View source for Wiki143 talk:WikiProject Law

{{talk header|noarchive=yes|search=no|wp=yes|WT:LAW}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WikiProject Law}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo                = old(90d)
| archive             = Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law/Archive %(counter)d
| counter             = 27
| maxarchivesize      = 150K
| archiveheader       = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft      = 4
}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law/Archive index|mask=Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law/Archive <#>|leading_zeros=0|indexhere=no}}
{{archives|index=/Archive index|bot=lowercase sigmabot III|age=90}}

== [[Ex contractu]] ==

Do you think we should redirect this to Wiktionary? Be bold! [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 11:03, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

:Sorry for the template.
:==  [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Ex contractu]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Ex contractu]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Unreferenced and unimproved for over 15 years. I asked on if anyone wanted to redirect it, at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law]], but got no volunteers. Run of the mill, obscure legal term.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Ex contractu|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 09:19, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

:I redirected it to ''[[Ex delicto]]''. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 22:52, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

== Good article reassessment for [[Article 12 of the Constitution of Singapore]] ==
[[Article 12 of the Constitution of Singapore]] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Article 12 of the Constitution of Singapore/1|reassessment page]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 16:57, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

:It was denied by another user. I agree with the current assessment of a C-class. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 19:23, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

== [[Law of Bulgaria]] ==

Can somebody please help to build up this stub, and source it? [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 22:30, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

:Almost 3 months later, it's still a stub. I can't read any Cyrillic words. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 19:25, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

== Requested move at [[Talk:Protecting Women's Private Spaces Act#Requested move 27 December 2024]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Protecting Women's Private Spaces Act#Requested move 27 December 2024]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. [[User_talk:Asukite|<span style="color:Purple;font-size:medium;font-family:Bradley Hand ITC"> ASUKITE</span>]] 19:53, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

:It was moved. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 19:26, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

== [[Administrative proceeding]] ==

Here's another stub for us to source and expand. This page hasn't been updated or properly sourced in 15 years. Please, rescue it, merge with another article such as [[Administrative law]], or go to [[WP:AfD]]. 2025 is a year of decisive action. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 06:45, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

:It was redirected. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 22:53, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

==  [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Beau pleader]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Beau pleader]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Referenced to a single source. Dictionary definition. Unimproved for a decade. Few sources online Google; they are all dictionary definitions themselves. Obscure legal term not used in 200 years.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Beau pleader|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 09:37, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
* Follow up: This has been redirected in lieu of deletion. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 23:04, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

== GA assessment for [[Measures for Justice]] ==

Sadly, the creator passed away after he requested an assessment, but before it could be fulfilled. Someone else assessed it as C-class in the past. I assessed it as B-class, with specific and actionable goals on the talk page for a GA. Can someone else please help by giving a required second opinion? [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 23:30, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

== Requested move at [[Talk:Auckland District Law Society#Requested move 24 March 2025]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Auckland District Law Society#Requested move 24 March 2025]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ''[[User:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#ff0000;">Tar</b><b style="color:#ff7070;">nis</b><b style="color:#ffa0a0;">hed</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b>]]''<sup>[[User talk:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b>]]</sup> 07:43, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

== Requested move at [[Talk:Federal Service for the Oversight of Consumer Protection and Welfare#Requested move 17 March 2025]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Federal Service for the Oversight of Consumer Protection and Welfare#Requested move 17 March 2025]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. –[[User:Owais Al Qarni|<span style="color:royalblue">𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢</span> <span style="color:red">ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ</span>]] 15:16, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

== Question about infobox for US immigration court (Article I) case for Mahmoud Khalil ==

In [[Detention of Mahmoud Khalil]], Khalil is involved in two legal cases, one before an Article III court (a habeas corpus case) and one before an Article I court (a deportation case before an immigration court). Since there are two relevant cases, we're trying to pay attention to both, though there's a lot more info about the former than the latter.  We have the info for the <nowiki>{{Infobox court}}</nowiki> in the habeas corpus case. But I'm having trouble finding <nowiki>{{Infobox court}}</nowiki> info about the immigration court. I know that the case involves Khalil, and the name/location of the immigration court (LaSalle Immigration Court in LA), but can't find a case no. or a judge's name or a case name. Are immigration court cases just called something like "In re Mahmoud Khalil" or "In the matter of Mahmoud Khalil"? Do they get case numbers and dockets? Do immigration courts publicly identify the judge assigned to the case? My impression is that <nowiki>{{Infobox court}}</nowiki> generally isn't used for Article I court cases, but I think it would be helpful to readers of this article if we lay out the two different cases proceeding in different kinds of courts. I'd appreciate guidance about what info should be included in the deportation case Infobox.

Less important: I've seen the habeas corpus case identified both as Khalil v. Joyce and Khalil v. Trump. Joyce was named as the first respondent in the initial petition for a writ, but Trump and Rubio were added as respondents in an amended petition for a writ, with Trump named first. Some of the lawyers (e.g., the ACLU) representing Khalil identify it as Khalil v. Trump, but the judge's order transferring it from SDNY to DNJ, and some other other documents still refer to it as Khalil v. Joyce. Does anyone knows which is the correct title? Thanks, [[User:FactOrOpinion|FactOrOpinion]] ([[User talk:FactOrOpinion|talk]]) 17:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

:There isn't really a case number for the administrative adjudication within DOJ, it's just the person's alien registration number ("A number"), which isn't public info. Nor is the record of proceeding public. DHS's notice-to-appear form uses "In the Matter of" [https://www.washingtonpost.com/documents/8a3cbff6-4589-43e1-8455-042fa9555e3c.pdf]. If it were to lead to a (very rare) published decision by the [[Board of Immigration Appeals]] or the Attorney General, that would then be cited as ''Matter of Khalil'', but I doubt that any source would call it that unless and until that happens. An appeal of a final order of removal would be filed in the court of appeals as ''Khalil v. Bondi'' (or whoever the AG happens to be), but obviously that wouldn't refer to the agency adjudication. Jenson[[User:SilverLocust|SL]]&nbsp;([[User talk:SilverLocust|SilverLocust]]) 04:58, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
::Thank you. I guess we won't use an infobox for the immigration court case, and we'll just address what's known about the case in the article's text. I'd seen that the A number was included in [https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/eoir/legacy/2014/07/25/3400.pdf this BIA ruling] that addressed the government's previous use of the same law (perhaps that's because Ruiz-Massieu died shortly after) and had wondered if that was a case number, so thanks for explaining the actual use. [[User:FactOrOpinion|FactOrOpinion]] ([[User talk:FactOrOpinion|talk]]) 12:31, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

== Requested move at [[Talk:American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act#Requested move 17 March 2025]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act#Requested move 17 March 2025]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. —usernamekiran [[User talk:usernamekiran|(talk)]] 21:11, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

== US Native American law categories ==

[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America#US law categories]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. [[User:Tule-hog|Tule-hog]] ([[User talk:Tule-hog|talk]]) 22:58, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

:Additional questions probably more appropriate for this WikiProject: would it be correct to re-categorize 'acts' currently listed in [[:Category:United States federal Indian policy]] into [[:Category:United States federal Native American legislation]]? Also, is it meaningful to have the latter as a subcategory of the former, or should they just link to each other with {{tlx|see also}}? [[User:Tule-hog|Tule-hog]] ([[User talk:Tule-hog|talk]]) 23:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
::I think all discussion should probably happen at one place to avoid things getting messy, so I will respond at the indigenous peoples talk page. [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 00:03, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

== Requested move at [[Talk:Censorship in Islamic societies#Requested move 14 March 2025]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Censorship in Islamic societies#Requested move 14 March 2025]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ''[[User:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#ff0000;">Tar</b><b style="color:#ff7070;">nis</b><b style="color:#ffa0a0;">hed</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b>]]''<sup>[[User talk:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b>]]</sup> 10:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

== Requested move at [[Talk:Refugee Act#Requested move 13 March 2025]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Refugee Act#Requested move 13 March 2025]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ''[[User:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#ff0000;">Tar</b><b style="color:#ff7070;">nis</b><b style="color:#ffa0a0;">hed</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b>]]''<sup>[[User talk:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b>]]</sup> 11:13, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

== ''Matter of Ruiz-Massieu'' ==
{{disdis|Manuductive|spi=Lardlegwarmers}}
I have a <s>userspace draft</s> article going [[Matter of Ruiz-Massieu|on this topic]].  I'd invite any and all constructive input.  Feel free to edit the draft with regular BRD protocols if you wish to do so.  I could use a little help with the placement and formatting of the references. [[User:Manuductive|Manuductive]] ([[User talk:Manuductive|talk]]) 03:29, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
:For reference formatting, see [[Wikipedia:Inline citation]]. You also need to dumb this down and explain it in plain English. Legal citations in the first sentence is not accessible to non-lawyers. Don't abbreviate things like SecState either. Additionally, I generally prefer citations to law reviews over news stories when writing legal articles. See, e.g., a featured article I wrote, [[Shostakovich v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.]]. [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 16:42, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
::<del>I've searched for "22 I&N Dec. 833" in a couple different places and nothing comes up except the opinion itself. Does any other legal source cite this case?  I think it's mostly notable for its coverage in news media. [[User:Manuductive|Manuductive]] ([[User talk:Manuductive|talk]]) 06:29, 31 March 2025 (UTC)</del> <small>Blocked sock. [[User:Horse Eye&#39;s Back|Horse Eye&#39;s Back]] ([[User talk:Horse Eye&#39;s Back|talk]]) 18:23, 6 April 2025 (UTC)</small>
:::Have you looked on Westlaw or Lexis? [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 12:41, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
::::Just noting here that I've added a Merge proposal. I don't think that the case is notable in itself. It didn't get significant coverage at the time, it didn't get significant coverage in the intervening years, and it's only getting small amounts of coverage now because the Trump admin. is trying to use the same law to deport a lot of people on visas and some with green cards. The more significant legal issue is whether the law is constitutional, and that will have be addressed in an Article III court. I've suggested merging it into [[Mario Ruiz Massieu]], and perhaps a bit into [[Detention of Mahmoud Khalil]], where it's already mentioned. [[User:FactOrOpinion|FactOrOpinion]] ([[User talk:FactOrOpinion|talk]]) 14:30, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
:::::<del>I could be mistaken, but the notability is established by the coverage in articles like {{tq2|Nathan, Debbie (March 21, 2025). "The Insidious Doctrine Fueling the Case Against Mahmoud Khalil: How a century of immigration law has evaded constitutional rights". Boston Review. Retrieved March 30, 2025 https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/the-insidious-doctrine-fueling-the-case-against-mahmoud-khalil/}} which go into moderate analysis and do mention that its a precedent decision at the BIA, which is not for nothing. [[User:Manuductive|Manuductive]] ([[User talk:Manuductive|talk]]) 20:39, 31 March 2025 (UTC)</del> <small>Blocked sock. [[User:Horse Eye&#39;s Back|Horse Eye&#39;s Back]] ([[User talk:Horse Eye&#39;s Back|talk]]) 18:23, 6 April 2025 (UTC)</small>
::::::Most precedential BIA cases are probably not notable, just like most published court decisions aren't notable. [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 20:53, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
::::<del>I don't have access to those databases, as far as I know.  They're not in the Wikipedia library, my public library doesn't provide them, and INAL.  Maybe somebody else could look.  Lexis Nexis does have a source that probably covers it that popped up:</del>
::::<del>https://store.lexisnexis.com/en-us/products/the-national-security-implications-of-immigration-law-grpussku-us-ebook-32400-epub.html [[User:Manuductive|Manuductive]] ([[User talk:Manuductive|talk]]) 20:30, 31 March 2025 (UTC)</del> <small>Blocked sock. [[User:Horse Eye&#39;s Back|Horse Eye&#39;s Back]] ([[User talk:Horse Eye&#39;s Back|talk]]) 18:23, 6 April 2025 (UTC)</small>
:::::Try HeinOnline on TWL. They archive legal journals and law reviews. [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 20:33, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
::::::<del>Nothing came up [[User:Manuductive|Manuductive]] ([[User talk:Manuductive|talk]]) 20:33, 31 March 2025 (UTC)</del> <small>Blocked sock. [[User:Horse Eye&#39;s Back|Horse Eye&#39;s Back]] ([[User talk:Horse Eye&#39;s Back|talk]]) 18:23, 6 April 2025 (UTC)</small>
:::::::This case may not be notable in the legal literature then, but that doesn't mean it doesn't meet GNG for being a prominent case that was written about by historians, etc. [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 20:37, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
::::::::<del>It's been referenced in a lot of news articles this week, with medium-depth analysis. [[User:Manuductive|Manuductive]] ([[User talk:Manuductive|talk]]) 20:40, 31 March 2025 (UTC)</del> <small>Blocked sock. [[User:Horse Eye&#39;s Back|Horse Eye&#39;s Back]] ([[User talk:Horse Eye&#39;s Back|talk]]) 18:23, 6 April 2025 (UTC)</small>
::{{outdent|6}} Sure, but that coverage isn't really likely to be [[WP:sustained|sustained]]. [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 20:52, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
<del>I merged the article into the BLP for [[Mario Ruiz Massieu]]. [[User:Manuductive|Manuductive]] ([[User talk:Manuductive|talk]]) 21:15, 31 March 2025 (UTC)</del> <small>Blocked sock. [[User:Horse Eye&#39;s Back|Horse Eye&#39;s Back]] ([[User talk:Horse Eye&#39;s Back|talk]]) 18:23, 6 April 2025 (UTC)</small>

== [[Chartered mark]] ==

Does anyone have expertise in this area? This stub, of unassessed importance, has been unreferenced for 15 years. Please add reliable sources. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 16:32, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

== Difference between detention and arrest in Turkey? ==

Hello,

Not being a lawyer I am a bit stuck with [[Talk:Arrest of Ekrem İmamoğlu#Arrested vs Detained?]]. Could anyone fix short “Turkey” subsections in the [[Detention (confinement)]] and [[arrest]] articles? [[User:Chidgk1|Chidgk1]] ([[User talk:Chidgk1|talk]]) 10:37, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
:I think you'd need a Turkish criminal lawyer or someone who can read Turkish sources to answer that question. In the US, arrest and detention (which could mean a seizure, imprisonment, pretrial detention, or a host of other things) are distinct legal concepts. [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 20:35, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

== [[Legal systems in Asia]] ==

I'm not sure if this list ''works''. It's been unsourced for 15 years. Should we delete it? Can you add reliable sources? Discuss. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 22:51, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

:Seems somewhat redundant for purely navigational purposes as categories and the template {{tlx|Asia topic|Law of}} cover this. Delete seems an option in its current iteration, but there is certainly a wide body of literature on law in Asia generally speaking. Regards, [[User:Goldsztajn|Goldsztajn]] ([[User talk:Goldsztajn|talk]]) 23:19, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

:What would a source even look like for this list? A citation to a geographical reference verifying that each country is in Asia? In its current form, this seems about as self-substantiating as it is possible for a list to be. That said, I don't think anything of encyclopedic value would be lost by deleting it. {{pb}}A clearer idea of the originally intended scope of this list/article can be seen by looking at the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Legal_systems_in_Asia&oldid=1014854212 last version before uncited statements were purged]. I don't think ''that'' text is salvageable, but it would certainly be possible to write a similar sort of overview based on reliable scholarly sources. Of course that would remain equally possible even if this list was deleted. -- [[User:Visviva|Visviva]] ([[User talk:Visviva|talk]]) 04:23, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

== [[Private limited company]] ==

Assess class C, in accord with [[User:Nettrom/sandbox/WikiProject Law stub predictions]]. This would easily be a B-class (or even a GA) if all sections had inline citations. Can somebody help with this please? [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 19:21, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

== Requested move at [[Talk:Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy#Requested move 26 March 2025]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy#Requested move 26 March 2025]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ''[[User:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#ff0000;">Tar</b><b style="color:#ff7070;">nis</b><b style="color:#ffa0a0;">hed</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b>]]''<sup>[[User talk:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b>]]</sup> 12:55, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

== Requested move at [[Talk:David Maxwell Fyfe, 1st Earl of Kilmuir#Requested move 26 March 2025]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:David Maxwell Fyfe, 1st Earl of Kilmuir#Requested move 26 March 2025]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ''[[User:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#ff0000;">Tar</b><b style="color:#ff7070;">nis</b><b style="color:#ffa0a0;">hed</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b>]]''<sup>[[User talk:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b>]]</sup> 13:15, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

==  [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Casu proviso]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Casu proviso]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Dictionary definition sourced to a single source and unimproved for about 19 years.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Casu proviso|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 04:46, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
: '''Note''': I have boldly merged this into [[List of writs]]. Cheers! [[User:BD2412|<span style="background:gold">'''''BD2412'''''</span>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 16:50, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
::Thanks, {{U|BD2412}}! [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 13:44, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

== Requested move at [[Talk:Executive Order 14172#Requested move 7 April 2025]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Executive Order 14172#Requested move 7 April 2025]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ''[[User:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#ff0000;">Tar</b><b style="color:#ff7070;">nis</b><b style="color:#ffa0a0;">hed</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b>]]''<sup>[[User talk:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b>]]</sup> 06:38, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

==Featured Article Review notice==
I have nominated [[Treaty of Devol]] for a [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Treaty of Devol/archive2|featured article review here]]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the [[Wikipedia:What is a featured article?|featured article criteria]]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are [[Wikipedia:Featured article review|here]].<!--Template:FARMessage--> [[User:AirshipJungleman29|&#126;~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]]) 16:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

== [[Suspended sentence]] ==

This Mid-important article has issues. I assessed it as a Start, but with all statements sourced reliably, and an image of a person doing [[community service]], and it will be a B-Class article. [[User:Nettrom/sandbox/WikiProject Law stub predictions]] assessed it as a C-Class, FWIW. Please help! [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 13:43, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

== DOGE executive orders at WP:RfD ==

A few weeks ago, I suggested changing the redirects for four Trump executive orders with "Department of Government Efficiency" in their titles from [[List of executive orders in the second presidency of Donald Trump]] to [[Department of Government Efficiency]] (and I now think that it's better to redirect to [[Department_of_Government_Efficiency#Legal_status|Department of Government Efficiency § Legal status]], which lists the #s and titles and then discusses the structure that arises from the combined EOs). It was relisted to generate more discussion, but there have been no new comments so far. I figured I'd post a notification here in case anyone wants to voice a preference. Here's the [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion#Executive Orders 14158, 14210, 14219, and 14222|link]]. [[User:FactOrOpinion|FactOrOpinion]] ([[User talk:FactOrOpinion|talk]]) 18:17, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

:Thanks! [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 10:23, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

== Question about SCOTUS infoboxes for emergency docket cases ==

In a couple of cases about deportations by the Trump admin of Venezuelans and Salvadorans to a prison in El Salvador, the Trump admin. has made emergency appeals to SCOTUS. The articles are [[J.G.G. v. Trump]] (about whether it's constitutional to invoke the Alien Enemies Act to deport alleged members of Tren de Aragua without due process, and whether the Trump admin. ignored a court order to bring planes carrying these men back to the US mid-flight) and the other is [[Deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia]] (about whether the Trump admin. must seek the return of a Salvadoran who was mistakenly deported to the Salvadoran prison despite a withholding of removal order). The articles have short sections on SCOTUS actions (a per curiam decision in the first case, an administrative stay in the second case while the appeal is referred to the court). Do people ever add infoboxes for emergency docket cases? 

I'm trying to decide whether to add infoboxes for the dockets in these emergency appeals, or if I should just add external links and docket #s at the bottom of the articles, since the Template:Infobox US Supreme Court case is really designed for normal SCOTUS cases where they've granted cert. [[User:FactOrOpinion|FactOrOpinion]] ([[User talk:FactOrOpinion|talk]]) 18:36, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

:Sure, see ''[[Tandon v. Newsom]]'', which I recently co-created. – Jenson[[User:SilverLocust|SL]]&nbsp;([[User talk:SilverLocust|SilverLocust]]) 21:29, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
::Thank you. [[User:FactOrOpinion|FactOrOpinion]] ([[User talk:FactOrOpinion|talk]]) 21:44, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
:::If you want to build better articles, an infobox is basically a criteria for GA status. It's also a good place to put essential information in one place for our readers. It's like a head note in West Reports. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 10:25, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

== [[Avocats Sans Frontières]] ==

This is possibly the worst article of our Project. Does anyone want to fix it? Or do we [[WP:TNT|need to  blow it up and start over again]]? Should we nominate it for deletion? [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 10:20, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

== [[Morgan Chu]] ==

Nine years later, this article still has serious issues. Chu is a [[patent attorney]] who has argued some of the most important cases in that specialized field of law, so he's notable. Can somebody please fix the issues with this? [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 10:37, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

== Requested move at [[Talk:Responses to the 2020 Chinese involvement with Hong Kong national security law#Requested move 1 April 2025]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Responses to the 2020 Chinese involvement with Hong Kong national security law#Requested move 1 April 2025]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ''[[User:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#ff0000;">Tar</b><b style="color:#ff7070;">nis</b><b style="color:#ffa0a0;">hed</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b>]]''<sup>[[User talk:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b>]]</sup> 04:01, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

== ASCAP lawsuit request ==

Hi editors, I made an [[Talk:American_Society_of_Composers,_Authors_and_Publishers#2009_lawsuit_rewording_and_move|edit request]] on the ASCAP talk page regarding a lawsuit that may be of interest to editors here. Any feedback would be appreciated! Cheers [[User:Stephanie BINK|Stephanie BINK]] ([[User talk:Stephanie BINK|talk]]) 20:38, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

== [[Sidley Austin]] ==

Hi! I've posted some COI edit requests at [[Talk:Sidley Austin#Feb. 2025 COI edit requests|Talk:Sidley Austin]]. Sharing in case anyone here is interested in taking a look. Thank you for any help or feedback! [[User:MaryGaulke|Mary Gaulke]] ([[User talk:MaryGaulke|talk]]) 04:52, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

== UK Supreme Court Ruling needs work ==

The just decided [[For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers]], which is garnering news coverage globally, is in need of expansion. Interested editors are invited to help improve the page. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 19:46, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
:It's not a High Court ruling - it's a Supreme Court ruling. [[User:Sweet6970|Sweet6970]] ([[User talk:Sweet6970|talk]]) 22:10, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
::I stand corrected. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 22:16, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
:::Thanks for the amendment. [[User:Sweet6970|Sweet6970]] ([[User talk:Sweet6970|talk]]) 13:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

== Format rights ==

Following ''[[Rinkoff v Baby Cow Productions]]'', we really should have an article about [[format rights]], which, depending on who you listen to, are either a valuable and important form of intellectual property around which a whole industry is based, or a nonsensical idea that doesn't actually exist in law. I've created a sub-stub draft article at [[Draft:Format rights]]. &mdash; [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome|talk]]) 13:03, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 20:49, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

==Auto-formatted dates in citation templates==
It is now possible for any citation template to automatically format dates. Is this desirable in any of the law citation templates?

The most popular citation templates all automatically format the dates if {{tl|use dmy dates}} or {{tl|use mdy dates}} are present in the article. These [[Help:CS1|citation style 1 (CS1)]] and [[Help:CS2|2 (CS2)]] templates are implemented by [[Module:Citation/CS1]]. Auto-formatted dates are also possible in any template via the recently written [[Module:Auto date formatter]]. It will either format the date, or if it cannot parse the date, it will output it as written. The module does not have the broad range of error detection, tracking, and warning that CS1 templates offer. Earlier this month, {{tl|cite patent}} was updated to use this module.

Would auto-formatting dates be desirable for any templates in [[:Category:Law citation templates]]? Some match external standards and style guides where a date format is specified. For example, the Bluebook citations output mdy dates. Others, like {{tl|UN document}}, look like CS1 formatting rather than an external style.

Rather than try to guess where it would be desirable to implement, I thought it would make the most sense to ask here. Also, I can assist or clarify anything in the module's documentation if there's a consensus to add auto-formatted dates to any of the legal citation templates.

Regards, [[User:Rjjiii|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rjj<sup>iii</sup></span>]] ([[User talk:Rjjiii|talk]]) 04:35, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

:Yes. Consistency with article date style is in our guidelines and should be followed. [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 13:53, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
::Right, but I mention it here because some of these are clearly based on an external style and therefore will be using that style's date formatting. I've pushed the changes live at [[Template:UN document]]. [[User:Rjjiii|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rjj<sup>iii</sup></span>]] ([[User talk:Rjjiii|talk]]) 04:31, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

== Requested move at [[Talk:Prostitution in the State of Palestine#Requested move 18 April 2025]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Prostitution in the State of Palestine#Requested move 18 April 2025]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. '''<span style="font-family: 'Georgia';">[[User:Valorrr|<span style="text-shadow:2px 2px 2px #a6a6a6"><span style="color: #8c8c8c;">Valorrr</span></span>]] <span style="color: #000000"><sup>([[User talk:Valorrr|<span style="color: #000000"><span style="text-shadow:2px 2px 2px #8c8c8c">lets chat</span></span>]])</sup></span></span>''' 04:40, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

== Good article reassessment for [[Article 9 of the Constitution of Singapore]] ==
[[Article 9 of the Constitution of Singapore]] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Article 9 of the Constitution of Singapore/1|reassessment page]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 20:33, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

== One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement! ==


{| style="background:#FFFFFF; border:2px solid #000080; padding: 10px; width: 100%"
|-
|[[File:Articles for improvement star.svg|right|85px]]
Hello,<br>Please note that '''[[Internet research]]''', which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for improvement|Articles for improvement]]'''. The article is [[Wikipedia:Today's article for improvement/Schedule|scheduled]] to appear on Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Community portal|Community portal]] in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! <!-- Substituted from Template:AFI project notice --><br />
<sub>Delivered by <!-- mbsig --><span style="font-family:sans-serif">&mdash; <b>[[User:MusikBot|<span style="color:black; font-style:italic">MusikBot</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:MusikAnimal|<span style="color:green">talk</span>]]</sup></b></span><!-- mbdate --> 00:05, 28 April 2025 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team</sub>
|-
|}

== [[For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers]] ==

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:For_Women_Scotland_Ltd_v_The_Scottish_Ministers
There is currently a discussion on the Talk page for this case, under the heading '''Rejected interventions''', which may be of interest to this project. [[User:Sweet6970|Sweet6970]] ([[User talk:Sweet6970|talk]]) 21:12, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

== Preterintention ==

[[Preterintention]] is mostly a steaming pile of dense incomprehensibility, with little puddles of clarity here and there, most likely due to the fact that the author's English level is probably 1 or 2 and he probably indulges in occasional AI translation. I left him [[User talk:Joseph77237#Problems at Preterintention|this message]] about it, but it's hard to know where to begin: it's way too late to draftify, so what is to be done? The one thing he gets right is sourcing, which he has been assiduous about (> 100 refs). Any ideas how to improve it? [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 08:09, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

:This is the third post about this article here: [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law/Archive 26#Preterintention]] and [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law/Archive 26#Preterintention 2]]. I don't know why this particular legal concept is attracting AI junk and poor writing. It can be redraftified via afd. [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 16:22, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
:: Thanks for the links. I had heard of the topic, first via French criminal law, as it happens, where it is known as ''[[Glossary of French criminal law#dol dépassé|dol dépassé]]'', but it seems to be a concept barely covered in English, although there is some Italian, Portuguese, German, and Spanish coverage of it. Unclear if enough to support an article here; perhaps a section or mention in another one. [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 08:11, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
:::I see that it's being worked on. I'd rather wait for a few days before merging it. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 19:11, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
::::The fact that it's being worked on is part of the issue, as Mathglot noted. [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 19:21, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
:::::Frankly, I think this needs to be TNT'd or stubified. [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 19:25, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
::::::Ok. Delete it. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 23:57, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
::::::: Pretty sure it won't be outright deleted. If kept at that title, it will very likely be TNT'd and become a [[WP:Permastub]]. A better outcome imho, would be write up a paragraph or two at [[Mens rea]] or [[Culpability]] about it, and then redirect the page to it.   [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 06:57, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

== [[Sylhet District Bar Association]] ==

This has been proposed for deletion. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 19:09, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

==  [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Multiplicity of suits]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Multiplicity of suits]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Unreferenced and unimproved for over 15 years. This term is very rarely used in the law.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Multiplicity of suits|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 00:22, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

:It was redirected per BLAR. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 23:58, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
::Thank you, {{U|Voorts}}! [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 17:44, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

==[[Draft:Musk v. Altman]]==
I created a draft for [[Draft:Musk v. Altman|Musk v. Altman]]. It may be of interest to members of this project. [[User:Thriley|Thriley]] ([[User talk:Thriley|talk]]) 18:17, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

:I don't think this is notable. This is all routine coverage. [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 18:32, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
::The suit is the subject of over one year of detailed reporting in global news media. There is definitely room for expansion. [[User:Thriley|Thriley]] ([[User talk:Thriley|talk]]) 19:19, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
:::From what I've seen, they're all primary sources / tick-tock reporting. Is there any in depth analysis of the case other than "this was filed on this day and then the judge ruled X"? [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 20:48, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

== [[Bangladesh Institute of Legal Development]] ==

Prodded by {{U|Worldbruce}}, seconded and assessed as a stub by me. Please review. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 23:56, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
:Thirded. [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 01:10, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

== [[Civil Service Reform Act of 1978]] ==

This article needs more work:
# updates to address the changes by Trump and Musk in 2025,
# images, including office buildings and/or administrators, and 
# additional secondary sources.
Please help out! [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 16:19, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Law/Assessment]] ==

I've completed the entire 10+ year backlog of requests for assessment. Now all that are left are my 13 requests. Can somebody please help me? [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 21:01, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

== [[Terry stop]] ==

I saw on the front page here at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Law]] that "[[Terry stop]] needs to be fixed...multiple warnings," but other than updates needed, I don't see a single problem with this. Am I missing something? [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 20:48, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

:Probably an old message. Who knows when the front page of the WikiProject was last substantively updated. (Obviously the page history, but I'm too lazy to look and I'd wager it was long ago.) [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 21:14, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
::Thanks. I'll check it out. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 20:17, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
:::I can't figure out how to edit it from my iPhone. Can you please help, {{U|Voorts}}? [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 20:48, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

== [[Perry v. Cyphers]] ==

This stub has been unsourced for 15 years. Can anyone source it? [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 20:17, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

== ''[[Habeas corpus]]'' ==

Let's keep on an eye on this. It's gotten [https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&range=latest-20&pages=Habeas_corpus an explosion of page views], obviously because it's in the news. Thanks for your help. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 00:37, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

==  [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Possession proceedings]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Possession proceedings]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Tagged as Unreferenced and unimproved for over 15 years. Tagged as NN for 5 years. No other language has an article from which to translate. This actually is a dictionary definition, but could be a dab page. Unless some editor wants to rescue it, it's probably better to delete or redirect somewhere.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Possession proceedings|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 00:09, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

== [[The Telephone Cases]] ==

I assessed this as a Start-Class article, and as predicted by [[User:Nettrom/sandbox/WikiProject Law stub predictions]]; I also requested images. There's no reason for why this important case has such a shabby article. With a bit of work, this could be a B-Class article. Please help out. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 00:42, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

== Requested move at [[Talk:W.M.M. v. Trump#Requested move 17 May 2025]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:W.M.M. v. Trump#Requested move 17 May 2025]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 02:21, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

== [[Continuance, etc., of Acts, 1735]] ==

This law-stub is up for deletion at [[WP:AfD]]. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 04:32, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

==  [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Judicature Act (Nova Scotia)]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Judicature Act (Nova Scotia)]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Notability not established with substantive sources for generic law'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Judicature Act (Nova Scotia)|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 20:29, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

== [[Senior General Counsel]] ==

This has been proposed as deletion. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 20:35, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you, {{U|Voorts}}! [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 17:44, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

== Good article reassessment for [[Non-constituency Member of Parliament]] ==
[[Non-constituency Member of Parliament]] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Non-constituency Member of Parliament/1|reassessment page]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 15:54, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

== [[Puerto Rico v. Shell Co. (P.R.)]] ==

Can somebody please add reliable sources to this stub? [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 07:02, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

== New page needs review ==
Hello all. If anyone at this project would be able to help with templates / mechanics / categorization, as well as independent review, on the page I've published on [[National TPS Alliance v. Noem et al.]] it would be appreciated. I've had trouble accessing the defendants filings to the court as well as broader context of their strictly legal argumentation (paywall issues). My thanks in advance to anyone who would be able to assist in finding information on their arguments / briefs, as they are currently lacking, and information has largely been pulled from the court ruling and news publications. Thanks again, and all my best - [[User:CSGinger14|CSGinger14]] ([[User talk:CSGinger14|talk]]) 05:29, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:Ok. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 01:51, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
::I added some categories. Make sure they make sense. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 02:00, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

== [[Constitutionality]] ==

This important article needs more reliable sources. Thanks in advance for helping. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 12:00, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

== [[Constitution of Rhode Island]] ==

Can somebody help add content to the current version, with reliable sources? [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 01:51, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

== [[Trade Expansion Act]] ==

Can someone update this article, please? [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 14:20, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

:@[[User:Bearian|Bearian]], I mean what needs updating? It allows for the president to make tariff some increases? It's a minor law like the AEA; merely because it's been in the news recently doesn't really change that. Pleasant editing, [[User:Irruptive Creditor|Irruptive Creditor]] ([[User talk:Irruptive Creditor|talk]]) 01:20, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
::Ok [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 01:23, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

==  [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:IWC meeting in 2006]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:IWC meeting in 2006]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Minutes of a three-day meeting. No secondary sources'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:IWC meeting in 2006|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 01:42, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

== Requested move at [[Talk:Brendan Carr (lawyer)#Requested move 23 May 2025]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Brendan Carr (lawyer)#Requested move 23 May 2025]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. [[User:Jeffrey34555|Jeffrey34555]] ([[User talk:Jeffrey34555|talk]]) 09:48, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

== [[Law Enforcement Guide to Truck Driving Safety Standards]] ==

Up for deletion, for various reasons. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 06:34, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

== [[United States Assistant Attorney General]] ==

Please update as tagged. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 21:41, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

== [[Declarant]] ==

This stub has been an unsourced dictionary definition for decades, darn it! Please add reliable sources. You too could earn points from [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articles/Backlog drives/June 2025]]. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 01:43, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
:Blanked and redirected. I don't think it makes sense to have a separate article from [[affidavit]]. Feel free to revert if you disagree. [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 02:20, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
::Thank you {{U|Voorts}}. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 19:13, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

== ''[[Fructus naturales]]'' ==

Can somebody please add reliable sources to this stub, which has been unsourced for 15 years. You may earn points at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articles/Backlog drives/June 2025]]. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 19:12, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

==  [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Independence constitution]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Independence constitution]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Tagged as Unreferenced and unimproved for 15 and 1/2 years. Tagged for Notability concerns for 3 months. [[WP:SOAP|Wikipedia is not a soap box]]. [[WP:OR|Wikipedia doesn't publish original content]].'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Independence constitution|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 01:41, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

== [[Legal systems in Asia]] ==

This has been tagged as unsourced for 15 and 1/2 years, and was proposed to merge for almost 17 years. We already have a banner and a category. Why is this needed? [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 23:17, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
:This seems like a navigational list. Why does it need references? [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 00:29, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
::Ok. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 17:45, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

== [[Literary property]] ==

This has been unsourced for 15 years. Does anyone want to take on this project and add reliable sources? [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 23:29, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
:{{done}} [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 01:48, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
::Thank you, {{U|Voorts}}! [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 17:45, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

== [[Manufacturing clause]] ==

[[Manufacturing clause]] has been tagged as unsourced for 15 and 1/2 years. It's an historical artifact. It's time to merge, which I'll do without objection next week, to [[History of copyright law of the United States]]. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 17:38, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

== New Hampshire law stubs ==

The following stubs about [[New Hampshire]] law have been tagged as unreferenced for over 15 years:
# [[NH RSA Title III]]
# [[NH RSA Title LXIII]]
# [[NH RSA Title V]]
# [[NH RSA Title XXX]].
I've cross-listed this with the WP NH.
Could someone please add reliable sources to them, or possibly merge them? [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 03:09, 20 June 2025 (UTC)