http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=User%3ATardis%2FRecursion_commentUser:Tardis/Recursion comment - Revision history2026-05-06T05:03:07ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.43.1http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?title=User:Tardis/Recursion_comment&diff=1347408&oldid=previmported>Mgreenbe: /* Recursion unimportant? */ move my comment to talk page; your template/comment is very confusing2006-01-23T13:47:00Z<p><span class="autocomment">Recursion unimportant?: </span> move my comment to talk page; your template/comment is very confusing</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>== Recursion unimportant? ==<br />
<br />
[[Infinite recursion]] redirects to [[infinite loop]]. A combined discussion might be useful, but there isn't anything about recursion there at all. Similarly, [[stack overflow]] (the result of infinite recursion!) redirects to [[buffer overflow]], which is unreleated (although buffers that overflow onto the stack could be called a stack overflow, that's not the only kind of stack overflow). Is there some reason that there's no discussion of the subject at any of the expected places? Is infinite recursion considered insufficiently notable when divorced from other problems? --[[User:Tardis|Tardis]] 01:09, 4 May 2005 (UTC)</div>imported>Mgreenbe