View source for Two-stage theory

{{Short description|Marxist–Leninist theoretical concept}}
{{More citations needed|date=February 2023}}
{{Marxism–Leninism sidebar}}
{{Revolution sidebar}}
The '''two-stage theory''', or '''stagism''', is a [[Marxism–Leninism|Marxist–Leninist]] political theory which argues that underdeveloped countries such as [[Russian Empire|Tsarist Russia]] must first pass through a [[Capitalist mode of production (Marxist theory)|stage of capitalism]] via a [[bourgeois revolution]] before moving to a [[Socialist mode of production|socialist stage]].<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |url=https://www.marxists.org/glossary/terms/s/t.htm |title=Stagism |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Marxism |via=[[Marxists Internet Archive]] |access-date=6 November 2018}}</ref>

Stagism was applied to countries worldwide that had not passed through the capitalist stage. In the [[Soviet Union]], the two-stage theory was opposed by the [[Trotskyism|Trotskyist]] theory of [[permanent revolution]].

While the discussion on stagism focuses on the [[Russian Revolution]], [[Maoist]] theories such as [[New Democracy]] tend to apply a two-stage theory to struggles elsewhere.

== Theory ==
In [[Marxist–Leninist]] theory under [[Joseph Stalin]], the theory of two stages gained a revival. More recently, the [[South African Communist Party]] and the [[Socialist Alliance (Australia)|Socialist Alliance]] have re-elaborated the two-stage theory, although the Socialist Alliance differentiates their position from the [[Stalinist]] one.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Lorimer |first=Doug |url=http://links.org.au/node/141 |title=In Defence of Lenin's Marxist Policy of a Two-Stage, Uninterrupted Revolution |journal=Links: International Journal of Socialist Renewal |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230217143221/https://links.org.au/defence-lenins-marxist-policy-two-stage-uninterrupted-revolution |archive-date=17 February 2023}}</ref>

== Criticism ==
The two-stage theory is often attributed to [[Karl Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels]], but critics such as [[David McLellan (academic)|David McLellan]]<ref>{{cite book |last=McLellan |first=David |author-link=David McLellan (academic) |date=1971 |title=The Thought of Karl Marx}}</ref> and others dispute that they envisaged the strict application of this theory outside of the actually existing Western development of capitalism.{{fact|date=January 2018}}

Although all agree that Marx and Engels argue that Western capitalism provides the technological advances necessary for socialism and the "grave diggers" of the [[capitalist class]] in the form of the [[working class]], critics of the two-stage theory, including most trends of [[Trotskyism]], counter that Marx and Engels denied that they had laid down a formula to be applied to all countries in all circumstances. McLellan and others cite Marx's "Reply to [[Nikolay Mikhaylovsky|Mikhailovsky]]":

{{quote|[Mikhailovsky] feels he absolutely must metamorphose my historical sketch of the genesis of capitalism in Western Europe into a historico-philosophic theory of the general path every people is fated to tread, whatever the historical circumstances in which it finds itself [...] but I beg his pardon. (He is both honoring and shaming me too much.)|Karl Marx, "Reply to Mikhailovsky"<ref>Marx, Karl; McLellan, David, ed. (1977). [http://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/ni/vol01/no04/marx.htm "A Letter on Russia by Karl Marx"]. ''Selected Writings''. Oxford. pp. 571.</ref>}}

In the preface to the Russian edition of ''[[The Communist Manifesto]]'' of 1882, Marx and Engels specifically outline an alternative path to [[Socialist mode of production|socialism]] for Russia.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Marx |first1=Karl |author1-link=Karl Marx |last2=Engels |first2=Friedrich |author2-link=Friedrich Engels |date=1882 |title=The Communist Manifesto |title-link=The Communist Manifesto |chapter=Preface to the Russian edition |quote=Now the question is: can the Russian [[obshchina]], though greatly undermined, yet a form of primeval common ownership of land, pass directly to the higher form of Communist common ownership? Or, on the contrary, must it first pass through the same process of dissolution such as constitutes the historical evolution of the West? The only answer to that possible today is this: If the Russian Revolution becomes the signal for a proletarian revolution in the West, so that both complement each other, the present Russian common ownership of land may serve as the starting point for a communist development.}}</ref>

In Russia, the [[Mensheviks]] believed the two-stage theory applied to [[Russian Empire|Tsarist Russia]]. They were criticized by [[Leon Trotsky]] in what became the theory of [[permanent revolution]] in 1905. Later when the two-stage theory re-appeared in the [[Soviet Union]] after the death of [[Vladimir Lenin]], the theory of permanent revolution was supported by the [[Left Opposition]]. The permanent revolution theory argues that the tasks allotted in the two-stage theory to the capitalist class can only be carried out by the working class with the support of the poor [[peasantry]] and that the working class will then pass on to the socialist tasks and expropriate the capitalist class. However, the revolution cannot pause here and must remain permanent in the sense that it must seek worldwide revolution to avoid isolation and move towards international socialism.{{fact|date=January 2018}}

== See also ==
* [[Historical materialism]]
* [[Impossibilism]]

== References ==
{{reflist}}

{{Marxist & Communist phraseology}}
[[Category:Marxist terminology]]
[[Category:Marxism]]