http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AMitsubishi_F-2Talk:Mitsubishi F-2 - Revision history2026-06-02T02:54:46ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.43.1http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?title=Talk:Mitsubishi_F-2&diff=932196&oldid=previmported>AydanL: /* F-2A super kai */ new section2025-05-14T12:22:05Z<p><span class="autocomment">F-2A super kai: </span> new section</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{talk header}}<br />
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|<br />
{{WikiProject Japan|importance= Mid|milhist=y}}<br />
{{WikiProject Military history|class= C<br />
|B-Class-1= no <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --><br />
|B-Class-2= yes <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --><br />
|B-Class-3= yes <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --><br />
|B-Class-4= yes <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --><br />
|B-Class-5= yes <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --><br />
|Aviation=yes |Weaponry=yes |Japanese=yes }}<br />
{{WikiProject Aviation|B-Class-1= no <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --><br />
|B-Class-2= yes <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --><br />
|B-Class-3= yes <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --><br />
|B-Class-4= yes <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --><br />
|B-Class-5= yes <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --><br />
|Aircraft=yes}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
== F-2A super kai ==<br />
<br />
The article lacks any kind of reliable information on the Super Kai variant (which was abandonned) and some info on it is plainly wrong: it's claimed to be based on the Block 60 (which seems true from what I've found) but is also claimed to be based on the "F-16C Block 60" which isn't a thing as the F-16C was upgraded from the block 50/52 to the block 70/72, and the block 60 is a block designed specifically for the F-16E/F. [[User:AydanL|AydanL]] ([[User talk:AydanL|talk]]) 12:22, 14 May 2025 (UTC)</div>imported>AydanL