View source for Uniform Resource Identifier

{{short description|String used to identify a name of a web or internet resource}}
{{Redirect|URI}}
{{Distinguish|URL}}
{{refimprove|date=August 2025}}
{{Infobox technology standard
| title = Uniform Resource Identifier
| long_name = 
| native_name = {{Sum RFC|3986|title=no|ref=yes}}
| native_name_lang = en
| status = Active
| year_started = 
| first_published =
| organization = [[ Internet Engineering Task Force ]]
| image = 
| caption = 
| abbreviation = URI
| authors = {{flatlist|
* [[Tim Berners-Lee]]
* [[Roy Thomas Fielding]]
* [[Larry Masinter]]}}
| domain = [[World Wide Web]]
| website = {{URL|https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3986#section-1.1}}
}}
A '''Uniform Resource Identifier''' ('''URI'''), formerly '''Universal Resource Identifier''', is a unique sequence of characters that identifies an abstract or physical resource,{{Ref RFC|3986|repeat=yes|rp=1}} such as resources on a [[Web page|webpage]], [[email address]], phone number,{{Ref RFC|3986|repeat=yes|rp=7}} books, real-world objects such as people and places, and concepts.{{Ref RFC|3986|repeat=yes|rp=5|}}

URIs which provide a means of locating and [[Information retrieval|retrieving]] information resources on a [[Network (computing)|network]] (either on the Internet or on another [[private network]], such as a [[computer file system]] or an [[Intranet]]) are [[Uniform Resource Locator]]s (URLs). Therefore, URLs are a subset of URIs, i.e. every URL is a URI (and not necessarily the other way around).{{Ref RFC|3986|repeat=yes|rp=7}} Other URIs provide only a unique name, without a means of locating or retrieving the resource or information about it; these are [[Uniform Resource Name]]s (URNs). The web technologies that use URIs are not limited to [[Web browser|web browsers]].

== History ==

=== Conception ===

URIs and URLs have a shared history. In 1990, [[Tim Berners-Lee|Tim Berners-Lee's]] proposals for [[hypertext]] implicitly introduced the idea of a URL as a short string representing a resource that is the target of a [[hyperlink]].<ref>{{cite web |last1=Palmer |first1=Sean |title=The Early History of HTML |url=http://infomesh.net/html/history/early/ |website=infomesh.net |access-date=6 December 2020}}</ref> At the time, people referred to it as a "hypertext name"<ref>{{cite web |title=W3 Naming Schemes |url=https://www.w3.org/History/19921103-hypertext/hypertext/WWW/Addressing/Addressing.html |website=W3C |date= 24 February 1992 |access-date=6 December 2020}}</ref> or "document name".

Over the next three and a half years, as the [[World Wide Web|World Wide Web's]] core technologies of [[HTML]], [[HTTP]], and [[Web browser|web browsers]] developed, a need to distinguish a string that provided an address for a resource from a string that merely named a resource emerged. Although not yet formally defined, the term ''Uniform Resource Locator'' came to represent the former, and the more contentious ''Uniform Resource Name'' came to represent the latter. In July 1992 Berners-Lee's report on the [[Internet Engineering Task Force]] (IETF) "UDI (Universal Document Identifiers) [[Birds of a feather (computing)|BOF]]" mentions URLs (as Uniform Resource Locators), URNs (originally, as Unique Resource Numbers), and the need to charter a new working group.<ref>{{cite web |title=Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Internet Engineering Task Force |page=193 |url=https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/24.pdf |publisher=Corporation for National Research Initiatives |date=July 1992 |website=IETF|access-date=27 July 2021}}</ref> In November 1992 the IETF "URI Working Group" met for the first time.<ref>{{cite web |title=Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Internet Engineering Task Force |page=501 |url=https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/25.pdf |publisher=Corporation for National Research Initiatives |date=November 1992 |website=IETF |access-date=27 July 2021}}</ref>

During the debate over defining URLs and URNs, it became evident that the concepts embodied by the two terms were merely aspects of the fundamental, overarching, notion of resource ''identification''. In June 1994, the IETF published {{IETF RFC|1630}}, Berners-Lee's first ''[[Request for Comments]]'' that acknowledged the existence of URLs and URNs. Most importantly, it defined a formal syntax for ''Universal Resource Identifiers'' (i.e. URL-like strings whose precise syntaxes and semantics depended on their schemes). It also attempted to summarize the syntaxes of URL schemes in use at the time. It acknowledged – ''but did not standardize''—the existence of relative URLs and fragment identifiers.{{Ref RFC|1630}}

=== Refinement ===
In December 1994, {{Sum RFC|1738|title=no|ref=yes}} formally defined relative and absolute URLs, refined the general URL syntax, defined how to resolve relative URLs to absolute form, and better enumerated the URL schemes then in use. The agreed definition and syntax of URNs had to wait until the publication of IETF {{Sum RFC|2141|title=no|ref=yes}} in May 1997.

The publication of IETF {{IETF RFC|2396}}{{Ref RFC|2396}} in August 1998 saw the URI syntax become a separate specification{{Ref RFC|2396}} and most of the parts of RFCs 1630 and 1738 relating to URIs and URLs in general were revised and expanded by the IETF. The new RFC changed the meaning of ''U'' in ''URI'' from "Universal" to "Uniform."

In December 1999, {{Sum RFC|2732|title=no|ref=yes}} provided a minor update to <nowiki>RFC 2396</nowiki>, allowing URIs to accommodate [[IPv6]] addresses. A number of shortcomings discovered in the two specifications led to a community effort, coordinated by <nowiki>RFC 2396</nowiki> co-author [[Roy Fielding]], that culminated in the publication of IETF {{Sum RFC|3986|title=no|ref=yes}} in January 2005. While obsoleting the prior standard, it did not render the details of existing URL schemes obsolete; <nowiki>RFC 1738</nowiki> continues to govern such schemes except where otherwise superseded. IETF {{Sum RFC|2616|title=no|ref=yes}} for example, refines the <code>http</code> scheme. Simultaneously, the IETF published the content of <nowiki>RFC 3986</nowiki> as the full standard STD 66, reflecting the establishment of the URI generic syntax as an official Internet protocol.

In 2001, the [[World Wide Web Consortium|World Wide Web Consortium's]] (W3C) Technical Architecture Group (TAG) published a guide to [[best practices]] and canonical URIs for publishing multiple versions of a given resource.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Raman |first1=T.V. |title=On Linking Alternative Representations To Enable Discovery And Publishing |url=https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/alternatives-discovery.html |website=W3C |access-date=6 December 2020 |date=1 November 2006}}</ref> For example, content might differ by language or by size to adjust for capacity or settings of the device used to access that content.

In August 2002, IETF {{IETF RFC|3305}}{{Ref RFC|3305}} pointed out that the term "URL" had, despite widespread public use, faded into near obsolescence, and serves only as a reminder that some URIs act as addresses by having schemes implying network accessibility, regardless of any such actual use. As URI-based standards such as [[Resource Description Framework]] make evident, resource identification need not suggest the retrieval of resource representations over the Internet, nor need they imply network-based resources at all.

The [[Semantic Web]] uses the HTTP URI scheme to identify both documents and concepts for practical uses, a distinction which has caused confusion as to how to distinguish the two. The ''TAG'' published an e-mail in 2005 with a solution of the problem, which became known as the ''httpRange-14 resolution''.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Fielding |first1=Roy |title=[httpRange-14] Resolved |url=https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005Jun/0039.html |website=W3C Public mailing list archives |access-date=6 December 2020 |date=18 June 2005}}</ref> The W3C subsequently published an Interest Group Note titled "Cool URIs for the Semantic Web", which explained the use of [[content negotiation]] and the [[HTTP 303]] response code for redirections in more detail.<ref>{{cite web |editor-last1=Sauermann |editor-first1=Leo |editor-first2=Richard |editor-last2=Cyganiak |first1=    Danny |last1=Ayers |first2=Max |last2=Völkel |title=Cool URIs for the Semantic Web |url=https://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/ |website=W3C |access-date=6 December 2020 |date=3 December 2008}}</ref>

== Design ==

=== URLs and URNs ===

A [[Uniform Resource Name]] (URN) is a URI that identifies a resource by name in a particular namespace. A URN may be used to talk about a resource without implying its location or how to access it. For example, in the [[International Standard Book Number]] (ISBN) system, ''<nowiki>ISBN</nowiki> 0-486-27557-4'' identifies a specific edition of the [[William Shakespeare]] play ''[[Romeo and Juliet]]''. The URN for that edition would be ''<nowiki>urn:isbn:0-486-27557-4</nowiki>''. However, it gives no information as to where to find a copy of that book.

A [[Uniform Resource Locator]] (URL) is a URI that specifies the means of acting upon or obtaining the representation of a resource, i.e. specifying both its primary access mechanism and network location. For example, the URL <code><nowiki>http://example.org/wiki/Main_Page</nowiki></code> refers to a resource identified as <code><nowiki>/wiki/Main_Page</nowiki></code>, whose representation is obtainable via the [[Hypertext Transfer Protocol]] (''http:'') from a network host whose [[domain name]] is <code><nowiki>example.org</nowiki></code>. (In this case, HTTP usually implies it to be in the form of [[HTML]] and related code. In practice, that is not necessarily the case, as HTTP allows specifying arbitrary formats in its header.)

A URN is analogous to a person's name, while a URL is analogous to their street address. In other words, a URN identifies an item and a URL provides a method for finding it.

Technical publications, especially standards produced by the IETF and by the W3C, normally reflect a view outlined in a [[W3C Recommendation]] of 30 July 2001, which acknowledges the precedence of the term URI rather than endorsing any formal subdivision into URL and URN. {{cquote|URL is a useful but informal concept: a URL is a type of URI that identifies a resource via a representation of its primary access mechanism (e.g., its network "location"), rather than by some other attributes it may have.<ref>{{cite web |last1=((URI Planning Interest Group, W3C/IETF)) |title=URIs, URLs, and URNs: Clarifications and Recommendations 1.0 |url=https://www.w3.org/TR/uri-clarification/ |website=www.w3.org |publisher=W3C/IETF |access-date=8 December 2020 |date=September 2001}}</ref>}}

As such, a URL is simply a URI that happens to point to a resource over a network.{{efn|A report published in 2002 by a joint W3C/IETF working group aimed to normalize the divergent views held within the IETF and W3C over the relationship between the various 'UR*' terms and standards. While not published as a full standard by either organization, it has become the basis for the above common understanding and has informed many standards since then.}}{{Ref RFC|3305}} However, in non-technical contexts and in software for the World Wide Web, the term "URL" remains widely used. Additionally, the term "web address" (which has no formal definition) often occurs in non-technical publications as a synonym for a URI that uses the ''http'' or ''https'' schemes. Such assumptions can lead to confusion, for example, in the case of XML namespaces that have a [[#Relation to XML namespaces|visual similarity to resolvable URIs]].

Specifications produced by the [[WHATWG]] prefer ''URL'' over ''URI'', and so newer HTML5 APIs use ''URL'' over ''URI''.<ref>{{cite web |title= 6.3. URL APIs elsewhere |url=https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#url-apis-elsewhere |date= 12 May 2025 |website=URL Standard }}</ref> {{cquote|Standardize on the term URL. URI and IRI [Internationalized Resource Identifier] are just confusing. In practice a single algorithm is used for both so keeping them distinct is not helping anyone. URL also easily wins the search result popularity contest.<ref>{{cite web |title=URL Standard: Goals |url=https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#goals}}</ref>}}

While most URI schemes were originally designed to be used with a particular [[protocol (computing)|protocol]], and often have the same name, they are semantically different from protocols. For example, the scheme ''http'' is generally used for interacting with [[web resource]]s using HTTP, but the scheme ''[[file URI scheme|file]]'' has no protocol.

===<span class="anchor" id="syntax"></span> Syntax ===
{{see also|List of URI schemes}}
A URI has a scheme that refers to a specification for assigning identifiers within that scheme. As such, the URI syntax is a federated and extensible naming system wherein each scheme's specification may further restrict the syntax and semantics of identifiers using that scheme. The URI generic syntax is a superset of the syntax of all URI schemes. It was first defined in {{IETF RFC|2396}}, published in August 1998,{{Ref RFC|2396}} and finalized in {{IETF RFC|3986}}, published in January 2005.{{Sfn|Berners-Lee, Tim; Fielding, Roy T.; Masinter, Larry|2005|p=46|ps=; "9. Acknowledgements"}}

A URI is composed from an allowed set of [[ASCII]] characters consisting of [[Filename|reserved characters]] (gen-delims: <code>:</code>, <code>/</code>, <code>?</code>, <code>#</code>, <code>[</code>, <code>]</code>, and <code>@</code>; sub-delims: <code>!</code>, <code>$</code>, <code>&</code>, <code>'</code>, <code>(</code>, <code>)</code>, <code>*</code>, <code>+</code>, <code>,</code>, <code>;</code>, and <code>=</code>),{{Ref RFC|3986|rpp=13-14}} unreserved characters ([[Latin-script alphabet|uppercase and lowercase letters]], [[Arabic numerals|decimal digits]], <code>-</code>, <code>.</code>, <code>_</code>, and <code>~</code>),{{Ref RFC|3986|rpp=13-14}} and the character <code>%</code>.{{Ref RFC|3986|rp=12}} Syntax components and subcomponents are separated by ''delimiters'' from the reserved characters (only from generic reserved characters for components) and define ''identifying data'' represented as unreserved characters, reserved characters that do not act as delimiters in the component and subcomponent respectively,{{Ref RFC|3986|rsection=2}} and [[percent-encoding]]s when the corresponding character is outside the allowed set or is being used as a delimiter of, or within, the component. A percent-encoding of an identifying data [[Octet (computing)|octet]] is a sequence of three characters, consisting of the character <code>%</code> followed by the two hexadecimal digits representing that octet's numeric value.{{Ref RFC|3986|rsection=2.1}}

<section begin="syntax"/><!-- This section is transcluded in other articles. See Help:Labeled section transclusion -->The URI generic syntax consists of five ''components'' organized hierarchically in order of decreasing significance from left to right:{{Ref RFC|3986|rsection=3}}

<pre>
URI = scheme ":" ["//" authority] path ["?" query] ["#" fragment]
</pre>

A component is ''undefined'' if it has an associated delimiter and the delimiter does not appear in the URI; the scheme and path components are always defined.{{Ref RFC|3986|rsection=5.2.1}} A component is ''empty'' if it has no characters; the scheme component is always non-empty.{{Ref RFC|3986|rsection=3}}

The authority component consists of ''subcomponents'':

<pre>
authority = [userinfo "@"] host [":" port]
</pre>

This is represented in a [[syntax diagram]] as:

<div class="skin-invert-image">{{wide image|URI syntax diagram.svg|900px|alt=URI syntax diagram}}</div>

The URI comprises:
* A non-empty '''{{visible anchor|scheme}}''' component followed by a colon (<code>:</code>), consisting of a sequence of characters beginning with a letter and followed by any combination of letters, digits, plus (<code>+</code>), period (<code>.</code>), or hyphen (<code>-</code>). Although schemes are case-insensitive, the canonical form is lowercase and documents that specify schemes must do so with lowercase letters. Examples of popular schemes include <code>[[Hypertext Transfer Protocol|http]]</code>, <code>[[HTTP Secure|https]]</code>, <code>[[File Transfer Protocol|ftp]]</code>, <code>[[mailto]]</code>, <code>[[File URI scheme|file]]</code>, <code>[[Data URI scheme|data]]</code> and <code>[[Internet Relay Chat#URI scheme|irc]]</code>. URI schemes should be registered with the [[Internet Assigned Numbers Authority|Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)]], although non-registered schemes are used in practice.{{Ref RFC|7595}}
* An optional '''{{visible anchor|authority}}''' component preceded by two slashes (<code>//</code>), comprising:
** An optional '''{{visible anchor|userinfo}}''' subcomponent followed by an at symbol (<code>@</code>), that may consist of a [[User (computing)|user name]] and an optional [[password]] preceded by a colon (<code>:</code>). Use of the format <code>username:password</code> in the userinfo subcomponent is deprecated for security reasons. Applications should not render as clear text any data after the first colon (<code>:</code>) found within a userinfo subcomponent unless the data after the colon is the empty string (indicating no password).
** A '''{{visible anchor|host}}''' subcomponent, consisting of either a registered name (including but not limited to a [[hostname]]) or an [[IP address]]. [[IPv4]] addresses must be in [[dot-decimal notation]], and [[IPv6]] addresses must be enclosed in brackets (<code>[]</code>).{{Ref RFC|3986|rsection=3.2.2}}{{efn|For URIs relating to resources on the World Wide Web, some web browsers allow {{code|.0}} portions of dot-decimal notation to be dropped or raw integer IP addresses to be used.{{sfnp|Lawrence|2014}}}}
** An optional '''{{visible anchor|port}}''' subcomponent preceded by a colon (<code>:</code>), consisting of decimal digits.
* A '''{{visible anchor|path}}''' component, consisting of a sequence of path segments separated by a slash (<code>/</code>). A path is always defined for a URI, though the defined path may be empty (zero length). A segment may also be empty, resulting in two consecutive slashes (<code>//</code>) in the path component. A path component may resemble or map exactly to a [[path (computing)|file system path]] but does not always imply a relation to one. If an authority component is defined, then the path component must either be empty or begin with a slash (<code>/</code>). If an authority component is undefined, then the path cannot begin with an empty segment—that is, with two slashes (<code>//</code>)—since the following characters would be interpreted as an authority component.{{Ref RFC|2396|rsection=3.3}}
: By convention, in '''http''' and '''https''' URIs, the last part of a ''path'' is named '''{{visible anchor|pathinfo}}''' and it is optional. It is composed by zero or more path segments that do not refer to an existing physical resource name (e.g. a file, an internal module program or an executable program) but to a logical part (e.g. a command or a qualifier part) that has to be passed separately to the first part of the path that identifies an executable module or program managed by a [[web server]]; this is often used to select dynamic content (a document, etc.) or to tailor it as requested (see also: [[Common Gateway Interface|CGI]] and PATH_INFO, etc.).
: Example:
:: URI: {{code|1="http://www.example.com/questions/3456/my-document"}}
:: where: {{code|1="/questions"}} is the first part of the ''path'' (an executable module or program) and {{code|1="/3456/my-document"}} is the second part of the ''path'' named ''pathinfo'', which is passed to the executable module or program named {{code|1="/questions"}} to select the requested document.
: An '''http''' or '''https''' URI containing a ''pathinfo'' part without a [[#query|query]] part may also be referred to as a '[[clean URL]],' whose last part may be a '[[Clean URL#Slug|slug]].'

{| class="wikitable" style="float: right; font-size: 0.9em; margin-left: 1em"
|-
! Query delimiter
! Example
|-
| Ampersand (<code>&amp;</code>)
| <code>key1=value1&key2=value2</code>
|-
| Semicolon (<code>;</code>){{efn|Historic {{IETF RFC|1866|link=no}} (obsoleted by {{Sum RFC|2854|title=no|ref=yes}}) encourages CGI authors to support ';' in addition to '&'.{{Ref RFC|1866|rsection=8.2.1}}}}
| <code>key1=value1;key2=value2</code>
|}
* An optional '''{{visible anchor|query}}''' component preceded by a question mark (<code>?</code>), consisting of a [[query string]] of non-hierarchical data. Its syntax is not well defined, but by convention is most often a sequence of [[attribute–value pair]]s separated by a [[delimiter]].
* An optional '''{{visible anchor|fragment}}''' component preceded by a [[Number sign|hash]] (<code>#</code>). The fragment contains a [[fragment identifier]] providing direction to a secondary resource, such as a section heading in an article identified by the remainder of the URI. When the primary resource is an [[HTML]] document, the fragment is often an [[HTML#Attributes|<code>id</code> attribute]] of a specific element, and web browsers will scroll this element into view.<section end="syntax"/>

The scheme- or implementation-specific reserved character <code>+</code> may be used in the scheme, userinfo, host, path, query, and fragment, and the scheme- or implementation-specific reserved characters <code>!</code>, <code>$</code>, <code>&</code>, <code>'</code>, <code>(</code>, <code>)</code>, <code>*</code>, <code>,</code>, <code>;</code>, and <code>=</code> may be used in the userinfo, host, path, query, and fragment. Additionally, the generic reserved character <code>:</code> may be used in the userinfo, path, query and fragment, the generic reserved characters <code>@</code> and <code>/</code> may be used in the path, query and fragment, and the generic reserved character <code>?</code> may be used in the query and fragment.{{Ref RFC|3986|rsection=A}}

=== Example URIs ===

The following figure displays example URIs and their component parts.
[[File:Example URIs.svg|frame]]

DOIs ([[digital object identifier]]s) fit within the [[Handle System]] and fit within the URI system, [[Handle System#DOIs-Handles-URIs|as facilitated by appropriate syntax]].<!--Per the [[Digital object identifier]] and [[Handle System]] articles, which see.-->

=== URI references ===

A ''URI reference'' is either a URI or a ''relative reference'' when it does not begin with a scheme component followed by a colon (<code>:</code>).{{Ref RFC|3986|rsection=4.1}} A path segment that contains a colon character (e.g., <code>foo:bar</code>) cannot be used as the first path segment of a relative reference if its path component does not begin with a slash (<code>/</code>), as it would be mistaken for a scheme component. Such a path segment must be preceded by a dot path segment (e.g., <code>./foo:bar</code>).{{Ref RFC|3986|rsection=4.2}}

Web document [[markup language]]s frequently use URI references to point to other resources, such as external documents or specific portions of the same logical document:{{Ref RFC|3986|rsection=4.4}}
* in [[HTML]], the value of the <code>src</code> attribute of the <code>img</code> element provides a URI reference, as does the value of the <code>href</code> attribute of the <code>a</code> or <code>link</code> element;
* in [[XML]], the [[system identifier]] appearing after the <code>SYSTEM</code> keyword in a [[Document Type Definition|DTD]] is a fragmentless URI reference;
* in [[XSLT]], the value of the <code>href</code> attribute of the <code>xsl:import</code> element/instruction is a URI reference; likewise the first argument to the <code>document()</code> function.

<pre>
https://example.com/path/resource.txt#fragment
//example.com/path/resource.txt
/path/resource.txt
path/resource.txt
../resource.txt
./resource.txt
resource.txt
#fragment
</pre>

=== Resolution ===

''Resolving'' a URI reference against a ''base URI'' results in a ''target URI''. This implies that the base URI exists and is an ''absolute URI'' (a URI with no fragment component). The base URI can be obtained, in order of precedence, from:{{Ref RFC|3986|rsection=5.1}}

* the reference URI itself if it is a URI;
* the content of the representation;
* the entity encapsulating the representation;
* the URI used for the actual retrieval of the representation;
* the context of the application.

Within a representation with a well defined base URI of

<pre>
http://a/b/c/d;p?q
</pre>

a relative reference is resolved to its target URI as follows:{{Ref RFC|3986|rsection=5.4}}

<pre>
"g:h"     -> "g:h"
"g"       -> "http://a/b/c/g"
"./g"     -> "http://a/b/c/g"
"g/"      -> "http://a/b/c/g/"
"/g"      -> "http://a/g"
"//g"     -> "http://g"
"?y"      -> "http://a/b/c/d;p?y"
"g?y"     -> "http://a/b/c/g?y"
"#s"      -> "http://a/b/c/d;p?q#s"
"g#s"     -> "http://a/b/c/g#s"
"g?y#s"   -> "http://a/b/c/g?y#s"
";x"      -> "http://a/b/c/;x"
"g;x"     -> "http://a/b/c/g;x"
"g;x?y#s" -> "http://a/b/c/g;x?y#s"
""        -> "http://a/b/c/d;p?q"
"."       -> "http://a/b/c/"
"./"      -> "http://a/b/c/"
".."      -> "http://a/b/"
"../"     -> "http://a/b/"
"../g"    -> "http://a/b/g"
"../.."   -> "http://a/"
"../../"  -> "http://a/"
"../../g" -> "http://a/g"
</pre>

=== URL munging ===
URL munging is a technique by which a [[Command (computing)|command]] is appended to a URL, usually at the end, after a "?" [[Lexical analysis#Token|token]]. It is commonly used in [[WebDAV]] as a mechanism of adding functionality to [[HTTP]]. In a versioning system, for example, to add a "checkout" command to a URL, it is written as <code><nowiki>http://editing.com/resource/file.php?command=checkout</nowiki></code>. It has the advantage of both being easy for [[Common Gateway Interface|CGI parsers]] and also acts as an intermediary between HTTP and underlying resource, in this case.{{sfn|Whitehead|1998|p=38}}

=== Relation to XML namespaces ===

In [[XML]], a [[XML namespace|namespace]] is an abstract domain to which a collection of element and attribute names can be assigned.<!-- who or what can do such assignation? --> The namespace name is a character string which must adhere to the generic URI syntax.{{sfnp|Morrison|2006}} However, the name is generally not considered to be a URI,{{sfnp|Harold|2004}} because the URI specification bases the decision not only on lexical components, but also on their intended use. A namespace name does not necessarily imply any of the semantics of URI schemes; for example, a namespace name beginning with ''http:'' may have no connotation to the use of the [[HTTP]].

Originally, the namespace name could match the syntax of any non-empty URI reference, but the use of relative URI references was deprecated by the W3C.{{sfnp|W3C|2009}} A separate W3C specification for namespaces in XML 1.1 permits [[Internationalized Resource Identifier]] (IRI) references to serve as the basis for namespace names in addition to URI references.{{sfnp|W3C|2006}}

==See also==

* [[CURIE]]
* [[Linked data]]
* [[Extensible Resource Identifier]]
* [[Internationalized Resource Identifier]] (IRI)
* [[Internet resource locator]]
* [[Persistent uniform resource locator]]
* [[Uniform Naming Convention]]
* [[Resource Directory Description Language]]
* [[Universally unique identifier]]
* [[List of URI schemes]]
* [[Resource Description Framework]]

== Notes ==

{{Notelist}}

== References ==

{{reflist}}

=== Works cited ===
* {{cite web |url=http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/#iri-use |title=Namespaces in XML 1.1 (Second Edition) |date=16 August 2006 |at=2.2 Use of URIs as Namespace Names |editor-first1=Tim |editor-last1=Bray |editor-link1=Tim Bray |editor-first2=Dave |editor-last2=Hollander |editor-first3=Andrew |editor-last3=Layman |editor-first4=Richard |editor-last4=Tobin |publisher=[[World Wide Web Consortium]] |access-date=31 August 2015 |ref={{SfnRef|W3C|2006}}}}
* {{cite web |url=http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/#iri-use |title=Namespaces in XML 1.0 (Third Edition) |date=8 December 2009 |at=2.2 Use of URIs as Namespace Names |editor-first1=Tim |editor-last1=Bray |editor-link1=Tim Bray |editor-first2=Dave |editor-last2=Hollander |editor-first3=Andrew |editor-last3=Layman |editor-first4=Richard |editor-last4=Tobin |editor-first5=Henry S. |editor-last5=Thompson |publisher=[[World Wide Web Consortium]] |access-date=31 August 2015 |ref={{SfnRef|W3C|2009}}}}
* {{cite book |author-first=Elliotte Rusty |author-last=Harold |author-link=Elliotte Rusty Harold |date=2004 |title=XML 1.1 Bible |edition=Third |publisher=[[Wiley Publishing]] |page=291 |isbn=978-0-7645-4986-1}}
* {{cite web |author-last1=Lawrence |author-first1=Eric |title=Browser Arcana: IP Literals in URLs |url=http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ieinternals/archive/2014/03/06/browser-arcana-ipv4-ipv6-literal-urls-dotted-va-dotless.aspx |website=IEInternals |publisher=[[Microsoft]] |date=6 March 2014 |access-date=25 April 2016}}
* {{cite book |author-last=Morrison |author-first=Michael Wayne |author-link=Michael Wayne Morrison |date=2006 |title=Sams Teach Yourself XML |publisher=[[Sams Publishing]] |chapter=Hour 5: ''Putting Namespaces to Use'' |page=91}}
* {{cite journal|journal=[[IEEE Internet Computing]]|year=1998|doi= 10.1109/4236.722228|issn=1941-0131|volume=2|issue=5|title=WebDAV: IEFT standard for collaborative authoring on the Web|first=E.J|last=Whitehead|pages=34–40 }}

== Further reading ==
{{refbegin}}

* {{cite web |author=((URI Planning Interest Group, W3C/IETF)) |title=URIs, URLs, and URNs: Clarifications and Recommendations 1.0 |url=http://www.w3.org/TR/uri-clarification/ |date=21 September 2001 |access-date=27 July 2009 |ref={{SfnRef|URI Planning Interest Group|2009}}}}
* {{cite web |url=http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/alternatives-discovery.html |title=On Linking Alternative Representations To Enable Discovery And Publishing |publisher=[[World Wide Web Consortium]] |date=2006 |orig-year=2001 |access-date=3 April 2012 |ref={{SfnRef|W3C|2001}}}}
{{refend}}

==External links==
* [https://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/uri-schemes.xhtml URI Schemes]&nbsp;– [[Internet Assigned Numbers Authority|IANA]]-maintained registry of URI Schemes
* [https://www.w3.org/wiki/UriSchemes URI schemes on the W3C wiki]
* [https://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#identification Architecture of the World Wide Web, Volume One, §2: Identification]&nbsp;– by W3C
* [https://www.w3.org/TR/uri-clarification/ W3C URI Clarification]

{{Semantic Web|state=collapsed}}
{{URI scheme}}
{{Hypermedia}}

{{Authority control}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2020|cs1-dates=y|}}

[[Category:Application layer protocols]]
[[Category:Internet protocols]]
[[Category:Internet Standards]]
[[Category:Semantic Web]]
[[Category:URL]]