View source for Talk:Alfred Hitchcock

{{Skip to talk}}
{{Talk header|noarchives=yes}}
{{British English|date=September 2011}}
{{Article history
|action1=RBP
|action1date=19 January 2004
|action1link=Wikipedia:Archive/Refreshing_brilliant_prose_-_People_and_culture
|action1result=kept
|action1oldid=2775716

|action2=FAR
|action2date=1 December 2004
|action2link=Wikipedia:Featured_article_removal_candidates/Alfred_Hitchcock
|action2result=demoted
|action2oldid=8346254

|action3=GAN
|action3date=17 October 2010
|action3link=Talk:Alfred Hitchcock/GA1
|action3result=failed
|action3oldid=389997019

|action4=GAN
|action4date=30 November 2017
|action4link=Talk:Alfred Hitchcock/GA3
|action4result=listed
|action4oldid=813119693

|topic=Media and drama
|maindate=November 19,2004
|action5=PR
|action5date=01:38:01 22 March 2018 (UTC)
|action5link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Alfred Hitchcock/archive1
|action5result=reviewed
|action5oldid=938272330
|otd1date=2021-08-13|otd1oldid=1038465575

|action6 = GAR
|action6date = 14:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
|action6link = Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Alfred Hitchcock/1
|action6result = delisted
|action6oldid = 1285126974
|currentstatus = DGA
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=b|vital=yes|listas=Hitchcock, Alfred|blp=no|1=
{{WikiProject Biography|core=yes|filmbio-work-group=yes|filmbio-priority=Top}}
{{WikiProject England|importance=high }}
{{WikiProject London|importance=high}}
}}
{{To do|collapsed=yes}}
{{Annual readership}}
<!--
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |target=Talk:Alfred Hitchcock/Archive index |mask=Talk:Alfred Hitchcock/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=no }}<!--
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{aan}}
|maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 4
|minthreadsleft = 0
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(365d)
|archive = Talk:Alfred Hitchcock/Archive %(counter)d
}}
-->
{{Archives |auto=long |index=/Archive index |bot=MiszaBot I |age=365 }}

== "Shamley Productions" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px]]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect [[:Shamley Productions]]. The discussion will occur at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 7#Shamley Productions]] until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> [[User:1234qwer1234qwer4|𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰]] ([[User talk:1234qwer1234qwer4|𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠]]) 12:46, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

== Image ==

We have this photo by [[Jack Mitchell (photographer)|Jack Mitchell]], an important photographer. Can we fit it in somewhere? [[File:Alfred Hitchcock by Jack Mitchell.jpg|thumb|Alfred Hitchcock by Jack Mitchell]] [[User:Valereee|—valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee|talk]]) 15:57, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

== Alfred Hitchcock ==

In the article it says having had 5 nominations which is incorrect grammar [[Special:Contributions/162.234.206.89|162.234.206.89]] ([[User talk:162.234.206.89|talk]]) 11:22, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 24 January 2023 ==

{{edit semi-protected|Alfred Hitchcock|answered=yes}}
Hitchcock is often described as an auteur; François Truffaut wrote that “Because he exercises such complete control over all the elements of his films and imprints his personal concepts at each step of the way, Hitchcock has a distinctive style of his own. He is undoubtedly one of the few film-makers on the horizon today whose screen signature can be identified as soon as the picture begins.” Anthony Lane writes "I once asked a friend who had never seen Marnie to guess the director. Skipping the opening credits, I started a stopwatch on the first shot—Tippi Hedren's clutch bag under her arm as she walks along a station platform. 'Hitchcock,' he said, and I checked the watch. Twelve seconds." [[Special:Contributions/2601:281:8300:9AF0:552B:C4B0:A82F:49A4|2601:281:8300:9AF0:552B:C4B0:A82F:49A4]] ([[User talk:2601:281:8300:9AF0:552B:C4B0:A82F:49A4|talk]]) 21:12, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a [[WP:EDITXY|"change X to Y" format]] and provide a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:Cannolis|Cannolis]] ([[User talk:Cannolis|talk]]) 22:37, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

== age at death ==

basic math will conclude that he was not age 80 when he died in 1980, having been born in 1899 [[Special:Contributions/2600:1702:3220:23B0:2CA3:2349:976F:95E9|2600:1702:3220:23B0:2CA3:2349:976F:95E9]] ([[User talk:2600:1702:3220:23B0:2CA3:2349:976F:95E9|talk]]) 02:19, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
: What sort of basic math would that be? He was born in August and died in April, making him 80 years and about 8 months old. When giving someone's age, we typically say the number of completed years. In Hitchcock's case, that was 80. --  [[User:JackofOz|<span style="font-family: Papyrus;">Jack of Oz</span>]] [[User talk:JackofOz#top|<span style="font-size:85%; font-family: Verdana;"><sup>[pleasantries]</sup></span>]] 02:55, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

== Citizenship  ==

why in the title it is mentioned as English filmmaker but in citizenship section it's mentioned as United Kingdom and United States [[User:Ashokkumar047|Ashokkumar047]] ([[User talk:Ashokkumar047|talk]]) 08:56, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

== Anglo-American ==

We had the article describing him as "English" and I changed it to "Anglo-American" because that is how to more accurately introduce him to the reader. There was an editors note suggesting not to change it, to wit:
{{talkquote|as per [[MOS:BIO]]; In addition to notability, self identification; "I'm English": Hitchcock in a 1963 interview with Fallaci; see http://scrapsfromtheloft.com/2016/06/14/fallaci-hitchcock-interview/}}
But, I can't see much merit in that. He was an immigrant to America, spent half his life and most of his adult life in Los Angeles, made more than half of his films, including of his most famous and great ones, while living and working in America, and had dual citizenship from 1955.

And all Fallaci has (in the ref) is Hitchcock saying "And then it must be because I’m English", explaining why he naturally finds imaginative and amusing ways for his characters to be killed. It's not like he's saying "I don't consider myself American, at all" or something. (And even if it was, subjects are not good sources for unbiased facts in biographies. Lots of people self-identify as having various qualities that they actually don't. It's a data point but no more.)

I'm confident that Hitchcock would have preferred to stay in Britain and only came to America because he had to in order to have an A+ level career, and that's too bad for Britain, and not really fair either. But it is what it is. It'd smack of special pleading to introduce him as either just "American" or "English".

I don't know what part of [[MS:BIO]] is being referred to, but if it is advising us to mislead the reader it'd best be ignored, I would say. [[User:Herostratus|Herostratus]] ([[User talk:Herostratus|talk]]) 00:55, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
:Generally in such instances we place precedence in how the the subject chooses to self-identify in reference to nationality, so I would agree with the reverseal back to "English". I do not understand how exactly this is misleading at all. (We do not describe Einstein as German-American despite a lot of portion of is spent in the US). [[User:Spy-cicle|<span style='color: 4019FF;'><b>&nbsp;Spy-cicle💥&nbsp;</b></span>]] [[User talk:Spy-cicle#top|<sup><span style='color: #1e1e1e;'><b>'''''Talk'''''?</b></span></sup>]] 01:13, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
::Indeed, and in additition to self-identity, notability is also key here and he became globally famous as an Englishman. As is noted he had also become critically acclaimed/celebrated prior to any Hollywood film ("Three unique and valuable institutions the British have that we in America have not: Magna Carta, the Tower Bridge and Alfred Hitchcock, the greatest director of screen melodramas in the world.") [[User:Para Clark|Para Clark]] ([[User talk:Para Clark|talk]]) 10:35, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
:::Mnmh, I hear you. But, I can't agree still, cos:
:::*We're not deciding if he should be characterized as "English" or "American". If we had to chose one, it's reasonable to hold that it be "English". But that's not what we're doing here. In dispute, if a compromise is available, that ''can'' be a good solution, and "Anglo-American" is sort of a compromise. Sort of.
:::*There's no slam-dunk argument either way. There are data points on each side and we weigh them. Data points that we might consider are:
::::*Self-identification, but that is quite low on the list, as I said. It's personal opinion that's probably biased. People are just poor sources for their own bios (for many facts). They are very good sources for if they ''hava'' an opinion, but not for if the opinion is ''true.'' [[Grey Owl]] said he was an Indian, maybe even kinda-sorta thought he was an Indian, in a way. But his birth name was Archibald Stansfeld Belaney and we don't describe him as an Indian. Etc. 
::::*Identification by others (as seen in "Three unique..." quote). In other words, what sources say. How notable and neutral the sources are matters a lot (also how much standing they have to weigh in). This goes high on the list. But not quite ''as'' high as if we were debating objective facts, e.g. how tall he was etc. We're talking about opinions here. (One reason why ''reliability'' doesn't matter here; all source are very reliable for their own opinions.) 
::::*Current usual practice, if there is one. Pretty high I guess. (If there is rule (E.g. [[WP:FOO|WHO_IS_WHAT_NATIONALITY]] also, that's another data point, but only if it codifies usual practice anyway rather than having been written by seven people 16 years ago or whatever.)
::::*Our own actual consideration and logic. If -- if -- there is a good majority of the most notable and unbiased sources saying one thing, and other things also weighing on that side, that's different. But if there isn't, just using our own wits matters.

:::Probably other things I'm not thinking of. I'm going to look at some of these presently, but not right now. There's no hurry here (as my edit was rolled back, IMO, and it's not super important.  [[User:Herostratus|Herostratus]] ([[User talk:Herostratus|talk]]) 03:59, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

:Hitchcock referred to himself as English, and self-identification takes precedence, it's who you are. He was also renowned as a particular type of English as articulated by a biographer in the ''Chicago Sun Times'' from 1978 who called him 'a straightforward middle-class Englishman who just happened to be an artistic genius'. He made his name in England as a peerless filmmaker which is why he got the Selznick contract, with ''The Telegraph'' summing up the overwhelming view of his status in Britain by calling him 'unquestionably the greatest filmmaker to emerge from these islands'. We go with identity, who the person is. It's as straightforward as that. [[User:Gabriella MNT|Gabriella MNT]] ([[User talk:Gabriella MNT|talk]]) 04:27, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
::Hm. Looked at [[MOS:NATIONALITY]]. It seems like the recommendation there, in a disputed case like this, would be to omit characterizing his nationality at all, in the lede or probably anywhere. Let the reader decide what nationality she wants to peg him to, if she cares, based on the material in the article. We don't want to lead the reader. If we did go with the double countries, it should be "British and American", not "Anglo-American." Did not know this. For Einstein, they have "German-born" which would at least be an improvement here. I suppose that is because "German and Swiss and American" would be unwieldy and possibly debatable. [[User:Herostratus|Herostratus]] ([[User talk:Herostratus|talk]]) 06:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
:::Re "Hitchcock referred to himself as English, and self-identification takes precedence, it's who you are" looks like it might be special pleading, t me. If I ever get an article here (you never know) and describe myself as Irish, or as "a citizen of the world", or as "an alien from Fomalhaut, it seems to me, sent here to try to understand and depict the odd inhabitants of this odd planet", do I get to be described as Fomalhautian? Or International? Or Irish, even tho I'm like 1/8 Irish and and I just think of myself as Irish cos we used to sing Irish songs at home? 

:::Lots of people, actresses, baseball players, etc. say they are younger than they actually are; "who they are" is really "who they want to be" and they want to be younger. Do we go with the false birthdate then. People will claim degrees they don't have, jobs they didn't have, family background different from real, and on and on. Some times they forget that that stuff isn't actual; it is indeed "who they are". 

:::Whatever. But in my house, Hitchcock is English and American (and also, Pluto is a planet). It's not a huge deal and I don't super care, as long as in ''my'' article I am described as "a dashing German World War I flying ace". [[User:Herostratus|Herostratus]] ([[User talk:Herostratus|talk]]) 21:48, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

== ALFRED HITCHCOCK FAMILY HOME MOVIES  1929 ==

*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJeLgQMnJLw
*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtPx1yz3TIs
[[Special:Contributions/2601:646:201:57F0:C452:D28F:99A4:46C1|2601:646:201:57F0:C452:D28F:99A4:46C1]] ([[User talk:2601:646:201:57F0:C452:D28F:99A4:46C1|talk]]) 18:36, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

== Article quality ==

Since it has been awhile since the last assessment, I have had another look at the current version and noticed the following:
*The article has some uncited statements, and verification needed tags
*The article is not concise and is considered [[WP:TOOBIG]]. I suggest that some information be moved to other articles or removed if unencyclopedic.

Should this article go to [[WP:GAR]]? [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 18:06, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

==GA Reassessment==
{{Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Alfred Hitchcock/1}}