Laozi: Difference between revisions
imported>Psychastes →External links: rm ethics template (per my last edit, looks like it was transcluded after all - but it really doesn't fit laozi) |
imported>Wolfdog m →Name: piping pinyin |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Semi-legendary Chinese philosopher, founder of Taoism}} | {{Short description|Semi-legendary Chinese philosopher, founder of Taoism}} | ||
{{ | {{about||the book also known as Laozi|Tao Te Ching|the 1996 sculpture by Mark di Suvero|Lao Tzu (sculpture)}} | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2019}} | {{Use dmy dates|date=September 2019}} | ||
{{CS1 config|mode=cs2}} | {{CS1 config|mode=cs2}} | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| tl = Ló-tsú | | tl = Ló-tsú | ||
| oc-bs = C.rˤuʔ tsəʔ<ref name=baxsag/> | | oc-bs = C.rˤuʔ tsəʔ<ref name=baxsag/> | ||
| vie = | | vie = | ||
| hn = 老子 | | hn = 老子 | ||
| hangul = | | hangul = | ||
| hanja = | | hanja = | ||
| rr = Noja | | rr = Noja | ||
| kanji = 老子 | | kanji = 老子 | ||
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
{{Taoism}} | {{Taoism}} | ||
'''Laozi''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|l|au|d|z| | '''Laozi''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|l|au||_|ˈ|d|z|ʌ}}) was a legendary [[Chinese philosophy|Chinese philosopher]] considered to be the author of the ''[[Tao Te Ching]]'' (''Laozi''), one of the foundational texts of [[Taoism]]. The name, literally meaning 'Old Master', was likely intended to portray an archaic anonymity that could converse with [[Confucianism]]. Modern scholarship generally regards his biographical details as later inventions and his opus a collaboration of various writers. Traditional accounts addend him as {{nowrap|'''Li Er'''}}, born in the 6th-century{{nbsp}}BC [[state of Chu]] during China's [[Spring and Autumn period]] ({{circa|770|481 BC}}). Serving as the royal [[archivist]] for the [[Zhou dynasty|Zhou]] court at [[Wangcheng (Zhou dynasty)|Wangcheng]] (modern [[Luoyang]]), he met and impressed [[Confucius]] ({{circa|551|479 BC|lk=no}}) on one occasion, composing the ''Tao Te Ching'' in a single session before retiring into the western wilderness. | ||
A central figure in [[Chinese culture]], Laozi is generally considered the founder of Taoism. He was claimed and [[ancestor veneration in China|revered]] as the ancestor of the [[Tang dynasty]] (618–907) and is similarly honored in modern China as the progenitor of the popular [[Li (surname 李)|surname Li]]. In some sects of Taoism, [[Chinese Buddhism]], Confucianism, and [[Chinese folk religion]], it is held that he then became an [[Taoist immortal|immortal]] hermit.<ref>{{Cite book |title=The Desk Encyclopedia of World History |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |year=2006 |isbn=978- | A central figure in [[Chinese culture]], Laozi is generally considered the founder of Taoism. He was claimed and [[ancestor veneration in China|revered]] as the ancestor of the [[Tang dynasty]] (618–907) and is similarly honored in modern China as the progenitor of the popular [[Li (surname 李)|surname Li]]. In some sects of Taoism, [[Chinese Buddhism]], Confucianism, and [[Chinese folk religion]], it is held that he then became an [[Taoist immortal|immortal]] hermit.<ref>{{Cite book |title=The Desk Encyclopedia of World History |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |year=2006 |isbn=978-0739478097 |editor-last=Wright |editor-first=Edmund |location=New York |pages=365}}</ref> Certain Taoist devotees held that the ''Tao Te Ching'' was the avatar{{snd}}embodied as a book{{snd}}of the god [[Laojun]], one of the [[Three Pure Ones]] of the Taoist pantheon, though few philosophers believe this.<ref>{{cite book |last=Goldin |first=Paul R. |title=The Art of Chinese Philosophy: Eight Classical Texts and How to Read Them |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0691200811 |page=110 |doi=10.1515/9780691200811-008 |s2cid=242423709}}</ref> | ||
The ''Tao Te Ching'' had a profound influence on [[religion in China|Chinese religious movements]] and on subsequent Chinese philosophers, who annotated, commended, and criticized the texts extensively. In the 20th century, [[textual criticism]] by historians led to theories questioning Laozi's timing or even existence, positing that the received text of the ''Tao Te Ching'' was not composed until the [[Warring States period]] ({{circa|475|lk=no}}{{snd}}221 BC), and was the product of multiple authors. | The ''Tao Te Ching'' had a profound influence on [[religion in China|Chinese religious movements]] and on subsequent Chinese philosophers, who annotated, commended, and criticized the texts extensively. In the 20th century, [[textual criticism]] by historians led to theories questioning Laozi's timing or even existence, positing that the received text of the ''Tao Te Ching'' was not composed until the [[Warring States period]] ({{circa|475|lk=no}}{{snd}}221 BC), and was the product of multiple authors. | ||
| Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
== Name == | == Name == | ||
''Lǎozǐ'' is the modern (''[[pinyin]]'') [[romanization of Chinese|romanization]] of {{lang|zh|老子}}. In English, a variety of pronunciations and spellings of the Chinese name exist, such as ''Lao-tse'' and ''Lao Tzu''. It is not a personal name, but rather an [[Chinese honorifics|honorific title]], meaning 'old' or 'venerable'. Its structure matches that of other ancient Chinese philosophers, such as [[Kongzi]] (Confucius), [[Mencius|Mengzi]], and [[Zhuang Zhou|Zhuangzi]].<ref>{{citation |contribution=The "Ancient Child" Fallacy |date=29 December 2016 |last=Lin |first=Derek |contribution-url=https://taoism.net/ancient-child/ |url=https://taoism.net |title=Taoism.net }}</ref> | |||
Traditional accounts give Laozi the personal name '''Li Er''' ({{lang|zh|李耳}}, {{tlit|zh|Lǐ Ěr}}), whose [[Old Chinese]] pronunciation [[reconstruction of Old Chinese|has been reconstructed]] as {{Transliteration|och|*C.rəʔ C.nəʔ}}.<ref name=baxsag>{{cite web |last1=Baxter |first1=William |first2=Laurent |last2=Sagart |url=http://ocbaxtersagart.lsait.lsa.umich.edu/BaxterSagartOCbyMandarinMC2014-09-20.pdf |title=Baxter–Sagart Old Chinese Reconstruction |date=20 September 2014 |access-date=1 May 2018}}</ref> [[Li (surname 李)|Li]] is a common [[Chinese surname]] which also has the meaning 'plum' or 'plum tree' when used as a common noun; there is a legend tying Laozi's birth to a plum tree.<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia <!-- Citation bot no -->|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Laozi|title=Laozi |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |date=2009 |last1=Ames |first1=Roger T. |last2=Kaltenmark |first2=Max |author1-link= Roger T. Ames }}</ref> Laozi has long been identified with the persona '''Lao Dan''' ({{lang|zh|老聃}}, {{tlit|zh|Lǎo Dān}}).{{sfnp|Luo|2004|p=118}}{{sfnp|Kramer|1986|p=118}}{{sfnp|Chan|2000|p=2}} ''Dan'' similarly means "Long-Ear" or "the Long-Eared One". The character {{lang|zh|耳}} is the Chinese word for 'ear'.<ref>{{Citation |script-work=zh:漢典 |work=Zdic |url=https://www.zdic.net/hant/%E8%80%B3 |script-title=zh:耳字 |language=zh}}</ref> | Traditional accounts give Laozi the personal name '''Li Er''' ({{lang|zh|李耳}}, {{tlit|zh|Lǐ Ěr}}), whose [[Old Chinese]] pronunciation [[reconstruction of Old Chinese|has been reconstructed]] as [[Reconstructions of Old Chinese#Yakhontov (1959–1965)|{{Transliteration|och|*C.rəʔ C.nəʔ}}.]]<ref name=baxsag>{{cite web |last1=Baxter |first1=William |first2=Laurent |last2=Sagart |url=http://ocbaxtersagart.lsait.lsa.umich.edu/BaxterSagartOCbyMandarinMC2014-09-20.pdf |title=Baxter–Sagart Old Chinese Reconstruction |date=20 September 2014 |access-date=1 May 2018 |archive-date=28 April 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220428050156/https://ocbaxtersagart.lsait.lsa.umich.edu/BaxterSagartOCbyMandarinMC2014-09-20.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> [[Li (surname 李)|Li]] is a common [[Chinese surname]] which also has the meaning 'plum' or 'plum tree' when used as a common noun; there is a legend tying Laozi's birth to a plum tree.<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia <!-- Citation bot no -->|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Laozi|title=Laozi |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |date=2009 |last1=Ames |first1=Roger T. |last2=Kaltenmark |first2=Max |author1-link= Roger T. Ames }}</ref> Laozi has long been identified with the persona '''Lao Dan''' ({{lang|zh|老聃}}, {{tlit|zh|Lǎo Dān}}).{{sfnp|Luo|2004|p=118}}{{sfnp|Kramer|1986|p=118}}{{sfnp|Chan|2000|p=2}} ''Dan'' similarly means "Long-Ear" or "the Long-Eared One". The character {{lang|zh|耳}} is the Chinese word for 'ear'.<ref>{{Citation |script-work=zh:漢典 |work=Zdic |url=https://www.zdic.net/hant/%E8%80%B3 |script-title=zh:耳字 |language=zh}}</ref> | ||
Laozi is recorded bearing the [[courtesy name]] '''Boyang''' ({{lang|zh|伯陽}}, {{tlit|zh|Bóyáng}}), whose Old Chinese pronunciation has been reconstructed as {{Transliteration|och|*pˤrak laŋ}}.<ref name=baxsag/> The character {{lang|zh|伯}} was the title of the eldest son born to the primary wife, or an uncle of the father's family who was older than one's father, also used as a [[Zhou dynasty nobility|noble title]] indicating an aristocratic lineage head with rulership over a small to medium domain, and as a general mark of respect. The character {{lang|zh|陽}} is [[yang (concept)|yang]], the solar and masculine life force in Taoist belief. Lao Dan seems to have been used more generally, however, including by [[Sima Qian]] in his ''[[Shiji]]'' ({{circa|91 BC|lk=no}}),<ref name="LDR">{{citation |last1=Rainey |first1=Lee Dian |title=Decoding Dao: Reading the ''Dao De Jing'' (''Tao Te Ching'') and the ''Zhuangzi'' (''Chuang Tzu'') |date=2013 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1118465677 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=YNFiAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT31 31] |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YNFiAgAAQBAJ}}.</ref> in the ''[[Zhuangzi (book)|Zhuangzi]]'',<ref name="LDR"/> and by some modern scholars.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia | author-last= Fu | author-first= Charles Wei-hsun |editor-last1=Carr |editor-first1=Brian |editor-last2=Mahalingam |editor-first2=Indira |title=Daoism in Chinese Philosophy |encyclopedia=Companion Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy |date=2002 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1134960583 |pages=497–519|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xIwrBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA497}}</ref> | Laozi is recorded bearing the [[courtesy name]] '''Boyang''' ({{lang|zh|伯陽}}, {{tlit|zh|Bóyáng}}), whose Old Chinese pronunciation has been reconstructed as {{Transliteration|och|*pˤrak laŋ}}.<ref name=baxsag/> The character {{lang|zh|伯}} was the title of the eldest son born to the primary wife, or an uncle of the father's family who was older than one's father, also used as a [[Zhou dynasty nobility|noble title]] indicating an aristocratic lineage head with rulership over a small to medium domain, and as a general mark of respect. The character {{lang|zh|陽}} is [[yang (concept)|yang]], the solar and masculine life force in Taoist belief. Lao Dan seems to have been used more generally, however, including by [[Sima Qian]] in his ''[[Shiji]]'' ({{circa|91 BC|lk=no}}),<ref name="LDR">{{citation |last1=Rainey |first1=Lee Dian |title=Decoding Dao: Reading the ''Dao De Jing'' (''Tao Te Ching'') and the ''Zhuangzi'' (''Chuang Tzu'') |date=2013 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1118465677 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=YNFiAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT31 31] |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YNFiAgAAQBAJ}}.</ref> in the ''[[Zhuangzi (book)|Zhuangzi]]'',<ref name="LDR"/> and by some modern scholars.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia | author-last= Fu | author-first= Charles Wei-hsun |editor-last1=Carr |editor-first1=Brian |editor-last2=Mahalingam |editor-first2=Indira |title=Daoism in Chinese Philosophy |encyclopedia=Companion Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy |date=2002 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1134960583 |pages=497–519|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xIwrBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA497}}</ref> | ||
| Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
By the mid-twentieth century, consensus had emerged among Western scholars that the [[historicity]] of a person known as Laozi is doubtful and that the ''Tao Te Ching'' is "a compilation of Taoist sayings by many hands",{{sfnp|Watson|1968|p=8}}<ref name=Kohn4>{{Harvp|Chan|2000|p=4}}</ref> with an author being invented afterwards.{{sfnp|Lewis|1999|p=61}} While multiple authorship over time is typical for early Chinese texts,{{sfnp|Zhang|2018|pp=26, 30}} the book's conspicuous absence of a central Master figure places it in marked contrast with nearly all other early Chinese philosophical works.{{sfnm|1a1=Denecke|1y=2011|1pp=208, 212–213|2a1=Lewis|2y=1999|2p=91}} | By the mid-twentieth century, consensus had emerged among Western scholars that the [[historicity]] of a person known as Laozi is doubtful and that the ''Tao Te Ching'' is "a compilation of Taoist sayings by many hands",{{sfnp|Watson|1968|p=8}}<ref name=Kohn4>{{Harvp|Chan|2000|p=4}}</ref> with an author being invented afterwards.{{sfnp|Lewis|1999|p=61}} While multiple authorship over time is typical for early Chinese texts,{{sfnp|Zhang|2018|pp=26, 30}} the book's conspicuous absence of a central Master figure places it in marked contrast with nearly all other early Chinese philosophical works.{{sfnm|1a1=Denecke|1y=2011|1pp=208, 212–213|2a1=Lewis|2y=1999|2p=91}} | ||
{{As of|2024}}, the oldest manuscript containing text from the ''Tao Te Ching'' dates to the late 4th century BC, written on [[bamboo slips]] excavated as part of the [[Guodian Chu Slips]]. These passages correspond with roughly one third of the received text,<ref>{{cite journal | last= Qiu | first= Xigui | author-mask= [[Qiu Xigui]] | title= Guodian ''Laozi'' jian chu tan | script-title = zh:郭店老子簡初談 | trans-title= An initial discussion of the Guodian ''Laozi'' slips | script-work=zh:道家文化研究 | volume= 17 | date=1999 | page= 26 n. 1}} Cited in {{harvp|Shaughnessy|2005|p=451}}</ref> and some are placed in the same order. These are mixed in with passages not carried by the transmitted ''Tao Te Ching'', indicating that its makeup was still undergoing revisions and modifications.{{sfnp|Shaughnessy|2005|p=445}} The oldest manuscripts of the ''Tao Te Ching'' in a complete form by itself were discovered at a tomb in [[Mawangdui]], and date to the early 2nd century BC.<ref name="stanford">{{cite encyclopedia |title=Laozi | last= Chan | first = Alan | orig-date= 2001 | editor1 = Edward N. Zalta | editor2= Uri Nodelman | display-editors= etal |url=http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/laozi/ |encyclopedia=[[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]] |publisher=Stanford University Department of Philosophy |year=2018 |quote=The discovery of two ''Laozi'' silk manuscripts at Mawangdui, near Changsha, Hunan province in 1973 marks an important milestone in modern ''Laozi'' research. The manuscripts, identified simply as 'A' (''[[sexagenary cycle|jia]]'') and 'B' (''yi''), were found in a tomb that was sealed in 168 B.C.E. The texts themselves can be dated earlier, the 'A' manuscript being the older of the two, copied in all likelihood before 195 B.C.E." [...]<br />"Until about two decades ago, the Mawangdui manuscripts have held the pride of place as the oldest extant manuscripts of the ''Laozi''. In late 1993, the excavation of a tomb (identified as M1) in Guodian, Jingmen city, [[Hubei]], has yielded among other things some 800 [[Guodian Chu slips|bamboo slips]], of which 730 are inscribed, containing over 13,000 Chinese characters. Some of these, amounting to about 2,000 characters, match the ''Laozi''. The tomb...is dated around 300 B.C.E.}}</ref> Analysis of early commentary on passages that appear in the received ''Tao Te Ching'' supports an accretionary evolution for the text rather than a singular authorship event.<ref>{{ cite book | last = Queen | publisher= Springer | editor= Paul R. Goldin | first= Sarah A. | chapter= <!-- Citation bot stet oblique --> ''Han Feizi'' and the Old Master: A Comparative Analysis and Translation of ''Han Feizi'' Chapter 20, "Jie Lao," and Chapter 21, "Yu Lao" | series= Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy |pages= 197–256 | date= 2013 | title= Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Han Fei | isbn = 978- | {{As of|2024}}, the oldest manuscript containing text from the ''Tao Te Ching'' dates to the late 4th century BC, written on [[bamboo slips]] excavated as part of the [[Guodian Chu Slips]]. These passages correspond with roughly one third of the received text,<ref>{{cite journal | last= Qiu | first= Xigui | author-mask= [[Qiu Xigui]] | title= Guodian ''Laozi'' jian chu tan | script-title = zh:郭店老子簡初談 | trans-title= An initial discussion of the Guodian ''Laozi'' slips | script-work=zh:道家文化研究 | volume= 17 | date=1999 | page= 26 n. 1}} Cited in {{harvp|Shaughnessy|2005|p=451}}</ref> and some are placed in the same order. These are mixed in with passages not carried by the transmitted ''Tao Te Ching'', indicating that its makeup was still undergoing revisions and modifications.{{sfnp|Shaughnessy|2005|p=445}} The oldest manuscripts of the ''Tao Te Ching'' in a complete form by itself were discovered at a tomb in [[Mawangdui]], and date to the early 2nd century BC.<ref name="stanford">{{cite encyclopedia |title=Laozi | last= Chan | first = Alan | orig-date= 2001 | editor1 = Edward N. Zalta | editor2= Uri Nodelman | display-editors= etal |url=http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/laozi/ |encyclopedia=[[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]] |publisher=Stanford University Department of Philosophy |year=2018 |quote=The discovery of two ''Laozi'' silk manuscripts at Mawangdui, near Changsha, Hunan province in 1973 marks an important milestone in modern ''Laozi'' research. The manuscripts, identified simply as 'A' (''[[sexagenary cycle|jia]]'') and 'B' (''yi''), were found in a tomb that was sealed in 168 B.C.E. The texts themselves can be dated earlier, the 'A' manuscript being the older of the two, copied in all likelihood before 195 B.C.E." [...]<br />"Until about two decades ago, the Mawangdui manuscripts have held the pride of place as the oldest extant manuscripts of the ''Laozi''. In late 1993, the excavation of a tomb (identified as M1) in Guodian, Jingmen city, [[Hubei]], has yielded among other things some 800 [[Guodian Chu slips|bamboo slips]], of which 730 are inscribed, containing over 13,000 Chinese characters. Some of these, amounting to about 2,000 characters, match the ''Laozi''. The tomb...is dated around 300 B.C.E.}}</ref> Analysis of early commentary on passages that appear in the received ''Tao Te Ching'' supports an accretionary evolution for the text rather than a singular authorship event.<ref>{{ cite book | last = Queen | publisher= Springer | editor= Paul R. Goldin | first= Sarah A. | chapter= <!-- Citation bot stet oblique --> ''Han Feizi'' and the Old Master: A Comparative Analysis and Translation of ''Han Feizi'' Chapter 20, "Jie Lao," and Chapter 21, "Yu Lao" | series= Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy |pages= 197–256 | date= 2013 | title= Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Han Fei | isbn = 978-9400743175 | doi = 10.1007/978-94-007-4318-2_10}}</ref> | ||
=== Traditional accounts === | === Traditional accounts === | ||
| Line 111: | Line 111: | ||
In a third, he was the court astrologer Lao Dan who lived during the 4th century{{nbsp}}BC reign of the [[Duke Xian of Qin (424–362 BC)|Duke Xian of Qin]]{{sfnp|Fowler|2005|p=96}}{{sfnp|Robinet|1997|p=26}} who grew weary of the moral decay of life in [[Chengzhou]] and noted the kingdom's decline. He ventured west to live as a hermit in the unsettled frontier at the age of 80. At the western gate of the city (or kingdom), he was recognized by the guard [[Yinxi]]. The sentry asked the old master to record his wisdom for the good of the country before he would be permitted to pass. The text Laozi wrote was said to be the ''Tao Te Ching'', although the present version of the text includes additions from later periods. In some versions of the tale, the sentry was so touched by the work that he became a disciple and left with Laozi, never to be seen again.{{sfnp|Kohn|Lafargue|1998|pp=14, 17, 54–55}} In some later interpretations, the "Old Master" journeyed all the way to India and was the teacher of Siddartha Gautama, [[the Buddha]]. Others say he was the Buddha himself.<ref name="Simpkins 1999 pp 12-13"/>{{sfnp|Morgan|2001|pp=224–225}} | In a third, he was the court astrologer Lao Dan who lived during the 4th century{{nbsp}}BC reign of the [[Duke Xian of Qin (424–362 BC)|Duke Xian of Qin]]{{sfnp|Fowler|2005|p=96}}{{sfnp|Robinet|1997|p=26}} who grew weary of the moral decay of life in [[Chengzhou]] and noted the kingdom's decline. He ventured west to live as a hermit in the unsettled frontier at the age of 80. At the western gate of the city (or kingdom), he was recognized by the guard [[Yinxi]]. The sentry asked the old master to record his wisdom for the good of the country before he would be permitted to pass. The text Laozi wrote was said to be the ''Tao Te Ching'', although the present version of the text includes additions from later periods. In some versions of the tale, the sentry was so touched by the work that he became a disciple and left with Laozi, never to be seen again.{{sfnp|Kohn|Lafargue|1998|pp=14, 17, 54–55}} In some later interpretations, the "Old Master" journeyed all the way to India and was the teacher of Siddartha Gautama, [[the Buddha]]. Others say he was the Buddha himself.<ref name="Simpkins 1999 pp 12-13"/>{{sfnp|Morgan|2001|pp=224–225}} | ||
The stories assert that Laozi never opened a formal school but nonetheless attracted a large number of students and loyal disciples. There are many variations of a story retelling his encounter with Confucius, most famously in the ''Zhuangzi''.<ref name="Simpkins 1999 pp 12-13">{{Harvp|Simpkins|Simpkins|1999|pp=12–13}}</ref>{{sfnp|Morgan|2001|pp=223–224}} [[A. C. Graham|A.C. Graham]] suggested that the Confucian version of the story presented in the ''[[Book of Rites]]'' was the original, which was borrowed and re-interpreted by the followers of [[Zhuang Zhou]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Graham |first=Angus C. |author-link=A. C. Graham |url=https://archive.org/details/chuangtzuinnerch0000zhua |title=Chuang-tzŭ: the Inner Chapters |date=2001 |publisher=Hackett Publishing Company, Inc |isbn=978- | The stories assert that Laozi never opened a formal school but nonetheless attracted a large number of students and loyal disciples. There are many variations of a story retelling his encounter with Confucius, most famously in the ''Zhuangzi''.<ref name="Simpkins 1999 pp 12-13">{{Harvp|Simpkins|Simpkins|1999|pp=12–13}}</ref>{{sfnp|Morgan|2001|pp=223–224}} [[A. C. Graham|A.C. Graham]] suggested that the Confucian version of the story presented in the ''[[Book of Rites]]'' was the original, which was borrowed and re-interpreted by the followers of [[Zhuang Zhou]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Graham |first=Angus C. |author-link=A. C. Graham |url=https://archive.org/details/chuangtzuinnerch0000zhua |title=Chuang-tzŭ: the Inner Chapters |date=2001 |publisher=Hackett Publishing Company, Inc |isbn=978-0872205826 |edition=Reprinted |location=Indianapolis Cambridge |pages=126–129 |chapter=The dialogues of Confucius and Old Tan |orig-date=1981}}</ref> His birthday is popularly held to be the 15th day of the second month of the [[Chinese calendar]].<ref name="Stepanchuk Mooncakes and Hungry Ghosts Lao Tze">{{cite book |last1=Stepanchuk |first1=Carol |title=Mooncakes and Hungry Ghosts: Festivals of China |date=1991 |publisher=China Books & Periodicals |location=San Francisco |isbn=0835124819 |page=125}}</ref> In accounts where Laozi married, he was said to have had a son who became a celebrated soldier of [[Wei (state)|Wei]] during the [[Warring States period]]. | ||
<gallery widths="200" heights="200" mode="packed"> | <gallery widths="200" heights="200" mode="packed"> | ||
| Line 123: | Line 123: | ||
[[File:Ping Sien Si - 016 Lao zi (16135526115).jpg|thumbnail|upright|Carving of Laozi at Ping Sien Si Temple in [[Perak]], Malaysia]] | [[File:Ping Sien Si - 016 Lao zi (16135526115).jpg|thumbnail|upright|Carving of Laozi at Ping Sien Si Temple in [[Perak]], Malaysia]] | ||
The ''Tao Te Ching'' is one of the most significant treatises in Chinese [[cosmogony]]. It is often called the ''Laozi'', and has always been associated with that name. The identity of the person or people who wrote or compiled the text has been the source of considerable speculation and debate throughout history.{{sfnp|Simpkins|Simpkins|1999|pp=11–13}}{{sfnp|Morgan|2001|p=223}} As with many works of ancient [[Chinese philosophy]], ideas are often explained by way of paradox, analogy, appropriation of ancient sayings, repetition, symmetry, rhyme, and rhythm. The ''Tao Te Ching'' stands as an exemplar of this literary form.<ref>{{ cite book| chapter = On the Range and Performance of ''Laozi''-Style Tetrasyllables | last = Schaberg | first = David | pages=87–111 | title= Literary Forms of Argument in Early China | editor1= Joachim Gentz |editor2=Dirk Meyer | publisher=Brill | series= Sinica Leidensia, vol. 123 | isbn = 978- | The ''Tao Te Ching'' is one of the most significant treatises in Chinese [[cosmogony]]. It is often called the ''Laozi'', and has always been associated with that name. The identity of the person or people who wrote or compiled the text has been the source of considerable speculation and debate throughout history.{{sfnp|Simpkins|Simpkins|1999|pp=11–13}}{{sfnp|Morgan|2001|p=223}} As with many works of ancient [[Chinese philosophy]], ideas are often explained by way of paradox, analogy, appropriation of ancient sayings, repetition, symmetry, rhyme, and rhythm. The ''Tao Te Ching'' stands as an exemplar of this literary form.<ref>{{ cite book| chapter = On the Range and Performance of ''Laozi''-Style Tetrasyllables | last = Schaberg | first = David | pages=87–111 | title= Literary Forms of Argument in Early China | editor1= Joachim Gentz |editor2=Dirk Meyer | publisher=Brill | series= Sinica Leidensia, vol. 123 | isbn = 978-9004299702 | date = 2015 }}</ref> Unlike most works of its genre, the book conspicuously lacks a central "master" character and seldom references historical people or events, giving it an air of timelessness.{{sfnp|Denecke|2011|pp=208, 213}} | ||
<section begin="DDJ themes" />The ''Tao Te Ching'' describes the Tao as the source and ideal of all existence: it is unseen, but not transcendent, immensely powerful yet supremely humble, being the root of all things. People have desires and free will (and thus are able to alter their own nature). Many act "unnaturally", upsetting the natural balance of the Tao. The ''Tao Te Ching'' intends to lead students to a "return" to their natural state, in harmony with Tao.<!-- ref supports whole of paragraph to this point -->{{sfnp|Van Norden|Ivanhoe|2005|p=162}} Language and conventional wisdom are critically assessed. Taoism views them as inherently biased and artificial, widely using paradoxes to sharpen the point.<ref name="Kohn-22">{{Harvp|Chan|2000|p=22}}</ref> | <section begin="DDJ themes" />The ''Tao Te Ching'' describes the Tao as the source and ideal of all existence: it is unseen, but not transcendent, immensely powerful yet supremely humble, being the root of all things. People have desires and free will (and thus are able to alter their own nature). Many act "unnaturally", upsetting the natural balance of the Tao. The ''Tao Te Ching'' intends to lead students to a "return" to their natural state, in harmony with Tao.<!-- ref supports whole of paragraph to this point -->{{sfnp|Van Norden|Ivanhoe|2005|p=162}} Language and conventional wisdom are critically assessed. Taoism views them as inherently biased and artificial, widely using paradoxes to sharpen the point.<ref name="Kohn-22">{{Harvp|Chan|2000|p=22}}</ref> | ||
| Line 156: | Line 156: | ||
=== Contemporary === | === Contemporary === | ||
Many contemporary philosophers have seen Laozi as a proponent of limited government.{{sfnp|Dorn|2008|pp=282–283}} The [[Right-libertarianism|right-libertarian]] economist [[Murray Rothbard]] suggested that Laozi was the first [[Libertarianism|libertarian]],<ref>Rothbard, Murray (2005). Excerpt from "Concepts of the Role of Intellectuals in Social Change Toward Laissez Faire", ''The Journal of Libertarian Studies'', Vol. IX, No. 2 (Fall 1990) at [https://mises.org/daily/1967 mises.org]</ref> likening Laozi's ideas on government to [[Friedrich Hayek]]'s theory of [[spontaneous order]].<ref>Rothbard, Murray (2005). "The Ancient Chinese Libertarian Tradition", ''Mises Daily'', (5 December 2005) (original source unknown) at [https://mises.org/daily/1967 mises.org]</ref> James A. Dorn agreed, writing that Laozi, like many 18th-century liberals, "argued that minimizing the role of government and letting individuals develop spontaneously would best achieve social and economic harmony."{{sfnp|Dorn|2008}} Similarly, the [[Cato Institute]]'s [[David Boaz]] includes passages from the ''Tao Te Ching'' in his 1997 book ''The Libertarian Reader'' and noted in an article for the ''Encyclopædia Britannica'' that Laozi advocated for rulers to "do nothing" because "without law or compulsion, men would dwell in harmony."<ref name="Boaz">{{cite encyclopedia |title=Libertarianism |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/339321/libertarianism |access-date=21 February 2017 |date=30 January 2009 |author-link=David Boaz |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150504222253/https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/339321/libertarianism |archive-date=4 May 2015 |quote=An appreciation for spontaneous order can be found in the writings of the ancient Chinese philosopher Lao-tzu (6th century bce), who urged rulers to "do nothing" because "without law or compulsion, men would dwell in harmony." |author=Boaz, David |url-status=live}}</ref>{{sfnp|Boaz|1997}} Philosopher Roderick Long argues that libertarian themes in Taoist thought are actually borrowed from earlier [[Confucian]] writers.{{sfnp|Long|2003}} | Many contemporary philosophers have seen Laozi as a proponent of limited government.{{sfnp|Dorn|2008|pp=282–283}} The [[Right-libertarianism|right-libertarian]] economist [[Murray Rothbard]] suggested that Laozi was the first [[Libertarianism|libertarian]],<ref>Rothbard, Murray (2005). Excerpt from "Concepts of the Role of Intellectuals in Social Change Toward Laissez Faire", ''The Journal of Libertarian Studies'', Vol. IX, No. 2 (Fall 1990) at [https://mises.org/daily/1967 mises.org]</ref> likening Laozi's ideas on government to [[Friedrich Hayek]]'s theory of [[spontaneous order]].<ref>[[Murray Rothbard|Rothbard, Murray]] (2005). "The Ancient Chinese Libertarian Tradition", ''Mises Daily'', (5 December 2005) (original source unknown) at [https://mises.org/daily/1967 mises.org]</ref> James A. Dorn agreed, writing that Laozi, like many 18th-century liberals, "argued that minimizing the role of government and letting individuals develop spontaneously would best achieve social and economic harmony."{{sfnp|Dorn|2008}} Similarly, the [[Cato Institute]]'s [[David Boaz]] includes passages from the ''Tao Te Ching'' in his 1997 book ''The Libertarian Reader'' and noted in an article for the ''Encyclopædia Britannica'' that Laozi advocated for rulers to "do nothing" because "without law or compulsion, men would dwell in harmony."<ref name="Boaz">{{cite encyclopedia |title=Libertarianism |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/339321/libertarianism |access-date=21 February 2017 |date=30 January 2009 |author-link=David Boaz |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150504222253/https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/339321/libertarianism |archive-date=4 May 2015 |quote=An appreciation for spontaneous order can be found in the writings of the ancient Chinese philosopher Lao-tzu (6th century bce), who urged rulers to "do nothing" because "without law or compulsion, men would dwell in harmony." |author=Boaz, David |url-status=live}}</ref>{{sfnp|Boaz|1997}} Philosopher Roderick Long argues that libertarian themes in Taoist thought are actually borrowed from earlier [[Confucian]] writers.{{sfnp|Long|2003}} | ||
The [[anarcho-syndicalism|anarcho-syndicalist]] writer and activist [[Rudolf Rocker]] praised Laozi's "gentle wisdom" and understanding of the opposition between political power and the cultural activities of the people and community in his 1937 book ''[[Nationalism and Culture]]''.{{sfnp|Rocker|1997|pp=82 & 256}} In his 1910 article for the ''[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]'', [[Peter Kropotkin]] also noted that Laozi was among the earliest proponents of essentially [[Anarchism|anarchist]] concepts.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/anarchist_archives/kropotkin/britanniaanarchy.html |title=Britannica: Anarchism |publisher=Dwardmac.pitzer.edu |access-date=14 November 2011}}</ref> More recently, anarchists such as John P. Clark and [[Ursula K. Le Guin]] have written about the conjunction between anarchism and Taoism in various ways, highlighting the teachings of Laozi in particular.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://raforum.info/spip.php?article4488&lang=fr|author=Clark, John P.|title=Master Lao and the Anarchist Prince|access-date=1 November 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171020015752/https://raforum.info/spip.php?article4488&lang=fr|archive-date=20 October 2017}}</ref> In her rendition of the Tao Te Ching, Le Guin writes that Laozi "does not see political power as magic. He sees rightful power as earned and wrongful power as usurped... He sees sacrifice of self or others as a corruption of power, and power as available to anyone who follows the Way. No wonder anarchists and Taoists make good friends."{{sfnp|Le Guin|2009|p=20}} | The [[anarcho-syndicalism|anarcho-syndicalist]] writer and activist [[Rudolf Rocker]] praised Laozi's "gentle wisdom" and understanding of the opposition between political power and the cultural activities of the people and community in his 1937 book ''[[Nationalism and Culture]]''.{{sfnp|Rocker|1997|pp=82 & 256}} In his 1910 article for the ''[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]'', [[Peter Kropotkin]] also noted that Laozi was among the earliest proponents of essentially [[Anarchism|anarchist]] concepts.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/anarchist_archives/kropotkin/britanniaanarchy.html |title=Britannica: Anarchism |publisher=Dwardmac.pitzer.edu |access-date=14 November 2011}}</ref> More recently, anarchists such as John P. Clark and [[Ursula K. Le Guin]] have written about the conjunction between anarchism and Taoism in various ways, highlighting the teachings of Laozi in particular.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://raforum.info/spip.php?article4488&lang=fr|author=Clark, John P.|title=Master Lao and the Anarchist Prince|access-date=1 November 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171020015752/https://raforum.info/spip.php?article4488&lang=fr|archive-date=20 October 2017}}</ref> In her rendition of the Tao Te Ching, Le Guin writes that Laozi "does not see political power as magic. He sees rightful power as earned and wrongful power as usurped... He sees sacrifice of self or others as a corruption of power, and power as available to anyone who follows the Way. No wonder anarchists and Taoists make good friends."{{sfnp|Le Guin|2009|p=20}} | ||
| Line 166: | Line 166: | ||
{{refbegin|2}} | {{refbegin|2}} | ||
* {{Citation |last=Boaz |first=David |title = The libertarian reader: classic and contemporary readings from Lao-tzu to Milton Friedman |publisher=Free Press |location=New York |year=1997 |isbn = 978-0684847672 | author-link= David Boaz }} | * {{Citation |last=Boaz |first=David |title = The libertarian reader: classic and contemporary readings from Lao-tzu to Milton Friedman |publisher=Free Press |location=New York |year=1997 |isbn = 978-0684847672 | author-link= David Boaz }} | ||
* {{ Citation| last= Denecke | first= Wiebke |title= The Dynamics of Masters Literature: Early Chinese Thought from Confucius to Han Feizi | date= 2011 | publisher= Brill | isbn = 978- | * {{ Citation| last= Denecke | first= Wiebke |title= The Dynamics of Masters Literature: Early Chinese Thought from Confucius to Han Feizi | date= 2011 | publisher= Brill | isbn = 978-1684170586 | doi = 10.1163/9781684170586 | series = Harvard–Yenching Institute Monographs, vol. 74}} | ||
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Dorn |first=James A. |title=Lao Tzu (c. 600 B.C.) |editor-first=Ronald |editor-last=Hamowy |editor-link=Ronald Hamowy |encyclopedia=The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=yxNgXs3TkJYC |access-date=12 May 2010 |year=2008 |publisher=[[SAGE Publishing|Sage]]; [[Cato Institute]] |location=Thousand Oaks, CA |isbn = 978-1412965804 |oclc = 750831024 |lccn = 2008009151 |doi = 10.4135/9781412965811.n169 |url-access=subscription }} | * {{cite encyclopedia |last=Dorn |first=James A. |title=Lao Tzu (c. 600 B.C.) |editor-first=Ronald |editor-last=Hamowy |editor-link=Ronald Hamowy |encyclopedia=The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=yxNgXs3TkJYC |access-date=12 May 2010 |year=2008 |publisher=[[SAGE Publishing|Sage]]; [[Cato Institute]] |location=Thousand Oaks, CA |isbn = 978-1412965804 |oclc = 750831024 |lccn = 2008009151 |doi = 10.4135/9781412965811.n169 |url-access=subscription }} | ||
* {{Citation |last=Fowler |first=Jeaneane |title=An Introduction to the Philosophy and Religion of Taoism: Pathways to Immortality |publisher=Sussex Academic Press |location=Brighton |year=2005 |isbn = 978-1845190859 }} | * {{Citation |last=Fowler |first=Jeaneane |title=An Introduction to the Philosophy and Religion of Taoism: Pathways to Immortality |publisher=Sussex Academic Press |location=Brighton |year=2005 |isbn = 978-1845190859 }} | ||
| Line 192: | Line 192: | ||
* {{Citation |last=Roberts |first=Moss |title = Dao De Jing: The Book of the Way |publisher=University of California Press |location=Berkeley, CA |year=2004 |isbn = 978-0520242210 }} | * {{Citation |last=Roberts |first=Moss |title = Dao De Jing: The Book of the Way |publisher=University of California Press |location=Berkeley, CA |year=2004 |isbn = 978-0520242210 }} | ||
* {{Citation |last=Robinet |first=Isabelle |title=Taoism: Growth of a Religion |publisher=Stanford University Press |location=Stanford |year=1997 |isbn = 978-0804728393 }} | * {{Citation |last=Robinet |first=Isabelle |title=Taoism: Growth of a Religion |publisher=Stanford University Press |location=Stanford |year=1997 |isbn = 978-0804728393 }} | ||
* {{cite book |last=Rocker |first=Rudolf |title=Nationalism and Culture |publisher=Black Rose Books |year=1997 | orig-date= 1937 | translator= Ray E. Chase | isbn = 978- | * {{cite book |last=Rocker |first=Rudolf |title=Nationalism and Culture |publisher=Black Rose Books |year=1997 | orig-date= 1937 | translator= Ray E. Chase | isbn = 978-1551645001 | place= Montreal | author-link= Rudolf Rocker | title-link= Nationalism and Culture }} | ||
* {{cite journal | * {{cite journal | ||
|title=The Guodian Manuscripts and Their Place in Twentieth-Century Historiography on the ''Laozi'' | |title=The Guodian Manuscripts and Their Place in Twentieth-Century Historiography on the ''Laozi'' | ||
| Line 198: | Line 198: | ||
|journal=Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies | |journal=Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies | ||
|date=2005 |volume=65 |number=2 | |date=2005 |volume=65 |number=2 | ||
|pages= 417–457|publisher=Harvard Yenching Institute | author-link= Edward L. Shaughnessy | |pages= 417–457|publisher=Harvard Yenching Institute | author-link= Edward L. Shaughnessy | ||
|jstor=25066782}} | |jstor=25066782}} | ||
* {{Citation |last1=Simpkins |first1=Annellen M. |last2=Simpkins |first2=C. Alexander |title=Simple Taoism: a guide to living in balance |publisher=Tuttle Publishing |edition=3rd Printing |location=Boston |year=1999 |isbn = 978-0804831734 }} | * {{Citation |last1=Simpkins |first1=Annellen M. |last2=Simpkins |first2=C. Alexander |title=Simple Taoism: a guide to living in balance |publisher=Tuttle Publishing |edition=3rd Printing |location=Boston |year=1999 |isbn = 978-0804831734 }} | ||
* {{Citation |last1=Van Norden |first1=Bryan W. |last2=Ivanhoe |first2=Philip J. |title=Readings in Classical Chinese Philosophy |publisher=Hackett Publishing Company |edition=2nd |location=Indianapolis, Ind |year=2006 |isbn = 978-0872207806 |ref = {{Harvid|Van Norden|Ivanhoe|2005}} | author2-link= Philip J. Ivanhoe }} | * {{Citation |last1=Van Norden |first1=Bryan W. |last2=Ivanhoe |first2=Philip J. |title=Readings in Classical Chinese Philosophy |publisher=Hackett Publishing Company |edition=2nd |location=Indianapolis, Ind |year=2006 |isbn = 978-0872207806 |ref = {{Harvid|Van Norden|Ivanhoe|2005}} | author2-link= Philip J. Ivanhoe }} | ||
* {{Citation |last=Watson |first=Burton |title=Complete Works of Chuang Tzu |publisher=Columbia Univ. Press ([[UNESCO Collection of Representative Works]]: Chinese Series) |location=New York |year=1968 |isbn = 978-0231031479 | author-link= Burton Watson }} | * {{Citation |last=Watson |first=Burton |title=Complete Works of Chuang Tzu |publisher=Columbia Univ. Press ([[UNESCO Collection of Representative Works]]: Chinese Series) |location=New York |year=1968 |isbn = 978-0231031479 | author-link= Burton Watson }} | ||
* {{Citation |last1=Watts |first1=Alan |last2=Huang |first2=Al Chung-liang |title=Tao: The Watercourse Way |publisher=Pantheon Books |location=New York, NY |year=1975 |isbn=978-0394733111 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/taowatercoursewa00watt_0 | author1-link= Alan Watts }} | * {{Citation |last1=Watts |first1=Alan |last2=Huang |first2=Al Chung-liang |title=Tao: The Watercourse Way |publisher=Pantheon Books |location=New York, NY |year=1975 |isbn=978-0394733111 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/taowatercoursewa00watt_0 | author1-link= Alan Watts }} | ||
* {{ Cite book | last= Zhang | first= Hanmo | date= 2018 | title= Authorship and Text-Making in Early China| series= Library of Sinology, vol. 2 | publisher= De Gruyter| chapter = Text, Author, and the Function of Authorship | pages= 10–34 | doi= 10.1515/9781501505133-003 | doi-access= free| jstor= j.ctvbkk21j.5| isbn= 978- | * {{ Cite book | last= Zhang | first= Hanmo | date= 2018 | title= Authorship and Text-Making in Early China| series= Library of Sinology, vol. 2 | publisher= De Gruyter| chapter = Text, Author, and the Function of Authorship | pages= 10–34 | doi= 10.1515/9781501505133-003 | doi-access= free| jstor= j.ctvbkk21j.5| isbn= 978-1501505133 | jstor-access= free}} | ||
{{refend}} | {{refend}} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:30, 16 November 2025
Template:Short description Script error: No such module "about". Template:Use dmy dates Template:CS1 config Script error: No such module "Template wrapper".Script error: No such module "Check for clobbered parameters". Script error: No such module "infobox". Template:Taoism
Laozi (Template:IPAc-en) was a legendary Chinese philosopher considered to be the author of the Tao Te Ching (Laozi), one of the foundational texts of Taoism. The name, literally meaning 'Old Master', was likely intended to portray an archaic anonymity that could converse with Confucianism. Modern scholarship generally regards his biographical details as later inventions and his opus a collaboration of various writers. Traditional accounts addend him as Li Er, born in the 6th-centuryTemplate:NbspBC state of Chu during China's Spring and Autumn period (Template:Circa). Serving as the royal archivist for the Zhou court at Wangcheng (modern Luoyang), he met and impressed Confucius (Template:Circa) on one occasion, composing the Tao Te Ching in a single session before retiring into the western wilderness.
A central figure in Chinese culture, Laozi is generally considered the founder of Taoism. He was claimed and revered as the ancestor of the Tang dynasty (618–907) and is similarly honored in modern China as the progenitor of the popular surname Li. In some sects of Taoism, Chinese Buddhism, Confucianism, and Chinese folk religion, it is held that he then became an immortal hermit.[1] Certain Taoist devotees held that the Tao Te Ching was the avatarTemplate:Sndembodied as a bookTemplate:Sndof the god Laojun, one of the Three Pure Ones of the Taoist pantheon, though few philosophers believe this.[2]
The Tao Te Ching had a profound influence on Chinese religious movements and on subsequent Chinese philosophers, who annotated, commended, and criticized the texts extensively. In the 20th century, textual criticism by historians led to theories questioning Laozi's timing or even existence, positing that the received text of the Tao Te Ching was not composed until the Warring States period (Template:CircaTemplate:Snd221 BC), and was the product of multiple authors.
Script error: No such module "anchor".
Name
Lǎozǐ is the modern (pinyin) romanization of Script error: No such module "Lang".. In English, a variety of pronunciations and spellings of the Chinese name exist, such as Lao-tse and Lao Tzu. It is not a personal name, but rather an honorific title, meaning 'old' or 'venerable'. Its structure matches that of other ancient Chinese philosophers, such as Kongzi (Confucius), Mengzi, and Zhuangzi.[3]
Traditional accounts give Laozi the personal name Li Er (Script error: No such module "Lang"., Template:Tlit), whose Old Chinese pronunciation has been reconstructed as [[Reconstructions of Old Chinese#Yakhontov (1959–1965)|Template:Transliteration.]][4] Li is a common Chinese surname which also has the meaning 'plum' or 'plum tree' when used as a common noun; there is a legend tying Laozi's birth to a plum tree.[5] Laozi has long been identified with the persona Lao Dan (Script error: No such module "Lang"., Template:Tlit).Template:SfnpTemplate:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp Dan similarly means "Long-Ear" or "the Long-Eared One". The character Script error: No such module "Lang". is the Chinese word for 'ear'.[6]
Laozi is recorded bearing the courtesy name Boyang (Script error: No such module "Lang"., Template:Tlit), whose Old Chinese pronunciation has been reconstructed as Template:Transliteration.[4] The character Script error: No such module "Lang". was the title of the eldest son born to the primary wife, or an uncle of the father's family who was older than one's father, also used as a noble title indicating an aristocratic lineage head with rulership over a small to medium domain, and as a general mark of respect. The character Script error: No such module "Lang". is yang, the solar and masculine life force in Taoist belief. Lao Dan seems to have been used more generally, however, including by Sima Qian in his Shiji (Template:Circa),[7] in the Zhuangzi,[7] and by some modern scholars.[8]
Identity
By the mid-twentieth century, consensus had emerged among Western scholars that the historicity of a person known as Laozi is doubtful and that the Tao Te Ching is "a compilation of Taoist sayings by many hands",Template:Sfnp[9] with an author being invented afterwards.Template:Sfnp While multiple authorship over time is typical for early Chinese texts,Template:Sfnp the book's conspicuous absence of a central Master figure places it in marked contrast with nearly all other early Chinese philosophical works.Template:Sfnm
Template:As of, the oldest manuscript containing text from the Tao Te Ching dates to the late 4th century BC, written on bamboo slips excavated as part of the Guodian Chu Slips. These passages correspond with roughly one third of the received text,[10] and some are placed in the same order. These are mixed in with passages not carried by the transmitted Tao Te Ching, indicating that its makeup was still undergoing revisions and modifications.Template:Sfnp The oldest manuscripts of the Tao Te Ching in a complete form by itself were discovered at a tomb in Mawangdui, and date to the early 2nd century BC.[11] Analysis of early commentary on passages that appear in the received Tao Te Ching supports an accretionary evolution for the text rather than a singular authorship event.[12]
Traditional accounts
The earliest biographical reference to Laozi is found in the 1st‑century BC Records of the Grand Historian by Sima Qian. Multiple accounts of Laozi's biography are presented, with Sima Qian expressing various levels of doubt in his sources.Template:Sfnp
In one account, Sima Qian reports that Laozi was said to be a contemporary of Confucius during the 6th or 5th centuryTemplate:NbspBC. His personal name was Er or Dan. He was born in the village of Quren (Script error: No such module "Lang"., Qūrén lǐ) in the southern state of Chu,[13] within present-day Luyi in Henan.Template:Sfnp He was said to be the son of the Censor-in-Chief of the Zhou dynasty and Lady Yishou (Script error: No such module "Lang".), and was a scholar who worked as the Keeper of the Archives for the royal Zhou court. This reportedly allowed him broad access to the works of the Yellow Emperor and other classics of the time, and he wrote a book in two parts before departing to the west.
In another, Laozi was a different contemporary of Confucius called Template:Ill (Script error: No such module "Lang".), one of the Twenty-four Filial Exemplars, and wrote a book in 15 parts. The story tells of Zong the Warrior who defeats an enemy and triumphs, and then abandons the corpses of the enemy soldiers to be eaten by vultures. By coincidence Laozi, traveling and teaching the way of the Tao, comes on the scene and is revealed to be the father of Zong, from whom he was separated in childhood. Laozi tells his son that it is better to treat respectfully a beaten enemy, and that the disrespect to their dead would cause his foes to seek revenge. Convinced, Zong orders his soldiers to bury the enemy dead. Funeral mourning is held for the dead of both parties and a lasting peace is made.
In a third, he was the court astrologer Lao Dan who lived during the 4th centuryTemplate:NbspBC reign of the Duke Xian of QinTemplate:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp who grew weary of the moral decay of life in Chengzhou and noted the kingdom's decline. He ventured west to live as a hermit in the unsettled frontier at the age of 80. At the western gate of the city (or kingdom), he was recognized by the guard Yinxi. The sentry asked the old master to record his wisdom for the good of the country before he would be permitted to pass. The text Laozi wrote was said to be the Tao Te Ching, although the present version of the text includes additions from later periods. In some versions of the tale, the sentry was so touched by the work that he became a disciple and left with Laozi, never to be seen again.Template:Sfnp In some later interpretations, the "Old Master" journeyed all the way to India and was the teacher of Siddartha Gautama, the Buddha. Others say he was the Buddha himself.[14]Template:Sfnp
The stories assert that Laozi never opened a formal school but nonetheless attracted a large number of students and loyal disciples. There are many variations of a story retelling his encounter with Confucius, most famously in the Zhuangzi.[14]Template:Sfnp A.C. Graham suggested that the Confucian version of the story presented in the Book of Rites was the original, which was borrowed and re-interpreted by the followers of Zhuang Zhou.[15] His birthday is popularly held to be the 15th day of the second month of the Chinese calendar.[16] In accounts where Laozi married, he was said to have had a son who became a celebrated soldier of Wei during the Warring States period.
-
Confucius meets Laozi, Shi Gang (Script error: No such module "Lang".), Yuan dynasty
-
Depiction of Laozi in E. T. C. Werner's Myths and Legends of China
Tao Te Ching
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
The Tao Te Ching is one of the most significant treatises in Chinese cosmogony. It is often called the Laozi, and has always been associated with that name. The identity of the person or people who wrote or compiled the text has been the source of considerable speculation and debate throughout history.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp As with many works of ancient Chinese philosophy, ideas are often explained by way of paradox, analogy, appropriation of ancient sayings, repetition, symmetry, rhyme, and rhythm. The Tao Te Ching stands as an exemplar of this literary form.[17] Unlike most works of its genre, the book conspicuously lacks a central "master" character and seldom references historical people or events, giving it an air of timelessness.Template:Sfnp
The Tao Te Ching describes the Tao as the source and ideal of all existence: it is unseen, but not transcendent, immensely powerful yet supremely humble, being the root of all things. People have desires and free will (and thus are able to alter their own nature). Many act "unnaturally", upsetting the natural balance of the Tao. The Tao Te Ching intends to lead students to a "return" to their natural state, in harmony with Tao.Template:Sfnp Language and conventional wisdom are critically assessed. Taoism views them as inherently biased and artificial, widely using paradoxes to sharpen the point.[18]
Wu wei, literally 'non-action' or 'not acting', is a central concept of the Tao Te Ching. The concept of wu wei is multifaceted, and reflected in the words' multiple meanings, even in English translation; it can mean "not doing anything", "not forcing", "not acting" in the theatrical sense, "creating nothingness", "acting spontaneously", and "flowing with the moment".Template:Sfnp
This concept is used to explain ziran, or harmony with the Tao. It includes the concepts that value distinctions are ideological and seeing ambition of all sorts as originating from the same source. Tao Te Ching used the term broadly with simplicity and humility as key virtues, often in contrast to selfish action. On a political level, it means avoiding such circumstances as war, harsh laws and heavy taxes. Some Taoists see a connection between wu wei and esoteric practices, such as zuowang ('sitting in oblivion': emptying the mind of bodily awareness and thought) found in the Zhuangzi.[18]
Alan Chan provides an example of how Laozi encouraged a change in approach, or return to "nature", rather than action. Technology may bring about a false sense of progress. The answer provided by Laozi is not the rejection of technology, but instead seeking the calm state of wu wei, free from desires. This relates to many statements by Laozi encouraging rulers to keep their people in "ignorance", or "simple-minded". Some scholars insist this explanation ignores the religious context, and others question it as an apologetic of the philosophical coherence of the text. It would not be unusual political advice if Laozi literally intended to tell rulers to keep their people ignorant. However, some terms in the text, such as "valley spirit" (Script error: No such module "Lang"., gǔshén) and 'soul' (Script error: No such module "Lang"., pò), bear a metaphysical context and cannot be easily reconciled with a purely ethical reading of the work.[18]
-
A stone sculpture of Laozi, located north of Quanzhou at the foot of Mount Qingyuan
Influence
Template:Asian philosophy sidebar Potential officials throughout Chinese history drew on the authority of non-Confucian sages, especially Laozi and Zhuangzi, to deny serving any ruler at any time. Zhuangzi, the other founder of Taoism, had a great deal of influence on Chinese literati and culture.[19] Political theorists influenced by Laozi have advocated humility in leadership and a restrained approach to statecraft, either for ethical and pacifist reasons, or for tactical ends. In a different context, various antiauthoritarian movements have embraced Laozi's teachings on the power of the weak.Template:Sfnp
Han dynasty
The story of Laozi has taken on strong religious overtones since the Han dynasty. As Taoism took root, Laozi was worshipped as a god. Belief in the revelation of the Tao from the divine Laozi resulted in the formation of the Way of the Celestial Masters, the first organized religious Taoist sect. In later Taoist tradition, Laozi came to be seen as a personification of the Tao. He is said to have undergone numerous "transformations" and taken on guises in various incarnations throughout history to initiate the faithful in the Way. Religious Taoism often holds that the "Old Master" did not disappear after writing the Tao Te Ching but rather spent his life traveling and revealing the Tao.[20]
Taoist myths state that Laozi was a virgin birth, conceived when his mother gazed upon a falling star. He supposedly remained in her womb for 62 years before being born while his mother was leaning against a plum tree. Laozi was said to have emerged as a grown man with a full grey beard and long earlobes, both symbols of wisdom and long life.Template:Sfnp Other myths state that he was reborn 13 times after his first life during the days of Fuxi. In his last incarnation as Laozi, he lived 990 years and spent his life traveling to reveal the Tao.[20]
Tang dynasty
Due to his traditional name Li Er, Laozi has been venerated as the ancestor of all subsequent Lis, and many clans of the Li family trace their descent to Laozi,[21] including the emperors of the Tang dynasty.[22][21][23] This family was known as the Longxi Li lineage (Script error: No such module "Lang".). According to the Simpkinses, while many (if not all) of these lineages are questionable, they provide a testament to Laozi's impact on Chinese culture.Template:Sfnp Under the Tang, Laozi received a series of temple names of increasing grandeur. In the year 666, Emperor Gaozong named Laozi the "Supremely Mysterious and Primordial Emperor" (Script error: No such module "Lang"., Tàishàng Xuán Yuán Huángdì).[24] In 743, Emperor Xuanzong declared him the "Sage Ancestor" (Script error: No such module "Lang"., Shèngzǔ) of the dynasty with the posthumous title of "Mysterious and Primordial Emperor" (Script error: No such module "Lang"., Xuán Yuán Huángdì). Emperor Xuanzong also elevated Laozi's parents to the ranks of "Innately Supreme Emperor" (Script error: No such module "Lang"., Xiāntiān Tàishàng Huáng) and "Innate Empress" (Script error: No such module "Lang"., Xiāntiān Tàihòu). In 749, Laozi was further honored as the "Sage Ancestor and Mysterious and Primordial Emperor of the Great Way" (Script error: No such module "Lang"., Shèngzǔ Dàdào Xuán Yuán Huángdì) and then, in 754, as the "Great Sage Ancestor and Mysterious and Primordial Heavenly Emperor and Great Sovereign of the Golden Palace of the High and Supreme Great Way" (Script error: No such module "Lang"., Dà Shèngzǔ Gāo Shǎng Dàdào Jīnquē Xuán Yuán Tiānhuáng Dàdì).
A seventh-century work, the Sandong Zhunang (Script error: No such module "Lang".; "Pearly Bag of the Three Caverns"), presents Laozi is the perfect Taoist master and a character named Yinxi as the ideal Taoist student. Yinxi follows a formal sequence of preparation, testing, training and attainment.Template:Sfnp
Tamil Nadu
In the Siddhar tradition of Tamil Nadu, the greatly revered Siddhar Bhogar, one of the 18 esteemed Siddhars of yore, is believed to be Laozi and is of Chinese origin. His caste, from obscure references is noted to be "Cinatecakkuyavar" or Chinese potter. In his principal book of poetry, the Bhogar 7000, he tells of his travels to China to spread his ideas on spirituality, specifically on the topic of sublimating the sexual energies and using said energies to become self-realised, with a spiritually-minded partner.[25][26] His Jeeva Samadhi can be found in the southwestern corridor of the Dhandayuthapani Temple, Palani, Dindigul district, Tamil Nadu.[27]
Contemporary
Many contemporary philosophers have seen Laozi as a proponent of limited government.Template:Sfnp The right-libertarian economist Murray Rothbard suggested that Laozi was the first libertarian,[28] likening Laozi's ideas on government to Friedrich Hayek's theory of spontaneous order.[29] James A. Dorn agreed, writing that Laozi, like many 18th-century liberals, "argued that minimizing the role of government and letting individuals develop spontaneously would best achieve social and economic harmony."Template:Sfnp Similarly, the Cato Institute's David Boaz includes passages from the Tao Te Ching in his 1997 book The Libertarian Reader and noted in an article for the Encyclopædia Britannica that Laozi advocated for rulers to "do nothing" because "without law or compulsion, men would dwell in harmony."[30]Template:Sfnp Philosopher Roderick Long argues that libertarian themes in Taoist thought are actually borrowed from earlier Confucian writers.Template:Sfnp
The anarcho-syndicalist writer and activist Rudolf Rocker praised Laozi's "gentle wisdom" and understanding of the opposition between political power and the cultural activities of the people and community in his 1937 book Nationalism and Culture.Template:Sfnp In his 1910 article for the Encyclopædia Britannica, Peter Kropotkin also noted that Laozi was among the earliest proponents of essentially anarchist concepts.[31] More recently, anarchists such as John P. Clark and Ursula K. Le Guin have written about the conjunction between anarchism and Taoism in various ways, highlighting the teachings of Laozi in particular.[32] In her rendition of the Tao Te Ching, Le Guin writes that Laozi "does not see political power as magic. He sees rightful power as earned and wrongful power as usurped... He sees sacrifice of self or others as a corruption of power, and power as available to anyone who follows the Way. No wonder anarchists and Taoists make good friends."Template:Sfnp
Notes
References
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
Further reading
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
External links
Script error: No such module "Sister project links".Template:Main other
- Template:StandardEbooks
- Script error: No such module "Gutenberg".
- Template:Internet Archive author
- Template:Librivox author
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Laozi
- Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Laozi
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Template:Harvp
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1". Cited in Template:Harvp
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Template:Harvp
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c Template:Harvp
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Template:Harvp
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Rothbard, Murray (2005). Excerpt from "Concepts of the Role of Intellectuals in Social Change Toward Laissez Faire", The Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. IX, No. 2 (Fall 1990) at mises.org
- ↑ Rothbard, Murray (2005). "The Ancient Chinese Libertarian Tradition", Mises Daily, (5 December 2005) (original source unknown) at mises.org
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Pages with script errors
- Pages with broken file links
- Articles with Project Gutenberg links
- Laozi
- 6th-century BC Chinese philosophers
- Chinese political philosophers
- Deified Chinese men
- Deities in Chinese folk religion
- Founders of religions
- Journey to the West characters
- Investiture of the Gods characters
- Metaphysicians
- Asian people whose existence is disputed
- Philosophers of mind
- Proto-anarchists
- Social philosophers
- Taoist immortals
- Zhou dynasty philosophers
- Zhou dynasty Taoists
- Taoist deities