View source for Talk:Schumann Center for Media and Democracy

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=|
{{WP Media}} }}

''From VfD:''

non-notable. PAC.  They did donate a building to Wesleyan though.  Still, other than that, didn't seem to have done all that much other than act like every other PAC out there. -[[User:Vina|Vina]] 20:33, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
*'''Weak keep'''. Not a PAC, by the way. And not a very well-written article. -- [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] 21:24, Sep 1, 2004 (UTC)
* Keep, notable. [[User:Duncharris|Dunc_Harris]]|[[User talk:duncharris|&#9786;]] 21:35, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
*They're a prominent nonprofit in the US; they fund a lot of educational and cultural programs. I'd say they're borderline encyclopedically notable. This article looks to mostly be pulled straight out of some other reference work, though, which is worrisome. Weak keep, bt major cleanup needed.-[[User:Finn-Zoltan|FZ]] 22:12, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
*Keep and Clean Up:  Quite notable in the US.  They're very active in environmentalism and soft-left causes.  They're a constant underwriter of several [[National Public Radio]] shows.  Desperately needs cleaning, though. [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] 00:32, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)

''end moved discussion''

== VERY Biased. ==

External links provide no educational support, just extremely subjective criticism and ''ad hominem'' . Not of any real educational value. (anon 10 Aug 2005)
: The external link was certainly misleadingly captioned. I don't feel comfortable removing it precisely ''because'' I disagree with its right-wing politics. However, I have now captioned it appropriately. Does the recaptioning answer your POV issue?
:Does anyone know if there is an official Schumann Foundation site? Google doesn't quickly find one. -- [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] | [[User talk:Jmabel|Talk]] 07:00, August 10, 2005 (UTC)