Ring (mathematics): Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Template:FlatlistExternal tools:

Template:Endflatlist


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

18 November 2025

16 June 2025

29 May 2025

  • curprev 11:0611:06, 29 May 2025 imported>Quondum 101,487 bytes +101,487 Undid revision by Goodphy – the lack of a requirement for some property is not a property, and that wording had the implication that invertibility is a property of the integers. If you really feel that the lack of the invertibility requirement must be stated in the lead (to be clear, I do not: the integers are clearly not invertible), say it in a way that makes sense.