View source for Utah Constitutional Amendment 3

{{Infobox referendum
| name = Constitutional Amendment 3
| yes = 593,297
| no = 	307,488
| total = 942,010
| electorate = 1,278,251
| turnoutpct = 70.47
| map = 2004 Utah Constitutional Amendment 3 results map by county.svg
| flag_year = 1922
| mapcaption = 
{{col-begin}}
{{col-2}}
'''Yes''' 
{{legend|#28497C|80–90% |border=1px #AAAAAA solid}}
{{legend|#47729E|70–80% |border=1px #AAAAAA solid}}
{{legend|#7D9CBB|60–70% |border=1px #AAAAAA solid}}
{{legend|#B6C8D9|50–60% |border=1px #AAAAAA solid}}
{{col-2}}
'''No'''
{{legend|#BCBC83|60–70% |border=1px #AAAAAA solid}}
{{legend|#DEDEBD|50–60% |border=1px #AAAAAA solid}}
{{col-end}}
| notes = Source: <ref>[https://vote.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/42/2023/09/2004Gen.pdf 2004 election Utah]</ref>
|title='''''Utah Marriage Amendment'''''|date=November 2, 2004|country=Utah}}

{{ElectionsUT}}

'''Utah Constitutional Amendment 3''' was an amendment to the [[Constitution of Utah|Utah state constitution]] that sought to define [[marriage]] as a union exclusively between a man and woman. It passed in the November 2, 2004, election, as did similar amendments in ten other [[U.S. state|states]].

The amendment, which added Article 1, Section 29, to the Utah Constitution, reads:

#''Marriage consists only of the legal union between a man and a woman.''
#''No other domestic union, however denominated, may be recognized as a marriage or given the same or substantially equivalent legal effect.''

On December 20, 2013, federal judge [[Robert J. Shelby]] of the [[United States District Court for the District of Utah|U.S. District Court for Utah]] struck down Amendment 3 as unconstitutional under the [[Due Process Clause|Due Process]] and [[Equal Protection Clause|Equal Protection]] clauses of the [[U.S. Constitution]].

==Background==
Both pro and anti amendment groups formed to sway voters. The "Don't Amend Alliance" organized in spring, much earlier than pro-amendment groups. The Alliance raised hundreds of thousands of dollars, catching supporters of the amendment by surprise. They responded with the "Yes! For Marriage" group, which only began a coordinated campaign on October 5. Nonetheless, latent support for the amendment appeared high with over 60% support for the Amendment in a ''[[The Salt Lake Tribune|Salt Lake Tribune]]'' poll conducted early October.

[[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]] (LDS church), though not officially endorsing the amendment, publicized a statement in July endorsing constitutional amendments that define marriage. On October 20, just 13 days before Utahns voted on the amendment, the LDS church officially stated that "Any other sexual relations, including those between persons of the same gender, undermine the divinely created institution of the family. ''The Church accordingly favors measures that define marriage as the union of a man and a woman and that do not confer legal status on any other sexual relationship.''"[https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/ldsnewsroom/eng/news-releases-stories/first-presidency-statement-on-same-gender-marriage] Supporters of the amendment asserted the second statement showed specific LDS support for Amendment 3. Others, including moderately conservative [[Latter-day Saint]] [[KSL (AM)|KSL]] radio talk show host Doug Wright, believed that since the new statement applied only to "sexual relations" it highlighted precisely how Amendment 3 went too far.

The [[Episcopal Church in the United States of America|Episcopal]] church publicly opposed the amendment.

Three candidates for Utah [[attorney general]], including incumbent [[United States Republican Party|Republican]] [[Mark Shurtleff]], issued a joint statement opposing the amendment on August 6. In many other political races, notably the gubernatorial race, candidates weighed in on this issue.

On November 2, 2004, Amendment 3 was approved by 66% of Utah voters, (rejected in two counties) in a closer than expected race. [[Governor Huntsman]] proposed reciprocal benefits for gay couples in reaction. The reciprocal beneficiary measure failed in the Utah Senate during the 2005 legislative session on a ten in favor to eighteen opposed poll.

On December 20, 2013 Amendment 3 was ruled unconstitutional by Federal District Court Judge Robert J. Shelby in Salt Lake City. The state government is expected to appeal.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/57291925-78/marriage-utah-laws-shelby.html.csp|title = Federal judge strikes down Utah ban on same-sex marriage}}</ref>

On January 6, 2014 the United States Supreme Court issued a stay of Judge Shelby's ruling "pending final disposition," according to the order. The Court's order reinstates the state Constitutional ban and will keep it intact until after a federal appeals court has ruled on it. The order appeared to have the support of the full Court, since there were no noted dissents.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/01/court-stops-utah-gay-marriages/|title = Court stops Utah gay marriages (UPDATED)|date = 6 January 2014}}</ref>

==Arguments for Amendment 3==
Supporters of Amendment 3 said that the amendment would do three things:

#Prevent state courts from making a ruling that current Utah marriage legislation as being unconstitutional.
#Prevent state courts from forcing recognition of out-of-state marriages.
#Prevent the creation of "counterfeit marriages", such as civil unions.

They also said the amendment would not hurt heterosexual marriage, [[common-law marriage]]s, or the right to [[Will (law)|will]] property to whomever one wishes.

==Arguments against Amendment 3==
Those opposed to the amendment say that section one of the amendment is completely unnecessary since Utah already outlaws [[same-sex marriage]]. They also say the second part of the amendment "goes too far". They feel that it would invalidate [[common-law marriage in the United States|common-law marriage]] as well as reducing rights to will property to whomever one chooses.

==Results==
{{Referendum
| title = Amendment 3<ref>{{cite web |url=http://elections.gmu.edu/Turnout_2004G.html |title=2004 General Election Turnout Rates |publisher=United States Election Project |date=June 4, 2013 |access-date=June 4, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130709145327/http://elections.gmu.edu/Turnout_2004G.html |archive-date=July 9, 2013 |url-status=dead |df=mdy-all }}</ref>
| yes = 593,297
| yespct = 65.86
| no = 	307,488
| nopct = 34.14
| total = 900,785
| electorate = 1,574,463 	
| turnoutpct = 57.21
}}

On November 2, 2004 Amendment 3 passed by a margin of 65.8% to 33.2%. Results were 593,297 votes for and 307,488 votes against the amendment. The amendment went into effect on January 1, 2005. Utah courts in 2006 ruled that the amendment does not ban domestic partnerships and allowed Salt Lake City's domestic partnership registry to stand. In 2009, Utah Governor [[Jon Huntsman, Jr.|Jon Huntsman]] indicated it was his belief the amendment would not ban civil unions.[http://kcpw.org/article/664] [http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=5946138] [http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=4506256] [http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148&sid=5626381] [http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=481&sid=6251467]

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! County
! [[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes vote
! [[Image:X mark.svg|15px|No]]&nbsp;No vote
! Final outcome
|-
| colspan=8 | ''Wasatch metropolitan area:''
|-
| Davis
| 71% (75,780)
| 29% (31,524)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes 
|-
| Salt Lake
| 54% (190,364)
| 46% (159,605)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes
|-
| Summit
| 39% (5,696)
| 61% (9,079)
|[[Image:X mark.svg|15px|No]]&nbsp;No
|-
| Tooele
| 64% (10,399)
| 36% (5,886)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes
|-
| Utah
| 82% (119,948)
| 18% (26,290)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes
|-
| Weber
| 62% (43,885)
| 38% (26,894)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes
|-
| colspan=8 | ''Rest of state:''
|-
| Beaver
| 76% (1,851)
| 24% (572)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes 
|-
| Box Elder
| 76% (13,707)
| 24% (4,246)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes 
|-
| Cache
| 75% (29,137)
| 25% (9,832)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes 
|-
| Carbon
| 61% (4,929)
| 39% (3,101)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes 
|-
| Daggett
| 72% (340)
| 28% (130)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes 
|-
| Duchesne
| 80% (4,288)
| 20% (1,076)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes
|-
| Emery
| 77% (3,483)
| 23% (1,039)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes
|-
| Garfield
| 77% (1,599)
| 23% (467)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes
|-
| Grand
| 46% (1,840)
| 54% (2,163)
|[[Image:X mark.svg|15px|No]]&nbsp;No
|-
| Iron
| 78% (11,625)
| 22% (3,364)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes
|-
| Juab
| 74% (2,437)
| 26% (870)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes
|-
| Kane
| 72% (2,080)
| 28% (792)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes
|-
| Millard
| 81% (3,844)
| 19% (894)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes
|-
| Morgan
| 75% (2,866)
| 25% (941)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes
|-
| Piute
| 79% (584)
| 21% (159)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes
|-
| Rich
| 76% (772)
| 24% (248)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes
|-
| San Juan
| 78% (3,243)
| 22% (897)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes
|-
| Sanpete
| 79% (6,518)
| 21% (1,753)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes
|-
| Sevier
| 80% (5,957)
| 20% (1,498)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes
|-
| Uintah
| 77% (7,337)
| 23% (2,135)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes
|-
| Wasatch
| 67% (4,907)
| 33% (2,429)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes
|-
| Washington
| 78% (32,946)
| 22% (9,217)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes
|-
| Wayne
| 71% (935)
| 29% (387)
|[[Image:Yes check.svg|15px|Yes]]&nbsp;Yes
|}

== Court challenge ==
{{main|Kitchen v. Herbert}}
On March 25, 2013, three same-sex couples, including one already married in Iowa, filed a lawsuit in the [[United States District Court for the District of Utah]] seeking to declare Utah's prohibition on the recognition of same-sex marriages unconstitutional under the [[Due Process Clause|Due Process]] and [[Equal Protection Clause|Equal Protection]] clauses of the [[United States Constitution]].<ref>{{cite news|last=Romboy|first=Dennis|url=http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865576781/Utah-among-several-states-with-marriage-laws-under-legal-challenge.html?pg=all|title=Utah among several states with marriage laws under legal challenge|date=March 26, 2013|publisher=Deseret News|access-date=December 5, 2013|archive-date=November 25, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131125041737/http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865576781/Utah-among-several-states-with-marriage-laws-under-legal-challenge.html?pg=all|url-status=dead}}</ref> The court heard arguments on December 4. The state argued that there was "nothing unusual" in enforcing policies that encourage "responsible procreation" and the "optimal mode of child-rearing". Plaintiffs' attorney contended that the policy is "based on prejudice and bias that is religiously grounded in this state".<ref>{{cite news|title=Judge hears arguments in case challenging Utah's gay marriage ban |url=http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2013/12/4/judge-hears-argumentsinsamesexmarriageban.html|access-date=December 5, 2013|newspaper=Aljazeera America|date=December 4, 2013}}</ref>

On December 20, 2013, District Judge [[Robert J. Shelby]] struck down the same-sex marriage ban as unconstitutional and violating same-gender couples' their rights to due process and equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment. The ruling prevents the State from enforcing Sections 30-1-2 and 30-1-4.1 of the Utah Code and Article I, § 29 of the Utah Constitution to the extent these laws prohibit a person from marrying another person of the same sex.<ref>{{cite news|title=Judge strikes down Utah's same-sex marriage ban|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/judge-strikes-down-utahs-same-sex-marriage-ban/2013/12/20/f032442e-69bc-11e3-997b-9213b17dac97_story.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131222123911/http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/judge-strikes-down-utahs-same-sex-marriage-ban/2013/12/20/f032442e-69bc-11e3-997b-9213b17dac97_story.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=December 22, 2013|access-date=December 20, 2013|newspaper=Washington Post|date=December 20, 2013}}</ref> Historian J. Seth Anderson and neuroscientist Michael Ferguson were the first same-sex couple legally married in Utah on Dec. 20, 2013.<ref>{{Cite web |title=PHOTOS: Meet the Gay Couple Who Made History in Utah |url=https://www.advocate.com/politics/marriage-equality/2014/01/17/photos-meet-gay-couple-who-made-history-utah |access-date=2023-08-28 |website=www.advocate.com |language=en}}</ref> State Senator [[Jim Dabakis]] and his partner of 27 years were among the first same-sex couples to marry in the state.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-rt-us-usa-gaymarriage-utah-20131220,0,4692192.story|agency=Chicago Tribune|title=Utah county begins issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples|date=December 20, 2013|access-date=December 20, 2013}}</ref>

Same sex marriages were performed in Salt Lake, Washington and Cache counties on December 20.<ref>{{cite web|last=Cutler|first=Annie|title=Videos: First same-sex couple to be married in Utah exchange vows|date=21 December 2013|url=http://fox13now.com/2013/12/20/videos-first-same-sex-couple-to-be-married-in-utah-exchange-vows/|publisher=KSTU FOX 13 News|access-date=2013-12-22}}</ref> Other counties declined to grant same-sex couples their request.<ref>{{cite news|last=Green, Goodell|first=Mark, Ashton|title=Confusion at county clerk's office after Utah's same-sex marriage ban struck down|url=http://fox13now.com/2013/12/21/confusion-at-county-clerks-office-after-utahs-same-sex-marriage-ban-struck-down/|access-date=2013-12-22|newspaper=KSTU FOX 13 News|date=2013-12-21}}</ref> At least one same-sex couple planned to camp overnight at the Salt Lake County Clerk's Office in anticipation of it opening at 8 a.m., one hour before the 9 a.m. hearing scheduled to hear a Motion for Stay submitted by the State of Utah in the 10th District Court.<ref>{{cite news|last=Green, Tanner|first=Mark, Todd|title=Utah same-sex couples seeking marriage to camp overnight outside county clerk's office|url=http://fox13now.com/2013/12/22/same-sex-couples-in-utah-race-to-get-married-ahead-of-mondays-hearing/|access-date=2013-12-22|newspaper=KSTU FOX 13 News|date=2013-12-22}}</ref> An Emergency Motion to Stay, which would have granted a stay pending the ruling on the stay that is the subject of a hearing scheduled for December 23, was denied December 22.<ref>{{cite news|last=Green|first=Mark|title=10th Circuit Court denies Utah's Emergency Motion for Temporary Stay|url=http://fox13now.com/2013/12/22/10th-circuit-court-denies-utahs-emergency-motion-for-temporary-stay/|access-date=2013-12-22|newspaper=KSTU FOX 13 News|date=2013-12-22}}</ref>

The United States Supreme Court issued an order on Monday, January 6, 2014, that halted same-sex marriages until an appeal is decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.<ref>{{cite news|last=Peralta|first=Eyder|title=Supreme Court Halts Gay Marriages In Utah|url=https://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2014/01/06/260156223/supreme-court-halts-gay-marriages-in-utah|access-date=2014-01-25|date=2014-01-06|newspaper=NPR}}</ref>

On January 16, Attorney General Sean Reyes named [[Gene C. Schaerr]], former law clerk to Supreme Court Justices Warren Burger and [[Antonin Scalia]], as lead outside counsel to make Utah's case to the Tenth Circuit. Schaerr was to be aided in the appeal by former Michigan Solicitor General John Bursch and Idaho Attorney (and former U.S. Attorney for the District of Nevada), [[Monte N. Stewart]].<ref>{{cite news|last=Romboy|first=Dennis|title=Utah attorney general hires 3 lawyers to fight same-sex marriage ruling|url=http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865594294/Utah-attorney-general-names-outside-counsel-for-same-sex-marriage-appeal.html?pg=all|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140119161714/http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865594294/Utah-attorney-general-names-outside-counsel-for-same-sex-marriage-appeal.html?pg=all|url-status=dead|archive-date=January 19, 2014|access-date=2014-01-25|newspaper=Deseret News|date=2014-01-16}}</ref>

That same day, the Utah State Tax Commission announced that it will allow married same-sex couples to file joint income tax returns for 2013.<ref>{{cite news|last=Romboy|first=Dennis|title=Married gay couples can file jointly, tax commission decides|url=http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865594294/Utah-attorney-general-names-outside-counsel-for-same-sex-marriage-appeal.html?pg=all|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140119161714/http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865594294/Utah-attorney-general-names-outside-counsel-for-same-sex-marriage-appeal.html?pg=all|url-status=dead|archive-date=January 19, 2014|access-date=2014-01-25|newspaper=Deseret News|date=2014-01-16}}</ref>

The Tenth Circuit heard oral argument on April 10, 2014. On June 25, 2014, a three-judge panel consisting of Judges [[Paul Joseph Kelly]], Jr., [[Carlos F. Lucero]], and [[Jerome Holmes]] of the Tenth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling in a 2-1 decision. Judge Lucero wrote the majority opinion and was joined by Judge Holmes, with Judge Kelly authoring a dissent. The ruling was immediately stayed pending appeal. On August 5, Utah appealed the ruling to the [[United States Supreme Court]].

On October 6, 2014, the Supreme Court denied to review ''Kitchen'', allowing the Tenth Circuit's decision to become final. Thus, Utah was required to immediately begin licensing and recognizing same-sex marriages. This decision also became binding on federal courts throughout the Tenth Circuit, including Oklahoma, Kansas, Wyoming, Colorado, and New Mexico (the only state that already allowed same-sex marriage prior to ''Kitchen'').

==See also==
* [[Same-sex marriage in the United States]]
* [[Same-sex marriage legislation in the United States]]
* [[Same-sex marriage in the United States by state]]
* [[Same-sex marriage in the United States public opinion]]
* [[Same-sex marriage status in the United States by state]]
* [[List of benefits of marriage in the United States]]
* [[Defense of Marriage Act]]
* [[Marriage Protection Act]]
* [[U.S. state constitutional amendments banning same-sex unions]]
* [[Federal Marriage Amendment]]
* [[Domestic partnerships in the United States]]
* [[Freedom to Marry|Freedom to Marry Coalition]]
* [[History of civil marriage in the U.S.]]

==Notes==
{{reflist}}

==External links==
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20040824113931/http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,595086280,00.html ''Deseret Morning News'' &mdash; Marriage measure dividing Utah race]
*[http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_2435943 ''Salt Lake Tribune'' &mdash; Amendments pass, No. 3 by wide margin]
*[http://www.followthemoney.org/press/ReportView.phtml?r=236 The Money Behind the 2004 Marriage Amendments -- National Institute on Money in State Politics]

{{U.S. same-sex unions ballot measures}}
{{Same-sex unions in the United States}}

[[Category:LGBTQ history in Utah]]
[[Category:Utah law]]
[[Category:2004 in LGBTQ history]]
[[Category:2004 in American law]]
[[Category:2004 in Utah]]
[[Category:U.S. state constitutional amendments banning same-sex unions]]
[[Category:2004 ballot measures in the United States]]
[[Category:Common-law marriage]]
[[Category:Same-sex marriage ballot measures in the United States]]
[[Category:Marriage in Utah]]