View source for User:Halakhic-Jews-Only

I cry inside when I see discussion about Yahadut and the nation of Israel by people blatantly ignorant concerning HaLakhah. Halakhah is the most misunderstood and abused thing amongst Jews. Please for the love of HaShem at least study Halakhah properly before you feel you can dismiss it while attempting to make an objective comment. Isn't a political compromise is just another POV? Isn't true NPOV only attainable through positive journalistic reportage of the plethora of POVs surrounding a topic without attempting to belittle or sweep any of them under the carpet? I can not lie and say I have no POV, but it does not mean I am not pro NPOV. I am very pro NPOV. I am also very pro fact. 

FACT: If it claims origin in Hebrew scriptures and is not in harmony with Halakhic Judaism it is displacement theology and might as well be baptist.

POV: Baptists have a right to exist.

I agree with both statements. Severing scriptures from their traditional context and creating a new context for them is displacement theology. This is just plain objective/true honesty. And of course Baptists can exist, why not? I will have no problem discussing scripture with people who are honest with themselves and about what they are doing. But I find it difficult to even get the ball rolling otherwise. If wikipaedia interprets NPOV as avoiding discussion of the POVs through an article then maybe I have misunderstood. If NPOV means belittling a POV or covering it up, then please make this clear in the policy pages.



&#1489;&#1489;&#1512;&#1499;&#1493;&#1514; &#1492;&#1514;&#1493;&#1512;&#1492;

&#1499;&#1500; &#1496;&#1493;&#1489;

[[User:Halakhic-Jews-Only|Halakhic-Jews-Only]] 22:55, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)