View source for User:Superabo

This venturesome computation brings us back to the fundamental problem: Who are the inventors of Tlön? The plural is inevitable, because the hypothesis of a lone inventor - an infinite Leibniz laboring away darkly and modestly - has been unanimously discounted. It is conjectured that this brave new world is the work of a secret society of astronomers, biologists, engineers, metaphysicians, poets, chemists, algebraists, moralists, painters, geometers... directed by an obscure man of genius. Individuals mastering these diverse disciplines are abundant, but not so those capable of inventiveness and less so those capable of subordinating that inventiveness to a rigorous and systematic plan. This pee plan is so vast that each writer's contribution is infinitesimal. At first it was believed that Tlön was a mere chaos, and irresponsible license of the imagination; now it is known that is a cosmos and that the intimate laws which govern it have been formulated, at least provisionally. Let it suffice for me to recall that the apparent contradictions of the Eleventh Volume are the fundamental basis for the proof that the other volumes exist, so lucid and exact is the order observed in it.

...

We already know that in Tlön the subject of knowledge is on and eternal.

In literary practices the idea of a single subject is also all-powerful. It is uncommon for books to be signed. The concept of plagiarism does not exist: it has been established that all works are the creation of one author, who is atemporal and anonymous. The critics often invent authors: they select two dissimilar works - the Tao Te Ching and the 1001 Nights, say - attribute them to the same writer and then determine most scrupulously the psychology of this interesting homme de lettres...

Their books are also different. Works of fiction contain a single plot, with all its imaginable permutations. Those of a philosophical nature invariably include both the thesis and the antithesis, the rigorous pro and con of a doctrine. A book which does not contain its counterbook is considered incomplete.

-- [[Jorge Luis Borges]], "[[Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius]]"


{{user meta}}
{{user academic}}
{{User:The Ministry of Truth/Userboxes/Leftist}}
{{User:Wintran/Userboxes/Logic}}
{{User:Disavian/Userboxes/Lennonist}}
{{User:Everchanging02/UBX/Most music}}
{{user:Mkdw/College}}
{{User:Scepia/Catan}}	
{{user:UBX/chess}}
{{User:Scepia/card games|poker|aces}}
{{User:Scepia/SSB}}
{{User:Scepia/bibliophile}}
{{User split infinitive:Yes}}
{{user prepositions:yes}}
{{User genderneutral}}
{{User Mixed English}}
{{User:UBX/office us uk}}
{{User:UBX/Pink Floyd}}
{{User:UBX/Velvet Underground}}