imported>Jonesey95: Fix Linter errors.

2024-02-15T16:01:30Z

Fix Linter errors.

New page

===[[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Tessellated Pavement Sunrise Landscape.jpg|Tessellated Pavement Sunrise]]===

[[Image:Tessellated Pavement Sunrise Landscape.jpg|thumb|250px|'''Original''' - Sunrise on the tessellated pavement at Eaglehawk Neck, Tasmania]]
;Reason:Its pretty, but good enc as well, the wide perspective gives both close-up detail and a wider view of the scene and helps to display the structure of the concave pans. I tried to stitch a panorama, but parallax caused problems with the stitching and the geometry of the rock was distorted with anything but a rectilinear projection.
;Articles this image appears in:[[Tessellated Pavement]], [[Eaglehawk Neck]], [[Tasmania]] (replaced an existing image of the same thing)
;Creator:[[User:Noodle snacks|Noodle snacks]]

* '''Support as nominator''' --[[User:Noodle snacks|Noodle snacks]] ([[User talk:Noodle snacks|talk]]) 13:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
* '''Strong Support''' A really good image of an interesting rock formation.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 14:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
*'''Strong Support''' Fascinating subject and the image portrays it perfectly. ~ '''[[User:Wadester16|ωαdεstεr16]]'''[[User talk:Wadester16|«talk]][[Special:Contributions/Wadester16|stalk»]] 06:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
**Updated to strong support per Durova. It really is outstanding. ~ '''[[User:Wadester16|ωαdεstεr16]]'''[[User talk:Wadester16|«talk]][[Special:Contributions/Wadester16|stalk»]] 23:43, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
*'''Strong support''' excellent illustration of an encyclopedic subject. Also high esthetic merit. You outdid yourself, Noodle snacks. :) [[User:Durova|Durova]]''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]'' 06:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' While pretty I think the angle in [[:File:Tessellated Pavement post Sunrise.jpg|this shot]] works much better for EV as it's hard to get an idea of the scale of the pavement from this image --[[User:Fir0002|Fir0002]] 09:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
**The closer foreground allows both detail and a wider view to be simultaneously seen, where as the view from the lookout only really gives an overview of what is going on. The alternate also misrepresents the scale, there are too many trees around the lookout to get a high up shot of the lot (the pavement extends along the shore a fair way). Furthermore, the tessellated pavement article is really about the geological feature ("Tessellated pavement is a rare erosional feature formed in...", "The pan formation is a series of concave depressions in the rock, and typically..."), only a passing mention is given to this place specifically. You could also argue that the EV is better in this image for Eaglehawk Neck as the sides of Pirate's bay are shown if you really wanted to. [[User:Noodle snacks|Noodle snacks]] ([[User talk:Noodle snacks|talk]]) 05:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
*'''Support''' Pretty picture and high EV. --[[User:Jf268|Jf268]] ([[User talk:Jf268|talk]]) 10:45, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
*'''Support''' I'm going to have to disagree with Fir0002 (hi!) on this one. I had a look at [[Tessellated pavement]] and tried to imagine each of these images being the lead photo. I think this one works better. He may be right that "it's hard to get an idea of the scale", but for this geological feature, I think detail is more important than scale. It's not like Uluru or something. Btw, how come I've never heard of this, I must have driven past it :( [[User Talk:Stevage|Stevage]] 21:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
*'''Weak, Weak Oppose.''' Though of good quality, I have to agree a bit with Fir. I don't get a size indication with this image like I do with [[:File:Tessellated Pavement post Sunrise.jpg]], and I think that image also shows how large the pavement actually is. '''[[User:Spencer|Spencer]]'''[[User talk:Spencer|T♦]][[Special:Contributions/Spencer|C]] 00:27, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' given the light conditions, I think information regarding colour and - to a lesser extent - texture is missing which could add value to the image. I also agree that a different image could better show the scale of the feature. [[User:Guest9999|Guest9999]] ([[User talk:Guest9999|talk]]) 14:57, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
*'''Support''' - been there a few times and taken quite a few photos. While the angle Fir0002 points out gives a better plan view it does not, from the point of view of a person who's stood on it, give a better feeling of scale. What Noodle's picture does is make me go WOW, want to fly back, see it again and know more about how the thing came about. It gives me enough of a scale feeling and does it for me - [[User:Peripitus |Peripitus]] [[User talk:Peripitus|(Talk)]] 21:37, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' I've changed my vote to strong support and I will support the other image too, if it is used in an article. This place is so interesting and so unusual that I see no problem, if two images are promoted. Thank you.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 16:40, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' No sense of scale. Distracting lighting. [[User:Makeemlighter|Makeemlighter]] ([[User talk:Makeemlighter|talk]]) 07:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
*'''Support:''' Ditto what [[User:Noodle snacks|Noodle snacks]] said in response to [[User:Fir0002|Fir0002]]. This image features detail of the actual nature of the rock formation; not ''this'' rock formation, in Tasmania, but this type of rock formation. I think that's invaluable; it's fascinating to look at. Plus, it has that crucial click-able pretty factor. [[User:Maedin|Maedin]]\[[User_talk:Maedin|talk]] 18:34, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
*'''Support.''' Have been there and photographed this place myself. Sure there are interesting features that this picture doesn't capture (like the 'loaf' formations which if anything I find more interesting), but not every picture has to capture every feature of a place, and to me this shows enough and serves to draw the reader in. --[[User:Jjron|jjron]] ([[User talk:Jjron|talk]]) 14:02, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

{{FPCresult|Promoted|File:Tessellated Pavement Sunrise Landscape.jpg}} [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 02:30, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
{{-}}

<noinclude>[[Category:Featured picture nominations]] [[Category:Featured picture nominations/January 2009]]</noinclude>

Wiki143:Featured picture candidates/File:Tessellated Pavement Sunrise Landscape.jpg - Revision history

imported>Jonesey95: Fix Linter errors.