View source for User talk:Cedars

Hi everyone,

Welcome to my talk page. I encourage feedback and this page will allow me to respond to your comments as soon as possible. Please add new comments to the end of this page. Although I may not be able to respond to all comments, I do take the time to read them all.

[[User:Cedars|Cedars]] 02:42, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

{{usercomment}}

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Emo&diff=195182544&oldid=194717113]

== U.S. embargo against Cuba ==

You voted for [[U.S. embargo against Cuba]], this week's [[Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week|Collaboration of the week]].  Please come and help it become a [[Wikipedia:Featured_articles|featured]]-[[Wikipedia:What is a featured article|standard]] article.

==Caesar cipher==
Hi, thanks for your wording tweaks on [[Caesar cipher]]! [[User:Matt Crypto|&mdash; Matt <small>Crypto</small>]] 11:48, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Caulfield Grammar School|Caulfield Grammar FAC]] ==

Hi! You previously voted to '''object''' this FAC nomination, but the article has been significantly upgraded and improved since then. I would urge you to have a second look before leaving your final vote. Thanks. [[User:Harro5|Harro5]] 08:14, May 25, 2005 (UTC)

== Heya! ==

Great work on the copyedit of [[Windows 2000]]... I was hoping someone would do this :-) I very much appreciate your help! Oh, welcome to Wikipedia... you should create an intro page that tells us a little bit about yourself if you want. That will at least get rid of the red link to your name! - [[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]] 04:51, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

* Thanks for the positive comments Ta and for your work on the Windows 2000 article. :-) [[User:Cedars|Cedars]] 12:55, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:Microsoft notice board]] ==

Are you interested? I hope to get info on Microsoft related topics up2date, accurate and presented neutrally. - [[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]] 02:44, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

==[[Wikipedia:Peer review/Education in the United States|Education in the United States peer review]]==
I left a response to your comment here.  Would you care to elaborate further?--[[User:naryathegreat|naryathegreat]] | [[User talk:Naryathegreat|(talk)]] 00:46, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your edits and comments.  I appreciate them.  I feel that enough peer review has occurred to move this forward to FAC.  Do you feel you would be ready to support its nomination there?  If not, why, and what would you change?  Thanks again for your efforts.--[[User:naryathegreat|naryathegreat]] | [[User talk:Naryathegreat|(talk)]] 23:03, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

Hi narya,

Sorry for my inattentiveness I've recently been going through exams, so Wikipedia has been left to fill the gaps in my time. I've made some suggestions on the [[Talk:Education_in_the_United_States|talk page]] of further improvements that could be made. Good work on the article so far.

[[User:Cedars|Cedars]] 08:55, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)


== Footnotes ==
Thanks for fixing the footnotes at [[Robert Lawson (architect)]] I knew there was a way like that to do it, but could not work out quite how! Thanks [[User:Giano|Giano]] | [[User talk:Giano|talk]] 07:27, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

== GNAA FAC ==
Thanks for your comments. I know the nomination was FUBAR from the start, and I personally think Ta bu is making it worse. I want the article to work, but I believe User:Raul654, who has the power to promote articles, should have been watching this. [[User:Zscout370|Zscout370]] [[User_talk:Zscout370|(Sound Off)]] 23:59, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
:One more thing, you said "Addition: It would also be helpful if the "Activities" section was broken up using subheadings." I have done so by creating three sub-headings: Website disruption, shock sites and hoaxes/spoilers. [[User:Zscout370|Zscout370]] [[User_talk:Zscout370|(Sound Off)]] 05:28, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

== DualDisc Article ==

Hello.  Thanks for the comments on the [[DualDisc]] article.  I have addressed all the points you mentioned on the FAC discussion page.  If you have any other comments, please let them be known.  Cheers! --[[User:K1vsr|K1vsr]] ([[User_talk:K1vsr|talk]]) 00:34, August 7, 2005 (UTC)
::Hi.  Thanks again for the additional comments.  I've addressed the second round of comments you had.  Please review.  Cheers! --[[User:K1vsr|K1vsr]] ([[User_talk:K1vsr|talk]]) 19:11, August 7, 2005 (UTC)
:::I did some further re-working of the section on competition with SACDs.  If you still think it needs something, then let me know.  I left out the bit about market share because there don't really seem to be any hard statistics on DualDisc vs. SACD.  There are plenty of statistics on SACD vs. DVD-Audio, but that's not relevant to DualDisc.  Cheers! --[[User:K1vsr|K1vsr]] ([[User_talk:K1vsr|talk]]) 16:56, August 8, 2005 (UTC)

== DualDisc FAC ==

Hey Cedars.  Thanks for all your feedback on the article.  The nomination failed the first time around, but I have re-submitted it as an FAC.  I was wondering if you'd consider [[Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/DualDisc|supporting]] it this time around?  Cheers! --[[User:K1vsr|K1vsr]] ([[User_talk:K1vsr|talk]]) 15:35, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

== [[Columbine High School massacre]] ==

Hey, thank you for adding the rationale for some of the pics.  Can you please help me with the others,  I can tell you where I got them.  Most are found in websites throughout the internet so I figure they're probably not copyrighted or released into the PD.  This is the first time I have added images to wikipedia so I'm not quite sure how to fix the copyrights.  Thanks!
[[User:PRueda29|PRueda29]]

I removed it from peer review because about a week passed without anyone commenting on it.  I removed it from featured article status because I had plenty of suggestions and someone told me to reffer it to peer review before submitting it to FAC, which being new at this I didn't know.  Thank you for your help, you basically fixed the one huge problem I didn't know how to fix.  I'm going to submit it to FAC again. - [[User:PRueda29|PRueda29]]

::Thanks for your support on getting the [[Columbine High School massacre]] article featured, and with the rationale for the pictures.  I wanted to let you know that it will be featured on the front page on September 18th. - [[User:PRueda29|PRueda29]] 13:33 10 September 2005 (UTC)

:::No problem. Your work was really at the core of making the article a featured one and on behalf of the community I also wanted to thank you for that. [[User:Cedars|Cedars]] 09:22, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

== Phase-shift keying peer review ==

Hi there! Thanks for commenting on [[User:Splash|Splash]]'s peer review at [[Phase-shift keying]]. I just started [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Digital Communication Systems|this]] project, and perhaps you might be interested in participating? Anyway, just thought you might be interested. We could really use some extra help! --[[User:HappyCamper|HappyCamper]] 11:09, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

== BEST ==

Hi. WRT to the BEST FAC, I would like to know
# I have no references stating that the Bombay Omnibus Company existed or was a proposed company then. If I modify the text to "an existing company", it may be incorrect. I would prefer not to modify.
#''resulting in the BEST securing a complete monopoly over bus services in the Greater Bombay area'' has been modified to ''That year the Undertaking and private operators went to court with the BEST asking for a complete closure of the private companies. The case dragged on for four years before the Supreme Court of India granted the organisation a complete monopoly over bus services in the Greater Bombay area.'' Is this Ok, or should is there somthing you still want addressed?
# Quantity of power. I'm waiting for a reply email. If I don't get one in time, would a dated (1998 exact, or 2002 approx) figure do?
#''Is the company expected to maximize profit''. I think all companies would like to maximize profits, please let me know what is meant by that.
#Is there anything else in mind you would like to see? 
Thanks, [[User:Nichalp|<font color="#0082B8">=Nichalp</font>]] [[User talk:Nichalp|<font color="#0082B8">«Talk»=</font>]] 06:17, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

== &amp;nbsp; ==

Hi I've rolled back your removal of the nonbreaking space to the BEST article. According to [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Units]], the nonbreaking space is required (#8) 'to ensure it does not break lines'. [[User:Nichalp|<font color="#0082B8">=Nichalp</font>]] [[User talk:Nichalp|<font color="#0082B8">«Talk»=</font>]] 09:41, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
:That's cool. [[User:Cedars|Cedars]] 09:48, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Belarusian Republican Youth Union]] ==
While I am not going to remove the article from FAC, I am going to have myself and others do a complete grammar check of the article. [[User:Zscout370|Zscout370]] [[User_talk:Zscout370|(Sound Off)]] 06:53, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

==Reading directions==

Hi, when you added that listing to [[WP:RfD]], did you happen to see the note about 2 lines above where your edit was: "New entries go at the **BOTTOM** of the page"? No problem, I moved it, but in the future, please read directions. Sorry to be so bureacratic, but it makes more work for other people (unless we want to wind up with a giant mess); in this case, not so much, but in other cases (e.g. people who move pages with cut-and-paste), lots of work. [[User:Jnc|Noel]] [[User_talk:Jnc|(talk)]] 15:15, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

== Heya ==

Any chance on some help with copy-editing [[MDAC]]? I'm getting worse at this sort of thing - not better :( [[User:203.134.166.99|203.134.166.99]] 03:34, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

== Denis Law FAC ==

Hi,

You objected to the images on [[Denis Law]] a day or two ago.  Since then, one of them has been removed and the other has been cropped and tidied up.  Please could you have a look at the article and let me know if you have any remaining objections, or change your vote to neutral or support if not?

Thanks, [[User:Cantthinkofagoodname|CTOAGN]] 11:15, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

==Picture==
Hmm. That is a nice picture, but I wanted to remove some pictures from that page. Anyway, as long as you're going in the right direction, that's ok to me. :) --[[User:Phroziac|Phroziac]]<sup>([[User talk:Phroziac|talk]])</sup>[[Image:Flag_of_Phyzech_Republic.svg|25px]] 14:06, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

==Deletion of transformer pic on electrical engineering page==

Just curious why you deleted pic of transformer. Followed up and saw in your edits. I'm sure you are aware since you know this page  [[User:Scottfisher|Scott]] 13:50, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Hi Scott, 
 
The reasons for deleting the power transformer image from the electrical engineering page were: 
  
# The image has an unsightly time stamp. 
# The photo was taken on a tilt. 
# The setting of the photo is not aesthetically pleasing. 
# There was a request from [[User:Phroziac|Phroziac]] that the pictures in the article be minimized. 
# Having two pictures for the power engineering part was inconsistent with the other items in the list. 
  
In short, I appreciate you uploading the image but I just felt it wasn't the right image for the article. 
  
[[User:Cedars|Cedars]] 15:29, 1 October 2005 (UTC) 

Ah I see, OK [[User:Scottfisher|Scott]] 15:34, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

==Tesla`s picture==
Hi Cedars! Whit all respect, I must tell you that [[Nikola Tesla|Tesla`s]] picture must be on that article together whit Edison`s. I do not understand your reasons why Tesla`s picture can't be in article... Tesla is one of the biggest scientists of Electrical engineering. Regards, --[[User:Pokrajac|M. Pokrajac]] 11:10, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

== New Engineering Wiki ==

[http://engineering.wikicities.com/wiki/Main_Page Engineering Wiki] is a [[wiki]] entirely dedicated to collecting information about Engineering. I invite you to join this wiki.

== [[University of Michigan]] - suggestions needed ==

I saw that you have looked over two university articles that are or once were on FAC. I was wondering if you would mind looking at the [[University of Michigan]] article, which I am trying to get featured. However, at the moment I am out of ideas of how to improve it further. Thanks. [[User:Pentawing|Pentawing]] 06:42, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

*I was wondering if you can get a chance to look over the article and comment on it further? Thanks. [[User:Pentawing|Pentawing]] 20:55, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

**I briefly looked at it a while ago and was very impressed, I may have time for a more in depth look in a week's time (right now I'm studying for exams :-(). [[User:Cedars|Cedars]] 12:38, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

==[[Baby Gender Mentor]]==
Hello Cedars, thank you very much for your suggestions at the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/Acu-gen peer review for Acu-gen].  Following your suggestion, I swtiched [[Baby Gender Mentor]] with [[Acu-Gen]] so that the former is now the article.  I have also made substantial updates and improvements to the article.  If you have the opportunity to re-read the article and offer further advice, I would greatly appreciate it.  Thanks! [[User:Johntex|Johntex]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Johntex|talk]]</sup> 21:50, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

== re: [[Electrical engineering]] ==

Mate, you do good work. [[User:MarkGallagher|fuddlemark]] ([[User talk:MarkGallagher|fuddle me!]]) 06:03, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

== [[Electrical Engineering]] ==

You are in danger of violating the [[Wikipedia:Three revert rule|three revert rule]]. Please cease further reverts or you may be [[WP:BAN|blocked]] from further editing. --[[User:Barberio|Barberio]] 02:21, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Hes '''already''' violated 3RR look at his contributions over last 24 hrs--[[User:Light current|Light current]] 03:00, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

== Reversions on globalisation tag ==

You have exceeded  3 reversions in 24 hours on [[electrical engineering]] with regard to the globalisation tag. I shall therefore be reporting your violation of the [[3 revert rule]]--[[User:Light current|Light current]] 02:59, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Please list the four reverts. [[User:Cedars|Cedars]] 03:01, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Here they are:

# 03:47, 27 November 2005 (hist) (diff) m Electrical engineering (moved tag to talk page - equally there are two people who want it on the talk page)
# 02:57, 27 November 2005 (hist) (diff) m Electrical engineering (removed tag)
# 01:25, 27 November 2005 (hist) (diff) m Electrical engineering (move systematic bias tag to talk page)
# 11:11, 26 November 2005 (hist) (diff) m Electrical engineering (move systematic bias tag to talk page)
--[[User:Light current|Light current]] 03:22, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

== Electrical engineering ==
Please join the discussion on electrical engineering and note the consensus for change.--[[User:Light current|Light current]] 13:11, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

Let us please try to work togther and reach consensus. Please discuss your concerns on the talk page before changing things. THe new pages are in the '''process''' of recreation. THis is '''not''' the final situation, so lets hammer out a compromise to statisfy a worldwide view. Please read the discussions you have missed whilst you have been away and respond to those before getting into edit wars. We are prepared to listen to well reasoned argument!--[[User:Light current|Light current]] 13:20, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

You have no consensus for your version since the poll was a sham asmany editors agree. Please do not revert the page. Others have been discussing the problem while you were away and we are coming to a common understanding. Its a pity you were not prepared to contribute to these early suggestions, but you didnt. Please do not NOW upset the apple cart uneccesarily. But please feel free to comment contructively on the proposed changes. Saying you dont like the new page or you prefer the old page without giving reasons is not helpful.--[[User:Light current|Light current]] 13:40, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

Constant reversion without discussion and agreement is not the Wiki way and could lead you to being blocked!! Please think on this--[[User:Light current|Light current]] 14:15, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

== User page ==
Sorry about editing your user page- my mistake. OH NO!!!!--[[User:Light current|Light current]] 13:42, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

Please '''STOP''' interfering with reconstruction work on electrical / electronics eng. Electrical eng will cease to exist as a separate page shortly. If you wanted to comment on the process, you should have done it when I first put out requests for comments, not now. Sulking [[Johnnny come latelys]] cannot be accommodated on WP.--[[User:Light current|Light current]] 01:25, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Well it DID have a redirect notice before someone removed it. Stop playing games and try to cooperate in the spirit of WP--[[User:Light current|Light current]] 02:48, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


== Illegal removing of tags ==
Quote from rules- please '''NOTE WELL''':--[[User:Light current|Light current]] 04:19, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

You may edit the article during the discussion

You and others are welcome to continue editing the article during the discussion period. Indeed, if you can address the points raised during the discussion by improving the article, you are encouraged to edit a nominated article (noting in the discussion that you have done so if your edits are significant ones).

There are, however, a few restrictions upon how you may edit an article:

* You must not blank the article (unless it is a copyvio).
'' '''* You must NOT modify or remove the AFD notice.'''''
* You must not rename the article unless you rename the associated discussion page(s) in parallel and update the section headings on the discussion page(s) to note the old and new names. If done, it's usually best to move the AFD sub-page immediately before the article page, since this ensures no links are broken, even if somebody visits a page in the middle of the changes.
* You should not turn the article into a redirect. A functioning redirect will overwrite the AFD notice. It may also be interpreted as an attempt to "hide" the old content from scrutiny by the community.
* You should exercise extreme caution before merging any part of the article. If you are bold but the community ultimately decides to delete the content, all your mergers must be undone. (This is necessary in order to remain compliant with the requirements of GFDL. Although Mediawiki now displays author information for deleted articles, it has not yet been settled whether this fulfils the GFDL requirements for the case of merging deleted articles into other articles.) It is far better to wait until the discussion period is complete unless there is a strong case for merge under the deletion policy.

You seem to be asking to be blocked - just carry on like this and you will be!

+:What is your reason for reinserting the history section? This should be on its own page called History of electrical engineering or something. THis would make the page flow a lot better I think and of course reduce it overburdening size somewhat.--[[User:Light current|Light current]] 05:18, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

== Your (last) go ==
You dont seem to be getting the hang of this Wikipedia business do you? You are supposed to discuss things -- not just midlkesly revert 2 or 3 times every 24 hrs--[[User:Light current|Light current]] 01:17, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

BTW your misleading edit summaries are being noted. If you are reverting it must be declared in the edit summary.--[[User:Light current|Light current]] 01:34, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

== Extreme Ironing ==

You wrote, ''If you take a look at the references they do check out.'' What references?  The article is missing references.  It mentions a tv show and twelve newspapers and publications yet has not one URL of them.  I also can't find the video on the Internet.  

Anyway, I put the tag because, while patrolling recent changes, I saw an anon user insert lots of text without references.  I see that the edit has been reverted, so that's the end of it. --&nbsp;[[User:Perfecto|Perfecto]] 16:32, 20 December 2005 (UTC)


== Magnetic Lock ==

* Nice lock article!  Could you next time include an edit summary so we don't think it's someone dumping copyrighted material?  Great stuff, though!! -[[User:Tux256ac|Tux256ac]] 05:06, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

== [[Virtual band]] PR ==

This article is now up for its third peer review. [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Virtual band/archive3|Please feel free to make their contributions.]] --[[User:Jb-adder|JB Adder]] | [[User talk:Jb-adder|Talk]] 21:13, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

== Box Office ==

These Box Office figures are secret from the [[Julian Thome Pictures Company]] and they are the total Box Office: Cinema, TV, Video, DVD!

:I imagine you realize that there is no "Julian Thome Pictures Company".  See [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Thome]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Film by Julian Thome]], etc. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 19:59, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

== electrical engineering ==

I agree with you&mdash;like you, I'm an engineering student trying to get [[welding|articles]] [[gas metal arc welding|related]] [[gas tungsten arc welding|to]] [[shielded metal arc welding|my]] major featured.  I'm working on dealing with the style/formatting problems that I and others have brought up so that this can be featured (I just converted the subdisciplines section to summary style as per my original comment and comments by Nichalp and nixie).  However, since I'm not an EE student, I don't have lots of references laying around that can verify the content of the article&mdash;with a couple good general EE books, it shouldn't be too tough to get this well sourced.  If you don't have access to that, let me know and I'll head to my university's library to see if I can dig anything up. --[[User:Spangineer|Spangineer]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Spangineer|<span style="color:brown; font-size:smaller;">(háblame)</span>]] 02:57, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

== Reasons for my changes (copy) ==

Hi Light current,

I realize we've had some difficulty creating a proper dialogue [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Light_current&action=history] but I really want to sort these changes out. So hopefully this helps you understand the reason for my changes:

* The reference to the "pneumatic tranducer circuit" is overly technical and is in contrast to the [[Wikipedia:Make technical articles accessible|make technical articles accessible]] guideline so I am going to return to the tuner circuit.

* The history section is far too lengthy relative to other parts of the article so I am going to try to trim it down but please feel free to add a more in-depth discussion of the history to the [[history of electrical engineering]] article.

* The discussion of enigma and world war two is unnecessary in such a concise discussion of the history of electrical engineering.

* The radar and magnetron are relevant developments so I am going to keep them with references to their history.

I really hope this resolves our dispute. Please consider that these changes were not easy to make, I had to spend a fair 30 minutes looking for references on the magnetron and radar as well as reviewing all the changes and copying text from old versions, etc.

[[User:Cedars|Cedars]] 02:43, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

== 3RR WARNING ==
You have reverted electrical engineering 3 times within 24 hrs. Next time you will be reported.--[[User:Light current|Light current]] 01:34, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

== Report new violation ==
Place new reports '''ABOVE''' this header, using the template below. Do '''not''' edit the template itself.
See the example at the top of the page for full details.  Take the time to do the job right to get
the quickest responses.  From the article's History page, '''use [[:meta:Help:Diff|diffs]] (links labelled "last"), not versions, and the "compare versions" button''' to clearly highlight the changes between versions of the article and show what has been reverted.

[[WP:3RR|Three revert rule]] violation on {{Article|ARTICLENAME}}. {{3RRV|USERNAME}}:

* Previous version reverted to: [Link Time]
* 1st revert: [DiffLink Time]
* 2nd revert: [DiffLink Time]
* 3rd revert: [DiffLink Time]
* 4th revert: [DiffLink Time]

Reported by: [[User:Light current|Light current]] 03:04, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Do you really want me to fill this in?--[[User:Light current|Light current]] 03:04, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

== Your Encouragment ==

Even though the Template that I created was deleted and poorly received, thank you for your encouragement. You are the only person who looked at it and at least made me feel that I did something worthwhile.

[[User:Lady Aleena|Lady Aleena]] | [[User talk:Lady Aleena|Talk]] 07:54, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

:No problem, I am glad I could help. [[User:Cedars|Cedars]] 02:21, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

== Electrical engineering ==

I see [[Electrical engineering]] recently acquired Featured Article status, primarily due it seems to your efforts. Let me offer my congratulations! [[User:BillC|BillC]] 16:48, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

:Thanks for your encouragement Bill! [[User:Cedars|Cedars]] 14:36, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

== UWA ==

Hi Cedars, I noticed you're a student of UWA. You might be interested in this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedians_by_alma_mater:University_of_Western_Australia
Cheers, [[User:Serephine|Serephine]] 14:39, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

:Thanks for the notice Serephine. I've added the category to my page. :-) [[User:Cedars|Cedars]] 00:47, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

== Featured! ==

I just wanted to let you know that [[Pink Floyd]] is now a featured article. Thanks a ton for supporting the candidacy! - [[User:Dharmabum420|dharmabum]] 22:59, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

== Root page template ==

Hi Lindosland,

I have removed the root page template from electrical engineering. I feel that the template is unappealing and adds little but confusion to the page.

I hope you will understand.

[[User:Cedars|Cedars]] 23:36, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Fair enough, but did you read [[Root page]] first? This concept is being used to coordinate editing on big topics. Another editor has supported the idea, saying that it is overdue, and urgently needed to sort out the mess on [[Electronics]], which is now proceeding. I back-linked [[Electronics]] to [[Electrical engineering]] as this seemed sensible, and that made [[Electrical engineering]] a root page. I would have thought it could usefully use the concept which aids coordinated editing as well as navigation forwards and backwards. It's a tricky concept, which we have been working on for some time, and which many fail to see the value of at first.  --[[User:Lindosland|Lindosland]] 23:58, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

== Re: [[Wikipedia: Userbox policy poll]] ==

I left a comment regarding your "Strong oppose" on the [[Wikipedia: Userbox policy poll]].  I've reproduced it below.  Please reply on the main page. [[User:JesseW/sig|JesseW, the juggling janitor]] 00:08, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
----
Users will remain totally free to "express their political opinions through user boxes including if they belong to a particular group or religion".  '''This proposal does not restrict what users may write on their user pages.'''  Please clarify your objection. -- JesseW, the juggling janitor 00:05, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
----

== My Brisbane photo ==

I am more than happy for you to use my photo in this way.
The very reason I released it under the GFDL.
Looks rather sweeeet in the screenshot. :-)   -- [[User:Gaz|Gaz]] 01:16, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

== GameRanger ==

Cedars, I want to thank you for your efforts in cleaning up the [[GameRanger]] article in response to the [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gameranger|AfD]]. In light of your changes I've added a '''Keep''' vote with cites for notability. Here's hoping the article survives. &mdash; [[User:Digitaleon|<font color="#AA0000">digital</font><font color="#777777">eon</font>]] • [[User_Talk:Digitaleon|talk]] @ 14:32, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

I would like to point out that the GameRanger page is, to this day, continually vandalized with nonsense.  This includes bashing as well as picture uploads that are of no relevance.  I tried to clean it up a bit but, still, it is incessantly altered.  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.14.140.158|24.14.140.158]] ([[User talk:24.14.140.158|talk]]) 20:23, 15 March 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== [[:Template:Good article]] ==

I was in the process of removing the excess template [[:Template:Good article|good article]]. -- [[User:Getcrunk|<FONT COLOR="#FF0000">getcrunk</FONT>]][[User_talk:Getcrunk|<span style="cursor: help"><FONT COLOR="#3366FF">juice</FONT></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Getcrunk|<sup><small><font face="Tahoma" color="#000033"><span style="background-color: #FFFF00"><span style="cursor: ne-resize">contribs</span></span></font></small></sup>]] 01:37, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

==lostprophet==

The problem is the bot on the talk page kept picking it up as a missing article if I didn't capitalize it, apparently all Wiki articles have to start with a capital letter due to technical restrictions :/. [[User:Homestarmy|Homestarmy]] 13:38, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

== GAauto question ==
Your gaauto.pl script automatically dropped two articles I recently added to the good article page.  How can this be avoided?  Thx, [[User:Vir|Vir]] 18:46, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
:Thanks much for the explanation at my user page :) [[User:Vir|Vir]] 00:49, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

hey hey hey 
````[[User:Worlock eats|Worlock eats]] 06:31, 12 March 2006 (UTC)````

== Cedars: Mais oui!, Phase4: Mais non! ==

Hi Cedars,

I've left a message for you on my talk page.[[User:Phase4|Phase4]] 15:58, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

== Proposed new look for Good article page ==

Hi Cedars,
You'll see the new look proposal for the GA page has taken you colour scheme concern on board. I'd really appreciate it if you take a look and post you feedback. I couldn't really support the version you mentioned as it did not contain edit links for complete sections. When experimenting with versions I found that without this, sections were a real pain to change around. TheGrappler also did sterling work on categorisations within the section which I think will make it much easier to find articles for viewing, and easier for editors to include and remove articles. Cheers [[User:SeanMack|SeanMack]] 16:46, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

== [[Electrical engineering]] ==

Please take a look at my (long) proposal for taking care of the Electrical Engineering article name problem at [[Talk:Electrical_and_electronics_engineering#Page_splitting_or_renaming.3F]].  Thanks! —[[User:Spangineer|Spangineer]]<sup>[[:es:Usuario:Spangineer|[es]]]</sup>&nbsp;[[User talk:Spangineer|<span style="color:brown; font-size:smaller;">(háblame)</span>]] 18:55, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

== Electrical and electronics engineering ==

Thanks for the comments. Makes sense to do it the way you propose, though at this point, it may not be necessary. Spangineer's latest proposal seems sound, though it still seems it would clutter the electrical engineering page. -- [[User:Superdosh|Superdosh]] 21:26, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

== Filmographies ==

I noticed you've changed the order of filmographies to newest first.  I'd like to point out that Zzzzz changed [[Wikipedia:Filmographies]] to suit his argument that it should be oldest first and has made threats to delist and has followed through on several pages based on the wikipedia page that he changed.  Hardly sounds like consensus and more like bad faith editting to me.  Please see [[Wikipedia talk:Filmographies]] for discussion. [[User:Cburnett|Cburnett]] 03:46, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

:I have no problem with either arrangement. I just didn't want to see articles kicked off the GA list for such a frivilous reason and it seemed better to address the reason and reinstate them than fight the delisting. I do feel kind of cheated that all that work was now for nothing (given that the changes were just reverted). [[User:Cedars|Cedars]] 05:34, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

==GAAuto==

Oops, sorry, I should have given you a heads up for that really! SeanMack discovered the idea on his sandpit version - it's pretty neat because it now means edit summaries will contain the section name. So I copied the idea over. Both of us think it's worth going with, so that some of the edit summaries will look less mysterious! Thanks for the warning. [[User:TheGrappler|TheGrappler]] 16:18, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

2:1

Guess! Im sure a person of your intelligence will soon work it out--[[User:Light current|Light current]] 01:00, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

== Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot == 

[[User:SuggestBot|SuggestBot]] predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles.  Have fun!
{|cellspacing=10 style="background-color:transparent;"
|-
|valign=top|
;Stubs:<!--'''[[Wikipedia:Stub|Stubs]]:'''-->
:[[Armor for Sleep]]
:[[Afro-punk]]
:[[Hawthorne Heights]]
:[[Fat Wreck Chords]]
:[[Remains of the Day (band)]]
:[[Mad Caddies]]
:[[The Kids Will Have Their Say]]
:[[Fire Party]]
:[[NMAM Institute of Technology]]
:[[Electronics and Communications Engineering]]
:[[Underground rock]]
:[[Bouncing Souls]]
:[[Samiam]]
:[[7 Seconds]]
:[[Roger Miret and the Disasters]]
:[[Ten Foot Pole]]
:[[List of black hardcore/punk musicians]]
:[[Steve Jocz]]
:[[Dag Nasty]]
|align=top|
;Cleanup
:[[Strung Out]]
:[[Michael Hampton]]
:[[Biomedical engineering]]
;Merge
:[[Punk revival]]
:[[Streetpunk]]
:[[Rhinoplasty (album)]]
;Add Sources
:[[Art-Pop/Punk/Metal]]
:[[Christian hardcore]]
:[[Art rock]]
;Wikify
:[[Millencolin]]
:[[Mechanical Engineering Technology]]
:[[New World ROM]]
;Expand
:[[Iefr]]
:[[Egeria (episode of Rome)]]
:[[History of electricity and radio]]
|}

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians.  It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work.  Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have '''feedback''' on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on [[User_talk:SuggestBot|SuggestBot's talk page]].  Thanks from [[User:ForteTuba|ForteTuba]], SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on [[User:SuggestBot/Requests|the SuggestBot request page]].  If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- [[User:SuggestBot|SuggestBot]] 16:30, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

== EE. again... ==

Hi there, I know all this trouble at the EE article is annoying... But why did you make the Hitachi. . .  pic smaller? I don't know what it looks like on your screen, but here it now shows a big empty space between that image and the '''Contents''' box. Of course, if you have your contents box ''deactivated'', there would be just a large image, and that would look bad as well...

''It keeps things peaceful'', yeah, I know what you mean... I was considering putting those two images in with the EE (terminology) article and putting the Mm pic up (or something...). But I better suggest it at the EE talk page first. [[User:VdSV9|<b style="color:#207912;">VdSV9</b>]]•[[User talk:VdSV9|<span style="font-size:large;">♫</span>]] 18:02, 20 April 2006 (UTC)


==Al Leong==
Actually, if you take a look at the [[Al Leong]] page (not the talk page), you'll see I just moved a GA tag from the article to the talk page.  I think that was an appropriate move, though it doesn't really qualify as a GA. --[[User:Keflavich|Keflavich]] 13:27, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
:No worries.  I'm glad you noticed that it didn't deserve the distinction. --[[User:Keflavich|Keflavich]] 14:52, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

== GA [[Tom Cousineau]] ==

Problem with the [[Tom Cousineau]] article are images that is why you failed it, sadly there no PD or GFDL images avalible and the only image I found a magazine cover that was later deleted as copyvio. No other images that isn't pure copyvio. I don't think thats a valid reason to decline a GA what I read. Thanks [[User:Jaranda|Jaranda]] [[User_talk:Jaranda|<sup>wat's sup</sup>]] 01:00, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

== IIT article ==

If the Dilbert image is added to "Criticism" section where media is criticied (and the strip being taken as example), will it qualify as fair use? Also, for it, I will need to add the sentence about [[hindsight bias]] that you deleted as "confusing". I feel its important to highlight the bias people have about IITians. There might be a need to copyedit it to make it clearer, but it is essential. -[[User:Ambuj.Saxena|Ambuj Saxena]] ([[User_talk:Ambuj.Saxena|talk]]) 10:34, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

== GAAuto ==

Great, thanks for implementing that :-) I checked the history page and the improvement is immediately obvious - changes from section editing are now appropriately labelled. Good stuff :) [[User:TheGrappler|TheGrappler]] 21:44, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

== thanks for your comments at peer review ==

Hi Cedars.  Thanks for your comments at the peer review for Poincare conjecture.  I wanted to let you know that I am considering them seriously, but as the issues brought up are not minor, I will need some time before I can implement changes.  Additionally, the article has unfortunately been the subject of a dispute, and my available time to edit the article has been taken up by that.  But I fully intend to give the article a reworking based on your comments in the next week or so.  --[[User:C S|C S]][[User talk:C S| (Talk)]] 06:50, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

==thanks for your comments==

[[332nd Engineer General Service Regiment]].  I have improved the section about the training, please let me know your thoughts.  Thanks very much for the help.  [[User:Mfields1|Mfields1]] 00:43, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

== Re:Computer ethics ==

Yeah, I guess I must be biased since I wrote the thing, but I still disagree with not promoting the article to Good Article status. According to the criteria, inline citations are desirable, but not necessary. In addition, the article does provide a sound overview of the topic. As for what it is lacking, I can attest that there simply isn't any verifiable information on the points that require further elaboration. Research on computer ethics is few and far between in both the philosophy and computing ends of academia. It seems more like we're reviewing it under the more rigorous terms of [[WP:FAC]]. Oh well. [[C'est la vie]].--[[User:Jtalledo|Jtalledo]] [[User_talk:Jtalledo|(talk)]] 10:54, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

==[[Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy]]==
Greetings, I see you've relisted this article on [[Wikipedia:Good articles]]. Thanks for that. Could you possibly change the GA template on [[Talk:Jyllands-Posten_Muhammad_cartoons_controversy]] as well? I'd do it myself but I think it'd be better if a more neutral third party did it. Thanks. [[User:Netscott|Netscott]] 13:41, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Hi Cedars. I've done a lot more than take an interest in GA; I've been involved in defending its standards, against the attempts by a group of editors to change the rules to suit their personal agenda, through a long mediation (see the talk:Disputes page). As such, I'm very much aware of how it works. I have chosen to veto the article in question, and have gone through the procedures for delisting the article as described in the GA project pages. (As an aside, I notice you also live in Perth; I wonder how many of us there are.) &nbsp;[[User:Jeremygbyrne|JEREMY]] 13:44, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
:It appears there may be a bit of an edit war on our hands. [[User:Jeremygbyrne|JEREMY]] reverted your revert on [[Wikipedia:Good articles]] I've since restored back to your version. I totally understand why you reverted Jeremy considering the article had [[Wikipedia:Good_articles/Disputes#Jyllands-Posten_Muhammad_cartoons_controversy|overwhelming support]] to be reinstated. [[User:Netscott|Netscott]] 13:55, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Automated]] ==

I followed up on [[User_talk:AndyZ#Peer_review_script|your idea]], and managed to get it to work – see [[WP:PR/A]]. Even better, I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Peer_review/Colombo&diff=60668910&oldid=60666391 managed to shrink down my suggestions] to only one line. How does it look? Thanks, ''[[User:AndyZ|Andy]]''&nbsp;<sub>[[User talk:AndyZ|t]]</sub> 16:46, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

== Actuary ==

Thank you very much for your helpful comments on [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Actuary]]. You have propelled the article to somewhat expand the content there, with suitable references. I hope you enjoy it :) Thanks again! -- [[User:Avraham|Avi]] 04:21, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

== GAAuto glitch? ==

Hey.  I've noticed what might be a slight bug with your great GAAuto script in regards to names...this has applied to the initial additions of [[Jimmy Carter]] and [[Tim Foli]] among others.  Namely, if the name is originally entered with the first name first, GAAuto will fix the name so that the last name comes first BUT it will order it as if the first name was the last name.  For example, in Foli's case, the name was corrected to read '''Foli, Tim''' but it was be ordered as if the name was '''Tim, Foli'''.  It has to be manually corrected to be listed properly.  I'm wondering if your script can be advanced enough to so that it can be done automatically. -- [[User:Sportsdude820|transaspie]] 07:12, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

==The Hershey Company==
Hello Cedars. I have expanded The Hershey Company by adding in the information you added to the talk page; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Hershey_Company&diff=61916196&oldid=61621442] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Hershey_Company&diff=next&oldid=61916196]. Hopefully the article is up to the standard of a "Good Article." Let me know if there's anything else. Regards, [[User:Kilo-Lima|<span style="color:#007FFF;">Iola</span>]][[User:Kilo-Lima/Esperanza|<b style="color:#50C878;">k</b>]][[User:Kilo-Lima|<span style="color:#007FFF;">ana</span>]]|[[User talk:Kilo-Lima|<sup style="color:orange;">T</sup>]] 22:03, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

== Mailing list discussion ==

Thanks for sharing your thoughts. There are always tradeoffs that have to be made in trying to improve the quality of our content and the freedom of others to reuse it. In this case I feel the benefits of the change would outweigh the costs. I recognize that some people feel as you do and would in fact decline to provide an email address in order to upload even if, as with the "email this user" function, it is not publicly displayed to senders. What proportion that would be is difficult to establish, which was precisely the point of my post, but I do think it would be a relatively unusual choice. I'll grant that mailing list participants may not be entirely representative of the relevant population, but I never suggested otherwise. --[[User:Michael Snow|Michael Snow]] 16:13, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

== Mark Hoppus ==

Hi Cedars, I have the same issues I had with the (+44) and AVA external links which have been cleaned-up, here is what I originally wrote :

When you should link externally : http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/When_should_I_link_externally

“Not very often. If the site you are linking to is an article, history or timeline, then wikipedia should have its own article on that subject, not just an external link. The web is already full past capacity of sites composed of links to other sites.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links

specifically adds:

“Links to normally avoid: A website that you own or maintain (unless it is the official site of the subject of the article). If it is relevant and informative, mention it as a possible link on the talk page and wait for someone else to include it, or include the information directly in the article.”

Basically a number of links are not related directly to Mark Hoppus. I feel that a "See Also" section with links to (+44) or Atticus Clothing wikipedia articles would be a better choice. What do you think?

Thanks,
--[[User:MrPink|MrPink]] 16:47, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

== Failed GA [[New England]] ==

Thanks for taking a look at the article and offering your input. It is much appreciated. Now that I think of it, the article is probably too long to be considered for good article status, anyways. What kind of changes do you think need to be made before nominating it for FA status, besides the ones you already suggested? I'll get to work on those soon, by the way. There are indeed some writing problems in the article. It just needs a bit of a comb-through. Thanks again, and happy editing. =) --[[User:AaronS|AaronS]] 02:16, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
==Notability==
As per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:BIO published authors are notable. The guidelines do not say whether it is Junior/Senior or Fiction/ Nonfiction etc Is it correct or not[[User:Doctorbruno|Doctor Bruno]] 07:47, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

(Sort of related) I see why you were able to put the Notable Wikipedians tag on my discussion page.  I have been told by someone in Wikipedia that I cannot start an article on myself, but someone else can, and I can add details (provided NPOV and verifiable) - do you think you could do me a favour and create an article called Paul Morrison, then you (or I) could just cut and paste the contents of User:Jpaulm into it.  This would make life quite a bit easier :-) [[User:Jpaulm|Jpaulm]] 14:28, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your answer on MyTalk - makes sense!  Maybe one day I'll have a few drinks and do it myself!  Regards [[User:Jpaulm|Jpaulm]] 23:46, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

==[[Mike Matusow]] GA==
Thanks for taking the time to review and comment on the GA nomination I made for Mike Matusow. I have made the change you requested. Hopefully I now have my first Good Article! [[User:Essexmutant|Essexmutant]] 16:53, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

== Globular clusters ==

:''Please verify that [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Globular_cluster&diff=69301574&oldid=69212696 this] change is correct and I will promote globular clusters to a good aritcle.''

Yes that's an improvement in the wording. Thank you. &mdash; [[User:RJHall|RJH]] ([[User_talk:RJHall|''talk'']]) 15:14, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

==GAAuto==
Something odd hppened with your script- I was looking at the New GAs, and I see [[Zero (Mega Man)]], which has been a GA since May 22nd, and was never delisted. --[[User:PresN|PresN]] 16:39, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

:The script relists articles that have moved recently. This is useful for keeping an eye on unstable articles. [[User:Cedars|Cedars]] 01:51, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

==[[Automated teller machine]]==
Good suggestions in the [[Wikipedia:Peer_review/Automated_teller_machine|peer review]].  Thanks.  After a trim or two, I'll take another run at GA.[[User:PrimroseGuy|PrimroseGuy]] 21:28, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

==[[Search Toppers]]==
''PLEASE READ'': for those of you who are doubters, please notice no back link to the website wich would be the case if one was self promotion, and further more if you have a phone with a web brouser go to searchtoppers.tv and view a demo of the search toppers mobile streaming technology in action. the mobile streaming transfer rate is greater than 24 frames per second (HD). It works on all carriers except verizon who has not lowered their "wall garden". search and lear about carrier wall gardens then you can look up H.264 technology without disclosing patent pending information you can easily see searctoppers is who they claim to be. Thank you in advance for the time it will take you to confirm.

== Telecommunication ==

Might the "Accessibility" paragraph fit in better at the end of the "Modern Operations" section? This is just a suggestion, as you may have good reasons for wanting it where it is now. But just a thought. [[User:MLilburne|MLilburne]] 13:45, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

:I've passed the article. Congrats! [[User:MLilburne|MLilburne]] 14:01, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

== Concern about the GA status of [[Mike Matusow]] ==

Howdy! I recently failed the article [[Ram Vaswani]] due to concerns about the lack reliable sources among others things. One of the editors on that article's [[Talk:Ram Vaswani|talk page]] put this article and it's GA status up as a comparision point. In looking at the Matusow's article, I see that it has the same issue with using blogs/internet forum as the majority of it's sources, which don't stack up with the guidelines listed in [[WP:RS]]. I also have minor concern about the inclusion of the Trivia section but again that is minor compared with the lack of reliable sources. My concerns may lead me to want to de-list the article, but I would want to discuss that with you first for your views. I appreciate your time. [[User:Agne27|Agne]] 03:03, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
: Comment - I have expanded the lead, and raised a discussion re: reliable sources at [[Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources#Reliable sources in poker articles|Talk:Reliable sources]]. [[User:Essexmutant|Essexmutant]] 10:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

''Moving comment from my talk page to keep discussion centralized''

Hi Agne,

After some consideration I still stand by my decision to promote Mike Matusow.

Most of the article's personal details come from Poker Player Magazine's Me and My Big Mouth - an interview which presumably remains faithful to what Matusow said. The Hendon Mob references are used largely to report the way particular tournaments have played out something that is less likely to be exposed to rumour.

I imagine it may be difficult to find authoritative references about modern poker players so I am quite comfortable with the choice of references. I also view the good article standard as a more relaxed standard compared to featured articles so that is probably why the issue of reliable sources concerns me less with good articles. Cedars 05:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

We still have a conflict with [[WP:RS]] and I appreciate Essexmutant's effort to get it clarified over on the policy's talk page. I will wait on making an action to de-list the article till things are settled there. As for GA standards, I guess I take the slogan ''The standards of GA are only as high as our weakest article'' to heart. Coupled with the fact that this is a [[WP:BLP]], I would tend not to approach these reviews with relaxed expectations. [[User:Agne27|Agne]] 17:45, 10 September 2006 (UTC)


== Elec eng page ==
I feel you are dispalying a degree of obstinacy in your refusal to discuss these changes you wish to make. Im not sure that you yet understand the processes and behavioral standards on WP. Please do not make major changes without agreement. This is the WP rule (above WP:BOLD). If you continue to change without discussion, I may have to report your actions to the Admin notice board.--[[User:Light current|Light current]] 00:36, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

:Light current,

:Please feel free to report my behaviour to the admin notice board. I feel that making a selection of changes to improve the article, restoring those changes, asking for reasons why those changes were reverted (receiving none) and then restoring those changes again once they were reverted again without explanation is entirely defendable.

:[[User:Cedars|Cedars]] 00:46, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

== [[KDE]] ==

Since nobody else seemed to respond, I've gone ahead and fixed the two points you raised about the GA nomination of [[KDE]]. I hope things are clearer now. Regards, [[User:Samsara|{{{2|Samsara}}}]] ([[User talk:Samsara|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Samsara|contribs]]) 16:29, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

== You are welcome ==

The lead felt like it needed an image, so I did a quick Commons search and found the mobile image. Glad you like it! [[User:Batmanand|Batmanand]] | [[User talk:Batmanand|Talk]] 09:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

==[[Óengus I of the Picts]]==

GAAuto keeps removing this article from the GA page...Not sure why, as it is a GA.  I've re-added it a couple of times.  It's in history, under historical figures. --[[User:PresN|PresN]] 20:19, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

:Sorry about that...I can't figure out why it is doing it yet but I will try to keep an eye on the article. Thanks for the bug report. [[User:Cedars|Cedars]] 00:39, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

==Telecoms==
Hi, it might be a good idea if you asked some FAC regulars directly to have a look at the article since it doesn't seem to be getting much attention on FAC.--[[User:Petaholmes|Peta]] 06:03, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

==GAAauto error?==
It seems to of removed a Typhoon and [[Black Marsh]], and I think those are both still GA's :/. [[User:Homestarmy|Homestarmy]] 00:39, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

:Hi Homestarmy,

:[[Black Marsh]] still appears to be listed under the "Fictional sites" category. It was removed from the recently added list but I don't think it was ever removed from the "Fictional sites" category.

:[[User:Cedars|Cedars]] 02:02, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

== Lloyd Levitin ==

I have added a comment countering TruthbringerToronto 's argument on the [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lloyd_Levitin]] page. Please read it and consider changing your vote. Thanks. --[[User:Ineffable3000|Ineffable3000]] 02:22, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

== Something you might be interested in ==

Since you requested deletion for the One Peice attacks, I thought you could help out here: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dragon Ball special abilities]]. [[User:Hydromasta231|Hydromasta231]] 04:29, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

== James Robert Baker ==

Thank you for that formatting edit you made to the article I wrote (the BDSM, gay-bondage fix). I had tried multiple times to make that fix, but could never get it to come out the way you did. It now looks exactly like I wanted it to, and I learned how to do it by going into the edit page to see how you formatted it. Thanks for the much needed improvement. [[User:Jeffpw|Jeffpw]] 09:41, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

:No problem, I am glad I could help. [[User:Cedars|Cedars]] 23:48, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

== Of bots and Good Articles ==

Hi,

There's a discussion of bot use at [[Wikipedia talk:Good articles]]. I'm new; not sure who does what. But apparently you have a bot that does related tasks. Thought you might wanna chime in.
--[[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] 00:24, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


==MIT==
The article on MIT has undergone some significant changes over the last month to prepare for a peer review and nomination for Featured Article. Because you have contributed previously, please review the changes and the discussion board. [[User:Madcoverboy|Madcoverboy]] 18:54, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

== GA nomination of [[OFDM]] ==

I think that the improvements that you suggested in [[:talk:Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing]] are addressed. Do you think that the [[OFDM]] article once again should be nominated as a good article? [[User:Mange01|Mange01]] 13:17, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

== Reply ==

Note the trial - in short it's to see what it actually does, it's kinda hard to judge without diffs :).  As for the whole community image thing, it's an issue for sure, but copyright issues I'd have to say are a greater legal issue in most cases.  As long as it leaves a nice edit summary w/ a link to an FAQ page which I suspect it will, it seems to be an non issue.  Do you recall Orphanbot at all - pretty much the same thing.  Werdna is still quite active on WMF projects, he still runs Werdnabot (the talk page archive bot) and I have him on more than one contact list, contact isn't an issue AFAIS.  Feel free to poke me if you have any other questions -- [[User:Tawker|Tawker]] 06:26, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

==A problematic GA review==
I was wondering if you might have the time to comment on the Agripinna opera GA review, the discussion is proving quite....contentious, and I think more editors might be able to help form a real supermajority one way or another. I have the feeling that a no consensus result isn't going to bode well :/. [[User:Homestarmy|Homestarmy]] 18:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

== Thanks for the heads-up ==

I already voted on that (support, of course). [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] 23:27, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

== Leaving Wikipedia ==

I can see why you are leaving and don't blame you at all. Will add you to Missing Wikipedians (not now though) just so you won't be forgotten here.--<small>[[User:Hamedog|Hamedog]]<sub>[[User talk:Hamedog|Talk]]</sub>|<sup>[[Special:Emailuser/Hamedog|@]]</sup></small> 16:31, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

== I hope you won't leave ==

The point is that the poll was inflammatory and divisive and stated the issue in terms that most people find unfair.  We are far from ready to have a proper poll on the issue, because a proper discussion has not been had in order to try to find consensus.  The point is that it is a disrespect to valued contributors on all sides of the issue to bring an issue to a poll when there is clearly room to explore common ground.--[[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo Wales]] 15:39, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
:I hope you don't leave too, you've done more things for Wikipedia than just talking about Fair Use rationals, who will run your wonderful and complex GA list updating script? Plus, i'll have one less person to call upon if there's another crazy GA review or something, these things only happen like once every month or something. :D  [[User:Homestarmy|Homestarmy]] 04:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
::In regards to fair use and [[Wikipedia:Elimination of Fair Use Rationale in Promotional Photos/Vote]], and the poll which was stopped.  
::Do you have a group, like  [[WP:RC Patrol]]? 
::I have seen so many good editors leave because they have unpopular minority views.  The majority has WP sites like [[WP:RC Patrol]]. 
::I was indefinetly booted for copyright violations myself, and am on self-imposed parol. (In fact I am going to message the person who unbooted from the indefinete boot about this message, just to give him a head up, so he can warn me if I am going over this self-imposed parol). [[User:Travb|Travb]] ([[User talk:Travb|talk]]) 15:43, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
:::[[User_talk:VoiceOfReason#Discussion_on_fair-use_policy_amendment]] [[User:Travb|Travb]] ([[User talk:Travb|talk]]) 22:51, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

== In case you ever look again... ==
We could use some help getting your GA script to run, so far, I haven't been able to make it work, all the instructions for installing cURL only work for UNIX machines or other cool obscure OS's that aren't like Windows, so even after I discovered the way to make it bind to Perl, the cURL commands still won't work on my computer :/. [[User:Homestarmy|Homestarmy]] 14:36, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
:Ok, one of them was actually a Linux system command for copy, but now I don't even know what the files your script is copying are even for.... [[User:Homestarmy|Homestarmy]] 02:48, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

==Revived discussion concerning fair use in portals==

I am contacting everyone who participated in [[Wikipedia talk:Fair use/Amendment/Fair use images in portals|the discussion]] that became inactive in December.  Due to the length of the previous discussion, I have proposed a [[Wikipedia:Fair use/Amendment/Fair use images in portals2|new amendment]] and you like you to weigh in so that we may actually have a consensus on this matter as it doesn't seem there exists one either way. -[[User:Zappernapper|ΖαππερΝαππερ]] <sup>[[User talk:Zappernapper|Babel]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Zappernapper|Alexandria]]</sub>

==TWA 800==
I have a death wish and high tolerance to pain, therefore have decided to try to improve the TWA 800 article. I put up an opening gambit in talk, please let me know what you think. [[User:Lipsticked Pig|Lipsticked Pig]] 08:43, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

== Welcome back ==

Hi, I'm a little late off the marks as you've been back for a while, but welcome back. &mdash; [[User:BillC|BillC]]  <sup>[[User talk:BillC|talk]]</sup> 16:00, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

:Thank you BillC. :-) [[User:Cedars|Cedars]] 00:37, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

from me too: WELCOME BACK. [[User:Northfox|Northfox]] 13:15, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

:Thank you Northfox. :-) [[User:Cedars|Cedars]] 06:29, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

== [[Template:GA]] ==

hi, well I didn't wanted to make it obsolete, just to show people it is better to replace it if possible. I think template:ArticleHistory should be replaced with "tempalte:GA" by experienced users only, regards --'''''[[User:Andersmusician|<font color="green">Andersmusician</font>]] [[user_talk:Andersmusician|<font size="3" color="red">$</font>]]''''' 04:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

==[[Wikipedia:Good article candidates|GAC]] backlog elimination drive==
This form message is being sent to you either due to your membership with [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles|WikiProject Good Articles]] and/or your inclusion on the [[Wikipedia:Good article candidates/List of reviewers]]. A new drive has been started requesting that all members review at least one article (or more, if you wish!) within the next two weeks at [[Wikipedia:Good article candidates|GAC]] to help in removing the large backlog. This message is being sent to all GA members and even members who have been recently reviewing articles. There are almost 130 members in this project and about 180 articles that currently need to be reviewed. If each member helps to review just one or two articles, the majority of the backlog will be cleared. Since the potential amount of reviewers may significantly increase, please make sure to add :{{tl|GAReview}} underneath the article you are reviewing to ensure that only one person is reviewing each article. Additionally, the [[WP:WIAGA|GA criteria]] may have been modified since your last review, so look over the criteria again to help you to determine if a candidate is GA-worthy. If you have any questions about this drive or the review process, leave a message on the GAC talk page. --[[User:Nehrams2020|Nehrams2020]] 23:50, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

==Please reconsider your opinion at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alton C. Crews Middle School]] in light of changes==

Hi,

A large number of improvements have been made to the [[Alton C. Crews Middle School]] article since you voted. Please take another look and reconsider. Thanks! [[User:Noroton|Noroton]] 18:37, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

== Invitation to WikiProject Telecommunications ==

Dear Cedars, 
Since you have made so many good contributions to telecom articles, I would like to invite you to become a member of the WikiProject in Telecommunications [[WP:TEL]]. [[User:Mange01|Mange01]] 14:46, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

==Perth Meetup Notification==
{{Wikipedia:Meetup/Perth}}
*You are invited to a  meetup of Western Australian Wikipedians on the 19th August 2007 in the tearooms of Tranby House. Please sign on the [[Wikipedia:Meetup/Perth/3]] if you are able to attend. you recieved this message as your account has been active during May, June 2007 and your user page is listed in the [[:Category:Wikipedians in Western Australia]] [[User:Gnangarra|Gnan]][[User_talk:Gnangarra|garra]] 03:16, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

==July 2007 GAC backlog elimination drive==
A new elimination drive of the backlog at  [[Wikipedia:Good article candidates]]  will take place from the month of July through August 12, 2007. There are currently about 130 articles that need to be reviewed right now. If you are interested in helping with the drive, then please visit [[Wikipedia:Good article candidates backlog elimination drive]] and record the articles that you have reviewed.  Awards will be given based on the number of reviews completed. Since the potential amount of reviewers may significantly increase, please make sure to add :{{tl|GAReview}} underneath the article you are reviewing to ensure that only one person is reviewing each article. Additionally, the [[WP:WIAGA|GA criteria]] may have been modified since your last review, so look over the criteria again to help you to determine if a candidate is GA-worthy. If you have any questions about this drive or the review process, leave a message on the drive's talk page. Please help to eradicate the backlog to cut down on the waiting time for articles to be reviewed.

''You have received this message either due to your membership with [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles|WikiProject: Good Articles]] and/or your inclusion on the [[Wikipedia:Good article candidates/List of reviewers]].'' --[[User:Nehrams2020|Nehrams2020]] 23:10, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

== List_of_songs_about_masturbation is in it's 5th AfD ==

[[List_of_songs_about_masturbation]] is up for it's fifth AfD.  You participated in an earlier one.  If you wish to participate again, please go to
[[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_songs_about_masturbation_%285th_nomination%29]]
[[User:Lentower|Lentower]] 03:18, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

== [[Emo (slang)]] Suggested Move ==

Hi.

There is currently a discussion at [[Talk:Emo (slang)]] reagarding a suggested move to [[Emo subculture]]. In an effort to generate a greater [[WP:CONSENSUS|consensus]], I am attempting to contact any user involved in similar discussions previously on the article's talk page.

''The great whale commands it...''
--[[User:ZayZayEM|ZayZayEM]] 06:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

==Reminder==

[[Wikipedia:Meetup/Perth/3]] is next sunday 19th August, if you haven't already please sign on the meetup page if your coming, if your still unsure indicate anyway so I can confirm numbers with the venue thankyou [[User:Gnangarra|Gnan]][[User_talk:Gnangarra|garra]] 00:40, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

== [[WP:WGA|WikiProject Good Articles]] Newsletter for November 2007 ==

The '''[[Wikipedia:Wikiproject good articles/Newsletter/November 2007|November 2007 issue]]''' of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter has been published. [[Wikipedia talk:Wikiproject good articles/Newsletter/November 2007|Comments]] are welcome on this, as well as suggestions or offers of assistance for the December 2007 issue. [[User:Derek.cashman|Dr. Cash]] 01:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

== [[WP:WGA|WikiProject Good Articles]] Newsletter for December 2007 ==

The '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/December 2007|December 2007 issue]]''' of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter has been published. [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter|Comments]] are welcome on this, as well as suggestions or offers of assistance for the January 2008 issue. [[User:Derek.cashman|Dr. Cash]] 00:30, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

==[[WP:WGA|WikiProject Good Articles January Newsletter]]==
Happy New Year! Here is the latest edition of the WikiProject GA Newsletter! [[User:Derek.cashman|Dr. Cash]] ([[User talk:Derek.cashman|talk]]) 03:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/January 2008}}

==[[WP:WGA|WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter]]==
The February 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! [[User:Derek.cashman|Dr. Cash]] ([[User talk:Derek.cashman|talk]]) 05:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/February 2008}}

==[[WP:WGA|WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter]]==
The March 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! [[User:Derek.cashman|Dr. Cash]] ([[User talk:Derek.cashman|talk]]) 05:54, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/March 2008}}
==April GA Newsletter==
The April issue of the [[WP:WGA|WikiProject Good Articles]] Newsletter is now available. [[User:Derek.cashman|Dr. Cash]] ([[User talk:Derek.cashman|talk]]) 03:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/April 2008}}
==[[WP:WGA|WikiProject Good Articles]] May Newsletter==
The May Newsletter for [[WP:WGA|WikiProject Good Articles]] has now been published. [[User:Derek.cashman|Dr. Cash]] ([[User talk:Derek.cashman|talk]]) 22:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/May 2008}}

== Speedy deletion of Image:Cvt.pdf ==
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|left|48px|]]A file that you uploaded, [[:Image:Cvt.pdf]], has been listed in  [[:Category:Candidates for speedy deletion]] because it is not an image, sound or video file and does not appear to have any encyclopedic use. See [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images/Media]] (criterion I10) If you feel that this file has a use in the encyclopedia, please place the {{tl|hangon}} tag on [[:Image:Cvt.pdf]], then go to its talk page (by clicking Discussion at the top of that page) and insert an explanation of how the file is useful to the encyclopedia. Thank you. <!-- Template:Idw-inv -->

This deletion applies only to the PDF version. The PNG version [[:Image:Cvt.png]] looks fine and is not being considered for deletion. --[[User:Metropolitan90|Metropolitan90]] [[User talk:Metropolitan90|(talk)]] 04:07, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

==WikiProject Good articles newsletter==
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/June 2008}}

Delivered by the automated [[User:Giggabot|Giggabot]] ([[User talk:Giggabot|<b>stop!</b>]]) 01:17, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

==WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter==
Sorry about the delay. [[WP:AWB|AWB]] has been having a few issues lately. Here is the august issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter! [[User:Derek.cashman|Dr. Cash]] ([[User talk:Derek.cashman|talk]]) 20:27, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/August 2008}}

==Speedy deletion of [[:Image:Cvt.pdf]]==
[[Image:Ambox warning_pn.svg|48px|left]] A tag has been placed on [[:Image:Cvt.pdf]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#I2|section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. 

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:Image:Cvt.pdf|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[ Talk:Image:Cvt.pdf|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  <!-- Template:Db-noimage-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Frogger3140|frogger3140]] ([[User talk:Frogger3140|talk]]) 21:58, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

== [[Communications in Canada]] ==

Hey&mdash;you may want to point CyclePat to [[WP:SUMMARY]] when disussing the issue.  I agree with you that the detailed analysis of Canada's ''Telecommunications Act'' doesn't belong in the parent article on [[telecommunications]], and moving the material to [[communications in Canada]] is sensible practice and not a [[WP:CFORK]] as CyclePat suggests.

I'm afraid that's as involved as I want to be in that issue, however, and will have no further comment.  I've run into CyclePat before, and he has a bad habit of arguing and wikilawyering until he grinds down any common-sense opposition.  Best of luck, [[User:TenOfAllTrades|TenOfAllTrades]]([[User_talk:TenOfAllTrades|talk]]) 13:20, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

:Hi Cedars, I've left a reply on my talk page. Thank you. p.s.: Thank you TenOfAllTrades for your feedback, we obvious disagree. (If you change your mind and want to join in on the debate, feel free to add your comment on my talk page if you wish). Also, I'dd like to point out that, all you have to do is a little research for other countries and then, instead of saying Canada's sovereignity we can simply state, Telecommunications plays an important role in "many countries sovereignity". Just need to find the sources for the other countries. Cedar seems to have an issue getting around to find some, perhaps you would like to try and help us find some?  Note: The article [[Communications in Canada]] is pure garbage. No real sources. No inline citations. Awfull. I'd trash it and start over. Prior to starting over, the must however be a main article. That is telecom. Telecom, encompassed many things, including broadcasting. Currently, the only reference to broadcasting is the Canadian example. Anyways, First, I would like for you to reply to my message on my talk page regarding NPOV. --[[User:CyclePat|CyclePat]] ([[User talk:CyclePat|talk]]) 14:54, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

==[[JoJo (singer)]]==
This article is up for reassessment. Hope you have time to take a look. — [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#4173E4">'''''Realist'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#D80B0B"><sup>'''''2'''''</sup></span>]] 21:42, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

== Talking Back Sunday members ==

These article were redirected because they failed to assert any notability under [[WP:MUSIC]], to quote "members of notable bands are redirected to the band's article". The articles were also entirely unsourced, in violation of [[WP:BLP]] and largely consisted of trivia and [[WP:FANCRUFT]]. They were of no real encyclopedic worth. This is a very common edit that can usually be done without the need for an afd. If you wish to discuss the edits or why we should keep such obviously poor articles, the main [[Talking Back Sunday]] talk page would me the best place. --<span style="color:black; background: white; border: 1.5pt dotted black; padding: 0pt 4pt;">neon white</span><small> [[User_talk:Neon white|talk]]</small> 10:34, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

== List of Artists ==
How can you agree that he is right though, when you just contridicted what he said. He said its not oppinion, then you wrote, "hes write it IS oppinion" that doesn't make sense, but regardless it isnt an oppinion this is a fact. Just because they got mixed up in one article doesnt mean they should forever be linked to that. Try to find that anywhere else and you cant. But what you can find is 8 million places that say they are a punk band, not emo.  <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Sam Wanamaker|Sam Wanamaker]] ([[User talk:Sam Wanamaker|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sam Wanamaker|contribs]]) 15:24, 4 October 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Talk:Emo ==
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please remember to [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|assume good faith]] when dealing with other editors{{#if:|, which you did not do on [[:{{{1}}}]]}}. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-agf2 -->

== Thanks ==

Hello Cedars, thanks for the review of [[Real-time_Transport_Protocol]]. I wanted know about, "You can add something about how RTP is usually only one part of the protocol stack and rests a top of UDP, IP, etc. if you want."[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Real-time_Transport_Protocol&diff=prev&oldid=278651776] I thought that the diagram was good enough for this, but probably I am missing something ... can you pls share your ideas regarding this? And also, [[H.225]], [[H.245]] are not codecs, (initially even I used to get confused {{=)}}) Thanks again for your time. --[[User:Nvineeth|Nvineeth]] ([[User talk:Nvineeth|talk]]) 06:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

:Thanks for sharing the comments. --[[User:Nvineeth|Nvineeth]] ([[User talk:Nvineeth|talk]]) 08:07, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

==GA Sweeps invitation==
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps|GA sweeps process]]'''. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps/Running total|running total]]''' has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps worklist|new worklist]]''' has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps|GA sweeps page]]. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps worklist|list]], and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or [[User:OhanaUnited|OhanaUnited]] and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! [[User:Nehrams2020|Nehrams2020]] ([[User talk:Nehrams2020|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nehrams2020|contrib]]) 08:02, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

== GAR notification of [[Real-time Transport Protocol]] ==

[[Real-time Transport Protocol]] has been nominated for a [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment|good article reassessment]]. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to [[Wikipedia:What is a good article?|good article quality]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are [[Talk:Real-time Transport Protocol{{#if:1|/GA1}}|here]]..

In the future, please be more thorough in reviewing Good Article Nominations. The copyright violations of this article were rather blatant, and a cursory glance at the sources would have revealed the problems here. Thanks. [[User:TwilligToves|TwilligToves]] ([[User talk:TwilligToves|talk]]) 04:57, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

== April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive ==

{| style="background-color: #F0FFEC; border: 4px solid #107020; width:100%" cellpadding="5"
|[[WP:WPGA|WikiProject Good Articles]] will be running a '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GAN backlog elimination drives/April 2010|GAN backlog elimination drive]]''' for the entire month of April. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 200. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GAN backlog elimination drives/April 2010#Participants|here]]'''. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. Hope we can see you in April.
|[[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|right|70px]]
|}

–[[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] <small>delivered by [[User:MuZebot|MuZebot]]</small> 17:22, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GAN backlog elimination drives/March 2011|March 2011 GAN backlog elimination drive]] a week away ==
<div style="background-color: #F0FFEC; border: 4px solid #107020; width:100%; -moz-border-radius: 15px; -webkit-border-radius: 15px;" >
[[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|right|70px]]
[[WP:WPGA|WikiProject Good Articles]] will be running a '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GAN backlog elimination drives/March 2011|GAN backlog elimination drive]]''' for the entire month of March. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 50. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GAN backlog elimination drives/March 2011#Participants|here]]'''. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. On behalf of my co-coordinator [[User:Wizardman|Wizardman]], we hope we can see you in March. [[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] <small>delivered by [[User:MuZebot|MuZebot]]</small> 00:32, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
</div>

==FAR for [[Electrical engineering]]==
{{#if:|[[User:{{{2}}}]] has|I have}} nominated [[Electrical engineering]] for a [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/{{#if:Electrical engineering/archive1|Electrical engineering/archive1|Electrical engineering/archive{{#if:||1}}}}|featured article review here]]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets [[Wikipedia:What is a featured article?|featured article criteria]]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are [[Wikipedia:Featured article review|here]]. --[[User:Wtshymanski|Wtshymanski]] ([[User talk:Wtshymanski|talk]]) 16:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles|WikiProject Good articles]] (Participant Clean-Up) ==

Hello, you are receiving this message because you are currently a participant of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles|WikiProject Good articles]]. Since the creation of the WikiProject, over 200 user's have joined to help review good article nominations and contribute to other sections of the WikiProject. Over the years, several of these users have stopped reviewing articles and/or have become inactive with the project but are still listed as participates. In order to improve communications with other participants and get newsletters sent out faster (newsletters will begin to be sent out monthly starting in October) all participants that are no longer active with the WikiProject will be removed from the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/participants|participants list]].

If you are still interested in being a participant for this WikiProject, please sign your user name [[User:Dom497/Active Good Article Participants|here]] and please help review some articles so we can reduce the size of the backlog. If you are no longer interested, you do not need to sign your name anywhere and your name will be removed from the participants list after the deadline. Remember that even if you are not interested at this time, you can always re-add your name to the list whenever you want. The deadline to sign your name on the page above will be November 1, 2012. Thank-you. 13:22, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
<!-- EdwardsBot 0361 -->

== Update for: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles|WikiProject Good articles]] (Participant Clean-Up) ==

Sorry for having to send out a second message but a user has brought to my attention that a point mentioned in the first message should be clarified. If user's don't sign on [[User:Dom497/Active Good Article Participants|this page]], they will be moved to an "Inactive Participants" list rather then be being removed from the entire WikiProject. Sorry for any confusion.--[[User:Dom497|Dom497]] ([[User talk:Dom497|talk]])15:13, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
<!-- EdwardsBot 0362 -->

== WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter - October 2012 ==
{| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 2px; margin-top: 0.2em;"
|-
! style="background-color: #F0FFEA; border: 2px #30B060 solid; text-align: center;" |'''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter|The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter]]'''
|-
| style="border: 2px #30B060 solid;"|
{| class="plainlinks"
| colspan="2" valign="middle" style="width: 60%; border: 2px #30B060 solid; background-color: #F0FFEA; padding: 1em;" |
{| style="width: 100%; border: 0px; background-color:#F0FFEA;"
| valign="middle" style="width: 55%; border: 0px; background-color:#F0FFEA; padding: 1em" |
[[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|75px|left]] <big>'''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter|The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter]]'''</big><br/> Volume III, No. 1 &ndash; October 2012 <br />
| valign="middle" align="right" style="width: 45%; border: 0px; background-color:#F0FFEA; padding: 1em;" |
[[Image:Fairytale left.png|30px]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/September-December 2008, 2009, 2010, January-April 2011|September-December 2008, 2009, 2010, January-April 2011]] | November 2012[[Image:Fairytale right.png|30px]]
|}

|- 
| valign="top" style="border: 2px #30B060 solid; padding: 1em; width: 45%; background-color:#F0FFEA;" |
; Project News<ref name=asof>As of October 2, 2012 at 19:05 (UTC).</ref>

* There are currently 15,862 Good Articles listed at [[WP:GA]].

* The backlog at [[WP:GAN|Good Article Nominations]] is 345 unreviewed articles. Out of 439 total nominations, 24 are '''on hold''', 66 are '''under review''', and 4 are seeking a '''second opinion'''. Please go to [[WP:GAN]] and review an article! Even just reviewing one will help!

::The oldest unreviewed articles are: [[General sejm]], [[Prime Minister of Vietnam]], [[Tanisha Thomas]], [[Kosta Pećanac]], and [[Jilly Kitzinger]].

::The categories with the largest backlogs are: Social sciences and society (80 articles), Sports and recreation (70 articles), Music (63 articles), Theatre, film and drama (52 articles), and History (41 articles). Please consider reviewing articles within these sections.

::There are currently 13 articles up for reassessment at [[WP:GAR|Good Article Reassessment]]. Please help out and go to [[WP:GAR]] and review an article! Remember that anyone can review articles that are listed under "Community Reassessment" even if another user has already listed their opinion...the more opinions, the better!

; Member News

*There are currently 222 members of WikiProject Good Articles! Welcome to all the new members that joined during the past 17 months! If you aren't yet part of WikiProject Good Articles and interested in joining WikiProject Good Articles, go [[Wikipedia:WGA#Participants|here]] and add you name. Everyone is welcomed!

*This WikiProject, and the [[WP:GA|Good Article program]] as a whole, would not be where it is today without each and every one of its members! Thank you to all!

*If you haven't done so already, please remember to add your name to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Active WP Good Article Participants|this list]] if you are still interested/active with this WikiProject. If you are no longer interested/active you don't need to add your name anywhere, you're name will be moved into a "inactive participant" list at the beginning of November. Inactive users will not receive future newsletters from this WikiProject via their talk page. 

; GA Task forces

* There is currently not much going on at this time but there is a very large backlog. Until the next backlog elimination drive, please help reduce the number of nominations by reviewing articles and helping other reviewers that may need second opinions. 

*Thanks to everyone who committed some time to help reduce the nominations backlog during the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GAN backlog elimination drives/June-July 2012|June-July 2012 backlog elimination drive]]. Most barnstars have been given out but there are still a few left. Participants that haven't gotten a barnstar yet should get it soon.

;Possible Fall/Winter 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive

*A discussion is currently being held on the WikiProject's [[Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations#October/November Backlog Elimination Drive?|talk page]] on weather another eliminations drive should take place within the next few months as the last one proved to be extremely successful. Please take the time to go to the the talk page and include your opinion on if you would be interested in taking part in a Fall/Winter 2012 elimination drive.

; Good Articles of the Month

Each month, 5 random good articles will be choose to be featured here as the good articles of the month.

*[[Barry (dog)]]
*[[I Love Bees]]
*[[Miles Copeland (Home and Away)]]
*[[London Country North East]]
*[[The Daily Show]]

| valign="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Dom497/GA_Newsletter_Fall_2012" style="border: 2px #30B060 solid; padding: 1em; width: 45%; background-color: #F0FFEA;" |

; Some Tips About References/Sources

Having references included in articles is one of the most important aspects to a good article, let alone Wikipedia! Without them, no one would ever know what is true and what is false and Wikipedia probably wouldn't be where it is today. So this month, I will talk about how to check for references, how reliable they are, and so on and so forth.

The first thing to do when reviewing an nominee is to do a quick scan of the article. One of the things to look for is if the article has references! If you don't see a list at the bottom of the article page, quick-fail it.<ref>Before quick-failing the article, verify that one of the several referencing templates is correctly placed at the bottom of the article. If the template is not placed, try to place it to see if references are displayed. If this proof returns no references, then proceed to quick-failing.</ref> For newcomers, quick-failing is failing an article when you spot a problem before actually conducting a full review. If you do find a list of references (and in most cases you will) make sure to look through each and every one. If you want to save some time, use [http://toolserver.org/~dispenser/view/Checklinks this tool] as it will tell you if there are any problematic references in the article you are reviewing. 

Next, check the reliability and type of the references/sources. In terms of the type of reference, check to see how many primary and/or secondary sources are included. Primary sources are the ones published by the subject of the article. For example, if the subject of the article has to do with the [[iPhone 4s]] and the source is published by [[Apple]], it is considered a primary source. Secondary sources are those ''not'' published by the subject of the article (or in close relation to it). Newspapers are examples of secondary sources and considered one of the better types to include in the article (not saying primary sources are bad). If you find that most/all of the references are primary sources, notify the nominator about this issue(s) and place the article on hold once you have completed the review. Only in the event that a secondary source can't be found as a replacement, then the primary source can remain. If there is a good mix of primary and secondary sources, that is perfect and no references need to be changed. 

Now, reliability. Forums are generally not considered reliable and some blog's may not be reliable either. Newspapers, most sources published by the subject, some blogs, etc. are considered reliable. If you don't know wether the source is reliable, ask for a second opinion. For more info about how to identify wether a reference is reliable or not, visit [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|this article]].

Finally, one of the more basic things to look for is that every statement in the article has at least one reference! The only case that a statement doesn't need a reference is when it is common sense that the statement is defiantly true and/or in the case where the statement can't be challenged, as per what Wikipedia says, "All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable published source using an inline citation."

; From the Editor

After a long 18 month hiatus, the third volume of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter is here! Please leave any comments or feedback regarding this issue of the newsletter [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter|here]] or on the editors [[User talk:Dom497|talk page]].

Also, Happy Halloween...in advance!!!

'' '''PLEASE READ:''' '' If you do not wish to receive future WikiProject Good Articles newsletter's on your talk page, please remove your self from [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/newsletter participants|this list]]. If you are viewing this newsletter from the WikiProject Good Articles page or on someone else's talk page and want to receive future newsletters on your talk page, please add your name to the list linked above.
; Contributors to this Issue

* [[User:Dom497|Dom497]] (Editor of this Issue)
; Did You Know...

* ... that 2,100 articles have been reviewed during all backlog elimination drives combined?
* ... that out of 4,055,039 articles on Wikipedia, only 15,846 are good articles?[[File:Jack-o-lantern.svg|200px|right]]
* ... that there are currently over 400 [[Wikipedia:Good articles/Video games|video game]] good articles?

;Notes
{{reflist}}
|-
| colspan="2" valign="top" style="border: 2px #30B060 solid; padding: 1em; width: 55%; background-color: #F0FFEA;" |
'''Improving [[Wikipedia]] one article at a time since 2005!'''
|-
| colspan="2" valign="top" style="border: 2px #30B060 solid; padding: 1em; width: 55%; background-color: #F0FFEA;" |
{{WikiProjectGATasks|centered=yes}}
|-
| valign="top" colspan="2" style="padding: 0.5em; text-align: right; font-size: 85%; " |
|}
|}
<div class="center"><small>Delivered October 3, 2012 by [[User:ENewsBot|'''ENewsBot''']]. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter any longer, please remove your name from [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/newsletter participants|this list]].</small></div>
→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.<br />→ Newsletter delivered by '''[[User:ENewsBot|ENewsBot]]''' ([[User:ENewsBot/Requests|info]]) ·  05:31, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

== WikiProject Good Articles - Participant Clean-up (Second Call) ==

{|{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Shell|introduction=You are reciving this message because you have not added your name to the list of active WikiProject Good Articles participants. Though you may have recived the first message sent out in September, some users may have had that message archived before coming online to read it and therefore never saw it. If you are deeming yourself inactive with the WikiProject please disregard this message as your name will be moved to an "inactive participant" list at the end of the clean-up. If you are still active with the WikiProject, please be sure to include your name on [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Active WP Good Article Participants|this list]]. The current deadline to add your name to the list (if you are still active) is November 1, 2012. A third and final message will be sent out during the last week of the clean-up before the deadline. Thank-you.--[[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]]}}
|}
<!-- EdwardsBot 0386 -->

== WikiProject Good Articles - Participant Clean-up (Final Call) ==

{|{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Shell|introduction=You are receiving this message because you have not added your name to the list of active WikiProject Good Articles participants. Though you may have recived the past two messages sent out in September and October, some users may have had that message archived before coming online to read it and therefore never saw it. If you are deeming yourself inactive with the WikiProject please disregard this message as your name will be moved to an "inactive participant" list at the end of the clean-up. If you are still active with the WikiProject, please be sure to include your name on [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Active WP Good Article Participants|this list]]. The deadline to add your name to the list (if you are still active) is November 1, 2012. This will be the last message sent out before the deadline which is in 2 days. Thank-you.--[[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]]}}
|}
<!-- EdwardsBot 0394 -->

==The GAN ''Newsletter'' (November 2012)==
{| align="center" style="font-family:Tahoma; background-color: #FFFFF; border: 2px solid #CCCCCC; width:100%" cellpadding="5"
|-
|
{{User:Hahc21/sandbox/Newsletter/Banner|volume=III|issue=2|month=November 2012}}
|}
|}
|-
|
{| align="center" style="width: 100%; font-family:Tahoma; background-color: #FFFFF; width:100%" cellpadding="5"
|-
|colspan="2" style="width: 50%;"|<big>'''In This Issue'''</big>
-------
|-
|valign=top style="width: 50%; font-family:Tahoma;"|
*'''Request for Comment''': [[User:Hahc21/Requests for comment/Future of GAN Backlog Elimination Drives|An RFC about the Backlog Elimination Drives]] has been started this month. Go and voice your opinions!
*Featured editorial: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/November 2012/FE|A Matter of Time: The Future of Backlog Elimination Drives]]
*Project News: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/November 2012/PN|Over 345 unreviewed articles, 13 at reassessment]]
|valign=top style="width: 50%; font-family:Tahoma; border-left: 2px solid #CCCCCC;"|
*[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/November 2012/GAMO|Good Articles of the Month]]
*GA Task Forces: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/November 2012/GATF|A calmed GA community awaiting for an RFC]]
*Member News: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/November 2012/MN|223 members of the GA Wikiproject]]
|-
|}
-------------------<br>
<center><div class="hlist">
* '''Read this newsletter'''
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/November 2012|Single-page]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/newsletter participants|Unsubscribe]]
* Newsletter delivered by '''[[User:ENewsBot|ENewsBot]]''' ([[User:ENewsBot/Requests|info]]) · 3 November 2012
</div></center><br>
|}

==The WikiProject: Good Articles ''Newsletter'' (December 2012)==
{| align="center" style="font-family:Tahoma; background-color: #FFFFF; border: 2px solid #CCCCCC; width:100%" cellpadding="5"
|-
|
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/Banner (December Version)|volume=III|issue=3|month=December 2012}}
|}
|}
|-
|
{| align="center" style="width: 100%; font-family:Tahoma; background-color: #FFFFF; width:100%" cellpadding="5"
|-
|colspan="2" style="width: 50%;"|<big>'''In This Issue'''</big>
-------
|-
|valign=top style="width: 50%; font-family:Tahoma;"|
*Featured editorial: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/December 2012/FE|"Drive-By Reviews": A Retrospective About Reviews During Backlog Drives]]
*[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/December 2012/PN|Project News]]: A '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GAN backlog elimination drives/November-December 2012|backlog elimination drive]]''' is being held now at GAN.
|valign=top style="width: 50%; font-family:Tahoma; border-left: 2px solid #CCCCCC;"|
*[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/December 2012/GAMO|Good Articles of the Month]]: Our picks for November, 150+ promotions.
*GA Task Forces: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/December 2012/GATF|Results from the Backlog Elimination RfC]]
*Member News: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/December 2012/MN|227 members of WikiProject Good Articles and counting]]
|-
|}
-------------------<br>
<center><div class="hlist">
* '''Read this newsletter'''
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/December 2012|Single-page]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/newsletter participants|Unsubscribe]]
* Newsletter delivered by '''[[User:ENewsBot|ENewsBot]]''' ([[User:ENewsBot/Requests|info]]) · 3 December 2012
</div></center><br>
|}

== The WikiProject: Good Articles ''Newsletter'' (January 2013) ==

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/January 2013/Delivery}}
<small>This newsletter was delivered by [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 14:41, 3 January 2013 (UTC)</small>
<!-- EdwardsBot 0432 -->

== WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter - February 2013 ==

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Newsletter/February 2013/Delivery}}
<!-- EdwardsBot 0460 -->

== Good Article Nominations Request For Comment ==

{| {{WP:WikiProject Good articles/Shell|introduction=A ''' '[[Wikipedia:Good article nominations/New Proposals for GAN, Part I|Request For Comment]]' '''for Good Article Nominations is currently being held. We are asking that you please take five to ten minutes to review all seven proposals that will affect Good Article Nominations if approved. Full details of each proposal can be found [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations/New Proposals for GAN, Part I|here]]. Please comment on each proposal (or as many as you can) [[Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations/New Proposals for GAN, Part I|here]].

At this time, '''Proposal 1, 3, and 5''' have received full (or close to) support. 

If you have questions of anything general (not related to one specif proposal), please leave a message under the ''General discussion'' thread.

Please note that '''Proposal 2''' has been '''withdrawn''' and no further comments are needed. Also, please disregard '''Proposal 9''' as it was never an actual proposal.}}
|}
<!-- EdwardsBot 0482 -->

== [[Photovoltaic power station]] ==

Hi, when you review an article for GA, please ensure that the author has filled out ''all''  of the references with citation templates with publisher information.This shouldn't have been passed until the refs were all sorted, see Refs 55-67 and 147-156. A link is not good enough for GA.♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000">Dr. ☠ Blofeld</span>]] 19:05, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

== WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre ==

{|{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/Shell|introduction=Hello! Now, some of you might be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:

*'''Recruiters:''' The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/Recruiter Central#Becoming a Recruiter|this criteria]]. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with, the Recruitment Centre ''will not'' open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/Recruiter Central#The Process|the process]] and add your name to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/List of Recruiters|list of recruiters]]. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/Recruiter Central#The Process|process section]] is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available".

*'''Co-Director:''' The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact [[User:Dom497|me (Dom497)]].

*'' '''Nominators, please read this:''' '' If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/Recruiter Central#Nominators That Are OK With A Recruitee Reviewing|this page]]. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article.

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to [[User talk:Dom497|contact me]]. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along.

''A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.''--[[User:Dom497|<span style="color:#1F75FE">'''Dom497'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Dom497|<span style="color:#00308F">'''talk'''</span>)]]

<small>This message was sent out by --[[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 01:24, 4 June 2013 (UTC)</small>
}}
|}
<!-- EdwardsBot 0539 -->

== DYK RfC ==

* As a listed [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/participants|GA participant]], you are invited to contribute to a formal Request for Comment on the question of whether Good Articles should be eligible to appear in the Did You Know? slot in future. Please see the proposal on its subpage [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Good Article RfC|here]], or on the main DYK talk page. To add the discussion to your watchlist, click [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Did_you_know/Good_Article_RfC&action=watch this link]. Thank you in advance. <span style="">[[User:Gilderien|Gilderien]] <span style="font-size:70%; vertical-align:sub;">[[User talk:Gilderien|Chat]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/Gilderien|Contributions]]</span></span>03:14, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
<!-- EdwardsBot 587 -->

== Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians ==

You have been mentioned at [[Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians]]. X[[User:Ottawahitech|Ottawahitech]] ([[User talk:Ottawahitech|talk]]) 14:58, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

== GAN December 2013 Backlog Drive ==

{| {{WP:WikiProject Good articles/Shell|introduction=Hello! A [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/December 2013|GAN Backlog Drive]] will begin in less than 4 days!<br/>

In past Backlog Drives, the goal was to reduce the backlog of Good article nominations. In the upcoming drive, another goal will be added - raising as much money as we can for the Wikimedia Foundation. How will this work? Well, its pretty simple. Any user interested in donating can submit a pledge at the Backlog Drive page (linked above). The pledge should mention the amount of money the user is willing to donate '''per review'''. For example, if a user pledges 5 cents per review and 100 nominations are reviewed, the total donation amount is $5.00.<br/>

At the time this message was sent out, two users have submitted pledges for a total of 8 cents per review. All pledges, no matter how much money, are greatly appreciated. Also, in no way is this saying you must make a pledge.</br>

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or leave a message on the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/December 2013|Backlog Drive talk page]]. And remember, there are less than 4 days before the drive starts!--[[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 03:18, 27 November 2013 (UTC)  }}
|}
<!-- EdwardsBot 0669 -->

== GAN December 2013 Backlog Drive ==

{| {{WP:WikiProject Good articles/Shell|introduction=Hello! Just a friendly reminder that the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/December 2013|GAN Backlog Drive]] has begun and will end on December 31, 2013!<br/>

If you know anyone outside of the WikiProject that may be interested, feel free to invite them to the drive!</br>

If you have any questions or want to comment about something regarding the drive, post them [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/December 2013|here]]--[[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 00:11, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
}}
|}
<!-- EdwardsBot 0671 -->

== March 2014 GAN Backlog Drive ==

It's that time again! Starting on March 1, there will be another GAN Backlog Drive! There will be several changes compared to previous drives:

*This drive will introduce a new component to it; a point system. In a nutshell, older nominations are worth more points than newer nominations. The top 3 participants who have the points will be awarded the Golden, Silver, or Bronze Wikipedia Puzzle Piece Trophy, respectively. 
*Unlike the December 2013 Backlog Drive, earning an additional barnstar if you reached your goal has been removed.
*The allowance to have insufficient reviews has been lowered to 2 before being disqualified.
*An exception to the rule that all reviews must be completed before the deadline has been created.

Also, something that I thought I would share with all of you is that we raised $20.88 (USD) for the WMF in the December 2013 drive. It may not sound like a lot but considering that that was raised just because we reviewed articles, I would say that's pretty good! With that success, pledges can be made for the upcoming drive if you wish.

More info regarding the drive and full descriptions regarding the changes to this drive can be found on the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/March 2014|the drive page]]. If you have any questions, feel free to leave a message on the drive talk page.

I look forward to your participation and hope that because of it, some day the backlog will be gone!

--Dom497

--[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Dom497@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Dom497/sandbox_2&oldid=596569396 -->

== GAN March 2014 Backlog Drive ==

The [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/March 2014|March 2014 GAN Backlog Drive]] has begun and will end on April 1, 2014! <small>Sent by Dom497 on behalf of [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 21:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)</small>
<!-- Message sent by User:Dom497@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Dom497/sandbox_2&oldid=596569396 -->

== WikiProject Good articles Future GAN Backlog Drive ==

Hello everyone! Hope you've all been having a great summer!

[[User:TheQ Editor|TheQ Editor]] recently proposed the idea of having another Backlog Drive in either September/October or November/December of this year. For those of you who have participated in the past two drives you know I was the one who organized them, however, come September, this will be my most important year in school so I will not be able to coordinate this drive (if it happens). TheQ Editor has volunteered to be a coordinator for the drive. If any of you would like to co-coordinator, please notify TheQ Editor on his talk page.

If you would be interested in participating in a Backlog Drive sometime before the end of this year, please notify TheQ Editor. Also, make sure to specify what month(s) work best for you.

At the time this message was sent out, the backlog was at 520 nominations. Since May, the backlog has been steadily increasing and we are currently near an all time high. Even though the backlog will not disappear over one drive, this drive can lead to several others which will (hopefully) lead to the day where there is no longer a backlog.

As always, the more participants, the better, and everyone is encouraged to participate!

<small>Sent by Dom497</small>--[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 15:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Dom497@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Dom497/Mail&oldid=621497354 -->

== GA Cup ==

Hello everyone! We hope you have all been having a great summer!

As we all know, the recent GAN Backlog Drives have not had any big impact on the backlog. Because of that, me (Dom497), Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor have worked on an idea that could possibly finally put a dent into the massive backlog. Now, I will admit, the idea isn't entirely ours as we have took the general idea of the WikiCup and brought it over to WikiProject Good Articles. But anyways, here's what we have in mind:

For all of you that do not know what the [[Wikipedia:WikiCup|WikiCup]] is, it is an annual competition between several editors to see who can get the most Good Articles, Featured Article's, Did You Know's, etc. Based of this, we propose to you the GA Cup. This competition will only focus on reviewing Good articles.

For more info on the proposal, [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GA Cup|click here]]. As a FYI, the proposal page is not what the final product will look like (if you do go ahead with this idea). It will look very similar to WikiCup's page(s).

The discussion for the proposal will take place [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Good articles/GA Cup|here]]. Please let us know if you are interested, have any concerns, things to consider, etc.

--Dom497, Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor

<small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 01:28, 31 August 2014 (UTC)</small>
<!-- Message sent by User:Dom497@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Dom497/Mail&oldid=621912692 -->

== WikiProject Good Articles - GA Cup ==

{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #58FA58; border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"

| <div style="font-size:110%; text-align:center;">'''[[WP:WPGA|WikiProject Good Articles's]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GA Cup|2014-15 GA Cup]]'''</div>

<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div>
<div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">[[File:Symbol support vote.svg|100px|link=]]</div>
<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" />
WikiProject Good articles is holding a new competition, the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GA Cup|'''GA Cup''']], from October 1, 2014 - March 28, 2015. The Cup will be based on reviewing [[WP:GAN|Good article nominations]]; for each review, points will be awarded with bonuses for older nominations, longer articles and comprehensive reviews. All participants will start off in one group and the highest scoring participants will go through to the second round. At the moment six rounds are planned, but this may change based on participant numbers.

Some of you may ask: what is the purpose for a competition of this type?  Currently, there is a backlog of about 500 unreviewed Good article nominations, almost an all time high.  It is our hope that we can decrease the backlog in a fun way, through friendly competition.

Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors! [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GA Cup/Sign-up|Sign-ups]] will be open until October 15, 2014 so sign-up now!

If you have any questions, take a look at the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GA Cup/FAQ|FAQ page]] and/or contact one of the four judges.

Cheers from {{noping|NickGibson3900}}, {{noping|Dom497}}, {{noping|TheQ Editor}} and  {{noping|Figureskatingfan}}.

--[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 19:04, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

{{center
| <small>To '''receive''' future GA Cup newsletter, please '''add''' your name to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GA Cup/Newsletters/Mailing List|our mailing list]].</small>
}}
|}
<!-- Message sent by User:Dom497@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Dom497/Mail&oldid=625518423 -->

== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] ==

Hi,<br>
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current [[WP:ACE2015|Arbitration Committee election]]. The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia [[WP:RFAR|arbitration process]]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[WP:ARBPOL|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to [[WP:ACE2015/C|review the candidates' statements]] and submit your choices on [[Special:SecurePoll/vote/398|the voting page]]. For the Election committee, [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=693174033 -->

== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Cedars. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2017|2017 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2017/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/400|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=813406680 -->

== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Cedars. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2018|2018 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2018/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/710|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=866997930 -->

== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message ==

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2020|2020 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|poll}}|voting page]]'''.  If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=990307860 -->

== Good article drive notice ==

{{tmbox
| name = March 2021 GAN Backlog Drive
| type  = notice
| image = [[File:Multiple GA Barnstar.png|60px]]
| imageright = 
| style = background-color: lightgreen; border: 2px solid #107020;
| textstyle = CSS values
| plainlinks = no
| text  = '''Good Article Nomination Backlog Drive'''<br>The '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/March 2021|March 2021 GAN Backlog Drive]]''' begins on March 1, and will continue until the end of the month. Please sign up to review articles and help reduce the backlog of nominations!
}}
<center><small>This message has been sent to users signed up for the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/newsletter participants|Good articles newsletter]]. Add or remove your name from [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/newsletter participants#List|the list]] to subscribe or unsubscribe from future updates. Alternatively, to opt-out of all [[Wikipedia:Mass message senders|massmessage mailings]], you may add [[:Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery]] to your user talk page.</small></center> -- For the drive co-ordinators, [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 15:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Eddie891@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Good_articles/newsletter_participants&oldid=1008096786 -->

== Good article reassessment for [[Telecommunications]] ==
[[Telecommunications]] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Telecommunications/1|reassessment page]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. [[User:Onegreatjoke|Onegreatjoke]] ([[User talk:Onegreatjoke|talk]]) 22:34, 16 July 2023 (UTC)