http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AFlash_mob_computingTalk:Flash mob computing - Revision history2026-05-11T00:23:35ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.43.1http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?title=Talk:Flash_mob_computing&diff=859845&oldid=previmported>Qwerfjkl (bot): Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)2024-02-02T09:22:35Z<p>Implementing <a href="/wiki143/index.php?title=WP:PIQA&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="WP:PIQA (page does not exist)">WP:PIQA</a> (<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bots/Requests_for_approval/Qwerfjkl_(bot)_26" class="extiw" title="wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Qwerfjkl (bot) 26">Task 26</a>)</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|<br />
{{WikiProject California|importance=low}}<br />
{{WikiProject Computing|auto=inherit}}<br />
}}<br />
FlashMob is technically incorrect English. For an encyclopedia entry I think "flash mob computing" is the general descriptive term. "FlashMob" is more like a brand name or token, it would be used to describe a product or event, such as "FlashMob I", while "flash mob computer" would describe it in general.[[User:Stbalbach|Stbalbach]] 22:47, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I think that the name FlashMob describes the event example "Lets set up a FlashMob" in turn they are setting up a FlashMob Super Computer. I used Flash Mob Computing because if you look at just FlashMob it has nothing to do with computers [[User:Kylehamilton|Kylehamilton]] 05:49, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I don't see what's so special about this "flash mob" event. Similar events took place earlier, e.g. this one: http://www.linux-magazin.de/Artikel/ausgabe/1999/02/Cluster/cluster.html (sorry only german) and if I'm not mistaken, [[ClusterKnoppix]] has been around since 2003.</div>imported>Qwerfjkl (bot)