<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AGraphics_program</id>
	<title>Talk:Graphics program - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AGraphics_program"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?title=Talk:Graphics_program&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-13T00:29:08Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?title=Talk:Graphics_program&amp;diff=1714451&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>imported&gt;Maylett: Vector vs. Raster?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?title=Talk:Graphics_program&amp;diff=1714451&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2005-08-07T19:34:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vector vs. Raster?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Just a thought: This article seems written from the perspective of a techie. Instead of categorizing incomplete lists of graphics apps according to their technical underpinnings of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;raster&amp;#039;&amp;#039; or &amp;#039;&amp;#039;vector,&amp;#039;&amp;#039; it might be more useful to mention broad categories of graphics tools and how they&amp;#039;re used; for instance, illustration, page layout, painting, 3D, animation, CAD, motion, GIS, interactive, Web design, special effects, photo/image processing, etc. Besides, many current generation graphics apps blur the distinction between vector and raster by incorporating elements of both (or, for that matter, neither). I certainly wouldn&amp;#039;t eliminate an explanation of the differences between raster- and vector-based apps, because it &amp;#039;&amp;#039;is&amp;#039;&amp;#039; important, but maybe it shouldn&amp;#039;t constitute the undepinnings of the article. I hesitate, however, to make these kinds of basic changes to an article that&amp;#039;s had so many contributors without first asking opinions. [[User:Maylett|Maylett]] 19:34, 7 August 2005 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>imported&gt;Maylett</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>