imported>Cewbot: Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Computing}}, {{WikiProject Software}}.

2024-01-16T23:58:15Z

Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Computing}}, {{WikiProject Software}}.

New page

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Computing|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Software|importance=Low}}
}}
Removed the inappropriate category ([[:Category:JavaScript dialects]]), as E4X is not a JavaScript dialect, but a language extension. --asqueella [[User:195.146.72.90|195.146.72.90]] 15:49, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

Any chances it will still make it into the ECMAScript standard? Apparently it was dropped from "Harmony", what a pity. Is it being considered for future versions of Webkit, Opera, IE? —Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/87.162.59.111|87.162.59.111]] ([[User talk:87.162.59.111|talk]]) 21:32, 12 November 2008 (UTC) 

''Any chances it will still make it into the ECMAScript standard?''
:None at all. For example:

::We've often cited EIBTI [Explicit Is Better Than Implicit] in ES4 working group meetings. In general I daresay the TC39 committee is more in favor of avoiding implicit magic, especially conversions, now than ever (E4X, ECMA-357, is full of it, and it's a mess). --Brendan Eich

:The contingent who were anti-ES4 would be even less likely to accept E4X as part of ES-Harmony. [[User:David-Sarah Hopwood|David-Sarah Hopwood]] ([[User talk:David-Sarah Hopwood|talk]]) 03:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

This is untrue: "JSON is an object-oriented data notation similar to XML." and should be removed. JSON is in no way similiar to XML. JSON is not a data notation, it's the syntax for creating a new javascript object, according to that description of JSON Java would also fit the bill as an OO data notation similiar to XML.... XML is also not object oriented. I could go on and on about the differences. They are completely unrelated technologies. [[User:Soverby|Soverby]] ([[User talk:Soverby|talk]]) 17:25, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

I think there should be some mention of the problems with/controversy surrounding the spec. In particular Mozilla's decision not to submit an E4X test for Acid 3 is of relevance. See http://www.webstandards.org/2008/01/16/whats-the-best-test-for-acid3/#comment-59499 and http://shaver.off.net/diary/2008/03/27/the-missed-opportunity-of-acid-3/#comment-135680. [[User:TheCycoONE|TheCycoONE]] ([[User talk:TheCycoONE|talk]]) 18:14, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

== Why deprecated ==

Something should be said in the article about why e4x has been deprecated.
[[User:Teo8976|Teo8976]] ([[User talk:Teo8976|talk]]) 19:50, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Does E4X supported in NodeJS? — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/95.161.141.5|95.161.141.5]] ([[User talk:95.161.141.5#top|talk]]) 11:50, 7 December 2017 (UTC) 

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[ECMAScript for XML]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=704766857 my edit]. If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150602131200/http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-357.htm to http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-357.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|cyberbot II]][[User talk:Cyberbot II|Talk to my owner]]:Online 13:27, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

== ECMAScript-for-XML inspired XQuery? ==

[[XQuery]] is from 2007 and ''ECMAScript for XML'' from 2004... Are there a citation of the use (inspiration) at XQuery development?

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on [[ECMAScript for XML]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=800767078 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120505042844/https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Firefox_10_for_developers to https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Firefox_10_for_developers
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090415002451/http://www.mozilla.org/js/spidermonkey/release-notes/JS_160.html to http://www.mozilla.org/js/spidermonkey/release-notes/JS_160.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081006212236/http://developer.mozilla.org/index.php?title=En%2FCore_JavaScript_1.5_Guide%2FProcessing_XML_with_E4X to https://developer.mozilla.org/index.php?title=En%2FCore_JavaScript_1.5_Guide%2FProcessing_XML_with_E4X
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080704203050/http://developer.yahoo.com/flash/articles/e4x-beginner-to-advanced.html to http://developer.yahoo.com/flash/articles/e4x-beginner-to-advanced.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''InternetArchiveBot''']] ([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]]) 15:00, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk:ECMAScript for XML - Revision history

imported>Cewbot: Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Computing}}, {{WikiProject Software}}.