View source for Work-in

{{Short description|Form of direct action in which workers continue working without pay}}
{{More citations needed|date=May 2022}}
A '''work-in''' is a form of [[direct action]] under which workers whose jobs are under threat resolve to remain in their place of employment and to continue producing, without pay. Their intention is usually to show that their place of work still has long-term viability or that it can be effectively [[workers' self-management|self-managed by the workers]].

== Historical examples ==
* 1972: [[Sydney Opera House]] work-in<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-03-23 |title=The 1972 Sydney Opera House Work-In |url=https://commonslibrary.org/the-1972-sydney-opera-house/ |access-date=2022-05-18 |website=The Commons |language=en-AU}}</ref>
* 1972: The women worker of the Sexton factory in Fakenham, Norfolk, England.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Fakenham Work-In at 50 |url=https://tribunemag.co.uk/2022/04/fakenham-women-norfolk-sexton-and-everard-shoes-occupation-work-in-1972 |access-date=2025-01-18 |website=tribunemag.co.uk |language=en-GB}}</ref>
* 1975: [[Nymboida, New South Wales|Nymboida]] coal mine work-in<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-03-22 |title=The Nymboida Coal Mine Takeover, NSW, 1975–1979 |url=https://commonslibrary.org/the-nymboida-mine-takeover-1975-1979/ |access-date=2022-05-18 |website=The Commons |language=en-AU}}</ref>
* 1981: BC Telephone work-in
===Upper Clyde Shipbuilders, 1971-1972===
In June 1971, [[Upper Clyde Shipbuilders]] in [[Scotland]] entered liquidation after the [[Heath government]] refused to provide further subsidies to save them from closure.<ref name=BBC>{{cite web |title=The UCS 'work in'. |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/scotland/education/hist/employment/ship/section_d/index.shtml |website=[[BBC]] |access-date=31 December 2023}}</ref> It was announced that two of the firm's three shipyards would close and 1400 people were immediately made redundant.<ref name=Holmes />{{rp|43}} Workers responded by occupying the three shipyards and announced that a group of workers would continue to run the yards.<ref name=Holmes />{{rp|43}} [[Jimmy Reid]], a [[shop steward]] and the spokesperson for the group, stated:<ref name=Holmes />{{rp|43}} {{quote|Nothing and nobody will come in or go out of the yards without our permission. The world is witnessing a new tactic on behalf of the workers ... We are not going on strike - not even a sit-in strike. We are taking over the yards because we refuse to accept that faceless men can make these decisions.}}

Marches, [[Benefit concert|concerts]], [[Donation|public collections]] and other fundraising was organised to support the workers involved, collecting nearly £250,000.<ref name=BBC /> The work-in gained international attention and public support; [[John Lennon]] and [[Yoko Ono]] donated £1000, as did the [[National Union of Mineworkers (Great Britain)|National Union of Mineworkers]], and shipbuilders from the [[USSR]] donated £2700.<ref name=HM>{{cite web |author1=Hamish MacPherson |title=Clyde shipbuilders work-in was caused by Tory incompetence |url=https://www.thenational.scot/politics/19578296.clyde-shipbuilders-work-in-caused-tory-incompetence/ |website=[[The National (Scotland)|The National]] |access-date=31 December 2023 |date=14 September 2021}}</ref>

On 18 August, a mass demonstration in support of the workers was held in [[Glasgow]], with 80,000 people marching from [[Glasgow Green]] to [[George Square]].<ref name=HM /> Among those who attended the protest were [[Vic Feather]] (the [[Trades Union Congress|TUC]] general secretary), [[Billy Connolly]], [[Matt McGinn (Scottish songwriter)|Matt McGinn]] and [[Tony Benn]].<ref name=HM /> The chief constable of [[City of Glasgow Police|Glasgow's police]], [[David McNee]], told the government he could not guarantee public safety if the yard closures went ahead and asked for 5000 extra officers to maintain order.<ref name=Holmes />{{rp|44}}

The work-in ended in spring 1972,<ref>{{cite web |author1=Conrad Landin |title=The Upper Clyde Shipbuilders Work-In |url=https://tribunemag.co.uk/2021/07/the-upper-clyde-shipbuilders-work-in-at-50 |website=[[Tribune (magazine)|Tribune]] |access-date=31 December 2023 |date=29 July 2021}}</ref> with the government committing in February 1972 to supporting UCS with a further £35m of state funding.<ref name=Holmes>{{cite book |author1=Martin Holmes |title=Political Pressure and Economic Policy: British Government 1970-1974 |date=1982 |publisher=[[Butterworth Scientific]] |isbn=9780408108300 |chapter=3 - The U-turn over industry policy}}</ref>{{rp|44}}

===Harco steel mill, 1971===
{{main|1971 Harco work-in}}
Harco Steel, a steel manufacturing company based in [[Campbelltown, New South Wales|Campbelltown]], [[Sydney]], was dependent on state and federal government contracts, laying off workers once they had been completed and rehiring them as new ones were signed.<ref name=Keys /> Workers went on strike often and sometimes won higher wages, but never managed to prevent dismissals.<ref name=Keys /> Strikes were less successful because management stockpiled materials before firing workers,<ref name=IM>{{cite web |author1=Iain McIntyre |title=Australian Actions at Different Points of Intervention |url=https://commonslibrary.org/ensuring-impact-australian-examples/#The_Point_of_Production_The_1971_Harco_Occupation |website=The Commons Social Change Library |date=23 March 2022 |access-date=1 January 2024}}</ref> meaning strikes would have no effect on the firm's profit in the short term.

On 16 November 1971, the firm dismissed five boilermakers and one ironworker due to a downturn in orders.<ref name=Keys>{{cite web |author1=Drew Cottle |author2=Angela Keys |title=The 1971 Harco 'Stay-Put': Workers' Control in One Factory? |url=https://www.labourhistory.org.au/hummer/vol-4-no-1/harco/ |website=[[Australian Society for the Study of Labour History]] |access-date=1 January 2024}}</ref> With past strikes having been generally ineffective, workers met and, taking inspiration from the UCS work-in and [[factory occupation]]s by French car-makers [[May 68|during May 1968]], decided to occupy the steelworks.<ref name=Keys />

The next morning, the workers took control of the factory, declaring management to be "surplus to their requirements".<ref name=Keys /> The management called the police and the workers informed the press and other unions in order to publicise their occupation.<ref name=Keys /> Due to the level of local support, police took no action.<ref name=Keys />

The occupation, termed a 'stay-put' by workers, continued for four weeks with a 35-hour [[work week]].<ref name=Keys /> The [[Boilermakers and Blacksmiths Society of Australia|Boilermakers Union]] had campaigned for a 35-hour work week, but this was the first instance of it being implemented.<ref name=Keys /><ref name=IM /> The workers were supported by donations from other unions and worksites and food from the local community.<ref name=IM />

Because the workers were working rather than striking, Harco could not remove them under the [[Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904|Arbitration Act]].<ref name=Keys /> Instead, management removed tools, ladders and power to try to shut down the steelworks and called on the [[Federated Ironworkers' Association of Australia|Federated Ironworkers' Association]] (FIA) to intervene in the dispute. Staunchly anti-Communist and known for its compliance with business, the FIA called for a strike at the Harco plant which would have ended the work-in.<ref name=Keys /> The workers ignored their union and continued their work-in.<ref name=Keys />

The work-in was defeated by the use of the New South Wales Summary Offenses Act,<ref>{{cite journal |author1=Sam Oldham |title=Taking Control: The Work-In Phenomenon in the Australian Metal Trades, 1969–78 |journal=[[Labour History (journal)|Labour History]] |date=November 2015 |issue=109 |pages=93–109 |doi=10.5263/labourhistory.109.0093 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5263/labourhistory.109.0093 |access-date=1 January 2024 |publisher=[[Australian Society for the Study of Labour History]] |jstor=10.5263/labourhistory.109.0093 |url-access=subscription}}</ref> with Harco issuing trespass notices to the workers ordering them to leave.<ref name=Keys /> Under the Commonwealth Industrial Act, any union which supported the work-in could be penalised and so the Boilermakers Union refused to give legal aid to the Harco workers if they continued working.<ref name=Keys /> 

The case made it to the [[Supreme Court of New South Wales]], where the workers were ordered to leave the steelworks - workers who remained would be fined $1000 per day which could be seized from sales of their personal property.<ref name=Keys /> The work-in ended and workers held a Christmas party to celebrate their occupation.<ref name=Keys />

===LIP watch factory, 1973===
After the [[LIP (company)|LIP]]'s managing director Jacques Saint-Esprit resigned in 1973, there was uncertainty over the firm's future. The workers' unions at the factory in [[Besançon]], the [[General Confederation of Labour (France)|CGT]] and the [[French Democratic Confederation of Labour|CFDT]], opposed [[administration (law)|administration]] plans and encouraged workers to support collective action rather than take [[Voluntary redundancy|voluntary redundancies]].<ref name=TLS>{{cite web |author1=Conrad Landin |title=Phantom workshops: Militancy, 'work-ins' and a French watch factory |url=https://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/phantom-workshops/ |website=[[The Times Literary Supplement]] |access-date=31 December 2023 |date=19 April 2019}}</ref> 

At a meeting between workers and the firm's directors in June 1973,<ref name=PB>{{cite web |title=LIP, la fin de l'horlogerie française |url=https://www.paulbouyssou.fr/lip-la-fin-de-lhorlogerie-francaise/ |website=Paul Bouyssou |date=16 December 2019 |access-date=1 January 2024}}</ref> a worker grabbed a briefcase from one of the directors and ran off with it.<ref name=QAP>{{cite web |author1=Colin Alexander Smith |title=How LIP And Timex Became Involved In Two Of The 20th Century's Most Vicious Industrial Disputes |url=https://quillandpad.com/2020/01/17/how-lip-and-timex-became-involved-in-two-of-the-20th-centurys-most-vicious-industrial-disputes/ |website=Quill and Pad |date=17 January 2020 |access-date=1 January 2024}}</ref> The briefcase's contents laid out the closure of all of LIP's divisions except watchmaking, which was to be sold to a Swiss company, Ébauches SA.<ref name=QAP /><ref name=XV>{{cite journal |author1=Xavier Vigna |title=Review: Donald Reid, Opening the Gates: The Lip Affair, 1968-1981 |journal=[[International Review of Social History]] |date=April 2019 |volume=64 |issue=1 |pages=159–161 |doi=10.1017/S0020859019000257}}</ref> The Swiss company planned to lay off at least 960 of LIP's 1427 employees.<ref name=XV />

On 10 June, workers occupied the LIP factory in order to "safeguard the means of production";<ref name=TLS /> the occupation continued for 57 days.<ref name=NYT>{{cite web |author1=Alice Pfeiffer |title=Lip: A Symbol of France |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/26/fashion/26iht-ACAW-LIP26.html |website=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=31 December 2023 |date=25 November 2011}}</ref> During this time, they seized 65,000 watches (30,000 of which were smuggled out of the factory and hidden across Besançon)<ref name=TLS /> and attempted to set up a [[Workers' self-management|self-management system]] under the slogan "We produce, we sell, we pay ourselves".<ref name=NYT /> On 18 June, workers endorsed the idea of restarting production, with leading shop steward [[Charles Piaget]] using the UCS work-in as an example.<ref name=TLS /> Different working processes were created with slower paces and more frequent rotations in the most tiring jobs; 25,000 watches were made during the work-in.

Despite an August 1973 finding 63% of French adults to be sympathetic to the cause of the LIP workers, the national political landscape was not favourable.<ref name=TLS /> Prime Minister [[Pierre Messmer]] sent 3,000 state police with orders to reclaim the factory and end the occupation.<ref name=TLS /> The factory was taken by police on 14 August and the work-in was ended.<ref name=QAP /> An agreement was eventually reached between workers and management, with Charles Neuschwander, a left-wing employer, taking over and pledging to employ all remaining workers as part of a new enterprise called SEHEM.<ref name=TLS /><ref name=XV />

==See also==
*[[Die-in]]
*[[Sit-in]]
*[[Teach-in]]
*[[Strike action]]
*[[Workplace democracy]]
*[[Workers' control]]

==References==
{{Reflist}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Work-In}}
[[Category:Labor relations]]
[[Category:Labor disputes]]