View source for Walker tariff

{{Short description|Historical United States tariff reduction}}
{{Use American English|date=January 2019}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2019}}

The '''Walker Tariff''' was a set of [[tariff]] rates adopted by the United States in 1846. Enacted by the [[History of the Democratic Party (United States)|Democrats]], it made substantial cuts in the high rates of the "[[Tariff of 1842|Black Tariff]]" of 1842, enacted by the Whigs. It was based on a report by [[United States Secretary of the Treasury|Secretary of the Treasury]] [[Robert J. Walker]].

The Walker Tariff reduced tariff rates from 32% to 25%. Coinciding with Britain's repeal of the [[Corn Laws]], it led to an increase in trade.  The tariff still remained higher than the 20% universal tariff that existed before the Tyler tariffs were imposed.  

==Adoption==
Democrat [[James Polk]] was [[1844 United States presidential election|elected President in 1844]] over [[Henry Clay]], a [[Whig Party (United States)|Whig]] who advocated a high tariff.

[[President of the United States|President]] Polk declared that reduction of the "Black Tariff" would be the first of the "four great measures" that would define his administration. He directed Walker to work out the details. In 1846, Polk delivered Walker's tariff proposal to [[United States Congress|Congress]]. Walker urged its adoption to increase commerce between the US and Britain. He also predicted that a reduction in tariff rates would stimulate trade, including imports. The result, asserted Walker, would be a net increase in customs revenue, despite the reduced rates.

Congress, then controlled by Democrats, acted quickly on Walker's recommendations. Southern Democrats, who had little industry in their states, were especially supportive.

The Walker Tariff produced the nation's first standardized tariff: rather than setting fixed rates for specific items on a case-by-case basis, it established general schedules into which all goods could be classified, subject to defined [[ad valorem]] rates. The bill reduced rates across the board on most major import items save [[luxury goods]], such as [[tobacco]] and [[alcoholic beverage]]s.

==Impact==
The bill made moderate reductions in many tariff rates. As Walker had predicted, trade increased substantially, and net revenue collected also increased,  from $30 million annually under the Black Tariff in 1845 to almost $45 million annually by 1850. It also improved relations with Britain that had soured over the [[Oregon boundary dispute]].

It was passed along with a series of financial reforms proposed by Walker including the [[Warehousing Act]] of 1846.  The 1846 tariff rates initiated a fourteen-year period of relative [[free trade]] by nineteenth century standards lasting until the high [[Morrill Tariff]] of 1861.

The Walker Tariff remained in effect until the [[Tariff of 1857]], which used it as a base and reduced rates further.

The 1861 Morril Tariff raised the effective rate collected on dutiable imports by approximately 70%. Customs revenue from tariffs totaled $345 million from 1861 through 1865.<ref>{{cite book|last=Markham|first=Jerry|title=A financial history of the United States|url=https://archive.org/details/financialhistory01mark|url-access=limited|year=2001|volume=3|page=[https://archive.org/details/financialhistory01mark/page/n231 220]}}</ref>

The tariff act of 1842 had a significant impact on railroad building.  The duty of $17/ton of hammered bar iron and $25/ton of rolled bar iron raised costs by 50 to 80%.  The Walker tariff of 1846 reduced the duty to 30% and set off a railroad building boom in the 1850s.<ref>{{cite journal| last = Murphy| first = Ared Maurice| date = June–September 1925| title = The Big Four Railroad in Indiana| url= https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/imh/article/view/6363/6443| journal = Indiana Magazine of History| volume = xxi| issue = 2 and 3| page = 112| access-date=December 25, 2022}}</ref>

==References==
{{reflist}}

==Further reading==
* James, Scott C., and David A. Lake. "The second face of hegemony: Britain's repeal of the Corn Laws and the American Walker Tariff of 1846." ''International Organization'' 43.1 (1989): 1–29. [https://quote.ucsd.edu/lake/files/2014/07/IO-43-1-1989.pdf online]
* Rowe, Christopher. "American society through the prism of the Walker Tariff of 1846." ''Economic Affairs'' 40.2 (2020): 180–197.
* [https://www.mises.org/etexts/taussig.pdf Taussig, Frank. ''Tariff History of the United States'' (1912)]
* Woodward, G. Thomas. "Revenue Response from a Tax Cut: The Walker Tariff of 1846." ''Proceedings. Annual Conference on Taxation and Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the National Tax Association'' Vol. 104. (2011) [https://ntanet.org/wp-content/uploads/proceedings/2011/021-woodward-revenue-response-tax-2011-nta-proceedings.pdf online].

{{James K. Polk}}
{{US tax acts}}

[[Category:1846 in American politics]]
[[Category:1846 in economic history]]
[[Category:Tariff laws in the United States]]
[[Category:Presidency of James K. Polk]]