View source for Talk:Knowledge Aided Retrieval in Activity Context

{{Old XfD multi |date=11 August 2024 |result='''no consensus''' |page=Knowledge Aided Retrieval in Activity Context}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=other|class=Stub|1=
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|terrorism=yes|terrorism-imp=Low|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Law Enforcement|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low}}
}}
{{Annual readership}}

==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment==
[[File:Sciences humaines.svg|40px]] This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available [[Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Oklahoma_State_University/Terrorism_and_Emergency_Management_(Spring_2017)|on the course page]].

{{small|Above undated message substituted from [[Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment]] by [[User:PrimeBOT|PrimeBOT]] ([[User talk:PrimeBOT|talk]]) 01:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)}}
==Untitled==
''..., however recent events have indicated the need for a proactive mechanism for anticipating terrorist atrocities.''

This is not a quite a [[:neutral point of view|neutral point of view]] and will also [[Wikipedia:Avoid statements that will date quickly|"date quickly"]]. --- [[User:Jagged|Jagged]]

I don't think this contravenes NPOV; I am not American and I can see why you probably need such a system. The ''dates quickly'' is not a big deal either in Wikipedia where the information can be modified as events unfold but I'll fix it in a temporal context relative to recent events. I am going to reinstate it since it qualifies the marker about civil liberties. [[User:sjc|sjc]]

Yes, that seems flow better and gives more facts behind the statement rather than having it just read like an opinion.

Not only does the references look better than the word recent, but in my opinion we should not be relying on being able to edit the entries in the future.  What would happen if someone were to take a snapshot of Wikipedia and archive it for future use?  Someone reading the first revision of this entry in 50 years time would be confused by that last sentance, however the current revision would give them the reference they would need to understand this entry. --- [[User:Jagged|Jagged]]

This kind of goes with the territory, I'm afraid. My parents have an old encyclopaedia in which ''aluminium'' is described as ''a metal of the future''.... [[User:sjc|sjc]]

----
A different question: Who is developing the system? CIA, FBI, ... ? --[[User:css|css]]

It is being developed by an independant company (Applied Systems Intelligence). Originally, the idea came out of some work being done by the US Air Force on global information exchange. The work is being done nominally for the Air Force, although it has far wider applications. [[User:sjc|sjc]]