabilities.[200]

Although the Apache project considers itself the direct continuation of OpenOffice.org,[201] others have described it as a fork or at least a separate project,[202] due to its different governance model, licensing, and development direction.[16][188][189][203][204][205][206]

LibreOffice

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Sun had stated in the original OpenOffice.org announcement in 2000 that the project would be run by a neutral foundation,[1] and put forward a more detailed proposal in 2001.[207] There were many calls to put this into effect over the ensuing years.[208][209][210][211] On 28 September 2010, in frustration at years of perceived neglect of the codebase and community by Sun and then Oracle,[51] members of the OpenOffice.org community announced a non-profit called The Document Foundation and a fork of OpenOffice.org named LibreOffice. Go-oo improvements were merged, and that project was retired in favour of LibreOffice.[212] The goal was to produce a vendor-independent office suite with ODF support and without any copyright assignment requirements.[213]

Oracle was invited to become a member of the Document Foundation and was asked to donate the OpenOffice.org brand.[213][214] Oracle instead demanded that all members of the OpenOffice.org Community Council involved with the Document Foundation step down,[52] leaving the Council composed only of Oracle employees.[53]

Most Linux distributions promptly replaced OpenOffice.org with LibreOffice;[215][38][39][40] Oracle Linux 6 also features LibreOffice rather than OpenOffice.org or Apache OpenOffice.[216][217][218] The project rapidly accumulated developers, development effort[219][220][221] and added features,[222] the majority of outside OpenOffice.org developers having moved to LibreOffice.[31][32][36] In March 2015, an LWN.net development comparison of LibreOffice with Apache OpenOffice concluded that "LibreOffice has won the battle for developer participation".[223]

Collabora Online is a version of LibreOffice with a web interface and real-time collaborative editing. It is developed by Collabora Productivity.[224] Collabora Online also has local client applications for Android, Chromebooks, iOS, iPadOS, Linux, Mac and Windows.

Discontinued

NeoOffice

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". NeoOffice, an independent commercial port for Macintosh that tracked the main line of development, offered a native Mac OS X Aqua user interface before OpenOffice.org did.[225] Later versions are derived from Go-oo, rather than directly from OpenOffice.org.[226] All versions from NeoOffice 3.1.1 to NeoOffice 2015 were based on OpenOffice.org 3.1.1, though latter versions included stability fixes from LibreOffice and Apache OpenOffice.[227] NeoOffice 2017 and later versions are fully based on LibreOffice.[228]

Go-oo

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

The ooo-build patch set was started at Ximian in 2002, because Sun was slow to accept outside work on OpenOffice.org, even from corporate partners, and to make the build process easier on Linux. It tracked the main line of development and was not intended to constitute a fork.[229] Most Linux distributions used,[230] and worked together on,[231] ooo-build.

Sun's contributions to OpenOffice.org had been declining for a number of years[209] and some developers were unwilling to assign copyright in their work to Sun,[232] particularly given the deal between Sun and IBM to license the code outside the LGPL.[27] On 2 October 2007, Novell announced that ooo-build would be available as a software package called Go-oo, not merely a patch set.[233] (The go-oo.org domain name had been in use by ooo-build as early as 2005.[234]) Sun reacted negatively, with Simon Phipps of Sun terming it "a hostile and competitive fork".[208] Many free software advocates worried that Go-oo was a Novell effort to incorporate Microsoft technologies, such as Office Open XML, that might be vulnerable to patent claims.[235] However, the office suite branded "OpenOffice.org" in most Linux distributions, having previously been ooo-build, soon in fact became Go-oo.[226][236][237]

Go-oo also encouraged outside contributions, with rules similar to those later adopted for LibreOffice.[238] When LibreOffice forked, Go-oo was deprecated in favour of that project.

OpenOffice Novell edition was a supported version of Go-oo.[239]

IBM Lotus Symphony

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". The Workplace Managed Client in IBM Workplace 2.6 (23 January 2006[240]) incorporated code from OpenOffice.org 1.1.4,[16] the last version under the SISSL. This code was broken out into a separate application as Lotus Symphony (30 May 2008[241]), with a new interface based on Eclipse. Symphony 3.0 (21 October 2010[242]) was rebased on OpenOffice.org 3.0, with the code licensed privately from Sun. IBM's changes were donated to the Apache Software Foundation in 2012, Symphony was deprecated in favour of Apache OpenOffice[191] and its code was merged into Apache OpenOffice 4.0.[194]

StarOffice

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Sun used OpenOffice.org as a base for its commercial proprietary StarOffice application software, which was OpenOffice.org with some added proprietary components. Oracle bought Sun in January 2010 and quickly renamed StarOffice to Oracle Open Office.[243] Oracle discontinued development in April 2011.[4]

Template:Portal bar

References

Template:Reflist

External links

Script error: No such module "Sister project links".Template:Main other

Template:OpenOffice Template:Office suites Template:Spreadsheets Template:Sun Microsystems Template:Oracle FOSS

Template:Authority control

  1. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. a b c Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named release1.0
  4. a b c d Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  9. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  12. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  14. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  16. a b c d e f Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  17. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  18. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  19. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  20. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  21. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  22. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  23. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  24. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  25. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  26. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  27. a b c d e Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  28. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  29. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  30. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  31. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  32. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  33. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  34. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  35. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  36. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  37. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  38. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  39. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  40. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  41. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  42. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  43. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".; Oracle blog version Template:Webarchive
  44. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  45. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  46. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  47. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  48. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  49. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  50. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  51. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  52. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  53. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  54. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  55. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  56. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  57. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  58. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  59. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  60. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  61. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  62. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  63. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  64. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  65. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  66. System Requirements for OpenOffice.org 1.0.x
  67. System Requirements for OpenOffice.org 1.1.x
  68. System Requirements for OpenOffice.org 2
  69. System Requirements for OpenOffice.org 3.0 – 3.3
  70. System Requirements for Apache OpenOffice 3.4
  71. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  72. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  73. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  74. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  75. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  76. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  77. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  78. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  79. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  80. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  81. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  82. Template:Cite mailing list
  83. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  84. Template:Cite magazine
  85. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  86. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  87. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  88. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  89. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  90. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  91. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  92. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  93. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  94. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  95. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  96. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  97. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  98. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  99. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  100. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  101. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  102. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  103. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  104. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  105. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  106. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  107. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  108. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  109. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  110. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  111. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  112. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  113. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  114. a b c d e f g h i j k Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  115. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  116. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  117. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  118. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named ooolicensechange
  119. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  120. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  121. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  122. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  123. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  124. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  125. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  126. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  127. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  128. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  129. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  130. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  131. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  132. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  133. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  134. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  135. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  136. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  137. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Template:Dead link
  138. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  139. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  140. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". Computerworld Volume 11, Issue 23.
  141. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  142. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  143. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  144. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  145. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  146. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  147. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  148. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  149. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  150. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  151. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  152. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named ooo34b1changes
  153. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  154. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  155. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  156. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  157. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  158. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  159. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  160. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  161. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  162. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  163. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  164. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  165. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  166. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  167. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  168. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  169. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  170. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  171. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  172. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  173. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  174. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  175. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  176. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  177. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  178. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  179. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  180. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  181. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  182. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  183. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  184. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  185. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  186. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  187. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".; attachment to Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  188. a b Template:Cite magazine
  189. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  190. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  191. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  192. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  193. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  194. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  195. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  196. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  197. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  198. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  199. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  200. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  201. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  202. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  203. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  204. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  205. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  206. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  207. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  208. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  209. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  210. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  211. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  212. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  213. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  214. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  215. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  216. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  217. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  218. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  219. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  220. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  221. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  222. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  223. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  224. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  225. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  226. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  227. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  228. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  229. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  230. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  231. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  232. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  233. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  234. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  235. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  236. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  237. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  238. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  239. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  240. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  241. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  242. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  243. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".