View source for Talk:Open-source model

{{talk page of redirect}}
{{merged-to|Open source|9 July 2021}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{WikiProject Computer science }}
{{WikiProject Computing|free-software=yes|software=yes}}
{{WikiProject Internet }}
{{WikiProject Internet culture }}
{{WikiProject Law }}
{{WikiProject Philosophy |ethics=yes}}
}}
{{Article history|aciddate=January 19 2008}}
{{To do|collapsed=yes}}
{{Notable citation|Harvard Journal of Law & Technology}}
{{Press|year=2006|section=February 21–28| author=Chris Bell| title=Back to the future: open source everything| org=Computerworld| url=http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/rss/36DCCEFC4C0ADC18CC25711F00108477| date=2006-02-27 }}

== Yes, but what IS open source? ==

This article fails to address (or at least conceals the answer to) a key question:

What actually MAKES a program open source? For example, if a program is NOT open source, what prevents me from viewing and editing it as a text file?

This question is what brought me to this article. In my opinion, it is more than a key question. It is THE a key question. ---[[User:Dagme|Dagme]] ([[User talk:Dagme|talk]]) 17:10, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

: Copyright is what prevents you from (legally) editing and/or redistributing the program. So what makes a program open source is that the copyright holder has granted the legal permission to do so, using a license that fulfils the [[the Open Source Definition]].
: With some technologies, you also cannot just view the pgoram as a text file because it has been compiled to machine code. In that case, there is also the practical issue of getting access to the source code in the first place.
: And yes, I agree that this article is not very helpful. I feel that's because it's too abstract and tries to cover topics ranging from software to fashion. The article specifically about [[Open-source software]] is better in that regard. --[[User:Tobias K.|Tobias K.]] ([[User talk:Tobias K.|talk]]) 13:48, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

== Improved open source disambiguation (that may become a broad concept article) ==

"Open source" (without dash, with dash, and disambiguation) are now redirected to the improved [[Open source]] disambiguation which may become a [[:WP:broad concept article]] to reduce the extreme number of disambiguation-link alarms.  Please read more on the latest developments on [[Talk:Open source]] and feel free to improve [[Open source]].  ~ '''<span style="font-family:Arial">[[User:JasonCarswell|<span style="color:black">JasonCarswell</span>]] <small>[[User talk:JasonCarswell|<span style="color:gray">(talk)</span>]]</small></span>''' 17:07, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

== Editing a table within this page ==

Hi Folks,

I came across this wiki page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_model#Economics and within the table, a company called 'Sauce Labs' is described as the leading company for Selenium (as seen in the table). That being said, the citation used - https://www.battery.com/powered/boss-index-tracking-explosive-growth-open-source-software/ clearly mentions BrowserStack and Sauce Labs. Could you guide me on the best way of incorporating 'BrowserStack' into the table? I am a novice and want to be cautious as there is also a conflict of interest (I work for BrowserStack). 

Thank you.

[[User:SManiar|SManiar]] ([[User talk:SManiar|talk]]) 16:01, 10 October 2019 (UTC)