<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Choice_sequence</id>
	<title>Choice sequence - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Choice_sequence"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?title=Choice_sequence&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-11T19:28:57Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?title=Choice_sequence&amp;diff=6943104&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>imported&gt;Marc Schroeder at 01:58, 30 May 2025</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?title=Choice_sequence&amp;diff=6943104&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2025-05-30T01:58:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;In [[Intuitionism|intuitionistic mathematics]], a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;choice sequence&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a [[Constructivism (mathematics)|constructive]] formulation of a [[sequence]]. Since the Intuitionistic school of mathematics, as formulated by [[L. E. J. Brouwer]], rejects the idea of a [[completed infinity]], in order to use a sequence (which is, in classical mathematics, an infinite object), we must have a formulation of a finite, constructible object that can serve the same purpose as a sequence.  Thus, Brouwer formulated the choice sequence, which is given as a construction, rather than an abstract, infinite object.{{sfn|Troelstra|1982}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lawlike and lawless sequences==&lt;br /&gt;
A distinction is made between &amp;#039;&amp;#039;lawless&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;lawlike&amp;#039;&amp;#039; sequences.{{sfn|Linnebo|Shapiro|2020|p=3}} A &amp;#039;&amp;#039;lawlike&amp;#039;&amp;#039; sequence is one that can be described completely&amp;amp;mdash;it is a completed construction, that can be fully described.  For example, the [[natural numbers]] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb N&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be thought of as a lawlike sequence: the sequence can be fully constructively described by the unique element 0 and a [[Primitive recursive function#Definition|successor function]].  Given this formulation, we know that the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;th element in the sequence of natural numbers will be the number &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;i-1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Similarly, a [[function (mathematics)|function]] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f : \mathbb N \mapsto \mathbb N&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; mapping from the natural numbers into the natural numbers effectively determines the value for any argument it takes, and thus describes a lawlike sequence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A &amp;#039;&amp;#039;lawless&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (also, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;free&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) sequence, on the other hand, is one that is not predetermined.  It is to be thought of as a procedure for generating values for the arguments 0, 1, 2, ....  That is, a lawless sequence &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a procedure for generating &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha_0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, ... (the elements of the sequence &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) such that:&lt;br /&gt;
*At any given moment of construction of the sequence &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, only an initial segment of the sequence is known, and no restrictions are placed on the future values of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; and&lt;br /&gt;
*One may specify, in advance, an initial segment &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\langle \alpha_0, \alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_k \rangle&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Note that the first point above is slightly misleading, as we may specify, for example, that the values in a sequence be drawn exclusively from the set of natural numbers—we can specify, [[A priori and a posteriori|a priori]], the range of the sequence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The canonical example of a lawless sequence is the series of rolls of a [[dice|die]].  We specify which die to use and, optionally, specify in advance the values of the first &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; rolls (for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k\in \mathbb N&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;).  Further, we restrict the values of the sequence to be in the set &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\{1,2,3,4,5,6\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  This specification comprises the procedure for generating the lawless sequence in question.  At no point, then, is any particular future value of the sequence known.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Axiomatization==&lt;br /&gt;
There are two [[axiom]]s in particular that we expect to hold of choice sequences as described above.  Let &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha\in n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; denote the relation &amp;quot;the sequence &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; begins with the initial sequence &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;quot; for choice sequence &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and finite segment &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (more specifically, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will probably be an integer [[Numbering (computability theory)|encoding]] a finite initial sequence).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We expect the following, called the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;axiom of open data&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, to hold of all lawless sequences:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math display=&amp;quot;block&amp;quot;&amp;gt;A(\alpha) \rightarrow \exists n[\alpha\in n \,\land\, \forall\beta\in n[A(\beta)]]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a [[one-place predicate]].  The intuitive justification for this axiom is as follows: in intuitionistic mathematics, verification that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; holds of the sequence &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is given as a [[algorithm|procedure]]; at any point of execution of this procedure, we will have examined only a finite initial segment of the sequence.  Intuitively, then, this axiom states that since, at any point of verifying that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; holds of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we will only have verified that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; holds for a finite initial sequence of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; thus, it must be the case that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; also holds for any lawless sequence &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\beta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; sharing this initial sequence. This is so because, at any point in the procedure of verifying &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A(\alpha)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, for any such &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\beta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; sharing the initial prefix of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; encoded by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; that we have already examined, if we run the identical procedure on &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\beta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we will get the same result.  The axiom can be generalized for any predicate taking an arbitrary number of arguments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another axiom is required for lawless sequences. The &amp;#039;&amp;#039;axiom of density&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, given by:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math display=&amp;quot;block&amp;quot;&amp;gt;\forall n \, \exists \alpha [\alpha\in n]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
states that, for any finite prefix (encoded by) &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, there is some sequence &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; beginning with that prefix.  We require this axiom so as not to have any &amp;quot;holes&amp;quot; in the set of choice sequences.  This axiom is the reason we require that arbitrarily long finite initial sequences of lawless choice sequences can be specified in advance; without this requirement, the axiom of density is not necessarily guaranteed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* {{annotated link|Constructivism (philosophy of mathematics)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Refbegin}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 |last= Dummett&lt;br /&gt;
 |first= Michael&lt;br /&gt;
 |author-link= Michael Dummett&lt;br /&gt;
 |title= Elements of Intuitionism&lt;br /&gt;
 |publisher= Oxford University Press&lt;br /&gt;
 |year= 1977&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite journal&lt;br /&gt;
 |last= Fourman&lt;br /&gt;
 |first= Michael P.&lt;br /&gt;
 |author-link= Michael Fourman&lt;br /&gt;
 |title= Notions of Choice Sequence&lt;br /&gt;
 |journal= Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics&lt;br /&gt;
 |url= http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mfourman/research/publications/pdf/fourman82-notions-of-choice-sequence.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
 |year= 1982&lt;br /&gt;
 |volume= 110&lt;br /&gt;
 |pages= 91–105&lt;br /&gt;
 |doi = 10.1016/S0049-237X(09)70125-9&lt;br /&gt;
 |isbn= 9780444864949&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 |last= Jacquette&lt;br /&gt;
 |first= Dale&lt;br /&gt;
 |author-link= Dale Jacquette&lt;br /&gt;
 |title= A Companion to Philosophical Logic&lt;br /&gt;
 |publisher= Blackwell Publishing&lt;br /&gt;
 |year= 2002&lt;br /&gt;
 |isbn= 9780631216711&lt;br /&gt;
 |page= 517&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite journal&lt;br /&gt;
 |last= Kreisel&lt;br /&gt;
 |first= Georg&lt;br /&gt;
 |author-link= Georg Kreisel &lt;br /&gt;
 |title= A remark on free choice sequences and the topological completeness proofs&lt;br /&gt;
 |journal= Journal of Symbolic Logic&lt;br /&gt;
 |year= 1958&lt;br /&gt;
 |volume= 23&lt;br /&gt;
 |issue= 4&lt;br /&gt;
 |pages= 369–388&lt;br /&gt;
 |doi= 10.2307/2964012&lt;br /&gt;
 |jstor= 2964012&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite web&lt;br /&gt;
 |last1= Linnebo&lt;br /&gt;
 |first1= Øystein&lt;br /&gt;
 |author-link1= Øystein Linnebo&lt;br /&gt;
 |last2= Shapiro&lt;br /&gt;
 |first2= Stewart&lt;br /&gt;
 |author-link2= Stewart Shapiro&lt;br /&gt;
 |title= Choice sequences: a modal and classical analysis&lt;br /&gt;
 |publisher= University of Oslo and Ohio State University&lt;br /&gt;
 |date= 23 September 2020&lt;br /&gt;
 |url= https://www.hf.uio.no/ifikk/english/research/projects/cl/events/conferences/slides-potensialism/reals-slides.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
 |access-date= 14 April 2022&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 |last= Troelstra&lt;br /&gt;
 |first= Anne Sjerp&lt;br /&gt;
 |author-link= Anne Sjerp Troelstra&lt;br /&gt;
 |title= Choice Sequences. A Chapter of Intuitionistic Mathematics&lt;br /&gt;
 |publisher= Clarendon Press&lt;br /&gt;
 |year= 1977&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite journal&lt;br /&gt;
 |last= Troelstra&lt;br /&gt;
 |first= Anne Sjerp&lt;br /&gt;
 |author-link= Anne Sjerp Troelstra&lt;br /&gt;
 |title= On the Origin and Development of Brouwer&amp;#039;s Concept of Choice Sequence&lt;br /&gt;
 |journal= Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics&lt;br /&gt;
 |year= 1982&lt;br /&gt;
 |volume= 110&lt;br /&gt;
 |pages= 465–486&lt;br /&gt;
 |doi= 10.1016/S0049-237X(09)70145-4&lt;br /&gt;
 |isbn= 9780444864949&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite journal&lt;br /&gt;
 |last= Troelstra&lt;br /&gt;
 |first= Anne Sjerp&lt;br /&gt;
 |author-link= Anne Sjerp Troelstra&lt;br /&gt;
 |title= Analysing Choice Sequences&lt;br /&gt;
 |journal= Journal of Philosophical Logic&lt;br /&gt;
 |year= 1983&lt;br /&gt;
 |volume= 12&lt;br /&gt;
 |issue= 2&lt;br /&gt;
 |pages= 197–260&lt;br /&gt;
 |doi= 10.1007/BF00247189&lt;br /&gt;
 |s2cid= 26373820&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 |last1= Troelstra&lt;br /&gt;
 |first1= Anne Sjerp&lt;br /&gt;
 |author-link1= Anne Sjerp Troelstra&lt;br /&gt;
 |last2= Van Dalen&lt;br /&gt;
 |first2= Dirk&lt;br /&gt;
 |author-link2= Dirk van Dalen&lt;br /&gt;
 |title= Constructivism in Mathematics: An Introduction, Volume 1&lt;br /&gt;
 |publisher= Elsevier Science&lt;br /&gt;
 |year= 1988a&lt;br /&gt;
 |isbn= 9780444702661&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 |last1= Troelstra&lt;br /&gt;
 |first1= Anne Sjerp&lt;br /&gt;
 |author-link1= Anne Sjerp Troelstra&lt;br /&gt;
 |last2= Van Dalen&lt;br /&gt;
 |first2= Dirk&lt;br /&gt;
 |author-link2= Dirk van Dalen&lt;br /&gt;
 |title= Constructivism in Mathematics: An Introduction, Volume 2&lt;br /&gt;
 |publisher= Elsevier Science&lt;br /&gt;
 |year= 1988b&lt;br /&gt;
 |isbn= 9780444703583&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Refend}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Constructivism (mathematics)]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>imported&gt;Marc Schroeder</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>