Inverse Laplace transform: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
The function is f or F, not f(s) or F(t)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Mathematical function}}
{{Short description|Mathematical function}}


In [[mathematics]], the '''inverse Laplace transform''' of a [[function (mathematics)|function]] <math>F(s)</math> is a [[real number|real]] function <math>f(t)</math> that is  piecewise-[[continuous function|continuous]], exponentially-restricted (that is, <math>|f(t)|\leq Me^{\alpha t}</math> <math>\forall t \geq 0</math> for some constants <math>M > 0</math> and <math>\alpha \in \mathbb{R}</math>) and  has the property:
In [[mathematics]], the '''inverse Laplace transform''' of a [[function (mathematics)|function]] <math>F</math> is a [[real number|real]] function <math>f</math> that is  piecewise-[[continuous function|continuous]], exponentially-restricted (that is, <math>|f(t)|\leq Me^{\alpha t}</math> <math>\forall t \geq 0</math> for some constants <math>M > 0</math> and <math>\alpha \in \mathbb{R}</math>) and  has the property:


:<math>\mathcal{L}\{f\}(s) = \mathcal{L}\{f(t)\}(s) = F(s),</math>
:<math>\mathcal{L}\{f\}(s) = F(s),</math>
where <math>\mathcal{L}</math> denotes the [[Laplace transform]].
where <math>\mathcal{L}</math> denotes the [[Laplace transform]].


It can be proven that, if a function <math>F(s)</math> has the inverse Laplace transform <math>f(t)</math>, then <math>f(t)</math> is uniquely determined (considering functions which differ from each other only on a point set having [[Lebesgue measure]] zero as the same). This result was first proven by [[Mathias Lerch]] in 1903 and is known as Lerch's theorem.<ref>{{Cite book | doi = 10.1007/978-0-387-68855-8_2| chapter = Inversion Formulae and Practical Results| title = Numerical Methods for Laplace Transform Inversion| volume = 5| pages = 23–44| series = Numerical Methods and Algorithms| year = 2007| last1 = Cohen | first1 = A. M. | isbn = 978-0-387-28261-9}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1007/BF02421315| title = Sur un point de la théorie des fonctions génératrices d'Abel| journal = Acta Mathematica| volume = 27| pages = 339–351| year = 1903| last1 = Lerch | first1 = M. | author-link1 = Mathias Lerch| doi-access = free| hdl = 10338.dmlcz/501554| hdl-access = free}}</ref>
It can be proven that, if a function <math>F</math> has the inverse Laplace transform <math>f</math>, then <math>f</math> is uniquely determined (considering functions which differ from each other only on a point set having [[Lebesgue measure]] zero as the same). This result was first proven by [[Mathias Lerch]] in 1903 and is known as Lerch's theorem.<ref>{{Cite book | doi = 10.1007/978-0-387-68855-8_2| chapter = Inversion Formulae and Practical Results| title = Numerical Methods for Laplace Transform Inversion| volume = 5| pages = 23–44| series = Numerical Methods and Algorithms| year = 2007| last1 = Cohen | first1 = A. M. | isbn = 978-0-387-28261-9}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1007/BF02421315| title = Sur un point de la théorie des fonctions génératrices d'Abel| journal = Acta Mathematica| volume = 27| pages = 339–351| year = 1903| last1 = Lerch | first1 = M. | author-link1 = Mathias Lerch| doi-access = free| hdl = 10338.dmlcz/501554| hdl-access = free}}</ref>


The [[Laplace transform]] and the inverse Laplace transform together have a number of properties that make them useful for analysing [[linear dynamical system]]s.
The [[Laplace transform]] and the inverse Laplace transform together have a number of properties that make them useful for analysing [[linear dynamical system]]s.
Line 13: Line 13:
An integral formula for the inverse [[Laplace transform]], called the ''Mellin's inverse formula'', the ''[[Thomas John I'Anson Bromwich|Bromwich]] integral'', or the ''[[Joseph Fourier|Fourier]]–[[Hjalmar Mellin|Mellin]] integral'', is given by the [[line integral]]:
An integral formula for the inverse [[Laplace transform]], called the ''Mellin's inverse formula'', the ''[[Thomas John I'Anson Bromwich|Bromwich]] integral'', or the ''[[Joseph Fourier|Fourier]]–[[Hjalmar Mellin|Mellin]] integral'', is given by the [[line integral]]:
:<math>f(t) = \mathcal{L}^{-1} \{F(s)\}(t) =  \frac{1}{2\pi i}\lim_{T\to\infty}\int_{\gamma-iT}^{\gamma+iT}e^{st}F(s)\,ds</math>
:<math>f(t) = \mathcal{L}^{-1} \{F(s)\}(t) =  \frac{1}{2\pi i}\lim_{T\to\infty}\int_{\gamma-iT}^{\gamma+iT}e^{st}F(s)\,ds</math>
where the integration is done along the vertical line <math>\textrm{Re}(s) = \gamma</math> in the [[complex plane]] such that <math>\gamma</math> is greater than the real part of all [[Mathematical singularity|singularities]] of <math>F(s)</math> and <math>F(s)</math> is bounded on the line, for example if the contour path is in the [[region of convergence]]. If all singularities are in the left half-plane, or <math>F(s)</math> is an [[entire function]], then <math>\gamma</math> can be set to zero and the above inverse integral formula becomes identical to the [[inverse Fourier transform]].
where the integration is done along the vertical line <math>\textrm{Re}(s) = \gamma</math> in the [[complex plane]] such that <math>\gamma</math> is greater than the real part of all [[Mathematical singularity|singularities]] of <math>F</math> and <math>F</math> is bounded on the line, for example if the contour path is in the [[region of convergence]]. If all singularities are in the left half-plane, or <math>F</math> is an [[entire function]], then <math>\gamma</math> can be set to zero and the above inverse integral formula becomes identical to the [[inverse Fourier transform]].


In practice, computing the complex integral can be done by using the [[Cauchy residue theorem]].
In practice, computing the complex integral can be done by using the [[Cauchy residue theorem]].
Line 20: Line 20:
'''Post's inversion formula''' for [[Laplace transform]]s, named after [[Emil Leon Post|Emil Post]],<ref name="Post1930">{{cite journal|last1=Post|first1=Emil L.|title=Generalized differentiation|journal=Transactions of the American Mathematical Society|volume=32|issue=4|year=1930|pages=723–781|issn=0002-9947|doi=10.1090/S0002-9947-1930-1501560-X|doi-access=free}}</ref> is a simple-looking but usually impractical formula for evaluating an inverse Laplace transform.
'''Post's inversion formula''' for [[Laplace transform]]s, named after [[Emil Leon Post|Emil Post]],<ref name="Post1930">{{cite journal|last1=Post|first1=Emil L.|title=Generalized differentiation|journal=Transactions of the American Mathematical Society|volume=32|issue=4|year=1930|pages=723–781|issn=0002-9947|doi=10.1090/S0002-9947-1930-1501560-X|doi-access=free}}</ref> is a simple-looking but usually impractical formula for evaluating an inverse Laplace transform.


The statement of the formula is as follows: Let <math>f(t)</math> be a continuous function on the interval <math>[0,\infty)</math> of exponential order, i.e.
The statement of the formula is as follows: Let <math>f</math> be a continuous function on the interval <math>[0,\infty)</math> of exponential order, i.e.


: <math>\sup_{t>0} \frac{f(t)}{e^{bt}} < \infty</math>
: <math>\sup_{t>0} \frac{f(t)}{e^{bt}} < \infty</math>


for some real number <math>b</math>. Then for all <math>s > b</math>, the Laplace transform for <math>f(t)</math> exists and is infinitely differentiable with respect to <math>s</math>. Furthermore, if <math>F(s)</math> is the Laplace transform of <math>f(t)</math>, then the inverse Laplace transform of <math>F(s)</math> is given by
for some real number <math>b</math>. Then for all <math>s > b</math>, the Laplace transform for <math>f</math> exists and is infinitely differentiable with respect to <math>s</math>. Furthermore, if <math>F</math> is the Laplace transform of <math>f</math>, then the inverse Laplace transform of <math>F</math> is given by


: <math>f(t) = \mathcal{L}^{-1} \{F\}(t)
: <math>f(t) = \mathcal{L}^{-1} \{F\}(t)
Line 35: Line 35:
With the advent of powerful personal computers, the main efforts to use this formula have come from dealing with approximations or asymptotic analysis of the Inverse Laplace transform, using the [[Grunwald–Letnikov differintegral]] to evaluate the derivatives.   
With the advent of powerful personal computers, the main efforts to use this formula have come from dealing with approximations or asymptotic analysis of the Inverse Laplace transform, using the [[Grunwald–Letnikov differintegral]] to evaluate the derivatives.   
      
      
Post's inversion has attracted interest due to the improvement in computational science and the fact that it is not necessary to know where the [[Pole (complex analysis)|poles]] of <math>F(s)</math> lie, which make it possible to calculate the asymptotic behaviour for big <math>x</math> using inverse [[Mellin transform]]s for several arithmetical functions related to the [[Riemann hypothesis]].
Post's inversion has attracted interest due to the improvement in computational science and the fact that it is not necessary to know where the [[Pole (complex analysis)|poles]] of <math>F</math> lie, which make it possible to calculate the asymptotic behaviour for big <math>x</math> using inverse [[Mellin transform]]s for several arithmetical functions related to the [[Riemann hypothesis]].


==Software tools==
==Software tools==

Latest revision as of 13:27, 30 June 2025

Template:Short description

In mathematics, the inverse Laplace transform of a function F is a real function f that is piecewise-continuous, exponentially-restricted (that is, |f(t)|Meαt t0 for some constants M>0 and α) and has the property:

{f}(s)=F(s),

where denotes the Laplace transform.

It can be proven that, if a function F has the inverse Laplace transform f, then f is uniquely determined (considering functions which differ from each other only on a point set having Lebesgue measure zero as the same). This result was first proven by Mathias Lerch in 1903 and is known as Lerch's theorem.[1][2]

The Laplace transform and the inverse Laplace transform together have a number of properties that make them useful for analysing linear dynamical systems.

Mellin's inverse formula

An integral formula for the inverse Laplace transform, called the Mellin's inverse formula, the Bromwich integral, or the FourierMellin integral, is given by the line integral:

f(t)=1{F(s)}(t)=12πilimTγiTγ+iTestF(s)ds

where the integration is done along the vertical line Re(s)=γ in the complex plane such that γ is greater than the real part of all singularities of F and F is bounded on the line, for example if the contour path is in the region of convergence. If all singularities are in the left half-plane, or F is an entire function, then γ can be set to zero and the above inverse integral formula becomes identical to the inverse Fourier transform.

In practice, computing the complex integral can be done by using the Cauchy residue theorem.

Post's inversion formula

Post's inversion formula for Laplace transforms, named after Emil Post,[3] is a simple-looking but usually impractical formula for evaluating an inverse Laplace transform.

The statement of the formula is as follows: Let f be a continuous function on the interval [0,) of exponential order, i.e.

supt>0f(t)ebt<

for some real number b. Then for all s>b, the Laplace transform for f exists and is infinitely differentiable with respect to s. Furthermore, if F is the Laplace transform of f, then the inverse Laplace transform of F is given by

f(t)=1{F}(t)=limk(1)kk!(kt)k+1F(k)(kt)

for t>0, where F(k) is the k-th derivative of F with respect to s.

As can be seen from the formula, the need to evaluate derivatives of arbitrarily high orders renders this formula impractical for most purposes.

With the advent of powerful personal computers, the main efforts to use this formula have come from dealing with approximations or asymptotic analysis of the Inverse Laplace transform, using the Grunwald–Letnikov differintegral to evaluate the derivatives.

Post's inversion has attracted interest due to the improvement in computational science and the fact that it is not necessary to know where the poles of F lie, which make it possible to calculate the asymptotic behaviour for big x using inverse Mellin transforms for several arithmetical functions related to the Riemann hypothesis.

Software tools

See also

References

Template:Reflist

Further reading

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". (p. 662 or search Index for "Bromwich Integral", a nice explanation showing the connection to the Fourier transform)
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Elementary inversion of the Laplace transform. Bryan, Kurt. Accessed June 14, 2006.

External links

This article incorporates material from Mellin's inverse formula on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".