http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3ACAOS_LinuxTalk:CAOS Linux - Revision history2026-05-10T19:45:18ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.43.1http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?title=Talk:CAOS_Linux&diff=1777113&oldid=previmported>Tom.Reding: -redundant class param; cleanup2025-02-06T13:29:08Z<p>-redundant class param; cleanup</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{Talk page of redirect}}{{Old XfD multi |date1=25 March 2021 |result1='''Restored and sent to AfD''' |page1=Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 25#CAOS Linux |date2=2 April 2021 |result2='''Merge''' |page2=CAOS Linux}}<br />
{{WikiProject banner shell|<br />
{{WikiProject Computing|importance=}}<br />
{{WikiProject Linux}}<br />
}}<br />
<br />
== Homepage down ==<br />
<br />
caoslinux.org points to a casino page. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/87.170.254.70|87.170.254.70]] ([[User talk:87.170.254.70|talk]]) 22:06, 19 September 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--><br />
<br />
== Article Contents? ==<br />
<br />
I think that this is clearly a direct copy from the about page of cAos Linux at [http://caos.caosity.org/about.html cAos Linux About]. I don't think that this qualifies as free content under the GPL, as it's copyright. I think we might want to delete this. [[User:Phsource|Phsource]]<br />
<br />
== Documentation License... ==<br />
<br />
Sorry, I copy and pasted the contents from cAos/about. I didn't think it would be a problem considering I wrote the original copy as well. I will clean up the code so it looks a bit nicer and update it a bit. Other then that is there anything that I need to add to it leagalease-wise?<br />
<br />
== Advertisement? ==<br />
This looks very much like and Advertisement. Could someone fix this. Here is a bit from the article:<br />
<br />
"It combines aspects of Debian, Red Hat/Fedora, and FreeBSD in a manner that ends up with a solution that is stable enough for servers and clusters, utilizes a long term life cycle (3-5 years), and built from current cutting edge packages (as of August 2005). It also includes many of the features that are considered standard for desktops and laptops, which makes it a very good general purpose Linux distribution." <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/72.45.102.90|72.45.102.90]] ([[User talk:72.45.102.90|talk]]) 16:40, 3 May 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --></div>imported>Tom.Reding