View source for User talk:Waltpohl

== Welcome ==
Hello, [[Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers|welcome]] to Wikipedia. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them:

*[[Wikipedia:How to edit a page|How to edit a page]]
*[[Wikipedia:How to write a great article|How to write a great article]]
*[[Wikipedia:Naming conventions|Naming conventions]]
*[[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]]

If you have any questions, see the [[Wikipedia:Help|help pages]], add a question to the [[Wikipedia:village pump|village pump]] or ask me on [[User talk:Dersonlwd|my talk page]]. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedian]]!

''Tip: you can sign your name with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>''

[[User:Dersonlwd|Dersonlwd]] [[User talk:Dersonlwd|Talk]] 04:25, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)

----
Hi, thanks much for filling in [[Angkor]].  Have been wanting to get around to it, but glad you did it! [[User:Fuzheado|Fuzheado]] 03:19, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC)

: Thanks, it was my pleasure. I was just impressed that all of those places already had pages.
----
Removing redirects just because one page has more links is a poor reason. It just so happens that most of those links came from US military articles. Eventually, there will be many articles on the cities and municipalities of Leyte and Samar (the provinces) that it will match the military articles for links. I'm sorry, I should've used the summary box. --[[User:Seav|seav]] 21:51, Mar 15, 2004 (UTC)

BTW, the same thing goes for [[Bicol]], the language [[Bikol]] deserves to be linked from a disambiguation page because an alternative spelling to the language's name is Bicol. --[[User:Seav|seav]] 22:14, Mar 15, 2004 (UTC)

: I don't think that they're really very ambiguous.  For example, [[Samar province]] is part of [[Samar (island)|Samar]].  If someone links to [[Samar]], and they meant the province and not the island, then all they have to do is click on the Samar province link that's prominently displayed under the list of provinces.  This is ''exactly'' as much work as you have to do with the redirect page.  But if you meant the island then you're already in the right spot.  I agree that the truly correct link for the island is [[Samar (island)]], which is why when I wrote the page for it, I put it on the island page.  But if someone links to just Samar, they're going to mean the island most of the time anyway, since the island is intrinsically more interesting than the province.

: Likewise, for Bicol, I think it's sufficient to add near the top that Bicol is another name for the language, followed by the link to the language page.

: Wikipedia already has a lot of situations handled this way.  For example, the state of New York is under [[New York]], while the city of New York is under [[New York City]], with a prominent link to New York City at the top. I added a page for the [[Great Lakes (Africa)]], but rather than turn [[Great Lakes]] into a disambiguating page, I added a link at the top of the page.  It just seemed politer to both users and writers. -- [[User:Waltpohl|Walt Pohl]] 08:04, 16 Mar 2004 (UTC)

::I don't agree that most people will link to Samar, the island, instead of Samar the province. It's the same thing as Leyte. Both the island and the province of Leyte are mentioned in almost equal times in local news that I read. The same goes for Samar. The reason why there are many articles that link to both the island right now in Wikipedia is because of the US Military stuff, and the WWII stuff.

::Have you read the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation]] page? Look under the '''Types of disambiguation''' section. There it says that for multiple article that share the same name, they are either equal in importance or one is overwhelmingly used. That's why [[Paris]] is about the French capital with a pointer to [[Paris (disambiguation)]] which points to other Parises like [[Paris, Texas]] and [[Paris (mythology)]] (the Trojan War character). Most will agree that the French capital shouldn't be just under [[Paris, France]].

::But there is equal disambiguation: which [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury Mercury] is more important? Is it the planet? The chemical element? The Roman god of trade? In this case, most will agree that the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury Mercury] page is itself a disambiguation page.

::I am contending that Samar and Leyte (and to a lesser degree, Bicol) will fall under the latter type of disambiguation. Just because the provinces are within the island doesn't mean that they are less important than the island.

::: But look at this rule on the same page.

::: '''Specific instances'''

::: On a page called Title, generally do not disambiguate:
:::    * Title County
:::    * Title City
:::    * Title Hospital
:::    * Title University 

::: Don't you think this applies here?  It's exactly the same situation.  Importance is not the only criterion.  What's more important?  [[New York]] the state, or [[New York City]]?  Yet, we manage without a disambiguating page.

::: For examples like Paris and Mercury, it's not just that they're ambiguous, it's that the different examples have nothing to do with each other.  Here, if I say something is a city in Samar province, and I link to the top-level Samar, have I even gotten anything wrong?  Samar the island and Samar the province are just not different enough to impose on everyone the work of disambiguating every single link to Samar.

::: There's also a point of etiquette here.  Look at this comment from the disambiguation page:

::: '''A code of honor for creating disambiguation pages is to fix the mis-directed links that will be created when the disambiguation page is made.'''

::: I think that's an important consideration. -- [[User:Waltpohl|Walt Pohl]] 23:17, 17 Mar 2004 (UTC)

::::Ok, I will concede. What convinced me was the way [[Ireland]] was handled. Ireland the country (i.e., the [[Republic of Ireland]]) occupies just a part of the island of [[Ireland]], but the two are somewhat equivalent in importance. In fact, the country is probably more important (when current news simply says "Ireland", usually the country is meant). Wikipedia, however, chose to do what you did for Samar and Leyte. --[[User:Seav|seav]] 15:45, Mar 18, 2004 (UTC)

----
Hi, welcome to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected Areas]].  I keep an eye on it and contribute from time to time.  I note that all your "to-dos" are done so you might find something in this project to occupy your talents.  [[User:Tiles|Tiles]] 07:18, 16 Mar 2004 (UTC)

: Tragically, they're only "done", i.e. they're really minimal stubs I hope to rewrite.  But don't worry, I'm planning on working on parks pages anyway (primarily for Africa). -- [[User:Waltpohl|Walt Pohl]] 08:04, 16 Mar 2004 (UTC)
----

Hi, thanks for your comments on [[List of Late Antique, Early Christian and Medieval art monuments]]. I agree, to a point.  If nothing else, the title is atrocious.  However, if one were to take an Art History course on medieval art, about 80% of these monuments would be covered.  I do think that a list of this sort is needed. (Actually I think that an even more comprehensive list is needed.)  The list could organized differently (It is now in roughly chronolical order.  The many links to nowhere is a problem, but I intend, in the fullness of time, to start many of these articles.[[User:David Stapleton|David Stapleton]] 14:24, Mar 18, 2004 (UTC)
----

At "pages needing attention" you wrote this:

:''Complex number - reads like it was originally copied from an old source. --Walt Pohl 18:19, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC)''

Can you be more specific as to what you had in mind?  Do you object to its having been ''copied'', or to the age of the source, or what?  I have some experience teaching most of the material on this page in classrooms at MIT and elsewhere.  The page is clearly not intended to bring people up to speed on current research or anything like that -- if it were, it would be on any of a great number of narrower topics.  I don't see why a source written in 1930 would be any worse than one written in 2000 just because of its age, in an article of this kind.  But maybe if you mention more specific points I'll understand what you're trying to say. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] 21:47, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)

: I had two concerns.  First, that it was taken from a source still under copyright.  Second, that since the source is old, that the terminology or the history might be out of date.  (For example, I've never heard the term "direction coefficient".) [[User:Waltpohl|Walt Pohl]] 19:29, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)

----

Hi, I just wanted to say thanks for the initial articles for the missing sporadic groups. -- [[User:Schneelocke|Schneelocke]] (''[[User talk:Schneelocke|cheeks clone]]'') [[<nowiki></nowiki>]] 22:37, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
: You're welcome.  I was sick of seeing those entries on the list of year-old requests. -- [[User:Waltpohl|Walt Pohl]] 08:32, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)

==Dsadfsdfasljk==

See my talk page --[[User:KayEss|KayEss]] 05:47, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

:You'd best do it. I have no idea how to list things for deletion... --[[User:KayEss|KayEss]] 22:54, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

== Article Licensing ==

Hi, I've [[User:rambot#Free the Rambot Articles project|started a drive]] to get users to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the [[Creative Commons]] Attribution-Share Alike  (''CC-by-sa'') v1.0 and v2.0 [[Creative Commons License|License]]s or into the [[public domain]] if they prefer.  The ''CC-by-sa'' license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the [[GFDL]], but it allows '''other projects''', such as [[WikiTravel]], to use our articles.  Since you are among the [[Wikipedia:List_of_Wikipedians_by_number_of_edits|top 1000]] Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at ''minimum'' those on the geographic articles.  Over 90% of people asked have agreed.  For More Information:
*[[User talk:Ram-Man#Multi-Licensing FAQ|Multi-Licensing FAQ]] - Lots of questions answered
*[[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|Multi-Licensing Guide]]
*[[User:rambot#Free the Rambot Articles project|Free the Rambot Articles Project]]

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "'''<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki>'''" template into their user page, but there are other options at [[Wikipedia:Template messages/User namespace#Licensing Templates|Template messages/User namespace]].  The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

:'''Option 1'''
:<nowiki>I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:</nowiki>
:<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki>
'''OR'''
:'''Option 2'''
:<nowiki>I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:</nowiki>
:<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki>

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "'''<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki>'''" with "'''<nowiki>{{MultiLicensePD}}</nowiki>'''".  If you only prefer using the [[GFDL]], I would like to know that too.  ''Please let me know'' what you think at my '''[[User talk:Ram-Man|talk page]]'''.  It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking.  -- [[User:Ram-Man|Ram-Man]] ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Ram-Man&action=edit&section=new comment]| [[User talk:Ram-Man|talk)]]

==[[Finance]]==
Can you please discuss your changes on the talk page for that article?  That is a pretty radica change, and while I don't think it currently helped, I welcome your edits and hope you will keep working on it. - [[User:Taxman|Taxman]] 14:32, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
----
But you're not Walter Pohl the Late Antique Scholar?  Or are you?  Oh wait -- are you the Walt Pohl that comments at CT, Dr. B, etc.?

: I have an active dream life, so I can't rule out that I'm a sleepwalking Late Antique Scholar.  Is CT Crooked Timber?  Then that's me. -- [[User:Waltpohl|Walt Pohl]] 01:38, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

== Administrator nomination ==

Hello & happy new year. I see that you are a contributor since early 2004 and you've made a lot of edits on many topics, and equally important you seem able to get along with other editors. I will sponsor you for administratorship if you are interested. You may reply here or on [[user talk:Wile E. Heresiarch|my talk page]]. Regards & happy editing, [[User:Wile E. Heresiarch|Wile E. Heresiarch]] 07:08, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)

: I would definitely be interested.  I appreciate you noticing my contributions. -- [[User:Waltpohl|Walt Pohl]] 18:22, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)

:: Terrific! Please reply at [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Waltpohl]] to accept the nomination. Regards, [[User:Wile E. Heresiarch|Wile E. Heresiarch]] 01:37, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

== Congratulations! ==

Congratulations! It's my pleasure to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrator]]. You should read the relevant policies and other pages linked to from the [[Wikipedia:administrators' reading list|administrators' reading list]] before carrying out tasks like deletion, protection, banning users, and editing protected pages such as the [[Main Page]]. Most of what you do is easily reversible by other sysops, apart from page history merges and image deletion, so please be especially careful with those. You might find the new [[Wikipedia:Administrators' how-to guide|administrators' how-to guide]] helpful. Cheers! -- [[User:Cecropia|Cecropia]] | [[User talk:Cecropia|''explains it all'' ®]] 02:33, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)

: Thanks! -- [[User:Waltpohl|Walt Pohl]] 02:55, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)

:: Congratulations, Walt. Use your awesome powers wisely! I'm sure you will continue to be a credit to the project. Regards & happy editing, [[User:Wile E. Heresiarch|Wile E. Heresiarch]] 04:26, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)

== New Mathematics Wikiportal ==

I noticed you've done some work on Mathematics articles.  I wanted to point out to you the new [[Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Mathematics|Mathematics Wikiportal]]- more specifically, to the [[Wikipedia:Mathematics Collaboration of the Week|Mathematics Collaboration of the Week]] page.  I'm looking for any math-related stubs or non-existant articles that you would like to see on Wikipedia.  Additionally, I wondered if you'd be willing to help out on some of the Collaboration of the Week pages.

I encourage you to vote on the current Collaboration of the Week, because I'm very interested in which articles you think need to be written or added to, and because I understand that I cannot do the enormous amount of work required on some of the Math stubs alone.  I'm asking for your help, and also your critiques on the way the portal is set up.

Please direct all comments to [[User:Ral315|my user-talk page,]] [[Wikipedia talk:Wikiportal/Mathematics|the Math Wikiportal talk page]], or [[Wikipedia talk:Mathematics Collaboration of the Week|the Math Collaboration of the Week talk page.]]  Thanks a lot for your support!  [[User:Ral315|ral315]] 02:54, Feb 11, 2005 (UTC)

==A message to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Rivers]] participants==
Would you, please, consider participation in the discussion about the naming of the articles on rivers?  Certain users suggested that the word "River" should be omitted from the title.  Currently the discussion is held at [[User talk:Markussep#River naming]], but it will hopefully be moved to [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers]] soon.  Thank you for your attention.&mdash;[[User:Ezhiki|Ëzhiki (erinaceus europeaus)]] 21:09, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)

== New Mathematics Project Participants List ==

Hi Walt.

In case you didn't follow the discussion on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics]] here: [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics#Reformat of Participants list]], I'm writing to you to let you know that I've converted the "[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/Participants|WikiProject Mathematics Participants List]]" into a table. It is now alphabetical, includes links to the participant's talk page and contribution list, and has a field for "Areas of Interest". Since your name is on the list, I thought you might want to check and/or update your entry.

Regards, [[User:Paul August|Paul August ]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 15:10, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)

== Talk page changes ==

I've been [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AWaltpohl&diff=18324325&oldid=16329284 removing links to a disambiugation page]; so that [[Special:Whatlinkshere/mercury]] isn't so polluted I can't figure out what's linking to it.  Because I've been changing so many pages (I don't watch them otherwise I'd have thousands of pages being watched), I hadn't realised you'd changed it back, which is why the changes were made a second time. Do you have a burning desire to link a year old conversation directly to that disambiguation page rather than indirectly via an external link? [[User:Josh Parris|Josh Parris]] [[User_talk:Josh Parris|&#9993;]] 23:37, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

==[[L(R)]] and large cardinals==
I've added the dependency on large cardinals to the section header. Hope this addresses your concern. The point is that a coherent picture emerges in the presence of large cardinals, and that's what I want to get across, not lose it in a lot of graphs of what depends on what.

== Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas ==

Howdy...we've been making some alterations to infoboxes and the project that you may wish to be aware of and have an opportunity to discuss in the protected areas project. Link to the "general" and the "status" subpages to see what's going on.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 05:09, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

==Please vote on ''list of lists'', a featured list candidate==

Please vote at [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of lists of mathematical topics]]. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] 20:46, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

== Henry the Navigator ==

An article that you've edited before ([[Henry the Navigator]]) is nominated for [[Wikipedia:Biography Collaboration of the Week|Biography Collaboration of the Week]]. If you want go there and vote. Thanks. [[User:Joaopais|Gameiro]] 20:44, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

== [[Co-recursion]] ==
Thanks for catching my error with regard to the redirect.  I was only familiar with recursive/co-recusive with regard to computability.  Since you seem to have a much better understanding, could you create an article (or at least a stub) to replace the redirect I created.  Thanks.  [[User:Kenj0418|Kenj0418]] 07:06, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

== Computational algebra improvement drive? ==

Hi, Walt, looks like you are semi-retired, but you might like to know that I have been thinking of trying to improve articles on Gröbner basis stuff, including [[Syzygy]], where I think a much more intuitive discussion should be possible, and also adding other stuff as per ''Ideals, Varieties, and Algorithms'' and other textbooks, including
*{{cite book|author=Schenck, Hal|title=Computational Algebraic Geometry|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2003|id={{ISBN|0-521-53650-2}}}}
plus the books of Sturmels.  I had a pretty awful time [[User:Hillman|trying]] to [[User:Hillman/Wikiproject_GTR_draft|improve general relativity articles]], but some have suggested that I might find pure math less crank infested.  Reply by email, perhaps?---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 00:11, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

:I tried sending you email, but I might have the wrong address.  (It did not bounce, though.)  Did you get any? -- [[User:Waltpohl|Walt Pohl]] 03:58, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi, Walt, good to hear from you.  Can you try again, this time putting your name in the subject line?  I am trying to debug after some recent changes.---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 19:35, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Please bear with me, if this doesn't work you might need to try again after I have shot the trouble with a sysadmin, which could take a few days. ---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 19:49, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Email: never mind, the problem was at my end and I am fixing it.  I did get your email and have replied. ---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 20:54, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

== Question about the Zande in Sudan ==

Hello, Walt,

I've tracked you down as the culprit who wrote that the Sudanese Zande live in the area of the Uele River.  Isn't the Uele in the DR Congo only?  Do you have any other info about where they are?  I had a Zande friend from Aba in southern Sudan, but I have no info that's more specific.  Cheers.  [[User:Dblomgren|Dblomgren]] 03:56, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

: I was just changing links from Uele to Uele River.  I have no information on the subject, sadly. -- [[User:Waltpohl|Walt Pohl]] 06:49, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

== Wikiproject Finance ==

Seeing some of your editorial interests, I'd like to invite you to join and help form [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Finance]]. --[[User:Leifern|Leifern]] 20:35, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

== World Heritage template ==

Hi! I created a template for World Heritage Sites: {{tl|Infobox World Heritage Site}}. Since many of the protected areas are also recognized as World Heritage Sites, I thought that it will be appropriate to forward this template here, and hopefully, for the community to help improve the template. Someone mentioned that the footnotes are unclear (i.e. why the need to emphasize "official" there). It's because the official name (or the name as inscribed on the List) is different from what we usually know. And the Region also has footnote to tackle specifically the classification of those regions which may fall ambiguously between two continents (e.g. those in Russia, Turkey, Cyprus, etc.). In addition, I think that the info provided in the template is much like a jargon for most readers since it box is more of use for internal references in the World Heritage program. I hope that the community will help improve the template and make it more relevant to the readers of wikipedia in general. Thanks. [[User:Joey80|Joey80]] 13:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

== Prime rings ==

Hello, I slightly changed the definition of [[prime ring]], see [[Talk:prime ring]]. I hope that was ok. Cheers, [[User:AxelBoldt|AxelBoldt]] 15:01, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

== Mathematics CotW ==

Hey Walt, I am writing you to let you know that the Mathematics Collaboration of the week(soon to "of the month") is getting an overhaul of sorts and I would encourage you to participate in whatever way you can, i.e. nominate an article, contribute to an article, or sign up to be part of the project. Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks--[[User:Cronholm144|Cronholm144]] 00:22, 14 May 2007 (UTC)


== Subnet ==

Please, have a look at [[Talk:Subnet (mathematics)]]. (The article you have created.) --[[User:Kompik|Kompik]] 10:47, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

== Atlas ==

Dear Waltpohl,

I appreciate the fact that you wrote a improved copy of the page, [[Atlas (topology)]] 4 years ago but I still have some criticism:

* You referred to a manifold as a 'complicated space'; this word is not mathematical and doesn't explain what a manifold really is
* Additional to this, you wrote that a manifold is made up of 'simple spaces'. According to this, a 'simple space' could be an open interval in '''R'''. But any open interval in R is also a manifold (being homeomorphic to R) which means that according to a space can be 'simple' and 'compicated' at the same time
* There is no such concept of a 'simple space' in mathematics anyhow. There is such thing as a simple function (often used in measure theory), however.
* Worst of all, you haven't included the actual definition of an atlas
* However, the article suggests that you obivously know what an atlas is and what it is mathematically described as.

Therefore, I am compelled to ask you why you wrote the article in a non-formal manner. Could you please tell me why? In any case, I will propose that parts of the article be rewritten.

Thanks

[[User:Topology Expert|Topology Expert]] ([[User talk:Topology Expert|talk]]) 07:33, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

== Emil or Michael? ==

Could you address the question at [[Talk:Artin–Zorn theorem]]? Thanks. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] ([[User talk:Michael Hardy|talk]]) 20:38, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

== Initial contex-setting ==

:: In [[group theory]], an '''oligomorphic group''' is a particular kind of.....
: 
Hello.
: 
I think "In group theory,..." fails to tell the lay reader that mathematics is what this is about.  "In geometry,..." or "In algebra,..." or "In number theory,..." or "In calculus,..." or "In arithmetic,..." works, but the typical lay person would probably not have heard of group theory.  I've changed it to this:
: 
:: In [[group theory]], a branch of mathematics, an '''oligomorphic group''' is a particular kind of.....
: 
[[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] ([[User talk:Michael Hardy|talk]]) 05:28, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

: That's perfectly fine. -- [[User:Waltpohl|Walt Pohl]] ([[User talk:Waltpohl#top|talk]]) 09:17, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

== Quadruple product article ==

Brews told me that he won't be able to edit Wikipedia for the coming few weeks. So, I think you can go ahead and make the edits to the article that are necessary. Brews told me to keep an eye on the article (he feared that it would be railroaded to deletion via PROD or AFD with few editors commenting there). Of course, I would always give my indpendent opinion on the article; I don't have any strong opinions right now. [[User:Count Iblis|Count Iblis]] ([[User talk:Count Iblis|talk]]) 22:34, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

: Thanks for letting me know.  -- [[User:Waltpohl|Walt Pohl]] ([[User talk:Waltpohl#top|talk]]) 13:21, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

== MSU Interview ==

Dear Waltpohl,

My name is Jonathan Obar [[user:Jaobar]], I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community,  and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community[[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Archive_82#Learn_to_be_a_Wikipedia_Administrator_-_New_class_at_MSU|HERE]], where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.


So a few things about the interviews:
* Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
* Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
* All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
* All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
* The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.


Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name[[User:Jaobar/Admins_to_Interview_List_1|HERE]] instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --[[User:Jaobar|Jaobar]]  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/35.9.115.210|35.9.115.210]] ([[User talk:35.9.115.210|talk]]) 21:36, 2 March 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Happy Admin Anniversary!!! ==

<center><div class="boilerplate metadata" id="SCOTW" style="background-color:#E6E6FA;border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em;width:90%;float:center">[[Image:Icon tools.svg|50px|left]]<font style="font-weight:bold;font-size:125%;float:left">Happy Adminship Anniversary!</font>[[Image:Nuvola apps date.svg|50px|right]]<div align="center"><br>Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!<br>Best wishes, [[User:2teach4ever|<sup>†2†</sup>]][[User talk:2teach4ever|ťəäçħ]][[Special: contributions/2teach4ever|<sup>†4†</sup>]][[User:2teach4ever/Guestbook|ӛṿəř]] (22:22, 10 January 2015 (UTC))</div></div></center>

== A pie for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:A very beautiful Nectarine Pie.jpg|120px]]
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | (Here's a pie to go along with your birthday card! :-) [[User:2teach4ever|<sup>†2†</sup>]][[User talk:2teach4ever|ťəäçħ]][[Special: contributions/2teach4ever|<sup>†4†</sup>]][[User:2teach4ever/Guestbook|ӛṿəř]] 22:24, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
|}

==Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity==
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]]
Following a [[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/suspend sysop rights of inactive admins|community discussion]] in June 2011, consensus was reached to [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Procedural removal for inactive administrators|provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year]] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard]] and the userright will be restored per the [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Resysopping|re-sysopping process]] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at [[WP:RFA]]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->[[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 10:35, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

== Welcome back! ==

As a recently [[Wikipedia:List_of_resysopped_users|returned]] sysop, welcome back to the admin corps. We always need help at [[WP:ADMINBACKLOG]] if there are any areas you can help with that would be most welcomed.  Happy mopping! — [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#00FF00;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 18:59, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

== Desuspension ==

Hi,

I have just noticed that you contributed a lot to write about [[suspension (topology)]]. I have tried to write about [[desuspension]], an opposite operation. May you review my work? I am not a professional mathematician, but high-profile math has been my passion since my childhood. Cheers!

[[User:Lamro|Lamro]] ([[User talk:Lamro|talk]]) 14:34, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

== Extended confirmed protection ==

{{ivmbox|1=Hello, Waltpohl. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

[[WP:BLUELOCK|Extended confirmed protection]] (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned [[WP:EXTENDEDCONFIRMED|"extended confirmed" user right]] was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following [[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 129#New usergroup with autopromotion to implement arbitration "30-500" bans as a page protection|this community discussion]] with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, [[WP:ECP2016|a request for comment]] established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
* '''Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective'''. It should not be used as a first resort.
* '''A bot will post a notification at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] of each use'''. MusikBot currently does this by updating [[User:MusikBot/ECPMonitor/Report|a report]], which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review [[Wikipedia:Protection policy#Extended confirmed protection|the protection policy]] carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you. <br><small>This message was sent to the administrators' [[Wikipedia:Administrators/Message list|mass message list]]. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)</small> |2=Padlock-blue.svg}}
<!--Message sent following discussion at WT:PP-->
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators/Message_list&oldid=737471142 -->

==Disambiguation link notification for September 29==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Congruence-permutable algebra]], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages [[Rings]] and [[Groups]]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:59, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

== Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins ==

Hello,

Please note that [[Time-based One-time Password Algorithm|TOTP]] based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your [[Special:Preferences|preferences page]] in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the [[Help:Two-factor authentication|developing help page]] for additional information. '''Important''': Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Two-Factor_Authentication_now_available_for_admins|thread on the administrators' noticeboard]]. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mike V@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mike_V/All_admins&oldid=749162175 -->

== A new user right for New Page Patrollers ==

Hi {{BASEPAGENAME}}.

A new user group, [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers|'''New Page Reviewer''']], has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at [[Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer|PERM]]. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Templates|here]] but very often a friendly custom message works best. 

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at [[WT:NPR]]. <small>''(Sent to all admins)''</small>.[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 13:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Kudpung@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators/Message_list&oldid=748418714 -->

== Happy Adminship Anniversary! ==

{| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="border: 1px solid #CC9999; background-color: Yellow;"
|style="text-align:center"|[[Image:Wikipedia Administrator.svg|50px]]
|style="text-align:left" width="100%"|Wishing <b>[[User:{{PAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}}]]</b> a very '''happy adminship anniversary''' on behalf of the '''[[WP:BDC|Wikipedia Birthday Committee]]'''! [[User:Lepricavark|Lepricavark]] ([[User talk:Lepricavark|talk]]) 22:01, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
|}

== Invitation to Admin confidence survey ==

Hello, 

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well  tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment. 

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators. 

<big>To take the survey sign up '''[[en:Wikipedia:Community health initiative on English Wikipedia/Administrator confidence survey|here]]''' and we will send you a link to the form.</big>

We really appreciate your input! 

<small>Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all [[en:Wikipedia:Mass message senders|massmessage mailings]] from the Anti-harassment tools team. </small>

For the Anti-harassment tools team, [[User:SPoore (WMF)|SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative]] ([[User talk:SPoore (WMF)|talk]]) 20:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:SPoore (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:SPoore_(WMF)/Admin_confidence_survey_massmessage_list_2&oldid=17224940 -->

== A barnstar for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Tireless Contributor Barnstar Hires.gif|100px]]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Tireless Contributor Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Walt, I made my first edit in years and it led me to review your Talk page.  That led me to look at the UNCOL page.  I remember all that and, although I knew Mel Conway, I had no idea he made the original proposal.  The last time I saw Tom Steele, at some sort of standards-related meetings, I told him I remembered UNCOL and he winced and laughed.  I notice that LLVM and another approach are now listed, but I am surprised the JVM and the .NET Common Language Runtime and intermediate language are not mentioned.  

I sort of gave up on Wikipedia when I saw how the Ariane 501 loss was clung to as a software bug example when that completely clouds the magnificent chain of events that led to a completely unnecessary mishap.

My interest in computation theory has taken a different direction and I don't know that there is anything that would lead me to address it on Wikipedia :). [[User:Orcmid|Orcmid]] ([[User talk:Orcmid|talk]]) 15:35, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
|}

== Birthday Committee ==

<center><div class="boilerplate metadata" id="SCOTW" style="background-color:#E6E6FA;border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em;width:90%;float:center">[[File:Crystal Clear action exit clicked.svg|50px|left]]<span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:125%;float:center">Removal from member list</span>[[File:Crystal Clear action exit clicked.svg|50px|right]]<div align="center"><br />You have been inactive for more than 6 months and have been removed from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee [[Wikipedia:Birthday Committee/Calendar|birthday list]]. If you become active again please feel free to re-add yourself {{p}} <br />Best wishes, [[User:A 10 fireplane|<span style="color:#7CE329; cursor:no-drop;"><b>A 10 fireplane</b></span>]] [[User_talk:A 10 fireplane|<sup><span style="color:#7CE329; cursor:no-drop;">Imform me</span></sup>]] 15:25, 29 January 2019 (UTC)</div></div></center>



== ArbCom 2019 special circular ==

<div class="notice" style="background:#fff1d2; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height:40px; line-height:130.7%; font-weight: 130.7%;">
{|
|valign="top" style="padding: 0.5em 1em 0 0.25em;"| [[File:Warning sign font awesome.svg|40px|center|link=|alt=Icon of a white exclamation mark within a black triangle]]
|<span style="font-size: 125%;">'''Administrators [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Security|must]] secure their accounts'''</span>
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
* Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email
* [[Special:ChangePassword|Change your password now]] if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, [https://haveibeenpwned.com/Passwords exposed], or weak
* [[Wikipedia:User_account_security#Two-factor authentication (2FA)|Enable two-factor authentication now]] for improved security
|}
<span style="color:#5871C6;cursor:pointer" class="mw-customtoggle-ArbCom_2019_special_circular">{{clickable button 2|1=View additional information|link=no}}</span>
</div><div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-ArbCom_2019_special_circular" style="display:none">
<div style="border-style: dotted; border-color: #886644; border-width: 0 3px 3px 3px; padding: 0 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em;">

{| style="border-left: 3px solid black; padding-left: 1em;"
|{{null}}
; Why have I received this message?
: All administrators are receiving it.

; What prompted you to send this message?
: Recently, several Wikipedia admin accounts were compromised.  The admin accounts were [[WP:LEVEL1|desysopped on an emergency basis]].  In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account.  The committee has updated its guidelines.  Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh [[WP:RFA|Request for Adminship (RfA)]] after losing control of their account.

; What do I need to do?
: Only to follow the instructions in this message.
:# Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites).
:# Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable).
:# Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers.

; How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)?
: You can find out more about 2FA at [[m:2FA]].
|}</div>
</div>

<small>This message was sent to all administrators following a [[Special:Permalink/891851004#Return of permissions for compromised administrator accounts|recent motion]].  Thank you for your attention.  For the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]], [[User:Cameron11598|Cameron11598]] 02:19, 4 May 2019 (UTC)</small>
<!-- Template:ArbCom 2019 special circular -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Cameron11598@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bradv/Adminlist-mms&oldid=891852932 -->

== Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular) ==

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Security|required]] to "have strong passwords and [[Wikipedia:Personal security practices|follow appropriate personal security practices]]." We have [[Special:Permalink/891851004#Return of permissions for compromised administrator accounts|updated]] our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, [[WP:2FA|two-factor authentication]] remains an ''optional'' means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised. 

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered. 

For the Arbitration Committee, -[[User:Cameron11598|Cameron11598]] 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)</small>
<!-- Template:ArbCom 2019 special circular correction -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Cameron11598@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bradv/Adminlist-mms&oldid=891852932 -->

== Administrators will no longer be [[WP:AUTOP|autopatrolled]] ==

A [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/2021_review/Proposals#Passed:_7D_Remove_autopatrolled_from_default_toolkit|recently closed]] Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove [[WP:Autopatrolled|Autopatrolled]] from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with [[WP:EFM|Edit Filter Manager]], choose to [[Special:UserRights/{{BASEPAGENAME}}|self-assign]] this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Administrators_will_no_longer_be_autopatrolled|Administrator's Noticeboard]]. 20:07, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Barkeep49@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators/Message_list&oldid=1058184441 -->

== How we will see unregistered users ==

<section begin=content/>
Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin '''will still be able to access the IP'''. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on [[m:IP Editing: Privacy Enhancement and Abuse Mitigation/Improving tools|better tools]] to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can [[m:IP Editing: Privacy Enhancement and Abuse Mitigation|read more on Meta]]. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can [[m:Global message delivery/Targets/Tech ambassadors|subscribe]] to [[m:Tech/News|the weekly technical newsletter]].

We have [[m:IP Editing: Privacy Enhancement and Abuse Mitigation#IP Masking Implementation Approaches (FAQ)|two suggested ways]] this identity could work. '''We would appreciate your feedback''' on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can [[m:Talk:IP Editing: Privacy Enhancement and Abuse Mitigation|let us know on the talk page]]. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. 
/[[m:User:Johan (WMF)|Johan (WMF)]]<section end=content/>

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Johan (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Johan_(WMF)/Target_lists/Admins2022(2)&oldid=22532495 -->

== New administrator activity requirement ==

{{ivmbox|The administrator policy has been updated with new [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Procedural_removal_for_inactive_administrators|activity requirements]] following a successful [[Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Request for comment on administrator activity requirements|Request for Comment]].

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
#Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
#Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period 

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
}}
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Barkeep49@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=All_administrators&oldid=1082922312 -->

==[[Draft:Saifi Ismail]]==
Hello, Waltpohl,

If you restore a draft or user page deleted for CSD G13 criteria, you need to make a minor edit to the page afterwards or it immediately becomes eligible for deletion again. If you expect to be doing this more, like helping out at [[WP:REFUND]], you should install the script at [[User:SD0001/RFUD-helper]] which will do these minor edits for you. Thanks. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 03:11, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

:: Thanks. [[User:Waltpohl|Walt Pohl]] ([[User talk:Waltpohl#top|talk]]) 03:29, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message ==

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2022|2022 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|poll}}|voting page]]'''.  If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1124425177 -->

== [[Draft:AlphaPolis|AlphaPolis]] moved to draftspace ==

Thanks for your contributions to [[Draft:AlphaPolis|AlphaPolis]]. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because '''it has no sources'''.
Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at [[Help:Unreviewed new page]].
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -[[User:MPGuy2824|MPGuy2824]] ([[User talk:MPGuy2824|talk]]) 04:23, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

== Deletion discussion about [[AlphaPolis]] ==

Hello, Waltpohl, and welcome to Wikipedia.  I edit here too, under the username [[User:FormalDude|FormalDude]], and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, [[AlphaPolis]], should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AlphaPolis]]. 

You might like to note that such [[WP:AFD|discussions]] usually run for seven days and are ''not'' votes. And, [[WP:DISCUSSAFD|our guide]] about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. 

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with <code><nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>FormalDude<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>. And, don't forget to sign your reply with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code> . Thanks!

<small>(Message delivered via the [[Wikipedia:Page Curation/Help|Page Curation]] tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:AfD-notice-NPF -->

––[[User:FormalDude|{{color|#004ac0|Formal}}{{color|black|Dude}}]] [[User talk:FormalDude|<span style="color:#004ac0;font-size:90%;">(talk)</span>]] 06:34, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

:{{Re|FormalDude}} The worst part about these bot-executed actions is the fake-polite boilerplate.  Welcome to Wikipedia?  I've been here for more than a decade.
:Ironically, if I was new this would be the opposite of welcoming.  The Wikipedia editing process is dominated by interactions like this.  All of the rewards for petty, bot-driven policy actions.  (I use bots myself, so I'm not innocent.)  The rewards for creating new content is essentially zero. -- [[User:Waltpohl|Walt Pohl]] ([[User talk:Waltpohl#top|talk]]) 08:20, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message ==

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2023|2023 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|poll}}|voting page]]'''.  If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1187131902 -->
== Nomination of [[:Gustave Lefebvre]] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:Gustave Lefebvre]] is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].

The article will be discussed at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gustave Lefebvre]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:AndyTheGrump|AndyTheGrump]] ([[User talk:AndyTheGrump|talk]]) 19:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
== "[[:Blowing down]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px]]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blowing_down&redirect=no Blowing down]</span> has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|redirects for discussion]] to determine whether its use and function meets the [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect guidelines]]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 14#Blowing down}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> [[User:1234qwer1234qwer4|1234qwer]][[User talk:1234qwer1234qwer4|1234qwer]][[Special:Contribs/1234qwer1234qwer4|4]] 02:32, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

== Invitation to participate in a research ==

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this '''[https://wikimediafoundation.limesurvey.net/294789?lang=en anonymous survey]'''.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its [[m:Special:MyLanguage/Research:Wikipedia Administrator Recruitment, Retention, and Attrition|Meta page]] and view its [[wmf:Special:MyLanguage/Legal:Administrator Experiences 2024 Survey Privacy Statement|privacy statement]] .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

[[mw:Special:MyLanguage/Wikimedia Research|WMF Research Team]]

<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[[User:BGerdemann (WMF)|BGerdemann (WMF)]] ([[User talk:BGerdemann (WMF)|talk]]) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 -->

== Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research ==

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its [[m:Special:MyLanguage/Research:Wikipedia Administrator Recruitment, Retention, and Attrition|Meta page]] and view its [[wmf:Special:MyLanguage/Legal:Administrator Experiences 2024 Survey Privacy Statement|privacy statement]]. 

Take the survey '''[https://wikimediafoundation.limesurvey.net/294789?lang=en here]'''.

Kind Regards,

[[mw:Special:MyLanguage/Wikimedia Research|WMF Research Team]]

<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[[User:BGerdemann (WMF)|BGerdemann (WMF)]] ([[User talk:BGerdemann (WMF)|talk]]) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 -->

== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2024|2024 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|poll}}|voting page]]'''.  If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 -->