Tachyon: Difference between revisions
imported>Driftingdrifting Reverting edit(s) by 68.179.203.4 (talk) to rev. 1295108795 by ReyHahn: test edits (RW 16.1) |
imported>Roxy the dog |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
}} | }} | ||
A '''tachyon''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|t|æ|k|i|ɒ|n}}) or '''tachyonic particle''' is a hypothetical [[particle]] that always travels [[Faster-than-light|faster than light]]. [[Physicist]]s posit that faster-than-light particles cannot exist because they are inconsistent with the known [[Scientific law#Laws of physics|laws of physics]].<ref name="Tipler" /><ref name="Randall 2005 p286">{{cite book |last=Randall |first=Lisa |date=2005 |title=Warped Passages: Unraveling the Mysteries of the Universe's Hidden Dimensions |isbn= | A '''tachyon''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|t|æ|k|i|ɒ|n}}) or '''tachyonic particle''' is a hypothetical [[particle]] that always travels [[Faster-than-light|faster than light]]. [[Physicist]]s posit that faster-than-light particles cannot exist because they are inconsistent with the known [[Scientific law#Laws of physics|laws of physics]].<ref name="Tipler" /><ref name="Randall 2005 p286">{{cite book |last=Randall |first=Lisa |date=2005 |title=Warped Passages: Unraveling the Mysteries of the Universe's Hidden Dimensions |isbn=978-0-06-053108-9 |quote=People initially thought of tachyons as particles traveling faster than the speed of light ... But we now know that a tachyon indicates an instability in a theory that contains it. Regrettably, for science fiction fans, tachyons are not real physical particles that appear in nature. |page=286 |publisher=Harper Collins }}</ref> If such particles did exist they perhaps could be used to send signals faster than light and into the past. According to the [[theory of relativity]] this would violate [[Causality (physics)|causality]], leading to [[logical paradox]]es such as the [[grandfather paradox]].<ref name="Tipler" /> Tachyons would exhibit the unusual property of increasing in speed as their energy decreases, and would require infinite energy to slow to the speed of light. No verifiable experimental evidence for the existence of such particles has been found. | ||
The term "tachyon" derives from a 1967 paper by [[Gerald Feinberg]] about excitations of a quantum field with imaginary mass. Subsequent work has shown the excitations are not faster than light particles but particle physicists still discuss "tachyons", e.g. in [[tachyon condensation]], when they are referring to tachyonic fields. | |||
== Etymology == | == Etymology == | ||
The term ''tachyon'' comes from the {{langx|el|links=no|[[Wiktionary:ταχύς|ταχύς]]}}, ''tachus'', meaning ''swift''.<ref name="FoxKuperLipson">{{Cite journal |last1=Fox |first1=R. |last2=Kuper |first2=C. G. |last3=Lipson |first3=S. G. |date=1970 |title=Faster-Than-Light Group Velocities and Causality Violation | The term ''tachyon'' comes from the {{langx|el|links=no|[[Wiktionary:ταχύς|ταχύς]]}}, ''tachus'', meaning ''swift''.<ref name="FoxKuperLipson">{{Cite journal |last1=Fox |first1=R. |last2=Kuper |first2=C. G. |last3=Lipson |first3=S. G. |date=1970 |title=Faster-Than-Light Group Velocities and Causality Violation |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences |volume=316 |issue=1527 |pages=515–524 |doi=10.1098/rspa.1970.0093 |jstor=77636 |bibcode=1970RSPSA.316..515F |issn=0080-4630}}</ref>{{rp|515|q= The name 'tachyon' was proposed by Feinberg (1967), from the Greek ταχύς ('swift').}} The complementary particle types are called [[Massless particle|luxons]] (which always move at the [[speed of light]]) and [[bradyons]] (which always move slower than light); both of these particle types are known to exist. | ||
== History == | == History == | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
In 1962<ref name="sudarshan62" /> and again in 1969<ref name="sudarshan69" /> Oleksa-Myron Bilanuik, Vijay Deshpande and [[E. C. George Sudarshan]] discussed the possibility of a class of faster-than-light particles consistent with special relativity. As part of their discussion they point out that light particles are never accelerated but rather are created with the full velocity of light. Similarly they argue that while accelerating normal matter beyond the speed of light is inconsistent with special relativity, this does not prevent creation of faster than light particles.<ref name="Feinberg 1967-1969" /> | In 1962<ref name="sudarshan62" /> and again in 1969<ref name="sudarshan69" /> Oleksa-Myron Bilanuik, Vijay Deshpande and [[E. C. George Sudarshan]] discussed the possibility of a class of faster-than-light particles consistent with special relativity. As part of their discussion they point out that light particles are never accelerated but rather are created with the full velocity of light. Similarly they argue that while accelerating normal matter beyond the speed of light is inconsistent with special relativity, this does not prevent creation of faster than light particles.<ref name="Feinberg 1967-1969" /> | ||
The term ''tachyon'' was coined by [[Gerald Feinberg]] in a 1967 paper titled "Possibility of faster-than-light particles".<ref name="Feinberg 1967-1969" /> He had been inspired by the science-fiction story "Beep" by [[James Blish]].<ref name="Benford-legends" /> Feinberg studied the kinematics of such particles according to [[special relativity]]. In his paper, he also introduced [[Tachyonic field|fields with imaginary mass]] (now also referred to as tachyons) in an attempt to understand the microphysical origin such particles might have. | The term ''tachyon'' was coined by [[Gerald Feinberg]] in a 1967 paper titled "Possibility of faster-than-light particles". He proposed that tachyonic particles could be made from excitations of a [[Quantum field theory|quantum field]] with [[imaginary mass]].<ref name="Feinberg 1967-1969" /> He had been inspired by the science-fiction story "Beep" by [[James Blish]].<ref name="Benford-legends" /> Feinberg studied the kinematics of such particles according to [[special relativity]]. In his paper, he also introduced [[Tachyonic field|fields with imaginary mass]] (now also referred to as tachyons) in an attempt to understand the microphysical origin such particles might have. It was soon realized that Feinberg's model did not in fact allow for [[superluminal]] (faster than light) particles or signals and that tachyonic fields merely give rise to instabilities, not causality violations.<ref name="Aharonov-etal-1969" /> The term [[tachyonic field]] refers to imaginary mass fields rather than to faster-than-light particles.<ref name="Randall 2005 p286" /><ref name="Sen" /> | ||
In September 2011, it was reported that a [[tau neutrino]] had traveled faster than the speed of light; however, later updates from CERN on the [[OPERA experiment]] indicate that the [[2011 OPERA faster-than-light neutrino anomaly|faster-than-light readings]] were due to a faulty element of the experiment's fibre optic timing system.<ref name="CERN-2012-06-08" /> | In September 2011, it was reported that a [[tau neutrino]] had traveled faster than the speed of light; however, later updates from CERN on the [[OPERA experiment]] indicate that the [[2011 OPERA faster-than-light neutrino anomaly|faster-than-light readings]] were due to a faulty element of the experiment's fibre optic timing system.<ref name="CERN-2012-06-08" /> | ||
== Special relativity == | == Special relativity == | ||
In [[special relativity]], a faster-than-light particle would have [[spacelike]] [[four-momentum]],<ref name="Feinberg 1967-1969" /> unlike ordinary particles that have [[time-like]] [[four-momentum]]. While some theories suggest the mass of tachyons is [[imaginary number|imaginary]], modern formulations often consider their mass to be real,<ref name=" | In [[special relativity]], a faster-than-light particle would have [[spacelike]] [[four-momentum]],<ref name="Feinberg 1967-1969" /> unlike ordinary particles that have [[time-like]] [[four-momentum]]. While some theories suggest the mass of tachyons is [[imaginary number|imaginary]], modern formulations often consider their mass to be real,<ref name="recami 2007">{{Cite journal |last=Recami |first=E. |date=16 October 2007 |title=Classical tachyons and possible applications |journal=Rivista del Nuovo Cimento |volume=9 |issue=6 |pages=1–178 |bibcode=1986NCimR...9e...1R |doi=10.1007/BF02724327 |issn=1826-9850 |s2cid=120041976}}</ref><ref name="vieira 2011">{{Cite journal |last=Vieira |first=R. S. |date=2011 |title=An introduction to the theory of tachyons |journal=Rev. Bras. Ens. Fis. |volume=34 |issue=3 |arxiv=1112.4187 |bibcode=2011arXiv1112.4187V}}</ref><ref name="hill cox 2012">{{Cite journal |last=Hill |first=James M. |last2=Cox |first2=Barry J. |date=8 December 2012 |title=Einstein's special relativity beyond the speed of light |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society A |volume=468 |issue=2148 |pages=4174–4192 |bibcode=2012RSPSA.468.4174H |doi=10.1098/rspa.2012.0340 |issn=1364-5021 |doi-access=free}}</ref> with redefined formulas for momentum and energy. Additionally, since tachyons are confined to the [[spacelike]] portion of the energy–momentum graph, they cannot slow down to subluminal (slower-than-light) speeds.<ref name="Feinberg 1967-1969" /> | ||
=== Mass === | === Mass === | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
This equation shows that the total energy of a particle (bradyon or tachyon) contains a contribution from its rest mass (the "rest mass–energy") and a contribution from its motion, the kinetic energy. When '''<math> v </math>''' (the particle's velocity) is larger than '''<math> c </math>''' (the speed of light), the [[Fraction|denominator]] in the equation for the energy is [[imaginary number|imaginary]], as the value under the square root is negative. Because the total [[energy]] of the particle must be [[real number|real]] (and not a [[Complex number|complex]] or imaginary number) in order to have any practical meaning as a measurement, the numerator must ''also'' be imaginary (i.e. the rest mass ''m'' must be imaginary, as a pure imaginary number divided by another pure imaginary number is a real number). | This equation shows that the total energy of a particle (bradyon or tachyon) contains a contribution from its rest mass (the "rest mass–energy") and a contribution from its motion, the kinetic energy. When '''<math> v </math>''' (the particle's velocity) is larger than '''<math> c </math>''' (the speed of light), the [[Fraction|denominator]] in the equation for the energy is [[imaginary number|imaginary]], as the value under the square root is negative. Because the total [[energy]] of the particle must be [[real number|real]] (and not a [[Complex number|complex]] or imaginary number) in order to have any practical meaning as a measurement, the numerator must ''also'' be imaginary (i.e. the rest mass ''m'' must be imaginary, as a pure imaginary number divided by another pure imaginary number is a real number). | ||
In some modern formulations of the theory, the mass of tachyons is regarded as real.<ref name=" | In some modern formulations of the theory, the mass of tachyons is regarded as real.<ref name="recami 2007" /><ref name="vieira 2011" /><ref name="hill cox 2012" /> | ||
=== Speed === | === Speed === | ||
| Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
=== Neutrinos === | === Neutrinos === | ||
In 1985, Chodos proposed that [[neutrino]]s can have a tachyonic nature.<ref name="Chodos" /> The possibility of standard model particles moving at faster-than-light speeds can be modeled using [[Lorentz invariance]] violating terms, for example in the [[Standard-Model Extension]].<ref name="Colladay" /><ref> | In 1985, Chodos proposed that [[neutrino]]s can have a tachyonic nature.<ref name="Chodos" /> The possibility of standard model particles moving at faster-than-light speeds can be modeled using [[Lorentz invariance]] violating terms, for example in the [[Standard-Model Extension]].<ref name="Colladay" /><ref> | ||
{{cite journal |last1=Colladay |first1=D. |last2=Kostelecky |first2=V. A. |date=1998 |title=Lorentz-Violating Extension of the Standard Model |journal=[[Physical Review D]] |volume=58 |issue=11 | | {{cite journal |last1=Colladay |first1=D. |last2=Kostelecky |first2=V. A. |date=1998 |title=Lorentz-Violating Extension of the Standard Model |journal=[[Physical Review D]] |volume=58 |issue=11 |article-number=116002 |arxiv=hep-ph/9809521 |bibcode=1998PhRvD..58k6002C |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.58.116002 |s2cid=4013391}} | ||
</ref><ref> | </ref><ref> | ||
{{cite journal |last=Kostelecky |first=V. A. |date=2004 |title=Gravity, Lorentz Violation, and the Standard Model |journal=[[Physical Review D]] |volume=69 |issue=10 | | {{cite journal |last=Kostelecky |first=V. A. |date=2004 |title=Gravity, Lorentz Violation, and the Standard Model |journal=[[Physical Review D]] |volume=69 |issue=10 |article-number=105009 |arxiv=hep-th/0312310 |bibcode=2004PhRvD..69j5009K |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.69.105009 |s2cid=55185765}} | ||
</ref> In this framework, neutrinos experience [[Lorentz-violating neutrino oscillations|Lorentz-violating oscillations]] and can travel faster than light at high energies. This proposal was strongly criticized.<ref> | </ref> In this framework, neutrinos experience [[Lorentz-violating neutrino oscillations|Lorentz-violating oscillations]] and can travel faster than light at high energies. This proposal was strongly criticized.<ref> | ||
{{cite journal |last1=Hughes |first1=Richard J. |last2=Stephenson |first2=G. J. |date=1990 |title=Against Tachyonic Neutrinos |url=https://zenodo.org/record/1258487 |journal=Physics Letters B |volume=244 |issue=1 |pages=95–100 |bibcode=1990PhLB..244...95H |doi=10.1016/0370-2693(90)90275-B}} | {{cite journal |last1=Hughes |first1=Richard J. |last2=Stephenson |first2=G. J. |date=1990 |title=Against Tachyonic Neutrinos |url=https://zenodo.org/record/1258487 |journal=Physics Letters B |volume=244 |issue=1 |pages=95–100 |bibcode=1990PhLB..244...95H |doi=10.1016/0370-2693(90)90275-B}} | ||
| Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
In the paper that coined the term "tachyon", Gerald Feinberg studied Lorentz invariant quantum fields with [[imaginary mass]].<ref name="Feinberg 1967-1969" /> Because the [[group velocity]] for such a field is [[Superluminal motion|superluminal]], naively it appears that its excitations propagate faster than light. However, it was quickly understood that the superluminal group velocity does not correspond to the speed of propagation of any localized excitation (like a particle). Instead, the [[negative mass]] represents an instability to [[tachyon condensation]], and all excitations of the field propagate subluminally and are consistent with causality.<ref name="susskind" /> Despite having no faster-than-light propagation, such fields are referred to simply as "tachyons" in many sources.<ref name="Sen" /><ref name="Greene" /><ref name="Kutasov" /><ref name="Gibbons" /><ref name="Randall 2005 p286" /> | In the paper that coined the term "tachyon", Gerald Feinberg studied Lorentz invariant quantum fields with [[imaginary mass]].<ref name="Feinberg 1967-1969" /> Because the [[group velocity]] for such a field is [[Superluminal motion|superluminal]], naively it appears that its excitations propagate faster than light. However, it was quickly understood that the superluminal group velocity does not correspond to the speed of propagation of any localized excitation (like a particle). Instead, the [[negative mass]] represents an instability to [[tachyon condensation]], and all excitations of the field propagate subluminally and are consistent with causality.<ref name="susskind" /> Despite having no faster-than-light propagation, such fields are referred to simply as "tachyons" in many sources.<ref name="Sen" /><ref name="Greene" /><ref name="Kutasov" /><ref name="Gibbons" /><ref name="Randall 2005 p286" /> | ||
Tachyonic fields play an important role in modern physics. Perhaps the most famous is the [[Higgs boson]] of the [[Standard | Tachyonic fields play an important role in modern physics. Perhaps the most famous is the [[Higgs boson]] of the [[Standard Model|Standard Model of particle physics]], which has an imaginary mass in its uncondensed phase. In general, the phenomenon of [[spontaneous symmetry breaking]], which is closely related to tachyon condensation, plays an important role in many aspects of theoretical physics, including the [[Ginzburg–Landau theory|Ginzburg–Landau]] and [[BCS theory|BCS]] theories of superconductivity. Another example of a tachyonic field is the tachyon of [[bosonic string theory]].<ref name="Greene" /><ref name="Polchinski 1998" /> | ||
Tachyons are predicted by bosonic string theory and also the [[Super Virasoro algebra|Neveu-Schwarz]] (NS) and [[NS-NS sector|NS-NS sectors]], which are respectively the open bosonic sector and closed bosonic sector, of [[Superstring theory|RNS superstring theory]] prior to the [[GSO projection]]. However such tachyons are not possible due to the [[Tachyon condensation#Tachyon condensation in string theory|Sen conjecture]], also known as [[tachyon condensation]]. This resulted in the necessity for the [[GSO projection]]. | Tachyons are predicted by bosonic string theory and also the [[Super Virasoro algebra|Neveu-Schwarz]] (NS) and [[NS-NS sector|NS-NS sectors]], which are respectively the open bosonic sector and closed bosonic sector, of [[Superstring theory|RNS superstring theory]] prior to the [[GSO projection]]. However such tachyons are not possible due to the [[Tachyon condensation#Tachyon condensation in string theory|Sen conjecture]], also known as [[tachyon condensation]]. This resulted in the necessity for the [[GSO projection]]. | ||
| Line 149: | Line 149: | ||
|title = Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion | |title = Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion | ||
|journal = Journal of High Energy Physics | |journal = Journal of High Energy Physics | ||
|volume = 2006 |issue = 10 | | |volume = 2006 |issue = 10 |page = 014 | ||
|arxiv = hep-th/0602178 |doi = 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/10/014 | |arxiv = hep-th/0602178 |doi = 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/10/014 | ||
|bibcode = 2006JHEP...10..014A |s2cid = 2956810 | |bibcode = 2006JHEP...10..014A |s2cid = 2956810 | ||
| Line 198: | Line 198: | ||
|publisher = [[CERN]] | |publisher = [[CERN]] | ||
|url = http://press-archived.web.cern.ch/press-archived/PressReleases/Releases2011/PR19.11E.html | |url = http://press-archived.web.cern.ch/press-archived/PressReleases/Releases2011/PR19.11E.html | ||
|access-date = 8 June 2012 | |access-date = 8 June 2012 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140222165941/http://press-archived.web.cern.ch/press-archived/PressReleases/Releases2011/PR19.11E.html | ||
|archive-date= 22 February 2014 | |archive-date= 22 February 2014 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 226: | Line 225: | ||
|title=High-energy tests of Lorentz invariance | |title=High-energy tests of Lorentz invariance | ||
|journal=[[Physical Review D]] | |journal=[[Physical Review D]] | ||
|volume=59 |issue=11 | | |volume=59 |issue=11 |article-number=116008 | ||
|arxiv=hep-ph/9812418 |bibcode=1999PhRvD..59k6008C | |arxiv=hep-ph/9812418 |bibcode=1999PhRvD..59k6008C | ||
|s2cid=1273409 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.59.116008 | |s2cid=1273409 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.59.116008 | ||
| Line 246: | Line 245: | ||
<ref name="Feinberg 1967-1969"> | <ref name="Feinberg 1967-1969"> | ||
{{blist| | |||
{{cite journal | {{cite journal | ||
|last=Feinberg |first=G. | |last=Feinberg |first=G. | ||
| Line 254: | Line 254: | ||
|bibcode=1967PhRv..159.1089F | |bibcode=1967PhRv..159.1089F | ||
|doi=10.1103/PhysRev.159.1089 | |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.159.1089 | ||
}} | }}| | ||
{{cite journal | {{cite journal | ||
|last=Feinberg |first=G. | |last=Feinberg |first=G. | ||
|title=Lorentz invariance of tachyon theories | |||
|date=1978 | |date=1978 | ||
|journal=[[Physical Review D]] | |journal=[[Physical Review D]] | ||
|volume=17 |page=1651 | |volume=17 |issue=6 | ||
|page=1651 | |||
|doi=10.1103/physrevd.17.1651 | |doi=10.1103/physrevd.17.1651 | ||
|bibcode=1978PhRvD..17.1651F | |||
}} | |||
}} | }} | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
| Line 274: | Line 277: | ||
|volume=1970 |pages=425–426 | |volume=1970 |pages=425–426 | ||
|date=1970 | |date=1970 | ||
|quote=A more powerful argument to show that retrocausal tachyons involve an intolerable conceptual difficulty is illustrated by the | |quote=A more powerful argument to show that retrocausal tachyons involve an intolerable conceptual difficulty is illustrated by the 'Case of the Logically Pernicious Self-Inhibitor' ... | ||
}} | }} | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
| Line 411: | Line 414: | ||
|title='Meta' Relativity | |title='Meta' Relativity | ||
|journal=[[American Journal of Physics]] | |journal=[[American Journal of Physics]] | ||
|volume=30 |issue=10 | | |volume=30 |issue=10 |page=718 | ||
|bibcode=1962AmJPh..30..718B | |bibcode=1962AmJPh..30..718B | ||
|doi=10.1119/1.1941773 | |doi=10.1119/1.1941773 | ||
Latest revision as of 15:09, 11 October 2025
Template:Short description Script error: No such module "about". Template:Use dmy dates Template:Infobox particle
A tachyon (Template:IPAc-en) or tachyonic particle is a hypothetical particle that always travels faster than light. Physicists posit that faster-than-light particles cannot exist because they are inconsistent with the known laws of physics.[1][2] If such particles did exist they perhaps could be used to send signals faster than light and into the past. According to the theory of relativity this would violate causality, leading to logical paradoxes such as the grandfather paradox.[1] Tachyons would exhibit the unusual property of increasing in speed as their energy decreases, and would require infinite energy to slow to the speed of light. No verifiable experimental evidence for the existence of such particles has been found.
The term "tachyon" derives from a 1967 paper by Gerald Feinberg about excitations of a quantum field with imaginary mass. Subsequent work has shown the excitations are not faster than light particles but particle physicists still discuss "tachyons", e.g. in tachyon condensation, when they are referring to tachyonic fields.
Etymology
The term tachyon comes from the Template:Langx, tachus, meaning swift.[3]Template:Rp The complementary particle types are called luxons (which always move at the speed of light) and bradyons (which always move slower than light); both of these particle types are known to exist.
History
Faster-than-light particles were discussed before the advent of relativity by such physicists as JJ Thomson and Arnold Sommerfeld.[4][5]Template:Rp The possibility of existence of faster-than-light particles was also proposed by Template:Ill in 1923.[6]
In 1962[5] and again in 1969[7] Oleksa-Myron Bilanuik, Vijay Deshpande and E. C. George Sudarshan discussed the possibility of a class of faster-than-light particles consistent with special relativity. As part of their discussion they point out that light particles are never accelerated but rather are created with the full velocity of light. Similarly they argue that while accelerating normal matter beyond the speed of light is inconsistent with special relativity, this does not prevent creation of faster than light particles.[8]
The term tachyon was coined by Gerald Feinberg in a 1967 paper titled "Possibility of faster-than-light particles". He proposed that tachyonic particles could be made from excitations of a quantum field with imaginary mass.[8] He had been inspired by the science-fiction story "Beep" by James Blish.[9] Feinberg studied the kinematics of such particles according to special relativity. In his paper, he also introduced fields with imaginary mass (now also referred to as tachyons) in an attempt to understand the microphysical origin such particles might have. It was soon realized that Feinberg's model did not in fact allow for superluminal (faster than light) particles or signals and that tachyonic fields merely give rise to instabilities, not causality violations.[10] The term tachyonic field refers to imaginary mass fields rather than to faster-than-light particles.[2][11]
In September 2011, it was reported that a tau neutrino had traveled faster than the speed of light; however, later updates from CERN on the OPERA experiment indicate that the faster-than-light readings were due to a faulty element of the experiment's fibre optic timing system.[12]
Special relativity
In special relativity, a faster-than-light particle would have spacelike four-momentum,[8] unlike ordinary particles that have time-like four-momentum. While some theories suggest the mass of tachyons is imaginary, modern formulations often consider their mass to be real,[13][14][15] with redefined formulas for momentum and energy. Additionally, since tachyons are confined to the spacelike portion of the energy–momentum graph, they cannot slow down to subluminal (slower-than-light) speeds.[8]
Mass
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
In a Lorentz invariant theory, the same formulas that apply to ordinary slower-than-light particles (sometimes called bradyons in discussions of tachyons) must also apply to tachyons. In particular, the energy–momentum relation:
(where p is the relativistic momentum of the bradyon and m is its rest mass) should still apply, along with the formula for the total energy of a particle:
This equation shows that the total energy of a particle (bradyon or tachyon) contains a contribution from its rest mass (the "rest mass–energy") and a contribution from its motion, the kinetic energy. When (the particle's velocity) is larger than (the speed of light), the denominator in the equation for the energy is imaginary, as the value under the square root is negative. Because the total energy of the particle must be real (and not a complex or imaginary number) in order to have any practical meaning as a measurement, the numerator must also be imaginary (i.e. the rest mass m must be imaginary, as a pure imaginary number divided by another pure imaginary number is a real number).
In some modern formulations of the theory, the mass of tachyons is regarded as real.[13][14][15]
Speed
One curious effect is that, unlike ordinary particles, the speed of a tachyon increases as its energy decreases. In particular, approaches zero when approaches infinity. (For ordinary bradyonic matter, increases with increasing speed, becoming arbitrarily large as approaches , the speed of light.) Therefore, just as bradyons are forbidden to break the light-speed barrier, so are tachyons forbidden from slowing down to below c, because infinite energy is required to reach the barrier from either above or below.
As noted by Albert Einstein, Richard C. Tolman, and others, special relativity implies that faster-than-light particles, if they existed, could be used to communicate backwards in time.[16]
Neutrinos
In 1985, Chodos proposed that neutrinos can have a tachyonic nature.[17] The possibility of standard model particles moving at faster-than-light speeds can be modeled using Lorentz invariance violating terms, for example in the Standard-Model Extension.[18][19][20] In this framework, neutrinos experience Lorentz-violating oscillations and can travel faster than light at high energies. This proposal was strongly criticized.[21]
Superluminal information
If tachyons can transmit information faster than light, then, according to relativity, they violate causality, leading to logical paradoxes of the "kill your own grandfather" type. This is often illustrated with thought experiments such as the "tachyon telephone paradox"[16] or "logically pernicious self-inhibitor."[22]
The problem can be understood in terms of the relativity of simultaneity in special relativity, which says that different inertial reference frames will disagree on whether two events at different locations happened "at the same time" or not, and they can also disagree on the order of the two events. (Technically, these disagreements occur when the spacetime interval between the events is 'space-like', meaning that neither event lies in the future light cone of the other.)[23]
If one of the two events represents the sending of a signal from one location and the second event represents the reception of the same signal at another location, then, as long as the signal is moving at the speed of light or slower, the mathematics of simultaneity ensures that all reference frames agree that the transmission-event happened before the reception-event.[23] However, in the case of a hypothetical signal moving faster than light, there would always be some frames in which the signal was received before it was sent, so that the signal could be said to have moved backward in time. Because one of the two fundamental postulates of special relativity says that the laws of physics should work the same way in every inertial frame, if it is possible for signals to move backward in time in any one frame, it must be possible in all frames. This means that if observer A sends a signal to observer B which moves faster than light in A's frame but backwards in time in B's frame, and then B sends a reply which moves faster than light in B's frame but backwards in time in A's frame, it could work out that A receives the reply before sending the original signal, challenging causality in every frame and opening the door to severe logical paradoxes.[24] This is known as the tachyonic antitelephone.
Reinterpretation principle
The reinterpretation principle[8][5][24] asserts that a tachyon sent back in time can always be reinterpreted as a tachyon traveling forward in time, because observers cannot distinguish between the emission and absorption of tachyons. The attempt to detect a tachyon from the future (and violate causality) would actually create the same tachyon and send it forward in time (which is causal).
However, this principle is not widely accepted as resolving the paradoxes.[16][24][25] Instead, what would be required to avoid paradoxes is that, unlike any known particle, tachyons do not interact in any way and can never be detected or observed, because otherwise a tachyon beam could be modulated and used to create an anti-telephone[16] or a "logically pernicious self-inhibitor".[22] All forms of energy are positted to interact at least gravitationally, and many authors state that superluminal propagation in Lorentz invariant theories always leads to causal paradoxes.[26][27]
Fundamental models
In modern physics, all fundamental particles are regarded as excitations of quantum fields. There are several distinct ways in which tachyonic particles could be embedded into a field theory.
Fields with imaginary mass
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
In the paper that coined the term "tachyon", Gerald Feinberg studied Lorentz invariant quantum fields with imaginary mass.[8] Because the group velocity for such a field is superluminal, naively it appears that its excitations propagate faster than light. However, it was quickly understood that the superluminal group velocity does not correspond to the speed of propagation of any localized excitation (like a particle). Instead, the negative mass represents an instability to tachyon condensation, and all excitations of the field propagate subluminally and are consistent with causality.[28] Despite having no faster-than-light propagation, such fields are referred to simply as "tachyons" in many sources.[11][29][30][31][2]
Tachyonic fields play an important role in modern physics. Perhaps the most famous is the Higgs boson of the Standard Model of particle physics, which has an imaginary mass in its uncondensed phase. In general, the phenomenon of spontaneous symmetry breaking, which is closely related to tachyon condensation, plays an important role in many aspects of theoretical physics, including the Ginzburg–Landau and BCS theories of superconductivity. Another example of a tachyonic field is the tachyon of bosonic string theory.[29][32]
Tachyons are predicted by bosonic string theory and also the Neveu-Schwarz (NS) and NS-NS sectors, which are respectively the open bosonic sector and closed bosonic sector, of RNS superstring theory prior to the GSO projection. However such tachyons are not possible due to the Sen conjecture, also known as tachyon condensation. This resulted in the necessity for the GSO projection.
Lorentz-violating theories
In theories that do not respect Lorentz invariance, the speed of light is not (necessarily) a barrier, and particles can travel faster than the speed of light without infinite energy or causal paradoxes.[26] A class of field theories of that type is the so-called Standard Model extensions. However, the experimental evidence for Lorentz invariance is extremely good, so such theories are very tightly constrained.[33][34]
Fields with non-canonical kinetic term
By modifying the kinetic term of the field, it is possible to produce Lorentz invariant field theories with excitations that propagate superluminally.[28][27] However, such theories, in general, do not have a well-defined Cauchy problem (for reasons related to the issues of causality discussed above), and are probably inconsistent quantum mechanically.
In fiction
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
Tachyons have appeared in many works of fiction. They have been used as a standby mechanism upon which many science fiction authors rely to establish faster-than-light communication, with or without reference to causality issues. The word tachyon has become widely recognized to such an extent that it can impart a science-fictional connotation even if the subject in question has no particular relation to superluminal travel (a form of technobabble, akin to positronic brain).[35]
See also
- Lorentz-violating neutrino oscillations
- Massive particle – bradyon, aka tardyon
- Massless particle – luxon
- Retrocausality
- Tachyonic antitelephone
- Virtual particle
- Wheeler–Feynman absorber theory
References
External links
Template:Sister project Template:Sister project
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
Template:Particles Template:String theory topics Template:Authority control
- ↑ a b Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedTipler - ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedSommerfeld - ↑ a b c Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedsudarshan62 - ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedsudarshan69 - ↑ a b c d e f Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedFeinberg 1967-1969 - ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedBenford-legends - ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedAharonov-etal-1969 - ↑ a b Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedSen - ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedCERN-2012-06-08 - ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c d Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedBenford - ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedChodos - ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedColladay - ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedFitzgerald - ↑ a b Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedJarrell - ↑ a b c Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedGron - ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedRecami - ↑ a b Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedBarcelo - ↑ a b Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedArkani - ↑ a b Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedsusskind - ↑ a b Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedGreene - ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedKutasov - ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedGibbons - ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedPolchinski 1998 - ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedColeman - ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".