View source for Wiki143:Articles for deletion/Scholars for 9 11 Truth

<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.  ''
<!--
Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result of the debate was '''REDIRECT''' to ''Scholars for 9/11 Truth''. I'm not going to merge since the only content in this article is summaries of other articles...that exist to contain their summaries! -[[User:Splash|Splash]]<small><sup>[[User talk:Splash|talk]]</sup></small> 00:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
===[[Scholars for 9 11 Truth]]===
Essentially an advertisement; [[WP:NPOV]] violation; one of a number of pages created by [[User:Striver|Striver]] as part of his ongoing campaign to make a POV argument on [[Talk:September 11, 2001 attacks]]. [[User:Aaron|Aaron]] 18:14, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''': Violates [[WP:NOT]], Wikipedia is not a list of links or someone's personal soapbox. --[[User:Hetar|Hetar]] 18:49, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Are you kidding me? Read: [[WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox]]:

:''Propaganda or advocacy of any kind. '''Of course, an article can report objectively about such things, as long as an attempt is made to approach a neutral point of view'''. You might wish to go to Usenet or start a blog if you want to convince people of the merits of your favorite views. You can also use Wikinfo which promotes a "sympathetic point of view" for every article.

*<s>'''Keep'''</s>:--[[User:Striver|Striver]] 19:27, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' to existing article, [[Scholars for 9/11 Truth]]. [[User:Rhobite|Rhobite]] 19:47, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
:Oh, wow, cool, it already existed. I guess you are now going to delete that article as well using the same arguement? --[[User:Striver|Striver]] 20:01, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

*'''Merge''' to [[Scholars for 9/11 Truth]] --[[User:Striver|Striver]] 20:19, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
* '''Merge''' and '''redirect''' to [[Scholars for 9/11 Truth]]. — [[User:Adrian~enwiki|Adrian~enwiki]] ([[User talk:Adrian~enwiki|talk]]) 21:06, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' with [[Scholars for 9/11 Truth]] per above and let it share the same fate. :) &mdash; [[User:RJHall|RJH]] 02:20, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' to existing article, [[Scholars for 9/11 Truth]]. &ndash; [[User:Doug Bell|Doug Bell]] <sup>[[User talk:Doug Bell|talk]]'''&bull;'''[[Special:Contributions/Doug Bell|contrib]]</sup> 18:58, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' to [[Scholars for 9/11 Truth]]. [[User:GregorB|GregorB]] 19:23, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' along withg Scholars for 9/11 Truth. [[User:Peter Grey|Peter Grey]] 18:20, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>