Multituberculata: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>OAbot
m Open access bot: url-access updated in citation with #oabot.
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{Automatic taxobox
{{Automatic taxobox
| name = Multituberculates
| name = Multituberculates
| fossil_range = [[Middle Jurassic]]-[[Late Eocene]] {{Fossil range|168|35|}}
| fossil_range = [[Middle Jurassic]]-[[Late Eocene]] {{Fossil range|168|34}}
| image = Catopsbaatar catopsaloides.jpg
| image = Catopsbaatar catopsaloides.jpg
| image_caption = Skeleton of ''[[Catopsbaatar]]''
| image_caption = Skeleton of ''[[Catopsbaatar]]''
Line 20: Line 20:
[[File:Ptilodus skull BW.jpg|thumb|Skull of ''[[Ptilodus]]''. Notice the massive blade-like lower premolar.]]
[[File:Ptilodus skull BW.jpg|thumb|Skull of ''[[Ptilodus]]''. Notice the massive blade-like lower premolar.]]


Unlike rodents and similar therians, multituberculates had a palinal jaw stroke (front-to-back), instead of a propalinal (back-to-front) or transverse (side-to-side) one; as a consequence, their jaw musculature and cusp orientation is radically different.<ref name="Agusti-3" /><ref name="p. 299"/> Palinal jaw strokes are almost entirely absent in modern mammals (with the possible exception of the [[dugong]]<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Lanyon |first1=J. M. |last2=Sanson |first2=G. D. |title=Degenerate dentition of the dugong (Dugong dugon), or why a grazer does not need teeth: morphology, occlusion and wear of mouthparts |journal=Journal of Zoology |date=February 2006 |volume=268 |issue=2 |pages=133–152 |doi=10.1111/j.1469-7998.2005.00004.x }}</ref>), but are also present in [[haramiyida]]ns, [[argyrolagoidea]]ns and [[tritylodontid]]s, the former historically united with multituberculates on that basis. Multituberculate mastication is thought to have operated in a two stroke cycle: first, food held in place by the last upper premolar was sliced by the bladelike lower pre-molars as the dentary moved orthally (upward). Then the lower jaw moved palinally, grinding the food between the molar cusp rows.<ref name="Agusti-3" /><ref name="p. 299"/>
Unlike rodents and similar therians, multituberculates had a palinal jaw stroke (front-to-back), instead of a propalinal (back-to-front) or transverse (side-to-side) one; as a consequence, their jaw musculature and cusp orientation is radically different.<ref name="Agusti-3" /><ref name="p. 299"/> Palinal jaw strokes are almost entirely absent in modern mammals (with the possible exception of the [[dugong]]<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Lanyon |first1=J. M. |last2=Sanson |first2=G. D. |title=Degenerate dentition of the dugong (Dugong dugon), or why a grazer does not need teeth: morphology, occlusion and wear of mouthparts |journal=Journal of Zoology |date=February 2006 |volume=268 |issue=2 |pages=133–152 |doi=10.1111/j.1469-7998.2005.00004.x }}</ref>), but are also present in [[haramiyida]]ns, argyrolagoideans and [[tritylodontid]]s, the former historically united with multituberculates on that basis. Multituberculate mastication is thought to have operated in a two stroke cycle: first, food held in place by the last upper premolar was sliced by the bladelike lower pre-molars as the dentary moved orthally (upward). Then the lower jaw moved palinally, grinding the food between the molar cusp rows.<ref name="Agusti-3" /><ref name="p. 299"/>
[[File:American Jurassic Mammals plate VII.jpg|thumb|Lower jaws and teeth of [[Allodontidae|allodontid]] multituberculates]]
[[File:American Jurassic Mammals plate VII.jpg|thumb|Lower jaws and teeth of [[Allodontidae|allodontid]] multituberculates]]


Line 31: Line 31:
==Evolution==
==Evolution==


Multituberculates first appear in the fossil record during the [[Jurassic]] period, and then survived and even dominated for over one hundred million years, longer than any other order of [[mammaliforms]], including placental mammals. The earliest known multituberculates are from the [[Middle Jurassic]] ([[Bathonian]] ~166-168 million years ago) of England and Russia, including ''[[Hahnotherium]]'' ''and [[Kermackodon]]'' from the [[Forest Marble Formation]] of England, and ''[[Tashtykia]]'' and ''[[Tagaria (mammal)|Tagaria]]'' from the [[Itat Formation]] of Russia. These forms are only known from isolated teeth, which bear close similarity to those of [[Euharamiyida|euharamyidans]], which they are suspected to be closely related to.<ref name=":1">{{cite journal |last1=Averianov |first1=Alexander O. |last2=Martin |first2=Thomas |last3=Lopatin |first3=Alexey V. |last4=Schultz |first4=Julia A. |last5=Schellhorn |first5=Rico |last6=Krasnolutskii |first6=Sergei |last7=Skutschas |first7=Pavel |last8=Ivantsov |first8=Stepan |title=Multituberculate mammals from the Middle Jurassic of Western Siberia, Russia, and the origin of Multituberculata |journal=Papers in Palaeontology |date=May 2021 |volume=7 |issue=2 |pages=769–787 |doi=10.1002/spp2.1317 |s2cid=219067218 |issn=2056-2799 |url=https://zenodo.org/record/3877503 }}</ref> During the Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous, primitive multituberculates, collectively grouped into the [[Paraphyly|paraphyletic]] "[[Plagiaulacida]]", were abundant and widespread across [[Laurasia]] (including Europe, Asia and North America). During the [[Aptian]] stage of the Early Cretaceous, the advanced subgroup [[Cimolodonta]] appeared in North America, characterised by a reduced number of lower premolars, with a blade-like lower fourth premolar. By the early Late Cretaceous ([[Cenomanian]]) Cimolodonta had replaced all other multituberculate lineages.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Weaver|first1=Lucas N.|last2=Wilson|first2=Gregory P.|last3=Krumenacker|first3=L. J.|last4=Mclaughlin|first4=Kayla|last5=Moore|first5=Jason R.|last6=Varricchio|first6=David J.|date=2019-03-04|title=New multituberculate mammals from the mid-Cretaceous (lower Cenomanian) Wayan Formation of southeastern Idaho and implications for the early evolution of Cimolodonta|url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02724634.2019.1604532|journal=Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology|language=en|volume=39|issue=2|pages=e1604532|doi=10.1080/02724634.2019.1604532|bibcode=2019JVPal..39E4532W |s2cid=196655261 |issn=0272-4634|url-access=subscription}}</ref>
Multituberculates first appear in the fossil record during the [[Jurassic]] period, and then survived and even dominated for over one hundred million years, longer than any other order of [[mammaliforms]], including placental mammals. The earliest known multituberculates are from the [[Middle Jurassic]] ([[Bathonian]] ~166-168 million years ago) of England and Russia, including ''Hahnotherium'' ''and [[Kermackodon]]'' from the [[Forest Marble Formation]] of England, and ''Tashtykia'' and ''Tagaria'' from the [[Itat Formation]] of Russia. These forms are only known from isolated teeth, which bear close similarity to those of [[Euharamiyida|euharamyidans]], which they are suspected to be closely related to.<ref name="Averianov-2021">{{cite journal |last1=Averianov |first1=Alexander O. |last2=Martin |first2=Thomas |last3=Lopatin |first3=Alexey V. |last4=Schultz |first4=Julia A. |last5=Schellhorn |first5=Rico |last6=Krasnolutskii |first6=Sergei |last7=Skutschas |first7=Pavel |last8=Ivantsov |first8=Stepan |title=Multituberculate mammals from the Middle Jurassic of Western Siberia, Russia, and the origin of Multituberculata |journal=Papers in Palaeontology |date=May 2021 |volume=7 |issue=2 |pages=769–787 |doi=10.1002/spp2.1317 |s2cid=219067218 |issn=2056-2799 |url=https://zenodo.org/record/3877503 }}</ref> During the Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous, basal multituberculates, collectively grouped into the [[Paraphyly|paraphyletic]] "[[Plagiaulacida]]", were abundant and widespread across [[Laurasia]] (including Europe, Asia and North America). During the [[Aptian]] stage of the Early Cretaceous, the advanced subgroup [[Cimolodonta]] appeared in North America, characterised by a reduced number of lower premolars, with a blade-like lower fourth premolar. By the early Late Cretaceous ([[Cenomanian]]) Cimolodonta had replaced all other multituberculate lineages.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Weaver|first1=Lucas N.|last2=Wilson|first2=Gregory P.|last3=Krumenacker|first3=L. J.|last4=Mclaughlin|first4=Kayla|last5=Moore|first5=Jason R.|last6=Varricchio|first6=David J.|date=2019-03-04|title=New multituberculate mammals from the mid-Cretaceous (lower Cenomanian) Wayan Formation of southeastern Idaho and implications for the early evolution of Cimolodonta|url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02724634.2019.1604532|journal=Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology|language=en|volume=39|issue=2|article-number=e1604532|doi=10.1080/02724634.2019.1604532|bibcode=2019JVPal..39E4532W |s2cid=196655261 |issn=0272-4634|url-access=subscription}}</ref>


During the Late Cretaceous, multituberculates experienced an [[adaptive radiation]], corresponding with a shift towards herbivory.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Wilson|first1=Gregory P.|last2=Evans|first2=Alistair R.|last3=Corfe|first3=Ian J.|last4=Smits|first4=Peter D.|last5=Fortelius|first5=Mikael|last6=Jernvall|first6=Jukka|date=March 2012|title=Adaptive radiation of multituberculate mammals before the extinction of dinosaurs|url=https://www.nature.com/articles/nature10880|journal=Nature|language=en|volume=483|issue=7390|pages=457–460|doi=10.1038/nature10880|pmid=22419156 |bibcode=2012Natur.483..457W |s2cid=4419772 |issn=1476-4687|url-access=subscription}}</ref> Multituberculates reached their peak diversity during the early [[Paleocene]], shortly after the [[Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event]], but declined from the mid Paleocene onwards, likely due to competition with placental mammals such as [[rodent]]s and [[ungulate]]s, the group finally became extinct in the Late [[Eocene]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Adams|first1=Neil F.|last2=Rayfield|first2=Emily J.|last3=Cox|first3=Philip G.|last4=Cobb|first4=Samuel N.|last5=Corfe|first5=Ian J.|date=March 2019|title=Functional tests of the competitive exclusion hypothesis for multituberculate extinction|journal=Royal Society Open Science|language=en|volume=6|issue=3|pages=181536|doi=10.1098/rsos.181536|issn=2054-5703|pmc=6458384|pmid=31032010|bibcode=2019RSOS....681536A }}</ref><ref name="Brocklehurst et al 2021">{{cite journal|last1=Brocklehurst|first1=Neil|last2=Panciroli|first2=Elsa|last3=Benevento|first3=Gemma Louise|last4=Benson|first4=Roger B. J.|date=July 2021|title=Mammaliaform extinctions as a driver of the morphological radiation of Cenozoic mammals|journal=Current Biology|volume=31|issue=13|pages=2955–2963.e4|doi=10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.044|pmid=34004143|s2cid=234782605|url=https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:bda82407-db76-4c15-b061-ceb9ae271dd5 |doi-access=free}}</ref>
During the Late Cretaceous, multituberculates experienced an [[adaptive radiation]], corresponding with a shift towards herbivory.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Wilson|first1=Gregory P.|last2=Evans|first2=Alistair R.|last3=Corfe|first3=Ian J.|last4=Smits|first4=Peter D.|last5=Fortelius|first5=Mikael|last6=Jernvall|first6=Jukka|date=March 2012|title=Adaptive radiation of multituberculate mammals before the extinction of dinosaurs|url=https://www.nature.com/articles/nature10880|journal=Nature|language=en|volume=483|issue=7390|pages=457–460|doi=10.1038/nature10880|pmid=22419156 |bibcode=2012Natur.483..457W |s2cid=4419772 |issn=1476-4687|url-access=subscription}}</ref> Multituberculates reached their peak diversity during the early [[Paleocene]], shortly after the [[Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event]], but declined from the mid Paleocene onwards, likely due to competition with placental mammals such as [[rodent]]s and [[ungulate]]s. The group finally became extinct in the Late [[Eocene]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Adams|first1=Neil F.|last2=Rayfield|first2=Emily J.|last3=Cox|first3=Philip G.|last4=Cobb|first4=Samuel N.|last5=Corfe|first5=Ian J.|date=March 2019|title=Functional tests of the competitive exclusion hypothesis for multituberculate extinction|journal=Royal Society Open Science|language=en|volume=6|issue=3|article-number=181536|doi=10.1098/rsos.181536|issn=2054-5703|pmc=6458384|pmid=31032010|bibcode=2019RSOS....681536A }}</ref><ref name="Brocklehurst et al 2021">{{cite journal|last1=Brocklehurst|first1=Neil|last2=Panciroli|first2=Elsa|last3=Benevento|first3=Gemma Louise|last4=Benson|first4=Roger B. J.|date=July 2021|title=Mammaliaform extinctions as a driver of the morphological radiation of Cenozoic mammals|journal=Current Biology|volume=31|issue=13|pages=2955–2963.e4|doi=10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.044|pmid=34004143|s2cid=234782605|url=https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:bda82407-db76-4c15-b061-ceb9ae271dd5 |doi-access=free}}</ref>


There are some isolated records of multituberculates from the Southern Hemisphere, including the cimolodontan ''[[Corriebaatar]]'' from the Early Cretaceous of Australia,<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last1=Rich |first1=Thomas |last2=Trusler |first2=Peter |last3=Kool |first3=Lesley |last4=White |first4=Matt A. |last5=Bevitt |first5=Joseph |last6=Morton |first6=Steven |last7=Vickers−Rich |first7=Patricia |date=2022 |title=Second specimen of Corriebaatar marywaltersae from the Lower Cretaceous of Australia confirms its multituberculate affinities |journal=Acta Palaeontologica Polonica |volume=67 |doi=10.4202/app.00924.2021 |s2cid=247905998 |issn=0567-7920|doi-access=free }}</ref> and fragmentary remains from the Late Cretaceous [[Maevarano Formation]] of Madagascar.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Krause |first1=David W. |last2=Hoffmann |first2=Simone |last3=Werning |first3=Sarah |date=December 2017 |title=First postcranial remains of Multituberculata (Allotheria, Mammalia) from Gondwana |journal=Cretaceous Research |language=en |volume=80 |pages=91–100 |doi=10.1016/j.cretres.2017.08.009|bibcode=2017CrRes..80...91K |doi-access=free }}</ref> The family [[Ferugliotheriidae]] from the Late Cretaceous of South America, traditionally considered gondwanatherians, may actually be cimolodontan multituberculates.<ref name=":0" />
There are some isolated records of multituberculates from the Southern Hemisphere, including the cimolodontan ''[[Corriebaatar]]'' from the Early Cretaceous of Australia,<ref name="Rich-2022">{{Cite journal |last1=Rich |first1=Thomas |last2=Trusler |first2=Peter |last3=Kool |first3=Lesley |last4=White |first4=Matt A. |last5=Bevitt |first5=Joseph |last6=Morton |first6=Steven |last7=Vickers−Rich |first7=Patricia |date=2022 |title=Second specimen of Corriebaatar marywaltersae from the Lower Cretaceous of Australia confirms its multituberculate affinities |journal=Acta Palaeontologica Polonica |volume=67 |doi=10.4202/app.00924.2021 |s2cid=247905998 |issn=0567-7920|doi-access=free }}</ref> and fragmentary remains from the Late Cretaceous [[Maevarano Formation]] of Madagascar.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Krause |first1=David W. |last2=Hoffmann |first2=Simone |last3=Werning |first3=Sarah |date=December 2017 |title=First postcranial remains of Multituberculata (Allotheria, Mammalia) from Gondwana |journal=Cretaceous Research |language=en |volume=80 |pages=91–100 |doi=10.1016/j.cretres.2017.08.009|bibcode=2017CrRes..80...91K |doi-access=free }}</ref> The family [[Ferugliotheriidae]] from the Late Cretaceous of South America, traditionally considered gondwanatherians, may actually be cimolodontan multituberculates.<ref name="Rich-2022" />


During the Late Cretaceous and Paleocene the multituberculates [[Evolutionary radiation|radiated]] into a wide variety of [[morphotype]]s, including the squirrel-like arboreal [[Ptilodontidae|ptilodonts]]. The peculiar shape of their last lower [[premolar]] is their most outstanding feature. These teeth were larger and more elongated than the other cheek-teeth and had an [[Occlusion (dentistry)|occlusive]] surface forming a serrated slicing blade. Though it can be assumed that this was used for crushing seeds and nuts, it is believed that most small multituberculates also supplemented their diet with insects, worms, and fruits.<ref name="Agusti-3" /> Tooth marks attributed to multituberculates are known on ''[[Champsosaurus]]'' fossils, indicating that at least some of these mammals were [[scavenger]]s.<ref>{{cite journal | doi = 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2010.00957.x | volume=53 | title=Mammalian tooth marks on the bones of dinosaurs and other Late Cretaceous vertebrates | journal=Palaeontology | pages=703–709 | last1 = Longrich | first1 = Nicholas R. | last2 = Ryan | first2 = Michael J.| year=2010 | issue=4 | bibcode=2010Palgy..53..703L | doi-access = free }}</ref> A ptilodont that thrived in North America was ''[[Ptilodus]]''. Thanks to the well-preserved ''Ptilodus'' specimens found in the [[Bighorn Basin]], [[Wyoming]], we know that these multituberculates were able to [[Anatomical terms of motion|abduct and adduct]] their [[hallux|big toes]], and thus that their foot mobility was similar to that of modern squirrels, which descend trees head first.<ref name="Agusti-3" />
During the Late Cretaceous and Paleocene the multituberculates [[Evolutionary radiation|radiated]] into a wide variety of [[morphotype]]s, including the squirrel-like arboreal [[Ptilodontidae|ptilodonts]]. The peculiar shape of their last lower [[premolar]] is their most outstanding feature. These teeth were larger and more elongated than the other cheek-teeth and had an [[Occlusion (dentistry)|occlusive]] surface forming a serrated slicing blade. Though it can be assumed that this was used for crushing seeds and nuts, it is believed that most small multituberculates also supplemented their diet with insects, worms, and fruits.<ref name="Agusti-3" /> Tooth marks attributed to multituberculates are known on ''[[Champsosaurus]]'' fossils, indicating that at least some of these mammals were [[scavenger]]s.<ref>{{cite journal | doi = 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2010.00957.x | volume=53 | title=Mammalian tooth marks on the bones of dinosaurs and other Late Cretaceous vertebrates | journal=Palaeontology | pages=703–709 | last1 = Longrich | first1 = Nicholas R. | last2 = Ryan | first2 = Michael J.| year=2010 | issue=4 | bibcode=2010Palgy..53..703L | doi-access = free }}</ref> A ptilodont that thrived in North America was ''[[Ptilodus]]''. Thanks to the well-preserved ''Ptilodus'' specimens found in the [[Bighorn Basin]], [[Wyoming]], we know that these multituberculates were able to [[Anatomical terms of motion|abduct and adduct]] their [[hallux|big toes]], and thus that their foot mobility was similar to that of modern squirrels, which descend trees head first.<ref name="Agusti-3" />
Line 44: Line 44:


== Classification ==
== Classification ==
Multituberculate is generally placed within [[Allotheria]] alongside [[Euharamiyida]], a clade of mammals known from the Middle Jurassic to Early Cretaceous of Asia and possibly Europe that possess several morphological similarities with multituberculates.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":02">{{Cite journal |last1=Hoffmann |first1=Simone |last2=Beck |first2=Robin M. D. |last3=Wible |first3=John R. |last4=Rougier |first4=Guillermo W. |last5=Krause |first5=David W. |date=2020-12-14 |title=Phylogenetic placement of Adalatherium hui (Mammalia, Gondwanatheria) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar: implications for allotherian relationships |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02724634.2020.1801706 |journal=Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology |language=en |volume=40 |issue=sup1 |pages=213–234 |doi=10.1080/02724634.2020.1801706 |bibcode=2020JVPal..40S.213H |s2cid=230968231 |issn=0272-4634|url-access=subscription }}</ref>
Multituberculate is generally placed within [[Allotheria]] alongside [[Euharamiyida]], a clade of mammals known from the Middle Jurassic to Early Cretaceous of Asia and possibly Europe that possess several morphological similarities with multituberculates.<ref name="Averianov-2021" /><ref name="Hoffmann-2020">{{Cite journal |last1=Hoffmann |first1=Simone |last2=Beck |first2=Robin M. D. |last3=Wible |first3=John R. |last4=Rougier |first4=Guillermo W. |last5=Krause |first5=David W. |date=2020-12-14 |title=Phylogenetic placement of Adalatherium hui (Mammalia, Gondwanatheria) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar: implications for allotherian relationships |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02724634.2020.1801706 |journal=Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology |language=en |volume=40 |issue=sup1 |pages=213–234 |doi=10.1080/02724634.2020.1801706 |bibcode=2020JVPal..40S.213H |s2cid=230968231 |issn=0272-4634|url-access=subscription }}</ref>


[[Gondwanatheria]] is a monophyletic group of allotherians that was diverse in the [[Late Cretaceous]] of South America, India, [[Madagascar]] and possibly Africa and occurs onwards into the [[Paleogene]] of South America and [[Antarctica]]. Their placement within Allotheria is highly controversial, with some phylogenies recovering the group as deeply nested within multituberculates, while others recover them as a distinct branch of allotherians separate from multituberculates.<ref name=":02" />[[File:Taeniolabis taoensis.jpg|thumb|Restoration of ''Taeniolabis taoensis'']]
[[Gondwanatheria]] is a monophyletic group of allotherians that was diverse in the [[Late Cretaceous]] of South America, India, [[Madagascar]] and possibly Africa and occurs onwards into the [[Paleogene]] of South America and [[Antarctica]]. Their placement within Allotheria is highly controversial, with some phylogenies recovering the group as deeply nested within multituberculates, while others recover them as a distinct branch of allotherians separate from multituberculates.<ref name="Hoffmann-2020" />[[File:Taeniolabis taoensis.jpg|thumb|Restoration of ''Taeniolabis taoensis'']]
In their 2001 study, [[Zofia Kielan-Jaworowska|Kielan-Jaworowska]] and [[Jørn Hurum|Hurum]] found that most multituberculates could be referred to two suborders: "[[Plagiaulacida]]" and [[Cimolodonta]]. The exception is the genus ''[[Arginbaatar]]'', which shares characteristics with both groups.
In their 2001 study, [[Zofia Kielan-Jaworowska|Kielan-Jaworowska]] and [[Jørn Hurum|Hurum]] found that most multituberculates could be referred to two suborders: "[[Plagiaulacida]]" and [[Cimolodonta]]. The exception is the genus ''[[Arginbaatar]]'', which shares characteristics with both groups.


"Plagiaulacida" is [[Paraphyly|paraphyletic]], representing the more [[Primitive (phylogenetics)|primitive]] [[evolutionary grade]]. Its members are the more [[Basal (phylogenetics)|basal]] Multituberculata. Chronologically, they ranged from perhaps the Middle Jurassic until the mid-[[Cretaceous]]. This group is further subdivided into three informal groupings: the [[Plagiaulacida#Allodontid line|allodontid line]], the [[Plagiaulacida#Paulchoffatiid line|paulchoffatiid line]], and the [[Plagiaulacida#Plagiaulacid line|plagiaulacid line]].
"Plagiaulacida" is [[Paraphyly|paraphyletic]], representing the more [[Primitive (phylogenetics)|primitive]] [[evolutionary grade]]. Its members are the more [[Basal (phylogenetics)|basal]] Multituberculata. Chronologically, they ranged from perhaps the Middle Jurassic until the mid-[[Cretaceous]]. This group is further subdivided into three informal groupings: the [[Plagiaulacida#Allodontid line|allodontid line]], the [[Plagiaulacida#Paulchoffatiid line|paulchoffatiid line]], and the [[Plagiaulacida#Plagiaulacid line|plagiaulacid line]].


[[Cimolodonta]] is, apparently, a natural ([[monophyletic]]) suborder. This includes the more derived Multituberculata, which have been identified from the lower Cretaceous to the [[Eocene]]. The superfamilies [[Djadochtatherioidea]], [[Taeniolabidoidea]], [[Ptilodontoidea]] are recognized, as is the [[Paracimexomys group]]. Additionally, there are the families [[Cimolomyidae]], [[Boffius|Boffiidae]], [[Eucosmodontidae]], [[Kogaionidae]], [[Microcosmodontidae]] and the two genera ''[[Uzbekbaatar]]'' and ''[[Viridomys]]''. More precise placement of these types awaits further discoveries and analysis.<ref name="Dykes">Dykes ''Multituberculata (Cope 1884)''</ref>{{better source needed|date=April 2015|reason=Dykes' site is defunct}}<!--- ref for entire section -->
[[Cimolodonta]] is, apparently, a natural ([[monophyletic]]) suborder. This includes the more derived Multituberculata, which have been identified from the lower Cretaceous to the [[Eocene]]. The superfamilies [[Djadochtatherioidea]], [[Taeniolabidoidea]], [[Ptilodontoidea]] are recognized, as is the Paracimexomys group. Additionally, there are the families [[Cimolomyidae]], [[Boffius|Boffiidae]], [[Eucosmodontidae]], [[Kogaionidae]], [[Microcosmodontidae]] and the two genera ''[[Uzbekbaatar]]'' and ''[[Viridomys]]''. More precise placement of these types awaits further discoveries and analysis.<ref name="Dykes">Dykes ''Multituberculata (Cope 1884)''</ref>{{better source needed|date=April 2015|reason=Dykes' site is defunct}}<!--- ref for entire section -->


===Taxonomy===
===Taxonomy===
Line 60: Line 60:


Suborder †'''[[Plagiaulacida]]''' <small>Simpson 1925</small>
Suborder †'''[[Plagiaulacida]]''' <small>Simpson 1925</small>
* Genus ?†''[[Argillomys]]'' <small>Cifelli, Gordon & Lipka 2013</small>
* Genus ?†''Argillomys'' <small>Cifelli, Gordon & Lipka 2013</small>
** Species †''[[Argillomys marylandensis]]'' <small>Cifelli, Gordon & Lipka 2013</small>
** Species †''Argillomys marylandensis'' <small>Cifelli, Gordon & Lipka 2013</small>
* Genus ?†''[[Janumys]]'' <small>Eaton & Cifelli 2001</small>
* Genus ?†''[[Janumys]]'' <small>Eaton & Cifelli 2001</small>
** Species †''[[Janumys erebos]]'' <small>Eaton & Cifelli 2001</small>
** Species †''[[Janumys erebos]]'' <small>Eaton & Cifelli 2001</small>
Line 74: Line 74:
**** Species †''[[Zofiabaatar pulcher|Z. pulcher]]'' <small>Bakker & Carpenter, 1990</small>
**** Species †''[[Zofiabaatar pulcher|Z. pulcher]]'' <small>Bakker & Carpenter, 1990</small>
** Family †'''[[Allodontidae]]''' <small>Marsh, 1889</small>
** Family †'''[[Allodontidae]]''' <small>Marsh, 1889</small>
*** Genus †''[[Passumys]]'' <small>Cifelli, Davis & Sames 2014</small>
*** Genus †''Passumys'' <small>Cifelli, Davis & Sames 2014</small>
**** Species †''[[Passumys angelli]]'' <small>Cifelli, Davis & Sames 2014</small>
**** Species †''Passumys angelli'' <small>Cifelli, Davis & Sames 2014</small>
*** Genus †''[[Ctenacodon]]'' <small>Marsh, 1879</small>
*** Genus †''[[Ctenacodon]]'' <small>Marsh, 1879</small>
**** Species †''[[Ctenacodon serratus|C. serratus]]'' <small>Marsh, 1879</small>
**** Species †''[[Ctenacodon serratus|C. serratus]]'' <small>Marsh, 1879</small>
Line 583: Line 583:
===Extinction===
===Extinction===


The extinction of multituberculates has been a topic of controversy for several decades.<ref name="Wood 2010">{{Cite thesis |last=Wood |first=D. Joseph |title=The Extinction of the Multituberculates Outside North America: a Global Approach to Testing the Competition Model |type=M.S. |year=2010 |publisher=The Ohio State University |url=https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=osu1275595604&disposition=inline |access-date=2015-04-03 |archive-date=2015-04-08 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150408104907/https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=osu1275595604&disposition=inline |url-status=dead}}</ref> After at least 88&nbsp;million years of dominance over most mammalian assemblies, multituberculates reached the peak of their diversity in the early [[Palaeocene]], before gradually declining across the final stages of the epoch and the [[Eocene]], finally disappearing in the early [[Oligocene]].<ref name="Ostrander 1984">{{cite journal |last1=Ostrander |first1=Gregg |title=The Early Oligocene (Chadronian) Raben Ranch Local Fauna, Northwest Nebraska: Multituberculata; with Comments on the Extinction of the Allotheria |journal=Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies |date=1 January 1984 |url=https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tnas/239/ }}</ref>
The extinction of multituberculates has been a topic of controversy for several decades.<ref name="Wood 2010">{{Cite thesis |last=Wood |first=D. Joseph |title=The Extinction of the Multituberculates Outside North America: a Global Approach to Testing the Competition Model |type=M.S. |year=2010 |publisher=The Ohio State University |url=https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=osu1275595604&disposition=inline |access-date=2015-04-03 |archive-date=2015-04-08 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150408104907/https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=osu1275595604&disposition=inline }}</ref> After at least 88&nbsp;million years of dominance over most mammalian assemblies, multituberculates reached the peak of their diversity in the early [[Palaeocene]], before gradually declining across the final stages of the epoch and the [[Eocene]], finally disappearing in the early [[Oligocene]].<ref name="Ostrander 1984">{{cite journal |last1=Ostrander |first1=Gregg |title=The Early Oligocene (Chadronian) Raben Ranch Local Fauna, Northwest Nebraska: Multituberculata; with Comments on the Extinction of the Allotheria |journal=Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies |date=1 January 1984 |url=https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tnas/239/ }}</ref>


The last multituberculate species, ''[[Ectypodus childei]]'', went extinct near the end of the Eocene in North America. It is unclear why this particular species persisted for so long when all of its counterparts succumbed to replacement by rodents.<ref>{{Cite thesis |title=The Extinction of the Multituberculates Outside North America: a Global Approach to Testing the Competition Model |url=https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_olink/r/1501/10?clear=10&p10_accession_num=osu1275595604 |publisher=The Ohio State University |date=2010 |language=en |first=D. Joseph |last=Wood |access-date=2023-05-19 |archive-date=2023-05-19 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230519082943/https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_olink/r/1501/10?clear=10&p10_accession_num=osu1275595604 |url-status=dead }}</ref>{{Rp|page=43}}
The last multituberculate species, ''[[Ectypodus|Ectypodus childei]]'', went extinct near the end of the Eocene in North America. It is unclear why this particular species persisted for so long when all of its counterparts succumbed to replacement by [[rodent]]s.<ref>{{Cite thesis |title=The Extinction of the Multituberculates Outside North America: a Global Approach to Testing the Competition Model |url=https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_olink/r/1501/10?clear=10&p10_accession_num=osu1275595604 |publisher=The Ohio State University |date=2010 |language=en |first=D. Joseph |last=Wood |access-date=2023-05-19 |archive-date=2023-05-19 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230519082943/https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_olink/r/1501/10?clear=10&p10_accession_num=osu1275595604 }}</ref>{{Rp|page=43}}


Traditionally, the extinction of multituberculates has been linked to the rise of [[rodents]] (and, to a lesser degree, earlier [[placental]] competitors like [[Hyopsodontidae|hyopsodonts]] and [[Plesiadapiformes]]), which supposedly [[Competitive exclusion principle|competitively excluded]] multituberculates from most mammalian faunas.<ref name="Krause 1986">{{cite book |doi=10.2113/gsrocky.24.special_paper_3.95 |chapter=Competitive exclusion and taxonomic displacement in the fossil record |title=Vertebrates, Phylogeny, and Philosophy |year=1986 |last1=Krause |first1=David W. |pages=95–117 |isbn=978-0-941570-02-2 |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/vertebratesphylo0000unse/page/95 }}</ref>
Traditionally, the extinction of multituberculates has been linked to the rise of rodents (and, to a lesser degree, earlier [[placental]] competitors like [[Hyopsodontidae|hyopsodonts]] and [[Plesiadapiformes]]), which supposedly [[Competitive exclusion principle|competitively excluded]] multituberculates from most mammalian faunas.<ref name="Krause 1986">{{cite book |doi=10.2113/gsrocky.24.special_paper_3.95 |chapter=Competitive exclusion and taxonomic displacement in the fossil record |title=Vertebrates, Phylogeny, and Philosophy |year=1986 |last1=Krause |first1=David W. |pages=95–117 |isbn=978-0-941570-02-2 |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/vertebratesphylo0000unse/page/95 }}</ref> Adams et al. (2019) argued in favor of this hypothesis as rodents have a higher bite force than  multituberculates, which would have given them access to harder, drier seeds which were becoming more abundant and had a greater range of food compared to multituberculates. The authors also argued rodents had was longer gestation periods and larger neonates which gave them a competitive advantage over multituberculates. In addition, they believed the diversity of new predators such as  [[owl]]s, [[Creodonta|creodonts]], and [[carnivora]]ns, also played a role in their extinction.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Adams |first=Neil F. |last2=Rayfield |first2=Emily J. |last3=Cox |first3=Philip G. |last4=Cobb |first4=Samuel N. |last5=Corfe |first5=Ian J. |date=2019 |title=Functional tests of the competitive exclusion hypothesis for multituberculate extinction |url=https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.181536#d1e1774 |journal=Royal Society Open Science |volume=6 |issue=3 |doi=10.1098/rsos.181536 |doi-access=free|pmc=6458384 }}</ref>


However, the idea that multituberculates were replaced by rodents and other placentals has been criticised by several authors. For one thing, it relies on the assumption that these mammals are "inferior" to more derived placentals, and ignores the fact that rodents and multituberculates had co-existed for at least 15&nbsp;million years. According to some researchers, multituberculate "decline" is shaped by sharp extinction events, most notably after the [[Tiffanian]], where a sudden drop in diversity occurs. Finally, the youngest known multituberculates do not exemplify patterns of competitive exclusion; the Oligocene ''[[Ectypodus]]'' is a rather generalistic species, rather than a specialist. This combination of factors suggests that, rather than gradually declining due to pressure from rodents and similar placentals, multituberculates simply could not cope with climatic and vegetation changes, as well as the rise of new predatory eutherians, such as [[Miacidae|miacids]].<ref name="Ostrander 1984"/>
However, the idea that multituberculates were competitively replaced by rodents and other placentals has been criticised by several authors. For one thing, it relies on the assumption that these mammals are "inferior" to more derived placentals, and ignores the fact that rodents and multituberculates had co-existed for at least 15&nbsp;million years. According to some researchers, multituberculate "decline" is shaped by sharp extinction events, most notably after the [[Tiffanian]], where a sudden drop in diversity occurs. Finally, the youngest known multituberculates do not exemplify patterns of competitive exclusion; the Oligocene ''Ectypodus'' is a rather generalistic species, rather than a specialist. This suggests that multituberculates simply could not cope with climatic and vegetation changes, as well as the rise of new predatory eutherians, such as [[Miacidae|miacids]]. However, rodents probably still played a role in their decline.<ref name="Ostrander 1984"/>


More recent studies show a mixed effect. Multituberculate faunas in North America and Europe do indeed decline in correlation to the introduction of rodents in these areas. However, [[Asia]]n multituberculate faunas co-existed with rodents with minimal extinction events, implying that competition was not the main cause for the extinction of Asiatic multituberculates. As a whole, it seems that Asian multituberculates, unlike North American and European species, never recovered from the [[KT event]], which allowed the evolution and propagation of rodents in the first place.<ref name="Wood 2010"/> A recent study seems to indeed indicate that eutherians recovered more quickly from the KT event than multituberculates.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Pires | first1 = Mathias M. | last2 = Rankin | first2 = Brian D. | last3 = Silvestro | first3 = Daniele | last4 = Quental | first4 = Tiago B. | year = 1804 | title = Diversification dynamics of mammalian clades during the K–Pg mass extinction | journal = Biology Letters | volume = 14 | issue = 9| page = 2058 | doi = 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0458 | pmid = 30258031 | pmc = 6170748 }}</ref> Conversely, another study has shown that placental radiation did not start significantly until after the decline of multituberculates.<ref name="Brocklehurst et al 2021"/>
More recent studies show a mixed effect. Multituberculate faunas in North America and Europe do indeed decline in correlation to the introduction of rodents in these areas. However, [[Asia]]n multituberculate faunas co-existed with rodents with minimal extinction events, implying that competition was not the main cause for the extinction of Asiatic multituberculates. As a whole, it seems that Asian multituberculates, unlike North American and European species, never recovered from the [[KT event]], which allowed the evolution and propagation of rodents in the first place.<ref name="Wood 2010"/> A recent study seems to indeed indicate that eutherians recovered more quickly from the KT event than multituberculates.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Pires |first1=Mathias M. |last2=Rankin |first2=Brian D. |last3=Silvestro |first3=Daniele |last4=Quental |first4=Tiago B. |year=2018 |title=Diversification dynamics of mammalian clades during the K–Pg mass extinction |journal=Biology Letters |volume=14 |issue=9 |page=2058 |doi=10.1098/rsbl.2018.0458 |pmc=6170748 |pmid=30258031}}</ref> Conversely, another study has shown that placental radiation did not start significantly until after the decline of multituberculates.<ref name="Brocklehurst et al 2021" />
 
However, competitive replacement among North American species has been called into question by Benjamin John Burger in his 2025 study. He suggests the extinction of multituberculates in North America was correlated to the decline of boreal forests that were dominated by [[dawn redwoods]] and Chinese swamp cypress. The analysis suggested that multituberculates avoided pine and spruce-dominated forests despite having similar geographic distributions to those trees. However, Burger argues competitive replacements by seed-eating passerine birds such as [[songbird]]s, and several mammalian groups such as [[Paromomyidae|paromomyids]], may have played a role in the extinction of multituberculates, although this requires more testing.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Burger |first=Benjamin John |date=2025 |title=Comparative spatial paleoecology: assessing niche competition between Eocene North American multituberculates and rodents regarding forest resources to elucidate the cause of multituberculate extinction |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/paleobiology/article/comparative-spatial-paleoecology-assessing-niche-competition-between-eocene-north-american-multituberculates-and-rodents-regarding-forest-resources-to-elucidate-the-cause-of-multituberculate-extinction/B1D9E93C24C909E16DB263F77468289E |journal=Paleobiology |pages=1-16 |doi=10.1017/pab.2025.10048 |doi-access=free}}</ref>


==References==
==References==
Line 605: Line 607:
|isbn = 978-0-231-11640-4
|isbn = 978-0-231-11640-4
}}
}}
*{{cite web|url=http://home.arcor.de/ktdykes/multis.htm |title=Multituberculata (Cope 1884) |first=Trevor |last=Dykes |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091228041258/http://home.arcor.de/ktdykes/multis.htm |archive-date=December 28, 2009 }}
*{{cite web|url=http://home.arcor.de/ktdykes/multis.htm |title=Multituberculata (Cope 1884) |first=Trevor |last=Dykes |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091228041258/http://home.arcor.de/ktdykes/multis.htm |archive-date=December 28, 2009 }}
*{{cite journal
*{{cite journal
|last1 = Kielan-Jaworowska|first1 = Zofia|last2=Hurum|first2 = Jørn H.
|last1 = Kielan-Jaworowska|first1 = Zofia|last2=Hurum|first2 = Jørn H.

Latest revision as of 16:16, 15 November 2025

Template:Short description Template:Automatic taxobox

Multituberculata (commonly known as multituberculates, named for the multiple tubercles of their teeth) is an extinct order of rodent-like mammals with a fossil record spanning over 130 million years.Script error: No such module "Unsubst". They first appeared in the Middle Jurassic, and reached a peak diversity during the Late Cretaceous and Paleocene. They eventually declined from the mid-Paleocene onwards, disappearing from the known fossil record in the late Eocene.[1] They are the most diverse order of Mesozoic mammals with more than 200 species known, ranging from mouse-sized to beaver-sized. These species occupied a diversity of ecological niches, ranging from burrow-dwelling to squirrel-like arborealism to jerboa-like hoppers.[2][3] Multituberculates are usually placed as crown mammals outside either of the two main groups of living mammals, Theriaplacentals and marsupials — and Monotremata,[4] but usually as closer to Theria than to monotremes.[5][6] They are considered to be closely related to Euharamiyida and Gondwanatheria as part of Allotheria.

Description

File:Taeniolabis NT small.jpg
Restoration of Taeniolabis, the largest multituberculate at approximately Template:Convert.

The multituberculates had a cranial and dental anatomy superficially similar to rodents such as mice and rats, with cheek-teeth separated from the chisel-like front teeth by a wide tooth-less gap (the diasteme). Each cheek-tooth displayed several rows of small cusps (or tubercles, hence the name) that operated against similar rows in the teeth of the jaw; the exact homology of these cusps to therian ones is still a matter of debate.Script error: No such module "Unsubst". Unlike rodents, which have ever-growing teeth, multituberculates underwent dental replacement patterns typical of most mammals (though in at least some species the lower incisors continued to erupt long after the root's closure).[7] Multituberculates are notable for the presence of a massive fourth lower premolar, the plagiaulacoid; other mammals, like Plesiadapiformes and diprotodontian marsupials, also have similar premolars in both upper and lower jaws, but in multituberculates this tooth is massive and the upper premolars are not modified this way. In basal multituberculates all three lower premolars were plagiaulacoids, increasing in size posteriorly, but in Cimolodonta only the fourth lower premolar remained, with the third one remaining only as a vestigial peg-like tooth,[7] and in several taxa like taeniolabidoideans, the plagiaulacoid disappeared entirely or was reconverted into a molariform tooth.[8][9][10]

File:Ptilodus skull BW.jpg
Skull of Ptilodus. Notice the massive blade-like lower premolar.

Unlike rodents and similar therians, multituberculates had a palinal jaw stroke (front-to-back), instead of a propalinal (back-to-front) or transverse (side-to-side) one; as a consequence, their jaw musculature and cusp orientation is radically different.[4][7] Palinal jaw strokes are almost entirely absent in modern mammals (with the possible exception of the dugong[11]), but are also present in haramiyidans, argyrolagoideans and tritylodontids, the former historically united with multituberculates on that basis. Multituberculate mastication is thought to have operated in a two stroke cycle: first, food held in place by the last upper premolar was sliced by the bladelike lower pre-molars as the dentary moved orthally (upward). Then the lower jaw moved palinally, grinding the food between the molar cusp rows.[4][7]

File:American Jurassic Mammals plate VII.jpg
Lower jaws and teeth of allodontid multituberculates

The structure of the pelvis in the Multituberculata suggests that they gave birth to tiny helpless, underdeveloped young, similar to modern marsupials, such as kangaroos.[2][7] However, a 2022 study reveals that they might actually have had long gestation periods like placentals.[12] However, in 2024, all Allotheria (including multituberculates) fell outside the crown group of Mammalia, implying that cimolodonts developed placental-like gestation (and viviparity in general) independently, rather than multituberculates and therians having a common viviparous ancestor.[13]

At least two lineages developed hypsodonty, in which tooth enamel extends beyond the gumline: lambdopsalid taeniolabidoideans[14] and sudamericid gondwanatheres.[15]

Studies published in 2018 demonstrated that multituberculates had relatively complex brains, some braincase regions even absent in therian mammals.[16]

Evolution

Multituberculates first appear in the fossil record during the Jurassic period, and then survived and even dominated for over one hundred million years, longer than any other order of mammaliforms, including placental mammals. The earliest known multituberculates are from the Middle Jurassic (Bathonian ~166-168 million years ago) of England and Russia, including Hahnotherium and Kermackodon from the Forest Marble Formation of England, and Tashtykia and Tagaria from the Itat Formation of Russia. These forms are only known from isolated teeth, which bear close similarity to those of euharamyidans, which they are suspected to be closely related to.[17] During the Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous, basal multituberculates, collectively grouped into the paraphyletic "Plagiaulacida", were abundant and widespread across Laurasia (including Europe, Asia and North America). During the Aptian stage of the Early Cretaceous, the advanced subgroup Cimolodonta appeared in North America, characterised by a reduced number of lower premolars, with a blade-like lower fourth premolar. By the early Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian) Cimolodonta had replaced all other multituberculate lineages.[18]

During the Late Cretaceous, multituberculates experienced an adaptive radiation, corresponding with a shift towards herbivory.[19] Multituberculates reached their peak diversity during the early Paleocene, shortly after the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event, but declined from the mid Paleocene onwards, likely due to competition with placental mammals such as rodents and ungulates. The group finally became extinct in the Late Eocene.[20][21]

There are some isolated records of multituberculates from the Southern Hemisphere, including the cimolodontan Corriebaatar from the Early Cretaceous of Australia,[22] and fragmentary remains from the Late Cretaceous Maevarano Formation of Madagascar.[23] The family Ferugliotheriidae from the Late Cretaceous of South America, traditionally considered gondwanatherians, may actually be cimolodontan multituberculates.[22]

During the Late Cretaceous and Paleocene the multituberculates radiated into a wide variety of morphotypes, including the squirrel-like arboreal ptilodonts. The peculiar shape of their last lower premolar is their most outstanding feature. These teeth were larger and more elongated than the other cheek-teeth and had an occlusive surface forming a serrated slicing blade. Though it can be assumed that this was used for crushing seeds and nuts, it is believed that most small multituberculates also supplemented their diet with insects, worms, and fruits.[4] Tooth marks attributed to multituberculates are known on Champsosaurus fossils, indicating that at least some of these mammals were scavengers.[24] A ptilodont that thrived in North America was Ptilodus. Thanks to the well-preserved Ptilodus specimens found in the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming, we know that these multituberculates were able to abduct and adduct their big toes, and thus that their foot mobility was similar to that of modern squirrels, which descend trees head first.[4]

File:Catopsbaatar.jpg
Restoration of Catopsbaatar

Another group of multituberculates, the taeniolabids, were heavier and more massively built, indicating that they lived a fully terrestrial life. The largest specimens weighed probably as much as Template:Convert, making them comparable in size to large rodents like the modern beaver.[25][26]

Classification

Multituberculate is generally placed within Allotheria alongside Euharamiyida, a clade of mammals known from the Middle Jurassic to Early Cretaceous of Asia and possibly Europe that possess several morphological similarities with multituberculates.[17][27]

Gondwanatheria is a monophyletic group of allotherians that was diverse in the Late Cretaceous of South America, India, Madagascar and possibly Africa and occurs onwards into the Paleogene of South America and Antarctica. Their placement within Allotheria is highly controversial, with some phylogenies recovering the group as deeply nested within multituberculates, while others recover them as a distinct branch of allotherians separate from multituberculates.[27]

File:Taeniolabis taoensis.jpg
Restoration of Taeniolabis taoensis

In their 2001 study, Kielan-Jaworowska and Hurum found that most multituberculates could be referred to two suborders: "Plagiaulacida" and Cimolodonta. The exception is the genus Arginbaatar, which shares characteristics with both groups.

"Plagiaulacida" is paraphyletic, representing the more primitive evolutionary grade. Its members are the more basal Multituberculata. Chronologically, they ranged from perhaps the Middle Jurassic until the mid-Cretaceous. This group is further subdivided into three informal groupings: the allodontid line, the paulchoffatiid line, and the plagiaulacid line.

Cimolodonta is, apparently, a natural (monophyletic) suborder. This includes the more derived Multituberculata, which have been identified from the lower Cretaceous to the Eocene. The superfamilies Djadochtatherioidea, Taeniolabidoidea, Ptilodontoidea are recognized, as is the Paracimexomys group. Additionally, there are the families Cimolomyidae, Boffiidae, Eucosmodontidae, Kogaionidae, Microcosmodontidae and the two genera Uzbekbaatar and Viridomys. More precise placement of these types awaits further discoveries and analysis.[28]Template:Better source needed

Taxonomy

Template:Collapse top

File:Multituberculata.png
Multituberculate phylogenetic tree[29]

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Based on the combined works of Mikko's Phylogeny Archive[30] and Paleofile.com.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

Suborder †Plagiaulacida Simpson 1925

Template:Collapse top

Template:Collapse bottom Template:Collapse top

Template:Collapse bottom Template:Collapse bottom

Phylogeny

After Chimento et al. 2015:[29]

Template:CladeCladogram after Carvalho et al. 2025:[31]Template:Clade

Paleoecology

Behaviour

Multituberculates are some of the earliest mammals to display complex social behaviours. One species, Filikomys, from the Late Cretaceous of North America, engaged in multi-generational group nesting and burrowing.[32]

Extinction

The extinction of multituberculates has been a topic of controversy for several decades.[33] After at least 88 million years of dominance over most mammalian assemblies, multituberculates reached the peak of their diversity in the early Palaeocene, before gradually declining across the final stages of the epoch and the Eocene, finally disappearing in the early Oligocene.[34]

The last multituberculate species, Ectypodus childei, went extinct near the end of the Eocene in North America. It is unclear why this particular species persisted for so long when all of its counterparts succumbed to replacement by rodents.[35]Template:Rp

Traditionally, the extinction of multituberculates has been linked to the rise of rodents (and, to a lesser degree, earlier placental competitors like hyopsodonts and Plesiadapiformes), which supposedly competitively excluded multituberculates from most mammalian faunas.[1] Adams et al. (2019) argued in favor of this hypothesis as rodents have a higher bite force than multituberculates, which would have given them access to harder, drier seeds which were becoming more abundant and had a greater range of food compared to multituberculates. The authors also argued rodents had was longer gestation periods and larger neonates which gave them a competitive advantage over multituberculates. In addition, they believed the diversity of new predators such as owls, creodonts, and carnivorans, also played a role in their extinction.[36]

However, the idea that multituberculates were competitively replaced by rodents and other placentals has been criticised by several authors. For one thing, it relies on the assumption that these mammals are "inferior" to more derived placentals, and ignores the fact that rodents and multituberculates had co-existed for at least 15 million years. According to some researchers, multituberculate "decline" is shaped by sharp extinction events, most notably after the Tiffanian, where a sudden drop in diversity occurs. Finally, the youngest known multituberculates do not exemplify patterns of competitive exclusion; the Oligocene Ectypodus is a rather generalistic species, rather than a specialist. This suggests that multituberculates simply could not cope with climatic and vegetation changes, as well as the rise of new predatory eutherians, such as miacids. However, rodents probably still played a role in their decline.[34]

More recent studies show a mixed effect. Multituberculate faunas in North America and Europe do indeed decline in correlation to the introduction of rodents in these areas. However, Asian multituberculate faunas co-existed with rodents with minimal extinction events, implying that competition was not the main cause for the extinction of Asiatic multituberculates. As a whole, it seems that Asian multituberculates, unlike North American and European species, never recovered from the KT event, which allowed the evolution and propagation of rodents in the first place.[33] A recent study seems to indeed indicate that eutherians recovered more quickly from the KT event than multituberculates.[37] Conversely, another study has shown that placental radiation did not start significantly until after the decline of multituberculates.[21]

However, competitive replacement among North American species has been called into question by Benjamin John Burger in his 2025 study. He suggests the extinction of multituberculates in North America was correlated to the decline of boreal forests that were dominated by dawn redwoods and Chinese swamp cypress. The analysis suggested that multituberculates avoided pine and spruce-dominated forests despite having similar geographic distributions to those trees. However, Burger argues competitive replacements by seed-eating passerine birds such as songbirds, and several mammalian groups such as paromomyids, may have played a role in the extinction of multituberculates, although this requires more testing.[38]

References

Template:Reflist

Sources

Template:Sister project Template:Sister project

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".

Template:Allotheria Template:Taxonbar Template:Authority control

  1. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  4. a b c d e Agustí-Antón 2002, pp 3-4
  5. Benton, Michael J. Vertebrate Palaeontology (2004), p. 300
  6. Carrano, Matthew T., and Richard W. Blob, Timothy J. Gaudin, and John R. Wible (2006). Amniote Paleobiology: Perspectives on the Evolution of Mammals, Birds, and Reptiles, p. 358.
  7. a b c d e Kielan-Jaworowska, Zofia, Richard L. Cifelli, and Zhe-Xi Luo (2005). Mammals from the Age of Dinosaurs: Origins, Evolution, and Structure , p. 299
  8. Gurovich 2005 p. 334Template:Full citation needed
  9. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  10. Rougier et al. 2009 p.233Template:Full citation needed
  11. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  12. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  14. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Template:Dead link
  16. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  17. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  18. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  19. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  20. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  21. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  22. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  23. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  24. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  25. Krause et al 2021
  26. Wilson et al 2012
  27. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  28. Dykes Multituberculata (Cope 1884)
  29. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  30. Mikko's Phylogeny Archive Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  31. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  32. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  33. a b Template:Cite thesis
  34. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  35. Template:Cite thesis
  36. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  37. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  38. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".