Moth: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Tpbradbury
see alsos already in main body of text
imported>Swu1998
added more species
 
Line 12: Line 12:
| includes =  
| includes =  
*[[Aglossata]]
*[[Aglossata]]
*[[Glossata]] (excluding [[butterflies]])
*[[Glossata]]  
*[[Heterobathmiina]]
*[[Heterobathmiina]]
*[[Zeugloptera]]
*[[Zeugloptera]]
| excludes = * [[Papilionoidea]]
}}
}}


'''Moths''' are a group of insects that includes all members of the order [[Lepidoptera]] that are not [[Butterfly|butterflies]].<ref name=Heppner>{{cite book|last1=Heppner |first1=J.B. |year=2008 |chapter=Moths (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) |editor-last=Capinera |editor-first=J.L. |title=Encyclopedia of Entomology |pages=2491–2494 |publisher=Springer, Dordrecht |doi=10.1007/978-1-4020-6359-6_4705|isbn=978-1-4020-6242-1 }}</ref> They were previously classified as suborder '''Heterocera''', but the group is [[Paraphyly|paraphyletic]] with respect to butterflies (suborder Rhopalocera) and neither subordinate taxon is used in modern classifications. Moths make up the vast majority of the order. There are approximately 160,000 [[species]] of moth,<ref>{{cite web | title=Moths | work=Smithsonian Institution | url=http://www.si.edu/Encyclopedia_SI/nmnh/buginfo/moths.htm | access-date=12 January 2012 | archive-date=2 July 2018 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180702164937/https://www.si.edu/Encyclopedia_SI/nmnh/buginfo/moths.htm | url-status=live }}</ref> many of which have yet to be described. Most species of moth are [[nocturnal]], although there are also [[crepuscular]] and [[Diurnal animal|diurnal]] species.
'''Moths''' are a group of insects that includes all members of the order [[Lepidoptera]] that are not [[Butterfly|butterflies]].<ref name=Heppner>{{cite book|last1=Heppner |first1=J.B. |year=2008 |chapter=Moths (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) |editor-last=Capinera |editor-first=J.L. |title=Encyclopedia of Entomology |pages=2491–2494 |publisher=Springer, Dordrecht |doi=10.1007/978-1-4020-6359-6_4705|isbn=978-1-4020-6242-1 }}</ref> They were previously classified as suborder '''Heterocera''', but the group is [[Paraphyly|paraphyletic]] with respect to butterflies (suborder Rhopalocera) and neither subordinate taxon is used in modern classifications. Moths make up the vast majority of the order. There are approximately 160,000 [[species]] of moth,<ref>{{cite web | title=Moths | work=Smithsonian Institution | url=http://www.si.edu/Encyclopedia_SI/nmnh/buginfo/moths.htm | access-date=12 January 2012 | archive-date=2 July 2018 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180702164937/https://www.si.edu/Encyclopedia_SI/nmnh/buginfo/moths.htm | url-status=live }}</ref> many of which have yet to be described. Most species of moth are [[nocturnal]], although there are also [[crepuscular]] and [[Diurnal animal|diurnal]] species.


== Differences between butterflies and moths ==
== Etymology ==
The [[modern English]] word ''moth'' comes from [[Old English]] {{lang|ang|moððe}} ([[cf.]] [[Northumbrian Old English|Northumbrian]] {{lang|ang|mohðe}}) from [[Common Germanic]] (compare [[Old Norse]] {{lang|non|motti}}, [[Dutch language|Dutch]] {{lang|nl|mot}}, and [[German language|German]] {{lang|de|Motte}} all meaning 'moth'). Its origins are possibly related to the Old English {{lang|ang|maða}} meaning '[[maggot]]' or from the root of ''[[midge]]'' which until the 16th century was used mostly to indicate the [[larva]], usually in reference to devouring clothes.
 
== Differences between butterflies and moths==
{{Main|Comparison of butterflies and moths}}
{{Main|Comparison of butterflies and moths}}


Line 25: Line 29:
While the [[Butterfly|butterflies]] form a [[monophyly|monophyletic]] group, the moths, comprising the rest of the Lepidoptera, do not. Many attempts have been made to group the superfamilies of the Lepidoptera into natural groups, most of which fail because one of the two groups is not monophyletic: [[Microlepidoptera]] and [[Macrolepidoptera]], Heterocera and [[Rhopalocera]], Jugatae and Frenatae, [[Monotrysia]], and [[Ditrysia]].<ref name="scoble">Scoble, MJ 1995. The Lepidoptera: Form, function and diversity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 404 p.</ref>
While the [[Butterfly|butterflies]] form a [[monophyly|monophyletic]] group, the moths, comprising the rest of the Lepidoptera, do not. Many attempts have been made to group the superfamilies of the Lepidoptera into natural groups, most of which fail because one of the two groups is not monophyletic: [[Microlepidoptera]] and [[Macrolepidoptera]], Heterocera and [[Rhopalocera]], Jugatae and Frenatae, [[Monotrysia]], and [[Ditrysia]].<ref name="scoble">Scoble, MJ 1995. The Lepidoptera: Form, function and diversity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 404 p.</ref>


Although the rules for distinguishing moths from butterflies are not well established, one very good guiding principle is that butterflies have thin [[Antenna (biology)|antennae]] and (with the exception of the family [[Hedylidae]]) have small balls or clubs at the end of their antennae. Moth antennae are usually feathery with no ball on the end. The divisions are named by this principle: "club-antennae" (Rhopalocera) or "varied-antennae" (Heterocera). Lepidoptera first evolved during the [[Carboniferous]] period, but only evolved their characteristic [[proboscis]] alongside the rise of [[angiosperm]]s in the [[Cretaceous]] period.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Kawahara|first1=Akito Y.|authorlink= Akito Y. Kawahara|last2=Plotkin|first2=David|last3=Espeland|first3=Marianne|last4=Meusemann|first4=Karen|last5=Toussaint|first5=Emmanuel F. A.|last6=Donath|first6=Alexander|last7=Gimnich|first7=France|last8=Frandsen|first8=Paul B.|last9=Zwick|first9=Andreas|last10=Reis|first10=Mario dos|last11=Barber|first11=Jesse R.|date=5 November 2019|title=Phylogenomics reveals the evolutionary timing and pattern of butterflies and moths|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|language=en|volume=116|issue=45|pages=22657–22663|doi=10.1073/pnas.1907847116|issn=0027-8424|pmc=6842621|pmid=31636187|bibcode=2019PNAS..11622657K |doi-access=free}}</ref>
Although the rules for distinguishing moths from butterflies are not well established, one very good guiding principle is that butterflies have thin [[Antenna (biology)|antennae]] and (with the exception of the family [[Hedylidae]]) have small balls or clubs at the end of their antennae. Moth antennae are usually feathery with no ball on the end. The divisions are named by this principle: "club-antennae" (Rhopalocera) or "varied-antennae" (Heterocera). Lepidoptera first evolved during the [[Carboniferous]] period, but only evolved their characteristic [[proboscis]] alongside the rise of [[angiosperm]]s in the [[Cretaceous]] period.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Kawahara|first1=Akito Y.|author-link= Akito Y. Kawahara|last2=Plotkin|first2=David|last3=Espeland|first3=Marianne|last4=Meusemann|first4=Karen|last5=Toussaint|first5=Emmanuel F. A.|last6=Donath|first6=Alexander|last7=Gimnich|first7=France|last8=Frandsen|first8=Paul B.|last9=Zwick|first9=Andreas|last10=Reis|first10=Mario dos|last11=Barber|first11=Jesse R.|date=5 November 2019|title=Phylogenomics reveals the evolutionary timing and pattern of butterflies and moths|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|language=en|volume=116|issue=45|pages=22657–22663|doi=10.1073/pnas.1907847116|issn=0027-8424|pmc=6842621|pmid=31636187|bibcode=2019PNAS..11622657K |doi-access=free}}</ref>
 
== Etymology ==
The [[modern English]] word ''moth'' comes from [[Old English]] {{lang|ang|moððe}} ([[cf.]] [[Northumbrian Old English|Northumbrian]] {{lang|ang|mohðe}}) from [[Common Germanic]] (compare [[Old Norse]] {{lang|non|motti}}, [[Dutch language|Dutch]] {{lang|nl|mot}}, and [[German language|German]] {{lang|de|Motte}} all meaning 'moth'). Its origins are possibly related to the Old English {{lang|ang|maða}} meaning '[[maggot]]' or from the root of ''[[midge]]'' which until the 16th century was used mostly to indicate the [[larva]], usually in reference to devouring clothes.


== Caterpillar ==
== Caterpillar ==
Line 36: Line 37:
Moth larvae, or [[caterpillar]]s, make [[Cocoon (silk)|cocoon]]s from which they emerge as fully grown moths with wings. Some moth caterpillars dig holes in the ground, where they live until they are ready to turn into adult moths.<ref>{{Cite book | last = Darby | first = Gene | title = What is a Butterfly | publisher = [[Benefic Press]] | location = Chicago | year = 1958 | page = 41 }}</ref>
Moth larvae, or [[caterpillar]]s, make [[Cocoon (silk)|cocoon]]s from which they emerge as fully grown moths with wings. Some moth caterpillars dig holes in the ground, where they live until they are ready to turn into adult moths.<ref>{{Cite book | last = Darby | first = Gene | title = What is a Butterfly | publisher = [[Benefic Press]] | location = Chicago | year = 1958 | page = 41 }}</ref>


==History==
==Evolution==
Moths evolved long before butterflies; moth [[fossil]]s have been found that may be 190&nbsp;million years old. Both types of Lepidoptera are thought to have co-evolved with [[flowering plant]]s, mainly because most modern species, both as adults and larvae, feed on flowering plants. One of the earliest known species that is thought to be an ancestor of moths is [[Archaeolepis|''Archaeolepis mane'']]. Its fossil fragments show scaled wings that are similar to [[caddisflies]] in their veining.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Hoyt |first=Cathryn |work=Chihuahuan Desert Nature Center |url=http://cdri.org/publications/nature-notes/evolution-ecology/evolution-of-moths-and-butterflies/ |title=Evolution of Moths and Butterflies |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140106184057/http://cdri.org/publications/nature-notes/evolution-ecology/evolution-of-moths-and-butterflies/ |archive-date=6 January 2014 |url-status=dead |quote=Studying the evolution of butterflies and moths is challenging, since fossils are so rare. But the few Lepidopteran fossils that exist, captured in amber or compressed in fine-grained rocks, show an astonishing amount of detail. The earliest Lepidopteran fossils appear in rocks that are about 190 million years old. These tiny fragments of scaled wings and bodies clearly indicate that moths evolved before butterflies.}}</ref>
Moths evolved long before butterflies; moth [[fossil]]s have been found that may be 190&nbsp;million years old. Both types of Lepidoptera are thought to have co-evolved with [[flowering plant]]s, mainly because most modern species, both as adults and larvae, feed on flowering plants. One of the earliest known species that is thought to be an ancestor of moths is [[Archaeolepis|''Archaeolepis mane'']]. Its fossil fragments show scaled wings that are similar to [[caddisflies]] in their veining.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Hoyt |first=Cathryn |work=Chihuahuan Desert Nature Center |url=http://cdri.org/publications/nature-notes/evolution-ecology/evolution-of-moths-and-butterflies/ |title=Evolution of Moths and Butterflies |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140106184057/http://cdri.org/publications/nature-notes/evolution-ecology/evolution-of-moths-and-butterflies/ |archive-date=6 January 2014 |quote=Studying the evolution of butterflies and moths is challenging, since fossils are so rare. But the few Lepidopteran fossils that exist, captured in amber or compressed in fine-grained rocks, show an astonishing amount of detail. The earliest Lepidopteran fossils appear in rocks that are about 190 million years old. These tiny fragments of scaled wings and bodies clearly indicate that moths evolved before butterflies.}}</ref>


== Economics ==
== Economics ==
Line 45: Line 46:
[[File:Moth September 2008-3.jpg|thumb|200px|An adult male pine processionary moth (''[[Thaumetopoea pityocampa]]''). This species is a serious forest pest when in its larval state. Notice the bristle springing from the underside of the hindwing ([[frenulum]]) and running forward to be held in a small catch of the forewing, whose function is to link the wings together.]]
[[File:Moth September 2008-3.jpg|thumb|200px|An adult male pine processionary moth (''[[Thaumetopoea pityocampa]]''). This species is a serious forest pest when in its larval state. Notice the bristle springing from the underside of the hindwing ([[frenulum]]) and running forward to be held in a small catch of the forewing, whose function is to link the wings together.]]


Some moths, particularly their [[caterpillar]]s, can be major [[agriculture|agricultural]] [[Pest (organism)|pests]] in many parts of the world. Examples include [[corn borer]]s and [[Bollworm (disambiguation)|bollworm]]s.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/eib11/eib11.pdf |title=The First Decade of Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States |last1=Fernandez-Cornejo |first1=Jorge |last2=Caswell |first2=Margriet |date=April 2006 |website=ers.usda.gov |id=Economic Information Bulletin Number 11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100614154639/http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/eib11/eib11.pdf |archive-date=14 June 2010 |url-status=dead |publisher=[[USDA]]}}</ref> The caterpillar of the [[spongy moth]] (''Lymantria dispar'') causes severe damage to forests in the northeastern United States, where it is an [[invasive species]]. In temperate climates, the [[codling moth]] causes extensive damage, especially to fruit farms. In tropical and subtropical climates, the diamondback moth (''[[Plutella xylostella]]'') is perhaps the most serious pest of [[Brassicaceae|brassicaceous]] crops. Also in [[sub-Saharan Africa]], the [[Eldana|African sugarcane borer]] is a major pest of sugarcane, [[maize]], and [[sorghum]].<ref>{{Cite journal  |doi=10.1016/0167-8809(94)90070-1|title=A review and perspectives for the biological control of the African sugarcane stalkborer Eldana saccharina Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)|journal=Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment|volume=48|issue=1|pages=9–17|date=February 1994|last1=Conlong|first1=D.E.|bibcode=1994AgEE...48....9C }}</ref>
Some moths, particularly their [[caterpillar]]s, can be major [[agriculture|agricultural]] [[Pest (organism)|pests]] in many parts of the world. Examples include [[corn borer]]s and [[Bollworm (disambiguation)|bollworm]]s.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/eib11/eib11.pdf |title=The First Decade of Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States |last1=Fernandez-Cornejo |first1=Jorge |last2=Caswell |first2=Margriet |date=April 2006 |website=ers.usda.gov |id=Economic Information Bulletin Number 11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100614154639/http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/eib11/eib11.pdf |archive-date=14 June 2010 |publisher=[[USDA]]}}</ref> The caterpillar of the [[spongy moth]] (''Lymantria dispar'') causes severe damage to forests in the northeastern United States, where it is an [[invasive species]]. In temperate climates, the [[codling moth]] causes extensive damage, especially to fruit farms. In tropical and subtropical climates, the diamondback moth (''[[Plutella xylostella]]'') is perhaps the most serious pest of [[Brassicaceae|brassicaceous]] crops. Also in [[sub-Saharan Africa]], the [[Eldana|African sugarcane borer]] is a major pest of sugarcane, [[maize]], and [[sorghum]].<ref>{{Cite journal  |doi=10.1016/0167-8809(94)90070-1|title=A review and perspectives for the biological control of the African sugarcane stalkborer Eldana saccharina Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)|journal=Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment|volume=48|issue=1|pages=9–17|date=February 1994|last1=Conlong|first1=D.E.|bibcode=1994AgEE...48....9C }}</ref>


Several moths in the family [[Tineidae]] are commonly regarded as pests because their larvae eat [[Cloth|fabric]] such as [[clothes]] and [[blanket]]s made from natural [[proteinaceous]] fibers such as [[wool]] or [[silk]].<ref name="Scott">Scott, Thomas (1995). [https://books.google.com/books?id=LorrYj5pkKYC&pg=PA681 ''Concise Encyclopedia Biology''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140112033954/http://books.google.com/books?id=LorrYj5pkKYC&pg=PA681 |date=12 January 2014 }}. Walter de Gruyter. {{ISBN|3-11-010661-2}}.</ref> They are less likely to eat mixed materials containing some artificial fibers. There are some reports that they may be repelled by the scent of wood from [[juniper]] and [[cedrus|cedar]], by [[lavender]], or by other natural oils; however, many consider this unlikely to prevent infestation. [[Naphthalene]] (the chemical used in [[mothball]]s) is considered more effective, but there are concerns over its effects on human health.
Several moths in the family [[Tineidae]] are commonly regarded as pests because their larvae eat [[Cloth|fabric]] such as [[clothes]] and [[blanket]]s made from natural [[proteinaceous]] fibers such as [[wool]] or [[silk]].<ref name="Scott">Scott, Thomas (1995). [https://books.google.com/books?id=LorrYj5pkKYC&pg=PA681 ''Concise Encyclopedia Biology''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140112033954/http://books.google.com/books?id=LorrYj5pkKYC&pg=PA681 |date=12 January 2014 }}. Walter de Gruyter. {{ISBN|3-11-010661-2}}.</ref> They are less likely to eat mixed materials containing some artificial fibers. There are some reports that they may be repelled by the scent of wood from [[juniper]] and [[cedrus|cedar]], by [[lavender]], or by other natural oils; however, many consider this unlikely to prevent infestation. [[Naphthalene]] (the chemical used in [[mothball]]s) is considered more effective, but there are concerns over its effects on human health.
Line 67: Line 68:
Baculoviruses are parasite [[double-stranded DNA]] [[insect]] viruses that are used mostly as [[biological control]] agents. They are members of the [[Baculoviridae]], a family that is restricted to insects. Most baculovirus isolates have been obtained from insects, in particular from Lepidoptera.
Baculoviruses are parasite [[double-stranded DNA]] [[insect]] viruses that are used mostly as [[biological control]] agents. They are members of the [[Baculoviridae]], a family that is restricted to insects. Most baculovirus isolates have been obtained from insects, in particular from Lepidoptera.


There is evidence that ultrasound in the range emitted by bats causes flying moths to make evasive maneuvers. [[Ultrasound|Ultrasonic]] frequencies trigger a reflex action in the [[noctuid]] moth that causes it to drop a few centimeters or inches in its flight to evade attack,<ref>{{cite journal| last = Jones| first = G | author2=D A Waters| title = Moth hearing in response to bat echolocation calls manipulated independently in time and frequency| doi = 10.1098/rspb.2000.1188| year = 2000| journal = Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences| volume = 267| pmid = 11467425| issue = 1453| pmc = 1690724| pages = 1627–32}}</ref> and [[Arctiini (erebid moths)|tiger moths]] can emit clicks to foil bats' echolocation.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Kaplan |first=Matt |date=17 July 2009 |url=http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/07/090717-moths-jam-bat-sonar.html |title=Moths Jam Bat Sonar, Throw the Predators Off Course |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090822014813/http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/07/090717-moths-jam-bat-sonar.html |archive-date=22 August 2009 |url-status=dead |website=[[National Geographic]] News}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=106733884 |title=Some Moths Escape Bats By Jamming Sonar |type=video |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170810131957/http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=106733884 |archive-date=10 August 2017 |url-status=live |website=[[NPR]] |date=17 July 2009}}</ref>
There is evidence that ultrasound in the range emitted by bats causes flying moths to make evasive maneuvers. [[Ultrasound|Ultrasonic]] frequencies trigger a reflex action in the [[noctuid]] moth that causes it to drop a few centimeters or inches in its flight to evade attack,<ref>{{cite journal| last = Jones| first = G | author2=D A Waters| title = Moth hearing in response to bat echolocation calls manipulated independently in time and frequency| doi = 10.1098/rspb.2000.1188| year = 2000| journal = Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences| volume = 267| pmid = 11467425| issue = 1453| pmc = 1690724| pages = 1627–32}}</ref> and [[Arctiini (erebid moths)|tiger moths]] can emit clicks to foil bats' [[Animal echolocation|echolocation]].<ref>{{Cite web|last=Kaplan |first=Matt |date=17 July 2009 |url=http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/07/090717-moths-jam-bat-sonar.html |title=Moths Jam Bat Sonar, Throw the Predators Off Course |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090822014813/http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/07/090717-moths-jam-bat-sonar.html |archive-date=22 August 2009 |website=[[National Geographic]] News}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=106733884 |title=Some Moths Escape Bats By Jamming Sonar |type=video |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170810131957/http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=106733884 |archive-date=10 August 2017 |url-status=live |website=[[NPR]] |date=17 July 2009}}</ref>


The fungus ''[[Ophiocordyceps sinensis]]'' infects the larvae of many different species of moths.<ref>{{cite journal | title=Entomopathogenicity and biological attributes of Himalayan treasured fungus ''Ophiocordyceps sinensis'' (Yarsagumba) | last1=Baral | first1=B | journal=Journal of Fungi | volume=3 | issue=1 | page=4 | pmid=29371523 | pmc=5715966 | doi=10.3390/jof3010004 | date=Feb 2017 | doi-access=free }}</ref>
The fungus ''[[Ophiocordyceps sinensis]]'' infects the larvae of many different species of moths.<ref>{{cite journal | title=Entomopathogenicity and biological attributes of Himalayan treasured fungus ''Ophiocordyceps sinensis'' (Yarsagumba) | last1=Baral | first1=B | journal=Journal of Fungi | volume=3 | issue=1 | page=4 | pmid=29371523 | pmc=5715966 | doi=10.3390/jof3010004 | date=Feb 2017 | doi-access=free }}</ref>


== Ecological importance ==
== Ecological importance ==
Moths, like butterflies, bees and other more popularly recognized [[Pollinator|pollinating]] insects, serve an essential role as pollinators for many flowering plants, including species that bees do not visit. Nocturnal moths fly from flower to flower to feed on nectar during the night much as their diurnal relatives do during the day. A study conducted in the UK found moths dusted with pollen from 47 different plant species, including seven species largely ignored by bees.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Fox |first1=Alex |title=Moths Work the Pollination Night Shift, Visiting Some Flowers Bees Skip |url=https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/moths-work-pollination-night-shift-visiting-some-flowers-bees-skip-180974884/ |website=smithsonianmag.com |access-date=30 October 2022 |archive-date=30 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221030201654/https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/moths-work-pollination-night-shift-visiting-some-flowers-bees-skip-180974884/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Some studies indicate that certain species of moths, such as those belonging to the families [[Erebidae]] and [[Sphingidae]], may be the key pollinators for some flowering plants in the Himalayan ecosystem.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://nmhs.org.in/MG_24_2017_18.php|title=National Mission on Himalayan Studies|website=nmhs.org.in|language=en-gb|access-date=4 November 2018|archive-date=4 November 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181104031614/http://nmhs.org.in/MG_24_2017_18.php|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/energy-and-environment/moths-are-key-to-pollination-in-himalayan-ecosystem/article25354080.ece|title=Moths are key to pollination in Himalayan ecosystem|last=Singh|first=Shiv Sahay|date=28 October 2018|work=The Hindu|access-date=4 November 2018|language=en-IN|issn=0971-751X|archive-date=28 October 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181028192046/https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/energy-and-environment/moths-are-key-to-pollination-in-himalayan-ecosystem/article25354080.ece|url-status=live}}</ref> The roles of moths as pollinators have been studied less frequently than those of diurnal pollinators, but recent studies have established that moths are important, but often overlooked, nocturnal pollinators of a wide range of plants.<ref>{{cite journal|publisher=The Royal Society|title=Nocturnal pollinators strongly contribute to pollen transport of wild flowers in an agricultural landscape|date=13 May 2020|doi=10.1098/rsbl.2019.0877|last1=Walton|first1=Richard E.|last2=Sayer|first2=Carl D.|last3=Bennion|first3=Helen|last4=Axmacher|first4=Jan C.|journal=Biology Letters|volume=16|issue=5|pmid=32396782|pmc=7280044}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|publisher=BBC|title=Nature crisis: Moths have 'secret role' as crucial pollinators|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-52630991|author=Matt McGrath|date=13 May 2020|access-date=13 May 2020|archive-date=13 May 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200513014202/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-52630991|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Macgregor|first1=Callum J.|last2=Pocock|first2=Michael J. O.|last3=Fox|first3=Richard|last4=Evans|first4=Darren M.|date=2015|title=Pollination by nocturnal Lepidoptera, and the effects of light pollution: a review|journal=Ecological Entomology|language=en|volume=40|issue=3|pages=187–198|doi=10.1111/een.12174|issn=1365-2311|pmc=4405039|pmid=25914438|bibcode=2015EcoEn..40..187M }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Hahn|first1=Melanie|last2=Brühl|first2=Carsten A.|date=25 January 2016|title=The secret pollinators: an overview of moth pollination with a focus on Europe and North America|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11829-016-9414-3|journal=Arthropod-Plant Interactions|volume=10|issue=1|pages=21–28|doi=10.1007/s11829-016-9414-3|bibcode=2016APInt..10...21H |s2cid=18514093|issn=1872-8855|access-date=19 September 2021|archive-date=14 March 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220314172022/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11829-016-9414-3|url-status=live|url-access=subscription}}</ref> Some researchers say it is likely that many plants thought to be dependent on bees for [[pollination]] also rely on moths, which have historically been less observed because they pollinate mainly at night.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Kuta |first1=Sarah |title=Moths are the Unsung Heroes of Pollination |url=https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/moths-are-the-unsung-heroes-of-pollination-180980491/ |website=smithsonianmag.com |access-date=30 October 2022 |archive-date=30 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221030201653/https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/moths-are-the-unsung-heroes-of-pollination-180980491/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
Moths, like butterflies, bees and other more popularly recognized [[Pollinator|pollinating]] insects, serve an essential role as pollinators for many flowering plants, including species that bees do not visit. Nocturnal moths fly from flower to flower to feed on nectar during the night much as their diurnal relatives do during the day. A study conducted in the UK found moths dusted with pollen from 47 different plant species, including seven species largely ignored by bees.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Fox |first1=Alex |title=Moths Work the Pollination Night Shift, Visiting Some Flowers Bees Skip |url=https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/moths-work-pollination-night-shift-visiting-some-flowers-bees-skip-180974884/ |website=smithsonianmag.com |access-date=30 October 2022 |archive-date=30 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221030201654/https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/moths-work-pollination-night-shift-visiting-some-flowers-bees-skip-180974884/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Some studies indicate that certain species of moths, such as those belonging to the families [[Erebidae]] and [[Sphingidae]], may be the key pollinators for some flowering plants in the Himalayan ecosystem.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://nmhs.org.in/MG_24_2017_18.php|title=National Mission on Himalayan Studies|website=nmhs.org.in|language=en-gb|access-date=4 November 2018|archive-date=4 November 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181104031614/http://nmhs.org.in/MG_24_2017_18.php|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/energy-and-environment/moths-are-key-to-pollination-in-himalayan-ecosystem/article25354080.ece|title=Moths are key to pollination in Himalayan ecosystem|last=Singh|first=Shiv Sahay|date=28 October 2018|work=The Hindu|access-date=4 November 2018|language=en-IN|issn=0971-751X|archive-date=28 October 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181028192046/https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/energy-and-environment/moths-are-key-to-pollination-in-himalayan-ecosystem/article25354080.ece|url-status=live}}</ref> The roles of moths as pollinators have been studied less frequently than those of diurnal pollinators, but recent studies have established that moths are important, but often overlooked, nocturnal pollinators of a wide range of plants.<ref>{{cite journal|publisher=The Royal Society|title=Nocturnal pollinators strongly contribute to pollen transport of wild flowers in an agricultural landscape|date=13 May 2020|doi=10.1098/rsbl.2019.0877|last1=Walton|first1=Richard E.|last2=Sayer|first2=Carl D.|last3=Bennion|first3=Helen|last4=Axmacher|first4=Jan C.|journal=Biology Letters|volume=16|issue=5|pmid=32396782|pmc=7280044}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|publisher=BBC|title=Nature crisis: Moths have 'secret role' as crucial pollinators|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-52630991|author=Matt McGrath|date=13 May 2020|access-date=13 May 2020|archive-date=13 May 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200513014202/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-52630991|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Macgregor|first1=Callum J.|last2=Pocock|first2=Michael J. O.|last3=Fox|first3=Richard|last4=Evans|first4=Darren M.|date=2015|title=Pollination by nocturnal Lepidoptera, and the effects of light pollution: a review|journal=Ecological Entomology|language=en|volume=40|issue=3|pages=187–198|doi=10.1111/een.12174|issn=1365-2311|pmc=4405039|pmid=25914438|bibcode=2015EcoEn..40..187M }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Hahn|first1=Melanie|last2=Brühl|first2=Carsten A.|date=25 January 2016|title=The secret pollinators: an overview of moth pollination with a focus on Europe and North America|journal=Arthropod-Plant Interactions|volume=10|issue=1|pages=21–28|doi=10.1007/s11829-016-9414-3|bibcode=2016APInt..10...21H |s2cid=18514093|issn=1872-8855}}</ref> Some researchers say it is likely that many plants thought to be dependent on bees for [[pollination]] also rely on moths, which have historically been less observed because they pollinate mainly at night.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Kuta |first1=Sarah |title=Moths are the Unsung Heroes of Pollination |url=https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/moths-are-the-unsung-heroes-of-pollination-180980491/ |website=smithsonianmag.com |access-date=30 October 2022 |archive-date=30 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221030201653/https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/moths-are-the-unsung-heroes-of-pollination-180980491/ |url-status=live }}</ref>


==Attraction to light==
==Attraction to light==
Line 82: Line 83:
One hypothesis is called celestial or transverse orientation. By maintaining a constant angular relationship to a bright celestial light, such as the moon, they can fly in a straight line. Celestial objects are so far away that, even after travelling great distances, the change in angle between the moth and the light source is negligible; further, the moon will always be in the upper part of the visual field, or on the horizon. When a moth encounters a much closer artificial light and uses it for navigation, the angle changes noticeably after only a short distance, in addition to being often below the horizon. The moth instinctively attempts to correct by turning toward the light, thereby causing airborne moths to come plummeting downward, and resulting in a spiral flight path that gets closer and closer to the light source.<ref>{{cite news | title=Why Are Moths Attracted to Flame? | work=[[npr.org]] | url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=12903572 | date=18 August 2007 | access-date=5 April 2018 | archive-date=8 January 2009 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090108215236/http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=12903572 | url-status=live }}</ref>
One hypothesis is called celestial or transverse orientation. By maintaining a constant angular relationship to a bright celestial light, such as the moon, they can fly in a straight line. Celestial objects are so far away that, even after travelling great distances, the change in angle between the moth and the light source is negligible; further, the moon will always be in the upper part of the visual field, or on the horizon. When a moth encounters a much closer artificial light and uses it for navigation, the angle changes noticeably after only a short distance, in addition to being often below the horizon. The moth instinctively attempts to correct by turning toward the light, thereby causing airborne moths to come plummeting downward, and resulting in a spiral flight path that gets closer and closer to the light source.<ref>{{cite news | title=Why Are Moths Attracted to Flame? | work=[[npr.org]] | url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=12903572 | date=18 August 2007 | access-date=5 April 2018 | archive-date=8 January 2009 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090108215236/http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=12903572 | url-status=live }}</ref>


Studies have found that [[light pollution]] caused by increasing use of artificial lights has either led to a severe decline in moth population in some parts of the world<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=van Langevelde|first1=Frank|last2=Braamburg-Annegarn|first2=Marijke|last3=Huigens|first3=Martinus E.|last4=Groendijk|first4=Rob|last5=Poitevin|first5=Olivier|last6=van Deijk|first6=Jurriën R.|last7=Ellis|first7=Willem N.|last8=van Grunsven|first8=Roy H. A.|last9=de Vos|first9=Rob|date=4 January 2018|title=Declines in moth populations stress the need for conserving dark nights|journal=Global Change Biology|language=en|volume=24|issue=3|pages=925–932|doi=10.1111/gcb.14008|pmid=29215778|issn=1354-1013|bibcode=2018GCBio..24..925V|s2cid=205145880}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://butterfly-conservation.org/moths/the-state-of-britains-moths|title=The State Of Britain's Moths|website=butterfly-conservation.org|language=en|access-date=4 November 2018|archive-date=4 November 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181104165943/https://butterfly-conservation.org/moths/the-state-of-britains-moths|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Boyes|first1=Douglas H.|last2=Evans|first2=Darren M.|last3=Fox|first3=Richard|last4=Parsons|first4=Mark S.|last5=Pocock|first5=Michael J. O.|date=August 2021|title=Street lighting has detrimental impacts on local insect populations|journal=Science Advances|volume=7|issue=35|pages=eabi8322|language=EN|doi=10.1126/sciadv.abi8322|pmc=8386932|pmid=34433571|bibcode=2021SciA....7.8322B}}</ref> or has severely disrupted nocturnal pollination.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Macgregor|first1=Callum J.|last2=Evans|first2=Darren M.|last3=Fox|first3=Richard|last4=Pocock|first4=Michael J. O.|date=12 July 2016|title=The dark side of street lighting: impacts on moths and evidence for the disruption of nocturnal pollen transport|journal=Global Change Biology|language=en|volume=23|issue=2|pages=697–707|doi=10.1111/gcb.13371|pmid=27251575|issn=1354-1013|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Knop|first1=Eva|last2=Zoller|first2=Leana|last3=Ryser|first3=Remo|last4=Gerpe|first4=Christopher|last5=Hörler|first5=Maurin|last6=Fontaine|first6=Colin|date=2 August 2017|title=Artificial light at night as a new threat to pollination|journal=Nature|language=En|volume=548|issue=7666|pages=206–209|doi=10.1038/nature23288|pmid=28783730|issn=0028-0836|bibcode=2017Natur.548..206K|s2cid=4466564|url=https://hal.science/hal-03947729/file/nature23288.pdf|access-date=13 June 2023|archive-date=27 May 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230527212730/https://hal.science/hal-03947729/file/nature23288.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
Studies have found that [[light pollution]] caused by increasing use of artificial lights has either led to a severe decline in moth population in some parts of the world<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=van Langevelde|first1=Frank|last2=Braamburg-Annegarn|first2=Marijke|last3=Huigens|first3=Martinus E.|last4=Groendijk|first4=Rob|last5=Poitevin|first5=Olivier|last6=van Deijk|first6=Jurriën R.|last7=Ellis|first7=Willem N.|last8=van Grunsven|first8=Roy H. A.|last9=de Vos|first9=Rob|date=4 January 2018|title=Declines in moth populations stress the need for conserving dark nights|journal=Global Change Biology|language=en|volume=24|issue=3|pages=925–932|doi=10.1111/gcb.14008|pmid=29215778|issn=1354-1013|bibcode=2018GCBio..24..925V|s2cid=205145880}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://butterfly-conservation.org/moths/the-state-of-britains-moths|title=The State Of Britain's Moths|website=butterfly-conservation.org|language=en|access-date=4 November 2018|archive-date=4 November 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181104165943/https://butterfly-conservation.org/moths/the-state-of-britains-moths|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Boyes|first1=Douglas H.|last2=Evans|first2=Darren M.|last3=Fox|first3=Richard|last4=Parsons|first4=Mark S.|last5=Pocock|first5=Michael J. O.|date=August 2021|title=Street lighting has detrimental impacts on local insect populations|journal=Science Advances|volume=7|issue=35|article-number=eabi8322|language=EN|doi=10.1126/sciadv.abi8322|pmc=8386932|pmid=34433571|bibcode=2021SciA....7.8322B}}</ref> or has severely disrupted nocturnal pollination.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Macgregor|first1=Callum J.|last2=Evans|first2=Darren M.|last3=Fox|first3=Richard|last4=Pocock|first4=Michael J. O.|date=12 July 2016|title=The dark side of street lighting: impacts on moths and evidence for the disruption of nocturnal pollen transport|journal=Global Change Biology|language=en|volume=23|issue=2|pages=697–707|doi=10.1111/gcb.13371|pmid=27251575|issn=1354-1013|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Knop|first1=Eva|last2=Zoller|first2=Leana|last3=Ryser|first3=Remo|last4=Gerpe|first4=Christopher|last5=Hörler|first5=Maurin|last6=Fontaine|first6=Colin|date=2 August 2017|title=Artificial light at night as a new threat to pollination|journal=Nature|language=En|volume=548|issue=7666|pages=206–209|doi=10.1038/nature23288|pmid=28783730|issn=0028-0836|bibcode=2017Natur.548..206K|s2cid=4466564|url=https://hal.science/hal-03947729/file/nature23288.pdf|access-date=13 June 2023|archive-date=27 May 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230527212730/https://hal.science/hal-03947729/file/nature23288.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>


==Noteworthy moths==
==Examples of moth species==
*Atlas moth (''[[Attacus atlas]]''), one of the largest moths in the world
*Atlas moth (''[[Attacus atlas]]''), one of the largest moths in the world
*Hercules moth (''[[Coscinocera hercules]]''), largest moth in Australia
*Hercules moth (''[[Coscinocera hercules]]''), largest moth in Australia
Line 103: Line 104:
*[[Xanthopan|Morgan's sphinx moth]] (''Xanthopan morganii''), known for orchid pollination
*[[Xanthopan|Morgan's sphinx moth]] (''Xanthopan morganii''), known for orchid pollination
*[[Comet moth]] (''Argema mittrei''), known for coevolutionary arms race with bats
*[[Comet moth]] (''Argema mittrei''), known for coevolutionary arms race with bats
*Magpie moth (''[[Nyctemera annulata]])'', pupae used in Maori children's game
*Bamboo worm (''[[Omphisa fuscidentalis]]''), used as food source in Thailand and Nagaland
*[[Hummingbird hawk-moth]] (''Macroglossum stellatarum''), seen as good/lucky omen
*Mother Shipton moth (''[[Callistege mi]]''), forewing pattern represents English folklore figure [[Mother Shipton]]
*Mopone moth (''[[Gonimbrasia belina]]''), caterpillars are food source in southern Africa
*African wild silk worm (''[[Gonometa postica]]'')
*Japanese silk moth (''[[Antheraea yamamai]]'')
*[[Garden tiger moth]] (''Arctia caja''), caterpillar hairs known for causing hives and irritation
*''[[Erasmia pulchella]]'', known for beautiful wing patterns resembling ''nishiki'' cloth (type of Japanese brocade)


===Moth species that may cause significant economic damage===
===Moth species that may cause significant economic damage===
Line 113: Line 123:
*[[Wax moth]]s (''[[Galleria mellonella]]'', ''[[Achroia grisella]]''), pests of bee hives
*[[Wax moth]]s (''[[Galleria mellonella]]'', ''[[Achroia grisella]]''), pests of bee hives
*''[[Duponchelia fovealis]]'', a new invasive pest of vegetables and ornamental plants in the United States
*''[[Duponchelia fovealis]]'', a new invasive pest of vegetables and ornamental plants in the United States
*[[Levuana moth|Leuvana moth]] (''Levuana iridescens''), notorious coconut pest made extinct


==Gallery==
==Gallery==

Latest revision as of 17:00, 4 November 2025

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "other uses". Template:Pp-semi-indef Template:Paraphyletic group

Moths are a group of insects that includes all members of the order Lepidoptera that are not butterflies.[1] They were previously classified as suborder Heterocera, but the group is paraphyletic with respect to butterflies (suborder Rhopalocera) and neither subordinate taxon is used in modern classifications. Moths make up the vast majority of the order. There are approximately 160,000 species of moth,[2] many of which have yet to be described. Most species of moth are nocturnal, although there are also crepuscular and diurnal species.

Etymology

The modern English word moth comes from Old English Script error: No such module "Lang". (cf. Northumbrian Script error: No such module "Lang".) from Common Germanic (compare Old Norse Script error: No such module "Lang"., Dutch Script error: No such module "Lang"., and German Script error: No such module "Lang". all meaning 'moth'). Its origins are possibly related to the Old English Script error: No such module "Lang". meaning 'maggot' or from the root of midge which until the 16th century was used mostly to indicate the larva, usually in reference to devouring clothes.

Differences between butterflies and moths

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

File:Basic moth identification features.jpg
Basic moth identification features

While the butterflies form a monophyletic group, the moths, comprising the rest of the Lepidoptera, do not. Many attempts have been made to group the superfamilies of the Lepidoptera into natural groups, most of which fail because one of the two groups is not monophyletic: Microlepidoptera and Macrolepidoptera, Heterocera and Rhopalocera, Jugatae and Frenatae, Monotrysia, and Ditrysia.[3]

Although the rules for distinguishing moths from butterflies are not well established, one very good guiding principle is that butterflies have thin antennae and (with the exception of the family Hedylidae) have small balls or clubs at the end of their antennae. Moth antennae are usually feathery with no ball on the end. The divisions are named by this principle: "club-antennae" (Rhopalocera) or "varied-antennae" (Heterocera). Lepidoptera first evolved during the Carboniferous period, but only evolved their characteristic proboscis alongside the rise of angiosperms in the Cretaceous period.[4]

Caterpillar

File:Poplar hawk-moth.jpg
Poplar hawk-moth caterpillar (Laothoe populi)

Moth larvae, or caterpillars, make cocoons from which they emerge as fully grown moths with wings. Some moth caterpillars dig holes in the ground, where they live until they are ready to turn into adult moths.[5]

Evolution

Moths evolved long before butterflies; moth fossils have been found that may be 190 million years old. Both types of Lepidoptera are thought to have co-evolved with flowering plants, mainly because most modern species, both as adults and larvae, feed on flowering plants. One of the earliest known species that is thought to be an ancestor of moths is Archaeolepis mane. Its fossil fragments show scaled wings that are similar to caddisflies in their veining.[6]

Economics

Significance to humans

File:Moth September 2008-3.jpg
An adult male pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea pityocampa). This species is a serious forest pest when in its larval state. Notice the bristle springing from the underside of the hindwing (frenulum) and running forward to be held in a small catch of the forewing, whose function is to link the wings together.

Some moths, particularly their caterpillars, can be major agricultural pests in many parts of the world. Examples include corn borers and bollworms.[7] The caterpillar of the spongy moth (Lymantria dispar) causes severe damage to forests in the northeastern United States, where it is an invasive species. In temperate climates, the codling moth causes extensive damage, especially to fruit farms. In tropical and subtropical climates, the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) is perhaps the most serious pest of brassicaceous crops. Also in sub-Saharan Africa, the African sugarcane borer is a major pest of sugarcane, maize, and sorghum.[8]

Several moths in the family Tineidae are commonly regarded as pests because their larvae eat fabric such as clothes and blankets made from natural proteinaceous fibers such as wool or silk.[9] They are less likely to eat mixed materials containing some artificial fibers. There are some reports that they may be repelled by the scent of wood from juniper and cedar, by lavender, or by other natural oils; however, many consider this unlikely to prevent infestation. Naphthalene (the chemical used in mothballs) is considered more effective, but there are concerns over its effects on human health.

Despite being commonly thought to be undertaken by all moths,[10][11] only the larvae of several moth species eat animal fibres, creating holes in articles of clothing, in particular those made of wool. Most species do not eat fabrics, and some moth adults do not even eat at all. Some, like the Luna, Polyphemus, Atlas, Promethea, cecropia, and other large moths do not have mouth parts. This is possible because they live off the food stores from when they were a caterpillar, and only live a short time as an adult (roughly a week for some species).[12] Many species of adult moths do however eat: for instance, many will drink nectar.[9]

Items of fabric infested by clothes moth larvae may be treated by freezing them for several days at a temperature below Template:Convert.[13]

Some moths are farmed for their economic value. The most notable of these is the silkworm, the larva of the domesticated moth Bombyx mori. It is farmed for the silk with which it builds its cocoon. Template:As of, the silk industry produces more than 130 million kilograms of raw silk, worth about 250 million U.S. dollars, each year.[14][15][16]

Not all silk is produced by Bombyx mori. There are several species of Saturniidae that also are farmed for their silk, such as the ailanthus moth (Samia cynthia group of species), the Chinese oak silkmoth (Antheraea pernyi), the Assam silkmoth (Antheraea assamensis), and the Japanese silk moth (Antheraea yamamai).

The larvae of many species are used as food, particularly in Africa, where they are an important source of nutrition. The mopane worm, the caterpillar of Gonimbrasia belina, from the family Saturniidae, is a significant food resource in southern Africa. Another saturniid used as food is the cavorting emperor (Usta terpsichore). In one country alone, Congo, more than 30 species of moth larvae are harvested. Some are sold not only in the local village markets, but are shipped by the ton from one country to another.[17]

Predators and parasites

File:Tomato Hornworm Parasitized by Braconid Wasp.jpg
Tobacco hornworm parasitized by braconid wasps

Nocturnal insectivores often feed on moths; these include some bats, some species of owls and other species of birds. Moths also are eaten by some species of lizards, amphibians, cats, dogs, rodents, and some bears. Moth larvae are vulnerable to being parasitized by Ichneumonidae.

Baculoviruses are parasite double-stranded DNA insect viruses that are used mostly as biological control agents. They are members of the Baculoviridae, a family that is restricted to insects. Most baculovirus isolates have been obtained from insects, in particular from Lepidoptera.

There is evidence that ultrasound in the range emitted by bats causes flying moths to make evasive maneuvers. Ultrasonic frequencies trigger a reflex action in the noctuid moth that causes it to drop a few centimeters or inches in its flight to evade attack,[18] and tiger moths can emit clicks to foil bats' echolocation.[19][20]

The fungus Ophiocordyceps sinensis infects the larvae of many different species of moths.[21]

Ecological importance

Moths, like butterflies, bees and other more popularly recognized pollinating insects, serve an essential role as pollinators for many flowering plants, including species that bees do not visit. Nocturnal moths fly from flower to flower to feed on nectar during the night much as their diurnal relatives do during the day. A study conducted in the UK found moths dusted with pollen from 47 different plant species, including seven species largely ignored by bees.[22] Some studies indicate that certain species of moths, such as those belonging to the families Erebidae and Sphingidae, may be the key pollinators for some flowering plants in the Himalayan ecosystem.[23][24] The roles of moths as pollinators have been studied less frequently than those of diurnal pollinators, but recent studies have established that moths are important, but often overlooked, nocturnal pollinators of a wide range of plants.[25][26][27][28] Some researchers say it is likely that many plants thought to be dependent on bees for pollination also rely on moths, which have historically been less observed because they pollinate mainly at night.[29]

Attraction to light

File:Moth near lamp (cropped).jpg
Moths circling an electric lightbulb

Moths frequently appear to circle artificial lights. The reason for this behavior (positive phototaxis) is currently unknown.

One hypothesis is called celestial or transverse orientation. By maintaining a constant angular relationship to a bright celestial light, such as the moon, they can fly in a straight line. Celestial objects are so far away that, even after travelling great distances, the change in angle between the moth and the light source is negligible; further, the moon will always be in the upper part of the visual field, or on the horizon. When a moth encounters a much closer artificial light and uses it for navigation, the angle changes noticeably after only a short distance, in addition to being often below the horizon. The moth instinctively attempts to correct by turning toward the light, thereby causing airborne moths to come plummeting downward, and resulting in a spiral flight path that gets closer and closer to the light source.[30]

Studies have found that light pollution caused by increasing use of artificial lights has either led to a severe decline in moth population in some parts of the world[31][32][33] or has severely disrupted nocturnal pollination.[34][35]

Examples of moth species

Moth species that may cause significant economic damage

Gallery

See also

References

Template:Reflist

External links

Template:Sister project

Template:Insects in culture Template:Navbox with collapsible groups Template:Portal bar

Template:Taxonbar Template:Authority control

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. Scoble, MJ 1995. The Lepidoptera: Form, function and diversity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 404 p.
  4. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  5. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  9. a b Scott, Thomas (1995). Concise Encyclopedia Biology Template:Webarchive. Walter de Gruyter. Template:ISBN.
  10. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  12. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  14. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". gives silk prices in rupees. Exchange rate is about 50 RS to dollar.
  16. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  17. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  18. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  19. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  20. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  21. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  22. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  23. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  24. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  25. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  26. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  27. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  28. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  29. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  30. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  31. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  32. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  33. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  34. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  35. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  36. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  37. Brundage, Adrienne (23 March 2009), Other Arthropods of Forensic Importance, Texas A&M University, Texas A&M University Forensic Entomology Lecture