View source for User talk:Myndex

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Color/Userbox}} {{User Filmmaking task force}} {{User GitHub|Myndex}}
{{User:Myndex/ubx/StackOverflow | dark | account = 10315269 | rep = 4600+ }}
<br>
<br>
<br>

I am currently researching color and human vision for [https://readtech.org/ARC/ Accessibility Standards].


=== Wiki Quick Help Links:===

*[[Wikipedia:Five pillars|The five pillars of Wikipedia]]
*[[Help:Contents|Help pages]]
*[[Wikipedia:How to write a great article|How to write a great article]]
*[[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]]
*[[Wikipedia:Where to ask a question]], ask me on my talk page, or place <code>{&#123;helpme}}</code> on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!&nbsp; -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]] | [[User talk:Longhair|Talk]] 23:37, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

--------

== SOME KEY FILES FOR COLOR ==

[[File:CIE1931xy gamut comparison of sRGB P3 Rec2020.svg|thumb|left|comparison of gamuts of sRGB P3 Rec2020 using the CIE1931chromaticity diagram]] [[File:CIE 1931 chromaticity ACES sRGB gamut comparison CreativeCommons v06.svg|thumb|CIE 1931 chromaticity diagram comparing ACES and sRGB gamuts]]
[[File:CIE1931xy gamut comparison CC v06 NTSC 709 P3.png|thumb|1931 CIE Chromaticity diagram, showing gamuts for NTSC, BT.709, and P3]]


<br clear="all">

== Apologies... ==

if I sound/sounded moody on [[golden ratio]], and if I caused you any offense. That article tends to attract a lot of problematic edits and so I was somewhat guarded. Thank you for your color and accessibility work; it's important but often forgotten. If you'd be willing, I'd appreciate accessibility critiques on the figures on [[Doyle spiral]]. [[User:Ovinus|Ovinus]] ([[User talk:Ovinus|talk]]) 04:59, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

:Understood... I'll review the Doyle Spiral page... For the record, I have a CVD simulator based on clinically tested math that is useful for dataviz like this: https://www.myndex.com/CVD/ &nbsp;<span style="border:1px solid #30a;border-left:0;border-radius:20px;padding: 0;background:#eef">[[User:Myndex|<span style="border-radius:22px;padding:3px 7px;background:#30a;color:#def;">Myndex</span>]] [[User talk:Myndex|talk]]&nbsp;&nbsp;</span> 05:07, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
::Hey, this is actually really cool! Next time I make diagrams I'll be sure to pass it through. [[User:Ovinus|Ovinus]] ([[User talk:Ovinus|talk]]) 05:30, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
:So on the spiral page, I'd say nothing serious as far as the figures, but some things that could be adjusted to be a bit better. For the svgs with the blue/green spirals: Blue is usually best as the darkest color, though this blue is about in the middle. It's also close to the green in terms of luminance. As a personal preference, I'd make the blue darker and set the text to white, and the green lighter (keeping the "2" black). This will make the spirals more obvious as well.
:[[File:Doyle spiral (6,8) with spirals colored part3BLUE.svg|thumb|]]
:'''Luminance is KING'''
:Keep in mind that for all sighted users (everyone) we process details based on achromatic luminance, not color. Color can augment separation, but luminance is what drives our perception of shape, form, details, etc.
:So, when doing dataviz, and especially when things get small (as the circles do get very small) we want to ensure lots of luminance contrast, in addition to any color contrast therein. This is because our perception of contrast and details are very sensitive to spatial frequency. Higher spatial frequencies, i.e. smaller items, need more luminance contrast to be discernible.
:Hope this helps. I have more on contrast in general at https://git.myndex.com &nbsp;<span style="border:1px solid #30a;border-left:0;border-radius:20px;padding: 0;background:#eef">[[User:Myndex|<span style="border-radius:22px;padding:3px 7px;background:#30a;color:#def;">Myndex</span>]] [[User talk:Myndex|talk]]&nbsp;&nbsp;</span> 05:40, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

== APCA LaTeX ==

The current TeX text isn't rendering too well using MediaWiki's MathJax backend. Perhaps some workarounds like the following can be arranged?

* 0.0.98G-4g-base is mistaken as a mathematical expression; this should affect standard TeX too. do textit: <math>\textit{0.0.98G-4g-base}</math>. The entire string is ideally made textit, although the alignment point in Contrast requires breaking out.
* textstyle does not seem to do anything. textrm works though: <math>\textrm{Where:}</math>, <math>\textrm{Find}\ \textrm{Perceptual\ Lightness\ Difference}</math>
* Yeah, MathJaX is not great with macros, even <code>\ </code>, in textrm -- it's [https://docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/input/tex/differences.html#tex-differences some sort of intentional simplification]. Gotta use individual textrm bits stringed together with <code>\ </code> instead...
[[User:Artoria2e5|Artoria]][[User talk:Artoria2e5|2e5]] <small style="font-weight:lighter">[[Special:Contributions/Artoria2e5|🌉]]</small> 16:38, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

:Hey @[[User:Artoria2e5|Artoria2e5]] thank you for the tips... Since we are on the subject, here's a question: I wrote this math out in reverse notation, so the input is at the bottom of the page, and result is at top... I've been debating if I should simplify, and also use forward notation or algorithmic (pseudocode) notation.... so I'm collecting opinions... &nbsp;<span style="border:1px solid #30a;border-left:0;border-radius:20px;padding: 0;background:#eef">[[User:Myndex|<span style="border-radius:22px;padding:3px 7px;background:#30a;color:#def;">Myndex</span>]] [[User talk:Myndex|talk]]&nbsp;&nbsp;</span> 11:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
::I think using the forward direction would be nicer. I also noticed that sRGB is using an exponent of 2.4 in your 4g-base (user page and https://github.com/Myndex/SAPC-APCA/blob/master/documentation/APCA-W3-LaTeX.md), which a bit unexpected.
::For the sake of generality, maybe we should just tell users to get the ''Y'' value from the usual XYZ(D65) translation, then in an appendix include the ''Y'' part of [[sRGB#From sRGB to CIE XYZ]]? That would also automagically translate APCA to other SDR color spaces like [[Display P3]]. [[User:Artoria2e5|Artoria]][[User talk:Artoria2e5|2e5]] <small style="font-weight:lighter">[[Special:Contributions/Artoria2e5|🌉]]</small> 03:44, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
::: Hi @[[User:Artoria2e5|Artoria2e5]] the linearizing exponent choice is intentional, in retrospect it might have been better to make it 2.5 or 2.35, just to prevent comparison to sRGB. I describe the rationale in more detail in the documentation folder [https://github.com/Myndex/SAPC-APCA/blob/master/documentation/regardingexponents.md "regarding exponents"]. The short answer is this is a pre-shaping that is relative to estimated perceived screen luminance '''''Ys''''', and it also helps adjust certain saturated colors toward perception.
:::There is already a P3 and Adobe98 input module., and IMO an accurate contrast prediction is more challenging than simply transiting the standard XYZ... XYZ is a neutral touchstone, sure, but there is nuance among various color spaces that are not necessarily considered with a straight transform (which is why there's choices of absolute, perceptual, etc in ICC-land). With APCA I've been concerned only with emulating or estimating the HVS actual perception of self-illuminated displays, and not round trips or interchange or gamut mapping.
:::That said, I'll mention that CIEXYZ is based on the vision of ~16 young white British males in the 1920s... you know, for diversity... and most colorimetry recites that, and that's fine for a lot of applications like color matching. But supra-threshold contrast between adjacent colors is different than finding JND between two colors, and the HVS behavior is different. In that regard, I've been considering Stockton&Sharpe sharpened cone responses, or perhaps Judd/Vos, instead of the 1931 standard observer. &nbsp;<span style="border:1px solid #30a;border-left:0;border-radius:20px;padding: 0;background:#eef">[[User:Myndex|<span style="border-radius:22px;padding:3px 7px;background:#30a;color:#def;">Myndex</span>]] [[User talk:Myndex|talk]]&nbsp;&nbsp;</span> 15:34, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
::::That makes some sense. I get the doubt around old XYZ, but one thing stopping us from just moving to a new system (like XYZ<sub>F</sub> based on Stockton&Sharpe cones) is that every color space we have is defined around 1931 XYZ. Given a display's real spectrum for each primary color, you can probably make use of S&S by a pipeline that goes sRGB &rarr; spectrum &rarr; XYZ<sub>F</sub>, but that's a lot of assumptions to be made about the display. [[User:Artoria2e5|Artoria]][[User talk:Artoria2e5|2e5]] <small style="font-weight:lighter">[[Special:Contributions/Artoria2e5|🌉]]</small> 09:53, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
:::::@[[User:Artoria2e5|Artoria2e5]] yes it is, and I haven't made that change yet, and I'm considering these things... But the one thing that we generally know about displays, are the assumed coordinates of the primaries and white point. 
:::::For the purpose here, to predict contrast, we're not concerned about roundtrips or in terms of matching a gamut or anything else. Our only real interest here is in modeling how displays are perceived, and how we can adjust our perception model to various visual impairments. &nbsp;<span style="border:1px solid #30a;border-left:0;border-radius:20px;padding: 0;background:#eef">[[User:Myndex|<span style="border-radius:22px;padding:3px 7px;background:#30a;color:#def;">Myndex</span>]] [[User talk:Myndex|talk]]&nbsp;&nbsp;</span> 15:28, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2024|2024 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|poll}}|voting page]]'''.  If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 -->