View source for Ten percent plan

{{Short description|Model for reinstatement of Southern states during the American Civil War}}
{{Multiple issues|
{{refimprove|date=April 2017}}
{{more footnotes|date=April 2017}}
}}

{{Abraham Lincoln series}}
The '''Ten Percent Plan''', formally the '''Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction''' ({{USStat|13|737}}), was a [[United States]] [[presidential proclamation]] issued on December 8, 1863, by [[President of the United States|United States President]] [[Abraham Lincoln]], during the [[American Civil War]]. By this point in the war (nearly three years in), the [[Union Army]] had pushed the [[Confederate States Army|Confederate Army]] out of several regions of the [[Southern United States|South]], and some [[Confederate States|Confederate states]] were ready to have their governments rebuilt. Lincoln's plan established a process through which this [[Reconstruction Era|postwar reconstruction]] could come about.

==Background==
A component of President Lincoln's plans for the postwar reconstruction of the South, this proclamation decreed that a state in rebellion against the [[Federal government of the United States|U.S. federal government]] could be reintegrated into the Union when 10% of the 1860 vote count from that state had taken an oath of allegiance to the U.S. and pledged to abide by [[abolitionism in the United States|Emancipation]].<ref name="openstax-history">{{Cite web |last1=Corbett |first1=P. Scott |last2=Janssen |first2=Volker |last3=Lund |first3=John M. |last4=Pfannestiel |first4=Todd |last5=Waskiewicz |first5=Sylvie |last6=Vickery |first6=Paul |date=2014-12-30 |title=16.1 Restoring the Union - U.S. History |url=https://openstax.org/books/us-history/pages/16-1-restoring-the-union |access-date=2024-09-14 |website=openstax.org |language=English}}</ref> Voters could then elect delegates to draft revised state constitutions and establish new state governments.<ref name=":0" /> All Southerners except for high-ranking Confederate army officers and government officials would be granted a full pardon. The policy also made it so the South had to provide education for formerly enslaved people, who were no longer considered private property. Lincoln guaranteed Southerners that he would protect their remaining property.<ref name="A&E">{{cite web|url=http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/lincoln-issues-proclamation-of-amnesty-and-reconstruction|title=Lincoln issues Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction|work=This Day in History|date=13 November 2009 |publisher=A+E Networks|access-date=April 12, 2017}}</ref> By 1864, Louisiana, Tennessee, and Arkansas had established fully functioning Unionist governments under these guidelines.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Welch |first1=Richard E. |last2=Trefousse |first2=Hans L. |date=September 1969 |title=The Radical Republicans: Lincoln's Vanguard for Racial Justice |url=https://doi.org/10.2307/363636 |journal=The New England Quarterly |volume=42 |issue=3 |pages=475 |doi=10.2307/363636 |jstor=363636 |issn=0028-4866}}</ref>

This policy was meant to shorten the war by offering a moderate peace plan. It was also intended to further his emancipation policy by insisting that the new governments abolish slavery.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Caron |first=Nathalie |date=2006-06-01 |title=William E. Gienapp, Abraham Lincoln and Civil War in America: A Biography,New York, Oxford University Press, 2002, 239 p. ISBN : 0-19-515100-3. 21 dollars.William E. Gienapp, (ed), This Fiery Trial: The Speeches and Writings of Abraham L |url=https://doi.org/10.4000/rh19.1127 |journal=Revue d'histoire du XIXe siècle |issue=32 |pages=153–209 |doi=10.4000/rh19.1127 |issn=1265-1354}}</ref>

==Reaction==
Congress reacted sharply to this proclamation of Lincoln's plan. Most [[Moderate Republicans (Reconstruction era)|moderate Republicans]] in Congress supported the president's proposal for Reconstruction because they wanted to bring a swift end to the war,<ref name="openstax-history" /> but other Republicans feared that the [[Planter class|planter aristocracy]] would be restored and formerly enslaved individuals might be subjected to re-enslavement or systemic oppression.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Hyman |first=Harold M. |date=1990-02-01 |title=James M. Mcpherson. <i>Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era</i>. (The Oxford History of the United States, number 6.) New York: Oxford University Press. 1988. Pp. xix, 904. $35.00 |url=https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/95.1.260 |journal=The American Historical Review |volume=95 |issue=1 |pages=260–262 |doi=10.1086/ahr/95.1.260 |issn=1937-5239}}</ref> Lincoln's reconstructive policy toward the South was lenient because he wanted to popularize his [[Emancipation Proclamation]]. Lincoln feared that compelling enforcement of the proclamation could lead to the defeat of the Republican Party in the election of 1864, and that popular Democrats could overturn his proclamation.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Durden |first1=Robert F. |last2=Belz |first2=Herman |date=December 1977 |title=A New Birth of Freedom: The Republican Party and Freedmen's Rights, 1861 to 1866 |url=https://doi.org/10.2307/1856521 |journal=The American Historical Review |volume=82 |issue=5 |pages=1332 |doi=10.2307/1856521 |jstor=1856521 |issn=0002-8762}}</ref>

The [[Radical Republicans]] opposed Lincoln's plan, as they thought it too lenient toward the South.<ref name="openstax-history" /> Radical Republicans believed that Lincoln's plan for Reconstruction was not harsh enough because, from their point of view, the South was guilty of starting the war and deserved to be punished as such. Radical Republicans hoped to control the Reconstruction process, transform Southern society, disband the planter aristocracy, redistribute land, develop industry, and guarantee [[civil liberties]] for former slaves. Although the Radical Republicans were the minority party in Congress, they managed to sway many moderates in the postwar years and came to dominate Congress in later sessions. In the summer of 1864, the Radical Republicans passed a new bill to oppose the plan, known as the [[Wade–Davis Bill]]. These radicals believed that Lincoln's plan was too lenient, and this new bill would make readmission into the Union more difficult. The Bill stated that for a state to be readmitted, the majority of the state would have to take a loyalty oath, not just ten percent. Lincoln later [[Pocket veto|pocket-vetoed]] this new bill.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|title = Abraham Lincoln {{!}} president of United States|url = http://www.britannica.com/biography/Abraham-Lincoln|website = Encyclopædia Britannica|access-date = 2015-12-03}}</ref>

== Criticism, Political Conflict, and Legacy ==
While moderate Republicans supported Lincoln’s approach as a pragmatic path to end the war, Radical Republicans criticized the plan as too lenient and lacking guarantees for newly freed African Americans.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Barreyre |first=Nicolas |date=September 2020 |title=Eric Foner Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877 New York, Harper & Row, 1988, <scp>xxx</scp>-690 p. |url=https://doi.org/10.1017/ahss.2021.19 |journal=Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales |volume=75 |issue=3–4 |pages=814–817 |doi=10.1017/ahss.2021.19 |issn=0395-2649}}</ref> They viewed it as allowing former Confederates to resume power without meaningful transformation of Southern society.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Welch |first1=Richard E. |last2=Trefousse |first2=Hans L. |date=September 1969 |title=The Radical Republicans: Lincoln's Vanguard for Racial Justice |url=https://doi.org/10.2307/363636 |journal=The New England Quarterly |volume=42 |issue=3 |pages=475 |doi=10.2307/363636 |jstor=363636 |issn=0028-4866}}</ref>

This led to the Wade–Davis Bill (1864), which proposed more stringent terms: a majority (rather than 10%) of white male citizens would be required to take an oath of loyalty, and high-ranking Confederate leaders would be permanently disenfranchised. The bill also demanded  assurances of emancipation and political equality. Lincoln pocket-vetoed the bill, prompting the publication of the Wade–Davis Manifesto, in which Radical Republicans accused him of executive overreach and insufficient commitment to Reconstruction.<ref>{{Citation |title=The Wade-Davis Manifesto(1864) |date=2009-09-30 |work=African American Studies Center |url=https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780195301731.013.33774 |access-date=2025-05-31 |publisher=Oxford University Press |doi=10.1093/acref/9780195301731.013.33774 |isbn=978-0-19-530173-1}}</ref>

Black leaders also voiced concern. [[Frederick Douglass]] criticized the plan’s failure to secure political and economic rights for formerly enslaved people, calling it a policy that “betrays the cause of liberty.”<ref>{{Citation |last=DOUGLASS |first=FREDERICK |title="One Hundred Conventions" (1843), from Life and Times of Frederick Douglass (1881; 1892) |work=The Speeches of Frederick Douglass |pages=523–525 |url=https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv6hp3kt.31 |access-date=2025-05-31 |publisher=Yale University Press |doi=10.2307/j.ctv6hp3kt.31 |isbn=978-0-300-24069-6}}</ref> Many modern historians argue that the Ten Percent Plan was not a comprehensive Reconstruction strategy, but rather a wartime political tool aimed at encouraging Southern Unionism and weakening Confederate resolve.<ref>{{Citation |last=Mcpherson |first=James M |chapter=Abraham Lincoln and the Second American Revolution |date=1991-02-05 |pages=23–42 |chapter-url=https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195055429.003.0002 |access-date=2025-05-31 |publisher=Oxford University PressNew York, NY |doi=10.1093/oso/9780195055429.003.0002 |isbn=978-0-19-505542-9}}</ref>

Following Lincoln’s assassination in 1865, the plan was never fully enacted. His successor, Andrew Johnson, adopted a similarly lenient approach to Reconstruction, but Congress ultimately rejected his policies, initiating Radical Reconstruction with a more aggressive federal role in reshaping the postwar South.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Durden |first1=Robert F. |last2=Belz |first2=Herman |date=December 1977 |title=A New Birth of Freedom: The Republican Party and Freedmen's Rights, 1861 to 1866 |url=https://doi.org/10.2307/1856521 |journal=The American Historical Review |volume=82 |issue=5 |pages=1332 |doi=10.2307/1856521 |jstor=1856521 |issn=0002-8762}}</ref>

== See also ==
* [[Forty acres and a mule]]
* [[Freedmen's Bureau]]
* [[Treatment of slaves in the United States]]

==References==
{{reflist}}

== Bibliography ==
* [[Eric Foner|Foner, Eric]]. ''Forever Free: The Story of Emancipation & Reconstruction.'' New York: Vintage Books, 2005.

==External links==
{{Wikisource|Proclamation 108|Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction}}
* [http://www.freedmen.umd.edu/procamn.htm The Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction] Freedmen & Southern Society Project of the History Department of the [[University of Maryland]]
* [https://www.loc.gov/resource/mal.2849300/?sp=1&st=text Lincoln, Abraham.] . December 8, 1863. Manuscript/Mixed Material. Retrieved from the Library of Congress

{{History of slavery in the United States}}
{{Abraham Lincoln}}
{{American Civil War}}
{{Reconstruction Era}}

[[Category:Presidency of Abraham Lincoln]]
[[Category:American Civil War documents]]
[[Category:Slavery in the United States]]
[[Category:Reconstruction Era]]
[[Category:United States presidential directives]]
[[Category:People pardoned by Abraham Lincoln]]