View source for Wiki143:Article assessment/Extinct mammals/Mammoth

{{Wikipedia:Article assessment/Extinct mammals/status}}
[[Wikipedia:Article assessment|Assessment]] of an article under the topic [[Wikipedia:Article assessment/Extinct mammals|Extinct mammals]].


<big>'''Article:''' [[Mammoth]]</big>

Details of the assessment method can be found at the [[Wikipedia:Article assessment|main page]].  Feel free to add comments when you assess an article, or use the talk page for discussion.

==Review by violet/riga==
*Coverage and factuality: 7
:Poor referencing; does not go into detail about its position in the food chain, but seems to cover most other things
*Writing style: 8
:Some informal language
*Structure: 7
:The lead is too short and needs to summarise the article; the sections need rearranging to group things together, using more levels
*Aesthetics: 7
:Could do with one or two more images
*'''Overall: 7'''

Needs some rearranging, but is generally fairly good.  [[user:violetriga|violet/riga]] [[User_talk:violetriga|(t)]] 20:55, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

==Review by [[User:HereToHelp|HereToHelp]]==
*Coverage and factuality: '''5'''
:References are not inlined; general references are non-existant.
*Writing style: '''8'''
:Could use some disambiging of a few technical terms, but otherwise pretty good.
*Structure: '''8'''
:Couldn't find many problems but it didn't jump out at me as fantastic either. Headers could use a little tweaking.
*Aesthetics: '''8'''
:Standard taxobox. Two images seem a bit on the skimpy side making the article seem a little arid with text.

*'''Overall: 6.5'''
Seems mediocre except for the references, which bring this down a lot.--[[User:HereToHelp|HereToHelp]] ([[User talk:HereToHelp|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/HereToHelp|contribs]]) 13:57, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

==Review by [name]==
*Coverage and factuality: 
*Writing style: 
*Structure: 
*Aesthetics: 
*'''Overall: '''