View source for Wiki143 talk:WikiProject Templates

{{Talk header|shortcut1=WT:WPT|wp=yes}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WikiProject Templates}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo                = old(120d)
| archive             = Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Templates/Archive %(counter)d
| counter             = 8
| maxarchivesize      = 150K
| archiveheader       = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 2
| minthreadsleft      = 7
}}

== [[tm:light dark]] ==

Hello! 

I recently made (stole, look at revision history) the template {{tl|light dark}}, which basically lets you have different content for light and dark mode. 

My question is, do you think that this template is good? How can I test this template and see where it breaks?

Also, is the documentation adequate? And what categories should be added to the template? And I didn't quite understand how you add categories to templates... <span style="border-radius:99q;padding:0 7q;background:#103;border:3q solid #FBF">[[User:QuickQuokka|<span style="color:#FBF">'''QuickQuokka'''</span>]]</span> <sup>[⁠[[User talk:QuickQuokka|talk]] • [[Special:Contribs/QuickQuokka|contribs]]]</sup> 07:09, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
:{{tq|How can I test this template}} - try it in different places, with different values, using both dark and light mode.
:{{tq|is the documentation adequate}} - yes.
:{{tq|how [to] add categories to templates}} - see the bottom of the /doc and the {{tq|Categories below this line}} comment.
:No comments on its usefulness given that I use the gadget and so it doesn't work for me anyway. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 12:35, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
::{{Re|Primefac}} Hmmm... Maybe I should add it in the [[tm: light dark/doc#Notes|§ Notes]] section of the docs that it also doesn't work with the gadget, but rather only with the dark mode version of the vector skin. 
::Also, my question wasn't only how to add the categories, but also which ones fit best to this specific template? <span style="border-radius:99q;padding:0 7q;background:#103;border:3q solid #FBF">[[User:QuickQuokka|<span style="color:#FBF">'''QuickQuokka'''</span>]]</span> <sup>[⁠[[User talk:QuickQuokka|talk]] • [[Special:Contribs/QuickQuokka|contribs]]]</sup> 13:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
::Some things I noticed but don't have to technical expertise to fix: 
::* On light mode, text shows up on a new line: e.g. {{tq|You are on {{light dark|light|dark}} mode}}
::* Hidden images from the opposite mode show up in the media viewer
::<span style="border-radius:99q;padding:0 7q;background:#103;border:3q solid #FBF">[[User:QuickQuokka|<span style="color:#FBF">'''QuickQuokka'''</span>]]</span> <sup>[⁠[[User talk:QuickQuokka|talk]] • [[Special:Contribs/QuickQuokka|contribs]]]</sup> 13:08, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
:::{{tag|div}} tags put things on new lines, I'm pretty sure you'd need to use a {{tag|span}} pair for inline stuff. [[:Category:Wikipedia formatting templates]] might be a reasonable cat, maybe [[:Category:Accessibility templates]]. If there are more desired you could just start at [[:Category:Wikipedia templates by task]] and go down the tree until you find something useful (which is basically what I did for those two). [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 13:51, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
::::Why do editors keep recreating {{tl|If dark}}? – [[User:Jonesey95|Jonesey95]] ([[User talk:Jonesey95|talk]]) 21:55, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
:::::Probably because they don't know it exists; I didn't. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 01:20, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

== Discussion about adding do not remove text to Template:rfd ==
There is a discussion about adding do not remove text at [[Template_talk:Redirect_for_discussion#Can_%22do_not_remove_this_notice_before_the_discussion_is_closed%22_be_added?]]  --[[User:Jax 0677|Jax 0677]] ([[User talk:Jax 0677|talk]]) 18:23, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

== Don't know what to do ==

Hi I'm completely new to this project and to WPs in general so could someone please explain to me what should I do?  <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Applefruitlife|Applefruitlife]] ([[User talk:Applefruitlife#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Applefruitlife|contribs]]) 07:32, 27 February 2025 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:You can do whatever you want, provided you're following the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|Five pillars]] (i.e. editing constructively). If you're not really sure how to contribute, I would suggest reading through [[Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia]]; there are a ton of ways to get involved, so it really just depends on what you're interested in doing. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 13:38, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

== Removing Hispanic and Latino American and Mexican Americans from [[Template:WikiProject United States]] ==

Is anyone able to remove the Hispanic and Latino project and its task Mexican Americans from [[Template:WikiProject United States]]? The project is now its own WikiProject and has its own project banner now. [[User:Magiciandude|Erick]] ([[User talk:Magiciandude|talk]]) 18:11, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
:Discussion is at {{slink|Template_talk:WikiProject_United_States#Edit_request_2_March_2025}}. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 14:40, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
::@[[User:Primefac|Primefac]] I was told to ask here since it was complicated to remove the parameters. [[User:Magiciandude|Erick]] ([[User talk:Magiciandude|talk]]) 20:19, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
:::Indeed, and it was good advice. I was pointing to the original discussion so that others would know the provenance of the request. As a minor point, the discussion of the implementation of the proposed change is ''usually'' best-discussed at the template's talk page, though it's not necessarily a requirement. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 20:35, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

== Template:Monthly archive list ==

Does anyone wanna take a crack at rewriting [[Template:Monthly archive list|this template]] so that it doesn't have to be manually updated every year? [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 01:54, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

== User warning Uw-controversial under discussion ==

Your feedback at [[Wikipedia talk:Template index/User talk namespace#Uw-controversial – vague, arbitrary, useless?|this user warning template discussion]] about {{tl|uw-controversial}} would be appreciated. [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 09:14, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

== [[Template:Over-quotation]] ==

I encountered the clean-up <nowiki>{{Template:Over-quotation}}</nowiki> today and went to find out more info (as I have an article in mind where it would be appropriate), and I saw that it doesn't have very good [[Template:Over-quotation|documentation]] (also see: [[Template:Over-quotation/doc|doc]]). If you try to insert this template, the following message appears: "Due to missing [[mediawikiwiki:Special:MyLanguage/Help:TemplateData|TemplateData]], parameters for this template have been auto-generated. Please be aware that they may not be accurate." One of the parameters is only identified as +1. Unlike many clean-up templates, it does not include anything about when to remove the template. My experience with templates is limited, so I'm not well-positioned to improve this; I figured I'd leave a message in case someone who's more knowledgeable wants to take a look. [[User:FactOrOpinion|FactOrOpinion]] ([[User talk:FactOrOpinion|talk]]) 14:59, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
:I assume you're using VE? The documentation looks fine to me, and the only thing I can think of is that VE doesn't really play well with /doc pages that don't have TemplateData (which is dumb, but so is that entire editing platform). To your secondary point I've added {{para|removalnotice|yes}} for more info on removal. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 15:35, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
::Though I usually use VE, I used the source editor and clicked on the template icon to see what came up when I chose the Over-quotation template. Re: documentation, often a template page will include a clearer list of all of the parameters and one or more examples of what appears when one uses a template (e.g., [[Template:Cite tweet]], where a full list of the parameters is in the box ''Full parameter set in horizontal format''); I always find that helpful, though I recognize that it may not be necessary when the template only has a few parameters. [[User:FactOrOpinion|FactOrOpinion]] ([[User talk:FactOrOpinion|talk]]) 16:47, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
:::Holy crap, I've been editing almost a decade and I didn't know that existed in the source editor (though I suspect it's a ''fairly'' recent thing?). Adding TemplateData to the /doc isn't a bad idea if it'll solve this issue. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 18:03, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
::::I don't know whether or not it's recent. I'm not a newbie, but I'm also not hugely experienced, and I noticed the icon recently (and then clicked on it to see what it does) when I was investigating whether there was a way to search for a template while in the source editor, in the same way that typing {{ will pull up a template search in the VE. Thank you for your help. [[User:FactOrOpinion|FactOrOpinion]] ([[User talk:FactOrOpinion|talk]]) 23:28, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
::::The TemplateWizard in 2010 wikitext editor is 2020ish. [[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 02:46, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

== template:parts per million/sandbox ==

Interested editors are invited to comment on a proposed change to {{tl|parts per million}}. The proposal is in the templates sandbox and test cases are available. The discussion is at {{slink|template talk:Parts per million#Linking ppm}}. I would be particularly grateful if someone who understands safesubst would review my proposal. The current template makes extensive use of this feature, so I expect my modifications should also, but as I don’t understand this feature, I haven't used it in the wiki text I added. Thanks. [[User:YBG|YBG]] ([[User talk:YBG|talk]]) 06:58, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

== Which of those two template designs do you prefer? ==

Hi, recently, I have made the tempalte titled [[:Template:Public art in Warsaw|Public art in Warsaw]] listing monuments and sculptures in [[Warsaw]], Poland. However, I'm not sure, which solution would be better, when in comes to former art, which was since removed. Currently, such works are marked with a symbol (†), and included with the rest of the sculptures. I copied such design from templates such as [[:Template:Public art in Washington, D.C.]], and [[:Template:Public art in Manhattan]]. However, I'm wondering if maybe putting them into their own category at the bottom wouldn't be better. I have made example of how it could look in this [[User:Artemis Andromeda/sandbox/four|sandbox]]. Which design do you think would be better? Sincerely, [[User:Artemis Andromeda|Artemis Andromeda]] ([[User talk:Artemis Andromeda|talk]]) 00:02, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

:I think I prefer the dagger, but over all I find a design with more categories like {{tl|Public art in London}} to be less overwhelming.  You might check other large city templates in this search: [[Special:PrefixIndex/template:Public_art_in|Public art in *]]. [[User:YBG|YBG]] ([[User talk:YBG|talk]]) 08:03, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

== Question about non-standard template organization ==

Came across a bit of an oddball situation today that I wanted to ask for some input about.

Within the past couple of days, every "Districts of the [Province Name] Province" subcategory of {{cl|Districts of Peru}} got speedy-renamed to a version that decapitalized "province" — but because they were nearly all populated by ''templates'' instead of direct declarations on individual pages, the new categories were almost completely empty while the old ones were non-empty redlinks jamming up [[Special:WantedCategories]]. I was able to clean all of that up with an AWB run to rename the category in the templates, so that's not the problem, it's just background on how the matter came to my attention.

The ''problem'' is that the templates are quite oddly structured: each "province" has its own template ''name'' that transcludes a province category, but none of them are actually true templates: they're actually each just a ''wrapper'' which really just transcludes another ''template'' at the next higher ''region'' level instead of directly listing any districts itself. [[Ascope District]], for example, has a {{tl|Districts of Ascope Province}} template at the bottom of it, but the actual ''content'' of that template is really just a call of another ''template'', {{tl|Districts of La Libertad Region}}, and ''both'' of those templates are transcluding categories onto the pages so that each page is ''duplicate'' categorized in ''both'' {{cl|Districts of the Ascope province}} ''and'' its {{cl|Districts of the Department of La Libertad}} parent at the same time.

There are a few categories where the districts each just have the regional-level template directly on them and are ''manually'' categorized for province — but many, many more are doing this two-step "province-level template wrapping a wider region-level template" thing.

Obviously this isn't how templates are supposed to be structured, but I don't want to just unilaterally do anything about them myself without any discussion about the best ways to fix it, so I'm bringing it to the project's attention. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 18:50, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
:So I just delved into the history at {{tl|Districts of Ascope Province}}, and saw that it predates {{tl|Districts of La Libertad Region}} by about six months. But on May 1, 2008, the region template was created - apparently by just incorporating the content from all of the applicable province templates - and the province template changed to simply transclude the region template as a whole. There are a couple of approaches that could be pursued here: 1) make all the province templates redirects to their region template. 2) Rebuild each of the province templates as they were in early 2008, and leave the region template for its own transclusions, possibly making the region template a glorified wrapper for transcluding the relevant province templates. 3) Keep the general content as is, but build logic in the region template for a <code>province</code> parameter that could be called from the province templates that would enable each province's content to be featured in some way. [[User:Vanisaac|Van]][[User talk:Vanisaac|Isaac]], GHTV<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Vanisaac|contr]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-4.2ex"><small>[[User:Vanisaac/about|about]]</small></sub> 19:31, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
::There is another thing that needs to be done, which is to get those article-space categories out of the templates. We have long abandoned the use of templates for anything other than maintenance categories, and they really shouldn't be doing that (for pretty much this exact reason). [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 19:58, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
:::Yeah, that's obviously another concern: templates really shouldn't be artificially transcluding mainspace content categories onto articles, precisely because that results in duplicate categorization and/or messes like me having to gnome my way through fixing 100+ redlinked categories this morning. But obviously we can't just immediately remove the categories from the templates until we've ensured that they're all directly declared on the appropriate pages themselves, which seems like a bit of a...project, I suppose. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 20:13, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
::::I just filed a bot task to deal with the cats issue. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 22:36, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
::Okay, my short answer to the bigger question is that I think the Province templates need to just be redirected to the District templates; another example is {{t|Districts of Bolívar Province}} which (other than the category issue) is literally just a transclusion of {{t|Districts of La Libertad Region}}. I don't have an issue with the name of the template call (since it's accurate) but nesting transclusions like that leads to issues. I'll see if I can whip up a (relatively) quick fix for the cat issue, but after that's sorted we should just redir everything to their respective base template. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 22:20, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

== Feedback requested re Tfd links ==

If you are interested in [[WP:Templates for discussion]], you may recall that each Tfd idiscussion has a small set of convenience links at the top, generated by {{tl|Tfd links}} and the [[Module:Tfd links|underlying module]]. An enhancement request is open to add a new convenience link, and your feedback would be appreciated at [[WT:Templates for discussion#Module:Tfd links edit request: add new link]]. Thank you. [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 16:28, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

== Looking to create Encyclopedia Source templates. ==

[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Fraternities and Sororities]] uses [[Baird's Manual of American College Fraternities]] *extensively*. It had 20 editions starting in 1879 with the last in 1977 with the last being over 600 pages. We'd like to create Encyclopedia Source templates looking like {{tlx|Bairds14|345-346}} . At this point starting out, the templates would only have one argument starting out, page/pages. Are there suggestions on templates to use as a guide or any issue with this idea?[[User:Naraht|Naraht]] ([[User talk:Naraht|talk]]) 11:03, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

:Check out [[:Category:Encyclopedia source templates]] for many examples. Instead of a numerical parameter ({{tlx|Bairds14|345-346}}), it would be more flexible to pass along the in-source parameters to a CS1 template (<code><nowiki>{{Bairds14|pp=345-346}}</nowiki></code>). Your template could then use {{para|p}}, {{para|pp}}, and {{para|at}} in the article. If the encyclopedia template uses [[Module:Template wrapper]], then it will automatically support those parameters. {{tl|cite Catholic Encyclopedia}} works this way. [[User:Rjjiii|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rjj<sup>iii</sup></span>]] ([[User talk:Rjjiii|talk]]) 11:33, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
:@[[User:Naraht|Naraht]] Hey, idk if this is the best place to mention this, but I checked [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fraternities and Sororities]] and saw some of the discussion about which template to base yours on. There isn't going to be anything lost really choosing between {{tl|cite encyclopedia}} and {{tl|cite book}}. Cite book has a {{para|section}} parameter that works the same cite encycolpedia's {{para|entry}} parameter. There is no difference in the output, just the parameter names and setup. You can also use {{tl|citation}} with [[Module:Citation mode]]; I think it does have less useful metadata, but I don't remember exactly why. Feel free to {{tl|ping}} me if you get stuck at any point. [[User:Rjjiii|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rjj<sup>iii</sup></span>]] ([[User talk:Rjjiii|talk]]) 01:36, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

== Remove ifeq statement when substing a template ==

I'm working on a template to expediate the expansion of a certain type of tables with location data, and I have an #ifeq statement that stays in source with the #ifeq statement. I need this to be where it is otherwise links to Georgia will be sent to a disambiguation page instead of [[Georgia (U.S. state)]]. The #ifeq statement in the source doesn't affect where the source goes and is invisible to most readers, but unnecessarily inflates the page's source length, especially when this template is intended to save time when being reused tens or even hundreds of times on a single page. What should I do in this instance? The template is at [[User:Departure–/iemlisttemplate]]. Thanks! [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 17:29, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

:You can subst parser functions the same as other templates. See also [[Help:Safesubst]]. [[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 17:45, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
:I spent some time in the past building new templates and better ones, and I found that a large number of #ifeq functions could be replaced by one or more #switch functions. If you know how or learn how to construct switches, then you might find that they are better and faster than using many #ifeq functions. '''''[[User:Paine Ellsworth|<span style="font-size:92%;color:darkblue;font-family:Segoe Script">P.I.&nbsp;Ellsworth</span>]]'''''&thinsp;,&nbsp;[[Editor|<span style="color:black">ed.</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Paine Ellsworth|<sup>put'er&nbsp;there</sup>]]&nbsp;<small>23:00, 11 April 2025 (UTC)</small>
::Even better, that huge block can be replaced by the already-existing {{t|USStateNameToAbb}}. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 12:29, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
:::Thanks to everyone here. I'm going to be experimenting with this type of template to save me time from now. [[User:Departure–|Departure–]] ([[User talk:Departure–|talk]]) 16:35, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

== Wikilink text colour output ==

Hi all, new to wikitext; coding experience is limited to the brain cells I lost writing broken MATLAB programs at uni. I'm looking at making the text output for the {{code|<nowiki>black|disqualified|dsq</nowiki>}} parameter at [[Template:Motorsport result]] to be always white, ''including wikilinks''.  Any help would be greatly appreciated, gen-AI has been completely hopeless at pointing me in the right direction!

{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; font-size:85%"
!colspan=2|Outputs
|-
!Current
!Desired
|-
|{{msrslt|dsq|'''[[2017 Spa-Francorchamps Formula 2 round|SPA<br>FEA]]'''<br>{{small|DSQ}}}}
|{{msrslt|dsq|'''[[2017 Spa-Francorchamps Formula 2 round|<span style="color:white;">SPA<br>FEA</span>]]'''<br>{{small|DSQ}}}}
|} '''[[User:Mb2437|<span style="background:#19543E; border:2px solid #19543E; color:white; padding:2px;">MB</span>]][[User talk:Mb2437|<span style="background:white; border:2px solid #19543E; color:#19543E; padding:2px;">2437</span>]]''' 21:14, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
:Yes, there is definitely a need to lighten the link color to aid accessibility. There is also a need to distinguish link text from non-link text even when the background color changes. Perhaps a lighter blue text? 

:{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; font-size:85%"
!colspan=2|Outputs
|-
!Current
!Desired
|-
|{{msrslt|dsq|'''[[2017 Spa-Francorchamps Formula 2 round|SPA<br>FEA]]'''<br>{{small|DSQ}}}}
|{{msrslt|dsq|'''[[2017 Spa-Francorchamps Formula 2 round|<span style="color:#aed6f1;">SPA<br>FEA</span>]]'''<br>{{small|DSQ}}}}
|} '''''[[User:Paine Ellsworth|<span style="font-size:92%;color:darkblue;font-family:Segoe Script">P.I.&nbsp;Ellsworth</span>]]'''''&thinsp;,&nbsp;[[Editor|<span style="color:black">ed.</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Paine Ellsworth|<sup>put'er&nbsp;there</sup>]]&nbsp;<small>22:50, 18 April 2025 (UTC)</small>
::I agree, but all-white text on black is the long-standing convention for [[WP:MOTORSPORT]] (we recently received suggestions to improve the accessibility of our colour palette, which were swiftly pushed away to avoid needing to alter 20,000+ articles). Just looking to simplify this for editors in the WP as entering a disqualified result currently requires at least some knowledge of wikimarkup to keep it all-white. '''[[User:Mb2437|<span style="background:#19543E; border:2px solid #19543E; color:white; padding:2px;">MB</span>]][[User talk:Mb2437|<span style="background:white; border:2px solid #19543E; color:#19543E; padding:2px;">2437</span>]]''' 23:24, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
* Please see [[Help:Link color]] for information on coloring links. From what I can see, you basically have to put your {{tag|span|attribs=color:xxx}} ''inside'' the {{!((}} {{))!}} wikimarkup to be able to change link colors. [[User:Vanisaac|Van]][[User talk:Vanisaac|Isaac]], GHTV<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Vanisaac|contr]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-4.2ex"><small>[[User:Vanisaac/about|about]]</small></sub> 23:42, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

== Assistance needed ==

Having a problem with [[List of House members of the 45th Parliament of Canada]], for which I need some help from someone with more skill in template coding than I've got.

The problem is that the members tables are zooming past the right margin of the display window, and thus ''covering'' the right-hand "tools" menu in a way that renders those links nearly impossible to use — basically you have to try to navigate a link into the whitespace between two tables in order to actually click on it — so I need somebody to look into whether there's any code in them that needs to be changed to confine them to the article display margins. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 21:41, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
:Someone has set minimum width values on the columns, such as <code>min-width:28em;</code> on many of the "Titles" columns. Since most of the "Titles" columns are empty, I would just remove that column's min-width and let the tables figure out an appropriate width. Also, you might want to hack your .css file to allow the content column (the part that is not the two sidebars) to take up more space in your browser window. Vector 2022's defaults are pretty lame in that regard. – [[User:Jonesey95|Jonesey95]] ([[User talk:Jonesey95|talk]]) 15:10, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

== Error message issued by [[Template:DGRG]] ==

Dear Colleagues,<br />I hope I have come to the correct place to report the following problem; if not, then I apologise.<br />I have just come across the subject template, and was hoping that someone with the appropriate coding skills would please fix the error message issued by default:
:{{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
Adding the 'title=' parameter (<code><nowiki>{{DGRG|title=Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography}}</nowiki></code>) fixes the error message but simply duplicates the book title in double quotation marks, which doesn't seem useful:
:{{xt| {{DGRG|title=Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography}} }}
Very many thanks in advance.<br />With kind regards;<br />Patrick. ツ [[User:Pdebee|Pdebee.]]<sup>[[User talk:Pdebee|(talk)]]</sup><sup>(become [[Wikipedia:Old Fashioned Wikipedian Values|old-fashioned!]])</sup> 15:30, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

:@[[User:Pdebee|Pdebee]], what entry in the encyclopedia are you citing or crediting? The template is written so that it needs either {{para|wstitle}} for entries available on wikisource or {{para|title}}. This seems intentional. There is a maintenance category for pages that don't specify an article in the encyclopedia at: [[:Category:Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the DGRG with no article parameter]]. I can't think of a great alternative. For example, some templates will default to using the title of the Wikipedia article, but many of these entries won't match the Wikipedia entries. For example, DGRG has [https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Dictionary_of_Greek_and_Roman_Geography/Volume_I#Ab 3 entries for Athens] all with a different spelling that a human editor would need to specify. [[User:Rjjiii|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rjj<sup>iii</sup></span>]] ([[User talk:Rjjiii|talk]]) 16:46, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Dear {{U|Rjjiii}},<br />I was looking at [[Exilles]] and noticed that the <code><nowiki>{{SmithDGRG}}</nowiki></code> template (which redirects to <code><nowiki>{{DGRG}}</nowiki></code>) is used in the 'Sources' section. This prompted me to try and fix the red error message, hence the above alert when I realised I couldn't. Thank you for your cogent explanation above, which I only saw just now, as I was offline this weekend.<br />With kind regards;<br />Patrick. ツ [[User:Pdebee|Pdebee.]]<sup>[[User talk:Pdebee|(talk)]]</sup><sup>(become [[Wikipedia:Old Fashioned Wikipedian Values|old-fashioned!]])</sup> 10:00, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
  
::{{ping|Pdebee|Rjjiii}} {{Fixed}} I went ahead and modified the underlying {{tl|Cite DGRG}} template to handle the case when neither {{para|title}} nor {{para|wstitle}} are set. — [[User:Hike395|hike395]] ([[User talk:Hike395|talk]]) 16:50, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Dear {{U|Hike395}},<br />Thank you so much for fixing this error condition so promptly; your technical assistance is much appreciated! {{smiley}}<br />With kind regards;<br />Patrick. ツ [[User:Pdebee|Pdebee.]]<sup>[[User talk:Pdebee|(talk)]]</sup><sup>(become [[Wikipedia:Old Fashioned Wikipedian Values|old-fashioned!]])</sup> 10:00, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

== Template doc not showing as anticipated ==

Hi all, I have created documentation for [[Template:British university]], but it is not showing on the main page as it does in the separate documentation article (shortcut box and see also section missing). Is there any way I can fix this? '''[[User:Mb2437|<span style="background:#19543E; border:2px solid #19543E; color:white; padding:2px;">MB</span>]][[User talk:Mb2437|<span style="background:white; border:2px solid #19543E; color:#19543E; padding:2px;">2437</span>]]''' 08:29, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
:I have fixed it with a [[Help:purge|purge]] of the template page. -- [[User:John of Reading|John of Reading]] ([[User talk:John of Reading|talk]]) 08:56, 16 May 2025 (UTC)