Xenarthra: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Dylan Hackworth1
Reverted 2 edits by 2001:448A:11A1:110E:B13B:C3BB:995D:7B61 (talk): Wasn't the only one
imported>BunnysBot
Fix CW Errors with GenFixes (T1)
 
Line 5: Line 5:
| image = Xenarthra.jpg
| image = Xenarthra.jpg
| image_upright = 1.3
| image_upright = 1.3
| image_caption = Clockwise from upper left: ''[[Megatherium]]'', [[giant anteater]], two-toed [[sloth]], [[nine-banded armadillo]].
| image_caption = Clockwise from upper left: the giant ground sloth ''[[Megatherium]]'', [[giant anteater]], [[two-toed sloth]], [[nine-banded armadillo]]
| taxon = Xenarthra
| taxon = Xenarthra
| authority = [[Edward Drinker Cope|Cope]], 1889
| authority = [[Edward Drinker Cope|Cope]], 1889
| subdivision_ranks = Orders and suborders
| subdivision_ranks = Orders and suborders
| subdivision = * Order [[Cingulata]]
| subdivision = * Order [[Cingulata]] (armadillos)
* Order [[Pilosa]]
* Order [[Pilosa]]
:* Suborder [[Folivora]]
:* Suborder [[Folivora]] (sloths)
:* Suborder [[Vermilingua]]
:* Suborder [[Vermilingua]] (anteaters)
<br/>''See text for more details''
<br/>''See text for more details''
| range_map = Xenarthra range.jpg
| range_map = Xenarthra range.jpg
Line 18: Line 18:
}}
}}


'''Xenarthra''' ({{IPAc-en|z|E|'|n|ɑr|T|r|@}}; from Ancient Greek [[wikt:ξένος|ξένος]], xénos, "foreign, alien" + [[wikt:ἄρθρον|ἄρθρον]], árthron, "joint") is a [[Order (biology)|superorder]] and major [[clade]] of [[Placentalia|placental mammals]] native to the [[Americas]]. There are 31 living species: the [[anteater]]s, tree [[sloth]]s, and [[armadillo]]s.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|title=The biology of the Xenarthra|date=2008|publisher=University Press of Florida |editor=Vizcaíno, Sergio F. |editor2=Loughry, W. J.|isbn=978-0-8130-3718-9|location=Gainesville|oclc=741613153}}</ref> Extinct xenarthrans include the [[glyptodont]]s, [[Pampatheriidae|pampatheres]] and [[ground sloth]]s. Xenarthrans originated in South America during the late [[Paleocene]] about 60 million years ago.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = O'Leary | first1 = M. A. | last2 = Bloch | first2 = J. I. | last3 = Flynn | first3 = J. J. | last4 = Gaudin | first4 = T. J. | last5 = Giallombardo | first5 = A. | last6 = Giannini | first6 = N. P. | last7 = Cirranello | first7 = A. L. | year = 2013 | title = The placental mammal ancestor and the post–K-Pg radiation of placentals | journal = Science | volume = 339 | issue = 6120| pages = 662–667 | doi=10.1126/science.1229237 | pmid=23393258| hdl = 11336/7302 | bibcode = 2013Sci...339..662O | s2cid = 206544776 | hdl-access = free }}</ref> They evolved and diversified extensively in [[South America]] during the continent's long period of isolation in the early to mid [[Cenozoic]] Era. They spread to the [[Antilles]] by the early [[Miocene]] and, starting about 3 million years ago, spread to [[Central America|Central]] and [[North America]] as part of the [[Great American Interchange]].<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1007/s10914-010-9144-8 |title=The Great American Biotic Interchange: Dispersals, Tectonics, Climate, Sea Level and Holding Pens |year=2010 |last1=Woodburne |first1=Michael O. |journal=Journal of Mammalian Evolution |volume=17 |issue=4 |pages=245–264 |pmid=21125025 |pmc=2987556}}</ref> Nearly all of the formerly abundant [[megafauna]]l xenarthrans [[Quaternary extinction event|became extinct]] at the end of the [[Pleistocene]].
'''Xenarthra''' ({{IPAc-en|z|E|'|n|ɑr|T|r|@}}; from [[Ancient Greek]] [[wikt:ξένος|ξένος]] (''xénos''), meaning "strange, foreign", and [[wikt:ἄρθρον|ἄρθρον]] (''árthron''), meaning "joint") is a [[Order (biology)|superorder]] and major [[clade]] of [[Placentalia|placental mammals]] native to the [[Americas]]. There are 31 living species: the [[anteater]]s, tree [[sloth]]s, and [[armadillo]]s.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|title=The biology of the Xenarthra|date=2008|publisher=University Press of Florida |editor=Vizcaíno, Sergio F. |editor2=Loughry, W. J.|isbn=978-0-8130-3718-9|location=Gainesville|oclc=741613153}}</ref> Extinct xenarthrans include the [[glyptodont]]s, [[Pampatheriidae|pampatheres]] and [[ground sloth]]s, with some glyptodonts and ground sloths reaching sizes of several tonnes, much larger than any living xenarthran. Xenarthrans originated in South America during the late [[Paleocene]] about 60&nbsp;million years ago.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = O'Leary | first1 = M. A. | last2 = Bloch | first2 = J. I. | last3 = Flynn | first3 = J. J. | last4 = Gaudin | first4 = T. J. | last5 = Giallombardo | first5 = A. | last6 = Giannini | first6 = N. P. | last7 = Cirranello | first7 = A. L. | year = 2013 | title = The placental mammal ancestor and the post–K-Pg radiation of placentals | journal = Science | volume = 339 | issue = 6120| pages = 662–667 | doi=10.1126/science.1229237 | pmid=23393258| hdl = 11336/7302 | bibcode = 2013Sci...339..662O | s2cid = 206544776 | hdl-access = free }}</ref> They evolved and diversified extensively in [[South America]] during the continent's long period of isolation in the early to mid [[Cenozoic]] Era. They spread to the [[Antilles]] by the early [[Miocene]] and, starting about 3 million years ago, spread to [[Central America|Central]] and [[North America]] as part of the [[Great American Interchange]].<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1007/s10914-010-9144-8 |title=The Great American Biotic Interchange: Dispersals, Tectonics, Climate, Sea Level and Holding Pens |year=2010 |last1=Woodburne |first1=Michael O. |journal=Journal of Mammalian Evolution |volume=17 |issue=4 |pages=245–264 |pmid=21125025 |pmc=2987556}}</ref> Nearly all of the formerly abundant [[megafauna]]l xenarthrans became extinct at the end of the [[Pleistocene]] as part of the [[Late Pleistocene extinctions|end-Pleistocene extinction event]].


==Characteristics==
==Characteristics==
Xenarthrans share several characteristics that are not present in other placental mammals, which suggest that xenarthrans descend from subterranean diggers. The name Xenarthra derives from the two [[ancient Greek]] words {{wikt-lang|grc|ξένος}} ({{grc-transl|ξένος}}), meaning "strange, unusual", and {{wikt-lang|grc|ἄρθρον}} ({{grc-transl|ἄρθρον}}), meaning "joint",<ref>{{Cite book |title=Abrégé du dictionnaire grec français |last=Bailly |first=Anatole |date=1981-01-01 |publisher=Hachette |isbn=978-2010035289 |location=Paris |oclc=461974285 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.tabularium.be/bailly/ |title=Greek-french dictionary online |last=Bailly |first=Anatole |website=www.tabularium.be |access-date=May 2, 2020 }}</ref> and refers to their vertebral joints, which have extra articulations that are unlike other mammals. The [[ischium]] of the pelvis is also fused to the [[sacrum]] of the spine.<ref name="Delsuc2001">{{Cite journal | last1 = Delsuc | first1 = Frédéric | last2 = Catzteflis | first2 = François M. | last3 = Stanhope | first3 = Michael J. | last4 = Douzery | first4 = Emmanuel J. P. | title = The evolution of armadillos, anteaters and sloths depicted by nuclear and mitochondrial phylogenies: implications for the status of the enigmatic fossil ''Eurotamandua'' | journal = Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B | date = August 2001 | volume = 268 | issue = 1476 | pages = 1605–15 | url = http://fdelsuc.perso.neuf.fr/fd_files/Delsuc-ProcRSocB01.pdf | doi = 10.1098/rspb.2001.1702 | pmc = 1088784 | pmid = 11487408 | access-date = 2013-01-04 | archive-date = 2016-03-04 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160304042457/http://fdelsuc.perso.neuf.fr/fd_files/Delsuc-ProcRSocB01.pdf | url-status = dead }}</ref> Xenarthran limb bones are typically robust, with large processes for muscle attachment. Relative to their body size, living xenarthrans are extremely strong.<ref>{{cite book |last=Webb |first=S. David |date=2001 |editor-last=Hulbert |editor-first=Richard C. |title=The Fossil Vertebrates of Florida |publisher=University Press of Florida |pages=176 |chapter=Chapter 10: Mammalia 2: Xenarthrans |isbn=0-8130-1822-6}}</ref> Their limb bone structures are unusual. They have single-color vision. The teeth of xenarthrans are unique. Xenarthrans are also often considered to be among the most primitive of placental mammals. Females show no clear distinction between the uterus and vagina, and males have [[testicle]]s inside the body, which are located between the bladder and the rectum.<ref>{{cite journal |pmid=20413907 |year=2010 |last1=Kleisner |first1=K |last2=Ivell |first2=R |last3=Flegr |first3=J |title=The evolutionary history of testicular externalization and the origin of the scrotum |volume=35 |issue=1 |pages=27–37 |journal=Journal of Biosciences |doi=10.1007/s12038-010-0005-7|s2cid=11962872 }}</ref> Xenarthrans have the lowest [[Basal metabolic rate|metabolic rates]] among [[theria]]ns.<ref name="Basal Metabolic Rates in Mammals: A">{{cite journal |first1=M. A. |last1=Elgar |first2=P. H. |last2=Harvey |year=1987 |title=Basal Metabolic Rates in Mammals: Allometry, Phylogeny and Ecology |journal=Functional Ecology |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=25–36 |jstor=2389354 |doi=10.2307/2389354|bibcode=1987FuEco...1...25E }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |first1=Barry G. |last1=Lovegrove |year=2000 |title=The Zoogeography of Mammalian Basal Metabolic Rate |journal=The American Naturalist |volume=156 |issue=2 |pages=201–19 |doi=10.1086/303383 |pmid=10856202 |jstor=3079219|s2cid=4436119 }}</ref>
Xenarthrans share several characteristics that are not present in other placental mammals. The name Xenarthra derives from the two [[ancient Greek]] words {{wikt-lang|grc|ξένος}} ({{grc-transl|ξένος}}), meaning "strange, unusual", and {{wikt-lang|grc|ἄρθρον}} ({{grc-transl|ἄρθρον}}), meaning "joint",<ref>{{Cite book |title=Abrégé du dictionnaire grec français |last=Bailly |first=Anatole |date=1981-01-01 |publisher=Hachette |isbn=978-2-01-003528-9 |location=Paris |oclc=461974285 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.tabularium.be/bailly/ |title=Greek-french dictionary online |last=Bailly |first=Anatole |website=www.tabularium.be |access-date=May 2, 2020 |archive-date=March 18, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220318000653/http://www.tabularium.be/bailly/ }}</ref> and refers to their vertebral joints, which have extra articulations that are unlike other mammals. The [[ischium]] of the pelvis is also fused to the [[sacrum]] of the spine.<ref name="Delsuc2001">{{Cite journal | last1 = Delsuc | first1 = Frédéric | last2 = Catzteflis | first2 = François M. | last3 = Stanhope | first3 = Michael J. | last4 = Douzery | first4 = Emmanuel J. P. | title = The evolution of armadillos, anteaters and sloths depicted by nuclear and mitochondrial phylogenies: implications for the status of the enigmatic fossil ''Eurotamandua'' | journal = Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B | date = August 2001 | volume = 268 | issue = 1476 | pages = 1605–15 | url = http://fdelsuc.perso.neuf.fr/fd_files/Delsuc-ProcRSocB01.pdf | doi = 10.1098/rspb.2001.1702 | pmc = 1088784 | pmid = 11487408 | access-date = 2013-01-04 | archive-date = 2016-03-04 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160304042457/http://fdelsuc.perso.neuf.fr/fd_files/Delsuc-ProcRSocB01.pdf }}</ref> Xenarthran limb bones are typically robust, with large processes for muscle attachment. Relative to their body size, living xenarthrans are extremely strong.<ref>{{cite book |last=Webb |first=S. David |date=2001 |editor-last=Hulbert |editor-first=Richard C. |title=The Fossil Vertebrates of Florida |publisher=University Press of Florida |page=176 |chapter=Chapter 10: Mammalia 2: Xenarthrans |isbn=0-8130-1822-6}}</ref> Their limb bone structures are unusual. They have single-color vision. The teeth of xenarthrans are unique. Xenarthrans are also often considered to be among the most primitive of placental mammals. Females show no clear distinction between the uterus and vagina, and males have [[testicle]]s inside the body, which are located between the bladder and the rectum.<ref>{{cite journal |pmid=20413907 |year=2010 |last1=Kleisner |first1=K |last2=Ivell |first2=R |last3=Flegr |first3=J |title=The evolutionary history of testicular externalization and the origin of the scrotum |volume=35 |issue=1 |pages=27–37 |journal=Journal of Biosciences |doi=10.1007/s12038-010-0005-7|s2cid=11962872 }}</ref> Xenarthrans have the lowest [[Basal metabolic rate|metabolic rates]] among [[theria]]ns.<ref name="Basal Metabolic Rates in Mammals: A">{{cite journal |first1=M. A. |last1=Elgar |first2=P. H. |last2=Harvey |year=1987 |title=Basal Metabolic Rates in Mammals: Allometry, Phylogeny and Ecology |journal=Functional Ecology |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=25–36 |jstor=2389354 |doi=10.2307/2389354|bibcode=1987FuEco...1...25E }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |first1=Barry G. |last1=Lovegrove |year=2000 |title=The Zoogeography of Mammalian Basal Metabolic Rate |journal=The American Naturalist |volume=156 |issue=2 |pages=201–19 |doi=10.1086/303383 |pmid=10856202 |jstor=3079219|s2cid=4436119 }}</ref>


Xenarthran forms and lifestyles include:
=== Dentition ===
* Armadillos: Mostly small and some larger omnivores and insectivores with flexible banded body armor
The teeth of xenarthrans differ from all other mammals. The dentition of most species is either significantly reduced and highly modified, or absent.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Vizcaíno |first=Sergio F. |date=2009 |title=The teeth of the "toothless": novelties and key innovations in the evolution of xenarthrans (Mammalia, Xenarthra) |journal=Paleobiology |volume=35 |issue=3 |pages=343–366 |bibcode=2009Pbio...35..343V |doi=10.1666/0094-8373-35.3.343 |issn=0094-8373 |s2cid=86798959}}</ref> With the single exception of ''Dasypus'' armadillos and their ancestral genus ''Propraopus'', xenarthrans do not have a [[Baby teeth|milk dentition]]. They have a single set of teeth through their lives; these teeth have no functional [[Tooth enamel|enamel]], and usually there are few or no teeth in the front of the mouth and the rear teeth all look alike. As a result, it is impossible to define Xenarthra as having incisors, canines, premolars, or molars. Since most mammals are classified by their teeth, it has been difficult to determine their relationships to other mammals. Xenarthrans may have evolved from ancestors that had already lost basic mammalian dental features like tooth enamel and a crown with cusps; reduced, highly simplified teeth are usually found in mammals that feed by licking up social insects. Several groups of xenarthrans did evolve [[cheek teeth]] to chew plants, but since they lacked enamel, patterns of harder and softer [[dentin]]e created grinding surfaces. Dentine is less resistant to wear than the enamel-cusped teeth of other mammals, and xenarthrans developed open-rooted teeth that grow continuously.<ref name=":1">{{Cite book |last=Farina |first=Richard A |title=Megafauna; Giant Beasts of Pleistocene South America |author2=Sergio F. Vizcaino |author3=Gerry de Iuliis |publisher=Indiana University Press |year=2013 |isbn=978-0-253-00230-3 |location=Bloomington}}</ref> Currently, no living or extinct xenarthrans have been found to have the standard mammalian [[dental formula]] or crown morphology derived from the ancient [[Tribosphenic molar|tribosphenic]] pattern.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Gaudin |first1=Timothy J. |last2=Croft |first2=Darin A. |date=2015-06-24 |title=Paleogene Xenarthra and the evolution of South American mammals |journal=Journal of Mammalogy |volume=96 |issue=4 |pages=622–634 |doi=10.1093/jmammal/gyv073 |issn=0022-2372 |doi-access=free}}</ref>
* Glyptodonts: Large herbivores with a rigid semi-spherical carapace
 
* Pampatheres: Large herbivores (and possibly omnivores) with banded body armor
===Spine===
* Anteaters: Small to large specialized feeders on social insects
The name Xenarthra, which means "strange joints", was chosen because the vertebral joints of members of the group have extra articulations of a type unlike any other mammals. This trait is referred to as "xenarthry". (Tree sloths lost these articulations to increase the flexibility of their spines, but their fossil ancestors had xenarthrous joints.) Additional points of articulation between vertebrae [[Thor's hero shrew|strengthen and stiffen the spine]], an adaptation developed in different ways in various groups of mammals that dig for food. Xenarthrans also tend to have different numbers of vertebrae than other mammals; sloths have a reduced number of lumbar vertebrae with either more or fewer [[cervical vertebrae]] than most mammals, while cingulates have neck vertebrae fused into a cervical tube, with glyptodonts fusing [[Thorax|thoracic]] and [[lumbar]] vertebrae as well.<ref name=":0" />
* Tree sloths: Medium-sized [[folivore]]s specialized for life hanging upside-down in trees
 
* Ground sloths: Medium to very large ground-living herbivores (and possibly omnivores)
===Vision===
* Aquatic sloths: ''[[Thalassocnus]]'', a medium-sized herbivore, is the only known aquatic sloth
Xenarthrans have been determined to have single-color vision. [[Polymerase chain reaction|PCR]] analysis determined that a mutation in a stem xenarthran led to long-wavelength sensitive-cone (LWS) [[monochromacy]] (single color vision), common in nocturnal, aquatic and subterranean mammals.<ref name="Emerling2015">{{Cite journal |last1=Emerling |first1=Christopher A. |last2=Springer |first2=Mark S. |date=2015-02-07 |title=Genomic evidence for rod monochromacy in sloths and armadillos suggests early subterranean history for Xenarthra |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |volume=282 |issue=1800 |article-number=20142192 |doi=10.1098/rspb.2014.2192 |issn=0962-8452 |pmc=4298209 |pmid=25540280}}</ref> Further losses led to rod monochromacy in a stem [[Cingulata|cingulate]] and a stem [[pilosa]]n, pointing to a subterranean ancestry; the ancestors of Xenarthra had the reduced eyesight characteristic of vertebrates that live underground.<ref name="Emerling2015" /> Some authorities state that xenarthrans lack a functional [[pineal gland]]; pineal activity is related to the perception of light.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Axelrod |first1=J. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VH7SBwAAQBAJ&q=pineal+regularly+present+Xenarthra&pg=PA62 |title=The Pineal Gland and its Endocrine Role |date=December 2013 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-1-4757-1451-7 |via=Google Books}}{{full citation needed|date=June 2019}}</ref>
 
===Metabolism===
Living xenarthrans have the lowest metabolic rates among [[theria]]ns.<ref name="Basal Metabolic Rates in Mammals: A" /><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Lovegrove |first1=Barry G. |year=2000 |title=The Zoogeography of Mammalian Basal Metabolic Rate |journal=The American Naturalist |volume=156 |issue=2 |pages=201–219 |doi=10.1086/303383 |jstor=3079219 |pmid=10856202 |s2cid=4436119}}</ref> Paleoburrows have been discovered which are up to {{Convert|1.5|m|ft|0|abbr=on}} wide and {{Convert|40|m|abbr=on}} long, with claw marks from excavation referred to the ground sloths ''Glossotherium'' or ''Scelidotherium''. Remains of ground sloths (''Mylodon'' and others) in caves are particularly common in colder parts of their range, suggesting ground sloths may have used burrows and caves to help regulate their body temperature. Analysis of the fossil South American [[Luján River|Lujan]] fauna suggests far more large herbivorous mammals were present than similar contemporary environments can support. As most large Lujan herbivores were xenarthrans, low metabolic rate may be a feature of the entire clade, allowing relatively low-resource scrublands to support large numbers of huge animals. Faunal analysis also shows far fewer large predators in pre-[[Great American Interchange|GABI]] South American faunas than would be expected based on current faunas in similar environments. This suggests other factors than predation controlled the numbers of xenarthrans. South America had no placental predatory mammals until the Pleistocene, and xenarthran large-mammal faunas may have been vulnerable to many factors including a rise in numbers of mammalian predators, resource use by spreading North American herbivores with faster metabolisms and higher food requirements, and climate change.<ref name=":1" />


==Evolutionary relationships==
==Relationships to other mammals==
<!-- Warning: other pages link to this section -->
<!-- Warning: other pages link to this section -->
[[File:Pink Fairy Armadillo (Chlamyphorus truncatus) (cropped).jpg|thumb|right|[[Pink fairy armadillo]] (''Chlamyphorus truncatus'')]]
[[File:Pink Fairy Armadillo (Chlamyphorus truncatus) (cropped).jpg|thumb|right|[[Pink fairy armadillo]] (''Chlamyphorus truncatus'')]]
Line 39: Line 42:
Whatever the rank, Xenarthra is now generally considered to be divided into two orders:
Whatever the rank, Xenarthra is now generally considered to be divided into two orders:


* [[Cingulata]] (Latin, "the ones with belts/armor"), the armadillos and the extinct glyptodonts and pampatheres  
* [[Cingulata]] (Latin, "the ones with belts/armor"), the armadillos and the extinct glyptodonts and pampatheres
* [[Pilosa]] (Latin, "the ones with fur"), which is subdivided into:  
* [[Pilosa]] (Latin, "the ones with fur"), which is subdivided into:  
** [[Vermilingua]] ("worm-tongues"), the anteaters
** [[Vermilingua]] ("worm-tongues"), the anteaters
** [[Folivora]] ("leaf-eaters"), the sloths (both tree sloths and the extinct ground sloths). Folivora is also called Tardigrada or Phyllophaga.<ref name="McKenna1997">{{cite book | last1 = McKenna | first1 = M.C. | last2 = Bell | first2 = S.K. | title = Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level | publisher = Columbia University Press | location = New York | isbn = 978-0-231-11013-6 | oclc = 37345734| year = 1997 | pages = 93}}</ref>
** [[Folivora]] ("leaf-eaters"), the sloths (both tree sloths and the extinct ground sloths). Folivora is also called Tardigrada or Phyllophaga.<ref name="McKenna1997">{{cite book | last1 = McKenna | first1 = M.C. | last2 = Bell | first2 = S.K. | title = Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level | publisher = Columbia University Press | location = New York | isbn = 978-0-231-11013-6 | oclc = 37345734| year = 1997 | page = 93}}</ref>


Their relationship to other placental mammals is obscure. Xenarthrans have been defined as most closely related to [[Afrotheria]]<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1101/gr.5918807 |title=Using genomic data to unravel the root of the placental mammal phylogeny |year=2007 |last1=Murphy |first1=W. J. |last2=Pringle |first2=T. H. |last3=Crider |first3=T. A. |last4=Springer |first4=M. S. |last5=Miller |first5=W. |journal=Genome Research |volume=17 |issue=4 |pages=413–21 |pmid=17322288 |pmc=1832088}}</ref> (in the group [[Atlantogenata]]), or to [[Boreoeutheria]] (in the group [[Exafroplacentalia]]), or to [[Epitheria]]<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0040091 |title=Retroposed Elements as Archives for the Evolutionary History of Placental Mammals |year=2006 |last1=Kriegs |first1=Jan Ole |last2=Churakov |first2=Gennady |last3=Kiefmann |first3=Martin |last4=Jordan |first4=Ursula |last5=Brosius |first5=Jürgen |last6=Schmitz |first6=Jürgen |journal=PLOS Biology |volume=4 |issue=4 |pages=e91 |pmid=16515367 |pmc=1395351 |doi-access=free }}</ref> (Afrotheria+Boreoeutheria, i.e. as a sister group to all other placental mammals). A comprehensive phylogeny by Goloboff et al.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00255.x |title=Phylogenetic analysis of 73 060 taxa corroborates major eukaryotic groups |year=2009 |last1=Goloboff |first1=Pablo A. |last2=Catalano |first2=Santiago A. |last3=Marcos Mirande |first3=J. |last4=Szumik |first4=Claudia A. |last5=Salvador Arias |first5=J. |last6=Källersjö |first6=Mari |last7=Farris |first7=James S. |journal=Cladistics |volume=25 |issue=3 |pages=211–30|pmid=34879616 |s2cid=84401375 |doi-access=free |hdl=11336/78055 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> includes xenarthrans as a sister clade of [[Euarchontoglires]] within [[Boreoeutheria]] ([[Laurasiatheria]]+[[Euarchontoglires]]). Overall, studies using mitochondrial DNA have tended to group them as a sister clade to [[Ferungulata]] (carnivorans+ungulates+pholidotans), while studies using nuclear DNA have identified them as 1) a sister clade to Afrotheria, 2) a sister clade to all placentals ''except'' Afrotheria, or 3) a trichotomy (three-way split): Afrotheria, Xenarthra, and everything else (i.e. Boreoeutheria). Among studies that use physical characteristics rather than DNA to look at relationships, a large [[Phenomics|phenomic]] analysis of living and fossil mammals suggests placental mammals evolved shortly after the end of the Cretaceous, and first split into Xenarthra and Epitheria (all other placentals).<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=O'Leary|first1=Maureen A.|last2=Bloch|first2=Jonathan I.|last3=Flynn|first3=John J.|last4=Gaudin|first4=Timothy J.|last5=Giallombardo|first5=Andres|last6=Giannini|first6=Norberto P.|last7=Goldberg|first7=Suzann L.|last8=Kraatz|first8=Brian P.|last9=Luo|first9=Zhe-Xi|last10=Meng|first10=Jin|last11=Ni|first11=Xijun|date=2013-02-08|title=The placental mammal ancestor and the post-K-Pg radiation of placentals|journal=Science|volume=339|issue=6120|pages=662–667|doi=10.1126/science.1229237|issn=1095-9203|pmid=23393258|bibcode=2013Sci...339..662O|s2cid=206544776|hdl=11336/7302|hdl-access=free}}</ref>
Their relationship to other placental mammals is obscure. Xenarthrans have been defined as most closely related to [[Afrotheria]]<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1101/gr.5918807 |title=Using genomic data to unravel the root of the placental mammal phylogeny |year=2007 |last1=Murphy |first1=W. J. |last2=Pringle |first2=T. H. |last3=Crider |first3=T. A. |last4=Springer |first4=M. S. |last5=Miller |first5=W. |journal=Genome Research |volume=17 |issue=4 |pages=413–21 |pmid=17322288 |pmc=1832088}}</ref> (in the group [[Atlantogenata]]), or to [[Boreoeutheria]] (in the group [[Exafroplacentalia]]), or to [[Epitheria]]<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0040091 |title=Retroposed Elements as Archives for the Evolutionary History of Placental Mammals |year=2006 |last1=Kriegs |first1=Jan Ole |last2=Churakov |first2=Gennady |last3=Kiefmann |first3=Martin |last4=Jordan |first4=Ursula |last5=Brosius |first5=Jürgen |last6=Schmitz |first6=Jürgen |journal=PLOS Biology |volume=4 |issue=4 |article-number=e91 |pmid=16515367 |pmc=1395351 |doi-access=free }}</ref> (Afrotheria+Boreoeutheria, i.e. as a sister group to all other placental mammals). A comprehensive phylogeny by Goloboff et al.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00255.x |title=Phylogenetic analysis of 73 060 taxa corroborates major eukaryotic groups |year=2009 |last1=Goloboff |first1=Pablo A. |last2=Catalano |first2=Santiago A. |last3=Marcos Mirande |first3=J. |last4=Szumik |first4=Claudia A. |last5=Salvador Arias |first5=J. |last6=Källersjö |first6=Mari |last7=Farris |first7=James S. |journal=Cladistics |volume=25 |issue=3 |pages=211–30|pmid=34879616 |s2cid=84401375 |doi-access=free |hdl=11336/78055 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> includes xenarthrans as a sister clade of [[Euarchontoglires]] within [[Boreoeutheria]] ([[Laurasiatheria]]+[[Euarchontoglires]]). Overall, studies using mitochondrial DNA have tended to group them as a sister clade to [[Ferungulata]] (carnivorans+ungulates+pholidotans), while studies using nuclear DNA have identified them as 1) a sister clade to Afrotheria, 2) a sister clade to all placentals ''except'' Afrotheria, or 3) a trichotomy (three-way split): Afrotheria, Xenarthra, and everything else (i.e. Boreoeutheria). Among studies that use physical characteristics rather than DNA to look at relationships, a large [[Phenomics|phenomic]] analysis of living and fossil mammals suggests placental mammals evolved shortly after the end of the Cretaceous, and first split into Xenarthra and Epitheria (all other placentals).<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=O'Leary|first1=Maureen A.|last2=Bloch|first2=Jonathan I.|last3=Flynn|first3=John J.|last4=Gaudin|first4=Timothy J.|last5=Giallombardo|first5=Andres|last6=Giannini|first6=Norberto P.|last7=Goldberg|first7=Suzann L.|last8=Kraatz|first8=Brian P.|last9=Luo|first9=Zhe-Xi|last10=Meng|first10=Jin|last11=Ni|first11=Xijun|date=2013-02-08|title=The placental mammal ancestor and the post-K-Pg radiation of placentals|journal=Science|volume=339|issue=6120|pages=662–667|doi=10.1126/science.1229237|issn=1095-9203|pmid=23393258|bibcode=2013Sci...339..662O|s2cid=206544776|hdl=11336/7302|hdl-access=free}}</ref>


===Phylogeny===
===Phylogeny===
[[File:OrthoMaM v10b 2019 116genera circular tree.svg|thumb|upright=1.35|Phylogenetic position of xenarthrans (in orange) among placentals in a genus-level molecular phylogeny of 116 extant mammals inferred from the gene tree information of 14,509 [[Coding region|coding DNA sequences]].<ref name=Scornavacca2019>{{cite journal | vauthors = Scornavacca C, Belkhir K, Lopez J, Dernat R, Delsuc F, Douzery EJ, Ranwez V | title = OrthoMaM v10: Scaling-up orthologous coding sequence and exon alignments with more than one hundred mammalian genomes | journal = Molecular Biology and Evolution | volume = 36 | issue = 4 | pages = 861–862 | date = April 2019 | pmid = 30698751 | pmc = 6445298 | doi = 10.1093/molbev/msz015 }}</ref> The other major clades are colored: marsupials (magenta), afrotherians (red), laurasiatherians (green), and Euarchontoglires (blue).]]
[[File:OrthoMaM v10b 2019 116genera circular tree.svg|thumb|upright=1.35|Phylogenetic position of xenarthrans (in orange) among placentals in a genus-level molecular phylogeny of 116 extant mammals inferred from the gene tree information of 14,509 [[Coding region|coding DNA sequences]].<ref name="Scornavacca2019">{{cite journal | vauthors = Scornavacca C, Belkhir K, Lopez J, Dernat R, Delsuc F, Douzery EJ, Ranwez V | title = OrthoMaM v10: Scaling-up orthologous coding sequence and exon alignments with more than one hundred mammalian genomes | journal = Molecular Biology and Evolution | volume = 36 | issue = 4 | pages = 861–862 | date = April 2019 | pmid = 30698751 | pmc = 6445298 | doi = 10.1093/molbev/msz015 }}</ref> The other major clades are colored: marsupials (magenta), afrotherians (red), laurasiatherians (green), and Euarchontoglires (blue).]]
Below is a recent simplified phylogeny of the xenarthran families based on Slater et al. (2016)<ref>Slater, G., Cui, P., Forasiepi, A. M., Lenz, D., Tsangaras, K., Voirin, B., ... & Greenwood, A. D. (2016). Evolutionary relationships among extinct and extant sloths: the evidence of mitogenomes and retroviruses. Genome Biology and Evolution, evw023.</ref> and Delsuc et al. (2016).<ref>Delsuc, F., Gibb, G. C., Kuch, M., Billet, G., Hautier, L., Southon, J., ... & Poinar, H. N. (2016). The phylogenetic affinities of the extinct glyptodonts. Current Biology, 26(4), R155-R156.</ref> The dagger symbol, "†", denotes extinct groups.
Below is a recent simplified phylogeny of the xenarthran families based on Slater et al. (2016)<ref>Slater, G., Cui, P., Forasiepi, A. M., Lenz, D., Tsangaras, K., Voirin, B., ... & Greenwood, A. D. (2016). Evolutionary relationships among extinct and extant sloths: the evidence of mitogenomes and retroviruses. Genome Biology and Evolution, evw023.</ref> and Delsuc et al. (2016).<ref>Delsuc, F., Gibb, G. C., Kuch, M., Billet, G., Hautier, L., Southon, J., ... & Poinar, H. N. (2016). The phylogenetic affinities of the extinct glyptodonts. Current Biology, 26(4), R155-R156.</ref> The dagger symbol, "†", denotes extinct groups.
{{clade
{{clade
Line 83: Line 86:
             |1=[[Bradypodidae]] (three-toed sloths)
             |1=[[Bradypodidae]] (three-toed sloths)
             |2=†[[Nothrotheriidae]]
             |2=†[[Nothrotheriidae]]
             |3=†''[[Megatheriidae]]''
             |3=†[[Megatheriidae]]
             }}
             }}
         }}
         }}
Line 89: Line 92:
   }}
   }}
}}
}}
== Evolution ==
It has been suggested that the last common ancestor of xenarthrans was [[myrmecophagous]] (feeding on ants and termites), with digging and possibly climbing capabilities. The oldest fossils of xenarthrans are isolated remains known from the [[Itaboraí Formation]] of Brazil, dating to the early [[Eocene]] or possibly latest [[Paleocene]], which already includes remains recognisable as armadillos. Most Eocene remains of xenarthrans are attributed to armadillos. The oldest known sloth, ''[[Pseudoglyptodon]]'' is known from the late Eocene, with remains known from across South America. The oldest fossils of anteaters date to the [[Miocene]] epoch.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Gaudin |first=Timothy J. |last2=Croft |first2=Darin A. |date=2015-08-03 |title=Paleogene Xenarthra and the evolution of South American mammals |url=https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/jmammal/gyv073 |journal=Journal of Mammalogy |language=en |volume=96 |issue=4 |pages=622–634 |doi=10.1093/jmammal/gyv073 |issn=0022-2372|url-access=subscription }}</ref>


==Classification==
==Classification==
The name Pan-Xenarthra is used for the [[total group]], with the alternative Americatheria having been abandoned.<ref>[https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bruce-Shockey/publication/344072492_Phylonyms_A_Companion_to_the_PhyloCode_Edited_by/links/5f50ed6d92851c250b8cc0a3/Phylonyms-A-Companion-to-the-PhyloCode-Edited-by.pdf Kevin de Queiroz,1 Philip D. Cantino,2 and Jacques A. Gauthier, Phylonyms A Companion to the PhyloCode 891-896]</ref> However no unambiguous [[stem group]] taxa have been identified.
[[File:Giant armadillo.jpg|thumb|right|[[Giant armadillo]]]]
[[File:Glyptodon-1.jpg|thumb|Skeleton of ''[[Glyptodon]],'' an extinct [[glyptodont]] related to living armadillos]]
[[File:Florida-015.jpg|thumb|right|[[Nine-banded armadillo]]]]
[[File:Bicho-preguiça 3.jpg|thumb|right|[[Brown-throated sloth]]]]
[[File:2 toed sloth.jpg|thumb|right|[[Hoffmann's two-toed sloth]]]]
[[File:2 toed sloth.jpg|thumb|right|[[Hoffmann's two-toed sloth]]]]
[[File:Bicho-preguiça 3.jpg|thumb|right|[[Brown-throated sloth]]]]
[[File:Florida-015.jpg|thumb|right|[[Nine-banded armadillo]]]]
[[File:Myresluger2.jpg|thumb|right|[[Giant anteater]]]]
[[File:Myresluger2.jpg|thumb|right|[[Giant anteater]]]]
[[File:Giant armadillo.jpg|thumb|right|[[Giant armadillo]]]]
'''XENARTHRA'''
'''XENARTHRA'''
* Order [[Cingulata]]
* Order [[Cingulata]]
Line 145: Line 153:
**** [[Southern tamandua]], ''Tamandua tetradactyla''
**** [[Southern tamandua]], ''Tamandua tetradactyla''


==Characteristics==
==References==
[[File:Glyptodon-1.jpg|thumb|Skeleton of ''[[Glyptodon]],'' an extinct [[glyptodont]] related to living armadillos]]
{{Reflist}}
Xenarthrans share several characteristics not present in other mammals. Authorities have tended to agree they are a primitive group of placental mammals not very closely related to other orders, without agreeing on how to classify them. [[George Gaylord Simpson]] first suggested in 1931 that their combination of unique characteristics shows the group evolved from highly specialized early ancestors that lived underground or were nocturnal and dug with their forelimbs to feed on social insects like ants or termites. Most researchers since then have agreed.<ref>{{Cite journal|url=https://jeb.biologists.org/content/jexbio/219/19/2991.full.pdf|title=Vertebral bending mechanics and xenarthrous morphology in the nine-banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus)|last=Oliver|first=Jillian D. |author2=Katrina E. Jones |author3=Lionel Hautier |author4=W. J. Loughry |author5=Stephanie E. Pierce|date=2016|journal=Journal of Experimental Biology|volume=219|issue=Pt 19|pages=2991–3002|doi=10.1242/jeb.142331|pmid=27473436|s2cid=12547340|doi-access=free}}</ref> These extreme characteristics led to their confusion with unrelated groups that had similar specializations ([[aardvark]]s and [[pangolin]]s), and obscures their relationships with other mammals.
 
=== Dentition ===
The teeth of xenarthrans differ from all other mammals. The dentition of most species is either significantly reduced and highly modified, or absent.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Vizcaíno|first=Sergio F.|date=2009|title=The teeth of the "toothless": novelties and key innovations in the evolution of xenarthrans (Mammalia, Xenarthra)|journal=Paleobiology|volume=35|issue=3|pages=343–366|doi=10.1666/0094-8373-35.3.343|bibcode=2009Pbio...35..343V |s2cid=86798959|issn=0094-8373}}</ref> With the single exception of ''Dasypus'' armadillos and their ancestral genus ''Propraopus'', xenarthrans do not have a [[Baby teeth|milk dentition]]. They have a single set of teeth through their lives; these teeth have no functional [[Tooth enamel|enamel]], and usually there are few or no teeth in the front of the mouth and the rear teeth all look alike. As a result, it is impossible to define Xenarthra as having incisors, canines, premolars, or molars. Since most mammals are classified by their teeth, it has been difficult to determine their relationships to other mammals. Xenarthrans may have evolved from ancestors that had already lost basic mammalian dental features like tooth enamel and a crown with cusps; reduced, highly simplified teeth are usually found in mammals that feed by licking up social insects. Several groups of xenarthrans did evolve [[cheek teeth]] to chew plants, but since they lacked enamel, patterns of harder and softer [[dentin]]e created grinding surfaces. Dentine is less resistant to wear than the enamel-cusped teeth of other mammals, and xenarthrans developed open-rooted teeth that grow continuously.<ref name=":1">{{Cite book|last=Farina|first=Richard A |author2=Sergio F. Vizcaino |author3=Gerry de Iuliis|title=Megafauna; Giant Beasts of Pleistocene South America|publisher=Indiana University Press|year=2013|isbn=9780253002303|location=Bloomington}}</ref> Currently, no living or extinct xenarthrans have been found to have the standard mammalian [[dental formula]] or crown morphology derived from the ancient [[Tribosphenic molar|tribosphenic]] pattern.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Gaudin|first1=Timothy J.|last2=Croft|first2=Darin A.|date=2015-06-24|title=Paleogene Xenarthra and the evolution of South American mammals|journal=Journal of Mammalogy|volume=96|issue=4|pages=622–634|doi=10.1093/jmammal/gyv073|issn=0022-2372|doi-access=free}}</ref>
 
===Spine===
The name Xenarthra, which means "strange joints", was chosen because the vertebral joints of members of the group have extra articulations of a type unlike any other mammals. This trait is referred to as "xenarthry". (Tree sloths lost these articulations to increase the flexibility of their spines, but their fossil ancestors had xenarthrous joints.) Additional points of articulation between vertebrae [[Thor's hero shrew|strengthen and stiffen the spine]], an adaptation developed in different ways in various groups of mammals that dig for food. Xenarthrans also tend to have different numbers of vertebrae than other mammals; sloths have a reduced number of lumbar vertebrae with either more or fewer [[cervical vertebrae]] than most mammals, while cingulates have neck vertebrae fused into a cervical tube, with glyptodonts fusing [[Thorax|thoracic]] and [[lumbar]] vertebrae as well.<ref name=":0" />
 
===Vision===
Xenarthrans have been determined to have single-color vision. [[Polymerase chain reaction|PCR]] analysis determined that a mutation in a stem xenarthran led to long-wavelength sensitive-cone (LWS) [[monochromacy]] (single color vision), common in nocturnal, aquatic and subterranean mammals.<ref name="Emerling2015">{{Cite journal |last1=Emerling |first1=Christopher A. |last2=Springer |first2=Mark S. |date=2015-02-07 |title=Genomic evidence for rod monochromacy in sloths and armadillos suggests early subterranean history for Xenarthra |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |volume=282 |issue=1800 |pages=20142192 |doi=10.1098/rspb.2014.2192 |issn=0962-8452 |pmc=4298209 |pmid=25540280}}</ref> Further losses led to rod monochromacy in a stem [[Cingulata|cingulate]] and a stem [[pilosa]]n, pointing to a subterranean ancestry; the ancestors of Xenarthra had the reduced eyesight characteristic of vertebrates that live underground.<ref name="Emerling2015" /> Some authorities state that xenarthrans lack a functional [[pineal gland]]; pineal activity is related to the perception of light.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Axelrod|first1=J.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VH7SBwAAQBAJ&q=pineal+regularly+present+Xenarthra&pg=PA62|title=The Pineal Gland and its Endocrine Role|date=December 2013|publisher=Springer |isbn=9781475714517|via=Google Books}}{{full citation needed|date=June 2019}}</ref>
 
===Metabolism===
Living xenarthrans have the lowest metabolic rates among [[theria]]ns.<ref name="Basal Metabolic Rates in Mammals: A"/><ref>{{cite journal |first1=Barry G. |last1=Lovegrove |year=2000 |title=The Zoogeography of Mammalian Basal Metabolic Rate |journal=The American Naturalist |volume=156 |issue=2 |pages=201–219 |doi=10.1086/303383 |pmid=10856202 |jstor=3079219|s2cid=4436119 }}</ref> Paleoburrows have been discovered which are up to {{Convert|1.5|m|ft|0|abbr=on}} wide and {{Convert|40|m|abbr=on}} long, with claw marks from excavation referred to the ground sloths ''Glossotherium'' or ''Scelidotherium''. Remains of ground sloths (''Mylodon'' and others) in caves are particularly common in colder parts of their range, suggesting ground sloths may have used burrows and caves to help regulate their body temperature. Analysis of the fossil South American [[Luján River|Lujan]] fauna suggests far more large herbivorous mammals were present than similar contemporary environments can support. As most large Lujan herbivores were xenarthrans, low metabolic rate may be a feature of the entire clade, allowing relatively low-resource scrublands to support large numbers of huge animals. Faunal analysis also shows far fewer large predators in pre-[[Great American Interchange|GABI]] South American faunas than would be expected based on current faunas in similar environments. This suggests other factors than predation controlled the numbers of xenarthrans. South America had no placental predatory mammals until the Pleistocene, and xenarthran large-mammal faunas may have been vulnerable to many factors including a rise in numbers of mammalian predators, resource use by spreading North American herbivores with faster metabolisms and higher food requirements, and climate change.<ref name=":1" />
 
==References==<!-- Syst. Biol. 56(5):753 -->
{{Reflist|30em}}


==External links==
==External links==

Latest revision as of 17:10, 18 November 2025

Template:Short description Template:Automatic taxobox

Xenarthra (Template:IPAc-en; from Ancient Greek ξένος (xénos), meaning "strange, foreign", and ἄρθρον (árthron), meaning "joint") is a superorder and major clade of placental mammals native to the Americas. There are 31 living species: the anteaters, tree sloths, and armadillos.[1] Extinct xenarthrans include the glyptodonts, pampatheres and ground sloths, with some glyptodonts and ground sloths reaching sizes of several tonnes, much larger than any living xenarthran. Xenarthrans originated in South America during the late Paleocene about 60 million years ago.[2] They evolved and diversified extensively in South America during the continent's long period of isolation in the early to mid Cenozoic Era. They spread to the Antilles by the early Miocene and, starting about 3 million years ago, spread to Central and North America as part of the Great American Interchange.[3] Nearly all of the formerly abundant megafaunal xenarthrans became extinct at the end of the Pleistocene as part of the end-Pleistocene extinction event.

Characteristics

Xenarthrans share several characteristics that are not present in other placental mammals. The name Xenarthra derives from the two ancient Greek words Template:Wikt-lang (Template:Grc-transl), meaning "strange, unusual", and Template:Wikt-lang (Template:Grc-transl), meaning "joint",[4][5] and refers to their vertebral joints, which have extra articulations that are unlike other mammals. The ischium of the pelvis is also fused to the sacrum of the spine.[6] Xenarthran limb bones are typically robust, with large processes for muscle attachment. Relative to their body size, living xenarthrans are extremely strong.[7] Their limb bone structures are unusual. They have single-color vision. The teeth of xenarthrans are unique. Xenarthrans are also often considered to be among the most primitive of placental mammals. Females show no clear distinction between the uterus and vagina, and males have testicles inside the body, which are located between the bladder and the rectum.[8] Xenarthrans have the lowest metabolic rates among therians.[9][10]

Dentition

The teeth of xenarthrans differ from all other mammals. The dentition of most species is either significantly reduced and highly modified, or absent.[11] With the single exception of Dasypus armadillos and their ancestral genus Propraopus, xenarthrans do not have a milk dentition. They have a single set of teeth through their lives; these teeth have no functional enamel, and usually there are few or no teeth in the front of the mouth and the rear teeth all look alike. As a result, it is impossible to define Xenarthra as having incisors, canines, premolars, or molars. Since most mammals are classified by their teeth, it has been difficult to determine their relationships to other mammals. Xenarthrans may have evolved from ancestors that had already lost basic mammalian dental features like tooth enamel and a crown with cusps; reduced, highly simplified teeth are usually found in mammals that feed by licking up social insects. Several groups of xenarthrans did evolve cheek teeth to chew plants, but since they lacked enamel, patterns of harder and softer dentine created grinding surfaces. Dentine is less resistant to wear than the enamel-cusped teeth of other mammals, and xenarthrans developed open-rooted teeth that grow continuously.[12] Currently, no living or extinct xenarthrans have been found to have the standard mammalian dental formula or crown morphology derived from the ancient tribosphenic pattern.[13]

Spine

The name Xenarthra, which means "strange joints", was chosen because the vertebral joints of members of the group have extra articulations of a type unlike any other mammals. This trait is referred to as "xenarthry". (Tree sloths lost these articulations to increase the flexibility of their spines, but their fossil ancestors had xenarthrous joints.) Additional points of articulation between vertebrae strengthen and stiffen the spine, an adaptation developed in different ways in various groups of mammals that dig for food. Xenarthrans also tend to have different numbers of vertebrae than other mammals; sloths have a reduced number of lumbar vertebrae with either more or fewer cervical vertebrae than most mammals, while cingulates have neck vertebrae fused into a cervical tube, with glyptodonts fusing thoracic and lumbar vertebrae as well.[1]

Vision

Xenarthrans have been determined to have single-color vision. PCR analysis determined that a mutation in a stem xenarthran led to long-wavelength sensitive-cone (LWS) monochromacy (single color vision), common in nocturnal, aquatic and subterranean mammals.[14] Further losses led to rod monochromacy in a stem cingulate and a stem pilosan, pointing to a subterranean ancestry; the ancestors of Xenarthra had the reduced eyesight characteristic of vertebrates that live underground.[14] Some authorities state that xenarthrans lack a functional pineal gland; pineal activity is related to the perception of light.[15]

Metabolism

Living xenarthrans have the lowest metabolic rates among therians.[9][16] Paleoburrows have been discovered which are up to Template:Convert wide and Template:Convert long, with claw marks from excavation referred to the ground sloths Glossotherium or Scelidotherium. Remains of ground sloths (Mylodon and others) in caves are particularly common in colder parts of their range, suggesting ground sloths may have used burrows and caves to help regulate their body temperature. Analysis of the fossil South American Lujan fauna suggests far more large herbivorous mammals were present than similar contemporary environments can support. As most large Lujan herbivores were xenarthrans, low metabolic rate may be a feature of the entire clade, allowing relatively low-resource scrublands to support large numbers of huge animals. Faunal analysis also shows far fewer large predators in pre-GABI South American faunas than would be expected based on current faunas in similar environments. This suggests other factors than predation controlled the numbers of xenarthrans. South America had no placental predatory mammals until the Pleistocene, and xenarthran large-mammal faunas may have been vulnerable to many factors including a rise in numbers of mammalian predators, resource use by spreading North American herbivores with faster metabolisms and higher food requirements, and climate change.[12]

Relationships to other mammals

File:Pink Fairy Armadillo (Chlamyphorus truncatus) (cropped).jpg
Pink fairy armadillo (Chlamyphorus truncatus)

Xenarthrans were previously classified alongside the pangolins and aardvarks in the order Edentata (meaning toothless, because the members do not have incisors and lack, or have poorly developed, molars). Subsequently, Edentata was found to be a polyphyletic grouping whose New World and Old World taxa are unrelated, and it was split up to reflect their true phylogeny. Aardvarks and pangolins are now placed in individual orders, and the new order Xenarthra was erected to group the remaining families (which are all related). The morphology of xenarthrans generally suggests that the anteaters and sloths are more closely related to each other than either is to the armadillos, glyptodonts, and pampatheres; this idea is upheld by molecular studies. Since its conception, Xenarthra has increasingly come to be considered to be of a higher rank than 'order'; some authorities consider it to be a cohort, while others consider it to be a superorder.

Whatever the rank, Xenarthra is now generally considered to be divided into two orders:

  • Cingulata (Latin, "the ones with belts/armor"), the armadillos and the extinct glyptodonts and pampatheres
  • Pilosa (Latin, "the ones with fur"), which is subdivided into:
    • Vermilingua ("worm-tongues"), the anteaters
    • Folivora ("leaf-eaters"), the sloths (both tree sloths and the extinct ground sloths). Folivora is also called Tardigrada or Phyllophaga.[17]

Their relationship to other placental mammals is obscure. Xenarthrans have been defined as most closely related to Afrotheria[18] (in the group Atlantogenata), or to Boreoeutheria (in the group Exafroplacentalia), or to Epitheria[19] (Afrotheria+Boreoeutheria, i.e. as a sister group to all other placental mammals). A comprehensive phylogeny by Goloboff et al.[20] includes xenarthrans as a sister clade of Euarchontoglires within Boreoeutheria (Laurasiatheria+Euarchontoglires). Overall, studies using mitochondrial DNA have tended to group them as a sister clade to Ferungulata (carnivorans+ungulates+pholidotans), while studies using nuclear DNA have identified them as 1) a sister clade to Afrotheria, 2) a sister clade to all placentals except Afrotheria, or 3) a trichotomy (three-way split): Afrotheria, Xenarthra, and everything else (i.e. Boreoeutheria). Among studies that use physical characteristics rather than DNA to look at relationships, a large phenomic analysis of living and fossil mammals suggests placental mammals evolved shortly after the end of the Cretaceous, and first split into Xenarthra and Epitheria (all other placentals).[21]

Phylogeny

File:OrthoMaM v10b 2019 116genera circular tree.svg
Phylogenetic position of xenarthrans (in orange) among placentals in a genus-level molecular phylogeny of 116 extant mammals inferred from the gene tree information of 14,509 coding DNA sequences.[22] The other major clades are colored: marsupials (magenta), afrotherians (red), laurasiatherians (green), and Euarchontoglires (blue).

Below is a recent simplified phylogeny of the xenarthran families based on Slater et al. (2016)[23] and Delsuc et al. (2016).[24] The dagger symbol, "†", denotes extinct groups. Template:Clade

Evolution

It has been suggested that the last common ancestor of xenarthrans was myrmecophagous (feeding on ants and termites), with digging and possibly climbing capabilities. The oldest fossils of xenarthrans are isolated remains known from the Itaboraí Formation of Brazil, dating to the early Eocene or possibly latest Paleocene, which already includes remains recognisable as armadillos. Most Eocene remains of xenarthrans are attributed to armadillos. The oldest known sloth, Pseudoglyptodon is known from the late Eocene, with remains known from across South America. The oldest fossils of anteaters date to the Miocene epoch.[25]

Classification

The name Pan-Xenarthra is used for the total group, with the alternative Americatheria having been abandoned.[26] However no unambiguous stem group taxa have been identified.

File:Giant armadillo.jpg
Giant armadillo
File:Glyptodon-1.jpg
Skeleton of Glyptodon, an extinct glyptodont related to living armadillos
File:Florida-015.jpg
Nine-banded armadillo
File:Bicho-preguiça 3.jpg
Brown-throated sloth
File:2 toed sloth.jpg
Hoffmann's two-toed sloth
File:Myresluger2.jpg
Giant anteater

XENARTHRA

References

Template:Reflist

External links

Template:Sister project Template:Sister project Template:Sister project

  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Template:Eutheria Script error: No such module "navbox". Template:Portal bar

Template:Taxonbar Template:Authority control

  1. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  9. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  12. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  14. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Template:Full citation needed
  16. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  17. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  18. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  19. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  20. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  21. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  22. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  23. Slater, G., Cui, P., Forasiepi, A. M., Lenz, D., Tsangaras, K., Voirin, B., ... & Greenwood, A. D. (2016). Evolutionary relationships among extinct and extant sloths: the evidence of mitogenomes and retroviruses. Genome Biology and Evolution, evw023.
  24. Delsuc, F., Gibb, G. C., Kuch, M., Billet, G., Hautier, L., Southon, J., ... & Poinar, H. N. (2016). The phylogenetic affinities of the extinct glyptodonts. Current Biology, 26(4), R155-R156.
  25. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  26. Kevin de Queiroz,1 Philip D. Cantino,2 and Jacques A. Gauthier, Phylonyms A Companion to the PhyloCode 891-896