View source for User talk:Halda

<center><font size=4>'''Have something new to say? So, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alcarillo&action=edit&section=new talk...]'''</center></font>

* [[User talk:Halda/Old talk|Talk threads from 2003-2006]]
* [[User talk:Halda/Old talk (2007)|2007]]
* [[User talk:Halda/Old talk (2008-2010)|2008-2010]]


== [[Excalibur (film)]] ==

Please revert your last edit on Excalibur.  It was your fourth reversion today, and the deletion of "widely" is in direct contradiction of the dozen or so reviews you deleted.    [[User:Medeis|μηδείς]] ([[User talk:Medeis|talk]]) 17:52, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
:See where the paragraph nets out now. I believe it's much more neutral. "Widely" is tricky in that it necessitates a bunch of reviews, which is what we don't want in the lede. We can have it in the Reception section, but I think it's a bit overkill. The notion of who is an 'authority' among film critics is a bit vague, but I believe mentioning a few of the more popular, highly regarded ones like Ebert and Canby and Variety suffice. [[User:Halda|Halda]] ([[User talk:Halda#top|talk]]) 17:54, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
::One last time, please revert the fourth edit.  Thirteen reviews, including those by Canby, Ebert, and Variety, all comment of the film's visual beauty.  NPOV doesn't mean we don't report wide praise when wide praise exists.  And whatever your opinion you are in violation of wp-3rr. [[User:Medeis|μηδείς]] ([[User talk:Medeis|talk]]) 18:05, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
:::I think you're overreacting. Take it up with an admin, if you want. My editing record speaks for itself. [[User:Halda|Halda]] ([[User talk:Halda#top|talk]]) 18:07, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
::::Fine, I will change the text to "with even Ebert and Canby praising it visually" (maybe you'll accept that) and formally warn you now not to revert. [[User:Medeis|μηδείς]] ([[User talk:Medeis|talk]]) 18:11, 23 March 2011 (UTC)  
:::::Do you even know what a [[WP:revert]] is? It's not the same thing as editing. I suggest you spend more time figuring out how WP works instead of overreacting. [[User:Halda|Halda]] ([[User talk:Halda#top|talk]]) 18:15, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:TALKDONTREVERT|collaborate]] with others and avoid editing [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptively]].<br>
In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] states that: 
# '''Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.'''
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you continue to edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing without further notice.'''<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->

::No 3-revert violations here, since one of the two was my own, undoing an incorrect revert. Please read [[WP:3RR]]. [[User:Halda|Halda]] ([[User talk:Halda#top|talk]]) 18:39, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Good one, was wondering where Pauline Kael was on this. [[User:Medeis|μηδείς]] ([[User talk:Medeis|talk]]) 20:00, 23 March 2011 (UTC)