Law and Justice: Difference between revisions
imported>Chuckhutch29 m Added links |
imported>OAbot m Open access bot: doi updated in citation with #oabot. |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|date=October 2023| fa = yes | |date=October 2023| fa = yes | ||
}}}} | }}}} | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2020}} | {{Use dmy dates|date=July 2020}} | ||
{{EngvarB|date=February 2021}} | {{EngvarB|date=February 2021}} | ||
| Line 14: | Line 13: | ||
| logo = Logo of the Law and Justice.svg | | logo = Logo of the Law and Justice.svg | ||
| logo_upright = 0.6 | | logo_upright = 0.6 | ||
| colorcode = {{party color | | colorcode = {{Political party data|color}} | ||
| abbreviation = PiS | | abbreviation = PiS | ||
| split = {{ublist|class = nowrap | | split = {{ublist|class = nowrap | ||
| Line 33: | Line 32: | ||
| membership = {{increase}} 48,000 (2023 {{estimation}})<ref name="membership_2023">{{cite web |url=https://wiadomosci.radiozet.pl/polska/polityka/pis-nie-jest-najwieksza-partia-w-polsce-liczy-sie-tylko-kartel-czterech |title=PiS nie jest największą partią w Polsce. "Liczy się tylko kartel czterech" |first=Piotr |last=Drabik |date=1 June 2023 |website=[[Radio ZET]] |language=pl |quote="Drugie miejsce należy do Prawa i Sprawiedliwości, które przez 22 lata istnienia mocno ugruntowało się także w terenie. Sekretarz generalny partii Krzysztof Sobolewski przekazał nam, że ugrupowanie rządzące ma ok. 48 tys. członków. - Najwięcej w województwie mazowieckim - dodał. Na pytanie, jak liczebność PiS zmieniła się w ostatnich trzech latach, odpowiedział tylko: - Znacząco wzrosła." |trans-quote="Second place belongs to Law and Justice, which has also become firmly established on the ground over its 22 years of existence. The party's general secretary Krzysztof Sobolewski told us that the ruling grouping has around 48,000 members. - The largest number in the Mazowieckie Voivodeship," he added. When asked how the size of PiS had changed in the last three years, he replied only: - It has increased significantly."}}</ref> | | membership = {{increase}} 48,000 (2023 {{estimation}})<ref name="membership_2023">{{cite web |url=https://wiadomosci.radiozet.pl/polska/polityka/pis-nie-jest-najwieksza-partia-w-polsce-liczy-sie-tylko-kartel-czterech |title=PiS nie jest największą partią w Polsce. "Liczy się tylko kartel czterech" |first=Piotr |last=Drabik |date=1 June 2023 |website=[[Radio ZET]] |language=pl |quote="Drugie miejsce należy do Prawa i Sprawiedliwości, które przez 22 lata istnienia mocno ugruntowało się także w terenie. Sekretarz generalny partii Krzysztof Sobolewski przekazał nam, że ugrupowanie rządzące ma ok. 48 tys. członków. - Najwięcej w województwie mazowieckim - dodał. Na pytanie, jak liczebność PiS zmieniła się w ostatnich trzech latach, odpowiedział tylko: - Znacząco wzrosła." |trans-quote="Second place belongs to Law and Justice, which has also become firmly established on the ground over its 22 years of existence. The party's general secretary Krzysztof Sobolewski told us that the ruling grouping has around 48,000 members. - The largest number in the Mazowieckie Voivodeship," he added. When asked how the size of PiS had changed in the last three years, he replied only: - It has increased significantly."}}</ref> | ||
| national = [[United Right (Poland)|United Right]] | | national = [[United Right (Poland)|United Right]] | ||
| european = [[European Conservatives and Reformists Party]] | | european = [[Alliance for Europe of the Nations|AEN]] (until 2009)<br>[[European Conservatives and Reformists Party|ECR Party]] (since 2009) | ||
| europarl = [[European Conservatives and Reformists Group| | | europarl = [[Union for Europe of the Nations|UEN]] (2004–2009)<br>[[European Conservatives and Reformists Group|ECR Group]] (since 2009) | ||
| colours = {{Color box|{{party color | | colours = {{Color box|{{Political party data|color}}|border=darkgray}} Blue {{Color box|#ffffff|border=darkgray}} White {{Color box|#DC241f|border=darkgray}} Red<ref>{{Cite journal |first=Marcin |last=Fijołek |title=Republikańska symbolika w logotypie partii politycznej Prawo i Sprawiedliwość |journal=Ekonomia I Nauki Humanistyczne |issue=19 |year=2012 |pages=9–17 |doi=10.7862/rz.2012.einh.23 |url=http://doi.prz.edu.pl/pl/pdf/einh/14|doi-access=free }}</ref><br>{{color box|{{party color|Law and Justice (2001-2005)}}}} Cyan{{efn|between 2001 and 2005<ref name="znaczek"/>}} | ||
| anthem = | | anthem = | ||
<!-- Values obtained from Wikidata; to edit, see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q156874 --> | <!-- Values obtained from Wikidata; to edit, see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q156874 --> | ||
| seats1_title = [[Sejm]] | | seats1_title = [[Sejm]] | ||
| seats1 = {{ | | seats1 = {{Political party data|seat composition bar|ms-lower-house}} | ||
| seats2_title = [[Senate of Poland|Senate]] | | seats2_title = [[Senate of Poland|Senate]] | ||
| seats2 = {{Political party data|seat composition bar|ms-upper-house}} | | seats2 = {{Political party data|seat composition bar|ms-upper-house}} | ||
| seats3_title = [[European Parliament]] | | seats3_title = [[European Parliament]] | ||
| seats3 = {{Political party data|seat composition bar| | | seats3 = {{Political party data|seat composition bar|EP}} | ||
| seats4_title = [[Voivodeship sejmik|Regional assemblies]] | | seats4_title = [[Voivodeship sejmik|Regional assemblies]] | ||
| seats4 = {{Composition bar|258|552|hex={{party color|Law and Justice}}}} | | seats4 = {{Composition bar|258|552|hex={{party color|Law and Justice}}}} | ||
| Line 56: | Line 55: | ||
| footnotes = {{cnote|A|The party is also considered economically [[Left-wing politics#Economics|left-wing]],{{refn|<ref name="left1"/><ref name="left2"/><ref name="left3"/><ref name="sagehandbook"/><ref name="kossack_q"/>}} or left-leaning.{{refn|<ref name="lean1"/><ref name="lean2"/><ref name="lean3"/>}}}} | | footnotes = {{cnote|A|The party is also considered economically [[Left-wing politics#Economics|left-wing]],{{refn|<ref name="left1"/><ref name="left2"/><ref name="left3"/><ref name="sagehandbook"/><ref name="kossack_q"/>}} or left-leaning.{{refn|<ref name="lean1"/><ref name="lean2"/><ref name="lean3"/>}}}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[File:Law_and_Justice_2001-05_logo.png|thumb|upright=0.75|right|Old logo of the party, used between 2001 and 2005.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://pl.wikinews.org/wiki/2006-01-27:_Sonda%C5%BC_OBOP-u:_PO_na_czele,_LPR_i_PSL_poza_Sejmem |title=2006-01-27: Sondaż OBOP-u: PO na czele, LPR i PSL poza Sejmem |language=pl |date=27 January 2006 |website=e-Polityka.pl}}</ref><ref name="znaczek">{{cite web |url=https://archiwum.rp.pl/artykul/1252639-Partyjny-znaczek-do-liftingu.html |language=pl |title=Partyjny znaczek do liftingu |date=30 August 2014 |first=Wiktor |last=Ferfecki |website=[[Rzeczpospolita (newspaper)|Rzeczpospolita]] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180807223300/https://archiwum.rp.pl/artykul/1252639-Partyjny-znaczek-do-liftingu.html |archive-date=7 August 2018}}</ref>]] | [[File:Law_and_Justice_2001-05_logo.png|thumb|upright=0.75|right|Old logo of the party, used between 2001 and 2005.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://pl.wikinews.org/wiki/2006-01-27:_Sonda%C5%BC_OBOP-u:_PO_na_czele,_LPR_i_PSL_poza_Sejmem |title=2006-01-27: Sondaż OBOP-u: PO na czele, LPR i PSL poza Sejmem |language=pl |date=27 January 2006 |website=e-Polityka.pl}}</ref><ref name="znaczek">{{cite web |url=https://archiwum.rp.pl/artykul/1252639-Partyjny-znaczek-do-liftingu.html |language=pl |title=Partyjny znaczek do liftingu |date=30 August 2014 |first=Wiktor |last=Ferfecki |website=[[Rzeczpospolita (newspaper)|Rzeczpospolita]] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180807223300/https://archiwum.rp.pl/artykul/1252639-Partyjny-znaczek-do-liftingu.html |archive-date=7 August 2018}}</ref>]] | ||
'''Law and Justice'''{{efn|Sometimes also called '''Right and Justice''' in English.<ref>{{cite journal |url=https://czasopisma.marszalek.com.pl/images/pliki/ppk/70/ppk7032.pdf |title=The Government and Politics of Poland in the Light of the Constitutional Perspective since 1989 |first=Mukesh Shankar |last=Bharti |journal=Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego |issn=2082-1212 |doi=10.15804/ppk.2022.06.32 |issue=6 |volume=70 |year=2022 |page=446 |quote="The 2007 Polish parliamentary election is the best way to understand as a plebiscite over the government led by the polarizing Right and Justice Party and its controversial “Fourth Republic” political project."}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |url=https://china-cee.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/2024er10_Poland.pdf |title=Poland external relations briefing: Poland and Europe change migration strategy |first=Konrad |last=Rajca |issn=2939-5933 |volume=77 |issue=4 |year=2024 |journal=Weekly Briefing |publisher=China-CEE Institute |page=3 |quote="The regulation of this issue is related to the practice of illegal issuance of visas during the previous Right and Justice (PiS) government, referred to as the “visa scandal.”"}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |first=Ewa |last=Bogalska-Martin |title=Implementing a | '''Law and Justice'''{{efn|Sometimes also called '''Right and Justice''' in English.<ref>{{cite journal |url=https://czasopisma.marszalek.com.pl/images/pliki/ppk/70/ppk7032.pdf |title=The Government and Politics of Poland in the Light of the Constitutional Perspective since 1989 |first=Mukesh Shankar |last=Bharti |journal=Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego |issn=2082-1212 |doi=10.15804/ppk.2022.06.32 |issue=6 |volume=70 |year=2022 |page=446 |quote="The 2007 Polish parliamentary election is the best way to understand as a plebiscite over the government led by the polarizing Right and Justice Party and its controversial “Fourth Republic” political project."}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |url=https://china-cee.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/2024er10_Poland.pdf |title=Poland external relations briefing: Poland and Europe change migration strategy |first=Konrad |last=Rajca |issn=2939-5933 |volume=77 |issue=4 |year=2024 |journal=Weekly Briefing |publisher=China-CEE Institute |page=3 |quote="The regulation of this issue is related to the practice of illegal issuance of visas during the previous Right and Justice (PiS) government, referred to as the “visa scandal.”"}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |first=Ewa |last=Bogalska-Martin |title=Implementing a "non-discrimination" policy in a country "without foreigners": the case of Poland |year=2019 |journal=Management & Gouvernance: Entreprises. Territoires. Sociétés |page=8 |quote="The conservative and nationalist parties founded in the context of the integration of Poland into the EU in the 2000s (such as the League of Polish Families and the Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland party, and the formation of the Right and Justice - PiS in 2001) gradually seized and modified this model." |url=https://hal.science/hal-02057535}}</ref>}} ({{langx|pl|Prawo i Sprawiedliwość}} {{IPA|pl|ˈpravɔ i ˌspravjɛˈdlivɔɕt͡ɕ||Pl-Prawo i Sprawiedliwość.ogg}}, '''PiS''') is a [[Right-wing populism|right-wing populist]] and [[National conservatism|national-conservative]] [[List of political parties in Poland|political party in Poland]]. The party is a member of [[European Conservatives and Reformists Group]]. Its chairman has been [[Jarosław Kaczyński]] since 18 January 2003. | ||
It was founded in 2001 by Jarosław and [[Lech Kaczyński]] as a direct successor of the [[Centre Agreement]] after it split from the [[Solidarity Electoral Action]] (AWS). It won the [[2005 Polish parliamentary election|2005 parliamentary]] and [[2005 Polish presidential election|presidential]] elections, after which Lech became the [[president of Poland]]. It headed a parliamentary coalition with the [[League of Polish Families]] and [[Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland]] between 2005 and the [[2007 Polish parliamentary election|2007 election]]. It placed second and they remained in the parliamentary opposition until 2015. It regained the presidency in the [[2015 Polish presidential election|2015 election]], and later won a majority of seats in the [[2015 Polish parliamentary election|parliamentary election]]. They retained the positions following the [[2019 Polish parliamentary election|2019]] and [[2020 Polish presidential election|2020 election]], but lost their majority following the [[2023 Polish parliamentary election]]. | It was founded in 2001 by Jarosław and [[Lech Kaczyński]] as a direct successor of the [[Centre Agreement]] after it split from the [[Solidarity Electoral Action]] (AWS). It won the [[2005 Polish parliamentary election|2005 parliamentary]] and [[2005 Polish presidential election|presidential]] elections, after which Lech became the [[president of Poland]]. It headed a parliamentary coalition with the [[League of Polish Families]] and [[Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland]] between 2005 and the [[2007 Polish parliamentary election|2007 election]]. It placed second and they remained in the parliamentary opposition until 2015. It regained the presidency in the [[2015 Polish presidential election|2015 election]], and later won a majority of seats in the [[2015 Polish parliamentary election|parliamentary election]]. They retained the positions following the [[2019 Polish parliamentary election|2019]] and [[2020 Polish presidential election|2020 election]], but lost their majority following the [[2023 Polish parliamentary election]]. | ||
During its foundation, it sought to position itself as a [[Centrism|centrist]] [[Christian democracy|Christian democratic]] party, although shortly after, it adopted more [[Cultural conservatism|culturally]] and [[Social conservatism|socially conservative]] views and began their shift to the [[Right-wing politics|right]]. Under Kaczyński's [[National conservatism|national-conservative]] and [[Law and order (politics)|law and order]] agenda, PiS embraced [[economic interventionism]].<ref>{{Cite news |date=July 21, 2019 |title=Premier o PiS. "Myśl socjalistyczna również jest dla nas ważna" |language=pl |work=[[Wirtualna Polska]] |url=https://wiadomosci.wp.pl/premier-o-pis-mysl-socjalistyczna-rowniez-jest-dla-nas-wazna-6404992628864641a |access-date=June 6, 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Turczyn |first=Andrzej |date=July 22, 2019 |title=Mateusz Morawiecki: robotnicza myśl socjalistyczna jest głęboko obecna w filozofii Prawa i Sprawiedliwości |url=https://trybun.org.pl/2019/07/22/mateusz-morawiecki-robotnicza-mysl-socjalistyczna-jest-gleboko-obecna-w-filozofii-prawa-i-sprawiedliwosci/ |access-date=June 24, 2023 |website=Trybun Broni Palnej |language=Polish}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Szeląg |first=Wojciech |date=May 24, 2021 |title=Marek Goliszewski, prezes BCC: Polski Ład wystraszył nawet tych, którzy wspierają PiS |url=https://biznes.interia.pl/raport-rozmowy-interii/news-marek-goliszewski-prezes-bcc-polski-lad-wystraszyl-nawet-tyc,nId,5252103 |access-date=June 24, 2023 |website=[[Interia]] |language=pl}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Kołakowska |first=Agnieszka |date=October 9, 2019 |title=In defense of Poland's ruling party |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/in-defense-of-poland-ruling-party-law-and-justice-pis/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191009123343/https://www.politico.eu/article/in-defense-of-poland-ruling-party-law-and-justice-pis/ |archive-date=October 9, 2019 |access-date=June 24, 2023 |website=[[Politico]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Orenstein |first=Mitchell |date=July 4, 2018 |title=Populism with socialist characteristics |url=https://jordantimes.com/opinion/mitchell-aorenstein/populism-socialist-characteristics |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180704233456/https://jordantimes.com/opinion/mitchell-aorenstein/populism-socialist-characteristics |archive-date=July 4, 2018 |access-date=June 24, 2023 |website=[[The Jordan Times]]}}</ref> It has also pursued close relations with the [[Catholic Church]], although in 2011, the [[Christian nationalism|Catholic-nationalist]] faction split off to form [[United Poland]].<ref name="no Christian Democracy in Poland">{{cite journal|last1=Bale|first1=Tim|last2=Szczerbiak|first2=Aleks|date=December 2006|title=Why is there no Christian Democracy in Poland (and why does this matter)?|url=https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=sei-working-paper-no-91.pdf&site=266|journal=SEI Working Paper|publisher=Sussex European Institute|issue=91}}</ref> During the 2010s, it also adopted [[right-wing populism|right-wing populist]] positions. After regaining power, PiS gained popularity with more populist and social policies.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Santora|first1=Marc|date=14 October 2019|title=In Poland, Nationalism With a Progressive Touch Wins Voters (Published 2019)|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/10/world/europe/poland-election-law-and-justice-party.html|access-date=20 October 2020}}</ref> The party is sometimes labelled as "[[left-wing politics|left]]-[[Paternalism|paternalistic]]".<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Putintsev |first=Igor S. |date=2023 |title=The two-party tendency in | During its foundation, it sought to position itself as a [[Centrism|centrist]] [[Christian democracy|Christian democratic]] party, although shortly after, it adopted more [[Cultural conservatism|culturally]] and [[Social conservatism|socially conservative]] views and began their shift to the [[Right-wing politics|right]]. Under Kaczyński's [[National conservatism|national-conservative]] and [[Law and order (politics)|law and order]] agenda, PiS embraced [[economic interventionism]].<ref>{{Cite news |date=July 21, 2019 |title=Premier o PiS. "Myśl socjalistyczna również jest dla nas ważna" |language=pl |work=[[Wirtualna Polska]] |url=https://wiadomosci.wp.pl/premier-o-pis-mysl-socjalistyczna-rowniez-jest-dla-nas-wazna-6404992628864641a |access-date=June 6, 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Turczyn |first=Andrzej |date=July 22, 2019 |title=Mateusz Morawiecki: robotnicza myśl socjalistyczna jest głęboko obecna w filozofii Prawa i Sprawiedliwości |url=https://trybun.org.pl/2019/07/22/mateusz-morawiecki-robotnicza-mysl-socjalistyczna-jest-gleboko-obecna-w-filozofii-prawa-i-sprawiedliwosci/ |access-date=June 24, 2023 |website=Trybun Broni Palnej |language=Polish}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Szeląg |first=Wojciech |date=May 24, 2021 |title=Marek Goliszewski, prezes BCC: Polski Ład wystraszył nawet tych, którzy wspierają PiS |url=https://biznes.interia.pl/raport-rozmowy-interii/news-marek-goliszewski-prezes-bcc-polski-lad-wystraszyl-nawet-tyc,nId,5252103 |access-date=June 24, 2023 |website=[[Interia]] |language=pl}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Kołakowska |first=Agnieszka |date=October 9, 2019 |title=In defense of Poland's ruling party |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/in-defense-of-poland-ruling-party-law-and-justice-pis/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191009123343/https://www.politico.eu/article/in-defense-of-poland-ruling-party-law-and-justice-pis/ |archive-date=October 9, 2019 |access-date=June 24, 2023 |website=[[Politico]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Orenstein |first=Mitchell |date=July 4, 2018 |title=Populism with socialist characteristics |url=https://jordantimes.com/opinion/mitchell-aorenstein/populism-socialist-characteristics |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180704233456/https://jordantimes.com/opinion/mitchell-aorenstein/populism-socialist-characteristics |archive-date=July 4, 2018 |access-date=June 24, 2023 |website=[[The Jordan Times]]}}</ref> It has also pursued close relations with the [[Catholic Church]], although in 2011, the [[Christian nationalism|Catholic-nationalist]] faction split off to form [[United Poland]].<ref name="no Christian Democracy in Poland">{{cite journal|last1=Bale|first1=Tim|last2=Szczerbiak|first2=Aleks|date=December 2006|title=Why is there no Christian Democracy in Poland (and why does this matter)?|url=https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=sei-working-paper-no-91.pdf&site=266|journal=SEI Working Paper|publisher=Sussex European Institute|issue=91}}</ref> During the 2010s, it also adopted [[right-wing populism|right-wing populist]] positions. After regaining power, PiS gained popularity with more populist and social policies.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Santora|first1=Marc|date=14 October 2019|title=In Poland, Nationalism With a Progressive Touch Wins Voters (Published 2019)|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/10/world/europe/poland-election-law-and-justice-party.html|access-date=20 October 2020}}</ref> The party is sometimes labelled as "[[left-wing politics|left]]-[[Paternalism|paternalistic]]".<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Putintsev |first=Igor S. |date=2023 |title=The two-party tendency in Poland's political system: manifestations, causes and prospects |url=https://balticregion.kantiana.ru/en/jour/5311/40560/ |journal=Baltic Region |language=en |volume=15 |issue=1 |pages=18–33 |doi=10.5922/2079-8555-2023-1-2 |issn=2310-0524 |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20240909122609/https://balticregion.kantiana.ru/en/jour/5311/40560/ |archive-date=2024-09-09 |quote=Each party had something to offer them: PiS promoted leftist paternalistic views of the economy and social problems, while PO attracted people of secular thinking who opposed the intensification of clerical trends — a burning issue in Poland.|doi-access=free }}</ref> | ||
It is a member of the [[European Conservatives and Reformists Party|European Conservatives and Reformists]],<ref>{{Cite book|last=Nordsieck|first=Wolfram|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1aGbDwAAQBAJ&q=pis+party+ACRE&pg=PA417|title=Parties and Elections in Europe: Parliamentary Elections and Governments since 1945, European Parliament Elections, Political Orientation and History of Parties|date=5 June 2019|publisher=BoD – Books on Demand|isbn=9783732292509|language=en}}</ref> and on national-level, it heads the [[United Right (Poland)|United Right]] coalition. It currently holds 190 seats in the [[Sejm]] and 34 in the [[Senate of Poland|Senate]]. | It is a member of the [[European Conservatives and Reformists Party|European Conservatives and Reformists]],<ref>{{Cite book|last=Nordsieck|first=Wolfram|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1aGbDwAAQBAJ&q=pis+party+ACRE&pg=PA417|title=Parties and Elections in Europe: Parliamentary Elections and Governments since 1945, European Parliament Elections, Political Orientation and History of Parties|date=5 June 2019|publisher=BoD – Books on Demand|isbn=9783732292509|language=en}}</ref> and on national-level, it heads the [[United Right (Poland)|United Right]] coalition. It currently holds 190 seats in the [[Sejm]] and 34 in the [[Senate of Poland|Senate]]. | ||
| Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
===In opposition: 2023–present=== | ===In opposition: 2023–present=== | ||
The [[United Right (Poland)|United Right]] alliance placed first for the third straight election and won a plurality of seats but fell short of a Sejm majority. The opposition, consisting of the [[Civic Coalition (Poland)|Civic Coalition]], [[Third Way (Poland)|Third Way]], and [[The Left (Poland)|The Left]], achieved a combined total vote of 54%, managing to form a majority [[Third Cabinet of Donald Tusk|coalition government]].<ref>{{cite web |date=15 October 2023 |title=Opposition wins Polish election, according to exit poll |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/opposition-wins-polish-election-according-to-exit-poll-poland-kaczynski-duda-tusk-election-rule-of-law/ |access-date=15 October 2023 |website=POLITICO |archive-date=15 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231015191532/https://www.politico.eu/article/opposition-wins-polish-election-according-to-exit-poll-poland-kaczynski-duda-tusk-election-rule-of-law/ |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Picheta |first=Rob |date=15 October 2023 |title=Poland's opposition has path to oust populist ruling party, exit poll shows |url=https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/15/europe/poland-election-voting-intl/index.html |access-date=15 October 2023 |publisher=CNN |archive-date=15 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231015152206/https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/15/europe/poland-election-voting-intl/index.html |url-status=live}}</ref> Although PiS would be unable to govern on its own, the Polish president [[Andrzej Duda]] stated his intention to re-appoint the incumbent [[Mateusz Morawiecki]] as prime minister due to the existing albeit unofficial convention of nominating a member of the winning party.<ref name=":4">{{Cite web |last=Cienski |first=Jan |date=2023-11-27 |title=Poland's zombie government shuffles into being |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/poland-government-election-donald-tusk-mateusz-morawiecki-andrzej-duda/ |access-date=2023-12-11 |website=POLITICO |language=en}}</ref> The four opposition parties criticized Duda's decision as a delay tactic. The opposition parties subsequently signed a coalition agreement on 10 November, de facto taking over control of the Sejm, and agreed to nominate former prime minister and [[President of the European Council|European Council President]] [[Donald Tusk]] as their candidate.<ref>{{cite web |author=Easton, Adam |date=10 November 2023 |title=Poland's Tusk-led pro-EU opposition signs deal and waits to govern |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-67381267.amp |access-date=10 November 2023 |work=[[BBC]]}}</ref> Morawiecki's new cabinet, dubbed "two-week government" and "zombie government" by the media due to its anticipated short-livedness, was sworn in on 27 November 2023.<ref name=":4" /><ref>{{Cite web |title=Prezydent powoła "rząd dwutygodniowy" |url=https://wyborcza.pl/7,75398,30444513,prezydent-powola-rzad-dwutygodniowy.html |access-date=2023-11-27 |website=wyborcza.pl |language=pl}}</ref> As expected, [[Third Cabinet of Mateusz Morawiecki|the Morawiecki's government]] was defeated in the Sejm on 11 December 2023, effectively ending its tenure. | The [[United Right (Poland)|United Right]] alliance placed first for the third straight election and won a plurality of seats but fell short of a Sejm majority. The opposition, consisting of the [[Civic Coalition (Poland)|Civic Coalition]], [[Third Way (Poland)|Third Way]], and [[The Left (Poland)|The Left]], achieved a combined total vote of 54%, managing to form a majority [[Third Cabinet of Donald Tusk|coalition government]].<ref>{{cite web |date=15 October 2023 |title=Opposition wins Polish election, according to exit poll |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/opposition-wins-polish-election-according-to-exit-poll-poland-kaczynski-duda-tusk-election-rule-of-law/ |access-date=15 October 2023 |website=POLITICO |archive-date=15 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231015191532/https://www.politico.eu/article/opposition-wins-polish-election-according-to-exit-poll-poland-kaczynski-duda-tusk-election-rule-of-law/ |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Picheta |first=Rob |date=15 October 2023 |title=Poland's opposition has path to oust populist ruling party, exit poll shows |url=https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/15/europe/poland-election-voting-intl/index.html |access-date=15 October 2023 |publisher=CNN |archive-date=15 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231015152206/https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/15/europe/poland-election-voting-intl/index.html |url-status=live}}</ref> Although PiS would be unable to govern on its own, the Polish president [[Andrzej Duda]] stated his intention to re-appoint the incumbent [[Mateusz Morawiecki]] as prime minister due to the existing albeit unofficial convention of nominating a member of the winning party.<ref name=":4">{{Cite web |last=Cienski |first=Jan |date=2023-11-27 |title=Poland's zombie government shuffles into being |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/poland-government-election-donald-tusk-mateusz-morawiecki-andrzej-duda/ |access-date=2023-12-11 |website=POLITICO |language=en}}</ref> The four opposition parties criticized Duda's decision as a delay tactic. The opposition parties subsequently signed a coalition agreement on 10 November, de facto taking over control of the Sejm, and agreed to nominate former prime minister and [[President of the European Council|European Council President]] [[Donald Tusk]] as their candidate.<ref>{{cite web |author=Easton, Adam |date=10 November 2023 |title=Poland's Tusk-led pro-EU opposition signs deal and waits to govern |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-67381267.amp |access-date=10 November 2023 |work=[[BBC]]}}</ref> Morawiecki's new cabinet, dubbed "two-week government" and "zombie government" by the media due to its anticipated short-livedness, was sworn in on 27 November 2023.<ref name=":4" /><ref>{{Cite web |title=Prezydent powoła "rząd dwutygodniowy" |url=https://wyborcza.pl/7,75398,30444513,prezydent-powola-rzad-dwutygodniowy.html |access-date=2023-11-27 |website=wyborcza.pl |language=pl}}</ref> As expected, [[Third Cabinet of Mateusz Morawiecki|the Morawiecki's government]] was defeated in the Sejm on 11 December 2023, effectively ending its tenure. | ||
The Law and Justice candidate for the [[2025 Polish presidential election]], [[Karol Nawrocki]], won the election. The results mean that Law and Justice and its aligned presidential candidates have lost only one presidential election— in 2010 — since the party’s founding 24 years ago. | |||
====2024 party subsidy issue==== | ====2024 party subsidy issue==== | ||
| Line 118: | Line 120: | ||
On 14 March 2024, the President appointed a new composition of the [[National Electoral Commission (Poland)|National Electoral Commission]] (PKW), selected by the Sejm in December 2023. While {{ill|Sylwester Marciniak|pl|Sylwester Marciniak}} remained the chairman of the PKW, a position he held since 11 February 2020 and {{ill|Wojciech Sych|pl|Wojciech Sych}} as his deputy, seven other members were recommended by different parties in parliament: KO recommended {{ill|Konrad Składowski|pl|Konrad Składowski}} and {{ill|Ryszard Balicki|pl|Ryszard Balicki}}, PiS recommended {{ill|Mirosław Suski|pl|Mirosław Suski}} and {{ill|Arkadiusz Pikulik|pl|Arkadiusz Pikulik}}, PSL recommended {{ill|Maciej Kliś|pl|Maciej Kliś}}, PL2050 recommended {{ill|Paweł Gieras|pl|Paweł Gieras}}, and Lewica recommended [[Ryszard Kalisz]].<ref>{{cite news |last=Matłacz |first=Agnieszka |date=2023-12-22 |title=Sejm wybrał siedmiu członków Państwowej Komisji Wyborczej |url=https://www.prawo.pl/samorzad/sklad-pkw-2023-2027,524613.html |publisher=Prawo.pl |access-date=2025-01-10}}</ref><ref>{{cite press release |author=<!-- not stated --> |date=2024-03-06 |title=Prezydent RP powołał członków Państwowej Komisji Wyborczej |url= https://wybory.pkw.gov.pl/aktualnosci/informacje/prezydent-rp-powolal-czlonkow-panstwowej-komisji-wyborczej |publisher=PKW |access-date=2025-01-10}}</ref> | On 14 March 2024, the President appointed a new composition of the [[National Electoral Commission (Poland)|National Electoral Commission]] (PKW), selected by the Sejm in December 2023. While {{ill|Sylwester Marciniak|pl|Sylwester Marciniak}} remained the chairman of the PKW, a position he held since 11 February 2020 and {{ill|Wojciech Sych|pl|Wojciech Sych}} as his deputy, seven other members were recommended by different parties in parliament: KO recommended {{ill|Konrad Składowski|pl|Konrad Składowski}} and {{ill|Ryszard Balicki|pl|Ryszard Balicki}}, PiS recommended {{ill|Mirosław Suski|pl|Mirosław Suski}} and {{ill|Arkadiusz Pikulik|pl|Arkadiusz Pikulik}}, PSL recommended {{ill|Maciej Kliś|pl|Maciej Kliś}}, PL2050 recommended {{ill|Paweł Gieras|pl|Paweł Gieras}}, and Lewica recommended [[Ryszard Kalisz]].<ref>{{cite news |last=Matłacz |first=Agnieszka |date=2023-12-22 |title=Sejm wybrał siedmiu członków Państwowej Komisji Wyborczej |url=https://www.prawo.pl/samorzad/sklad-pkw-2023-2027,524613.html |publisher=Prawo.pl |access-date=2025-01-10}}</ref><ref>{{cite press release |author=<!-- not stated --> |date=2024-03-06 |title=Prezydent RP powołał członków Państwowej Komisji Wyborczej |url= https://wybory.pkw.gov.pl/aktualnosci/informacje/prezydent-rp-powolal-czlonkow-panstwowej-komisji-wyborczej |publisher=PKW |access-date=2025-01-10}}</ref> | ||
On 29 August, the PKW ruled 5:3<ref name="Onet-20240829">{{Cite news |title=Tak głosowali członkowie PKW w sprawie rozliczenia PiS. Wiemy, co zrobił przewodniczący: Podział głosów w PKW podczas głosowania nad odrzuceniem rozliczenia wyborczego Prawa i Sprawiedliwości był następujący: pięć "za", trzy "przeciw", jeden wstrzymujący się. Przewodniczący Państwowej Komisji Wyborczej był tym, który wstrzymał się od głosu. |date={{date|2024-08-29|DMY}} |url=https://wiadomosci.onet.pl/kraj/tak-glosowali-czlonkowie-pkw-w-sprawie-rozliczenia-pis-wiemy-co-zrobil-przewodniczacy/z6s7m0l |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240829162750/https://wiadomosci.onet.pl/kraj/tak-glosowali-czlonkowie-pkw-w-sprawie-rozliczenia-pis-wiemy-co-zrobil-przewodniczacy/z6s7m0l |archive-date={{date|2024-08-29|DMY}} |access-date={{date|2025-03-03|DMY}} |work=[[Onet.pl]] |trans-title=This is how the members of the PKW voted on the PiS settlement. We know what the chairperson did: The division of votes in the PKW during the vote on the rejection of the Law and Justice election settlement was as follows: five "for", three "against", one abstention. The Chairperson of the State Electoral Commission was the one who abstained. |language=pl}}</ref> to penalize PiS by refusing to return 10.8 million PLN for 36 million designated to it via [[party subsidy]], alleging the party misused 3.6 million PLN of their provided campaign funds in the 2023 parliamentary election.<ref>{{cite news |author=<!-- not stated --> |date=2024-08-29 |title=Jest decyzja PKW w sprawie pieniędzy z budżetu dla PiS |url=https://www.rp.pl/polityka/art41041661-jest-decyzja-pkw-w-sprawie-pieniedzy-z-budzetu-dla-pis |publisher=[[Rzeczpospolita (newspaper)|Rzeczpospolita]] |access-date=2025-01-10}} </ref> Despite PiS appealing the decision to the [[Supreme Court of Poland|Supreme Court]], the Supreme Court issued no verdict within the 60-day deadline. The party appealed to its members and supporters for financial aid in donations.<ref>{{cite news |last=Żółciak |first=Tomasz |date=2024-08-29 |title="Będzie wiadomo, kto jest z nami na dobre i na złe". W PiS mobilizacja po decyzji PKW |url=https://www.money.pl/gospodarka/bedzie-wiadomo-kto-jest-z-nami-na-dobre-i-na-zle-w-pis-mobilizacja-po-decyzji-pkw-7065381397543456a.html |publisher=Money.pl |access-date=2025-01-10}}</ref> The PKW tied in a vote on 23 September regarding whether the committee recognizes the Supreme Court as valid considering the ongoing [[Polish constitutional crisis|constitutional crisis]].<ref name="KUC2024">{{Cite news |title=Pat w PKW. PiS może nadal dostawać subwencję: W Państwowej Komisji Wyborczej trwa pat, który skutkuje paraliżem prac tego organu. W efekcie może dojść do sytuacji, w której PiS jednak będzie otrzymywał subwencję z budżetu. Szef PKW Sylwester Marciniak postanowił bowiem na razie nie zwoływać posiedzeń Komisji. |author1=KUC |date={{date|2024-10-05|DMY}} |url=https://businessinsider.com.pl/prawo/pat-w-pkw-pis-moze-nadal-dostawac-subwencje/bnne910 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241005075133/https://businessinsider.com.pl/prawo/pat-w-pkw-pis-moze-nadal-dostawac-subwencje/bnne910 |archive-date={{date|2024-10-05|DMY}} |access-date={{date|2025-03-03|DMY}} |work=[[Business Insider|BUSINESS INSIDER]] |trans-title=A stalemate at PKW. PiS can still get a subsidy: There is an ongoing stalemate at the State Election Commission which is resulting in the paralysis of the work of this body. As a result, a situation may arise in which PiS will nevertheless receive a subsidy from the budget. This is because the head of the PKW, Sylwester Marciniak, has decided not to convene meetings of the Commission for the time being. |language=pl |agency=[[Polish Press Agency|Polska Agencja Prasowa]]}}</ref> Further penalizations by the PKW on 18 November occurred thereafter, with the Commission ruling 5:4 to deprive PiS of its entire 75 million PLN subsidy for the three next years. PiS likewise appealed this decision to the Supreme Court,<ref>{{cite news |author=<!-- not stated --> |date=2024-11-18 |title=Sprawozdanie finansowe PiS. Jest decyzja PKW |url=https://www.money.pl/gospodarka/sprawozdanie-finansowe-pis-jest-decyzja-pkw-7094017149197248a.html|publisher=Money.pl |access-date=2025-01-10}}</ref><ref name="HorbaczewskiŻaczkiewicz-Zborska2025">{{Cite news |title=Izba Kontroli SN: Niesłuszne odrzucenie sprawozdania rocznego PiS za 2023 r.: We wtorek 21 stycznia Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych Sądu Najwyższego orzekła na posiedzeniu niejawnym, że odrzucenie rocznego sprawozdania finansowego Prawa i Sprawiedliwości za 2023 rok przez Państwowa Komisję Wyborczą było niezasadne. Rozpatrując sprawozdanie finansowe PKW powinna była przeprowadzić nowe postępowanie dowodowe. W sprawie zdecydowało siedmioro sędziów tej Izby, która według Trybunału w Strasburgu nie jest sądem w rozumieniu ustawy. |last1=Horbaczewski |first1=Robert |date={{date|2025-01-21|DMY}} |url=https://www.prawo.pl/samorzad/odrzucone-sprawozdanie-finansowe-pis-za-2023-r,530057.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250303231322/https://www.prawo.pl/samorzad/odrzucone-sprawozdanie-finansowe-pis-za-2023-r,530057.html |archive-date={{date|2025-03-03|DMY}} |access-date={{date|2025-03-03|DMY}} |work=Prawo.pl |last2=Żaczkiewicz-Zborska |first2=Katarzyna |trans-title=SN Control Chamber: wrongful rejection of Law and Justice's 2023 annual report: On Tuesday 21 January, the Supreme Court's Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs ruled in a closed session that the rejection of Law and Justice's annual financial report for 2023 by the State Election Commission was unjustified. When considering the financial report, the PKW should have conducted a new evidentiary procedure. The case was decided by seven judges of the Chamber, which, according to the Strasbourg Court, is not a court under the law. |language=pl}}</ref> which the Supreme Court ruled invalid on 11 December, obligating the PKW to return PiS its subsidy.<ref>{{cite news |author=<!-- not stated --> |date=2024-12-11 |title=PiS wygrywa w Sądzie Najwyższym. Uchwała PKW o rozliczeniu kampanii uchylona |url=https://www.rp.pl/prawo-dla-ciebie/art41568741-pis-wygrywa-w-sadzie-najwyzszym-uchwala-pkw-o-rozliczeniu-kampanii-uchylona |publisher=[[Rzeczpospolita (newspaper)|Rzeczpospolita]] |access-date=2025-01-10}}</ref> The Commission voted 5:4 to adjourn the meeting on 16 December without recognizing the Supreme Court or its ruling.<ref name="ŻakStelmachSkory2024">{{Cite news |title=Zaskakująca decyzja PKW w sprawie subwencji dla PiS: Niespodziewany wynik posiedzenia Państwowej Komisji Wyborczej ws. kar nałożonych w sierpniu na Komitet Wyborczy PiS, a uchylonych przez Sąd Najwyższy. Pięcioma głosami przeciw czterem PKW przyjęła wniosek o odroczenie decyzji w tej sprawie "do czasu systemowego rozwiązania sprawy tzw. neo-sędziów, tworzących Izbę Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej". |last1=Żak |first1=Karol |date={{date|2024-12-16|DMY}} |url=https://www.rmf24.pl/polityka/news-zaskakujaca-decyzja-pkw-w-sprawie-subwencji-dla-pis,nId,7876298 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241216154821/https://www.rmf24.pl/polityka/news-zaskakujaca-decyzja-pkw-w-sprawie-subwencji-dla-pis,nId,7876298 |archive-date={{date|2024-12-16|DMY}} |access-date={{date|2025-03-03|DMY}} |work=[[RMF FM]] |last2=Stelmach |first2=Waldemar |last3=Skory |first3=Tomasz |trans-title=Surprising PKW decision on Law and Justice (PiS) subsidies: Unexpected outcome of the State Electoral Commission meeting on penalties imposed on the Law and Justice (PiS) Electoral Committee in August and overturned by the Supreme Court. By five votes against four, the PKW adopted a motion to postpone a decision on the matter "until the case of the so-called neo-judges, forming the Chamber of Extraordinary Control, is resolved systemically". |language=pl}}</ref> On 30 December, a re-vote was held on the matter of whether it recognizes the Supreme Court, ruling 4:3 in favor of recognizing its verdict on this matter, and accepting the Supreme Court's decision to return the funds to PiS.<ref>{{cite press release |author=<!-- not stated --> |date=2024-12-31 |title=Uchwała nr 421/2024 PKW z dnia 30 grudnia 2024 r. w sprawie sprawozdania finansowego Komitetu Wyborczego Prawo i Sprawiedliwość z wyborów do Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej i do Senatu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej przeprowadzonych w dniu 15 października 2023 r. |url=https://pkw.gov.pl/aktualnosci/uchwaly/uchwala-nr-4212024-pkw-z-dnia-30-grudnia-2024-r-w-sprawie-sprawozdania-finansowego-komitetu-wyborcze |location= |publisher=[[National Electoral Commission (Poland)|National Electoral Commission]] |access-date=2025-01-10}}</ref><ref name="gkmp2024">{{Cite news |title=PKW przyjmuje sprawozdanie PiS. Decyzja o wypłacie w rękach ministra: Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza, wykonując postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego z 11 grudnia, przyjęła w poniedziałek sprawozdanie finansowe komitetu PiS z wyborów parlamentarnych 2023 r. Mimo to partia Jarosława Kaczyńskiego może jeszcze poczekać na pieniądze. Obecnie wszystko w rękach ministra finansów, a ten otrzymuje różne sygnały. |author1=gkmp |date={{date|2024-12-31|DMY}} |url=https://businessinsider.com.pl/wiadomosci/panstwowa-komisja-wyborcza-przyjela-sprawozdanie-finansowe-komitetu-pis/7hqdxxd |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241231132736/https://businessinsider.com.pl/wiadomosci/panstwowa-komisja-wyborcza-przyjela-sprawozdanie-finansowe-komitetu-pis/7hqdxxd |archive-date={{date|2024-12-31|DMY}} |access-date={{date|2025-03-03|DMY}} |work=[[Business Insider|BUSINESS INSIDER]] |trans-title=PKW accepts PiS report. Decision on payment in the hands of the minister: the State Election Commission, implementing the Supreme Court's decision of 11 December, on Monday accepted the PiS committee's financial report on the 2023 parliamentary elections. Despite this, Jarosław Kaczyński's party can still wait for the money. It is currently all in the hands of the finance minister, and he is receiving mixed signals. |language=pl |agency=[[Polish Press Agency|Polska Agencja Prasowa]]}}</ref> Subsequently, the matter was relayed to the [[Ministry of Finance (Poland)|Ministry of Finance]], in charge of granting subsidies. | On 29 August, the PKW ruled 5:3<ref name="Onet-20240829">{{Cite news |title=Tak głosowali członkowie PKW w sprawie rozliczenia PiS. Wiemy, co zrobił przewodniczący: Podział głosów w PKW podczas głosowania nad odrzuceniem rozliczenia wyborczego Prawa i Sprawiedliwości był następujący: pięć "za", trzy "przeciw", jeden wstrzymujący się. Przewodniczący Państwowej Komisji Wyborczej był tym, który wstrzymał się od głosu. |date={{date|2024-08-29|DMY}} |url=https://wiadomosci.onet.pl/kraj/tak-glosowali-czlonkowie-pkw-w-sprawie-rozliczenia-pis-wiemy-co-zrobil-przewodniczacy/z6s7m0l |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240829162750/https://wiadomosci.onet.pl/kraj/tak-glosowali-czlonkowie-pkw-w-sprawie-rozliczenia-pis-wiemy-co-zrobil-przewodniczacy/z6s7m0l |archive-date={{date|2024-08-29|DMY}} |access-date={{date|2025-03-03|DMY}} |work=[[Onet.pl]] |trans-title=This is how the members of the PKW voted on the PiS settlement. We know what the chairperson did: The division of votes in the PKW during the vote on the rejection of the Law and Justice election settlement was as follows: five "for", three "against", one abstention. The Chairperson of the State Electoral Commission was the one who abstained. |language=pl}}</ref> to penalize PiS by refusing to return 10.8 million PLN for 36 million designated to it via [[party subsidy]], alleging the party misused 3.6 million PLN of their provided campaign funds in the 2023 parliamentary election.<ref>{{cite news |author=<!-- not stated --> |date=2024-08-29 |title=Jest decyzja PKW w sprawie pieniędzy z budżetu dla PiS |url=https://www.rp.pl/polityka/art41041661-jest-decyzja-pkw-w-sprawie-pieniedzy-z-budzetu-dla-pis |publisher=[[Rzeczpospolita (newspaper)|Rzeczpospolita]] |access-date=2025-01-10}}</ref> Despite PiS appealing the decision to the [[Supreme Court of Poland|Supreme Court]], the Supreme Court issued no verdict within the 60-day deadline. The party appealed to its members and supporters for financial aid in donations.<ref>{{cite news |last=Żółciak |first=Tomasz |date=2024-08-29 |title="Będzie wiadomo, kto jest z nami na dobre i na złe". W PiS mobilizacja po decyzji PKW |url=https://www.money.pl/gospodarka/bedzie-wiadomo-kto-jest-z-nami-na-dobre-i-na-zle-w-pis-mobilizacja-po-decyzji-pkw-7065381397543456a.html |publisher=Money.pl |access-date=2025-01-10}}</ref> The PKW tied in a vote on 23 September regarding whether the committee recognizes the Supreme Court as valid considering the ongoing [[Polish constitutional crisis|constitutional crisis]].<ref name="KUC2024">{{Cite news |title=Pat w PKW. PiS może nadal dostawać subwencję: W Państwowej Komisji Wyborczej trwa pat, który skutkuje paraliżem prac tego organu. W efekcie może dojść do sytuacji, w której PiS jednak będzie otrzymywał subwencję z budżetu. Szef PKW Sylwester Marciniak postanowił bowiem na razie nie zwoływać posiedzeń Komisji. |author1=KUC |date={{date|2024-10-05|DMY}} |url=https://businessinsider.com.pl/prawo/pat-w-pkw-pis-moze-nadal-dostawac-subwencje/bnne910 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241005075133/https://businessinsider.com.pl/prawo/pat-w-pkw-pis-moze-nadal-dostawac-subwencje/bnne910 |archive-date={{date|2024-10-05|DMY}} |access-date={{date|2025-03-03|DMY}} |work=[[Business Insider|BUSINESS INSIDER]] |trans-title=A stalemate at PKW. PiS can still get a subsidy: There is an ongoing stalemate at the State Election Commission which is resulting in the paralysis of the work of this body. As a result, a situation may arise in which PiS will nevertheless receive a subsidy from the budget. This is because the head of the PKW, Sylwester Marciniak, has decided not to convene meetings of the Commission for the time being. |language=pl |agency=[[Polish Press Agency|Polska Agencja Prasowa]]}}</ref> Further penalizations by the PKW on 18 November occurred thereafter, with the Commission ruling 5:4 to deprive PiS of its entire 75 million PLN subsidy for the three next years. PiS likewise appealed this decision to the Supreme Court,<ref>{{cite news |author=<!-- not stated --> |date=2024-11-18 |title=Sprawozdanie finansowe PiS. Jest decyzja PKW |url=https://www.money.pl/gospodarka/sprawozdanie-finansowe-pis-jest-decyzja-pkw-7094017149197248a.html|publisher=Money.pl |access-date=2025-01-10}}</ref><ref name="HorbaczewskiŻaczkiewicz-Zborska2025">{{Cite news |title=Izba Kontroli SN: Niesłuszne odrzucenie sprawozdania rocznego PiS za 2023 r.: We wtorek 21 stycznia Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych Sądu Najwyższego orzekła na posiedzeniu niejawnym, że odrzucenie rocznego sprawozdania finansowego Prawa i Sprawiedliwości za 2023 rok przez Państwowa Komisję Wyborczą było niezasadne. Rozpatrując sprawozdanie finansowe PKW powinna była przeprowadzić nowe postępowanie dowodowe. W sprawie zdecydowało siedmioro sędziów tej Izby, która według Trybunału w Strasburgu nie jest sądem w rozumieniu ustawy. |last1=Horbaczewski |first1=Robert |date={{date|2025-01-21|DMY}} |url=https://www.prawo.pl/samorzad/odrzucone-sprawozdanie-finansowe-pis-za-2023-r,530057.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250303231322/https://www.prawo.pl/samorzad/odrzucone-sprawozdanie-finansowe-pis-za-2023-r,530057.html |archive-date={{date|2025-03-03|DMY}} |access-date={{date|2025-03-03|DMY}} |work=Prawo.pl |last2=Żaczkiewicz-Zborska |first2=Katarzyna |trans-title=SN Control Chamber: wrongful rejection of Law and Justice's 2023 annual report: On Tuesday 21 January, the Supreme Court's Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs ruled in a closed session that the rejection of Law and Justice's annual financial report for 2023 by the State Election Commission was unjustified. When considering the financial report, the PKW should have conducted a new evidentiary procedure. The case was decided by seven judges of the Chamber, which, according to the Strasbourg Court, is not a court under the law. |language=pl}}</ref> which the Supreme Court ruled invalid on 11 December, obligating the PKW to return PiS its subsidy.<ref>{{cite news |author=<!-- not stated --> |date=2024-12-11 |title=PiS wygrywa w Sądzie Najwyższym. Uchwała PKW o rozliczeniu kampanii uchylona |url=https://www.rp.pl/prawo-dla-ciebie/art41568741-pis-wygrywa-w-sadzie-najwyzszym-uchwala-pkw-o-rozliczeniu-kampanii-uchylona |publisher=[[Rzeczpospolita (newspaper)|Rzeczpospolita]] |access-date=2025-01-10}}</ref> The Commission voted 5:4 to adjourn the meeting on 16 December without recognizing the Supreme Court or its ruling.<ref name="ŻakStelmachSkory2024">{{Cite news |title=Zaskakująca decyzja PKW w sprawie subwencji dla PiS: Niespodziewany wynik posiedzenia Państwowej Komisji Wyborczej ws. kar nałożonych w sierpniu na Komitet Wyborczy PiS, a uchylonych przez Sąd Najwyższy. Pięcioma głosami przeciw czterem PKW przyjęła wniosek o odroczenie decyzji w tej sprawie "do czasu systemowego rozwiązania sprawy tzw. neo-sędziów, tworzących Izbę Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej". |last1=Żak |first1=Karol |date={{date|2024-12-16|DMY}} |url=https://www.rmf24.pl/polityka/news-zaskakujaca-decyzja-pkw-w-sprawie-subwencji-dla-pis,nId,7876298 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241216154821/https://www.rmf24.pl/polityka/news-zaskakujaca-decyzja-pkw-w-sprawie-subwencji-dla-pis,nId,7876298 |archive-date={{date|2024-12-16|DMY}} |access-date={{date|2025-03-03|DMY}} |work=[[RMF FM]] |last2=Stelmach |first2=Waldemar |last3=Skory |first3=Tomasz |trans-title=Surprising PKW decision on Law and Justice (PiS) subsidies: Unexpected outcome of the State Electoral Commission meeting on penalties imposed on the Law and Justice (PiS) Electoral Committee in August and overturned by the Supreme Court. By five votes against four, the PKW adopted a motion to postpone a decision on the matter "until the case of the so-called neo-judges, forming the Chamber of Extraordinary Control, is resolved systemically". |language=pl}}</ref> On 30 December, a re-vote was held on the matter of whether it recognizes the Supreme Court, ruling 4:3 in favor of recognizing its verdict on this matter, and accepting the Supreme Court's decision to return the funds to PiS.<ref>{{cite press release |author=<!-- not stated --> |date=2024-12-31 |title=Uchwała nr 421/2024 PKW z dnia 30 grudnia 2024 r. w sprawie sprawozdania finansowego Komitetu Wyborczego Prawo i Sprawiedliwość z wyborów do Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej i do Senatu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej przeprowadzonych w dniu 15 października 2023 r. |url=https://pkw.gov.pl/aktualnosci/uchwaly/uchwala-nr-4212024-pkw-z-dnia-30-grudnia-2024-r-w-sprawie-sprawozdania-finansowego-komitetu-wyborcze |location= |publisher=[[National Electoral Commission (Poland)|National Electoral Commission]] |access-date=2025-01-10}}</ref><ref name="gkmp2024">{{Cite news |title=PKW przyjmuje sprawozdanie PiS. Decyzja o wypłacie w rękach ministra: Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza, wykonując postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego z 11 grudnia, przyjęła w poniedziałek sprawozdanie finansowe komitetu PiS z wyborów parlamentarnych 2023 r. Mimo to partia Jarosława Kaczyńskiego może jeszcze poczekać na pieniądze. Obecnie wszystko w rękach ministra finansów, a ten otrzymuje różne sygnały. |author1=gkmp |date={{date|2024-12-31|DMY}} |url=https://businessinsider.com.pl/wiadomosci/panstwowa-komisja-wyborcza-przyjela-sprawozdanie-finansowe-komitetu-pis/7hqdxxd |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241231132736/https://businessinsider.com.pl/wiadomosci/panstwowa-komisja-wyborcza-przyjela-sprawozdanie-finansowe-komitetu-pis/7hqdxxd |archive-date={{date|2024-12-31|DMY}} |access-date={{date|2025-03-03|DMY}} |work=[[Business Insider|BUSINESS INSIDER]] |trans-title=PKW accepts PiS report. Decision on payment in the hands of the minister: the State Election Commission, implementing the Supreme Court's decision of 11 December, on Monday accepted the PiS committee's financial report on the 2023 parliamentary elections. Despite this, Jarosław Kaczyński's party can still wait for the money. It is currently all in the hands of the finance minister, and he is receiving mixed signals. |language=pl |agency=[[Polish Press Agency|Polska Agencja Prasowa]]}}</ref> Subsequently, the matter was relayed to the [[Ministry of Finance (Poland)|Ministry of Finance]], in charge of granting subsidies. | ||
In reaction to the ruling, several politicians commented. Prime Minister Donald Tusk stated on [[Twitter|X]] that he does not recognize the PKW positively ruling on granting PiS its subsidy.<ref>{{Cite tweet |number=1873793926634885589 |user=donaldtusk |title="Pieniędzy nie ma i nie będzie". Na moje oko tyle wynika z uchwały PKW. |first=Donald Franciszek |last=Tusk |date=2024-12-30 |access-date=2025-01-11 |author-link=Donald Tusk |language=pl |archive-url=https://archive.today/20241230184509/https://x.com/donaldtusk/status/1873793926634885589 |archive-date=2024-12-30 |url-status=live |trans-title="The money is not there and will not be there". To my eye, that much is clear from the resolution of the PKW. |df=dmy-all}}</ref> Marshal of the Sejm [[Szymon Hołownia]] stated the need for a compromise that lets Poles decide on a President without the validity of the president-elect's mandate being disputed by different parties.<ref>{{cite news |author=<!-- not stated --> |date=2024-12-30 |title=Hołownia komentuje decyzję PKW. "Potrzebna ustawa ratunkowa" |url=https://businessinsider.com.pl/wiadomosci/marszalek-sejmu-holownia-komentuje-decyzje-pkw/2z9lxkk |publisher=[[Business Insider]] |access-date=2025-01-10}}</ref> On 8 January 2025 Minister of Finance [[Andrzej Domański]] refused to recognize the PKW's ruling affirming PiS is to be granted its subsidy, stating the verdict was written in a "self-contradictory" way.<ref>{{cite news |author=<!-- not stated --> |date=2025-01-08 |title=Pieniądze dla PiS. Co dokładnie napisał minister Domański w piśmie do PKW? |url=https://www.rp.pl/prawo-w-polsce/art41657721-pieniadze-dla-pis-co-dokladnie-napisal-minister-domanski-w-pismie-do-pkw |publisher=[[Rzeczpospolita (newspaper)|Rzeczpospolita]] |access-date=2025-01-10}}</ref> Sylwester Marciniak, the PKW chairman, responded by stating the verdict was written clearly and demanding the Ministry grant PiS its allotted funds.<ref>{{cite news |author=<!-- not stated --> |date=2025-01-09 |title=Pieniądze dla PiS. Szef PKW odpowiada ministrowi finansów |url=https://www.tysol.pl/a133583-pieniadze-dla-pis-szef-pkw-odpowiada-ministrowi-finansow |publisher=Tysol.pl |access-date=2025-01-10}}</ref> Prime Minister Tusk expressed doubt over the legal validity of the PKW verdict, defending his Minister.<ref>{{cite news |author=<!-- not stated --> |date=2024-12-31 |title=Tusk komentuje decyzję Domańskiego ws. PKW. "Nie interesuje mnie, czy PiS ma te pieniądze" |url=https://businessinsider.com.pl/wiadomosci/tusk-komentuje-decyzje-domanskiego-ws-pkw-nie-interesuje-mnie-czy-pis-ma-te-pieniadze/9jejysg |publisher=[[Business Insider]] |access-date=2025-01-11}}</ref> A poll suggests 47.1% of Poles (98% of PiS voters, 71% of TD voters, 53% of Lewica voters) support PiS receiving the funds, and 46.9% (85% of PO voters, 80% of Konfederacja voters) are against.<ref>{{cite news |author=<!-- not stated --> |date=2025-01-16 |title=Sondaż "Rzeczpospolitej": Polacy podzieleni po decyzji PKW w sprawie pieniędzy dla PiS |url=https://www.rp.pl/polityka/art41684851-sondaz-rzeczpospolitej-polacy-podzieleni-po-decyzji-pkw-w-sprawie-pieniedzy-dla-pis |publisher=[[Rzeczpospolita (newspaper)|Rzeczpospolita]] |access-date=2025-01-10}}</ref> | In reaction to the ruling, several politicians commented. Prime Minister Donald Tusk stated on [[Twitter|X]] that he does not recognize the PKW positively ruling on granting PiS its subsidy.<ref>{{Cite tweet |number=1873793926634885589 |user=donaldtusk |title="Pieniędzy nie ma i nie będzie". Na moje oko tyle wynika z uchwały PKW. |first=Donald Franciszek |last=Tusk |date=2024-12-30 |access-date=2025-01-11 |author-link=Donald Tusk |language=pl |archive-url=https://archive.today/20241230184509/https://x.com/donaldtusk/status/1873793926634885589 |archive-date=2024-12-30 |url-status=live |trans-title="The money is not there and will not be there". To my eye, that much is clear from the resolution of the PKW. |df=dmy-all}}</ref> Marshal of the Sejm [[Szymon Hołownia]] stated the need for a compromise that lets Poles decide on a President without the validity of the president-elect's mandate being disputed by different parties.<ref>{{cite news |author=<!-- not stated --> |date=2024-12-30 |title=Hołownia komentuje decyzję PKW. "Potrzebna ustawa ratunkowa" |url=https://businessinsider.com.pl/wiadomosci/marszalek-sejmu-holownia-komentuje-decyzje-pkw/2z9lxkk |publisher=[[Business Insider]] |access-date=2025-01-10}}</ref> On 8 January 2025 Minister of Finance [[Andrzej Domański]] refused to recognize the PKW's ruling affirming PiS is to be granted its subsidy, stating the verdict was written in a "self-contradictory" way.<ref>{{cite news |author=<!-- not stated --> |date=2025-01-08 |title=Pieniądze dla PiS. Co dokładnie napisał minister Domański w piśmie do PKW? |url=https://www.rp.pl/prawo-w-polsce/art41657721-pieniadze-dla-pis-co-dokladnie-napisal-minister-domanski-w-pismie-do-pkw |publisher=[[Rzeczpospolita (newspaper)|Rzeczpospolita]] |access-date=2025-01-10}}</ref> Sylwester Marciniak, the PKW chairman, responded by stating the verdict was written clearly and demanding the Ministry grant PiS its allotted funds.<ref>{{cite news |author=<!-- not stated --> |date=2025-01-09 |title=Pieniądze dla PiS. Szef PKW odpowiada ministrowi finansów |url=https://www.tysol.pl/a133583-pieniadze-dla-pis-szef-pkw-odpowiada-ministrowi-finansow |publisher=Tysol.pl |access-date=2025-01-10}}</ref> Prime Minister Tusk expressed doubt over the legal validity of the PKW verdict, defending his Minister.<ref>{{cite news |author=<!-- not stated --> |date=2024-12-31 |title=Tusk komentuje decyzję Domańskiego ws. PKW. "Nie interesuje mnie, czy PiS ma te pieniądze" |url=https://businessinsider.com.pl/wiadomosci/tusk-komentuje-decyzje-domanskiego-ws-pkw-nie-interesuje-mnie-czy-pis-ma-te-pieniadze/9jejysg |publisher=[[Business Insider]] |access-date=2025-01-11}}</ref> A poll suggests 47.1% of Poles (98% of PiS voters, 71% of TD voters, 53% of Lewica voters) support PiS receiving the funds, and 46.9% (85% of PO voters, 80% of Konfederacja voters) are against.<ref>{{cite news |author=<!-- not stated --> |date=2025-01-16 |title=Sondaż "Rzeczpospolitej": Polacy podzieleni po decyzji PKW w sprawie pieniędzy dla PiS |url=https://www.rp.pl/polityka/art41684851-sondaz-rzeczpospolitej-polacy-podzieleni-po-decyzji-pkw-w-sprawie-pieniedzy-dla-pis |publisher=[[Rzeczpospolita (newspaper)|Rzeczpospolita]] |access-date=2025-01-10}}</ref> | ||
| Line 166: | Line 168: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="background-color:#263778;" | | | style="background-color:#263778;" | | ||
| PiS | |||
| Mirosław Suski | | Mirosław Suski | ||
| style="text-align:center; background:#FF9E9E" | Against | | style="text-align:center; background:#FF9E9E" | Against | ||
| Line 173: | Line 175: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="background-color:#263778;" | | | style="background-color:#263778;" | | ||
| PiS | |||
| Arkadiusz Pikulik | | Arkadiusz Pikulik | ||
| style="text-align:center; background:#FF9E9E" | Against | | style="text-align:center; background:#FF9E9E" | Against | ||
| Line 232: | Line 234: | ||
Based on this voter profile, Law and Justice forms the core of the conservative post-Solidarity bloc, along with the [[League of Polish Families]] and [[Solidarity Electoral Action]], as opposed to [[liberal conservative]] post-Solidarity bloc of Civic Platform.<ref>Jungerstam-Mulders (2006), p. 104</ref> The most prominent feature of PiS voters was their emphasis on [[decommunisation]].<ref>Jungerstam-Mulders (2006), p. 103</ref> | Based on this voter profile, Law and Justice forms the core of the conservative post-Solidarity bloc, along with the [[League of Polish Families]] and [[Solidarity Electoral Action]], as opposed to [[liberal conservative]] post-Solidarity bloc of Civic Platform.<ref>Jungerstam-Mulders (2006), p. 104</ref> The most prominent feature of PiS voters was their emphasis on [[decommunisation]].<ref>Jungerstam-Mulders (2006), p. 103</ref> | ||
{{ill|David Ost|pl}} distinguishes three main voters groups that form the base of Law and Justice's support. The first group are conservative Catholics, which support efforts to empower the Church and embrace anti-progressive, conservative social norms. The second group are secular intellectuals which are committed to "Polishness" and an enhanced international position of Poland - they support PiS to push back against the influence of the European Union, which they regard as a tool for Western domination. The third group are the working-class and poor voters that support PiS because of its economic policies which address the economic insecurity and wealth inequality of Poland. The workers that are particularly supportive of PiS are industrial workers and unionized labor, "where classic labor traditions are strongest." These workers also tend to be culturally conservative, which further aligns them with PiS.<ref name="ost">{{cite journal |last=Ost |first=David |author-link=:pl:David Ost |title=Workers and the Radical Right in Poland |journal=International Labor and Working-Class History |issue=93 |year=2018 |pages=113–24 |doi=10.1017/S0147547917000345 |publisher=CrossMark |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/26868599}}</ref> | {{ill|David Ost|pl}} distinguishes three main voters groups that form the base of Law and Justice's support. The first group are conservative Catholics, which support efforts to empower the Church and embrace anti-progressive, conservative social norms. The second group are secular intellectuals which are committed to "Polishness" and an enhanced international position of Poland - they support PiS to push back against the influence of the European Union, which they regard as a tool for Western domination. The third group are the working-class and poor voters that support PiS because of its economic policies which address the economic insecurity and wealth inequality of Poland. The workers that are particularly supportive of PiS are industrial workers and unionized labor, "where classic labor traditions are strongest." These workers also tend to be culturally conservative, which further aligns them with PiS.<ref name="ost">{{cite journal |last=Ost |first=David |author-link=:pl:David Ost |title=Workers and the Radical Right in Poland |journal=International Labor and Working-Class History |issue=93 |year=2018 |volume=93 |pages=113–24 |doi=10.1017/S0147547917000345 |publisher=CrossMark |jstor=26868599 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/26868599}}</ref> | ||
The trade union [[Solidarity (Polish trade union)|Solidarity]] has emerged as a staunch ally of Law and Justice in 2015, when the party's presidential candidate [[Andrzej Duda]] signed a pledge to implement the economic reforms proposed by Solidarity. Ost wrote: "In its first two years in power, as already noted, PiS essentially delivered on each of the promises.The reduction of the retirement age, the increases in the minimum and hourly wage, the fight against “junk contracts,” the commitment to do battle with the EU in order to subsidize national industrial champions, the greater respect accorded to unions: All of this has made full-time manufacturing employees PiS’s most loyal working-class constituency."<ref name="ost"/> Ost also notes that given the decline of trade unions in Poland, the PiS' vote potential lies in marginalized labor: | The trade union [[Solidarity (Polish trade union)|Solidarity]] has emerged as a staunch ally of Law and Justice in 2015, when the party's presidential candidate [[Andrzej Duda]] signed a pledge to implement the economic reforms proposed by Solidarity. Ost wrote: "In its first two years in power, as already noted, PiS essentially delivered on each of the promises.The reduction of the retirement age, the increases in the minimum and hourly wage, the fight against “junk contracts,” the commitment to do battle with the EU in order to subsidize national industrial champions, the greater respect accorded to unions: All of this has made full-time manufacturing employees PiS’s most loyal working-class constituency."<ref name="ost"/> Ost also notes that given the decline of trade unions in Poland, the PiS' vote potential lies in marginalized labor: | ||
{{blockquote|text=The big change in the last few years has been the entry of more marginal and precarious labor into the political fray, increasingly on the side of the extremist far right. These are the workers from small towns and cities, or from the fringes of the large cities: places where liberal prosperity never really reached. Unions here are virtually non-existent. Workers have few prospects for stable employment, [...] struggling to find some security. To this group PiS has appealed via nationalism. Instead of giving up home and family to be treated as second-class citizens in Manchester or Dublin, PiS promises, together we can build a strong Poland where you can stay home and thrive. For this group, nationalism is not just identity with a swagger, but a concrete economic appeal: We will build industry at home, we will renovate the places liberalism bypassed, and we will not allow Poles to be treated as neocolonial subjects. By regularly charging that previous governments turned Poland into a subordinate colony doing the hard labor for Western exploiters, PiS often sounds like old-school Latin American dependency theorists.<ref name="ost"/>}} | {{blockquote|text=The big change in the last few years has been the entry of more marginal and precarious labor into the political fray, increasingly on the side of the extremist far right. These are the workers from small towns and cities, or from the fringes of the large cities: places where liberal prosperity never really reached. Unions here are virtually non-existent. Workers have few prospects for stable employment, [...] struggling to find some security. To this group PiS has appealed via nationalism. Instead of giving up home and family to be treated as second-class citizens in Manchester or Dublin, PiS promises, together we can build a strong Poland where you can stay home and thrive. For this group, nationalism is not just identity with a swagger, but a concrete economic appeal: We will build industry at home, we will renovate the places liberalism bypassed, and we will not allow Poles to be treated as neocolonial subjects. By regularly charging that previous governments turned Poland into a subordinate colony doing the hard labor for Western exploiters, PiS often sounds like old-school Latin American dependency theorists.<ref name="ost"/>}} | ||
==Ideology== | ==Ideology== | ||
{{Conservatism in Poland|Parties}} | {{Conservatism in Poland|Parties}} | ||
| Line 248: | Line 251: | ||
Initially, the party was broadly pro-market, although less so than the [[Civic Platform]].<ref name="Tiersky 392">{{cite book |title=Europe Today: a Twenty-first Century Introduction |last=Tiersky |first=Ronald |author2=Jones, Erik |year=2007 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |location=Lanham |isbn=978-0-7425-5501-3 |url=https://archive.org/details/europetodaytwent00tier |url-access=registration |page=[https://archive.org/details/europetodaytwent00tier/page/392 392] }}</ref> It has adopted the [[social market economy]] rhetoric similar to that of western European [[Christian democratic]] parties.<ref name="no Christian Democracy in Poland" /> In the [[2005 Polish parliamentary election|2005 election]], the party shifted to the [[protectionism|protectionist]] left on economics.<ref name="Tiersky 392" /> As prime minister, [[Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz]] was more [[economic liberalism|economically liberal]] than the Kaczyńskis, advocating a position closer to Civic Platform.<ref>Myant et al. (2008), pp. 67–68</ref> In 2005, Law and Justice made Civic Platform its main ideological opponent despite their previous closeness - Law and Justice posed a difference between Civic Platform's "liberal Poland" and its "social Poland". The former was marked by economic liberalism, austerity, deregulation and "serving the rich". In contrast, Law and Justice stressed its "social" character, pledging policies that would help the poor. The party attacked Civic Platform's flat tax proposal and advocated a much more active role of the state in the economy. Law and Justice also made "an offer to the left", stressing its economically left-wing policies.<ref>{{cite journal |journal=Electoral Studies |volume=26 |year=2007 |title=The 2005 parliamentary and presidential elections in Poland |first=Frances |last=Millard |publisher=University of Essex |location=Colchester |page=213|doi=10.1016/j.electstud.2006.03.001 }}</ref> This pivot led the leader of far-left Samoobrona, Andrzej Lepper, to endorse Lech Kaczyński in the [[2005 Polish presidential election]], arguing that left-wing voters must vote against the neoliberalism of Civic Platform; Lepper also justified his decision on the basis of Kaczyński's declarations in support of funding social welfare, fighting unemployment and taking a tougher stance towards the European Union.<ref name="lew_endor">{{cite web |url=https://www.lewica.pl/index.php?id=3548&tytul=SLD-nie-popar%B3-nikogo,-Samoobrona-za-Kaczy%F1skim |title=SLD nie poparł nikogo, Samoobrona za Kaczyńskim |date=18 October 2005 |language=pl |website=lewica.pl |first=Grzegorz |last=Ilnicki}}</ref> | Initially, the party was broadly pro-market, although less so than the [[Civic Platform]].<ref name="Tiersky 392">{{cite book |title=Europe Today: a Twenty-first Century Introduction |last=Tiersky |first=Ronald |author2=Jones, Erik |year=2007 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |location=Lanham |isbn=978-0-7425-5501-3 |url=https://archive.org/details/europetodaytwent00tier |url-access=registration |page=[https://archive.org/details/europetodaytwent00tier/page/392 392] }}</ref> It has adopted the [[social market economy]] rhetoric similar to that of western European [[Christian democratic]] parties.<ref name="no Christian Democracy in Poland" /> In the [[2005 Polish parliamentary election|2005 election]], the party shifted to the [[protectionism|protectionist]] left on economics.<ref name="Tiersky 392" /> As prime minister, [[Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz]] was more [[economic liberalism|economically liberal]] than the Kaczyńskis, advocating a position closer to Civic Platform.<ref>Myant et al. (2008), pp. 67–68</ref> In 2005, Law and Justice made Civic Platform its main ideological opponent despite their previous closeness - Law and Justice posed a difference between Civic Platform's "liberal Poland" and its "social Poland". The former was marked by economic liberalism, austerity, deregulation and "serving the rich". In contrast, Law and Justice stressed its "social" character, pledging policies that would help the poor. The party attacked Civic Platform's flat tax proposal and advocated a much more active role of the state in the economy. Law and Justice also made "an offer to the left", stressing its economically left-wing policies.<ref>{{cite journal |journal=Electoral Studies |volume=26 |year=2007 |title=The 2005 parliamentary and presidential elections in Poland |first=Frances |last=Millard |publisher=University of Essex |location=Colchester |page=213|doi=10.1016/j.electstud.2006.03.001 }}</ref> This pivot led the leader of far-left Samoobrona, Andrzej Lepper, to endorse Lech Kaczyński in the [[2005 Polish presidential election]], arguing that left-wing voters must vote against the neoliberalism of Civic Platform; Lepper also justified his decision on the basis of Kaczyński's declarations in support of funding social welfare, fighting unemployment and taking a tougher stance towards the European Union.<ref name="lew_endor">{{cite web |url=https://www.lewica.pl/index.php?id=3548&tytul=SLD-nie-popar%B3-nikogo,-Samoobrona-za-Kaczy%F1skim |title=SLD nie poparł nikogo, Samoobrona za Kaczyńskim |date=18 October 2005 |language=pl |website=lewica.pl |first=Grzegorz |last=Ilnicki}}</ref> | ||
On [[foreign policy]], PiS is [[Atlanticist]] and less supportive of [[European integration]] than Civic Platform.<ref name="Tiersky 392" /> The party is [[Soft euroscepticism|soft eurosceptic]]<ref name="Myant 88">Myant et al. (2008), p. 88</ref><ref name="Szczerbiak 224">{{cite book |title=Opposing Europe? |last=Szczerbiak |first=Aleks |author2=Taggart, Paul A. |year=2008 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-925830-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BruGwnDp0YsC |page=224 }}</ref> and opposes a [[federal Europe]], especially the [[Euro]] currency. In its campaigns, it emphasises that the [[European Union]] should "benefit Poland and not the other way around".<ref>Maier et al. (2006), p. 374</ref> It is a member of the anti-federalist [[European Conservatives and Reformists Party]], having previously been a part of the [[Alliance for Europe of the Nations]] and, before that, the [[European People's Party]].<ref name="no Christian Democracy in Poland" /><ref>Jungerstam-Mulders (2006), p. 100</ref> Although it has some elements of [[Christian democracy]], it is not a Christian democratic party.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/214927094.pdf|title=Chrześcijańska demokracja w Polsce|last=Sozańska|first=Dominika|publisher=Krakow Academy|website=core.ac.uk|language=Polish}}</ref> The party is commonly placed on the [[Right-wing politics|right wing]] of the political spectrum,<ref name="Right-wing">{{bulleted list|{{cite book|author=Michael Minkenberg|chapter=Between Tradition and Transition: the Central European Radical Right and the New European Order|editor=Christina Schori Liang|title=Europe for the Europeans: The Foreign and Security Policy of the Populist Radical Right|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7I_pDb1O2EQC&pg=PA261|year=2013|publisher=Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.|isbn=978-1-4094-9825-4|page=261}}|{{cite book|author=Lenka Bustikova|chapter=The Radical Right in Eastern Europe|editor=Jens Rydgren|title=The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XD9FDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA574|year=2018|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-027455-9|page=574}}|{{cite book|author=Aleks Szczerbiak|title=Poland Within the European Union: New Awkward Partner Or New Heart of Europe?|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FW5RbXxRMj4C&pg=PA1|year=2012|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-0-415-38073-7|page=1}}}}</ref> although its economic ideology is also classified as left-wing,<ref name="left1"/><ref name="left2"/><ref name="left3"/><ref name="kossack_q"/><ref name="sagehandbook"/> or left-leaning.<ref name="lean1"/><ref name="lean2"/><ref name="lean3"/> It combines conservative, egalitarian and populist elements in its ideology.<ref>{{cite | On [[foreign policy]], PiS is [[Atlanticist]] and less supportive of [[European integration]] than Civic Platform.<ref name="Tiersky 392" /> The party is [[Soft euroscepticism|soft eurosceptic]]<ref name="Myant 88">Myant et al. (2008), p. 88</ref><ref name="Szczerbiak 224">{{cite book |title=Opposing Europe? |last=Szczerbiak |first=Aleks |author2=Taggart, Paul A. |year=2008 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-925830-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BruGwnDp0YsC |page=224 }}</ref> and opposes a [[federal Europe]], especially the [[Euro]] currency. In its campaigns, it emphasises that the [[European Union]] should "benefit Poland and not the other way around".<ref>Maier et al. (2006), p. 374</ref> It is a member of the anti-federalist [[European Conservatives and Reformists Party]], having previously been a part of the [[Alliance for Europe of the Nations]] and, before that, the [[European People's Party]].<ref name="no Christian Democracy in Poland" /><ref>Jungerstam-Mulders (2006), p. 100</ref> Although it has some elements of [[Christian democracy]], it is not a Christian democratic party.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/214927094.pdf|title=Chrześcijańska demokracja w Polsce|last=Sozańska|first=Dominika|publisher=Krakow Academy|website=core.ac.uk|language=Polish}}</ref> The party is commonly placed on the [[Right-wing politics|right wing]] of the political spectrum,<ref name="Right-wing">{{bulleted list|{{cite book|author=Michael Minkenberg|chapter=Between Tradition and Transition: the Central European Radical Right and the New European Order|editor=Christina Schori Liang|title=Europe for the Europeans: The Foreign and Security Policy of the Populist Radical Right|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7I_pDb1O2EQC&pg=PA261|year=2013|publisher=Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.|isbn=978-1-4094-9825-4|page=261}}|{{cite book|author=Lenka Bustikova|chapter=The Radical Right in Eastern Europe|editor=Jens Rydgren|title=The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XD9FDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA574|year=2018|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-027455-9|page=574}}|{{cite book|author=Aleks Szczerbiak|title=Poland Within the European Union: New Awkward Partner Or New Heart of Europe?|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FW5RbXxRMj4C&pg=PA1|year=2012|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-0-415-38073-7|page=1}}}}</ref> although its economic ideology is also classified as left-wing,<ref name="left1"/><ref name="left2"/><ref name="left3"/><ref name="kossack_q"/><ref name="sagehandbook"/> or left-leaning.<ref name="lean1"/><ref name="lean2"/><ref name="lean3"/> It combines conservative, egalitarian and populist elements in its ideology.<ref>{{cite thesis |url=https://rep.up.krakow.pl/xmlui/handle/11716/11656?locale-attribute=en |language=pl |title=Przemiany ustrojowe a funkcjonowanie sił zbrojnych Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w systemie bezpieczeństwa państwa w latach 1989-2004 |first=Marceli |last=Herman |location=Kraków |year=2022 |publisher=Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie |journal=Wydział Nauk Społecznych Instytut Nauk o Polityce i Administracji |page=196}}</ref> | ||
==Platform== | ==Platform== | ||
| Line 255: | Line 258: | ||
The party supports a state-guaranteed minimum [[social safety net]] and extensive state intervention in the economy, and argues that a "more socially sensitive and less market-dominated" economic system is necessary.<ref name="koch"/> It advocates progressive taxation that would redistribute the wealth from the wealthy to the poor, and it supports a large-scale social housing program. The party promised and implemented tax and welfare benefits to married couples and family. It also adheres to the principles of [[economic nationalism]], postulating state control over key sectors of the economy.<ref name="kossack_q">{{cite journal |title=Pariahs or Partners? Patterns of Government Formation with Radical Right Parties in Central and Eastern Europe, 1990-2020 |year=2023 |location=Bielefeld |publisher=Verlag |first=Oliver |last=Kossack |doi=10.14361/9783839467152 |volume=153 |journal=Reihe Edition Politik |series=Edition Politik |page=132 |isbn=978-3-8376-6715-8 |quote="In socio-economic terms, PiS positioned itself on the left. The party advocated progressive taxation, a large-scale social housing programme, and it promised tax and welfare benefits to married couples and (traditional) families. The party generally favoured a private economy, but it also wanted to keep key sectors under state control (Millard 2010, 131–33)."}}</ref> It seeks to increase healthcare spending to 6% of the Polish GDP, and nationalize hospital debts.<ref>{{cite book |title=Partie i ugrupowania parlamentarne III Rzeczypospolitej |isbn=978-83-89706-84-3 |author1=Krzysztof Kowalczyk |author2=Jerzy Sielski |year=2006 |publisher=Dom Wydawniczy DUET |page=222 |location=Toruń |language=pl}}</ref> During the 2015 election campaign, it proposed tax rebates related to the number of children in a family, as well as a reduction of the [[VAT]] rate (while keeping a variation between individual types of VAT rates). In 2019, the lowest personal income tax threshold was decreased from 18% to 17%.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Favourable tax changes included in the Polish Deal – the Prime Minister took part in a videoconference with entrepreneurs - The Chancellery of the Prime Minister - Gov.pl website|url=https://www.gov.pl/web/primeminister/favourable-tax-changes-included-in-the-polish-deal--the-prime-minister-took-part-in-a-videoconference-with-entrepreneurs|access-date=2021-11-10|website=The Chancellery of the Prime Minister|language=en-GB}}</ref> | The party supports a state-guaranteed minimum [[social safety net]] and extensive state intervention in the economy, and argues that a "more socially sensitive and less market-dominated" economic system is necessary.<ref name="koch"/> It advocates progressive taxation that would redistribute the wealth from the wealthy to the poor, and it supports a large-scale social housing program. The party promised and implemented tax and welfare benefits to married couples and family. It also adheres to the principles of [[economic nationalism]], postulating state control over key sectors of the economy.<ref name="kossack_q">{{cite journal |title=Pariahs or Partners? Patterns of Government Formation with Radical Right Parties in Central and Eastern Europe, 1990-2020 |year=2023 |location=Bielefeld |publisher=Verlag |first=Oliver |last=Kossack |doi=10.14361/9783839467152 |volume=153 |journal=Reihe Edition Politik |series=Edition Politik |page=132 |isbn=978-3-8376-6715-8 |quote="In socio-economic terms, PiS positioned itself on the left. The party advocated progressive taxation, a large-scale social housing programme, and it promised tax and welfare benefits to married couples and (traditional) families. The party generally favoured a private economy, but it also wanted to keep key sectors under state control (Millard 2010, 131–33)."}}</ref> It seeks to increase healthcare spending to 6% of the Polish GDP, and nationalize hospital debts.<ref>{{cite book |title=Partie i ugrupowania parlamentarne III Rzeczypospolitej |isbn=978-83-89706-84-3 |author1=Krzysztof Kowalczyk |author2=Jerzy Sielski |year=2006 |publisher=Dom Wydawniczy DUET |page=222 |location=Toruń |language=pl}}</ref> During the 2015 election campaign, it proposed tax rebates related to the number of children in a family, as well as a reduction of the [[VAT]] rate (while keeping a variation between individual types of VAT rates). In 2019, the lowest personal income tax threshold was decreased from 18% to 17%.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Favourable tax changes included in the Polish Deal – the Prime Minister took part in a videoconference with entrepreneurs - The Chancellery of the Prime Minister - Gov.pl website|url=https://www.gov.pl/web/primeminister/favourable-tax-changes-included-in-the-polish-deal--the-prime-minister-took-part-in-a-videoconference-with-entrepreneurs|access-date=2021-11-10|website=The Chancellery of the Prime Minister|language=en-GB}}</ref> | ||
In 2019, the party introduced a bill proposing a financial benefit in the form of a [[13th pension]], intended for retirees and pensioners receiving the minimum old-age pension on 1 May 2019.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Izdebska-Białka |first=Katarzyna |date=2019-03-09 |title=13. emerytura dla emerytów i rencistów. Ile dodatkowo dostaniesz w 2019 r.? |url=https://www.money.pl/emerytury/13-emerytura-dla-emerytow-i-rencistow-ile-dodatkowo-dostaniesz-w-2019-r-6357663618984065a.html |access-date=2025-06-23}}</ref> And subsequently on an annual basis starting in 2020.<ref>{{Cite web |title=„Emerytura+” przyjęta przez Radę Ministrów - Ministerstwo Rodziny, Pracy i Polityki Społecznej - Portal Gov.pl |url=https://www.gov.pl/web/rodzina/emerytura-przyjeta-przez-rade-ministrow |access-date=2025-06-23 |website=Ministerstwo Rodziny, Pracy i Polityki Społecznej |language=pl-PL}}</ref> A [[14th pension]] was introduced on 21 January 2021 and is now paid out with [[13th pension]].<ref>{{cite web|access-date=2024-06-19 |date=2021-01-21 |language=pl |title=Ustawa z dnia 21 stycznia 2021 r. o kolejnym w 2021 r. dodatkowym rocznym świadczeniu pieniężnym dla emerytów i rencistów |url=https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20210000432 |website=Internetowy System Aktów Prawnych}}<!-- auto-translated from Polish by Module:CS1 translator --></ref> | |||
PiS opposes cutting social welfare spending, and also proposed the introduction of a system of state-guaranteed housing loans. The party also opposes foreign ownership of crucial industries and businesses, and proposed buying back the largest convenience store chain in Poland, [[Żabka]], from its foreign owners.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://notesfrompoland.com/2022/10/13/poland-could-buy-back-biggest-convenience-store-chain-from-foreign-owners-says-kaczynski/ |title=Poland could "buy back" biggest convenience store chain from foreign owners, says Kaczyński |date=13 October 2022 |first=Daniel |last=Tilles |website=Notes from Poland}}</ref> It also supports state provided [[universal health care]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rynekzdrowia.pl/Polityka-zdrowotna/PiS-wygrywa-koniec-NFZ-system-budzetowy-i-siec-szpitali,156173,14.html|title=PiS wygrywa: koniec NFZ, system budżetowy i sieć szpitali? – Polityka zdrowotna|date=25 October 2015 |publisher=www.rynekzdrowia.pl}}</ref> PiS has been also described as [[Statism|statist]],<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://wyborcza.pl/7,75968,26158024,modernizacje-polski-zawdzieczamy-prywatnemu-kapitalowi-etatyzm.html?disableRedirects=true|title=Wyborcza.pl|website=wyborcza.pl}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.rp.pl/Publicystyka/303029909-Petru-Muzealny-etatyzm-PiS.html|title=Petru: Muzealny etatyzm PiS|website=www.rp.pl}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://naszemiasto.pl/ziemkiewicz-krytykuje-pis-za-etatyzm/ar/c1-4533220|title=Ziemkiewicz krytykuje PiS za etatyzm|first=Radosław|last=Kowalski|date=20 November 2015|website=Nasze Miasto}}</ref> [[Protectionism|protectionist]],<ref name="sobieski.org.pl">{{cite web|url=http://www.sobieski.org.pl/tworzenie-szans-dla-wszystkich/|title=Program działań Prawa i Sprawiedliwości. Tworzenie szans dla wszystkich|publisher=Instytut Sobieskiego|access-date=14 February 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160221152745/http://www.sobieski.org.pl/tworzenie-szans-dla-wszystkich/|archive-date=21 February 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.politykainsight.pl/_resource/multimedium/20078722 | title=Dossier: What PiS would change in the economy | publisher=PI Research | work=Polityka Insight | date=October 2015 | access-date=14 August 2018}}</ref><ref name="reuters_2015/10/26">{{Cite web|url=http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2015/10/26/polands-tilt-to-nationalism-is-bad-for-investment/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151027144626/http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2015/10/26/polands-tilt-to-nationalism-is-bad-for-investment/|url-status=dead|archive-date=27 October 2015|title=Poland's tilt to nationalism is bad for investment|first=Dominic|last=Elliott|date=26 October 2015}}</ref> [[Christian corporatism#Solidarism|solidarist]],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.pb.pl/marcinkiewicz-program-pis-to-przywrocenie-solidaryzmu-takze-w-sluzbie-zdrowia-280760|title=Marcinkiewicz: Program PiS to przywrócenie solidaryzmu, także w służbie zdrowia|publisher=Plus Biznesu|website=pb.pl|date=6 October 2005}}</ref> and [[Economic interventionism|interventionist]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://businessinsider.com.pl/wiadomosci/interwencjonizm-panstwowy-a-rzady-pis/2t2bclb?srcc=ucs|title=To łączy rządy PiS z polityką Herberta Hoovera i Franklina D. Roosevelta|date=6 December 2016|publisher=Business Insider|website=businessinsider.com.pl|language=Polish}}</ref> It also holds [[Agrarianism|agrarianist]] views.<ref>{{bulleted list|{{cite web|url=https://polskieradio24.pl/5/1222/Artykul/2290705,Antoni-Macierewicz-polska-wies-jest-w-centrum-programu-PiS |work=Polskie Radio 24 |title=Antoni Macierewicz: Wieś jest w centrum programy PiS |language=pl |trans-title=Antoni Macierewicz: Polish countryside is at the center of the PiS program |date=6 April 2019 |access-date=8 May 2019}}|{{cite web|url=https://www.polityka.pl/tygodnikpolityka/rynek/1788604,1,konwencja-rolnicza-w-kadzidle-pis-znow-stawia-na-wies.read |work=Polityka |title=Konwencja rolnicza w Kadzidle. PiS znów stawia na wieś |language=pl |trans-title=Agricultural Convention in Kadzidło. PiS again puts on the countryside |author=Joanna Solska |date=6 April 2019 |access-date=8 May 2019}}|{{cite web|url=https://www.tvp.info/42807260/pis-wygrywa-na-wsi-koalicja-europejska-w-miastach |work=TVPinfo|title=PiS wygrywa na wsi. KE w miastach|language=pl |trans-title=PiS has won in the countryside. KE in cities|author= SJ, MNIE |date=26 May 2019}}|{{cite book|author=Stijn van Kessel|title=Populist Parties in Europe: Agents of Discontent?|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=I0MTBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA145|year=2015|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan UK|isbn=978-1-137-41411-3|page=145}}|{{cite web|url=https://opinie.wp.pl/lukasz-warzecha-pis-czyli-populizm-i-socjalizm-6243286146467969a|title= PiS, Czyli Populizm i Socjalizm|language=pl |trans-title=PiS means Populism and Socialism|author= Łukasz Warzecha|date=20 April 2018|access-date=29 May 2019}}}}</ref> Given the redistributive and protectionist agenda of the party as well as its focus on welfare and nationalization, some political scientists classify Law and Justice as economically left-wing.<ref name="left1">{{cite journal |title=Progressive proposals for the turbulent times: How to boost the political, organizational and electoral potential |first1=Andreas |last1=Schieder |first2=László |last2=Andor |first3=Maria |last3=Maltschnig |first4=Ania |last4=Skrzypek |isbn=978-2-930769-78-3 |publisher=Foundation for European Progressive Studies and Karl-Renner-Institut |year=2022 |journal=Next Left |volume=13 |page=56 |quote="... following the Polish Law and Justice party, favouring an economically left-wing agenda." |url=https://feps-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Next-Left-Volume-13.pdf}}</ref><ref name="left2">{{cite journal |title=Queer(in)g Poland in the 21st Century: How Was It at the Beginning of the Millennium? Introduction to This Special Issue on Queer Culture and the LGBTQ+ Movement in Poland |first1=Urszula |last1=Chowaniec |first2=Ewa |last2=Mazierska |first3=Richard |last3=Mole |date=1 June 2021 |volume=19 |journal=Central Europe |issue=1 |doi=10.1080/14790963.2021.1920131 |publisher=Taylor & Francis |quote="... Jarosław Kaczynski’s party won the parliamentary election with his party Prawo i Sprawiedliwość (Peace and Justice), which was economically left-wing, but socially on the right: a mixture which has ensured its continuing political success." |page=5|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="left3">{{cite journal |title=Authoritarian Populism Index |date=April 2024 |first1=Andreas Johansson |last1=Heinö |author-link1=:sv:Andreas Johansson Heinö |journal=Timbro |url=https://www.epicenternetwork.eu/publications/timbro-authoritarian-populism-index-2024/ |publisher=European Policy Information Center |quote="Over its eight years in power, PiS eroded democratic structures in Poland. Additionally, the party has articulated a clear nationalism and adopted staunchly conservative positions on various social issues such as LGBTQ rights and abortion rights. In economic policy, the party has positioned itself slightly left of center, consistently investing in welfare, social transfers, and the like." |page=247}}</ref><ref name="kossack_q"/> [[Stephen Park Turner]] likewise classified it as having "economically leftist policies on trade and welfare."<ref name="sagehandbook">{{cite book |title=The SAGE Handbook of Political Sociology |first1=William |last1=Outhwaite |first2=Stephen |last2=Turner |author-link2=Stephen Park Turner |quote="And this makes sense, given that many such parties (e.g. the National Front in France, the Law and Justice Party in Poland) offer platforms combining socially conservative policies on crime and immigration with economically leftist policies on trade and welfare." |page=112 |volume=1 |isbn=978-1-4739-1946-4 |publisher=SAGE Publications |year=2023}}</ref> It has also been described as economically left-leaning by the [[Centre for European Reform]],<ref name="lean1">{{cite web |url=https://www.cer.eu/insights/four-questions-polish-parliamentary-elections |title=Four Questions on the Polish Parliamentary Elections |first1=Agata |last1=Gostyńska-Jakubowska |date=10 October 2019 |publisher=[[Centre for European Reform]] |quote="All polling suggests that the current governing party – the socially conservative and economically left-leaning Law and Justice (PiS) party – will remain the largest political bloc."}}</ref> [[Reuters]],<ref name="lean2">{{cite web |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/world/polish-parliament-rejects-near-total-abortion-ban-after-protests-idUSKCN1260Q3/ |title=Polish parliament rejects near-total abortion ban after protests |date=6 October 2016 |first1=Paweł |last1=Sobczak |first2=Marcin |last2=Goettig |website=[[Reuters]] |quote="Since winning a parliamentary majority last October, the economically left-leaning PiS has appeared firmly in control, thanks to a mix of generous welfare payouts, promises to help poorer Poles and nationalist rhetoric laced with Catholic piety."}}</ref> and The Routledge Handbook of East European Politics.<ref name="lean3">{{cite book |title=The Routledge Handbook of East European Politics |first1=Adam |last1=Fagan |first2=Petr |last2=Kopecký |page=2018 |quote="The weakening of ex-communist parties in Hungary and Poland coincided with the rise of economically left-leaning but socially conservative parties - Fidesz and Law and Justice (PiS), respectively." |year=2017 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=9780367500092 |edition=1st}}</ref> Political economist Cédric M. Koch wrote that PiS combines "political communitarianism with neo-socialist economic views".<ref name="koch">{{cite journal |title=Varieties of populism and the challenges to Global Constitutionalism: Dangers, promises and implications |first=Cédric M. |last=Koch |journal=Global Constitutionalism |volume=10 |issue=3 |year=2021 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/72C6D827F42A8E7A963D72B8B2F1E7F0/S2045381719000455a.pdf/varieties_of_populism_and_the_challenges_to_global_constitutionalism_dangers_promises_and_implications.pdf |pages=415–418|doi=10.1017/S2045381719000455 }}</ref> | |||
Writing on the economic policies of Law and Justice and their character, American political scientist {{ill|David Ost|pl}} wrote: | Writing on the economic policies of Law and Justice and their character, American political scientist {{ill|David Ost|pl}} wrote: | ||
{{blockquote|text=So, since winning power for the second time in 2015, PiS has taken real efforts to tame economic liberalism. It reversed the previous government’s hiking of the retirement age, offered new drug benefits for the elderly, and has initiated a broad program for the construction of new affordable housing. It has limited employer use of insecure short-term “junk contracts,” and raised the guaranteed hourly minimum to 13 złotys (nearly $4), a significant increase upon prevailing informal standards. Its hallmark social policy has been a new child-benefit program, with a monthly payment of 500 złotys (about $140) to parents of each second and additional child under eighteen, paid for, in part, by a new surcharge tax imposed on foreign-owned banks and insurance companies. For the many hundreds of thousands of working parents earning only 2,000–2,500 złotys a month, this meant a sudden untaxed pay raise of twenty or even forty percent. Within a year, children living in extreme poverty declined by a third. Single mothers found themselves able to quit overly exploitative jobs and seek other options. [...] With such rhetoric and policies, PiS is embracing a project that really deserves the name it is impossible to apply: national socialism.<ref name="ost"/>}} | {{blockquote|text=So, since winning power for the second time in 2015, PiS has taken real efforts to tame economic liberalism. It reversed the previous government’s hiking of the retirement age, offered new drug benefits for the elderly, and has initiated a broad program for the construction of new affordable housing. It has limited employer use of insecure short-term “junk contracts,” and raised the guaranteed hourly minimum to 13 złotys (nearly $4), a significant increase upon prevailing informal standards. Its hallmark social policy has been a new child-benefit program, with a monthly payment of 500 złotys (about $140) to parents of each second and additional child under eighteen, paid for, in part, by a new surcharge tax imposed on foreign-owned banks and insurance companies. For the many hundreds of thousands of working parents earning only 2,000–2,500 złotys a month, this meant a sudden untaxed pay raise of twenty or even forty percent. Within a year, children living in extreme poverty declined by a third. Single mothers found themselves able to quit overly exploitative jobs and seek other options. [...] With such rhetoric and policies, PiS is embracing a project that really deserves the name it is impossible to apply: national socialism.<ref name="ost"/>}} | ||
The economic views and policies of Law and Justice derive from the Polish political party [[Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland]] (Samoobrona) led by [[Andrzej Lepper]]. Law and Justice appropriated the economic rhetoric and views of Samoobrona following its complete collapse in the [[2007 Polish parliamentary election]].<ref>{{cite book |title=Start-Up Poland: The People Who Transformed an Economy |first=Jan |last=Cienski |publisher=The University of Chicago Press |location=Chicago and London |year=2018 |isbn=978-0-226-30695-7 |doi=10.7208/chicago/9780226306957.001.0001 |page=54}}</ref> Samoobrona is an economically far-left party, much further left than parties of post-communist origin such as the social-democratic [[Democratic Left Alliance (Poland)|Democratic Left Alliance]].<ref>{{cite journal |title=Political Responses to the Extreme-Right in Poland: Motivations and Constrains for Collaboration in the Executive Arena |publisher=University of Wrocław |journal=Studia Polityczne |year=2019 |volume=47 |issue=4 |issn=1230-3135 |doi=10.35757/STP.2019.47.4.03 |first=Aleksandra |last=Moroska-Bonkiewicz |page=82|doi-access=free }}</ref> After Samoobrona and the far-right anti-capitalist League of Polish Families (LPR) formed a coalition with PiS in 2006 in order to prevent the neoliberal Civic Platform from coming to power, Law and Justice managed to claim the voters of both parties by "taking up economically inclusionary discourse from the originally left-wing Self-Defence and outbidding the LPR on cultural conservatism".<ref name="koch"/> | The economic views and policies of Law and Justice derive from the Polish political party [[Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland]] (Samoobrona) led by [[Andrzej Lepper]]. Law and Justice appropriated the economic rhetoric and views of Samoobrona following its complete collapse in the [[2007 Polish parliamentary election]].<ref>{{cite book |title=Start-Up Poland: The People Who Transformed an Economy |first=Jan |last=Cienski |publisher=The University of Chicago Press |location=Chicago and London |year=2018 |isbn=978-0-226-30695-7 |doi=10.7208/chicago/9780226306957.001.0001 |page=54}}</ref> Samoobrona is an economically far-left party, much further left than parties of post-communist origin such as the social-democratic [[Democratic Left Alliance (Poland)|Democratic Left Alliance]].<ref>{{cite journal |title=Political Responses to the Extreme-Right in Poland: Motivations and Constrains for Collaboration in the Executive Arena |publisher=University of Wrocław |journal=Studia Polityczne |year=2019 |volume=47 |issue=4 |issn=1230-3135 |doi=10.35757/STP.2019.47.4.03 |first=Aleksandra |last=Moroska-Bonkiewicz |page=82|doi-access=free }}</ref> After Samoobrona and the far-right anti-capitalist League of Polish Families (LPR) formed a coalition with PiS in 2006 in order to prevent the neoliberal Civic Platform from coming to power, Law and Justice managed to claim the voters of both parties by "taking up economically inclusionary discourse from the originally left-wing Self-Defence and outbidding the LPR on cultural conservatism".<ref name="koch"/> | ||
Ever since, Law and Justice has been critical of the capitalist transformation in Poland, accusing the 1990s Polish cabinets of 'choosing the wrong path of transformation after the 1989 system change' and leading to 'beneficiaries under such capitalist conditions [having] become undeservedly privileged'.<ref name="koch"/> Rakib Ehsan argues that PiS pursues a "brand of ‘red and blue’ politics – social-democratic economics combined with socio-cultural conservatism".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.spiked-online.com/2019/10/17/poland-and-the-rise-of-red-and-blue-politics/ |website=[[Spiked (magazine)|Spiked]] |title=Poland and the rise of | Ever since, Law and Justice has been critical of the capitalist transformation in Poland, accusing the 1990s Polish cabinets of 'choosing the wrong path of transformation after the 1989 system change' and leading to 'beneficiaries under such capitalist conditions [having] become undeservedly privileged'.<ref name="koch"/> Rakib Ehsan argues that PiS pursues a "brand of ‘red and blue’ politics – social-democratic economics combined with socio-cultural conservatism".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.spiked-online.com/2019/10/17/poland-and-the-rise-of-red-and-blue-politics/ |website=[[Spiked (magazine)|Spiked]] |title=Poland and the rise of 'red and blue' politics |date=17 October 2019 |first=Rakib |last=Ehsan}}</ref> Similarly, Polish political scientist Marek M. Kamiński described PiS as "culturally conservative, economically social democratic".<ref>{{cite journal |first=Marek M. |last=Kamiński |title=Spoiler efects in proportional representation systems: evidence from eight Polish parliamentary elections, 1991–2015 |doi=10.1007/s11127-018-0565-x |date=23 May 2018 |journal=Public Choice |volume=176 |issue=3–4 |publisher=Springer |page=450|url=https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0gx0f683 }}</ref> [[Foreign Affairs]] remarked that the program of PiS "amounts to a very leftist (or, rather, a Catholic socialist) set of economic policies", listing policies such as increasing minimum wage, abolishing short-term job contracts, limiting self-employment contracts abused by employers to avoid benefit payments, decreasing retirement age, increasing family benefits, implementing social payments for large families, and enacting a special tax on foreign banks' assets and foreign big stores.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/poland/2015-11-01/paranoid-poland |title=How Worried Should the West be About the Law and Justice Party's Victory? |date=1 November 2015 |first=Mitchell A. |last=Orenstein |website=[[Foreign Affairs]]}}</ref> | ||
Igor S. Putintsev wrote that "the political views of PiS are 70% right-wing and socioeconomic ones 100% left-wing", arguing that PiS pursuses a "proactive and consistent social policy", which included its 500+ state program, annulment of neoliberal pension reforms carried out under Civic Platform and reduction in retirement age. Putintsev credited PiS with constructing "a Polish model of a modern welfare state".<ref>{{cite journal |title=The two-party tendency in Poland's political system: manifestations, causes and prospects |journal=Baltic Region |volume=15 |issue=1 |first=Igor S. |last=Putintsev |year=2023 |doi=10.5922/2079-8555-2023-1-2 |publisher=Gesis Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften |pages= | Igor S. Putintsev wrote that "the political views of PiS are 70% right-wing and socioeconomic ones 100% left-wing", arguing that PiS pursuses a "proactive and consistent social policy", which included its 500+ state program, annulment of neoliberal pension reforms carried out under Civic Platform and reduction in retirement age. Putintsev credited PiS with constructing "a Polish model of a modern welfare state".<ref>{{cite journal |title=The two-party tendency in Poland's political system: manifestations, causes and prospects |journal=Baltic Region |volume=15 |issue=1 |first=Igor S. |last=Putintsev |year=2023 |doi=10.5922/2079-8555-2023-1-2 |publisher=Gesis Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften |pages=24–25 |url=https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/86623/ssoar-balticreg-2023-1-putintsev-The_two-party_tendency_in_Polands.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y}}</ref> The party claims to represent the "marginalised vast majority of Poles" who had to bear the costs of capitalist transformation, and states that its main goal is to provide the "common man its fair economic share of societal resources". Law and Justice is highly critical of [[neoliberalism]], describing it as "anti-family" and arguing that neoliberal policies are responsible for social inequality, as well as maximizing profit at the cost of the "ordinary people" and "Catholic values". The party proposes increasing social benefit payments, raising the minimum wage, increasing expenditures on child nutrition and benefits to worse-off families. It also postulates more subsidies and state control of the Polish infrastructure, and expansion of the healthcare and education system. The party also opposes privatization, stating: "We cannot deprive the state of influence and responsibility for the social order, in particular for the weakest social groups whose situation as a result of the transformation has been rapidly deteriorating."<ref name="koch"/> | ||
===National political structures=== | ===National political structures=== | ||
| Line 273: | Line 278: | ||
===Diplomacy and defence=== | ===Diplomacy and defence=== | ||
The party is in favour of strengthening the [[Polish Armed Forces|Polish Army]] through diminishing bureaucracy and raising military expenditures, especially for modernisation of army equipment. The party supports Polish membership in NATO, arguing that Poland should fulfill its military obligations and aspire to become one of the countries that shape NATO policy. In its 2001 program, the party called for maintaining compulsory military service, but shortening it as much as possible, writing: "PiS will strive to shorten the duration of compulsory military service to the extent possible, so that it is limited to the conscript training process. Universal military service should be imposed on the best conscripts, raising the level of the reserves and creating appropriate social role models. We will support the development of an attractive military training programme for students and a military class programme in secondary schools, together with an appropriate incentive system."<ref name="marceli"/> | The party is in favour of strengthening the [[Polish Armed Forces|Polish Army]] through diminishing bureaucracy and raising military expenditures, especially for modernisation of army equipment. The party supports Polish membership in NATO, arguing that Poland should fulfill its military obligations and aspire to become one of the countries that shape NATO policy. In its 2001 program, the party called for maintaining compulsory military service, but shortening it as much as possible, writing: "PiS will strive to shorten the duration of compulsory military service to the extent possible, so that it is limited to the conscript training process. Universal military service should be imposed on the best conscripts, raising the level of the reserves and creating appropriate social role models. We will support the development of an attractive military training programme for students and a military class programme in secondary schools, together with an appropriate incentive system."<ref name="marceli"/> | ||
Later the party abandoned its support of military draft - it planned to introduce a fully professional army and end conscription by 2012; in August 2008, compulsory military service was abolished in Poland. It is also in favour of participation of Poland in foreign military missions led by the United Nations, [[NATO]] and United States, in countries like [[Afghanistan]] and [[Iraq]].<ref name="marceli">{{cite | Later the party abandoned its support of military draft - it planned to introduce a fully professional army and end conscription by 2012; in August 2008, compulsory military service was abolished in Poland. It is also in favour of participation of Poland in foreign military missions led by the United Nations, [[NATO]] and United States, in countries like [[Afghanistan]] and [[Iraq]].<ref name="marceli">{{cite thesis |url=https://rep.up.krakow.pl/xmlui/handle/11716/11656?locale-attribute=en |language=pl |title=Przemiany ustrojowe a funkcjonowanie sił zbrojnych Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w systemie bezpieczeństwa państwa w latach 1989-2004 |first=Marceli |last=Herman |location=Kraków |year=2022 |publisher=Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie |journal=Wydział Nauk Społecznych Instytut Nauk o Polityce i Administracji |pages=12–13}}</ref> The party moderated its policies in the wake of its coalition with far-left Samoobrona and far-right LPR in 2006, as both parties demanded withdrawal of Polish troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, and distancing Poland from the European Union.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Political Responses to the Extreme-Right in Poland: Motivations and Constrains for Collaboration in the Executive Arena |publisher=University of Wrocław |journal=Studia Polityczne |year=2019 |volume=47 |issue=4 |issn=1230-3135 |doi=10.35757/STP.2019.47.4.03 |first=Aleksandra |last=Moroska-Bonkiewicz |page=86|doi-access=free }}</ref> | ||
Ever since its founding in 2001, Law and Justice had a catalogue of complex reforms in the sphere of defence and national security, which it also connected to economic matters. The party postulates a national security law that would expand the legal capabilities of special and public security services. Law and Justice proposed monitoring key industries such as energy, telecommunications, banking as well as stock exchange, including taking note of the ownership situation in these economic sectors and the main companies operating in these fields. The national security act and extensive monitoring of the economy were to provide the basis for the Polish government to safeguard economic security by partial or complete compulsory state buyouts of companies "whose operation on the market creates a direct or potential threat to national security". In this way, the party connected its anti-privatization views with its law-and-order proposals.<ref name="marceli"/> | Ever since its founding in 2001, Law and Justice had a catalogue of complex reforms in the sphere of defence and national security, which it also connected to economic matters. The party postulates a national security law that would expand the legal capabilities of special and public security services. Law and Justice proposed monitoring key industries such as energy, telecommunications, banking as well as stock exchange, including taking note of the ownership situation in these economic sectors and the main companies operating in these fields. The national security act and extensive monitoring of the economy were to provide the basis for the Polish government to safeguard economic security by partial or complete compulsory state buyouts of companies "whose operation on the market creates a direct or potential threat to national security". In this way, the party connected its anti-privatization views with its law-and-order proposals.<ref name="marceli"/> | ||
| Line 286: | Line 291: | ||
They have frequently expressed [[Anti-Germanism|anti-German]],<ref>{{cite news |last1=Wieliński |first1=Bartosz T. |title=Poland, Germany still friends despite PiS' anti-German campaign |url=https://www.euractiv.com/section/freedom-of-thought/news/fri-poland-germany-still-friends-despite-pis-anti-german-campaign/ |access-date=24 August 2020 |work=www.euractiv.com |date=8 June 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Sieradzka |first1=Monika |title=Anti-German sentiment colors Polish president's election campaign |url=https://www.dw.com/en/anti-german-sentiment-colors-polish-presidents-election-campaign/a-54137270 |access-date=24 August 2020 |work=Deutsche Welle |date=11 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Zaborowski |first1=Marcin |title=What is the Future for German-Polish Relations |url=https://visegradinsight.eu/what-is-the-future-for-german-polish-relations/ |access-date=24 August 2020 |work=Visegrad Insight |date=27 November 2017}}</ref> and [[anti-Russian sentiment|anti-Russian]] stances.<ref>{{cite news |title=Poland's New Populism |url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/10/05/polands-new-populism-pis/ |work=Foreign Policy |date=5 October 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Russia warns Poland not to touch Soviet WW2 memorials |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-40775355 |publisher=BBC News |date=31 July 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Law and Justice banks on Smolensk conspiracy theories |url=https://www.euractiv.com/section/elections/news/law-and-order-banks-on-smolensk-conspiracy-theories/ |work=[[Euractiv]] |date=13 April 2016}}</ref> | They have frequently expressed [[Anti-Germanism|anti-German]],<ref>{{cite news |last1=Wieliński |first1=Bartosz T. |title=Poland, Germany still friends despite PiS' anti-German campaign |url=https://www.euractiv.com/section/freedom-of-thought/news/fri-poland-germany-still-friends-despite-pis-anti-german-campaign/ |access-date=24 August 2020 |work=www.euractiv.com |date=8 June 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Sieradzka |first1=Monika |title=Anti-German sentiment colors Polish president's election campaign |url=https://www.dw.com/en/anti-german-sentiment-colors-polish-presidents-election-campaign/a-54137270 |access-date=24 August 2020 |work=Deutsche Welle |date=11 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Zaborowski |first1=Marcin |title=What is the Future for German-Polish Relations |url=https://visegradinsight.eu/what-is-the-future-for-german-polish-relations/ |access-date=24 August 2020 |work=Visegrad Insight |date=27 November 2017}}</ref> and [[anti-Russian sentiment|anti-Russian]] stances.<ref>{{cite news |title=Poland's New Populism |url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/10/05/polands-new-populism-pis/ |work=Foreign Policy |date=5 October 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Russia warns Poland not to touch Soviet WW2 memorials |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-40775355 |publisher=BBC News |date=31 July 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Law and Justice banks on Smolensk conspiracy theories |url=https://www.euractiv.com/section/elections/news/law-and-order-banks-on-smolensk-conspiracy-theories/ |work=[[Euractiv]] |date=13 April 2016}}</ref> | ||
Law and Justice has taken a hardline stance against Russia in its foreign policy since the party's foundation.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Why Is CPAC Traveling to Illiberal Hungary? |url=https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2022/04/05/why-cpac-traveling-illiberal-hungary |access-date=2022-04-06 |website=Southern Poverty Law Center |language=en}}</ref> The party vocally advocated for military aid to [[Ukraine]] during the 2022 [[Russian invasion of Ukraine]], but announced it would halt arms transfers in September 2023 following disagreements over the export of Ukrainian grain to Poland.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/21/europe/poland-ukraine-weapons-grain-explainer-intl/index.html|title=Analysis: What Poland and Ukraine's feud means for the war|first=Rob|last=Picheta|date=21 September 2023|website=CNN}}</ref> The party has been described as divided between pro-Ukrainian and anti-Ukrainian factions.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2023/10/06/ahead-of-poland-election-support-for-ukraine-is-a-collateral-victim_6153496_4.html|title=Ahead of Polish election, support for Ukraine is a collateral victim|newspaper=Le Monde|date=6 October 2023 | Law and Justice has taken a hardline stance against Russia in its foreign policy since the party's foundation.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Why Is CPAC Traveling to Illiberal Hungary? |url=https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2022/04/05/why-cpac-traveling-illiberal-hungary |access-date=2022-04-06 |website=Southern Poverty Law Center |date=5 April 2022 |language=en}}</ref> The party vocally advocated for military aid to [[Ukraine]] during the 2022 [[Russian invasion of Ukraine]], but announced it would halt arms transfers in September 2023 following disagreements over the export of Ukrainian grain to Poland.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/21/europe/poland-ukraine-weapons-grain-explainer-intl/index.html|title=Analysis: What Poland and Ukraine's feud means for the war|first=Rob|last=Picheta|date=21 September 2023|website=CNN}}</ref> The party has been described as divided between pro-Ukrainian and anti-Ukrainian factions.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2023/10/06/ahead-of-poland-election-support-for-ukraine-is-a-collateral-victim_6153496_4.html|title=Ahead of Polish election, support for Ukraine is a collateral victim|newspaper=Le Monde|date=6 October 2023}}</ref> | ||
Though the PiS government initially advocated a [[pro-Israel]] policy, relations with Israel deteriorated following the 2018 [[Amendment to the Act on the Institute of National Remembrance]] and subsequent [[Israel–Poland relations#Diplomatic incidents|diplomatic incidents]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.euractiv.pl/section/polityka-zagraniczna-ue/news/polski-premier-nie-przyjedzie-na-szczyt-v4-do-jerozolimy/|title=Polski premier nie przyjedzie na szczyt V4 do Jerozolimy|first=Barbara|last=Bodalska|date=18 February 2019|website=www.euractiv.pl}}</ref> In opposition, PiS called for the expulsion of the Israeli Ambassador following the [[World Central Kitchen drone strikes]] and criticized the [[Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip (2023–present)|2023 Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://wpolityce.pl/polityka/687426-wydalenie-ambasadora-izraela-prezes-pis-zrobilbym-to|title=Wydalenie ambasadora Izraela? Prezes PiS: Zrobiłbym to|website=wpolityce.pl}}</ref> | Though the PiS government initially advocated a [[pro-Israel]] policy, relations with Israel deteriorated following the 2018 [[Amendment to the Act on the Institute of National Remembrance]] and subsequent [[Israel–Poland relations#Diplomatic incidents|diplomatic incidents]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.euractiv.pl/section/polityka-zagraniczna-ue/news/polski-premier-nie-przyjedzie-na-szczyt-v4-do-jerozolimy/|title=Polski premier nie przyjedzie na szczyt V4 do Jerozolimy|first=Barbara|last=Bodalska|date=18 February 2019|website=www.euractiv.pl}}</ref> In opposition, PiS called for the expulsion of the Israeli Ambassador following the [[World Central Kitchen drone strikes]] and criticized the [[Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip (2023–present)|2023 Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://wpolityce.pl/polityka/687426-wydalenie-ambasadora-izraela-prezes-pis-zrobilbym-to|title=Wydalenie ambasadora Izraela? Prezes PiS: Zrobiłbym to|website=wpolityce.pl}}</ref> | ||
The PiS government supported [[accession of Turkey to the European Union]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.newarab.com/analysis/whats-behind-turkey-and-polands-growing-alliance|title=What's behind Turkey and Poland's growing alliance?|first=Fuad|last=Shahbazov|date=7 June 2021|website=www.newarab.com/}}</ref> PiS also advocates for a strong relationship with Hungary under [[Viktor Orbán]], though they diverged over the [[Russo-Ukrainian War]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://vsquare.org/orban-kaczynski-novak-morawiecki-poland-hungary-russia-war-ukraine/|title=HOW ORBÁN ANGERED HIS CLOSEST POLISH ALLIES|date=15 May 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://notesfrompoland.com/2024/02/01/pis-open-to-orban-joining-its-european-group-and-condemns-eu-blackmail-against-hungary/|title=PiS "open" to Orbán joining its European group and condemns EU "blackmail" against Hungary|first=Daniel|last=Tilles|date=1 February 2024}}</ref> Law and Justice criticised the Polish government's decision in 2008 to [[2008 Kosovo declaration of independence|recognise the independence of Kosovo]] from Serbia.<ref>{{cite news|work=TVN24|url=https://tvn24.pl/polska/polski-rzad-oficjalnie-uznal-niepodleglosc-kosowa-ra50294-ls3693036|date=26 February | The PiS government supported [[accession of Turkey to the European Union]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.newarab.com/analysis/whats-behind-turkey-and-polands-growing-alliance|title=What's behind Turkey and Poland's growing alliance?|first=Fuad|last=Shahbazov|date=7 June 2021|website=www.newarab.com/}}</ref> PiS also advocates for a strong relationship with Hungary under [[Viktor Orbán]], though they diverged over the [[Russo-Ukrainian War]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://vsquare.org/orban-kaczynski-novak-morawiecki-poland-hungary-russia-war-ukraine/|title=HOW ORBÁN ANGERED HIS CLOSEST POLISH ALLIES|date=15 May 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://notesfrompoland.com/2024/02/01/pis-open-to-orban-joining-its-european-group-and-condemns-eu-blackmail-against-hungary/|title=PiS "open" to Orbán joining its European group and condemns EU "blackmail" against Hungary|first=Daniel|last=Tilles|date=1 February 2024}}</ref> Law and Justice criticised the Polish government's decision in 2008 to [[2008 Kosovo declaration of independence|recognise the independence of Kosovo]] from Serbia.<ref>{{cite news|work=TVN24|url=https://tvn24.pl/polska/polski-rzad-oficjalnie-uznal-niepodleglosc-kosowa-ra50294-ls3693036|date=26 February 2008|title=Polski rząd oficjalnie uznał niepodległość Kosowa}}</ref> | ||
===Social policies=== | ===Social policies=== | ||
| Line 329: | Line 334: | ||
====Nationalism==== | ====Nationalism==== | ||
{{see also|Historical policy of Law and Justice}} | {{see also|Historical policy of Law and Justice}} | ||
Academic research has characterised Law and Justice as a partially nationalist party,{{refn|<ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/poland/2017-12-18/rise-polands-far-right|title=The Rise of Poland's Far Right|magazine=Foreign Affairs|date=18 December 2017|last1=Charnysh |first1=Volha }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|work=[[The New York Times Magazine]]|title=The Party That Wants to Make Poland Great Again|date=2 November 2016|first=James|last=Traub|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/06/magazine/the-party-that-wants-to-make-poland-great-again.html?_r=0}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|work=[[The Guardian]]|title=Xenophobic, authoritarian – and generous on welfare: how Poland's right rules|date=25 October 2016|first=Remi|last=Adekoya|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/25/poland-right-law-justice-party-europe}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|newspaper=[[The Economist]]|title=Protests grow against Poland's nationalist government|date=20 December 2016|url=https://www.economist.com/news/europe/21712168-law-and-justice-party-restricts-freedom-assembly-and-movement-journalists}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Polynczuk-Alenius |first1=Kinga |title=At the intersection of racism and nationalism: Theorising and contextualising the 'anti-immigration' discourse in Poland |journal=Nations and Nationalism |date=2020 |volume=27 |issue=3 |pages=766–781 |doi=10.1111/nana.12611|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Krzyżanowski |first1=Michał |title=Discursive Shifts in Ethno-Nationalist Politics: On Politicization and Mediatization of the "Refugee Crisis" in Poland |journal=Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies |date=2018 |volume=16 |issue=1–2 |pages=76–96 |doi=10.1080/15562948.2017.1317897|s2cid=54068132 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Żuk |first1=Piotr |title=Nation, national remembrance, and education — Polish schools as factories of nationalism and prejudice |journal=Nationalities Papers |date=2018 |volume=46 |issue=6 |pages=1046–1062 |doi=10.1080/00905992.2017.1381079|s2cid=158161859 }}</ref>}} but PiS's leadership rejects this label.{{efn|During the 2008 [[National Independence Day (Poland)|Polish Independence Day]] celebrations, [[Lech Kaczyński]] said in his speech during the visit to the city of [[Elbląg]] that "the state is a great value, and attachment to the state, to one's fatherland, we call patriotism – beware of the word nationalism, as nationalism is evil!"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://wiadomosci.wp.pl/prezydent-l-kaczynski-nacjonalizm-jest-zlem-6036779525371009a|title=Prezydent L. Kaczyński: nacjonalizm jest złem|date=30 September 2008}}</ref> On the same day during the celebrations in Warsaw, L. Kaczyński again stated: "patriotism doesn't equal nationalism."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.polskatimes.pl/artykul/59272,lech-kaczynski-patriotyzm-nie-oznacza-nacjonalizmu,id,t.html|title=Lech Kaczyński: Patriotyzm nie oznacza nacjonalizmu|work=Portal I.pl |date=11 November 2008 }}</ref> In 2011, [[Jarosław Kaczyński]] criticised pre-war [[Polish nationalism]] for "its intellectual, political and moral failure" by emphasising that the movement "did not know how to deal with and solve the problems of [[Ethnic minorities in Poland|Polish minorities]]."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.rp.pl/Rzecz-o-polityce/303299876-Jaroslaw-Kaczynski-z-Romana-Dmowskiego.html|title=Jarosław Kaczyński z Romana Dmowskiego|website=www.rp.pl}}</ref>}} Both Kaczyńskis look up for inspirations to the pre-war [[Sanacja]] movement with its leader [[Józef Piłsudski]], in contrast to the nationalist [[Endecja]] that was led by Piłsudski's political archrival, [[Roman Dmowski]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://kresy.pl/wydarzenia/kowal-kaczynski-powstrzymuje-w-polsce-nacjonalizm/|title=Kowal: Kaczyński powstrzymuje w Polsce nacjonalizm |date=10 February 2016 |publisher=Kresy – Portal Społeczności Kresowej}}</ref> However, parts of the party, especially the faction around [[Radio Maryja]], are inspired by Dmowski's movement.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Żuk |first1=Piotr |last2=Żuk |first2=Paweł |title=Dangerous Liaisons between the Catholic Church and State: the religious and political alliance of the nationalist right with the conservative Church in Poland |journal=Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe |date=2019 |volume=27 |issue=2–3 |pages=191–212 |doi=10.1080/25739638.2019.1692519|s2cid=211393866 }}</ref> Polish far-right organisations and parties such as [[National Revival of Poland]], [[National Movement (Poland)|National Movement]] and [[Autonome Nationalisten|Autonomous Nationalists]] regularly criticise PiS's relative ideological moderation and its politicians for "monopolizing" official political scene by playing on the popular patriotic and religious feelings.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://autonom.pl/?s=%22Prawo+i+Sprawiedliwo%C5%9B%C4%87%22|title=Search Result | AUTONOM.PL | autonomiczni nacjonaliści nowoczesny nacjonalizm AN|website=autonom.pl}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nacjonalista.pl/?s=%22Prawo+i+Sprawiedliwo%C5%9B%C4%87%22|title="Prawo I Sprawiedliwość" | Nacjonalista.pl – Dziennik Narodowo-Radykalny|website=nacjonalista.pl}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://xportal.pl/|title=Strona główna|website=XPortal}}</ref> However, the party does include several overtly nationalist politicians in senior positions, such as Digital Affairs Minister [[Adam Andruszkiewicz]], the former leader of the [[All-Polish Youth]];<ref>{{cite news|work=[[Seattle Times]]|title=Far-right Polish official steps back from radical comments|date=4 January 2019|url=https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/nation/controversy-around-extreme-right-member-of-polish-government/}}</ref> and deputy PiS leader and former Defence Minister [[Antoni Macierewicz]], the founder of the [[National-Catholic Movement]].<ref>{{Cite news|work=[[The Guardian]]|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/12/polish-minister-accused-of-having-links-with-pro-kremlin-far-right-groups|date=12 July 2017|title=Polish minister accused of having links with pro-Kremlin far-right groups}}</ref> It has been also described as [[National conservatism|national-conservative]].<ref name="Ashgate">{{Citation|last1=Hloušek|first1=Vít|title=Origin, Ideology and Transformation of Political Parties: East-Central and Western Europe Compared|page=196|year=2010|publisher=Ashgate|last2=Kopeček|first2=Lubomír}}</ref><ref name="Nordsieck2">{{cite web|last=Nordsieck|first=Wolfram|year=2019|title=Poland|url=http://parties-and-elections.eu/poland.html|access-date=28 November 2019|publisher=Parties and Elections in Europe}}</ref><ref name="dw24717">{{cite web|date=24 July 2017|title=How the Catholic Church ties in to Poland's judicial reform|url=https://www.dw.com/en/how-the-catholic-church-ties-in-to-polands-judicial-reform/a-39809383|website=dw.com|publisher=[[Deutsche Welle]]}}</ref> | Academic research has characterised Law and Justice as a partially nationalist party,{{refn|<ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/poland/2017-12-18/rise-polands-far-right|title=The Rise of Poland's Far Right|magazine=Foreign Affairs|date=18 December 2017|last1=Charnysh |first1=Volha }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|work=[[The New York Times Magazine]]|title=The Party That Wants to Make Poland Great Again|date=2 November 2016|first=James|last=Traub|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/06/magazine/the-party-that-wants-to-make-poland-great-again.html?_r=0}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|work=[[The Guardian]]|title=Xenophobic, authoritarian – and generous on welfare: how Poland's right rules|date=25 October 2016|first=Remi|last=Adekoya|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/25/poland-right-law-justice-party-europe}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|newspaper=[[The Economist]]|title=Protests grow against Poland's nationalist government|date=20 December 2016|url=https://www.economist.com/news/europe/21712168-law-and-justice-party-restricts-freedom-assembly-and-movement-journalists}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Polynczuk-Alenius |first1=Kinga |title=At the intersection of racism and nationalism: Theorising and contextualising the 'anti-immigration' discourse in Poland |journal=Nations and Nationalism |date=2020 |volume=27 |issue=3 |pages=766–781 |doi=10.1111/nana.12611|doi-access=free |hdl=10138/342733 |hdl-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Krzyżanowski |first1=Michał |title=Discursive Shifts in Ethno-Nationalist Politics: On Politicization and Mediatization of the "Refugee Crisis" in Poland |journal=Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies |date=2018 |volume=16 |issue=1–2 |pages=76–96 |doi=10.1080/15562948.2017.1317897|s2cid=54068132 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Żuk |first1=Piotr |title=Nation, national remembrance, and education — Polish schools as factories of nationalism and prejudice |journal=Nationalities Papers |date=2018 |volume=46 |issue=6 |pages=1046–1062 |doi=10.1080/00905992.2017.1381079|s2cid=158161859 }}</ref>}} but PiS's leadership rejects this label.{{efn|During the 2008 [[National Independence Day (Poland)|Polish Independence Day]] celebrations, [[Lech Kaczyński]] said in his speech during the visit to the city of [[Elbląg]] that "the state is a great value, and attachment to the state, to one's fatherland, we call patriotism – beware of the word nationalism, as nationalism is evil!"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://wiadomosci.wp.pl/prezydent-l-kaczynski-nacjonalizm-jest-zlem-6036779525371009a|title=Prezydent L. Kaczyński: nacjonalizm jest złem|date=30 September 2008}}</ref> On the same day during the celebrations in Warsaw, L. Kaczyński again stated: "patriotism doesn't equal nationalism."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.polskatimes.pl/artykul/59272,lech-kaczynski-patriotyzm-nie-oznacza-nacjonalizmu,id,t.html|title=Lech Kaczyński: Patriotyzm nie oznacza nacjonalizmu|work=Portal I.pl |date=11 November 2008 }}</ref> In 2011, [[Jarosław Kaczyński]] criticised pre-war [[Polish nationalism]] for "its intellectual, political and moral failure" by emphasising that the movement "did not know how to deal with and solve the problems of [[Ethnic minorities in Poland|Polish minorities]]."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.rp.pl/Rzecz-o-polityce/303299876-Jaroslaw-Kaczynski-z-Romana-Dmowskiego.html|title=Jarosław Kaczyński z Romana Dmowskiego|website=www.rp.pl}}</ref>}} Both Kaczyńskis look up for inspirations to the pre-war [[Sanacja]] movement with its leader [[Józef Piłsudski]], in contrast to the nationalist [[Endecja]] that was led by Piłsudski's political archrival, [[Roman Dmowski]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://kresy.pl/wydarzenia/kowal-kaczynski-powstrzymuje-w-polsce-nacjonalizm/|title=Kowal: Kaczyński powstrzymuje w Polsce nacjonalizm |date=10 February 2016 |publisher=Kresy – Portal Społeczności Kresowej}}</ref> However, parts of the party, especially the faction around [[Radio Maryja]], are inspired by Dmowski's movement.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Żuk |first1=Piotr |last2=Żuk |first2=Paweł |title=Dangerous Liaisons between the Catholic Church and State: the religious and political alliance of the nationalist right with the conservative Church in Poland |journal=Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe |date=2019 |volume=27 |issue=2–3 |pages=191–212 |doi=10.1080/25739638.2019.1692519|s2cid=211393866 }}</ref> Polish far-right organisations and parties such as [[National Revival of Poland]], [[National Movement (Poland)|National Movement]] and [[Autonome Nationalisten|Autonomous Nationalists]] regularly criticise PiS's relative ideological moderation and its politicians for "monopolizing" official political scene by playing on the popular patriotic and religious feelings.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://autonom.pl/?s=%22Prawo+i+Sprawiedliwo%C5%9B%C4%87%22|title=Search Result | AUTONOM.PL | autonomiczni nacjonaliści nowoczesny nacjonalizm AN|website=autonom.pl}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nacjonalista.pl/?s=%22Prawo+i+Sprawiedliwo%C5%9B%C4%87%22|title="Prawo I Sprawiedliwość" | Nacjonalista.pl – Dziennik Narodowo-Radykalny|website=nacjonalista.pl}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://xportal.pl/|title=Strona główna|website=XPortal}}</ref> However, the party does include several overtly nationalist politicians in senior positions, such as Digital Affairs Minister [[Adam Andruszkiewicz]], the former leader of the [[All-Polish Youth]];<ref>{{cite news|work=[[Seattle Times]]|title=Far-right Polish official steps back from radical comments|date=4 January 2019|url=https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/nation/controversy-around-extreme-right-member-of-polish-government/}}</ref> and deputy PiS leader and former Defence Minister [[Antoni Macierewicz]], the founder of the [[National-Catholic Movement]].<ref>{{Cite news|work=[[The Guardian]]|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/12/polish-minister-accused-of-having-links-with-pro-kremlin-far-right-groups|date=12 July 2017|title=Polish minister accused of having links with pro-Kremlin far-right groups}}</ref> It has been also described as [[National conservatism|national-conservative]].<ref name="Ashgate">{{Citation|last1=Hloušek|first1=Vít|title=Origin, Ideology and Transformation of Political Parties: East-Central and Western Europe Compared|page=196|year=2010|publisher=Ashgate|last2=Kopeček|first2=Lubomír}}</ref><ref name="Nordsieck2">{{cite web|last=Nordsieck|first=Wolfram|year=2019|title=Poland|url=http://parties-and-elections.eu/poland.html|access-date=28 November 2019|publisher=Parties and Elections in Europe}}</ref><ref name="dw24717">{{cite web|date=24 July 2017|title=How the Catholic Church ties in to Poland's judicial reform|url=https://www.dw.com/en/how-the-catholic-church-ties-in-to-polands-judicial-reform/a-39809383|website=dw.com|publisher=[[Deutsche Welle]]}}</ref> | ||
==== Refugees and economic migrants ==== | ==== Refugees and economic migrants ==== | ||
| Line 409: | Line 414: | ||
! [[2005 Polish presidential election|2005]] | ! [[2005 Polish presidential election|2005]] | ||
| '''[[Lech Kaczyński]]''' | | '''[[Lech Kaczyński]]''' | ||
| 4,947,927 | | 4,947,927 | ||
| 33.1 (#2) | | 33.1 (#2) | ||
| 8,257,468 | | 8,257,468 | ||
| 54.0 ('''#1''') | | 54.0 ('''#1''') | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 439: | Line 444: | ||
| 5,790,804 | | 5,790,804 | ||
| 29.5 (#2) | | 29.5 (#2) | ||
| | | 10,606,877 | ||
| | | 50.9 ('''#1''') | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 456: | Line 461: | ||
! rowspan="3" | [[2001 Polish parliamentary election|2001]] | ! rowspan="3" | [[2001 Polish parliamentary election|2001]] | ||
| rowspan="3" |[[Lech Kaczyński]] | | rowspan="3" |[[Lech Kaczyński]] | ||
| rowspan="3" | 1,236,787 | | rowspan="3" | 1,236,787 | ||
| rowspan="3" | 9.5 (#4) | | rowspan="3" | 9.5 (#4) | ||
| rowspan="3" |{{Composition bar|44|460|{{party color|Law and Justice (2001-2005)}}}} | | rowspan="3" |{{Composition bar|44|460|{{party color|Law and Justice (2001-2005)}}}} | ||
| Line 511: | Line 516: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! rowspan="3" |[[2023 Polish parliamentary election|2023]] | ! rowspan="3" |[[2023 Polish parliamentary election|2023]] | ||
| rowspan="2" |7,640,854 | | rowspan="2" |7,640,854 | ||
| rowspan="2" |35.4 ('''#1''') | | rowspan="2" |35.4 ('''#1''') | ||
| rowspan="2" |{{Composition bar|161|460|hex={{party color|Law and Justice}}}} | | rowspan="2" |{{Composition bar|161|460|hex={{party color|Law and Justice}}}} | ||
| Line 861: | Line 866: | ||
[[Category:Right-wing parties in Europe]] | [[Category:Right-wing parties in Europe]] | ||
[[Category:Right-wing populist parties]] | [[Category:Right-wing populist parties]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Socially conservative parties]] | ||
[[Category:Opposition to same-sex marriage in Europe]] | [[Category:Opposition to same-sex marriage in Europe]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:16, 23 June 2025
Template:Short description Script error: No such module "other uses". Script error: No such module "redirect hatnote". Template:Multiple issues Template:Use dmy dates Template:EngvarB
Script error: No such module "Infobox".Template:Template otherScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Law and JusticeTemplate:Efn (Template:Langx Script error: No such module "IPA"., PiS) is a right-wing populist and national-conservative political party in Poland. The party is a member of European Conservatives and Reformists Group. Its chairman has been Jarosław Kaczyński since 18 January 2003.
It was founded in 2001 by Jarosław and Lech Kaczyński as a direct successor of the Centre Agreement after it split from the Solidarity Electoral Action (AWS). It won the 2005 parliamentary and presidential elections, after which Lech became the president of Poland. It headed a parliamentary coalition with the League of Polish Families and Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland between 2005 and the 2007 election. It placed second and they remained in the parliamentary opposition until 2015. It regained the presidency in the 2015 election, and later won a majority of seats in the parliamentary election. They retained the positions following the 2019 and 2020 election, but lost their majority following the 2023 Polish parliamentary election.
During its foundation, it sought to position itself as a centrist Christian democratic party, although shortly after, it adopted more culturally and socially conservative views and began their shift to the right. Under Kaczyński's national-conservative and law and order agenda, PiS embraced economic interventionism.[3][4][5][6][7] It has also pursued close relations with the Catholic Church, although in 2011, the Catholic-nationalist faction split off to form United Poland.[8] During the 2010s, it also adopted right-wing populist positions. After regaining power, PiS gained popularity with more populist and social policies.[9] The party is sometimes labelled as "left-paternalistic".[10]
It is a member of the European Conservatives and Reformists,[11] and on national-level, it heads the United Right coalition. It currently holds 190 seats in the Sejm and 34 in the Senate.
It has attracted widespread international criticism and domestic protest movements for allegedly dismantling liberal-democratic checks and balances.[12]Template:Synthesis inline
History
Formation
The party was created on a wave of popularity gained by Lech Kaczyński while heading the Polish Ministry of Justice (June 2000 to July 2001) in the AWS-led government, although local committees began appearing from 22 March 2001.[8] The AWS itself was created from a diverse array of many small political parties.[8] In the 2001 general election, PiS gained 44 (of 460) seats in the lower chamber of the Polish Parliament (Sejm) with 9.5% of votes. In 2002, Lech Kaczyński was elected mayor of Warsaw. He handed the party leadership to his twin brother Jarosław in 2003.[13]
In coalition government: 2005–2007
In the 2005 general election, PiS took first place with 27.0% of votes, which gave it 155 out of 460 seats in the Sejm and 49 out of 100 seats in the Senate. It was almost universally expected that the two largest parties, PiS and Civic Platform (PO), would form a coalition government.[8] The putative coalition parties had a falling out, however, related to a fierce contest for the Polish presidency. In the end, Lech Kaczyński won the second round of the presidential election on 23 October 2005 with 54.0% of the vote, ahead of Donald Tusk, the PO candidate.
After the 2005 elections, Jarosław should have become prime minister. However, in order to improve his brother's chances of winning the presidential election (the first round of which was scheduled two weeks after the parliamentary election), PiS formed a minority government headed by Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz as prime minister, an arrangement that eventually turned out to be unworkable. In July 2006, PiS formed a right-wing coalition government with the agrarian populist Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland and the nationalist League of Polish Families, headed by Jarosław Kaczyński. Association with these parties, on the margins of Polish politics, severely affected the reputation of PiS. When accusations of corruption and sexual harassment against Andrzej Lepper, the leader of Self-Defence, surfaced, PiS chose to end the coalition and called for new elections.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
In opposition: 2007–2015
In the 2007 general election, PiS managed to secure 32.1% of votes. Although an improvement over its showing from 2005, the results were nevertheless a defeat for the party, as Civic Platform (PO) gathered 41.5%. The party won 166 out of 460 seats in the Sejm and 39 seats in Poland's Senate.
On 10 April 2010, its former leader Lech Kaczyński died in the 2010 Polish Air Force Tu-154 crash.[14] Jarosław Kaczyński became the sole leader of the party. He was the presidential candidate in the 2010 elections. In the 2010 election, Jarosław gathered 46.99% of the vote, losing to Civic Platform candidate Bronislaw Komorowski, who won with 53.01%.[15][16]
In majority government: 2015–2023
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Template:Multiple issues
The party won the 2015 parliamentary election, this time with an outright majority—something no Polish party had done since the fall of communism. In the normal course of events, this should have made Jarosław Kaczyński prime minister for a second time. However, Beata Szydło, perceived as being somewhat more moderate than Kaczyński, had been tapped as PiS's candidate for prime minister.[17][18]
The party supported controversial reforms carried out by the Hungarian Fidesz party, with Jarosław Kaczyński declaring in 2011 that "a day will come when we have a Budapest in Warsaw".[19] PiS's 2015 victory prompted creation of a cross-party opposition movement, the Committee for the Defence of Democracy (KOD).[20] Law and Justice has Proposed 2017 judicial reforms, which according to the party were meant to improve efficiency of the justice system, sparked protest as they were seen as undermining judicial independence.Template:Refn While these reforms were initially unexpectedly vetoed by President Duda, he later signed them into law.[21] In 2017, the European Union began an Article 7 infringement procedure against Poland due to a "clear risk of a serious breach" in the rule of law and fundamental values of the European Union.[22]
The party has caused what constitutional law scholar Wojciech Sadurski termed a "constitutional breakdown"[23] by packing the Constitutional Court with its supporters, undermining parliamentary procedure, and reducing the president's and prime minister's offices in favour of power being wielded extra-constitutionally by party leader Jarosław Kaczyński.[24] After eliminating constitutional checks, the government then moved to curtail the activities of NGOs and independent media, restrict freedom of speech and assembly, and reduce the qualifications required for civil service jobs in order to fill these positions with party loyalists.[24][25] The media law was changed to give the governing party control of the state media, which was turned into a partisan outlet, with dissenting journalists fired from their jobs.[24][26] Due to these political changes, Poland has been termed an "illiberal democracy",[27][28] "plebiscitarian authoritarianism",Template:Sfn or "velvet dictatorship with a façade of democracy".[29]
The party won reelection in the 2019 parliamentary election. With 44% of the popular vote, Law and Justice received the highest vote share by any party since Poland returned to democracy in 1989, but lost its majority in the Senate.[30][31][32]
In opposition: 2023–present
The United Right alliance placed first for the third straight election and won a plurality of seats but fell short of a Sejm majority. The opposition, consisting of the Civic Coalition, Third Way, and The Left, achieved a combined total vote of 54%, managing to form a majority coalition government.[33][34] Although PiS would be unable to govern on its own, the Polish president Andrzej Duda stated his intention to re-appoint the incumbent Mateusz Morawiecki as prime minister due to the existing albeit unofficial convention of nominating a member of the winning party.[35] The four opposition parties criticized Duda's decision as a delay tactic. The opposition parties subsequently signed a coalition agreement on 10 November, de facto taking over control of the Sejm, and agreed to nominate former prime minister and European Council President Donald Tusk as their candidate.[36] Morawiecki's new cabinet, dubbed "two-week government" and "zombie government" by the media due to its anticipated short-livedness, was sworn in on 27 November 2023.[35][37] As expected, the Morawiecki's government was defeated in the Sejm on 11 December 2023, effectively ending its tenure.
The Law and Justice candidate for the 2025 Polish presidential election, Karol Nawrocki, won the election. The results mean that Law and Justice and its aligned presidential candidates have lost only one presidential election— in 2010 — since the party’s founding 24 years ago.
2024 party subsidy issue
Script error: No such module "Unsubst". Template:Multiple image On 14 March 2024, the President appointed a new composition of the National Electoral Commission (PKW), selected by the Sejm in December 2023. While Template:Ill remained the chairman of the PKW, a position he held since 11 February 2020 and Template:Ill as his deputy, seven other members were recommended by different parties in parliament: KO recommended Template:Ill and Template:Ill, PiS recommended Template:Ill and Template:Ill, PSL recommended Template:Ill, PL2050 recommended Template:Ill, and Lewica recommended Ryszard Kalisz.[38][39]
On 29 August, the PKW ruled 5:3[40] to penalize PiS by refusing to return 10.8 million PLN for 36 million designated to it via party subsidy, alleging the party misused 3.6 million PLN of their provided campaign funds in the 2023 parliamentary election.[41] Despite PiS appealing the decision to the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court issued no verdict within the 60-day deadline. The party appealed to its members and supporters for financial aid in donations.[42] The PKW tied in a vote on 23 September regarding whether the committee recognizes the Supreme Court as valid considering the ongoing constitutional crisis.[43] Further penalizations by the PKW on 18 November occurred thereafter, with the Commission ruling 5:4 to deprive PiS of its entire 75 million PLN subsidy for the three next years. PiS likewise appealed this decision to the Supreme Court,[44][45] which the Supreme Court ruled invalid on 11 December, obligating the PKW to return PiS its subsidy.[46] The Commission voted 5:4 to adjourn the meeting on 16 December without recognizing the Supreme Court or its ruling.[47] On 30 December, a re-vote was held on the matter of whether it recognizes the Supreme Court, ruling 4:3 in favor of recognizing its verdict on this matter, and accepting the Supreme Court's decision to return the funds to PiS.[48][49] Subsequently, the matter was relayed to the Ministry of Finance, in charge of granting subsidies.
In reaction to the ruling, several politicians commented. Prime Minister Donald Tusk stated on X that he does not recognize the PKW positively ruling on granting PiS its subsidy.[50] Marshal of the Sejm Szymon Hołownia stated the need for a compromise that lets Poles decide on a President without the validity of the president-elect's mandate being disputed by different parties.[51] On 8 January 2025 Minister of Finance Andrzej Domański refused to recognize the PKW's ruling affirming PiS is to be granted its subsidy, stating the verdict was written in a "self-contradictory" way.[52] Sylwester Marciniak, the PKW chairman, responded by stating the verdict was written clearly and demanding the Ministry grant PiS its allotted funds.[53] Prime Minister Tusk expressed doubt over the legal validity of the PKW verdict, defending his Minister.[54] A poll suggests 47.1% of Poles (98% of PiS voters, 71% of TD voters, 53% of Lewica voters) support PiS receiving the funds, and 46.9% (85% of PO voters, 80% of Konfederacja voters) are against.[55]
| PartyTemplate:Efn | PKW member | Ruling | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 August | 23 September | 18 November | 16 December | 30 December | ||||
| Independent | Sylwester Marciniak | Abstained | For | Unknown | Against | For | ||
| Independent | Wojciech Sych | Against | Unknown | Against | For | |||
| KO | Konrad Składkowski | For | For | Abstained | ||||
| KO | Ryszard Balicki | For | For | Abstained | ||||
| PiS | Mirosław Suski | Against | Against | For | ||||
| PiS | Arkadiusz Pikulik | Against | Against | For | ||||
| PSL | Maciej Kliś | For | For | Against | ||||
| PL2050 | Paweł Gieras | For | For | Against | ||||
| Left | Ryszard Kalisz | For | For | Against | ||||
| Total | 5:3[40] | 4:4[43] | 5:4[45] | 5:4[47] | 4:3[49] | |||
Breakaways
In January 2010, a breakaway faction led by Jerzy Polaczek split from the party to form Poland Plus. Its seven members of the Sejm came from the centrist, economically liberal wing of the party. On 24 September 2010, the group was disbanded, with most of its Sejm members, including Polaczek, returning to Law and Justice.
On 16 November 2010, MPs Joanna Kluzik-Rostkowska, Elżbieta Jakubiak and Paweł Poncyljusz, and MEPs Adam Bielan and Michał Kamiński formed a new political group, Poland Comes First (Polska jest Najważniejsza).[56] Kamiński claimed that the Law and Justice party had been taken over by far-right extremists. The breakaway party formed following dissatisfaction with the direction and leadership of Kaczyński.[57]
On 4 November 2011, MEPs Zbigniew Ziobro, Jacek Kurski, and Tadeusz Cymański were ejected from the party, after Ziobro urged the party to split further into two separate parties – centrist and nationalist – with the three representing the nationalist faction.[58] Ziobro's supporters, most of whom on the right-wing of the party, formed a new group in Parliament called Solidary Poland,[59] leading to their expulsion, too.[60] United Poland was formed as a formally separate party in March 2012, but has not threatened Law and Justice in opinion polls.[61]
United Poland which would later become Sovereign Poland merged with Law and Justice on 12 October 2024 during PiS congress in Przysucha.
Base of support
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
Like Civic Platform, but unlike the fringe parties to the right, Law and Justice originated from the anti-communist Solidarity trade union (which is a major cleavage in Polish politics), which was not a theocratic organisation.[62] Solidarity's leadership wanted to back Law and Justice in 2005, but was held back by the union's last experience of party politics, in backing Solidarity Electoral Action.[8]
Today, the party enjoys great support among working class constituencies and union members. Groups that vote for the party include miners, farmers, shopkeepers, unskilled workers, the unemployed, and pensioners. With its left-wing approach toward economics, the party attracts voters who feel that economic liberalisation and European integration have left them behind.[63] The party's core support derives from older, religious people who value conservatism and patriotism. PiS voters are usually located in rural areas and small towns. The strongest region of support is the southeastern part of the country. Voters without a university degree tend to prefer the party more than college-educated voters do.
Regionally, it has more support in regions of Poland that were historically part of western Galicia-Lodomeria and Congress Poland.[64] Since 2015, the borders of support are not as clear as before and party enjoys support in western parts of country, especially these deprived ones.Script error: No such module "Unsubst". Large cities in all regions are more likely to vote for a more liberal party like PO or .N. Still, PiS receives good support from poor and working class areas in large cities.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Based on this voter profile, Law and Justice forms the core of the conservative post-Solidarity bloc, along with the League of Polish Families and Solidarity Electoral Action, as opposed to liberal conservative post-Solidarity bloc of Civic Platform.[65] The most prominent feature of PiS voters was their emphasis on decommunisation.[66]
Template:Ill distinguishes three main voters groups that form the base of Law and Justice's support. The first group are conservative Catholics, which support efforts to empower the Church and embrace anti-progressive, conservative social norms. The second group are secular intellectuals which are committed to "Polishness" and an enhanced international position of Poland - they support PiS to push back against the influence of the European Union, which they regard as a tool for Western domination. The third group are the working-class and poor voters that support PiS because of its economic policies which address the economic insecurity and wealth inequality of Poland. The workers that are particularly supportive of PiS are industrial workers and unionized labor, "where classic labor traditions are strongest." These workers also tend to be culturally conservative, which further aligns them with PiS.[67]
The trade union Solidarity has emerged as a staunch ally of Law and Justice in 2015, when the party's presidential candidate Andrzej Duda signed a pledge to implement the economic reforms proposed by Solidarity. Ost wrote: "In its first two years in power, as already noted, PiS essentially delivered on each of the promises.The reduction of the retirement age, the increases in the minimum and hourly wage, the fight against “junk contracts,” the commitment to do battle with the EU in order to subsidize national industrial champions, the greater respect accorded to unions: All of this has made full-time manufacturing employees PiS’s most loyal working-class constituency."[67] Ost also notes that given the decline of trade unions in Poland, the PiS' vote potential lies in marginalized labor:
<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />
The big change in the last few years has been the entry of more marginal and precarious labor into the political fray, increasingly on the side of the extremist far right. These are the workers from small towns and cities, or from the fringes of the large cities: places where liberal prosperity never really reached. Unions here are virtually non-existent. Workers have few prospects for stable employment, [...] struggling to find some security. To this group PiS has appealed via nationalism. Instead of giving up home and family to be treated as second-class citizens in Manchester or Dublin, PiS promises, together we can build a strong Poland where you can stay home and thrive. For this group, nationalism is not just identity with a swagger, but a concrete economic appeal: We will build industry at home, we will renovate the places liberalism bypassed, and we will not allow Poles to be treated as neocolonial subjects. By regularly charging that previous governments turned Poland into a subordinate colony doing the hard labor for Western exploiters, PiS often sounds like old-school Latin American dependency theorists.[67]
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Ideology
Template:Conservatism in Poland The ideological roots of Law and Justice go back to the late 1980s to a Christian-democratic and nationalist wing of the Solidarity movement. The party derives from a dissident faction of Solidarity which felt alienated from the economically liberal policies of the post-communist Polish establishment. This faction was centered around Jarosław Kaczyński as well as President Lech Wałęsa, and was powerful, albeit briefly, in the early 1990s when the capitalist transition was in its early stages. However, it suddenly lost all influence when Kaczyński's party, Centre Agreement, failed to reach the newly-established 5% electoral threshold in the 1993 Polish parliamentary election. This led the political movement that would later form PiS to spend the rest of the 1990s with only marginal political influence. It slowly started to re-establish itself in the late 1990s, as this period marked the strongest and most persistent wave of public dissatisfaction with economic liberalism and corruption.[68]
For the first years after its foundation, Law and Justice was characterized as a moderate, single-issue party narrowly focused on the issue of 'law and order', appealing to voters concerned about corruption and high crime rates.[69] In its 2002 assessment of Poland, the Immigration and Nationality Directorate led by the UK government described Law and Justice as "basically a law and order party".[70] In 2003, German political scientist Nikolaus Werz classified Law and Justice as a centrist, law-and-order party that "advocates a strong state, the fight against corruption and the tightening of criminal law". Werz contrasted the moderation of PiS with the radicalism of League of Polish Families, which he described as a nationalist and 'Catholic-fundamentalist' party.[71]
The party then started radicalizing and broadening its program following its victory in the 2005 Polish parliamentary election. In 2006, Chicago Tribune wrote that "President Kaczynski's Law and Justice Party ran on a populist reform platform but veered sharply to the right after its victory". The same year, Polish journalist Template:Ill wrote: "When they started out, the Kaczynski brothers were fairly mainstream … but now they've gotten into bed with the League of Polish Families and Samoobrona. They are moving to the right, and it's a pretty intolerant right."[72] The party had undergone a radical ideological change, abandoning its centrist position towards an increasingly populist and nationalist political orientation. This change was also marked by a pivot on the party's position towards the European Union - initially strongly supportive of European integration, PiS became an Eurosceptic party that criticized the EU from nationalist, protectionist, and anti-neoliberal perspectives.[73]
According to Polish political scientists Krzysztof Kowalczyk and Jerzy Sielski, Law and Justice had moved from a single-issue party in 2001 to a staunchly and broadly conservative one by 2006. They noted that by 2006 the party started calling for a "conservative revolution" that would restore traditional values to Poland, and gradually adopted right-wing populist rhetoric characterized by a "somewhat leftist" economical policy to undercut the appeal of far-right anti-capitalist League of Polish Families (LPR), agrarian socialist Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland (Samoobrona) and the agrarian Polish People's Party (PSL).[74] The populist pivot of PiS is credited with causing the electoral blowout of Samoobrona and LPR in the 2007 Polish parliamentary election.[75]
Initially, the party was broadly pro-market, although less so than the Civic Platform.[63] It has adopted the social market economy rhetoric similar to that of western European Christian democratic parties.[8] In the 2005 election, the party shifted to the protectionist left on economics.[63] As prime minister, Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz was more economically liberal than the Kaczyńskis, advocating a position closer to Civic Platform.[76] In 2005, Law and Justice made Civic Platform its main ideological opponent despite their previous closeness - Law and Justice posed a difference between Civic Platform's "liberal Poland" and its "social Poland". The former was marked by economic liberalism, austerity, deregulation and "serving the rich". In contrast, Law and Justice stressed its "social" character, pledging policies that would help the poor. The party attacked Civic Platform's flat tax proposal and advocated a much more active role of the state in the economy. Law and Justice also made "an offer to the left", stressing its economically left-wing policies.[77] This pivot led the leader of far-left Samoobrona, Andrzej Lepper, to endorse Lech Kaczyński in the 2005 Polish presidential election, arguing that left-wing voters must vote against the neoliberalism of Civic Platform; Lepper also justified his decision on the basis of Kaczyński's declarations in support of funding social welfare, fighting unemployment and taking a tougher stance towards the European Union.[78]
On foreign policy, PiS is Atlanticist and less supportive of European integration than Civic Platform.[63] The party is soft eurosceptic[79][80] and opposes a federal Europe, especially the Euro currency. In its campaigns, it emphasises that the European Union should "benefit Poland and not the other way around".[81] It is a member of the anti-federalist European Conservatives and Reformists Party, having previously been a part of the Alliance for Europe of the Nations and, before that, the European People's Party.[8][82] Although it has some elements of Christian democracy, it is not a Christian democratic party.[83] The party is commonly placed on the right wing of the political spectrum,[84] although its economic ideology is also classified as left-wing,[85][86][87][88][89] or left-leaning.[90][91][92] It combines conservative, egalitarian and populist elements in its ideology.[93]
Platform
Economy
The party supports a state-guaranteed minimum social safety net and extensive state intervention in the economy, and argues that a "more socially sensitive and less market-dominated" economic system is necessary.[94] It advocates progressive taxation that would redistribute the wealth from the wealthy to the poor, and it supports a large-scale social housing program. The party promised and implemented tax and welfare benefits to married couples and family. It also adheres to the principles of economic nationalism, postulating state control over key sectors of the economy.[88] It seeks to increase healthcare spending to 6% of the Polish GDP, and nationalize hospital debts.[95] During the 2015 election campaign, it proposed tax rebates related to the number of children in a family, as well as a reduction of the VAT rate (while keeping a variation between individual types of VAT rates). In 2019, the lowest personal income tax threshold was decreased from 18% to 17%.[96]
In 2019, the party introduced a bill proposing a financial benefit in the form of a 13th pension, intended for retirees and pensioners receiving the minimum old-age pension on 1 May 2019.[97] And subsequently on an annual basis starting in 2020.[98] A 14th pension was introduced on 21 January 2021 and is now paid out with 13th pension.[99]
PiS opposes cutting social welfare spending, and also proposed the introduction of a system of state-guaranteed housing loans. The party also opposes foreign ownership of crucial industries and businesses, and proposed buying back the largest convenience store chain in Poland, Żabka, from its foreign owners.[100] It also supports state provided universal health care.[101] PiS has been also described as statist,[102][103][104] protectionist,[105][106][107] solidarist,[108] and interventionist.[109] It also holds agrarianist views.[110] Given the redistributive and protectionist agenda of the party as well as its focus on welfare and nationalization, some political scientists classify Law and Justice as economically left-wing.[85][86][87][88] Stephen Park Turner likewise classified it as having "economically leftist policies on trade and welfare."[89] It has also been described as economically left-leaning by the Centre for European Reform,[90] Reuters,[91] and The Routledge Handbook of East European Politics.[92] Political economist Cédric M. Koch wrote that PiS combines "political communitarianism with neo-socialist economic views".[94]
Writing on the economic policies of Law and Justice and their character, American political scientist Template:Ill wrote:
<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />
So, since winning power for the second time in 2015, PiS has taken real efforts to tame economic liberalism. It reversed the previous government’s hiking of the retirement age, offered new drug benefits for the elderly, and has initiated a broad program for the construction of new affordable housing. It has limited employer use of insecure short-term “junk contracts,” and raised the guaranteed hourly minimum to 13 złotys (nearly $4), a significant increase upon prevailing informal standards. Its hallmark social policy has been a new child-benefit program, with a monthly payment of 500 złotys (about $140) to parents of each second and additional child under eighteen, paid for, in part, by a new surcharge tax imposed on foreign-owned banks and insurance companies. For the many hundreds of thousands of working parents earning only 2,000–2,500 złotys a month, this meant a sudden untaxed pay raise of twenty or even forty percent. Within a year, children living in extreme poverty declined by a third. Single mothers found themselves able to quit overly exploitative jobs and seek other options. [...] With such rhetoric and policies, PiS is embracing a project that really deserves the name it is impossible to apply: national socialism.[67]
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
The economic views and policies of Law and Justice derive from the Polish political party Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland (Samoobrona) led by Andrzej Lepper. Law and Justice appropriated the economic rhetoric and views of Samoobrona following its complete collapse in the 2007 Polish parliamentary election.[111] Samoobrona is an economically far-left party, much further left than parties of post-communist origin such as the social-democratic Democratic Left Alliance.[112] After Samoobrona and the far-right anti-capitalist League of Polish Families (LPR) formed a coalition with PiS in 2006 in order to prevent the neoliberal Civic Platform from coming to power, Law and Justice managed to claim the voters of both parties by "taking up economically inclusionary discourse from the originally left-wing Self-Defence and outbidding the LPR on cultural conservatism".[94]
Ever since, Law and Justice has been critical of the capitalist transformation in Poland, accusing the 1990s Polish cabinets of 'choosing the wrong path of transformation after the 1989 system change' and leading to 'beneficiaries under such capitalist conditions [having] become undeservedly privileged'.[94] Rakib Ehsan argues that PiS pursues a "brand of ‘red and blue’ politics – social-democratic economics combined with socio-cultural conservatism".[113] Similarly, Polish political scientist Marek M. Kamiński described PiS as "culturally conservative, economically social democratic".[114] Foreign Affairs remarked that the program of PiS "amounts to a very leftist (or, rather, a Catholic socialist) set of economic policies", listing policies such as increasing minimum wage, abolishing short-term job contracts, limiting self-employment contracts abused by employers to avoid benefit payments, decreasing retirement age, increasing family benefits, implementing social payments for large families, and enacting a special tax on foreign banks' assets and foreign big stores.[115]
Igor S. Putintsev wrote that "the political views of PiS are 70% right-wing and socioeconomic ones 100% left-wing", arguing that PiS pursuses a "proactive and consistent social policy", which included its 500+ state program, annulment of neoliberal pension reforms carried out under Civic Platform and reduction in retirement age. Putintsev credited PiS with constructing "a Polish model of a modern welfare state".[116] The party claims to represent the "marginalised vast majority of Poles" who had to bear the costs of capitalist transformation, and states that its main goal is to provide the "common man its fair economic share of societal resources". Law and Justice is highly critical of neoliberalism, describing it as "anti-family" and arguing that neoliberal policies are responsible for social inequality, as well as maximizing profit at the cost of the "ordinary people" and "Catholic values". The party proposes increasing social benefit payments, raising the minimum wage, increasing expenditures on child nutrition and benefits to worse-off families. It also postulates more subsidies and state control of the Polish infrastructure, and expansion of the healthcare and education system. The party also opposes privatization, stating: "We cannot deprive the state of influence and responsibility for the social order, in particular for the weakest social groups whose situation as a result of the transformation has been rapidly deteriorating."[94]
National political structures
PiS has presented a project for constitutional reform including, among others: allowing the president the right to pass laws by decree (when prompted to do so by the Cabinet), a reduction of the number of members of the Sejm and Senat, and removal of constitutional bodies overseeing the media and monetary policy. PiS advocates increased criminal penalties. It postulates aggressive anti-corruption measures (including creation of an Anti-Corruption Bureau (CBA), open disclosure of the assets of politicians and important public servants), as well as broad and various measures to smooth the working of public institutions.
PiS is a strong supporter of lustration (lustracja), a verification system created ostensibly to combat the influence of the Communist era security apparatus in Polish society. While current lustration laws require the verification of those who serve in public offices, PiS wants to expand the process to include university professors, lawyers, journalists, managers of large companies, and others performing "public functions". Those found to have collaborated with the security service, according to the party, should be forbidden to practice in their professions.
Diplomacy and defence
The party is in favour of strengthening the Polish Army through diminishing bureaucracy and raising military expenditures, especially for modernisation of army equipment. The party supports Polish membership in NATO, arguing that Poland should fulfill its military obligations and aspire to become one of the countries that shape NATO policy. In its 2001 program, the party called for maintaining compulsory military service, but shortening it as much as possible, writing: "PiS will strive to shorten the duration of compulsory military service to the extent possible, so that it is limited to the conscript training process. Universal military service should be imposed on the best conscripts, raising the level of the reserves and creating appropriate social role models. We will support the development of an attractive military training programme for students and a military class programme in secondary schools, together with an appropriate incentive system."[117]
Later the party abandoned its support of military draft - it planned to introduce a fully professional army and end conscription by 2012; in August 2008, compulsory military service was abolished in Poland. It is also in favour of participation of Poland in foreign military missions led by the United Nations, NATO and United States, in countries like Afghanistan and Iraq.[117] The party moderated its policies in the wake of its coalition with far-left Samoobrona and far-right LPR in 2006, as both parties demanded withdrawal of Polish troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, and distancing Poland from the European Union.[118]
Ever since its founding in 2001, Law and Justice had a catalogue of complex reforms in the sphere of defence and national security, which it also connected to economic matters. The party postulates a national security law that would expand the legal capabilities of special and public security services. Law and Justice proposed monitoring key industries such as energy, telecommunications, banking as well as stock exchange, including taking note of the ownership situation in these economic sectors and the main companies operating in these fields. The national security act and extensive monitoring of the economy were to provide the basis for the Polish government to safeguard economic security by partial or complete compulsory state buyouts of companies "whose operation on the market creates a direct or potential threat to national security". In this way, the party connected its anti-privatization views with its law-and-order proposals.[117]
PiS is eurosceptic,[119][120][121] although the party supports integration with the European Union on terms beneficial for Poland. It supports economic integration and tightening cooperation in areas of energy security and military operations, but is sceptical about closer political integration. It is against the formation of a European superstate or federation. PiS is in favour of a strong political and military alliance between Poland and the United States.
In the European Parliament, it is a member of the European Conservatives and Reformists, a group founded in 2009 to challenge the prevailing pro-federalist ethos of the European Parliament and address the perceived democratic deficit existing at a European level.
They have frequently expressed anti-German,[122][123][124] and anti-Russian stances.[125][126][127]
Law and Justice has taken a hardline stance against Russia in its foreign policy since the party's foundation.[128] The party vocally advocated for military aid to Ukraine during the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, but announced it would halt arms transfers in September 2023 following disagreements over the export of Ukrainian grain to Poland.[129] The party has been described as divided between pro-Ukrainian and anti-Ukrainian factions.[130]
Though the PiS government initially advocated a pro-Israel policy, relations with Israel deteriorated following the 2018 Amendment to the Act on the Institute of National Remembrance and subsequent diplomatic incidents.[131] In opposition, PiS called for the expulsion of the Israeli Ambassador following the World Central Kitchen drone strikes and criticized the 2023 Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip.[132]
The PiS government supported accession of Turkey to the European Union.[133] PiS also advocates for a strong relationship with Hungary under Viktor Orbán, though they diverged over the Russo-Ukrainian War.[134][135] Law and Justice criticised the Polish government's decision in 2008 to recognise the independence of Kosovo from Serbia.[136]
Social policies
The party's views on social issues are much more traditionalist than those of social conservative parties in other European countries,[137][138] and its social views reflect those of the Christian right.[139] PiS has been described to hold right-wing populist views.Template:Refn
Family
The party strongly promotes itself as a pro-family party and encourages married couples to have more children. Prior to 2005 elections, it promised to build three million inexpensive housing units as a way to help young couples start a family. Once in government, it passed legislation lengthening parental leaves.
In 2017, the PiS government commenced the so-called "500+" programme under which all parents residing in Poland receive an unconditional monthly payment of 500 PLN for each second and subsequent child (the 500 PLN support for the first child being linked to income). It also revived the idea of a housing programme based on state-supported construction of inexpensive housing units.
Also in 2017, the party's MPs passed a law that bans most retail trade on Sundays on the premise that workers will supposedly spend more time with their families.
Abortion
The party is anti-abortion and supports further restrictions on Poland's abortion laws which are already one of the most restrictive in Europe. PiS opposes abortion resulting from foetal defects[141] which is currently allowed until specific foetal age.
In 2016, PiS supported legislation to ban abortion under all circumstances, and investigate miscarriages. After the black Protests the legislation was withdrawn.[142]
In October 2020, the Constitutional Court ruled that one of three circumstances (foetal defects) is unconstitutional. However, many constitutionalists argue that this judgement is invalid.
The party is against euthanasia and comprehensive sex education. It has proposed a ban of in-vitro fertilisation.
Disability rights
In April 2018, the PiS government announced a PLN 23 billion (EUR 5.5 billion) programme (named "Accessibility+") aimed at reducing barriers for disabled people, to be implemented 2018–2025.[143][144]
Also in April 2018, parents of disabled adults who required long-term care protested in Sejm over what they considered inadequate state support, in particular, the reduction of support once the child turns 18.[145][146] As a result, the monthly disability benefit for adults was raised by approx. 15 per cent to PLN 1,000 (approx. EUR 240) and certain non-cash benefits were instituted, although protesters' demands of an additional monthly cash benefit were rejected.
Gay rights
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". The party opposes the LGBT movement and many of its postulates, in particular same-sex marriages and any other form of legal recognition of same-sex couples. In 2020, Poland was ranked the lowest of any European Union country for LGBT rights by ILGA-Europe.[147] The organisation also highlighted instances of anti-LGBT rhetoric and hate speech by politicians of the ruling party.[148][149] A 2019 survey by Eurobarometer found that more than two-thirds of LGBT people in Poland believe that prejudice against them has risen in the last five years.[150]
On 21 September 2005, PiS leader Jarosław Kaczyński said that "homosexuals should not be isolated, however they should not be school teachers for example. Active homosexuals surely not, in any case", but that homosexuals "should not be discriminated otherwise".[151] He has also stated, "The affirmation of homosexuality will lead to the downfall of civilization. We can't agree to it".[152] Lech Kaczyński, while mayor of Warsaw, refused authorisation for a gay pride march; declaring that it would be obscene and offensive to other people's religious beliefs.[153] He stated, "I am not willing to meet perverts."[154] In Bączkowski and Others v. Poland, the European Court of Human Rights unanimously ruled that the ban of the parade violated Articles 11, 13 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The judgement stated that "The positive obligation of a State to secure genuine and effective respect for freedom of association and assembly was of particular importance to those with unpopular views or belonging to minorities".[155]
In 2016, Beata Szydło's government disbanded the Council for the Prevention of Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Intolerance, an advisory body set up in 2011 by then-Prime Minister Donald Tusk. The council monitored, advised and coordinated government action against racism, discrimination and hate crime.[156][157]
Many local towns, cities,[158][159] and Voivodeship sejmiks[160] comprising a third of Poland's territory have declared their respective regions as LGBT-free zones with the encouragement of the ruling PiS.[161][158] Polish President Andrzej Duda, who was the Law and Justice party's candidate for presidency in 2015 and 2020, stated that "LGBT is not people, it's an ideology which is worse than Communism."[162][163] During his successful 2020 election campaign, he pledged he would ban teaching about LGBT issues in schools;[164] he also proposed changing the constitution to ban LGBT couples from adopting children.[165]
Nationalism
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Academic research has characterised Law and Justice as a partially nationalist party,Template:Refn but PiS's leadership rejects this label.Template:Efn Both Kaczyńskis look up for inspirations to the pre-war Sanacja movement with its leader Józef Piłsudski, in contrast to the nationalist Endecja that was led by Piłsudski's political archrival, Roman Dmowski.[166] However, parts of the party, especially the faction around Radio Maryja, are inspired by Dmowski's movement.[167] Polish far-right organisations and parties such as National Revival of Poland, National Movement and Autonomous Nationalists regularly criticise PiS's relative ideological moderation and its politicians for "monopolizing" official political scene by playing on the popular patriotic and religious feelings.[168][169][170] However, the party does include several overtly nationalist politicians in senior positions, such as Digital Affairs Minister Adam Andruszkiewicz, the former leader of the All-Polish Youth;[171] and deputy PiS leader and former Defence Minister Antoni Macierewicz, the founder of the National-Catholic Movement.[172] It has been also described as national-conservative.[173][174][175]
Refugees and economic migrants
PiS opposed the quota system for mass relocation of immigrants proposed by the European Commission to address the 2015 European migrant crisis. This contrasted with the stance of their main political opponents, the Civic Platform, which have signed up to the commission's proposal.[176] Consequently, in the campaign leading to the 2015 Polish parliamentary election, PiS adopted the discourse typical of the populist-right, linking national security with immigration.[177] Following the election, PiS sometimes utilised Islamophobic rhetoric to rally its supporters.[178]
Examples of anti-migration and anti-Islam comments by PiS politicians when discussing the European migrant crisis:[179] in 2015, Jarosław Kaczyński stated that Poland can not accept any refugees because "they could spread infectious diseases."[180] In 2017, the first Deputy Minister of Justice Patryk Jaki stated that "stopping Islamization is his Westerplatte".[181] In 2017, Interior minister of Poland Mariusz Błaszczak stated that he would like to be called "Charles the Hammer who stopped the Muslim invasion of Europe in the 8th century". In 2017, Deputy Speaker of the Sejm Joachim Brudziński stated during the pro-party rally in Siedlce; "if not for us (PiS), they (Muslims) would have built mosques in here (Poland)."[182]
Structure
Internal factions
Law and Justice is divided into many internal factions, but they can be grouped into three main blocs.Template:Refn
The most influential group within PiS is unofficially named "Order of the Centre Agreement". It is led by leader is Jarosław Kaczyński, and its main members are Joachim Brudziński, Adam Lipiński and Mariusz Błaszczak.
The second major group is a radical, religious and hard Eurosceptic right-wing faction focused around Antoni Macierewicz, Beata Szydło that has close views to United Poland party of Zbigniew Ziobro. This faction opts for radical reforms and is supported by Jacek Kurski and Tadeusz Rydzyk.
The third major group is a Christian-democratic, republican and moderate social conservative faction focused around Mateusz Morawiecki, Łukasz Szumowski, Jacek Czaputowicz that has close views to The Republicans party of Adam Bielan. Although not officially a party member, Polish president Andrzej Duda can also be placed in this faction.
Political committee
President:
Vice-presidents:
- Mariusz Błaszczak
- Joachim Brudziński
- Mariusz Kamiński
- Antoni Macierewicz
- Mateusz Morawiecki
- Beata Szydło
Treasurer:
- Henryk Kowalczyk
Spokesperson:
Party discipline spokesman:
Chairman of the Executive Committee:
President of the Parliamentary Club:
Leadership
| No. | Image | Name | Tenure |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | File:Lech Kaczyński.jpg | Lech Kaczyński | 13 June 2001 – 18 January 2003 |
| 2. | File:Jarosław Kaczyński Sejm 2016a (cropped).JPG | Jarosław Kaczyński | 18 January 2003 Incumbent |
Election results
Presidential
| Election year | Candidate | 1st round | 2nd round | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # of overall votes | % of overall vote | # of overall votes | % of overall vote | ||
| 2005 | Lech Kaczyński | 4,947,927 | 33.1 (#2) | 8,257,468 | 54.0 (#1) |
| 2010 | Jarosław Kaczyński | 6,128,255 | 36.5 (#2) | 7,919,134 | 47.0 (#2) |
| 2015 | Andrzej Duda | 5,179,092 | 34.8 (#1) | 8,719,281 | 51.5 (#1) |
| 2020 | Supported Andrzej Duda | 8,450,513 | 43.5 (#1) | 10,440,648 | 51.0% (#1) |
| 2025 | Supporting Karol Nawrocki | 5,790,804 | 29.5 (#2) | 10,606,877 | 50.9 (#1) |
Sejm
| Election | Leader | Votes | % | Seats | +/– | Government |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | Lech Kaczyński | 1,236,787 | 9.5 (#4) | Template:Composition bar | New | SLD–UP–PSL (2001-2003) |
| SLD–UP Minority (2003-2004) | ||||||
| SLD-UP-SDPL Minority (2004-2005) | ||||||
| 2005 | Jarosław Kaczyński | 3,185,714 | 27.0 (#1) | Template:Composition bar | Increase 111 | PiS Minority (2005-2006) |
| PiS–SRP–LPR (2006-2007) | ||||||
| PiS Minority (2007) | ||||||
| 2007 | 5,183,477 | 32.1 (#2) | Template:Composition bar | Increase 11 | PO–PSL | |
| 2011 | 4,295,016 | 29.9 (#2) | Template:Composition bar | Decrease 9 | PO–PSL | |
| 2015 | 5,711,687 | 37.6 (#1) | Template:Composition bar | Increase 36 | PiS | |
| As a part of the United Right coalition, which won 235 seats in total.[183] | ||||||
| 2019 | 8,051,935 | 43.6 (#1) | Template:Composition bar | Decrease 6 | PiS | |
| As a part of the United Right coalition, which won 235 seats in total. | ||||||
| 2023 | 7,640,854 | 35.4 (#1) | Template:Composition bar | Decrease 26 | PiS Minority (2023) | |
| KO–PL2050–KP–NL (2023-present) | ||||||
| As a part of the United Right coalition, which won 194 seats in total. | ||||||
Senate
| Election | Seats | +/– | Majority |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | Template:Composition bar | New | Opposition |
| As part of the Senate 2001 coalition, which won 15 seats. | |||
| 2005 | Template:Composition bar | Increase 49 | PiS Minority (2005-2006) |
| Coalition (2006-2007) | |||
| PiS Minority (2007) | |||
| 2007 | Template:Composition bar | Decrease 10 | Opposition |
| 2011 | Template:Composition bar | Decrease 8 | Opposition |
| 2015 | Template:Composition bar | Increase 30 | PiS |
| 2019 | Template:Composition bar | Decrease 23 | Opposition |
| As part of the United Right coalition, which won 48 seats. | |||
| 2023 | Template:Composition bar | Decrease 9 | Opposition |
| As part of the United Right coalition, which won 34 seats. | |||
European Parliament
| Election | Leader | Votes | % | Seats | +/– | EP Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | Jarosław Kaczyński | 771,858 | 12.67 (#3) | Template:Composition bar | New | UEN |
| 2009 | 2,017,607 | 27.40 (#2) | Template:Composition bar | Increase 8 | ECR | |
| 2014 | 2,246,870 | 31.78 (#2) | Template:Composition bar | Steady 0 | ECR | |
| 2019 | 6,192,780 | 45.38 (#1) | Template:Composition bar | Increase 6 | ECR | |
| As part of the United Right coalition, that won 27 seats in total. | ||||||
| 2024 | 4,253,169 | 36.16 (#2) | Template:Composition bar | Decrease 3 | ECR | |
| As part of the United Right coalition, that won 20 seats in total. | ||||||
*Currently 16: Zdzisław Krasnodębski is elected from the PiS register, but not a member of the party, Mirosław Piotrowski left PiS (08.10.2014), Marek Jurek is a member of Right Wing of the Republic.
Regional assemblies
| Election year | % of vote |
# of overall seats won |
+/– |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 12.1 (#4) | Template:Composition bar | New |
| In coalition with Civic Platform as POPiS. | |||
| 2006 | 25.1 (#2) | Template:Composition bar | Increase 91 |
| 2010 | 23.1 (#2) | Template:Composition bar | Decrease 29 |
| 2014 | 26.9 (#1) | Template:Composition bar | Increase 30 |
| 2018 | 34.1 (#1) | Template:Composition bar | Increase 83 |
| 2024 | 34.3 (#1) | Template:Composition bar | Decrease 15 |
County councils
| Election year | % of vote |
# of overall seats won |
+/– |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 12.1 (#4) | Template:Composition bar | New |
| In coalition with Civic Platform as POPiS. | |||
| 2006 | 19.8 (#1) | Template:Composition bar | Increase 1194 |
| 2010 | 17.3 (#2) | Template:Composition bar | Decrease 157 |
| 2014 | 23.5 (#1) | Template:Composition bar | Increase 429 |
| 2018 | 30.5 (#1) | Template:Composition bar | Increase 600 |
| 2024 | 30.0 (#1) | Template:Composition bar | Decrease 34 |
Mayors
| Election | No. | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 2 | New |
| 2006 | 77 | Increase 75 |
| 2010 | 37 | Decrease 40 |
| 2014 | 124 | Increase 87 |
| 2018 | 234 | Increase 110 |
| 2024 | 105 | Decrease 129 |
Presidents of the Republic of Poland
| Name | Image | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lech Kaczyński | File:Lech Kaczyński.jpg | 23 December 2005 | 10 April 2010 |
| Andrzej Duda | File:Andrzej Duda portret.JPG | 6 August 2015 | incumbent |
Prime Ministers of the Republic of Poland
| Name | Image | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz | File:Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz 2005.jpg | 31 October 2005 | 14 July 2006 |
| Jarosław Kaczyński | File:Jarosław Kaczyński (5) (cropped 2).jpg | 14 July 2006 | 16 November 2007 |
| Beata Szydło | File:Beata Szydło - Tallinn Digital Summit 2017 (cropped 3).jpg | 16 November 2015 | 11 December 2017 |
| Mateusz Morawiecki | File:Mateusz Morawiecki Prezes Rady Ministrów (cropped).jpg | 11 December 2017 | 13 December 2023 |
Voivodeship Marshals
| Name | Image | Voivodeship | Date vocation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jarosław Stawiarski | File:J. Stawiarski.jpg | Lublin Voivodeship | 21 November 2018 |
| Template:Ill | File:Władysław Ortyl Kancelaria Senatu.jpg | Podkarpackie Voivodeship | 27 May 2013 |
| Łukasz Smółka | File:Łukasz Smółka (cropped).jpg | Lesser Poland Voivodeship | 4 July 2024 |
| Renata Janik | File:Renata Janik.jpg | Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship | 6 May 2024 |
See also
Script error: No such module "Portal". Template:Div col
- 2010 Polish Air Force Tu-154 crash
- List of Law and Justice politicians
- Polish constitutional crisis, 2015
- Polish nationalism
Explanatory notes
Citations
General references
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
External links
Template:Polish political parties Template:European Conservatives and Reformists Party Template:Authority control
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c d e f g Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".; Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".; Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Template:Cite tweet
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Law and Justice breakaway politicians form new 'association', thenews.pl
- ↑ Conservatives' EU alliance in turmoil as Michał Kamiński leaves 'far right' party, The Guardian, 22 November 2010
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Myant et al. (2008), p. 3
- ↑ a b c d Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Frank Jacobs, "Zombie Borders", The New York Times Opinionator blog, 12 December 2011
- ↑ Jungerstam-Mulders (2006), p. 104
- ↑ Jungerstam-Mulders (2006), p. 103
- ↑ a b c d Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Myant et al. (2008), pp. 67–68
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Myant et al. (2008), p. 88
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Maier et al. (2006), p. 374
- ↑ Jungerstam-Mulders (2006), p. 100
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Template:Bulleted list
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Template:Cite thesis
- ↑ a b c d e Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Template:Bulleted list
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c Template:Cite thesis
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Why is Poland's government worrying the EU? The Economist. Published 12 January 2016. Retrieved 22 July 2017.
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION OF LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, TRANS, AND INTERSEX PEOPLE IN POLAND COVERING THE PERIOD OF JANUARY TO DECEMBER 2019 ILGA-Europe
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
- ↑ "Poland: LGBT rights under attack". Amnesty International. Retrieved on 19 July 2009.
- ↑ "Poland: Official Homophobia Threatens Basic Freedoms". Human Rights Watch. 4 June 2006.
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Polish towns advocate ‘LGBT-free’ zones while the ruling party cheers them on, Washington Post, 21 July 2019
- ↑ Why 'LGBT-free zones' are on the rise in Poland, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, 27 July 2019
- ↑ Polish ruling party whips up LGBTQ hatred ahead of elections amid 'gay-free' zones and Pride march attacks, Telegraph, 9 August 2019
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ The Everyday Politics of Migration Crisis in Poland: Between Nationalism, Fear and Emphathy, Palgrave Macmillan, Krzysztof Jaskulowski, 2019, pages 38–45
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Pages with script errors
- Pages with broken file links
- Law and Justice
- Christian political parties in Poland
- Conservative parties in Poland
- Euroscepticism in Poland
- National conservative parties
- Organizations that oppose LGBTQ rights in Poland
- Political parties in Poland
- Right-wing parties in Europe
- Right-wing populist parties
- Socially conservative parties
- Opposition to same-sex marriage in Europe