View source for Talk:Get It Done

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|
{{WikiProject Television|importance=Low|buffyverse=yes|buffyverse-importance=|episode-coverage=Yes}}
{{WikiProject Horror|importance=Low}}
}}

==Untitled==
Please help complete the Angel/Buffy episode articles. See what needs to be done on this sub-page of WikiProject Buffy:

[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Buffy/Episodes]]

Also please help update any major changes made to episode articles on that page so that progress can be mapped.

________________________________________________________

==Criticism?==

Should a Criticism section be added? As Nalvage and Anonymous (below) have pointed out, there are parts of this article that shouldn't be there, but I do not think they should all go. So, I suggest making a Criticism(s?) section, and adding the most noteworthy... issues, there. --[[User:DrGero49|Gero]] 04:58, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
:The problem is in deciding which, if any, criticisms are noteworthy.  People will have a whole host of different subjective opinions about this episode and this season, and there's a danger of getting into "Some/Many fans think..." which is against Wikipedia's policy on unsourced [[Wikipedia:Avoid_weasel_words|Weasel Words]].  Which fans have these critical opinions?  When were they expressed?  What exactly did they say?  Why is their opinion noteworthy?  How many of them are there?  What percentage of the viewership?  Without reliable sources you fall into the trap of, "Well, I've seen a lot of criticism online..." which, to me, seems too vague for an encyclopaedia.  My feeling is that Wikipedia should avoid talking about a show's quality (either good or bad) unless there's something verifiable that can be pointed to, like ratings, or awards, or quotes from those working on the show etc.--[[User:Nalvage|Nalvage]] 13:20, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
::Well, I know I've seen some articles around (one in a magazine, a couple online) that talk about and criticize the many deus ex machina used in the final episodes, and how some of the characters would be simply knocked out if they would have gotten in the way of a scene. (Willow, with her magic recently of course, but it happened to Giles most of all. The writers even included him saying, 'At least I wasn't knocked out', once.) I'll try and find some links. And I know a quote can be found somewhere with Sarah Michelle Gellar talking about how Buffy felt like a different person the last two seasons, and was unhappy about it. --[[User:DrGero49|Gero]] 22:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

== Giles' Absence ==

Does anyone know why Giles wasn't in this episode? Was Anthony Stewart Head busy with something else, or is Giles' absence an explanation for the new Potentials that show up later? Like he was out gathering them. --[[User:DrGero49|Gero]] 16:05, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

:I think story-wise during this time Giles is travelling and collecting potentials. In real life I think he was only a recurring guest star in series 7, rather than a regular, because he needed more time with his family who lived in england. -- [[User:Paxomen|Paxomen]] 17:49, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

== Willow Drains Power ==

"When Willow needs energy, she takes it from Kennedy and Anya. However, Anya is human again, and so it would seem more likely that Xander would be the strongest person there after Kennedy."

I dont agree with this, because even as a human, Anya is still a more than capable magic user.

And to be honest, this entire article is has a very bitter tone and needs to be made a bit more neutral.

-I have to second that, but I think it would be hard finding someone with a neutral stance that could rewrite this well. That's goes for most of the last season as well it seems.  --[[User:DrGero49|Gero]] 15:59, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

== Writing And Acting Section ==

The writing and acting section of this article was full of vague opinions and contradictory insults. I deleted it. [[User:Lots42|Lots42]] 14:52, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

== What I Did ==

For the record: I nuked the trivia for being trivia and the expanded overview for violating copyright. [[User:Lots42|Lots42]] ([[User talk:Lots42|talk]]) 10:48, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

==Fair use rationale for Image:Buffy715.jpg==
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|70px|left]]
'''[[:Image:Buffy715.jpg]]''' is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under [[Wikipedia:Fair use|fair use]] but there is no [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline|explanation or rationale]] as to why its use in '''this''' Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Fair use|boilerplate fair use template]], you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with [[WP:FU|fair use]].

Please go to [[:Image:Buffy715.jpg|the image description page]] and edit it to include a [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline |fair use rationale]]. Using one of the templates at [[Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline]] is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Missing rationale2 -->

[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 19:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

==Friend==
The recently added bit about Anya and Buffy's friendship confuses me; it smells of original research which isn't valid for Wikipedia. [[User:Lots42|Lots42]] ([[User talk:Lots42|talk]]) 18:20, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

==Jawohl and Nazi reference==

The German version put "Zu Befehl" changing "Jawohl" from the original. It's true that "Zu Befehl" has no Nazi-connotation (or almost any) but the alternative "Jawohl!" wouldn't, either, since it's still used without any reference to Nazi ideology (mostly in tongue-in-cheek use). Still, blind obedience is transported by "Jawohl!", which could be roughly translated as "How high?".  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/84.177.121.18|84.177.121.18]] ([[User talk:84.177.121.18|talk]]) 21:23, 27 September 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


I agree with on minor adjustment: "Jawohl!" in military jargon essentially means just "Yes Sir!" as is "Zu Befehl!" the literal translation of which "As ordered." "Jawohl" is kind of archaic (being of middle high german origin) and was thus used well before the 20th Century and is still in use today as a stronger form of agreement or to stress a point, not necessarily in a military context. Maybe that's the reason the translators changed it to "Zu Befehl!"
[[User:Dekar1241|Dekar1241]] ([[User talk:Dekar1241|talk]]) 16:15, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

== Shadow Figures ==

I'm wondering if anyone has any information on those shadow figures (from the emergancy bag). Are these things real, as in was it invented for the show or is it something that really would be been used in Africa/anywhere? [[User:Drewder|Drewder]] ([[User talk:Drewder|talk]]) 03:12, 18 June 2012 (UTC)