Media Matters for America: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Marquardtika
update $
 
imported>BlueboyLINY
m Cleaned up using AutoEd, General formatting, per WP:Linking, Script-assisted fixes: per CS1 and MOS:ITALICS, sorted categories alphabetically via script, script-assisted date audit and style fixes per MOS:NUM, unpiped links using script per MOS:NOTBROKEN
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|American media watchdog organization}}
{{Short description|American media watchdog organization}}
{{redirect-distinguish-text|Media Matters|the 2002–2012 radio program hosted by [[Robert W. McChesney]]}}
{{redirect-distinguish-text|Media Matters|the 2002–2012 radio program hosted by [[Robert W. McChesney]]}}
{{use mdy dates|date=January 2016}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=June 2025}}
{{Infobox organization
{{Infobox organization
| image = mediamatters.png
| image = mediamatters.png
| logo = Mediamatters-square.jpg
| logo = Mediamatters-square.jpg
| alt =  
| alt =
| caption = Screenshot of website, January 4, 2021
| caption = Screenshot of website, January 4, 2021
| formation = {{start date and age|2004|5|3}}
| formation = {{start date and age|2004|5|3}}
| extinction = <!-- use {{end date and age|YYYY|MM|DD}} -->
| extinction = <!-- use {{end date and age|YYYY|MM|DD}} -->
| type = 501(c)(3) nonprofit
| type = 501(c)(3) nonprofit
| status =  
| status =
| purpose = "Comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media"<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-02-10 |title=About Us |url=https://www.mediamatters.org/about-us |access-date=2024-02-11 |website=Media Matters for America |language=en |archive-date=November 1, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231101171057/http://www.mediamatters.org/about-us |url-status=live }}</ref>
| purpose = "Comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media"<ref>{{Cite web |date=February 10, 2024 |title=About Us |url=https://www.mediamatters.org/about-us |access-date=February 11, 2024 |website=Media Matters for America |language=en |archive-date=November 1, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231101171057/http://www.mediamatters.org/about-us |url-status=live }}</ref>
| headquarters =  
| headquarters =
| leader_title = President
| leader_title = President
| leader_name = [[Angelo Carusone]]
| leader_name = [[Angelo Carusone]]
| leader_title2 =  
| leader_title2 =
| leader_name2 =  
| leader_name2 =
| leader_name3 =  
| leader_name3 =
| leader_title3 =  
| leader_title3 =
| leader_title4 =  
| leader_title4 =
| leader_name4 =  
| leader_name4 =
| board_of_directors =  
| board_of_directors =
| key_people =  
| key_people =
| main_organ =  
| main_organ =
| parent_organization =  
| parent_organization =
| subsidiaries =  
| subsidiaries =
| affiliations = [[American Bridge 21st Century]] Super PAC, Media Matters Action Network (501(c)(4))
| affiliations = [[American Bridge 21st Century]] Super PAC, Media Matters Action Network (501(c)(4))
| budget =  
| budget =
| name = Media Matters for America
| name = Media Matters for America
| native_name =  
| native_name =
| native_name_lang =  
| native_name_lang =
| named_after =  
| named_after =
| image_size =  
| image_size =
| map_caption =  
| map_caption =
| map2 =  
| map2 =
| map2_caption =  
| map2_caption =
| abbreviation =  
| abbreviation =
| founder = [[David Brock]]
| founder = [[David Brock]]
| founding_location = [[Washington, D.C.]], [[United States|U.S.]]
| founding_location = Washington, D.C., US
| merger =  
| merger =
| tax_id = 47-0928008
| tax_id = 47-0928008
| registration_id = <!-- for non-profit org -->
| registration_id = <!-- for non-profit org -->
| sec_gen =  
| sec_gen =
| secessions =  
| secessions =
| budget_year =  
| budget_year =
| revenue = $19.6 million<ref name=propublica>{{cite web |title=Media Matters For America - Nonprofit Explorer |url=https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/470928008 |website=ProPublica |access-date=26 March 2025 |language=en |date=9 May 2013}}</ref>
| revenue = $19.6&nbsp;million<ref name=propublica>{{cite web |title=Media Matters For America - Nonprofit Explorer |url=https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/470928008 |website=ProPublica |access-date=March 26, 2025 |language=en |date=May 9, 2013}}</ref>
| revenue_year = 2023
| revenue_year = 2023
| disbursements =  
| disbursements =
| expenses = $20.8 million<ref name=propublica/>
| expenses = $20.8&nbsp;million<ref name=propublica/>
| expenses_year = 2023
| expenses_year = 2023
| website = {{Official URL}}
| website = {{Official URL}}
}}
}}
'''Media Matters for America''' ('''MMfA''') is a non-profit [[Centre-left politics|le<!-- For additional sources and discussion, see talk page section "Left leaning" created February 2024 -->ft-leaning]] [[watchdog journalism]] organization.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Russonello |first=Giovanni |date=February 12, 2021 |title=How Conservative Outlets Are Covering Impeachment, or Not |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/12/us/fox-news-newsmax-impeachment.html |newspaper=The New York Times |archive-date=February 23, 2021 |access-date=February 24, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210223155128/https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/12/us/fox-news-newsmax-impeachment.html |url-status=live }}</ref> It was founded in 2004 by journalist and political activist [[David Brock]] as a counterweight to the conservative [[Media Research Center]].<ref name="Rutenberg">{{cite news|last1=Rutenberg|first1=Jim|title=New Internet Site Turns Critical Eyes and Ears to the Right|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/03/business/media/03BROC.html|access-date=2017-02-28|work=[[The New York Times]]|date=May 3, 2004|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151104235311/http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/03/business/media/03BROC.html|archive-date=November 4, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> It seeks to spotlight "conservative misinformation" in the U.S. media; its methods include issuing reports and quick responses.<ref name="Steinberg">{{cite news |last=Steinberg |first=Jacques |date=October 31, 2008 |title=An All-Out Attack on 'Conservative Misinformation' |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/01/washington/01media.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090425022542/http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/01/washington/01media.html |archive-date=April 25, 2009 |access-date=April 17, 2010 |work=The New York Times |page=A15}}</ref><ref name=":1" /> Two example initiatives include the "Drop Fox" campaign (2011–2013) that sought to discredit [[Fox News]]' "[[fair and balanced]]" claims;<ref name="Smith"/><ref name="Politico 2011-07-07"/><ref>{{cite news|last1=Zengerle|first1=Jason|title=If I Take Down Fox, Is All Forgiven?|url=http://nymag.com/news/media/david-brock-media-matters-2011-5/|access-date=October 19, 2015|work=New York|date=May 22, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151022052753/http://nymag.com/news/media/david-brock-media-matters-2011-5/|archive-date=October 22, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> and a 2023 report about [[X (formerly Twitter)]] that highlighted [[Twitter under Elon Musk#Increase in hate speech|antisemitism on the platform]].
'''Media Matters for America''' ('''MMfA''') is a non-profit [[Centre-left politics|le<!-- For additional sources and discussion, see talk page section "Left leaning" created February 2024 -->ft-leaning]] [[watchdog journalism]] organization.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Russonello |first=Giovanni |date=February 12, 2021 |title=How Conservative Outlets Are Covering Impeachment, or Not |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/12/us/fox-news-newsmax-impeachment.html |newspaper=The New York Times |archive-date=February 23, 2021 |access-date=February 24, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210223155128/https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/12/us/fox-news-newsmax-impeachment.html |url-status=live }}</ref> It was founded in 2004 by journalist and political activist [[David Brock]] as a counterweight to the conservative [[Media Research Center]].<ref name="Rutenberg">{{cite news|last1=Rutenberg|first1=Jim|title=New Internet Site Turns Critical Eyes and Ears to the Right|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/03/business/media/03BROC.html|access-date=February 28, 2017|work=[[The New York Times]]|date=May 3, 2004|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151104235311/http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/03/business/media/03BROC.html|archive-date=November 4, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> It seeks to spotlight "conservative misinformation" in the U.S. media; its methods include issuing reports and quick responses.<ref name="Steinberg">{{cite news |last=Steinberg |first=Jacques |date=October 31, 2008 |title=An All-Out Attack on 'Conservative Misinformation' |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/01/washington/01media.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090425022542/http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/01/washington/01media.html |archive-date=April 25, 2009 |access-date=April 17, 2010 |work=The New York Times |page=A15}}</ref><ref name=":1" /> Two example initiatives include the "Drop Fox" campaign (2011–2013) that sought to discredit [[Fox News]]' "[[fair and balanced]]" claims;<ref name="Smith"/><ref name="Politico 2011-07-07"/><ref>{{cite news|last1=Zengerle|first1=Jason|title=If I Take Down Fox, Is All Forgiven?|url=http://nymag.com/news/media/david-brock-media-matters-2011-5/|access-date=October 19, 2015|work=New York|date=May 22, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151022052753/http://nymag.com/news/media/david-brock-media-matters-2011-5/|archive-date=October 22, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> and a 2023 report about [[X (formerly Twitter)]] that highlighted [[Twitter under Elon Musk#Increase in hate speech|antisemitism on the platform]].


==Organization overview==
==Organization overview==
Line 60: Line 60:


===Funding===
===Funding===
In 2004, MMfA began with the help of $2 million in donations.<ref name="Rutenberg" /><ref name="Steinberg" /> That year MMfA received the endorsement of the [[Democracy Alliance]], a partnership of wealthy and politically active progressive donors. The Alliance itself does not fund endorsees, but many wealthy Alliance members acted on the endorsement and donated directly to MMfA.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/410000040|title=A New Alliance of Democrats Spreads Funding; But Some in Party Bristle at Secrecy and Liberal Tilt|date=July 17, 2006|newspaper=The Washington Post|first1=Jim|last1=VandeHei|first2=Chris|last2=Cillizza|page=A1|access-date=May 3, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203062534/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/doc/410000040.html|archive-date=December 3, 2013|id={{ProQuest|410000040}} |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Wash. Times op-ed expanded on O'Reilly's false attacks on Soros and Media Matters|url=http://mediamatters.org/research/2007/05/09/dobbs-refused-to-correct-debunked-leprosy-stati/141071|publisher=Media Matters for America|date=May 9, 2007|access-date=March 27, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121009171915/http://mediamatters.org/research/2007/05/09/dobbs-refused-to-correct-debunked-leprosy-stati/141071|archive-date=October 9, 2012|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>[http://www.hudson.org/files/pdf_upload/Transcript_2006_11_30.pdf#page=21 How Vast The Left Wing Conspiracy?] {{Webarchive|url=http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20081024154705/http://www.hudson.org/files/pdf_upload/Transcript_2006_11_30.pdf#page=21 |date=October 24, 2008 }}. [[Hudson Institute]], November 30, 2006.</ref> In 2010, [[George Soros]] donated $1 million to MMfA citing concerns that the "incendiary rhetoric of [[Fox News]] hosts may incite violence."<ref>{{cite news|last1=Shear|first1=Michael|title=Soros Donates $1 Million to Media Matters|url=http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/20/soros-donates-1-million-to-media-matters|access-date=September 10, 2015|work=The New York Times|date=October 20, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150908005612/http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/20/soros-donates-1-million-to-media-matters/|archive-date=September 8, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Smith|first=Ben|url=http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1010/Soros_gives_to_Media_Matters_publicly.html|title=Soros gives to Media Matters, publicly|publisher=Politico|date=October 20, 2010|access-date=November 28, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141113065909/http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1010/Soros_gives_to_Media_Matters_publicly.html|archive-date=November 13, 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> During a 2014 [[CNN]] interview, David Brock stated that Soros' contributions were "less than 10 percent" of Media Matters' budget.<ref>[http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1404/27/rs.01.html Transcript of David Brock on Soros contributions to Media Matters] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150225025247/http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1404/27/rs.01.html |date=February 25, 2015 }}, CNN. Retrieved February 24, 2015.</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Hagey |first=Keach |date=October 20, 2010 |title=Soros gives $1 million dollars to Media Matters |url=http://www.politico.com/blogs/onmedia/1010/Soros_gives_1_million_to_Media_Matters.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150313121935/http://www.politico.com/blogs/onmedia/1010/Soros_gives_1_million_to_Media_Matters.html |archive-date=March 13, 2015 |access-date=March 9, 2015 |publisher=Politico}}</ref>
In 2004, MMfA began with the help of $2&nbsp;million in donations.<ref name="Rutenberg" /><ref name="Steinberg" /> That year MMfA received the endorsement of the [[Democracy Alliance]], a partnership of wealthy and politically active progressive donors. The Alliance itself does not fund endorsees, but many wealthy Alliance members acted on the endorsement and donated directly to MMfA.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/410000040|title=A New Alliance of Democrats Spreads Funding; But Some in Party Bristle at Secrecy and Liberal Tilt|date=July 17, 2006|newspaper=The Washington Post|first1=Jim|last1=VandeHei|first2=Chris|last2=Cillizza|page=A1|access-date=May 3, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203062534/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/doc/410000040.html|archive-date=December 3, 2013|id={{ProQuest|410000040}} |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Wash. Times op-ed expanded on O'Reilly's false attacks on Soros and Media Matters|url=http://mediamatters.org/research/2007/05/09/dobbs-refused-to-correct-debunked-leprosy-stati/141071|publisher=Media Matters for America|date=May 9, 2007|access-date=March 27, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121009171915/http://mediamatters.org/research/2007/05/09/dobbs-refused-to-correct-debunked-leprosy-stati/141071|archive-date=October 9, 2012|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>[http://www.hudson.org/files/pdf_upload/Transcript_2006_11_30.pdf#page=21 How Vast The Left Wing Conspiracy?] {{Webarchive|url=http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20081024154705/http://www.hudson.org/files/pdf_upload/Transcript_2006_11_30.pdf#page=21 |date=October 24, 2008 }}. [[Hudson Institute]], November 30, 2006.</ref> In 2010, [[George Soros]] donated $1&nbsp;million to MMfA citing concerns that the "incendiary rhetoric of [[Fox News]] hosts may incite violence."<ref>{{cite news|last1=Shear|first1=Michael|title=Soros Donates $1 Million to Media Matters|url=http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/20/soros-donates-1-million-to-media-matters|access-date=September 10, 2015|work=The New York Times|date=October 20, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150908005612/http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/20/soros-donates-1-million-to-media-matters/|archive-date=September 8, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Smith|first=Ben|url=https://www.politico.com/blogs/ben-smith/2010/10/soros-gives-to-media-matters-publicly-030089|title=Soros gives to Media Matters, publicly|work=Politico|date=October 20, 2010|access-date=November 28, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141113065909/http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1010/Soros_gives_to_Media_Matters_publicly.html|archive-date=November 13, 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> During a 2014 [[CNN]] interview, David Brock stated that Soros' contributions were "less than 10 percent" of Media Matters' budget.<ref>[http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1404/27/rs.01.html Transcript of David Brock on Soros contributions to Media Matters] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150225025247/http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1404/27/rs.01.html |date=February 25, 2015 }}, CNN. Retrieved February 24, 2015.</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Hagey |first=Keach |date=October 20, 2010 |title=Soros gives $1 million dollars to Media Matters |url=https://www.politico.com/blogs/onmedia/1010/Soros_gives_1_million_to_Media_Matters.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150313121935/http://www.politico.com/blogs/onmedia/1010/Soros_gives_1_million_to_Media_Matters.html |archive-date=March 13, 2015 |access-date=March 9, 2015 |work=Politico}}</ref>


===Personnel===
===Personnel===
[[John Podesta]], the former chief of staff to President [[Bill Clinton]], provided office space for Media Matters early in its formation at the Center for American Progress, a Democratic think tank which Podesta established in 2002.<ref name="Thrush">{{cite news|title=Switching allegiances|last=Thrush|first=Glenn|url=http://www.newsday.com/news/switching-allegiances-1.690641|date=September 6, 2006|work=[[Newsday]]|access-date=May 3, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121010200617/http://www.newsday.com/news/switching-allegiances-1.690641|archive-date=October 10, 2012|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Hillary Clinton]] advised Media Matters in its early stages out of a belief that progressives should follow conservatives in forming think tanks and advocacy groups to support their political goals.<ref name="Thrush"/><ref>{{cite news|url=http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2007/11/15/4429164-calling-out-media-matters-bias|title=Calling Out Media Matters' Bias|access-date=May 13, 2010|last=Todd|first=Chuck|date=November 15, 2007|publisher=[[MSNBC]]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120804035251/http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2007/11/15/4429164-calling-out-media-matters-bias|archive-date=August 4, 2012|url-status=live}}</ref> According to ''[[The New York Times]]'', Media Matters "helped lay the groundwork" for [[Hillary Clinton 2016 presidential campaign|Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign]].<ref>{{cite news|last1=Schmidt|first1=Michael S.|last2=Confessore|first2=Nicholas|title=Clinton Friend's Memos on Libya Draw Scrutiny to Politics and Business|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/19/us/politics/clinton-friends-libya-role-blurs-lines-of-politics-and-business.html|access-date=September 10, 2015|work=The New York Times|date=May 18, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150907020840/http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/19/us/politics/clinton-friends-libya-role-blurs-lines-of-politics-and-business.html|archive-date=September 7, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref>
[[John Podesta]], the former chief of staff to President [[Bill Clinton]], provided office space for Media Matters early in its formation at the Center for American Progress, a Democratic think tank which Podesta established in 2002.<ref name="Thrush">{{cite news|title=Switching allegiances|last=Thrush|first=Glenn|url=http://www.newsday.com/news/switching-allegiances-1.690641|date=September 6, 2006|work=[[Newsday]]|access-date=May 3, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121010200617/http://www.newsday.com/news/switching-allegiances-1.690641|archive-date=October 10, 2012|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Hillary Clinton]] advised Media Matters in its early stages out of a belief that progressives should follow conservatives in forming think tanks and advocacy groups to support their political goals.<ref name="Thrush"/><ref>{{cite news|url=http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2007/11/15/4429164-calling-out-media-matters-bias|title=Calling Out Media Matters' Bias|access-date=May 13, 2010|last=Todd|first=Chuck|date=November 15, 2007|publisher=[[MSNBC]]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120804035251/http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2007/11/15/4429164-calling-out-media-matters-bias|archive-date=August 4, 2012|url-status=live}}</ref> According to ''[[The New York Times]]'', Media Matters "helped lay the groundwork" for [[Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign]].<ref>{{cite news|last1=Schmidt|first1=Michael S.|last2=Confessore|first2=Nicholas|title=Clinton Friend's Memos on Libya Draw Scrutiny to Politics and Business|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/19/us/politics/clinton-friends-libya-role-blurs-lines-of-politics-and-business.html|access-date=September 10, 2015|work=The New York Times|date=May 18, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150907020840/http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/19/us/politics/clinton-friends-libya-role-blurs-lines-of-politics-and-business.html|archive-date=September 7, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref>


Media Matters has hired several of the best known political professionals who have worked for Democratic politicians and for other progressive groups.<ref name="York">{{cite web |last=York |first=Byron |date=May 28, 2004 |title=David Brock is Buzzing Again |url=http://www.nationalreview.com/article/210853/david-brock-buzzing-again-byron-york |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150511210304/http://www.nationalreview.com/article/210853/david-brock-buzzing-again-byron-york |archive-date=May 11, 2015 |access-date=September 10, 2015 |work=[[National Review]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://thehill.com/capital-living/20906-fighting-ire-with-fire/|title=Fighting ire with fire|access-date=May 17, 2010|last=Rothstein|first=Betsy|date=November 3, 2008|work=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110622014852/http://thehill.com/capital-living/24113-fighting-ire-with-fire|archive-date=June 22, 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2004, ''[[National Review]]'' referred to MMfA staffers who had recently worked on the presidential campaigns of [[John Edwards]] and [[Wesley Clark]], for Congressman [[Barney Frank]], and for the [[Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee]].<ref name="York"/>
Media Matters has hired several of the best known political professionals who have worked for Democratic politicians and for other progressive groups.<ref name="York">{{cite web |last=York |first=Byron |date=May 28, 2004 |title=David Brock is Buzzing Again |url=http://www.nationalreview.com/article/210853/david-brock-buzzing-again-byron-york |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150511210304/http://www.nationalreview.com/article/210853/david-brock-buzzing-again-byron-york |archive-date=May 11, 2015 |access-date=September 10, 2015 |work=[[National Review]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://thehill.com/capital-living/20906-fighting-ire-with-fire/|title=Fighting ire with fire|access-date=May 17, 2010|last=Rothstein|first=Betsy|date=November 3, 2008|work=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110622014852/http://thehill.com/capital-living/24113-fighting-ire-with-fire|archive-date=June 22, 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2004, ''[[National Review]]'' referred to MMfA staffers who had recently worked on the presidential campaigns of [[John Edwards]] and [[Wesley Clark]], for Congressman [[Barney Frank]], and for the [[Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee]].<ref name="York"/>


Eric E. Burns served as MMfA's president until 2011.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://bullfightstrategies.com/press.htm|work=Bullfight Strategies|title=Former Media Matters President Responds to Beck's Fox News Departure|access-date=November 28, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203020302/http://bullfightstrategies.com/press.htm|archive-date=December 3, 2013|url-status=live}}</ref> Burns was succeeded by Matt Butler, and then, in 2013, by Bradley Beychok.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Tau|first1=Byron|title=Media Matters names new president|url=http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2013/05/media-matters-names-new-president-163079|access-date=September 10, 2015|publisher=Politico|date=May 1, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304215143/http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2013/05/media-matters-names-new-president-163079|archive-date=March 4, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> In late 2016, [[Angelo Carusone]] replaced Bradley Beychok as MMfA's president. Under Carusone, the organization's focus has shifted toward focusing on the [[alt-right]], [[conspiracy theories]], and [[fake news]].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Gold |first=Hadas |date=December 6, 2016 |title=Media Matters to pivot away from focus on Fox News, as it names new president |url=http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/12/media-matters-announces-new-president-and-new-direction-232228 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170413072421/http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/12/media-matters-announces-new-president-and-new-direction-232228 |archive-date=April 13, 2017 |access-date=2017-04-12 |work=POLITICO}}</ref>
Eric E. Burns served as MMfA's president until 2011.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://bullfightstrategies.com/press.htm|work=Bullfight Strategies|title=Former Media Matters President Responds to Beck's Fox News Departure|access-date=November 28, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203020302/http://bullfightstrategies.com/press.htm|archive-date=December 3, 2013|url-status=live}}</ref> Burns was succeeded by Matt Butler, and then, in 2013, by Bradley Beychok.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Tau|first1=Byron|title=Media Matters names new president|url=https://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2013/05/media-matters-names-new-president-163079|access-date=September 10, 2015|work=Politico|date=May 1, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304215143/http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2013/05/media-matters-names-new-president-163079|archive-date=March 4, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> In late 2016, [[Angelo Carusone]] replaced Bradley Beychok as MMfA's president. Under Carusone, the organization's focus has shifted toward focusing on the [[alt-right]], [[conspiracy theories]], and [[fake news]].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Gold |first=Hadas |date=December 6, 2016 |title=Media Matters to pivot away from focus on Fox News, as it names new president |url=https://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/12/media-matters-announces-new-president-and-new-direction-232228 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170413072421/http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/12/media-matters-announces-new-president-and-new-direction-232228 |archive-date=April 13, 2017 |access-date=April 12, 2017 |work=Politico}}</ref>


In 2014, the staff of Media Matters voted to join the [[Service Employees International Union]] (SEIU). Initially, Media Matters management had declined to recognize the union through a [[card check]] process, instead exercising its right to force a union election which delayed the process until July when the vote went in favor of unionization.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Jamieson|first1=Dave|title=Media Matters Staff Votes To Join Union|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/01/media-matters-staff-votes-union_n_5547540.html|access-date=September 10, 2015|work=The Huffington Post|date=July 1, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150609022324/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/01/media-matters-staff-votes-union_n_5547540.html|archive-date=June 9, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Gold |first1=Hadas |author-link=Hadas Gold |date=April 29, 2014 |title=Media Matters 'not opposed' to unionizing |url=http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2014/04/media-matters-not-opposed-to-unionizing-187643 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151224092127/http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2014/04/media-matters-not-opposed-to-unionizing-187643 |archive-date=December 24, 2015 |access-date=September 10, 2015 |publisher=Politico |type=Blog post}}</ref>
In 2014, the staff of Media Matters voted to join the [[Service Employees International Union]] (SEIU). Initially, Media Matters management had declined to recognize the union through a [[card check]] process, instead exercising its right to force a union election which delayed the process until July when the vote went in favor of unionization.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Jamieson|first1=Dave|title=Media Matters Staff Votes To Join Union|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/01/media-matters-staff-votes-union_n_5547540.html|access-date=September 10, 2015|work=HuffPost|date=July 1, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150609022324/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/01/media-matters-staff-votes-union_n_5547540.html|archive-date=June 9, 2015|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Gold |first1=Hadas |author-link=Hadas Gold |date=April 29, 2014 |title=Media Matters 'not opposed' to unionizing |url=https://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2014/04/media-matters-not-opposed-to-unionizing-187643 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151224092127/http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2014/04/media-matters-not-opposed-to-unionizing-187643 |archive-date=December 24, 2015 |access-date=September 10, 2015 |work=Politico |type=Blog post}}</ref>


In May 2024, a dozen staffers at Media Matters were laid off amid a series of lawsuits and legal investigations by [[Elon Musk]] and Republican [[State attorney general|state attorneys general]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Griffing |first=Alex |date=2024-05-23 |title=Media Matters Staffers Announce Sweeping Lay Offs: 'There's a Reason Far-Right Billionaires Attack' |url=https://www.mediaite.com/news/media-matters-staffers-announce-sweeping-lay-offs-theres-a-reason-far-right-billionaires-attack/ |access-date=2024-05-23 |website=[[Mediaite]] |language=en |archive-date=May 23, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240523215946/https://www.mediaite.com/news/media-matters-staffers-announce-sweeping-lay-offs-theres-a-reason-far-right-billionaires-attack/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Baragona |first=Justin |date=2024-05-23 |title=Media Matters Lays Off a Dozen Staffers Amid Elon Musk Lawsuit |url=https://www.thedailybeast.com/media-matters-lays-off-a-dozen-staffers-amid-elon-musk-lawsuit |access-date=2024-05-24 |work=[[The Daily Beast]] |language=en |archive-date=May 24, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240524152952/https://www.thedailybeast.com/media-matters-lays-off-a-dozen-staffers-amid-elon-musk-lawsuit |url-status=live }}</ref>
In May 2024, a dozen staffers at Media Matters were laid off amid a series of lawsuits and legal investigations by [[Elon Musk]] and Republican [[state attorneys general]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Griffing |first=Alex |date=May 23, 2024 |title=Media Matters Staffers Announce Sweeping Lay Offs: 'There's a Reason Far-Right Billionaires Attack' |url=https://www.mediaite.com/news/media-matters-staffers-announce-sweeping-lay-offs-theres-a-reason-far-right-billionaires-attack/ |access-date=May 23, 2024 |website=[[Mediaite]] |language=en |archive-date=May 23, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240523215946/https://www.mediaite.com/news/media-matters-staffers-announce-sweeping-lay-offs-theres-a-reason-far-right-billionaires-attack/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Baragona |first=Justin |date=May 23, 2024 |title=Media Matters Lays Off a Dozen Staffers Amid Elon Musk Lawsuit |url=https://www.thedailybeast.com/media-matters-lays-off-a-dozen-staffers-amid-elon-musk-lawsuit |access-date=May 24, 2024 |work=[[The Daily Beast]] |language=en |archive-date=May 24, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240524152952/https://www.thedailybeast.com/media-matters-lays-off-a-dozen-staffers-amid-elon-musk-lawsuit |url-status=live }}</ref>


== Initiatives ==
== Initiatives ==


===Early research===
===Early research===
Media Matters analyzes American news sources from networks and channels to websites, including [[NBC]], [[American Broadcasting Company|ABC]], [[CBS]], [[PBS]], CNN, [[MSNBC]], [[CNBC]], [[One America News Network|OAN]], [[Breitbart News|Breitbart]] and Fox News, as well as [[conservative talk radio]]s. Its techniques include [[content analysis]], [[fact checking]], monitoring, and comparison of quotes or presentations from media figures to primary documents such as [[United States Department of Defense|Pentagon]] or [[Government Accountability Office]] reports.{{Citation needed|date=February 2024|reason=Removed WP:synthesis citation that was supporting this sentence}}
Media Matters analyzes American news sources from networks and channels to websites, including [[NBC]], [[American Broadcasting Company|ABC]], [[CBS]], [[PBS]], CNN, [[MSNBC]], [[CNBC]], [[One America News Network|OAN]], [[Breitbart]] and Fox News, as well as [[conservative talk radio]]s. Its techniques include [[content analysis]], [[fact checking]], monitoring, and comparison of quotes or presentations from media figures to primary documents such as [[United States Department of Defense|Pentagon]] or [[Government Accountability Office]] reports.{{Citation needed|date=February 2024|reason=Removed WP:synthesis citation that was supporting this sentence}}


Beginning in 2006, Media Matters for America has released a number of studies which documented that Democrats and progressives were outnumbered by Republicans and conservatives in terms of guest appearances on television news programs.<ref>{{cite news |last=Brass |first=Kevin |date=March 23, 2007 |title=Media Watch: Sunday Morning Blues? |url=http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/column?oid=oid%3A458467 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930171705/http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/column?oid=oid:458467 |archive-date=September 30, 2007 |access-date=September 26, 2007 |work=[[The Austin Chronicle]]}}</ref>{{Better source needed|reason=The current source is insufficiently reliable ([[WP:NOTRS]]).|date=February 2024}}
Beginning in 2006, Media Matters for America has released a number of studies which documented that Democrats and progressives were outnumbered by Republicans and conservatives in terms of guest appearances on television news programs.<ref>{{cite news |last=Brass |first=Kevin |date=March 23, 2007 |title=Media Watch: Sunday Morning Blues? |url=http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/column?oid=oid%3A458467 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930171705/http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/column?oid=oid:458467 |archive-date=September 30, 2007 |access-date=September 26, 2007 |work=[[The Austin Chronicle]]}}</ref>{{Better source needed|reason=The current source is insufficiently reliable ([[WP:NOTRS]]).|date=February 2024}}


On September 12, 2007, Media Matters released a comprehensive study of 1,377 U.S. newspapers and the 201 syndicated political columnists the papers carry on a regular basis. Media Matters said "in paper after paper, state after state, and region after region, conservative syndicated columnists get more space than their progressive counterparts."<ref>{{cite news |date=September 12, 2006 |title=Black and White and Re(a)d All Over: The Conservative Advantage in Syndicated Op-Ed Columnists |url=http://mediamatters.org/research/oped |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121007014810/http://mediamatters.org/research/oped/ |archive-date=October 7, 2012 |access-date=November 4, 2007 |publisher=Media Matters for America}}</ref> John Diaz, an editor at the ''[[San Francisco Chronicle]]'', cautioned that the small town columnists leaned significantly to the right, which he felt could explain the rightward slant in columnists even if the trend doesn't hold for papers with the largest readership.<ref>{{cite news |last=Diaz |first=John |date=September 29, 2007 |title=John Diaz An Editor's Note/Beyond the right-left labels |url=http://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Beyond-the-right-left-labels-2537719.php |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203012722/http://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Beyond-the-right-left-labels-2537719.php |archive-date=December 3, 2013 |access-date=November 28, 2013 |work=[[SF Gate]]}}</ref>
On September 12, 2007, Media Matters released a comprehensive study of 1,377 U.S. newspapers and the 201 syndicated political columnists the papers carry on a regular basis. Media Matters said "in paper after paper, state after state, and region after region, conservative syndicated columnists get more space than their progressive counterparts."<ref>{{cite news |date=September 12, 2006 |title=Black and White and Re(a)d All Over: The Conservative Advantage in Syndicated Op-Ed Columnists |url=http://mediamatters.org/research/oped |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121007014810/http://mediamatters.org/research/oped/ |archive-date=October 7, 2012 |access-date=November 4, 2007 |publisher=Media Matters for America}}</ref> John Diaz, an editor at the ''[[San Francisco Chronicle]]'', cautioned that the small town columnists leaned significantly to the right, which he felt could explain the rightward slant in columnists even if the trend doesn't hold for papers with the largest readership.<ref>{{cite news |last=Diaz |first=John |date=September 29, 2007 |title=John Diaz An Editor's Note/Beyond the right-left labels |url=http://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Beyond-the-right-left-labels-2537719.php |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203012722/http://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Beyond-the-right-left-labels-2537719.php |archive-date=December 3, 2013 |access-date=November 28, 2013 |work=[[San Francisco Chronicle]]}}</ref>


=== "Misinformer of the Year" ===
=== "Misinformer of the Year" ===
An annual feature on the Media Matters website is the title of "Misinformer of the Year", which is given to the journalist, commentator, or network that Media Matters contends was responsible for the most factual errors or claims. Past recipients include [[Rupert Murdoch]],<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |last=Lekach |first=Sasha |date=2017-12-20 |title='Misinformer of the Year' award goes to Mark Zuckerberg |url=https://mashable.com/article/mark-zuckerberg-fake-news-misinformer-award |access-date=2024-02-11 |website=Mashable |language=en |archive-date=October 1, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231001165116/https://mashable.com/article/mark-zuckerberg-fake-news-misinformer-award |url-status=live }}</ref> [[Sean Hannity]],<ref name=":2" /> [[Glenn Beck]],<ref name=":2" /> [[Mark Zuckerberg]],<ref name=":2" /> and [[Steve Bannon]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Vossoughian |first=Yasmin |title=Steve Bannon named Media Matter's "Misinformer of the Year" |url=https://www.msnbc.com/yasmin-vossoughian-reports/watch/steve-bannon-named-media-matter-s-misinformer-of-the-year-129945669892 |access-date=2024-02-11 |website=MSNBC.com |language=en |archive-date=May 26, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240526063340/https://www.msnbc.com/yasmin-vossoughian-reports/watch/steve-bannon-named-media-matter-s-misinformer-of-the-year-129945669892 |url-status=live }}</ref>
An annual feature on the Media Matters website is the title of "Misinformer of the Year", which is given to the journalist, commentator, or network that Media Matters contends was responsible for the most factual errors or claims. Past recipients include [[Rupert Murdoch]],<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |last=Lekach |first=Sasha |date=December 20, 2017 |title='Misinformer of the Year' award goes to Mark Zuckerberg |url=https://mashable.com/article/mark-zuckerberg-fake-news-misinformer-award |access-date=February 11, 2024 |website=Mashable |language=en |archive-date=October 1, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231001165116/https://mashable.com/article/mark-zuckerberg-fake-news-misinformer-award |url-status=live }}</ref> [[Sean Hannity]],<ref name=":2" /> [[Glenn Beck]],<ref name=":2" /> [[Mark Zuckerberg]],<ref name=":2" /> and [[Steve Bannon]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Vossoughian |first=Yasmin |title=Steve Bannon named Media Matter's "Misinformer of the Year" |url=https://www.msnbc.com/yasmin-vossoughian-reports/watch/steve-bannon-named-media-matter-s-misinformer-of-the-year-129945669892 |access-date=February 11, 2024 |publisher=MSNBC |language=en |archive-date=May 26, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240526063340/https://www.msnbc.com/yasmin-vossoughian-reports/watch/steve-bannon-named-media-matter-s-misinformer-of-the-year-129945669892 |url-status=live }}</ref>


=== Progressive Talent Initiative ===
=== Progressive Talent Initiative ===
Line 93: Line 93:
In 2009, Media Matters Action Network launched the Conservative Transparency website, aimed at tracking the funding of conservative activist organizations.<ref>{{cite news|last=Eggen|first=Dan|title=Liberal group eyes conservatives' connections|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/03/AR2009110300372_pf.html|access-date=June 19, 2011|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=November 3, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121112160549/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/03/AR2009110300372_pf.html|archive-date=November 12, 2012|url-status=live}}</ref> Media Matters Action Network established the Political Correction project with the goal of holding conservative politicians and advocacy groups accountable.<ref>{{cite news|last=Terris|first=Ben|title=Outside Conservative Ads Overwhelming the Midterm Campaigns|work=National Journal|date=October 28, 2010}}</ref>
In 2009, Media Matters Action Network launched the Conservative Transparency website, aimed at tracking the funding of conservative activist organizations.<ref>{{cite news|last=Eggen|first=Dan|title=Liberal group eyes conservatives' connections|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/03/AR2009110300372_pf.html|access-date=June 19, 2011|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=November 3, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121112160549/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/03/AR2009110300372_pf.html|archive-date=November 12, 2012|url-status=live}}</ref> Media Matters Action Network established the Political Correction project with the goal of holding conservative politicians and advocacy groups accountable.<ref>{{cite news|last=Terris|first=Ben|title=Outside Conservative Ads Overwhelming the Midterm Campaigns|work=National Journal|date=October 28, 2010}}</ref>


In December 2010, Media Matters Action Network started [[Equality Matters|EqualityMatters.org]], a site "in support of gay equality". At launch the site fully incorporated Media Matters's content on LGBT issues.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/20/us/politics/20marriage.html|title=One Battle Won, Gay Activists Shift Sights|author=Sheryl Stolberg|work=The New York Times|date=December 19, 2010|access-date=February 7, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161207132537/http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/20/us/politics/20marriage.html|archive-date=December 7, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> Designed to provide talking points for liberal activists and politicians, Brock set up the Message Matters project.<ref name="Zengerie">{{cite news |last=Zengerie |first=Jason |date=May 22, 2011 |title=If I Take Down Fox, Is All Forgiven? |url=http://nymag.com/news/media/david-brock-media-matters-2011-5/index4.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121022155341/http://nymag.com/%2Fnews%2Fmedia%2Fdavid-brock-media-matters-2011-5%2Findex4.html |archive-date=October 22, 2012 |access-date=June 11, 2011 |work=[[New York (magazine)|New York magazine]]}}</ref> Media Matters runs the website DropFox.com and works to get advertisers to boycott Fox News. One target, [[Orbitz]], initially referred to Media Matters' efforts as a "smear campaign",<ref>{{cite news|last=Bond|first=Paul|title=Orbitz Backs Fox News Channel Amid Media Matters' 'Smear Campaign'|url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/orbitz-backs-fox-news-channel-190372|access-date=May 28, 2011|work=The Hollywood Reporter|date=May 19, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110523052904/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/orbitz-backs-fox-news-channel-190372|archive-date=May 23, 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> but agreed, on June 9, 2011, following a three-week effort by prominent LGBT organizations, to "review the policies and process used to evaluate where advertising is placed".<ref>{{cite web |author=Rothaus |first=Steve |date=June 9, 2011 |title=Orbitz agrees to review advertising policies following campaign by LGBT groups |url=http://miamiherald.typepad.com/gaysouthflorida/2011/06/orbitz-agrees-to-review-advertising-policy-on-fox-news-channel-following-campaign-by-lgbt-groups.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203013917/http://miamiherald.typepad.com/gaysouthflorida/2011/06/orbitz-agrees-to-review-advertising-policy-on-fox-news-channel-following-campaign-by-lgbt-groups.html |archive-date=December 3, 2013 |access-date=November 28, 2013 |website=[[Miami Herald]] |publisher= |type=Opinion}}</ref> In 2015, the formal Equality Matters program was deactivated and merged with the LGBT Program within Media Matters.{{Citation needed|date=June 2024}}
In December 2010, Media Matters Action Network started [[Equality Matters|EqualityMatters.org]], a site "in support of gay equality". At launch the site fully incorporated Media Matters's content on LGBT issues.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/20/us/politics/20marriage.html|title=One Battle Won, Gay Activists Shift Sights|author=Sheryl Stolberg|work=The New York Times|date=December 19, 2010|access-date=February 7, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161207132537/http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/20/us/politics/20marriage.html|archive-date=December 7, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> Designed to provide talking points for liberal activists and politicians, Brock set up the Message Matters project.<ref name="Zengerie">{{cite news |last=Zengerie |first=Jason |date=May 22, 2011 |title=If I Take Down Fox, Is All Forgiven? |url=http://nymag.com/news/media/david-brock-media-matters-2011-5/index4.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121022155341/http://nymag.com/%2Fnews%2Fmedia%2Fdavid-brock-media-matters-2011-5%2Findex4.html |archive-date=October 22, 2012 |access-date=June 11, 2011 |work=[[New York (magazine)|New York]]}}</ref> Media Matters runs the website DropFox.com and works to get advertisers to boycott Fox News. One target, [[Orbitz]], initially referred to Media Matters' efforts as a "smear campaign",<ref>{{cite news|last=Bond|first=Paul|title=Orbitz Backs Fox News Channel Amid Media Matters' 'Smear Campaign'|url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/orbitz-backs-fox-news-channel-190372|access-date=May 28, 2011|work=The Hollywood Reporter|date=May 19, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110523052904/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/orbitz-backs-fox-news-channel-190372|archive-date=May 23, 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> but agreed, on June 9, 2011, following a three-week effort by prominent LGBT organizations, to "review the policies and process used to evaluate where advertising is placed".<ref>{{cite web |author=Rothaus |first=Steve |date=June 9, 2011 |title=Orbitz agrees to review advertising policies following campaign by LGBT groups |url=http://miamiherald.typepad.com/gaysouthflorida/2011/06/orbitz-agrees-to-review-advertising-policy-on-fox-news-channel-following-campaign-by-lgbt-groups.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203013917/http://miamiherald.typepad.com/gaysouthflorida/2011/06/orbitz-agrees-to-review-advertising-policy-on-fox-news-channel-following-campaign-by-lgbt-groups.html |archive-date=December 3, 2013 |access-date=November 28, 2013 |website=[[Miami Herald]] |type=Opinion}}</ref> In 2015, the formal Equality Matters program was deactivated and merged with the LGBT Program within Media Matters.{{Citation needed|date=June 2024}}


=== American Bridge 21st Century ===
=== American Bridge 21st century ===
Brock established [[American Bridge 21st Century]] as a super [[political action committee|PAC]] focused on [[opposition research]] in 2010.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Haberman |first1=Maggie |date=July 17, 2015 |title=David Brock, Key Hillary Clinton Ally, to Work More Closely With Her Campaign |url=https://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/07/17/david-brock-key-hillary-clinton-ally-to-work-more-closely-with-her-campaign/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150824055129/http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/07/17/david-brock-key-hillary-clinton-ally-to-work-more-closely-with-her-campaign/ |archive-date=August 24, 2015 |access-date=September 10, 2015 |work=The New York Times}}</ref>
Brock established [[American Bridge 21st Century]] as a super [[political action committee|PAC]] focused on [[opposition research]] in 2010.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Haberman |first1=Maggie |date=July 17, 2015 |title=David Brock, Key Hillary Clinton Ally, to Work More Closely With Her Campaign |url=https://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/07/17/david-brock-key-hillary-clinton-ally-to-work-more-closely-with-her-campaign/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150824055129/http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/07/17/david-brock-key-hillary-clinton-ally-to-work-more-closely-with-her-campaign/ |archive-date=August 24, 2015 |access-date=September 10, 2015 |work=The New York Times}}</ref>


Line 103: Line 103:
===Rush Limbaugh "phony soldiers"===
===Rush Limbaugh "phony soldiers"===
{{Main|Phony soldiers controversy}}
{{Main|Phony soldiers controversy}}
In September 2007, Media Matters reported on radio talk show host [[Rush Limbaugh]] saying [[Iraq War]] veterans opposed to the war were "the phony soldiers". Limbaugh later said he was speaking of only one soldier, [[Jesse Macbeth]], who had falsely claimed to have been decorated for valor but had never seen combat. Limbaugh said he was the victim of a "smear" by Media Matters, which had taken out of context and selectively edited his comments. After Limbaugh published what he said was the entire transcript of phony soldiers discussion, Media Matters reported that over a minute and 30 seconds was omitted without "notation or ellipsis to indicate that there is, in fact, a break in the transcript."<ref>{{cite web|title=Limbaugh falsely recasts 'phony soldiers' smear|publisher=Media Matters|date=September 28, 2007|url=http://mediamatters.org/research/2007/09/28/limbaugh-falsely-recasts-phony-soldiers-smear/139980|access-date=August 12, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121010235353/http://mediamatters.org/research/2007/09/28/limbaugh-falsely-recasts-phony-soldiers-smear/139980|archive-date=October 10, 2012|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Limbaugh selectively edited 'phony soldiers' clip, claimed it was "the entire transcript"|publisher=Media Matters|date=September 28, 2007|url=http://mediamatters.org/research/2007/09/28/limbaugh-selectively-edited-phony-soldiers-clip/139979|access-date=August 12, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120925014757/http://mediamatters.org/research/2007/09/28/limbaugh-selectively-edited-phony-soldiers-clip/139979|archive-date=September 25, 2012|url-status=live}}</ref> Limbaugh told ''National Review'' that the gap between referring to "phony soldiers" and MacBeth was a delay because his staff printed out an ABC news story that reported on what it called "phony soldiers" and that his transcript and audio edits were "for space and relevance reasons, not to hide anything."<ref>{{cite web |last=York |first=Byron |author-link=Byron York |date=October 3, 2007 |title=Limbaugh Makes His Case |url=http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/222373/limbaugh-makes-his-case/byron-york |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110512221334/http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/222373/limbaugh-makes-his-case/byron-york |archive-date=May 12, 2011 |access-date=August 16, 2010 |work=[[National Review Online]]}}</ref>
In September 2007, Media Matters reported on radio talk show host [[Rush Limbaugh]] saying [[Iraq War]] veterans opposed to the war were "the phony soldiers". Limbaugh later said he was speaking of only one soldier, [[Jesse Macbeth]], who had falsely claimed to have been decorated for valor but had never seen combat. Limbaugh said he was the victim of a "smear" by Media Matters, which had taken out of context and selectively edited his comments. After Limbaugh published what he said was the entire transcript of phony soldiers discussion, Media Matters reported that over a minute and 30 seconds was omitted without "notation or ellipsis to indicate that there is, in fact, a break in the transcript."<ref>{{cite web|title=Limbaugh falsely recasts 'phony soldiers' smear|publisher=Media Matters|date=September 28, 2007|url=http://mediamatters.org/research/2007/09/28/limbaugh-falsely-recasts-phony-soldiers-smear/139980|access-date=August 12, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121010235353/http://mediamatters.org/research/2007/09/28/limbaugh-falsely-recasts-phony-soldiers-smear/139980|archive-date=October 10, 2012|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Limbaugh selectively edited 'phony soldiers' clip, claimed it was "the entire transcript"|publisher=Media Matters|date=September 28, 2007|url=http://mediamatters.org/research/2007/09/28/limbaugh-selectively-edited-phony-soldiers-clip/139979|access-date=August 12, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120925014757/http://mediamatters.org/research/2007/09/28/limbaugh-selectively-edited-phony-soldiers-clip/139979|archive-date=September 25, 2012|url-status=live}}</ref> Limbaugh told ''National Review'' that the gap between referring to "phony soldiers" and MacBeth was a delay because his staff printed out an ABC news story that reported on what it called "phony soldiers" and that his transcript and audio edits were "for space and relevance reasons, not to hide anything."<ref>{{cite web |last=York |first=Byron |author-link=Byron York |date=October 3, 2007 |title=Limbaugh Makes His Case |url=http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/222373/limbaugh-makes-his-case/byron-york |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110512221334/http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/222373/limbaugh-makes-his-case/byron-york |archive-date=May 12, 2011 |access-date=August 16, 2010 |work=[[National Review]]}}</ref>


The [[Associated Press]], CNN, and ABC reported on the controversy,<ref>{{cite web |date=October 3, 2007 |title=Rush Limbaugh Comments Spark Outrage |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=3683929&page=1 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110430072758/https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=3683929&page=1 |archive-date=April 30, 2011 |access-date=August 16, 2010 |work=ABC News}}</ref> as [[political satire|political satirist]] and fictional pundit [[Stephen Colbert (character)|Stephen Colbert]] lampooned Limbaugh and his defenders saying: "Hey, Media Matters, you want to end offensive speech? Then stop recording it for people who would be offended."<ref>{{cite web |date=October 9, 2007 |title=Colbert: "Hey, Media Matters, you want to end offensive speech? Then stop recording it for people who would be offended." |url=https://www.mediamatters.org/stephen-colbert/colbert-hey-media-matters-you-want-end-offensive-speech-then-stop-recording-it |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120928202412/http://mediamatters.org/research/2007/10/09/reporting-on-allard-attending-visa-sponsored-ev/141446 |archive-date=September 28, 2012 |access-date=January 9, 2008 |website=Media Matters for America}}</ref>
The [[Associated Press]], CNN, and ABC reported on the controversy,<ref>{{cite web |date=October 3, 2007 |title=Rush Limbaugh Comments Spark Outrage |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=3683929&page=1 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110430072758/https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=3683929&page=1 |archive-date=April 30, 2011 |access-date=August 16, 2010 |work=ABC News}}</ref> as [[political satirist]] and fictional pundit [[Stephen Colbert (character)|Stephen Colbert]] lampooned Limbaugh and his defenders saying: "Hey, Media Matters, you want to end offensive speech? Then stop recording it for people who would be offended."<ref>{{cite web |date=October 9, 2007 |title=Colbert: "Hey, Media Matters, you want to end offensive speech? Then stop recording it for people who would be offended." |url=https://www.mediamatters.org/stephen-colbert/colbert-hey-media-matters-you-want-end-offensive-speech-then-stop-recording-it |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120928202412/http://mediamatters.org/research/2007/10/09/reporting-on-allard-attending-visa-sponsored-ev/141446 |archive-date=September 28, 2012 |access-date=January 9, 2008 |website=Media Matters for America}}</ref>


===Bill O'Reilly Harlem restaurant===
===Bill O'Reilly Harlem restaurant===
In October 2007 television and radio host and commentator [[Bill O'Reilly (political commentator)|Bill O'Reilly]] said a Media Matters headline declaring "O'Reilly surprised 'there was no difference' between [[Harlem]] restaurant and other [[New York City|New York]] restaurants" took out of context comments he made regarding a pleasant dinner he shared with [[Al Sharpton]] at a Harlem restaurant.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://mediamatters.org/research/2007/09/21/oreilly-surprised-there-was-no-difference-betwe/139893|title=Media Matters: O'Reilly surprised "there was no difference" between Harlem restaurant and other New York restaurants|website=Media Matters for America|date=September 21, 2007 |access-date=August 1, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120925014736/http://mediamatters.org/research/2007/09/21/oreilly-surprised-there-was-no-difference-betwe/139893|archive-date=September 25, 2012|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Bauder|first=David|title=Bill O'Reilly Says He's Being Smeared|agency=Associated Press|date=September 26, 2007|url=http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/life/people/2007-09-26-oreilly_N.htm|access-date=September 26, 2007|work=USA Today|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121104180656/http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/life/people/2007-09-26-oreilly_N.htm|archive-date=November 4, 2012|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=O'Reilly |first=Bill |date=September 26, 2007 |title=CNN Goes Over to the Dark Side |url=https://www.foxnews.com/story/cnn-goes-over-to-the-dark-side/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131215225937/http://www.foxnews.com/story/2007/09/26/cnn-goes-over-to-dark-sid-1410350411/ |archive-date=December 15, 2013 |access-date=October 4, 2007 |work=Fox News Channel}}</ref> O'Reilly said Media Matters misleadingly took comments spoken five minutes apart and presented them as one.<ref>{{cite news |last=O'Reilly |first=Bill |date=September 27, 2007 |title=Media Matters and the Corrupt Press on the Run |url=https://www.foxnews.com/story/media-matters-and-the-corrupt-press-on-the-run/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131215143941/http://www.foxnews.com/story/2007/09/27/media-matters-and-corrupt-press-on-run/ |archive-date=December 15, 2013 |access-date=October 4, 2007 |work=Fox News Channel}}</ref> On NBC's ''[[Today (NBC program)|Today]]'', Media Matters senior fellow [[Paul Waldman]] said Media Matters had included "the full audio, the full transcript, nothing was taken out of context".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Waldman |first=Paul |date=2007-09-26 |title=Media Matters' Waldman: "[I]f Bill O'Reilly got caught robbing a bank he would say he was taken out of context" |url=https://www.mediamatters.org/nbc/media-matters-waldman-if-bill-oreilly-got-caught-robbing-bank-he-would-say-he-was-taken-out |access-date=2024-06-04 |website=Media Matters for America |language=en}}</ref>
In October 2007 television and radio host and commentator [[Bill O'Reilly (political commentator)|Bill O'Reilly]] said a Media Matters headline declaring "O'Reilly surprised 'there was no difference' between [[Harlem]] restaurant and other New York City restaurants" took out of context comments he made regarding a pleasant dinner he shared with [[Al Sharpton]] at a Harlem restaurant.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://mediamatters.org/research/2007/09/21/oreilly-surprised-there-was-no-difference-betwe/139893|title=Media Matters: O'Reilly surprised "there was no difference" between Harlem restaurant and other New York restaurants|website=Media Matters for America|date=September 21, 2007 |access-date=August 1, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120925014736/http://mediamatters.org/research/2007/09/21/oreilly-surprised-there-was-no-difference-betwe/139893|archive-date=September 25, 2012|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Bauder|first=David|title=Bill O'Reilly Says He's Being Smeared|agency=Associated Press|date=September 26, 2007|url=http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/life/people/2007-09-26-oreilly_N.htm|access-date=September 26, 2007|work=USA Today|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121104180656/http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/life/people/2007-09-26-oreilly_N.htm|archive-date=November 4, 2012|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=O'Reilly |first=Bill |date=September 26, 2007 |title=CNN Goes Over to the Dark Side |url=https://www.foxnews.com/story/cnn-goes-over-to-the-dark-side/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131215225937/http://www.foxnews.com/story/2007/09/26/cnn-goes-over-to-dark-sid-1410350411/ |archive-date=December 15, 2013 |access-date=October 4, 2007 |publisher=Fox News}}</ref> O'Reilly said Media Matters misleadingly took comments spoken five minutes apart and presented them as one.<ref>{{cite news |last=O'Reilly |first=Bill |date=September 27, 2007 |title=Media Matters and the Corrupt Press on the Run |url=https://www.foxnews.com/story/media-matters-and-the-corrupt-press-on-the-run/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131215143941/http://www.foxnews.com/story/2007/09/27/media-matters-and-corrupt-press-on-run/ |archive-date=December 15, 2013 |access-date=October 4, 2007 |publisher=Fox News}}</ref> On NBC's ''[[Today (NBC program)|Today]]'', Media Matters senior fellow [[Paul Waldman]] said Media Matters had included "the full audio, the full transcript, nothing was taken out of context".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Waldman |first=Paul |date=September 26, 2007 |title=Media Matters' Waldman: "[I]f Bill O'Reilly got caught robbing a bank he would say he was taken out of context" |url=https://www.mediamatters.org/nbc/media-matters-waldman-if-bill-oreilly-got-caught-robbing-bank-he-would-say-he-was-taken-out |access-date=June 4, 2024 |website=Media Matters for America |language=en}}</ref>


===Laura Schlessinger racial slur===
===Laura Schlessinger racial slur===
On August 12, 2010, Media Matters reported that radio host [[Laura Schlessinger]] said the word "[[nigger]]" eleven times during a discussion with an African-American woman, although Schlessinger did not [[Use–mention distinction|use the word as a slur]]. Schlessinger continued to say the word after the caller took offense, saying she thought the woman was being too sensitive and that a double standard was being used to determine who could say the word. Schlessinger also said that those "hypersensitive" about color should not "marry outside of their race". The caller had earlier in the discussion said her husband was white.<ref name="Plambeck">{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/19/arts/television/19laura.html|work=The New York Times|title='Dr. Laura' Retreats After Use of Epithet|first=Joseph|last=Plambeck|date=August 19, 2010|access-date=February 7, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170812102252/http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/19/arts/television/19laura.html|archive-date=August 12, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://mediamatters.org/blog/2010/08/12/full-audio-dr-laura-schlessingers-n-word-rant/169161 |title=Full Audio: Dr. Laura Schlessinger's N-word rant |website=Media Matters for America |date=August 12, 2010 |access-date=November 28, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203064119/http://mediamatters.org/blog/2010/08/12/full-audio-dr-laura-schlessingers-n-word-rant/169161 |archive-date=December 3, 2013 |url-status=live }}</ref> Schlessinger apologized for the epithet the day after the broadcast. A joint statement of Media Matters and other organizations noted that although Schlessinger "attempted to apologize for using the epithet, the racist diatribe on Tuesday's show extends far beyond the use of a single word" and urged advertisers to boycott her show. After General Motors, [[OnStar]], and [[Motel 6]] pulled their advertising, Schlessinger said she would not renew her syndication contract set to expire December 2010.<ref name="Plambeck"/><ref>{{cite news |author=Wire Staff |date=August 20, 2010 |title=Dr. Laura to end her radio show |url=http://www.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/celebrity.news.gossip/08/17/doctor.laura.ends.show |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100821032559/http://www.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/celebrity.news.gossip/08/17/doctor.laura.ends.show/ |archive-date=August 21, 2010 |access-date=August 23, 2010 |work=CNN}}</ref> In January 2011, her show resumed on satellite radio.<ref>{{cite web |last=Russian |first=Demian |date=November 29, 2010 |title=Laura Ingraham |url=http://satelliteradioplayground.com/tag/laura-ingraham |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203022012/http://satelliteradioplayground.com/tag/laura-ingraham/ |archive-date=December 3, 2013 |access-date=November 28, 2013 |publisher=Satellite Radio Playground}}</ref>
On August 12, 2010, Media Matters reported that radio host [[Laura Schlessinger]] said the word "[[nigger]]" eleven times during a discussion with an African-American woman, although Schlessinger did not [[Use–mention distinction|use the word as a slur]]. Schlessinger continued to say the word after the caller took offense, saying she thought the woman was being too sensitive and that a double standard was being used to determine who could say the word. Schlessinger also said that those "hypersensitive" about color should not "marry outside of their race". The caller had earlier in the discussion said her husband was white.<ref name="Plambeck">{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/19/arts/television/19laura.html|work=The New York Times|title='Dr. Laura' Retreats After Use of Epithet|first=Joseph|last=Plambeck|date=August 19, 2010|access-date=February 7, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170812102252/http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/19/arts/television/19laura.html|archive-date=August 12, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://mediamatters.org/blog/2010/08/12/full-audio-dr-laura-schlessingers-n-word-rant/169161 |title=Full Audio: Dr. Laura Schlessinger's N-word rant |website=Media Matters for America |date=August 12, 2010 |access-date=November 28, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203064119/http://mediamatters.org/blog/2010/08/12/full-audio-dr-laura-schlessingers-n-word-rant/169161 |archive-date=December 3, 2013 |url-status=live }}</ref> Schlessinger apologized for the epithet the day after the broadcast. A joint statement of Media Matters and other organizations noted that although Schlessinger "attempted to apologize for using the epithet, the racist diatribe on Tuesday's show extends far beyond the use of a single word" and urged advertisers to boycott her show. After General Motors, [[OnStar]], and [[Motel 6]] pulled their advertising, Schlessinger said she would not renew her syndication contract set to expire December 2010.<ref name="Plambeck"/><ref>{{cite news |date=August 20, 2010 |title=Dr. Laura to end her radio show |url=http://www.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/celebrity.news.gossip/08/17/doctor.laura.ends.show |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100821032559/http://www.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/celebrity.news.gossip/08/17/doctor.laura.ends.show/ |archive-date=August 21, 2010 |access-date=August 23, 2010 |publisher=CNN}}</ref> In January 2011, her show resumed on satellite radio.<ref>{{cite web |last=Russian |first=Demian |date=November 29, 2010 |title=Laura Ingraham |url=http://satelliteradioplayground.com/tag/laura-ingraham |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203022012/http://satelliteradioplayground.com/tag/laura-ingraham/ |archive-date=December 3, 2013 |access-date=November 28, 2013 |publisher=Satellite Radio Playground}}</ref>


Schlessinger held Media Matters responsible for the boycott, which she called a typical tactic of the group to fulfill its "sole purpose of silencing people". She said the boycotts' "threat of attack on my advertisers and stations" had violated her First Amendment free speech rights.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1008/17/lkl.01.html |publisher=[[CNN]] |title=Dr. Laura to End Her Radio Show (transcript) |work=[[Larry King Live]] |date=August 17, 2010 |access-date=2017-02-28 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110512221325/http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1008/17/lkl.01.html |archive-date=May 12, 2011 |url-status=live }}</ref> Media Matters said that, as the boycott was not "government-sanctioned censorship", her [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|First Amendment]] rights had not been violated.<ref>[http://mediamatters.org/blog/2010/08/19/palin-ratchets-up-absurd-and-offensive-defense/169529 Palin ratchets up absurd and offensive defense of Dr. Laura, claims they've been "shackled" by critics] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203065303/http://mediamatters.org/blog/2010/08/19/palin-ratchets-up-absurd-and-offensive-defense/169529 |date=December 3, 2013 }}, MediaMatters.org. Retrieved January 5, 2015.</ref>
Schlessinger held Media Matters responsible for the boycott, which she called a typical tactic of the group to fulfill its "sole purpose of silencing people". She said the boycotts' "threat of attack on my advertisers and stations" had violated her First Amendment free speech rights.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1008/17/lkl.01.html |work=[[Larry King Live]]|publisher=[[CNN]] |title=Dr. Laura to End Her Radio Show (transcript) |date=August 17, 2010 |access-date=February 28, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110512221325/http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1008/17/lkl.01.html |archive-date=May 12, 2011 |url-status=live }}</ref> Media Matters said that, as the boycott was not "government-sanctioned censorship", her [[First Amendment]] rights had not been violated.<ref>[http://mediamatters.org/blog/2010/08/19/palin-ratchets-up-absurd-and-offensive-defense/169529 Palin ratchets up absurd and offensive defense of Dr. Laura, claims they've been "shackled" by critics] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203065303/http://mediamatters.org/blog/2010/08/19/palin-ratchets-up-absurd-and-offensive-defense/169529 |date=December 3, 2013 }}, MediaMatters.org. Retrieved January 5, 2015.</ref>


==="Drop Fox" campaign===
==="Drop Fox" campaign===
During an interview in March 2011, Brock said MMfA would focus its efforts on Fox News and select conservative websites in a new strategy that Brock described as a campaign of "guerrilla warfare and sabotage" and a "war on Fox."<ref name="Smith">{{cite web|url=http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/51949.html|title=Media Matters' war against Fox|first=Ben|last=Smith|publisher=Politico|date=March 26, 2011|access-date=March 27, 2011|author-link=Ben Smith (journalist)|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110328075934/http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/51949.html|archive-date=March 28, 2011|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Hayden |first1=Erik |title=The Weird Case Against Media Matters's Non-Profit Status |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/03/media-matters-fox/349123/ |website=The Atlantic |access-date=30 November 2023 |date=28 March 2011 |archive-date=December 3, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241203061202/https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/03/media-matters-fox/349123/ |url-status=live }}</ref> MMfA said the greater attention given to Fox News was part of an initiative to educate the public about what it regarded as the distortions of conservative media, and the greater attention given to Fox News was in line with its prominence. MMfA said its Drop Fox initiative, for advertisers to boycott Fox, was also part of the organization's educational mission. MMfA said that changing Fox, not shutting it down, was its intention.<ref name="Politico 2011-07-07">{{cite web |last=Hagey |first=Keach |date=July 7, 2011 |title=Fox News takes on Media Matters |url=http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0711/58468.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131204012302/http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0711/58468.html |archive-date=December 4, 2013 |access-date=November 28, 2013 |publisher=Politico}}</ref>
During an interview in March 2011, Brock said MMfA would focus its efforts on Fox News and select conservative websites in a new strategy that Brock described as a campaign of "guerrilla warfare and sabotage" and a "war on Fox."<ref name="Smith">{{cite web|url=https://www.politico.com/story/2011/03/media-matters-war-against-fox-051949|title=Media Matters' war against Fox|first=Ben|last=Smith|work=Politico|date=March 26, 2011|access-date=March 27, 2011|author-link=Ben Smith (journalist)|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110328075934/http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/51949.html|archive-date=March 28, 2011|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Hayden |first1=Erik |title=The Weird Case Against Media Matters's Non-Profit Status |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/03/media-matters-fox/349123/ |website=The Atlantic |access-date=November 30, 2023 |date=March 28, 2011 |archive-date=December 3, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241203061202/https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/03/media-matters-fox/349123/ |url-status=live }}</ref> MMfA said the greater attention given to Fox News was part of an initiative to educate the public about what it regarded as the distortions of conservative media, and the greater attention given to Fox News was in line with its prominence. MMfA said its Drop Fox initiative, for advertisers to boycott Fox, was also part of the organization's educational mission. MMfA said that changing Fox, not shutting it down, was its intention.<ref name="Politico 2011-07-07">{{cite web |last=Hagey |first=Keach |date=July 7, 2011 |title=Fox News takes on Media Matters |url=https://www.politico.com/story/2011/07/fox-news-takes-aim-at-media-matters-058468 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131204012302/http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0711/58468.html |archive-date=December 4, 2013 |access-date=November 28, 2013 |work=Politico}}</ref>


In December 2013, MMfA's then-Executive Vice President Angelo Carusone said "The war on Fox is over. And it's not just that it's over, but it was very successful. To a large extent, we won," claiming to have "effectively discredited the network's desire to be seen as '[[fair and balanced]].'" Around that time, Glenn Beck had departed the network and Sean Hannity's time slot was moved from 9 p.m. to 10 p.m.<ref>Terkel, Amanda. [https://www.huffpost.com/entry/media-matters-fox_n_4433207 "Media Matters Declares Victory: 'The War on Fox is Over'"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231121165557/https://www.huffpost.com/entry/media-matters-fox_n_4433207 |date=November 21, 2023 }} ''The Huffington Post''; December 13, 2013. Retrieved January 6, 2015.</ref> Other boycotts of cable news programs continued after the campaign, with [[PolitiFact]] suggesting that the boycotts are more successful in raising awareness than having an impact on the companies' bottom-line.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |last=McCarthy |first=Bill |date=July 22, 2019 |title=The facts on advertiser boycotts against cable news networks |url=https://www.politifact.com/article/2019/jul/22/facts-advertiser-boycotts-against-cable-news-netwo/ |website=PolitiFact |access-date=February 24, 2021 |archive-date=February 24, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210224111710/https://www.politifact.com/article/2019/jul/22/facts-advertiser-boycotts-against-cable-news-netwo/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
In December 2013, MMfA's then-Executive Vice President Angelo Carusone said "The war on Fox is over. And it's not just that it's over, but it was very successful. To a large extent, we won," claiming to have "effectively discredited the network's desire to be seen as '[[fair and balanced]].'" Around that time, Glenn Beck had departed the network and Sean Hannity's time slot was moved from 9 p.m. to 10&nbsp;pm.<ref>Terkel, Amanda. [https://www.huffpost.com/entry/media-matters-fox_n_4433207 "Media Matters Declares Victory: 'The War on Fox is Over'"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231121165557/https://www.huffpost.com/entry/media-matters-fox_n_4433207 |date=November 21, 2023 }} ''The Huffington Post''; December 13, 2013. Retrieved January 6, 2015.</ref> Other boycotts of cable news programs continued after the campaign, with [[PolitiFact]] suggesting that the boycotts are more successful in raising awareness than having an impact on the companies' bottom-line.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |last=McCarthy |first=Bill |date=July 22, 2019 |title=The facts on advertiser boycotts against cable news networks |url=https://www.politifact.com/article/2019/jul/22/facts-advertiser-boycotts-against-cable-news-netwo/ |website=PolitiFact |access-date=February 24, 2021 |archive-date=February 24, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210224111710/https://www.politifact.com/article/2019/jul/22/facts-advertiser-boycotts-against-cable-news-netwo/ |url-status=live }}</ref>


===Tucker Carlson audio recordings===
===Tucker Carlson audio recordings===
In March 2019, MMfA released audio recordings of Fox News host [[Tucker Carlson]], in which he made remarks demeaning to women between 2006 and 2011 on the call-in show hosted by shock jock [[Bubba the Love Sponge]]. Among other comments, Carlson called [[rape shield law]]s "unfair", defended [[Mormon fundamentalist]] church leader [[Warren Jeffs]], who had been charged of [[child sexual assault]], and called women "extremely primitive". After Carlson's remarks had been widely reported, Carlson tweeted: "Media Matters caught me saying something naughty on a radio show more than a decade ago" and declined to apologize.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Cummings |first=William |date=March 11, 2019 |title=Tucker Carlson refuses to apologize amid uproar over past comments on 'extremely primitive' women |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/03/11/fox-tucker-carlson-bubba-love-sponge-comments-spark-uproar/3127666002/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190728053203/https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/03/11/fox-tucker-carlson-bubba-love-sponge-comments-spark-uproar/3127666002/ |archive-date=July 28, 2019 |access-date=2019-03-19 |website=USA Today |language=en}}</ref> The following day, MMfA released a second set of audio recordings in which Carlson referred to [[Iraqis]] as "semiliterate primitive monkeys" and said they "don't use toilet paper or forks." Carlson also suggested that immigrants to the U.S. should be "hot" or "really smart" and that white men "created civilization".<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Brice-Saddler |first1=Michael |last2=Rosenberg |first2=Eli |date=March 11, 2019 |title=Fox News host Tucker Carlson uses racist, homophobic language in second set of recordings |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts-entertainment/2019/03/12/new-tucker-carlson-audio-released-this-time-using-racist-homophobic-language/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190319225139/https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts-entertainment/2019/03/12/new-tucker-carlson-audio-released-this-time-using-racist-homophobic-language/ |archive-date=March 19, 2019 |access-date=March 19, 2019 |newspaper=The Washington Post}}</ref>
In March 2019, MMfA released audio recordings of Fox News host [[Tucker Carlson]], in which he made remarks demeaning to women between 2006 and 2011 on the call-in show hosted by shock jock [[Bubba the Love Sponge]]. Among other comments, Carlson called [[rape shield law]]s "unfair", defended [[Mormon fundamentalist]] church leader [[Warren Jeffs]], who had been charged of [[child sexual assault]], and called women "extremely primitive". After Carlson's remarks had been widely reported, Carlson tweeted: "Media Matters caught me saying something naughty on a radio show more than a decade ago" and declined to apologize.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Cummings |first=William |date=March 11, 2019 |title=Tucker Carlson refuses to apologize amid uproar over past comments on 'extremely primitive' women |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/03/11/fox-tucker-carlson-bubba-love-sponge-comments-spark-uproar/3127666002/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190728053203/https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/03/11/fox-tucker-carlson-bubba-love-sponge-comments-spark-uproar/3127666002/ |archive-date=July 28, 2019 |access-date=March 19, 2019 |website=USA Today |language=en}}</ref> The following day, MMfA released a second set of audio recordings in which Carlson referred to [[Iraqis]] as "semiliterate primitive monkeys" and said they "don't use toilet paper or forks." Carlson also suggested that immigrants to the U.S. should be "hot" or "really smart" and that white men "created civilization".<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Brice-Saddler |first1=Michael |last2=Rosenberg |first2=Eli |date=March 11, 2019 |title=Fox News host Tucker Carlson uses racist, homophobic language in second set of recordings |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts-entertainment/2019/03/12/new-tucker-carlson-audio-released-this-time-using-racist-homophobic-language/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190319225139/https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts-entertainment/2019/03/12/new-tucker-carlson-audio-released-this-time-using-racist-homophobic-language/ |archive-date=March 19, 2019 |access-date=March 19, 2019 |newspaper=The Washington Post}}</ref>


''[[The Daily Caller]]'', which Carlson co-founded, responded by resurfacing blog posts made by MMfA's president Angelo Carusone. These blog posts included derogatory comments about [[transvestites]], [[Jews]], and people from [[Japan]] and [[Bangladesh]]. Carusone responded by saying that the posts were supposed to be a "caricature of what a right wing blowhard would sound like if he was living my life" and apologized for the "gross" remarks.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Axelrod |first1=Tal |title=Media Matters president facing scrutiny for derogatory comments, racial slurs in resurfaced posts |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/media/433979-media-matters-president-made-insensitive-comments-used-racial-slurs-in/ |work=The Hill |date=13 March 2019 |language=en |access-date=March 14, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190314235320/https://thehill.com/homenews/media/433979-media-matters-president-made-insensitive-comments-used-racial-slurs-in |archive-date=March 14, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Palmer |first1=Ewan |title=Donald Trump Jr. wants to know where's the outrage over Media Matters president's blog comments |url=https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-jr-media-matters-angelo-carusone-blog-tucker-carlson-1362709 |work=Newsweek |date=14 March 2019 |language=en |access-date=March 14, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190314185730/https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-jr-media-matters-angelo-carusone-blog-tucker-carlson-1362709 |archive-date=March 14, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Levine |first1=Jon |title=Tucker Carlson Lashes Out at Media Matters Chief Angelo Carusone Over Past 'Racist Blog' |url=https://www.thewrap.com/tucker-carlson-lashes-out-at-media-matters-chief-angelo-carusone-over-past-racist-blog/ |work=www.thewrap.com |access-date=March 14, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190314215212/https://www.thewrap.com/tucker-carlson-lashes-out-at-media-matters-chief-angelo-carusone-over-past-racist-blog/ |archive-date=March 14, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Choi |first1=David |title='Everything is irony': Fox News' Tucker Carlson fires back at progressive watchdog amid resurrected offensive statements |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-tucker-carlson-media-matters-blog-posts-2019-3 |work=Business Insider |access-date=March 14, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190328043409/https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-tucker-carlson-media-matters-blog-posts-2019-3 |archive-date=March 28, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref>
''[[The Daily Caller]]'', which Carlson co-founded, responded by resurfacing blog posts made by MMfA's president Angelo Carusone. These blog posts included derogatory comments about [[transvestites]], Jews, and people from Japan and [[Bangladesh]]. Carusone responded by saying that the posts were supposed to be a "caricature of what a right wing blowhard would sound like if he was living my life" and apologized for the "gross" remarks.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Axelrod |first1=Tal |title=Media Matters president facing scrutiny for derogatory comments, racial slurs in resurfaced posts |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/media/433979-media-matters-president-made-insensitive-comments-used-racial-slurs-in/ |work=The Hill |date=March 13, 2019 |language=en |access-date=March 14, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190314235320/https://thehill.com/homenews/media/433979-media-matters-president-made-insensitive-comments-used-racial-slurs-in |archive-date=March 14, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Palmer |first1=Ewan |title=Donald Trump Jr. wants to know where's the outrage over Media Matters president's blog comments |url=https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-jr-media-matters-angelo-carusone-blog-tucker-carlson-1362709 |work=Newsweek |date=March 14, 2019 |language=en |access-date=March 14, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190314185730/https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-jr-media-matters-angelo-carusone-blog-tucker-carlson-1362709 |archive-date=March 14, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Levine |first1=Jon |title=Tucker Carlson Lashes Out at Media Matters Chief Angelo Carusone Over Past 'Racist Blog' |url=https://www.thewrap.com/tucker-carlson-lashes-out-at-media-matters-chief-angelo-carusone-over-past-racist-blog/ |work=thewrap.com |access-date=March 14, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190314215212/https://www.thewrap.com/tucker-carlson-lashes-out-at-media-matters-chief-angelo-carusone-over-past-racist-blog/ |archive-date=March 14, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Choi |first1=David |title='Everything is irony': Fox News' Tucker Carlson fires back at progressive watchdog amid resurrected offensive statements |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-tucker-carlson-media-matters-blog-posts-2019-3 |work=Business Insider |access-date=March 14, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190328043409/https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-tucker-carlson-media-matters-blog-posts-2019-3 |archive-date=March 28, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref>


=== Misinformation on social media ===
=== Misinformation on social media ===
Line 129: Line 129:


===Antisemitism on X (formerly Twitter)===
===Antisemitism on X (formerly Twitter)===
In November 2023, Media Matters published analysis indicating that advertisements of major firms such as [[IBM]] were being displayed on the social media platform [[X (formerly Twitter)]] next to user posts containing antisemitic content, including praise for [[Adolf Hitler]] and [[Nazis]]. Several prominent companies suspended their advertising on the platform in reaction to the study and to some of Musk's recent posts.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Taylor |first1=Harry |date=November 18, 2023 |title=Elon Musk to file 'thermonuclear lawsuit' as advertisers desert X |url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/nov/18/elon-musk-to-file-thermonuclear-lawsuit-as-advertisers-desert-x |work=The Guardian |archive-date=November 19, 2023 |access-date=November 20, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231119192505/https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/nov/18/elon-musk-to-file-thermonuclear-lawsuit-as-advertisers-desert-x |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Montgomery |first1=Blake |date=November 17, 2023 |title=White House condemns Elon Musk's 'abhorrent' antisemitic tweets |url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/nov/17/white-house-biden-elon-musk-antisemitic-tweet-hate |work=The Guardian |archive-date=November 23, 2023 |access-date=November 20, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231123040538/https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/nov/17/white-house-biden-elon-musk-antisemitic-tweet-hate |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Montgomery |first=Blake |date=17 November 2023 |title=Apple, Disney and IBM to pause ads on X after antisemitic Elon Musk tweet |url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/nov/17/elon-musk-antisemitic-tweet-apple-pausing-ads |access-date=21 November 2023 |work=The Guardian}}</ref>
In November 2023, Media Matters published analysis indicating that advertisements of major firms such as [[IBM]] were being displayed on the social media platform [[X (formerly Twitter)]] next to user posts containing antisemitic content, including praise for [[Adolf Hitler]] and [[Nazis]]. Several prominent companies suspended their advertising on the platform in reaction to the study and to some of Musk's recent posts.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Taylor |first1=Harry |date=November 18, 2023 |title=Elon Musk to file 'thermonuclear lawsuit' as advertisers desert X |url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/nov/18/elon-musk-to-file-thermonuclear-lawsuit-as-advertisers-desert-x |work=The Guardian |archive-date=November 19, 2023 |access-date=November 20, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231119192505/https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/nov/18/elon-musk-to-file-thermonuclear-lawsuit-as-advertisers-desert-x |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Montgomery |first1=Blake |date=November 17, 2023 |title=White House condemns Elon Musk's 'abhorrent' antisemitic tweets |url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/nov/17/white-house-biden-elon-musk-antisemitic-tweet-hate |work=The Guardian |archive-date=November 23, 2023 |access-date=November 20, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231123040538/https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/nov/17/white-house-biden-elon-musk-antisemitic-tweet-hate |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Montgomery |first=Blake |date=November 17, 2023 |title=Apple, Disney and IBM to pause ads on X after antisemitic Elon Musk tweet |url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/nov/17/elon-musk-antisemitic-tweet-apple-pausing-ads |access-date=November 21, 2023 |work=The Guardian}}</ref>


== Lawsuit and state investigations ==
== Lawsuit and state investigations ==
{{Further information|Twitter under Elon Musk#Media Matters}}
{{Further information|Twitter under Elon Musk#Media Matters}}


On November 20, 2023, [[X Corp.]] owner [[Elon Musk]] filed a suit in a Texas court alleging Media Matters defamed the platform with the intention of hurting its advertising revenues. According to the lawsuit, Media Matters had "manufactured side-by-side images depicting advertisers' posts on X Corp's social media platform beside Neo-Nazi and white-nationalist fringe content", falsely portraying the juxtaposition as a routine occurrence on X.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Matza |first=Max |date=2023-11-21 |title=Elon Musk's X sues Media Matters over antisemitism analysis |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67482231 |access-date=2024-10-21 |work=BBC |language=en-GB |archive-date=November 21, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231121021824/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67482231 |url-status=live }}</ref> Media Matters called the complaint frivolous and an attempt to silence their reporting.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ortutay |first=Barbara |date=20 November 2023 |title=Musk's X sues liberal advocacy group Media Matters over its report on ads next to hate groups' posts |work=Associated Press |url=https://apnews.com/article/elon-musk-media-matters-lawsuit-advertising-neonazi-1fe499daa600f513af27ffa68d2e8b91 |url-status=live |access-date=21 November 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231121094525/https://apnews.com/article/elon-musk-media-matters-lawsuit-advertising-neonazi-1fe499daa600f513af27ffa68d2e8b91 |archive-date=21 November 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Dang |first=Sheila |date=21 November 2023 |title=X sues Media Matters after report about ads next to antisemitic content |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/legal/x-sues-media-matters-after-report-about-ads-next-antisemitic-content-2023-11-20/ |url-status=live |access-date=21 November 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231121011933/https://www.reuters.com/legal/x-sues-media-matters-after-report-about-ads-next-antisemitic-content-2023-11-20/ |archive-date=21 November 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Matza |first=Max |date=November 20, 2023 |title=Elon Musk's X sues Media Matters over antisemitism analysis |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67482231 |publisher=BBC news |archive-date=November 21, 2023 |access-date=November 21, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231121021824/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67482231 |url-status=live }}</ref> Legal experts criticized Musk's lawsuit, deeming it "frivolous" or "bogus", and saying that it contradicts the First Amendment.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Fung |first=Brian |date=2023-11-21 |title=Legal critics blast Elon Musk's lawsuit against Media Matters as 'weak' and 'bogus' |url=https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/21/tech/elon-musk-texas-lawsuit-media-matters/index.html |access-date=2023-12-24 |website=CNN Business |language=en |archive-date=December 24, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231224120542/https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/21/tech/elon-musk-texas-lawsuit-media-matters/index.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Judge [[Reed O'Connor]], as of October 2024, has refused calls by some legal experts to [[Recusal|recuse]] himself from the case for owning [[Tesla, Inc.|Tesla]] stock, disputing the ruling would significantly impact Tesla's share price.<ref name=":4">{{Cite news |last=Allyn |first=Bobby |date=October 17, 2024 |title=New records show Texas judge on X case didn't sell his Tesla shares after taking the suit |url=https://www.npr.org/2024/10/16/g-s1-28620/texas-judge-elon-musk-x-case-tesla-shares |work=NPR |archive-date=November 21, 2024 |access-date=November 21, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241121023327/https://www.npr.org/2024/10/16/g-s1-28620/texas-judge-elon-musk-x-case-tesla-shares |url-status=live }}</ref> X has been described as [[judge shopping]] by seeking to settle all litigation in Reed O'Connor's district.<ref name=":4" />
On November 20, 2023, [[X Corp.]] owner [[Elon Musk]] filed a suit in a Texas court alleging Media Matters defamed the platform with the intention of hurting its advertising revenues. According to the lawsuit, Media Matters had "manufactured side-by-side images depicting advertisers' posts on X Corp's social media platform beside Neo-Nazi and white-nationalist fringe content", falsely portraying the juxtaposition as a routine occurrence on X.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Matza |first=Max |date=November 21, 2023 |title=Elon Musk's X sues Media Matters over antisemitism analysis |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67482231 |access-date=October 21, 2024 |publisher=BBC |language=en-GB |archive-date=November 21, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231121021824/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67482231 |url-status=live }}</ref> Media Matters called the complaint frivolous and an attempt to silence their reporting.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ortutay |first=Barbara |date=November 20, 2023 |title=Musk's X sues liberal advocacy group Media Matters over its report on ads next to hate groups' posts |agency=Associated Press |url=https://apnews.com/article/elon-musk-media-matters-lawsuit-advertising-neonazi-1fe499daa600f513af27ffa68d2e8b91 |url-status=live |access-date=November 21, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231121094525/https://apnews.com/article/elon-musk-media-matters-lawsuit-advertising-neonazi-1fe499daa600f513af27ffa68d2e8b91 |archive-date=November 21, 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Dang |first=Sheila |date=November 21, 2023 |title=X sues Media Matters after report about ads next to antisemitic content |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/legal/x-sues-media-matters-after-report-about-ads-next-antisemitic-content-2023-11-20/ |url-status=live |access-date=November 21, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231121011933/https://www.reuters.com/legal/x-sues-media-matters-after-report-about-ads-next-antisemitic-content-2023-11-20/ |archive-date=November 21, 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Matza |first=Max |date=November 20, 2023 |title=Elon Musk's X sues Media Matters over antisemitism analysis |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67482231 |publisher=BBC news |archive-date=November 21, 2023 |access-date=November 21, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231121021824/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67482231 |url-status=live }}</ref> Legal experts criticized Musk's lawsuit, deeming it "frivolous" or "bogus", and saying that it contradicts the First Amendment.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Fung |first=Brian |date=November 21, 2023 |title=Legal critics blast Elon Musk's lawsuit against Media Matters as 'weak' and 'bogus' |url=https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/21/tech/elon-musk-texas-lawsuit-media-matters/index.html |access-date=December 24, 2023 |website=CNN Business |language=en |archive-date=December 24, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231224120542/https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/21/tech/elon-musk-texas-lawsuit-media-matters/index.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Judge [[Reed O'Connor]], as of October 2024, has refused calls by some legal experts to [[recuse]] himself from the case for owning [[Tesla, Inc.|Tesla]] stock, disputing the ruling would significantly impact Tesla's share price.<ref name=":4">{{Cite news |last=Allyn |first=Bobby |date=October 17, 2024 |title=New records show Texas judge on X case didn't sell his Tesla shares after taking the suit |url=https://www.npr.org/2024/10/16/g-s1-28620/texas-judge-elon-musk-x-case-tesla-shares |publisher=NPR |archive-date=November 21, 2024 |access-date=November 21, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241121023327/https://www.npr.org/2024/10/16/g-s1-28620/texas-judge-elon-musk-x-case-tesla-shares |url-status=live }}</ref> X has been described as [[judge shopping]] by seeking to settle all litigation in Reed O'Connor's district.<ref name=":4" />


On the same day that the X lawsuit was filed, [[Texas Attorney General]] [[Ken Paxton]] opened an investigation into Media Matters for "potentially fraudulent activity", stating that his goal was "to ensure that the public has not been deceived by the schemes of radical left-wing organizations".<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Vinall |first1=Frances |last2=Bella |first2=Timothy |date=2023-11-21 |title=Musk's X sues Media Matters after report shows ads next to pro-Nazi posts |language=en-US |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2023/11/21/musk-media-matters-x-lawsuit-ken-paxton/ |access-date=2023-11-26 |issn=0190-8286 |archive-date=November 21, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231121195405/https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2023/11/21/musk-media-matters-x-lawsuit-ken-paxton/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Conger |first1=Kate |last2=Mac |first2=Ryan |date=November 20, 2023 |title=X Sues Media Matters Over Research on Ads Next to |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/20/technology/x-sues-media-matters-antisemitic-posts.html |work=The New York Times}}</ref> He also urged other state attorneys general to investigate the group.<ref name=":3">{{Cite web |last=Belanger |first=Ashley |date=2024-04-15 |title=Judge halts Texas probe into Media Matters' reporting on X |url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/04/judge-halts-texas-probe-into-media-matters-reporting-on-x/ |access-date=2024-10-21 |website=Ars Technica |language=en-US |archive-date=August 26, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240826205145/https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/04/judge-halts-texas-probe-into-media-matters-reporting-on-x/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Media Matters filed suit against Paxton in federal court days later, alleging he had violated the [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|First Amendment]] to chill the group's work and engaged in unlawful retaliation to punish the group.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Ingram |first1=David |title=Media Matters sues Texas attorney general over response to Elon Musk dispute |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/internet/media-matters-elon-musk-texas-attorney-general-ken-paxton-rcna129402 |publisher=NBC News |date=December 12, 2023 |archive-date=December 13, 2023 |access-date=December 13, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231213005957/https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/internet/media-matters-elon-musk-texas-attorney-general-ken-paxton-rcna129402 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=McHardy |first=Martha |date=December 13, 2023 |title=Media Matters fires back at Texas AG in row over Elon Musk's X |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/media-matters-elon-musk-antisemitism-ken-paxton-lawsuit-b2463281.html |work=The Independent |access-date=December 13, 2023 |archive-date=December 13, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231213163509/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/media-matters-elon-musk-antisemitism-ken-paxton-lawsuit-b2463281.html |url-status=live }}</ref> In April 2024, Judge [[Amit Mehta]] issued a preliminary injunction against Paxton's demand for internal documents from the group.<ref name=":3" />  
On the same day that the X lawsuit was filed, [[Texas Attorney General]] [[Ken Paxton]] opened an investigation into Media Matters for "potentially fraudulent activity", stating that his goal was "to ensure that the public has not been deceived by the schemes of radical left-wing organizations".<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Vinall |first1=Frances |last2=Bella |first2=Timothy |date=November 21, 2023 |title=Musk's X sues Media Matters after report shows ads next to pro-Nazi posts |language=en-US |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2023/11/21/musk-media-matters-x-lawsuit-ken-paxton/ |access-date=November 26, 2023 |issn=0190-8286 |archive-date=November 21, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231121195405/https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2023/11/21/musk-media-matters-x-lawsuit-ken-paxton/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Conger |first1=Kate |last2=Mac |first2=Ryan |date=November 20, 2023 |title=X Sues Media Matters Over Research on Ads Next to |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/20/technology/x-sues-media-matters-antisemitic-posts.html |work=The New York Times}}</ref> He also urged other state attorneys general to investigate the group.<ref name=":3">{{Cite web |last=Belanger |first=Ashley |date=April 15, 2024 |title=Judge halts Texas probe into Media Matters' reporting on X |url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/04/judge-halts-texas-probe-into-media-matters-reporting-on-x/ |access-date=October 21, 2024 |website=Ars Technica |language=en-US |archive-date=August 26, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240826205145/https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/04/judge-halts-texas-probe-into-media-matters-reporting-on-x/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Media Matters filed suit against Paxton in federal court days later, alleging he had violated the [[First Amendment]] to chill the group's work and engaged in unlawful retaliation to punish the group.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Ingram |first1=David |title=Media Matters sues Texas attorney general over response to Elon Musk dispute |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/internet/media-matters-elon-musk-texas-attorney-general-ken-paxton-rcna129402 |publisher=NBC News |date=December 12, 2023 |archive-date=December 13, 2023 |access-date=December 13, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231213005957/https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/internet/media-matters-elon-musk-texas-attorney-general-ken-paxton-rcna129402 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=McHardy |first=Martha |date=December 13, 2023 |title=Media Matters fires back at Texas AG in row over Elon Musk's X |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/media-matters-elon-musk-antisemitism-ken-paxton-lawsuit-b2463281.html |work=The Independent |access-date=December 13, 2023 |archive-date=December 13, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231213163509/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/media-matters-elon-musk-antisemitism-ken-paxton-lawsuit-b2463281.html |url-status=live }}</ref> In April 2024, Judge [[Amit Mehta]] issued a preliminary injunction against Paxton's demand for internal documents from the group.<ref name=":3" />


In December 2023, [[Missouri Attorney General]] [[Andrew Bailey (politician)|Andrew Bailey]] opened a similar investigation into Media Matters.<ref>Rosenbaum, Jason. (December 18, 2023) [https://www.stlpr.org/government-politics-issues/2023-12-18/elon-musks-fight-against-media-matters-gets-backup-from-missouri-attorney-general "Elon Musk's fight against Media Matters gets backup from Missouri attorney general"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231224012651/https://www.stlpr.org/government-politics-issues/2023-12-18/elon-musks-fight-against-media-matters-gets-backup-from-missouri-attorney-general |date=December 24, 2023 }} ''[[St. Louis Public Radio]]''</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Prater |first=Nia |date=2023-11-21 |title=Does Elon Musk's Media Matters Lawsuit Have a Chance? |url=https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/11/does-elon-musks-media-matters-lawsuit-have-a-chance.html |access-date=2023-12-24 |website=Intelligencer |language=en}}</ref> In August 2024, a federal judge granted an injunction to halt the Missouri investigation, saying the suit was "using law enforcement machinery for political ends" against Media Matters, running contrary to the organization's First Amendment rights.<ref>{{cite web |last=Johnson |first=Ted |title=Judge Halts Missouri AG's Elon Musk-Triggered Investigation Of Media Matters |work=Deadline |via=[[Yahoo! News]] |date=August 26, 2024 |access-date=2024-08-26 |url=https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-halts-missouri-ag-elon-214743757.html |archive-date=August 27, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240827010024/https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-halts-missouri-ag-elon-214743757.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
In December 2023, [[Missouri Attorney General]] [[Andrew Bailey (politician)|Andrew Bailey]] opened a similar investigation into Media Matters.<ref>Rosenbaum, Jason. (December 18, 2023) [https://www.stlpr.org/government-politics-issues/2023-12-18/elon-musks-fight-against-media-matters-gets-backup-from-missouri-attorney-general "Elon Musk's fight against Media Matters gets backup from Missouri attorney general"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231224012651/https://www.stlpr.org/government-politics-issues/2023-12-18/elon-musks-fight-against-media-matters-gets-backup-from-missouri-attorney-general |date=December 24, 2023 }} ''[[St. Louis Public Radio]]''</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Prater |first=Nia |date=November 21, 2023 |title=Does Elon Musk's Media Matters Lawsuit Have a Chance? |url=https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/11/does-elon-musks-media-matters-lawsuit-have-a-chance.html |access-date=December 24, 2023 |website=Intelligencer |language=en}}</ref> In August 2024, a federal judge granted an injunction to halt the Missouri investigation, saying the suit was "using law enforcement machinery for political ends" against Media Matters, running contrary to the organization's First Amendment rights.<ref>{{cite web |last=Johnson |first=Ted |title=Judge Halts Missouri AG's Elon Musk-Triggered Investigation Of Media Matters |work=Deadline |via=[[Yahoo! News]] |date=August 26, 2024 |access-date=August 26, 2024 |url=https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-halts-missouri-ag-elon-214743757.html |archive-date=August 27, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240827010024/https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-halts-missouri-ag-elon-214743757.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
In June 2025, Media Matters sued the [[Federal Trade Commission]], alleging that the FTC's ongoing investigation into Media Matters was in retaliation for Media Matter's scrutiny of Trump administration allies including X Corp., and that the investigation violated Media Matters' First Amendment rights.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Nover |first=Scott |date=June 24, 2025 |title=Media Matters sues FTC over advertising investigation |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/style/media/2025/06/23/media-matters-ftc-lawsuit/ |work=The Washington Post}}</ref>


==Reception==
==Reception==
Columnists and writers such as [[Paul Krugman]] and the late [[Molly Ivins]] cited Media Matters or identified it as a helpful source.<ref>{{cite news |last=Ivins |first=Molly |author-link=Molly Ivins |date=May 11, 2006 |title=Developments in journalism's frontier |url=http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/11/ivins.future.journalism/index.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090609093646/http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/11/ivins.future.journalism/index.html |archive-date=June 9, 2009 |access-date=May 5, 2010 |work=CNN}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Krugman |first=Paul |date=April 30, 2010 |title=The Oil Spill Is Obama's Fault |url=https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/30/the-oil-spill-is-obamas-fault |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150908002223/http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/30/the-oil-spill-is-obamas-fault/ |archive-date=September 8, 2015 |access-date=February 7, 2017 |work=The New York Times |type=Opinion}}</ref>
Columnists and writers such as [[Paul Krugman]] and the late [[Molly Ivins]] cited Media Matters or identified it as a helpful source.<ref>{{cite news |last=Ivins |first=Molly |author-link=Molly Ivins |date=May 11, 2006 |title=Developments in journalism's frontier |url=http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/11/ivins.future.journalism/index.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090609093646/http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/11/ivins.future.journalism/index.html |archive-date=June 9, 2009 |access-date=May 5, 2010 |publisher=CNN}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Krugman |first=Paul |date=April 30, 2010 |title=The Oil Spill Is Obama's Fault |url=https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/30/the-oil-spill-is-obamas-fault |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150908002223/http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/30/the-oil-spill-is-obamas-fault/ |archive-date=September 8, 2015 |access-date=February 7, 2017 |work=The New York Times |type=Opinion}}</ref>


In 2008, columnist [[Jacques Steinberg]] of ''The New York Times'' quoted [[David Folkenflik]] of [[National Public Radio]] as telling him that although Media Matters has a partisan slant they were still a useful source for leads, partly due to their broad research. Steinberg said the right already had similar outlets looking for stories and feeding them to reporters, and that Media Matters has effectively filled a void on the left. He notes that some journalists like [[Stuart Rothenberg]] prefer non-partisan sources.<ref name="Steinberg" /> A 2010 opinion piece by "M. S." on the blog of ''[[The Economist]]'' magazine argued that it carries no weight with conservatives due to its mostly critiquing conservative outlets.<ref>{{cite news|author=M.S.|title=Epistemic closure and political disinformation|newspaper=[[The Economist]]|date=May 5, 2010|url=https://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2010/05/health-care_reform|access-date=July 20, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170816034937/https://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2010/05/health-care_reform|archive-date=August 16, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref>
In 2008, columnist [[Jacques Steinberg]] of ''The New York Times'' quoted [[David Folkenflik]] of [[National Public Radio]] as telling him that although Media Matters has a partisan slant they were still a useful source for leads, partly due to their broad research. Steinberg said the right already had similar outlets looking for stories and feeding them to reporters, and that Media Matters has effectively filled a void on the left. He notes that some journalists like [[Stuart Rothenberg]] prefer non-partisan sources.<ref name="Steinberg" /> A 2010 opinion piece by "M. S." on the blog of ''[[The Economist]]'' magazine argued that it carries no weight with conservatives due to its mostly critiquing conservative outlets.<ref>{{cite news|author=M.S.|title=Epistemic closure and political disinformation|newspaper=[[The Economist]]|date=May 5, 2010|url=https://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2010/05/health-care_reform|access-date=July 20, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170816034937/https://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2010/05/health-care_reform|archive-date=August 16, 2017|url-status=live}}</ref>


Some object to the organization focusing its efforts to fact-check conservatives more than liberal commentators.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Tavernise |first=Sabrina |date=2017-11-23 |title=Ben Shapiro, a Provocative 'Gladiator,' Battles to Win Young Conservatives (Published 2017) |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/23/us/ben-shapiro-conservative.html |access-date=2020-11-28 |work=The New York Times |language=en-US |issn=0362-4331 |archive-date=February 8, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180208085657/https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/23/us/ben-shapiro-conservative.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Shapiro |first1=Ben |date=June 12, 2019 |title=The Media/Democrat Complex Strikes Big Tech |url=https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/06/12/the_mediademocrat_complex_strikes_big_tech_140544.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191106234111/https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/06/12/the_mediademocrat_complex_strikes_big_tech_140544.html |archive-date=November 6, 2019 |access-date=November 6, 2019 |website=Real Clear Politics}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Levine |first=Jon |date=2019-03-14 |title=Why Does Media Matters Only Seem to Target Fox News Stars Like Tucker Carlson? |url=https://www.thewrap.com/why-does-media-matters-only-seem-to-target-fox-news-stars-like-tucker-carlson/ |access-date=2022-06-01 |publisher=[[TheWrap]] |language=en-US |archive-date=July 21, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220721131214/https://www.thewrap.com/why-does-media-matters-only-seem-to-target-fox-news-stars-like-tucker-carlson/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Media Matters also received some criticism as being too supportive of Hillary Clinton before and during her 2016 presidential bid.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Roller |first1=Emma |date=March 27, 2015 |title=Media Matters and the Battle for the Hillary Clinton Narrative |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/03/media-matters-and-the-battle-for-the-hillary-clinton-narrative/455403/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180502140343/https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/03/media-matters-and-the-battle-for-the-hillary-clinton-narrative/455403/ |archive-date=May 2, 2018 |access-date=May 1, 2018 |work=The Atlantic}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Henwood|first1=Doug|title=My Turn: Hillary Clinton Targets the Presidency|date=2016|publisher=Seven Stories Press|isbn=978-1-60980-757-3|page=34|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4di7CwAAQBAJ&pg=PT34|language=en}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{cite magazine |last1=Chang |first1=Clio |last2=Shephard |first2=Alex |date=December 19, 2016 |title=What Happens to Media Matters in a Post-Hillary World? |url=https://newrepublic.com/article/139385/happens-media-matters-post-hillary-world |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170301004305/https://newrepublic.com/article/139385/happens-media-matters-post-hillary-world |archive-date=March 1, 2017 |access-date=February 28, 2017 |magazine=The New Republic}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Calderone|first1=Michael|last2=Stein|first2=Sam|title=The New York Times Corrects Explosive Hillary Clinton Email Story Amid Campaign Pushback|url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/new-york-times-hillary-clinton_us_55b2a5cbe4b0224d883252f0|work=Huffington Post|date=24 July 2015|access-date=May 2, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161108225211/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/new-york-times-hillary-clinton_us_55b2a5cbe4b0224d883252f0|archive-date=November 8, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref>
Some object to the organization focusing its efforts to fact-check conservatives more than liberal commentators.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Tavernise |first=Sabrina |date=November 23, 2017 |title=Ben Shapiro, a Provocative 'Gladiator,' Battles to Win Young Conservatives (Published 2017) |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/23/us/ben-shapiro-conservative.html |access-date=November 28, 2020 |work=The New York Times |language=en-US |issn=0362-4331 |archive-date=February 8, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180208085657/https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/23/us/ben-shapiro-conservative.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Shapiro |first1=Ben |date=June 12, 2019 |title=The Media/Democrat Complex Strikes Big Tech |url=https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/06/12/the_mediademocrat_complex_strikes_big_tech_140544.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191106234111/https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/06/12/the_mediademocrat_complex_strikes_big_tech_140544.html |archive-date=November 6, 2019 |access-date=November 6, 2019 |website=Real Clear Politics}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Levine |first=Jon |date=March 14, 2019 |title=Why Does Media Matters Only Seem to Target Fox News Stars Like Tucker Carlson? |url=https://www.thewrap.com/why-does-media-matters-only-seem-to-target-fox-news-stars-like-tucker-carlson/ |access-date=June 1, 2022 |publisher=[[TheWrap]] |language=en-US |archive-date=July 21, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220721131214/https://www.thewrap.com/why-does-media-matters-only-seem-to-target-fox-news-stars-like-tucker-carlson/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Media Matters also received some criticism as being too supportive of Hillary Clinton before and during her 2016 presidential bid.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Roller |first1=Emma |date=March 27, 2015 |title=Media Matters and the Battle for the Hillary Clinton Narrative |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/03/media-matters-and-the-battle-for-the-hillary-clinton-narrative/455403/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180502140343/https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/03/media-matters-and-the-battle-for-the-hillary-clinton-narrative/455403/ |archive-date=May 2, 2018 |access-date=May 1, 2018 |work=The Atlantic}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Henwood|first1=Doug|title=My Turn: Hillary Clinton Targets the Presidency|date=2016|publisher=Seven Stories Press|isbn=978-1-60980-757-3|page=34|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4di7CwAAQBAJ&pg=PT34|language=en}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{cite magazine |last1=Chang |first1=Clio |last2=Shephard |first2=Alex |date=December 19, 2016 |title=What Happens to Media Matters in a Post-Hillary World? |url=https://newrepublic.com/article/139385/happens-media-matters-post-hillary-world |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170301004305/https://newrepublic.com/article/139385/happens-media-matters-post-hillary-world |archive-date=March 1, 2017 |access-date=February 28, 2017 |magazine=The New Republic}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Calderone|first1=Michael|last2=Stein|first2=Sam|title=The New York Times Corrects Explosive Hillary Clinton Email Story Amid Campaign Pushback|url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/new-york-times-hillary-clinton_us_55b2a5cbe4b0224d883252f0|work=HuffPost|date=July 24, 2015|access-date=May 2, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161108225211/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/new-york-times-hillary-clinton_us_55b2a5cbe4b0224d883252f0|archive-date=November 8, 2016|url-status=live}}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
*[[Journalism ethics and standards]]
* [[Journalism ethics and standards]]
* [[Media bias]] ([[Media bias in the United States|in the United States]])
* [[Media bias]] ([[Media bias in the United States|in the United States]])
* [[Media monitoring service]]
* [[Media monitoring service]]
Line 160: Line 162:


== External links ==
== External links ==
* {{Official website}}
* {{Official website}}
* {{ProPublicaNonprofitExplorer|470928008}}
* {{ProPublicaNonprofitExplorer|470928008}}
Line 167: Line 168:
{{DEFAULTSORT:Media Matters For America}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Media Matters For America}}
[[Category:Media analysis organizations and websites]]
[[Category:Media analysis organizations and websites]]
[[Category:Non-profit organizations based in Washington, D.C.]]
[[Category:Opposition research]]
[[Category:Organizations established in 2004]]
[[Category:Political advocacy groups in the United States]]
[[Category:Political advocacy groups in the United States]]
[[Category:Progressive organizations in the United States]]
[[Category:Progressive organizations in the United States]]
[[Category:Non-profit organizations based in Washington, D.C.]]
[[Category:Organizations established in 2004]]
[[Category:Opposition research]]

Latest revision as of 15:25, 25 June 2025

Template:Short description Template:Redirect-distinguish-text Template:Use mdy dates Script error: No such module "Infobox".Template:Template otherScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Template:Main other Media Matters for America (MMfA) is a non-profit left-leaning watchdog journalism organization.[1] It was founded in 2004 by journalist and political activist David Brock as a counterweight to the conservative Media Research Center.[2] It seeks to spotlight "conservative misinformation" in the U.S. media; its methods include issuing reports and quick responses.[3][4] Two example initiatives include the "Drop Fox" campaign (2011–2013) that sought to discredit Fox News' "fair and balanced" claims;[5][6][7] and a 2023 report about X (formerly Twitter) that highlighted antisemitism on the platform.

Organization overview

Founding

Media Matters for America was founded in May 2004 by David Brock,[8] a former conservative journalist. Brock said that a central goal would be to monitor journalists and outlets for misleading conservative claims and then to point them out.[2] Brock argued that existing conservative monitoring groups had been doing this and pushing mainstream journalists, the media, and American politics, to the right as a result.[2] Brock founded the group with help from the Center for American Progress.[2]

Funding

In 2004, MMfA began with the help of $2 million in donations.[2][3] That year MMfA received the endorsement of the Democracy Alliance, a partnership of wealthy and politically active progressive donors. The Alliance itself does not fund endorsees, but many wealthy Alliance members acted on the endorsement and donated directly to MMfA.[9][10][11] In 2010, George Soros donated $1 million to MMfA citing concerns that the "incendiary rhetoric of Fox News hosts may incite violence."[12][13] During a 2014 CNN interview, David Brock stated that Soros' contributions were "less than 10 percent" of Media Matters' budget.[14][15]

Personnel

John Podesta, the former chief of staff to President Bill Clinton, provided office space for Media Matters early in its formation at the Center for American Progress, a Democratic think tank which Podesta established in 2002.[16] Hillary Clinton advised Media Matters in its early stages out of a belief that progressives should follow conservatives in forming think tanks and advocacy groups to support their political goals.[16][17] According to The New York Times, Media Matters "helped lay the groundwork" for Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign.[18]

Media Matters has hired several of the best known political professionals who have worked for Democratic politicians and for other progressive groups.[19][20] In 2004, National Review referred to MMfA staffers who had recently worked on the presidential campaigns of John Edwards and Wesley Clark, for Congressman Barney Frank, and for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.[19]

Eric E. Burns served as MMfA's president until 2011.[21] Burns was succeeded by Matt Butler, and then, in 2013, by Bradley Beychok.[22] In late 2016, Angelo Carusone replaced Bradley Beychok as MMfA's president. Under Carusone, the organization's focus has shifted toward focusing on the alt-right, conspiracy theories, and fake news.[23]

In 2014, the staff of Media Matters voted to join the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). Initially, Media Matters management had declined to recognize the union through a card check process, instead exercising its right to force a union election which delayed the process until July when the vote went in favor of unionization.[24][25]

In May 2024, a dozen staffers at Media Matters were laid off amid a series of lawsuits and legal investigations by Elon Musk and Republican state attorneys general.[26][27]

Initiatives

Early research

Media Matters analyzes American news sources from networks and channels to websites, including NBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, CNN, MSNBC, CNBC, OAN, Breitbart and Fox News, as well as conservative talk radios. Its techniques include content analysis, fact checking, monitoring, and comparison of quotes or presentations from media figures to primary documents such as Pentagon or Government Accountability Office reports.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

Beginning in 2006, Media Matters for America has released a number of studies which documented that Democrats and progressives were outnumbered by Republicans and conservatives in terms of guest appearances on television news programs.[28]Template:Better source needed

On September 12, 2007, Media Matters released a comprehensive study of 1,377 U.S. newspapers and the 201 syndicated political columnists the papers carry on a regular basis. Media Matters said "in paper after paper, state after state, and region after region, conservative syndicated columnists get more space than their progressive counterparts."[29] John Diaz, an editor at the San Francisco Chronicle, cautioned that the small town columnists leaned significantly to the right, which he felt could explain the rightward slant in columnists even if the trend doesn't hold for papers with the largest readership.[30]

"Misinformer of the Year"

An annual feature on the Media Matters website is the title of "Misinformer of the Year", which is given to the journalist, commentator, or network that Media Matters contends was responsible for the most factual errors or claims. Past recipients include Rupert Murdoch,[31] Sean Hannity,[31] Glenn Beck,[31] Mark Zuckerberg,[31] and Steve Bannon.[32]

Progressive Talent Initiative

The initiative seeks to train mid-career liberal pundits in media skills like TV interviews using four-day bootcamps.[33][34]

Media Matters Action Network

In 2010 David Brock established Media Matters Action Network, a 501(c)(4), to track conservative politicians and organizations.[35]

In 2009, Media Matters Action Network launched the Conservative Transparency website, aimed at tracking the funding of conservative activist organizations.[36] Media Matters Action Network established the Political Correction project with the goal of holding conservative politicians and advocacy groups accountable.[37]

In December 2010, Media Matters Action Network started EqualityMatters.org, a site "in support of gay equality". At launch the site fully incorporated Media Matters's content on LGBT issues.[38] Designed to provide talking points for liberal activists and politicians, Brock set up the Message Matters project.[33] Media Matters runs the website DropFox.com and works to get advertisers to boycott Fox News. One target, Orbitz, initially referred to Media Matters' efforts as a "smear campaign",[39] but agreed, on June 9, 2011, following a three-week effort by prominent LGBT organizations, to "review the policies and process used to evaluate where advertising is placed".[40] In 2015, the formal Equality Matters program was deactivated and merged with the LGBT Program within Media Matters.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

American Bridge 21st century

Brock established American Bridge 21st Century as a super PAC focused on opposition research in 2010.[41]

Don Imus

On April 4, 2007, Media Matters posted a video clip of Don Imus calling the Rutgers University women's basketball team members "nappy-headed hoes" and made their discovery known in Media Matters' daily e-mailing to hundreds of journalists. According to The Wall Street Journal, top news outlets didn't mention the incident until objections made to CBS Radio by the National Association of Black Journalists led to an on-the-air apology from Imus. MSNBC, calling Imus's comments "racist" and "abhorrent", suspended Imus' show, and within minutes, CBS suspended Imus's radio show. The Wall Street Journal said Imus's apology "seemed to make matters worse, with critics latching on to Mr. Imus's use of the phrase 'you people.'" Included among those dissatisfied with Imus's apology and suspension were the coach of the Rutgers team and a group of MSNBC African-American employees. After Procter & Gamble pulled advertising from all of MSNBC's daytime schedule, and other advertisers, including General Motors and American Express requested CBS to cancel any upcoming advertising they had bought for Imus in the Morning, MSNBC and CBS dropped Imus's show.[42]

Rush Limbaugh "phony soldiers"

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". In September 2007, Media Matters reported on radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh saying Iraq War veterans opposed to the war were "the phony soldiers". Limbaugh later said he was speaking of only one soldier, Jesse Macbeth, who had falsely claimed to have been decorated for valor but had never seen combat. Limbaugh said he was the victim of a "smear" by Media Matters, which had taken out of context and selectively edited his comments. After Limbaugh published what he said was the entire transcript of phony soldiers discussion, Media Matters reported that over a minute and 30 seconds was omitted without "notation or ellipsis to indicate that there is, in fact, a break in the transcript."[43][44] Limbaugh told National Review that the gap between referring to "phony soldiers" and MacBeth was a delay because his staff printed out an ABC news story that reported on what it called "phony soldiers" and that his transcript and audio edits were "for space and relevance reasons, not to hide anything."[45]

The Associated Press, CNN, and ABC reported on the controversy,[46] as political satirist and fictional pundit Stephen Colbert lampooned Limbaugh and his defenders saying: "Hey, Media Matters, you want to end offensive speech? Then stop recording it for people who would be offended."[47]

Bill O'Reilly Harlem restaurant

In October 2007 television and radio host and commentator Bill O'Reilly said a Media Matters headline declaring "O'Reilly surprised 'there was no difference' between Harlem restaurant and other New York City restaurants" took out of context comments he made regarding a pleasant dinner he shared with Al Sharpton at a Harlem restaurant.[48][49][50] O'Reilly said Media Matters misleadingly took comments spoken five minutes apart and presented them as one.[51] On NBC's Today, Media Matters senior fellow Paul Waldman said Media Matters had included "the full audio, the full transcript, nothing was taken out of context".[52]

Laura Schlessinger racial slur

On August 12, 2010, Media Matters reported that radio host Laura Schlessinger said the word "nigger" eleven times during a discussion with an African-American woman, although Schlessinger did not use the word as a slur. Schlessinger continued to say the word after the caller took offense, saying she thought the woman was being too sensitive and that a double standard was being used to determine who could say the word. Schlessinger also said that those "hypersensitive" about color should not "marry outside of their race". The caller had earlier in the discussion said her husband was white.[53][54] Schlessinger apologized for the epithet the day after the broadcast. A joint statement of Media Matters and other organizations noted that although Schlessinger "attempted to apologize for using the epithet, the racist diatribe on Tuesday's show extends far beyond the use of a single word" and urged advertisers to boycott her show. After General Motors, OnStar, and Motel 6 pulled their advertising, Schlessinger said she would not renew her syndication contract set to expire December 2010.[53][55] In January 2011, her show resumed on satellite radio.[56]

Schlessinger held Media Matters responsible for the boycott, which she called a typical tactic of the group to fulfill its "sole purpose of silencing people". She said the boycotts' "threat of attack on my advertisers and stations" had violated her First Amendment free speech rights.[57] Media Matters said that, as the boycott was not "government-sanctioned censorship", her First Amendment rights had not been violated.[58]

"Drop Fox" campaign

During an interview in March 2011, Brock said MMfA would focus its efforts on Fox News and select conservative websites in a new strategy that Brock described as a campaign of "guerrilla warfare and sabotage" and a "war on Fox."[5][59] MMfA said the greater attention given to Fox News was part of an initiative to educate the public about what it regarded as the distortions of conservative media, and the greater attention given to Fox News was in line with its prominence. MMfA said its Drop Fox initiative, for advertisers to boycott Fox, was also part of the organization's educational mission. MMfA said that changing Fox, not shutting it down, was its intention.[6]

In December 2013, MMfA's then-Executive Vice President Angelo Carusone said "The war on Fox is over. And it's not just that it's over, but it was very successful. To a large extent, we won," claiming to have "effectively discredited the network's desire to be seen as 'fair and balanced.'" Around that time, Glenn Beck had departed the network and Sean Hannity's time slot was moved from 9 p.m. to 10 pm.[60] Other boycotts of cable news programs continued after the campaign, with PolitiFact suggesting that the boycotts are more successful in raising awareness than having an impact on the companies' bottom-line.[4]

Tucker Carlson audio recordings

In March 2019, MMfA released audio recordings of Fox News host Tucker Carlson, in which he made remarks demeaning to women between 2006 and 2011 on the call-in show hosted by shock jock Bubba the Love Sponge. Among other comments, Carlson called rape shield laws "unfair", defended Mormon fundamentalist church leader Warren Jeffs, who had been charged of child sexual assault, and called women "extremely primitive". After Carlson's remarks had been widely reported, Carlson tweeted: "Media Matters caught me saying something naughty on a radio show more than a decade ago" and declined to apologize.[61] The following day, MMfA released a second set of audio recordings in which Carlson referred to Iraqis as "semiliterate primitive monkeys" and said they "don't use toilet paper or forks." Carlson also suggested that immigrants to the U.S. should be "hot" or "really smart" and that white men "created civilization".[62]

The Daily Caller, which Carlson co-founded, responded by resurfacing blog posts made by MMfA's president Angelo Carusone. These blog posts included derogatory comments about transvestites, Jews, and people from Japan and Bangladesh. Carusone responded by saying that the posts were supposed to be a "caricature of what a right wing blowhard would sound like if he was living my life" and apologized for the "gross" remarks.[63][64][65][66]

Misinformation on social media

Media Matters analyzed Donald Trump's Facebook posts from 2020 and early 2021 and flagged 1/4 of them as containing misinformation or extremist rhetoric.[67][68]

Antisemitism on X (formerly Twitter)

In November 2023, Media Matters published analysis indicating that advertisements of major firms such as IBM were being displayed on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) next to user posts containing antisemitic content, including praise for Adolf Hitler and Nazis. Several prominent companies suspended their advertising on the platform in reaction to the study and to some of Musk's recent posts.[69][70][71]

Lawsuit and state investigations

Template:Further information

On November 20, 2023, X Corp. owner Elon Musk filed a suit in a Texas court alleging Media Matters defamed the platform with the intention of hurting its advertising revenues. According to the lawsuit, Media Matters had "manufactured side-by-side images depicting advertisers' posts on X Corp's social media platform beside Neo-Nazi and white-nationalist fringe content", falsely portraying the juxtaposition as a routine occurrence on X.[72] Media Matters called the complaint frivolous and an attempt to silence their reporting.[73][74][75] Legal experts criticized Musk's lawsuit, deeming it "frivolous" or "bogus", and saying that it contradicts the First Amendment.[76] Judge Reed O'Connor, as of October 2024, has refused calls by some legal experts to recuse himself from the case for owning Tesla stock, disputing the ruling would significantly impact Tesla's share price.[77] X has been described as judge shopping by seeking to settle all litigation in Reed O'Connor's district.[77]

On the same day that the X lawsuit was filed, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton opened an investigation into Media Matters for "potentially fraudulent activity", stating that his goal was "to ensure that the public has not been deceived by the schemes of radical left-wing organizations".[78][79] He also urged other state attorneys general to investigate the group.[80] Media Matters filed suit against Paxton in federal court days later, alleging he had violated the First Amendment to chill the group's work and engaged in unlawful retaliation to punish the group.[81][82] In April 2024, Judge Amit Mehta issued a preliminary injunction against Paxton's demand for internal documents from the group.[80]

In December 2023, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey opened a similar investigation into Media Matters.[83][84] In August 2024, a federal judge granted an injunction to halt the Missouri investigation, saying the suit was "using law enforcement machinery for political ends" against Media Matters, running contrary to the organization's First Amendment rights.[85]

In June 2025, Media Matters sued the Federal Trade Commission, alleging that the FTC's ongoing investigation into Media Matters was in retaliation for Media Matter's scrutiny of Trump administration allies including X Corp., and that the investigation violated Media Matters' First Amendment rights.[86]

Reception

Columnists and writers such as Paul Krugman and the late Molly Ivins cited Media Matters or identified it as a helpful source.[87][88]

In 2008, columnist Jacques Steinberg of The New York Times quoted David Folkenflik of National Public Radio as telling him that although Media Matters has a partisan slant they were still a useful source for leads, partly due to their broad research. Steinberg said the right already had similar outlets looking for stories and feeding them to reporters, and that Media Matters has effectively filled a void on the left. He notes that some journalists like Stuart Rothenberg prefer non-partisan sources.[3] A 2010 opinion piece by "M. S." on the blog of The Economist magazine argued that it carries no weight with conservatives due to its mostly critiquing conservative outlets.[89]

Some object to the organization focusing its efforts to fact-check conservatives more than liberal commentators.[90][91][92] Media Matters also received some criticism as being too supportive of Hillary Clinton before and during her 2016 presidential bid.[93][94][95][96]

See also

References

Template:Reflist

External links

Template:Authority control

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. a b c d e Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. Template:Cite magazine
  9. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. How Vast The Left Wing Conspiracy? Template:Webarchive. Hudson Institute, November 30, 2006.
  12. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  14. Transcript of David Brock on Soros contributions to Media Matters Template:Webarchive, CNN. Retrieved February 24, 2015.
  15. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  16. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  17. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  18. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  19. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  20. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  21. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  22. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  23. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  24. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  25. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  26. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  27. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  28. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  29. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  30. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  31. a b c d Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  32. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  33. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  34. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  35. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  36. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  37. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  38. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  39. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  40. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  41. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  42. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  43. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  44. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  45. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  46. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  47. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  48. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  49. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  50. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  51. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  52. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  53. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  54. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  55. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  56. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  57. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  58. Palin ratchets up absurd and offensive defense of Dr. Laura, claims they've been "shackled" by critics Template:Webarchive, MediaMatters.org. Retrieved January 5, 2015.
  59. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  60. Terkel, Amanda. "Media Matters Declares Victory: 'The War on Fox is Over'" Template:Webarchive The Huffington Post; December 13, 2013. Retrieved January 6, 2015.
  61. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  62. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  63. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  64. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  65. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  66. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  67. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  68. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  69. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  70. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  71. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  72. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  73. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  74. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  75. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  76. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  77. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  78. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  79. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  80. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  81. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  82. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  83. Rosenbaum, Jason. (December 18, 2023) "Elon Musk's fight against Media Matters gets backup from Missouri attorney general" Template:Webarchive St. Louis Public Radio
  84. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  85. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  86. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  87. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  88. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  89. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  90. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  91. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  92. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  93. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  94. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  95. Template:Cite magazine
  96. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".